20221676 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20221130

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
8/29/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20221676 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Niblick Drive Culvert Replacement
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
City of Gastonia
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Andrew Pitner:eads\ahpitner
1 b. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
11/30/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Catawba Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.237068 -81.172810
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Gaston
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 14 - Linear transportation
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
City of Gastonia
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB 0768 PG0669
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address
Street Address
PO Box 1748
Address Line 2
City
Gastonia
Postal /Zip Code
28054
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Ian McMillan
4b. Business Name:
WithersRavenel
4c. Address
Street Address
115 MacKenan Drive
Address Line 2
City
Cary
Postal / Zip Code
27511
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Gastonia
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
112832
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Niblick Drive/Elmwood Drive
Address Line 2
City
Gastonia
Postal / Zip Code
28054
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Catawba Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501011502
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
199.73
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is located within the southern portion of the Catawba Creek Golf Course and south of the site is wooded areas and residential.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
Yes No Unknown

4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
138 linear feet perennial stream
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of the proposed project is to replace the existing, 6-foot wide, 55' long, failing Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) arch culvert with an embedded culvert 90'-foot 12'Wx7'H
reinforced concrete box culvert and 25-foot riprap plunge pool. This project is being conducted to address safety concerns with the failing arch culvert on Niblick Drive as well as to
stabilize the golf cart bridge downstream of Niblick Drive.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project involves excavation of the existing failing Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) arch culvert and working in the dry to replace the existing arch culvert with a 90'-foot 12'Wx7'H
reinforced concrete box culvert and 25-foot riprap plunge pool. Heavy equipment typically used in construction will be utilized for the project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes
Comments:
No Unknown
WithersRavenel staff delineated the stream on October 17, 2022. No wetlands were identified within
the project area.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Ian McMillan/Patrick Welsh
WithersRavenel
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
3. Stream Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
Sf
Replace culvert and add
plunge pool
Permanent
Culvert
Catawba Creek
Perennial
Both
3
Average (feet)
115
(linear feet)
S2
Culvert and plunge pool
installation
Temporary
Dewatering
Catawba Creek
Perennial
Both
3
Average (feet)
38
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
115
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
153
3j. Comments:
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
38
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation

1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Proposed permanent impacts for replacement of existing, failing CMP are necessary for the safety of drivers over the stream crossing on Niblick Drive
as well to stabilize the adjacent golf cart pathway bridge. The proposed culvert replacement will occupy the same alignment as the existing arch culvert
and be oriented with 75° to 105° of the stream. Access during construction will occur within uplands. Proposed permanent impacts for replacement of
existing, failing CMP are necessary for the safety of drivers over the stream crossing on Niblick Drive as well to stabilize the adjacent golf cart pathway
bridge.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed prior to construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Permanent impacts are below mitigation thresholds.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
Catawba River basin buffers exist on the mainstem only.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes No
Comments: *
The project is below SEPA thresholds.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This is a standalone project and not likely to negatively impacts surrounding areas.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
WR conducted a file review of records maintained by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP). An official
species list was generated using USFWS' Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC), located at https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov , on 10/17/2022.
WR also submitted a project review request to the NCNHP through their Data Explorer webpage, located at: https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/, to identify
known occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species within 1.0 mile of the review area. The NCNHP project review did not identify
any known occurrences of federally listed species within the review area or within 1.0 mile, as documented in the attached letter from NCNHP dated
10/17/2022. See attached report as well.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
Online Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NCSHPO website search
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Yes, project is within Zone AE. AE flood zones are areas that present a 1 % annual chance of flooding. The culvert and golf course should mitigate
flooding within the project area.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA online portal search — Panel No. 3710355400J, effective 9/28/2007
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Attachments Binder 11.30.22.pdf 7.51 MB
File must be PDF or KMZ

Comments
Attachments:
1 PCN Cover Letter
2 Agent Authorization
3 USGS Topographic Map
4 Gaston County Soil Survey
5 Parcel Property Owner Info
6 2022 Aerial Map
7 NCNHP Project Review Letter
8 USFWS IPaC Species List
9 NCSHPO Database Search
10 Impact Exhibits
11 T&E Review
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
lan McMillan
Signature
Date
11/30/2022

