WQ0019960_Annual Report_20160201

--ff ff(—�7r-AV ED
DMIS71-11 of VV"te'
Resources
FEB - 8 2016
Water 0jjaj*jty seplonal 00erat'on5
A ezie Reg"111 I
sh
ity of
anion
Cily of Marion, NC
Waste Water Treatment Plant
201.5 Annual Report
Land Application Program
Nq Permit No. WQ0019960
81P
311 -5 //
RFORVED
He 01 2016
DAIR SECTION
jKipORMATIoN PROCESSING UNIT

A1N1NUALLAINJU Arr1.I1.A 1 II/IV 1.t•.K 1II'1i.A 1 IIJIV ICIIKIVI
WQ Permit#: WQ0019960 _ County:
Facility Name (as shown on permit):
McDowell
City of Marion
Year: / '2t015
Land Application Operator:
Southern Soil Builders, Inc.
Land application of residuals as allowed by the permit occurred during the past
0 Yes El No - If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to Part C. A SI
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residua
Part A - Residuals A - Residuals Application Summary:
33
c�uu�ao�ycai: G
I�� 91duals w�r�0�
were hallea.
Total number of application fields in the per it:
Total number of fields utilized for land application during the year. , tie1 4
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites: \ 72.6
Total number of acres utilizes for land application during the year: 94.1
Part B - Annual Compiance Statement:
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2015 with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-13 below) issued by the Division of Water Resources. 21 Yes , 0 No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corre tine action
taken.
1) Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2) Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at le st 6.0 or
the limit specified in the permit.
3) Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies
of laboratory results are attached.
i
4) Annual TCLP analysis (if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are att lied.
5) All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required a d three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(a) or the Poll itant
Loading Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities). i
7) All general requirements in as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 4 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All monitoring and reporting requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1111 were complied with (applicable to 40 C; R Part
503 regulated facilities).
9) All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Resources.
10) No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of viola ions are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations. .
11) Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receing residuals, as
specified in the permit.
12) No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occur.
13) All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
Part C Certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the ;
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
-Permittee Name and Title .(type or print) t Sign re of
Signature of freparer* Date Signature of LaiffApplier Date
(if different from Permittee) (if different from Permittee and Preparer)
* Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) and 15A NCAC 02T .1102 (26) DGNR FORM ACF (1; ,/2006)

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORKS
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed. The parameters can be reported in FORM RSSF - B
•..c = ermit Number:
vv Qvu199b0
Laboratory: 1) Waypoint
Facility Name:
City of Marion
Residual Source WQ # or
2)
NPDFS #:
NC0031879
3)
WWTP Name:
Corpening Creek WWTP
4)5)
Residual Analysis Data
Conc.
Parameter Limit
7�5 „a� L.t l ,,� Sample or Composite Date
(mpg) a
s 5
8-5-15 �lrt�`
T
m
Percent Solids (%) NA
2.27 02, 70
Arsenic 75
- 4 ✓ _ 4
- - - —^ ---
Cadmium 85
2 ✓ (� S
Copper 4,300
348 va �!
Chromium NA
49
Lead 840
42 ✓ 3,-2,7
Mercury 57
1.4 ✓ 3.2
Molybdenum 75
Nickel 420
8 170
24 t . S
Selenium 100
Zinc
5 ✓
�I
7
7,500
817 j
���
�I
Total Phosphorus NA
27400 I
�St ;r!�
TKN NA
52000 I
0— �'
Ammonia -Nitrogen NA
13200
Nitrate and Nitrite NA
2
e
'For surface disposal facilities the ceiling concentration limits listed in this form are not a licable. Ri
PP
"I
�L+5' — �o� 176 /
certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my dire)!
to assure that
i a system designed
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the informatiTr.,erceptm
peD4'es for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and iiF"'y°�-WilS."
t u z u m a b � e significant
Sigkfeparer *
Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
DENR FORM RSSF (12/2006)

It a
A
Facility N i
Permit #:
Operator:
Acres Used:
Residual
Sample or
Com-
posite
Date
Solids
Arsenic
Cadmium
this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 25.22
WQ0019960 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Nancy Ross Owner: Nancy Ross Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
19.4 Acres Permitted: 19.4 Site #: R1 Field #: Rl
ysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent #):
/5/15
?.27
4
_2
348
49
Lead
142
Mercury
11.4
Molyb-
denum
S
_
Nickel
24
Selenium
5
Zinc
17
Total
Phos-
21,100
Total
DT/Ac./
App.
Event
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Mercury
Molyb-
denum
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
Total
Phos-
0. 27
0. 109
0. 04
0.021
0. 62
0. '13
71
"I certify, u
with a syste
I am aware
imprisonm(
-Z-,
Signature of
Loadings (Calculated in
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 1 1
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 Itl
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 11
1' 1
1 1'
1 11�
1 1
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 Itl
1 Ilt
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 1!1
1 111
1 111
®
1 111
1 111
®®
1 111
1 1 11
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 1•
1 1
1 !11
t 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
I l t/
1 111
I l t l
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1
40 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0001
.000 71.240
ler penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
at there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
for knowing violations".
Applier
Date
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

I? R
Facility N i
Permit #:
Operator:
Acres Used:
Residual
Sample or
Com-
posite
Date
% Solids
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Mercury
Molyb-
denum
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
Total
Phos-
I this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
e: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 8.61
NancyNancy
Roossss Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Owner: Nancy Ross Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
22.9 Acres Permitted: 22.9 Site #: R2 Field #: R2
V"
alysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent #):
15/15
?.27
4
_2
348
49
42
1.4
8
:5
17
Metal Field T.nadinae ft,0Id,12ln+.A ;„ 11.n/.... �.
Total
DT/Ac./
App.
Event
1
0,3 8
2
3
4
5
6 ~y
L v�.
8
9
10
11
12
y
0
y
Arsenic
Cadmium
Copper
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Molyb-0.
denture
denum.
0.)03
0.)02
0. 62
0.37
0.032
0.601
06
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0. 000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0.00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.003
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 1
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.262
0.000
0.037
0.000
0.032
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.006
Nickel
0. 18
0.(04
0114
05
Pr nanah4
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
r of
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
In-,
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 1
0.000
0.00.0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.018
0.004
Selenium
Zinc
Total
Phos- 20.
horus
"T certify un
0.614
20.605
L ✓ __ --.., _____ __-_ wv_.uaaay.a4 TV no NLcNaLcu ta-vu my uirection or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
ii
iture of
Applier
--,�i;'-)c;
Date
a
M
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Nq me: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 27.68
Permit #: WQ0019960 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Operator: Mario DeLuca Owner: Marion DeLuca Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
Acres Used: 16 Acres Permitted: 16 Site #: K1
Field #: Kl ar
Residual nalysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent ft
Rmmnla ­1 1 91 N R I I w _
Com-
posite
Date
Solids
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Mercury
Molyb-
denum
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
Total
Phos-
Annual
Total
DT/Ac./
App.
Event
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
Total
Phos-
15115
?.27
4
_2
348
49
42
1.4 >/
8 c/
5
17
400
1173
0.)14
1.)07
1. 04
0. 70
0. L45
0. ,05
0.028
0. 83
0.017
2. EF
"I certify, t
with a syste
I am aware
imprisonm(
Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 011
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
t Itl
1 111
0 111
1 111
t 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 Itl
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 11!
!�
1®®
1 111
1 111
1 Itl
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
I l t l
1 1 i 1
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 1!1
1 111
1 111
! 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
04 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Ler penalty of law that this docume t
10
11
12
0
r+
sv
y
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.014
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.007
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.204
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.170
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.145
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.005
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.028
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.083
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.017
0.000
0.000
0.000
2.827
0.000
0.000
0.000
94.804
n was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
at there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
for knowing violations".
Signature of L4nd Applier
f " )-�C-1r
Date
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

