WQ0019960_Annual Report_20100219

Cc,, E �j rE Du
MAR 0 251
O'MCe
CITY OF MARION, NC
2009 ANNUAL REPORT
Land Application Program
NC Permit No. WQOO 19960
RECE�YFD
FEB 1 9 2010
khl".. I - - I i,-)iq
- -
11-1f0m, uriii

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM .
WQ Permit#- WQ0019960' County:
Facility Name (as shown on permit):
McDowell
City of Marion
Year: 2009
Land Application Operator:, Southern Soil Builders, Inc. Phone: [phone]
Land applidation of residuals as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year?
❑ Yes ❑ No - If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to Part C. Also, If residuals were
generated bot not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A - Residuals Application Summary:
Total number of application fields in the permit:1
8
Total number of fields utilized for land application during the year:
2
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites:
112.82
Total number of acres utilizes for land application during the year:
51.8
Part B - Annual Compiance Statement:
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2009 with all conditions of the land application permit
(including bpt not limited tolsems 1-13 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality. Yes ❑ No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corrgctive action
taken.
1) Only resjduals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2) Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at least 6.0 or
the limit specified in the permit.
3) Annual sails analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies
of laboratory results are attached.
4) Annual TCLP analysis (if -required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5) All other'monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3)
copiel of -certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .l 105(a) or the Pollutant
LoacUng)Ratgs in 15A NCAC 02T .l 105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7) All general requirements it as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All monitoring and reporting.requirements in 15A NCAC 02T. I 1 1 1 were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503
regulated. facilities).
9) All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality.
10) No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
1 1) Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receing residuals, as
speci'Fied in the permit. u
h`� fig
12) No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface Taos kas9occurred.
13) All buffer requirements as -'specified on the permit were maintained during each applicatioesidual �10
l - I ION
Part C - Certification: Ini,.r Processing Unit
.. t
"I certify, umier, penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of,,fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
b 6t,+gM��3� 2 r a
Permittee Name and Title (type or pint) Signature of Permittee Date
A.
2 -(6 ---e4 //-C ..,
Sigfrature�of,Prep rara er*
(if different from Permittee)
* Preparer is defined in 40 CFIZ Part 503.9 (r) and
Date
Signature of Land Applier
Date
(if different from Permittee and Preparer)
15A NCAC 02T .l 102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (12/2006)

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed. The parameters can be reported in FORM RSSF - B
s
.. a ,A&L Eastern LabsWOQ19960 :.Lab;rr, • -•t)WQ perrt Number: ao
. Facility„Name• City of Marion 2)
Residual Source WQ # or NCO031879 3)
NPDES #: 4)
WWTP Name: 5)
' "' Recirinal'.�na'I�icic nata '• •• •••
Parameter
Conc.Ceiling
Sample or Composite Date
11,
----_-_-_
�11 It
Molybdenum
Total Phosphorusi.��
Nitrate and Nitrite
For surface disposal facilities the ceiling concentration limits listed in this form are not applicable. Reference the individual permit for metals limits.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Si ature o Preparer * Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
DENR FORM RSSF (12/2006)

SAR= 0.8
PAN = 19,831
.,
4,

ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
5'
Facility Name: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual):
Permit #: WQ0019960 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Operator: Mario Deluca Owner: Anna Deebold Predominant Soil Series:
Acres Used: 16 Acres Permitted: 16 Site #: K-01 Field #:
46.40
Hayesville
K-01
Residual Analvsis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent #):
Sample orl
Com-
posite
Date
1 1
5/4/09
2
"
3
4
5
J_j
7 1
jj
9j
10
Ill 1
12
% Solids
3.89
Arsenic
5.3
Cadmium
1.8
Copper
394
Chromium
45
Lead
46
Mercury
1.9
Molyb-
denum
7
t
Nickel
23
Selenium
8.6
Zinc
871
Total
Phos-
horus
20500
;
Annual Heavv Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
Total
1 11
L 2j
L3J4
5
6
11
8
9
10
Lj
12
DT/Ac./
o
App.
Event
2.90
Arsenic
0.031
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.031
Cadmium
0.6.10
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.010
Copper
2285
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
2.285
Chromium
0.261
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.261
Lead
0.267
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.267
Mercury
0.011
0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.011
Molyb-
0.041
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.041
denum I
Al
Nickel
0.133
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.133
Selenium
0.0.50
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
0.000
0.050
Zinc
5.052
0'000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
5.052
Total
;t
Phos-
118.900
0000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
118.900
horus
"1 certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
Signature of ( and pplier Date
I
M
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: City of Marion Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 66.41
Permit #: WQ0019960 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Operator: Mario Deluca Owner: Anna Deebold Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville
Acres Used: 35.8 Acres Permitted: 35.8 Site #: K-02 Field #: K-02
Residual Analvsis-Data (Heave Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent #)
Sample or
Com-
posite
Date
Llj
5/4/09
L2J3
4
L5J
6
7
8
9j
10
11
12
% Solids
3.89
Arsenic
5.3
Cadmium
1.8
Copper
394
Chromium
45
Lead
46
Mercury
1.9
Molyb-
denum
7
Nickel
•23
Selenium
8.6
Zinc
871
Total
Phos-
horus
20500
Annual Heavy Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
Total
11
2 J
L3]4
L 5
6
7j
8
191
10
11
12
DT/Ac./
App.
Event
1.86
••
Arsenic
0.020
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.020
Cadmium
0.007
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.007
Copper
1.462
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.462
Chromium
9167
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.167
Lead
0.171
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.171
Mercury
0.007
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.007
Molyb-
0:626
(3.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.026
denum
Nickel
0.085
•' .000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.085
Selenium
0.032
6.000
0.000
0.000.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.032
Zinc
3.231
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000 1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
3.231
Total
Phos-
76.lD55
g.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
76.055
horus
t certity, under penalty of taw, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a systeW designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
Signature of Land A'Pplier Date
• DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
� Facility Name: Ciry of Marion WQ Permit`#: WQ0019960 '-Field #: K-01 ' Acres Utilized: 16
Land Owner: Anna Deebold Annual Dry Tons Applied: 46.3929 Site #: K-01 Acres Permitted: 16
Operator: Mario Deluca Predominant Soil Series: hayesvill7 Cation `Exchange Capacity (non 503): '
Crop 1 Name: Fescue Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 Crop 2 Name: Crop 2 Max. PAN:
n
Volume applied
PP
enter one Solids/
( )
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
a
/o
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Pp p
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#,
a Fert., Animal.
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond.
(Dry,
e '
t'
Moist)
Precip.
Fast 24
Hrs..
inches
D
K �
cu v
.0 c
�' �`
o
w =
N
o'
7
3
m w
* "
TKN
.�
mg/kg
Z Y
q
o 3
c' 2. _'
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
• Jgitrite
mg/kg
PAN: Applied
(tbs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
5-2009
286000
3.89
2.900
WQ0019960
dry
0
s
0.5
1 0.3
62500
5400
1
115.002
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM
FSF supp to this form):
,`
TOTALSI
01
286000
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
115.002
0.000
Lime Applied
Annual Ibs/acre
0.031
0.078
0.109
36
0.010
0.0847
0.095,
34
2.285
11.19
13.475,,
NA
0.261
0.1866
0.448v
1338
0.267
1.4297
1.697v
267
0.011
0.0716
0.083V
15
0.041
2.307
2348
NA
0.133
0.6661
0.800y
374
0.050
0.1617
0.2f2
89
5.052
28.27
33.322b
2498
118.900
Date
lbs/ac
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
Current Cumulative Ibs/ac
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
Permit PAN Limit Ist/2nd Crop
F 202
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
!jam *Application Method: S - Surface, 1N - Injection, INC - Incorporation
11� **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date *** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
.. PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR.BOX WHEN NQT_APPL,ICABLE.
Facility Natne: City of Marion WQ Permit #: WQ0019960 t "Field #: K_02 Acres Utilized: 35.8
Land Owner: Anna Deebold Annual Dry Tons Applied: 66.4262 Site #: K-02 Acres Permitted: 35.8
Operator: Mario Deluca Predominant Soil Series: Hayesville Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 1 Name: Fescue Crop 1 Max. PAN: 202 Crop 2 Name: Crop 2 Max. PAN:
L
o
i °
Q
Volume applied
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
. 9
Cu. YdS Gallons
oho
Solids
Volume
Applied per
_ Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Fen.. Animal
Waste, etc)
SO1l
Cond.
(DO.'
Wet,
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
D
K �
a _
S "
. o� m
* O
°
o
w =
*.
*
>
w -,
w
N .
* W
>
TKN
,:
mg/kg
? Y
9
o -3
on 0..
g �.
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN,Applied
. ( Ibsaacre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
pp
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
5-2009
1
409500
1 3.89
1.855
W00019960
dry
0
s
0.5
1 0.3
62500
1 5400
1
73.592
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp (.attach FORM FSF supp to this form):
TOTALS:
01
409500
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
• Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn .
P
73.592
0.000
Lime Applied
Annual lbs/acre
0.020
0.007
1.462
0.167
0.171
0.007
0.026,,
0.085✓
0.032
3.231
76.055
Date
lbs/ac
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0.0816
0.088
12.13
0.27
1.53
0.0759
2.32
0.7132
0.1729
30.129
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
0.101 v,
0.095v
13.592j
0.437,/
1.701 V
0.083V
2.346
0.799V
0.205
33.360-1
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
36
1 34
1 NA
1 1338
267
15
NA
374
1 89
1 2498
Permit PAN Limit Ist/2nd Crop
202
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date *** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

