The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20140351 Ver 2_More Info Received_20150129Homewood, Sue From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Good morning Sue and David, Diebolt, Linda <Idiebolt @hazenandsawyer com> Thursday, January 29, 2015 9 43 AM Homewood, Sue, Bailey, David E SAW Babson, Aaron D TZ Osborne WRF Corrected PCN-pages 4 and 7 pdf While addressing your emailed questions relative to the T.Z. Osborne PCN application, two mathematical errors were identified Below are the two items that required correction. The modified PCN application pages are attached Page 4 of 10: The total wetland impacts is incorrect The individual impact amounts are correct, but the total is wrong The incorrect number is highlighted below (0 096 acre) and the corrected information (0.108 acre) is provided on the attached PCN application page 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland Impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wedand area Impacted. 29. Wetland Impact number Permanent (P) or Tem 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland 2d_ Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction Corps (404,10) or DM (401, other) 2f Area of impact (acres) W1 P FM urkwm No Corps 0.074 W2 P FIB Unknown No Corps 0.005 W3 T Fill Unknown No Corps 0.029 W4 Chow® one Choose one YesMo - W5 - Choose one Choose one Yesmo We - Choose one Choose one YealNo - 2g, Total Wetland ImpacCs: � Page 7 of 10: There is a mathematical error in the buffer mitigation table, as highlighted below. The impact amounts are correct, but the math associated with the Zone 2 required mitigation calculation is incorrect (1,882 times 1.5 does not equal 1,884), which means that the total buffer mitigation required is also incorrect The buffer mitigation being purchased for this project is for the correct amount (7,643 square feet) A copy of the corrected PCN application page is attached 6b. If yes, then klentify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer than requires mlUgation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 8e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 Road and grading for road and clarifier x'640 3 (2 for Catawba) 4,820 Zone Road and grading for road and clarifier 1.883 1.59,884 N Of. Total buffer mitigation required: 8504 I apologize for the mathematical errors. Final impacts were calculated and the previously estimated impact totals were changed in the application, but evidently the math /totals were not changed It was Christmas eve and the spiked egg nog may or may not have been present. O Please let me know if you have any questions, etc Have a great day Linda Diebolt Senior Principal Scientist I HAZEN AND SAWYER 4011 WestChase Boulevard, Suite 500, Raleigh, NC 27607 919 833 -7152 (office) 1919 863 -9256 (direct) 1919 906 -1775 (cell) Idiebolt @hazenandsawyer com I hazenandsawyer com C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply) ❑K Wetlands ❑ Streams —tributaries ❑x Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of number Corps (404,10) or impact Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres) Temporary T W1 P Fill Unknown No Corps 0 074 W2 P Fill Unknown No Corps 0 005 W3 T Fill Unknown No Corps 0 029 W4 - Choose one Choose one Yes /No - W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes /No - W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes /No 2g Total Wetland Impacts: 0 108 2h Comments W1 is a narrow herbaceous wetland located in a maintained, grassed field and is mowed on a regular basis W2 is a fringe wetland abutting an area of open water Permanent impacts will occur from fill associated with the perimeter road Temporary impacts will occur from construction activities associated with the perimeter road The area of temporary impact will be returned to original grade upon completion of construction 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or Intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites Impacted 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g Stream Impact Type of Impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact number Intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream length Permanent (P) or width (linear Temporary (T) (feet) feet) S1 - Choose one - - S2 - Choose one - - S3 - Choose one - - S4 - Choose one - - S5 - Choose one - - S6 - Choose one - - 3h Total stream and tributary Impacts 31 Comments Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires x Yes No buffer mitigation? 6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the amount of mitigation required 6c 6d 6e Zone Reason for impact Total Impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 Regrading for road 1,540 3 (2 for Catawba) 4,820 Zone 2 Regrading for road and road 1,882 1 5 2,823 6f Total buffer mitigation required: 7,643 6g If buffer mitigation Is required, discuss what type of mitigation Is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank, permlttee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment Into an approved In -lieu fee fund) The City of Greensboro will secure mitigation credits through an approved in -lieu fee program Documentation of the purchase of mitigation credits will be provided to DWR upon receipt 6h Comments Page 7 of 10 Homewood, Sue From: Diebolt, Linda <Idiebolt @hazenandsawyer com> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 112 PM To: Bailey, David E SAW Cc: Babson, Aaron D, Homewood, Sue Subject: RE TZ Osborne Water Reclamation Facility upgrades, Package 2, Guilford Co., SAW- 2014 -00820 (UNCLASSIFIED) Attachments: Figure 3 - Impacts Map pdf David, I hope that you are doing well I apologize for the confusion caused by the cover letter being incorrect My responses to your questions are provided below. 