Ai
Facility N
Permit #:
Operator:
Acres Usei
Residual
Com-
posite
Date
% Solids
Arsenic
Cadmium
Lead
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
Total
Phos- 2
this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 11.06
WQ0019960 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Mario DeLuca Owner: Marion DeLuca Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
35.8 Acres Permitted: 35.8 Site #: K2 Field #: K2
ysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent ft
V15
:_.27
4
-2 1-eA
�48
49
1.2
_4
i1
S✓
17 %/
400
ivy Metal Field Loadines (Calculated in the/aorM. - -
=4t
Total
1 1
�,�
2
3
4
1 5 1
6 1
8
9
110111
12
DT/Ac./
H
App.
J
Event
0.31
y
Arsenic
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.000
Cadmium
0.601
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001:
Copper
0.
.15
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.215
Chromium
0.
30
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.030
Lead
0.026
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.026
Mercury
0.
01
0.000
O.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
Molu denm.
denum
0
05
0.000
0.00Q
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.005
0.000
0.000
0.000
Nickel
0.(15
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.015
0.000
0.000
0.000
Selenium
0.(03
0.000
O.00Q
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
Zinc
0.505
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.505
ti
Total
.
Phos-
16.33
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
16.933
horns
"I certify, under
penalty
of law, that this document was prepared under my direction
or supervision in accordance
with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly
gathered
and evaluated the
information submitted.
I am aware Mat
there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and
imprisonmenj
for knowing
violations".
Signature of
Applier
Date
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MADE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
CitvnfMpr;nn -I- .. " - - --
Land Owner: Nancy Ross
Operator: Nancy Ross
Crop 1 Name:
Volume applied
0 � (enter one) Solids/
Q 0 Liquid
Cu. Yds�266500
7-2015
Solids
2.27
roTAL&I 01 26650q
Annual lbs/acre
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
-urrent Cumulative lbs/ac
?ermitted C. P. L. R.****
JMJL
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 25.2266 1/ Site #: R1
Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
Fescue Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 Crop 2 Name:
Volume
Residual Sources
Soil
Precip.
y
o
Applied per
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Cond'•
Past 24
. b
Acre
Fert., Animal
D
W�'
Hrs.
¢
(Dry TonslAc)
Waste, etc)
Moist)
Inches'
1.300
WQ0019960
I dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Acres Utilized: 19.4
Acres Permitted: 19.4
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
rwo
mg/kg
52000
Z Nitrate
o and
�• Nitrite
mg/kg mg/kg
13200 2
As
Residuals Applications totals
Cd Cu Cr
on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM FSF supp to this form):
Pb Hg Mo Ni I Se Zn I P
0.010
0.005
0.905 v
0.127
0.109
0.004
0.021
0.062
0.013
0.165
2.124
22.467
71.240
0.127
0.068
8.801
1.348
1.36
0.053
1.264
0.54
0.137
0.073
9.706
1.475
1.469
0.057
1.285
-0.602-T
0.178
24.591
36
34 1
NA
1338
267
15
NA
PAN Applied
( lbs/a.,re)
Crop 1 Crop 2
47.442 NA
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual_
Application
Crop: Crop 2
Fescue
0.000 Lime Applied
Date lbs/ac
8-2015 2000
374 89 2498
'ermit PAN Limit l st/2nd Crop _ .. _ _.. _
_ 202 ..
`I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
lualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant- penalties for submitting false
nformation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
f/ 1 ma'*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
" ` s **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation -1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date *** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
a
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Marion i �,Pei mit # - Q()11 �a ` R2
.t .._•••,., X-;e,u n. icc Acres Utilized: 22.9
Land Owner: Nancy Ross Annual Dry Tons Applied: 8.6140 Site #: R2
Acres Permitted: 22.9
Operator: Nancy Ross Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville Cation Exchange Capacity
g p ty (non 503):
Crop 1 Name: Fescue Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 Crop 2 Name: Crop 2 Max. PAN:
o
� o(enter
Q
Volume applied
one) Solids/
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
/o o
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
7-2015
91000
2.27
0.376 4l
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
91
Annual
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
Permit PAN Limit 1 st/2nd (
Residual Sources
JO11
Precip.
y
o
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Cond.
Past 24
cD -
w
TI{I�i
z�
Fert., Animal
We ,
Hrs.
a F.
*
K'
0
Waste, etc)
t'
* o
*
Moist)
inches
mg/kg
mg/kg
WQ0019960
dry
0
s
1 0.5
0.3
52000
13200
As
Residuals
Cd
Applications
Cu
totals
Cr
on FORM
Pb
FSF
H
0.003
0.002
0.262
0.037
0.032to,
0.001
0.066
0.048
6.968
0.0278
0.867
0.327
0.069
0.050
7.230
0.065
0.899
0.328
36
34
NA
1338
267
15
ipp ( attach
Mo
0.006
FORM
Ni
0.018
FSF supp
to this
I Se
Zn
0.004
0.614
0.743
0.374
0.085
16.045
0.749
0.392
0.089
16.659
NA
374
89
2498
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
/kC
mM0000
PAN Applied
( lbs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
I
2
Crop 1
Crop 2
Fescue
0
0
0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 T
0.000
0.000 1
0.000
20.605
13.724 1 0.000
mate ins/ac
8-2015 2000
202
`I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
lualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
nformation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." _
17t. *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation -1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date *** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name- City of Marion - ��py iI V- vu � onto
•• � ..woo r,e,a #: Iu Acres Utilized: 16
Land Owner: Mario DeLuca Annual Dry Tons Applied: 27.6878
Site #: g1 Acres Permitted: 16
Operator: Mario DeLuca Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville Cation Capacity Exchange Ca g p ty (non 503):
Crop 1 Name: Fescue Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 Crop 2 Name:
Crop 2 Max. PANS
O -C
Volume applied
Volume
Residual Sources
Soil
Precip.
>
o
a
N o
(enter one) Solids/
%
Applied per
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Cond.
Past 24
b
w
w t;
Z
�t
Nitrate
Q
Liquid
Solids
Acre
Fert., Anima)
(Dry'
Hrs.
o
N
* w
TKN
o
10 0
and
Cu. Yds Gallons
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Waste, etc)
Wet,
a o
* w
w.
�•
Nitrite
8-2015
292500
2.27
1.000
WQ0019960
Residuals Applications
Moist)
dry
totals
inches
0
on FORM
p
s
FSF
0.5
supp ( attach
0
0.3
FORM
mg/kg
52000
FSF supp
mg/kg
13200
to this
mg/kg
2
form):
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
TOTALS:
01 2925061
Annuallbs/acre
As
Cd Cu Cr Pb I Hg I Mo I
Ni Se Zn I P
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0.014
0.007 1.204
0.170
0.145
0.005
0.028v
0.083
0.017
2.827
94.804
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
0.193
0.127 17.617
0.94
2.295
0.103
2.474
1.038
0.277
40.717
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
0.207
0.134 18.821
1.110
2.440
0.108
2.502
1.121
0.294
43.717
544
?ermit PAN Limit 1 st/2nd Crop
36
34 NA
1338
267
15
NA
374
89
2498
PAN Applied
( lbs/acre)
Crop 1 I Crop 2
63.135 NA
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000.
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1 Crop 2
Fescue
135 1 0.000 Lime A lie(
Date lbs/a,
8-2015 2000
202
`I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
lualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
nformation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation -1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date *** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A !!N/A'! IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Marion nPgr.t #; i000 rAnfn Ricca-#._ - reUtilized: Land Owner: Mario DeLuca
Operator: Mario DeLuca
Crop 1 Name: Fescue
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 11.0751
Site #: K2
Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 Crop 2 Name:
Acres Permitted: 35.8
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
°
Volume applied
Volume
Residual Sources
Soil
Cond.
Preci p'
>
�s
o
�4
�
z
Nitrate
Name of Crop Type
a�
°
(enter one) Solids/
%
Applied per
PP P
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Past 24
cc �
7y iv
P
po !�
w
TKN
=+
o �
and
PAN Applied
ReceivingResidual
Q
Liquid
Solids
Acre
Fert., Animal
wry'
Hrs.
o w
D N'
°c° 0
Nitrite
(lbs/acre)
Application
Cu. Yds Gallons
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Waste etc )
Wei
Moist)
inches
o
*
0
mg/kg
�•
mg/kg
mg/kg
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
8-2015
117000
2.27
0.309
WQ0019960
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
52000
13200
2
11.287
NA
Fescue
0.000
-
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals
on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM
FSF supp to this form):
TOTALS:
01 1170001
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Hiz
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P 11.2871 0.000
Lime Applied
Annual
lbs/acre
0.002
0.194
0.196
36
0.001
0.131
0.132
34
0.215
18.268
18.483
NA
0.030
0.997
1.027
1338
0.026
2.377
2.403
267
0.001
0.106
0.107
15
0.005
2.487
2.492
NA
0.015W,`0.003
1.067'
1.082
374
0.278
0.281
89
0.505 W16.933
41.503
42.008
2498
-
Date Ibs/ac
'rior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
8-2015
2000
�urrent Cumulative lbs/ac
?ermitted C. P. L. R.****
ennrt PAN Limit lsd2nd Crop-
_. -
r
202
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
lualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
nformation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature of Land Applier
Date
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation.
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation -1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

