20221683 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20221128

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
10/13/2022
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20221683 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required Reviewing Office*
Fee received Winston-Salem Regional Office - (336) 776-
Fee needed - send electronic notification 9800
Select Project Reviewer*
Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood:[e-mail]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
COURTESY COPY Bethany Townes
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Sean Clark
1 b. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
11/28/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Little Alamance Creek (Gant Lake, Mays Lake)
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C;NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
36.0394 -79.3950
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Alamance
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 18 - Minor Discharges
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Clay Pigeon Properties, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB 4165, DP 0637 / DB 4166, DP0071
2c. Contact Person:
Mitchell Murphy
2d. Address
Street Address
PO Box 90427
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal /Zip Code
27676
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Kim Hamlin
4b. Business Name:
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
3707 Swift Drive
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27606
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Bethany Townes
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Graham
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
8883-33-2545, 8883-33-2335 & 8883-23-6448
2c. Project Address
Street Address
1501 & 1505 South Main Street
Address Line 2
City
Graham
Postal / Zip Code
27253
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Little Alamance Creek (Gant Lake, Mays Lake)
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300020309
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
9.03
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The Site is comprised of three adjacent parcels. Two parcels are adjacent to South Main Street, and the third parcel is adjacent to Forest Drive. The two parcels adjacent to South Main
Street each contain a single-family residential home with a large, maintained lawn/field in the eastern portion and southern portion. The northwestern portion of the Site contains a forested
area with a hardwood canopy and interspersed pines. The topography of the Site ranges from a high point at the eastern Site boundary adjacent to South Main Street of +/- 585 feet above
mean sea level (msl), to a low point of +/- 535 feet msl along the western boundary where the drainage exits the Site.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.14
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
300
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of the project is to construct a residential subdivision with associated utilities and roads to meet the demand for housing in this area.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The project proposes to construct a residential townhouse subdivision that will tie into existing utilities adjacent to the site. Access to the Site will be provided by connection to existing
South Main Street along the eastern boundary. One stormwater basin (SCM) is proposed in the center of the site along the northern property boundary. Typical equipment used to
construct residential developments and utilities will be utilized including backhoes, tractors, excavators, and dump trucks. Proposed permanent wetland impacts total XX acre for lot fill and
grading. XX acre of permanent wetland impact is also proposed for construction of an SCM. Proposed temporary stream impacts total XX LF (XX sf) for dewatering to construct the
sewerline. Riparian buffer impacts are also proposed, and will be authorized by the City of Graham, the local delegated authority.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2021-02654
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
Mr. David Gainey
Sage Ecological Services, Inc. (Sage)
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1A
Lot Fill
P
Seep
WB-2
Yes
Corps
0.011
(acres)
W1B
Grading/Sidewalk
P
Seep
WB-2
Yes
Corps
0.009
(acres)
W2
SCM
P
Headwater Forest
WB-1
Yes
Corps
0.010
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.030
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.030

2i. Comments:
Proposed permanent impacts due to lot fill, grading, and construction of an SCM total 0.03 acre. No temporary wetland impacts are proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
si
TS1 - Sewerline installation
Temporary
Dewatering
SA
Intermittent
Corps
5
Average (feet)
37
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
0
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
37
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
37
3j. Comments:
Proposed temporary stream impacts total 37 LF (387 SF, 0.008 ac) due to dewatering to construct the sewerline.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
A wetland, stream, and riparian buffer delineation were performed to locate sensitive areas on the site prior to site design. The proposed sewerline
crossing is aligned to cross the stream channel as perpendicularly as possible, and no permanent stream impacts are proposed. Lots were positioned to
avoid fill in wetlands, streams and buffers where practicable. Stormwater outfalls were designed to minimize impacts to riparian areas. The location of
the SCM was chosen due to the natural drainage of the Site toward the northwest. Shifting the SCM farther west would have resulted in more stream
and riparian buffer impacts. This would have also prevented construction of the proposed sewerline which is connecting to existing adjacent sewerlines
along Forest Drive.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Equipment
will be parked and cleaned in uplands away from jurisdictional areas. Work within jurisdictional areas will be conducted during periods when dry weather
is predicted, and large bare areas of soil will be reseeded and protected as soon as practicable. Silt fencing and sediment basins will also be used to
prevent sediment runoff into the stream and wetland areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Proposed impacts to wetlands and streams is below mitigable thresholds. Proposed riparian buffer impacts are either "Deemed Allowable" or "Allowable Upon Authorization."
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre

2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of Graham
Comments:
The stormwater management plan will be reviewed and approved by the locally delegated authority. The applicant requests the 401 Certification approval be conditioned to require the
stormwater management plan be approved before any impacts may be conducted.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Per the NC DWQ April 2004 Version 2.1 Cumulative Impacts policy, small scale residential development projects have a "low potential for cumulative
impact" since the project already in a developed landscape (i.e., existing residences and development in the vicinity) and the area already contains the
necessary infrastructure (i.e., sewer, water, electricity, etc.). The project drains to Little Alamance Creek, which is Class C; Nutrient Sensitive Waters
(NSW), (i.e., not HQW or ORW). We anticipate the NCDWR will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative analysis is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
The project proposes to tie into existing sewerlines adjacent to the site.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No

