WQ0019960_Annual Report_20150223

City of
Marion
City of Marion, NC
Waste Water Treatment Plant
2014 Annual Report
Land Application Program
NC Permit No. WQ0019960
GENE®
bivision of Water Resources
FEB 2 3 2015
Water Quallty Regional Operations
Asheville Regional Office
�p
RECEIVED
FEB 13 2015
DWR SECTION
INFORMATION PROCESSINd UNiT

A1N11 V AL ],^INV ArrLIUA I ILV1V %_JU K I III11;A 11V1V r VK1Vl
WQ Permit#: WQ0019960 County:
Facility Name (as shown on permit):
McDowell
Year: 2014,
Land Application Operator: Southern Soil Builders, Inc. _Phone: 336• 957-8909
Land application of residuals as allowed by the, permit occurred during the past calendar year?
Yes U No --If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to Part C. Also, If residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part Ai!- ResidualsApplication Summary:
Total number of application fields in the permit:
8
Total number' of fields utilized for land application during the year:'
.6
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites:
117.23
Total number of acres utilizes for land application during the year:
113.7
Part R- Annual Compiance Statement:
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2014 with all conditions of the land application permit
(includ ng'but not limited to items 1-13 below) issued by the Division of Water Resources. 21 Yes No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corrective action
taken.
1) Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2) Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at least 6.0 or
the, limit specified in the permit.
3) Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies
of laboratory results are attached.
4) Annual TCLP analysis (if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are'aaached.
5) All. other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did'not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .I 105(a) or the Pollutant
Loading Rates in 15A NCAC 02T 1105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities). .
7) Alt general requirements in as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All, monitoring and reporting.requirements in 15A NCAC 02T. 1111 were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
9) All: operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation,; prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Resources.
10) No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
11) Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receing residuals as
specified in the permit.
12) No.runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters. has occurred.
13) All•buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
Part'C : Certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false'information, including the
possibility, of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
vr z- - Is
Permittee Name and Title (type or print) SSature of Per ' ee Date
of
Date
of
(if different from Permittee) (if different from Permittee and Preparer)
*.Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) and 15A NCAC 02T .1102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (12/2008)

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Please note that your permit may contain additional -parameters to be analyzed. The parameters can be reported in FORM RSSF - B
WQ Permit Number: WQ0019960 Laboratory: 1) ETS
Facility Name: City- of Marion 2)
Residual Source WQ # or NCO031879 3)
NPDES #: 4)
WWTP Name: Corpening Creek WWTP 5)
Residual Analvsis Data
Parameter
(mpg)
Cone.
Limit
m a
Sample or Composite Date
4-7-14
Percent Solids (%)
NA
2.5 ►-
Arsenic
75
19.9
Cadmium
85
7.95
Copper
4,300
343 v
Chromium
NA
NA
Lead
840
49.8
Mercury
57
0.8
Molybdenum
75
19.9
Nickel
420
14.2
Selenium
100
19.9
Zinc
7,500
912,
Total Phosphorus
NA
27400
-
TKN
NA
5580.0.
Ammonia -Nitrogen
NA
2000
Nitrate and Nitrite
NA
949.97
rur surrace aisposai iacuines me ceumg concentration limits listed in this form are not applicable. Reference the individual permit for metals limits.
"I certify, under penalty of law; that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the. information submitted. I am aware that there are significant
penaltun for
-gubmu-in--gb f- »lep .1-1:4.V4r r---.Qn.7 ' � 1-
jVxP7jivauaJl 11GA u 11PHISVl11er1LlU-1 knowing Vlolatlons..
Sli6attire of Preparer * Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26) DENR FORM RSSF. (12/2006)

L-11\i\UTAJL,iViL'lAL311L+LLLVALPIUNkTk')UlV11V1AKY IVVK1V1"
is Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual):
Permit #: WQ0019960 _ Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Operator: Nancy Ross _ Owner: Nancy Ross - Predominant Soil Series:
Acres Used: 19.4 Acres Permitted: 19.4 Site #:
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use me/kg,
30.50
Hayesville
R-01 Field #: R-01
% Solids use Raw Percent #):
. •
Com-
posite
Date
N
N
o
n
E�
,00
W.M.
®
• •
�_
__�
___
• .
•
. •ONE
MEN
Annual Heavy Metal Vield Loadmgs (Calculated in lbs/acre):
Total
1
21
3
4
5
6
7
L8J
9
10
111112
App.
Event
1.57
4
Arsenic
0.063
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.063
Cadmium
0.025
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.025
Copper
1.078
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.078
Chromium
######
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
######
Lead '
0.157
0.000
0.000
0 000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.157
Mercury
0.003
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0000
0.003
Molyb0.063
denum
denum
0.000
0.000
0.000
_
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.063
Nickel
0.045
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.045
Selenium
0.063
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.063
Zinc
2.867
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.006
2.867
Total
Phos-
86.146
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
86.146
horus
rrr •r
1 cerEuy, under penalty of law, that tams document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
Sign Kure of Land Applier Date
DENR FORM MFI RF (iq/gnnm

Li1N1vUALi NMIAL6 r'1ELL LVAl)MG SUMMARY FORM*
' Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): _ 16.26
Permit #: , WQ0019960 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only): _
Operator: Nancy Ross - Owner: Nancy Ross _ Predominant Soil Series: _ Mayesyille
Acres Used: 22.9 Acres Permitted: 22.9 Site #: R-02 Field #: R-02
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosnhorus use mu/kff_ 0/., Cnl;rlc nen R.ur Pot•..ot,+.4N.
Sample
1
2
-
3
41
5
-- 1--
6
-- --- ��-
---a'--b7
l,VRlb rr).
or
7
8
9
10
11
12.
Com-
posite
Date
4/7/14
% Solids
2:5
Arsenic
19.9
_
Cadmium
7.95
Copper
343
Chromium
NA
Lead
49.8
_
Mercury
0.8
Molyb-
denum
19.9
_
Nickel
14.2
Selenium
19.9
Zinc
912
Total
Phos-
27400
horus
rAuuuai iiUavy iV1Gy2U JVjIVIU UUUUIHP_S (Calculated In Instacrp)'
Total
1
_2
3
4
15
6
7/
8
9
10
11
12
DT/Ac./
I
o
App.
�I
0
Event
0.71
Arsenic
0.028
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0.00
0.000
0.000
0.028
Cadmium
0.011
0.0.00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.011
Copper
0.487
0.000.
0.000
0.()00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.487
Chromium
######
0.000
0.000
0.000
6.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0:000
0.000
0.000,
######
Lead
0.071
0.000
0.000
0.(100
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000,
0.071
Mercury
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
Molyb-
denum
0.028
0.000
0.000
O.C100
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.028
Nickel
0.020
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.02 0
Selenium
0.028
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 1
0.000
0.02
Zinc
1.295
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.295
Total
Phos-
38.908
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
38.908
horus
"I certify
under
anal '
f 1 th
t ' d
y w , p to a, a t Ins ocument was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to: assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
Signature of La Applier Date
M
r1FAlp Gn0r%A ival cc: r�nrnnnn_�

AuviN UAL i UlALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
' Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): _ 12.88
Permit #: WQ0019960- Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only): _
Operator: !Mario DeLuca. Owner: Anna Deebold Predominant Soil Series: _ Hayesville
Acres Used: 16 Acres Permitted: _ 16 Site #: K-01 Field #: _ K-01
Residual Analvsis Data (Heave Metals and Tn+nl Phnenhnrne ,men .. /i_ o/ Q_i.,A .. n
Sample or
Com-
posite
Date
1
4/7/14
2
3
4
5
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
% Solids
2.5
Arsenic
19.9
_
Cadmium
7.95
_
Copper
343
Chromium
NA
Lead
49.8
_
Mercury
0.8
Molyb-
denum
19.9
_
Nickel
14.2
Selenium
19.9
Zinc
912
Total
Phos-
horus
27400
■ . .
� . .. .
A...... -I
LT,..._._.IS-4-,_1
r+__7.7
T
Total
1 21
L3J_
4
151
1 5
7
181
19
1111
112J
DT/Ac./
f
App.
0
Event
0.81
y
Arsenic
0.032
0.000
0.000 1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.032
Cadmium
0.013
0.000:
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.013
Copper
0.552 `
0.000'
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.552
Chromium
######
0.000,
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
######
Lead
0.080
0.000i
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0 _ _
0.080
Mercury
0.001
0.00.0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.006
0.001
Molyb-
denum
0.032
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.032
Nickel
0.023
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 1
0.000
0.023
Selenium
0.032
0.000'.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 1
0.000'
0.032
Zinc
1.468
0.000
0.000
0.()00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 t
0.000
1.468
Total
Phos-
44.114
0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
44.114
horus
nnnnl4-� ln... = 411-. ,7,...__�_-.
-_-_ _
nT oPrfifv nndar
__ ­. , ___ »....»...--- ,.- F-. F", %,u UUUUX MY U11VU UH ur supervision In accordance .
with a system designed to assure that ilualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
Signature of Land Applier, . Date
r%mAln r-e' nRA AEI- ^ram .�.r.....

AivlvuAL iv KIALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
t Attach this form to the corresponding Field" Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual ]Report
Facility Name: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 31.18
01
Permit #: WQ09960 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only): _
Operator: Mario DeLuca Owner: _ Anna Deebold _ Predominant Soil Series: _ Hayesyille
Acres Used: 35.8 Acres Permitted: - 35.8 Site # K-02 Field #: K-02
Residual Analvsis Data (Heave 1 wf9le anti rn+.i ni n -
Sample or
Com-
posite
Date
1
4/7/14
2
3
4
L5
L6j
_0V.
r,,z.r�,
.0 .Mils
9
use
10
tcaw rercent
11
1*):
12
% Solids
2.5
Arsenic
19.9
Cadmium
7.95
Copper
343
Chromium
NA
Lead
49.8
_
Mercury
Molyb-
denum
0.8
-
19.9
_
Nickel
14.2
Selenium
19.9
Zinc
912
Total
Phos-
horus
27400
-
Annual
Heaw Metal
Pipet_.-
----
Total I1 L21
L3J_4I
DT/Ac./ J A
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
12
App. J
0
Event 0.87
v
Arsenic 0.035 1 0,000' 0.000 0.000
0.0.00
0.000
0.000
0,000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.035
Cadmium 0.014 0.000! 0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.014
Copper 0.598 0.000; 0.000 0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.598
Chromium 44#### 0.000' 0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
######
Lead 0.087 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.087 ✓
Mercury 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0001
0.001
Molyb-
0.035 0.000 0.000 0.000.
denum -
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000'
0.035
Nickel 0.025 0.000 0..000 0.000
0 000
0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.0 00
0.000
0.025
Selenium 0.035 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.035
Zinc 1.589 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1,589
Total
Phos- 47.731 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
47.731
horus
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or
with a system designed to, assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated
supervision
in accordance
I am aware that there are' significant
for
the
information
submitted.
penalties submitting false information,
imprisonment forknowing violations".
including the possibility of fines
and
y-
Signa re of Land Applier '
Date J
Mr - __ - . . .._. _- .

t&i'NII IAIj IV 1AM5 rirMED LVAJUL Iti 6WV11V1AKY FVKMI
"Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): _ 14.23
Permit #: iWQ0019960 - Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only): _
Operator: ,James Fisher - Owner: _ James Fisher Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
Acres Used: 21.4 Acres Permitted: 11.4 Site #: F-03 Field #: F-03
Residual Analysis Dat` (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use m /k °
... .
'�'i1
d
i7
�']
E]
Q7
93
0
Com-
posite
Date,
Total
P
mom
h
Hnnual neavy ivietar rieia Loadrnps (Ualcuiated in lbs/acre):
Total
1
2 {
1 3]
141
j 5
6
7
8
9
10-J
11ii-12
DT/Ac./
I
o
App.
�f
Event
1.25.
Arsenic
0.050
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000'
0.050
Cadmium
0.020
0.000:
0.000
O.Ci00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.020
Copper
0.856
0.000:
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000'
0.856
Chromium
######
0.000;
0.000
0.Ci00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000'
######
Lead
0.124
1 0.000 s
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.124
Mercury
0.002
0.000 '
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002 i
Molyb-
enum
denumd
0.050
0,000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.050
Nickel
0.0335
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.060
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.035
Selenium
0.050
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.050
Zinc
2.276
0.000,
0,000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
2.276
Total
Phos-
68.390
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000'
68.390
horus
"T
..a,....
is . !
r_�_ .L_.
�■�•_ ,_
Wly, uuuva Ncuaaiy vi law, LuaL uus uucument was prepared under my airection or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to; assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that thereare significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
IS
Signature of Land Applier ; Date
nFNR FnRhn NAPI .F (1,)i,)nnrN

U
A1V1V UAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 12.19
Permit #: ! WQ0019960- Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Operator: James Fisher Owner: James Fisher Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
Acres Used: 8.2 Acres Permitted: 8.2 Site #: F-04 Field #: F-04
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mag, % Solids use Raw Percent #):
Sample or LU 1 2j 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Com-
posite
Date
4/7/14
1
% Solids
2.5
Arsenic
19.9
j
Cadmium
7.95
Copper
343
Chromiu
NA
}
Lead
49.8
Mercury
Molyb-
denum
0.8
19.9
{
Nickel
14.2
Selenium
19.9
I
-
Zinc
912
Total
Phos-
horus
Annual
27400
Hones Mpfa
Ti';pla
I
T .,�,a;,,
-
e� �r
.� __�_�_
Total
DT/Ac./
App.
Event
1 -1-21
(
V
1.49
j
k
1415
" 1" JLLYJ/aut
6�
Up
7
8
9
10
of
✓
11
12
y
y
Arsenic
Cadmium
'Copper
Dhromiu
Lead
0.059
0.024
1.020
######
0.148
1 0.000;
1 0.000':
0.000 �
0.000'
0. 00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.00.0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0100
0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000',
0.059
0.000
0.000
0.000
OA24
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.020
0.000
0.000
0.000'
######
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.148
Mercury.
Molyb-
denum
0.002
0.059
0.000
0.000
0-000
0.000
0.000
-
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0-.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,002
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.059
Nickel
Selenium
0.042
0.059
0.0001
0.00.0 i
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.006
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.042
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.059
Zinc
Total
Phos-
bhorus
2.712
81.488
0.000 ,
0.000 i
0.000
0.000
0.000
-
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
O 000
0.000
0.000
2.712
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
81.488
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
Signature of LanApplier 11 Date