Page: 1 of 2
Report Number: 15-222-0209
Account Number: 46381
Send To: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS
DENNIS KEY
958 HOOTS ROAD
ROARING RIVER NC 28669
Waypoint--0111�
ANALYTICAL
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Project: MARION/NC CERT#257
REPORT OF ANALYSIS Date Sampled: 8/5/2015 13:30:00
Lab Number: 63435 Date Received: 08/10/2015 00:00
Sample Id: MARION Date Reported: 08/18/2015
L.LI
LLruu
100.0
RD
08/10/2015 15:20
Moisture *
97.73
100.0
RD
08/10/2015 15:20
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
5.20
52000
10.0
SB
08/11/2015 08:39
Total Phosphorus
2.74
27400
100
KM
08/11/2015 11:32
Total Potassium
0.78
7800
100
KM
08/11/2015 11:32
Total Sulfur
0.84
8430
100
KM
08/11/2015 11:32
Total Calcium
1.58
15800 -
35%-Ub—A-
100
KM
08/11/2015 11:32
Total Magnesium
0.69
6880-*
i'T�•l-7('r'�100
KM
08/11/2015 11:32
Total Sodium
0.36
3560
100
KM
08/11/2015 11:32
Total Iron
24000
100
KM
08/11/2015 11:32
Total Aluminum
17100
100
KM
08/11/2015 11:32
Total Manganese
352.
5
KM
08/11/2015 11:32
Total Copper
348:
5
KM
08/11/2015 11:32
Total Zinc
817.
5
KM
08/11/2015 11:32
Ammonia Nitrogen
1.32
13200.
10.0
SB
08/17/2015 12:00
Organic N.
3.88
38800
10.0
08/11/2015 08:39
Nitrate+Nitrite-N
<2.00
2.00
SB
08/10/2015.08:40
Total Cadmium
2.0. '
2.0
KM
08/11/2015 11:32
SM-2540G
'SM-2540G
SM-4500-NH3C-TKN
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SM-4500-NH3C
CALCULATION
SM-450ONO3F
SW 6010C
a
All :'?wiu'uco are vir 8 di y. Wci'yii ua5i5 G i.CN`t_aJ_I LU`ICiLU eStetl$1C._LEIeCIion-Umii-on-all-N-senes-is-on-a-wet-Masts. - --- -- — --
Cur reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our rlients. and ,-:: y riot he reproduced in whole or part, ncr may Fny reference be rrac'e -�
to the zvork, the resufis. or the company in any advertising. notvs release, or other public announcements x4thout obtaining our ,o or viritten aurhor izatfon.
Debbie Holt

Page: 2 of 2
Report Number: 15-222-0209
Account Number: 46381
Send To: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS
DENNIS KEY
958 HOOTS ROAD
ROARING RIVER, NC 28669
y" a
" aypovint-
1
ANALYTICAL
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Project: MARION/NC CERT#257
Lab Number: 63435
REPORT OF ANALYSIS Date Sampled: 8/5/2015 13:30:00
Sample Id : MARION Date Received: 08/10/2015 00:00
Data Rnnnrtpfl- nwiQ/on1ti
Total Nickel
Total Lead
Total Arsenic
Total Mercury
Total Selenium
pH (Standard Units)
Total Molybdenum
7.53
-ra
24
42
4.0
1.4
<5.0.
8
Comments:
SULFUR AND ORGANIC NITROGEN NOT FOR COMPLIANCE PURPOSES.
All values are on a dry weight back except ac
a
KM
08/11/201511:32
5
KM
08/11/201511:32
5
KM
08/11/201511:32
3.0
KM
08111/201511:32
0.4
KM
08/12/2015 09:00
5.0
KM
08/11/201511:32
2.00
SB
08/10/2015 08:39
5
KM
08/11/201511:32
cur rapons and letters are for the ezc.!usive and confidential use o; our c1ieJ>ts. and may not be reproduced in v✓nole cr par. nor may any reference be made
O the work. the results. or the company in ara;, ad•✓eri'isin- neUrs re,'esse, or other public annou,?ceme.ais With o ut ociairina our prior v✓r.�iter, auilrorizatior;.
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW-7471 B
SW 6010C
SW-9045D
SW 6010C
Debbie Holt

PAN
Rate TKN NH3 N®3 N®2 as decarrlat Totem Acres
0.3 52000 13200 2 % Solids tons/�rear Applied on
0 0.0227 72.6 94.1
PAN Surface
18242 mgikg
36.484 phis/dl°ja toss
V/
2648.733
lbs total PAN
28.14812
lbs Pmgi2Gr a
PAN In'ection
24842 rreglkg
49.684M
lbs/drytor:
3607.058l
PAN
33.33218lacre
Cry Tons/1000 gal.
0.094659
1st year PAN
lbs./acre
Surface lbs.
2648. 7384
Surface
28.14812327
1st year PAN
lbs./acre
Injected Ibs.
Injected
J8.332 16297
MR(TKN-NH3)+ + .5(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton
MR(TKN-NH3) + 1(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton
1000 X 8.34 X %solids X sp. gravi "=dry tons/1000gal."
2000

Ig2,('�Y
SAR
Sodium Absorption Ratio
Na: Sodium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 23
Ca: Calcium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 20
Mg : Magnesium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 12
Milli Equivalent = Mg/L / Equivalent weight
IN
z
Ni 21D Ca McLLI lMq(fv[g/L)
80.812 358.66 156.176
f�l�LJ
Ca L
17.933
IE).
13, 014� 7
3.513565
SAR= Na Milli Equivalent/[0.5 X (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli equivalent)]O.ti power
SAR = 0.893201](From IVIg/L entered above)
SAR= 0.890438 (From ME entered below)
Na MF_
Ca ME
M ME
3.5
17.9
13
5157--33
i ne amour
arriount of E
ng c

Project name:
Collection date:
Date received:
Certificate of Analysis
Marion WWTP
18-Mar-15
18-Mar-15
Sample identification: CC Sludge #1 - Grab
Parameter
Method Result
%TS RL Units Muli le Tube Fermentation Procedure SM 2540 G 3.1 0.10
_ SM 9221-$ 10230Q 5,6 _.._
Sample identification: CC She #2 _ Grab
PO 1%
Asheville, NC
Phone: (828) 35
Fax: (828) 35,
Project number.
Sample number: 124624
Date
i,nalyzed Analyst Footnotes
18.Mar-1sK
Sample number:
-�,.., ULVF Method
%TS Result R1. Units A Date
Tube Fermentation Procedure DM 2540 G
SM 9221-E
Analyst Footnotes
�••s..yccu
2.7 0.10 % ]s-Mar-]s KEK
62100 4.9 MPN 1s-Mar-]s ILK
Sample identification: CC Slud a #3 Grab
Sample number: 124626
rardmerer Method
Result RL Units Date
%TS Analyzed Analyst Footnotes
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure 92210-E 2.6 0.10 %
SM ]a-Mar_]s
59800 4 7 KEK
MPN ]a-Mar-]s KEK
Sample identification: CC Sludge #4 Grab
Sample number: 124627
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date
Analyzed Analyst Footnotes
6 % 18-Maz-15
lviulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure SM 2540 G 2.0.10 KEKSM 9221-E 119600 ' 4.7 MEN is Mar ]s KEK
Footnotes:
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
Date reviewed: 07 m'- is
Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan NC Certification Number: 600
SC Certification Number: 99053
Signature: d, NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
7565
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Soluti� one
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

R -q
5 Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.,:
Ceftificate of Analysis
Project name: Marlon WWTP
lection date: 25-
ate received: r;,i
3ample identificatidw: CC sthilge '!:-Gral-1
Parameter
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone- [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number: 150325.502
Sample number: 124741
Result RL Units Date Anal .
Analyzed
O/OTS
S
S. 25400
3.1
0.10
%
25-Mar-15
KEK
Ktftle Tube F00entatioti -VXOOdm
J W ON-E.
71306
5.6
XVN
25=yar­15
--KEK
ample identifibatiow. S1
-cC !
Sample number:
124741
Parameter J
1 A
-;Method
Result
IRL
Units
J
Date
Analyzed
Analyst
Footnotes
%Ts
sM 1540 G'
2.9
.0.10
25= -t5
KEK
Mulitple Tube ehiattivi
[jwb`,- i.o 9M
1 ti I -E
2262Q
'5
MIN
25rMar-15
KEK
:ample iddntifiO'Aiiow�'.:'C cigi4
001-ntrikh,':
SarAple number:
124143
Parameter Para
qi
e
Result
RL
U
Pate
Al'alyzed
Analyst
Footnotes
VOTS
i
! 1pr p;'I�SM 2540 G:I*
2.7
0.10
%
25'Mar-15:
KEK
,Muhtple be �eime4i�i:
ur4P::;-.!.8M
�: i.,:. V 121-t'
"'6110Q,
4.9
Nfl�N
25-
*Mar-15'
KEK.
M
j
NC Certification Number: 600
rta reviewed ':
SC Certification Numben: 99053
NC -Dnnld.ng Water Certification Number- 37786
,natu
re::
wd M
This topprtbh6tiltUact bb it0'
Ixept ih itg entirety, WithouthomuTte w6tten consent ofEnvironniental Testing So utions, Inc,
w
e U .1 1in tieiS)7ep hrt relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

SOUR CALCULATION SHEET
1.37
1.36
1.52
1.44
1.64
1.49
1.5
1.1315 s h©u4-
�_ �° 47

5pecmc uxygen upidrm rlatc
SOUR
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
I
5
6
7
8
9
10
i 11
i
12
13
j 14
f 15
Facility
Biosolids Permit N
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 8.0
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Dry Solids
grees Celsius
grees Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 17.47 mg Oxygen/hr
bient Specific Oxygen Uptake. Rate: 1.75 m Q
Average Temperature: g xY9en/9/hr
Temperature Correction Factor degrees degrees Celsius
0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Speecific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
1.3T mg Oxygen/g/hr
ns: Enter Data in the Blue 13oxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute auto matically.