5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Per the NCNHP database report (November 2, 2022) there are no threatened or endangered species on or within 1.0 mile of the Site. The USFWS IPaC
report indicates that only the monarch butterfly is potentially listed for the Site. Habitat for monarch butterfly is present on the site in the open, maintained
areas; however, Candidate species are not currently afforded protection under the ESA. Therefore, a biological conclusion is not required for this
species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
The Project is located in Alamance County which does not support Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The Site is not listed as a historic property or within a historic district. Six properties are listed within 1.0 mile of the Site based on a query of the GIS files
from NCSHPO. One property is designated as "Surveyed Only (SO)," and the remaining five properties are designated as "SO -Gone." Figure 4 located
provides a graphical representation of this site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC FEMA Flood Map Service
Panel 3710888300K, effective on 11/17/2017
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
NWP18 Request - SAW-2021-02654 - Alamance Co - Bethany Townes - Sage Project #2020.105.pdf 5.62MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1 — USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3 — PJD Sketch Map
Figure 4 — NCSHPO Map
NCNHP Database Report
USFWS IPaC Report
SAW-2021-02654 PJD Submittal Receipt email
Riparian Buffer Determination Letter — City of Graham
401 Pre -File Email
Impact Maps
ORM Spreadsheet
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Kimberly Hamlin
Signature
Date
11/28/2022

SAGE
%W-1
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
EST.
2016
November 28, 2022
US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regulatory Office 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Mr. Chris Hopper Attn: Ms. Sue Homewood
3331 Heritage Trade Dr., Ste. 105 450 W Hanes Mill Road
Wake Forest, NC 27587 Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Re: Bethany Townes
SAW-2021-02654
Request for NWP 18 & GC4249 (Courtesy copy)
Sage Project #2020.105
On behalf of Clay Pigeon Properties, LLC (c/o Mitchell Murphy) (owner and applicant), please find attached
a complete application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) that the activities associated with the proposed Bethany Townes (Project)
may proceed under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 18. A courtesy copy of this application is being provided to
the NC Division of Water Resource (NCDWR) because the proposed permanent wetland impacts and
temporary stream impacts are below notification thresholds. Proposed riparian buffer impacts will be
authorized through the City of Graham.
Project Purpose and Location
The purpose of the project is to construct a residential subdivision with associated utilities and roads to
meet the demand for housing in this area. The +/-9.03-acre Site (NC PINs: 8883-33-2545, 8883-33-2335
& 8883-23-6448) is located at 1501 and 1505 South Main Street in Graham, Alamance County, NC. The
coordinates of 36.0394°N, 79.3950°W generally correspond to the center of the Site. The Site is located in
the piedmont region of NC and within the Jordan Lake watershed of the Cape Fear River Basin.
Project Detail
The project proposes to construct a residential townhouse subdivision that will tie into existing utilities
adjacent to the site. Access to the Site will be provided by connection to existing South Main Street along
the eastern boundary. Water and wastewater will be provided by connection to existing lines adjacent to
the site. One stormwater basin (SCM) is proposed in the center of the site along the northern property
boundary. Typical equipment used to construct residential developments and utilities will be utilized
including backhoes, tractors, excavators, and dump trucks.
Per the NCNHP database report (November 2, 2022) there are no threatened or endangered species on
orwithin 1.0 mile of the Site. The USFWS IPaC report indicates that only the monarch butterfly is potentially
listed for the Site. Habitat for monarch butterfly is present on the site in the open, maintained areas;
however, Candidate species are not currently afforded protection under the ESA. Therefore, a biological
conclusion is not required for this species.
The Site is not listed as a historic property or within a historic district. Six properties are listed within 1.0
mile of the Site based on a query of the GIS files from NCSHPO. One property is designated as "Surveyed
Bethany Townes Page 1 of 3

Only (SO)," and the remaining five properties are designated as "SO -Gone." Figure 4 located provides a
graphical representation of this site.
Protect History
The Site is comprised of three adjacent parcels. Two parcels are adjacent to South Main Street, and the
third parcel is adjacent to Forest Drive. The two parcels adjacent to South Main Street each contain a single-
family residential home with a large, maintained lawn/field in the eastern portion and southern portion. The
northwestern portion of the Site contains a forested area with a hardwood canopy and interspersed pines.
The topography of the Site ranges from a high point at the eastern Site boundary adjacent to South Main
Street of +/- 585 feet above mean sea level (msl), to a low point of +/- 535 feet msl along the western
boundary where the drainage exits the Site. Land use in the vicinity includes urban and suburban
residences, undeveloped, forested land, and land used for timber.
A wetland, stream, and riparian buffer delineation was performed on the Site by Sage Ecological Services,
Inc. (Sage) in December 2020. A request for a preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) was submitted
on December 15, 2021. A verification has not been received as of the date of this application. A riparian
buffer determination was issued on March 21, 2022, by the City of Graham.
Avoidance and Minimization
A wetland, stream, and riparian buffer delineation were performed to locate sensitive areas on the site prior
to site design. The proposed sewer line crossing is aligned to cross the stream channel as perpendicularly
as possible, and no permanent stream impacts are proposed. Lots were positioned to avoid fill in wetlands,
streams and buffers where practicable. Stormwater outfalls were designed to minimize impacts to riparian
areas. The SCM was designed to be large enough to accommodate the anticipated stormwater flows on
the Project and to meet the design standards outlined by the municipality. The location of the SCM was
chosen due to the natural drainage of the Site toward the northwest. Shifting the SCM farther west would
have resulted in more stream and riparian buffer impacts. This would have also prevented construction of
the proposed sewerline which is connecting to existing adjacent sewerlines along Forest Drive.
Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional
impacts. Silt fencing will be installed to provide additional protection from stormwater runoff.
General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent
any accidental additional impacts. Equipment will be parked and cleaned in uplands away from jurisdictional
areas. Work within jurisdictional areas will be conducted during periods when dry weather is predicted, and
large bare areas of soil will be reseeded and protected as soon as practicable. Silt fencing and sediment
basins will also be used to prevent sediment runoff into the stream and wetland areas.
Project Impacts
Proposed permanent wetland impacts total 0.02 acre for lot fill and grading. 0.01 acre of permanent wetland
impact is also proposed for construction of an SCM. Proposed temporary stream impacts total 37 LF (387
sf, 0.008 ac) for dewatering to construct the sewer line. Riparian buffer impacts are also proposed, and will
be authorized by the City of Graham, the local delegated authority.
Mitigation
Proposed permanent impacts to wetlands and streams are below mitigable thresholds. Proposed riparian
buffer impacts will be authorized by the City of Graham, however, buffer impacts are either "Deemed
Allowable" or "Allowable Upon Authorization."
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Respectfully submitted:
4/4
Kim Hamlin, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
can Clark, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Bethany Townes Page 2 of 3

Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1 — USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3 — PJD Sketch Map
Figure 4 — NCSHPO Map
NCNHP Database Report
USFWS IPaC Report
SAW-2021-02654 PJD Submittal Receipt email
Riparian Buffer Determination Letter— City of Graham
401 Pre -File Email
Impact Maps
ORM Spreadsheet
Bethany Townes Page 3 of 3

SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
EST, 2016
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner or Legal Representative
Name: Clay Pigeon Properties LLC
Address: PO Box 90427
Raleigh NC 27675
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Project Name/Description: Bethany Towns
Sage Project 9 2020.105
Date: 12-15-21
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. BOX 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, the owner or a duly authorized representative of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. I also hereby designate and authorize Sage Ecological Services to act on my behalf as my
agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by Sage staff. Please contact Sage to arrange a meeting
prior to visiting the site. Cla Pi eon Pro erties LLC
y 9 P
By: Mitchell Murphy, managing member By: �j--
Print Name of Landowner or Signature o andowner or
Legal Representative Legal Representative

iviap L-vcanvn
ROCKINGHAM CASWELL PERSON
GUILFORD ALAMA NCE II ORANGE
RANDOLPH CHATHAM
WAKE
00
Project Study Area
USGS Topo Map Figure 1
Bethany Towns
Sage Project # 2020.105
N SAGE
Burlington, NC Quadrangle
USGS Topography, December 2013 SERVICES
Map Prepared by: Philip Beach . T
December 10, 2020
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
0 1,000 2,000 Office: 919-335-6757
Feet Cell: 919-559-1537

iviap L-vcanvn
ROCKINGHAM I CASWELL I PERSON
GUILFORD iALAMA NCEi ORANGE
RANDOLPH I CHATHAM I
WAKE
NRCS Soils Map
Bethany Towns
Sage Project # 2020.105
N
Alamance County Soil Survey,1960
Sheet # 18 and 19
Map Prepared by: Philip Beach
December 10, 2020
0 350 700
Feet
Figure 2
SERVICES
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

fit"1 J
jj
I�•ti r f4 ti
r NOTE: Location, shape and size of
y. r
_
depicted features on the evaluated
site are approximate and should be
k� surveyed by a licensed NC
,n
NIS'
q f�
�,i Ip. ' r � lg% CIA f__ �;,• � r �,.
Potential Non- A
the US
'R • • . - 11
A r
•try,'.'.the US ,
. 11 Potential Non -wetland -��
- - �!•� - Waters of the USy'
e.SAB-2Aft
00 3
f � Potentabl Wetland � �,"�� e- •
tA
rl '��� Waters of the�USV
�a: '7' * Potential Wetland
1. WA240005ac..!"- v-
c�, Waters of In US
�� .ili �tPK sat •ya'4w x s - WA-1 -U.095 ac.
, T7
r
"' �L r
,�"¢ Pot ential etl
Wand
`.*Potential Wetland x u2rk y w hF j Waters 0.02 of the US
Waters of the US WB-2 - ac.
, „�, • -WB 1 - 0. 12 ack
4e
4
P; w
a �
�',r• a C� r ••.•Y 1e�i � �: Mf. �.d�.� iat .
M
rI} it •4 �: ,0.
� � •�T,. .�' '-er 1E 'yJ: it b� i..'..
Legend
QProject Study
Potent al Nonce,tl,nd
• Potentel No —fl nd
= Potentel wenend
ap I-ocauon
ALA • CE ORANGE
CHATHAM
r � �
y � •y�
• S� �� a
-
W � 4
t d
'q NCE GIs Unit, Nd OneMap,tNCm tenter foFGeo r p •r dI Bo rd
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination N Figure 3
Bethany Towns
Sage Project # 2020.105 Drawn By:
David Gainey
November 30, 2021
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
0 75 150 Cell: 919-559-1537
Feet

