20171156 Ver 1_HorneCrk_100026_MY3_2022_20221205

ID#* 20171156 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 12/06/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 12/5/2022
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Matthew Reid [e-mail]
Project Information
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20171156 Version:* 1
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: • DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project
County: Surry
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: HorneCrk_100026_MY3_2022.pdf 25.68MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name: * Matthew Reid
Signature:

Monitoring Report
FINALVERSION
Horne Creek TributariesMitigation Project
Monitoring Year 3
Calendar Year of Data Collection: 2022
NCDEQ DMS Project Identification # 100026
NCDEQ DMS Contract # 7181
YadkinRiver Basin (Cataloging Unit 03040101)
USACE Action ID Number: SAW-2017-01510
NCDEQ DWR Project # 2017-1156
SurryCounty, NC
Contracted Under RFP # 16-006993, Date of Issue: August 16, 2016
Data Collection Period: July - October 2022
Submission Date: November2022
Prepared for:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Prepared by:

th
November 30, 2022
.# $¤¯ ±³¬¤­³ ®¥ %­µ¨±®­¬¤­³ « 1´ «¨³¸
$¨µ¨²¨®­ ®¥ -¨³¨¦ ³¨®­ 3¤±µ¨¢¤²
!³³­Ȁ - ³³§¤¶ 2¤¨£Ǿ 0±®©¤¢³ - ­ ¦¤±
ΑΏΘΏ 5ȁ3ȁ ΖΏ (¨¦§¶ ¸
SwannanoaǾ .# ΑΗ778
2%Ȁ 7,3 2¤²¯®­²¤² ³® .#$%1 $-3 2¤µ¨¤¶ #®¬¬¤­³² ¥®± 4 ²ª Θ 3´¡¬¨³³ «Ǿ -®­¨³®±¨­¦ 9¤ ± Β
2¤¯®±³ ¥®± ³§¤ (®±­¤ #±¤¤ª 4±¨¡´³ ±¨¤² -¨³¨¦ ³¨®­ 0±®©¤¢³Ǿ $-3 &´««-$¤«¨µ¤±¸ 0±®©¤¢³ )$
ͰΐΏΏΏΑΕǾ #®­³± ¢³ ͰΖΐΗΐǾ 9 £ª¨­ 2¨µ¤± " ²¨­Ǿ # ³ «®¦¨­¦ 5­¨³ ΏΒΏΓΏΐΏΐǾ 3´±±¸ #®´­³¸Ǿ .#
Dear Mr. Reid:
Water & Land Solutions, LLC (WLS) is pleased to present the Final MonitoringYear 3 Report for the Horne
Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). Per the DMS review comments, WLS has updated the Monitoring
Year 3 Report and associated deliverables accordingly. The electronic deliverables are organized under
the following folder structure as required under the digital submission requirements:
1.Report PDF
2.Support Files
1_ Background Tables
2_Visual
3_Veg Data
4_Geomorphology
5_Hydro
6_Other Data
We are providing our written responses to DMS’ review comments on the Draft Monitoring Year 3 Report
below. Each of the DMS review comments is copied below in bold text, followed by the appropriate
response from WLS in regular text:
0«¤ ²¤ ¤­²´±¤ ³§¤ -®­¨³®±¨­¦ 0§ ²¤ 0¤±¥®±¬ ­¢¤ "®­£ § ² ¡¤¤­ ´¯£ ³¤£  ­£  ¯¯±®µ¤£
¡¸ +±¨²³¨¤ #®±²®­ ¡¤¥®±¤ ¨­µ®¨¢¨­¦ ¥®± 4 ²ª Θȁ Response:WLSwill ensure that the Monitoring
Phase Performance Bond has been updated and approved prior to invoicing for Task 9.
)­  ­ ¤¥¥®±³ ³® ¨£¤­³¨¥¸  ­£ ±¤²®«µ¤ ¯±®¯¤±³¸ ¨²²´¤² ¤ ±«¸ £´±¨­¦ ³§¤ ¬®­¨³®±¨­¦ ¯¤±¨®£Ǿ
¯«¤ ²¤ µ¤±¨¥¸ ³§ ³ ³§¤ ¢®­²¤±µ ³¨®­ ¤ ²¤¬¤­³ ¡®´­£ ±¸ § ² ¡¤¤­ ¶ «ª¤£Ǿ ¬ ±ª¨­¦  ­£
²¨¦­ ¦¤ ¨² ´¯ ³® ²¯¤¢Ǿ ¥¤­¢¨­¦ ¨² ¨­³ ¢³Ǿ  ­£ ­® ¤­¢±® ¢§¬¤­³² § µ¤ ¡¤¤­ ¨£¤­³¨¥¨¤£ȁ
Response:Theeasement boundary has been walked, fencing is intact, and no encroachments
have been identified. Easement signage is up to spec and WLS will continue to monitor for
encroachments on a quarterly basis.

4¨³«¤ 0 ¦¤Ȁ 0«¤ ²¤  ££ Ȩ$ ³¤ ®¥ )²²´¤Ȁ !´¦´²³ ΐΕǾ ΑΏΐΕȩ ¥®««®¶¨­¦ ³§¤ 2&0Ͱȁ Response:The
title page is updated as requested.
0«¤ ²¤ ¨­¢«´£¤ ³§¤ ##06 ®µ¤±µ¨¤¶ ²§¤¤³ Ȩ¥¨¦´±¤ ΐ ¨­ ¯±¤µ¨®´² ±¤¯®±³²ȩ ¨­ ¥¨­ « ²´¡¬¨³³ «ȁ
Response:TheCCPV overview sheet has been added to the final monitoring report.
2¤¢®¬¬¤­£ £®¶­«® £¨­¦ ¥«®¶ ¦ ´¦¤ Α ¯±¨®± ³® ¢±¤£¨³ ±¤«¤ ²¤ ¬¤¤³¨­¦  ­£ § µ¨­¦ £ ³ 
 µ ¨« ¡«¤ ¥®± £¨²¢´²²¨®­ȁ Response:WLS will downloadflow gauge 2 and have data available
for discussion prior to credit release meeting.
4 ¡«¤ Ε Ȁ 0«¤ ²¤ µ¤±¨¥¸ £ ³  ¥®± 0«®³ ­´¬¡¤± Ζȁ .® µ®«´­³¤¤±² ¶¤±¤ ¨­£¨¢ ³¤£ ¨­ 4 ¡«¤ Ε
¥®± ³§¨² ¯«®³ǿ §®¶¤µ¤±Ǿ 4 ¡«¤ Ε  ²§®¶² ΐΑΐ µ®«´­³¤¤±²ȝ ¢±¤ȁ Response:Table 6a incorrectly
showed 121 volunteers/acre. As indicated in Table 6, there were no volunteers in Plot 7 during
MY3 and the typo has been corrected in the final monitoring report.
3¤¢³¨®­ ΐȁΐ  ­£ ΒȁΒȀ 2¤¢®¬¬¤­£ ¨­¢«´£¨­¦ ȏ¶§¤­ µ®«´­³¤¤± ²¯¤¢¨¤²  ±¤ ¨­¢«´£¤£Ȑ ¶§¤­
£¨²¢´²²¨­¦ ¤¨¦§³ ®¥ ³¤­ µ¤¦¤³ ³¨®­ ¯«®³² ¬¤¤³¨­¦ ²´¢¢¤²² criteria.Response:WLShas
updated the language in the final monitoring report to include “when volunteer species are
included” when discussing vegetation plot success criteria.
4 ¡«¤ ΑȀ 0«¤ ²¤  ££ ȏ)­µ ²¨µ¤ 3¯¤¢¨¤² 4±¤ ³¬¤­³Ȑ  ­£ ³§¤ £ ³¤² ¨³ ®¢¢´±±¤£ ³® ³§¤ ³ ¡«¤ȁ
0«¤ ²¤  «²® ¬®µ¤ ³§¤ ¡®³³®¬ ³¶® ¤­³±¨¤² ³® ³§¤¨± ¢§±®­®«®¦¨¢ « ¯®²¨³¨®­ ¨­ ³§¤ ³ ¡«¤ȁ
Response:Invasive species treatment was added to Table 2. The stream survey and vegetation
survey were moved to chronological order.
4§ ­ª ¸®´ ¥®± ¨­¢«´£¨­¦ ´¯£ ³¤£ ¯¨¢³´±¤ ®¥ 30!Δȁ 0«¤ ²¤ ¯±®µ¨£¤ ´¯£ ³¤  ­£ ¯§®³®² ®­¢¤
³§¤  ±¤  ¨² ±¤¯ ¨±¤£ ¨­ -9Γ ±¤¯®±³ȁ Response:WLSwill continue to provide updates and
photos of SPA5 in the MY4 report
%«¤¢³±®­¨¢ $¤«¨µ¤± ¡«¤Ȁ
0«¤ ²¤ ²´¡¬¨³ £¨¦¨³ « ¥¨«¤ ¶¨³§ ²³±¤ ¬ ¦ ´¦¤ ¥«®¶ ¦± ¯§²ȁ Response:Hydrology graphs are
provided in the Hydro folder.
0«¤ ²¤ ²´¡¬¨³ µ¤¦¤³ ³¨®­ §¤¨¦§³ £ ³ ȁ Response:Averagevegetationheight by plot is
provided in Table 6a.