'Time
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility
Biosolids Permit N
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time-
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
. Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
5 1
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 8.2
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Dry Solids
grees Celsius
gees Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 17.20 mg Oxygen/hr
)ient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.74 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: . 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction ):actor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rater 1.36 mg Oxygen/g/hr
ins: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

0
.1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility l'
Biosolids Permit Nu
Digester Temperature:
Sampling De'ite/Tlme:
Sampled By:
Analysis Daterfime:
Analyzed -By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temrnerature:l
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
it Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Average Temperature:
Temperature Correction Factor:
Dry Solids
grees Celsius
grees Celsius
0.3
7.6
1.0
20.21 mg Oxygen/hr
1.94 mg. Oxygen/g/hr
25 degrees Celsius
0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Spf:cific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.52 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

iinutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:KR.Carte
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
it Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Average Temperature:
Temperature Correction Factor:
1.
0.3
7.0
1.0
Ililiters
Dry Solids
grees Celsius
frees Celsius
18.68 mg Oxygen/hr
1.83 mg Oxygen/g/hr
25 degrees Celsius
0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.44 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

(r
Time
0
1
2
3
4
.5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time: 3/17/2015
Sampled By: Lee Estes
Analysis Date/Time: 3/17/2015
Analyzed By: R. Carter
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
it Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Average Temperature:
Temperature Correction Factor:
0 milliliters
151
% Dry Solids
5 degrees Celsius
5 degrees Celsius
0.3
7.6
1.0
20.88 mg Oxygen/hr
2.09 mg Oxygenlg/hr
25 degrees Celsius
0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.64 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

-e--aa., 1
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
'10
11
•12� .
13
'14
15
Facility
Biosolids Permit N
Digester Temperature:
15
Sampling Daterrime:
3/19/2015 0715
Sampled By:
I_ee Estes
Analysis Date/Time:
3/1.9/2015 .0821
Analyzed By:
R. Carter
Sample 'Volume:
milliliters
1000
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
1.01
25
% Dry Solids
degrees Celsius
End Temperature:
25
degrees Celsius
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
Oxygen Uptake: Rate:
it Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Average Temperature:
Temperature Correction Factor:
0.3
8.2
1.0
19.23 mg Oxygen/hr
1.90 mg Oxygen/g/hr
25 degrees Celsius
0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen -Uptake Rate: �1,49 mg Oxygen/g/hr
rns: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
inme
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Facility
Biosolids Permit N
Digester Temperature. �3
Sampling Date/Time: 3/20/2015 0755
Sampled By: Lee Estes
Analysis Date/Time: 3/20/2015 0 30
Analyzed By: R. Carter
Sample Volume. 1000 milliliters
Total Solids: 1.02 % Dry Solids
Beginning Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
End Temperature. 25 degrees Celsius
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Slope:
Intercept
Correlation Coefficient:
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
it Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Average Temperature:
Temperature Correction Factor:
0.3
7.9
1.0
19.51 mg .Oxygen/hr
1.91 mg Oxygen/g/hr
25 degrees Celsius
0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.50 mg Oxygen/g/hr
�t
: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

c)gers at
1
-- tt
ENVI,RO.NMEhI UAL
EnvironnientlaI Testing Solutions
351 Depot St,
Asheville, N6 28801-4310
Sample
Sample
Parameter
General Che
Nitrate as N, w
Nitrite as N, ex
Total Kjeldahl 1
Total Nitrogen 1
Total Solids
Total Metals
Mercury
Aluminum
Arsenic
Cadmium
Calcium
Copper
Lead
Magnesium
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
iodium
fotal Phosphorus
,me
D Box 5655 1
012015 10:34
Project: Marion WWTp
Work Order: 5030738
Reported: 04/10/15 10:34
Sample Data
5030738-01
On Marion vrww CC Sludge Grab collected on 03/18/15 07:49
Reporting
Result
Limit Units
.
DF
Analyzed
Method
Flag Analyst
Batch
try Parameters
table
1200
137 mgikg dry
1.00
03/26/15 16:25
EPA 921OA
ablb
ND
1.37 rng/lgilry
].00
03/26/15 14:OS
SM450ONO2B-2o11
LDP
BSCO936
ygen
51200
844 mg/kg dry
1.00
04/07/] 5 16:27
EPA 351.2
REH
BSC]000
IJ+Nitrate+Nitrite)
52400
844 mglkg,dry .
1.00
04/07/15 16:27
-
LDP
B5130154
2,90
0.10
1.00
03123l15 10:30
SM254OG
LDP
B5C]002
LCB
B5CO810
ND
3.2
mg/kg dry
5.00
03/23/15 16:24
EPA 7471E
11900
854
mgft dry
50:0
04/01/15 12:20
EPA 6010C
DER
B5CO749
ND
17.0
mg/kg dry
1.06
03/25/15 11:00
EPA 6010C
MEC
135C1001
ND
6.82
mg/kg d y
1.00
-03/25/15 11:00
EPA 6010C
MEC
135C0781
11200
854
mg/kgdry
50.0
04/O1/15 12:20
EPA 6010C
MEC
BSC0791
246
6.82
mg/kg dry
1.00
03/25/I5 - ] 1:00
EPA 6010C
MEC
13SC1001
32.7
17.0
mg/kgdry
1.00
03/25/I5 11:00
EPA6010C
MEC
BSC0781
4920
1700
mg/kgdry
50.0
03/25/IS 10:52
EPA 6010C
MEC
135CO781
ND
17.0
mg/kg dry
1.00
03/25/I5 11:00
EPA 6010C
NEC
BSC0781
13.5
6.82
mg/hgdry
1.00
25l
03/1S I1:00
EPA6olOC
MEC
B5CO781
5330
34.1
mg/kg dry
].00
03/25/15 1 I:60
EPA 6010C
MEC
BSC0781
ND
17.0
mglkg dry.
1.00
03/25/15 11:00
EPA 6010C
MEC
B5C0781
2960
1700
mg/kg dry
50.0
03/25/I5 10:52
EPA 601OC
MEC
BSC0781
19200
683
mA9 dry
50.0.
04/01/15 12:20
EPA 6010C
MEC
B5C0781
574
17.0
mg/kg dry' �
1.00
03/25/15 11:00
EPA 6010C
MEC
BSC1001
NEC
BSC07R1
tville SC 29606 I.436 Fairforest Way_1 Greegyiile,-SC-29607'1 main.864.232,155.6.1 fax864.232,6140' .
This repnrt.may not be reproduced, except in frill,. ivtthout wrltien permission jnnr Pokers & r1allcon, Inc.
g: er. san--;allcott.c()M
an employee o/wnened'�tdmpany