Report Number:
R09126-8
A&L EASTERN LABORATORIES, INC. 06
Account NNumber: um� �2
46381 1621 \\'hitchinc Road • Richmond, \-ir inia :?37-'') 14
Phone (801) 74;-9401 • Fax (804) _'71-6446
. ; We[is itc:ahs-easlicrn.CoIll. - I 111f1-iL.ofI1N (u.al-1ahs-enstcrn.conI
To: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS FOR: MARION WWTP copy: ZACH KEY
958 HOOTS ROAD
ROARING RIVER, NC 28669 'NC CERT #257
"• ATTN: DENNIS•KEY' • ' y.
DATE SAMPLED: 5/4/2009 1300
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
LAB NUMBER: 42763 DATE RECEIVED: 5/6/2009 1230
SAMPLE ID: MARION WWTP DATE REPORTED: 5/11/2009 PAGE: 1
Solids, Total (As is)
3.89
38900
100
JM
05/06/09
16:00
SM 2540G
Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl
6.25
62500
10
JM
05/07/09
16:00
SM 4500 (NorgB+NH3C)
Phosphorus
2.05
20500
100
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/601OB
Potassium
0.40
4000
100
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/601OB
Sulfur
0.82
8200
100
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/601OB
Calcium
1.28
12800
100
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/601OB
Magnesium
0.44
4400
100
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/601OB
Sodium
0.17
1700
100
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
Iron
18200
1
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
Aluminum
22300
10
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/601OB
Manganese
233,
1
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
Copper
394
1
KM
05/07/09
15:00
SW 846-3051/601OB
Zinc
871
1
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
Nitrogen, Ammonia (as N)
0.54
5400
10
JM
05/07/09
14:00
SM 4500(NH3B+NH3C)
Nitrogen, Organic (N)
5.71
57100
100
DCH
CALCULATION
Nitrogen, NO3+NO2
< 1
1
KS
05/07/09
15:00
SM 4500-NO3F
Cadmium
1.8
1
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/601OB
Chromium
45
5
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
All values are on a dry weight basis except as noted. Detection Limit on all N series is on a wet basis. BDL" - Below Detection Limit
Our reports and letters arc for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients. and may not be reproduced in whole or in parr, nor may any reference be made
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our poor written authorization _ J aJ
PAUL C H CHU

Report Number:
R09126-8006 A&L EASTERN LABORATORIES INC.
Account Number:
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237-2214
46381 Phone (It04) 743-9401 • Fax [phone]
Websitc: %vxyw.al labs-eastei"n.coiii • E-mail: offi�(!@al-l<ibs-eastern.com
To: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS FOR: MARION WWTP
958 HOOTS ROAD
ROARING RIVER, NC 28669 NC CERT #257
ATTN: DENNIS KEW
LAB NUMBER: 42763
SAMPLE ID: MARION WWTP
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
copy: ZACH KEY
DATE SAMPLED: 5/4/2009 1300
DATE RECEIVED: 5/6/2009 1230
DATE REPORTED: 5/1 1/2009 PAGE: 2
Nickel
23
5
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/601OB
Lead
46
5
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/601OB
Arsenic
5.3
1.0
KM
05/07/09
15:00
SW 846-601OB
Mercury
1.9
0.4
KM
05/08/09
15:00
SW 846-7471A
Selenium
8.6
1.0
KM
05/07/09
15:00
SW 846-601OB
pH (Std. Unit, As is)
6.74
0.01
RD
05/07/09
12:30
SW 846-9045D
Molybdenum
7
5
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/601OB
All values are on a dry weight basis except as noted. Detection Limit on all N series is on a wet basis. BDL' - Below Detection Limit
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use o1 our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made
to the work, the results. or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization
PAUL C. H CHU