Please contact me if you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
7 ³¤± lj , ­£ 3®«´³¨®­²Ǿ ,,#
Emily Dunnigan
Water & Land Solutions, LLC
7721 Six Forks Road, Suite 130
Raleigh, NC 27615
Office Phone: [phone]
Mobile Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

TableofContents
1 Project Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Project Location and Description .................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................ 1
1.3 Project Success Criteria ................................................................................................................. 2
1.3.1 Streams ................................................................................................................................. 2
1.3.2 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................. 3
1.3.3 Visual Assessment ................................................................................................................. 3
2 Project Mitigation Components ............................................................................................................ 4
2.1 Project Components ..................................................................................................................... 4
3 Monitoring Year 3 Assessment and Results .......................................................................................... 4
3.1 Morphological Assessment ........................................................................................................... 4
3.1.1 Stream Horizontal Pattern & Longitudinal Profile ................................................................ 4
3.1.2 Stream Horizontal Dimension ............................................................................................... 5
3.2 Stream Hydrology ......................................................................................................................... 6
3.2.1 Stream Flow .......................................................................................................................... 6
3.2.2 Bankfull Events ...................................................................................................................... 6
3.3 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................................... 6
3.4 Macrobenthic Sampling ................................................................................................................ 7
4 Methods ................................................................................................................................................ 7

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Background Tables
Table 1 Project Mitigation Components
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts
Table 4 Project Information and Attributes

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 5a Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photos Stream Photo Points (Cross-Sections, Culvert Crossings, EII Reaches)
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Random Vegetation Plot Photographs
Potential Problem Areas

Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6 Planted and Total Stem Counts
Table 6a Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 6b Red-line Planting List
Table 6c Random Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix D Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Figure 2 MY3 Cross-Sections
Table 7a Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 7b Cross-section Morphology Data
Table 7c Stream Reach Morphology Data

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
Table 8 Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure 3 Surface Flow Data
Figure 4 Flow and Crest Gauge Installation Diagrams
Figure 5 Rainfall Data

Appendix F Macrobenthic Data
Table 9 Biotic Index Data and Scores
Benthic Field Data Sheets
Photos Biotic Sampling Photographs

1ProjectSummary
1.1ProjectLocationandDescription
The HorneCreek Tributaries Mitigation Project (“Project”)is a North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) full-delivery mitigation project
contracted with Water & Land Solutions, LLC (WLS) in response to RFP 16-006993.The Project
constructionand plantingwas completedin April 2020. The Project was built as documented in the
approved mitigation plan and record drawings. The Project provides warm stream mitigation credits in
the Yadkin River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03040101). The Project is located in Surry County
approximately seven miles southwest of the Town of Pilot Mountain (36.282582°, -80.509153°).
The Projectrestored, enhanced, and permanentlyprotectedseven stream reaches (R1, R2, R3, R4, R4a,
R4b, and R5) and their riparian buffers, totaling approximately 5,428linearfeet of streamchannel. The
Project provides significant ecological improvements and functional uplift through stream and aquatic
habitat restoration and through decreasing nutrient and sediment loads within the watershed.The
mitigation planprovides adetailed project summary and Table 1provides a summary of project assets.
Monitoring Year 3 (MY3) activities occurred fromJulythruOctober 2022. This report presents the data
for MY3. The Project meets the MY3 success criteria for stream horizontal and vertical stability, streambed
condition and stability. Flow gauges 1 and 3 (FG-1, FG-3) did meet the flow requirement, and Flow gauge
2 (FG-2)on R2 did not meet the 30-day flow requirement. Eightof the ten vegetation plots are meeting
interim success criteriawhen volunteer species are included. Based on these results, the Project is on
trajectory to meet interim and final success criteria. For more information on thechronology of the project
history and activity, refer to AppendixA, Table 2. Relevant project contact information is presentedin the
appendicesin Table 3 and project background information is presented in Table 4.
1.2ProjectGoalsandObjectives
The Project is on track tomeetthe goals and objectives described in the HorneCreek TributariesFinal
Approved Mitigation Plan and will address general restoration goals and opportunities outlined in the
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) Upper Yadkin River Basin Restoration Priority Plan
(RBRP) (DEQ 2009). More specifically, watershed goals and management strategies described in the Upper
Yadkin Local Watershed Plan (LWP) will be met by:
•Reducing sediment, soil erosion, turbidity, and nutrient inputs such as fecal coliform bacteria,
nitrogen, and phosphorus to the Horne CreekWatershed.
•Restoring, enhancing, and protecting headwater streams, wetlands, riparian buffers,and aquatic
habitat functions.
•Improving riparian corridor management and targeting restoration of impacted streams and
riparian buffer areas.
•Promoting agronomic farm management techniques and implementing agricultural BMPs and
water quality features such as livestock exclusion fencing, alternative watering systems, and
nutrient managementdevices.
To accomplish these project-specific goals, the following objectives will be measured to document overall
project success:
MY3 FINALHorne Creek Tributaries
DMS Project ID #100026
1

Provide a floodplain connection to the incised Project stream reaches by lowering bank height
ratios (BHRs) to less than 1.2, thereby promoting more natural or overbank flood flows,
Improve bedform diversity by increasing scour pool spacing and depth variability,
Increase native species riparian buffer and vegetation density/composition along streambank and
floodplain areas that meet requirements of a minimum 30-foot-wide and 210 stems/acre after
the monitoring period,
Improve aquatic habitat and fish species diversity and migration through the addition of in-stream
cover and native woody debris,
Site protection through an 11.87-acre conservation easement in excess of 30 feet from the top of
the restored streambanks, that will protect all streams, wetlands and aquatic resources in
perpetuity.
1.3ProjectSuccessCriteria
The success criteria for the Project follows the approved performance standards and monitoring protocols
from thefinal approved mitigation plan; which wasdeveloped in compliance with the USACE October
2016 Guidance, USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines (April 2003 and October 2005), and 2008
Compensatory Mitigation Final Rule. Cross-section and vegetation plot data will be collected in Years 0, 1,
2, 3, 5, and 7. Stream hydrology data and visual monitoring will be reported annually. Specific success
criteria components and evaluation methods are described below.
1.3.1Streams
Stream Hydrology:Four separate bankfull or over bank events must be documented within the seven-
year monitoring period and the stream hydrology monitoring will continue until four bankfull events have
been documented in separate years. Stream hydrology monitoring will be accomplished with pressure
transducers installed in pools and correlating sensor depth to top of bank elevation(Figure 4). Recorded
water depth above the top of bank elevation will document a bankfull event.
Stream Profiles, Vertical Stability, and Floodplain Access: Stream profiles, as a measure of vertical
stability and floodplain access will be evaluated by looking at Bank Height Ratios (BHR). In addition,
observed bedforms should be consistent with those observed for channels of the design stream type(s).
The BHR shall not exceed 1.2 along the restored Project stream reaches. This standard only applies to
restored reaches of the channel where BHRs were corrected through design and construction. Vertical
stabilitywill be evaluated with visual assessment, cross-sections and, if directed by the IRT, longitudinal
profile.
Stream Horizontal Stability:Cross-sections will be used to evaluate horizontal stream stabilityon restored
streams. There should be little change expected fromas-built restoration cross-sections. If measurable
changes do occur, they should be evaluated to determine if the changes represent a movement toward a
more unstable condition (e.g., downcutting, erosion) or a movement towards increased stability (e.g.,
settling, vegetation establishment, deposition along the streambanks, decrease in width/depth ratio).
Cross-sections shall be classified using the Rosgen Stream Classification method and all monitored cross-
sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type.
MY3 FINALHorne Creek Tributaries
DMS Project ID #100026
2

StreambedMaterial Condition and Stability:Pebble counts or streambed material samples will not be
collected per the DMS Pebble Count Data Requirements memo sent on October 19, 2021. The IRT reserves
the right to request pebble count data/particle distributions if deemed necessary during the monitoring
period.
Jurisdictional Stream Flow:Monitoring of stream flow will be conducted to demonstrate that the restored
stream systems classified as intermittent exhibit surface flow for a minimum of 30 consecutive days
throughout some portion of the year during a year with normal or below normal rainfall conditions.
Stream flowmonitoring will be accomplished with pressure transducers installed in pools and correlating
sensor depth to the downstream top of riffle elevation(diagram in Appendix E). If the pool water depth is
at or above the top of riffle elevation,then the channel will be assumed to have surface flow.
1.3.2Vegetation
Vegetation monitoring will occur in the fall each required monitoring year, typically prior to leaf drop.
Plots will be monitored in years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Vegetative success for the Project during the intermediate
monitoring years will be based on the survival of at least 320, three-year-old trees per acre at the end of
Year 3 of the monitoring period; and at least 260, five-year-old, trees per acre that must average sixfeet
in height at the end of Year 5 of the monitoring period. The final vegetative restoration success criteria
will be achieving a density of no less than 210, seven-year-old stems per acre that must average eightfeet
in height in Year 7 of monitoring. Volunteer specieson the approved planting list thatmeet success criteria
standardswill be counted towards success criteria.
1.3.3Visual Assessment
WLS will conduct visual assessments in support of mitigation performance monitoring. Visual assessments
of all stream reaches will be conducted twice per monitoring year with at least five months in between
each site visit for each of the seven years of monitoring. Photographs will be used to visually document
system performance and any areas of concern related to streambank and bed stability, condition of in-
stream structures, channel migration, active headcuts, live stake mortality, invasive plant species or
animal browsing, easement boundary encroachments, cattle exclusion fence damage, and general
streambed conditions. Permanent photo points will be locatedatcross-sections, culvert crossings, and
Enhancement II reaches.
MY3 FINALHorne Creek Tributaries
DMS Project ID #100026
3

2ProjectMitigationComponents
2.1ProjectComponents
The Projectmitigation componentsincludea combination of Stream RestorationandEnhancement
activities, as summarized in the table below.
Table 1. Mitigation PlanStream Mitigation Credits (SMCs)
ExistingRestoredCreditable
ProposedApproach
ProjectFootageFootage,Footage,Restoration MitigationMitigation
ReachPriority
Component orAcreage,AcreageLevelRatio (X:1)Credits
StationingLevel
Acreageor SFor SF
10+00 –
R11,39723+401,3201,320RPI/PII11,320
10+17 –
R228613+13296296RPII1296
11+80 –
R37512+557676RPII176
13+13 –
R41,19125+191,1671,167RPI/PII11,167
10+98 –
R4a12411+545757EII-2.523
11+55–
R4a-12+65111111RPI1111
10+72 –
R4b8910+992727EII-2.511
10+99 –
R4b-12+24125125RPI1125
25+19 –
R52,51948+12 2,2492,249RPI12,249
Totals 5,6815,4285,4285,378
Credit Loss in Required Buffer-300
Credit Gain for Additional Buffer325
Net Change in Credit from Buffers+25
Total Credits per Buffer Calculator5,403
Total Adjusted SMCs5,389
3MonitoringYear3AssessmentandResults
The dates of Year 3 monitoring activities are detailed in Appendix A, Table 2. All Year 3 monitoring data is
presented in this report and in the appendices. The Project is on track for meeting stream interim success
criteria.The flow gauge located on upper R2 did not meet the 30-day flow requirement. Eightof the ten
vegetation plots are meeting interim success criteria. All monitoring device locations are depicted on the
CCPV (Figure 1).
3.1MorphologicalAssessment
3.1.1 Stream Horizontal Pattern & Longitudinal Profile
Visual assessment and cross-section surveys wereutilized for assessment of MY3 horizontal and vertical
stream stability. The visual assessments for each stream reach concluded that the MY3 stream channel
MY3 FINALHorne Creek Tributaries
DMS Project ID #100026
4

