20221689 Ver 1_401 Application_20221201

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
7/5/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20221689 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Zachary Thomas:eads\ztthomas
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
COURTESY COPY 2901 Sandia Drive
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jessica Tisdale
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
lb. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
12/1/2022
Nearest Body of Water
House Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C;NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.821594 -78.681929
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No

1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 58 - Utility Line Activities for Water and Other Substances (frequently used)
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
City of Raleigh
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Whit Wheeler, PE
2d. Address
Street Address
222 W. Hargett Street
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal /Zip Code
27601
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Jessica Tisdale
4b. Business Name:
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
4c. Address
Street Address
555 Fayetteville St., Suite 400
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27601
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality I town:
Raleigh
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number: 2b. Property size:
2c. Project Address
Street Address
2901 Sandia Drive
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27607
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
House Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010803
4. Project Description and History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
This site is located within a City of Raleigh sewer easement which has a sewer line running alongside a stream that feeds to House Creek. The western stream bank has eroded to a point
where it is at risk of damaging the exposed nearby sanitary sewer pipe.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
none. Study area is completely in easement.
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
60
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of this project is to stabilize and repair a streambank which has failed and exposed a previously buried gravity sewer pipe. The project will temporarily impact a total of
approximately 600 square feet of streambank on an unnamed tributary of House Creek near 2901 Sandia Drive at 35.821594, -78.681929 decimal degrees.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
Work will entail creating a dry work area, establishing a stable toe, placing new ductile iron pipe, constructing a stable bank using rock/geotextile, coir matting and establishing a stable
segment of stream bed at the base of the bank. The site will be accessed by obtaining a landowner access agreement to the southeast of the site. The permanent disturbance will occur
inside the maintained easement and will include the removal of one tree within the maintained easement. Erosion control measures will be installed prior to work.
A "pump around" will be established to create a dry work area. Disturbed areas will be reseeded and mulched when work is complete. It is expected that a rubber tire loader or skid steer
loader and a dump truck will be used to place the boulders, reconstruct the streambank, and stabilize the streambank. Please see the five attached details; "pump around", temporary silt
fence, temporary construction entrance, bank stabilization, and seeding details.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
3. Stream Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
Si
Stream bank stabilization
Permanent
Stabilization
Ut to House Creek
Perennial
DWR
10
Average (feet)
60
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
60
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
60
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0

3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
See project description in Section C.4.i.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
See attached details referenced in Section C.4.i.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) U
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
lb. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes No
Comments: *
No, the impacts to the one stream are minimal.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No

3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project is solely to repair an existing sewer system and no additional development is planned.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
The ECOS IPAC database and the NHP data explorer results are attached for the project location.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
NOAA Fish Map
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/1594. Stream stabilization is for a small area and archaeological resources were not reviewed.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Floodplain GIS Map
Miscellaneous u
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
2901 Sandia Drive_ Attachment A.pdf 108.23MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Supporting information is provided in Attachment A.
-Agent authorization is within Attachment A.
-NHP is within Attachment A.
-IPAC report is within Attachment A.
-Pre-filing request is within Attachment A.

Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Jessica Tisdale
Signature
Date
12/1/2022

Attachment A
Proposed Bank Stabilization
2901 Sandia Drive, Raleigh
The purpose of this project is to stabilize and repair a streambank which has failed and exposed a
previously buried gravity sewer pipe. The project will temporarily impact a total of approximately 600
square feet of streambank on an unnamed tributary of House Creek near 2901 Sandia Drive at
35.821594, -78.681929 decimal degrees.
Work will entail creating a dry work area, establishing a stable toe, placing new ductile iron pipe,
constructing a stable bank using rock/geotextile, coir matting and establishing a stable segment of
stream bed at the base of the bank. The site will be accessed by obtaining a landowner access
agreement to the southeast of the site. The permanent disturbance will occur inside the maintained
easement and will include the removal of one tree within the maintained easement. Erosion control
measures will be installed prior to work.
A "pump around" will be established to create a dry work area. Disturbed areas will be reseeded and
mulched when work is complete. It is expected that a rubber tire loader or skid steer loader and a dump
truck will be used to place the boulders, reconstruct the streambank, and stabilize the streambank.
Please see the five attached details; "pump around", temporary silt fence, temporary construction
entrance, bank stabilization, and seeding details.

E�2
City of Raleigh, 2901 Sandia Drive, Stream Stabilization
Photograph 1 (above), Site Entrance, Facing Northwest (Dated October, 2022).
Photograph 2 (above) , View of exposed pipe, Facing Northeast (Dated October, 2022).

E�2
City of Raleigh, 2901 Sandia Drive, Stream Stabili
TREE WITHIN
EASEMENT TO
BE REMOVED
Photograph 3 (above), View of tree to be removed, facing northwest (Dated June, 2022).

\WaUseirtANSITtt FM11 tyammuust
LEGEND
Stream (UT to House Creek)
DATA SOURCE: USATOPO MAPS
0 Feet 2,000
(i/°pYrpii .1ilY° �°Fgrarffe
2901 SANDIA DRIVE SANITARY SEWER REPAIR
RALEIGH WEST 24K QUADRANGLE
FIGURE 1
EPCN APPLICATION