-0- WithersRavenel
.. Our People. Your Success.
November 30, 2022
US Army Corps of Engineers NC -Division of Water Resources
Regulatory Field Office 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Ms. Krysta B. Stygar Ms. Kelsey Rowland
151 Patton Avenue 1617 Mail Service Center
Room 208 Raleigh, NC 27699
Asheville, NC 28801-7980
Re: Niblick Drive - NWP 14 PCN Submittal
Gastonia, Gaston County
WR Project #06210404.01
Dear Ms. Stygar and Ms. Rowland,
On behalf of the town of Gastonia, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use NWP
14, as well as requesting a 401 WQC from NC DWR, for the following impacts:
Proposed Impact Table
Feature
Type of Impact
Impact Area
LF
SF
AC
Stream
Permanent
115
860
0.019
Stream
Temporary
38
316
0.007
The proposed total permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters are 0.019 acres and therefore the
project is eligible for authorization under an NWP 14.
The proposed project consists of the replacement of the existing 6-foot wide, 55' long, Corrugated
Metal Pipe (CMP) arch culvert with a 90' long 12'Wx7'H reinforced concrete box culvert plus 25-
foot riprap plunge pool. The longer replacement culvert will facilitate additional necessary support
for the adjacent golf cart bridge.
The proposed culvert replacement is contained within a 199.73-acre parcel (PIN: 3544985926)
located at Niblick Drive, Gastonia, Gaston County (Lat: 35.237068°N;-81.173810°W).
The project is in the Catawba River basin (HUC: 030501011502) and onsite waters drain to
Catawba Creek. The Water Quality Classification for Catawba Creek is C and the Stream Index
Number is: 11-130.
Proposed Project
The purpose of the proposed project, as discussed above, is to replace the existing 6-foot wide,
55' long, failing Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) arch culvert with an embedded culvert 90'-foot
12'Wx7'H reinforced concrete box culvert and 25-foot riprap plunge pool.
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 910.469.3340 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. F-1479
Asheville I Cary I Charlotte I Greensboro I Lumberton I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Southern Pines I Wilmington

Niblick Drive Culvert Replacement
Gastonia, Gaston Co.
NWP 14 PCN Submittal
Protect History
::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
WithersRavenel staff conducted a delineation of the stream and Preliminary Threatened and
Endangered Species survey on October 17, 2022. (see attached report)
Threatened & Endangered Species Review
Methodology
WR conducted a file review of records maintained by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
and NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP). An official species list was generated using USFWS'
Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaQ, located at https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov , on
10/17/2022. This species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species,
as well as proposed and designated critical habitat, which may occur within the boundary of the
project and may be affected by the project. The IPaC specified that there are four federal ly-Iisted
species that may occur within the project boundary and may be affected by the proposed project.
These species include Tricolored Bat (PE), Bog Turtle (T/SA), Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf (T), and
Schweinitz's Sunflower (E). The IPaC list did not identify any critical habitat within the project area.
WR also submitted a project review request to the NCNHP through their Data Explorer webpage,
located at: https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/, to identify known occurrences of federally listed
threatened or endangered species within 1.0 mile of the review area. The NCNHP project review
did not identify any known occurrences of federally listed species within the review area or within
1.0 mile, as documented in the attached letter from NCNHP dated 10/17/2022. In summary, the
review area does not contain occurrences of, or potential habitat for (Bald Eagle, Tricolored Bat,
Bog Turtle, Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf, and the Schweinitz's Sunflower) and will have no effect on
these species. Therefore, it is the opinion of WR that federally protected species are not likely to
be present within the project area, and development of the proposed project is not likely to
adversely affect federally listed species or their designated critical habitat.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed permanent stream impact of 115 linear feet is necessary for the replacement of the
failing existing corrugated metal pipe (CMP) arch and to stabilize the adjacent golf cart bridge. The
existing arch culvert has been failing for years and is a hazard for drivers. Additionally, the golf cart
bridge is failing and the new culvert will help provide support for the new golf cart bridge.
Avoidance and Minimization
Proposed permanent impacts for replacement of existing, failing CMP are necessary for the safety
of drivers over the stream crossing on Niblick Drive as well to stabilize the adjacent golf cart
pathway bridge.
The proposed culvert replacement will occupy the same alignment as the existing arch culvert and
be oriented with 75' to 105' of the stream.
Access during construction will occur within uplands. Additionally, sediment and erosion control
measures will be installed prior to construction.
Mitigation
The proposed project will result in 0.019 acres and 115 If of permanent stream impacts. These
impacts are below mitigation thresholds.
Page 2 of 3

Niblick Drive Culvert Replacement
Gastonia, Gaston Co.
NWP 14 PCN Submittal
::WithefsRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information to complete your
review.
Sincerely,
WithersRavenel
Ian McMillan
Senior Technical Consultant
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization Form
• Aerial Exhibit
• USGS Quads
• Gaston County Soil Survey
• Parcel/Property Owner Info
• NCNHP Project Review Letter
• USFWS IPaC Species List
• Impact Exhibits
Page 3 of 3