Environmental Testing Solutions, Ina
Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Marion WWTP
Collection date: _ 18-Mar-15 _
Date received: 18-Mar-15
Sample identification: CC Sludge.- Grab
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number: 150318.511
l
Sample number: 124642
Parameter
Method.
Result
RL
Units
Date
Analyst
Footnotes
r
Analyzed
d
Tota Solids
SM 2540 G
2.90
0.10
%
1
Mercury
7471B
<3.2
3.2
mg/kg
23-Mar-15
DER
1
Aluminum
6010C
11900
854
'mg/kg
1-Apr-is
MEC
1
Arsenic
6010C
<17.0
17.0
mg/kg
25-Mar-13
MEC
1
Cadmium
6010C
<6.82
6.82
mg/kg
25-Mar.15
MEC
1
Calcium
6010C
11200
854
mg/kg
25-Mar-15
NEC
1
Copper
6010C
246
6.82
mg/kg
25-Mar-15
MEC
1
Lead
6010C,
32.7.
17.0
mg/kg
25-Mar-15
MEC
1
Magnesium
6010C
4920
1700
mg/kg
25-Mar-15
NEC
t
Molybdenum
6010C
<17:0
17.0
mg/kg 25-Mar-15
MEC
Nickel
6010C
13.5
6.82
mg/kg 25-Mar-15
MEC
Potassium
6010C
5330
34.1'
mg/kg zs-Marls
NEC
Selenium
6010C
<17.0
17.0
mg/kg' 25-Mar-15
NEC
Sodium
60SOC
Zinc
2960
1700
mg/kg
25-Mar-u
NEC
1
6010C
574-
17.0
mg/kg
25-Mar-15
MEC
1
Nitrate + Nitrite as N
1200
138.37
mg/kg
26-Mar-15
LDP/REH
1, 3
Total Phosphorus
6010C
19200
683
mg/kg
1-Apr-15
NEC
1
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
351.2
51200
' 844
mg/kg
7-Apr-15
LDP
1
Total Nitrogen
Calculation
52400
844
mg/kg
7-Apr-15
LDP
1
Ammonia Nitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 D
59
37
mg/kg
19-Apr45
KEK
Percent Solids
SM 2540 G
2.7 `
%
18-Mar-15
KW
pH in Liquid
SW 846 9045C
5.5
S.U.
18-Mar-15
KW
4
N-PAV
Calculation
153546
13-Apr-15
KEK
Sodium Absorption Rate
Calculation
33
13-Apr•15
KEK
Reactive Cyanide
335.4 •
<0:124
0.124
mg/kg
26-Mar-15
ECHEM
3
Reactive Sulfide
SM 4500 S D
<0.249
0.249
mg/kg
26-Mar-15
ECHEM
3
Ignitability.
SW 846 1030
>212
•212.0
mm/sec
7-Apr-15
ECHEM
3
Arsenic - TCLP
6010 C
<0.25
0.25
mg/L
i-Apr-15
NEC
1
'Barium - TCLP
6010 C
<2.50
2.50
mg/L
1-Apr-15
MEC
l
Cadmium -TCLP
6010 C
<0.05
0.05
mg/L
1-Apr-15
MEC
1
Chromium - TCLP.
6010 C
<0.10
0.10
mg/L
1-Apr-u
NEC
1
.Lead - TCLP
6010 C
<0.25
0.25
mg/L
i-Apr-15
NEC
1
Selenium - T:CLP..
6010 C
<0.25 ..
0.25
mg/L
1-Apr-15
NEC
1
Silver - TCLP
6010 C..
<0.10
0.10
mg/L
1-Apr-15
MEC
1
Mercury - TCLP
7470A,
<0.0020
0.0020
mg/L
9-Apr-15
DER
1
Full Span TCLP Organics
_ See attached sheets
1,3
inIS reportsnoulo not be reproduced, exept in its" eptirety,,without t a written consent ofEnvironmer
The results:in this reportrelate only.to the samples submitted for analysis.'

I o r c�At
�NV.I:RONM.`ENTAL
d, ~En ntal Testing Solutions
351 Depot.St,
Asheville NC 28801-4310 .
Sample
Sample
Parameter
TCLP Metals
Mercury
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
I
Chromium
Lead
Selenium
Silver
TCLP V4tile Organics
Benzene
2-Butanone (MEK)
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
1,2-Dichlon
1.4=Dichlon
1,1-Dichlori
Vinyl..chloride
Surrogates
5030738-02
Marion WV/TP CC Sludge Grab collected on 03/18/15 07:49
Reporting.
Result Limit Units
42-Dichl orac%thane-D4
I, ..
Tohiene-D8
4-Bromofhrorohensene
TCLP Semi -Volatile Organics
2-Methylpliol (o-Cresol)
3/4-Methylphenol (m;p-Cresol)
total Cresol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Hexachloro6mzene
I
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorogthane
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
i
Method. Flag Analyst Batch
ND.
0.0020
mg/L
10.0
04/Q9/15 12:11
EPA7470A
DER
BSD0246
ND.
0.25.
m8/L
5.00
04/01/15 14:33
EPA 6010C
MEC
B5C1046
ND
2.50
ms/L
5.00.
04/01/15 14:33
EPA.6010C
MEC
B5C1046
ND.
0.05
mg/L
5.00
04/01/15 14:33
EPA 6010C
MEC
B5C1046
ND
0.10
mg/L
5.00
04/01/15 14:33
EPA 6010C
MEC
B5C]046
ND
0.25
mg/L
5.00
04/01/15 14:33
EPA 6010C
NEC .
B5C1046
ND
0.25
mg/L
5.00
04/01/15 14:33
EPA6010C
MEC
B5CI046
ND
0.10
mg/L
5,00
04/01/15 14:33
EPA 6010C
MEC
135C1046
ND
0:100
mg/L
50.0
03/31/15 20:32
EPA 8260B
ARM
B51)0174
ND
0.200
mg/L
50.0
03/31/15 20:32
EPA 8260B
ARM
B51)0174
ND
0.100
M91L
50.0
03/31/15 20:32
EPA 8260E
P
ARM
B51)0174
ND
0.1.00
mg/L
50.6
03/31/15 20:32
EPA 8260E
ARM
135DO174
ND
0.100
mg/L
50.0
03/31/15 20:32
EPA 8260E
ARM
B5130174
ND
0.100
w9&
50.0'
03/31/15 20:32
EPA 8260B
ARM
B51)0174
ND
0.100
mg/L
50.0
03/31/15 20:32
EPA 8260E
ARM
B51)0174
ND
0.100
mg/L
50.0
03/31/15 20:32
EPA 8260B
P
ARM
BSD0174
ND
0.100
mg/L
50:0
03/31/15 20:32
EPA 8260B
P
ARM
BSD0174
ND
0.100'
mg/L
50.0
03/31/15 20:32
EPA 8260B
P2
ARM
B5D0174
ND
0.100
mg/L
•50.0
03/31/15 20:32
EPA 8260B
P2
ARM
B5D0174
%REC
%REC Limits
Flag
88 70-130
89 70-130
91 70-130
ND
0.100
mg/L
10.0
04/06/15 21:24
EPA 8270D
RJM
B5D0005
ND
0.100
mg/L
10.0
04/06/15 21:24
EPA 8270D
RJM
B5D0005
ND
0.200
mg/L
10.0
04/06/15 21:24
EPA 8270D
RJM
B51)0005
ND
0.100
mg/L
10.0
04/06/15 21:24
EPA 8270D
RJM
B5D0005
ND
0.100
mg/L
-10.0
04/06/15 21:24
EPA 8270D
RJM
B5D0005
ND
0.100
a
mg/L
10.0
04/06/15 21:24
EPA 8270D
RJM
BSD0005
_
ND
01100
mg/L
10.0
04/06/15 21:24
EPA 8210D
RJM
B51)0005
ND
0.100
mg/L
10.0
04/06/15 21:24
EPA 8270D
RJM
BSD0005
ND
0'.100
mg/L
10.0
04/06/15 21:24
EPA 8270D
RJM
B5D0005
I
PO Box 56:55 I GrWO enville SC29606 1426 FaIrforEst Way I Greenhjle; SC.29b07.• I anOin 86A.232.155b I fax 8b4.Z32:b140 :rogersarldcalicott.com
--�-- an empl8yee-owned company
Th4report may riot Be rebr Iuceti, except in full, without written permission from Rogers R C'allcott, Inc.
04i10,2015 110:34 fM