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Marion
Land Owner: Nancy Ross
Operator: Nancy Ross
Crop 1 Name:
Vescue
WQ Permit #: WQ0019960
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 30.4931
Field #: R-01
Site #: R-01
Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 1 202 Crop 2 Name:
Acres Utilized: 19.4
Acres Permitted: 19.4
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
° y
Volume applied
Volume
Residual Sources
Soil
Cond.
Preci .
p
a
Ks
C
o
_Z Y
Nitrate
Name of Crop Type
°
enter one Solids/
( )
o
/o
Applied per
DES #, W #
(NP Q ,
Past 24
10
9
w
TKN
o
and
PAN Applied
pp
Receiving Residual
+, o
Liquid
Solids
Acre
Fert., Animal
D
( n',
Hrs.
'
o w
, .
0
N'
�' j
* J
°4 o
Nitrite
lbs/acre
( )
Application
Q
Cu. Yds Gallons
(Dry TonslAc)
Waste, etc)
We
Moist)
inches
Q. ^
* 0
*
o
o
*
* ~=
mg/kg
�•
mg/kg
mg/kg
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
5-2014
1
292500
2.5
1.572
WQ0019960
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
55800
2000
949.97
56.868
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 .
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
500
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM
FSF supp to this form).
'OTALS:
01
292500
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
A
Ni
Se
Zn
P
56.868
0.000
Lime A
%nnual
lbs/acre
0.063. V
0.025
1.078
#######
0.157
O3
t20
0.045
0.063
2.867
86.146
Date
lbs/ac
'rior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0.064
0.127 i/
36
0.043
0.068
34
7.723
' 8.501
NA
1.348
#######'
1338
1.203
1.360 '
267
0.05
0.053
15
1.264 1
NA
0.495
0.540 '
374
0.102
6.165 +�2498
89
19.6
2.467
10-14
2000
:urrent Cumulative lbs/ac
'ermitted C. P. L. R.****
'enmt PAN Limit 1 st/2nd Crop
202
_rJ
'1 certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or.supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
uahfied personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted_. I_am aware, that there are_significant-penalties_ for- submitting-false-
__-
1 �_ P __ P 1? Y g _ _ _ � _
nformation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature of Land Applier
Date
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Marion
Land Owner: Nancy Ross
Operator: Nancy Ross
Crop 1 Name: Fescue
WQ Permit #: WQ0019960 Field #: R-02 Acres Utilized: 22.9
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 16.2630 Site #: R-02 Acres Permitted: 22.9
Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 Crop 2 Name:
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
9.Volume
0 °
Q
applied
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
%
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Sod
Cond.
(Dry,
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
>
4
o w
o
-
� ?:
C'
�,
9
m �
CD w
TKN
mg/kg
Z
o
°4 °
r,
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
(lbs/acre)
Name of CropT
ReceivingResidual
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
5-2014
156000
2.5
0.710
WQ0019960
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
55800
2000
1 949.97
25.694
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
_
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM
FSF supp to this form):
oTALs:
_ 01
156000
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
25.694
0.000
Lime A ,
�nnuallbs/acre
0.028
0.038
0.066
36
0.011. w
0.037.
0.048-
34
0.487
6.481
6.968
NA
#######
0.0278
#######'
1338
0.071
0.796
0.867 1
267
0.001
0.326
0.327 '
15 1
0.028
0.715
0.743
NA
0.020
0.354
0.374 1
374
0.028
0.057
0.085
89
1.295
14.75
16.045
2498
38.908
'
Date
s/ac
3rior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
10-14
2000
.urrent Cumulative lbs/ac
'ermitted C. P. L. R.****
'ermit PAN Limit lst/2nd Crop
_ _ ._ . _.. . . _ :.1
262
`I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
lualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for_submitting
nformation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
/ 'P _ ��_q- *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
/7--__
�� **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
r
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Marion
Land Owner: Anna Deebold
Operator: Mario DeLuca
Crop 1 Name: Fescue
WQ Permit #: WQ0019960 Field #: K-()l
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 12.8749 Site #: K 01
Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 Crop 2 Name:
Acres Utilized: 16
Acres Permitted: 16
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
ti
+,
Q
Volume applied
PP
enter one Solids/
( )
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
o
/o
Solids
Volume
Applied per
PP P
Acre
D Tons/Ac
(Dry )
Residual Sources
DES #, W #
Q '
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond.
(Dry,
We
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
a
t,
co -
o'
o �;
Z
o
�
-
* N
°
�
7y �,
?=
'.
o
:Z
TKN
mg/kg
Z
q
ao O
CD R.
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
pp
( lbs/acre)
Name of CropType
YP
Receiving Residual
Application
PP
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
12-14
123500
2.5
0.805
WQ0019960
dry
0
s
1 0.5
0.3
55800
1 2000
949.97
29.113
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM
FSF supp to this form):
'OTALS:
Q1
1235001
As
Cd
Cu
I Cr
Pb
Hf4
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn I
P
29.113
0.000
Lime Applied
\rmuallbs/acre
0.032
.161
0.193
36
0.013
0.114
v.127
34
0.552
17.065 1
i 7.o.i 7 '
NA
#######
0.94
######
1338
0.080
2.215
2.295
267
0.001
0.102
0.103
15
0.032
2.442
2.474
NA
0.023
1.015
1.038
374
0.032
0.245
0.277
89
1.468
39.249
40.717
2498
44.114
Date
lbs/ac
'rlor Years Cumulative sac 1
:ur r ent Cumulative ibs/ac
'ermitted C. P. L. R.****
'ermit PAN Limit 1st/2nd Crop
-
202
'I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
lualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the i_nformation_submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for_ submitting -false..
nformation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date
**" Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND
SUBMITTED FOR EACH
FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Marion
WQ Permit #• WQ0019960 Field #: V
Land Owner: Anna Deebold
_ _02
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 31.1708
Acres Utilized: 0 �S,g
Operator: Mario DeLuca
Site #: K-02
Acres Permitted: 35.8
Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville Cation Exchange Capacity
g p ty (non 503):
Crop 1 Name:
Fescue
_
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 Crop 2 Name:
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
o
Volume applied
Volume
Residual Sources
Soil
Precip.
a
o
Z Y
o(enter
one) Solids/
o
/o
Applied per
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Cond.
Past 24
-a
c
�'
w `;
TKN
o
Nitrate
Name of Crop Type
PAN Applied
Q
Liquid
Solids
Acre
Fert., Animal
(Dry,
Hrs.
o w
N'
�, w
o
and
ReceivingResidual
(lbs/acre)
Cu. Yds
Gallons
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Waste, etc)
Wet,
a: �.
.� w
o•
�
* •*
� w
Nitrite
Application
WQ0019960
Moist)
dry
inches
0
a
m /k
s s
m !k
9 9
m /k
9 9
Crop 1
Crop 2 Crop 1
Crop 2
12-14 '
299000
2.5kjO.811
s
0.5
0.3
55800
2000
949.97
31.502
NA Fescue.000.0000.000
0.000000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
o.000
0.0oo
0.000
0000
0.000
0.000
o
to.000
0.00
00.000
iviru,a:l Ul GyyUUUI -
knnual lbs/acre
?rior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
current Cumulative lbs/ar_.
?ermitted C. P. L. R. * * * *
'ermit PAN Limit 1 st/2nd
As
Residuals
Cd
Applications
Cu
totals
Cr
on FORM
Pb
FSF
Hg
supp ( attach
Mo
FORM
Ni
FSF supp
Se
to this
form):
Zn
P
31.502
0.000 Lime
0.035
0.014
0.598
#######
0.087V
0.001
0.035
0.0�O.035
1039.914
f1
L067
374
!1 1
,,.278
89
1.589
t Cn
4,.503U.
2498
47.73]0.159 Date
I
0.117
17.67
0.997
2.29
0.105
2.452
194
n 131
, Q ��o_
I lJ6 1
%_Ll� 1
u/
36
34
NA
1338,
267
15
NA
_. _.
certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
lualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false__ .... nfar-mation includin -the ossibili - - --------_____;- _ __ . _.
g p ty-offines-and-imprisonment for knowing violations."
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date Mineralization Rates: Compost-0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
Facility Name: City of Marion
Land Owner: James Fisher
Operator: James Fisher
Crop 1 Name: Fescue
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
WQ Permit #: WQ0019960 Field #: F-03
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 14.2301 Site #: F-03
Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 Crop 2 Name:
Acres iltilized: 11.4
Acres Permitted: 11.4
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
°
° rZ
°
A
Volume applied
PP
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
%
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
DES # W #
(NP Q ,
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond.
�D>
We
Moist)
Precip.
past 24
Hrs.
inches
a
b
o w
n
o `y
N'
�,
o
o
w C
Pi "
CD
* -
TKN
mg/kg
o
°Q °
o 0
� E
mg/kg °
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
(lbs/acre)
Name of CropType
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
12-14
136500
2.5
1.248
WQ0019960
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
55800
2000
949.97
45.162
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
O.000
0.000 1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
C.CCC
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM
FSF supp to this form):
'OTALS:
0
136500
AS
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
H
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
45.16
0.000
Lime Applied
�rmuallbs/acre
0.050
0.042
0.092
36
0.020
0.018
0.038
34
0.956
1 2.531
1 3.387 10#0011
NA
#######
1.763
D38
0.124
0.475
0.599
267
0.002
0.019
0.021 Lr
15
0.050
0.09
0.140 1
NA
0.035
0.219
0.254 1
374
0.050
0.038
0.088
89
2.276
9.034
11.310
2498
68.390
Date
lbs/ac
'rior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
:urrent Cumulative lbs/ac
'ermitted C. P. L. R.****
'ermit PAN Limit lst/2nd Crop
_
202
`I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
Iualified_personnel_properly_gathered-and_evaluate_d_theinformation_submitted._I..am.awar_e_.that_there.ar_e_significant-penalties-for submitting -false ----- -
nformation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Al r
Signature of Land Applier
0 _,j ,,j-
Date
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation -1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
r
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Marion
Land Owner: James Fisher
Operator: James Fisher
Crop 1 Name: Fescue
WQ Permit #: WQ0019960 Field #: F-04
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 12.1973 Site #: F-04
Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 Crop 2 Name:
Acres Utilized: 8.2
Acres Permitted: 8.2
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
Y
0 o
Q
Volume applied
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
%
Solids
Volume
Applied per
PP P
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond.
(Dry,
Wet,ao
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
a
��,
5 o
o w
o
�y �;
C'
�
4
;o
x N
TKN
mg/kg
Z
q
�o o
mglkg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mglkg
PAN Applied
(Ibs/acre)
Name of CropType
Receiving Residual
APP lication
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
12-14
117000
2.5
1.487
WQ0019960
dry
0
s
1 0.5
0.3
55800
2000
949.97
1 53.817
NA
Fescue
0.000
0. 000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM
FSF supp to this form):
'OTALS:
01
117000
'
As
Cd
Cu I
Cr
Pb I
Hg
I Mo
I Ni I
Se I
Zn I
P
53.8.17
0.000
Lime lied
knnuallbs/acre
0.059
0.066
0.125
36
0.024
0.035
0.059
34
1.020
6.114
' 7.134
NA
#######
2.109 1
### ##'
1338
0.148
0.904 1
i.052
267
0.002
0.036
0.038 1
15
0.059 It
0.165 1
0.2244
NA
0.042
0.409
0.451
374
0.059 1
0.076
0.135
89
2.712.4
14.495
i7.20r
2498
81.488
DatV
lbs/ac
'rior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
:u�,ent 'Cumulative lbs/ac
'
'ermitted C. P. L. R.****
'ermit PAN Limit lst/2nd Crop
202
'I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
lualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information_ submitted. I am aware that t_here_ are significant penalties for submitting false
nformation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature of Land Applier
Date
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2005)

