20221716 Ver 1_401 Application_20221205

Staff Review Form
NORTH CAROLINA
Ertrlmnmertlrtl Quality
Updated September 4, 2020
Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
Yes No
ID# *
20221716
Version* 1
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Reviewer List:*
Select Reviewing Office: *
Submittal Type:*
Yes
No
Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood:[e-mail]
Winston-Salem Regional Office - [phone]
401 Application
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
Yes
No
How much is owed?* $240.00
$570.00

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: *
For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
New Project
Modification/New Project with Existing ID
More Information Response
Other Agency Comments
Pre -Application Submittal
Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
Stream or Buffer Appeal
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
9/9/2022
Project Contact Information
Name:
Heather LaGamba
Who is submitting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
...................................
Project Name: US Highway 119
Is this a public transportation project?
Yes
No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No Unknown
County (ies)
Alamance
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
2972.2_NC Highway 119_PCN_12.2.22.pdf 4.13MB
Only pdf or kmz files are accepted.
Describe the attachments or
comments:
PCN for 401 WQC
Sign and Submit
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I, the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

• I, the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I agree that submission of this online form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
rif 00. �Zaf.
Submittal Date: 12/5/2022
Is filled in automatically.

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2017-02651
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: NC Highway 119
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
2. Work Type: VPrivate ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Attached
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Attached
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Brad Luckey/Pilot Environmental
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B lb]:
36.04430,-79.33318
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: Attached
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Alamance
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Mebane
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Back creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03030002
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
❑✓ Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
C
Revised 20150602

