U-5850_Supplemental_Info_With_Cover_Letter (2)

Tnr�M
O�
qq�
'u C
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER ERIC BOYETTE
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
Mr. David Bailey October 20, 2022
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
SUBJECT: Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Regional General Permit 50
NCDOT Division 7 Road Widening Project
STIP U-5850 SR 1007 (Randleman Road) Widening, Guilford County, NC
WBS Number: 50239.1.1
Dear Mr. Bailey:
We are requesting a Section 404 Regional General Permit (RGP) 50 for work associated with the road
widening of SR 1007 (Randleman Road) between Glendale Drive and West Elmsley Drive in Guilford
County (See Attachment A). The project proposes to widen SR 1007 (Randleman Road) to two 11-foot
wide travel lanes in each direction and a continuous 11-foot wide center turn lane with curb and gutter.
Additionally, the project proposes the construction of contiguous 5-foot to 6-foot wide sidewalks on both
sides of the roadway. The project includes the construction of an approximately 200-foot long retaining
wall along the frontage of New Goshen United Methodist Church on the west side of SR 1007
(Randleman Road). The project also requires tie-ins at the intersections of Glendale Avenue, Shoffner
Court, and Nestleway Drive/W. Elmsley Drive. The tie-in at Nestleway Drive/W. Elmsley Drive will
extend approximately 250 feet west of the intersection on Nestleway Drive and will extend approximately
475 feet east of the intersection on W. Elmsley Drive. Additional improvements include tie-ins to eight
existing driveways along the project corridor. The project is located in the Jordan Lake watershed and is
classified as Water Supply V (WS-V) with a Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) supplemental
classification and is subject to Jordan Lake Buffer Rules. Enhanced erosion control measures (known as
Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds) have been implemented for the project. A delineation of
Waters of the U.S. was conducted on July 3, 2018 and verified by representatives from the USACE
(David Bailey) and NCDWR (April Norton) on February 26, 2019 (See Attachment B). As part of the
environmental review, a Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist was completed for the project (See
Attachment Q. The project is located outside of a FEMA regulated floodplain or floodway (See
Attachment D)
The project will temporarily impact 53 linear feet and permanently impact 29 linear feet of Stream B for
drainage improvements associated with the road widening. There will be 0.03 acre of temporary impacts
to Wetland A for hand clearing and 0.13 acre of temporary impacts to Wetland B for hand clearing within
an overhead utility easement. There will be 0.08 acre of permanent fill impacts to Wetland B for roadway
widening. There will be an additional 0.03 acre temporary impacts and less than 0.01 acre of permanent
fill impacts to Wetland B for drainage improvements along Stream B associated with the roadway
widening. There are 6,991 sq. ft. of mitigable riparian buffer impacts (including 6,339 sq. ft. in Zone 1
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HIGHWAY DIVISION 7
PO BOX 14996
GREENSBORO, NC 27415-4996
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
HIGHWAY DIVISION 7
1584 YANCEYVILLE STREET
GREENSBORO, NC 27405

and 652 sq. ft. in Zone 2). There is 584 sq. ft. of wetland fill impacts which overlap with mitigable Zone
2 impacts which will be excluded from mitigation totals (See Attachment E).
Section 106
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 requires Federal agencies to take into
account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties. NCDOT Cultural Resource staff reviewed
the project for Historic Architectural and Archaeological Resources. A Historic Architecture and
Landscapes Assessment of Effects Form was provided by a NCDOT Architectural Historian on August
19, 2021. A No Archaeological Survey Required Form was provided by a NCDOT Archaeologist on
February 15, 2018 (See Attachment F).
Protected Species
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaQ
website lists Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) as endangered, and small whorled pogonia
(Isotria medeoloides) as threatened within the study area. There is marginal habitat in the study area for
Schweinitz's sunflower and small whorled pogonia. No Schweinitz's sunflowers or small whorled
pogonia were found during field surveys of the study area conducted on July 3, 2018, and September 8,
2021. A search of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database, accessed September
13, 2022, found no occurrences of Schweinitz's sunflower or small whorled pogonia within 1.0 mile of
the study area. Due to marginal habitat throughout the majority of the study area and based on the
findings of the literature review and completed survey conducted during the optimal survey window it is
determined that the project would have a biological conclusion of "No Effect" for Schweinitz's
sunflower. Due to protected species surveys for small whorled pogonia only being valid for one year a
biological conclusion of "Unresolved" was reached. NCDOT has committed to surveying for small
whorled pogonia before construction.
Bald eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. A desktop-GIS assessment of
the study area, as well as the area within a 1.13-mile radius (1.0 mile plus 660 feet) of the project limits
was performed. No water bodies large enough or sufficiently open to be considered potential feeding
sources were identified. Since there was no foraging habitat within the review area, a survey of the study
area and the area within 660 feet of the project limits was not conducted. Additionally, a review of the
NCNHP database on September 13, 2022, revealed no known occurrences of this species within 1.0 mile
of the study area. Due to no nests or eagles being identified during the survey, no known occurrences
within a mile, and minimal impact anticipated for this project, it has been determined that this project will
not affect bald eagles (See Attachment G).
If you have any questions, comments or need additional information after reviewing this material please
contact me at [phone]. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Jerry Parker
Division PDEA Engineer, NCDOT Division 7

Attachment A — Figures
Attachment B — NCDWR Onsite Determination Letter Figures
Attachment C — Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist
Attachment D — FEMA Mapping
Attachment E — Permit Drawings with Stormwater Management Plan
Attachment F — No Archaeological Survey Required Form; Historic Architecture and Landscapes
Assessment of Effects Form
Attachment G — T&E Supplemental Information

NCDOT Division 7 STIP U-5850
SR 1007 (Randleman Road) Widening — PCN for RGP 50
Attachment A
Figures

1 2J8B Sou'Crw
II
II
1, r- — WestlJDrIve
B d9 c
—Creek R4ge Roa0`
Vona
Creek RidgOf 3
i�
35
a West Vandalia Road
SR 1007
o �
---' r
R
lia Road ZJ E Vandalia Rd ° SR 3505
34 aLN
c� w
US 220 E Rj
�iS
6 7�:
22
I8S `_ G
° US 421
° _.
_ I
—'�Volfetrall Rol
� I 'I II
• ova � ; �,�;, � o
SR 1007
C
iv
- F a
a
a � n
94 °
° x
H
OF NORTH C
0
A4
OF TAP
STv ioo
STV Engineers, Inc. Project No.
4019526
Drawn By: I Checked By; Approved By:
JLK BJP MAI
r
Legend
I Project Study Area (— 10.0 Acres)
i 0 0.21 o.s
,
i
Guilford County, NC
Sources: Guilford County GIS
Department, NC One Map &
NCDOT
i
,Miles
NCDOT Division 7
STIP U-5850
Randleman Rd (SR 1007)
Widening
Guilford County, NC
Thursday, September 20, 2018 1
FIGURE 1
Vicinity Map

Legend
Project Study Area (- 10.0 acres)
Delineated Stream
Delineated Wetland
0 200 400
L
'•ti
1
800
T Feet
Old Treybrooke Dr. begins approximately 1,800 feet east
of the intersection of Randleman Rd. and W. Elmsley Dr.
Client:
Project:
ST �l,00
04 NORrk c
(°� J A
M
OF iPA
NCDOT Division 7
STIP U-5850
Randleman Rd (SR 1007)
Widening
Guilford County, NC
Title:
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Ref. USGS 7.5 Minute
Topography Quadrangle Map
[Greensboro, NC] (2016)
Greensboro
Drawn By: Checked By:
JLK BJP
Approved By: Date:
MAI 9/20/2018
STV Inc. Project No.
4019526
FIGURE 2

� .t•' � � � WQ��pH
.* i' k SStltlW/
Eniq
.+ _Or,
En D
## •' Erb C+'
1 i
r t
NIL BEl
iIlt
h
Glendale Dr
1
Awl
It
41
' r 4
}
n
F?
Sho fner Ct
del F1f D
w ►�ir',��
Nestleway Dr
Elmsley Dr E n
nb
All
Mapped Soil Units Within the PSA
EnB Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
L Ef1C Enon fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
i IfB Iredell fine sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes
ti MhB2 Mecklenburg sandy clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes,
IL moderately eroded
0 30o soo 200 _ MUB Mecklenburg -Urban land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes
Feet Wh Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
3
e NoarH Guilford County, NC
NCDOT Division 7
Legend STIPU-5850
Randleman Rd (SR 1007)
Project Study Area 10.0 Acres) 29 Widening
sbor• Guilford County, NC
oK rnn
Thursday, September 20, 2018
STv ioo
FIGURE 3
STV Engineers, Inc. Project No.
Sources: NC OneMap, NC Center for
4019526 Geographic Information and Analysis, NRC S SOILS MAP
Drawn By: I Checked By: I Approved By: NC 911 Board;
MAI Guilford County Soil Survey, NC (1977)
JLK BJP

_ - �.yr
n Legend
�k� F STV
- 100
Project Study Area 10.0 acres Stream
r
e�
} r
■' z Wetland Client:
('n
rPhotograph Location
O
,s Data Polnt Locatlon�F TRAHc'?
0 200 400 800
• r' i S1Gc•
Feet Project:
' ' '
NCDOT Division 7
I
��,' ' Randleman Rd (SR 1007)
Widening
a , - �•., " �„ Guilford County, NC
Wetland
Waters of the US i! A
,.� .
WA (� .08 Acre) 1�
' ..;�. Title:
N
-a + - on -Wetland zz
Waters of the US
Tr' Stream B (� 156 If
4-0
APPROXIMATE POTENTIAL
WATERS OF THE U.S.
®* �, ,'' AND WETLANDS
BOUNDARY MAP
d ,
Yy }#
r ° Sources: Guilford County GIS
Notes:
Department, NC One Map & NCDOT
1. The boundaries of potential jurisdictional
�waters of the U.S. were approximated by STV
W Non -Wetland - Engineers, Inc. during a field review conducted
3 Waters of the US c' } on July 3rd, 2018. Potential jurisdictional
Stream A 350 If o Wetland ,
� ) r Waters of the US �'� • ' � ._ boundaries have been marked in the field with
' WI3 (� .39 Acre) blue and white striped tape and mapped using
1 a Trimble Geo7X hand-held GPS unit capable
` of subfoot accuracy. This map is intended for
Y k planning purposes only.
Boundaries of the potential waters of the
were verified by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers on February 26, 2019.
Drawn By: Checked By:
IPA
JLK BJP
Sheet Revised 3/6/2019
A field verification with representatives
Approved By: Date:
from the USACE and NCDWR was
MAI 3/6/2019
.4, , conducted on February 26 2019.
} ° Wetland B was expanded from 0.33 STv Inc. Project No.
4 Ak
p
acre to 0.39 acre which is included in
�y t this sheet revision. 4019526
.:
3 i `
i�' FIGURE 4