i
_ Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Project name:
Marion WWTP
Collection date: 14-Apr-14
Date received: 14-Apr-141
Certificate of Analysis
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number:
Sample identification: CC Sludge #4 - Grab Sample number:
140414.502
115180
Parameter Method Result RL, Units Date Analyst ]Footnotes
_ Analyzed
%TS SM 2540 G 2.6 0.10 % 14-Apr-14 KEK
Mulitple'1•ube Femientation Procedure SM 9221-E 5200 4.7 MPN 7-Apr-14 KEK
Sample identification: CC Sludge #5 - Grab Sample number:
115181
Parameter ]Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
_ Analyzed
WFS SM 2540 G 2.6 0.10 % 14-Apr-14 KEK -
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure SM 9221-E 5200_ 4.7 MPN 7-Apr-14 KEX
Sample identification: CC Sludge 96 - Grab Sample number: 115182
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS SM 2540 G 2.6 0.10 % H-Apr-14 KLX -
Mulilple Tube Fennentation Procedure SM 9221-E 5200 4.7 MPN 7-Apr-14 KEK
Sample identification: CC Sludlze #7 - Grab Sample number: 115183
Result RL Units,Date Analyst Footnotes
Parameter Method Analyzed
%TS SM 2540 G 2.6 0.10 % 14-Apr-14 KEK
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure SM 9221-E 5200 4.7 MPN 7-Apr-14 KEK
Footnotes
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
Date reviewed: NC Certification Number: 600
Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan SC Certification Number: 990.53
Signature: NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted For analysis.

