NC0025496_Application_20200218

�Sy91(
Lincolnton NC
February 13,2020
Ms. Wren Thedford
NC DENR/DWR/NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RECEIVED
FEB 18 2020
NCDEQIDWRINPDES
Enclosed are 2 copies of the City of Lincolnton Wastewater Treatment Plant NPDES permit renewal application for NPDES
Permit NCO025496. The original permit application I submitted only contained the original application form. On the original
application I submitted, I forgot to sign the application on Page 9. 1 have enclosed a signed page 9 with this packet and the 2
copies 1 am submitting have copies of the original signed signature page included in them. Please replace the current Page 9
with the enclosed signed Page 9 in the original permit application.
I am also submitting the original + 2 copies of our sludge management plan for our W WTP.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at 704-736-8960 or by e-mail at:
[e-mail]
Sincerely,
L.� A
Donald A. Burkey, Jr.
W WTP Superintendent
City of Lincolnton
[phone]
CITY OF LINCOLNTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
550 W. HWY.150 BYPASS • P.O. BOX 617 • LINCOLNTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28093-0617
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
ACTION REQUESTED:::[
RIVER BASIN:
TRMIT
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART C. CERTIFICATION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained In the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application Is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
® Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
® Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
® Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitodng Data)
® Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOMfiNG CERTIFICATION.
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief. true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title D nald A. Burkev Jr. WWTP Su erintendent/ORC REGEIVED
Signature
Telephone number 704 736-8960
PDES
a - 10 - aoaa
Date signed
Upon request of the permitting authority. you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENRI DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1.99). Replaces EPA farms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 9 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO
FORM
2A
NPDES
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
PPLICATION OVERVIEW
RIVER BASIN:
South Fork
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a `Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.B. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow z 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through B.6.
C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
E. Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
Industrial User Discharges and RCRAICERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
G. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
G. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-5 & 7550-22. Page 1 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO026496
Renewal
South Fork
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet
A.I. Facility Information.
Facility Name City of Lincolnton WWTP
Mailing Address Post Office Box 617
Lincolnton NC 28093
Contact Person Donald Burkey, Jr
Tale SuaerintendenVORC
Telephone Number [phone]
Facility Address 550 Highway 150 Bypass West
(not P.O. Box) Lincolnton, NC 28092
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
❑ owner ® operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
❑ facility ® applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NCO025496 PSD
UIC Stormwater NCG110000
RCRA Residuals W00002712
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and. if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
Lincolnton 10,393 Sanitary City of Lincolnton
Total population served 10,393
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 8 7550-22. Page 2 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincointon WWTP, NCO025496 Renewal South Fork
A.S. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each years data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12" month of "this year' occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 6.0 mgd
Two Years Ago Last Year This Year
b. Annual average daily flow rate 1.698 mqd (2017) 1.897 mqd 12018) 2.281 mqd (2019)
C. Maximum daily flow rate 5.588 mqd (2017) 6.798 mqd (2018) 12.750 mgd (2019)
A.7. Collection System Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
® Separate sanitary sewer 100 %
❑ Combined storm and sanitary sewer %
A.6. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent
H. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent
iii. Combined sewer overflow points
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)
V. Other
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? ❑ Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s)
Is discharge ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
c. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater?
If yes, provide the following for each land application she:
d.
Location:
Number of acres:
Annual average daily volume applied to site:
Is land application ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550.6 & 7550-22,
0
mgd
❑ Yes N No
mgd
❑ Yes ® No
Page 3 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following:
Name
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility.
mgd
e. Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included
in A.8. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection): O Yes
® No
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
Annual daily volume disposed by this method:
Is disposal through this method ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 8 7550-22, Page 4 of 22