M-1b-` O 1'L, �b I CHUM -race Analvtacal b'LKLISZQbI8
f-MU r'ddi/001 r-b5�
Anabu cal Results
Pace An IyucalAsheville®r 9240644
2225 River 'de Drive
Asheville NC 28804
Entered 3/27r2OO9
Reported: 4/15/2009
$ample Remark Ram OUT OF HOLD
Sample ID
Pain l' eter
tCust ID
Result Units
pAothod
Ans el
Ann
080327-8.1
% Solids
9240wool
2.&7
%
SM25408
3/27/09
CL
090327.8.1
Fecal CoMorm MTF
9240944001
10,453
MPN/g
SM92210E
3127/0®
CL
090327.8.2
% Solids— _.
92-40844002
2.90
%
SM25408
&Ir27/09
DM
090927.5.2
Fecal Coliftrm MW
9240844002
10,345
MPNtq
3M9410E
'WZu09
CL
090327.8.3
% Solids
9240944,003
2.91
%
SM2540B
W27M
Cl.
090327-8.3
FBI Calit®rm MTF
9240944003
10,309 t/
MPN/g
SM92210E
3/27/09
090321-8.4
% Solids
92409440P4
2.90
%
SM25408
3/27/09
CL
090327-8.4
FBI CoMorm MTF
9240844004
10,345
MPNI9
SM92210E
31271i39
CL
Respectfully submitted,
*. 1^� our-� C' -rav��� (.&)
Dena Uyers
NC Ce►t #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA NC00909
I� a� G,M.
P.O. Box 228 o Statesville, North Carolina 28E

Analytical Results
Pace Analytical -Asheville For: 9241578001
2225 Riverside Drive
Asheville NC 28804
Entered 4/8/2009
Repotted: 4/14/2009
Sample Remark
Sample ID Parameter Cult ID
Result
Units
Method
Date Analyzed
Analyst
09048-10.1 % Solids 9241578001
3.04
%
SM2540B
4/8/09
CL
09048-10.1 Fecal Coliform MTF 9241578001
4,276
MPN/g
SM92210E
4/8/09
CL
09048-10.2 % Solids 9241578002
2.91
%
SM2540B
4/8/09
CL
09048-10.2 Fecal Coliform MTF 9241578002
5,842 ✓
MPN/g
SM92210E
4/8/09
CL
09048-10.3 % Solids 9241578003
3.01
%
SM2540B
4/8/09
CL
09048-10.3 Fecal Coliform Iv1TF 9241578003
4,319 ✓
MPN/g
SM92210E
4/8/09
CL
Respectfully submitted,
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA NCO0909
• P0. Box 228 • Statesville, North Carolina 28687.704/872/4697

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature.
Sampling*Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature
Dissolved Oxygen Level
(maul
7.61
7.35
7.17
6.9
6.63
6.39
6.1
5.89
5.64
5.39
5.12
4.86
'.. 4.61
4.33
4.06
3.8
Slope.
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
Corpening Creek
WQ 0019960
4/21 /2009
17
4/21/2009--1155 ,
L. Estes
4/21 /2009--1319
R.CARTER
1000
0.83
25
25
0.3
7.6
1.0
'nilliliters
'/o Dry Solids
Degrees Celsius
legrees Celsius
'Oxygen Uptake Rate: 15.26 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.84 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.44 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Byes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.
I

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature;
Sampling Dale/Time:
Sampled By
Analysis Date/Time
Analyzed By
Sample Volume
Total Solids
Beginning Temperature
End Temperature
Dissolved Oxygen Level
(mg/l
7.34
7.14
6.84
6.55
6.29
6.02
5.75
5.49
5.2
4.95
4.64
4.38
4.07
3.79
3.5
3.21
Corpening Creek
WQ 0019960
4/20/2009
16
4/20/200 --1111
L. Estes
4/20/200 --1327
R. CARTE
1000
0.8
25
25
milliliters
% Dry Solids
degrees Celsius
degrees Celsius
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 7.4
Correlation Coefficient; 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 16.60 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific,,Oxygen Uptake Rate: 2.07 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.63 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Time
(minutes)
0
2
3
4
5
6
8'
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name
Biosolids Permit Numbei
Date
Digester Temperature
Sampling Date/Time
Sampled By
• ' Analysis Date/Time
Analyzed By
Sample Volume
Total Solids
Beginning Temperature
End Temperature
Dissolved Oxygen Level
m /l
7.74
7.57
7.32
7.07
6.8
6.4
6.24
5..94
5.63
5.32
4.99
4.67
4.32
4.06
' 3.75
3.44
in
4/3/2009 ` 1157
R. CARTER'
1
J525
d(
di
illiliters
Dry Solids
agrees Celsius
agrees Celsius
Slope: 0.3
Intercept: 7.9
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 17.6.3 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.80 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:r�® 1.41 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.
J
t

Time
(minutes)
0
1
13
4
+5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1.3
-14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name
Biosolids Permit Number
Date
Digester Temperature
Sampling Date/Time
Sampled By
Analysis Date/Time
Analyzed By
Sample Volume
Total Solids
Beginning Temperature
End Temperature
Dissolved Oxygen Level
m /I
7.36
7.25
6.94
6.7
6.44
6.19
5.96
5.74
3, 5.52
5.27
5.02
4.78
4.54
4.28
4.03
3.77
Corpening Creek
WQ 0019960
4/6/2009
15
4/6/09--1127
L. Estes
4/6/09--1314
R. CARTER
1000
0.98
25
25
milliliters
% Dry Solids
degrees Celsius
degrees Celsius
Slope: 0.2
• Intercept: 7.4
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 14.49 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.48 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783626166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:1 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Corpening Creek
Biosolids Permit Number: WQ 0019960
Dater 4/7/2009
Digester Temperature: 14
Sampling Date/Time: 4/7/09--0955
Sampled By: L. Estes
Analysis Date/Time: 4/7/09--1142.
Analyzed By: R. CARTER
Sample Volume: 1000 milliliters
Total Solids: 0.99 % Dry Solids
Beginning Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
End Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Time Dissolved Oxygen Level
(minutes)
0
2
3
4
5
6
-7
9
.1 p'
1.a.
1-2
13
14
'15
5pc�d2p SoLLvr x 2
f=o C2o-i�l
�
0
r 4 � � ► 500"7
l`i X
i,L7
Slope: 0.3 •
I ntercept: 6.8
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 18,58'mg Oxygen/hr
Amgient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.88 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
..Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:1 1.47 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automtitically.
0Q
/ 5

