WQ0019960_Annual Report_20140224

City of
Marion,
NC
City of Marion, NC WWTP
2013 Annual Report
Land Application Program
NC Permit No. WQ0019960
FEB 17 2014
0AItrtUUMLu1 0 =GTION
NJFGRMATIOKI PROCESSING UNIT
�s
i

-I\ I VG - JJC I" LXA l 1 L.L111V1 I 1' Vlklvl
WQ Permit#: WQ0019960 County:
Facility Name (as shown on permit):
Land Application Operator:
McDowell
Year: 2013
City of Marion
Southern Soil Builders, Inc. Phone: [phone]
Land application of residuals as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year?
RI Yes ® No - If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to Part C. Also, If residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A - Residuals Application Summary:
Total number of application fields in thepermit:
1 8
Total number of fields utilized for land application during the year:
4
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites:
1 77.04
Total number of acres utilizes for land application during the year:
94.1
Part B - Annual Compiance Statement:
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2013 with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-13 below) issued by the Division of Water Resources. R1 Yes ® No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corrective action
taken.
1) Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2) Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at least 6.0 or
the limit specified in the permit.
3) Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies
of laboratory results are attached.
4) Annual TCLP analysis (if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5) All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(a) or the Pollutant
Loading Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7) All general requirements in as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All monitoring and reporting requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1111 were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
9) All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Resources.
10) No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
11) Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receing residuals, as
specified in the permit.
12) No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
13) All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
Part C - Certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
F-EX Mqk1-QfJC(- Q��4 2boll
JJ&Lmittee Name and Title (type or print) re of Permittee Date
Date SiLydature of
1-30 o'l
Date
(if different from Permittee) (if different from Permittee and Preparer)
* Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) and 15A NCAC 02T .1102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (12/2006)

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed. The parameters can be reported in FORM RSSF - D
WQ Permit Number: WQ0019960 Laboratory: 1)
Facility Name: City of Marion 2)
Residual Source WQ # or NCO031879 3)
NPDES #: 4)
WWTP Name: 5)
Residual Analvsis Data
A&L Eastern Labs
Parameter m
Molybdenum
Nitrate and Nitrite
For surface disposal facilities the ceiling concentration limits listed in this form are not applicable. Reference the individual permit for metals limits.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant
penalties forAsubmittingfalse information, including the possibility of Imes and imprisonment for knowing violations."
a-S
Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26) DENR FORM RSSF (12/2006)

Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual):
Permit #: WQ0019960 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Operator: Nancy Ross Owner: Nancy Ross Predominant Soil Series:
Acres Used: 19.4 Acres Permitted: 19.4 Site #: R-01 Field #:
22.81
Hayesville
R-01
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent #):
•
posite
DateWIN
fl
M
ENEM
flowl,
Total
Phos-
..
��
Annual Heavy Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
TotalU
—
�
NON
me
-..
MEM
I I
� Ill
� iii
l lIl
l iii
I Ill
IIII
I lII
l iii
IIII
I iii
� lII
l I
��
���
I11
���
���
���
���
► ���
1 Iil
I III
1111
...
l 111Mr,I
ffI III
M
WI Ill
���
���
•
I iii
l iii
IIII
I iii
1 11�
1 111
1 iii
1 iii
1 iii
1 iii
in iii
1 111
1 iii
1 iii
I iii
IT, ll�
'
MMM=M=MMMMMMM
1
1 111
1 1
••
�
1 111
I III
MITI Il
KITITII
KITM
MITII
1 Ill
1 111
1 111
I III
1 l,•
1 1
IT, Il
ffI III
1 111
1 Ill
1 III
1 III
1 111
1 Ill
1 Ill
1 III
1 III
1 1
®®
1 III
1 III
1 111
! 111
1 111
1 III
1 III
1 Ill
1 Ill
1 111
1 111
Total
IIII.
I
I
I
..
"I
Si ature of L d Applier
/' 1,1.11
Date
DENR FORM MFLSF (1212006)

-.i. va _ 11-iJJAI1 ..•__ 1J__J \" UV1ti1�.LLlI\1 1`VJl\lvl
Attach this form to the corresponding. Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name:
Permit #:
Operator:
Acres Used:
City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual):
WQ0019960 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Nancy Ross Owner: Nancy Ross Predominant Soil Series:
22.9 Acres Permitted: 22.9 Site #: R-02 Field #:
9.37
Hayesville
R-02
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/ku. % Ralide. pep Raw PProont in.
Com-
posite
Date
MENEM
•
Total
'.,M
.,ENEENEEMENE
Annualeavy a al tTe oa ings a cu ate in s acre):
In
film
1 11�
1 111
fill
1 111
1 !11
1 111
! 111
1 111
1 111
1 11!
1 111
1 !ll
.• ..
KII 1!1
1 111
1 111
1 fll
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 1!1
111
• •
! 111
1 111
1 11f,
fff 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 11ism,
1
. •.
1 1
1 111
1 111
1 1 $
1 111
1 111
1 111PROM
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 1i1
1 111
1 1
1 1�1
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 11!
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
! 111
1 1�1
1 11
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 11
�-• �
1 11
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 11.
1 1
1 11!
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 !11
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 1
1 111
I 1 11i
E!11
nivir,1
ff, 111
1 111
W on1
1 111
KITIT,1
KITITI1
KIT, 11
®
1
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 !11
1 111
1 11!
1 11!
1 111
1 !11
1 111
1
,.
'••
• 1 •
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 11!
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 !11
1 111
1 111
• 1 •
.•
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
Sign ture of Land Applier
H'i-►l
Date
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