FACIL"Y NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496 I Renewal I South Fork
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes" to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.B& go to Pam "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number 001
It. Location Lincolnton, NC
28092
(City or town, d applicable)
(Zip Code)
Lincoln
North Carolina
(County)
(State)
N 350 26' 26"
W 81 a 16' 44"
(Latitude)
(Longitude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable)
ft.
d. Depth below surface if applicable)
ft.
e. Average daily flow rate
1.959 mgd
I. Does this outiall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge?
❑ Yes ® No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge:
mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser?
❑ Yes ® No
A-110. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water South Fork River
b. Name of watershed (if known) Catawba
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
C. Name of State Management'River Basin (if known): Catawba
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute
cfs
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable):
cfs
mg/I of CaCO3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 149). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 5 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
® Primary ® Secondary
❑ Advanced ❑ Other. Descnbe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal 95 %
Design SS removal 93 %
Design P removal 25 %
Design N removal 78 %
Other %
C. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this ouffall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
Sodium Hvaochlorite 10%
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlonnation used for this ouffall? ® Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? ❑ Yes ® No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfalt through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QAIQC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart
Oudall number. 001
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
PARAMETER
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
6.1
S.U.
_
pH (Maximum)
7.8
S.U.
Flow Rate
12.75
mgd
1.959
m d
36
Temperature (Winter)
20.0
°C
16.8
°C
12
Temperature (Summer) 29.0 °C 26.9 °C 9
' For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Number
Cone.
Units
Cone.
Untts
of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
BOD5
32
m /I
5.76
m /I
36
SM521OB-2001
2 m /L
DEMAND (Report one)
CB0D5
FECAL COLIFORM
15300
Colonies/
23.4
Colonies/
36
SM9222D-1997
Colonies/
100mL
100mL
10OmL
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
44.2
In 11
7.93
m /I
36
SM254OD-1997
END OF PART A.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550.6 & 7550-22.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate z 0.1 mild must answer questions BA through 8.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.I. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
700,000 (heavy rain events) god
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map If one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within %mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, anti/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redunancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
BA. OperationlMaintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractors responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: I )
Responsibilities of Contractor:
B.G. Scheduled Improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any unwmpleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design rapacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the ouffall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
NIA
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes ❑ No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 7 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
C. If the answer to B.5.b is'Yes,' briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as
applicable. For improvements planned independently of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MMIDD/YYYY MMIDD/YYYY
- Begin Construction I / / /
- End Construction l 1 I l
- Begin Discharge
- Attain Operational Level / / / /
e. Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other FederalfState requirements been obtained? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Describe briefly:
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters.
Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent
is discharged. Do not include information on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information reported
must be based on data collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this
data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for
standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and on -half years old.
Outfall Number: 001
MAXIMUM DAILY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
MUMDL
Cone.
Units
Conc.
Units
Numberof
METHOD
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
15.3
mg/L
0.73
mg/L
36
SM 4500NH3-
1997
0.1 mg/L
CHLORINE(TOTAL
49
pg/L
15.3
Ng/L
36
SM 4500CLG-
20 ug/L
RESIDUAL, TRC)
2000
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
8.32
mg/L
7.79
mg/L
3
HACH110360-
2011 REV (LDO)
0.1 mg/L
TOTAL KJELDAHL
38.0
mg/L
6.5
mg/L
36
SM 4500-N
0.5 mg/L
NITROGEN (TKN)
ORG B
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
8.0
mg/L
3.7
mg/L
36
SM 4500-NO3
01 mg/L
NITROGEN
F
OIL and GREASE
4.0
mg/L
2.1
mg/L
3
5520B-2001
1 mg/L
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
9.2
mg/L
1.83
mg/L
36
SM 4500-P F
0.100 mg/L
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS 3
830 mg/L 368 mg/L SM 2540C 1 mg/L
(TDS)
TOTAL NITROGEN 13.9 mg/I 9.36 mg/L 36 CALCULATED 1 mg/L
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton VVWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART C. CERTIFICATION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Forth 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
® Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
® Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
® Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitonng Data)
® Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION.
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathenng the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official tltle D nald A. Burke Jr. VVWTP Su erintendent/ORC
Signature
Telephone number (7 041736-8960
a _ 10 - 9-o g b
Date signed
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EPA Far, 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 9 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
South Fork
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate CA/QC requirements for standard methods for analyses not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this forth. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLJMOL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Unib
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
28
pg/L
< 10
pg/L
12
EPA 200.7
10 ug/L
ARSENIC
< 10
pg/L
< 10
pg/L
12
EPA 200.7
10 ug/L
BERYLLIUM
< 20
pg/L
< 1
pg/L
3
EPA 200.7
1 ug/L
CADMIUM
< 0.2
pg/L
< 0.2
pg/L
12
EPA 200.7
0.2 ug/L
CHROMIUM
6
pg/L
< 1
pg/L
12
EPA 200.7
1 ug/L
COPPER
33
pg/L
10.6
pg/L
12
EPA 200.7
1 ug/L
LEAD
< 10
pg/L
< 10
pg/L
12
EPA 200.7
10 uglL
MERCURY
11.5
ng/L
3.6
ri
12
EPA 1631 E
0.5 nglL
NICKEL
< 1
pg/L
< 1
pg/L
12
EPA 200.7
1 ug/L
SELENIUM
< 10
pg/L
< 10
pg/L
12
EPA 200.7
10 ug/L
SILVER
< 1
pg/L
< 1
pg/L
12
EPA 200.7
1 ug/L
THALLIUM
< 20
pg/L
< 1
pg/L
3
EPA 200.7
1 ug/L
ZINC
380
pglL
70
pg/L
12
EPA 200.7
1 ug/L
CYANIDE
5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
12
SEM 4500-CN
5 ug/L
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
14
pg/L
6.3
pg/L
3
EPA 420.1
5 L
ug/L
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)
94
mg/L
39
mg/L
12
EPA 23408
30 ug/L
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
MOLYBDENUM
< 1
pg/L
< 1
pg/L
12
EPA 200.7
1 ug/L
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 10 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton VVVVTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
Outfall number: (Complete once for each ouffall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Number
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Unts
Mass
Units
Of
Samples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
< 50
pg/L
< 50
pg/L
3
EPA 624
50 ug/L
ACRYLONITRILE
< 50
pg/L
< 50
pg/L
3
EPA 624
50 ug/L
BENZENE
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
BROMOFORM
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
< 5
pg/L
<5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
CHLOROBENZENE
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
CHLORODIBROMO-
9.92
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
METHANE
CHLOROETHANE
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
ETHER
< 10
/L
pg/L
<1O
pi� L
3
EPA 624
10 ug/L
CHLOROFORM
22.5
pg/L
10.9
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
DICHLOROBROMO-
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
METHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
TRANS-I,2-DICHLORO-
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
1,&DICHLORO-
PROPYLENE
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
ETHYLBENZENE
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
METHYL BROMIDE
< 10
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
METHYL CHLORIDE
< 10
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
CHLOROETHANE
TErRACHLORO-
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
ETHYLENE
TOLUENE
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
EPA Fonn 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forma 7550-5 R 7550-22. Page 11 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Lincolnton VVVVTP, NCO025496
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
South Fork
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Unit
s
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
TRICHLOROETHANE
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
TRICHLOROETHANE
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
< 5
pg/L
< 5
pg/L
3
EPA 624
5 ug/L
VINYL CHLORIDE
< 5
pg/L
< 2.3
pg/L
3
EPA 624
2 ug/L
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
2-CHLOROPHENOL
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
4,6-DINITRO-0-CRESOL
< 280
pg/L
< 95.6
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
< 320
pg/L
< 108.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
5.9 ug/L
2-NITROPHENOL
/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
4-NfTROPHENOL
/L
< 55.6
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
1pg
/L
< 35.6
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
5.9 ug/L
PHENOL
/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
TR;C
TRICHLOROPHENOL
/L
< 9.1
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid -extractable compounds requested by the permit writer
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
ACENAPHTHYLENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
ANTHRACENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
BENZIDINE
< 340
pg/L
< 115.6
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
BENZO(A)PYRENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22, Page 12 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO026496
REQUESTED:
South Fork
Renewal
Outfall number (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Number
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
of
Samples
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
FLUORANTHENE
RANT
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
< 60
pg/L
< 22.3
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
LUORA� FNTHENE
LUORA
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
METHANE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
ETHER
BIS (2-CHL -
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
THER
PROPVL)EETHER
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
< 320
pg/L
< 108.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
PHTHALATE
HE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
PHENYLETHERR
PHENYLETHER
BUTYL BENZYL
< 40
pg/L
< 15.6
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
PHTHALATE
H LORO-
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
NAPHTHALTHALENE
NA
4-CHLORPHENYL
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
PHENYLETHER
CHRYSENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
< 120
pg/L
< 42.3
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
DISENZO(A,H)
< 200
pg/L
< 68.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
ANTHRACENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625A
1.2 ug/L
1,3-DICHLOROSENZENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
3,3-DICHLORO-
< 240
pg/L
< 82.3
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
BENZIDINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
2,6-DINrrROTOLUENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
1,2-DIPHENYL-
< 80
pg/L
< 28.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
HYDRAZINE
EPA Farm 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 13 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
South Fork
Outfall number. (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United Stales.) '
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MLIMDL
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
FLUORANTHENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
Ng/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 u9/1-
FLUORENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
HEXACHLORO-
BUTADIENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
PENTADIENE
< 240
pg/L
< 82.3
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
HEXACHLOROETHANE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
PYRENE
< 56
pg/L
< 20.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
ISOPHORONE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
NAPHTHALENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
NITROBENZENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
N-NITROSODI-N-
PROPYLAMINE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
N-NITROSODI-
METHYLAMINE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
N-NITROSODI-
PHENYLAMINE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
PHENANTHRENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
PYRENE
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
TRIGHLOROBENZENE
RIC
< 20
pg/L
< 8.9
pg/L
3
EPA 625.1
1.2 ug/L
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base -neutral compounds requested by the permit writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g., pesticides) requested by the permit writer
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fortes 7550-6 8 7550-22. Page 14 of 22