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
•.••4
�•5
7
8
9
'10
.11
Y
.12
13
+ 14
�15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature
Sampling Date/Time
Sampled By
Analysis Date/Time
Analyzed By
Sample Volume
Total Solids
Beginning Temperature
End Temperature
Dissolved Oxygen Level
7.46
7.2
6.95
6.7
6.47
6.24
5.99
5.77
5.54
5.29
5.08
4.84
4.6
4.37
4.14
3.91
Corpening Creek
WQ 0019960
4/16/2009
15
4/16/09--0853
L. Estes
4/16/09-1048
R.CARTER
1000
0.92
25
25
nilliliters
'/o Dry Solids
legrees Celsius
Jegrees Celsius
Slope: 0.2
.� Intercept: 7.4
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 14.10 mg Oxygen/hr
&nbient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.53 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rater 1.20 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instrtctions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.
.�L

z " s
Time
(min6tes)
0
2
3
4
5
6
7- .
9
.10
11
12
13•
15.
t•
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name
Biosolids Permit Number
Date
Digester Temperature.
Sampling Date/Time
Sampled By.
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume.
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
mall
7.19
6.92
6.68
6.41
6.16
5.93
5.68
5.43
5.19
4.94
4.7
4.4
4.16
3.89
3.66
3.33
CorEening Creek
WQ 0019960
4/17/2009
15
4/17/09--0757
L. Estes
4/17/09--0901
R. CARTER
1000
0.93
25
25
'milliliters
Yo Dry Solids
legrees Celsius
Jegrees Celsius
Slope: 0.3.
' Intercept: 7.Z
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
,. Oxygen Uptake Rate: 15.19 mg"Oxygen/hr r
Ambient Specific Oxygen -_.Uptake Rate: 1.63 'mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:1 1.28 mg Oxygen/g/hr -
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.
Time
(min6tes)
0
2
3
4
5
6
7- .
9
.10
11
12
13•
15.
t•
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name
Biosolids Permit Number
Date
Digester Temperature.
Sampling Date/Time
Sampled By.
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume.
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
mall
7.19
6.92
6.68
6.41
6.16
5.93
5.68
5.43
5.19
4.94
4.7
4.4
4.16
3.89
3.66
3.33
CorEening Creek
WQ 0019960
4/17/2009
15
4/17/09--0757
L. Estes
4/17/09--0901
R. CARTER
1000
0.93
25
25
'milliliters
Yo Dry Solids
legrees Celsius
Jegrees Celsius
Slope: 0.3.
' Intercept: 7.Z
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
,. Oxygen Uptake Rate: 15.19 mg"Oxygen/hr r
Ambient Specific Oxygen -_.Uptake Rate: 1.63 'mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 25 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 0.783526166
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:1 1.28 mg Oxygen/g/hr -
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

/V
ace74nalytical
www.pacelabs.com
Project: Corpening Creek -Sludge 3/09
Pace Project No.: 9240861
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: Sludge
Lab ID: 9240861001 Collected: 03/26/09 10:10
Received: 03/26/09 13:05 Matrix: Solid
Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis
,Parameters
++
Results Units
Report Limit DF
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
353.2 Nltrogen; NO2/NO3
Analytical Method: EPA 353.2
Nitrogen;:Nitrate
ND mg/kg
300 1
03/31/09 15:12
Nitrogen;; Nitrite
ND mg/kg
300 1
03131/0915:12
Nitrogen, NQ2 plus NO3
ND mg/kg
300 1
03/31/09 15:12
365.1 Phosphorus, Total
Analytical Method: EPA 365.1
Phosphorus
19100 mglkg
168 1
04/07/0919:09 7723-14-0 R1
. •t
01'
Date: O'4/0812009 11:03 AM '
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
� l l-
Page 5 of 20

e ' a f
hceAnalytical
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
www.pacelabs.com
Asheville, NC 28804
Hunlersville, NC 28078
[phone]
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Corpening Creek -Sludge 3/09
Pace Project No.: 9240861
Sample: Sludge Lab ID: 9240861001 Collected: 03/26/09 10:10 Received: 03/26/09 13:05 Matrix: Solid
Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8270 MSSV TCLP Sep Funnel Analytical Method: EPA 8270 Preparation Method: EPA 3510
2-Methylphenol(o-Cresol)
ND ug/L
50.0
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/09 18:37
95-48-7
3&4-Methylphenol(m&p Cresol)
ND ug/L
50.0
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/09 18:37
Nitrobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/09 18:37
98-95-3
Pentachlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/09 18:37
87-86-5
Pyridine
ND ug/L
50.0
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/09 18:37
110-86-1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/09 18:37
95-95-4
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
NO ug/L
50.0
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/09 18:37
88-06-2
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
49 %
30-150
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/09 18:37
4165-60-0
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
49 %
30-150
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/09 18:37
321-60-8
Terpheifyl-d14 (S)
75 %
30-150
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/09 18:37
1718-51-0
Phenol-d6 (S)
26 %
25-160
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/09 18:37
13127-88-3
2-Fluorophenol (S)
'34 %
25-150
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/09 18:37
367-12-4
2,4,6-T.ribromophenol (S)
75 %
25-150
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/09 18:37
118-79-6
8260 MSV TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Benzene
ND ug/L
125
25
04/02/09 07:40
71-43-2
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
250
25
04/02/09 07:40
78-93-3
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
125
25
04/02/09 07:40
56-23-5
Chlorobenkene
ND ug/L
125
25
04/02/09 07:40
108-90-7
Chloroform
ND ug/L
125
25
04/02/09 07:40
67-66-3
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
125
25
04/02/09 07:40
106-46-7
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
125
25
04/02/09 07:40
107-06-2
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
125
25
04/02/09 07:40
75-35-4
Tetra chloroethene
NO ug/L
125
25
04/02/09 07:40
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND Og/L
125
25
04/02/09 07:40
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
125
25
04/02/09 07:40
75-01-4
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
142 %
79-120
25
04/02/09 07:40
17060-07-0 SO
Toluene-i8 (3)
118 %
70-120
25
04/02/09 07:40
2037-26-5
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
too %
87-109
25
04/02/09 07:40
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
138 %
85-116
25
04/02/09 07:40
1868-53-7 SO
Percent Moisture
Analytical Method: ASTM D2974-87
Percen) Moisture
97,0 %
0.10
1
03/30/09 14:37
254OG Total Percent Solids
Analytical Method: SM 254OG
Total Solids
3.0 %
0.10
1
03/30/09 14:37
Plant Available Nitrogen
Analytical Method: 40CFR PART 503
Plant Available Nitrogen
17500 mg/kg
1.0
1
04/07/09 14:55
350.1 Ammonia
Analytical Method: EPA 350.1
Nitrogen, Ammonia
014 mg/kg
306
1
04/04/0912:16
7764-41-7
351.2 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Analytical Method: EPA 351.2
r. ,
Nitrogerf, Kjeldahl, Total
57800 mg/kg
4710
7
04/03/09 18:56
7727-37-9
Date: 04108/2009 11:03 AM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Page 4 of 20
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical
Services, Inc..