NCDOT Division 7 STIP U-5850
SR 1007 (Randleman Road) Widening — PCN for RGP 50
Attachment B
NCDWR Onsite Determination Letter

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
Jerry Parker, NCDOT
Division Environmental Supervisor
1584 Yanceyville Street
Greensboro, NC 27415-4996
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
March 11, 2019
Subject. Onsite Determination for Applicability to the Mitigation Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0506)
Onsite Determination for Applicability to the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0267)
Proposed Project: Randleman Road Widening (SR 1007) located south of Greensboro between West Elmsley Drive
and Glendale Drive in the City of Greensboro; Guilford County; STIP U-5850.
Dear Mr. Parker:
On February 26, 2019, the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR), along with the Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps), and consultants representing the North Carolina Department of Transportation conducted an onsite
determination to review drainage features described in Table 1 regarding applicability to mitigation and buffer
requirements.
NCDWR acknowledges the areas and boundaries identified as jurisdictional wetlands by the USACE. The attached
map(s) accurately depicts stream determinations conducted during the site visit.
Table 1. Description of drainage features.
Stream
Name
Feature
Code
Basin
Sub -basin
Stream
Classification
Stream
index No.
Applicable
Buffer Rule
Mitigation
Rule
UT to
16-11-14-
Ryan
SA
Cape Fear
CPF02
WS-TV; NSW
Subject
Not Subject
Creek
2-3
UT to
16-11-14-
Ryan
SB
Cape Fear
CPF02
WS-TV; NSW
Not Subject
Not Subject
Creek
2-3
NCDWR has determined that the above features identified as SA and SB intermittent and are not subject to mitigation
rules. NCDWR has determined that the above feature identified as SA is subject to the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation rules and does not approve any activity within Waters of
the United States, or Waters of the State. Any impacts to wetlands and streams must comply with 404/401 regulations,
water supply regulations (15A NCAC 2B .0216), and any other required federal, state and local regulations.
The owner (or future owners) or permittee should notify NCDWR (and other relevant agencies) of this determination
in any future correspondences concerning this property and/or project. This on -site determination shall expire five (5)
years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by NCDWR or Delegated Local Authority that a
surface water exists and that it is subject to the mitigation rules may request a determination by the Director. A request
DEQNorth
� Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Ralet9h, North Carolina 27699-1611
N RTH INA �
o.osmeime���10n4\ /� 919,707,9000

for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Amy Chapman, NCDWR
Wetlands/401 Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
Individuals that dispute a determination by NCDWR or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water
from the mitigation rules may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the office of
Administrative hearings. You must file the petition with the office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days
of receipt of this notice and the date the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of
this decision. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the office of Administrative Hearings during normal
office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of
8:OOam and 5:OOpm, except for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with
the Office of Administrative Hearings.
The petition may be faxed -providing the original and one copy of the document is received by the Office of
Administrative Hearings within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission.
The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. Bill F. Lane, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
If you have any additional questions or require additional information, please call April Norton at 919-707-9111 or
A iril.Norton(d�ncdenr.2ov.
Sincerely,
DceuSipned by:
03BAC6376A6340D...
Attachments: Jurisdictional Features Map
Electronic copy only distribution:
David Bailey, US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Field Office
Brandon Phillips, STV Engineers
Nicole Thomson, DEO Assistant
Della Moore, DEO Assistant
Office
File Copy

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
NCDWR Project No.:
Applicant:
Project Name:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification:
County:
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and
any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401 Transportation Permitting
Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Resources, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1617. This form
may be returned to NCDWR by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not
necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence
was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
Agent's Certification
T, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence
was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Engineer's Certification
Partial Final
Date:
T, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North
Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project for the
Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the
construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401
Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature
Date
Registration No.
DE�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raletgh, North Carolina 27699-1611
�i
N RTH NA
o.osmeime���onj4\ /� 919.707.9{)00

UP 7'- IVKAVX�
Blazidawo d
W. Elmsley Dr �su � y �� 1ec� V ♦ � Y.
t k...- o N n �. •J N-aleway Dr Y.
A.
fir' t bl E F . wt,
6i-1 YF: K H`E!
6
O
U
G
OG
L 3
A
a
m
� a
�
0
o
A
03
�
� W
to
`�
va
- a
0
�a
G -
5
a+A\
N
y
O

120#14kiRip
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: OB97E5224C50449D94BA88E2CFD32B3A
Status: Completed
Subject: Please DocuSign: NCDWR U-5850 Stream Determination Letter.docx, U5850_Figure4_JurisdictionalFea...
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 4 Signatures: 1
Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 1 Initials: 1
April Norton
AutoNav: Disabled
217 W. Jones Street
Envelopeld Stamping: Disabled
Raleigh, NC 27699
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
[e-mail]
IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Record Tracking
Status: Original
Holder: April Norton
Location: DocuSign
3/11/2019 12:01:02 PM
[e-mail]
Signer Events
Signature
Timestamp
April Norton
a ly.
Sent: 3/11/2019 12:02:38 PM
[e-mail]
pD-Si,,,,d kr°''�°'"'Viewed:3/11/2019
12:02:44 PM
DWR
BAC6376A6340D_
Signed: 3/11/2019 12:04:04 PM
DEO
Signature Adoption: Pre selected Style
Freeform Signing
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Using IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
In Person Signer Events
Signature
Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events
Status
Timestamp
Notary Events
Signature
Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events
Status
Timestamps
Envelope Sent
Hashed/Encrypted
3/11/2019 12:02:38 PM
Certified Delivered
Security Checked
3/11/2019 12:02:44 PM
Signing Complete
Security Checked
3/11/2019 12:04:04 PM
Completed
Security Checked
3/11/2019 12:04:04 PM
Payment Events
Status
Timestamps

NCDOT Division 7 STIP U-5850
SR 1007 (Randleman Road) Widening — PCN for RGP 50
Attachment C
Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist

DocuSign Envelope ID: BF1A9581-8A8F-42F7-B6EC-FF74302A604C
NCDOT MINIMUM CRITERIA DETERMINATION CHECKLIST
TIP Protect Number: U-5850
WBS No.: 50239.1.1
Protect Location: SR 1007 (Randleman Road) between Glendale Drive and West Elmsley
Drive in Greensboro, Guilford County
Protect Description: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Division 7 plans to widen an approximately 0.4-mile section of SR 1007 (Randleman
Road) between Glendale Drive and W. Elmsley Drive.
The proposed project is included in NCDOT's 2020-2029 State Transportation
Improvement Program published in September 2021 as U-5850. The purpose of project is
to relieve traffic congestion.
SR 1007 (Randleman Road) is currently a three -lane roadway with two 12-foot through
lanes and a 12-foot center turn lane between Glendale Drive and West Elmsley Drive.
North of Glendale Drive, SR 1007 (Randleman Road) is five lanes with four 11-foot wide
through lanes and an 11-foot wide center turn lane. SR 1007 (Randleman Road) is
functionally classified as a minor arterial and had a 2020 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of
15,600 vehicles -per -day (vpd). Existing sidewalks extend approximately 500 feet north of
the W. Elmsley Drive intersection and approximately 300 feet south of the Glendale Drive
intersection on the east side of SR 1007 (Randleman Road). The posted speed limit along
SR 1007 (Randleman Road) varies between 35 miles per hour (mph) and 45 mph within
the Project Study Area (PSA). Existing right-of-way width in the project corridor varies
between approximately 60 feet to 70 feet.
The project proposes to widen SR 1007 (Randleman Road) to two 11-foot wide travel lanes
in each direction and a continuous 11-foot wide center turn lane with curb and gutter.
Pending a municipal agreement with the City of Greensboro, the project proposes the
construction of contiguous 5-foot to 6-foot wide sidewalks on both sides of the roadway.
The project includes the construction of an approximately 200-foot long retaining wall
along the frontage of New Goshen United Methodist Church on the west side of SR 1007
(Randleman Road). The project also requires tie-ins at the intersections of Glendale
Avenue, Shoffner Court, and Nestleway Drive/W. Elmsley Drive. The tie-in at Nestleway
Drive/W. Elmsley Drive will extend approximately 250 feet west of the intersection on
Nestleway Drive and will extend approximately 475 feet east of the intersection on W.
Elmsley Drive. Additional improvements include tie-ins to eight existing driveways along
the project corridor; further coordination may be required with property owners to ensure
property access during the construction phase.
The project is located approximately 4.8 miles south of downtown Greensboro. Land use
within the PSA primarily consists of undeveloped lands and commercial, medium density
residential and institutional uses. The New Goshen United Methodist Church and
10/12/21