1) Total permanent impacts are 0 079 acre and the temporary impacts are 0.029 acre. The quantification in the cover letter is incorrect. - 2) Permanent impacts associated with W2 will occur from fill associated with the perimeter road. The temporary impacts to W2 will occur from construction activities associated with the perimeter road The area of temporary impact will be returned to original grade upon completion of construction A modified Figure 3 is attached that depicts the areas of permanent versus temporary impacts to W2. 3) The PCN is correct and the cover letter is incorrect The cumulative permanent impacts for the T Z Osborne WRF to date include 0 005 acre of permanent wetland impacts associated with Package 3 and 0 079 acre of permanent wetland impact associated with Package 2. Therefore, the total permanent wetland impacts associated with the upgrade activities at the T Z Osborne WRF to date are 0 084 acre Please let me know if you have any additional questions, etc. Have a great days Linda Diebolt Senior Principal Scientist I HAZEN AND SAWYER 4011 WestChase Boulevard, Suite 500, Raleigh, NC 27607 919 833 -7152 (office) 1919 863 -9256 (direct) 1919 906 -1775 (cell) Idiebolt @hazenandsawyer.com hazenandsawyer com - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Bailey, David E SAW [mailto.David E Bailey2 @usace.army.mil] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 3 23 PM To Diebolt, Linda; Steve Drew Cc Homewood, Sue Subject: T Z Osborne Water Reclamation Facility upgrades, Package 2, Guilford Co.; SAW- 2014 -00820 (UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats. NONE Linda and Steve, Thanks for your PCN and attached plans dated 12/22/2014, received 12/29/2014, for the above referenced project have reviewed the information and offer the following comments to be addressed before your application can be considered complete 1) The cover letter notes that impacts associated with the project include 0 096 acre of permanent impacts to wetlands However, the PCN lists wetland impact 3 as a temporary impact, which would reduce the amount of total permanent wetland impacts proposed to 0 079 acre. Which one is correct? 2) As described above, the PCN proposes 0.005 acre of permanent impacts to wetland 2, and 0 029 acre of temporary impacts to wetland 2. However, the PCN doesn't clearly describe what activity will result in temporary wetland impacts vs the permanent ones. Are the permanent impacts in wetland 2 related to perimeter road fill? If so, what will cause the temporary wetland impacts? Also, neither Figure 3 nor the plan sheets clearly show the break between temporary and permanent impacts to wetland 2. 3) Note that, if the PCN is correct and the use of Nationwide Permit 39 is verified for this project, than the total impacts for the T Z Osborne single and complete project (Package 1 -3) would include 0 084 acre of permanent wetland impacts. However, if, as the cover letter suggests all of the wetland impacts for Package 2 are permanent, then the total impacts for the T.Z. Osborne single and complete project (Package 1 -3) would include 0 101 acre of permanent wetland impacts; thus, per Nationwide Permit general condition 23(c), compensatory mitigation would be required in order to verify the use of NWP 39. Please provide the above information within 30 days of receipt of this Notification or we will consider your application withdrawn and close the file If you have any questions please let me know -Dave Bailey David E Bailey, PWS Regulatory Project Manager US Army Corps of Engineers CE- SAW -RG -R 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Phone (919) 554 -4884, Ext. 30. Fax. (919) 562 -0421 Email: David.E.Bailey2 @usace.army• mil The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at http: / /regulatory usacesurvey.com/ Classification. UNCLASSIFIED Caveats. NONE Homewood, Sue From: Babson, Aaron D <ababson @hazenandsawyer com> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10 29 AM To: Homewood, Sue, Diebolt, Linda Subject: RE TZ osborne Attachments: Re TZ Osborne SWMP, FONSI PDF, TZO Expansion Cleared Letter pdf Sue, Attached you'll find an email from Terri Aprile with the City of Greensboro Stormwater group who is responsible for Phase II permitting on the TZO site The email confirms the site was approved /grandfathered for Phase 2 requirements with the dates of approval Linda also provided the FONSI and Clearing house letter requested, also attached Please let me know if we can answer any additional questions. Best Regards, Aaron D Babson, PE Senior Principal Engineer I Hazen and Sawyer 4011 Westchase Blvd Raleigh, NC 27607 919 