Map Preparers P. Beach
Data Source: NC SHPO GIS Shapefiles
.t h
Downloaded on October 6, 2020
�0 4pC
https://vmm..ncdcr.gov/aboutthistory/division-historical-
reso urces/g is-maps-and-data#gis-data-down load
rL
4e
4
Sr
} �w
EaStWay Ln
a
Rd
Mentree Ct
`Tefi i
t
Corwin a C k.-yl 0,
w
r
fi
`Hla
'gt
O�
br
p0C
�a
Flounce $
Cornelia
Of
c
r Webster Rd Vt�
,6 arirl .-,91
❑
c
i �•� 4f House (Gone)
4 O AM2430 House(Gone)
�a
p
r
vp ♦42
�o4c
-
Nina 0r
J
Elijah or
GQuackenbush
ComTech
(Gone)
Nay noke Or
'>•
House (Original site) AM2436
ran o
AM0545
Rumar St
n mo
c
Amos Ln
iAvc
'` �O S[a a�,sdalr R(,r
•`'
C
a
L
t Attu
k nn
Gte u
�'"
o
J
•.
n iPn
F
.z4 Y
prep �a ��dgccresS Si �
N b�d�
w 4
oCm
y
O
o 0. ;
of+Ory ��r Dag'Nopd
Ty
d' �,o
�.] South so
Graham Fork 7
i ftd•,
Thompson
Curtis and Rogers Mill (Gone)
AM0357 n
E
Q
dtatd plagra4n
4
�00 `
rrr
nr�•7 i •-
Wildwood Ln
Q,r
e
li
i � L7 Gtand�iew ❑r
a
d
\t,
•'
2
n Dr
Sao
`40
1
�
a
4
Q-
CG
�+
Gorge Curtis/Judge Ruffin
AM0117
House OldESI
Y
U pl.
'YW
A f
An
r w
�° 0,01
Project Study Area
4.
1-Mile Project Buffer
(a
��
4
b
0 Surveyed Only Property
Mall 71a G.f
via°aJ
0 Surveyed Only Property - Gone
O` 45hbr rk
a.
v
iviap Location
ROCKINGHAM CASWELL PERSON
GUILFORD ALAMANCE ORANGE
RANDOLPH CHATHAM
WAKE
NCSHPO Map
Bethany Towns
Sage Project # 2020.105
Map Prepared by: Philip Beach
December 10, 2020
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
N
Figure 4
SERVICES
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

Roy Cooper, Governor
9" 0 INC DEPARTMENT OF
""i ■
WMk.M 1 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■-000
November 2, 2022
Kim Hamlin
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE: Bethany Townes; 2020.105
Dear Kim Hamlin:
13. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
041011 .1D1M111901.1101
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 1N. JON S STREET, RALEIGI I_ NC 27603 - 16Sl MAOL SERVICE CENTER. PAL EIGH. rkc 276�0
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAK 919.707.9421

/
»
\
CO%
/ CO 3
>
\\
\
/
o e e
? ® 9
\
CO
\
/
t
3 / CO e
°
CO� LF CO
/
g/ \2
/
®
\
�
\
/
\/
}
E)
CO\/
3:
/\
2
/s
»
t
t
G }
E
E
3/
}
>
/ 4
eE
®)
g
= o
ze
%
\/
`
\ \
© \
\
/
E CO
u
\ \
/
u
\
/\
\\\
\
» _±
cn
%
3
±
» \ m ®
J
4 e
e 2
- -
3\
g/
»
\\/
\.z
=4o a
=
/\
`/~ ®
» ±
)(
x %m
\ \
CO \ \ \ \
CO
\ E
m� 2
< a e o m
\ E
Tt.\/e
ƒ®//®\
\
CO
_
\
L
.\
<
%
<
®
x
M
c
u
t
/
\
_
2
\
Z
m
0E
2
±
g
C
/
\\
\
/
/
m
3
/
E
`°
.§/ CO
CO
`
�}
\
E
CO
D
/
\
y g
\
\uCO
y
/
�\
CO
E
\
\
CO
u
CO
}
a)=
H
» e \
_
2
O
/
i
-\
\
E e
\ CO CO\
CO
\
\
CO
.(\
\
®
2
\\ >
t
ƒ
E
E
}
\E
\
=
E.± o
m
§
\
CO
-
2
_
// /
=
<
g
z�
10
/
n
\
\
co0\
Ln
\
E
2
/
\
\ /
\�
`
^
\
\\
§
COLn
CO
/
E
_ \
� /
/ g
/
<
\
/
Z E �
(
\
\ /
©
� \
\/ z
CO
s
s CO
z
z\
.0
E } /
®
CO
7 »
/ >
E §
/ \
/
/
/
\
/ \
<
< \
/
§
\
/

&$
¢k 2
z'rZ"
M —A
: 2g|
X �a!
\
s
_
/
(
\ 0
R � m
§ \ ]
\
co
/
/ m / /
/
0El El2

IPaC
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
WaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust
resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project
area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project
may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -
specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the
defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS
Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Alamance County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Servicesr
o
[phone]-
l(
JEJ [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
CP

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence
(AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected
by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may
indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can
change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects
to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species
which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted,
permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement
can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or
from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official speci
list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST. 00(
Listed species! and their critical habitats are managed by the Eco o ical Services Program of the Ut Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries?).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction. 14
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or
proposed, for listing. See the Listing status pag-e for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see
FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
Wherever found
N'o critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https7//ecos.f\Ns.gov/ecpLpecies/9743
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act?.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats
should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.