1 6 0 0
(�J/�/ q n j ® Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
1 ac AI IaI�ICaI 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
www.pacelabca Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Corpening Creek -Sludge 3/09
Pace Project No.: 9240861
Sample: Sludge
Lab ID: 9240861001 Collected: 03/26/09 10:10
Received: 03/26/09 13:05 Matrix: Solid
Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8081 GCS Pesticides, TCLP SPE
Analytical Method: EPA 8081
Preparation Method:
EPA 3535
gamma; BHC (Lindane)
ND ug/L
0.50
1
04/01/09 11:53
04/06/09 13:08
58-89-9
ChlordaAe (Technical)
ND ug/L
3.0
1
04/01/09 11:53
04/06/09 13:08
57-74-9
Endrin
ND ug/L
0.50
1
04/01/09 11:53
04/06/09 13:08
72-20-8
Heptachlor epoxide
ND ug/L
0.50
1
04/01109 11:53
04/06/09 13:08
1024-57-3
Methoxychlor
ND ug/L
1000
1
04101/0911:53
04/06/09 13:08
72-43-5
Toxaphene,
ND ug/L
3.0
1
04/01/09 11:53
04/06/09 13:08
8001-35-2
Decachlorobiphenyl (S).
54 %
10-138
1
04/01/09 11:53
04/06/09 13:08
2051-24-3
Tetrachloro-m-xylene (S)
49 %
10-110
1
04/01/09 11:53
04/06/09 13:08
877-09-8
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010
Preparation Method:
EPA 3050
Aluminum
14000 mg/kg
247
1
04/02/09 11:22
04/02/09 16:22
7429-90-5
Arsenic ,
ND mg/kg
12.4
1
04/02/09 11:22
04/02/09 16:22
7440-38-2
Cadmium
ND mg/kg
2.5
1
04/0210911:22
04102/0916:22
7440-43-9
Calcium
13600 mg/kg
247
1
04/02/09 11:22
04/02/09 16:22
7440-70-2
Copper,
430 mg/kg
12.4
1
04/02/09 11:22
04/02/09 16:22
7440-50-8
Lead
49.0 mg/kg
12.4
1
04/02/09 11:22
04/02/09 16:22
7439-92-1
Magnesium
4710 mg/kg
247
1
04/02/09 11:22
04/02/09 16:22
7439-95-4
Molybdenum
ND mg/kg
12.4
1
04/02/09 11:22
04/02/09 16:22
7439-98-7
Nickel
15.7 mg/kg
12.4
1
04/02/09 11:22
04/02/09 16:22
7440-02-0
Potassium
ND mg/kg
12400
1
04/02/09 11:22
04/02/09 16:22
7440-09-7
Selenium
ND mg/kg
24.7
1
04/02/09 11:22
04102/0916:22
7782-49-2
Sodium '
ND mg/kg
12400
1
04/02/09 11:22
04/02/09 16:22
7440-23-5
Zinc
1010 mg/kg
24.7
1
04102/09.11:22
04/02/09 16:22
7440-66-6
6010 MET ICP, TCLP +
Analytical Method: EPA 6010
Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Arsenic '
ND mg/L
0.025
1
04/02/09 11:31
04/02/09 20:23
7440-38-2
_
Barium,
0.45 mg/L
0.025
1
04/02/09 11:31
04/02/09 20:23
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND mg/L
0.0050
1
04/02/09 11:31
04/02/09 20:23
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND mg/L
0.025
1
04/02/09 11:31
04/02/09 20:23
7440-47-3
Lead
ND mg/L
0.026
1
04/02/09 11:31
04/02/09 20:23
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND mg/L
0.050
1
04/02/09 11:31
04/02/09 20:23
7782-49-2
silver.,
ND mg/L
0.025
1
04/02/09 11:31
04/02/09 20:23
7440-22-4
7470 Mercury, TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 7470
Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Mercury
ND ug/L
0.20
1
04/02/0912:10
04/03/09 12:20.
7439-97-6
7471 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7471
Preparation Method:
EPA 7471
Mercury•
1.1 mg/kg
0.095
1
03/30/0910:25
03/30/0914'A1
7439-97-6
8270 MSSV TCLP Sep Funrwl
Analytical Method: EPA 8270
Preparation Method: EPA 3610
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/0918:37
106-46-7
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/0918:37
121-14-2
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiehe
ND ug/L
60.0
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/091&37
87-68-3
Hexachlorobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/09 18.37
118-74-1
Hexachloroethane
ND ug/L
50.0
1
04/01/09 14:00
04/02/09 18:97
67-72-1
Date: 04108I2009 11:03 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
i
> This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 3 of 20

• • ^ ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM (02T Rules)
Facility Name: City of.Marion WQ Permit Number:
WWTP Name: City of Marion WWTP NPDES Number:
Monitoring Period: From l/l/2009
To 12/31 /2009
WQ0019960
NC6031879
Pathogen Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1106) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed:
Class A:
Alt. A (time/temp) ❑
Alt B (Alk Treatment)❑
Alt. C (Prior Testing)[]
Alt.D (No Prior Test) ❑
Process to Further Reduce Pathogengs ❑
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Compost ❑
Heat Drying ❑
Heat Treatment ❑
Thermophilic ❑
Beta Ray ❑
Gamma Ray ❑
Pasteurization ❑
Class B:
Alt. (1) Fecal Density ❑�
Alt. (2) Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens ❑
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization ❑
Air Drying ❑
Composting ❑
Aerobic Digestion ❑�
Anaerobic Digestion ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring data:
Parameter
Allowable Level
in Sludge
Pathogen Density
Number ot
Excee-
dences
Frequency
of Analysis
Sample
Type
AnaFtica
"Lech -
ni oue
Minimum
Geo. Mean
Maximu
Units
Fecal Coliform
.°
2 x 10 to the
6th• power
per gram of
total solids
MPN
4,319
7413.1
10,456
MPN/g
0
7
grab
sm9221 e
CFU
1000 inpn per gram
of total solid (dry
weight)
Salmonella bacteria
(in lieu of fecal
coliform)
3 MPN;per 4 grams
total.solid (dry
weight)
Vector Attraction Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1107) - Please indicate alternative performed:
Alt. l (VS reduction) ❑
Alt. 2 (40-day bench) ❑
Alt. 3 (30-day bench) ❑
Alt. 4 (Spec. O, uptake)
Alt. 5 (14-Day Aerobic) ❑`
Alt. 6 (Alk. Stabilization ❑
Alt 7 (Drying - Stable)
jAlt. 8 (Drying - Unstable) ❑
Alt. 9 (Injection) ❑
Alt. 10 (Incorporation) ❑
No vector attraction reduction alternatives were performed ❑
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction, reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have been met."
❑ "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have not been met." (Please note
if you check this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the
requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system
designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine
that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
Dennis Key President Southern Soil Builders, Inc.
Prepares Na e and Title (type or print) Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print)
Sig4Sat6r of Preparer* Date Si ature of L d Applier (if applicable) Date
*Preparer is defined in 40.CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
DENR FORM PVRF 02T (12/2006)