760000 FEET
750000 FEET
2090000 FEET
35°50'0"N
35°49'30"N
35°49'0"N
2090000 FEET
78°41'30"W
78°41'30"W
POINT OF REPAIR,
LAT: 35.821594r
LONG: -78.681929
78°41'0"W
78°41'0"W
78°40'30"W
78°40'30"W
78°40'0"W
78°40'0"W
2100000 FEET
35°50'0"N
35°49'30"N
35°49'0"N
2100000 FEET
NORTH CAROLINA
erating Tec
111�.1J USi1S�
FEMA'S COOPERATING TECHNICAL PARTNER
760000 FEET
750000 FEET
This digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was produced through a unique
cooperative partnership between the State of North Carolina and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The State of North Carolina has
implemented a long term approach to floodplain management to decrease the
costs associated with flooding. This is demonstrated by the State's commitment
to map flood hazard areas at the local level. As a part of this effort, the State of
North Carolina has joined in a Cooperating Technical State agreement with
FEMA to produce and maintain this digital FIRM.
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION
SEE FIS REPORT FOR ZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP
FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT
HTTPS://FRIS.NC.GOV/FRIS
HTTPS://MSC. FEMA.GOV
SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD AREAS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A,V, A99
With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
Regulatory Floodway
OTHER AREAS OF
FLOOD HAZARD
OTHER
AREAS
GENERAL
STRUCTURES
SIMS
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% Annual Chance Flood with Average
Depth Less Than One Foot or With Drainage
Areas of Less Than One Square Mile
Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood Hazard
'";; Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee
See Notes
Areas Determined to be Outside the
0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain zone x
Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
Levee, Dike, orFloodwall
4)12)-1'872 Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
Water Surface Elevation (BFE)
Coastal Transect
NOTES TO USERS
For information and questions about this map, available products associated with this FIRM including
historic versions of this FIRM, how to order products or the National Flood Insurance Program in general,
please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Map
Service Center website at https://msc.fema.gov. An accompanying Flood Insurance Study report, Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) or Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) revising portions of this panel, and digital versions of this
FIRM may be available. Visit the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program website at https://flood.nc.gov/ncflood,
or contact the FEMA Map Service Center.
Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as
the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Map Service Center at the number listed above.
For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction.
To determine if flood insurance is available in the community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National
Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620.
Flood Insurance Study (FIS) means an examination, evaluation, and determination of flood hazards, corresponding
water surface elevations, flood hazard risk zones, and other flood data in a community issued by the North Carolina
Floodplain Mapping Program (NCFMP). The Flood Insurance Study (FIS) is comprised of the following products
used together: the Digital Flood Hazard Database, the Water Surface Elevation Rasters, the digitally derived,
autogenerated Flood Insurance Rate Map and the Flood Insurance Survey Report. A Flood Insurance Survey is a
compilation and presentation of flood risk data for specific watercourses, lakes, and coastal flood hazard areas within
a community. This report contains detailed flood elevation data, data tables and FIRM indices. When a flood study is
completed for the NFIP, the digital information, reports and maps are assembled into an FIS. Information shown on
this FIRM is provided in digital format by the NCFMP. Base map information shown on this FIRM was provided in
digital format by the NCFMP. The source of this information can be determined from the metadata available in the
digital FLOOD database and in the Technical Support Data Notebook (TSDN).
ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If an accredited levee note appears on this panel check with your local
community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of protection provided (which may exceed the
1-percent-annual-chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the levee system(s) shown as providing protection
for areas on this panel. To mitigate flood risk in residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged
to consider flood insurance and floodproofing or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance,
interested parties should visit the FEMA Website at https://www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program.
PROVISIONALLY ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If a Provisionally Accredited Levee (PAL) note
appears on this panel, check with your local community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of
protection provided (which may exceed the 1-percent-annual-chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the
levee system(s) shown as providing protection for areas on this panel. To maintain accreditation, the levee owner or
community is required to submit the data and documentation necessary to comply with Section 65.10 of the NFIP
regulations. If the community or owner does not provide the necessary data and documentation or if the data and
documentation provided indicate the levee system does not comply with Section 65.10 requirements, FEMA will
revise the flood hazard and risk information for this area to reflect de -accreditation of the levee system. To mitigate
flood risk in residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood insurance and
floodproofing or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested parties should visit
the FEMA Website at https://www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program.
LIMIT OF MODERATE WAVE ACTION NOTES TO USERS: For some coastal flooding zones the AE Zone
category has been divided by a Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA). The LiMWA represents the approximate
landward limit of the 1.5-foot breaking wave. The effects of wave hazards between the VE Zone and the LiMWA
(or between the shoreline and the LiMWA for areas where VE Zones are not identified) will be similar to, but less
severe than those in the VE Zone.
SCALE
Map Projection:
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
1 inch = 500 feet
1:6,000
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Meters
0 75 150 300
PANEL LOCATOR
i
1
0874-0884-0894,
1804
08,73
1
0872
0883
08827
0893
0892
1803
1802
1813
1812
1823
1822
1832•
0881
0891
1801
1811
1821
1831
.1842
1851-1861
1841
0880
0890
1800
1810
1820
1830
1840
1850
1860
\
1870
0759
0758
0769
0768
0779
/
0778
0789
0788
0799
0798
1709
1708
1719
1718
1729
1728
1739
1738
1749
1748
1759
1758
1769
1768
1779-1789-
1778
1788
-1799
1798
2708
0727
0737
0747
0757
0767
0777
0787
0797
1707
1717
1727
1737
1747
1757
0726
0736
0746
0756
0766
0776
0786
0796
1706
1716
1726
1736
1746
1756
1766
1787
1797
2707'
.2717
1786
1796
2706
0704
0725
0735
0745
0755
0765
0775
0785
1
1705
1715
1725
1735
1745
1755
1765
1775
1785
1795
2705
2716
2715\725
(0724
0734
0744
0754
0764
0774
0784
0794
1704
1714
1724
1734
1744
1754
1764
1774
1784
1794
2704
72714
0713'
0723
0733
0743
0753
0763
0773
0783
0793
1703
1713
1723
1733
1743
1753
1763
0712
0722
0732
0742
0752
0762
0772
0782
0792
1702
1712
1722
1732
1742
1752
1762
1773
1793
1772-1782
0711
0721
0731
0741
0751
0761
0771
0781
0791
1701
1711
1721
1731
1741
1751
1761
1771
0700/
0710
0720
0730
0740
0750
0760
0770
0780
0790
1700
1710
1720
1730
1740
/1750
2703
E
L
ion
c.9
a
cc/9
1
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
" +D INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
PANEL 0795
Panel Contains:
COMMUNITY CID PANEL SUFFIX
RALEIGH, CITY OF 370243 0795 K
1783
1852
OTHER
FEATURES
- - - Coastal Transect Baseline
Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA)
i0608
0628
0649
0659
0669
0679
0689
0699
1609
1619
1629
1639
/1649
0648
0658
0668
0678
0688
0698
0606 \
0647
0657
0667
0677
0687
0697
0646
0645
0656
0666
0676
0655�0665
0674
0686
0696
0684"
1608
1618
1628,
/
1617 1627
1606/1616
1607
1605
1638
Johnston
VERSION NUMBER
2.3.3.2
MAP NUMBER
3720079500K
MAP REVISED
July 19, 2022
0675

POINT OF REPAIR,
LAT: 35.821594°r
LONG: -78.681929
2901 Sandia Drive Sanitary Sewer Repair
Location of Impacts
0
25 50
I
100 ft
1 inch equals 50 feet
Disclaimer
iMaps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate information possible.
However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied
,are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