833 -7152 (main) 1919 971 -3256 (cell) ababsonC�hazenandsawyer com I www hazenandsawyer com From: Babson, Aaron D Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 8 56 AM To: 'Homewood, Sue'; Diebolt, Linda Subject: RE. TZ osborne Hi Sue, I was not involved with the stormwater permitting back in 2009, I'll work on tracking down the history of that and get back to you. As for the stormwater collection /conveyance system, there are three drop inlets to accept flow right around the Secondary Clarifier 7 and 8 in the middle of the site shown on C7 and C8 in your package This is a very small portion of the impervious area on site and is not expected to affect the time to peak or nutrient concentrations in that area by significant amounts You are correct that the majority of the stormwater falling on the new construction will sheetflow to the perimeter grassed swale and discharge to the farm pond. Thanks, Aaron Regards, Aaron D Babson, PE 1 Senior Principal Engineer I Hazen and Sawyer 4011 Westchase Blvd Raleigh, NC 27607 919 833 -7152 (main) 1919 971 -3256 (cell) ababson(cDhazenandsawyer com I www hazenandsawver com From: Homewood, Sue [mailto• sue homewood @ncdenr Rov] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 5 43 PM To: Babson, Aaron D, Diebolt, Linda Subject: RE TZ osborne Aaron and Linda, I have Just a couple administrative clarifications /questions for this permit. Under the stormwater questions I'm a little unclear on the master plan /grandfathering Who decided that the site was grandfathered? Was this through the Phase II permitting process? Can you provide any documentation that is specific to grandfathering any new BUA (roof, parking lot, new roads etc) at the plant? I Just need to be sure I've covered everything adequately in my file Am I correct in that the area being added for this phase does not include any stormwater collection /conveyance system? All stormwater that hits the pad or the road will sheet flow across the area to the slopes along the edges and that these will be vegetated. The only collection is the drainage swale that already exists and will be relocated to the new edge of the pad? Do you have a FONSi approval that is stamped or signed by state clearing house? Please note my new contact information Sue Homewood NC DENR Winston -Salem Regional Office Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 Winston Salem NC 27105 Voice. (336) 776 -9693 Cell (336) 813 -1863 E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Babson, Aaron D [ma i Ito: ababson @hazenandsawyer.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 4:26 PM To: Homewood, Sue; Diebolt, Linda Subject: RE: TZ osborne Thank you Sue, To update you on where this project stands; we have rerouted the storm drain system originally designed to outlet to a new outfall on the northeast corner and now have it routed to combine at an existing structure, resulting in no new storm drain outfall in the pond. We believe this decreases the original proposed impacts and I think /hope you'll like it Now the only features outfalling to the buffer /pond is the proposed perimeter channel outletting to the same location as the existing rip rap channel and the proposed road fill we discussed on previous emails I hope this design Homewood, Sue From: Apple, Terri <Tern Apple @greensboro -nc gov> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10 20 AM To: Babson, Aaron D Cc: Spillman, Virginia Subject: Re TZ Osborne SWMP Aaron — a plan was submitted to grandfather the site for the upcoming Phase 2 requirements, water quality The Phase 2 grandfathering process entailed a Stormwater Management Plan to be submitted and approved by December 31, 2009 Then a subsequent TRC site plan must be submitted by July 30, 2014 and approved by December 31, 2014. There was an extension in the time from the NC Legislature for the TRC plan to be submitted The plan was 2009 -0737 titled TZ Osborne Water Reclamation Facility SWMP. This plan was approved on July 28,2009 The subsequent TRC site plan 2013- 1054 TZ Osborne Water Reclamation Facility plan was submitted by July 30, 2014 and approved by TRC on May 8, 2014 The process was correctly done and the site was grandfathered for Phase 2 requirements Let me know if Sue Homewood needs any further information on the site Thanks) Terri C. Aprile, Stormwater Engineering Specialist Department of Water Resources City of Greensboro Phone: (336) 373 -2729 Fax: (336)412 -6305 PO Box 3136, Greensboro, NC 27402 www. q ree n s b o ro -n c. q ov Please note that email sent to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. RCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E. Governor Director October 10, 2012 MEMORANDUM TO: Mary Sadler Hazen and Sawyer FROM: Hannah Headrick, SEPA Coordinator 0116k Basinwide Planning Unit and SEPA Program SUBJECT: Guilford County City of Greensboro — TZ Osborne WWTP Expansion DWQ #14418, DENR#1566 Dee Freeman Secretary On October 9, 2012, the State Clearinghouse deemed the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act review on the above project complete (see attached correspondence from the Clearinghouse). It is now acceptable to proceed with your permit applications through the