J. ::Rogers &-Caticott
ENV'tRON.N1a-NTAL
nEnvironmental Testing Solutions Project: Marion. WWTP
351 Dept t St. Work Order: 5030738
Asheville, NC 28801-43.10 Reported: 04/10/15 10:34
Sample Number 5030738-02
Sample D IScription Marion WWTP CC Sludge Grab collected on 03/18/15 07:49
i
Reporting
Parameter
TCLP Sel d-Volatile Organics
Pyridine .
Surrogates
Phenol-D5
2, 4, 6-7}ibrolncphenol.
Terphenyl-D1114
TCLP Pesticides
Gana ima-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane
Endrin
j
Heptachlor
Heptaehlor�epoxide
Toxaphenei'
Methoxyeflor
Surrogates
2,4,5,6-Ten4chlcm-nr zylei
Method Flag Analyst Batch
ND 0.100 mg/L 10.0 04/06/15 21:24 EPA 8270D RJM B5D0005
ND 0.100 mg/L 10.0 04/06/15 21:24 EPA 8270D RJM BSD0005
ND 0.100 mg/L 10.0 04/06/15 21:24 EPA 8270D RJM B51)0005
%REC %REC Limits Flag
88 35-114
87 43-116
49 21-110
35 10-110
90 10-123
80 33-141
ND
0:00050
mg/1-
10.0
04/08/15 20:59
EPA 8081B
ND
0.0050
mg/L
10.0
04/08/15 20:59
EPA 8081B
ND
0.00050
mg/L
10.0
04/08/15 20:59
EPA 8081E
ND
0.00050
mg/L
10.0
04/08/15 20:59
EPA 8081B
ND
0.00050
mg/L
10.0
04/08/15 20:59
EPA 8081B
ND
0.0050
mg/L
10.0
04/08/15 20:59
EPA 8081E
ND
0.00050
mg/L
10.0
04/08/15 20:59
EPA 8081E
%REC
%REC Limits
86 60-130
84 30-150
Flag
RKH B5D0110
RKH B51)0110
RKH B51)0110
RKH B51)0110
RKH B5D0110
RKH B5D0110
RKH B5D0110
I '
FO-.Box 5655 I. Greenville SC 29406 1426 Fairforest,�lYay I Greenville, SQ 29607.1. rnaiii 864.232.1556 i fax [phone] roger.&alldtal1COtt.COm
an ernployeel.owned company
04.11012015 10:34 'This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written permusimiftoru Rogers R Callcatt, Inc.
i ..

E - 1 I - ----------_--. i ",L)%.11V1I rvnlvl kul.I Kules)
Facili P, Name: City of Marion
WQ Permit Number: WQ0019960
WWTP Name: Corpening Creek WWTP NPDES Number: NCO031879
Monitoring Period: From _ 1/1/2015 To
1 2/31/2015
Pathogen Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1106) - Please indicate level achieved and alternativeperformed:
Class A: I Alt. A (time/temp) ❑ Alt B (Alk Treatment) ❑ I Alt. C (Prior Testing) ❑
A1t.D (No Prior Test) ❑ Process to Further Reduce Pathogengs ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Comp It ❑ Heat Drying ❑ Heat Treatment ® Thermophilic ❑
Beta Ray ❑ Gamma Ray ❑ Pasteurization ❑
Class B.
Alt. (1) Fecal Der s1 ity v❑ Alt. (2) Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens.' ElIf appli able to alternative performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization ❑ Air Drying ❑ Compostina Aerobic Digestion ElAnaerobic Digestion
.........
If a pli,cable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring data:
Allowable Level Pathogen Density um er o na ytica
Parameter Excee- Frequency Sample
in Sludge Minim Geo. Mean axim Units Ce of Analysis Type Tech -
Allowable T e ni
gne
2 x 10 to the MPN 22620 63512.19 119600 MPN 0 7
6th power grab sm9221 e
per gram of
Fecal doliform total solids CFU
F
00mpnperotal solid (dry
timonela. bacterial 3 WN per 4 grams
(in lieu of fecal I total solid (dry
Vector 4.ttraction Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1107)'- Please indicate alternative performed:
Alt.l (V reduction) ❑ Alt. 2 (40-day bench) ❑ Alt. 3 (30-day bench) ® Alt. 4 (Spec. 02 uptake) R]
Alt. 5 (14; Day Aerobic) []__Alt 6 (Alk. Stabilization ❑ Alt 7 (Drying - Stable) I Alt. 8 (Drying - Unstable) ❑
Alt. 9 (Injection) ❑ AIt. 10 (Incorporation) ❑ No vector attraction reduction alternatives were performed ❑
CERT (CATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have been met."
® "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have not been met." (Please note
if you check this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the
requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system
designed Ito ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine
that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significamt'penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
Preparer I� tame and Title (type or print)
of Preparer*
/ -2ef-I&
Date
Dennis Key Southern Soil Builders, Inc.
Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print)
Signature of Land Applier (if applicable) Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
DENR FORM PVRF 02T (12/2006)

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division
rnune: tv-Iyl I33-Zbbb Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report
`+ lj
FY16-SL020543
Predictive
loft ■ ■ .
Client: Zach Key
Southern Soil Builders, Inc.
958 Hoots Rd
Roaring River, NC 28669
Sampled County: McDowell
Advisor:
Sampled: 11/24/2015 Received: 11/30/2015 Completed: 01/14/2016 Farm:
Sample ID: K1 Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (Ib/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu
Lime History: 1- Fescue/OGrassmm, 1 0.0 1.20-200 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 tons/acre; 8/2015 2 _ 0 0
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in me /100 cm3• NO N
q 3-
m 111g/dm3].
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC
BS% Ac pH
P-I K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-1
Mn-Ail Mn Ail
Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I
1.19 1.01 9.4
Sample ID: K2
86 1.3 6.1
123 92
64 18
35
249
165
273 273
208
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
Lime History:
Crop
1- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, 1
(tons/acre)
0.0
N P2O5
120-200
K2O
Mg S
Mn Zn
Cu
1.00 tons/acre; 8/2015
2 -
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
Test Results [units - WN
in 9/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC
BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-1
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I
1.31 1.04 10.2
Sample ID: R1
87 1.3 6.2
128 97
65 18
38
255
167
295 295
221
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (Ib/acre)
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P2O5
K2O
M
Links to Helpful information
More
B Information
0 4 Note: 12
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.1 1
More
B Information
0 Note: 12
Na
0.1
g S Mn Zn Cu B
Lime Histo
1 Y: 1- Fescue/OGrass/Tm, 1 0.0 120-200 110 100 0 0 0 0 0
1.00 tons/acre; 8/2015 2 _ 0
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm31: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-I Na
0.71 1.02 6.3 84 1.0 6.2 12 18 56 26 36 259 169 28 28 33 0.1
North Carolina
1rh:�tt;� auti; tuc:clLi::rn:r��:.r„
ESP SS-1 NO3-N
1 More
Information
Note: 12
ESP SS-1 NO3-N
2
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
Steve Trox

NCDA&GS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. 1=Y16-SL020543
Zach Key
Sample ID: R2 Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop _ (tons/acre) _ N P_2_Q5__K20MgS Mn— Zn -,
U—Mey• i -, escueIv�1assiiirn, i 0.0 120-200 50 80 0
1.00 tons/acre; 8/2015 2 _
Test Results [units - WN in 91CM3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3 : Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS%a Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1 Mn-I Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-1
0.81 1.02 7.5 86 1.0 6.1 38 28 64 20 30 87 68 73 73 47
0 0
Page 2 of 3 ,
More
I,nfnrm�inn---
Note: 12
Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
ni

rvL;uAsc:s Agronomic Division
Phone: [phone]
Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY16-SL020543
Zach Key
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Lime
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting,
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full i
is applied. if MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Fertilizer
Recommendations forfield crops orotherlarge areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
ibiacre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K I and P-1 values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-1 levels appear
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients In general, homeowners do not
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
ncag--.go-,;.Iagro,-.ot-ni/pL,bs.htm.
Recommendations forsmall areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft. If you cannot find
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www.ncaor.ciov/agronomi/ohoart4 htm lnd information that
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Ferti/izei
Test Results
Page 3 of 3 :
Report Abbreviations
Ac
exchangeable acidity
B
boron
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic cations
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
CEC
cation exchange capacity
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
HM%
percent humic matter
K-I
potassium index
K20
potash
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
MIN
mineral soil class
Mn
manganese
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-AI2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Mn-I
manganese index
M-O
mineral -organic soil class
N
nitrogen
Na
sodium
NO3-N nitrate nitrogen
ORG
organic soil class
pH
current soil pH
P-1
phosphorus index
P205
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
SS-1
soluble salt index
W/V weight per volume
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The Zn-AI zinc availability index
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-All, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routine) Zn-I zinc index
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/uvrst htm

a
.r .
WoterResources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
May-3,, 2016
J. Robert Boyette
City of Marion
PO,Drawer 700
Marion, NC28752
SUBJECT: Annual Report°Review (2615) Inspection
City of Marion.RLAP
Permit No: WQo0f9966
McDowell County
Dear Mr, Boyette;
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY, ZIMMERMAN'
' Director,
Enclosed please find a copy of the -Annual Reportt (AR)'Inspection Form from the inspection conducted on,3/15/2016. The facility
was found'to be incompliance with,permit WQ.Q91996.o.
'Please recalculate and-resubmittheField Summary Form for field K-2 as the acreage has .decreased. The Form should be submitted
to.;
.NC DEQ-Division of Water Resources
Information Processing Unit
1617°Mail Services Center
Raleigh NC 27699.4617
According to the AR, the Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate (SOUR) is used to verify -Vector Attraction Reduction (VAR). The testresults
for all seven SOUR tests were included. The SOUR chart/curve should also be submitted with.the analyses. The SOUR-chart/curve
can'be found on our web site,at htt :/p /deg.no.goy/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources permits/wastewater branch/non
discharge-permitting-utut/reportina forms under Residuals Forms.;
Please refer- to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and to min erits. If you or your staff have any questions,.
,please call meat 82.8-296-4685;.
Sincerel3 , .
Beverly Price
iivirpmnentaI Senior Specialist
Eno.
ccLarry; Carver, Wastewater Superintendpnt w/enclosure
Dennis Key,.ORC, SSB w/enclosure
MSC 1617=Central' Files -Basement
Asheville'Files
G:1WP,kW..QlN1oI]owelLlWastewateiNon-dischargelCity of MarionlCity Of Marion Land Application Class B10EI16 2015 AR Revi6w.docz
State of Nptth Carolina 1 EnVGnumentaL Quality J Water Resources
204o U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC28778
828 296 4500,

ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be,submitted in Annual_Repoft.
Facility Name; City of 1Vlarion, Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 11 09
Permit;#.: WQ0019960, Cation Exchange Capacity (non-503 only)
Operators Mario DeLuca Owner:Mario beLuca Predominant Soil Series: Hayesvillew
Acres Used: 30.3; AcresPermitt'ed: '30.3 Site#: K2, FieldK2
lies dual,Analysis Data O eavy.Metals and Total'Phosnhorus use MPACu_.%, @elide IIQC, Poxxirvp..,,o.;+:u.".
Sample
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
--07
8
1-...-..
--- .. --
---- a. v
irJ'.
or
9.
10
11,
1P;
Com-
'posite
bate
8/5/15
% Solids
2.27
Arsenic
4
Cadmium
2
Copper
348
opornium
49
Lead
42
Mercury
1.4
Molyb-
8
-
denum
Nickel
24
Selenium
S
Zinc
817
LT6ial27400
unc 4xGaxy lVzcia< Rwid.,luauiuKs.« aicwaiea iniosiacrep:
Total
DT/Ac:(
App..
Event
1
0.37
2
3
4.
5
161
L8J
L9J
1p
11
12
►-3
a
Arsenic
Ot003
Q 000
0 000
' '0 000
0a -0
0 040
0 000_
0 0'00 '
'0 000
t} 000
0 OOQ>'
0 000
U 003
dm
Caium
0`001,
U OOa #
= 0 000
0 000
O'000
0 OO,o
70 004>
o 00o
a'Y-000
Copper
' A 25'S
1,04
0 00a,
0 000
0' 000
O'000 j
'Q �0;00
0 �000
0 -004'
0 000 '
0 OA00 I
4 `000 '
0 255
Chromi
0 036
' 0' 000
.' 0 000' "{
O'`000
Q.
01000 ;"
0` 000
0 `036
Lead
0 031
0 000
.0 000
0 000
0 000 ,
O�OOO s
44 000:'
0 0000'000
0000
0 000
,0;00
0 000
w�
6 0 031
Mercury
10 001 1
` 0 000
` 0 0,00` '
0 000§
�0 U00 i
'0 OOo; `'
'0 000
0 000
0` 000
0 000
.
' 0 000;
.µ
0 0.00
0001
Molyb--
denum
0 006 '
i 30:000 `
:0 004.
O�OgO
O 000
0' 000
�0'000"'
0 fOQO
0000p.;
0000
` 0 000,OOQ6
Nickel
O'r018
�0t0009
, 0 400 .
s0 000
0 000
0 000''
' 0 000
0 oao
t)?OOOxO
OOU.,
0 000`;
O'000,
; 0018
Selenium '
0 004
0:400
0 400 :'
'0 000
000W,`0
000'
0�000 `
0 r400`
0�04U
0 600 :
0 000,
0 00'0
0.004
zing
0 s9s$
O aao.
a000
o 000
, ,4tWooa
;o 000
; o 000
Fo 000
o 000 t
; o 000 :
,'
' o�oyoo
,
a oao
,
> o sag# f
Total
Pros-
zo os
oa000,
o oao, j
>o 000 ,
o 000,
1 Eo 040 ,
: a `aooLL:
o 000
o:°000
o, 60o
w {o 000_
o oo:0
Zoos
horus
_
i
1
.i:...i: ice.
.i•....
,....1s�:. ::57,��.
LL��.
aL t_ �_
a.,. ..
.�.. ..,
,,
1 1-UA 1klA,'f LLAAUF& Fauacay V1.14w, MUD ius uocumena, was,prepareaunder my direction or supervision an accordance
with a,systein designed to assure that•qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are signifrcant penalties for submitting, false in formatioli, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing. violations".
Signa " re of Land Applier Date
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL L:ANO AP]PLIC:ATION.`FIELD SIW)")y FOR
PLI✓,ASE.MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM rQ BE COMPLETED AN D`SU.B11 I?II T i ED FOR.EACH'FJELlD APPLIED UN
PLACE A "N/Af",IN,A--,BL,ANICQR,o,OX- WRtN NOT APT ILA ,A:B1ixE..
Facility Name Cxty of Marion. 'WQ Permit # WQ0019460 I+reld #s K2. Acres Utilized: 30
`.
Land. Qwner Maria DeLuca Annual A,ry. xons;AppVWd 11 0�7YASite.# : Acres Terri fitted .:39;3
Operator:. Maid De! uca Predominant Soil Serees: I3ayesville Catxoax ExcIfange Capaciiy (non;;503):
Crop :T .Namez Fescue Cron T` 1N m.-TAN: 202 C.
2 NAmP� r �, � . „.;.Y_`
�,...
a
Volume applied
Z/olutne
Residual Sources
S6xl
'Cond.
Precip,
by
o
Nitrate
Name of Crop Type
o
(enter one) Soldsl
°lo
Applied per
(NPDES:#, WQ#,
Past 24
cg �,
;,
��PAN
,;
Tl{N
�`
A lied
PP,_
Q
Lxq�tid
Soiids.
Acre
-Pert, Animal•
{D`'
Hrs.
c
m;
# �'
oa o;"Ibs'tacxe)
arxilReceivin
Nitrite
Resuivah
Application
Cix."Yd's Gallons
(oryTonslAe)
Waste,ete)
Wet
Ivloist)
inches,
M00
�.
84QiS
3,
mg/kg
mglkg
Crop I
Crop 2
Crop,l,
Crog2
117000
2.27
fl 366
W " 00,19466
Q
diy,
0-
s
.6.5°
6:3
52000
13200
2
13}335
N A
Fescac
-
o QQa
�Q�000��, �0�600�
;0000,
O,OQ`OC100
_fl
imlk 0 Q00
fl
- `000 OQ
V
0„ 0 p0
Residuals Applications totalk.pn FQRN[ FSF supp (attach)
tiB1VI
FSF'cupp
to this forrx ); 4
TOTALS:
Cd Cu Cr P& HIZ Mo
Ni
. Se:
�� <<
P t3:335 O UOQ "
Lime A lied
Annual;lbs/acresO`fl03t
4'Et
0"001 �0 25S 0 036.w «�0 03i1 QQOIz�Q 006
Q 018
0 0
,
20 Os�7
Date fibs/ae,�
Prior Years Cumulative lbslac
0.194
6.01 1826$ fl 997 2:377 0 ",106 2 487
I 7
Q.278
41.503
z
42102`
'2000,
Currenf.'Curnulative;lbs/ac -,
0 i97<
,
0 232„ 18'S23 1033 wt f 2:4b8,_0° 0.,
.w 1 7 2 �#93
_ Q85i
'
Permitted C P:
36
,
34 NA 133�8 267 t5 NA
,I
374
x1282
89
2498
Permit.PAN Lirriit istl2rid'vro
=xnq u"Uv'A Nv,.444y. w xarry, 4u4 Lamuumument was preparea,uncter my curioct on mr sap rvisiou4n,aecordance'with,a system degf ed.to:assure that
qualified.personnet,proper`ly:gat erect and,evalaated the�informatfon ubmiEteci. I;am a�vaxe that.there reaign iicant penalties submitt n false_
nfor-oration, actuding the. possibility of fines amd imprison men_ t`'%r kn€atving violations:
. Si9dature e
QWR S Tit N
'*Application Method. S' -Surface, TN-jection,;INC Incorporation
*'volatilization=hate; Surface:- O.S; Tijectionllncorporafton.
=.1A
** 1Y[ineraliz4iib# Rates', 0)mpost:-0.4, anaerobiaily Rested -0:2,
:aerobically digested =0.3 ;raw. -sludge -0.
#*� C ,C.umulative Pblutaat Loadrne.Rate°
DEN;3 FARM FSF'(!-?. 006j

Southern
S foil
B .1 Builders, 'Inc.,
Friday;. May 1.11,2.0.16
NCDEQ-Division of Water Resources
Information Processing Unit
16 ' 17 Mail ' Service Center
Raleigh, NC:276994617
058 Hoots Road Roaring, River, .NC- �,,866
(336),957-8909 -o Fax [phone]
Reference: Updates Form FSFfbr field K2
City, of MarionA *15, Annual'Report
PermPermit-NoWQ,,. 00199,60
.., - -
RECEivEQjNcDEW
10 MAY 16 "2016
P
Enclosed with this letter is, the requested updated Field Summary Form for field,K,2-ih the City of
Marion's land application permit W
QQ.019960. ThistpdAted.FSF f6rm,reflects the new "reduced
acreage that has been,taken out of the. field due, to� the vineyard.
meyard.
t hwe also include' 4 a, copy of. the letter requesting,the updated form F8F with this letter.
If you have any questions or concerns, please. contact, me at 336-957-7871 or at,
,zachkey,@southemsoilbuilders,com
Sincerely,
Zach Key
Southern Soil Buildeisl Inc.