r,
Wit..
}
:(
Environmental
Testing Solutions, Inc.
Prqiect name: Marion WM"rP
Collection date: 7-Apr-141
Date received: 7-Apr-141
Certificate of AnalyMs
Sample identification: CC Sludge #1 - Grab
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number: 140407.503
Sample number: 114920
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS SM 2540 G 2.5 0.10 % 7-Apr-14 KEK
Mulitple "Cube Fermentation Procedure SM 9221-E 19500 4.5 MPN , 7-Apr-14 KEK
Sample identification: CC Sludge #2 - Grab Sample number: 114921
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS SM 2540 G 2.6 0.10 % 7-Apr-14 KEK
Mulitple Tubc Fermentation Procedure SM 9221-E 59800 4.7 MPN 7 .Apr-t4 KEK
Sample identification: CC S1uolge #3 Grab
Sample number: 114922
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analvsi Footnotes
_ Analyzed
%TS SM 2540 G 2.6 0.10 % 7-Apr-14 KEK
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure SM 9221-E 33800 4.7 MPN 7-Apr-14 KEK
v
Footnotes:
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported dovNm to the Reporting Limit only.
Date reviewed: NC Certification Number: 600
Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan SC Certification Number: 99053
Signature:
NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
This report should not be reproducdd, exept in its entirety, I consent �ol �P.nvirontnental Testing Solutions, Inc. 055'
The: results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

hFFl,h� e G 7- -nr}•}
..........
L
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Project name: Marion W W'Fp
Collection date: 7-Apr--14
Date received: 7-Apr.44
Sample identification: CC Sludge - Grab
Certificate of Analysis
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number: 140407.504
Sample number: 1I4923
Parameter
Method
Result
RL
Units
Date
Analyst
Footnotes
Analyzed
Percent Solids
SM 2540 G
2.50
0.10
%
9-Apr-14
ASI3
1
Mercury
747113
0.80
0.79
mg/kg
16-Apr.14
DER
I
Aluminum
601OC
11800
1990
mg/kg
10-Apr.14
MEC
]
Arsenic
6010C
<19.9
19.9
mg/kg
10-Apr.14
MEC
1
Cadmium
6010C
<7.95
7.95
mg/kg
10-Apr-14
MEC
1
Calcium
6010C
13300
1990
mg/kg
10-Apr-14
MEC
1
Copper
6010C
343
7.95
mg/kg
10-Apr-14
MEC
1
Lead
601OC
49.8
19.9
mg/kg
10-Apr-14
MEC
1
Magnesium
6010C
6320
1990
mg/kg
10-Apr-14
MEC
1
Molybdenum
6010C
<19.9
19.9
mg/kg
10-Apr-14
MEC
1
Nickel
601OC
14.2
7.95
1n g/kg
10•Apr-14
MEC
1
Potassium
601OC
7010
39.8
mg/kg
10-Apr-14
MEC
1
Selenium
601OC
<19.9
19.9
mg/kg
I0-Apr-14
MEC
1
Sodium
601OC
2850
1990
mg/kg
10-Apr-14
MEC
1
Zinc
.6010C
912
19.9
mg/kg
10-Apr-14
MEC
I
,cNitrate- Nitrittnasrl��,'j
-949:9-71
160.59
mg/kg
16-Apr-14
LDP/REH
1, 3
Total Phosphorus
601OC
27400
795
mg/kg
10-Apr-14
MEC
l
Tvital--I
351.2
�6580JOA
1070
mg/kg
23•Apr-14
LDP
I
Total i litrogen 1
-,zCalculatiarlY
-,56-800
1070
mg/kg
23-Apr-14
LDP
I
AtnxnaniaNitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 D
�2000&
150
mg/kg
11-Apr-14
KEK
Percent Solids
pH in Liquid
SM 2540 G
2.7
%
7-npr-14
KEK
SW 846 9045C
6.6 -
S.U.
7-Apr-14
KEK
4
Reactive Cyanide
335A
<0.134
0.134
mg/kg
23-Apr-14
ECHEM
2
Reactive Sulfide
SM 4500 S D
0.67
mg/kg
23-Apr•14
ECHEM
2
Ignitabilit},
SW 846 1010
>212
212
OF
11-Apr-14
ECHEM
2
N-PAV
Calculation
1645950
29-Apr-14
KEK
Sodium Absorption Rate
Calculation
46
29-Apr-14
KEK
Footnotes:
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
1. Sampie analyzed by -Rogers & Callcott Environmental.
2. Sample analyzed by`Enviro Chemists, Inc.
3. Methods EPA 921 OA and SM 450ON0213 by LDP and REH.
4. Sample analyzed outside ihold time.
Date reviewed: dy 241-(N
Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan
Signature:
NC Certification Number: 600
SC Certification Number: 99053
NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
This report should not be reproduced', exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. m
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate,
SOUR
Facility Name: Cor enin . Creek
Biosolids Permit Number: WQ 0019960
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time: 4/28/14 0825
Sampled By: Lee:Estes
Analysis Date/Time: 4/28/14 0954
Analyzed By: R. Carter
Sample -Volume:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
�illiliters�
6-Dry-Solids
egrees Celsius /
egrees Celsius t/
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 6'.2'
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 15.87 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rater 1.89 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.48 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in- the Blue Boxes-. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Facility Name: Coreenin2 Creek
Biosolids Permit Number: WQ 0019960
Date: 4/25/2014 /
Digester Temperature: 16 +�
Sampling Date/Time: 4/26/14 0815
Sampled By: Lee -Estes
Analysis Date/Time: 4/25/14 0956
Analyzed By: R. Carter
Sample Volume: - 1000 milliliters
Total -Solids -0.81 % Dry Solids
Beginning Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
End Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 7.0
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 15.77 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.95 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.53 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the B16(r Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Facility Na
Biosolids Permit Num
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
__ -,Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature,
Dissolved Oxygien Level
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient-,
4
- 1000 milliliters
=-.:0..7.9 %- Dry Solids
25 degrees Celsius ✓
25 degrees Celsius
0.2
6.7
1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 13.95 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.77 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.38 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions:, Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically,

Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Corpeninq Creek
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
.....Total. Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
-8
9
10
11
'12
13
14
15
4 091
milliliters
W Dry Solids
degrees Celsius
degrees Celsius
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 6.9
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 16.99 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.89 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rater 1.48 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue,Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Facility Name: Corpening Creek
Biosolids Permit Number: VV 0019960
Date: 4/3/201
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time: 4/3/14
Sampled By: Lee-Esi
Analysis Date/Time: 4/3/14
Analyzed By: R. Carh
Sample Volume: ------
_.Total olids .--_-
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature;
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Average Temperature:
Temperature Correction Factor:
10
d
A
milliliters
%o.D y Solids.degrees Celsius
degrees Celsius
0.3
7.0
1.0
16.45 mg Oxygen/hr
1.91 mg Oxygen/g/hr
25 degrees Celsius
0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.50 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Facility Name
Biosolids Permit Number
Date
Digester Temperature
Sampling Date/Time
Sampled By
Analysis DatefTime
Analyzed By
Sample Volume
Total. Solids
:Beginning Temperature.
End Temperature
Coreening Creek
WQ 0019960
4/2/2014
18
412/14 0817
Lee_Estes
4/2/14 0930
R. Carter
•1000
- --:_ -w
25
25
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 7.5
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
t/
milliliters
%.Dry Solids
9egrees Celsius
legrees Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 17.45 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 2.01 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:= 1.57 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blu"Ei�Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Specific Oxygen Vptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume.j
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature: -
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
.4
5
6
7
.8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Creek
milliliters
%-Dry.Solids
degrees Celsius
degrees Celsius
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 6:9
Correlation Coefficient: 1;0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 15.30 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.72 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature'Correction Factor: 0.783526166.
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 9.36 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

