WQ0019960_Annual Report_20170228

City of
Marion
City of Marion, NC
Waste Water Treatment Plant
2016 Annual Report
Land Application Program
NC Permit No. WQ0019960
f?PCr7jj
FEp
I '7 201?
DPI'R
Division at Twom
2 8 2017
VVater'n'wwy Re0b"M

? .� aaa.a.vas.,iL lIJV t1L.1JJlVt111V1\ %-Jvj mIIVI%_AIIV1V 1'VKlvl
WQ Permit#: WQ0019960 County: McDowell Year:
2016
Facility Name (as shown on permit): City of Marion
Land Application Operator: Southern Soil Builders, Inc. Phone: [phone]
Land application of residuals as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year?
0 Yes ❑ No - If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to Part C. Also, If residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Total number of application fields in the permit• 8
Total number of fields utilized for land application during the year: 4
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites: 35 13
Total number of acres utilizes for land application during the year: 60.4
as L „ - riuuuai %.u„iuiance aiaiemeni•
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2016 with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-13 below) issued by the Division of Water Resources. 0 Yes ❑ No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corrective action
taken.
1) Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2) Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at least 6.0 or
the limit specified in the permit.
3) Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies
of laboratory results are attached.
4) Annual TCLP analysis (if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5) All other monitoring was performed In accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(a) or the Pollutant
Loading Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7) All general requirements in as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All monitoring and reporting requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1111 were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
9) All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Resources.
10) No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
11) Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receing residuals, as
specified in the permit.
12) No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
13) All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
Part C - Certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
1,72
Permittee Name and Title (type or print
Preparer*
2-a-0
Date
Z IV (I
S' ature of Permittee Date
of Land
�'a ,�` n
Date
(if different from Permittee) (if -different from Permittee and Preparer)
* Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) and 15A NCAC 02T .1102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (12/2006)

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Please note that your permit, may contain additional parameters to be analyzed. The parameters can be reported in FORM RSSF - B
WQ Permit Number: WQ0019960 Laboratory: 1)
Facility Name: City of Marion 2)
Residual Source WQ # or NCO031879 3)
NPDES #: 4)
WWTP Name: Corpening Creek 5)
Residual Analvsk Data
ETS
Parameter
Cone..
_'
or • .• Date
Total Pho'sphorus
Nitrate and Nitrite
- r or surface disposal tacilities the ceiling concentration limits listed in this form are not applicable. Reference the individual permit for metals limits.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. lam aware that there are significant
penalties f,9T submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
igiiature of Preparer *
24'T —17?
Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26) DENR FORM RSSF (12/2006)

- �� •� • �+� a.sa, a L �LIJ 1' 1JJLL ilvt11JJ1� V tJ 111r11V1H1� Y iI VI�UV1,
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 8.77
Permit #: WQ0019960 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Operator: Mario DeLuca Owner: Mario DeLuca Predominant Soil Series: HaC
Acres Used: 16.4 Acres Permitted: 16.4 Site #: K1 Field #: K1
Aesiauai Analysis Data
(Heavy
Metals
and Total
Phosphorus
use mg/kg,
% Solids
use
Raw Percent #):
Sample or 1 11 1213
4
L5J
6
171 L8J
9
1101
1121
Com-
posite
Date 2/23/16
% Solids
1.2
Arsenic
41.6
Cadmium
16.6
Copper
. 301
Chromiurr
NA
Lead
41.6 ✓
Mercury
1.6 V
Molyb-
denum
41.6
Nickel
18
Selenium
41.6 ,/
Zinc
768
Total
Phos-
24400
horus
Annual
Heavy Metal Field Loadings
(Calculated in lbs/acre):
Total
1 21
L3]4j
1 51
L6
L 7j
L8
9
10
11
12
DT/Ac./
H
App.
0
Event
0.54
14
Arsenic
0.045
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0.00
0.045
Cadmium
0.018
0.000
O:000
` 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000.
0.000
0.000
0.000,
0 000.
.0.000-
, 0.018
Copper
0.322
0.000
a O:000.
0.000
0.000
6.000
: ,0 000
0.000
0.000
0.000`
0.000
0.000
0.322
:hromi
######
0.000
' 0:000
0.000
0.060
0.000 •
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0:.000
-######
Lead
0.045
0.000
"0.000
0.000
0.000
0.00.0
0.000
0.000
0.060
6.000
0.000
0.000
0.045
Mercury
0.002
0.000.
' .0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0:000
0.002
Molybdenum
enum
0.045
0.000
0.000
0'.000
0.000
0.000,
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.045
Nickel
0.019
0.000
'0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
O'.000
0.000
- 0.019
Selenium
0.045
0.000
;.0.000 1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 _
0.000
0.045
Zinc
0.822
0.00.0
0:0'00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.822 i
Total
Phos-
26.108
0.000
.0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
26.108
horus
J certify, under penalty
of law, that this document was prepared
under my direction
or supervision in accordance
vith a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
mprisonment for knowing violations".
,/6
-igna re of Land Applier
/-)$-n
Date
J
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 1:59.4
Permit #: WQ0019960 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Operator: Mario DeLuca Owner: Mario DeLuca Predominant Soil Series: HaC
Acres Used: 30.3 Acres Permitted: 30.3 Site #: K2 Field #: K2
Residual Analvsis Data (Heave Metals an.l Tnfal ,
Sample or
1
2
3
4
5
_ _ �__r�
6
_ »„ ---
_&-
9 ,v uuaiva
u5o
XXAW K V
-CC}f IIL ):
1 71
L 8
9j
10
[1.1j
1121
Com-
posite
Date
2/23/16
% Solids
1.2
Arsenic
41.6
Cadmium
16.6
Copper
301
Chromium
NA
Lead
41.6
Mercury
1.6
Molyb-
denum
41.6
Nickel
18
Selenium
41.6
Zinc
768
Total
Phos-
24400
horus
Total
1
2
1 31
4
5
6
L7j
L 8
L 9j
10
11
12
DT/Ac./
y
App.'
Event
0.53
Arsenic
0.-044
0.000
1 -0.000
.0.000
0.000
0 000.
; 0:00.0
0:000"
" 0 000
0 000
0 000
0-;000.
, 0 044
Cadmium
001.7
0.000�
; 0:000.
1-0.000,
. 0:000
0.000
0. 000
0 000
0.000
0 000
; 0.'000
.0::000,
: O.O F7
Copper
0.3 Y7
0:000
0:000
0.000
0.000
, 0.000
0.000
Q;000
0.317
chromi
######
o 000 ,
a 000:.
o.000
0 No.:
o 000
0 000
0 000
0.000
0 000 ;
o
#
Lead
0 044_
0;00011
0' OQO:
0.000
0000
0 000
'; 0 000 ,
..0.000
b':000
0 000
" 0 000
0"'s000
0 044
Mercury
O.OQ2.
0:000 ;
- 0.00.-0
A-000
O:o00
;, '0 000,
0.000
0 000
;:. 0:000 ;
,., 0 000:
O OQ.O
0:000
0.002
Molyb-
denum
0.044•
0 000 �
° . 1,000
0.000
0 000
0.000
0.000
0.000:
0.000
-
0:000 .
0:000
U 000
0 044'
Nickel
0.019
0000
, 0:000
0.000
0.000
0,600
0.000'
0.000
` -0':000'..
0 00,0
0 000
Q:000
0 019
Selenium
0.0444
0,000
0,060
0.000
0:000
0 000
-: 0.000
0.000::
0:000
0 00.0.'
0 000
Os000
Zinc
0.808
0:000 I
, 0t000
0.000-,0.000
0.00.0'
0 0.0.0
_0 000
o.o00
0:000
0.000'
0 000-
0.80$`
Total
Phos-
25.669
0;0.00
0 00W
0.0.00
01.060.
0 000
0 000
0;000
0.00.0
10 000
0.000
0:000
:25.659`
horus
-
'
"T rerfifv
nnrlaT.
nnnolf,...f---
_ .,Qa Y, upa, ru uuucl- my ulrecuon or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
Signature of Land Applier Date
U
J
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