as Ii•vta 1•ail a[ V 1'iL•-" LI_P l al\" l 1 IVA_LV1t1L\1 V Vl%lVl
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name:
Permit #:
Operator:
Acres Used:
City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual):
WQ0019960 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Mario DeLuca Owner: Anna Deebold Predominant Soil Series:
16 Acres Permitted:
16
Site #: K-01
.12.05
Hayesville
Field #: K-01
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kgr, % Solids use Raw Percent #):
Com-
posite
Date
---
-
I�
on
'!
0
'�
ail
Iris
..
TotalPRIM
Phos-
phorus
Annual Heavy Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
Total
1I
L2j3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 1
Ill 1
1121
DT/Ac./
o
App.
sv
Event
0.75
y
Arsenic
0.008
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.008
Cadmium
0.003
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
Copper
0.590
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.590
Chromium
0.059
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.059
Lead
0.074
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0.00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.074
Mercury
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
Molyb-
0.011
0.000
0.000
0.000
0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.011
denum
denum
Nickel
0.032
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.600
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.032
Selenium
0.008
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.008
Zinc
1.611
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 1
0.000
0.000
1.611
Total
Phos-
35.090
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
35.090
horus
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
SiglKature of La Applier
Date
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 32.79
Permit #: WQ0019960 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Operator: Mario DeLuca Owner: Anna Deebold Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
Acres Used: 35.8 Acres Permitted: 35.8 Site #: K-02 Field #: K-02
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent #);
Com-
posite
Date 1 7/9/13
% Solids
2.47
Arsenic
5
�admium
2
Copper
392
IromiunA
39
Lead
49
Mercury
Molyb-
1.5
7
Nickel 1
21
Selenium
5
Zinc
1070
Total
Phos-
23300
Heavv Metal Field Landinue wai,�vaa+oa - nk-t,.77.
Total
DT/Ac./
App.
Event
0.92
1 4 V
1 5 -�6V
_~y
»7 v'.
1 8
9
10
11
12
Arsenic
Cadmium
0.009
0.004
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
6.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Copper
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Molyb-
denum
0.718
0.071
0.090
0.003
0.013
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
.
0000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0000
.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.006
0.000
0.0 00
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
Total
Phos-
horus
"I certify.
0.038
0,009
1.960
42.686
under nenalty
0.0.00
0.000
0.000
0.000
of
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
law tha++h;.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
,a,,,,,,...
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.009
0.004
0.718
0.071
0.090
0.003
0.013
0.038
0.009
1.960
42.686
r--t,..-- u.,uu, „ly wi-ection or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
Signature of Lan Applier Date
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED
FOR EACH FIELD
APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Marion
WQ Permit #: WQ0019960 Field #: R-01
Land Owner: Nancy Ross
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 22.8143
Acres Utilized: 19.4
Site # R-01
Acres Permitted: 19.4
Operator: Nancy Ross
Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 1 Name:
Fescue
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 Crop 2 Name: Crop 2 Max. PAN:
o Volume applied
Volume
Residual Sources Soil Precip. Y c Z Nitrate
/o.
y o(enter one) Solids/ o
Applied per
Cond. a
(NPDES #, WQ#, Past 24 o �' w :° TgN o
Name of CropType
PAN Applied
Liquid Solids
Acre
and
(Dry, o �" o o
Fert., Animal Hrs. o
lbs/acre Receiving Residual
( )
Q
Cu. Yds Gallons
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Waste, etc Wet, o * �'. w Nitrite
) o
Application
8-2013 221500 2.47
1.176
Moist inches 0 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
WQ0019960 dry 0
Crop 1 Crop 2 Crop 1 Crop 2
0.000
s 0.5 0.3 66400 15800 2
54.289 NA Fescue
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0:000 0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0;000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM FSF
0.000 0:000
.OTALS: 01 221500
As
supp to this form):
Cd I Cu Cr Pb H Mo Ni Se
knnuallbs/acre
0.012
Zn P
0.005 0.922. 0.092 0.115 0.004°, 0.016 0.049 0.012 2.517 54.802
54 289 0.000 Lime A lied
'rior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0.052
. �
0.038' 6.801 1.256 1.088 0.046 1.185 0.446 0.09 17:083
Date lbs/ac
12-2013
:urrent Cumulative lbs/ac
0.064 if
0.043 7.723 1.3481 1.203 . 0.050 1.201 0.495 V 0.102 19.600
1000
'ermitted C. P. L. R.****
36
34 NA 1338 2 77 15 1 NA 374 1 89 2498
'ermit PAN Limit lst/2nd Crop
. _.. _ . -- 202
certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
lualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
nformation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKEA COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Marion
Land Owner: Nancy Ross
Operator: Nancy Ross
Crop 1 Name: Fescue
WQ Permit #: WQ0019960 Field #: R-02 Acres Utilized: 22.9
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 9.3729 Site #: R-02 Acres Permitted: 22.9
Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 Crop 2 Name:
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
o Y
Y o
Q
Volume applied
PP
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
%
Solids
Volume
Applied per
PP P
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond.
D
( ry,
Wet,
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
"o
4 ,t,
N
"
a
* p
o
� w
�'
CD
o
0
0
� �
�'
`D
*
0
TICN
mg/kg
Z
�
o
°
w.
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
lbs/acre
( )
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
8-2013
91000
2.47
0.409
WQ0019960
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
66400
15800
2
18.895
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals
on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM
FSF supp to this form):.
oTALS:
o
. 9100o
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
18.895
0.000
Lime A lied
�nnuallbs/acre
0.004
0.034
0.038
36
0.002
0.035
0.037
34
0.321
6.16
6.481
NA
0.03,2
0.246
0.278
1338
0.040
0.756'
0.796
267
0.001
0.325
0.326
15
0.006
0.709
0.715
NA
0.017
0.337
0.354 .
374
6.004.
0.053
0.057
89
0.875
13.8749
14.750
2498
19.059
00
Date
lbs/ac
'rior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
;urrent Cumulative lbs/ac
'ermitted C. P. L. R.****
'ermit PAN Limit lst/2nd Crop
202
'I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
lualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
nformation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
of Land Applier
1- 3 s_P
Date
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Marion WQ Permit #: WQ0019960 Field #: K 01 Acres Utilized: 16
Land Owner: Anna Deebold
Operator: Mario DeLuca
Crop 1 Name:
Fescue
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 12.0509
Site #: K-01
Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 Crop 2 Name:
Acres Permitted: 16
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
° Y
° °
Q
Volume applied
enter one Solids/
( )
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
u
/o
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Fert• Animal
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond.
(Dry,
Wei
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
Y
o w
a
o
o
w
K'
# M
�
7y
w'
0
TKN
mg/kg
Z
o
CD �
� w•
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
pp
(lbs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
8-2013
117000
2.47
0.753
WQ0019960
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
66400
15800
2
34.770
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM
FSF supp to this form):
MAU:'
0
1lz000
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
34.77
0.000
Lime Applied
knnuallbs/acre
0.008
0.003
0.590
0.059
0.074
6.002
0.011
0.032
0.008'
1.611
35.090
Date
lbs/ac
'rior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0.153
0.161 7
36
0.111
0.114 V
34
16.475
17.065
NA
0.881
0.940 V
1338
2.141
2.215
267
0.1
0.102
15
2.431
2.442 v
NA
oe 0.983
1.015
374
0.237
0.245
89
37.638
39.2491
2498
. _..
12-2013
2000 1
;urrent Cumulative lbs/ac
'ermitted C. P. L. R.****
'ermit PAN Limit 1 st/2nd Crop
_
202
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
lualified personnel properly gathered :and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
nformation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature of Land Applier
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Date
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: City of Marion
WQ Permit #: WQ0019960 Field #: K-02
Acres Utilized: 35.8
Land Owner: Anna Deebold
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 32.8052 Site #: K-02
Acres Permitted: 35.8
Operator: Mario DeLuca
Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 1 Name:
Fescue
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 Crop 2 Name: Crop 2 Max. PAN:
.
Volume applied
o= (enter one) Solids/ %
s~
Volume
Applied per
PP � P
Residual Sources Soil Preci C
Cond. P• Y o 0 Z Nitrate
#, Past � �
Name of Crop Type
PAN Applied p yp
a�
Liquid Solids
Acre
(NPDES WQ#, 24 � ?� w �;
(Dry, o' cc >v TKN oov o and
Fert., Animal Hrs. �'
Receiving Residual
Ibs/acre )
Q
Cu. Yds G8110nS
o w cc
Waste, etc) Wet ° M o w o �, Nitrite
Application
8-2013
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Moist) inches o 0 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Crop 1 Crop 2 Crop 1 Crop 2
318500 2.47
0.916
WQ0019960 dry 0 s 0.5 0.3 66400 15800 2
42.302 NA Fescue
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM FSF supp to this form):
['OTALS: 01 318500 _
As
Cd Cu Cr I Pb Hg Mo Ni Se Zn P
42.3 2 0 000 Lime Applied
Annuallbs/acre
0.009
0.004 0.718 0.071 0.090 0.003 0.013 0.038 0.009 1.960 42.686
Date lbs/ac
?rior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0.15
0.113 16.952 0.926 2.2 0.102 2.439 1.004 0.234 37.954
�urrent Cumulative lbs/ac
0.159 ,/
0.117• 17. 770 0.997 2.290 0.105 2.452 1.042 0.243 39.914
12-2013 2000
'ermitted C. P. L. R.****
36
34-1 NA 1338 267 15 NA 374 89 2498
'ermit PAN Limit l st/2nd Crop
202
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designedto assure that
lualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
nformation, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
�- 31l i`f17-**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation -1.0
Signature of Land ApPlien Date *** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobiall digested -0.2
,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R-: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