EXISTING ROADWAY
X
0
50' MIN.
AND SUFFICIENT TO KEEP
X X SEDIMENT ON SITE
oo00o 00 0 0 0 0 000 0 00000 O 0 0
000000go?,
000$0000000�00 0$0000�000�
0
0 00000 00 0
%%0000 0 go
0000OOo 3"-4"STONE TO BE USED co
00o O
0000000 0 ( SURGE STONE OR o0
00000 o RAILROAD BALAST)
0 000
00°000°
00
0 0
00 0
O 000000 0 00s 0
0
0
0000000p0 00
000p00 000000 00000p00 0 0 0 0000 0 000 00 0000 0
000 0
0000 000 00 0 00000000 ,0O 00000 00Oc
o
SILT FENCE (SEE NOTE 1)
60'0Z-MS
37 OS0110A
PLAN
EXISTING ROADWAY -
L
6" MIN.
25' OR FULL WIDTH
OF PROPOSED STREET
OR ENTRANCE,
WHICHEVER IS
GREATER.
35' MIN.
NOTES:
1. SILT FENCE SHOULD BE INSTALLED TO ENSURE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IS USED.
2. IF MUD IS NOT REMOVED FROM THE VEHICLE TRAVELING
OVER THE STONE, THEN THE TIRES OF THE
VEHICLE MUST BE WASHED BEFORE ENTERING THE
PUBLIC ROAD OR THE LENGTH OF THE CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE EXTENDED.
15' MIN.
NEW CONSTRUCTION
groe.e0
"oo�$0000 0000$000000 0000000_ 08%Ye::: 000000 0 00 00000III II
III
12"MIN.c0g00000008oAo
eo.eooq00000 00 O 00p�000000p0S o000000-00O0cp000000ecogQ00-III III —I
III—III—I1I f11ll1ll=L 1 I 1 11 I 11 I I I I —I 1I-
I 1—I 1 I —I 1 I- -1 I I=III=I 11 I I=III—I I —I I
III E1 1—I1I
-
III— FABRIC UNDER STONE =I I E
CROSS SECTION
MAINTENANCE:
ADD ADDITIONAL STONE AND "FLUFF" TOP
DRESSING WITH 2" STONE.
SEE N.C. DEQ EROSION and SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLANNING and DESIGN MANUAL
FOR CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES;
PLANNING CONSIDERATION & DESIGN CRITERIA.

EXISTING GROUND
TIE TO GRADE
H T MIN
GEOTEXI1LE FABRIC
COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL
CLASS II RIP RAP
OR LARGER
H T MIN
1.5 T MIN
NOTES:
1. RIP RAP AND GEOTEXIILE ALONE SHOULD NOT BE USED ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 2H:1V.
2. ON SLOPES BETWEEN 2H:1V AND 1.5H:1V RIP RAP MAY BE BEDED IN 6" OF #57 STONE. CONSULT ENGINEER PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION.
3. THICKNESS OF RIP RAP (T) SHOULD BE NO LESS THAN 1.5 X D50 (APPROXIMATELY 21" FOR CLASS II).
4. DEPTH OF THE TOE SHOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 1.5 X THICKNESS (APPROXIMATELY 30" FOR CLASS II).
5. RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION IS MODIFIED FROM VDH&T AND NCDENR LAND QUALITY SECTION EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL DESIGN MANUAL.
STREAM BANK STABALIZATION

MAINTENANCE: CLEAN OUT AT 50% CAPACITY
LIFE OF FENCING: 6-9 MONTHS
60'0Z-MS
3ON3d (1nIS/1N3WIa3S)
A2iV Od1N31 a2ivaNv1S
37VOS 0110N
MIN. 10 GA.
LINE WIRES
0
0
N
WOVEN WIRE FABRIC
FILL SLOPE
GRADE
MIN SILT FENCE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
SIDE VIEW
VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
♦ ,
♦♦♦♦♦►♦♦♦�♦♦�\
.O♦.�♦♦�♦i
♦,
4,
SILT FENCE FABRIC
INSTALLED TO SECOND
�1•_���_e_���.��������
1♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
#1♦♦♦♦♦'♦♦♦♦
♦•♦, OHOOOP
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
WIRE FROM TOP 64. / iv w��D*vDV*
♦♦♦,•♦♦•• ♦...... ♦'►♦♦♦♦."•♦♦♦•♦♦♦
♦♦♦
D
♦♦♦♦ i♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
w
1111
11`
.1 I I11-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-I
11
11a I -III
FRONT VIEW
-III -III 11
-IJ�`�
II-
11
11 III
1_I
.11
NOTES:
1. FLOW SHALL NOT RUN PARALLEL WITH THE FENCE.
2. END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS TO BE TURNED UPHILL.
3. SEE NC DEQ SEDIMENT DESIGN MANUAL FOR CONSTRUCTION
SPECIFICATIONS, WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES AND PLANNING
CONSIDERATIONS.
4. SILT FENCE SHOULD NOT BE USED ALONE BELOW GRADED
SLOPES GREATER THAN 10' IN HEIGHT.
PLASTIC OR
WIRE TIES
MIN. 12-1/2 GA.
INTERMEDIATE
WIRES
GRADE

PROVIDE HIGH STRENGTH
DOUBLE STITCHED J
TYPE SEAMS
HEAVY DUTY
DIRTBAG 55
OR EQUAL
SEWN IN SPOUT
HIGH STRENGTH STRAPPING
FOR HOLDING HOSE IN PLACE
WATER FLOW
FROM PUMP
OPENING TO ACCOMMODATE
UP TO 4" DISCHARGE HOSE
AGGREGATE UNDERLAYMENT
(3" THICK NCDOT NO. 57 STONE)
i
SEDIMENT DIKE
ACCEPTED DEWATERING DEVICE (SILT BAG) PROVIDE
POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM SILT BAG TO STREAM
FLOW
DISCHARGE HOSES,
DEWATERING PUMP
INTAKE HOSE
CLEAN WATER
DIKE
STREAM
DIVERSION PUMPS
INTAKE HOSE
FLOW
SUMP -HOLE OR POOL
(12"TO 18" DEEP, 2'
DIA.)
DEWATERING BAG NOTES:
1. THE DEWATERING BAG SHALL BE MADE OF NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE WITH
A MIN. SURFACE AREA OF 225 SQUARE FEET.
2, ALL STRUCTURAL SEAMS SHALL BE SEWN WITH A DOUBLE STITCH USING
A DOUBLE NEEDLE MACHINE WITH HIGH STRENGTH THREAD.
3. THE SEAM STRENGTH SHALL WITHSTAND 100 LB/IN USING ASTM D-4884
TEST METHOD.
4. THE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE A 10 OZ NON -WOVEN FABRIC.
5. DISCHARGE FROM THE DEWATERING BAG SHALL BE DIRECTED SUCH THAT
PRE -DISTURBANCE HYDROLOGY IS NOT CHANGED.
DEWATERING BAG
WORK AREA
LENGTH NOT TO EXCEED
THAT WHICH CAN BE
COMPLETED IN ONE DAY
PLAN VIEW
NOTES:
1. SANDBAG DIKES SHALL BE SITUATED AT THE UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM ENDS OF THE
WORK AREA AND STREAM FLOW SHALL BE PUMPED AROUND THE WORK AREA. THE PUMP
SHOULD DISCHARGE INTO A STABLE VELOCITY DISSIPATER CONSTRUCTED OF HP RAP OR
SANDBAGS.
2. WATER FROM THE WORK AREA SHALL BE PUMPED TO A SEDIMENT FILTERING MEASURE
SUCH AS A DEWATERING BASIN, SEDIMENT BAG, OR OTHER ACCEPTED DEVICE. THE
MEASURE SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THE WATER DRAINS BACK INTO THE CHANNEL
BELOW THE DOWNSTREAM SANDBAG DIKE WITHOUT CAUSING OUTLET EROSION BETWEEN
THE SILT BAG AND CHANNEL.
3. AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY, THE DISTURBED CHANNEL SHALL BE MATTED.
4. WHEN REPLACING CULVERTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE SAND BAGS ACROSS THE
ENTIRE DOWNSTREAM FACE OF EACH PIPE TO PREVENT BACKFLOW DURING PUMP AROUND
ACTT VI TI ES.
PUMP AROUND DETAIL

SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND
MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EROSION CONTROL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, SPECIFICALLY
THE SEDIMENT POLLUTION CONTROL ACT OF 1973, AS AMENDED, AND THE LOCAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL ORDINANCES.
THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE OF EVENTS AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE FOR THIS PROJECT AND SHALL APPLY TO ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN
PROJECT LIMITS:
1. INSTALL SILT FENCE, CHECK DAMS, AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AS DEPICTED ON DRAWINGS AND IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS.
2. THE EROSION CONTROL REVIEW AND INSPECTION WILL BE ADDRESSED BY NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES (NCDENR) LAND QUALITY SECTION, NOT THE CITY OF RALEIGH.
3. AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE DISTURBED SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED BY FENCING, FLAGS, SIGNS, ETC.
4. UPON ACCEPTANCE OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, COMMENCE EXCAVATION AND/OR
GRADING ACTIVITIES. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESTRICTED TO A 25 FOOT WIDE AREA FOR EXCAVATION,
EQUIPMENT STAGING ACTIVITIES AND TEMPORARY STOCKPIUNG OF EXCAVATED SOIL ALONG THE LENGTH OF
PIPELINES 4-INCH THROUGH 8-INCH AND 30-FOOT WIDE ALONG THE LENGTH OF PIPELINES 12-INCH
THROUGH 20-INCH. TEMPORARILY STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED UPSLOPE OF THE EXCAVATION.
FOR ANY DEMOLITION OR OTHER ACTIVITIES DESIRED PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF ALL EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, INTERIM MEASURES ACCEPTABLE TO AND PRE -APPROVED BY ENGINEER,
AND NCDENR DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL LAND RESOURCES, LAND QUALITY SECTION MUST BE PROVIDED.
5. LIMIT CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE TRENCH TO THE AMOUNT OF PIPE THAT CAN BE CONSTRUCTED IN
ONE DAY. LIMIT TRENCH EXCAVATION TO THE AMOUNT OF PIPE THAT CAN BE CONSTRUCTED AND
BACKFILLED IN ONE DAY, OR 50 LINEAL FEET, WHICHEVER IS LESS. EXCAVATED TRENCH MATERIAL MUST BE
STOCKPILED UPSLOPE OF THE TRENCH. OPEN TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND STABIUZED AT THE
CESSATION OF EACH WORK DAY. ALL DISTURBED SURFACES MUST RECEIVE TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AT
THE END OF EACH WORK DAY. PROVIDE PUMP FILTER BAGS OR OTHER APPROVED DEWATERING DEVICES
FOR DEWATERING OF TRENCH EXCAVATION AS NEEDED. SOIL SUPPLEMENTS, SEED AND MULCH, IF
APPLICABLE, SHOULD BE APPLIED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE PIPELINE/UTILITY LINE IS CONSTRUCTED.
ANY TEMPORARY ACCESS CONSTRUCTED FOR PIPELINE WORK MUST BE STABILIZED WITH A NON -GRADE
AGGREGATE.
6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TEMPORARY PROTECTION AND PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF
ALL SOIL STOCKPILES ON SITE AS WELL AS SOIL INTENTIONALLY TRANSPORTED FROM THE PROJECT SITE.
INSPECT ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ONCE PER SEVEN DAYS, AND IMMEDIATELY
FOLLOWING ANY RAINFALL OF 0.5" OR MORE IN A 24-HOUR PERIOD. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATIONS ALONG
SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED. THE PROJECT
SUPERINTENDENT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES.
7. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL WILL BE CHECKED REGULARLY FOR UNDERMINING OR DETERIORATION AND
BUILDUP OR CLOGGING WITH SEDIMENT. CORRECTIVE ACTION WILL BE TAKEN IMMEDIATELY.
8. ANY AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE FURTHER GRADED WITHIN A 14-DAY PERIOD, OR WHICH HAVE NOT
BEEN GRADED WITHIN 14 DAYS SHALL BE SEEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:
SITE DESCRIPTON
STABILIZATION TIME
TIMEFRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
DITCHES, AND SLOPES
7 DAYS
NONE
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HQW)
ZONES
7 DAYS
NONE
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN
LENGTH AND ARE NOT STEEPER
THAN 2:1, 14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER
14 DAYS
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN
50' IN LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES
FLATTER THAN 4:1
14 DAYS
NONE, EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND
ZONES
F�2
E&SC Notes

SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES CONTINUED:
9. PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS BY SEEDING AND MULCHING PER THE
STANDARD DETAILS.
10. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO ENSURE THAT A GOOD STAND OF GRASS IS
MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. UPON FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF
COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF THE SITE BY THE ENGINEER AND NCDENR, REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REMOVED. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MEASURES TO BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION OR AFTER MEASURES ARE NO
LONGER NEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY THE LOCAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR.
11. UPON COMPLETION OF PROJECT, THE SELF-INSPECTION/SELF-MONITORING FORMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO
THE ENGINEER FOR CONVEYANCE TO THE OWNER FOR REGULATORY RECORD MAINTENANCE TIME PERIOD.
12. WHERE CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS ROUTES INTERSECT WITH PAVED PUBLIC ROADS, PROVISIONS SHALL
BE MADE TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT ONTO THE PAVED SURFACE. WHERE SEDIMENT IS
TRANSPORTED ONTO A PUBLIC ROAD SURFACE, THE ROAD SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END
OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING, AND
TRANSPORTED TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL DISPOSAL AREA (STREET WASHING SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER
SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER).
13. SITES UTILIZED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE PURPOSE OF STORING EQUIPMENT, EXCESS EXCAVATED
MATERIALS, STRIPPED TOPSOIL, ETC, SHALL BE ENVIRONMENTALLY SUITABLE FOR SUCH PURPOSES AND
SHALL BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE OWNER. ENVIRONMENTALLY SUITABLE SITES SHALL BE LEVEL,
DEVOID OF MATURE STANDS OF TREES, AND ISOLATED FROM DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND FEATURES, WETLANDS
STREAMS, AND STREAM CORRIDORS. SITES SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
REQUIREMENTS OF THE TOWN OF CARY.
14. THE CLEANUP AND DISPOSAL OF EXCESS EXCAVATED MATERIALS SHALL BE DONE AS SOON AS PRACTICAL
AND AS THE OWNER MAY DIRECT.
15. CHECK DAMS, SILT FENCE, OR OTHER FILTERING DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT AREAS OF STOCKPILED
MATERIALS, EXCAVATED AREAS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER STORM WATER INLET STRUCTURES IN
CONSTRUCTION AREAS TO CONTROL SILT RUNOFF.
16. ALL DEWATERING FLOWS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF SILT, SEDIMENT, DEBRIS, AND OTHER POLLUTANTS
THROUGH APPROPRIATE MEANS (SETTLING BASINS, FILTER, ETC.). FOLLOWING THIS, THE FLOWS SHALL ONLY
BE RELEASED DIRECTLY INTO STORM SEWERS, STREAM CHANNELS, TO OTHER STABILIZED DRAINAGE
COURSES AND NOT INTO EXPOSED SOILS, STEEP SLOPES, OR ANY OTHER SITE WHERE FLOWS COULD
CAUSE FURTHER DAMAGE.
17. CUT AND FILL SLOPES ARE TO BE VERTICALLY TRACKED, HORIZONTALLY SCARIFIED, MATTED, OR OTHERWISE
CONSTRUCTED TO ENHANCE VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND EXPEDITE STABILIZATION. SEEDING SHALL BE
INSTALLED AS PORTIONS OF THESE SLOPES ARE COMPLETED.
18. THE EXISTING EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SUCH AS ROCK CHECK DAMS AND RIP RAP ALONG THE NEW
RECLAIMED WATERLINE ROUTE MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED TO FACILITATE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW
RECLAIMED WATERLINE AS SHOWN.
19. IF AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE EXPIRATION OF THE CONTRACT BOND ANY PART OF THE SEEDED AREA IS NOT
IN GOOD CONDITION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FERTILIZE AND RESEED AS OFTEN AS NECESSARY TO GET A
GOOD STAND OF GRASS.
20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT CROSS ANY DITCH WHEN FLOWING WATER IS PRESENT OR DURING WET WEATHER
UNLESS A PUMP AROUND SYSTEM IS PROVIDED DURING INSTALLATION OF PIPELINE (SEE DETAIL).
PRIOR TO CROSSING A DITCH, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP OR CHECK
DAM EXISTS DOWNSTREAM OF CROSSING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PIPELINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER
BACKFIWNG OF PIPELINE, DITCH SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL GRADE AND STABILIZED. USE EXCELSIOR
MATTING OR RIP RAP AS NECESSARY TO STABILIZE THE DITCH. INSPECT DITCHES IMMEDIATELY AFTER WET
WEATHER EVENT FOR STABILIZATION.
21. WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION CAUSES LAND DISTURBANCE OF ANY KIND WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A DITCH, THE
CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL EXCELSIOR MATTING OR RIP RAP AS NECESSARY TO STABILIZE THE DITCH.
22. ALL OPEN CUT CROSSINGS OF DITCHES SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ONE WORK DAY.
23. ALL CHECK DAMS SHOULD APPROPRIATELY FILL THE DITCH THEY ARE PLACED IN, SO THAT DRAINAGE IS
FORCED THROUGH THE STRUCTURE. THE ENGINEER WILL NOTIFY THE CONTRACTOR IN WRITING IF ANY
CHECK DAM IS INSUFFICIENTLY SIZED BASED ON THE ENGINEER'S JUDGEMENT. CONTRACTOR WILL REMEDY
THE PROBLEM WITHIN 3 DAYS.
02
E&SC Notes

SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES CONTINUED:
24. GROUND STABILIZATION SHALL BE ACHIEVED CONSISTENT WITH NC DENR GENERAL PERMIT NCG010000 EFFECTIVE AS OF APRIL
1, 2019. WHERE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE
LAST LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY EXCEPT FOR ALL PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES, AND ALL SLOPES
STEEPER THAN 3:1 (H:V), WHICH SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER
WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
25. IF EXCAVATED SOIL IS PLACED ON ANY ROADWAY PAVEMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL
PROVIDE SAND OR SCREENING FINES ALONG PAVEMENT SURFACE FOR SUFFICIENT REMOVAL OF SEDIMENT.
26.IN THE EVENT THAT SEEDING IS PERFORMED AFTER EXCELSIOR MATTING IS PLACED AS A STABILIZING
FEATURE, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO REMOVE THE MATTING WHEN APPLYING GRASS SEED AND FERTILIZER.
CONTRACTOR MUST REPLACE THE MATTING AT THE END OF EACH DAY TO STABILIZE THE SOILS.
27. SPOIL OR DEBRIS SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN 50' OF STORM DRAINS OR STREAMS.
28. PROVIDE PORTABLE SELF-CONTAINED CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT SYSTEM. ALL CONCRETE TRUCKS WILL
UTILIZE PORTABLE WASHOUT SYSTEM FOR CLEAN OUT. NO CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT WILL BE ALLOWED
TO REACH GROUND, AND NO CONCRETE WASHOUT DEBRIS SHALL BE ALLOWED ON GROUND.
29. REMOVE DEMOLITION DEBRIS FROM SITE ON A DAILY BASIS AND DISPOSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE
REGULATIONS.
30. HYDROSEEDING SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON THIS PROJECT. CRIMPING STRAW MULCH SHALL NOT BE
ALLOWED ON THIS PROJECT.
31. SEED SHALL BE UNIFORMLY BROADCAST AND LIGHTLY CULTIVATED PRIOR TO MULCH AND TACKIFER
OPERATIONS.
32. MULCH AND TACKIFIER OPERATIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF SEEDING.
33. CONTRACTOR STAGING, TEMPORARY STORAGE, LAY DOWN AREAS, AND DIRT PILES SHALL BE WITHIN LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE.
34. OBTAIN AND PAY FOR EROSION CONTROL PERMITS FOR OFF -SITE STORAGE YARD, BORROW AREA, AND
DISPOSAL AREAS AS REQUIRED. INSTALL AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
APPROVED PLAN.
35. A LAYER OF SAND, FINES, OR SCREENINGS SHALL BE PLACED ON PAVED SURFACES BEFORE DEPOSITION
OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL. AFTER REMOVAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL FROM PAVED SURFACES, A MECHANICAL
SWEEPER SHALL BE USED TO REMOVE ALL MATERIAL FROM PAVED SURFACES. PAVED SURFACES SHALL BE
SWEPT ON A DAILY BASIS WITH MATERIAL PLACED ON NON -PAVED SURFACES WITHIN LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE.
36. ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 5:1, DITCHES, PLACE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET IMMEDIATELY AFTER BACKFILL
AND GRADING.
37. NOTIFICATION OF LAND RESOURCES SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL SELF -INSPECTION PROGRAM:
THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT WAS AMENDED IN 2006 TO REQUIRE THAT PERSONS
RESPONSIBLE FOR LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES INSPECT A PROJECT AFTER EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT
TO MAKE SURE THAT THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN IS BEING FOLLOWED.
RULES DETAILING THE DOCUMENTATION OF THESE INSPECTIONS TOOK EFFECT OCTOBER 1, 2010. THE
INSPECTIONS MUST BE CONDUCTED AFTER EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT, AND CONTINUED UNTIL
PERMANENT GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCGS 113A-54.1 AND 15A NCAC
4B.0131. TO SIMPLIFY DOCUMENTATION OF SELF -INSPECTION REPORTS AND NPDES SELF -MONITORING
REPORTS, A COMBINED FORM IS NOW AVAILABLE. THE NEW FORM WAS DEVELOPED TO SATISFY
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT AND THE NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT FOR
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, NCG010000. BEGINNING AUGUST 1, 2013, THE DMSION OF ENERGY, MINERAL,
AND LAND RESOURCES IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTERING BOTH THE SPCA AND THE NPDES STORMWATER
PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, NCG 010000. THE COMBINED FORM SHOULD MAKE IT EASIER TO
COMPLY WITH SELF -INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS. THE COMBINED SELF -MONITORING FORM IS AVAILABLE AS A
PDF AND WORD DOCUMENT FROM THE LAND QUALITY WEB SITE,
HTTP://PORTALNCDENR.ORG/WEB/LR/EROSION. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR CANNOT ACCESS THE FORM,
PLEASE CONTACT THE LAND QUALITY SECTION OF THE RALEIGH DENR OFFICE AT [phone].
02
E&SC Notes

