The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNC0021717_Pretreatment Compliance Inspection_20150223 NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart Governor Secretary January 23, 2015 Mr. Scott Church Town of Wilkesboro 100 West Street RECEIVEDIDENRIDWR Wilkesboro,NC 28697 JAN 2 7 2015 SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspectionter i�tv� Town of Wilkesboro Permitting Section NPDES #NC0021717 Wilkes County Dear Mr. Church: On January 21, 2015 George Smith, of this office, conducted an inspection of the Town's pretreatment program. Ms. Brenda Welborn, Pretreatment Coordinator and Kim Wilkes were present for the inspection. The purpose of this inspection was to determine the effectiveness of the Town's pretreatment program by reviewing the files, which include: POTW plant performance, industry monitoring data, and adherence to the enforcement response plan(ERP). Background Information Currently,the Town has 2 significant industrial users (SIUs). POTW Interview • Review of the monitoring reports from January through November 2014 showed there was a monthly average violation for BOD for January 2014. The plant is very well operated and maintained. There are no problems at this time. Program Elements The Headworks Analysis (HWA) was approved on June 16, 2014. The next HWA is due April 1, 2019. The Industrial Waste Survey (IWS) was approved on December 15, 2014. The next IWS is due December 1., 2019. The Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)was approved on January 2, 2013. The Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) was approved on May 27, 2003. Long Term Monitoring Plan(LTMP)was approved on June 16, 2010. 450 W.Hanes Mill Road,Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27105 Phone:336-776-98001 Internet:www.ncdenr.gov An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer—Made in part by recycled paper PCI January 23,2015 File Review A review of the file for Tyson (#1003-1) revealed that the monitoring data was well organized and compliance evaluation was correctly performed. A review of the file for Wilkes County Landfill (#1004-1)revealed that the monitoring data was well organized and compliance evaluation was correctly performed. The slug control plans were kept in a file cabinet. The plans were recently updated to show the latest contacts. Action Items The next pretreatment annual report is due on March 1,2015. A review of the current permit for Wilkes County Landfill (#1004-1)showed that a permit limit for Ammonia 25 mg/L was added. The Landfill may not be able to meet this limit. This office recommends a permit modification to show a higher limit for Ammonia. The limit must be within the MAHL loading of the plant. Ms. Welborn is doing a very good job implementing the pretreatment program. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact George Smith or me at(336) 776-9800. Sincerely, W. Corey Basinger,Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Division of Water Resources,NCDENR cc: PERCS Unit—Monti Hassan WSRO Files NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION(PCI)REPORT / BACKGROUND INFORMATION[Complete Prior To PCI;Review Program Info Database Sheet(s], 1. Control Authority(POTW)Name: /a w a 6 f 1t.1/i/kes',opt 2. Control Authority Representative(s): grc„h. 14/z./bort/ 3. Title(s): 'Qps Cr etcnto/vi~ 4. Last Inspection Date: I/7t71 III Inspection Type(Check One): Elia ❑ Audit 5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ❑YES ❑NO 6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑YES 0 NO Order Type,Number,Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑YES 0 NO PCS CODING Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY �y Inspec.Type Inspector Fac.Type 1 N 1NICIO10I11 ' I71H7[ I6/ la/ I1" l 111 (DTIA) (TYPI) (1NSP) (FACC) 7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users(SIUs)? I X 1 SNS 8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users(CIUs)? I D CNS 9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? I 0 10.Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? 0 ` 11.Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10 I 0 NON 12.Number of SIUs With No IUP,or With an Expired IUP 0 NOCM 13.Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 0 PSNC Semi-Annual Periods(Total Number of Sills in SNC) 14.Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi-Annual Periods 0 MSNC 15.Number of SlUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi-Annual Periods .0 SNPS 16.Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi-annual Periods U POTW INTERVIEW 17. Since the Last PCI,has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations? LLKES r NO If Yes,What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed? pop ',TA 4 a yr y ,)*V f f1,vp�tz��f 18. Since the Last PCI,has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial DYES Vico Discharge(Interference,Pass-Through,Blockage,Citizens'Complaints,Increased Sludge Production,Etc.)? If Yes,How are these Problems Being Addressed? 19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for Limits: Al either of the Last 2 Semi-Annual Periods?Not Been Published for SNC for Reporting: /l ori_ Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Published: 20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders?For all SIUs on an Order,Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division? J J - 21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication?If Yes,Which ❑YES O Ones? LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW: 22. Is LIMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? [ 4 ES ❑NO 23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Mo ' ring? (EKES ❑NO ,_,_,� 24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? YES El NO Is Table Adequate? Er ES ❑NO 25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ffriES ❑ NO DWQ Inspector, please verify yourself! 26. If NO to 23 -26,list violations p 27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑YES �O If yes,which ones?Eliminated: ,,v /14- Added: N /4 NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection(PCI)Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1 28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program ' Element in their files,corn.lete with su.s.rtin_ documents and co. of PERCS A..roval Letter,and dates consistent with Pro_ ... Info: Program Element Last Submittal Last Approval Date Next Due, ‘ Date In file? Date -,Inn file If Applicable Headworks Analysis(HWA) _ Yes E No L -l 6,- /'/ _I�c es ` No i(- /- / Industrial Waste Surve ` S Yes _ No 1. - 4.5--I ales No '_ _ - 1 Sewer Use Ordinance(SUO) _ Yes,_ No j.. 0j_ , /3 Yes No Enforcement Response Plan(ERP) _ Yes[ No .F...j 7-03 ❑Yes _ No Long Term Monitoring Plan(LIMP) r Yes E No es_ No INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT(IUP)FILE REVIEW(3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 11U INSPECTION) 29. User Name 1. i t1504oh i13. foo �S 2. �V,(��.5 Ciunc Lc.�F•Ll 30. IUP Number ( 93-I i0011' 31. Does File Contain Current Permit? Ies ❑ No I 0 Yes ❑ No ❑Yes 0 No I 32. Permit Expiration Date I Oer .3/ a o/y e t; )01 33. Categorical Standard Applied(LE.40 CFR,Etc.)Or N/A N7 N 34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior ( Yes ❑ No [mss [1 No ❑Yes 0 No to Permit Issue Date? 35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year? I [ es ❑ No [fes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No 36. a.Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan? a. [des ONo a. lies ONo a. ❑Yes ONo b.If No,is One Needed?(See Inspection Form from POTW) b.-DYes❑Na b.❑Yes ONo 37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification,Does File Contain a Toxic 0Yes❑No05?A ❑Yes❑No /A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A Organic Management Plan(TOMP)? 38. a.Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division? a. Les ONo a.pies ONoi a. ❑Yes ONo b.All Issues Resolved? b.❑Yes❑NoVI/A b.0Y3nNeaWA b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A 39. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Did the POTW Complete [Ales El No es ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No its Sampling as Required by IUP,including flow? I 40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain-Of-Custody Forms? I U s ❑ No [es ❑ No I ❑Yes ❑ No 41. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Did the S10 Complete its n 'es❑No❑N/A 13Yes❑NopN1A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A Sampling as Required by]UP,including flow? /' 41b.During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Did SIU submit all reports 11 s❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑No A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A on time? 42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula(CWF),does ❑Yes❑NoL A ❑Yes❑NoWI4lA ' ❑Yes❑No❑N/A file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP? 42b.For categorical IUs with Production based limits,does file include ❑Yes❑Not J A ❑Yes❑No /A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP? 43a. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Did the POTW Identifyes ❑ No -0 YY No ❑Yes ❑ No All Limits Non-Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling? �� 43b. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Did the POTW Identify es❑No❑N/A ❑Yes■ o[UN/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A All Reporting Non-Compliance from SIU Sampling? 44. a.Was the POTW Notified by SIU(Within 24 Hours)of All Self- a. No❑N/A a.❑Yes❑NoI7A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A Monitoring Violations? b.Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days? b.IUX(s-ONo❑N/A b.❑Yes❑Nod/A b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A c.If applicable,Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware C. es❑No❑NIA of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SIU? c.❑Yes❑No A c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A 46. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Was the S10 in SNC? 0 Yes iii/No ❑Yes D4io ❑Yes ❑ No 47. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Was Enforcement Taken £❑No❑N/A ❑Yes❑Nopta/A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A as Specified in the POTW's ERP(NOVs,Penalties,timing,etc.)? � 48. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices? ❑Yes❑No is /A i ❑Yes❑No■ . A ❑Yes❑No❑N/A 49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection? I ❑Yes❑NoQN%A n ❑Yes❑No /A ' ❑Yes❑No❑N/A 50. a.Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders? a.OYesCINoCOK a.❑Yes❑No&/A a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A b.Is SIU in Compliance with Order? b.❑Yes❑No /A b.❑Yes❑Nok/A b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A 51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This ❑Yes [II/No ❑Yes [ To ❑Yes ❑ No Requested Information For You? NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection(PCI)Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2 FILE REVIEW COMMENTS: INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING: Trans. Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac.Type N 1 '4._ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l 1 5 1 1 2 1 (DTIA) (TYPI) (NSP) (FAC 1.Industry Inspected: 2.Industry Address: 3.Type of Industry/Product: 4.Industry Contact: Title: Phone: Fax: 5.Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Eq ` •ent? ❑YES 0 NO 6.Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of is dustrial Inspection Thoroughly? Comments: A. Initial Interview 0 YES 0 NO. B. Plant Tour ❑ YESip NO C. Pretreatment Tour ❑}FES 0 NO D. Sampling Review % YES 0 NO E. Exit Intervie El YES ❑NO • Industrial Inspection , is"ents: OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS: Comments: Requirements: Recommendations: NOD: 0 YES 4.1'r0 NOV: 0 YES plO QNCR: 0 YES [fi'f6 POTW Rating: Satisfactory ✓Marginal UnSatisfactory PCI COMPLETED BY: C gy ' DATE: / I1 I i 3' NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection(PCI)Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3 . . ••-r-r.1,•_-_-. ...1.):1r.-1, T-., . DIWT.irIVITROBVIsrUIPM%-1717T:-P--r---7-'•'''•-•-- '' •„,.4_4 .. -.-•• - " ' ''..-it,-•7...".-. ' —' •- - 7-'-'-- ' • , . .• .• • • . • . . . • • . .. . : .', •-..., •'iii •' • '5.:-P _ . . •, . . • • • • ... . • , . • . . • • , . . . • • •A , . • . . . • • . - • • . .. • . . . . . • . li. • •• - • . . . • • • . • . • • '• -.:•-•;-.:''':- • . . . . . . . . . . ••- .. • • • Tf- . . . . .. • . • . . . - . . . . ••• • • . • • . • • • • . -..; [;',. . . . V. '1 . . . . -. . ., . . • ..• , . . ' .' • ..A . . • • . • f-- L . . . . . . . . ... . . . . „ ,.. : . . . . . I. . . • *,. • • . V.I r. • • . ,. , . • . . . • . • : . . . - . .. . • 1. . • . . ..... ... ...- , . . H . ... • • • . . . ... . .• .. . . - . . . . • . ' • • . . • 121 I.. . . . '. • • ' • . • . . . . . • . . . ..- . . . . . . . . .. . . • • . . . , . .. 1 i • • .. • . . . . . .• • . . . . . , ' . _ . " i.. 1 •• 1 =' • . 1 . • . . _v. . , . . . • - • . , . . • . : . . . .. • .. • . . . . .1 li4., I . . • , _ I( - ' .. . • . . •1 , . . . — ! - • t A . , • . . r•.- . . • _ . . . ',,, . . • . . .. , e .. #. , • +, • . ',,V• • . . . . .„ • n, .. . „. . . , r • r.• . . . . , • - • ,..ii il, .. . V , • . • •• • , • • . I-4 • • . . • • . - H. ' . . • f , 1 . _ . . . • . . . . 1 i • . . • . .4 -• VT. . r--; • . . . ; 41. • , - . . •