t11111UtlL 1VM1tiL0 VI M) liVA111INU bUIVEWARY FORM,
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual):
Permit #: WQ0019960 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Operator: John Fisher Owner: John Fisher Predominant Soil Series:
Acres Used: 7 Acres Permitted: 7 Site #: F3 Field #:
5..85
HaC
F3
Residual Analvsis Data (Heaw Metals and Tntal Phncnhnrna „ep ln../lr.. o/ c„i;a� ..-- 113..__, U--- u._
E
N
w
-
..,-.
noun"
Com-
posite
O
on
no
Date,
Total
h
--��
oil
�E
..
a 11 - ♦ 111rffll 1,XV l gfd1 Mllmm 11 .i1 ■l'1f f5ffl'.1■ fff lflwlmg-V1-
Total
LIJ
L2J3
141
L5J
6
L7J
L8
9
10
11
12
DT/Ac./
c
App.
i
Event
0.84
1
Arsenic
0.070
0.000
0.000
,0.000
0 000 '
A,0.00
0.000
0 000
0.000
0.000
; 0.000
0.000
0.070
Cadmium
0.028,
_0.000 ,
0 000'
0.006
0.0,00 ,
0.000 .
.0:000 :
0.000
0.000
0.00:0„
! 0:000
0.000
0.028
Copper
0.503
1 0.006
A0.00
0.000
0 000 :
0 O,OU
0:000
0000
0.000
0.000
` 0:000
0.000
0.503
Chromium
######
0:000
0:000 .
0.000
0 000'
0.000
"0:000 .
0.000
0.000
0.000
f0:000
0.000
######
Lead
0.070
0.000
0 0.00
0.000
-0:000
0:000
.6.006
0.0-0 `
0.000
0.060
,1 Mob
0:000
0:070
Mercury
0.003
0.000'
0.000
0:000
0 000 .
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
` ! 0.000
0.000
0.003
Molyb-
denum
0.070
0.000
. 0.000
0.000.
0.:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
;'0.000
0.000
0.070
Nickel
0.030
0.000.-
0:000
0.,000
0.000
01000 -
0.000
0.000
0:000
-0.000
, b.000
0.000
0.030
Selenium
0.070
0.000 .
0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000 :
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
;. j 0.000 "
0.000
0.070
Zinc
1.284
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0..600
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
, 1,0;000
0.000
1.284
Total
{
Phos-
40.797
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
f0.000
0.000
40.797
horus
- --- - ----- r-----_-� - - ---•• � - - -- --Aly. -aa N. GYa,-Cu uuuer my uirection or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
.,,� " "Y
Signature of Land Applier
/- ZS- i,
Date
I
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

Aiviv UAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 4.56
Permit #: WQ0019960 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Operator: John Fisher Owner: John Fisher Predominant Soil Series: HaC
Acres Used: 6.7 Acres Permitted: 6.7 Site #: F4 Field #: F4
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent #):
�------ --- 41 1 n I .
Com-
posite
Date
2/23/16
% Solids
1.2
Arsenic
41.6
Cadmium
16.6
Copper
301
Chromium
NA
Lead
41.6
Mercury
1.6
Molyb-
denum
41.6
Nickel
18
Selenium
41.6
Zinc
768
Total
Phos-
24400
Annual Heavy Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
DT/Ac./
App.
Event 1 0.68
Arsenic
0.057
1 0.000 _
0.600.
Cadmium
0.023
0 000 ;
' ..°0.000_
Copper
0.409
0.000:
0.000
Chromi
4#4###1
0.000
b.000
Lead
0.057
0.000
0.000
Mercury
Molyb-
denumd
enum
0.002
0.057
0.000 ;"
0.000 "
,0 0.00
. 0.000
Nickel
0.024 '
� 0.000
0.000
Selenium
0.057
0.000
0.000
Zinc
1:044
0:000
.0.006
Total
0 V00
. 0:000
0:000
0.00..0
o:0.00
6.000
0.000"
0:000.
0.000
0.000
0s00o
0:000
0.000
0.000 "
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 :
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 "
'0.000
0 000
0.000
0.000
0;000 ;
0 000
0.000
0:000
0:000
0 000
0.000
0:000
:0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000-'0:000
0.000 '
'0:000
0:000.
0:000
0.000
0.00.0
-0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.006
0:000
0.000
0.000
Phos- 33.184 0.000 0:000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000 10.000
10
11
12
0
y
0:000
Q000
0.000
0.057
0.006
Q:000
0.000
0.023
0.000
0:000
0.000
0.409
0.000
0 000
0.000
######
o
0:0'00
0:000
0:457
0 000 °
fo.000
U 000
.0.000
0.002
.000 ..
,Q000
0.000
0.057
0:000
0000
0:000
0.024
0.000,
0;000
0.000
0.057
0.000
0.-000
0.000
1.044 ti
0:000
:0000
0.000
33.184
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
Signature of Lan Applier Date

