20150078 Ver 1_Application_20150121

��
� r��"��.
'� �� �
.m��.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY
Gove[u�ox
December 16, 2014
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
ATTN: Liz Hair
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Madam:
ANTHONY J. TATA
SECR[TARY
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification for proposed replacement of Bridge No. 230075 over Big
Branch on SR 1006 in Columbus County
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the existing 18.3! foot,
double span Bridge No. 230075 with a single span 55-foot cored slab bridge on the existing alignment.
Traffic will follow an offsite detour during construction. Permanent impacts to jurisdictional resources
cover approximately 0.02 acres resulting from installation of the new bridge and abutments.
Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Form, permit drawings, stormwater management plan and design plans for the above-
referenced project. The State Minimum Criteria Checklist was completed on 6/25/2012 and copies were
distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request.
This project was let on 2/19/2013 and construction is due to begin 7/2/2015.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal Highway
Administration as a"State Minimum Criteria Checklist" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The
NCDOT requests that these activities be authorized under a Nationwide 3 permit.
Section 401 Permit: The NCDOT requests that these activities be authorized under Water Quality
Certification Number 3883. We anticipate that written approval from the NC Department of Water
Resources will be required.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at [phone].
Si cerely,
� �� s
,
James J Rerko
Division Environmental Offcer — Division 6
rK.�

�
oaoF w A rF9QG
> t IL.JI�J� ;
o -c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. A licant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number: 3883
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictionai General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1 f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge 230075 on SR 1006 over Big Branch
2b. County: Columbus
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Bethel
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state NCDOT Project 17BP.6.R.40
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. Not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if James J. Rerko, Division Environmental Officer
applicable):
3d. Street address: PO Box 1150
3e. City, state, zip: Fayetteville, NC 28302
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: Not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable}:
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Not applicable
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 34.117139 Longitude: -78.718167
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: <1 acre
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to gig Branch
proposed project:
2b. Water Qualiry Classification of nearest receiving water: C; Sw
2c. River basin: Lumber
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the viciniry of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing conditions at the Project Site include maintained/ disturbed roadside shoulder and forest areas. Land use in the
Project vicinity is predominately agriculture and forest with scattered residential properties.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
< 0.1 acre
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
100 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Replace existing two-span (2 @ 18.3') reinforced concrete on steel I-beams structure with a single-span (1 @ 55') cored
slab structure. Traffic will follow an offsite detour during construction. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks,
dozers and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes ❑ No � Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Mulkey, Inc.
Name (if known): Mark Mickley Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem orar T
W 1 � P❑ T Permanent fill ❑ Yes � Corps 0.02
� No � DWQ
W1 ❑ P� T Temporaryfill ❑ Yes � Corps 0.03
� No � DWQ
W2 ❑ P� T Hand clearing � Yes � Corps 0.10
❑ No � DWQ
W4 ❑ P 0 T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.15
2h. Comments: Permanent impacts consist of placement of permanent fill along right of way.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type ofjurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 � P❑ T Permanent fill Big Branch � PER � Corps 30 66.7
❑ INT � DWQ
S2 ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 66.7
3i. Comments: Permanent impacts consist of placement of permanent fill (rip rap) along stream bank under bridge.
Page 4 of 10

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem orar T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
Sf. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet
Tem orar T im act re uired? � (square feet)
B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed bridge provides a more effective hydraulic opening than the existing bridge. The bridge and abutments will be
installed to maintain stream bedform and there will be no excavation in non-permitted jurisdictional areas. Promotion of sheet
flow and infiltration over rip/rap bank stabilization or grassed surfaces is proposed.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Best Management Practices for Protection of Surface Waters and for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be implemented
during the construction phase. Drill shafts will not be utilized.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. if yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? Not applicable
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The Stormwater Management Plan is designed in accordance with NPDES Permit # NCS000250. See attached permit
drawings and stormwater management plan.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? Not applicable
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? � Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? � Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian BufFer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Not applicable
Page 9 of 10

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ No
habitat? � Yes
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No
impacts?
� Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program, USFWS website, USFWS scoping letter (see attached) and field surveys.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Flsh Habitat Mapper.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCDOT PDEA — Human Environment Section
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT-NCFMP Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) Type 2a.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Map / NC Floodplain Mapping Program
James J. Rerko December 16,
�� � L D/� 2014
ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name App�i a gent's gnature Date
(AgenYs sign ure is vali only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.
Page 10 of 10