Division of Water Quality for the proposed project. No further actions on the Environmental Assessment are required. Please contact me at 807 -6434 or via email (hannah.headrick@ncdenr.gov) if you have any questions. Thank you. 1617 Mad Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617 Location 512 N. Salisbury St Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone, 919 -807 -63001 FAX, 919 -807 -6492 Internet: www ncwaterQuality org An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmabve Action Employer NonrthCarolina Natm6 tiff R �1Ep North Carolina Department of Administration Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Moses Carey, Jr., Secretary October 9, 2012 Ms. Harmah Headrick NCDENR Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617 Re: SC13 File # 13 -E- 4300 -0075; EA/FONSI; Proposed project is for the T.Z. Osborne Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion. Dear Ms. Headrick. The above referenced environmental impact information has been reviewed through the State Clearinghouse under the provisions of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act. Attached to this letter are comments made in the review of this document. Because of the nature of the comments, it has been determined that no further State Clearinghouse review action on your part is needed for compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act. The attached comments should be taken into consideration in project development. Sincerely, Crystal Best State Environmental Review Clearinghouse Attachments cc: Region G Mailing Address. Telephone (919)807 -2425 Location Address: 1301 Mail Service Center Fax (919)733 -9571 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27699 -1301 State Courier #51 -01 -00 Raleigh, North Carolina e -mail state clearinghouse Q daa nc gov An Egval Opportunity/Affirmatrve Acton Employer ;Homewood, Sue i From: Babson, Aaron D <ababson @hazenandsawyer com> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 8 56 AM To: Homewood, Sue, Diebolt, Linda Subject: RE TZ osborne Hi Sue, I was not involved with the stormwater permitting back in 2009, I'll work on tracking down the history of that and get back to you As for the stormwater collection /conveyance system, there are three drop inlets to accept flow right around the Secondary Clarifier 7 and 8 in the middle of the site shown on C7 and C8 in your package. This is a very small portion of the impervious area on site and is not expected to affect the time to peak or nutrient concentrations in that area by significant amounts You are correct that the majority of the stormwater falling on the new construction will sheetflow to the perimeter grassed swale and discharge to the farm pond Thanks, Aaron Regards, ,Aaron D. Babson, PE Senior Principal Engineer I Hazen and Sawyer 4011 Westchase Blvd Raleigh, NC 27607 .919 833 -7152 (main) ( 919 971 -3256 (cell) ababsonahazenandsawyer com I www hazenandsawyer com From: Homewood, Sue [mailto:sue homewood @ncdenr.gov] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 5.43 PM To: Babson, Aaron D, Diebolt, Linda Subject: RE. TZ osborne Aaron and Linda, I have dust a couple administrative clarifications /questions for this permit. Under the stormwater questions I'm a little unclear on the master plan /grandfathering. Who decided that the site was grandfathered? Was this through the Phase II permitting process? Can you provide any documentation that is specific to grandfathering any new BUA (roof, parking lot, new roads etc) at the plant? I just need to be sure I've covered everything adequately in my file Am I correct in that the area being added for this phase does not include any stormwater collection /conveyance system? All stormwater that hits the pad or the road will sheet flow across the area to the slopes along the edges and that these will be vegetated The only collection is the drainage Swale that already exists and will be relocated to the new edge of the pad? Do you have a FONSi approval that is stamped or signed by state clearing house? Please note my new contact information Sue Homewood NC DENR Winston -Salem Regional Office Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Programs 450 W Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 Winston Salem NC 27105 Voice. (336) 776 -9693 Cell- (336) 813 -1863 E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties From: Babson, Aaron D [ma i Ito: ababson(a)hazenandsawyer.