pattern and longitudinal profiles, and in-stream structure location/function, still closely match the profile
design parameters and MY0/baseline conditions (Appendix D). The MY3 planform geometry and
dimensions fall within acceptable ranges of the design parameters for all restored reaches.Minor channel
adjustments in riffle slopes, pool depths and pattern were observed based on natural sediment migration
and stream bank vegetation establishmentbutdid not present a stability concern or indicate a need for
remedial action.
During the fall visual assessment for MY1, WLS staff noted sevenpotential problem areasoutside the
channel. One additionalin-channel problem area was noted during MY2.Problem areas 1-4, 6, and 7from
MY2have all been stabilized and are no longer considered problem areas. Theremainingareas are noted
on the CCPV (Figures 1a-1c) and photos can be found in Appendix B and the E-Data Submission included
with this report.No additional problem areas were identified during MY3.
SPA5- On R5, in the left floodplain area: minor deposition and erosion is occurring adjacent to
station 32+60as a result of erosion outside of the easement.
o MY2 Action: During August 2021, WLS installed straw balesand coir logsoutside of the
easementto slow and spread the flow of watercomingoffthe farm field, planted
livestakesin the easement, and re-seeded. The installation of coir logs/straw bales in the
farm field and increased vegetation cover reduced erosion in this areabut did not
permanently arrest the erosion. No depositionor erosion is impactingthe R5 channel.
o MY3 Action: No action was taken during MY3.During MY4, the area outside the easement
will be repaired by grading the slope drainage feature, applying temporary and
permanent seeding, and installing a permanent erosion control liner. All proposed work
will take place outside the conservation easement.
SPA8- On R4, just below two log vanes fromapproximate station 20+75 to21+75, an area of the
stream has dropped elevation and has some eroding banks. Coarse riffle substrate is still present,
the log vanes directly upstream are stable and functional, and the culvert immediately
downstream is holding grade. Supplemental cross-section data was collected froma riffle inthis
area and the data islocated inAppendix D. No remedial action is required at this time,and this
area willcontinue to be monitoredcloselyin MY4.
3.1.2 Stream Horizontal Dimension
The MY3 channel dimensions generally match thedesign parametersand are within acceptable andstable
ranges of tolerance. Dataforthe16cross-sections (eight riffle and eight pool) can be found in Appendix
D. It is expected over timethat some pools may accumulate finesediment and organic matter, however,
this is notan indicator ofchannel instability. Maximum riffle depths are also expected tofluctuate
throughout the monitoring period as the channels adjust to the new flow regime. Of the eight riffle cross-
sections, fourexperiencedminor changes in bankheight ratio (BHR)from MY0 to MY3. Two of the eight
riffle cross-sections (XS-10 and XS-12) have decreased BHRs fromMY2, but still have BHRs above 1.2. One
riffle cross-section, XS-15on R5, experienced minor aggradation due to sediment migration and thick
herbaceous vegetation occurring during MY3. The cross-section isstable and shows minimal change from
MY1. Threeriffle cross sections, XS-10, XS-12, and XS-14 on R5, experienced degradation. XS-10and XS-
12 on R5, experienced degradation due to bed material entrainment from the riffles during MY2 storm
events. Both riffles adjusted to be shorter and migrated slightly downstream, resulting in apparent
degradation. R5 is stable above and belowboth cross-sections. XS-10 and XS-12 were re-surveyed in
MY3 FINALHorne Creek Tributaries
DMS Project ID #100026
5

Spring 2022during visual assessmentsfor MY3 and the cross-section data showed no major changes from
MY2. XS-14 is stable and shows minimal changes from MY1. Visual surveys indicate the areas affected
through aggradation and degradation are functioning and stable.WLS will closely monitor any changes to
all streamreachesduring MY4.
3.2StreamHydrology
3.2.1Stream Flow
Twoflow gauges (FG-1 and FG-3), installed in May 2020 on R1 and R4 respectively, documentedthat the
stream exhibited surface flow for a minimum of 30 consecutive days throughout the monitoring year
(Appendix E). One additional flow gauge (FG-2)was installed during MY1 furtherupstream on Reach R2
thth
on September 18, 2020, in response to IRT comments received duringthe September 15, 2020, site
visit. FG-2 did not meet the 30-day flow requirement,recording a maximum flow duration of 10 days. FG-
2 data for the remainder of 2022 will be provided in the MY4 reportAdditionally, to determine if rainfall
amounts are normal for the given year, precipitation data was obtained fromPilotMountain Weather
Station (CBTN7), approximately fivemiles north of the site.Rainfall was above normal for 2022(Appendix
E).
Flow Gauge Data
Flow Flow Longest Period of Total Days of Total Days Longest Period of
Gauge Gauge Consecutive FlowCumulative of No FlowConsecutive No Flow
NameLocationFlow
279days
FG-1 R1279days0 days0 days
1/1/2022–10/6/2022
10days
FG-2 R272days207 days36 days
2/23/2022 – 3/4/2022
141days
FG-3 R4273days6 days2 days
5/19/2022 – 10/6/2022
3.2.2Bankfull Events
During MY3, bankfull events were recorded onbothpressure transducerandcrest gauges. CG-1 (R1)
recorded tenevents with a maximum event of 1.00’ above bankfull. CG-2 (R5) recorded fiveevents with
a maximumevent of 1.16’ above bankfull. Additionally, the cork crest gauge located adjacent to CG-1 on
R1 recorded onebankfull event. The associateddata and photographs arelocated in Appendix E.
3.3Vegetation
Monitoring of the10 permanent vegetation plots was completed during September and October 2022.
Vegetation data can be found in Appendix C with the associated photos located in Appendix B. The MY3
average density is 417stems per acre, which exceeds the interim measure ofvegetativesuccess of at least
320 stems per acre at the end of the third monitoring year.Twoof the ten plots arebelow the interim
success criteria due to prolonged saturation and thick herbaceous cover. Plot 6 istwostems below interim
success criteriabut is meeting the final success criteria. A random vegetation plot was surveyed adjacent
to Plot 6and met the interim success criteria with 324 stems/acre. Plot 9, located on R5, had 162
stems/acre. Many black willow stems(22)were found inPlot 9, only two were included in the total stem
count.A random vegetation plot was surveyed adjacent to plot 9 and met the interim success criteria with
364 stems/acre. An areaon R5was noted during an IRT site visit to have low stemdensity. A random
MY3 FINALHorne Creek Tributaries
DMS Project ID #100026
6

vegetation plot was surveyed in this area and met interim success criteria with 405 stems/acre. No
remedial action is proposed at this time.Random vegetation plots will be surveyed again in MY5.The
permanentvegetation plots had 162to567 stems per acre, including appropriate volunteers. Volunteer
persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), and black willow (Salix nigra)
werenoted in MY3, and moreare expected to establish in upcoming years.These volunteer speciesare
on the approved mitigation plan planting listand are counted towards success criteria, with no one tree
species being counted more than 50 percent. Plots 2, 5,and 10 did not meet interim success criteria with
planted stems, buttheseplots do meet criteria with the addition of volunteer stems. Volunteer black
willow is doing well in these areas.Plots 6 and 9are in the old channel areaand as a resulthave prolonged
saturationand dense herbaceous vegetation.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation
is becoming well established throughout the project.
A small cluster(belowthemapping threshold)of princess tree (Paulownia tomentosa) is located on the
right side slope of R4 and is actively being cut-stump treatedwith herbicide.Nootherareas of significant
invasive plant species were observed during monitoring year 3. The site will be monitored closely, and any
invasive plant species will be treated as needed. Small populations of narrow-leaved cattail (Typha
latifolia) are present in some saturated floodplain areas;however,none were observedcausing issues
withinthe channels.
Invasive Species Treatment Table
Monitoring YearSpeciesDateTreatment
Princess Tree4/6/2022Rodeo cut-stump
MY3
Princess Tree1/23/2022 Rodeo cut-stump
3.4MacrobenthicSampling
th
Two macrobenthic sampling locations were surveyed prior to restoration activities on June 5, 2018, on
R1 and R5. R1had a biotic index score of 6.53and R5had a score of 4.99. Two macrobenthic sampling
th
locations were surveyed in MY3 on May 10, 2022, on R1and R5. R1had a biotic index score of 8.24and
R5had a score of 5.65. Benthic data and photographs are located in Appendix F.
4Methods
Stream cross-section monitoring was conducted using a Topcon Total Station. Survey data wasimported
into Microsoft Excel® for data processing and analysis. The stage recorders include an automatic pressure
transducer (HOBO Water Level (13 ft) Logger) set in PVC piping in the channel. The elevation of the bed
and top of bank at each stage recorder location was recorded to be able to document presence of water
in the channel and out of bank events. Visual observations (i.e. wrack or debris lines)and traditional cork
crest gaugeswill also be used to document out of bank events.
Vegetation success is being monitored at a total of 10permanent vegetation plots. Vegetation plot
monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008)
and includes analysis of species composition and density of planted and volunteer species. Data are
processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently
MY3 FINALHorne Creek Tributaries
DMS Project ID #100026
7

marked with PVC at the origin and rebarat the other corners. Tree species and height will be recorded for
each planted stemand photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Benthic macroinvertebrate (BMI) sampling usedmethods and procedures defined by DWR’s Standard
Operating Procedures for the Collection and Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrates(NCDWR, 2016) to
determine a Biotic Index (BI) valueand a bioclassification rating. Sampling was conducted during MY3 and
will be conducted again in MY7.
MY3 FINALHorne Creek Tributaries
DMS Project ID #100026
8

Appendix A:
Background Tables
Table 1: Project Mitigation Components
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts
Table 4: Project Information and Attributes

Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent Conservation EasementFull Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation EasementFull Channel
Restoration, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation EasementFull Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation EasementSupplemental Planting of Buffer, Livestock Exclusion,
Permananent EasementFull Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation EasementSupplemental Planting of Buffer, Livestock Exclusion, Permananent EasementFull Channel Restoration,
Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation EasementFull Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Permanent Conservation Easement.
735727
289105123
1,1812,270
As-Built
Components
and
Non-RipCoastal
WetlandMarsh
Assets
PI2.50000PI1.00000PI2.50000PI1.00000
PI1.00000
PII1.00000PII1.00000
PI/PII1.00000
Mitigation
0.0000.0000.000
RRRRRR
RiverineNon-Riv
100026)
(ID
NANANA
300325
5,4035,389
5,378
76Warm57WarmEII27WarmEII
111Warm125Warm
Tributaries
StreamRiparian Wetland
OverallCredits
Creek
33.600
--
orFootage orMitigationRestorationPriorityMitigationFootage or
7589
Summary
286296Warm124
5344.000
1,1911,167Warm2,5192,249Warm
WarmCoolCold
5377.600
ExistingMitigation
FootagePlan
Horne
Assets
1.
SMCs
SMC
SMC
Overall
Credits
Table
R11,3971,320WarmRPI/PII1.000001,342R2R3R4R5
R4AR4AR4BR4B
LossGain
Category
SMUAdjusted
Wetland
Wetland
Project SegmentAcreageAcreageCategoryLevelLevelRatio (X:1)AcreageComments
Restoration Level
Totals
Project
RestorationRe-establishmentRehabilitationEnhancementEnhancement IEnhancement IICreationPreservation AssetStreamRPNRBufferBufferBufferTotalTotal