SAR
Sodium Absorption Ratio
Na: Sodium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 23
Ca: Calcium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 20
Mg : Magnesium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 12
Milli Equivalent = Mg/L / Equivalent weight
Na(M. /L) Ca M /L M M /L
58.786 1 353.21 1 125.476
Na ME
Ca ME
Mg (ME)
2.555913
17.6605
1 10.45633
SAR= Na Milli Equivalent/[0.5 X (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli equivalent)]0.5 power
SAR = 0.681676 (From Mg/L entered above) o%
SAR= 0.6r30181 (From ME entered below)
Na ME
Ca ME
1
2.55
17.66
10.45
The amour
amount of E
Permitting I

PAN
Mineralization as decimal T®tal dry Acres
Rate TKN NH3 N®3=h—NLO-2 % Solids tons/veer A flied on
0.3 66400 15800 2 0.0247 77.04 94.1
PAN Surface
23082 snaglkg
46.164 lbs/dry ton
/
3556.475
Ibs total PAN
/
37.79463
Ibs PAN/acre
"`✓✓✓
PAN Injection
30982 m9/kg
61.964 Ibs/dry toss
4773.707
ibs total PAN
50.73014 Ibs PAN/acre
Dry Tons/1000 gal.
0.102999
1st year PAN
Ibs./acre
Surface lbs.
Surface
3556.474561
37.79462869
1st year PAN
Ibs./acre
Injected Ibs.
Injected
4773.70656
50.7301441
MR(TKN-NH3)+ + .5(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton
MR(TKN-NH3) + l(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
Mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton
1000 X 8.34 X %solids X sp. gravity "=dry tons/1000gal."
2000