4
W/
Page 4 of 5
Report Number: 09-351-0538
Account Number: 46381
Send To: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS
DENNIS KEY
958 HOOTS ROAD
ROARING RIVER NC 28669
A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
T
7621 Whltepme Road Richmond. Virginia 23237 [phone] Fax [phone]"6 1<
4tvww.allabs.com Submitted B ZACH KEY
Grower: y=
SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS Farm ID:
.,SOIL ANALYSIS ,REPORT Analytical Method(s):
IInI nnno fu1FHl 1(:H 3
Date Received: 1211
//ZUWJ
Uate vt rtnatyata.
Phosphorus
r_... ._._-
Potassium
Magnesium
Calcium
Sodium
pH
Acidity
C.E.0
A
Organic Matter
Sample ID
Lab
ENR
Mehlich 3
Reserve
K
Mg
Ca
Na
Soil
Buffer
H
Field ID
Number
% Rate Ibs/A
Rate
Rate
Rate
ppm
Rate
ppm
Rate
ppm
Rate
pH
Index
meq/100g
meq/100g
ppm
ppm
ppm
DP1
15 L
31 VL
172
H
625
M
18
VL
6.0
6.84
0.9
5.6
17866
1.7
L
76
NC=12
NC=16
61 H
34 VL
175
H
1143
M
96
M
6.5
6.87
0.6
8.3
RP1
17867
2.8 M
94
NC=51
NC=17
26 L
34 VL
147
H
926
H
31
L
6.6
6.89
0.4
6.5
Rp2
17868
2.1
L
83
NC=22
NC=17
162 VH
272 VH
184
H
1245
M
19
VL
6.3
6.83
1.0
9.5
K1
17869
3.7
M 110
NC = 135
NC = 139
192 VH
95 L
201
H
1606
H
25
VL
6 4
6.63
1.0
11.0
17870
4.9
M 132
NC = 160
NC = 49
Percent
Base
Saturation
Nitrate
Sulfur
Zinc
Manganese
Iron
Copper
Boron
Soluble
Salts
Chloride
Aluminum
Sample ID
K
Mg
Ca
Na
H`
NO
S
Zn
Mn
Fe
Cu
B
SS
CI
AI
Field ID
%
%
%
%
%
ON
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm
Rate
ppm Rate
ppm
Rate
ms/cm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm
28 H
1.2 L
13 M
36
H
1.8 H
0.1
VL
0.12
VL
DP1
1.4
25.6
55.8
1.4
15.3
NC = 70
NC = 30.0
NC = 81
NC = 90.0
9 VL
7.9 H
17 M
96
VH
6.1 VH
0.6
M
0.2
VL
RP1
F1.1
17.6
68.9
5.0
7.4
NC = 23
NC = 197.5
NC = 106
NC = 305.0
8 VL
2.9 M
40 H
82
VH
2.8 H
0.4
L
0.16
VL
RP2
1T.8
71.2
2.1
5.9
NC = 20
NC = 72.5
NC = 250
NC = 140.0
8 VL
VH
25 H
111
VH
3.6 VH
0.5
L
0.17
VL
K1
7.3
16.1
65.5
0.9
10.6
110.3
NC = 20
NC = 257.5
NC = 156
NC = 180.0
9 VL
11.9 VH
23' H
120
VH
4.5 VH
0.7
M
0.15
VL
�
2.2
15.2
73.0
1.0
9.0
NC = 23
NC = 297.5
NC = 144
NC = 225.0
Values on this report represent the plant available nutrients in the Explanation of symbols i (percent). ppm (parts per nuewn�l. 1w•.• ••••_ •_��•• ���--- •- -- --•-• --- - l•
soil. Rating after each value: VL (Very Low). L (Low). M (Medium). (pounds per acre). ms/cm (milli -mhos per centimeter). meq/100g max mum of tnrrty days after testing by
H (High), VH (Very High). ENR - Estimated Nitrogen Release (milli -equivalent per 100 grams). Conversions ppm x 2 = Ibs/A• Analys.s oreoareo oy ASL Eastern Laooratones lac
C.E.C. - Cation Exchange Capacity Soluble Salts ms/cm x 640 = ppm.
Oscar Ruiz

rv'SOP
1.. Annual Land Application Certification Form
• Was a certification fc,=submitted?yeS
• Was land application conducted during the reported year?Yes
• How many dry tons and dry tons per acre were applied? //Z. e2 rD7-
• Were the applications within the permitted amount? yes.
• Verify PAN if more than 10 tons/acre IVA
• Did it indicate compliance? Ye5
m Was it signed by the appropriate people? YES
2.9 � 4 gs L)r/,�
2. Monitoring
• Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency? yes -- - .
• Were the metals analyses reported: on the Residual Sampling Surmnary Form?des
e Were the results reported in mg/kg? yeS
®: Were the heavy metals within ceiling concentration permit limits?*yt5
• If no, were the lab analyses attached?
• Were all the required parameters tested?yeO
• Was TCLP analysis conducted?yes o„/, . r,�u;-ed office%��,rF c y�1r
! 3. Field Summary btc4 WursS#Jn4 2` -D 1 SitVtx c eck 1FYsi rG(� [1y,o! so
..
• Were the land applicationevents recorded on the Field Summary Forms?jeS
Was a Field Summary Form submitted for each field? S r«p 2��t, (07
y �o
• Were all the residuals applied to permitted land? l.z,y-DK
.es
• Were all the residuals applied from permitted sources? yes
• Were the field loading rates for each metal and PAN calculated (year to date)?yes 1� (c"rO�(RRn�� • " a f<
• Were the cumulative pollutant loading rates calculated?y�&5
• Were the calculations correct?yes
• Were the PAN loading rates -within permit Iimits?,po
• Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits?Y.0-5
• Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop? ye,3
• Were the applications conducted during the crop's growing season? yes
• Were the Field Summary Forms complete? Yes
4. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction
• Was a signed copy of the Pathogen and Vector Attractip .Reduction Form subrrptted? y&5
• Did the 'f/or�m indicate the period of coverage, the residual class, and the pathogen reduction alternative and the
vector attraction reduction option used?
•. Was the app''rqpriate documentation to show pathogen and vector attraction reduction included in the report?
Was pathogen and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503?
5. Soil Tests Nl?b%� 1 � yl�%°i- L.Y�«�d 1-'�1.�'�nti-tl-�lsk C-�e��� - �'e✓ 7`/°-fie-5
• Was a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis conducted for each application field? �g
• Were the soil pH's 6.0 or greater for each application field? y'es � � '''� Nov - b�
• Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil less than 3000 for each application field).e,S
6. General
• Was the report in the proper format?yeS 0. i
• Were any parts of the annual reportmissing? lJ�
• Was the report submitted on time?,, ,5
ft
�,#e visit °►Ix3P10
* Any.violations of ceilyfig�nce.ntral;ons sh ld.b reported to Pretreafinent:for. riiuricipalities:..only.. sir
14 ecd �e r i,-C`ik ry � . rw-, .