DocuSign Envelope ID: BF1A9581-8A8F-42F7-B6EC-FF74302A604C
Rosenwald School (GFI I IS) historic property is located within the PSA on the west side
of SR 1007 (Randleman Road) across from Shoffner Court. NC SHPO determine this.
historic property to be eligible for listing on the National Register (NR) in August 2019.
Preliminary design plans anticipate construction easement and right-of-way impacts to the
historic property. Proposed improvements would require approximately 0.07 acres of right-
of-way acquisition and approximately 0.05 acres of temporary construction easement from
the property. Based on SHPO coordination, the project is expected to have No Adverse
Effect on the property.
Additionally, an unnamed tributary of Ryan Creek runs along the east side of SR 1007
(Randleman Road) within the PSA. It is anticipated that approximately 50 feet of stream
would be impacted by the proposed improvements.
Proposed right-of-way varies and is anticipated to be approximately 90 feet at its widest
point. Preliminary plans would require approximately 0.40 acres of proposed right-of-way
acquisition and approximately 1.27 acres of proposed construction and utility easements.
Residential and business relocations are not anticipated. The project is scheduled for right-
of-way in September 2022 and has a LET date of February 2023.
Purpose and Need: The purpose of the proposed project is to relieve traffic congestion
along SR 1007 (Randleman Road).
Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements:
A Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 14 `Linear Transportation Projects' or a Regional
General Permit (RGP 50) may be applicable for the discharge of fill material into waters
of the U.S. associated with roadway construction activities such as road extensions, and/or
intersection improvements. The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) holds
the final discretion as to what permit will be required to authorize project construction. If
a Section 404 NWP No. 14 is required, then a Section 401 Water Quality Certification
(WQC) 4088 Water Quality Certification (WQC) 4135 goes with the NW14 and the RGP
50 from the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) will be needed. If
impacts to waters exceed 300 linear feet, or 0.5 acre in area, an Individual Permit will be
required.
Two potential jurisdictional streams were identified in the study area. All jurisdictional
streams in the study area have been designated as warm water streams for the purposes of
stream mitigation. No streams within the study area have been designated as an
Outstanding Resource Water (ORW). There are no designated High -Quality Waters
(HQW) or water supply watersheds (WS-I or WS-II) within or within 1.0 mile downstream
of the study area. The North Carolina 2016 Final 303(d) list of impaired waters identifies
no waters within the study area as an impaired water. No other surface waters were
identified in the study area.
Cultural Resources: A No Archaeological Survey Required Form was provided by
NCDOT Archaeologist on February 15, 2018.
10/12/21

DocuSign Envelope ID: BF1A9581-8A8F-42F7-B6EC-FF74302A604C
A Historic Architecture and Landscapes survey found that Area of Potential Effects
contains a number of properties over 50 years of age, including the Goshen School
(GF I IS 1) which has been determined eligible for National Register (NR) listing. These
findings resulted in a Survey Required Form from NCDOT Architectural Historian on
February 5, 2018. An Effects Assessment Required Form was provided by the NCDOT
Architectural Historian on April 23, 2019 due to the presence of the Goshen School
(National Register eligible) within the Area of Potential Effects. An Eligibility Report was
submitted to NC SHPO on June 29, 2019 to determine if the property remained eligible for
NR listing and if so, to draw an appropriate historic boundary. In a letter dated August 2,
2019, NC SHPO concurred with the recommendation that the New Goshen United
Methodist Church and Rosenwald School (GF I I IS) are eligible for NR listing.
On August 19, 2021, an Effects Meeting was held resulting in a No Adverse Effect ruling
with the Environmental Commitments. The Effects Meeting determined that 3-feet high
retaining wall will reduce the amount of right-of-way encroachment on the existing historic
property boundary. The utilities will remain in their current location. The planned retaining
wall will have a brick veneer to match the historic church and school buildings. Temporary
orange fencing will be erected around the church sign, historic marker, and trees during
construction.
Threatened and Endangered Species: As of October 5, 2018, the United States Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists two federally protected plant species and two fish
species in Guilford County. ESA federally protected species listed for Guilford County
include Schweinitz's sunflower, Small whorled pogonia, Cape Fear shiner and Roanoke
logperch. The biological conclusion for Schweinitz's sunflower, Cape Fear shiner and
Roanoke logperch is "no effect." The biological conclusion for the Small whorled pogonia
is unresolved pending an updated field survey.
Suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower is present in the study area along roadside
shoulders. Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) was added to the Guilford
County list on October 5, 2018. A plant by plant survey was conducted on September 8,
2021. No individuals of Schweinitz's sunflower were observed and the field survey was
conducted during the flowering season. A review of NCNHP records on September 10,
2021 indicates no known occurrences within one mile of the study area and no effect to
Schweinitz's sunflower is anticipated.
Potential habitat for the Small whorled pogonia exists within limited areas of the forests of
the study area. Plant by plant surveys were conducted throughout areas of suitable habitat
on July 3, 2018 during the flowering season. No individuals of small whorled pogonia were
observed. There are records of small whorled pogonia being located in Guilford County,
but no records of small whorled pogonia being located in the study area USGS topographic
quadrangle. The NCNHP website was reviewed (September 10, 2021) to determine the
locations of the nearest populations of small whorled pogonia. The NCNHP determined
that no populations of small whorled pogonia were present within one mile of the study
area. Since field surveys for the small whorled pogonia are effective for one year, the
biological conclusion for the species is unresolved; an updated field survey will need to be
10/12/21 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: BF1A9581-8A8F-42F7-B6EC-FF74302A604C
conducted during the flowering season to render a biological conclusion for the species
before construction begins. A project commitment to resolve the biological conclusion for
the small whorled pogonia is added to the Greensheet on the final page of the MCDC
document.
Potential habitat for the Cape Fear shiner does not exist in the project area streams. No
formal survey for Cape Fear shiner was performed. There are records of Cape Fear shiner
being located in Guilford County, but no records of Cape Fear shiner being located in the
study area. The NCNHP website does not list Cape Fear shiner and the USFWS IPaC has
determined that no populations of Cape Fear shiner were present within one mile of the
study area, so no effect to Cape Feat- shiner is anticipated.
Potential habitat for the Roanoke logperch does not exist in the project area streams. No
formal survey for Roanoke logperch was performed. There are records of Roanoke
logperch being located in Guilford County, but no records of Roanoke logperch being
located in the study area. The NCNHP website does not list Roanoke logperch and the
USFWS IPaC has determined that no populations of Roanoke logperch were present within
one mile of the study area, so no effect to Roanoke logperch is anticipated.
Guilford County added the Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni) mussel as a newly listed
"threatened" species in late 2019. Although a small portion of Guilford County is within
the range by basin for Atlantic pigtoe, the USFWS has determined that the U-5850 project
site is not within the drainage basin range of the Atlantic pigtoe.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has revised the previous programmatic
biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA), the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and NCDOT for the northern long-
eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers the
entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and activities.
Although this programmatic covers Divisions 1-8, NLEBs are currently only known in 22
counties, but may potentially occur in 8 additional counties within Divisions 1-8. NCDOT,
FHWA, and USACE have agreed to two conservation measures which will avoid/minimize
mortality of NLEBs. These conservation measures only apply to the 30-current
known/potential counties of the PBO at this time. The programmatic determination for
NLEB for the NCDOT program is May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect. The PBO will
ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for ten years (effective
through December 31, 2030) for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-
8, which includes Guilford County, where U-5850 is located.
Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act: The bald eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus) is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, and enforced
by the USFWS. Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forests in
proximity to large bodies of open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized
for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 mile of open water.
A desktop-GIS assessment of the study area, as well as the area within a 1.0-mile radius
10/12/21 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: BF1A9581-8A8F-42F7-B6EC-FF74302A604C
of the project limits, was performed on July 6, 2018 using NC OneMap color aerials. No
water bodies large enough or sufficiently open to be considered potential feeding sources
were identified. Since there was no foraging habitat within the review area, a survey of
the study area and the area within 660 feet of the project limits was not conducted.
Additionally, a review of the NHP database on July 6, 2018 revealed no known
occurrences of this species within 1.0 mile of the study area. Due to the lack of habitat,
known occurrences, and minimal impact anticipated for this project, it has been
determined that this project will not affect this species.
Special Proiect Information:
Environmental Commitments: Greensheet Commitments are located at the end of the
checklist.
Estimated Costs (FY 2021):
Prior Year Cost:
$830,000
Utility:
$400,000
R/W:
$600,000
Contt:
$2,400,000
Total:
$4,230,000
(Source: Current NCDOT ST7P, September 2021)
Traffic Information:
Current (2020) 15,600 vpd
Year (2040) 21,300 vpd
TTST 1.0%
Duals 10.0%
(Source: TIP U-5850 Preliminary Design Plans, submitted March 17, 2020)
Design Exceptions: There are no anticipated design exceptions for this project.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodations: Pending a municipal agreement with the City
of Greensboro, the project proposes the construction of contiguous 5-foot to 6-foot wide
sidewalk on both sides of the SR 1007 (Randleman Road) extending the entire length of
the project corridor. The proposed sidewalk will tie -into the existing sidewalks along the
project corridor. SR 1007 (Randleman Road) is not an NCDOT bike route.
Utility: Overhead transmission lines cross the project corridor; the transmission lines are
owned by Duke Energy. Coordination with Duke Energy has begun and will continue as
design progresses to address any utility impacts.
Alternatives Discussion:
No -Build Alternative: The No -Build Alternative would not address the need to relieve
traffic congestion along the project corridor, therefore it is not considered a viable option.
Build Alternative: The Build Alternative includes the following improvements:
10/12/21 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: BF1A9581-8A8F-42F7-B6EC-FF74302A604C
Widen SR 1007 (Randleman Road) to include five 11-foot wide lanes consisting of
two travel lanes in each direction and a center turn lane with curb and gutter;
Construct contiguous 5-foot to 6-foot wide sidewalk on both sides of the roadway,
Construction of an approximately 200-foot long brick retaining wall along the
frontage of New Goshen United Methodist Church; and,
Construct tie-ins at the intersections of Glendale Avenue, Shoffner Court, and
Nestleway Drive/W. Elmsley Drive.
Other Agency Comments:
Start of Study Letters: Start of Study Letters were sent to agencies on 9/28/2018. Agency
input is summarized below.
NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources
DWR noted that Ryan Creek and an Unnamed Tributary to Ryan Creek are within the
Project Study Area. Ryan Creek and the Unnamed Tributary to Ryan Creek are classified
as water supply - five (WS-V); nutrient sensitive waters (NSW). The streams are not
classified as 303(d) waters of the state.
NCDWR is concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this
project. The NCDWR recommends protective sediment and erosion control Best
Management Practices (BMPs) be implemented to reduce further degradation to Ryan
Creek and tributaries. To meet the requirements ofNCDOT's National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit NCS0000250, NCDWR requests that road design
plans provide stormwater runoff treatment through BMPs as detailed in the most recent
version of NCDWR Stormwater Best Management Practices. Additionally, the project is
located within the Jordan River Riparian Buffer Basin. Riparian buffer impacts should be
avoided and minimized to the greatest extent possible pursuant.
Response: Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and potential jurisdictional streams are
anticipated to be minor. Roadway design plans were generated to minimize stream
impacts. All necessary mitigation efforts and agency coordination will be conducted by
NCDOT moving forward.
Roadway impacts to the stream buffers are likely unavoidable due to the location of the
existing roadway and the location of the Unnamed Tributary to Ryan Creek and Ryan
Creek. Roadway and utility easement uses within the stream buffers are existing and
ongoing and are therefore exempt fi^om the Jordan Lake water supply riparian buffer rules.
Proposed roadway improvements would require the project meet the diffuse flow
stormwater requirement of the Jordan Lake water supply riparian buffer rules.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
The USACE specified that the construction of this project is likely to impact aquatic
resources within the work corridor, including two unnamed tributaries to Ryan Creek and
two wetland areas. They noted that much of the PSA is previously developed, although
areas in the southern and northeastern extents of the PSA contain landscape positions
typical of wetlands. Discharges of dredged or fill material into jurisdictional waters of the
10/12/21 6