Hi�1'1wd}� North Carolina Department of Transportation /
Storr��water � `�i
,,,...., Highway Stormwater Program �,�;!
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN _
(Version 1.2; Released July 2012) FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS
Project/TIP No.: 17BP.6.R.40 Count (ies): Columbus Page 1 of 3
General Project Information
Pro�ect No.: 17BP.6.R.40 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 9/24/2014
NCDOT Contact: Rachel Evans Contractor / Desi ner: Frank Flemin , PE - Ecolo ical En ineerin
Address: 1020 Birch Ridge Drive Address: 1151 SE Cary Parkway
Room #16 Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27610 Cary, NC 27518
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail] Email: fflemin @ecolo icalen .com
Cit /Town: N/A Count (ies : Columbus
River Basin(s): Lumber CAMA Count ? No
Primar Receivin Water: Bi Branch NCDWQ Stream Index No.: 15-17-1-12-5
NCDWQ Surface Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water Primary: Class C
Su lemental: Swamp Waters Sw
Other Stream Classification: None
303 d) Im airments: None
Buffer Rules in Effect N/A
Pro'ect Descri tion
Project Length (lin. Miles or feet): 0.06 Surrounding Land Use: Rural area with some forest and agricultural land use.
Pro osed Pro'ect Existin Site
Project Built-U on Area (ac.) 0.23 ac. 0.17 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: 2@ 11.0 ft lane with 4.4 ft shoulders and 1.1 ft guardrail with total bridge width of 33 ft 2@11 ft lane with 2.0 ft shoulders with total bridge width of 24.0 ft and total bridge
and total bridge length of 55 ft length of 36.4 ft.
Average Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 460 Existin : 460
General Project Narrative: State Project 176P.6.R.40 involves the replacement of the existing NCDOT Bridge #230075 on SR 1006 over Big Branch. Bridge #230075 consists of 2@ 18.3' reinforced
concrete deck on steel I beams with concrete caps and timber abutments. The proposed bridge at #230075 will be 1@55'; 21" Cored Slab with 2'-6" caps. The proposed
bridge will reduce the upstream 100-yr water surface elevation and will provide more hydraulic opening than the exising bridge. No deck drains are proposed. One
stormwater outfall is proposed and Rip Rap pads will be utilized to dissipate the energy.
References

1I��1E��C1ElL N�,
b �)
il �
��
�������� �������
����� ��� �����;����
�����
'�°��°]CAN� �"01B���i 1[�[�]L,�,
lEg�l�AiL,� �Va 1H[A�]G� �
�f����T1I;lL,�Iai1� ��]E�11�
�":I4�A�'1��� ]f�, � �1L?h,�'1[�A�
l[�o ��]I���J�
A��lE�lE��1C�
����� �UAI�l[]�� �$ �1�[��[°lE 1�[WSY�
`7C' �1���� ��7[°�� �� ���[��
���� ll,l�]B�I�T�1� �IE��T]Eg�"1[� ][$�o
�b,��]E?��@�I�T, N�C ���I��
���� ��� ��� ��a
�1LA�1G�'��1�, I��� ���1��

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size/Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands inWetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (tt) (ft) (tt)
1 11+97/13+25 -L- 1@55'-21" CORED < 0.01 0.02 0.04
SLAB
1@55'-21" CORED 66.7
2 13+38/15+10 -L- SLAB 0.01 < 0.01 0.06
TOTALS: 0.02 0.03 0.10 66.7
Fill In Wetlands Hand Clearing Temporary Fill
(Sq. Ft) In Wetlands In Wetlands
I111p8CtS: (Sq. Ft) (Sq. Ft)
Site 1 338.2 1716.4 827.5
Site 2 538.5 2570.2 391.0
Total 876.7 4286.6 1218.5
Revised 3/31/O5