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Marion
Land Owner: Mario DeLuca
Operator: Mario DeLuca
Crop 1 Name: Fescue
WQ Permit #: WQ0019960 Field #: KI
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 8.7820 Site #• KI
Predominant Soil Series: HaC
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 V Crop 2 Name:
Acres Utilized: 16.4
Acres Permitted: 16.4
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
° �
Volume applied
PP �
Volume
Residual Sources
Soil
Precip.
y
c
��.
Z �
Nitrate
Name of CropType
+�
a; o
(enter one) Solids/
%
Applied per
PP P
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Cond.
Past 24
cY b
;�
c
w
TKN
Gt
o
and
PAN Applied
Receiving. Residual
Q
Liquid
Solids
Acre
Fert., Animal
(Dry'
Hrs.
a;
°
*
CD
°
Nitrite
lbs/acre
( )
Application
Cu. Yds Gallons
(Dry Tons/AC)
Waste etc )
Wet,
Moist)
inches
# G
��i
5
* 2
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
7-2016
175500
1.2101
0.535
WQ0019960
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
41200
,
13800'
1481.8
17.780
NA
Fescue
0:000
0.000
0.000
'0.000
0.000
0:000
0:000
0.000
0.000
0:000
0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.060
0.000
0.0.00,
0.000
0.000
0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM
FSF supp ( attach FORM
FSF supp to this form):
aTAr
0
175500
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
H
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
17.7801
0 000
Lime A lied
nnuallbs/acre
0.045 v
0.207
0.252 V/
36
0.018
0.134
0.152
34
0.322
18.821
19.143
1338
#######
1.11
#######
NA
0.045
2.44
2.485
267
0.002.
0.108
0.110 W
15
0.045
2.502
2.547
NA
0.019
1.121
1.140
374
0.045.
0.294
0.339.
89
0.822
43.544
44.366
2498
26.108
Date
lbs/ac
rior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
12-2016
2500
urrent Cumulative lbs/ac
-rmitted C. P. L. R.****
:rmit PAN Limit lst/2nd Crop
-
i cernry, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
nalified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
.formation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature of Land Applier
I -?
Date
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost-0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Marion
Land Owner: Mario DeLuca
Operator: Mario DeLuca
Crop 1 Name: Fescue
WQ Permit #: WQ0019960 Field #: K2
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 15.9377 Site #: K2
Predominant Soil Series: HaC
Crop 1 Max. PAN:
202
Crop 2 Name:
Acres Utilized: 30.3
Acres Permitted: 30.3
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
S.,
° y
Q
Volume applied
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
%
Solids
Volume
Applied per
PP P
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES # W #
Q
Fert., Animal
Waste etc)
Soil
Cond.
wry'
Wet'
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
>
�_
o
�
c
:v w
�
w
o
4
w
� w
* �'
0
TKN
mg/kg
X
o S
°�
c w
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
(lbs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
6-2016
104000
1.2
0.172
WQ0019960
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
41200
13800
1481.8
5.703
NA
Fescue
7-2016
214500
1.2
0.354
WQ0019960
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
41200
13800
1481.8
11.762
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
0,000
0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
01.000
0.000
0.000
0000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach
FORM
FSF supp
to this form):
'0TALS:1
01.
318500
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
17.465
0.000
Lime Applied
lnnuallbs/acre
0.044
0.196
0.240
36
0.017
0.132
0.149
34
0.317
18.483
18.800
1338
#######
1.027
#######
NA
0.044
2.403
2.447
267
0.002
0.107
0.109
15
0.044
2.492
2.536
NA
0.019
1.082
1.101
374
0.044
0.281
0.325
89
0.808
42.008
42.816
2498
25:669
Date
lbs/ac
' for Years Cumulative lbs/ac
12-2016
2500
,urgent Cumulative lbs/ac
'ermitted C. P. L. R.****
'ermit PAN Limit 1st/2nd Crop
'I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
ivalified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
nformation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature of Land Applier
I - 2 5-J,,
Date
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation 1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Marion
Land Owner: John Fisher
Operator: John Fisher
WQ Permit #: WQ0019960
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 5.8547
Predominant Soil Series: HaC
Crop 1 Name: Fescue Crop 1 Max. PAN:
Field #: F3 Acres Utilized:
7
Site #: F3 Acres Permitted: 7
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
202 Crop 2 Name:
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
Volume applied
Volume
Residual Sources
Soil
Precip.
a
d
o
Z
Nitrate
Name of CropType
° +-'
a� >~
(enter one) Solids/
%
Applied per
PP � P
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Cond.
Past 24
cY
;� iv
�, �
;d
w..,
TKN
o
and
PAN Applied
ReceivingResidual
c °
A
Liquid
Solids
Acre
Fert. Animal
(Dry,
Hrs.
o w
�'
o w-
�'
°° °
0
Nitrite
( lbs/acre)
Application
Cu. Yds Gallons
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Waste etc )
We
Moist)
inches
G,
*
* 'n.
°
o
#
* o'
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
6-2016
117000
1.2
0.836
WQ0019960
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
41200
13800
1481.8
27.771
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.00.0
0.000
0.000
-0.000
0000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0:000
0.000
0:000
0:000
0.000
0:000
0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
_
0.000
0.0.00
0.000
0.000
0.000
-
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM
FSF supp ( attach FORM
FSF supp to this form):
oTALs:
01 117000 I
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
H
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P 27.771 0.000
Lime A lied
umuallbs/acre
0.070
0.092
0.162
36
0.028
0.038
0.066
34
0.503
3.387
3.890
1338
#######
1.763
#######
NA
0.07M
0.599
0.669
267
0.003
0.021
0.024
15
0.070
0.14
0.21OV,
NA
0.030
0.254
0.284
374
0.070
0.088
0.158 t,
89
1.284
11.31
12.594
2498
40:797
Date lbs/ac
'rior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
12-2016
2500
,urrent Cumulative lbs/ac
ermitted C. P. L. R.****
ermit PAN Limit 1st/2nd Crop
.....
.. _.... .
T---�2�- -•
:.... _.
202
I ceruiy, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
ualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penaltiesfor submitting false
iformation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing, violations."
Signature of Land Applier
Date
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Marion
WQ Permit #: WQ0019960
Field #: F4
Acres Utilized: 6.7
Land Owner: John Fisher
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 4.5536
Site #: F4
Acres Permitted: 6.7
Operator: John Fisher
Predominant Soil Series: HaC
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 1 Name:
Fescue
Crop I Max. PAN: 202
Crop
2 Name:
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
o +�
Volume applied
(enter one) Solids/
o
/o
Volume
Applied per
Residual Sources
(NPDES # WQ#
Soil
Cond.
Precip.
Past 24
y
d
D
C
o
%v
o
:;
Z
a
Nitrate
PAN Applied
Name of Crop Type
P YP
Liquid
4
Solids
Acre
Fert., Animal
(Dry,
Hrs.
c�
o w
ii'
w
T
o
" o
and
(lbs/acre)
Receiving Residual
Cu. Yds Gallons
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Waste, etc)
Wet,
p c
*
o
rq•
0
o w
Nitrite
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
6-2016
91000
1.2
0.680
WQ0019960
Moist)
dry
inches
0
-S-f
p
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
13800
1481.8
22.567
NA
I Fescue
0.5
0.3
41200
0.000
1
1
1
_ _ _ _
nA L,i:[, 01 910001
unual lbs/acre
-ior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
arrent Cumulative lbs/ac
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.600
0:000
0.060
0.000
0.000
0.000
0000 '
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0:000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM
FSF sump ( attach
FORM
FSF supp to this form):
As
0.057
Cd
0.023
Cu
0.409
Cr
#######
Pb
0.057
Hg
0.002
Mo
0.057
Ni
0.024-
Se
0.057
Zn
1.044
P 22.567 0.000
33.184
Lime Applied
Date
lbs/ac
0.125
0.059
7.134
2.109
1.052
0.038
0.224
0.451
0.135
17.207
12-2016
2500
0.182
0.082
7.543
#######
1.109
0:040
0 281
0 475
0 192
lQ141jol
;rmitted C. P. L. R.**** 36 34 1338 NA 267 15 NA 374 1 89 2498
:rmit PAN Limit lst/2nd Crop -
,_ 202
certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
talified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
formation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
��,� *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DF_NR FORM FSAF lispignnri