HERBACEOUS PLANTS -Seeding recommendations for primary stabilization
Successful) development depends on planting date (effectiveness goal: 6 mo. - 3 yrs. without an ongoing maintenance program)
NATIVE SPECIES
Table 6.11.c (con't)
Op imal Planting Dates
Common Name
Botanical Name /
Cultivar
Native /
Introduced
See Table
6.11.d for
variety
seedling rates
Fertilization/
limestone
Ibs/acre
Mountains
Piedmont
coastal Sun/Shade
Plains tolerant
Wetlands
Riparian
Buffers
Invasive
Yes or
No
Installation / Maintenance
Considerations
Other information,
commentary
Indiangrass
Sorghastrum nutans/
N
B
By soil test
12/1-4/15
12/1 - 4/1
12/1-4/1 Sun
NR
Well
No
Responds well to controlled
Western coastal plain only
Cheyenne
drained
burns. Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
varieties that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Indiangrass
Sorghastrumnutans/
N
B
By soil test
NR
12/1-5/1
1/1-5/1 Sun
NR
Well
No
Responds well to
Only lndiangrass adaptable to
Lomenta
drained
controlled burns. Mix with
Eastern coastal plain (Zone 8)
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Deertongue
Dichanthelium
N
C
By soil test
5/1-4/15
5/1 - 4/1
NR Sun &
Yes
Poorly
No
Responds well to
clandestinum/Tioga
Shade
drained to
controlled burns. Mix with
drought
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Big Bluestem
Andropogon gerardii /
N
D
By soil test
12/1-4/15
12/1 - 4/1
NR Sun
NR
Weill
No
Responds well to
Warm season grass
Rountree
drained
controlled burns. Mix with
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Big Bluestem
Andropogon gerardii /
N
D
By soil test
12/1-4/15
12/1 - 4/1
NR Sun
NR
Weill
No
Responds well to
Warm season grass
Kaw
drained
controlled burns. Mix with
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Big Bluestem
Andropogon gerardii /
N
D
By soil test
12/1-4/15
12/1 - 4/1
12/1-5/1 Sun
NR
Weill
No
Responds well to
Warm season grass
Earl
drained
controlled burns. Mix with
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Little Bluestem
Schizachyrium
N
E
By soil test
12/1-4/15
NR
NR Sun
NR
Weill
No
Responds well to
Warm season grass
scoparium/Aldous
drained
controlled burns. Mix with
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Little Bluestem
Schizachyrium
N
E
By soil test
12/1-4/15
12/1 - 4/1
NR Sun
NR
Weill
No
Responds well to
Warm season grass
scoparium/Cimmaron
drained
controlled burns. Mix with
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Practice Standards and Specifications

HERBACEOUS PLANTS -Seeding recommendations for primary stabilization
Successful) development depends on planting date (effectiveness goal: 6 mo. - 3 yrs. without an ongoing maintenance program)
NATIVE SPECIES
Table 6.11.c (con't)
Op imal Planting Dates
Common Name
Botanical Name /
Cultivar
Native /
Introduced
See Table
6.11.d for
variety
seedling rates
Fertilization/
limestone
Ibs/acre
Mountains
Piedmont
coastal Sun/Shade
Plains tolerant
Wetlands
Riparian
Buffers
Invasive
Yes or
No
Installation / Maintenance
Considerations
Other information,
commentary
Little Bluestem
Schizachyrium
N
E
By soil test
NR
NR
12/1-4/1 Sun
NR
Weill
No
Responds well to
Warm season grass
scoparium/Common
drained
controlled burns. Mix with
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Sweet Woodreed
Cinna arundinacea
N
F
By soil test
12/1-4/15
12/1 - 4/1
12/1-4/1 Sun &
Yes
Poorly to
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
Warm season grass
mod. Shade
well drained
varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Rice Cutgrass
Leersia oryzoides
N
G
By soil test
12/1-4/15
12/1 - 4/1
12/1-4/1 Sun
Yes
Poorly
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
Warm season grass.
drained
varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Indian Woodoats
Chasmanthium latifolium
N
H
By soil test
3/1 - 5/15
2/15 - 4/1
2/15-3/20 Sun &
NR
Well
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
Cool season grass
7/15-8/15
3/15 - 10/1 `9/1
- 11/1 mod. Shade
drained
varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Virginia Wild Rye
Elymus virginicus
N
I
By soil test
3/1 - 5/15
2/15 - 4/1
2/15-3/20 Sun &
NR
Well
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
Cool season grass
7/15-8/15
3/15- 10/1`9/1
- 11/1 mod. Shade
drained
varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Eastern Bottlebrush
Elymus hystrix
N
J
By soil test
3/1 - 5/15
2/15 - 4/1
NR. Sun &
NR
Well
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
Cool season grass
Grass
7/15-8/15
3/15 - 10/15 mod. Shade
drained
varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Soft Rush
Juncus effusus
N
K
By soil test
12/1 - 5/15
12/1 - 5/1
12/1-4/15 Sun
Yes
Poorly
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
8/15-10/15.
9/1 - 11/1
drained
varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Shallow Sedge
Carex lurida
N
L
By soil test
12/1 - 5/15
12/1 - 5/1
12/1-4/15 Sun
Yes
Poorly
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
8/15-10/15
9/1 - 11/1
drained
varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Fox Sedge
Carex vulpinoidea
N
L
By soil test
12/1 - 5/15
12/1 - 5/1
12/1-4/15 Sun
Yes
Poorly
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
8/15-10/15
9/1 - 11/1
drained
varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
NOTE:
1. Seeding rates are for hulled seed unless otherwise noted.
2. Fertilizer & Limestone - rates to be applied in absense of soils tests. Recommended application rate assumes significantly disturbed site soils with little or no residual value.
3. NR means Species not recommended for this region or application area.
4. Native, warm season grasses require six or more months to germinate under optimum conditions. If they are planted in the summer, then a whole y ear will have to pass before they germinate.
5. Invasive designation as determined by the N.C. Exotic Pest Pant Council and N.C. Native Plant Society .
6. Sprigging is not recommended for immediate stabilization unless terrain is flat, heavymulch is applied and no other immediate stabilization method is practical.
7. Sodding for immediate stabilization - see primary stabilization charts (other information column) and Section 6.12.
8. Long term stabilization can only be accomplished with an adequate, immediate, and primary stabilization program. To achieve long term protective cover with the species listed in
this chart, the approved plan, construction sequence and maintenance schedule must include sufficient detail to assure vegetation will be established and maintained. To assure the
long term protective cover will be established, the reviewing and approving governing body may require a performance/maintenance bond.