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project #100026
Elapsed Time Since grading complete:2 year 6 months
Elapsed Time Since planting complete:2 year 6 months
1
Number of reporting Years:
3
Data Collection Completion or
Activity or DeliverableCompleteDelivery
Institution DateN/A05/22/17
404 permit dateN/A01/15/20
Mitigation PlanN/A07/29/19
Final Design – Construction PlansN/A07/29/19
ConstructionN/A04/30/20
Containerized, bare root and B&B plantings for reach/segments 1&2N/A04/30/20
As-built (Year 0 Monitoring – baseline)
Vegetation Monitoring5/6/2020N/A
Stream Survey5/8/2020N/A
As-built (Year 0 Monitoring – baseline) Report5/20/20207/1/2020
Year 1 Monitoring
Stream Survey11/5/2020N/A
Vegetation Monitoring11/10/2020N/A
Year 1 Monitoring Report11/10/202011/20/2020
Year 2 Monitoring
Encroachment PlantingN/A2/4/2021
Livestake Planting and MaintenanceN/AFebruary 2021
Vegetation Monitoring10/27/2021N/A
Stream Survey10/27/2021N/A
Year 2 Monitoring Report10/27/202112/23/2021
Year 3 Monitoring
Invasive Species TreatmentN/A4/6/2022
Stream Survey8/3/2022N/A
Vegetation Monitoring10/6/2022N/A
Invasive Species TreatmentN/A11/23/2022
Year 3 Monitoring Report10/6/202211/30/2022
Year 4 Monitoring
Vegetation Monitoring
Stream Survey
Year 4 Monitoring Report
Year 5 Monitoring
Vegetation Monitoring
Stream Survey
Year 5 Monitorig Report
Year 6 Monitoring
Vegetation Monitoring
Stream Survey
Year 6 Monitoring Report
Year 7 Monitoring/ Close Out
Vegetation Monitoring
Stream Survey
Year 7 Monitoring Report

Table 3. Project Contacts
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project #100026
Water & Land Solutions, LLC
Designer
7721 Six Forks Rd, Ste. 130, Raleigh, NC 27615
Primary project design POCChristopher Tomsic - [phone]
North State Environmental, Inc.
Construction Contractor
2889 Lowery Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Construction contractor POCAndrew Roten - [phone]
Ascension Land Surveying
Survey Contractor
116 Williams Road, Mocksville, NC 27028
Survey contractor POCChristopher Cole - [phone]
Ripple EcoSolutions, LLC
Planting Contractor
215 Moonridge Rd, Chapel Hill, NC 27516
Planting contractor POCGeorge Morris - [phone]
North State Environmental, Inc.
Seeding Contractor
2889 Lowery Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Contractor point of contactAndrew Roten - [phone]
Green Resource
Seed Mix Sources
[phone]
Native Forest Nursery
Nursery Stock Suppliers (Bare Roots)
[phone]
Mellow Marsh Farm
Nursery Stock Suppliers (Bare Roots/plugs)
[phone]
Foggy Mountain Nursery
Nursery Stock Suppliers (Live Stakes)
[phone]
Water & Land Solutions, LLC
Monitoring Performers
7721 Six Forks Rd, Ste. 130, Raleigh, NC 27615
Stream Monitoring POCEmily Dunnigan - [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POCEmily Dunnigan - [phone]
Wetland Monitoring POCN/A; Emily Dunnigan - [phone]

C4
N/A
IV/V
2,249
Reach 5
C, WS-IV
unconfined
B4c/G4c (incised)
I
C
B4
G5
152N/A
Reach 4B
unconfined
2 and 0.003166 and 0.26
I
C
B4
168N/A
Reach 4A
unconfined
29 and 0.05
B4c (incised)
N/A
IV/V
1,167
Reach 4
B4/C4b
C, WS-IV
C
III
76
N/A
B4a
Reach 3
W
IntermittentPerennialPerennial/IntermittentPerennial/IntermittentPerennial
29 and 0.0583 and 0.13
E6b (incised)B4 (incised)
mod confinedunconfined
03040101110070
Supporting Docs?
PCNPCNCategoricalExclusionCategoricalExclusionN/AN/ACategoricalExclusion
Reach Summary Information
III
B4
10.2
Surry296N/A
11.87
Yadkin
N, -80.5032100
Reach 2
03-07-02
Piedmont
C, WS-IV
YesYesYesYesN/AN/AN/A
Horne Creek Tributaries
36.2851950
C
B4
N/A
III/IV
1,320
Reach 1
PerennialIntermittent
38 and 0.0641 and 0.06
mod confinedmod confined
E5b/F5b (incised)G4 (incised)
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 0.06 (R1) and 0.26 (R5)<1%2.01.03, 2.01.01, 3.02 (46% pasture/hay, 24% row crop, 16% mixed forest)YesYesYesYesNoNoNo
03040101
Regulatory Considerations
Project Watershed Summary Information
Table 4. Project Background Information
ParametersParametersApplicable?Resolved?
Project NameCountyProject Area (acres) Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)Physiographic ProvinceRiver BasinUSGS Hydrologic Unit
8-digitDWR Sub-basinProject Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles)Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area CGIA Land Use ClassificationValley confinement (Confined, moderately
confined, unconfined)Drainage area (Acres and Square Miles)Perennial, Intermittent, EphemeralNCDWR Water Quality ClassificationStream Classification (existing)Stream Classification
(proposed)Evolutionary trend (Simon)Water of the United States - Section 404Water of the United States - Section 401Endangered Species ActHistoric Preservation ActCoastal Zone Management
Act (CZMA or CAMA)FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Length of reach (linear feet)FEMA classificationEssential Fisheries Habitat

Appendix B:
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1: Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Table 5: Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 5: Vegetation Condition Assessment
Stream Photo Points (Cross-Sections, Culvert Crossings, EII Reaches)
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Random Vegetation Plot Photographs
Potential Problem Area Photographs

!>
!>
"
)
")
"
)
")
")
"
)
±

")
XW
!.
")
±

100%
Woody
StabilizingVegetation
Adjusted % for
0
Woody
Stabilizing
Vegetation
Footage with
0
Woody
Stabilizing
Vegetation
Number with
100%100%
Intended
% Stable,
Performing as
0
Footage
Unstable
Amount of
00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%
0
Unstable
Segments
Number of
Totals
2
in As-built
Total Number
222100%
Stable,
Number
Intended
Performing as
exceed 15%.
include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapseStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.7979100%Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade
across the sill. 3939100%Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.3939100%Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
MetricBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour anderosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely.Does NOT(See guidance
for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >
Visual Stream Morphology Stability AssessmentHorne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project (DMS ID #100026)R11,342
ChannelSub-Category1. Scoured/Eroding2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat
Table 5Project:Reach ID:Assessed Length:Date of Survey4/6/2022 and 10/6/2022
Major Channel Category1. Bank *2. Engineered Structures

100%
Woody
StabilizingVegetation
Adjusted % for
0
Woody
Stabilizing
Vegetation
Footage with
0
Woody
Stabilizing
Vegetation
Number with
100%
#DIV/0!
Intended
% Stable,
Performing as
0
Footage
Unstable
Amount of
00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%
0
Unstable
Segments
Number of
Totals
0
in As-built
Total Number
000#DIV/0!
Stable,
Number
Intended
Performing as
exceed 15%.
include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapseStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.2222100%Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade
across the sill. 1212100%Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.1212100%Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
MetricBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour anderosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely.Does NOT(See guidance
for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >
Visual Stream Morphology Stability AssessmentHorne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project (DMS ID #100026)R2289
ChannelSub-Category1. Scoured/Eroding2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat
Table 5Project:Reach ID:Assessed Length:Date of Survey4/6/2022 and 10/6/2022
Major Channel Category1. Bank *2. Engineered Structures

100%
Woody
StabilizingVegetation
Adjusted % for
0
Woody
Stabilizing
Vegetation
Footage with
0
Woody
Stabilizing
Vegetation
Number with
100%
#DIV/0!
Intended
% Stable,
Performing as
0
Footage
Unstable
Amount of
00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%
0
Unstable
Segments
Number of
Totals
0
in As-built
Total Number
000#DIV/0!
Stable,
Number
Intended
Performing as
exceed 15%.
include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapseStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.88100%Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across
the sill. 44100%Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.44100%Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
MetricBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour anderosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely.Does NOT(See guidance
for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >
Visual Stream Morphology Stability AssessmentHorne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project (DMS ID #100026)R373
ChannelSub-Category1. Scoured/Eroding2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat
Table 5Project:Reach ID:Assessed Length:Date of Survey4/6/2022 and 10/6/2022
Major Channel Category1. Bank *2. Engineered Structures

96%
Woody
Stabilizing
Vegetation
Adjusted % for
0
Woody
StabilizingVegetation
Footage with
0
Woody
Stabilizing
Vegetation
Number with
96%
100%
Intended
% Stable,
Performing as
91
Footage
Unstable
Amount of
00100%00100%00100%00100%19196%0096%
1
Unstable
Segments
Number of
Totals
14
in As-built
Total Number
141414100%
Stable,
Number
Intended
Performing as
exceed 15%.
include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapseStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.5252100%Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade
across the sill. 212295%Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.2525100%Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
MetricBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour anderosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely.Does NOT(See guidance
for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >
Visual Stream Morphology Stability AssessmentHorne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project (DMS ID #100026)R41,181
ChannelSub-Category1. Scoured/Eroding2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat
Table 5Project:Reach ID:Assessed Length:Date of Survey4/6/2022 and 10/6/2022
Major Channel Category1. Bank *2. Engineered Structures

100%
Woody
StabilizingVegetation
Adjusted % for
0
Woody
Stabilizing
Vegetation
Footage with
0
Woody
Stabilizing
Vegetation
Number with
100%
#DIV/0!
Intended
% Stable,
Performing as
0
Footage
Unstable
Amount of
00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%
0
Unstable
Segments
Number of
Totals
0
in As-built
Total Number
000#DIV/0!
Stable,
Number
Intended
Performing as
exceed 15%.
include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapseStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.55100%Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across
the sill. 11100%Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.11100%Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
MetricBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour anderosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely.Does NOT(See guidance
for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >
Visual Stream Morphology Stability AssessmentHorne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project (DMS ID #100026)R4a162
ChannelSub-Category1. Scoured/Eroding2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat
Table 5Project:Reach ID:Assessed Length:Date of Survey4/6/2022 and 10/6/2022
Major Channel Category1. Bank *2. Engineered Structures