■■ WithersRavenel
lipOur People. Your Success.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION

0 WithersR,avenel
NoOur People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Municipality City of Gastonia (Client) does hereby appoint WithersRavenel,
Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate local, state and
federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of
Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for: a) review
and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, surface
waters, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate
environmental permit applications/requests for the Niblick Drive Culvert Replacement.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Date: 10 -1 2- - Z Z
Agent's Name, Address &Telephone: Signature of Client:
WithersRavenei, Inc. GA Xy V. 5A1Me C IT G14eEX
(Name -Print) (Title)
115 MacKenan Drive L
Cary, NC 27511 (Signature)
Tel. [phone] To 1 vc I'N 9
M�+ailing Address
UA5-To1d1A 11 c, "z b5q- Rq$
City State Zip
Phone: _7014- & �- 61620
Email; i t 4 ,fn • �'�'1
115 MacKenan Drive i Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 f: 919,467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. F-1479
Asheville I Cary I Charlotte Greensboro I Lumberton I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Southern Pines I Wilmington

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USGS QUADS

p� � 01 LQ LQ GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
1 inch = 500 ft.
1 { 11 1
1
1 1
A �
1
REVIEW AREA
274
1
NIBLICK DRIVE CULVERT
REPLACEMENT
USGS (2019) - GASTONIA SOUTH
WithersRavenet
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
GASTON COUNTY
SOIL SURVEY

Cf D GRAPHIC SCALE
0 _ 0 250 500
1 inch = 500 ft.
"Ilk 4
CeB eB2 N
CfB CAD2
'r
pa I t TO`
t
CH C H
0? .
CeB 2 a
CeB 2 REVIEW AREA
Ceo2
2
CeB2,
r
�. jr,
� M
NIBLICK DRIVE CULVERT �10 WithersRavenel
REPLACEMENT GASTON CO. SOIL SURVEY (1989) - SHEET 7 I/ Engineers l Planners l Surveyors
GASTONIA GASTON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
PARCEL/PROPERTY
OWNER INFO

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 50 100
1 inch = 100 ft.
GASTON CO. PIN: 3544985926 /
CITY OF GASTONIA /
P.O BOX1748 /
GASTONIA, NC 28053 /
±199.73-ACRES
00
�9
F
REVIEW AREA
GASTON CO. PIN: 3554071592 I I
/ \ WINSTON DEVELOPMENT CORP I _
540 E GORDON STREET
SAVANNAH, GA 31401 -
\ \ ±15.57-ACRES
I I
I I
� I _
I
I I
NIBLICK DRIVE CULVERT
REPLACEMENT
PARCEL EXHIBIT
WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
2022 AERIAL

I
- i
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 40 80
1 inch = 80 ft.
REVIEW AREA
I
NIBLICK DRIVE CULVERT IIF roWithersRavenel
AERIAL (2022)REPLACEMENT Engineers i Planners i Surveyors

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
NCN H P PROJECT
REVIEW LETTER

Roy Cooper, Governor
2r■� NC DEPARTMENT OF
■a■■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■■E■■
October 17. 2022
Troy Beasley
Withers & Ravenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
RE: Niblick Drive 2022; 06210404.01
Dear Troy Beasley:
D_ Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-19662
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally- listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.ciov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler(ancdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES

j
\
2
&
0
\
\
/
/
\
n
V)
/
0
a
_
0
�3
/
\\
/
/\
2
« y % t t « «
§ƒ
\ \ \
E E E E
/§
f
z c c c c z z
/
L
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
\/
m
=
O O O O O O O
> s
J
\
a) 0)
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
\
/
2
c a a a a a a a G
« 3
/-
/
/
/
-\
\
\o \
:
\/
a 90
j
�
m
ce& m
\
®
> g
y«
m > c d Y
©� /
\
\ \
\ \
o
/ \ /
\
\
\
r
�4
U o
3
±
«
3
\
\ ƒ / \ J
/
\
/
/
/
/
4
»
d
/
/
/m//// ////
/
/
%
m m/ z
m
\/
g
<
/
O O O O O O O G
s¥
=«
\
E
/
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/
\\
/
\
ro /
\
\: : : : : : : 3
0
\
g
2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2
//
y
9
4-1\
\
./
\
\
^
(
/
Js
g
/
g
'E
%
m
\
/
/
\
E
.( /
\
:r
/2
E
/
M
m
_
=
3
«
>
2\
/
\
/
°
\}
CD
/
±
E
\
/ / / / / / / \
/
/
E
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2
\
/
/
/
c c c c c c c\
\{
CD
®
\
§
m
o
E c c c c c& c}
m O c O c O c O 4
/
r
g
z
J m m z z m m m°
\\
/
4-
/
e
m 'Z z c c c 'Z Z
_/
«
/
2 9 / / / / / /
t
/
«
=
« % m
$ $ $ $ $ z
s_
5
e
z
\\
m m
O O O O O O O-
/
®>
E
2
%
7
7 % % % % % % o
\
c
0
2
o
/
e
/ > > > > > > > ~
m » » » » » » » 3
7 9
\ a
2
2
2
2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2
0±
e
\
\
c