Lincolnton NC
City of Lincolnton WWTP
2020 NPDES Permit Application
Supplemental Application Information
Part E
Toxicity Testing Data
CITY OF LINCOLNTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
550 W. HWY. 150 BYPASS • P.O. BOX 617 • LINCOLNTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28093-0617
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403): or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• Al a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question EA for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.I. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
0 18E] chronic ❑ acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one -hag years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
Test number 9/15/15 Test number. 1211712015 Test number. 03124/2016
a. Test information.
Ceriodaphnia dubia 1002.0
Ceriodaphnia dubia 1002.0
Ceriodaphnia dubia 1002.0
Test Species Blest method number
Age at initiation of test
20.88hrs
22.58 hrs
21.63 hrs
Outfall number
001
001
001
Dates sample collected
9/15115
If 12/17/2015
3/2412016
Date test started
9114115
12/1612015
3/23/2016
Duration
24 hrs
24 hrs
24 hrs
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Short term Method for
Short term Method for
Short term Method for
Estimating Chronic Toxicity
Estimating Chronic
Estimating Chronic
Manual title
of Effluent Receiving
Toxicity of Effluent
Toxicity of Effluent
Waters to Fresh Water
Receiving Waters to Fresh
Receiving Waters to
Organisms
Water Organisms
Fresh Water Organisms
Edition number and year of publication
0 October 2002
4thO October 2002
4the October 2002
Page number(s)
141-196
141-196
141-196
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
x
x
x
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection

After disinfection
After dechlorination x - x I x
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
South Fork
Test number: S116116 Test number: 1211112016 Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
x
x
x
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
x
x
Flow -through
EEE
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Lake Brandt
Lake Brandt
Lake Brandt
Receiving water
I. Type of dilution water. If saltwater, specify 7naturar or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
x
x
x
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
11
11
11
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
PH
x
x
X
Salinity
Temperature
x
x
x
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
x
x
x
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
%
%

LCN
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMR ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
Chronic:
NOEC
%
%
%
ICas
%
%
%
Control percent survival
100 %
100
100
Other (describe)
m. Quality ControVQuality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
yes
yes
yes
Was reference toxicant test within
yes
yes
yes
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
09/30/2015
12/02/2015
03/30/2016
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe:
EA. Summary of Submitted Blomonftoring Test Information. if you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: / /(MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results(see instructions)
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Rp/ER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity. depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question EA for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomomtonng data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.I. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
®18 X❑ chronic ❑ acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
Test number. 06/09/2016 Test number 09/1512016 Test number. 12108/2016
a. Test information.
Cerindaphma dubia 1002.0
Ceriodaphnia dubia 1002.0
Ceriodaphnia dubis 1002.0
Test Species & test method number
Age at initiation of test
21.40 hrs
21.95 hrs
82.52 hrs
Outfall number
001
001
001
Dates sample collected
06/09/2016
09/15/2016
12/0812016
Date test started
06/08/2016
09/14/2016
12/0712016
Duration
24
24
24
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Short term Method for
Short term Method for
Short term Method for
Estimating Chronic Toxicity
Estimating Chronic
Estimating Chronic
Manual titre
of Effluent Receiving
Toxicity of Effluent
Toxicity of Effluent
Waters to Fresh Water
Receiving Waters to Fresh
Receiving Waters to
Organisms
Water Organisms
Fresh Water Organisms
Edition number and year of publication
4a' October 2002
0 October 2002
0 October 2002
Page number(s)
141-196
141-196
141-196
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used- For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
x
x
x
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection

After dechlonnation
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: TRMIT
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
South Fork
Test number: 061OW2018 Test number: Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity,
x
x
x
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
static
Static -renewal
x
x
x
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type: if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Lake Brandt
Lake Brandt
Lake Brandt
Receiving water
I. Type of diiution water. If sat water, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
x
x
x
Sat water
1. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
11
11
6
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
PH
x
x
x
Salinity
Temperature
x
x
x
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
x
x
x
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
LCW
95% C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%

Other (describe)
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
Chronic:
NOEC
%
%
%
ICss
%
%
%
Control percent survivat
100 %
100 %
100 %
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
yes
yes
yes
Was reference toxicant test within
yes
yes
yes
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
06/01/2016
09/07/2016
12/2112016
run (MWDONYYY)?
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitodng test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: / / (MWDD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with OA/OC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
OA/OC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question EA for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used report the reasons for using ahemate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.I. Required Testa.
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
18 X chronic ❑ acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests am being reported.
Test number. 03/06/2017 Test number 06/08/2017 Test number 09/14/2017
a. Test information.
Ceriodaphnia dubia 1002.0
Ceriodaphnia dubia 1002.0
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Test Species &test method number
1002.0
Age at initiation of test
22.87hrs
21.83 hrs
23.38 hrs
Outfall number
001
001
001
Dates sample collected
03109/2017
06/0812017
09/14/2017
Date test started
03/08/2017
06/07/2017
09/13/2017
Duration
24
24
24
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Short term Method for
Short term Method for
Short term Method for
Estimating Chronic Toxicity
Estimating Chronic
Estimating Chronic
Manual trite
of Effluent Receiving
Toxicity of Effluent
Toxicity of Effluent
Waters to Fresh Water
Receiving Waters to Fresh
Receiving Waters to
Organisms
Water Organisms
Fresh Water Organisms
Edition number and year of publication
4m October 2002
4`h October 2002
4th October 2002
Page number(s)
141-196
141-196
141-196
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
x
x
x
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection

After dechlormation
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCOO25496
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
South Fork
Test number. 0610812017 Test number: 09/14/2017 Test number.
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
x
x
x
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
x
x
x
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type: If receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Lake Brandt
Lake Brandt
Lake Brandt
Receiving water
I. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea setts or brine used.
Fresh water
x
x
x
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
6
6
k. Parameters measured during the lest. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
x
x
x
Salinity
Temperature
x
x
x
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
x
x
x
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
%
%
%
LC,
95% C.I.
%
%
%

Control percent survival % % %
Other (describe)
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
Chronic:
NOEC
%
%
%
ICZ
%
%
%
Control percent survival
100 %
100 %
100 %
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
Yes
Yes
Yes
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
03/01/2017
06/21/2017
09/06/2017
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ❑ No if yes, describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonilonng test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity. within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: / / (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
— - END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincointon WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• Al a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analyzes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question EA for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.1. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
C 18 X❑ chronic ❑ acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one -hall years. Allow one
column per test (where each species wnstilutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
Test number 12/07/2017 Test number 0310812018 Test number 06/07/2018
a. Test information.
Ceriodaphnia dubia 1002.0
Ceriodaphnia dubia 11302.0
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Test Species a test method number
1002.0
Age at initiation of test
21.45 his
21.52 hrs
22.38 hrs
Outfau number
001
001
001
Dates sample collected
12/07/2017
03/08/2018
06/07/2018
Date test started
12/06/2017
06/0712018
06/06/2018
Duration
24
24
24
h niva rnrinity ta_et maMMe frAnwad_

After deddodnation
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
PERMT ACTION REOUFSTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
South Fork
Test number: 12/07/2017 Test number: 0310812017 Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
f For each test, include whether fine test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
x
x
x
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
x
x
x
Flow -through
h. Sourceof dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type: if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Lake Brandt
Lake Brandt
Lake Brandt
Receiving water
I. Type of dilution water. If sae water, specify'naturar orb" of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
x
x
x
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
6
6
6
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether Parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
x
x
x
Salinity
Temperature
x
x
x
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
x
x
x
1. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
%
%
%
LC'
95% C.I.
%
%
%

Control percent survival % % %
Other (describe)
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
Chronic:
NOEC
%
%
%
IC,
%
%
%
Control percent survival
100 %
100 %
100 %
Other (describe)
m. Quality ControVOuality, Assurance.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
Yes
Yes
Yes
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
11/28/2017
02128/2018
05/30/2018
run (MMIDD/YYYY)?
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonhoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: / / (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results(see instructions)
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd: 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403): or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one -hag years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate CA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again Rather, provide the information
requested in question E 4 for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitonng data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the forth to
complete.
E.I. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
18 X chronic ❑ acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one -had years. Allow one
column per lest (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page 0 more than three tests are being reported.
Test number 09/27/2018 Test number: 12120/2018 Test number: 0312112019
a. Test information.
Ceriodaphnia dubia 1002.0
Ceriodaphnia dubia 1002.0
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Test Species 8testmefltod number
1002.0
Age at initiation of test
21.67 hrs
22.30 hrs
22.67 hrs
Outfall number
001
001
001
Dates sample collected
09/27/2018
12/20/2018
03121/2019
Date test started
09/26/2018
12/19/2018
03/20/2019
Duration
24
24
24
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Short term Method for
Short term Method
Short term Method
Estimating Chronic Toxicity
for Estimating Chronic
for Estimating Chronic
Manual title
of Effluent Receiving
Toxicity of Effluent
Toxicity of Effluent
Waters to Fresh Water
Receiving Waters to Fresh
Receiving Waters to
Organisms
Water Organisms
Fresh Water Organisms
Edition number and year of publication
41h October 2002
4'h October 2002
41h October 2002
Pagenumber(s)
141-196
141-196
141-196
c. Give the sample collection mettxxl(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
x
x
x
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection

After dechlorination
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Lincointon WWTP, NCO025496
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
South Fork
Test number: 09/27/2018 Test number: Test number:
e. Describe the point in the trealmsm process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
I. For each lest, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity. acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
x
x
x
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
x
x
x
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; 'd receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Lake Brandt
Lake Brandt
Lake Brand[
Receiving water
x
x
x
i. Type of dilution water. If sat water, specify'naturar or" of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
x
x
x
Sall water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
6
6
6
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
PH
x
x
x
Salinity
Temperature
x
x
x
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
x
x
x
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
%
%
%

95%C.I.
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
Other (describe)
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
END
PERMIT ACTION REQUF�TED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
Chronic:
NOEC
%
%
Ic"
%
%
%
Control percent survival
100 %
100 %
100 %
Other (describe)
m. Quality Controi/Quality Assurance.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
Yes
Yes
Yes
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
09/19/2018
01/02/2019
03127/2019
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works imotved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe:
EA. Summary of Submitted Blomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date wtxoitted: ! / (MMIDDIYYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
OF PART E
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.