Page: 1 of 2
Report Number: 13-196-0208 Y
Account Number: 46381 �7Yf■I &L Eastern Lai�orato;ies, Iif?C.
Submitted By: ZACH KEY
7621 Whitepine Road Richmond, Virginia 23237 [phone] Fax [phone]
`�
www.aieastern.com
Send To: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS Project :'r,MARION WWTP
D.ENNIS KEY
958 HOOTS ROAD
rNC CERT#257
ROARING RIVER, NC 28669
Lab Number: 94605 REPORT OFANALNSIS Date Sampled: 7/9/2013 14:05:00
Sample IdI: MARIONfWWTP
Date Received: 07/15/2013, 00:00
Date Reported: 07/18/2013.
Total Solids *
2.47
ry247.00
1Q'0.0
BW
07/15/201314:15
Moisture '
97.53
100.0
BW
07/15/2013 14:15
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
6.64
66400
10.0
Total Phosphorus
JM
07/16/2013 08:24
Total Potassium
2.33
23300
100
i!KM
07/17/2013 13:31
Total Sulfur
0.68
6760
100
'KM
07/17/2013 13:31
Total Total Calcium
0.86
8620
100
XM
07/17/2013 13:31
Total Magnesium
1.43
143.00
100
KM
07/17/2013 1:3:31
Total Sodium
0.51
5080
100
NKM
07/17/2013 13:31
Total
0.24
2380
100
KM
07/17/2013 13:31
Total Aluminum
19100
100
i1KM
07/17/2013 13:31
Total Manganese
21800
100
.KM
07/17/2013 13:31
Total Copper
298
5
•KM
07/17/2013 13:31
Total Zinc
392
5
iXM
07/17/2013 13:31
Ammonia Nitrogen
1070
5
hKM
07/171201313:31
Organic N
1.58
15800
10.0
JM
07/16/2013 08.24
5.06
50600
110.0
07/16/2013 d'8:24
Nitrate+Nitrite-N
<2.00
2.00
JM
07/16/2013 08:25
Total Cadmium
2.0
2.0
jKM
07/17/2013 13:31
All values are on a dry weight basis except as noted by asterisk. Detection limit on all N series is on.a wetrbasis.
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or pan. nor may any reference be made
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, neivs release. or otherpubltc annot:ncements �'Iiftut obtaining our prior mtien authorization.
Debbie Holt
SM42540G
SM-2540G
SM-4500-NH3C-TKN
SW 601.OG
SW 601 OC
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW 601 OC
SW 6010C
SW 601 OC
SW 6010C
SW 601 OC
SW 6010C
SW 601 OC
SM-4500-NH3C
CALCULATION
SM-450ONO3F
SW 601 OC

Page: 2 of 2
Report Number: 13-196-0208 v
Account Number: 46381 A &L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
Submitted By: ZACH KEY
7821 Whitepine Road Richmond, Virginia 23237 [phone] Fax [phone] e
`�
www.aleastem.com
Send iro: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS Project : MARION WWTP
DENNIS KEY
958 HOOTS ROAD
NC CERT#257
ROARING RIVER, NC 28669
Lab Number: 94005 REPORT O'FANALYSIS Date Sampled: 7/9/2013 14:05:00
Sample Id!: MARION WWTP
Date Received: 07/15/2013.00:00
Date Reported: 07/18/2013-
Total Chromium
39,
5
Total Nickel
:'.KM
07/17/2013 1:3:31
Total Lead
21
5
!KM
07/17/20131'3:31
Total Arsenic
49�
5
IKM
07/17/2013 1:3:31
Total Mercury
5.0
3.0
{KM
07/17/20131,3:31
Total Selenium
.5
1.5
0GA�KM
07/17/2013 1'0:00
PH (Standard Units) *
7.40
5.0
iKM
07/17/20131:3:31
Total Molybdenum
2-00
.JM
07/16/2013 08:24
7
5
iKM
07/17/2013 13 31
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW 6010C
SW-7471 B
SW 6010C
SW-9045D
Comments: SW 6010C
SULFUR AND OROANIG NITROGEN NOT FORiCOMPLIANCE PURPOSES.
QUALIFIER: THEILRB WAS OUT OF LIMITS FOR "Ni". THE MATRIX SPIKE WAS OUT OF LIMITS FOR "Al": ALL OTHER QC: DATA IS ACCEPTABLE.
All values are on a dry weight basis except as noted by asterisk. Detection limit on all N series is on,a wet[basis.
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or part, nor may any reference .he made
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, nevvs release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization.
Debbie Holt

Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Mari'
Collection date: 19-Mar-13
Date received: 19-Mar-13
Sample identification: CC Sludge #1-:Grab
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: (828) 3M-9368
Project number: 120319.510
Sample number: 104178
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS :SM 2540 G 3.0 0.10 % 19-Mar-13 JLB
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure 'SM 9221-E 69000' ] 5.4 MPN 19 Mar 13 KEK
Sample identification: CC Sludge #2 -Grab Sample number: 104179
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
/01 J SM 2540 G 3 0 0.10 % 19-Mar-13 JLB
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure 1SM 9221-E 990001 5.4 MPN 19-Mar 13 KEK
Sample identification:
CC Sludge #3 .Grab
Sample number: 104180
Parameter
Method
Date
Result RL Units Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS ' SM 2540 G
Mulitple Tube
3.0 0.10 % 19-Mar-13 JLB
Fermentation
Procedure SM 92ZJ-E
69000 5.4 MPN 19-Mar-13 KEK
Sample identification:
CC Sludge #4 Grab
Sample number: 104181
Parameter Method' Result RL Unit DateAnalyst Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS ` SM 2540 G 3.0 0.10 % 19-Mar-13 JLB
Muli le Tube Fermentation p oceduie . SM 9221-E 47000 5.4 MPN 19-Mar-13 KEK
1 -
Footnotes:
a -
RL = Reporting Unit.. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit ony.
Date reviewed: Q3 .Z'13 ' NC Certification Number: 600
Data reviewed by:; Kelley'- an ; SC Certification Number: 99053
Signature:
NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