100%
Woody
StabilizingVegetation
Adjusted % for
0
Woody
Stabilizing
Vegetation
Footage with
0
Woody
Stabilizing
Vegetation
Number with
100%
#DIV/0!
Intended
% Stable,
Performing as
0
Footage
Unstable
Amount of
00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%
0
Unstable
Segments
Number of
Totals
0
in As-built
Total Number
000#DIV/0!
Stable,
Number
Intended
Performing as
exceed 15%.
include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapseStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.1010100%Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade
across the sill. 44100%Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.44100%Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
MetricBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour anderosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely.Does NOT(See guidance
for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >
Visual Stream Morphology Stability AssessmentHorne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project (DMS ID #100026)R4b150
ChannelSub-Category1. Scoured/Eroding2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat
Table 5Project:Reach ID:Assessed Length:Date of Survey4/6/2022 and 10/6/2022
Major Channel Category1. Bank *2. Engineered Structures

100%
Woody
Stabilizing
Vegetation
Adjusted % for
0
Woody
StabilizingVegetation
Footage with
0
Woody
Stabilizing
Vegetation
Number with
100%100%
Intended
% Stable,
Performing as
0
Footage
Unstable
Amount of
00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%00100%
0
Unstable
Segments
Number of
Totals
26
in As-built
Total Number
262626100%
Stable,
Number
Intended
Performing as
exceed 15%.
include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.
providing habitat.Bank slumping, calving, or collapseStructures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.8181100%Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade
across the sill. 2828100%Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.3232100%Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
MetricBank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour anderosionBanks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely.Does NOT(See guidance
for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio >
Visual Stream Morphology Stability AssessmentHorne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project (DMS ID #100026)R52,270
ChannelSub-Category1. Scoured/Eroding2. Undercut3. Mass Wasting1. Overall Integrity2. Grade Control2a. Piping3. Bank Protection4. Habitat
Table 5Project:Reach ID:Assessed Length:Date of Survey4/6/2022 and 10/6/2022
Major Channel Category1. Bank *2. Engineered Structures

0.0%
0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
AcreageAcreage
% of Planted
% of Easement
0.00
0.000.000.000.000.000.00
AcreageAcreage
CombinedCombined
00000
PolygonsPolygons
Number of Number of
Total
line
Color
CCPVCCPV
DepictionDepiction
light green
Pattern and
Transparent
Green dotted
Cumulative Total
none
1 acreSolid light blue0
1000 SForange hatched0
MappingMapping
0.1 acres
Threshold
Threshold
Date of Survey: 4/6/2021 and 10/6/2022
Vegetation Condition AssessmentHorne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project (DMS ID #100026)10.211.9
DefinitionsVery limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.Areas with woody stems
of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year.0.25 acresDefinitionsAreas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).Areas or points (if too small
to render as polygons at map scale).
3
4
:
2
:
1
Table 5Project:Planted AcreageEasement Acreage
1.Bare Areas4. Invasive Areas of Concern5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Vegetation Category2.Low Stem Density Areas3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or VigorVegetation Category

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS1,
XS1,
R1,
R1,
20202020
6,6,
MayMay
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream,
Downstream
XS1,
XS1,
R1,
R1,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS1,
XS1,
R1,
R1,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS1,
XS1,
R1,
R1,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS2,
XS2,
R1,
R1,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS2,
XS2,
R1,
R1,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS2,
XS2,
R1,
R1,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS2,
XS2,
R1,
R1,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS3,
XS3,
R1,
R1,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS3,
XS3,
R1,
R1,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS3,
XS3,
R1,
R1,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS3,
XS3,
R1,
R1,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS4,
XS4,
R1,
R1,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS4,
XS4,
R1,
R1,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS4,
XS4,
R1,
R1,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS4,
XS4,
R1,
R1,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS5,
XS5,
R2,
R2,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS5,
XS5,
R2,
R2,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS5,
XS5,
R2,
R2,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS5,
XS5,
R2,
R2,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS6,
XS6,
R2,
R2,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS6,
XS6,
R2,
R2,

Surry
03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS6,
XS6,
R2,
R2,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS6,
XS6,
R2,
R2,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS7,
XS7,
R4,
R4,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS7,
XS7,
R4,
R4,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS7,
XS7,
R4,
R4,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS7,
XS7,
R4,
R4,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS8,
XS8,
R4,
R4,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS8,
XS8,
R4,
R4,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS8,
XS8,
R4,
R4,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS8,
XS8,
R4,
R4,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS9,
XS9,
R4,
R4,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS9,
XS9,
R4,
R4,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS9,
XS9,
R4,
R4,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS9,
XS9,
R4,
R4,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS10,
XS10,
R4,
R4,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS10,
XS10,
R4,
R4,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS10,
XS10,
R4,
R4,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS10,
XS10,
R4,
R4,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS11,
XS11,
R5,
R5,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS11,
XS11,
R5,
R5,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS11,
XS11,
R5,
R5,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS11,
XS11,
R5,
R5,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS12,
XS12,
R5,
R5,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS12,
XS12,
R5,
R5,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS12,
XS12,
R5,
R5,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS12,
XS12,
R5,
R5,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS13,
XS13,
R5,
R5,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS13,
XS13,
R5,
R5,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS13,
XS13,
R5,
R5,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS13,
XS13,
R5,
R5,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS14,
XS14,
R5,
R5,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS14,
XS14,
R5,
R5,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS14,
XS14,
R5,
R5,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS14,
XS14,
R5,
R5,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS15,
XS15,
R5,
R5,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS15,
XS15,
R5,
R5,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS15,
XS15,
R5,
R5,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS15,
XS15,
R5,
R5,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS16,
XS16,
R5,
R5,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
XS16,
XS16,
R5,
R5,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS16,
XS16,
R5,
R5,
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Bank
Bank
Left
Right
XS16,
XS16,
R5,
R5,

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
Crossing,
Crossing,
Culvert
Culvert
R1,
,
R1,
1
1,
PS
PS
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
Crossing,
Crossing,
Culvert
Culvert
R1,
R1,
1,
1,
PS
PS

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
Crossing,
Crossing,
Culvert
Culvert
R2,
R2,
2,
2,
PS
PS
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
Crossing,
Crossing,
Culvert
Culvert
R2
R2,
2,
2,
PS
PS

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
Crossing,
Crossing,
Culvert
Culvert
R4,
R4,
3,
3,
PS
PS
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
Crossing,
Crossing,
Culvert
Culvert
R4,
R4,
3,
3,
PS
PS

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
R4A,
R4A,
4,
4,
PS
PS
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
R4A,
R4A,
4,
4,
PS
PS

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
R4B,
,
R4B,
5
5,
PS
PS
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
R4B,
R4B,
5,
5,
PS
PS

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
Crossing,
Crossing,
Culvert
Culvert
R5,
R5,
6,
6,
PS
PS
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
Upstream
Downstream
Crossing,
Crossing,
Culvert
Culvert
R5,
R5,
6,
6,
PS
PS

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
Slope
Floodplain
Downstream
R1,
Right
8,
R4,
PS
7,
PS
01)
(MY
03)
Slope
(MY
Upstream
Floodplain
R1,
Right8,
PS
R4,
7,
PS

03)03)
(MY(MY
12
PlotPlot
VegVeg
00)00)
(MY(MY
12
PlotPlot
VegVeg

03)03)
(MY(MY
34
PlotPlot
VegVeg
00)00)
(MY(MY
34
PlotPlot
VegVeg

03)03)
(MY(MY
56
PlotPlot
VegVeg
00)00)
(MY(MY
56
PlotPlot
VegVeg

03)03)
(MY(MY
78
PlotPlot
VegVeg
00)00)
(MY(MY
78
PlotPlot
Veg
Veg

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
9
10
Plot
Plot
Veg
Veg
00)
00)
(MY
(MY
9
10
Plot
Plot
Veg
Veg

03)
03)
(MY
(MY
outh
West
2,
View
1,
Plot
Plot
Veg
Veg
Random
Random
03)
03)
(MY
(MY
East
North
View
View
1,
2,
Plot
Plot
Veg
Veg
Random
Random

03)03)
(MY(MY
SouthSouth
ViewView
3,4,
PlotPlot
VegVeg
RandomRandom
03)03)
(MY(MY
NorthNorth
ViewView
3,4,
PlotPlot
VegVeg
RandomRandom

ofof
outsideoutside
erosionerosion
ofof
resultresult
aa
asas
03)03)
(MY(MY
erosionerosion
andand
easementeasement
thethe
depositiondeposition
MinorMinor
Slope,Slope,
SideSide
R5R5
SPA5,SPA5,
of
of
result
result
a
a
as
as
erosion
erosion
01)
01)
and
and
(MY
(MY
deposition
deposition
easement
easement
Minor
Minor
the
the
of
of
Slope,
Slope,
outside
outside
Side
Side
R5
R5
erosion
erosion
Floodplain,
Floodplain,
Left
Left
R5
R5
SPA5,
SPA5,

03)03)
(MY(MY
ErosionErosion
BedBed
ChannelChannel
20+75,20+75,
STASTA
R4,R4,
SPA8,SPA8,
02)02)
(MY(MY
ErosionErosion
BedBed
ChannelChannel
20+75,20+75,
STASTA
R4,R4,
SPA8,SPA8,

Appendix C:
Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Data
Table 6: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Table 6a: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 6b: Red-line Planting List
Table 6c: Random Vegetation Plot Data

(2020)
allT 10
0.25
(2020)MY0
allTPnoLSP 10
0.25
Means
11
Annual
(2021)MY1
allTPnoLSP 10
0.25
222444444
MY2
32
33
(2022)
allTPnoLSP 10
0.25
33377710101013131333333344412121233833699121212122222222234442221111116663334448881515159911131313181818292929777999121212121212111333777777
MY3
121212121212151515444
7
0010
1
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
111555555101010181818222555444555101010111888999999777111555555101010555
006
22
0009
1
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
2
0008006
1
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
222
222
0007006
1
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
222111111333333111
006
0006
1
allTPnoLSP
2022)
01
0.02
222333111222111131313131313141414141414111
(MY3
2
Data
Plot
0005006
1
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
Current
111222111111
0004006
1
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
444333111111
0003006
1
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
111222111111111
006
42
0002
1
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
111111
111222222111222333111
31
0001006
1
allTPnoLSP
01
0.02
1112221111111111114443333338812771313131314141466866611111188102224661381811249595111138138142172172172557668888666445444666445112556151517161618161616161616
006
3243244862832835265265265265675675672432433242432432434454454453243244058181971243243526328328502384384449558558575696696696
PnoLSP
ACRE
Typecountcount
(ares)
(ACRES)
per
size
Stem
size
Species
TreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTree
Stems
10%
oakTree
NameSpecies
10%
10%
hornbeamTreehazelnutShrubwitchhazelTreesycamoreTreebasswoodTree
spicebushShrubred
persimmonTree
than
Counts
redbudTree
than
than
ash
oak
alderShrub
willowTree
birch
maple
less
more
less
Stem
by
redhazelpawpawriverblackgumwhitenorthernblackAmerican
by
by
10%
Total
but
by
and
y
NameCommon
tulipiferatuliptreerequirements,requirements
virginianaAmerican
virginianacommon
Planted Densit
carolinianaAmerican
occidentalisAmerican
pennsylvanicagreen
albarubra
requirementsrequirements,
triloba
americanaAmericanbenzoinnorthern
meetmeet
nigra
Creek
6:
canadensiseastern
sylvatica
serrulata
for
Scientific
rubrum
nigra
toto
americana
Table Horne AcerAlnusAsiminaBetulaCarpinusCercisCorylusDiospyrosFraxinusHamamelisLinderaLiriodendronNyssaPlatanusQuercusQuercusSalixTilia Color ExceedsExceedsFailsFails