DocuSign Envelope ID: BF1A9581-8A8F-42F7-B6EC-FF74302A604C
United States are subject to USACE regulatory authority pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act, and thus would require Department of the Army (DA) permit
authorization. The type of DA authorization required (i.e., general or individual permit)
will be determined by the location, type, and extent of jurisdictional area impacted by the
project, and by the project design and construction limits. One aspect of the project that
will require additional information for the Corps' single and complete project determination
will be justification of logical termini for the project. The USACE was unable to determine
permitting requirements because detailed delineation of the streams and/or wetlands had
not been undertaken when the Start of Study Letters were sent.
Response: Roadway design plans were generated to minimize impact to aquatic resources.
Minor stream and wetlands impacts are anticipated. A Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 14
'Linear Transportation Projects' may be applicable for the discharge of fill material into
waters of the U.S. associated with roadway construction activities such as road extensions,
and/or intersection improvements.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Forest Service, the NC Division of Parks and
Recreation, and the NC Wildlife Resource Commission provided no specific concerns
regarding the project.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, NCDOT Board of Transportation, Greensboro
Urban Area MPO, and Guilford County Transportation Department did not provide a
response to the start of study letters.
Local Input Forms: Local Input forms were sent to City of Greensboro Planning
Department, Guilford County Planning & Development Department, the Guilford County
School Director of Transportation and Guilford County Emergency Services Director.
Completed input forms were not received from Guilford County Planning & Development
Department.
The City of Greensboro Planning Director completed an input form on August 14, 2018
and indicated that the project will have a low impact on local planning objectives. The
Planning Director specified that the project corridor does not possess adequate pedestrian
and bicycle facilities and identified possible EJ and LEP populations in close proximity to
the project. Additional coordination with the City of Greensboro Planning Department was
conducted in preparation for the February 5, 2019 Public Meeting. The City of Greensboro
recommended having a Spanish -language interpreter available for the Public Meeting.
Response: Comment noted; a Spanish interpreter was made available at the Public
Information Meeting.
The Guilford County Schools Director of Transportation completed an input form on
August 15, 2018 and noted that at least 17 buses making at least 29 trips travel through the
project corridor daily. Guilford County Schools indicated that current school bus routes
could be re-routed around the project corridor and that the detour would be minimal and
therefore did not have any special concerns regarding the project. The Director of
Transportation recommended contacting Guilford County Schools Assistant Director of
Transportation to provide input regarding the project. The Assistant Director of
10/12/21

DocuSign Envelope ID: BF1A9581-8A8F-42F7-B6EC-FF74302A604C
Transportation attended the Local Officials Informational Meeting held on January 22,
2019 and did not express any special concerns regarding the project.
Response: Comment noted.
The Guilford County Emergency Services Director did not submit a completed input form
for this project. Separate correspondence with the Guilford County EMS Director on July
9, 2019 indicated that the organization is supportive of the project and does not anticipate
any substantial impacts resulting from the project. The EMS Director also recommended
contacting the City of Greensboro Fire Department to provide feedback on the project.
Response: Comment noted; an input form was sent to the City of ' Greensboro Fire Chief
and a response was not received.
Public Involvement:
Landowner Notification Postcards were sent out to residents within the project corridor in
January 2018, to make them aware of the project and let them know representatives of
NCDOT would be working in the field to gather data. Approximately 40 postcards were
sent to landowners along the Project Study Area.
A Local Officials Informational Meeting was held on January 22, 2019 at Greensboro
Town Hall. A short presentation providing project information was given followed by an
opportunity for attendees to provide comments and feedback.
A Public Meeting was held on February 5, 2019 at the New Goshen United Methodist
Church. In addition to addressing comments at the meeting, members of the public had the
opportunity to provide comments through mail or email until February 19, 2019.
10/12/21 8

DocuSign Envelope ID: BF1A9581-8A8F-42F7-B6EC-FF74302A604C
PART A: MINIMUM CRITERIA
to ho--mpletedihy the Engineer. YES NO
1. Is the proposed project listed as a type and class of activity allowed under ® ❑
the Minimum Criteria Rule in which environmental documentation is not
required'?
If the answer to number 1 is "no", then the project does not qualify as a
minimum criteria project. A state environmental assessment is required.
If yes, under which category? 8a (resurfacing, restoration, or
reconstruction)
PART B: MINIMUM CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS
— by the
YES
2. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse air quality
impacts?
3. Will the proposed activity have secondary impacts or cumulative
impacts that may result in a significant adverse impact to human health
or the environment?
4. Is the proposed activity of such an unusual nature or does the proposed
activity have such widespread implications, that an uncommon concern
for its environmental effects has been expressed to the Department?
5. Does the proposed activity have a significant adverse effect on wetlands;
surface waters such as rivers, streams, and estuaries; parklands; prime or
unique agricultural lands; or areas of recognized scenic, recreational,
archaeological, or historical value?
6. Will the proposed activity endanger the existence of a species on the ❑
Department of Interior's threatened and endangered species list?
7. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes inland use ❑
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse water quality or
ground water impacts?
O
M/
M/
ra
1 4
10/12/21

DocuSign Envelope ID: BF1A9581-8A8F-42F7-B6EC-FF74302A604C
S. Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse effect on
Ion —term recreational benefits or shellfish, finfish, wildlife, or their
natural habitats
F'r - 'I I
OMER,
PART C: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS
Items 9- 12JIkairpTeted &' nental
YES NO
9. Is a federally protected threatened or endangered species, or its
® ❑
habitat, likely to be impacted by the proposed action?
10. Does the action require the placement of temporary or permanent
® ❑
fill in waters of the United States'?
11. Does the project require the placement of a significant amount of
❑
fill in high quality or relatively rare wetland ecosystems, such as
mountain bogs or pine savannahs?
12. Is the proposed action located in an Area of Environmental
❑
Concern, as defined in the coastal Area Management Act'?
Items LW5 to he completed by the Enginee7`llllllllllllllllllll
13. Does the project require stream relocation or channel changes?
❑
Cultural Resources
14. Will the project have an "effect" on a property or site listed on the
® ❑
National Register of Historic Places'?
15. Will the proposed action require acquisition of additional right of
❑
way from publicly owned parkland or recreational areas?
Response to Question 9:
As of October 5, 2018, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists four
federally protected species, under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for Guilford County
include Schweinitz's sunflower, Small whorled pogonia, Cape Fear shiner and Roanoke
logperch. None of the listed federally protected plant species were observed in the Project
Study Area when the October survey was conducted. The biological conclusion for
Schweinitz's sunflower, Cape Fear shiner and Roanoke logperch is "no effect". Pending
an updated survey conducted during the flowering season, the biological conclusion for the
Small whorled pogonia is unresolved. The Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masom) mussel was
added to the threatened and endangered species list for Guilford County in late 2019.
Although a small portion of Guilford County is within the range by basin for Atlantic
pigtoe, the USFWS has determined that the U-5850 project site is not within the drainage
basin range of the Atlantic pigtoe.
10/12/21 10

DocuSign Envelope ID: BF1A9581-8A8F-42F7-B6EC-FF74302A604C
The US FWS has a programmatic biological opinion (PBO) with NCDOT for the northern
long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina. Although the
PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, NLEBs are currently only known
in 22 counties, but may potentially occur in 8 additional counties in eastern North Carolina.
As of September 1, 2021, NLEB is not on the USFWS threatened and endangered species
list for Guilford County. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT
program is May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect.
Response to Question 10:
Two potential jurisdictional streams and two potential jurisdictional wetlands were
identified and delineated in the Project Study Area; jurisdictional boundaries have not yet
been verified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) at this point in the project
development. A Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 14 `Linear Transportation Projects' may
be applicable for the discharge of fill material into waters of the U.S. associated with
roadway construction activities such as road extensions and/or intersection improvements.
The USACE holds the final discretion as to what permit will be required to authorize
project construction. If a Section 404 NWP No. 14 is required, then a Section 401 Water
Quality Certification (WQC) 4088 from the NCDWR will be needed. If impacts to waters
exceed 300 linear feet, or 0.5 acre in area, an Individual Permit will be required.
Response to Question 14:
An Effects Assessment Required Form was provided by the NCDOT Architectural
Historian on April 23, 2019 due to the presence of the Goshen School (National Register
eligible) within the Area of Potential Effects. An Eligibility Report was submitted to NC
SHPO on June 29, 2019 to determine if the property remained eligible for NR listing. NC
SHPO concurred with the recommendation that the New Goshen United Methodist Church
and Rosenwald School (GF1118) are eligible for NR listing.
An Effects Meeting was held resulting in a No Adverse Effect ruling with Environmental
Commitments. The Effects Meeting determined that a three-foot high retaining wall will
reduce the amount of right-of-way encroachment on the existing historic property
boundary. The utilities will remain in their current location. The planned retaining wall will
have a brick veneer to match the historic church and school buildings. Temporary orange
fencing will be erected around the church sign, historic marker, and trees during
construction.
10/12/21 11

DocuSign Envelope ID: BF1A9581-8A8F-42F7-B6EC-FF74302A604C
PART D:( To be completed when either category #8, 120) or #15 of the rules are
used.
Items 16- 22 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer.
16. Project length:
17. Right of Way width:
18. Project completion date:
Approximately 0.40
miles
Existing ROW width
varies and is
approximately 60 feet to
70 feet. Proposed ROW
width varies with a
maximum width at
approximately 90 feet.
ROW Date: 9/13/2022
LET Date: 2/10/2023
19. Total acres of newly disturbed ground Approximately 2.05
surface: Acres
20. Total acres of wetland impacts:
21. Total linear feet of stream impacts
22. Project purpose:
0.14 acres of potential
wetland impact
50 Linear Feet of
potential stream impact
The purpose of this
project is to relieve
traffic congestion.
10/12/21 12

