NC0025747_Wasteload Allocation_19830802

0
02
E
0
ca
0
N
a.
N
H
.=
Facility Name:
Existing
Proposed
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
ites/ C ;-4 6_4/7r
Permit No • d (.OQ.2 r `i"1"
Design Capacity (MGD): 1. S-- Industrial
Receiving Stream: --rec4v.Jgib()
Reference USGS Quad'
Pipe No.:
Engineer
Date Rec.
#
r) L
Co -a 1
rwri
Date G-Z-cl -df
County:
(% of Flow) : Domestic (% of Flow) :
Class: h`-17. Sub -Basin: 03-o46' -0 Z.
(Please attach) Requestor• IcRggiamx1 Office
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
Design Temp.:
7Q10:.
Drainage Area: / 7 3 n1 2 Avg. Streamflow:
Winter 7Q10: 30Q2:
Location of D.O.minimum (miles below outfall): Slope.
Velocity (fps): K1 (base e, per day, 20°C):_ K2 (base e, per day, 20°C)•
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
13ob�Iii
•
3
-au
F-e (aX co 1 ft,,
n
j
Original Allocation
Revised Allocation
Confirmation
1) Prepared By:
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
Date(s) of Revision(s)
(Please attach previous allocation)
eviewed By:
Date:
7
105--

REQUEST NO.
627
OR:
*******************: WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM *******************
FACILITY NAME
TYPE OF WASTE
COUNTY
REGIONAL OFFICE
RECEIVING STREAM
7010 : 45 CFS
DRAINAGE AREA
FOREST CITY WWTP
DOMESTIC
RUTHERFOR1:
ASHEVILLE
REQUESTOR : LAVE ADKIN S
SECOND BROAD RIVER SUBBASIN : 030602
. 173
W7010 :
SQ.MI.
CFS
3002 :
STREAM CLASS i A -]:I
CFS
***********************$ RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS ***********************
WASTEFLOW(S)
BOD-5
NH3-N
D.O.
PH
FECAL COLIFORM
TSS
(MGD)
(MG/L)
(MG/L.)
(MG/ L)
(SU) .
(/100ML):
(MG/L) :
•
4
1.5
30
6-9
1000
30
**************************************** *****:Yak*:k***************************
FACILITY IS : PROPOSED (
LIMITS ARE : REVISION
) EXISTING
W ( )
) CONFIRMATION ) OF THOSE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
n COO
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY:
MODELER
SUF'ERVISOR•MODELING GROUP
REGIONAL. SUPERVISOR
PERMITS MANAGER
_....._DATE
--- /TE :` (?Pit_5_ _..
DATE :��
DATE :.._�r�._...._

. ..
.
.
.
Vo 'ee,s+ C-.t So c_
A-rc
1>ps--_- 113
,45-
7 S, 6
I
,
eviln..• 7_ Cit 00
? 0 -- 1", Z.
1.14,
— ,01 7
SC', = 95 - 56C- ( IL-..7( 6 ., g7 7 1-,04--4/
lv,o. - 17 3_
jueorb :-.. ito
L S44* ; 1.1 etkzsL•nyr_s —

DISCHARGER
RECEIVING STREAM
7010
DESIGN TEMPERATURE
*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
FOREST CITY WWTP
SECOND BROAD RIVER
45 CFS
24 DEGREES C.
ILENGTHISLOF'E 1 VELOCITY (DEPTH
(MILES IFT/MI 1 FPS 1 FT
SUBBASIN 1 030302
STREAM CLASS: A -II
WI. i ER 7010 : CFS
WASTEFLOW : 1.5 MGD
K1
/DAY
F:n 1 SOD 1 I<2 1 NetF1
/DAY IMG/M2D1/DAY 1MG/L;1
1 1 1 I
SEGMENT 1 1 1.401 5.001 0.620 1 2.27
REACH 1 1 I 1 I
I 1 I I
0.47 1 0.00 1 0.01 2.981 0.'
I l I I
ALL RATES ARE AT 24 DEGREES C.
** INPUT DATA SUMMARY ***
FLOW
CFS
SEGMENT 1 REACH 1
WASTE
HEADWATERS
TRIBUTARY
RUNOFF
CBOD
MG/L
2.32.5 1110.000
45.000 1 2.000
0.000 1 0.000
1.000 1 2.000
NBOD
MG/ L
D.O.
MG/L
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
7.650
0,000
7.650
RUNOFF FLOW IS IN CFS/MILE:

DI VISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
July 22, 1983
MEMORANDUM
TO: Randy Wi 11 lams, Leader
Modeling Group
THROUGH: Roy M. Davis, Regional Supervisor
Division of Environmental Management
Heath P. Dobson, Regional Engineer
Water Quality Section
FROM: James R. Reid, Environmental ,
Chemistry Consultant 7
SUBJECT: Special Order by Consent
Town of Forest City
Rutherford County, North Carolina
Please model condi tions in the Second Broad Ri ver in the vicinity of
the Town of Forest City's wastewater treatment facility to project the
effects on the Second Broad River of an additional 0.26 MGD of wastewater
being discharged from the Town's treatment facility.
Self -monitoring data for the period June 1982 - May 1983 showed the
Town's wastewater to have the following effluent characteristics:
Fl ow
BOD
NH 5N
Fe dal Col iform
1.14 MGD
32 mg/1
9.2 mg/1
370 c fs / 100 ml
Please send the results of this analysis as soon as possible. The
Town of Forest City is currently under a moratorium on connections and
has several individual homeowners who have completed construction and
are awaiting issuance of the Special Order by Consent in order to occupy
new dwellings.
JRR/mkd

..'.
.' .^
MODEL RESULTS
DISCHARGER
RECEIVING STREAM �
THE END D.O. IS 7.69 MC/L
---------------------------
THE END CBOD 15 2.79 MC/L
---------------------------
THE END NBOD IS 0.00 MC/L
THE D.O.MIN OF SEGMENT 1 IS 7.51 MC/l
THIS MINIMUM IS LOCATED AT SEGMENT MILEPOINT 0.00
WHICH IS LOCATED IN PEACH NUMBER :1.
THE WLA FOA SEGMENT 1 PEACH 1 15 76.5 MC/L OF CBOD
THE WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 PEACH 1 IS 0 MC/L OF NBOD
THE REQUIRED EFFLUENT D O IS 3 M[:/L
THE WASTEFLOW ENTERING SEC I PEACH 1 IS 9100001 MGD

MODEL RESULTS
DISCHAAGEA
RECEIVING STREAM �
THE END D.O. IS 7.68 MG/1
---------------------------
THE END CBOD IS 2.81 MC/L
---------------------------
THE END NBOD IS 0.00 MG/1
THE D.O.MIN. OF SEGMENT 1 IS 7.51 MG/L
THIS MINIMUM IS LOCATED AT SEGMENT MILEPOINT 0.00
WHICH 15 LOCATED IN REACH NUMBER 1
THE WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 PEACH 1 IS 76.5 MG/L OF CBOD
THE WLA FOP SEGMENT 1 REACH I IS O MC/L OF NBOD
THE REQUIRED EFFLUENT D.O. IS 3 MC/L
THE WASTEFLOu ENTERING SEG 1 PEACH 1 15 .9300002 MCD