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express N Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
NC Highway 119
2b.
County:
Alamance
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Mebane
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Scott Mayo Properties II, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
2878/0611
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Taylor Irwin
3d.
Street address:
840 Plantation Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Burlington, NC 27215
3f.
Telephone no.:
336-282-3550
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Developer
4b.
Name:
Mr. Taylor Irwin
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Windsor Contracting, LLC
4d.
Street address:
1007 Battleground Avenue, Suite 301
4e.
City, state, zip:
Greensboro, NC
4f.
Telephone no.:
336-282-3550
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Bradley S. Luckey
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental Inc.
5c.
Street address:
PO Box 128
5d.
City, state, zip:
Kernersville, NC 27285
5e.
Telephone no.:
336-708-4997
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
9803172212
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.04566 Longitude: --79.33331
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
68 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Back Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-V, NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains undeveloped wooded land and fields. Structures are not located on the site. The site is located in
Alamance County, North Carolina.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
—0.56ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Perennial Stream=-1,600LF. Intermittent Stream=-325LF. Open Waters=-0.80ac.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide access for a proposed industrial facility
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of development of the site with an approximate 788,500 square foot industrial facility with
circular tractor access, shipping/receiving docks, tractor court parking, vehicular parking and stormwater retentions
devices. To provide circular access to the industrial facility, it is necessary to construct a road crossing that will impact an
intermittent stream. To facilitate development of the site, clearing and grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers,
excavators and other heavy equipment will be used during site construction.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No ❑Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Agency Visit 10.5.17
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc.
Name (if known): Bradley Luckey/Michael Brame
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
JD Not Issued. DWR, 10.9.17 (attached).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
The applicant requested NWP 39 Verification and assoicated 401 WQC for the proposed project in 2019. The proposed
project was not verified by NWP 39 at or since that time. The applicant received a DWR 401 WQC and Jordan Lake
Riparian Buffer Authorization Dated 6.16.20 (DWR2020484). The DWR 401 WQC has since expired.
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: Wetland impacts are not proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ®T
Fill
Unnamed
❑ PER
® INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
1.44
130
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
130
3i. Comments: The proposed stream crossing will permanently impact 130 linear feet (188SF) of intermittent stream channel
associated with road crossing fill. A BMP will be installed at the most down -gradient portion of the impact area to prevent
down -gradient sedimentation. Temporary impacts are not proposed.
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
— Permanent
(P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose of
pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico ®Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
T
Perpendicular
❑ Yes
B1 ® P ® T
Road
Unnamed
® No
8,255/0
5,525/1,540
Crossing
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
8,255/0
5,525/1,540
6i. Comments: The proposed road crossing will permanently impact 8,255SF of Zone 1 buffer, 5,525SF of Zone 2 buffer and
temporarily impact 1,540SF of Zone 2 buffer with clearing/grading. Areas of temporary impact will be planted with native
herbaceous seed mix. Mitigation is not proposed for buffer impacts.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant has designed the proposed project in efforts to avoid and minimize impacts to WoUS. Initial project designs
included the construction of a larger industrial facility. This design would have required an individual 404/401 permit. The
applicant reduced the size of the industrial facility to avoid significantly more impact to WoUS.
The proposed road crossing has been designed to cross the upper -most portion of a weakly defined intermittent stream, in an
area where the stream is relatively straight. The road crossing was designed as near to perpendicular as possible. Initial road
crossing designs impacted greater than 150LF of intermittent stream channel and were located farther down -gradient than the
impacts proposed within this application. However, the applicant further reduced the number of shipping/receiving
docks/tractor court parking and re -aligned the road crossing as close to the proposed facility to the maximum extent possible,
thus avoiding at least 20LF of intermittent stream impact.
The applicant has designed the road crossing to utilize a 3:1 side slope up -gradient of the proposed building that will be
graded to tie into final building grading, which is anticipated to be near the top elevation of the road. The 3:1 side slope up -
gradient of the culvert was shown to document that stream impacts were a result of the road crossing grading and not a result
of the building. The down -gradient portion of the culvert was designed with a 3:1 side slope to reduce safety concerns and will
require less maintenance than a 2:1 side slope. The applicant considered the use of retaining walls on the down -gradient
portion of the stream to further minimize slope impact to the stream. However, the cost of the retaining walls compared to the
relative little amount of reduction of stream impact is not practical or a cost effective technique to further avoid impact to
waters compared to other avoidance and minimization techniques utilize during preliminary design of the proposed facility that
result in greater avoidance of stream impact. The applicant further reduced and minimized impact to the stream by lowering
the elevation of the road and aligning the proposed road crossing as close to the building as possible. In doing so, the
applicant further reduced the number of tractor docks and court spaces to align the proposed road as close to the building as
possible while maintaining safe and appropriate turn radius, width, grade, etc. for safe tractor trailer accessibility. This design
technique reduced the area of stream impact by at least an additional approximate 20 linear feet. The road alignment cannot
be shifted closer to the building than is proposed because of safety concerns associated with tractor accessibility and building
structural design.
The applicant has designed a stormwater BMP to discharge proximate to the most down -gradient limits of stream fill to
supplement surface drainage area (attached). Based on preliminary calculations, it appears that approximately 30% or more
of the existing intermittent stream drainage area will discharge proximate to un-impacted portions of the intermittent stream
down -gradient of the proposed impact limits. Therefore, it is our opinion that de-wateringof the remainder of the un-impacted
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