DocuSign Envelope ID: BF1A9581-8A8F-42F7-B6EC-FF74302A604C
DocuSigned by:
Reviewed by: bf
451A63ED92B74FB...
Jacob Elliott, AICP
STV Engineers, Inc.
900 West Trade Street, Suite 715
Charlotte, NC 28202
DocuSigned bye:
�!^eFitta6L
1117124
CFE73462...
Brian K. Ketner, PE
Division 7 Project Engineer
1584 Yanceyville SLrec(
PO Box 14996
Greensboro, NC 27415-4996
DocuSigned by�jj
�1)" C/
D4E67B071 D1946B...
Jerry Parker
Division 7 Environmental Supervisor
1584 Yanceyville Street
PO Box 14996
Greensboro, NC 27415-4996
Date: 10/13/2021
Date: 10/13/2021
Date: 10/13/2021
10/12/21 13

DocuSign Envelope ID: BF1A9581-8A8F-42F7-B6EC-FF74302A604C
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
SR 1007 (Randleman Road) Widening
from Glendale Drive to West Elmsley Drive
in Guilford County, NC
WSS No. 50239.1.1
STIP U-5850
Coordination with the City of Greensboro — Pedestrian Facilities
Continued coordination with the City of Greensboro on the proposed construction
of sidewalk along the project corridor will occur through final design and
construction.
New Goshen United Methodist Church and Rosenwald School
In accordance with the Assessment of Effects Form (signed August 19, 2021) for
the New Goshen United Methodist Church and Rosenwald School (GF1118)
provided by North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), temporary
orange fencing will be erected around the church sign, historic marker, and trees
during construction. The brick retaining wall will have a brick veneer to match the
church and school buildings.
Property Owner Coordination
Continued coordination may be required with property owner during construction
for tie-in to residential and commercial driveways adjacent to the project corridor.
Small whorled pogonia
The biological conclusion for the Small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides)
must be resolved before construction; this will be coordinated through NCDOT
Division 7.
10/12/21 14

NCDOT Division 7 STIP U-5850
SR 1007 (Randleman Road) Widening — PCN for RGP 50
Attachment D
FEMA Mapping

National Flood Hazard Layer FI RMette
79o48'40.'W 36oO'34"N
s ft,
an
LJA
it
•. W
r
L9 I
r w i
j4REOr h+11NIVIP L rL %LPD HAZARD ti•
Z,,( •. S
FEMA
ka
• -ow- dp
W-j
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 I:t7,000
Basemap: USGS National Map: Orthoimagery: Data refreshed October, 2020
Legend
SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A, V, A99
SPECIAL FLOOD
With BFE or Depth ZoneAE, AO, AH, VE, AR
HAZARD AREAS
Regulatory Floodway
OTHER AREAS OF
FLOOD HAZARD
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mile Zonex
Future Conditions 1% Annual
4 '- Chance Flood Hazard Zonex
"Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
Levee. See Notes. Zone
" Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone D
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard
Q Effective LOMRs
OTHER AREAS
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
GENERAL
- — - - Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
STRUCTURES
IIIIIII Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
e n Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
17.5 Water Surface Elevation
a - - - Coastal Transect
_sfa— Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
— --- Coastal Transect Baseline
OTHER
- Profile Baseline
FEATURES
Hydrographic Feature
❑ Digital Data Available AN
0 No Digital Data Available
MAP PANELS
® Unmapped
QThe
pin displayed on the map is an approximate
point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
accuracy standards
The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map
was exported on 8/16/2022 at 9:34 AM and does not
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time. The NFHL and effective information may change or
become superseded by new data overtime.
This map image is void if the one or more of the following map
elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,
legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,
FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for
unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
regulatory purposes.

NCDOT Division 7 STIP U-5850
SR 1007 (Randleman Road) Widening — PCN for RGP 50
Attachment E
Permit Drawings with Stormwater Management Plan

Highway North Carolina Department of Transportation
StOTYT1wt01 Highway Stormwater Program xa
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Version 2.08; Released April 2018 FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: TIP No.: U-5850 County(ies): Guilford Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element:
ITIP Number: U-5850 Project Type: Roadway Widening Date: 9/13/2022
NCDOT Contact:
Brian Ketner, PE
Contractor / Designer:
STV Engineers, Inc.
Address:
NCDOT Division 7 Office
1584 Yanceyville Street
Greensboro, NC 27405
Address:
900 West Trade Street Suite 715
Charlotte, NC 28202-1144
Phone:
336-487-0165
Phone:
704-816-2528
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]
City/Town:
Greensboro
County(ies):
Guilford
River Basin(s):
Cape Fear
I CAMA County?
I No
Wetlands within Project Limits?
Yes
Project Description
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
0.36 Surrounding Land Use: Icommerciai, Institutional & Transportation
Proposed Project
0 Existing Site
Project Built -Upon Area (ac.)
3.8 ac.
2.7 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description:
Proposed four travel lanes with lengthened center turn lanes and lengthened right turn
lanes. Proposed curb & gutter and sidewalk along improvement section of roadway.
Existing two travel lanes with center turn lane and right turn lanes. Some sidewalk
and curb & gutter within project area.
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Design/Future: 22155 Year: 2043
Existing: 16455 Year: 2023
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
The project includes a proposed four travel lane section, with center turn lanes, medians, right turn lanes, sidewalk and curb and gutter. There are two storm water outfalls on
the east side of the road that carry roadway drainage from the project area and from offsite. The two existing drainage systems within the project limits will be modified to
account for the road widening and tie to the existing pipes of each system. The two drainage system outlets drain to the stream on the east side of the road (sheets 4 & 5).
Storm Water Treatment is not provided considering the potential impacts to existing utilities, adjacent properties, existing trees, and the existing stream banks. The existing
storm drainage outfalls appear stable at their current locations and the minor storm water flow increase is not anticipated to cause erosion. A proposed rip rap apron will be
installed at the moved outlet on sheet 5.
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1):
UT to Ryan Creek
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
16-11-14-2-3
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Primary Classification:
Water Supply V (WS-V)
Supplemental Classification:
Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments:
Aquatic T&E Species?
No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
SA & SB Buffer Rules in Effect: Jordan Lake
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
INo
I Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? INo Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? INo
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
INo
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative

oCE
See Sheet to For Index of Sheets
See Sheet IB For Standard Symbology Sheet
/ I
END
PROJECT I
I sT t q 1
BEGIN
PROJECT
85
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
E
280' 0' 280'
GRAPHIC SCALES
20 10 0 20 40
PLANS
20 10 0 20 40
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
4 2 0 4 8
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
DESIGN
DATA
ADT 2020 =
15,600
ADT 2040 =
21,300
K =
60%
D =
10%
T =
1 0
V =
40 MPH
FUNC. CLASSIFICATION:
MINOR ARTERIAL
S°1Pr1°1C'lE fl1F NOR°l['1H[ CrS1E?RO1LdNrS
IDdZydSdON ;{CIF' HIGHWAYS
GUILFORD CO UNTY
LOCATION. RANDLEMAN RD (SR1007) FROM ELMSLEY DR
TO GLENDALE DR.
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, & DRAINAGE
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
—Y— STA.18 + 03.88
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT U-5850 = .362 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT U-5850 = .362 MILES
NCDOT CONTACT: BRIAN KETNER, PE
Division 7 Project Engineer
PLANS PREPARED FOR THE NCDOT BY:
,ic.
�OQ 900 We t Trade S{, Suiie 715
S 1 V STV ,t Trade
N orl pit,, NC N be,
NC Llcen se Number F-17991
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
SEAN C. STEPHENS, PE
RIGHT OF WAY (DATE:
MAY 8, 2019
PROJECT ENGINEER
CLARK E. GROVES
LETTING DATE:
J U N E 24, 2021
PROJECT DESIGNER
TE PRO - REFERENCE Na SHEET NO.
.C. U-5850 I
U-5850 I PE
NORTH CAROLINA
NA 2011
NA'
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL I
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HYDRA ULICS
ENGINEER
.E.
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
ROADWAY
DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.E.

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
_ STV Engincas, Inc. U-585O 'f
� W EI P � 20� TV��1o0 90ar�o �e N�dzBzoz su,le 715
II 1 eail ROADWAY D SIGN SHEET NO. HYDRAULICS
(] NC License Number F-0991
S ° J I I W ENGINEER ENGINEER
Co z l J
CONC 1 /
-CARO �� I
ARCELO -� I I
CONSTA--R NO _ ALDONADO r I
ERNANDEZ M NDE ° I o�0
JOSS H ISA EL-HERNA I I 2
A/K/ A JOSS G 2041X nr o I O °°1J�J � n'
DB 80 p "C 'L 3SRW NEW GOS' IEN UNITED METHnni�T c'NIJRCI I I I DOCUMENT SIGNATOT URES
80 E `z T R U S T E E S 0 1— l BST UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
CONC GR l— E\ DB 244� PG 220 15" RCP -IV REM
W/LT � C E E E C
RE R
_ _ — __ ---15LKE— _ CB -- 30" C&
24" RCP -IV DI - — — — —� — — ,� —W—
RANDLEMAN RD
EMOVE — — — REMOVE DI D
— — — — - I — — T F O— -
- — — — — C B CB _ B 15" RCP -
AV Ln
° _ _
ILD
F --- „RCP-I� — �I S
ING
CP — — —RM8V 10
211
DI 42" `� PU nrn
42" Ft — — — — D CPR T — — ��=�� -P PUE 1 iv O
N Eft I I O
RETAIN x O
R ' \ h i .
� �
BZ 1 v mR
21 BST IIc� I s� �'•� +
4 I BZ 2 BZ 2 \ �� C-,W
. II
I `� 4 LLI
DI �� I =
W
I' Z �
W
Sl - HAND CLEARING IN WETLAND \ = W
cn
73
LEGEND
®DENOTES
TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
®DENOTES
PERMANENT IMPACTS
IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES HAND
CLEARING
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
11 `�
C)
RANDLEMAN ROAD PARTNERS II, LLC
401 0' 401
DB 6179 PG 694
PB 156 PG 96
GRAPHIC SCALE
Permit Drawing C
Sheet 2 of 9

