Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0043421_Additional Information Request #2_20221201 December 1, 2022 DAVID HUGHES – MANAGER SHINNVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC 236 RACEWAY DRIVE – SUITE 7 MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28117 Subject: Application No. WQ0043421 Additional Information Request #2 Shinn Village WWTF Wastewater Irrigation System Iredell County Dear Mr. Hughes: Division of Water Resources’ Central and Regional staff has reviewed the application package received May 6, 2022 and subsequent response package received September 2, 2022. However, additional information is required before the review may be completed. Please address the items on the attached pages no later than the close of business on January 2, 2023. Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the Applicant’s responsibility. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the outstanding items in Sections A through T, or failure to provide the additional information on or before the above requested date may result in your application being returned as incomplete pursuant to 15A NCAC 02T .0107(e)(2). Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. All revised and/or additional documentation shall be signed, sealed and dated (where needed), with an electronic response submitted to my attention at: https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/NonDischarge-Branch- Submittal-Form-Ver2. If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (919) 707-3660 or Lauren.Plummer@ncdenr.gov. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Lauren Raup-Plummer, Engineer III Division of Water Resources cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section (Electronic Copy) Gary S. MacConnell, PE – MacConnell & Associates, P.C. (Electronic Copy) Laserfiche File (Electronic Copy) Mr. David Hughes December 1, 2022 Page 2 of 5 A. Response Letter: 1. Please confirm whether Zones 4, 5, and 6 (which no longer have a proposed natural surface walking trail), are to be regulated as reclaimed water utilization sites under 15A NCAC 02U. The alternative would be that these spray irrigation areas are regulated as wastewater irrigation sites meeting the requirements of 15A NCAC 02T .0506(c) which qualify for reduced setbacks to property lines. Please note, should the adjacent parcels to Zones 4, 5, and 6 be developed in the future, a permit condition requiring the installation of a fence to prevent public access would be required to ensure the requirements of 15A NCAC 02T .0505(q) are met. B. Application Fee: 1. No comments. C. Application (Form RWPI 06-16): 1. No comments. D. Application (Form RWG 06-16): 1. Within Item VIII. Design Information for Earthen Storage Impoundments, design information for the treated effluent storage pond was provided; however, design information for the 5-day upset pond was missing from the RWG 06-16 application form . Multiple copies of the questions on Item VIII. are necessary for facilities with more than one impoundment. Please provide the design information for the 5-day upset pond using a copy of the questions in Item VIII. E. Application (Form RWNC 06-16): 1. Item II.6. refers to how reclaimed water utilization volume was calculated. The provided calculation of 90 gallons/day/bedroom represents the wastewater volume requiring treatment rather than the beneficial reuse of the reclaimed water. Please revise Item II.6 to show how the usage volume (the 52,830 GPD quantity listed in Item II.4) for non-food crop irrigation was calculated. 2. Item VI.5 regarding the minimum depth to the seasonal high water table (SHWT) within the irrigation area was left blank. Please revise to include the minimum depth to the SHWT or otherwise indicate its absence during the site evaluation (i.e. > 29 feet below ground surface). F. Property Ownership Documentation: 1. No comments. G. Soil Evaluation: 1. No comments. Mr. David Hughes December 1, 2022 Page 3 of 5 H. Agronomist Evaluation: 1. No comments. I. Hydrogeologic Report: 1. No comments. J. Water Balance: 1. No comments. K. Engineering Plans: 1. A review of Sheet WW-114 shows only one dedicated access point to Zones 1, 2, and 3, and it appears to be an access for the Natural Surface Walking Trail along “Road E” based on the depicted drawing. An access from the treatment facility to the utilization area was not indicated on the plans. The provided plans include a detail for the Natural Surface Walking Trail on Sheet D-105 that depicts a width of 3 feet 6 inches for the trail surface. Will this Natural Surface Walking Trail access point be used for the proposed agricultural harvesting equipment (e.g., tractor, mower, rake, baler)? It is unclear whether this access point is sufficiently designed to allow maintenance and harvesting of the Zone 1, 2, and 3 utilization area. Please provide additional information and indicate on the plans where the proposed operations and maintenance access point is for Zones 1, 2, and 3. Please indicate with a call-out, note, or detail drawing the minimum width required to allow the proposed agricultural harvesting equipment to use the access point. 2. Similar to Comment K.1, and assuming that Zones 4, 5, and 6 are to be reclaimed water utilization sites regulated under 15A NCAC 02U (see Comment A.1), it is unclear what access is available for maintenance and agricultural harvesting equipment for Zones 4, 5, and 6 located across the South Fork of Winthrow Creek based on the provided plan set. A path or road (including the Natural Surface Walking Trail) is not depicted on the plan sheets that crosses the South Fork of Winthrow Creek, and it is unclear whether an access agreement from an adjacent property has been obtained to access those utilization sites without crossing the creek. Please provide additional information and indicate on the plans where the proposed operations and maintenance access point is for Zones 4, 5, and 6. Please indicate with a call-out, note, or detail drawing the minimum width required to allow the proposed agricultural harvesting equipment to use the access point. 3. The response to Comment J.10 in the Additional Information Response dated September 2, 2022 indicated that a monitoring well detail drawing was added to Sheet D-104. The provided drawing appears to reference the test wells that are to be abandoned upon issuance of the permit (Wells “MW” and “TW” in the provided documents). However, for the proposed compliance wells (CW- 1 and CW-2) please provide a detail drawing that depicts the construction standards outlined in 15A NCAC 02C .0108 including, but not limited to, features such as a locking cap, screening/casing materials, well pad dimensions, identification plate, and wellhead protection. L. Specifications: 1. No comments. Mr. David Hughes December 1, 2022 Page 4 of 5 M. Engineering Calculations: 1. Within the provided process calculations, a maximum turbidity value of 14 NTU is listed under Design Effluent Characteristics. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02U .0301(b), the reclaimed water standard for maximum turbidity is 10 NTUs. A modelled value for final effluent turbidity was not provided, and it is unclear based on the provided calculations whether this requirement can be met. Please review and revise the Process Calculations as needed. N. Site Map: 1. No comments. O. Distribution System Monitoring Plan: 1. A distribution system monitoring plan was not included within the submitted documents. This plan is required for verifying that reclaimed water effluent standards (15A NCAC 02U .0301) will be met at the utilization sites. Please provide a copy of the distribution system monitoring plan for review. P. Education Program: 1. Documentation of a program of education and approval for all reclaimed water users was not provided. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02U .0501(a), a reclaimed water generator shall develop and maintain an education and approval program for all use of reclaimed water. Please provide a copy of the reclaimed water education program for review. 2. In addition to the education program for reclaimed water users requested in Comment P.1, please provide an educational document to be distributed to property owners and the Homeowner’s Association that defines reclaimed water, describes the on-site reclaimed water utilization activities, provides information on the proper use of reclaimed water, and further clarifies that reclaimed water is not intended for drinking. Please provide a copy of the educational document to be distributed to property owners and the Homeowner’s Association for our review. Q. Power Reliability Plan: 1. No comments. R. Operation & Maintenance Plan: 1. No comments. S. Residuals Management Plan: 1. No comments. Mr. David Hughes December 1, 2022 Page 5 of 5 T. Additional Documentation:  Operational Agreements: 1. No comments.  Threatened or Endangered Aquatic Species Documentation: 1. No comments.