�
�.
�
�
�
�
�
�
O
�
•
�
.
�o
�
�
�
♦ �
�
V
W
0
�
�
�
�
0
N
O
N
V
•�
�
V
�
�
O
V
See Sheet l—A For lndex of Sheets
See Sheet l—B For Cnnventional Plan Sheet Symbols
See Sheet l—C For Survey Control Sheet
NOTE: THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITH�N ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
�DETOUR ROUTE
���.�� �� d � ����� ��.������.
I�1[�IISI[�!� ��� ��������V���
COLUMBUS C�U1�TY
LOCATI0111: BRIDGE 230075 0111 SR 1006 (M.M. RAY ROAD)
ACROSS BIG BRANCH IN M0111TE SWAMP.
TYPE OF WORK: GRADIIIIG, DRAi11tAGE, PAVIIIIG A1VD STRUCTURE.
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
-L- STA. 11+75.00
TO SR 7141 '
(LEBANON CHURCH RD)_____
�
� SITE �1
,
�
, 1���-
- - - — � t
—� F
— — —w�e,� —�--. �
�
� �
� „_ �
�
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD 11.
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA
50 25 0 50 10o ADT 2013 = 460
V = 55 MPH
PLANS
FUNC CLASS =
50 25 0 50 loo RURAL MINOR
COLLECTOR
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
SUB—REGIONAL TIER
FILE
0
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT = 0.053 MILES
LENGTH STRUCTURES PROJECT = 0.010 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT = 0.063 MILES
NCDOT CONTACT: VIRGINIA MABRY
NCDOT TPMU
BIG �
�RANCH� �
I �� ,
�. ��� _ -n
-L- STA. 13 + 67.13
� �
� SI�E 2�. �
�
� r
--- —� -. —
i=r;Rn�LiSn 1L� - - -Y�- �
�
-L- STA. 15+10.00
-- - TO
_ - - - — - NC 905
�
�` � M.M. RAY ROAD
�
-Ik ' r �..TYPE_III GRAU_35 a� _ .,_ _ _ _v _ __ _
, _..,. __--..
_. :i. _ .. _-_
r-._.. - — —_ .
� � � -� �_ __.
_---.
Y- _— __ _ ._ ., _.—� — . __ — �
� � \,
1� /
� �� , �
;
; ,�
i
Prepared in ihe Office of: NC FIRM LICENSE No: P-0339
1� C1 ,��I� 504 Meadowlands Drive
Jv Hillsborough, NC 27278
[phone]
`�`��"w��� [phone] (FAX)
20/3 STANDARD SPECIFlCATIONS
RIGHT OF WAY DATE: TRACY N. PARROTf, PE
MARCH 26, 2013 I'ROJEC7 ETiG7NEER
LETTING DATE: BRANDON W. JOHNSON, PE
_ MARCH Z6� LO�.3 PxOJECT UESlGN GNGINElX
STATE PROJECT RL+PEREVCE NO. I SNO.T HEE]'S
���� 17BP.6.R.40 �
� YftW.NO. . . ., . �� uESC0.(PT�Oh
176P.6.R.40 NA PE
77BP.6.R.40 NA WW
UBP.6.R.40 NA CONST
±tl in tne NC FIRM �tCENSt No: F-1148
of: � II51 SE Ca�y POrkway
ECOLOGICAL ca.�y.`N� z�5�e
ENGINEERING �eisi ss�-oez�
�d in ihe
- �� NC FIRM LICENSE No: F-p342
of: �� �olcorpora!e Center Orive.5u�te 475
^� Raleigh, NC 27007
[phone] - [phone](FAXI
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET OF
HYDRAULICS ENGIIVEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.E.
��������.���: �T.���
DO NOT U9S FOR R/W A.(:QU[9iT[ON
�ll�1L:ili11mllS1Ll"1id4�o 1C%�!]�LV�
DO NOT USE FOA COhSTRUCT[ON