Price, Bev
From:
Glazier, Patrick K
Sent:
Monday, May 16, 2016 3:23 PM
To:
Price, Bev
Subject:
FW: Amended Report WQ0019960 City of Marion 2015 Residuals Annual Report
Attachments:
SKMBT 42316051614150.pdf
Follow Up Flag:
Follow up
Flag Status:
Flagged
10
Not sure if you received a copy of the attachment from City of Marion.
Also, would you email me a copy of the spreadsheet you called about this morning.
Regards,
Kipp Glazier
Environmental Sr. Specialist
Non -Discharge Permitting, Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
919.807.6319
512 N. Salisbury St.
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Email to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Low and may be disclosed to third parties.

14-Day Aerobic Process
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were the residuals treated for 14 days?
• Was the residuals temperature higher than 400C (104°F) for the 14-day period?
• Was the average residuals temperature.higherthan 45°C (113.°F)?
Alkaline Stabilization*
• Was the -pH. of the residuals raised to 12 or }ugher by the addition of alkali?
• Did the pH of residuals remain at 12 or higher for two hours wit.hoi t the addition
of more alkali?
• Did the pH of residuals remain at 11.5 or higher for an additional twenty-two
hours without the addition of more alkali?
• Was the pH corrected to 250C (77-F)?
Drying of Stabilized Residuals
• Does the residuals contain any unstabilized residuals?
• Were the residuals mixed with'any other materials?
• Were the residuals dried to 75% total solids?
Drying of Unstabilized Residuals
Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
• Were the residuals dried to 90% total solids?
Injection`.:
• Was there any significant amount of residuals on land surface one hour after
injection (Inspection)?
• Was injection done on pasture_ or hay field?
• Was injection done at= tune that .crop was growing?
• If Class A with respect to pathogen, were residuals injected within eight'hours
after discharge from.pathogen treatment?
Incorporation
• Were the residuals incorporated into the soilzwithin six hours after -application
(Class B)?..
• Was. incorporation done on :pasture: or hay field?,...
• Was incorporation done:at time that crop. was 'growing?
• If Class A with respect to pathogen, w&& residuals incorporated within eight
hours after discharge from pathogen treatment? .

Vector Attraction Reduction Review
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
38% Volatile Solids Reduction
• Was there 38% reduction?
• Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
• Was the reduction on volatile'solids (not total solids)?
• Was -the samples taken at beginning.of the residuals treatment process and before
application (Inspection)?
• Were calculations correct?
40-Day Bench Scale Test
• Were residuals from anaerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were residuals anaerobically digested in lab?
• Was the test run for 40 days?
• Was the test done between 30°C-(860F) and 37°C (990F)?
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not.total,solids)?.
• Was the reduction less than 17%?
• Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
• Were calculations correct?
30-Day Bench Scale Test
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were residuals aerobically digested in lab?
• . Were. residuals 2% or. less total, solids?.
• Was the test run for 30 days?
• Was the test done at 200C (68°F)?:
• Was the reduction on volatile solids :(not total -solids)?-
Wag. the reduction 'less. than 15%?
• Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
• Were calculations correct? (Van Kleeck or mass balance)
Specific OxY eg n Uptake Rate (SOUR)
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)? Y
• Were residuals 2% or less total solids -.(dry. weight -basis) (not diluted)?
• Was the test. done between.10°C (500F) and 30°C (86°F)? Y..
• Was the temperature corrected to 200C ..(680F)? '
• Was the SOUR equal to or less than'1.5'mg of oxygen per hour per gram oftotal residual
solids (dry weight basis)? ri % �A close- - co r -e--4 Fes,-L+ wAs I o of 7,
• Was the sample holding time under two hours? Y 5k e J s 4 o i cj
• Was the test started within15 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained?- 3 S
is So, , t Q ernke d is � 1 n ly��r S ?
_50 (k Z.- Cu r v'k-- re�� u es � L .- -6,R- 1.-4-t* x

Class B Pathogen Review
Alternative 1- Fecal Coliform Density
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency? Y
• Were seven samples taken?
• Was the geometric mean calculated and done correctly? Y
• Did the results show compliance (less than either 2,000,000 MPN/gram of total solids or 2,000,000
Colony Forming Units/gram of total solids).�j
Alternative 2 - Use of Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (one of five)
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
Aerobic Di estion
• Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
• Was the time and temperature between 40 days at 20°C (68T) and 60 days at 15°C (591F)?
Air Dreg
• Were residuals on sand beds or pave or unpaved basins for three months?
• Was the.ambient.temperature above 0°C (32°F) for two months?
• Were the residuals partially digested?
• Were residuals exposed to atmosphere during two months above 0°C (riot snow covered)?
Anaerobic Di esg tion
• Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
• Was the time and temperature.between 15 days at 35°C (95T) to 55°C (1311F) and 60 days at 20°C
(68-F)?
Composting
• Was it a. composting procedure (not natural decay under uncontrolled conditions)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the temperature raised to 40°C (104T) or higher and remained at 40°C (104T) for five days?
• Did the temperature exceed 55°C (13 PF) for four hours during the five-day period?
Lime Stabilization
• Was alkaline material added to residuals a form of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime containing
kiln dust or fly ash)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the pH raised to 12 after two hours of contact?
• Were logs submitted showing time and pH?
• Was the temperature corrected to 25°C (77°F)?

Annua) Re or'VVW'S0P
L Annual Land Application Certification Farm •
• Was a certification form• submitted?
• - Was land application conducted durith the -reported year? •4
• How many dry -tons and dry tons per acre were applied? ���, 6 .DT
• Were the applications within the perrmitted amount?-,
:�
• Verif--1 PAN if more titan 10 tons/acre y A
Did it indicate compliance?, Y
• Was it signed by the appropriate people?.,
2. Moniforing .
• Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency?,'y
• Were the metals analyses reported. -on the Residual Sampling Summary Form?
• Were the results reported in mg/kg?-y
• . - Were the heavy metals within ceiling concentration permit limits?*
• If no, were the lab analyses attached?
• Were all the required parameters tested? y
• Was TCLP analysis conducted? X� l�bY�s l2e-14
3. Field Summary /
• Were the land application. events recorded on the Field Summary Forms?,� Y
• Was a Field Summary Form submitted for each field? y
• Were all the residuals applied to permitted land?o y
• Were all the residuals applied from permitted sources
�y
• Were the field Ioading rates for each metal and PAN calculated (year to date)? ,
• Were the cumulative pollutant loading rates calculated? OezA t- v` s, b6 K-Z
s Were the calculations correct?,,, - y,+O,cJ9— reAvx___A
• Were the PAltii Ioading rates. within permit limits? yf
• - Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits?�
• Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop?,Y
• Were the applications conducted during the crop's growing season?-
• Were the Field Summary Forms complete?
4. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction
• Was a signed copy of the Pathoge -and Vector Attraction✓Reduction Form submjtted?}�
• Did the form indite the penodcoverage,*the residual class, and the pathogen red2ioi1 al«LLiative and the
vector attraction reduction option used'? 1/
•. Was the appropriate documen�tion to show pathogen and vector attraction reduction included in the report?
Was pathogen and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CPR Part 503? _
5. Soil Tests'
• Was a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis conducted for each application field? y _
• Were the soil pH's 6.0 or greater for each application field? /
• Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil less than 3000 for each application field?
6. General
• Was the report in the proper format?
• Were any parts of the annual report m suing? Orj
• Was the report submitted on time?
" Any violations of ceiling concentrations should be teport�d- to.-Prot"reatment-for.-rnunicipalities. only.