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
1�09ooweEnadesib'Inc71s U-5850 4
\ Charlotte, NC 28202 R/W SHEET NO.
E I P \ 2Q11 NC Llcenee Number F—U991 ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
N ENGINEER ENGINEER
---- `\ - CONC
-' �� ARCELO , � -_ _
_- STAND-MALDONADO IT�Ow _
JOS-HEZ_ ANDS-H�BpIANDE J'o� , 843 / III
e \
n /IAA Jos p- O ; 1fIII \-, - ° I I�I -T�, li 11 i \
2 — _ 1 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
-DE�� — \ \ �' ^ N I T E D METH 0 D I S T (. H IJ R C I I / I I I 1 1 UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
_I a T\RUSTEES OF NEVI GO EN U /, , \/ ,R
_ E- \ - - PG 220 _--_- El� RCP -IV I \
Eta - L p-- _
---_-----__---
00 _ _ - --_ �£ ��- _ _ - - — — 30" C&
—w= --- — — -- \ —
" 2 4'' RCP -IV 1 - - - —� — —� — — w — — —
/ DI `
�/� —
f I -RANDLEMAN RD
i MOVE DI '
EMOVE RE
— — — — — — — — �mono*
— — — — — —� T— — 30" C _ CB CB C13—�— _- — —T=M T
c� _
R00
AP T TING -Ti—`_ — ��i j
^ _
-8— \
ww ` i l \
21' BST - \�I _ - �/ �' \ \ zs �\ ' -'\ ;°� \ + I.{)
I 1 I \CU
------ �BZ 2 ` I BZ r. \ c \/ N �-
-I w
J W
\ I
7 vJ
Uj
FSI — HAND CLEARING IN WETLAND / \ 1V, III J Uj
8 Co
It
-----------------------\\—
----------------
—��8----------------- \`
-----------
LEGEND --�---
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER _ _ _ _ _ f, q �}� M A N �-aA D P-XR T NCR S 1 f� L LAG`
- DENOTES PERMANENT IMPACTS 7
® IN SURFACE WATER ----_ D 119 P�`,6994 �`\40 \` \\ \\ \\ 40
®DENOTES HAND ---_ PB PG 9ro
CLEARING —-9ti �� \ \\ \ 1
8 E �� GR HIC v \ \\ \v vv
DENOTES FILL IN � � � � )CAL
®WETLAND Permit Drawing \ `\ `-----------988,F—
\ ` Sheet 3 Of 9 \\ \ \ - C

E
T�% STV Engineers, Inc.
900 Wes{ Trade Si, Sulie 715
Charlotte, NC 28202
NC Llcense Number F-0991
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
U-5850
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Permit Drawing
Sheet 4 of 9
w
W
W
w
ST
. 19
50
Ln
Ln
RAn
\F
AND CLEARINl
21
HAN
CLEARI
G
_
RR 0
i
r
R 9.5
65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65

Y
►1 n��
1 .IR
jum
� _ r
I I /� I
4 �
CHI PROPERTIES, LLC L
DBPB595 PG 9060 I
I W/LT
I' CB 30" C&G
-w---- —
I m
O
C
'g3 NA 2011
NAD
i
--T
GO LID PROPERTIES _V-'�z
DB 8 56 PG 1824
i 24" RCP-IV\� III'
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
W Z ��� STV Engineers, ,Inc.
';�,1�� 900 west Tiedd,e Si,sisu��te 715 U-5850 5
CO �/ pp�y Cho ,.He, NC 28202 RNJ SHEET NO.
o NC License Number F-0991
CO � ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
1 ` °O ENGINEER ENGINEER
CO z �j (jj L J
COOD 41P� BST , ��4-:%:-
6 la
Ro
co 6'O 06°16'55 W Co W/LT
iv 32,1, 21°50' L;
o BST
`L IP 0 � DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
IS DI I„R ll0G
� E
RE VE DI ❑L2 MH 2q RCP DI CB 5" P- CB 15" RCP
PLUG & - REMOVE � . J007 RANDLEMAN RD 39' BST
_ O_
F 4 \_1 • v A I V L A s
4 A
\ S2 — PERMANENT FILL IN WETLAND * «
81M-----1. ---
Z, 15 is
S2 S2 — HAND CLEARING IN WETLAND _
BZ
-'jS3 — PERMANENT FILL IN WETLAND
'04 Z �--
S3 — HAND CLEARING IN WETLAND
D
r
CB C
S3 — PERMANENT IMPACT IN SURFACE WATER
r ' C A -- - PUE PUE
H S3 — TEMPORARY IMPACT IN SURFACE WATER
L 2
<�JS JS
Js
SW�u�_
e � c=..� JS \\✓S
,t22
�Q
U-j W
STEVEN Le DAVIS a
FRANKIE E. DAVIS HEIRS 4o� of qo�
STEVEN E. DAVIS
DB 3399 PG 538 GRAPHIC SCALE PUE
ESTATE FILE 95-E-695 Permit Drawing
Sheet 5 of 9
LEGEND
MEDENOTES
TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
MMDENOTES
PERMANENT IMPACTS
IN SURFACE WATER
MEDENOTES
HAND
CLEARING
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND

• Charlotte, NC 28202,_0991
00 NC License N um her ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULI S
It _834f
00 CO
• -
r �11
GOL/D PROPERTIES ALI�z -- li W
PB 1I UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
AM I
1� �i17.1�IJC:�i 1�'� .��, `i. ► ri._i�.�+�'��1;. �CAFAR-i__�•t��•'�:�_
�&i;av���••. �� _ -� � :i�lwra'!�-a.. 3�.�s�iz..rT� vim.— ..r�1 i% � • 1 �_ —��.9 i�;r, Lam• �>�r�� �'— Il
�'S4�7•"lam"ri.`i-1
CB
_ c
• ' �� ,
1 1� • ' __ _ I . • • • • n
i
•i
►'�
U �, ' , • -
1, _FILL
— -e
•
_ •
- ---- ---�
H , ' / H H H \��' S3 - PERMANENT IMPACT IN SURFACE WATER '
PU \
I \ +S2 " PERMANENT�FILL. IN "`WETLAND • C v -
rn r I J \_� _ -91M- �' " • + I + H + ` S3 - TE PACT IN SURFACE WATER
rn r I --_ �\ \� `�S� S2 - HAND CLEARING IN WETLAND - S ✓S 6-- -- / /------- ,�
m
is
S L IN WETLANDf� \ SI
19
�N �8\\\\ S3 - HAND CLEARING IN WETLAND \�\ I-,
-\�
GEND
I \
® DENOTES l
-\ IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
uj DENOTES PERMANENT IMPACTS
�\\`
_-- --- —\ ®® IN SURFAC
E WATERSiEVEN L. DAVIS DENOTES HAND
CLEARING
. DAVIS `�EIRS°O °'
c) NFRANKIE40 0DENOTES FILL INSTEVEM DAVIS'\ WETLAND
DB 3397 G821
DB 3399 PG�538 GRAPHIC SCALE
EIS_ ATE FILE 95-�\ 695 \\ Permit Drawing
9c 1 \ \ 6 9 \\
Cl 8� \ \ Sheet of \

STV Enginccrs, Tnc.
1o0 900 West Trade St, Suite 715
Charlotte, NC 28202
NC License Number F-0991
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
U-5850
5
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Permit Drawing
Sheet 7 of s
R40W
STA.
2
3 +
0
z
g
Lu
FILL I
ETLAN
3
HAND
CLEARING
L
Rl 1;
60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

PA
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
NO. NAMES
2 TRUSTEES OF NEW GOSHEN
UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
4 CHI PROPERTIES, LLC
6 GOLD PROPERTIES V, LLC
10 STEVEN L. DAVIS
FRANKIE E. DAVIS HEIRS
STEVEN E. DAVIS
11 RANDLEMAN ROAD
PARTNERS II, LLC
Permit Drawing
Sheet 8 of 9
n
SR 1007
0300 RANDLEMAN
RD)
GREENSEBORO, NC
27406
SR 1007
(3260 RANDLEMAN
RD)
GREENSEBORO, NC
27406
SR 1007
(3258 RANDLEMAN
RD)
GREENSEBORO, NC
27406
SR 1007
(3216 RANDLEMAN
RD)
GREENSEBORO, NC
27406
SR 1007
(3301 RANDLEMAN
RD)
GREENSEBORO, NC
27406
NCD®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GUILFORD COUNTY
PROJECT. U-SM
SR 1007 (RANDLEMAN ROAD)
FROM ELMSLEY DRIVE
TO GLENDALE DRIVE
9

WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
18+00.31 TO 20+36.47
ROAD
0.03
2
21+21.54 TO 23+65.88
ROAD
0.08
0.13
3
23+76.58 TO 24+51.79
ROAD
< 0.01
0.03
< 0.01
< 0.01
29
53
TOTALS":
0.09
0.19
< 0.01
< 0.01
1 29
53
1 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:

W
O
04
c
Q
I
0
w
0
a
EL
m
T
w
0
w
m
u,
w
z
a
w
0
w
w
w
w
c�
a
w
oCE
See Sheet to For Index of Sheets
See Sheet IB For Standard Symbology Sheet
/ I
END
PROJECT I
I I "
BEGIN
PROJECT
85
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
GRAPHIC SCALES
20 10 0 20 40
PLANS
20 10 0 20 40
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
4 2 0 4 8
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
DESIGN
DATA
ADT 2020 =
15,600
ADT 2040 =
21,300
K =
60%
D =
10%
T =
1 0
V =
40 MPH
FUNC. CLASSIFICATION:
MINOR ARTERIAL
S°1Pr1°1C'lE fl1F NOR°l['1H[ CrS1E?RO1LdNrS
IDdZydSdON ;{CIF' HIGHWAYS
GUILFORD CO UNTY
LOCATION. RANDLEMAN RD (SR1007) FROM ELMSLEY DR
TO GLENDALE DR.
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, & DRAINAGE
BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT
-Y- STA.18 + 03.88
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT U-5850 = .362 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT U-5850 = .362 MILES
NCDOT CONTACT: BRIAN KETNER, PE
Division 7 Project Engineer
TE PRO - REFERENCE Na SHEET NO.
.c. U-5850 I
U-5850 I PE
63
NA 20'
NA'
PLANS PREPARED FOR THE NCDOT BY:
,ic.
�0Q 900 We t Trade S{, Suiie 715
S 1 V STV ,t Trade
N orl pit,, NC N be,
NC Llcen se Number F-17991
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
SEAN C. STEPHENS, PE
RIGHT OF WAY (DATE:
MAY 8, 2019
PROJECT ENGINEER
CLARK E. GROVES
LETTING DATE:
J U N E 24, 2021
PROJECT DESIGNER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HYDRA ULICS
ENGINEER
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
ROADWAY
DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.E.