z
0
�
SITE 1
50
40
�
�s
i�»
� 30
�
�
�
�
+�
� 20 �
SITE 2
15
SITE 1
I
I
i �
\ �
\` y
� `'�TB 2GI�
— . � --_--..� �a �
_ - _ -.-__�_...— y-
O15 � � � -
�
CLA55 8 RIP RAP �
EST 1 TON
E5T 5 SY GEOTEXTILE
;^✓S� C
�,
/
� � I �
� 1 � �
� �
Y-� w
—� ..
. E i ����y �1�7 .
16
SITE 2
� � �
� . �
� �
.-�— - - �__ - - _ -
, ...... , . � .
� p . llLGg a _ �
i
� - _ _ . --_-_ - _ _
--_7� , _ � � . — ____ _
' _— .. _—'__
Y —
_ __ —_ _ _ .—'_ _'. -"—�\ �..
- � I ��� CLA55 II S'CREAMBANK '� .w � �\ . . � . �--
x ��� STABILIZATION -ti
i � EST 50 TONS
(�
17
,
, _,-1- ; ; � ; : : i ' ; : : - : i i ' _ _ � : .
_. ....._......_..... ._....... .. _
I
PI = 12f25.00 ':..: Pl = 14+00.00 P1= 14+65A0
__. . . . . . . , . ._ . . . , . ._ . . . . . ._ . . .__, . . . . EL = 40J0' EL = 4052' EL = 40.62'
._ ..... ......... ......... ....._... .. K = 237 K = l63 K = l77
..... ......... ......... ......... .. L = 50 L = 50 L = 50
- DS = 65 MPH DS = 60 MPH OS = 65 MPH
SHEET NO.
RhV SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
�'1E81CII.��Ii ][iV.�II85Y �L.�N�
DO rOT USF. FO CO�.�*STRUCTION
a o, ,,.� 1r su�„ti,,,rr ��4�ro q;9;�3a —
,�;99;3� F�;Fa.,
�arod in tho -
e o(: �.
�ECOLOGICAI
ENGINEERING � s.r o_E_
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET OF
� DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
�DENOTES IMPACTS IN
Sl1RFACE WATER
�DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
� DENOTES HAND
CLEARING
5o O lo�
I ■-�
CCA�� �
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
DESIGN D�SCHARGE = 500 CFS
DESIGN FREOUENCY = 25 YRS
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 38.8 FT
BASE DlSCHARGE = 800 CFS
BASE FREQUENCY = l00 YRS
BASE HW ELEVATION = 39.06 FT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = Cl100 CFS
OVERTOPPING FREOUENCY= C YRS
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 40.0 FT
BEGIN BRIDGE END BRIOGE
-L- STA 13+0388 _ -L- STA 13+6/J3 i = FT
BEGIN GRADE EL = 40.33 =- - EL = 40.50 END GRADE
-L- STA 11+75.pp -- -L- STA 15+10.00 � DATE OF SURVEY = 05/03/l2 50
-__ EL = 40A5 _ EL - 40J4 - W.S.ELEVATION
IJ - AT DATE OF SURVEY = 352 FT
_ (+J0.3000% f-NJ.0069% � - 40
� ------------- -
__ �_ . . (+) .089 I (+�,�]58I � � � � �. �. �. �. _ _ � � BRIpGE HYDRAUUC DATA PREPARED BY � � �
- - - - E%CAVATE E%IST ROAD FlLL E%ISTING BRIDGE � � � � � � � � � �- - . �. SUNGATE. DESIGN�. GROUP. P,A. �. . . . . .
... TO BE REMOVED �. 1 �-- � � �i �� Li_iJ �i ` � Li_i -� -I I � SEE BSR � APPROVED ON 12/IS/12 �
_ . .. .. ... ... . ... . . .. . . .. i-J ...
TO APPROX EL 35.0 AT Cl I_I _ �.
- . . . . EST 65 CY .. �� � \ �I EST 30ACYEXIST ROA� FlLL � � � I I �.�'�. �. �. �. �. � �. � � � � �.-� � �.
__. : . . . . _ . _ . I I TO APPROX EL 35.0 AT CL �. I I �I �. _ i- . . . . . .. . . � . .. �O
_ -
-- _ _ - �-
- - - - - � - - CL 'll' STREAMBANK � � � �- � �
-- CL 'll' STREAMBANK . . STAB�LIZATION . �._ - - -- - - - - - - �. �. ..
-� STABILIZATION E57 50 TONS ,,.-�I J ..
-- EST 140 TONS � � - - � � �
� � WSE AND NWSE � � 20
. _ . . . -. . . . ON 5-3-12..-352 � - - �. �.
_ _ _
_
_
.J. - ._._.. -___..._ _._-_...___. . . �.
. . il . _ _ - - ._
-�-i _ _ _ _ _ i T i - i i - i - . .T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . �. . -. . , i � i i - i i - i i i i - i � i i i - i - i i - i � i i - i . �. �.
1 � -,_ .'� _°__J,_ ._� __ �_ ."!, ___ � :.."!, ___ ,_ .'�-__ '.._„�° _ ' „_ ._,--� . _ e _ ____ ._ ____ _. ____ _ ' ' _ __ ' ____ ' ' _ ___ ' ___ __' ' ____ ' ' ___ _' _ ' ' ___' ' __ __' ' ___ ' ' ___ ' ___ 1 �
10 11 12 13 14 15 16