stream on the site is not likely to occur.
Approximately 1,600 linear feet of perennial stream channel, 0.56 acres of wetlands, 0.80 acres of open water ponds and the
remaining 245 linear feet of intermittent stream channel are being avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked and BMPs will be utilized to prevent down -gradient sedimentation. Temporary impacts to
riparian buffers will be stabilized with native herbaceous seed mix and matted appropriately.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Mitigation is not proposed.
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: Buffer mitigation is not proposed.
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: A diffuse plan is being completed as part of the post -construction
❑ Yes ® No
stormwater management plan. Based on preliminary design information, the
applicant has designed the proposed project to allow areas of uplands to be utilized
for stormwater retention devices to discharge via diffuse flow.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
49 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
A stormwater management plan is being completed for the proposed project. The applicant
has designed the proposed
project such that stormwater will be treated within uplands areas and diffuse flow can
be maintained.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
® DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
® Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
® No
Comments: We are not aware of a NEPA or SEPA being required as part of this
project.
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed project will connect to municipal sanitary sewer system.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The USFWS IPaC report (attached) identifies the Tri-colored bat as being proposed for listing threatened species. Other
federally protected species are not identified. The Project Area contains immature pines estimated to be less than 20
years in age. Similar and higher quality roosting habitat will remaining on the eastern portion of the site and adjacent
properties of the site. Based on our observations, it is our opinion the proposed project will have no effect to the Tri-
colored bat or protected species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the use of temporary sediment and erosion control devices will prevent sediment from entering
down -gradient waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
® Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
See SHPO consultation
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM 3710889300J (Drawing 4, Verification
Package Previously Provided)
Digitally signed by Bradley Luckey
Env mBradley Luckey, o—Pilot
Enviroromenta 1, Inc., ou,
Bradley Luc key
BradleyS. Lucke
email—[e-mail],c=US
12Z 2Z 22
Date: 2022.12.02 16:36:34 -05'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 13 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
Property Address:
Applicant Information:
2001 Kimrey Rd. (Tax ID 9803172212)
Mebane, NC
Name: Windsor Contracting, LLC Attn: Taylor Irwin
Address: 1007 Battleground Ave., Suite 301
Greensboro, NC
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Signature: ��'�`' `� ^ Date: 09/27/22

�31IS
NV -Id 7Vt J3n0
P
o
0
%Nnoa%DH1 ON-1-0D 3DN%WVl%
m
0
"
6TT AMH DN - 1N3Wd0�3/�34 �bI2ilSf14NI 43SOd02id
ZS9T-O 'ON 3SN3OIVNIIObVO Hi'dON
60bLZ JN Waogsu3�+aJaIO�9Z1400'9OZE9NI90E'9J9IEnSESN]3a3aNg95 ]ahse9w9''9�{EfZbl9381
a,o010
NoIsIn Hoot •••• ••
dnOuo SNO W W ' Ishoo
3H1 1tl tl3Nd 9/Ad SIHi
19
L
o
4l
as
n
�iiiiiiiii offliiiiiiiinllll
6
�a
�
nI1111111111nI1111111111nI1111111111n
� `��
G
'"
nI111
nI111
n
_ nI111
g
w Z
zw
p�
W
w O
>O
o
za
MQ�
wp
se �
q o
¢�
2
u n
—
a �.
2
w¢
J U
s
MZ
o�
fan
C)
W M D
ZO
s-
w
¢
O
�
Ir
C,
\
M
.0
M
LU
I I
W
/
1
O in U)
�
(n
o
OLo]-
o
p
jv o
O
U
Y
�
0EnW
O COS
� co ¢
v
U
Y
C)
\ '��
�
W
w
w
—
O
I
�Qin
I
m�
z
z N
OO u
wwm
¢w¢
�w
U
O?mO¢
F lrU)
OHO
�N
m
In
iQi M
(M
O
O u
\
z¢¢
\
OU Qw U
\
w Z LL
lanOO JIOnal
Wp U)
\
0
w
O
� LL
UN
(ovoatlS2l2kmN�a>rvaoiJ
'�
QNo�
y 9.�1=
O
e�ooW pooe, AN I WHa l: 0 f
oZOZ,S uo pallor{I6mpIN— e]is IleZeno\]i0iux,eeuSl9ooC1\P
e]iG �{77N-zoeaM/o L\.�

0IIOIHX3 JNISSO2JD VAVI2lSan
o °o
t/Nnoat/I H1aON-;.1Nno1 3�Nt/wVlt/ m q w ti
6TT lMH ON - 1N3Wd0-1DAD(I -1vidisn(INI O3SOdOldd
ZS9T-O 'ON 3SN3JIl VNIIObVO Hi'dON
+OZ40'Z99'9EE XV1 IIt0'Z99'9EE131 •• • �� d o OBI J S N O W W I1
60bLZ JN Waogsuaa9 , gEi EJInS ]aag5 ]ahsew'A{ Zb98
3JI31003109SN33N9 snnoH,nOnH1o3n3�F1nNOIIIA1—
3H11tl 432 Add —/A— SIHl • � �
W
I\ \ \ m LL
/ w 0 O U)
LLI W O 00
----- - - - - -_ / /' V ` �v Q H c� ao
\ U
IL IL U H H
d U U
IL IL �LL a a
U
I¢ N N W N Q Q
Of
I I / Of Of Of
\\\ / W/ I
/I W W W L U U
0 LILL IL IL
ILL
co W Z Z
N(D Q Q
I I LLB W W W W 2 2
M / Z Z ZOf Of
J O O O W W W
V) N N N Of I1 I1
\ I I r I—
/ 1
Lu
I
`z 0-1
\ \ W FC \ \ \
\\ \ \ d Lu,
O\ LL
ccam-�,, \ \ \ 1\\ \I 1\
\, 0\ M\ �\\ \
\\\�\o 7\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ II I II
\\ \ \ \ z 1)\ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I \ \
ILU
A
\ \ \\ \I Q OII
\ \ \ 1 >
V A 1 1 1,
\ \ \ Io
W \ I I \ \ \ \ \ I \ In \ \ \ \\ \\\
\ \ 1
eIOOW Oooer AN I W £C£ZZO ,/LL uO pe11 4 16,p 6wpe 6wssOd7 we719T➢p,-1-1—A ➢G -111 d—N-101-0I1 1

Water Resources
Environmental Quality
October 9, 2017
Mr. Michael T. Brame
Pilot Environmental Inc.
P.O. Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Mitigation Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500)
Subject Property: NC Commerce Park — Kimrey Rd, Mebane, Alamance County
Dear Mr. Brame:
On October 5, 2017, at your request, Sue Homewood conducted an on -site determination to review features
located on the subject project for stream determinations with regards to the above noted state regulations.
David Bailey with the US Army Corps of Engineers was also present during the site visit.
The Division acknowledges the areas and boundaries identified as jurisdictional wetlands by the USACE.
The attached sketch map accurately depicts all stream determinations conducted during the site visit.
Please note that at the time of this letter, all perennial stream channels and jurisdictional wetlands found on
the property are subject to the mitigation rules cited above. These regulations are subject to change in the
future. In addition, the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules may apply to some streams at this location, please be sure
to contact the local government for further information regarding the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules.
The owner (or future owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in
any future correspondences concerning this property. This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years
from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division or Delegated Local
Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by
the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650. Individuals that
dispute a determination by the Division or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" surface water from
the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you
receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until
the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. The
Division recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party
appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing within 60 days.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 1 Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336-776-9800

This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation rules and the buffer rules and does not approve
any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State or their associated buffers. If you
have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact me at 336-776-9693 or
sue.homewoodkncdenr. gov.
Sincerely,
S � ',= * � "S �'
Sue Homewood
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Enclosures: USGS Topo Map
Pilot Environmental Stream Map
Cc: Scott Mayo Properties II, LLC, 840 Plantation Dr, Burlington NC 27215
David Bailey, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office (via email)
Josh Johnson, AWCK (via email)
DWR, Winston-Salem Regional Office

�l' � J i — �Jj � � '�/"5•`>Q r ►" .;.� _ �� • ��i�: r ti � ( try ��.� l �fff���
550 .y i f � � j �-•-r.'•---4,'-+� •� •�l ����„ � � .� y ����ttt� �l N °�
� _� � `•r . ter- �
coo
Cen
t ri
tp
Park
i. '--- 530 r '� rrll ; Id i�- a {+I`(/yl1,jl 8 1 1•.1L•.—�.
�. ° L
V
600
� llli Ir '�C �� � � l �1 ' V ti • ��
612
T5 S—
P.
- � I � • _ VV '' � � Pia ; � ��' � � `- � f •
. ��� �' •`.. - � it •fy'.�.fjlj'! •��' r' •r
" '�/1� +�- LEGEND
Site Boundary
� `� • },>�,���fr ��-. , ,' ?�!�� • � . � `� 1"� I �= ^ ! � �",-�,. 1, ' ` -�•�� E �1 �=�.t11�-i�lff! �`-�-�1� .
USGS Topographic Map
Drawing 1
NC Commerce Park
USGS Topographic Map
Kimery Road
Concord West, NC Quadrangle P"-Q7. +� Graham, Alamance County, NC
Scale: 1"-2,000/ PILOT ENVIR0NMENTAL,INC Pilot Project2972