e�
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Certificate of Analysis
Project name:
Marion WWTP
Collection date: 23-Feb-16
Date received: 23-Feb-16
Sample identification: CC Sludge - Grab
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]'
Project number: 160223.506
Sample number: 134760
Parameter
Method
Result
RL
Units
Date
Analyst
Footnotes
Analyzed
\/Total Solids
SM 2540 G
1.20
0.10
%
24 Feb-16
LCB
1
JMercury
747.1B
<1.6
1.6
mg/kg
25-Feb-16
DER
1
,/ Aluminum �'
6010C
14700
2080
mg&g
2-Mar-16
MEC
1
✓Arsenic
6010C
<41.6
41.6
mg/kg
2Mar-16
NEC
1
/Cadmium
6010C
<16 6
16 6
k
MEC
1
4 Calcium
6010C
14300
4160
mg/ g
mg/kg
2-Mar-16
2-Mar-16
MEC
114 SOD
JCopper
6010C
301
16.6
mg/kg
2-Mar-16
MEC
1 U
,,%Lead
6010C
<41:6
41.6
mg/kg
2-Mar-16
NEC
1
v/Magnesium
6010C
6010
83.1
mg/kg
2-Mar-16
MEC
1('010
Nolybdenum
6010C
<41.6
41.6
mg/kg
2-Mar-16
MEC
1 tr'
Nickel
6010C
18.0
16.6
mg&g
2-Mar-16
MEC
1
✓Potassium
6010C
7440
83.1
mg/kg
2-Mar-16
NEC
1
✓Selenium
6010C
<41.6
41.6
mg/kg
2-Mar 16
MEC
1
1%Sodiu .
6010C
3020
166
mg/kg
2-Mar-16
MEC
13020
,&inc
6010C
768
41.6
mg/kg
2-Mar-16
MEC
1
JNitrate + Nitrite as N
1481.8
336.33
mg/kg
LEW/REH
1,3
,./Total Phosphorus
6010C
24400-
1660
mg/kg
2-Mar16
MEC
1
°Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
351.2
41200
3950
mg/kg
2-mug6
LEW
1
Total Nitrogen
Calculation
42700
3950
mg/kg
2-Mar-16
LEW
I
4Ammonia Nitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 D
13800,
154
mg/kg
3 Mar-16
KEK
✓Percent Solids
SM 2540 G
1.3
a/o
23-Feb-16
KEK
vpH in Liquid
SW 846 9045C
7.5
S.U.
23-Feb-16
KEK
4
✓N-PAV
Calculation
1244381.8
8-Mar-16
KEK
i/Sodium Absorption Rate
Calculation
8-Mar 16
KEK
/Reactive Cyanide
335.4
<0.124
0.124
mg/kg
5-Mar-16
ECHEM
3
Reactive Sulfide
SM 4500 S D
1.12
0.249
�212.0
mg/kg
1-Mar16
ECHEM
3
IIgnitability
SW 8461030
>212
T
29-Feb-16
ECHEM
3
01a '+0Ct
Footnotes:
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
1. Sample analyzed by Rogers & Callcott Environmental.
2. Sample analyzed by Enviro Chemists, Inc.
3. Methods EPA 9210A and SM 450ONO2 B.
4. Sample analyzed outside hold time.
Date reviewed: NC Certification Number: 600
Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan SC Certification Number: 99053