21.65 hrsFACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:W
City of Lincolnton WTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), of the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with CA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition. submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one -hart years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question E 4 for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the fore to
complete.
E.1. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
E] ❑ chronic ❑ acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity lest conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
Test number. 61062019 Test number. 9112//2019 Test number. 1210512019
a. Test information.
Ceriodaphniadubia 1002.0
Ceriodaphniadubia 1002.0
Ceriodaphniadubia
Test Species 8 test method number
1002.0
Age at initiation of test
21.65his
21.65 hrs
21.60
Outfall number
001
001
001
Dates sample collected
06/06/2019
9/12/2019
12/5/2019
Date test started
0610512019
9/11/2019
12/4/2019
Duration
24
24
24
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Short term Method for
Short term Method
Short term Method
Estimating Chronic Toxicity
for Estimating Chronic
for Estimating Chronic
Manual title
of Effluent Receiving
Toxicity of Effluent
Toxicity of Effluent
Waters to Fresh Water
Receiving Waters to Fresh
Receiving Waters to
Organisms
Water Organisms
Fresh Water Organisms
Edition number and year of publication
41" October 2002
4'" October 2002
4"October 2002
Page number(s)
141-196
141-196
141-196
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
x
x
x
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection

After dechlorination
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCOO25496
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
South Fork
Test number: Test number: 9/12112019 Tact number: 12/05/2019
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
I. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
X
x
X
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
X
x
x
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type: if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Lake Brandt
Lake Brandt
Lake Brandt
Receiving water
x
x
X
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify Yraturer "type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
x
X
x
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
6
6
6
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
PH
x
x
x
Salinity
Temperature
x
X
x
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
x
x
X
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
%
%
%

95% C.I.
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other(descdbe)
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
Chronic:
NOEC
%
%
%
Ices
%
%
%
Control percent survival
100 %
100 %
91.67%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
Yes
Yes
Yes
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
5/29/2019
9/4/2019
12/18/2019
run (MM/DDIYYYY)?
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe: _.
EA. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: / / _ (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.

Lincolnton NC
City of Lincolnton WWTP
2020 NPDES Permit Application
Supplemental Application Information
Part F
Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERLA Wastes
CITY OF LINCOLNTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
550 W. HWY. 150 BYPASS - P.O. BOX 617 - LINCOLNTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28093-0617
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
City of Linoolnton WWTP, NCO025496 I Renewal South Fork
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. N more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the Information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name:
Mailing Address:
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Ink adhesive and mating manufactunnu on water based ink
F.6. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Ultra violet and water based inks and coatings
Raw material(s): pigments dispersion ammonia and isopropyl alcohol
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
300 god ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent
400 gpd L continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits X❑ yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ yes X❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
F.8.
Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets. interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
; J Yes XLJ No If yes, describe each episode.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496 Renewal South Fork
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following Information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the Information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Cataler North America Corporation
Mailing Address:
Lincolnton NC 28092 _
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Provides catalytic coatings to ceramic substrates for the automotive industry.
F.S. Principal Products) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SlUs
discharge.
Principal product(s): Automotive catalytic converters _
Raw material(s) : See attached sheet for Cataler
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
16,736 glad ( X continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
glad ( x continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits X❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes x❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets. interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes X❑ No If yes, describe each episode.