7L-,irachem"':
ANALYTICAL &,CONSULTING
CHEMIISTS
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Post Office BOX 7665
Asheville NC 28802
Attention: Kelley Keenan (ETS)
Environmental Chemists, Inc.4.
6602 Windm ll Way ° Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone] (Lab) • [phone] (Fax)
710 Bowsertown Road ° Manteo, NC 27954
[phone]
NCDENR: DWQ CERTIFICATE #94. DI.S CERTIFICATE 4137729
Date of Report: Apr 24, 2014
Customer PO #:
Report #: 2014-04144
Report to: Kelley Keenan (ETS)
Project ID: Marlon WWTP
Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by
14-09977 • Site: CC -Sludge 4/7/2014 7:05 AM Solid/Sludge Client
Test Method Results Date Analyzed
RCI
Cyanide EPA=A <0.134 mg/kg 04/23/2014
Sulfide SM',W0 S n 0.67 mg/kg 04/23/2014
Ignitability SW M method 1010 >212 °fi 04/11 /2014
Comment:
Reviewed by: �--
2
Report #:: 2014-04144 Pago 1 of 1 �

t11111`1Au rA1J11VkYh1N AM) VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM (02T Rules)
acility Name: City of Marion
I WQ Permit Number: WQ0019960
WWTP Name: Corpeiiin'g'Cree — 7-�- - -�
Mo
nitoring Period: From 1/1/2014 NPDES Number: NC0031819
To 12/31/2014
Path2Reduction
1 —
_gen Redu tion (15A NC.AC, 02T Please indicate
level aChi6ved- and alt
ernativeTpe -formed:Class A: AltAfim6/tem ( Alt B Alk Treament)U 'Alt. C (Prior
Testing)
Alt-D (No Prior Test) Lj Process to Further Redude Patliogeli_fl__
If applicable to alternative perfdrme (Class A
CompostHeat-------- ((Cla only) indicate "Process to Further Redu,ce'Pathogefis!':
MP� 'Drying Q Heat Treatment ElThermophilic
El —
Beta Ray ❑ Gamma Ra n
Y❑ Pasteurizatio ❑
Class B: JAlt. (1):Fecal Density Alt. (2) Process
to Significantly Reduce Pathogen
If applicable to alternative performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization 0
Air Drying Cl COm ostin 13 Aerobic Digestion LjAnaerobic Digestion
.... ..........
........ ..........
11applicable toalternative perr red (Class A or Class B) complete the foll6wing-monitori'
g data:
Allowable Level Pathogen Density UM
Parameter Arial
Units
Sam" le
in Sludge ts Excee- of Analysis
p
N*Murr, Geo. Me Type Tech -
an $Waximurr Units of Analysis
2 x 10 to the niaue
T
WN 5200 11481.53 59800 MpN
6th power 0 7 grab sm9221
per gram of
Fecal Coliform total solids CFU
1000 mpn per gin a
o f total solid (dry
Salrnonella bacteria 5 WN
pet 4':,grams
(in lieu of fecal total solid (dry
coliform) weiaht)
Ve�ct0ei,Attraction Red uk"ti CAC-.02T .1107) - Plea'se indicate,... alt6 a ive'"heff6rtne
Alt. I (YS reduction) U Alt'. 2 (4 1 -day bench) 3 (30m.
Alt'. day V,en6h) 4 �(Spec,. uptake)
Alt. 5 (14-Day Aerobic) El Alt. 6
on El Alt 7 (Drying - Stable)
13 Alt. 8 (Drvi g - Unstable) Ej
Alt. 9 (1jection) i i EJ Alt. 10 (tco� =oration) F1 XT—vertor.9ttrac',tion reduction alternatives n'f
corporation)
CERTIFICATION W—A-11EMEN !�, I . vesw6rePe formed. [I
T iplease check the appropriate statement)
"I certify, under penalty off law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction qucti-ed ti
o4 requirement in 15A NCAC 02'T J107 have been met."
re uc I
461c 1
certify, under Penalty. 9f law, that the pathogen requir' _
pments�in 15A.N CC02T 110.6 and. the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1101 h6ve not ,be�en'me. 0' (Please.fiolte
if you check this statement attach an explanation why you, have not met one or both of the
requirements.)
............. "This Oeterminatio'n has been made 'under my direction and supervision in accordance with thesystem
designed to ensure that qualified pq'sonnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine
that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
1"tiZn �-/ C,442 U e,-i Dennis Key Southern Soil Builders, Inc.
Prepar6i:Name and"Title (type or Land Applier Name and Title if applicable)(type or print)
" Signal of —Preparer*
Date Signature of Larid Applier (if applicable) Date
*Preparor is defined in 40 CFR Part 503 :
.9,(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
M­­ ­­ ­ ._-

Report Number: 14-349-0719
ft
Account Number:46381
j
W W
Send To: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS
www.aleastern.com
DENNIS KEY
958 HOOTS ROAD
ROARING RIVER NC 28669
Date Received: 12/15/2014 Date Of Analysis: 12/16/2014
A&L Eastern Laboratories
7621 Whltepine Road Richmond, Virginia 23237 [phone] Fax [phone]
Grower:
SOUTHERN' SOIL BUILDERS
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT Analytical Method(s):
Mehlich 3
Date Of Report: 12/1R/?t114
1-ar l l l ILt:
r••
Organic Matter
Phosphorus
Potassium
Magnesium
Calcium
Sodium
Acidity
Sample ID
Lab
pH
C.E.0
Field ID
Number
% Rate
ENR
Mehlich 3
R
Reserve
K
M 9
Ca
Na
Soil
Buffer
H
Ibs/A
ppm Rate
prim Rate
ppm Rate
pm
'?�
Rate
n,
ppm
Rate
ate
R�•
ppm„ ate
u
p• •
index
,���
negr 100g
nmeq/100g
K1 (-
11778
5.1
H 142
I 46 M
49 VL
237
VH
851
M
16 VL
I
I
I ^!C=38 I
I N
I
I
I
I
6.4
I
0.6
I
7.1C=25
I I
K2
11779
4.3
M 124
130 VH
99 M
VH
1084
M
17 VL
NC=108
NC
1328
6.9
0.1
8.6
11780
4.3
M 128
24 L
31 VL
163
H
678
M
23
VL
NC=20
NC=16
5.9
6-83
1.0
5-9
11781
5-3
H 146
182
H 1
123 M
155
H
735
M
21
VL
NC=68
NC=63
1
5.5
6.74
1-9
7.2
�
11783
3.6 M 111
46 M
74 L
191
HP80
M
21
VL
=
NC 38
NC=38
5.6
6.75
1.8
7.5
Sample ID
Percent Base Saturation
Nitrate
Sulfur
Zinc
Manganese
Iron
Copper
Boron
Soluble Salts
Chloride
Aluminum
Field ID
K
Mg
Ca
Na
H
NON
S
Zn
Mn
Fe
Cu
B
SS
Cl
AI
° °
%
%
�
ppm Rate
ririm Rate
..
ppm Rate
m Rate
pp...
ppm
Rate
ppr. Rate
ppm Rate
ms/cm
Rate
ppm Rate
ppm
1.8
27.8
59.9
1.0
8.9
14 L
2.5 M
26 H
183
VH
2.5 H
0.4 L
NC=29
NC=62.5
NC=163
1
1 NC=125.0
<2
3.0
31.8
63-0
0.9 -
1.4
13 L
14.5 H
�35 H
1182
VH
14.4 VH
10.5 L
NC=27
NC=112.5
NC=219
NC=220.0'
1.3
23.0
57.5
1
17-3
16 M
4-8 H
101 VH
193
VH
16.5 VH
0.4 L
--T
NC = 33
NC = 120.0
NC = 631
NC = 325.0
4-4
17.9
51-0
1.3 1
25.9
118
M
7.3 H 128
H 1170
VH 1
5.7 VH
0.4 L
NC = 37
NC = 182.5
NC = 175
NC = 285-0
2.5
21.2
52.0
12
23 4
15 L
4.0 H
76 VH
117
VH
4.8 VH
0.3 VL
1
1
I
I
I
I
NC=31 I
NC=100.0 I
NC=475 I
I
NC=240.0
•^•��� �•• •••• ••-ram • •�r•��•-••• •• � r•� •a-���a��� ����� �_���� �� �nprdnauon or symoots: -/o (percent), ppm (parts per million), Ibs/A This report applies to sample(s) tested. Samples are retained a
oil. Rating after each value: VL (Very Low), L (Low), M (Medium), (pounds per acre), ms/cm (milli -mhos per centimeter), meq/100g maximum of thirty days after testing.
I (High), VH (Very High). ENR - Estimated Nitrogen Release. (milli -equivalent per 100 grams). Conversions: ppm x 2 = Ibs/A, Soluble nap y by P�'c
Al m G
:.E.C. - Cation Exchange Capacity. Salts ms/cm x 640 = ppm. Analysis prepared b : A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
Pauric McGroary