1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern fps://www.fws.gcov/pL gram/migr ry it / pecies
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing=
incidental -take -migratory -birds
Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-
conservation-measures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and
how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every
bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds
in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on
your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and
abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important
information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory
birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to
be present and breeding in your project area. s
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus reeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attentio Xe
of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certainty s of
development or activities.
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) througho its an in t continental USA and
Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus<2.4k* Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica di color Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
11111.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary

The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This
information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you
read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret
this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular
week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The
survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was
detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and
the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the
probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability
of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of
any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values
fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breads across its entire range. If there are no
yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1) R
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the
10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
w
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is
areas off the Atlancoast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much
more sparse.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle0 �! ]III
I �+ +} Jill
++
Non -BCC Vulnerable
Chimney Swift ++++ ++ I I ++++ ++" M"' Jill +"+ " + ,'-- `- �+ ++++ -�+++
BCC Rangewide (CON) ■ ■ ■■
Kentucky Warbler
AII
III
-
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
++++
++++
++++
IN$+
++++
Jill
++
++—
+--
++
+
(CON)
MEW
NONE
Prothonotary Warbler
++++
++++
++++
■
++TT
J"'
Jill
+--+
++++
—+++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Red-headed Woodpecker ++++
+++
++++
4 1
+++
+++
++++
++­
+'--
'--+
++++
—+++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Rusty Blackbird
++++
++++
++++
1 J++
++++
+++
++
++
+
++
+
BCC - BCR
Wood Thrush
++++
++++
++++
+1+1
*111
��1�
+,+,
MA
,"—
1--+
++++
—+++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.

Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round.
Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the
area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are
most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable
depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC). and other species that may warrant special attention in
your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKIN data is based on a
growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the
10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may
occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledg
data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability
of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these
graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your
location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your
results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be
nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including
Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for
eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy
development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the
birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help
avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area
off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may
be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA
NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf
project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on
survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag
studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your
list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the
migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10

km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort
(indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If
the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar
means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying
what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might
be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures
to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit
the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird
trust resources page.
Coastal Barrier Resources System
Projects within the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) maybe subject to the restrictions on federal
expenditures and financial assistance and the consultation requirements of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) (16 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.). For more information, please contact the local Ecological Services Field Office or visit the CBRA Consultations website.
The CBRA website provides tools such as a flow chart to help determine whether consultation is required and a template to
facilitate the consultation process.
There are no known coastal barriers at this location.
Data limitations
`'wc
The CBRS boundaries used in IPaC are representations of the controlling boundaries, which are depicted og the official CBRS m ps. The boundaries
depicted in this layer are not to be considered authoritative for in/out determinations close to a CBRS oundary (i.e., within the "CBRS Buffer Zone" that
appears as a hatched area on either side of the boundary). For projects that are very close to a CB b ndary bu%do not clearly intersect a unit, you
may contact the Service for an official determination by following the instructions here: - ystem_
property -documentation ��
Data exclusions glow,
CBRS units extend seaward out to either the 20- or 30-foot bathymetric contour (depending on the location of the unit). The true seaward extent of the
units is not shown in the CBRS data, therefore projects in the offshore areas of units (e.g., dredging, breakwaters, offshore wind energy or oil and gas
projects) may be subject to CBRA even if they do not intersect the CBRS data. For additional information, please contact CBRA Wws•gov.
Facilities `
�(
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination'
conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or
other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.

This location did not intersect any wetlands mapped by NWI.
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether wetlands occur. Additional information
on the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of
these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and
geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of
the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the
collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source
imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon
boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used
to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries
and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These
habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in fferent manner than that used in
this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state,
or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning
specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.

Sean Clark
From:
Ian McMillan
Sent:
Tuesday, March 1, 2022 4:51 PM
To:
Sean Clark
Subject:
Fwd: SAW-2021-02654 (Bethany Towns / 1501 and 1505 Main Street / Graham NC / Alamance
County)
Get Outlook for iOS
From: RaleighNCREG <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 11:06 AM
To: Ian McMillan
Cc: Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA); Thames, Joyce A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Subject: SAW-2021-02654 (Bethany Towns / 1501 and 1505 Main Street / Graham NC / Alamance County)
Good Morning,
Your JD request has been received, assigned action ID SAW-2021-02654 and forwarded to Mr. Chris Hopper for further
processing.
Please refer to the action ID in all correspondence.
Thank you,
Josephine Schaffer
From: Ian McMillan <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 5:52 PM
To: RaleighNCREG <[e-mail]>
Cc: Sean Clark <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] PJD Request for Bethany Towns Project (Alamance Co. Sage Ecological Project No. 2020.105)
To whom it may concern:
Please find the attached Preliminary JD Request and ORM Upload Sheet for the above -named project.
If you have any questions about this submittal, please feel free to contact myself at the below contact number and
email, or Sean Clark at [e-mail] (919-559-1537).
Sincerely,
1

Ian McMillan
Ian McMillan, PWS, GISP, CPM
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
919-608-3156
([e-mail]

ii 11 li[.I� ii
Jarn�an,.x_ I xa
Sage Ecological Services
Sean Clark
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
Site Visit# 2022-04
Determination:
® Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Determination Isolated Wetlands
Project Name: Bethany Towns
Location: NC 87 South. Graham, NC
Subject Little Alamance Creek (Nearest Stream)
Stream:
Date of Determination: March 21,2022
Not
Soil
USGS
Feature
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Subject
Survey
Topo
SA
X
Buffer Starts as
X
shown on Figure 3
SAB
X
Buffer Starts as
X
shown on Figure 3
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above have been located on the Soil Survey of
Alamance County, North Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map
at a 1:2,000 scale. Each feature that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined not
to be a stream, or not present on both the USGS Topographic map and the Soil Survey
map, or is not present on the property. Features that are checked "Subject" have been
located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream.
Streams that are considered subject have a 50' riparian buffer from the top of bank on
both sides of the stream. The City of Graham's jurisdiction is only over the stream
buffer. The NC Division of Water Resources and the US Army Corps of Engineers have
jurisdiction over streams both on previously mapped and unmapped streams as well as
on wetlands. There may be other streams located on your property that do not show up
on the maps referenced above, but still may be considered jurisdictional according to
the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources. Additionally,
impacts to the drainage feature may require permitting through either of these
permitting agencies.