v�r0
Rpe. �+�� `•`� � :off. r��
Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Marion WWTP
Collection date: 26-Mar-13 ,
Date received: 26-Mar-13
Sample identification: CC Sludge #5 - Grab
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number: 130326.511
Sample number: 104346
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS SM 2540 G 3.2 0.10 % 26-Mar-13 JLB
Mulitple. Tube Fermentation Procedure ' SM 9221-E 3600 5.8 MPN 26-Mar-13 KEK
Sample identification:'
CC Sludge #6 -'Grab.
Sample number:
.104347
Parameter
Method
Result
RL
Units
Date Analyst
Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS
SM 2540 G
3.1
0.10
%
26-Mar-13 JLB
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure SM 9221-E
1300
5.6
MPN
26-Mar-13 KEK
Sample identification:
CC Sludge 47 Grab
Sample number:
10.4348
Parameter
Method
Result
RL
Units
Date Analyst
Footnotes
Analyzed
%TS
SM 2540, G
.10
%
26-Mar-13 JLB
Mulitple Tube Fermentation Procedure SM 9221-E
/35200
5.8
MPN
26-Mar-13 KEK
Footnotes: i
RL Reporting Limit.. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
Date reviewed:
Data reviewed by:
Signature:
oar
NC Certification Number: 600
SC Certification Number: 99053
NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
report should not be reproduced, exeptin its entirety, without the written consent of Environmei
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name
Biosolids Permit Number
5/3
Digester Temperature; , . 20
- Sampling Date/Time: 5l31:/43 _ 0945.
Sam p led. B _ Ite-
Analysis Date/Time; 5/3:1/13_1121_-_.
Analyzed By; R,-Carter.
MPI
milliliters.
_.
-:o-Dfy-Solids—
Beginning Temperature _ . 25 degrees Celsius
- ._.
Temperaturex - 25 degrees Celsius
Time Dissolved.Oxj gen .Level:.::
(mwnutes) - -
0 7.83
1 7.64
2 7.39
3 6.-9
4 6.4
5 6.22
6 5.64
5.37
8 5.02
_ 9., . 4.77
10 4.36
11 4.1
12 3.93
13 3.76
14 3.51
15 �q
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 7.8
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 19.12 mg.Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 2.22 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature. Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.74 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Cor enin Creek
'. WQ 0019960
6/4/2013
21
:6/4/13 0917
_ 6/-4/1�3 'ID22:. -
R:-_Carter_ ... _..- __--
.1:000
._ 25 i
25 'i
Time Dissolved Oxygen Level
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
Facility Name
Biosolids Permit Number
Date
Digester Temperature
Sampling Date/Time
.- Sampled B�-
Analysis Pate/Time:
Analyzed By:
Beginning_Temp_erature
End:Temp rature:
Slope: . 0.3
Intercept: 7.8
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
milliliters--
'_
lWee's Celsius
legrees. Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 15.59 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.73 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor. 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:1 1.361 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Cor enin Creek
Biosolids Permit Number:
WQ 0019960
Date:
6/5/2013
Digester Temperature:
20
_...._.... _.._ ...._ ...
Sampling Date/Time:
6/5/201'3 0950
- _Sampled_
-..
-
Analysis. Date/Time
6/5113 1113
Analyzed By
- -- —
-Sam- PIL-VoluFxi---1000
milliliters
I-Sold.:olids
Beginning -Temperature:
- 25
degrees Celsius
-_., End --Temperature,
-_°.__ :._ __ ._.25
degrees Celsius
Time
Dissolv.e.d -Oxygen Level.
m-71 -
0
7:69
.
1
7.57
2
7.32
3
T: -
4
6.74
5
6.45
._
6
6.17
.
.7
5.89
-
8
5.6
9
5.-32
10
5.03
11
4.72
12
4.44
13
4.13
14
3.85
15
. R�
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 7.8
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 17.03 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.85 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.45 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Corpening Creek
Biosolids Permit Number: WQ 0019960
Date: 6/6/2013
Digester Temperature:::21
Sarimpling Date/Time 6/6/2013 ' 0926
=--
Analysis DateMine.; 6/.6/ _3_L' 5
:..Analyzed; By R- Carter - - - ......-.._
- sample-t/olunm milliliters
z: T T©taf Sol#d. r _, _ %�flfids�..—
.
Beginning Temperature:: 25 degrees Celsius
End:=Tem stature: ` -=5 degrees Celsius
P:
lime:. Dissolved Oxygen. Level, _ - -
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Slope: 0.2
Intercept: 7.9
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 12.92 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.85 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.461 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name
Biosolids Permit Number
Date
Digester Temperature
_.__. —.... ...-. Sampling Date/Time
— --.—._ ...... Sample .8
Analysis Date/Time.
-- Analyzed'By
y.. - � - Begi'nnmg�Temperature
- End_Iernperature
Time. Dissolved .Oxygen l.Ivel
(minutes) M /l
0 7.1
1 7.&
2 7.3�
3 7M
4 6.8�
5 6:5F
6 6.31
7 6.04
8 5.77
9 5.r
10 5.23
11 4.96
12 4.69
13 4.41
14 4.12
15 3.85
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
Corpening
e
Creek
WQ 0019960
./7/2013
20
W12.01:3:.
0830.
6%7/20`13
1008-
f' : Carter
-
=
1000 i
0.3
7.9
1.0
milliliters
logrees Celsius
Iegrees.Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 16.07 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.91 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
- Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 11.50 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Corpening Creek
Bi0solids Permit Number: WQ 0019960
Date: 6/24./2013
Digester Temperature::. 22
Sampling Date/Time: 6/24/13 0944 -
- SampledBy; LeeEtes_______:
Analysis Date/Time: 6/24/.-13----1-1-1:6-.—
Analyzed By: R.:Carter.:-,_
-----Sampte Volume. _---rQ00 milliliters
Beginning Temperature.
g g p erature:
25 degrees Celsius
-End-Tem erature::--:
- p 25 degrees -Celsius
Time. Dissolved Oxygen: Level
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
---9--.. .
10
11
12
13
14
15
Slope: 0.2
Intercept: 7.3
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 11.34 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.38 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.08 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.
r

Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:lCorpening Creei
Biosolids Permit Number WQ 0019960
Date: 4/30/2013
Digester Temperature:: -:- 17
Sampling Date/Time: 4/30/13--- 0815
SampledByLeetes
Analysis Date/Time 1/30/1.3=-0935_
_.Analyzed. By.- R-. Carter
�Qtal;�lisjn. -
:.-
eginning.Temperatuce;
End;'1'emperature
- == -25 c
Time _.
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
_ .... 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
milliliters
degrees Celsius
Slope: 0.2
Intercept: 7.6
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 14.96 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 2.00 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
-Temperature- Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.56 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone].
' Fax: [phone]
Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Marion WWTP
Collection date: 22-May-13
Date received: 22-May-13
Sample identification: CC Sludge - Grab
Project number:
Sample number:
130522.510
106011
Parameter
Method
Result
RL
Units
Date
Analyst
Footnotes
Analyzed
Percent Solids
SM 2540 G
2.70
0.100
%
4-Jun-13
CGP
1
Mercury
7471B
1.3
0.73
mg/kg
24-May-13
BGM
1
Aluminum
6010C
16000
92
mg/kg
29-May-13
BGM
1
Arsenic
6010C
<9.1
9.2
mg/kg
29-May-13
BGM
1'
Cadmium
6010C
<9.2
9.2
mg/kg
29-May-13
BGM
1
Calcium
6010C
15000
370
mg/kg
29-May-13
BGM
1
Copper
6010C
370
18
mg/kg
29-May-13
BGM
1
Lead
.6010C
55
9.2
mg/kg
31-May-13
BGM
1
Magnesium
6010C
4800
92
mg/kg
29-May-13
BGM
1
Molybdenum
6010C
<18
18
mg/kg
29-May-13
BGM
1
Nickel
6010C
<37
37
mg/kg
29-May-13
BGM
1
Potassium
6010C
7100
460
mg/kg
29-May.13
BGM
1
Selenium
6010C
<18
18
mg/kg.
29-May-13
BGM
1
Sodium
6010C
2300
460
mg/kg
29-May-13
BGM
1
Zinc
6010C
870
92
mg/kg
29-May-ia
BGM
1
Nitrate + Nitrite
SM 4500 NO3 F
300
190
mg/kg
3-Jun-13
CLB
1
Total Phosphorus
SM 4500 P F
18000
3700
mg/kg
1-Jun-13
CLB
1
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
351.2
57000
19000
mg/kg
4-Jun-13
CLB
1
Total Nitrogen
Calculation
57000
19000
mg/kg
4-Jun.13
CLB
1
Ammonia Nitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 D
1500.
110
mg/kg
24-May-13
KEK
Percent Solids
SM 2540 G
3.5
%
22-May-13
JLB
pH in Liquid
SW 846 9045C
6.3
S.U.
22-May-13
JLB
Reactive Cyanide
335.4
<0.120
0.120
mg/kg
4-Jun-13
ECHEM
2
Reactive Sulfide
SM 4500 S D
<0.241
0.241
mg/kg
31-May-13
ECHEM
2
Flashpoint
SW 846 1010�166�60
212
°F
31-May-13
ECHEM
2
N-PAV
Calculation
7-run-13
KEK
Sodium Abso tion Rate
Calculation
7-Jun-13
KEK
Footnotes:
RL = Reportinglimit.. Values are reported d6y'
1. Sample anal zed -by Prism Laboratories, Inc.
2.: Analyzed byEnvird :Chemists, Inc.
Date reviewed:. C(O.0
Data reviewed by: Kell'ey_'K Keenan
Signature:
555 R /
10
to the Reporting Limit only.
NC Certification Number: 600
SC Certification Number: 99053
NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
e.reproaucea, exept. in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmet
The'results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for anglysis.

J ., j _ ...- _ _____- -. ---- , --i- yy yy� %� JLJL""% 1.<1u11U\.11V1I 1'V1<1v1 kVG1 nules)
Facility Name: City of Marion WQ Permit Number:
WWTP Name: City of Marion NPDES Number:
Monitoring Period: From 1/1/2013 To 12/31/2013
WQ0019960
NCO031879
Pathogen- Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1106) -Please indicate level achieved and alternative e f d•
Class A:
Alt. A (time/temp) ❑
I Alt B (Alk Treatment) ❑
p r orme
Alt. C (Prior Testing)PE-1d
.
Alt.D (No Prior Test) ElProcess
to Further Reduce Pathogeng
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Compost ❑
Heat Drying ❑
Heat Treatment ❑
Thermophilic ❑
Beta Ray ❑
Gamma Rav ❑
Pasteurization ❑
:.:.............................
Class B:
Alt. (1) Fecal Density v❑
Alt. (2) Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class
B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization ❑
Air Drying ®
Composting ❑
Aerobic Digestion
Anaerobic
brc Digestion e ti
g s on
............
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring
data:
Parameter
Allowable Level
in Sludge
Pathogen Density
Number o
Excee-
e c
Frequency
of Analysis
ysis
Sample
T e
Type
a ytica
Tech-
n' e
Minim
Geo. Mean
axim
Units
Fecal Coliform
2
2 x 10 to the
6th power
per gram of
total solids
MpN
35200
73561.22
147000
MPN/ g
0
7
grab
sm9221 e
CFU
1000 mpn per gram
of total solid (dry
weight)
Salmonella bacteria
(in lieu of fecal
coliform)
ZT--4--. ♦ --__ _
3 WN per 4 grams
total solid (dry
weight)
T _ 1_
v CUw[ r'Kuracu011 lceuuenun (13A 1rl;AU ULl .11U•/ ) - Please indicate alternative nerfarmod-
Alt.1 (VS reduction) [j
Alt. 2 (40-day bench) ®
Alt. 3 (30-day bench) ❑
Alt. 4 (Spec. 02 uptake) R1
Alt. 5 (14-Day Aerobic) ❑
Alt. 6 (Alk. Stabilization ❑
Alt 7 (Drying - Stable) ®
Alt. 8 (Drying - Unstable) ❑
Alt. 9 (Injection) ❑
Alt. 10 (Incorporation) ❑
No vector attraction reduction alternatives were performed ❑
l.r tC1-tV.t Al1UrN S AlEN E1NT (please check the appropriate statement)
R1 "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have been met."
❑ "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have not been met." (Please note
if you check this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the
requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system
designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine
that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
LA-i ALI %'A�L)— %�"OCA, ;,mot I,JU-170 Dennis Key Southern Soil Builders, Inc.
Preparer Name and Title (type or print) Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print)
Si afore of Preparer* Date Sign ure of L d Applier (if applicable) Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .l 102 (26)
DENR FORM PVRF 02T (12/2006)