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone]
Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No.
FY15-SL006830 "
r
r
f
Client:
Southern Soil Builders, Inc.
Advisor:
,
Predictive
958 Hoots Rd
r
=: .g"�=:�'ti
Roaring River, NC 28669
Soil Report Mehlich-3 Extraction
Sampled County: McDowell
Sampled: Received: 09/25/2014
Completed: 10/06/2014 Farm:
Links to Helpful information
Sample ID: F3
V
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre)
N P2O5
K2O
Mg S Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1-Fescue/OGrass/Tim, 1 0.0
120-200 0
60
0 0 0
0
0 0
Note: 12
2-
Test Results [units - iiVfi in g/c0; CEC and Na in meg1100 crrr3; NO3-N in mg/da]:
Soil Class: Minerai
HM% WN
CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg% S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na ESP SS-1 NO3-N
0.46 1.12
8 82 1.4 6.2 107 38
54 26 36
159
110 121 /
121
226 ✓ 0.1✓
1
Sample ID: F4
V
Recommendations: Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre)
N P2O5
K2O
Mg S Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1- Fescue/OGrass/Tim, 1 0.0
120-200 0
40
0 0 0
0
0 0
Note: 12
2-
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN
CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg% S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2 Zn-1 Zn-AI
Cu-I Na / ESP / SS-1 NO3-N
0.56 1.10
7.6 79 1.6 119 49
52 24 37
127
93 137 ✓
137
236 ✓ 0.1
1
Sample ID: R1
Recommendatio : Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop (tons/acre)
N P2O5
K2O
Mg S Mn
Zn
Cu B
Information
Lime History:
1 - Fescue/OGrass/Tim, 1 0.0
120-200 70
100
0 0 0
0
0 0
Note: 12
2-
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 crn3; NO3-N in mg/drrP]:
Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN
CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg% S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-AI2 Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I Na / ESP / SS-1 NO3-N
0.41 1.00
8.3 84 1.4 Q 27 21
57 25 47
58
52 62 ✓
62
103 0.2 t/
2 ^
North Carolina
Reprogramming of the laboratory -information -management system that makes this report possible is being funded
through a grant from the North Carolina Tobacco Trust Fund Commission.
Thank you for using agronomic services to manage nutrients and safeguard environmental quality.
- Steve Troxler, Commissioner of Agriculture

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY15-SL006830"'
Page 2 of 3
Sample ID: R2 V
Lime History:
Recommendations: Lime
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5
1-Fescue/OGrass/Tim, 1 0.8 120-200 120
2.-
Nutrients (lb/acre)
Cu B
0 0
More
Information
Note: 12
K2O
110
Mg S Mn Zn
0 0 0 0
Test Results [units - W/V in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 crn3; NO3-N in mg/dnn ]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac p P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% S-1
0.46 1.09 6.0 68 1.9 5.6 11 15 46 21 40
Mn-I
133
Mn-All Mn-AI2
97
Zn-I Zn-AI
27 ✓ 27
Cu-I NaESP SS-1 NO3-N
✓
42 ✓ 0.1 2

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/
Report No. FY15-SL 686830
Page 3 of 3 1
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
Recommendations
Report Abbreviations
Lime
Ac
exchangeable acidity
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
B
boron
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
BS%
% CEC occupied by basic cations
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at
Ca%
% CEC occupied by calcium
one time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the
CEC
cation exchange capacity
full rate is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Cu-I
copper index
ESP
exchangeable sodium percent
Fertilizer
HLq%
percent humic matter
Recommendations for held crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
K-1
potassium index
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
K20
potash
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-1 and P-1 values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
Mg%
% CEC occupied by magnesium
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
MIN
mineral soil class
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS-1 levels appear
Mn
manganese
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Mn-All
Mn-availability index for crop 1
Mn-Al2
Mn-availability index for crop 2
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH,. C or Z
Mn-I
manganese index
notations appear on the soil report, refer to sNote: secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients• In general, homeowners do not
M-O
mineral -organic soil class
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
N
nitrogen
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
Na
NO3-N
sodium
nitrate nitrogen
ORG
organic soil class
Recommendations forsmall areas, such as home lawnslgardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft. If you cannot
pH
current soil pH
find the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www.ncagr.govlagronomi/oboart4_htm#tfs to find
P-1
phosphorus index
information that may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, readA Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer
P20s
phosphate
S-1
sulfur index
Test Results
SS-1
soluble salt index
WN
weight per volume
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
Zn-AI
zinc availability index
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-All, Mn-AI2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not
Zn-I
zinc index
routinely available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit wiryw.ncagr.govlagronomiluvrsthtm
for more information.