All streams were evaluated per NCDEQ Stream Identification Method 4.11.
• Streams SA and SAB shown ( Figure 3 Map) are subject to the buffer regulations.
Streams SA and SAB are approximately in the location of a stream as shown on the NRCS
Soil Survey Map, streams SA and SAB are Intermittent Streams
After the field visit, the City of Graham concurs with Sage Ecological Services
Consultant's determinations. The final map (Figure 3), Soil Survey of Alamance County,
the USGS Topographic map and NCDWQ Stream 4.11 Forms are attached to this
document.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners
or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the City of Graham representative
shall be referred to the Director of the Division of Water Resources, c/o the 401 Oversight
Express Permitting Unit, or its successor. The Director's decision is subject to review as
provided in G.S. 150B Articles 3 and 4. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days
of date of this letter or from the date the affected party (including downstream and/or
adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the Director shall
be referred to the Director and the City of Graham in writing.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for an appeal within
sixty (60) days.
The owner/future owners should notify the City of Graham and/or the Division of Water
Resources (including any other Local, State, and Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning
any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated above). This project may
require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries about 401/404
permitting should be directed to the Division of Water Resources (Winston Salem Regional
Office) and the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office).
Respectfully,
Josh Johnson, P.E.
cc: Sean Clark, Sage Ecological Services
Sue Homewood, Winston Salem Regional Office of DWR
Aaron Holland, City of Graham Assistant City Manager

All Features must be confirmed by , NOTE: Location, shape and size of
depicted features on the evaluated
the NC-DWR and the USACE. 1 site are approximate and should be
surveyed by a licensed NC
surveyor for final site planning.
V110 Cy
� r
51
�YZF
• kyRu __ * ]gym � � 1.
.xc; Y.. � •(:.ram': n� � r,.�.
0 a
44
AL 1
4&T' /
L T. d-
..A ,
Legend 1 — „I,•.:: R*
OProject St,dYArea
- 4 `•?. Non -Buffered lntennittent Stream -Jurisdictional Wate rs of the US
•••••• Intermittent Stream-J,nsdicti-1Waters ofth.US,S,bjectt,50.f-tJordan Lake Wetershed Riparian Buffers
Mzrgi-lW.tlwd- Potenezuv Jurisdictional WSt.rs fth.Us
W.fl-ds - J—dict-1 Wat.rs fm eUS
e
�NN�CDOT OIS Unit, neMap,
Map Location W tl d Sic t h M
RANDOLPH
•
ALAMANCE ORANGE
CHATHAM
e an e c ap
N
Bethany Towns Project
Sage Project # 2020.105
December 28, 2020
0 75 150
Feet
. _ .fk y
Figure 3
Drawn By:
David Gainey
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

iviap L-vcanvn
ROCKINGHAM I CASWELL I PERSON
GUILFORD iALAMA NCEi ORANGE
RANDOLPH I CHATHAM I
WAKE
NRCS Soils Map
Bethany Towns
Sage Project # 2020.105
N
Alamance County Soil Survey,1960
Sheet # 18 and 19
Map Prepared by: Philip Beach
December 10, 2020
0 350 700
Feet
Figure 2
SERVICES
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

iviap L-vcanvn
ROCKINGHAM CASWELL PERSON
GUILFORD ALAMA NCE II ORANGE
RANDOLPH CHATHAM
WAKE
00
Project Study Area
USGS Topo Map Figure 1
Bethany Towns
Sage Project # 2020.105
N SAGE
Burlington, NC Quadrangle
USGS Topography, December 2013 SERVICES
Map Prepared by: Philip Beach . T
December 10, 2020
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
0 1,000 2,000 Office: 919-335-6757
Feet Cell: 919-559-1537

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SA
Date: Mar 22, 2022
Project/Site: Bethany Towns
Latitude: 36.0395
Evaluator:
R. Elliott
County:
lamance
Longitude:-79.3965
Total Points:
Burlington, NC
Other:
Stream is at least intermittent if
Stream Determination:
EE
e.g. Quad Name:
>19 or perennial if>30
Intermittent
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =13 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -Channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
ool se uence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active/relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =? )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
3
C. Biology Subtotal =5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0
0
"perennial stream may also be identified using other methods. See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height feet 1
Bankfull Width feet 4
Water Depth inches 4
Channel Substrate Sand
Velocity: Slow
Clarity: lightly Turbid
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SAB
Date: Mar 22, 2022
Project/Site: Bethany Towns
Latitude: 36.0398
Evaluator:
R. Elliott
County:
lamance
Longitude:-79.3954
Total Points:
Burlington, NC
Other:
Stream is at least intermittent if
21.5 Stream Determination:
e.g. Quad Name:
>19 or perennial if>30
Intermittent
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =10_5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -Channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
ool se uence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =? )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
3
C. Biology Subtotal =4 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0
0
"perennial stream may also be identified using other methods. See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height feet 1
Bankfull Width feet 3
Water Depth inches 3
Channel Substrate Sand
Velocity: Slow
Clarity: lightly Turbid
Sketch:

Kim Hamlin
From: Kim Hamlin
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 3:37 PM
To: 401 [e-mail]
Subject: Pre -Filing Notification for Bethany Townes (Sage #2020.105)
To whom it may concern,
This email serves as notice of our intent to file a Pre -construction Notification (PCN) application for the above -named
project, a proposed residential development on +/-9.03 acres in Graham, Alamance County, NC.
Thanks,
Kim Hamlin, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Cell: 919.244.0623
[e-mail]

o
z
Z
Q
OF
�w0
U
s
Q U
a
H
`
¢ Q U
o
v
rl`�.,r l� U
U'
U
fL
F>
—p
Z
v
a
s
y
F
U
v F
d U
a
W
z
p
O
w
C�
a
0
s
��
s
Q
U
`�
(y�
J`°
s_
z
W
H
w z
z w
Z
z
C7
z
w
aU
s
�
z
l�
W
Q w¢
s
�
¢
wLL
3 ��a
LL
W
W
0: In
�! as
�
Dd W
O
0 ww
zz
Z w
o z
z
°
w
z
¢
LL
wNv w"!
z a�
rn
OZc�
10
M ¢0
N
N 0
N
N
a
O
N
OM
w ..
QF� i-
W W a Q
z 0 =
N W N
N N
N
NU
W fn
W 20
W a0
Jo s
OU9,
a
7-ra
F-
Ln
o m
NN
r
i N
v) Z
R E
O
O � Lfl
u N ' Ol
0 rn
Em OO
uNZ
LL H w oo
_ oo 3 c:
u oo 3
LL
00
Z
O
U
D
Z
O
U
Tf
O
LL
H
O
Z

wl
a
F-
U
a
9
LLn
uLL
v
a
Y
a
tq a
a
U
¢ U
a
Z
to
a
a
a
o
z
O
d¢
a w
w
w
w
Z
Z
w Z
z
z
a
w
Q
w
Z w
w
m
Ww¢
w¢
w¢
¢
s
G
¢o
w
mNo
No
mw
a w
a
w
u~iw
w w LL
w w N
w LL
m
Z
W N
z
O
N
LL
M
Z Z
O Z
N
Z
a a a
.. O M
..
O
O
¢
O
O
ro
w
¢
�N
¢
w N
N w N
N
w N
N N
N
N U
w
fn
.woo I
•♦1♦• ,�� r
/
aOp
/ s ♦ 5
O
hco� r� IO m \.m Z W
60 w ¢ \ w
w
N
w ��\
�yo m I
Z = 548
\ w OW
c�
Nw3aap
Mz ma:
Z tnwmm�
wm a
O U
w W
zz zz z
w Z W Z w Z \ I Q
aO aO aO
a
wU wU wU N \ w
m m >
O O
a- wN
w z w z
F pN F pN ro U 0
I i Z�7�O
C�',,,���

Im
QM
N
M
Q
¢
U ¢
z
> N O
M
o
¢o o
v
o
~
~
Z
w
In z
a
a
in
in
a
O=z¢
'�' ¢
x
N o
� m
z
¢
r�� oog�
J o
V
of
O
U U
F
F
U
H Q
z
^y �'
U
9a0
x j Z
N -p o
>
>
>
mw
>
o
F a a
¢
a
¢
o
F
\ w
Z Z F
F >' n 9
>
>
mw
~w
¢¢ ¢
¢�
¢U
fy �00o
`�� a�
o V
z<
zz0
z0
Z0
0 w
�Z
w
z Z
Z
=�
Q
^m
O
W o
¢
O
¢ N
¢ N
a N
J W a U N U
W
Z
z
W ¢
Z `�
W
Z
2 0
J co
C-0 O
.� m V N Z
Q d
d N
2~
U
2~
wU
2i~
�U
LL (j ¢ (j a
F w¢ w
w
�
¢
¢
a
w
l�
H oo
w N
w
wz
�w
wz
W a
Wa
W a
as
W a
ad
W LL Z Z ¢
xOo Oo
LLa
x[r
W
a
W
w a
[r
W
d'
�N
'�
U
Oz
W Ul
_oo C
'> 33
z II
x
a
it
II
II
}}o o
No
Fa
a N
a
'�'
�_
z
in m °;
W K LL K LL
<< w a N
'"'
Z�
W W
W
z
O
N Z
W
Z NN
N
W
Z
K
a W
¢ J
4
W U'
d W
Q
V oo > J
a
x
OOo pm
a LL v d LL m ¢
Gz
NN
a
NN ¢
NN
a
22 �
w W N N W N N
W N
N
N N
N U
W (�
rTl
^�
K
Q Z N
zQo
S rn
_o
k
548'-o
I
z > m
OU a
LLI
U
O
o N
II
IF
�I IH
\ Sr
\ H
LLJ
11
w� �� �� szw
O L` % - Z)
N � o 0o
N co co
` } U
Q Q
0 0 \
Q Q d o
X ao 2 LL
a 0o W cn
LL ~ o
w� w
z
W M O Q
CL
IL Oa H�
IN
0�s
I j \
/
os+t
11�o
1
IHI-�
M
` I
z o
W ILL
\¢
Z
\
� co
a o
sal
1
I l'
w v
LU �
N U
\
w
\.
\
z Q
LL
I
S
o
�
W M
tI'�G
N
dLL
—
H
1
Ilk
w
y U
o
N
Z
Ljj
LL
d F
Sf1 J
O
O
1 0
\
�\ \
Q U
Q
` J
1
O o C,
y\I
~
zU
Q
U
o
�
�\ 1OW
z U o
a
wl
�
\
U
- zO
w
Q—
g a
W'nO 00
o
s o
Z w�
¢
0
N CD
W o
M
\
\
_
.7 S
_
ofLL
W
(n0 W
r
K� s (=0
, n X
il
OF
N
r
LU�
a m
z W
d , W d
C.
Q a
W
^.
(n
N
N v
Z II
W
Z II
O U
Q U r7
� Z
0-
�! (n
w m ` =
0 II d
N
F
\j
OLL
UH
OF
N¢
-j
Z>0 `-
NU
FNQ
/
Na
LL
W �M
~ U
`
QQ
LL _
/
A09\\9
JpHJl D/1S3�1
v �
J
O
z
z
O
U
Q I--Z
= 00
O r0
Z
U W W
= H LU
—� OD
Z U
Z W U) z
¢a =0�
ow oa
N
¢O U)O
J Z 2
Q a 0w�
Q g
Z J Q Q� W
LLO�
(n J � d
LLI o
F ~ J U) (S
O 0 �D)w
Z LL Now'