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 4:26 PM To: Homewood, Sue; Diebolt, Linda Subject: RE: TZ osborne Thank you Sue, To update you on where this project stands; we have rerouted the storm drain system originally designed to outlet to a new outfall on the northeast corner and now have it routed to combine at an existing structure, resulting in no new storm drain outfall in the pond. We believe this decreases the original proposed impacts and I think /hope you'll like it Now the only features outfalling to the buffer /pond is the proposed perimeter channel outletting to the same location as the existing rip rap channel and the proposed road fill we discussed on previous emails I hope this design will be complete soon and we will get it in your hands as quickly as possible. We appreciate everything you've done and will do to help us on this time sensitive project and hope you see the attempts we made to have as little impact to the buffers and fringe wetlands as possible. Thanks again and hope you have a great weekend Regards, Aaron D Babson, PE Senior Principal Engineer I Hazen and Sawyer 4011 Westchase Blvd Raleigh, NC 27607 919 833 -7152 (main) ( 919 971 -3256 (cell) ababsonahazenandsawyer com ( www hazenandsawyer com From: Homewood, Sue [mailto sue homewood@ncdenr.Rov] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 4 10 PM To: Diebolt, Linda Cc: Bailey, David E SAW; Babson, Aaron D Subject: TZ osborne Hi Linda, I dust realized that I never wrote up a stream letter for the TZ Osborne site I'm sorry Here it is Homewood, Sue From: Diebo|t,Unda <|diebolt@hazenandsawyer.com> Sent: Thursday, January Z0'ZUl5Z:ZZPK4 To: Homewood, Sue Subject: Re: TZ Osborne VVRF Attachments: TZ Osborne WRF-City of Greensboro Reservation-012215.pdf Sue, l hope the new year is treating you well l have attached the file. Have a good day, Linda my Verizon Wireless 4G{lZDR[YD Sue" wrote: sm I'm very sorry I didn't catch this last week when I first picked up the project for review but we need a mitigation acceptance letter from EEPora buffer mitigation bank. Payment isn't required until vve issue our approvals but vveneed documentation that there is mitigation available for the project. Sue Homewood N[ DENRVVinston-Sa|em Regional Office DivisionofVVaterResources - VVaterCWa|ityPrograms 45OVV. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 3OO Winston Salem NC 27105 Voice:(336)776-9693 Cell: (336) 813-1863 E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed tothird parties. From: Diebn|t, Linda Sent: Thursday, ]anuary29,2O159:4]AM To: Homewood, Sue; Bailey, David ES/W Cm: Babson Aaron Subject: TZ Osborne VVRF Good morning Sue and David, 1 While addressing your emailed questions relative to the T.Z. Osborne PCN application, two mathematical errors were identified. Below are the two items that required correction. The modified PCN application pages are attached. Page 4 of 10: The total wetland impacts is incorrect. The individual impact amounts are correct, but the total is wrong. The incorrect number is highlighted below (0.096 acre) and the corrected information (0.108 acre) is provided on the attached PCN application page. W3 T 4 aCtS proposed err the site, then complete this question for each etlaod area it p cted. _.._.. 2_ 2e. 21r. 'hype of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdi n ,area of Corps. (4 .10) or impact L'V- (401, other) (acres) Fill y, Cortxs 0-074 Fill l 4f�kr Fill r� Choose ors 0hoose one Ysso o Choose one t,aose We Choose one No Cortxs 0-074 No Olorps �0.O06 No Corp 0-629 Ysso o - Y' ":I'NO 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: E !0=096 Page 7 of 10: There is a mathematical error in the buffer mitigation table, as highlighted below. The impact amounts are correct, but the math associated with the Zone 2 required mitigation calculation is incorrect (1,882 times 1.5 does not equal 1,884), which means that the total buffer mitigation required is also incorrect. The buffer mitigation being purchased for this project is for the correct amount (7,643 square feet). A copy of the corrected PCN application page is attached. b_ If yes, then WentVy the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that r"uires mitigation, Calcul ate the amount of mitiption required, Zane Reason f impact of l impact Multiplier Requ =red rnifi ion (square feet) (square feet) orre 1 Road and orading for r road and t, (2 for Catawba) 4,620 Read d �r r r r MW argil Zone clarifier t, 1, 4 �. fe Total buffer mitigatio required. 6,504 I apologize for the mathematical errors. Final impacts were calculated and the previously estimated impact totals were changed in the application, but evidently the math /totals were not changed. It was Christmas eve and the spiked egg nog may or may not have been present. O Please let me know if you have any questions, etc. Have a great day! Linda Diebolt Senior Principal Scientist I HAZEN AND SAWYER 4011 WestChase Boulevard, Suite 500, Raleigh, NC 27607 919 833 -7152 (office) 1919 863 -9256 (direct) 1919 906 -1775 (cell) Fil January 22, 2015 City of Greensboro PO Box 3136 Greensboro, NC 27402 Subject: Riparian Buffer Credit Reservation Letter —T.Z. Osborne Water Reclamation Facility Expansion and Upgrades Dear City of Greensboro: Restoration Systems has reserved +/ -7,643 sqft of riparian buffer offset credits at a price of $1.05 /sqft., making the total $8,025.15, from its Bass Mountain Mitigation Bank Parcel, DWR #09- 0622 to meet the requirements associated with permitting the project located within the Haw River Sub - watershed of Jordan Lake, USGS HUC 03030002 of the Cape Fear River Basin. These credits are reserved fora period of 60 days from the date of this letter, with the option to renew the reservation upon payment of a deposit equal to 1/3 of the total dollar amount reserved ($2,675.05). If you have any questions concerning this transaction please contact me at 919.334.9123. Sincerely, ti Tiffani Bylow Restoration Systems, LLC