.E
Mineralization
as decimal
Total dry
tons/year
Acres
Applied on
60.4
Rate
0.3
TKN
41200
NH3
13800
NO3
1481.8
NO2
0
% Solids
0.012
35.13
PAN Surface
16601.8 m /kg 33.2036 lbs/dry ton
1166.442 11bs total PAN
19.31196 lbs PAN/acre
PAN Injection
23501.8 mg/k 47.0036 lbs/dry ton
1651.236 lbs total PAN
27.33835 Ibs PAN/acre
Dry Tons/1000 gal.
0.05004
1st year PAN
Surface lbs. .
1166.442468
1st year PAN
Injected lbs.
1651.236468
lbs./acre
Surface
19.31196139
lbs./acre
Injected
27.33835212
MR(TKN-NH3)+ + .5(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton
MR(TKN-NH3) + l(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton
1000 X 8.34 X %solids X sp. gravity "=dry tons/1000gal."
2000

SAR
Sodium Absorption Ratio
Na: Sodium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 23
Ca: Calcium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 20
Mg : Magnesium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 12
Milli Equivalent = Mg/L / Equivalent weight
Na M /L Ca M /L M M /L
36.24 1 171.3 1 72.12
Na ME
Ca (ME)
M (ME)
1.575652
1 8.565
1 6.01
SAR= Na Milli Equivalent/[0.5 X (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli equivalent)]0.5 power
SAR = 0.583675 (From Mg/L entered above)
SAR= 0.581681 (From ME entered below)
Na (ME)
Ca ME
Mg(ME)
1.57
1 8.56
1 6.01
The amour
amount of t
Permitting I

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Ce *ftt ite•°of .Anal'
sis
Project name: Marion.WWTP Project number: 160223,504
Collection date: 23-Feb-16-
Date received: 23-Feb-16 '
Sample identification: CC Sludge #5 - Grab Sample number: •134756
Parameter Method lliesolt . -.RL Units-- :Doti An Footnotes.
Analyzed ,
°IoTS SM 2540 G. 1.2 . • " 0.10 % 23-Feb-16 KEK
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure • SM 9221-E ' <216 216 WN 23 . ?A-16 . KEK
Sample identification: CC Sludge #6 - Grab Sample number: 134757
Date.
Parameter Method 1t4dlt _RL.- - Units • Analyst. Footnotes-
°/aTS : SM 2540.0 1.2 0.10 % 23-Veb.16. ' . KEK
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure SM 9221E �<.216' 2.16 MPN 23-Fcb-26 KEK
Sample identification: CC Sludge #7 - Grab Sample number: 134159
Parameter Method Res6lt RL 'Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
o/aTS SM 2540 G 1..2 0.16 % 23-Fab-16 KEK
Muh!Elle Tube Fermentation Procedure SNI 9221-E .<216 .216 ' r WN 23-Feb-16 KEK
Footnotes:
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down.to the Reporting limit only.
Date reviewed: NC Certification Number: 600
Data reviewed by: Kelley 19. Keenan SC Certification Number: 99053
NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
Signature:
is report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety,'without the written consent ofl'Snvironmental TestingSolution%
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

P z7.
yy' k
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Certificate of Analysis
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project name: Marion WWTP Project number:
Collection date: 17-Feb-16
Date received: 174046
Sample identification: CC Sludge #1- Grab Sample number:
160217.502
134652
Parameter Method Result RL Units 1fl1e Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS SM 2540-G 0.62 0.10 , % 17-Feb-16 KEK
_ . _...-. • - •-.--.Mulitple Fitbe Fermentation Procedure SM-9221-E ei12 1:1.2 MPN— `tie T6— KEi ___..:,,. _•_ .. .
Sample identification: CC Sludge #2 - Grab Sample number: 134653
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date
Analyzed Analyst Footnotes
%TS SM 2540 G 0.62 0.10 % 17-Fab-16 KEK
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure SM 9221-E <112 112 MPN 17-Feb-16 KEK
Sample identification: CC Sludge #3 Grab Sample number: 134654
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS SM 2540 G 0.70 0.10 % 17-Feb-16 KEK
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure SM 9221-E <126 126 ' MPN 17-Feb-16 KEK
Sample identification: CC Sludge #4.Grab Sample number: 134655
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS -SM -2540 G 0.65 - 0.10 a/o' " 17-Feb=16 - KEK
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure- S9 9221-E <117 117 MPN 17-Feb-16 KEK
Footnotes:
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
Date reviewed: �r .2 ((e NC Certification Number: 600
Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan SC Certification Number: 99053
Signature: {IL
NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
This report should not be -repro uced, exept.m its entirety, without the written consent o Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name
Biosolids Permit Number
Date
Digester Temperature
Sampling Date/Time
Sampled By
Analysis Date/Time
Analyzed By
Sample Volume
Total Solids
Beginning Temperature
End Temperature
Dissolved Oxygen Level
7.
6-1
4.
Coreening
Creek
WQ 0019960.
2112/2016
11
2/12/16
0650
Lee Estes
2/12/2016
0828
R. Carter
1000
'0.84
25
25,
Slope: 0.2
Intercept: 8.1
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
milliliters
Dry Solids
iegrees Celsius
iegrees Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 12.41 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.48 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:1 1.16 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.
0