O
•>
•
•' •
•:
• • •
• • •
•
„
•
•
.:
_
1
•
•
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■���■�\■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
.
E■■on■■
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
.'
■■WERI
■■■�"1■■■■
..
■■■■■■■■■■■■
■'
■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
. I■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■
■■■■
iiiiiiiiOGiiiiiiiiiGiiiiiiGiiiiiii■■■■I.■■■■
_
GGiiGGGiGiGGGi
-GGGGiGGGiGGGGGiiG7■■■■1■■■■
'
• ..
I
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Il■■■■■1-soon
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
oon
-
-------------------------------
I
MEN
_
1
GGGGGGGGGGGGGG=.000GGGGGGGGI■■■■■■■■■■■'®loon
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
:
,'
�G�������������®loon
�
1
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
�--------------=■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■l�■■■■■■■■■■■■�:�■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\l■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■�
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■
=
NONE,■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■l�■■■■■■■■■■■'1
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■l�■■■■■■■■■■II■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
noon■II
. ■
1■
;
'
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■.
■■■■■��
■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
\
■■■■■�
.

Ln
0 m
T N Lf�
r-
Z > N s
Q U �
¢ H Z O= Z U X m
ai 0� ¢ �� rl��, l� UU' �H r6 O z
u U W cw Imo' ^ti' Oa¢p r' -O omm V 61 0
m a � ~UW' rn mm C wzzw Ww v ��-, o o
K z �K ZU Q z z � o0 F V
LL Iwi LL o zw �zvi IL oo `� lel a�0In -�
m m m� m� 0 u oww waw z mc�7 J<o '�.m u Z
a �> o H m -
K K z z z � z g ¢° o' O w W Z _ oo 2� O
wz zo zo zo o zo ¢a owe w n o ¢
°a °� �� �~ �~ �g z� a�a 3 0 oW iV o'0 3 ��
w 2 W w w Q W Q W Q W w F w z LL LL LL LL d W O
W Z W Z LLa LLa da s d W YQ dO J w N(n (n to ¢0� Z
Z N N II II U d I
= W �J dNF mv° v OZN w
2 I F Z N Z w _ N '�I �I K U- Z
© z �2 ni ❑UU a W o
a
zJm ¢ a LL
r„ OU ai o
vl o
0
0
z
o
a
m �
O
y J
C�
/ I
09s 1 , a
w
w=
3
O J v LL
IN/ \ a w -
C z
W W O
\ \Z O
2
0
o
�3z
w0
W 0 z I
4111 w 1 f of
^J �
l '1
Y 548'
I\ 1
o
o

LIJ
}
0
0
}
0
e
\
NOT TO SCALE
DRAWN BY: CAH
000
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Waters Name
din_Codel HGM
_
ocal Waterway
WA-1
NORTH CAROLINA PFO
RIVERINE
Area
0.095 ACRE RPWWD
36.03990000-79.39490000 Little Alamance Creek
WA-2
NORTH CAROLINA PFO
RIVERINE
Area
0.005 ACRE RPWWD
36.03950000-79.39670000 Little Alamance Creek
WB-1
NORTH CAROLINA PFO
RIVERINE
Area
0.02 ACRE RPWWD
36.03960000-79.39580000 Little Alamance Creek
WB-2
NORTH CAROLINA PFO
DEPRESS
Area
0.02 ACRE RPWWN
36.03930000-79.39500000 Little Alamance Creek
SA
NORTH CAROLINA R4
RIVERINE
Linear
200 FOOT RPW
36.03950000-79.39690000 Little Alamance Creek
SAB
NORTH CAROLINA R4
RIVERINE
Linear
100 FOOT RPW
36.03980000-79.39520000 Little Alamance Creek

�e°a�0ed-�llroa1Nw° n�ed-jllroalq o�a�ed�P�e a�n-J° w.-1PIA �°J-L o,, nh J� w� °-j�Am�o °�
d�nas�d�a�k
oo,
IA oe� n4 ane A4 a �re wo A—1 o�s�ema ,—ble o_ �, R e s�am _ —Pol N 4—M Are AS'gll e� 37 s