Practice Standards and Specifications
Table 6.11.d
Seed Mixes for Native Species (Ibs/ac)
When Mixed with 3, 4, or 5 Other Native Species
(See Table 6.11.a for nurse crop species to be added to these mixes)
3 Other
(total 4 species)
4 Other
(total 5 species)
5 Other
(total 6 species)
Switch Grasses (A)
3.5 Ibs.
3.0 Ibs.
2.5 Ibs.
Indian Grasses (B)
7.0 Ibs.
6.0 Ibs.
5.0 Ibs.
Deertongue (C)
6.0 Ibs.
5.0 Ibs.
4.0 Ibs.
Big Bluestem (D)
7.0 Ibs.
6.0 Ibs.
5.0 Ibs.
Little Bluestem (E)
7.0 Ibs.
6.0 Ibs.
5.0 Ibs.
Sweet Woodreed (F)
2.5 Ibs.
2.0 Ibs.
1.5 Ibs.
Rice Cutgrass (G)
6.0 Ibs.
5.0 Ibs.
4.0 Ibs.
Indian Woodoats (H)
2.5 lbs.
2.0 lbs.
1.5 lbs.
Virginia Wild Rye (I)
6.0 Ibs.
5.0 Ibs.
4.0 Ibs.
Eastern Bottlebrush Grass (J)
2.5 Ibs.
2.0 Ibs.
1.5 Ibs.
Soft Rush (K)
2.5 Ibs.
2.0 Ibs.
1.5 Ibs.
Sedges (L)
2.5 Ibs.
2.0 Ibs.
1.5 Ibs.
NOTE:
With the native varieties, the seed mix should be in the range of 15 pounds per acre.
Depending on availability of native seeds adaptable to North Carolina, the percentage
of a particular variety used may be reduced or increased accordingly. Although
diversity is desirable, it is imperative that the primary crop develop and become an
effective protective cover. In addition to the native species mix, additional nurse crop
species must be included to provide immediate stabilization and an adequate ground cover.
Rev. 5/08
6.11.19

IPaC
Report

12/1/22, 5:18 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced
below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but
that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust
resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species
surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to
each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that
section.
Location
Wake County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
[phone]
iter
MAILING ADDRESS
IDnet (lffirc Rnv ' 27°)t^
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EM IG7WGW2VBO5I DVJH I5U3TEXA/resources
1/14

12/1/22, 5:18 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
1 VJl Vll I'.. UV/. JJ/ LV
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EMIG7WGW2VBO51DVJH15U3TEXA/resources 2/14

12/1/22, 5:18 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis
of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in
that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at
the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this
list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often
required.+ k
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from
either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field
office directly. 0
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Login (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species1 and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries?).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for
more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EMIG7WGW2VBO51DVJHI5U3TEXA/resources 3/14

12/1/22, 5:18 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
Birds
Proposed Endangered
NAME STATUS
..• A.
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. '
Wherever found 11‘
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
Wherever found +►
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
V
Fishes
STATUS
Threatened
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME
Endangered
STATUS
https://ipac.ecosphere.iws.gov/location/EMIG7WGW2VBO51DVJHI5U3TEXA/resources 4/14

12/1/22, 5:18 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Insects
Threatened
Endangered
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
S\3
STATUS
Endangered
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.'and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Acts.
https://ipac.ecosphere.iws.gov/location/EMIG7WGW2VBO51DVJHI5U3TEXA/resources 5/14

12/1/22, 5:18 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation'
measures.pdf Namor
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see
exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around
your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional
maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your
list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other
important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EMIG7WGW2VB051DVJHI5U3TEXA/resources 6/14

12/1/22, 5:18 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Black -billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9399
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 15 to Oct 10
Breeds Apr 28 to Jul 20
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
https://ipac.ecosphere.iws.gov/location/EMIG7WGW2VBO51DVJHI5U3TEXA/resources 7/14

12/1/22, 5:18 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and
understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before
using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence
at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of
presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort (:)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EMIG7WGW2VBO51DVJHI5U3TEXA/resources 8/14

12/1/22, 5:18 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Black -billed
Cuckoo
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Cerulean
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Kentucky
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird
BCC - BCR
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
IIII IIIIIIIIIIIHHIIIIIIIIIHHIIIIi
++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ -1 I I I I I I I I+ I I I I I I I I 1 I I #4 I C I +i i+++
11.°C.:t>%‘‘
lvtAto
III+++I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I11 11111 l I I I I I I I III I
+Id 111111111 1111 1 1 1 I ++*+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII-
�+++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +III 11 IIII IIII I +++ +++I 1111 +00+
+++ ++++ ++II I I I I I I I I I I I I 11111111111111111111
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EMIG7WGW2VBO51DVJHI5U3TEXA/resources 9/14

12/1/22, 5:18 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds
are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of
Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity
you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.••
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and
citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps
provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird
on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
https://ipac.ecosphere.iws.gov/location/EM IG7WGW2VBO51 DVJH I5U3TEXA/resources
10/14