•
I r
.V .
N
� 1
ter► • �-M4 . •►_
A
4 '177' TT
• IL i +
.%
t � ' o,
•r 1 ♦ �,
LEGEND
Site Boundary
.•: Pond
...... Intermittent Stream
� • II
Perennial Stream
r r+
se
Wetlands
Surveyor SA 1-5 Flag Number
Locate'
i DP_1 p Data Point
0 Verification Results
Surveyor
Locate
.90— - -
Locate X i
dp
' e., wa3-11
4
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO * i
DP-2
O 1 ,
WETLAND FLAGS = � Q ate
STREAM FLAGS =
Stream Flags = 12 iSB 1-6
Wetland Flags = 41
Total Flags = 53► a
,'THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY AND APPROXIMATE. THEY WERE VERIFIED BY MR. DAVID BAILEY
WITH THE USACE AND MS. SUE HOMEWOOD WITH THE NCDEQ-DWR ON OCTOBER 5, 2017. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED OR61
GEOLOCATED. 1-
Drawing 5 Wetland Map
2016 Aerial Imagery from Google Earth NC Commerce Park
and Pilot Field Notes - - J Kimrey Road
Scale: 1" = 300' $11L.TIL01rA%Graham, Alamance County, NC
Date:08.30.17 ENYIRONMENTAL,INC Pilot Project2972

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0021224
Project Name: NC Highway 119
December 02, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

12/02/2022
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

12/02/2022
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

12/02/2022
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

12/02/2022
Project Summary
Project Code: 2023-0021224
Project Name: NC Highway 119
Project Type: Commercial Development
Project Description: Industrial Development
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)36.04451525,-79.33338113911825,14z
Counties: Alamance County, North Carolina

12/02/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 2 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

12/02/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA t0 Aug 25
and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 31
and Alaska.

12/02/2022
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 10
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

12/02/2022 3
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Chimney Swift BCC Rangewide +++1 1 +++ + I I I I III Jill Jill ill"'„ Jill "++ ++++ ++++
(CON)
Prairie Warbler BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ +++, ++T+ ++++ ++I+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
(CON) IN Ed 0
Warbler Prothonotary +++1 1 1 1 1 I-+++ +t I I I I I I I I I I++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Woodpecker +000 01+1 *++* ++++ +11� TITT TTTq III+ ++++ 1++10+++
BCC Rangewide r L
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird ++++ ++++ T+++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++, 0+++
BCC -BCR

12/02/2022
4
Wood Thrush ++++ ++ IT +
BCC Rangewide T T
(CON)
+111 +111 dill ++I+ ++++ ++++ ++++
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, bandim
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?

12/02/2022 5
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

12/02/2022 6
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

12/02/2022
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency: Pilot Enviromental, Inc
Name: Bradley Luckey
Address: 743 Park Lawn Court
City:
Kernersville
State:
NC
Zip:
27285
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
3367084997

From:
Heather LaGamba
To:
401PreFileCa ncdenr.aov
Subject:
Pre -File Notice - NC Commerce Park - US Highway 119 (2972.2)
Date:
Friday, September 9, 2022 2:17:00 PM
We would like to submit a Pre -filing Notice for the following project:
Project Name: INC Commerce Park— Kimrey Dr (2972.2)
Project Owner: Windsor Commercial
Project Owner's Address: 5603 New Garden Village Drive, Greensboro, INC 27410
Project County: Alamance
Type of project/Approval Sought: 401 WQC, Pre -Application Request Meeting Declined
Thank you and have a wonderful day!
Sincerely,
Heather LaGamba
336.345.9536 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
P.O. Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.oilotenviro.com
hlagamba(@pilotenviro.com