Page 2 of 2
Report Number: 13-343-0627
Account Number: 46381
Send To: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS
DENNIS KEY
958 HOOTS ROAD
ROARING RIVER NC 28669
a
A&L Eastern Laboratories
7621 Whltepine Road Richmond, Virginia 23237 (804) 74M401 Fax [phone]
e
www.aleastem.com
Grower: Submitted By: ZACH KEY
SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS Farm ID:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT Analytical Method(s):
Date Received: 12/09/2013 Date Of Analysis: 12/10/2013 Date Of Report: 12/1n/2n1s Mehlich 3
Sample ID
Lab
Organic
Matter
Phosphorus
Potassium
Magnesium
Calcium
Sodium
pH
Acidity
C.E.0
Field ID
Number
% Rate ENR
Mehlich 3
Reserve
K
Mg
Ca
Na
Soil
Buffer
H
Ibs/A
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm
Rate
ppm
Rate
ppm Rate
pH
Index
meq/100g
meq/100g
F4
21770
4.4
M 129
166 VH
69 L
157
H
757
M
23 VL
NC = 138
NC = 35
5.9
6.82
1.1
6.5
R-01
21771
5.6
H 150
197 VH
71�36
H
761
L
29 VL
NC = 164
N
5.2
6.64
2.9
8.5
R-02
21772
4.9
M 140
78 H
24 VL
163
H
697
M
21
VL
NC=65
NC=12
6.1
�685����
K01
21773
6.1
H 150
215 VH
95 M
121
M
523
L
31
VL
NC = 179
NC = 49
4.9
6.62
3.1
7.1
K02
I62
21774
6.4
H 150
158 VH
j
L
94
M
VL
25
VL
NC =132
NC = 32
1408
4.5
6.50
4.3
7.4
Sample ID
Percent Base Saturation
Nitrate
Sulfur
Zinc
Manganese
Iron
Copper
Boron
soluble salts
Chloride
Aluminum
Fed ID
K
ova
Mg
Ca
Na
H
NO3N
S
Zn
Mn
Fe
Cu
B
SS
Cl
Al
%
%
%
%
ppm Rate ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm
Rate
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ms/cm
Rate
ppm Rate
ppm
F4
2.7
20.1
58.2
1.5
17.1
15 L
18.0 VH
23 H
217
VH
8.5 VH
1.1 M
NC=31
NC=450.0
NC=144
NC=425.0
R-01
2.1
17.2
44.8
1.5
34.0
20 M
23.9 VH
19 M
249
VH
7.7 VH
1.1 M
NC = 42
NC = 597.5
NC = 119
NC = 385.0
R-02
23.4
60.1
1.6
13.7NC=27
13 L
7.7 H
10 M
166
VT84
VH
0.1 VL
NC = 192.5
NC = 63
420.0
K01
3.4
14.2
36.8
1.9
44.1
T
H
29.6 VH
26 H
125
VH
6.8 VH
M
NC = 56
NC = 740.0
NC = 163
10:9
NC = 340.0
K02
2.1
10.6
27.6
1.5
57.9
24 M 118.0
VH
22 H
107
VH
6.1 VH
NC = 50
NC = 450.0
NC = 138
NC = 305.0
soil. Rating after each value: VL (Very Low), L (Low), M (Medium),
H (High), VH (Very High). ENR - Estimated Nitrogen Release.
C.E.C. - Cation Exchange Capacity.
-^r•�� �•-••�� �-r11-1- 'o %P-Uoi iy, ppJ n tpaI L5 per munon), IDS/H This report applies to sample(s) tested. Samples are retained a
(pounds per acre), ms/cm (milli -mhos per centimeter), meq/100g maximum of thirty days after testing. I�
(milli -equivalent per 100 grams). Conversions: ppm x 2 = Ibs/A, Soluble by. ? Wc.
Salts ms/cm x 640 = ppm. Analysis prepared by: A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc. m G
Pauric McGroary