1
CONSTANTINO ARCELO-CARD
JOSE HERNANDE E M HERNANDEZ
A/K/A DB 8028A G 2041
\ E
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
STV STV Engincas, Inc. U-5850 4
" Io,0 900,,We t NCde,Si , Suite 715
G!!i2 NC License Number F-0991 202 R'`N SHEET NO.
NA 2011 ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
I BUFFER DRAWING
rSHEET 2 OF 5
I 2 N
O DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
F NEW GOSHEN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH I I
m � TRUSTEES 0 UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
C E\ DB 2448 PGc220 r
v �
II �
I I
II BZ 2-
I
I
I I
LIMITS OF EXISTING
FACILITY
;.�►�.ssss�ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZON]
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
® MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
s CD
\
SITE 1 O
BZ 1 \ �e�� CD
O+
BZ 2LU
J W
MITIGABLE IMPACTS F w U)
ZONE W
Jw
2
Q
a
RANDLEMAN ROAD PARTNERS II, LLC
DB 6179 PG 694
PB 156 PG 96 40, of 40,
GRAPHIC SCALE

D
Cn
m17-
rnz
Cn
=rn
rnr
mN
CD
4�6 +
P
O
O
I fn
� 1
1 O
\\ 4
CHI PROPERTIES, LLC
DB 7565 PG 3060
LlPB 93
95 PG 933
Fn
al
83 NA 2011 w
NAo I
5 I
GOLD PROPERTIES
DB 8056 PG 1824 J
PB 101 PG 134
F- 9 Fir
--=91M----
�5
SITE 2
LIMITS OF EXISTING
FACILITY
��f
BI 7
82 2
MITIGABLE IMP
ZONE 2
MITIGABLE IMPACTS
ZONE 1
10
STEVEN L. DAVIS
FRANKIE E. DAVIS HEIRS
STEVEN E. DAVIS
DB 3397 PG 821
DB 3399 PG 538
ESTATE FILE 95-E-695
STV I STV Engincas, Inc.
" jo,090orlWest NCde8Si, Suite 715
e!!i2 202
NC License Number F-0991
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 3 OF 5
N
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
/ I—C oCn c
RW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
LU PUE PUE
2WLB •-
•?
e
�S is
�
ALLOWABLE 271
ACTS ZONE 2 �$W _ '•.�—y
I I
12 2
W W
7 �
CI- o-
40, 0' 40' PUE
GRAPHIC SCALE
82 2
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2

RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACTS BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT
Site Station Structure ROAD PARALLEL
No. (From/To) Size / Type BRIDGE ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2
CROSSING IMPACT ftz ftz ftz ftz ftz ftz ftz ftz
1
17+31.54/ 20+38.19
ROAD
X
5304
5304
2
21+20.61/23+80.44
ROAD
X
4030
1035
652
1687
TOTALS*:
0
4030
0
6339
652
6991
0
0
NOTES:

WETLANDS IN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLANDS IN
BUFFERS
SITE STATION ZONE 1 ZONE 2
NO. (FROM/TO)ft2 ft2
1 18+07.47 / 20+09.00 584
TOTAL: 0 584
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
10/11/2022
GUILFORD COUNTY
U-5850
50239.1.2
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 5 OF 5
Nev. jan

NCDOT Division 7 STIP U-5850
SR 1007 (Randleman Road) Widening — PCN for RGP 50
Attachment F
No Archaeological Survey Required Form,
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Assessment of Effects Form

Project Tracking Yo.:
18-01-0024
o� NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
A.:•
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not �
?
h o ga valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the '0
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group. T,a
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: U-5850 County: Guilford
WBS No: 50239.1.1 Document: State EA & FONSI
F.A. No: N/A Funding' ® State ❑ Federal
Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: USAGE (not specified)
Project Description: NCDOT's Division 7 proposes to widen SR 1007 (Randleman Road) to multilanes
between Elmsley Drive and Glendale Drive in the City of Greensboro, Guilford County. The existing
cross-section consists of a three -lane facility with shoulders; the proposed cross-section will consist of a
five -lane facility curb -and -gutter section with a center turn -lane. Existing ROW is listed as 80 feet
whereas Proposed ROW is to be 120 feet. Project length is approximately 0.4 mile (2,112 feet). Since
Preliminary Design Plans have not been developed yet, a Study Area for the project has been generated in
order to facilitate environmental planning purposes at this stage. The Study Area will be centered along
the roadway corridor, incorporating extensions along major Y-lines (i.e. intersection roads). Overall, the
Study Area will encompass about 18 acres, inclusive of the existing roadways and any modern
development.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
This project was accepted on Wednesday, January 24, 2018. A map review and site file search was
conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Thursday, January 25, and Friday, January 26,
2018. The southern portion of the Study Area falls within the corridor of the Northern Alternative for the
Greensboro Bypass (TIP# I-2402), which was archaeologically surveyed in 1990/1991 (Hargrove 1991
[OSA Biblio# 2924]). As a result of that survey, two (2) archaeological sites were recorded, the only two
(2) archaeological sites documented within one (1) mile of the project area. Digital copies of HPO's
maps (Greensboro Quadrangle) as well as the HPOWEB GIS Service (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) were
last reviewed on Thursday, February 15, 2018. There are two (2) known historic architectural resources
(Hodgin-Stevenson Log House [GF1976] and Goshen School [GF1181]) located within or adjacent to the
Study Area; however, intact archaeological deposits associated with these resources would not be
anticipated within the footprint of the proposed project. In addition, topographic maps, historic maps
(NCMaps website), USDA soil survey maps, and aerial photographs were utilized and inspected to gauge
environmental factors that may have contributed to historic or prehistoric settlement within the project
limits, and to assess the level of modern, slope, agricultural, hydrological, and other erosive -type
disturbances within and surrounding the Study Area.
"Nn ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED " fnrrn for Alinnr Transpnrtatior Projects as Quah ied in the 2007/2015 Prngrarnrnatic Agreernerrt.
1 of 3

Project Tracking No.:
18-01-0024
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
Although this is a State -funded project, a Federal permit is necessary. A permanent/temporary easement
will also be necessary as well as additional ROW. The size and shape of the Study Area have been drawn
in a way to capture any possible impacts beyond the NCDOT's existing ROW along SR 1007
(Randleman Road). At this time, we are in compliance with NC GS 121-12a, since there are no eligible
(i.e. National Register -listed) archaeological resources located within the project's Study Area that would
require our attention. Based on the description of the proposed project, activities will take place beyond
the NCDOT's existing ROW. From an environmental perspective, the Study Area falls within a mixed
commercial and residential setting in the Piedmont physiographic region of North Carolina. The Study
Area consists of various soil types, most of which have been heavily disturbed, are considered to be
poorly drained, or have succumbed to varying degrees of erosion (e.g. Mecklenburg -Urban land complex,
2-10% slopes [MuB], Wehadkee silt loam [Wh], and Mecklenburg sandy clay loam, 2-6% slopes, eroded
[MhB2]). Based on the poor soil conditions and the level of development, the preservation of intact
archaeological resources would not be anticipated. The Office of State Archaeology (OSA) has reviewed
various projects within the vicinity of the Study Area for environmental compliance, most of which have
been residential in nature (ERs 87-7680, 88-7060, 88-8044, 90-7119, 95-0576, 98-0448, and 10-0514).
Stating a low probability for intact and significant archaeological sites to be present, OSA did not require
an archaeological survey for any of these housing projects. On the flip side, archaeological surveys were
recommended and conducted for the alternate corridors of the Greensboro Bypass (TIP# I-2402 [ER 91-
7969]). Asa result of that survey, two (2) archaeological sites (Sites 31GF295 and 31GF296**) were
documented along Kallamdale Road, both of which are located outside the current Study Area. Site
31GF295 was a small lithic scatter determined not eligible for the NRHP. Site 31GF296** consisted of
the remains of the Layton Farm, a late 19t'-century Piedmont farmstead (GF 1217), that was deemed
architecturally significant and eligible for the NRHP in 1991. Within five (5) miles of the Study Area,
NCDOT's Archaeology Group has reviewed fourteen (14) transportation -related projects for
environmental compliance under the Programmatic Agreement (PA) with the State Historic Preservation
Office (NC-HPO), none of which is located within one (1) mile of the proposed project. An
archaeological survey was not recommended for most of these projects, based on the presence of heavily
modified soils and/or poorly drained or eroded soil conditions. However, an archaeological survey was
recommended and conducted for the replacement of Bridge No. 121 on SR 4240 over South Buffalo
Creek (PA 16-01-0126 [TIP# B-5717]), because of the proximity of Site 31GF24, a possible village site
recorded by Joffre Coe in 1935. No archaeological remains were recorded as a result of that survey; the
village site is thought to have been "mismapped." Given the poor soil conditions and developed nature
within the Study Area and the results of previously reviewed and surveyed projects in the vicinity, there is
a low probability for significant prehistoric and/or historic archaeological materials to be present.
Therefore, it is believed that the current Study Area, as depicted, is unlikely to contain intact and
significant archaeological resources. No archaeological survey is required for this project. If design
plans change or are made available prior to construction, then additional consultation regarding
archaeology will be required. At this time, no further archaeological work is recommended. If
archaeological materials are uncovered during project activities, then such resources will be dealt with
according to the procedures set forth for "unanticipated discoveries," to include notification of NCDOT's
Archaeology Group.
A portion of the New Goshen Methodist Church Cemetery (1892-present) is located within the Study
Area. If any burials are to be impacted, then additional steps will need to be taken to relocate any
impacted burials in compliance with North Carolina statutes, including prior discussions with the State
Archaeologist and the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) in order to determine the manner by which any
impacted graves should be removed and relocated. Such discussions would also be held in conjunction
with the NCDOT's Archaeology Group.
"Nn ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED " fnrrn fnr Alinor Transpnrtation Projects as Quah ied in the 2007/2015 Prograrnrnatic Agreernerrt.
2 of 3