FACILITY NAME AND PERWT NUMBER: PERANT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496 I Renewal South Fork
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following Information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Celadon Recycling Solutions
Mailing Address: 288 Whitehouse Drive
Lincolnton NC 28092
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Service provider to recycle and wash intermediate bulk containersThe wash water will be treated on site and the maionty recycled back to
wash process Excess wash and rinse waters are discharged to the City.
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIIPs
discharge.
Principal pruduct(s): Cleaning and rebottling of IBC shipping containers
Raw material(s): Hot water, pressure washersVANr chemicals (wastewater treatment chemicals) ALCL3 solution NAOH and
Anionic Polymer Ozone for final rinse disinfection
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or inlerm Uent.
8300 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (god) and whether the discharge is continuous of intermittent.
Separate pipe for domesticgpd (_continuous or _ intemittent)
F.T Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits X❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes X❑ No
If subject to calegoncel pretreatment standards. which category and subcategory?
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or corvribuled to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
X❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe each episode.
Problems with excessive amounts of surfactants entering lant causing the Effluent to be soapy and the receivino water very suds
Their dischante of sudsy water entenno and processing through our plant has happened twice in 2019.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER' PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, N00025496 I Renewal South Fork
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: G&W NC Laboratories LLC _
Mailing Address: 1877 Kawai Road
Lincolnton NC 28092
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufacture and package topical creams lotions and ointment supposilones and liouid pharmaceuticals
F.B. Principal Product(s) and Raw Materfal(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the Slu's
discharge.
Principal pmduct(s): Pharmaceutical products of the following dwo class' Analgesic Antibacterial Antibiotic
AnlicholinemidAmispasmodic Anticonvulsant Antifungal Antihistamine Antiparasite Local Anesthetics Antiviral Bronchodilator. Corticosteroitl
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatoryand Retinoid
Raw material(s): Raw Materials induce petrolatum active pharmaceutical ingredients sudactants preservatives sweeteners and
alcohols.
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
6.510 gpd ( X continuous or _ intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (god) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
490 gpd (_ X continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits X❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards X❑ Yes ❑ No
It subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 439 Subc iteaory D
F.S. Problems at the Treatment works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
0 Yes X❑ No If yes, describe each episode.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496 Renewal South Fork
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. N more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial (tsar Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: KACO USA INC.
Mailing Address: 1001 Lincoln County Pkwy
Lincolnton NC 28092
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Automotive parts manufacturing cons sting in surface treatment of metals using phosphate and organic coatings rubber molding using
presses and finishing
F.5. Principal Products) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU s
discharge.
Principal product(s): Oil seals gaskets bonded piston seals
Raw material(s): See attached information for Kaco USA.
F.B. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
0 gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
Separate pipe for domestic gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits X❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards X❑ Yes ❑ No
If subject to categoncal pretreatment standards. which category and subcategory?
This 433 industrial user is working on drooping their permit due to a new unit they installed for the evaporation of their wastewater
discharge Currently their only dischage to the City is domestic and water from their metal molding department
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any, problems (e.g.,
upsets. interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes X❑ No If yes, describe each episode.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496 Renewal South Fork
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. N more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the Information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: McMurray Fabrics
Mailing Address: 1140 North Flint Street
Lincolnton NC 28092
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
This is a textile dyeing and finishing plant Various types of synthetic and cotton cloth goods are dyed Different finishes are also applied
during the Tenter Frame during and heating process
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Materlal(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Textile fabrics used in apparel industrial medical and automotive applications.
Raw matenal(s): Soda Ash Hydrogen peroxide 50 % Acetic Acid 50% Ammonium Hydroxide Cekasol BOD Salt, various dyes.
Ecoclean 478 Gardo 1501 Inuatex NSU Color Gear solution Caro -Clean BMC Bio-Carder 100 Sunmod BK-710.
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
212,000 gpd (X) continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. P.9b lanent Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Loral limits X❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes X❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards. which category and subcategory?
F.8. Problems at the Treatinerit Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes X❑ No If yes, describe each episode.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: I PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: I RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
supply the following information for each SIU. N more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submiladditional pages
as necessary.
Name: R W Garcia
Mailing Address: 3181 Progress Drive -
Lincolnton NC 28092
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufacture and distribute tortilla chips and crackers for human consumption
F.6. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that effect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): _ tortilla chips and crackers
Raw material(s): Whole com or com flour, vegetable powders salt various seasonings seeds (chia flax sesame). beans (black
beans chickpea Lentils) Quinoa Calcium Hydroxide (Lime).
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
14,906 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
24.450 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Prebeabnent Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits X❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes X❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or corddb4Aed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes X❑ No If yes, describe each episode.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
City of Lincolnton WWTR NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: ST Engineering LeeBoY Inc dba LeeBoy
Mailing Address: 500 Lincoln County Parkway Extension
Lincolnton NC 28092
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufactures Paving gguipment by taking raw steel parts and welding them painting them an adding them to the finished product.
Pressure washing is a necessary step in the cleaning and final Preparation of the product
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Asphalt pavers motor graders and rollers _
Raw matenal(s): Phosphate chemical solution sodium hydroxide -n cleaners mixed with city water to wash machines at off of 4-9
S U.
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
2886 gpd (X) continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
1887 gpd (X) continuous or internittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits X❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards X❑ Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
433 sub artA
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes X❑ No If yes, describe each episode.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
rzTk1VA:T_1iO
City of Lincolnton WWTP, NCO025496
Renewal
South Fork
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following Information for each SIU. N more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: The Timken Company
Mailing Address: 1000 Timken Place
Iron Station NC 28080
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that abed or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Produces HHIh Quality Tapered Roller Seanna Components and assemblies up to 10.5 inches (267) in diameter used for heavy duly
applications in U.S. truck farm and industrial applications
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Tapered Roller Bearings and Package Bearing Hub assemblies
Raw material(s): High Quality Alloy Steel Tubes wireand forgings
F.B. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent
7000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
20.000 gpd ( continuous or X intemrittenl)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following.
a. Local limits X❑ Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes X❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes X❑ No If yes, describe each episode.