z
�
SITE 1
50
40
�
�s
i�»
� 30
�
�
�
�
� 20 �
SITE 2
JA� 83 c/�;
NSR �
�,
SITE 1
- �- ._ __ ___� �� . .. ,�- �
. _--__ , _ --�__ y;..
-w(B�y.. Y . ______ __
�
15 ��� �'� � � � � � �
� ' CLA55 8 RIP RAP J
EST 1 TON
E5T 5 SY GEOTEXTILE
16
� �
y �:
� i
-.�- ._-- . . -__--._
� _ - - -
PE-llLG&ACL � _ � — _
i , _ - _
_ .. . .—_ �� - ._ . ____.
�. ._. .r: ________. -__
�
_ — __ ___ � . ._ __�
� �. �
x CLA55 II S'CREAMBANK r � �
� STABILIZA710N .. -Y -I � / /
EST 50 TONS I /
J
17
,
, _,-1- ; ; � ; : : i ' ; : : - : i i ' _ _ � : .
�
I
_ ..... ......... ......... ......... .. �
i
PI = 12f25.00 ':..: Pl = 14+00.00 P1= 14+65A0 ,
_. _, . . . . EL = 40J0' EL = 4052' EL = 40.62' -
._. _. ... _... .. K=237 K=163 K=177
L= 50 L= 50 L= 50
DS = 65 MPH DS = 60 MPH OS = 65 MPH
BEGIN BRIDGE END BRIOGE
-L- STA 13+0388 -L- STA 13+6/J3
r��--� -
ri
SHEET NO.
RhV SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
�'1E81CII.��Ii ][iV.�II85Y �L.�N�
DO rOT USF. FO CO�.�*STRUCTION
a o, ,,.� 1r su�„ti,,,rr ��4�ro q;9;�3a —
,�;99;3� F�;Fa.,
�arod in tho -
e o(: �.
�ECOLOGICAI
ENGINEERING � s.r o_E_
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET OF
� DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
�DENOTES IMPACTS IN
Sl1RFACE WATER
�DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
� DENOTES HAND
CLEARING
5o O lo�
���
CCA�� �
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
DESIGN D�SCHARGE = 500 CFS
DESIGN FREOUENCY = 25 YRS
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 38.8 FT
BASE DlSCHARGE = 800 CFS
BASE FREQUENCY = l00 YRS
BASE HW ELEVATION = 39.06 FT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = Cl100 CFS
OVERTOPPING FREOUENCY= C500 YRS
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 40.0 FT
- FT
BEGIN GRADE EL = 40.33 =-- EL = 40.50 END GRADE
-L- STA 11+75.00 -- _L- STA 15+10.00 ': � DATE OF SURVEY = 05/03/l2 50
-__ EL = 40A5 _ EL ° 40J4 -� W S ELEVATION
l +�.300a
�'fi .a89 i --�'
E%CAVATE E%IST ROAD FlLL
TO APPROX EL 35.0 AT Cl '�
EST 65 CY ' �
t
-- CL 'll' STREAMBANK � �
-� STABILIZATION
-- EST 140 TONS � �
J- AT DATE OF SURVEY = 352 FT
f-NJ.0069% _ _ _ _ � - 40
(+�,�]58I � . . �. _ _ � � BRIpGE HYDRAUUC DATA PREPARED BY � � �
E%ISTING BRIDGE � � � � � � � � � ��- - �. �. SUNGATE. DESIGN�. GROUP. P,A. �. . . . . .
TO BE REMOVED � � � � � . 1 �-- � �i �� Li_iJ � �i ` � Li_i -� -I I � � SEE BSR � APPROVED ON 12/IS/12 � � � �
. . . _ _ . . . . . . i_J . .
EXCAVATE EXIST ROA� FlLL � � - � � � � � � � � � �
TO APPROX EL 35.0 AT CL�. ___ _ �. �. . �. . . �O
EST 30 CY � � � � �
_ —
- �-
CL 'll' STREAMBANK � � � �- � �
STAB�LIZATION � - - - -- - - - - - - _ _ . .
E57 50 TON$ . ��i - . �. ��
WSE AND NWSE � � � 20
ON 5-3-12 �= 352 � - - �. �.
_
_
. .J. - ._._.. -___..._ _._-_...___. . . �.
. _ _ _ - - ._ _ . .
. I�_i _ _ _ _ _ i T i - i i - i - .T. . . — . -- . . . . . . — - . — i . . — . -- . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . i � i i - i i - i i i i - i � i i i - i - i i - i � i i - i . �. �.
1� -._..'L___J._.._� __ l_.._! ___ �..._L____._..' ___ ._.._.__ _ _.._.___ _.__ _ . _ , _ ___., ._.e._._ _ _.__ _ � _ e _ ____ _. ___ _. _.__. 1�
10 11 12 13 14 15 16