12/1/22, 5:18 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in
the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data
Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to
you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
141
What if I have eagles on my list?,,
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what
other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory
birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability
of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project
footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black
vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is
the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as
more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a
lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look
for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to
avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn
https://ipac.ecosphere.iws.gov/location/EMIG7WGW2VBO51DVJHI5U3TEXA/resources 11/14

12/1/22, 5:18 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement
to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources
page.
Coastal Barrier Resources System
Projects within the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) may be subject
to the restrictions on Federal expenditures and financial assistance and the consultation
requirements of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) (16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). For more
information, please contact the local Ecological Services Field Office or visit the CBRA
Consultations website. The CBRA website provides tools such as a flow chart to help
determine whether consultation is required and a template to facilitate the consultation --
process. ,Y
There are no known coastal barriers at this location. 41#4C
Data limitations
,e‘
The CBRS boundaries used in IPaC are representations of the controlling boundaries, which are depicted
on the official CBRS maps. The boundaries depicted in this layer are not to be considered authoritative for
in/out determinations close to a CBRS boundary (i.e., within the "CBRS Buffer Zone" that appears as a
hatched area on either side of the boundary). For projects that are very close to a CBRS boundary but do
not clearly intersect a unit, you may contact the Service for an official determination by following the
instructions here: https://www.fws.gov/service/coastal-barrier-resources-system-property-documentation
Data exclusions .+
V`
CBRS units extend seaward out to either the 20- or 30-foot bathymetric contour (depending on the location
of the unit). The true seaward extent of the units is not shown in the CBRS data, therefore projects in the
offshore areas of units (e.g., dredging, breakwaters, offshore wind energy or oil and gas projects) may be
subject to CBRA even if they do not intersect the CBRS data. For additional information, please contact
CBRA@ fws.gov.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EMIG7WGW2VBO51DVJHI5U3TEXA/resources 12/14

12/1/22, 5:18 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI) \\P** 4\i
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes
4
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District. % "
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to
determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
RIVERINE
R4SBC
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory
website
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether
wetlands occur. Additional information on the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular
site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/EMIG7WGW2VB051DVJHI5U3TEXA/resources 13/14

12/1/22, 5:18 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted
on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or
products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should
seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory
programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
https://ipac.ecosphere.iws.gov/location/EMIG7WGW2VBO51DVJHI5U3TEXA/resources 14/14

NCNHP
Report

Roy Cooper, Governor
■ ■■■■
■ :I • NC DEPARTMENT OF
■ om NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
snows
December 1, 2022
Jessica Tisdale
HDR
555 Fayetteville Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: City of Raleigh Sanitary Sewer Repairs for 2901 Sandia Drive
Dear Jessica Tisdale:
D_ Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-20163
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
City of Raleigh Sanitary Sewer Repairs for 2901 Sandia Drive
December 1, 2022
NCNHDE-20163
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner
Damselfly
Vascular Plant 38697 Cyperus virens
Vascular Plant 6342 Thermopsis mollis
Green Flatsedge
Appalachian Golden -
banner
Observation
Date
2004-Pre
1897-07
1956-05-01
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner
City of Raleigh Greenway City of Raleigh
City of Raleigh Greenway - House Creek Greenway City of Raleigh
City of Raleigh Greenway - House Creek Greenway City of Raleigh
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh
City of Raleigh Open Space - Beckana City of Raleigh
City of Raleigh Open Space - George F Marshall City of Raleigh
Memorial Park
City of Raleigh Open Space - Glen Eden Pilot Park
City of Raleigh Open Space - Laurel Hills Park
City of Raleigh Open Space - Ridge Neighborhood
Park
City of Raleigh Open Space - Windemere Beaver
Dam Park
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property - Raleigh
City of Raleigh Easement
City
City
City
of
of
of
Raleigh
Raleigh
Raleigh
City of Raleigh
NC DPS, Division of Emergency
Management
City of Raleigh
Occurrence
Rank
H?
H
H
Accu racy
5-Very
Low
5-Very
Low
4-Low
Federal
Status
Owner Type
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
State
Local Government
State Global State
Status Rank Rank
Significantly
Rare
Special
Concern
Vulnerable
Significantly
Rare
Throughout
G5 S2?
G5 S1
G3G4 S2
Page 2 of 4

Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
City of Raleigh Easement City of Raleigh Local Government
Triangle Land Conservancy Easement Triangle Land Conservancy Private
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.orq/help. Data query generated on December 1, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q3, October 2022.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-20163: City of Raleigh Sanitary Sewer Repairs for 2901 Sandia Drive
h Army
Guartk
W�
5
Tysonville
UNC Rex
Healthcare
485 jt
a
ce
v
rn
a
3
-Co
Harden Rd
Lake e
0
b
cr
tJ�
70
Vick Ave
9-a
ae
�e
Runny
Win
Be
Lewis
am
70
Glenwosd
Village
Carolina
Country Club
0.25a 0.5 1 Miles,403h
1 I 1 I I I 1
December 1, 2022
Managed Area (MAREA)
n Buffered Project Boundary
n Project Boundary
Sources: Esri, Airbus DS. USGS, NGA NASA, CG-AR. N Robinson, NCEAS,
NLS, OS. NMA, Geodatastyrelsen, Rpkswaterstaat, GSA, Geoland, FEMA,
Intermap and :he GIS user community
Sources: Esri. HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS. © OpenS:ree:Map
contributors, and the GIS User Community
Page 4 of 4

Pre -filing
Meeting
Request

Murphy, Michael
From: Murphy, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 3:09 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: 2901 Sandia Drive / 3408 Hampton Road / 3550 Horton Drive / 3408 Lake Boone Trail /
3608 Kemble Ridge
Good afternoon,
I am emailing you today to request 4 pre -filing meetings regarding areas where the City of Raleigh must perform a repair
on the sewer collection system, please let me know if you require any other information and we will continue forward
with our ePCN applications.
Thank you,
Michael Murphy
Water/ Wastewater EIT
HDR
555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 900
Raleigh, NC 27601-3034
D 919.985.8947
[e-mail]
hdrinc.com/follow-us
1

Agent
Authorization

DocuSign Envelope ID: CD1 E3F04-A347-437F-8ADE-D6FFA5EDF5A1
F�2
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
I, Acting Director of Public Utilities, Whit Wheeler, representing the City of Raleigh hereby certify that I have authorized Jessica
Tisdale, representing HDR (HDR) of the Carolinas, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing and
issuance of the Section 404/401 permits and associated regulatory forms for Sanitary Sewer Repair projects located in Wake
County, North Carolina.
We hereby certify that the information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge.
Whit Wheeler, PE Jessica Tisdale
Applicant's Name Agent's Name
�DocuSigned by:
63607D23CE4C474...
Applicant's Signature Agent's Signature
1 / 10/2022 1/6/2022
Date Date
hd rinc.com
555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 900, Raleigh NC 27601
T 919.232.6654 F 919.785.1187