Class B Pathogen Review
Alternative 1 - Fecal Coliform Density
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency? yeS
• Were seven samples taken?�'& 5
• Was the geometric mean calculated and done correctly? ^(->
• Did the results show compliance (less than either 2,000,000 MPN/gram of total solids or 2,000,000
Colony Forming Units/gram of total solids) $ S
Alternative 2 - Use of Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (one of five)
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
Aerobic Digestion
• Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
• Was the time and temperature between 40 days at 20°C (68T) and 60 days at 15°C (59°F)?
Air Dreg
• Were residuals on sand beds or pave or unpaved basins for three months?
• Was theambient.temperatur above 0°C (32T) for two months?
• Were the residuals partially digested?
• Were residuals exposed to atmosphere during two months above OT (riot snow covered)?
Anaerobic Digestion
• Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
• Was the time and temperature between 15 days at 350C (95T) to 55°C (131°F) and 60 days at 200C
(68-F)?
Composting
• Was it a composting procedure (not natural decay under uncontrolled conditions)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the temperature raised to 40°C (104°F) or higher and remained at 40°C (104T) for five days?
• Did the temperature exceed 55°C (13IT) for four hours during the five-day period?
Lime Stabilization
• Was alkaline material added to residuals a form of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime containing
kiln dust or fly ash)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the pH raised to 12 after two hours of contact?
• Were logs submitted showing time and pH?
• Was the temperature corrected to 25°C (77°F)?

A
�Y
A t� ti ?
Vector Attraction Reduction Review '•,l l`; '`
i Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
38% Volatile Solids Reduction
® Was there 38% reduction?
® Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
® Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
® Was the samples taken at beginning of digestion process and before application
(Inspection)?
® Were calculations,correct?
40-Day Bench Scale Test
® Were residuals from anaerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
a Were residuals anaerobically digested in lab?
® Was the test run for 40 days?
® Was the test done between 30°C (86T) and 370C (990F)?
o Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
® Was the reduction less than 17%?
o Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
® Were calculations correct?
30-Day Bench Scale Test
Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
® Were residuals aerobically digested in lab?
® Were residuals 2% or less total solids?
® Was the test nun for 30 days?
® Was the test done at 200C (680F)?
e Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
® Was the reduction less than 15%?
d Were lab'sheets/calculations in report?
® Were calculations correct?
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate (SOUR)
® Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?Ye5
® Were residuals 2% or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted)? ye,5
0 Was the test done between 10°C (50°F) and 30°C (861F)? y p,5
a Was the temperature corrected to 20°C (68T)? y &5
® Was the SOUR equal to or less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of total residual
solids (dry weight basis)? A& vi'- !• -57
e Was the sample holding time under two hours?gjgojo Y13M "14VI
® Was the test started withinl5 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained?
2 (J,,-- f►- - i5 wyke- .Y 0fla" I1 1Z- '-G',)LC ".
6U U�^d"\
eve, is had sib a zlnr- - b� CVCeecl��

14-Day Aerobic Process
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were the residuals treated for 14 days?
• Was the residuals temperature higher than 40°C (104T) for the 14-day period?
• Was the average residuals temperature higher than 45°C (113°F)?
Alkaline Stabilization - E
• Was the pH of the residuals raised to 12 or higher by the addition of alkali?
• Did the pH of residuals remain at 12 or higher for two hours without the addition
of more alkali?
• Did the pH of residuals remain at 11.5 or higher for an additional twenty-two
hours without the addition of more alkali?
• Was the pH, corrected to 250C (770F)?
Drying of Stabilized Residuals
• Does the residuals contain any unstabilized residuals?
• Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
• . Were the residuals dried to 75% total solids?
Drying of Unstabilized Residuals
• Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
• Were the residuals dried to 90% total solids? .
Injection
• Was there any significant. amount of residuals on land surface one hour after
injection (Inspection)?
• Was injection done on pasture or hay field?
• Was injection done at time that crop was growing?
• If Class A with respect to pathogen,'were residuals injected within eight hours
after discharge from pathogen treatment?
Incorporation
• Were the residuals- incorporated into the soil within six hours after application?
• Was incorporation done on pasture or hay field?
• Was incorporation done at time that crop was growing? .
• If Class A with respect to pathogen, were residuals incorporated within eight
--�--- -- -----hours-after--discharge -from pathogen -treatment? —_

0
ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
AES
April 01, 2009
Tom Williams
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr
Asheville NC 28804
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
RE: 9240861
Dear Tom Williams: Order No: 0903I54
Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. received 1 samples on March 27.2009 10:20 am
for the analyses presented in following report.
No problems were encountered during the analyses. Additionally, all results for the associated
Quality Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepancies
associated with the analyses contained herein will be noted and submitted in the form of a
project Case Narrative.
AES' certifications are as follows:
-NELAC/Florida Certification number E87582 for analysis of Environmental Water,
soil/hazardous waste, and Drinking Water Microbiology, effective 07/01/08-06/30/09.
-AU-IA Certification ID #100671 for Industrial Hygiene samples (Organics, Inorganics),
Environmental Lead (Paint, Soil, Dust Wipes, Air), and Environmental Microbiology (Fungal)
effective until 08/01/09.
These results relate only to the items tested. This report may only be reproduced in full.
If you have any questions regarding these test results, please feel free to call.
James Forrest
Project Manager
3785 PRESIDENTIAL PARKWAY • ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30340 - Tee : [phone] - FAX: [phone]
Page 1 of 5

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc.
Date: 01 Apr-09 "
CLIENT: Pace Analytical Services, Inc. ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
Work Order: 0903I54
Project: 9240861 TestCode: 1311_H
Sample ID: MB-111608
SampType: MBLK
TestCode: 1311_H Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 3/31/2009
RunNo: 145280
Client ID:
Batch ID: 111608
TestNo: SW1311/8161
Analysis Date: 4/1/2009
SegNo: 2981774
Analyte
Result
RPT Limit SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
BRL
0.20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,4-D
BRL
0.20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Surr: DCAA
0.5455-
0
0.5
0
109
36.6
149
0
0
Sample ID: LCS-111608
SampType: LCS
TestCode: 1311H Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 3/31/2009
RunNo: 146280
Client ID:
Batch ID: 111608
TestNo: SW131118151
Analysis Date: 4/1/2009
SegNo: 2981789
Analyte
Result
RPT Limit SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 0.5451 0.20 0.5 0 109 73.3 120 0 0
2,4-D 0.5314 0.20 0.5 0 106 57.9 120 0 0
Surr: DCAA 0.6823 0 0.5 0 116 36.6 149 0 0
Sample ID: 0903127-001CMS
SampType: MS
TestCode: 1311_H Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 3/31/2009
RunNo: 146280
Client ID:
Batch ID: 111608
TestNo: SW1311/8151
Analysis Date: 4/1/1009
SegNo: 2981827
Analyte
Result
RPT Limit SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
2,4,5 TP (Silvex) 0.6287 0.20 0.5 0 126 63.4 133 0 0
2,4-D 0.6369 0.20 0.5 0 127 44.5 128 0 0
Surr: DCAA 0.6077 0 0.5 0 122 36.6 149 0 0
Qualifiers: < Less than Result value > Greater than Result value
BRL Below Reporting Limit E Estimated value above quantitation range
J Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit N Analyte not NELAC certified
Rpt Lim Reporting Limit S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded
R RPD outside limits due to matrix
Page 1 of I
Page 5 of 5