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
95
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name
Biosolids Permit Number
Date
Digester Temperature
Sampling Date/Time
Sampled By
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed•By:
Sample Volume
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Cot enin
Creek
WQ 0019960
2/17/2016
12
2/17/16
0945
Lee Estes
2/17/16
1124
R. Carter
1000
0.84
25
. 25 ,
7.211
C!
11
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 7.8
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
IMA
milliliters
/o Dry Solids
iegrees Celsius
iegrees Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 15.94 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.90 mg Oxygen/g/lir
Average Temperature: 25 d grees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:.48 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name
Biosolids Permit Number
Date
Digester Temperature
Sampling DatelTime
Sampled By
Analysis Date/Time
Analyzed By
Sample Volume
Total Solids
Beginning Temperature:
End'Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
7.
Cj
Comenina
Creek
Q 0019960
21 12016
11
2/18/16
0935
Lee Estes
2/18/16
1104
R. Carter
1000
0.97
25
25 i
Slope: 0.3
Intercept 8.5
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
milliliters
Dry Solids '� J
legrees Celsius
legrees Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 15.29 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.58 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 de rees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166 7
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.24 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name
Biosolids Permit Number
Date
Digester Temperature
Sampling Date/Time
Sampled By
Analysis Date/Time
Analyzed By
Sample Volume
Total Solids
Beginning Temperature
End Temperature
Dissolved Oxygen Level
A
4.
Co enin Creek
WQ 0019960
2/19/2016
11
2/19/16 0920.
Lee Estes
2119 116 1100
R. Carter
1000
.0.98
25
25
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 8.6
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
nilliliters
Dry Solids
iegrees Celsius %
legrees Celsius t�
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 15.29 mg Oxygen/hr -
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:, 1.56 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature:- 25 d7kees Celsius
Temperature Correction. Factor: 0.783526166 ,
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.22 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically:

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility
Biosolids Permit N
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
7.1
C-3
1000 milliliters
0.96 %Dry Solids '�
26 degrees Celsius
25 degrees Celsius
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 8.0
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 17.45 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.82 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 d grees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166 f
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: IA2 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: 'Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Time
(minutes)
a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13'
14
16
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name
Biosolids Permit Number
Date
Digester Temperature
Sampling Date/Time
Sampled By
Analysis Date/Time
Analyzed By
Sample Volume
Total Solids
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Corpening Creek
WQ 0019960
2/29/2016
13
2/29/16 0805
Lee Estes
2/29/16 0948
R. Carter
A
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 7.5
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
milliliters
Dry Solids '�
iegrees Ceislus
legrees Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 19.14 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 2.28 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166 ✓
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.79 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name
Biosolids Permit Number
Date
Digester Temperature
Sampling Date/Time
Sampled By
Analysis Date/Time
Analyzed By
Sample Volume
. Total Solids
Beginning Temperature
End Temperature;
Dissolved Oxygen Level
VA
MI'
4
Corpening Creek
WQ 0019960
3/1/2016
13
3/1/16 085.0
Lee Estes
311/16 1015
R. Carter
1000
0.89
25
25
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 8.0
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
I/
milliliters
Vo Dry Solids
iegrees Celsius
legrees Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 19.03 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 2.14 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166 7
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.68 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

i 0-__-_-___- -, I-- T .. A%,P1`xyt'L--- xlVl\ 1%L�Lu%.I'"IN rutcviwz'1 Ruies)
Facility Name: City of Marion
WWTP Name: Corpening Creek
Monitoring Period: From 1/l/2016 To
WQ Permit Number: WQ0019960
NPDES lyumber: NC0031879
12/31/2016 V
Pathogen Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1106) - Please indicate level ach'
d d 1
Class A:
i�.e an a tvi-,iauve performea:
Alt. A (time/temp) ❑ Alt B (Alk Treatment) ❑ Alt. C (Prior Testing) ❑
AID (No Prior Test) ❑ Process to Further Reduce Pathogengs ❑
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Compost ❑
Heat Drying ❑ Heat Treatment ❑ Thermophilic ❑
Beta Ray ❑
Gamma Ray ❑ Pasteurization ❑
Class B: Alt. (1) Fecal Density Q Alt. (2) Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens ' ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization ❑F Air Drying ❑ ComPosting ❑ Aerobic Digestion ❑
Anaerobic
c Digestion
esf ion
If applicable
p to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitorin data:
Parameter
Allowable Level
en
Pathogen �' Densi
Number ot
Frequency
SampleAnalytical
Minim
Geo. Mean
axim
Units
in Sludge
Excee-
of Analysis
Tdencesype
Tech-
2 x p
6th power to the
MPN
112
149.9
216
MPN
0
7
grab
nioue
sm9221 e
per gram of
Fecal Coliform
total solids
CFU
1000 mpn per gram
of total solid (dry
weight)
Salmonella bacteria
3 NIPN per 4 grams
(in lieu of fecal
total solid (dry
coliform)
weight)
Wetar Attrartinn
fl CA
Ain A n
Al1•T „nn\
"■
,. ..
Alt.l (VS reduction) ❑
- - -- ---- .i
Alt. 2 (40-day bench) ❑
- wawa uauVc tPul lU11RCU:
Alt. 3 (30-day bench) ❑ Alt. 4 (Spec. OZ uptake) 0
Alt. 5 (14-Day Aerobic) ❑
Alt. 6 (Alk. Stabilization ❑
Alt 7 (Drying - Stable) ❑ Alt. 8 (Drying - Unstable) ❑
Alt. 9 (Injection) ❑
Alt. 10 (Incorporation) ❑
No vector attraction reduction alternatives were performed ❑
x `J- 4 u K P& A L' lTJLl\ A kplease cnecic the appropriate statement)
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T 1107 have been met."
® "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have not been met." (Please note
if you check this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the
requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system
designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and .evaluate the information used to determine
that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
Prepare"Name and Title (type or print)
r a e o reparer* Date
Dennis Key Southern Soil Builders, Inc
Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print)
Signature of L d AppHer (if applicable) Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
F
DENR FORM PVRF 02T (12/2006)