Table6a:VegetationPlotMitigationSuccessSummaryTable
HorneCreekTributaries
Average
Success
PlantedVolunteers/TotalStem
Plot#Criteria
Stems/AcreAcreStems/AcreHeight
Met
(ft)
132440364Yes5.8
2283243526Yes2.3
35260526Yes2.1
45670567Yes3.4
524381324Yes3.2
62430243No3.6
74450445Yes4.9
832481405Yes1.9
98181162No5.3
10243243486Yes3.0
Project
32876.9405Yes3.6
Average
*Noonespeciesaccountsformorethan50%ofthetotalspeciesinasingleplot.
**Plots2,5,and10meetinterimsuccesscriteriawhenvolunteerblackwillow,persimmon,andtulip
poplarareincludedinplotdata.Thesespeciesareinapprovedmitigationplanspecies.
***TotalStems/Acreonlyincludesspeciesfromapprovedmitigationplan

Table6b:HorneCreekTributariesRedlinePlantingList
PercentMitigation
PlantedPlanPercent
CommonNameSpeciesStems
Greenash2503.4%3.0%
Fraxinuspensylvanica
Riverbirch Betulanigra 5006.7%7.0%
Basswood5006.7%7.0%
Tiliaamericana
Blackgum Nyssasylvatica 4506.0%6.0%
Americansycamore5006.7%7.0%
Platanusoccidentalis
Tulippoplar Liriodendrontulipifera 5006.7%7.0%
Northernredoak2503.4%3.0%
Quercusrubra
Whiteoak Quercusalba 4506.0%6.0%
Persimmon5006.7%7.0%
Diospyrosvirginiana
Commonserviceberry Amelanchierarborea 00.0%5.0%
Umbrellamagnolia00.0%6.0%
Magnoliatripetala
Redbud4005.4%0.0%
Cerciscanadensis
Americanhornbeam4506.0%6.0%
Carpinuscaroliniana
Witchhazel Hamamelisvirginiana 4506.0%6.0%
Pawpaw90012.1%6.0%
Asiminatriloba
Spicebush Linderabenzoin 4506.0%6.0%
Tagalder4506.0%6.0%
Alnusserrulata
Hazelnut Corylusamericana 4506.0%6.0%
TotalPlanted7,450100.0%
*changesfrommitigationplaninred
RiparianBufferLiveStakePlantingsΑStreambanks
(ProposedЋ͸Ќ͸Spacing@MeanderBendsandЏ͸Б͸Spacing@RiffleSections)
Sambucuscanadensis Elderberry20%FACW
Salixsericea SilkyWillow30%OBL
Salixnigra BlackWillow10%OBL
Cornusamomum SilkyDogwood40%FACW

Table6c:RandomVegetationPlotData
RandomVegPlot3
RandomVegPlot1
Location
UpperR1,alongleftFPLocationLowerR4,leftFP
SpeciesHeight(ft)SpeciesHeight(ft)
Sycamore3.4Redbud2.4
GreenAsh5.4TulipPoplar2.2
Sycamore0.7TulipPoplar0.7
BlackWillow3.9BlackGum1.3
BlackWillow5.4Basswood2.5
RiverBirch5.6Ironwood2.2
RiverBirch8.2TulipPoplar2.5
TagAlder7.6Witchhazel1.2
TotalStems8TotalStems8
Stems/Acre324Stems/Acre324
RandomVegPlot2RandomVegPlot4
LocationUpperR4,nearVP5LocationR5leftFP,nearVP9
SpeciesHeight(ft)SpeciesHeight(ft)
TulipPoplar0.6RiverBirch3.7
Persimmon1Sycamore2.9
TagAlder6.4GreenAsh4
TulipPoplar0.9Sycamore4.1
TagAlder3Persimmon1.4
3.2
BlackWillow6.6RiverBirch
Sycamore2.1TagAlder3.4
TulipPoplar1.3TagAlder5.8
BlackGum2.8TulipPoplar2.9
WhiteOak1TotalStems9
TotalStems10Stems/Acre364
Stems/Acre405

Appendix D:
Stream Measurement and
Geomorphology Data
Figure 2: MY3 Cross-Sections
Table 7a: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 7b: Cross-section Morphology Data
Table 7c: Stream Reach Morphology Data

Floodprone Area
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-1 Pool, STA 12+85
MY2
MY1
Baseline MY0
0510152025303540
948947946945944943942941
Elevation (feet)

7
MY3
3of
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Floodprone Area
Looking Downstream
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-2 Riffle, STA 13+32
t
MY2
1.21.23.9
1.00
0.0%
942.7942.7
MY1
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Projec100026R1XS-2K. Obermiller, C. Durham
)
Baseline MY0
o
)
)
Project
0510152025303540
Mitigation
947946945944943942941
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewDimension Data Summary: MY3 2022Bankfull Elevation (ftLow Bank Height Elevation (ftBankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank
Height Ratio Bankfull X-section Area (ft²% Change Bank Height Rati
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

7
of
MY3
3
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Floodprone Area
Looking Downstream
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-3 Pool, STA 20+35
t
MY2
1.91.99.6
1.03
3.0%
920.6920.7
MY1
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Projec100026R1XS-3E. Dunnigan, C. Durham
)
Baseline MY0
o
)
)
Project
0510152025303540
Mitigation
924923922921920919918
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewDimension Data Summary: MY3 2022Bankfull Elevation (ftLow Bank Height Elevation (ftBankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank
Height Ratio Bankfull X-section Area (ft²% Change Bank Height Rati
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

7
of
MY3
3
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Floodprone Area
Looking Downstream
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-4 Riffle, STA 20+47
t
MY2
1.01.02.6
1.02
2.0%
920.3920.4
MY1
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Projec100026R1XS-4K. Obermiller, C. Durham
)
Baseline MY0
o
)
)
Project
0510152025303540
Mitigation
925924923922921920919
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewDimension Data Summary: MY3 2022Bankfull Elevation (ftLow Bank Height Elevation (ftBankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank
Height Ratio Bankfull X-section Area (ft²% Change Bank Height Rati
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

7
of
MY3
3
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Floodprone Area
Looking Downstream
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-5 Riffle, STA 13+84
t
MY2
0.90.93.7
1.05
5.0%
981.4981.4
MY1
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Projec100026R4XS-5K. Obermiller, E. Dunnigan
)
Baseline MY0
o
)
)
Project
0510152025303540
Mitigation
985984983982981980979
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewDimension Data Summary: MY3 2022Bankfull Elevation (ftLow Bank Height Elevation (ftBankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank
Height Ratio Bankfull X-section Area (ft²% Change Bank Height Rati
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

7
of
MY3
3
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Floodprone Area
Looking Downstream
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-6 Pool, STA 14+28
MY2
2.11.9
0.9011.6
980.3980.1
10.0%
MY1
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project100026R4XS-6K. Obermiller, C. Durham
Baseline MY0
Project
0510152025303540
Mitigation
983982981980979978977
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewBankfull Elevation (ft)Low Bank Height Elevation (ft)Bankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank Height Ratio Bankfull X-section
Area (ft²)% Change Bank Height Ratio
Dimension Data Summary: MY3 2022
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

7
of
MY3
3
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Floodprone Area
Looking Downstream
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-7 Pool, STA 19+50
t
MY2
2.22.3
1.0312.4
3.0%
966.5966.6
MY1
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Projec100026R4XS-7K. Obermiller, E. Dunnigan
)
Baseline MY0
o
)
)
Project
0510152025303540
Mitigation
969968967966965964963
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewDimension Data Summary: MY3 2022Bankfull Elevation (ftLow Bank Height Elevation (ftBankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank
Height Ratio Bankfull X-section Area (ft²% Change Bank Height Rati
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

7
of
MY3
3
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Floodprone Area
Looking Downstream
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-8 Riffle, STA 19+75
t
MY2
0.90.85.1
0.91
9.0%
966.1966.0
MY1
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Projec100026R4XS-8K. Obermiller, E.Dunnigan
)
Baseline MY0
o
)
)
Project
0510152025303540
Mitigation
969968967966965964963
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewDimension Data Summary: MY3 2022Bankfull Elevation (ftLow Bank Height Elevation (ftBankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank
Height Ratio Bankfull X-section Area (ft²% Change Bank Height Rati
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

7
of
MY3
3
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Floodprone Area
Looking Downstream
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-9 Pool, STA 25+18
t
MY2
1.81.4
0.8116.8
952.6952.1
22.0%
MY1
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Projec100026R5XS-9K. Obermiller, E. Dunnigan
)
Baseline MY0
o
)
)
Project
0510152025303540
Mitigation
955954953952951950949
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewDimension Data Summary: MY3 2022Bankfull Elevation (ftLow Bank Height Elevation (ftBankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank
Height Ratio Bankfull X-section Area (ft²% Change Bank Height Rati
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

7
of
MY3
3
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Floodprone Area
Looking Downstream
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-10 Riffle, STA 25+45
MY2
1.52.06.9
1.26
950.7951.1
26.0%
MY1
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project100026R5XS-10K. Obermiller, E. Dunnigan
Baseline MY0
Project
0510152025303540
Mitigation
955954953952951950949
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewBankfull Elevation (ft)Low Bank Height Elevation (ft)Bankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank Height Ratio Bankfull X-section
Area (ft²)% Change Bank Height Ratio
Dimension Data Summary: MY3 2022
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

7
of
MY3
3
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Floodprone Area
Looking Downstream
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-11 Pool, STA 32+70
MY2
2.21.8
0.8423.6
937.3936.9
16.0%
MY1
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project100026R5XS-11E. Dunnigan, C. Durham
Baseline MY0
Project
0510152025303540
Mitigation
939938937936935934933
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewBankfull Elevation (ft)Low Bank Height Elevation (ft)Bankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank Height Ratio Bankfull X-section
Area (ft²)% Change Bank Height Ratio
Dimension Data Summary: MY3 2022
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