Lincointon
New the City. Near the Mountaim. Near Perfect.:
City of Lincolnton WWTP
2020 NPDES Permit Application
Attachment 1
Question 13.2
Topographic Maps
CITY OF LINCOLNTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
550 W. HWY. 150 BYPASS - P.O. BOX 617 - LINCOLNTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28093-0617
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]

Attachment 1 is an assortment of maps and pictures of the City of Lincolnton WWTP. These maps range
from 1 mile or greater area surrounding the WWTP to showing each process unit at the WWTP.
CITY OF LINCOLNTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
SSO W. HWY. ISO BYPASS • P.O. BOX 617 - LINCOLNTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28093-0617
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]

:'r lonb
Elementary Schoolt a +nolDownr'
®
.r
' gar &wicur.
" •
Bplscaoal Cfiurc� '
®
' HIIIIrPSupviems'
^�
Calvary. BaDlist Chu ch',*
tar, Center Health and
Edl. ♦ _
Pi
n Edwards Landscape t
4L
oar
f
( OlAassapoanC
.
r .:
d Mana9emi
�o r
•
Cuniriq Hci`se Salon 0 "
x
t�
Hmerrcan ,p`,f�
South Fork Baptisi
Coweninq. LT � v�if
•' Q-socletian � -
.Y. r ♦ Love Memoeat..
Elementary Schcol.
♦ ., .
Lmcolmoa
: ¢,
t
%Poselhn�BaPticl k
Waste freatment
o rammo al e Cialo
�
Chun:fi�
® Nsleyan church
♦
n .lolnny's Me.ican s
.
� r141
,nte•ican. Bar and Gtll�
Fresenws KldneyjhV
e .ahside Baptist Church
Llncolmmn
South To k P
JI
his sY' fallrailh^ad
__ . South Fury. Pall Trail '
�dwirc
1.
�..�...
�• ChuchofC d
at 100nri
y{ • The l.uhoratory
Mill. ".
�
Google
�jhlakllJ
�.
South Plver

Ile
Y � 4
BettJI G
Ross �ParNIP
k
L
04
s
l• •
4. 3D
Google
i.
•27'08"N 81^15.33"W 4 ml

Facility Information
Latitude:
35 deg 26 min 34 sec
Longitude:
81 deg 15 min 39 sec
Quad No.:
F13NE
RecaMng Stream:
So lh Fork Catawba
Sub -Basin:
03-08-35
Stream Class:
WS-N
N
City of Lincol
Pease Associates
0 100200 400 600 800
2009027

Lincolnton WWTP Treatment Units Overview

Lincolnton WWT Flow Diagram

Lincolnton WWT Flow Diagram

Lincolnton WWT Flow Diagram

Lincolnton WWT Flow Diagram

kit
�a

Lincolnton WWT Flow Diagram

Lincolnton WWT Flow Diagram
..a

Near the City. Near the MountAns.Near Perfect
City of Lincolnton WWTP
2020 NPDES Permit Application
Attachment 2
Question B.3
Water Balance Sheet

Lincolnton WWTP Water Balance Sheet
Influent from City
Main Lift Pump
Station (Avg
Daily Flow is
2.2 MGD)
Orbal Ditch (Avg Flow-
2.2MGD Influent Flow +
2.4 MGD RAS ((Return
Activated Sludge)) Flow =
4.6 MGD)
Anaerobic
Digesters (Avg
Flow 12,000
oal/dav)
DAFT Return Water (20,000 gal/day)
Automatic Bar
Screen (Avg.
Daily Flow 2.2
MGD)
Aeration
Basins (Avg
Daily Flow 4.6
MGD)
Return Activated Sludge (2.4 MGD
Chlorine Dechlorination
Contact Basins Basin (Avg
(Avg Daily Daily Flow 2.2
Flow 2.2 MGD) MGD)
Grit Removal
System (Avg
Daily Flow 2.2
MGD)
WAS (Waste
Activated
Sludge) to
DAFT Unit
(Dissolved Air
Flotation
Thickner) (Avg
Daily Flow
50,000
gal/day)
(WAS
Final Clarifiers
(Avg Daily
Flow 4.6 MGD)
Effluent to
South Fork
River (Avg
Daily Flow 2.2
MGD)