I
Analytical Environmental Services, Inc
Date: 1-Apr-09
Client:
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Client Sample ID:
SLUDGE
Project:
9240861
Collection Date:
3/26/2009 10:10:00 AM
Lab ID:
0903I54-001
Matrix:
Solid
Analyses
Result
Reporting
Qual
Units BatchID
Dilution
Date Analyzed Analyst
Limit
Factor
HERBICIDES, TCLP
SW1311/8151A
(SW3510B)
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
BRL
0.20
mg/L 111608
1
04/01/200915:18 DN
2,4-D
BRL
0.20
mg/L 111608
1
04101/200915:18 DN
Surr. DCAA
117
36.6-149
%REC 111608
1
04/01/2009 15:18 DN
Qualifiers: Value exceeds maximum contaminant level
BRL Beloev reporting limit
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded
N Analyte not NELAC certified
B Analyte detected in the associated method blank
> Greater than Result value
E
Estimated (value above quantitation range)
S
Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix
Narr
See case narrative
NC
Not confirmed
<
Less than Result value
Page 3 of 5

M+• r.+. cvvi i.vc• + +��avavn a++vv
1.v, JJif +. 1/ 1
P CISION PETROLEUM LAW,, !
5915 Star Lane Houston., TX 77051
Ph. 713-680-9425 "Fax.- 713-680-9564
Website: predsionlabs,org
Company:
Invoice No.:
Lab Reference No.
Product ID:
Date Received:
Authorized By:
PARAMETER
Ignitability (Flash Point), PMCC
Reactive Cyanides, PPM
Reactive Sulfides, PPM
Daniel Zabihi
QA Manager
Date; 03-27-2009
BRL = Below Reporting Limit
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc -Asheville, NC
40664
2009-03-721
WO# 9240861 03-26-09
03-27-2009
Tom Williams
TEST
REPORTING
TEST
METHOD
LIMIT
RESULTS
EPA-1010
-10°F
6.35
S.W. 9010
0.01
BRL
S.W.9030
1.0
BRL
PRECISION PETROLEUM LABS, INC.'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ABOVE ANALYSIS,
OPINIONS OR INTERPRETATIONS IS LIMITED TO THE INVOICE AMOUNT.

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc.
Sample/Cooler Receipt Checklist
Client J,04 e"4- Work Order Number fO 3 :15'
Checklist completed by n`427
Signatures Date
Carrier name: FedEx UPS Courier Client US Mail Other
Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes % No _ Not Present
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes !� No Not Present _
Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes _ No _ Not Present !�
Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance? (4*C±2)* Yes No _
Cooler #1 % tl ` Cooler #2 Cooler #3 Cooler #4 CoolerO Cooler #6
Chain of custody present? Yes ! No _
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes No
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes Now '
Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes No _
Sample containers intact? Yes f No _
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes No _
.All samples received within holding time? Yes -z"', No _
Was TAT marked on the COC? Yes _� No
Proceed with Standard TAT as per project history? Yes _ No T Not Applicable /
Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? No VOA vials submitted Yes _ No _
Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes ^ No Not Applicable
Adjusted? Checked by
Sample Condition: Good Other(ExpWn)
(For diffusive samples or AMA lead) Is a known blank included? Yes _ No _
See Case Narrative for resolution of the Non -Conformance.
* Samples do not have to comply with the given range for certain parameters.
UQuality AssurancoTheeklists Procedures Sign -Off' TernplatesThecklistslSample Receipt Checklists\Sample Cooler_Receipi Checklist
Page 4 of 5

0910
Chain of Custody
Workorder: 9240WI Workorder Name: Corpening Creek -Sludge 3/09
Results Requested 4/9/2009
- .
'•{
't
-1 r.'
` .., .Jfl i.fr
'Tom Williams/
_S •
v 3 l�i�C�wa `` •
I
i
°
x81'f.,,} e'
Pace AnalyUcal Ashville
2226 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC :f•
PhoneEmail:
[e-mail]
oil
11
cSkE,
��' , )`r .l af�!nlr ii�}fLIL1Nk{,���1 jfIi` 1' Ii (��!i i` '! (1{t� i t�
i�F�� Iilatle���•.:.l,rHG��`I`f, � }! �']--tii(I'1�:+'i�iflil�l 4 t .
..
rlil la l' ;"f'.
� 9'.' � i I� I:;i;a !
'� ,��
. Ihl�;i±i!
I
.,} , h
�
'• �
l'KAi�:1
i���y7u}
WiN��f
lrl}. �l �
f.l.�
l
..� "f}�P
.a
I�i ,.�n -, ,� n
kil•}ii t Lri: �?}�I�;hiH�'e�l.:
�'Yf�kpl�{7�p
f
Yf i�tt{�j`P
,L}��+{7,��
I�
-
�!�l1I�11t�i
tq
, ' � d���
� L�" I
�;-� �•,
�
isi,
}l '.
%!iY'��i��';?i.,..�
`; ^# "11,'u
14:,�`� i'i
sui{ii'��
H
3 � �i���31
I_..f'.,`'`
is 1!
llar�il
a
�3 kl ` •r.r
qjI
4 I� t, Il�lt�li!tiG
r.. •
I _
°( .GtJi�
t l�rc a 1
, I } l{iti�j
t1a t }Ij i
I_
: I
r - o
Sps
f . ( ,;!�
i
• la
;i ltLHk�
11
.....:. $ ..k:.. ..f- VIf75.r .v. .. _ •
l
.�.
.:�s
,. �..,: .._.. .ca
...:i :..;.t f..r_
111`:yfk•
..'Svk•�SIL4®yyyy
R.v.
'
,.rti..
1 J
�. 4
_.�E
4
..�
f
•:�
k-� I
'w'.Yr.+c. i....
G1
(Q
(D
N
O
-h
0
Thursday, March 26, 2009 3:37:55 PM Page 1 of 1