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report
No. FY17-SL017271
Predictive
Client:
Southern Soil Builders, Inc.
Advisor:
•t.s�11
958 Hoots Rd
''`�� Soil Report Mehlich-3 Extraction
Roaring River, NC 28669
=�
Sampled County: McDowell
Sampled: 11/17/2016 Received: 11/21/2016 Completed: 12/22/2016
Farm:
Links to Helpful Information
Sample ID: F3
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
Lime History:
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 1.8 120-200 0
K2O
Mg S Mn Zn
Cu
B
More
Information
2-
40
0 0 0 0
0
0
Note: 12
Test Results [units - WN in g/cd; CEC and Na in meq/100 crrr3; NO3-N in mg/dnfl:
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1
Mn-1
Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-1 Zn-AI
Cu-I .) Na
ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.56 0.86 7.3 63 2.7 4.8 65 48 49 11 48
122
90 203
299
Sample ID: F4
RecommendafibmK Lime
1-/203
Nutrients (lb/acre)
V 0.1
1
Lime History:
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 1.4 120-200 0
K2O
Mg S Mn Zn
Cu
B
More
Information
2-
30
0 0 0 0
0
0
Note: 12
Test Results [units - WN in g/cd; CEC and Na in meq/100 cnr;1403-N in mg/da]:
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1
Mn-1
Mn-All Mn Al2 Zn-I Zn-Al
Cu-I Na
ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.46 0.90 7.4 69 2.3 5.1 93 59 51 14 38
135
98 175 175
353
Sample ID: K1
Recommendatio Lime
Nutrients (Ib/acre)
0.1
1
Lime History:
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1-Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 1.2 120-200 0
K2O
Mg S Mn Zn
Cu
B
More
More
2-
0
0 0 0 0
0
0
Note: 12
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm?; CEC and Na in meq/100 cO; NO3-N in mg/drd]:
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac p P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S4
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na
ESP SS4 NO3-N
0.81 0.90 9.0 74 2.4 5.4 117 108 51 17 37
147
105 198 198
210 0.1
1
North Carolina
[ !A
lolxiuu 3rnnt kmd Ctnrnn won
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Trox

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone]
Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY17-SL017271
Page 2 of 3
Sample ID: K2
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre)
N P2O5
K2O
Mg
S
Mn Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 1.6
120-200 0
50
0
0
0 0
0 0
Note: 12
2-
Test Results [units - W/V in g/ca; CEC and Na in meq/100 crrr; NO3-N in mg/drop]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg% S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-AI2
Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-1 Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.97 0.90 7.8 66 2.6 5.1 72 45
49 15 50
218
148
169 169
178 0.1 1

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.neagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY17-SL017271
Page 3 of 3
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Lime
Ac
exchangeable acidity
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
B
boron
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at on
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
CEC
cation exchange capacity
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HM%
percent humic matter
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
K-I
potassium index
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
K20
potash
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-1 and P-1 values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
MIN
mineral soil class
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-1 levels appear
Mn
manganese
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-AI2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-1
manganese index
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
M-O
mineral -organic soil class
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients_ In general, homeowners do not
N
nitrogen
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
Na
sodium
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
NO3-N
nitrate nitrogen
ORG
organic soil class
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft. If you cannot find
pH
current soil pH
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www.ncagr.goy/agronomi/obpart4.htmtifind information that
P-1
phosphorus index
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
P205
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
WN
weight per volume
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, WN, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
Zn-AI
zinc availability index
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-All, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routinel
Zn-I
zinc index
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit www•ncaar.gov1agronomi/uyrst.htm

9
61a h
60
Annual Report ReAew SOP Class B Land Application
Reporting Period: 6111"-
Permit Details: C'I 0 (,1
Is 503?V
Class-.Woi OB
m4imum- Dry,T. ons Per: Year: ;z. go
Nuinber of acres Permitted. I(a
Number of fields in permit::
Counties that land is permitted for. -AV D 0 W
., Monitoring F.requency.forTCLP: CYJe__
Monitoring Frequency for Residuals Analysis: A-nf\4&1
Monit6ring Frequency for.Pathogen & Vector Attraction Reduction: AA1) Wt
Groiindwater monitoring-. N/A:
l.-Aimual-LaudApplication C'erfificatioiiFomJ
-Was a certification. form. submitted V,
Was land application conducted during the reported year?. V
HOW many dry tons and dry ions per h acre were applied? .3 5.-J 3 0, 3-C, '0,9
Were the*applications. within the Verify PAN if more than 10 tons/acre?,
Did it indicate compliance?
Was it signed by the appropriate people?
.2. Monitoring.
Wdethe analyses 'conducted at-th6.required, fre
quency
Was. an analyses taken for.6ach sourcethat wa s. . lind.applip.0Summary
here themetfisanialys es reported on the Residual Sampling Form?
...
Were the results reported -in mg/kg?
Were the pH's 6.0 or greater for .each residual sample y
Were the heavy m et'Ois.within.ceilin concentration permit limits? its.
Werethe lab analypes attached?.
"d?
Were all . the required parameters teste&
Was TCLP analysis conducted? -go,- A
Were the TLCP contaminants within regulatory limits? NA
Was a corrosivity, ignitability, and reactivity analysis conducted?,j
3. Field Summary
ev.ents.*re'corded.-..on-tke-Field-Sunimary-F-orms?�
How many fields were applied on-AW& year?
Was 'a Field Summary Form.gubniitt!'ad for each field? q-
Were all the residuals applied to permitted land? and? y
Were all the residuals applied from permitted so'urces?,4
-Were the field loading rates for each -metal .and PAN. calculated (year to date)?
Were the cumulative -poll ' utant. loading rates calculated?q -
Were the calculations 'co'rre ?
Were the PAN loading rates win permit limits?
Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits?
Were the residu4ls applied on a suitable crop?