Annual Report Review SOP Class B Land Application
Reporting Period: :1 /t Att - /-21311/L/
Permit Details: C 4-� of IA& W Q Cd 1 a g G()
• Is 503?.1e.5
• Class A or B? l3
Maximum Dry Tons Per Year: a Q U
Number of acres permitted: 151, 70
Number of fields in permit:
Counties that land is permitted for:
Monitoring Frequency for TCLP: 1 x
Monitoring Frequency for Residuals Analysis: 44 nL
Monitoring Frequency for Pathogen & Vector Attraction Reduction: ,4,i•-.c-cL
Groundwater monitoring: N/A:
1. Annual Land Application Certification Form ,
Was a certification form submitted?y0-S.
Was land application conducted during the reported year? y S'
How many dry tons and dry tons per acre were applied? l 1 7, A 3
Were the applications within the permitted amount? 1,,e-5
Verify PAN if more than 10 tons/acre?
Did it indicate compliance? y C s
Was it signed by the appropriate people? S
2. Monitoring
Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency?
Was, an analyses taken for each source that was, land applied? �+
Were the metals analyses reported on the Residual Sampling Summary Form? �e-S
Were the results reported in mg/kg? �(
Were the pH's 6.0 or greater for each residual sample? y"-s
Were the heavy metals. within ceiling concentration permit limits? v-5
Were the lab analyses attached? -I S
Were all the required parameters tested? e S
Was TCLP analysis conducted?
Were the TLCP contaminants within regulatory limits? N
Was a corrosivity, ignitability, and reactivity analysis conducted? y e s
3. Field Summary
_... ...... .. Were-theland.application. events recorded_on.the-Field_Summary-Forms?---------=------
How many fields were applied on this year? 6
Was a Field Summary Form submitted for each field? yes
Were all the residuals applied to permitted land? Y4-3
Were all the residuals applied from permitted sources? `�eS
Were the field loading rates for each metal and PAN calculated (year to date)?y s
Were the cumulative pollutant loading rates calculated?y -a
Were the calculations correct. jF e-S'
Were the PAN loading rates within permit limits?YO-5
Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits? t4-S
Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop?v-y

Were the applications conducted during the crop's growing season? Y,?s
Were the Field Summary Forms complete? Ye_S'
Was lime application on Field Summary Form? No lime applied.
Y-e-9 -' Q--a 1 2WO 16, b,Z sty t G.
4. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction
• Was a signed copy of the Patho en and Vector Attractioneduction Form submitted? YeX
Did the form indicate the per' d of coverage; the residual class, and the pathogen reduction
alternative and the vector attraction reduction option used?
• Was the appropriate documentation to show pathogen and vector attraction reduction included
in the report?
• Was pathogen and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503?
Class B Pathogen Review
Alternative 1— Fecal Coliform Density
Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency? es
Were seven samples taken? Ya
Was the geometric mean calculated and done correctly?'V-5
Did the results show compliance (less than either 2,000 0, 00 MI'N/gram of total solids or
2,000,000 Colony Forming Units/gram of total solids)? YES
Alternative 2 — Use of Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (one of five)
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
1. Aerobic Digestion
• Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)?
-'Were logs submitted showing time and'temperature?
Were temperatures within range for complete'time period?
Was the time and temperature between 40 days at 20°C (68T) and 60 days at 150C
(590F)?
2. Air Drying
• Were the residuals on sand beds or pave or unpaved basins for three months?
Was the ambient temperature above 0°C (32°F) for two months?
Were the residuals partially digested?
Were residuals exposed to atmosphere during two months above 0°C (not snow
covered)?
3. Anaerobic Digestion
• Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
-Was the time and temperature between 15 days.at 35°C (95°F) to 550C (1310F) and 60
days at 200C (680F)?
4. Composting (usually will be. Class A when composting is used)
Was it a composting procedure (not natural decay under uncontrolled conditions)?
Were logs submitted showing time and,temperature?
Was the temperature raised to 40
5. Lime Stabilization

• Was alkaline material added to residuals a form of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime
containing kiln dust or fly ash)?
Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
Was the pH raised.to 12 after two hours of -contact?
Were logs submitted showing time and pH?
Was temperature corrected to 25°C (771F)?
Alternative 3 — Use of Processes'Equivalent-to RSRP
(Not commonly use. See White House Manual page 100-103, tables 11-1 and 11-2.)
Vector Attraction Reduction Review
Was the sampling conducted at the; required. frequency?�C S
Option 1— 38% Volatile Solids Reduction
Was there 3 8% reduction?
Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
Was the reduction on volatile solids (nottotal solids)?
Were the samples taken at beginning of digestion process and before application
(Inspection)?
Were calculations,correct?
Option 2—'40-Day.Bench.Scale.Test Were residuals from anaerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
Were residuals anaerobically digested -in lab?:
Was the test run for 40 days?.
Was the test done between 30°C (86°F) and 37°C (99°F)?
Was the reduction of on volatile solids (not total solids)?
Was the reduction less.than 17%?
Were lab sheets/calculations in'report?
Were calculations correct?
Option 3 — 30-Day Bench Scale Test
Were residuals from aerobically: digested treatment (Inspection)?
Were residuals aerobically digested in lab?
Were residuals 2% or less total solids?
If not 2% total solids, was the test ran on, a sample diluted to 2% with unchlorinated
effluent?
Was the test run for 30 days?
Was the test done at 20°C (68°F)?
Was the reduction of on volatile solids (not total solids)?
Was the reduction less than 15%?
Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
Were calculations correct? .
Option 4 — Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate(SOUR)
Were residuals form aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)? yes
Were residuals 2% or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted)? yzz s
Was the test done between 100C (50°F) and 300C (860F)?
Was the temperature corrected to 200C (680F)?Yt_v
Was the SOUR equal to or less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of total
residual solids -(dry weight basis)?�,�
8

Was the sampling holding time two hours?
Was the test started within 15 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained?
Option 5 —14-Day Aerobic Process
Were the residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
Were the residuals treated for 14 .days?
Was the residuals temperature higher than 40°C (1041F) for a 14-day period?
Was the average residuals temperature higher than 45. C (113°F)?
Option 6 — Alkaline Stabilization
Was the pH of the residuals raised to 12 or higher by the addition of alkali?
Did the pH of residuals remain at 12 or higher for two hours without the addition of
more alkali?
Did the pH of residuals remain at 11.5 or higher for an additional twenty4wo hours
without the addition of more alkali?
Was the pH corrected to.251C (77°F)?
Option 7 — Drying of Stabilized Residuals
Does the residuals contain any unstabilized residuals?
Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
Were the residuals dried up to 75% total solids?
Option 8 — Drying of Unstabilized Residuals
Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
Were the residuals dried to 90% total solids?
Option 9 — Injection
Was there any significant amount of residuals on land surface one hour after injection
(Inspection)?
Was injection done on pasture or hay field?
Was injection done at time that crop was growing?
If Class A with respect to pathogen, -were residuals injected With eight hours after
discharge from pathogen treatment?
5. Soil Tests
• Was a Standard Soil FertilityAnalysis conducted for each application field? kl�
If no was lime aWere the -soil pplied l eed to thoser for each R, iapzeication db field? I_�CF'4{b 1) Fq �n1° PN
pP 6y
3t • Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil lessIthan 2000 for each application. field? K I
Was sodium less than 0.5 meq/100 cm^3? i-eS L
Was the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) less than 15%? �•eS N o a
6.General
Was the report in the proper format? .`S'
Was the annual report complete?4,e
Was the report submitted on time? T&f
Cu DPP kllugl� �if s��
a,