7
of
MY3
3
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Floodprone Area
Looking Downstream
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-12 Riffle, STA 32+88
t
MY2
1.31.74.5
1.31
935.9936.3
31.0%
MY1
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Projec100026R5XS-12K. Obermiller, C. Durham
)
Baseline MY0
o
)
)
Project
0510152025303540
Mitigation
939938937936935934933
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewDimension Data Summary: MY3 2022Bankfull Elevation (ftLow Bank Height Elevation (ftBankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank
Height Ratio Bankfull X-section Area (ft²% Change Bank Height Rati
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

7
of
MY3
3
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Floodprone Area
Looking Downstream
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-13 Pool, STA 38+48
t
MY2
2.42.3
0.9716.4
3.0%
924.6924.5
MY1
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Projec100026R5XS-13E. Dunnigan, C. Durham
)
Baseline MY0
)
o
)
Project
0510152025303540
Mitigation
927926925924923922921
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewDimension Data Summary: MY3 2022Bankfull Elevation (ftLow Bank Height Elevation (ftBankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank
Height Ratio *Bankfull X-section Area (ft²% Change Bank Height Rati*Due to a calculation error MY0 bankfull was corrected from 19.9 to 16.4
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

7
of
MY3
3
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Floodprone Area
Looking Downstream
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-14 Riffle, STA 38+75
t
MY2
1.31.58.4
1.14
924.0924.1
14.0%
MY1
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Projec100026R5XS-14E. Dunnigan, C. Durham
)
Baseline MY0
o
)
)
Project
0510152025303540
Mitigation
927926925924923922921
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewDimension Data Summary: MY3 2022Bankfull Elevation (ftLow Bank Height Elevation (ftBankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank
Height Ratio Bankfull X-section Area (ft²% Change Bank Height Rati
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

7
of
MY3
3
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Floodprone Area
Looking Downstream
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-15 Riffle, STA 44+19
t
MY2
1.00.87.7
0.79
914.7914.5
21.0%
MY1
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Projec100026R5XS-15E. Dunnigan, C. Durham
)
Baseline MY0
o
)
)
Project
0510152025303540
Mitigation
918917916915914913912
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewDimension Data Summary: MY3 2022Bankfull Elevation (ftLow Bank Height Elevation (ftBankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank
Height Ratio Bankfull X-section Area (ft²% Change Bank Height Rati
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

7
of
MY3
3
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Floodprone Area
Looking Downstream
Bankfull Elevation
Width (feet)
MY3
XS-16 Pool, STA 44+66
MY2
2.62.3
0.8727.1
914.1913.8
13.0%
MY1
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project100026R5XS-16E. Dunnigan, C. Durham
Baseline MY0
Project
0510152025303540
Mitigation
916915914913912911910
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewBankfull Elevation (ft)Low Bank Height Elevation (ft)Bankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank Height Ratio Bankfull X-section
Area (ft²)% Change Bank Height Ratio
Dimension Data Summary: MY3 2022
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

7
of
MY3
3
Solutions
Year
Land
and
Monitoring
Water
Looking Downstream
Floodprone Area
Width (feet)
Bankfull Elevation
SPA-8 (Riffle), STA 21+15
t
MY3
1.42.1
*4.9
1.45
961.9962.5
MY2
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Projec100026R4SPA-8K. Obermiller, E. Dunnigan
)
)
)
Project
0510152025
Mitigation
964963962961960959
Elevation (feet)
Tributaries
#100026
Project NameProject IDReach IDCross Section IDField CrewDimension Data Summary: MY3 2022Bankfull Elevation (ftLow Bank Height Elevation (ftBankfull Max Depth (ft)Low Bank Height (ft)Bank
Height Ratio Bankfull X-section Area (ft²*SPA-8 Bankfull area was estimated off design parameters for constructed rock riffles on R4
2022
Creek
Project
HorneDMSAugust

Pattern and Profile data will not
data, dimensional data or profile
typically be collected unless visual data indicate significant deviations
baseline conditions
Pattern and Profile data will not typically be
profile data indicate significant deviations from
collected unless visual data, dimensional data or

Pattern and Profile data will not
data, dimensional data or profile
typically be collected unless visual data indicate significant deviations
Pattern and Profile data will not
typically be collected unless visual
indicate significant deviations from
data, dimensional data or profile data

Appendix E: Hydrologic Data
Table 8a and 8b: Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure 3: Surface Flow Events
Figure 4: Flow and Crest Gauge Installation Diagrams
Figure 5: Rainfall Data

Table8A:VerificationofBankfullEventsR1
HorneCreekTributariesMitigationProject
Measurement
Dateofabovebankfull
DateofCollectionOccurrenceMethodPhotos(feet)
MonitoringYear
9/15/20208/21/2020PressureTransducerNo0.18
11/5/20209/17/2020PressureTransducerNo0.18
11/5/202010/11/2020PressureTransducerNo0.28
MY1
11/5/202010/29/2020PressureTransducerNo0.11
8/12/2020UnknownCorkGaugeYes0.20
11/5/2020UnknownCorkGaugeYes0.35
10/26/20211/1/2021PressureTransducerNo0.03
10/26/20211/28/2021PressureTransducerNo0.02
10/26/20212/13/2021PressureTransducerNo0.02
10/26/20212/15/2021PressureTransducerNo0.36
10/26/20212/18/2021PressureTransducerNo0.06
10/26/20213/19/2021PressureTransducerNo0.14
MY2
10/26/20213/25/2021PressureTransducerNo0.02
10/26/20213/26/2021PressureTransducerNo0.08
4/30/2021UnknownCorkGaugeYes0.35
10/26/20217/2/2021PressureTransducerNo0.71
10/26/20218/7/2021PressureTransducerNo0.51
10/26/20218/16/2021PressureTransducerNo0.009
10/26/2021UnknownCorkGaugeYes1.3
1/11/20221/3/2022PressureTransducerNo0.06
4/7/20222/24/2022PressureTransducerNo0.059
4/7/20223/23/2022PressureTransducerNo0.45
4/7/20224/6/2022CorkGaugeYes0.35
8/3/20225/2/2022PressureTransducerNo0.07
MY3
8/3/20225/26/2022PressureTransducerNo0.10
8/3/20225/27/2022PressureTransducerNo1.00
8/3/20227/9/2022PressureTransducerNo0.26
ansducerNo0.34
10/6/20228/6/2022PressureTr
10/6/20228/22/2022PressureTransducerNo0.26
10/6/20229/5/2022PressureTransducerNo0.32

Table8B:VerificationofBankfullEventsR5
HorneCreekTributariesMitigationProject
Measurement
Dateofabovebankfull
DateofCollectionOccurrenceMethodPhotos(feet)
MonitoringYear
6/17/20205/20/2020PressureTransducerNo0.10
MY1
6/17/20205/24/2020PressureTransducerNo0.96
10/26/20212/15/2021PressureTransducerNo0.55
10/26/20217/2/2021PressureTransducerNo0.88
10/26/20218/16/2021PressureTransducerNo0.47
10/26/20218/18/2021PressureTransducerNo0.61
MY2
9/2/2021UnknownCorkGaugeYes1
10/26/20219/21/2021PressureTransducerNo1.67
10/26/20219/22/2021PressureTransducerNo0.16
10/27/2021UnknownCrestGaugeYes1.4
4/7/20223/23/2022PressureTransducerNo0.233
8/3/20225/27/2022PressureTransducerNo1.16
MY3
8/3/20227/9/2022PressureTransducerNo0.269
10/6/20228/22/2022PressureTransducerNo0.1
10/6/20229/5/2022PressureTransducerNo0.203

Figure3:SurfaceFlowData
HorneCreekTributariesMitigationProject
HorneCreekFG1(R1)
MaximumDaysofConsecutiveFlow
22.5
279days(1/1/202210/6/2022)
10/6/2022
EndofMY3Data
1.75
2
1.5
1.25
(feet)1.5
(inches)
1
Depth
Rainfall
1
0.75
Stream
Daily
0.5
0.5
0.25
00
1/1/20224/9/20225/7/20226/4/20227/2/2022
1/15/20221/29/20222/12/20222/26/20223/12/20223/26/20224/23/20225/21/20226/18/20227/16/20227/30/20228/13/20228/27/20229/10/20229/24/202210/8/202211/5/202212/3/2022
10/22/202211/19/202212/17/202212/31/2022
RainfallPoolDepthRiffleDepth
279daysofCumulativeFlow0daysofNoFlow
HorneCreekFG2(R2)
MaximumDaysofConsecutiveFlow
22.5
10days(2/23/20223/4/2022)
10/6/2022
EndofMY3Data
1.75
2
1.5
1.25
1.5
(feet)
(inches)
1
Depth
Rainfall
1
0.75
Stream
Daily
0.5
0.5
0.25
00
1/1/20224/9/20225/7/20226/4/20227/2/2022
1/15/20221/29/20222/12/20222/26/20223/12/20223/26/20224/23/20225/21/20226/18/20227/16/20227/30/20228/13/20228/27/20229/10/20229/24/202210/8/202211/5/202212/3/2022
10/22/202211/19/202212/17/202212/31/2022
RainfallPoolDepthRiffleDepth
72daysofCumulativeFlow207daysofNoFlow

HorneCreekFG3(R3)
MaximumDaysofConsecutiveFlow
12.5
141days(5/19/202210/6/2022)
10/6/2022
EndofMY3Data
0.82
(feet)0.61.5
(inches)
Depth
Rainfall
0.41
Stream
Daily
0.20.5
00
1/1/20224/9/20225/7/20226/4/20227/2/2022
1/15/20221/29/20222/12/20222/26/20223/12/20223/26/20224/23/20225/21/20226/18/20227/16/20227/30/20228/13/20228/27/20229/10/20229/24/202210/8/202211/5/202212/3/2022
10/22/202211/19/202212/17/202212/31/2022
RainfallPoolDepthRiffleDepth
273daysofCumulativeFlow6daysofNoFlow
HorneCreekCrestGaugeCG1(R1)
2.52.5
10/6/2022
EndofMY3Data
22
(feet)
1.51.5
(inches)
Depth
Max
11
Rainfall
Daily
Stream
0.50.5
00
1/1/20224/9/20225/7/20226/4/20227/2/2022
1/15/20221/29/20222/12/20222/26/20223/12/20223/26/20224/23/20225/21/20226/18/20227/16/20227/30/20228/13/20228/27/20229/10/20229/24/202210/8/202211/5/202212/3/2022
10/22/202211/19/202212/17/202212/31/2022
RainfallStreamDepthBankfullDepth