Were the applications conducted during the crWs growing season?
Were the. Field Summary Forms complete? 2 boo Ib� t z%cYr�
Was lime application Ion Field Summary Fo�? No lime applied. q- - 15o01b%A�
4. Pathogen and Vector. Attraction Reduction k a i JAV t
Was as copy of the Pathogepnd Vector Attraction Re uction Form subptted? �!
Did the form- indicate the period 5f coverage, the residual c ass, and the pathogen reduction
alternative and the vectorttraction reduction option -used?
Was the. appropriate documentation to show pathogen and vector attraction reduction included
in the report? _
Was pathogen and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503?-
Class B Pathogen Review
Alternative 1— Fecal Coliform Density
Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
Were seven samples taken?
Was the geometric mean calculated and done correctly? l
Did the results show compliance (less than either 2,000,000 MPN/gram-of total solids or
2,000,000 Colony Forming Units/gram: of total'soli' s)? : :.
Alternative 2 — Use of Process to Siguificantly-Roduce Pathogens (one -of five)
Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
L Aerobic Digestion .
Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)?
Were logs submitted showing time. and'temperat#e?
• Were temperatures within range foi completelime:-period?
Was the time and temperature:between 40, days at 20°C (68°F) and 60 days at-15°C
(o9°F)? .
2. Air Drying
Were the residuals on sand beds or pave or unpave-.0asiris for three months?-,
Was the ambient temperature above 0°C (32°F) fot two months?
Were the residuals partially digested? '
Were.residuals exposed to atmosphere during two months above 0°C (not snow
covered)?
3.. Anaerobic Digestion
Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)?
Were logs submitted —shoving time.andmtemperaturO-
-Were fernperatures within range for complete time period?
•Was the time and temperature between 1;5'days:at35°C (95°F) to 55°C (131°F) and 60
days at 20°C (68°F)?
4. Composting (usually.Wi°11be.:Class`A`. composting is used):
Was it a composting procedure (not,'natural deoay under uncontrolled conditions)?
Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
Was the temperature raised to 40
5. Lune Stabilization

Was alkaline material added to residuals a form: of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime
containing kiln dust or fly ash)?.
Were logs submitted showing time and. temperature?
Was the pHxaised.to 12 after two hours of contact?:.. .
Were logs _submitted showing time.and.pH?,
Was temperature corrected to'250C (771.)P
Alternative 3 -j Use of Processes Equivalent to RS.RP
(Not commonly use. See White House Manual page 100.103, tables 11-1 and 11-2.)
Vector Attraction Reduction Review
Was the sampling conducted afthe.required,frequency?
Option 1— 38% Volatile Solids Reduction
Was there 3 8% o reduction?
Were lab sheets/calculations in report? "
Was the reduction on volatile solids (not -total solids)?
Were the samples taken at beginning of digestion process and before* application
(Inspection)?
Were calculations correct?
Option 2 _ 40-Day Bench Scale. Test.. ' Were residuals from anaerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
Were residuals anaerobically digested n_10.7,:
Was the test run for 40 days? . ;
Was the test done between 30°C (86°F) and.37°C (999F)?
Was the reduction of on volatile solids (not total solids)?
Was the reduction less than 17%?
:: Were lab sheets/calculations. in: report?
.,. _....... Were calculations correct?
Option 3 — 30-Day Bench. Scale • Test
Were•residuals from aerobically'digested treatment (Inspection)?
Were residuals aerobically digested in lab? -
•, Were residuals 2% or less total solids?
If not 2% total solids, was the test ran on a sample diluted to 2% with unchlorinated
effluent?
Was the test run for 30 days? .
Was the test done at 200C (680F)?
Was the reduction of on volatile solids (not total solids)?
Was the reduction less than 15%?
Were lab sheets/calculations in: report?
Were calculations correct? .
Option 4 — Specific Oxygen'Uptake Rate(SOUR)
Were residuals form aerobically digested treatment (inspection)?
Were residuals 2% or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted)?.I
Was the test done between 10°C (50°F) and 30°C (86°F)? I
Was the temperature corrected to 20°C (687)?
Was the SOUk equal to or less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of total
residual solids (dry weight basis)?
.: I

Was the- sampling holding time two hours? Y.
Was the test started within'15 minutes of sampling or aeration. maintained? jl
Option 5 —14-Day Aerobic Process
.Were the residuals from aerobically digested treatment (inspection)?
Were the residuals treated for 14 .days?
Was the residuals temperature higher than 40°C (104°F) for a 14-day period?
Was the average residuals temperature higher thaii 450C (1'13°F)?
Option 6 - Alkaline Stabilization
Was the pH of the residuals raised to 12 or higher by -the addition of alkali?
Did the pH of residuals remain at 12 or higher for two hours without the addition of
more alkali?
Did the pH of residuals remain at 11.5 or higher for an'additionat twenty: two hours
without the addition of more alkali?
Was the pH corrected to.25°C :(770F)?
Option 7 _ Drying of Stabilized Residuals
Does. the residuals contain any unstabilized residuals?'
Were the residuals mixed with_any other materials? -
Were the residuals dried up to 75% total solids?
Option-8 — Drying of Unstabilized Residuals -
Were the residuals mixed with any other.materials?
• Were the residuals dried to 90% total solids?
Option 9 — Inj ection .
• Was there any significant amount of residuals on land surface one hour after innjection
(Inspection)?
Was injection done on pasture or hay field?
Was injection done at time that crop 'was growing?
If.Class A With'respect to pathogen, =were: residuals: injected with eight hours after
discharge from pathogen treatment?
5. Soil:Tests :.
.: Was a, Standard Soil Fertility,Analysis conducted for each application field? y
• Were the •soil pH's 6.0 or. greater for each application field? N © 9
If no, was lime applied to those fields?.�
• Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil lessthan 2000 for each application. field? �.
Was sodium less than 0.5 meq%100 c1li^3?
• .Vas the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) less than 15%?
6.General
Was the report in the proper format?
Was the annual reportcomplete?y .
Was the report submitted on timed`