Project Tracking No.:
18-01-0024
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ® Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED
I,-
17-
February 15, 2018
NCDOT A GEOLOGIST Date
i 'w r ■ �
i, lip '�p •..-'� i i�
t
■
tik~■_ 4 ■
�f �` ■ * ire I tirti" r _!—..____ -
fi
* *�
a ♦ s r�+ *�
r ti Y
■
�O
■
r
�11
Figure 1: Greensboro, NC (USGS 1951 [PR68]).
A
y
"Nn ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED " fnrrn for Alinnr Transpnrtatinn Projects a.s Quahjied in the 200712015 Prngrarnrnatic Agreernerrt.
3 of 3

I
TIP# U-5850(PA 18-01-0024) _
Widening of SR 1007 (Randlemand Rd)
from Elmsley Dr to Glendale Rd in
Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
OStudY_A—
ONCHPOpvwts
Local Dislncl Boundaries t • -
N C H P O_N R_S L_DOE B— l o d e s
N—ed_ste —
HYARNT l
—pfldha—
Ccmctcry
Streets
Soils All
Q Guilford_2014P—ls
EnC
cn
0 os 210 420 630 840
e: Es , D ,g lalGl be, GeoE e, Ea t sta Ge g aphi ems,
Feet CI&MAi b s D5, USDAA•USGS„AEX, Getmappi g, Aertgri.d,
+r ICI: T, +..,..,.., .,.....a +.�.,., r._Ic-�flmr�r✓..,-rY.arY.,1.a...r+:..,:�

DocuSign Envelope ID: BDC17F13-FCBD-43FA-9CF0-ADB7870D3D5F
Project Tracking No_ (Internal Use
18-01-0024
HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
U-5850
County:
Guilford
WBS No.:
50239.1.1
Document
Type:
Fed. Aid No:
Funding:
® State ❑ Federal
Federal
Permit(s):
® Yes ❑ No
Permit
T e(s):
USACE
Proiect Description:
Widen to multiple lanes SR 1007 (Randleman Rd) from Elmsley Dr to Glendale Dr.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions. -
Review of HPO quad maps, relevant background reports, historic designations roster, and
indexes was undertaken on February 5, 2018. The Goshen School (GF 1 181), a Determine
Eligible resource is located within the Area of Potential Effects (APE). No National Register
boundary was every recorded; therefore, NCDOT commissioned a new Eligibility Report to
determine if the property remained eligible and if so, draw an appropriate boundary. In a letter
dated August 2, 2019, HPO concurred with the recommendation that the New Goshen United
Methodist Church and Rosenwald School (GF1118) are eligible for NR listing. On August 19,
2021, an Effects Meeting was held resulting in a No Adverse Effect with Environmental
Commitments.
ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
Property Name:
New Goshen United
Status:
DE
Methodist Church and
Rosenwald School
Survey Site No.:
GF 1118
PIN.
Effects
❑ No Effect
® No Adverse Effect ❑ Adverse Effect
HnIoric Archi[ec[ure and Landscaper EFFECTS ASSESSMENTfornn fir -Ifinnr Tranrpor[adinn Prnjcir as Quahfied m the 2007 Prngrarnrnaiic Agreement.
Page 1 of 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: BDC17F13-FCBD-43FA-9CF0-ADB7870D3D5F
Explanation of Effects Determination:
The project will require 0.72 acres of new right-of-way. The lanes will be 11-feet wide with 6-
feet wide sidewalks which will start at the back -of -curb. A 3-feet high retaining wall will reduce
the amount of ROW. The utilities will remain in their current location.
List of Environmental Commitments:
Temporary orange fencing will be erected around the church sign, historic marker, and trees
during construction. The brick retaining wall will have a brick veneer to match the church and
school buildings.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
❑Map(s) ❑Previous Survey info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence ®Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT AND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
Historic Architecture and Landscapes —ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
—DocuSigned by:
-S� F--,f
8/19/2021
NCDOT Architectural Historian Date
—DocuSigned by:
—��a 8/19/2021
State Historic Preservation Office Representative Date
—DocuSigned by:
'41Jr'4_'.J (A)'. '.f<-
Federal Agency Representative
8/19/2021
Date
HnIoric Archi[ec[ure and Landscaper EFFECTS ASSESSMENTfornn fir Afinnr Tranrpor[adinn Prnjecir as Quahfied in the 2007 Prngrananalic Agreerneni.
Page 2 of 2

NCDOT Division 7 STIP U-5850
SR 1007 (Randleman Road) Widening — PCN for RGP 50
Attachment G
T & E Supplemental Information

Threatened & Endangered Species and Critical Habitat
NCDOT Division 7 — STIP U-5850 SR 1007 (Randleman Road) Widening
Project Number WBS: 50239.1.1
STV Engineers, Inc. (STV) conducted field reviews of an approximate 10-acre study area on July
3, 2018, October 12, 2018, and September 8, 2021. Prior to the field reviews, STV reviewed U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP)
online databases for information related to the occurrence of federal and state protected (threatened
or endangered) species in the study area. The USFWS IPaC protected species database reviewed
September 13, 2022, lists two federally protected species as occurring or having the potential to
occur in the study area (Table 1). Additionally, the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) which
is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act is discussed. As of September 13,
2022, the NCNHP lists no occurrences of federally protected species within one mile of the study
area. A brief description of each species, including habitat requirements and physical
characteristics, and biological conclusion rendered based on surveys of the study area follow.
Habitat requirements for each species are based on current available literature and/or the USFWS.
Table 1. ESA federally protected species potentially occurring in the Study Areal
Federal
Habitat
Biological
Scientific Name
Common Name
Status
Present
Conclusion
Helianthus schweinitzii
Schweinitz's sunflower
E
Yes
No Effect
Isotria medeoloides
Small whorled pogonia
T
Yes
Unresolved
' IPaC data checked on September 13t`, 2022
E - Endangered
T - Threatened
Schweinitz's sunflower
USFWS optimal survey window: Late August - October
Schweinitz's sunflower is a perennial herbaceous plant species limited to the Piedmont regions
and counties of North and South Carolina. The plant grows from one to two meters tall originating
from a cluster of tuberous roots. The plant's flower consists of yellow disk and ray flowers formed
on small heads less than 1.5 centimeter (cm) in diameter. The petals, or modified leaves, are two
to three cm long. The lanceolate leaves are arranged in an opposite pattern within the lower two-
thirds of the stem transitioning to alternate within the upper third. The typical habitat for
Schweinitz's sunflower includes periodically maintained roadsides and utility line rights -of -way
(R/Ws), old pastures, edges of upland woods, and other disturbed open areas. Soils associated
with suitable Schweinitz's sunflower habitat generally include thin upland soils clayey in texture
(and often with substantial rock fragments) which have a high shrink -swell capacity. Flowering
occurs from August to the first frost of the year.
STV Environmental Scientist Joshua Kotheimer, PWS conducted plant by plant field surveys for
the presence of Schweinitz's sunflowers on October 12, 2018, September 8, 2021 during the
flowering season and USFWS-designated optimal survey window. Suitable habitat was found
along the SR 1007 roadside and woodland edges, but no sunflowers were observed. Review of
the NCNHP records on September 13, 2022, revealed no documented occurrences or populations
of Schweinitz's sunflower in the study area or within one mile of the study area. Based on the
Supplemental Information

literature review and field survey conducted during the flowering season, it is determined that the
project would have `No Effect' on Schweinitz's sunflower.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Small whorled pogonia
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: Mid -May through early July
Small whorled pogonia occurs in young as well as maturing (second to third successional growth)
mixed -deciduous or mixed-deciduous/coniferous forests. It does not appear to exhibit strong
affinities for a particular aspect, soil type, or underlying geologic substrate. In North Carolina, the
perennial orchid is typically found in open, dry deciduous woods and is often associated with white
pine and rhododendron. The species may also be found on dry, rocky, wooded slopes; moist slopes;
ravines lacking stream channels; or slope bases near braided channels of vernal streams. The
orchid, often limited by shade, requires small light gaps or canopy breaks, and typically grows
under canopies that are relatively open or near features like logging roads or streams that create
long -persisting breaks in the forest canopy.
Potential habitat exists within limited areas of the forests of the study area. Plant by plant surveys
were conducted by STV Environmental Scientist Joshua Kotheimer, PWS, throughout areas of
suitable habitat on July 3, 2018. No individuals of small whorled pogonia were observed and the
July survey was conducted during the flowering season. The NCNHP website was reviewed on
September 13, 2022, to determine the locations of the nearest populations of small whorled
pogonia. The NCNHP determined that no populations of small whorled pogonia were present
within one mile of the study area. Since field surveys for small whorled pogonia are effective for
one year, the biological conclusion is unresolved; an updated field survey will need to be conducted
during the optimal survey window to render a biological conclusion for the species. The NCDOT
has a project commitment to survey the project area for small whorled pogonia and render a
biological conclusion before construction begins.
Biological Conclusion: Unresolved
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
The bald eagle is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act as regulated by the
USFWS. Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forests found in association with
rivers and other large bodies of open water utilized for foraging. Large dominant trees, typically
located within one mile of these waters, are used as nesting sites. Prior to conducting field reviews,
a desktop-GIS assessment of the study area and an area within a one -mile radius of the project
limits was performed. Specifically, aerial photographs were reviewed to identify any areas of
potential foraging habitat. No water bodies large enough to be considered potential foraging
habitat for the bald eagle were identified within the study area or one -mile radius; therefore, it has
been determined that no field surveys for the species are necessary. Additionally, a review of the
NCNHP database on September 13, 2022, revealed no known occurrences of this species within
1.0 mile of the study area. Due to no nests or eagles being identified during the survey, no known
occurrences within a mile, and minimal impact anticipated for this project, it has been determined
that this project will not affect bald eagles.
Supplemental Information