HorneCreekCG2(R5)
2.52.5
10/6/2022
EndofMY3Data
22
(feet)
1.51.5
(inches)
Depth
Max
Rainfall
11
Daily
Stream
0.50.5
00
1/1/20224/9/20225/7/20226/4/20227/2/2022
1/15/20221/29/20222/12/20222/26/20223/12/20223/26/20224/23/20225/21/20226/18/20227/16/20227/30/20228/13/20228/27/20229/10/20229/24/202210/8/202211/5/202212/3/2022
10/22/202211/19/202212/17/202212/31/2022
RainfallStreamDepthBankfullDepth

4.98
=
F
L
O
ELEVATIONOF DOWN
W
STREAM RIFFLE =
RRRRRR
IIII
FFFFF
FFFFFFF
LLLL
EEEEE
SENSOR
BASEFLOW
RRRRRRR
IIII
FFFFF
FFFFFF
LLLLLL
EEEEEE
ELEVATION=0
PPPPPOOOOOOOOOOOOO
LLLLLL
0.68
4.84
=
F
L
O
ELEVATIONOF DOWN
W
STREAM RIFFLE =
RRRRRR
IIII
FFFFF
FFFFFFF
LLLL
EEEEE
SENSOR
BASEFLOW
RRRRRRR
IIII
FFFFF
FFFFFF
LLLLLL
EEEEEE
ELEVATION=0
PPPPPOOOOOOOOOOOOO
LLLLLL
22
1.00

0
5.9
=
F
L
O
ELEVATIONOF DOWN
W
STREAM RIFFLE =
RRRRRR
IIII
FFFFF
FFFFFFF
LLLL
EEEEESENSOR
BASEFLOW
RRRRRRR
IIII
FFFFF
FFFFFF
LLLLLL
EEEEEE
ELEVATION=0
PPPPPOOOOOOOOOOOOO
LLLLLL
34
0.39

L
L
U
F
0
=
K
=
N
A
B
ELEVATION
R
=SENSOR
EE
C
R
UU
S
D
S
S
E
N
R
A
P
R
T
E
CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW OF STREAM
G
U
A
G

K
R
O
C

L
L
U
F
0
=
K

=
N
A
B
ELEVATION
R
=SENSOR
EE
C
R
UU
S
D
S
S
E
N
R
A
P
R
T
E
CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW OF STREAM
G
U
A
G

K
R
O
C

Figure 5: Monthly Rainfall Data
Horne Creek Tributaries Mitigation Project
MY3 2022
MonthlyRainfall
8.00
7.00
6.00
5.00
4.00
(inches)
Total
3.00
Rainfall
2.00
1.00
0.00
ObservedMonthlyRainfall30thPercentile*70thPercentile*
*30thand70thpercentiledatacollectedfromweatherstationCoop315890MountAiry,NC
**IncompleteMonth
Month30thPercentile*70thPercentile*ObservedMonthlyRainfall
Oct212.154.290.30
Nov212.224.111.60
Dec212.514.540.86
Jan222.604.553.60
Feb222.103.834.96
Mar223.035.033.83
Apr222.764.782.79
May223.305.615.94
Jun222.805.374.23
Jul223.515.814.64
Aug222.595.127.05
Sep222.635.323.61
Oct222.154.292.29
Nov222.224.11**
Dec222.514.54**

Appendix F: Macrobenthic Data
Table 9: Biotic Index Data and Scores
Benthic Field Data Sheets
Biotic Sampling Photographs

Table9:BioticIndexDataandScores
PreConstruction2018MY32022
Taxa/BioticIndexValueR1R5Taxa/BioticIndexValueR1R5Taxa/BioticIndexValueR1R5
EPHEMEROPTERAFamilyPsephenidaeEPHEMEROPTERA
FamilyBaetidaePsephenusherricki(2.3)FamilyBaetidae
Baetisflavistriga(6.8)FamilyPtilodactylidaeBaetisintercalaris(5.0)
Baetispluto(3.4)Anchytarsusbicolor(2.4)Baetispluto(3.4)
CAR
Diphetorhageni(1.1)RODONATAFamilyEphemeridae
FamilyCaenidaeFamilyAeshnidaeEphemeraspp(2.0)
Caenisspp(6.8)Boyeriavinosa(5.6)FamilyHeptageniidae
R
FamilyEphemerellidaeFamilyCalopterygidaeMaccaffertiummodestum(5.7)
C
Telagonopsisdeficiens(2.6)Calopteryxspp(7.5)RStenacroncarolina(1.3)
FamilyHeptageniidaeFamilyCordulegasteridaeFamilyLeptophlebiidae
Leucrocutaspp(2.0)Cordulegasterspp(5.7)Paraleptophlebiaspp(1.2)
R
Maccaffertiummodestum(5.7)FamilyGomphidaePLECOPTERA
A
FamilyLeptophlebiidaeGomphusspp(5.9)FamilyPerlidae
Habrophlebiavibrans(0.3)Stylogomphusalbistylus(5.0)Amphinemoura(3.8)
R
HabrophleboidessppOLIGOCHAETAEccopturaxanthenes(4.7)
C
Paraleptophlebiaspp(1.2)FamilyLumbriculidae(7.0)TRICHOPTERA
AR
PLECOPTERA
FamilyNaidaeFamilyHydropsychidae
FamilyPerlidaeNaisspp(8.7)Cheumatopsychespp(6.6)
R
Agnetinaflavescens(1.1)Pristinaspp(7.7)Diplectronamodesta(2.3)
RR
Eccopturaxanthenes(4.7)Slavinaappendiculata(8.4)Hydropsychebetteni(7.9)
CC
Isoperlaholochlora(1.2)MEGALOPTERAFamilyLimnephilidae
TRICHOPTERAFamilyCorydalidaeNeophylaxatlanta(1.6)
FamilyGlossosomatidaeNigroniafasciatus(6.1)Pycnopsychespp(2.5)
R
Glossomaspp(1.4)
CRUSTACEAMISCDIPTERA
FamilyHydropsychidaeFamilyAsellidaeFamilyCeratopogonidae
Cheumatopsychespp(6.6)Caecidoteaspp(8.4)Atrichopogonspp
AR
Diplectronamodesta(2.3)CMOLLUSCAFamilySimuliidae
Hydropsychebetteni(7.9)RCFamilyAncylidaeSimuliumspp(4.9)R
FamilyLimnephilidaeFerrissiaspp(6.6)DIPTERA;CHIRONOMIDAE
Neophylaxatlanta(1.6)RFamilyPleuroceridaeCorynoneuraspp(5.7)
FamilyOdontoceridaeElimiaspp(2.7)CCricotopusbicintus(C/Osp1)(8.7)R
Psilotretaspp(0.5)ROTHERTAXAOrthocladiuscarlatus:C/Osp54(4.4)
FamilyPhilopotamidaeFamilyPlanariidaeParakieferiellaspp(4.8)R
Chimarraspp(3.3)ADugesiatigrina(7.1)Parametriocnemusspp(3.9)R
FamilyRhyacophilidaeThienemaniellaspp(6.4)
R
Rhyacophilacarolina(0.4)R TotalTaxaRichness1538 Thienemannimyiagroup(8.4)
MISCDIPTERA EPTTaxaRichness115 Tribelosjacundum(5.7)
FamilyCulicidae EPTAbundance161 COLEOPTERA
Aedesspp BioticIndex FamilyDryopidae
R 6.534.99
Anopheles(8.6)R Key Helichusspp(4.1)
CulexsppFamilyDytiscidae
R=Rare,C=Common,A=Abundant
R
FamilyDixidaeIlybiusspp
Dixaspp(2.5)RCNeoporusspp(7.0)
FamilySimuliidaeFamilyElmidae
Simuliumspp(4.9)ARMacronychusglabratus(4.7)
FamilyTabanidaeFamilyHaliplidae
Chrysops(6.7)Peltodytesspp(8.4)
FamilyTipulidaeFamilyHydrophilidae
Dicranotaspp(0)RHydrochusspp
Hexatomaspp(3.5)Laccobiusspp(6.5)
Tipulaspp(7.5)RATropisternusblachleyi(9.3)R
DIPTERA;CHIRONOMIDAETropisternuscollaris(9.3)
Chironomusspp(9.3)AFamilyNoteridae
Corynoneuraspp(5.7)Hydrocanthusspp
Cricotopusbicintus(C/Osp1)(8.7)FamilyPtilodactylidae
Eukieferiellaclaripennis(6.2)RAnchytarsusbicolor(2.4)
LimnophyessppRODONATA
Micropsectrapolita(2.4)CFamilyAeshnidae
Microtendipespedellus(3.9)Boyeriavinosa(5.6)
Nilotanypusfimbratus(4.9)FamilyCalopterygidae
Parametriocnemuslundbecki(3.7)Calopteryxspp(7.5)RR
Phaenopscetraobediensgp(6.6)FamilyCoenagrionidae
Polypedilumaviceps(3.6)RRArgiaspp(8.3)C
Polypedilumfallax(6.5)Enallagmasp(8.5)R
Polypedilumflavum(5.7)RFamilyGomphidae
Polypedilumillinoense(8.7)RGomphusspp(5.9)
PolypedilumtritumProgomphusobscurus(8.2)
Psectrotanypusdyari(10)FamilyLibellulidae
Rheocricotpusglabricolis(4.7)RPachydiplaxlongipenis(9.6)
Rheotanytarsusspp(6.5)RFamilyMacromiidae
Stictochironomusdevinctus(5.4)Macromiaspp(6.2)
Tanytarsusacifer/buckleyi(6.6)ROLIGOCHAETA
Thienemaniellaspp(6.4)FamilyLumbriculidae(7.0)
Thienemannimyiagroup(8.4)RCFamilyNaidae
Tveteniabavaricagp(Esp1)(3.6)Pristinellaspp(7.7)
Zavrelimyiaspp(6.1)RCRUSTACEA
COLEOPTERAFamilyCambaridae
FamilyDryopidaeimmaturecrayfish(7.5)RR
Helichusspp(4.1)RMOLLUSCA
FamilyDytiscidaeFamilyPleuroceridae
Neoporusspp(5.0)Elimiaspp(2.7)R
PlatambussppFamilyCorbiculidae
ProdaticussppRCorbiculafluminea(6.6)
FamilyElmidaeOTHERTAXA
Stenelmisspp(5.6)CFamilyCorixidae
FamilyHydrophilidaeSigaraspp(8.7)
CymbiodytasppFamilyHydrachnidae
R
Torrenticolaspp(5.5)
TotalTaxaRichness512
EPTTaxaRichness03
EPTAbundance07
BioticIndex
8.245.65

03)03)
(MY(MY
UpstreamUpstream
R1,R5,
03)03)
(MY(MY
DownstreamDownstream
R1,R1,