TOW
rUIIa:lie; :;y SOP
e13�1�y
1.. Annual Land Application Certification Form
• Was a certification form submitted?. Ye-5
• .Was lard application conducted during the reported year?
ves-
t.
Ho;v rrami dry tons and dry tans per acre were applied? 77..aq
• Were the applications within the pe=itted amount?-y p-f
• Verify PAN if more than 10 tons/acre
• Did it indicate compliance?, y�e,5
Was it signed by the appropriate peopte?, i e,5
2. iYTonitoring
• Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency? ; l(�e-S
• Were the metals analyses reported:on the Residual Sampling Summary Form? �I
• Were the results reported in mg/kg? YES
• . - Were the heavy metals within ceiling concentration permit limits?*e.S
• If no, were the lab analyses attached?
• Were all the required parameters tested? yeS
• Was TCLP analysis conducted`�.,,��,.;-F �r'� u,�•W � �� �����,I � � ��
3. °Field Summary
• Were the land application. events recorded on the Field Summary Forms?,r4, C�
• Was a Field Summary Form submitted for each -field? �-0-5
• Were all the residuals applied to permitted land?a y25' .
• Were all the residuals applied from permitted sources?,y��
• Were the field Loading rates for each metal and PAN calculated (year to date)?.y
• Were the cumulative pollutant loading rates calculated?,y eS' y
• Were the calculations correct?. ye-5
• Were the PAN loading rates -within permit limits? J�-S
• Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits? ye-5
• Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop?,� S
• Were the applications conducted during the crop's growing season?ye.s
• Were the Field Summary Forms complete?,Y.63'
4. Pathogen and Vectbr Attraction Reduction
• Was a signed copy of the Pathc en and Vector Attraction R�ection Form subrn tted 11
• Did the form indreauction
he period of covirage,-the residual ass, and the pathogen reduction pl.r.Ldative and the
vector attraction option used'?
•. Was the appr Hate documentation to show pathogen and vector attraction reduction included in the report?
• Was patho en and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503'?. -
•
5. Soil Tests'
• Was a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis conducted for each'apvlication field? _
• Were the soil pH's 6.0 or greater for each application. field? �60-� 1` 2 i{ _ 1= 'ci bz-'}"
• Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil less than 300U for each application field?, •� o.
6. General'
• Was the report in t,►e proper format? `t,S
• Were, any parts of the annual report rhisblag?
• Was the report submitted on time?
* Any violations of ceiling concentrations should be ieporttd to.*Pretreatment for.-Aiunicipalities. only.

Class B Pathogen Review
Alternative 1- Fecal Coliform Densitv
r' Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency? )l e1
Were seven samples taken? Vf,'
-` Was the geometric mean calculated and done correctly?
Did the results show compliance (less than either 2,000 0 N/gram of total solids or 2,000,000
Colony Forming Units/gram of total solids) y t5
•
Alternative 2 - Use of Process to Significantly Reduce Patho ens (one of five,
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
Aerobic Di estion
• Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
• Was the time and temperature between 40 days at 20°C (68T) and 60 days at 150C (590F)?
Air Drying
• Were residuals on sand beds or pave or unpaved basins for three months?
• Was the.ambient.temperature above 0°C (32T) for two months?
• Were the residuals partially digested?
• Were residuals exposed to atmosphere during two months above 0°C (not snow covered)?
Anaerobic Di estion
• Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
• Was the time and temperature between 15 days at 35°C (95T) to 55°C (13 PF) and 60 days at 20°C
(68-F)?
Composting
• Was it a. composting procedure (not natural decay'under uricontrolled conditions)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the temperature raised to 40°C (104T) or higher and remained at 40°C (1040F) for five days?
• Did the temperature exceed 55°C (13 PF) for four hours during the five-day period?
Lime Stabilization
• Was alkaline material added to residuals a form of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime containing
kiln dust or fly ash)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the pH raised to 12 after two hours of contact?
• Were logs submitted showing time and pH?
• Was the temperature corrected to 25°C (77°F)?

Vector Attraction Reduction Review
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
38% Volatile Solids Reduction
• Was there 38% reduction?
• Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
• Was the samples taken at beginning of the residuals treatment process and before
application (Inspection)?
• Were calculations correct?
40-Dav Bench Scale Test
• Were residuals from anaerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were residuals anaerobically digested in lab?
• Was the test run for 40 days?
• Was the test done between 306C (86T) and 37°C
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total s
• Was the reduction less than 17%?
• Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
• Were calculations correct?
30-DU Bench Scale Test
• Were residuals from aerobically digested tr
• Were residuals aerobically digested in lab?
• Were residuals 2% or less total solids?
• Was the test run for 30 days?
• Was the test done at 200C (680F)?
Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solid
Was the reduction less than 15%? 1
Ih1 a
1��4 u D
Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
Were calculations correct? (Van Kleeck or mass balance)
t�5 O�Ro
M% ks I
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate (SOUR)
t-o- Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)? ye—S
Were residuals 2% or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted)?- e-S
Was the test done between 10°C (50T) and 30°C (86117)?
-•Was the temperature corrected to 20°C (681F)?`� 5
t-01�Was the SOUR equal to or less than 1.5 mg of ox gen per hour per gram of total residual
solids (dry weight basis)? `S�3/ 1,-4 y73D 56P ��
as the sample holding time under two hours? �IP—S
Was the test started withinl5 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained? �f

i
14-Day Aerobic Process
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were the residuals treated for 14 days?
• Was the residuals temperature higher than 40°C (104°F) for the 14-day period?
• Was the average residuals temperature higher than 45°C (113°F)?
Alkaline Stabilization
• Was the pH of the residuals raised to 12 or higher by the addition of alkali?
• Did the pH of residuals remain at 12 or higher for two hours without the addition
of more alkali?
• Did the pH of residuals remain at 11.5 or higher for an additional twenty-two
hours without the addition of more alkali?
• Was the pH corrected to 25°C (77°F)?
DnLma of Stabilized Residuals
• ' Does the residuals contain any unstabilized residuals?
• . Were'the residuals mixed with any other materials?
• Were the residuals dried to 75% total solids?
Drag of Unstabilized Residuals
Were the, residuals. mixed with any other materials?
• Were the residuals dried to 90% total solids?
Injection
• Was there any significant amount of residuals on land surface one hour after
injection (Inspection)?
• Was injection done on pasture or hay field?
• Was injection done at time that crop was growing?
• If Class A with respect to pathogen, were residuals injected within eight hours
after discharge from pathogen treatment?
Incorporation
• Were the residuals incorporated into the soil within six hours after application
(Class B)?
• Was incorporation done on pasture or hay field?
• Was incorporation done at time that crop was growing?
• If Class A with respect to pathogen, were residuals incorporated within eight
hours after discharge from pathogen treatment?