N
N
C)
N
U
L
U
Z
N
CD
z
U
Z
O�
4Okr�
v
V
p� poonnu�goa
m
� o �
0
Chur�h�11 r A c a CD
K
m
N
0
1 aane�
Fern Forest DC
Union Rd
9 a
m o5
2m
w
19
<¢ n
ww
ULL
Z
y
o�
a
o� O
z¢
O y
Q
U y QQ
Q m Q
Z N zO
0� O'E
z LL'E
`v
E
NUv E'U
T
�QW0
3 (D
aad
z=WNw"
rna..o
g O E c
tnZc � �
—ln u
i
Q �
LL, c
Q O
� m T
u 6
N
p^ c
N Q d o
N -0 7, Ca
C) u
rru V o
ra
m d
N
O 0 ❑ ❑
0
M
O
fM
N
J7

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USFWS I PaC
SPECIES LIST

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
�cH 3'$ Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0005212
Project Name: Niblick Drive 2022
vfso-1 ax'unut't:
October 17, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The enclosed species list
fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Please note that new species information can change your official species list. Under 50 CFR
402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list
should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends you visit the ECOS-IPaC website at
regular intervals during project planning and implementation to ensure your species list is
accurate or obtain an updated species list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A biological assessment (BA) or biological evaluation (BE) should be completed for your
project. A BA is required for major construction activities (or other undertakings having similar
physical impacts) considered to be Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c))
(NEPA). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a BE be
prepared to determine effects of the action and whether those effects may affect listed species
and/or designated critical habitat. E?ects of the action are all consequences to listed species or
critical habitat that are caused by the proposed action, including the consequences of other

10/17/2022
activities that are caused by the proposed action. A consequence is caused by the proposed action
if it is reasonably certain to occur and would not occur "but for" the proposed action..
Recommended contents of a BA/BE are described at 50 CFR 402.12. More information and
resources about project review and preparing a BA/BE can be found at the following web link:
https://www.fws. gov/office/asheville-ecological-services/asheville-field-office-online-review-
process-overview.
If a Federal agency determines listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected
by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR
402. The Service is not required to concur with "no effect" determinations from Federal action
agencies. If consultation is required, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed
species, proposed critical habitat, and at -risk species be addressed within the consultation. More
information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of
permit or licensed applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook"
at the following web link: https://www.fws.gov/media/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Act, there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project -
related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds,
including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12
and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). More information about MBTA and BGEPA can be found at the
following web link: https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory..
We appreciate your consideration of Federally listed species. The Service encourages Federal
agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species in their project planning
to further the purposes of the Act. Please contact our staff at 828-258-3939, if you have any
questions. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference the
Consultation Code which can be found in the header of this letter.
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List
■ USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
■ Migratory Birds
■ Wetlands

10/17/2022
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

10/17/2022
Project Summary
Project Code: 2023-0005212
Project Name: Niblick Drive 2022
Project Type: Species Survey/Monitor
Project Description: Gastonia
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www. google.com/maps/(a)35.237018649999996,-81.17378519371006,14z
r6uN Gaouip
rf
f
Counties: Gaston County, North Carolina

10/17/2022
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME
STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus
Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Endangered
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
Reptiles
NAME
STATUS
Bog Turtle Glyptemys muhlenbergii
Similarity of
Population: U.S.A. (GA, NC, SC, TN, VA)
Appearance
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
(Threatened)
Species profile: https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp/species/6962
Insects
NAME
STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp/species/9743

10/17/2022
4
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf Hexastylis nani flora Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2458
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp/species/3849
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

10/17/2022
USFWS National Wildlife Refuge Lands And Fish
Hatcheries
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refine system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.

10/17/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelogica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 25
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 10
and Alaska.

10/17/2022
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = l; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.

10/17/2022
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle —�
Nan -BCC +++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++Jill ­+­+ +++ +� +++� +++—
Vulnerable
Chimney Swift !111
'""''''"BCC Rangewide + + + ++ + +— +++— +(CON) ++ + ++ +i■1lul !!! 1111 ji ++—
Red-headed ,+ + +' + + ++ ++■' lopI JlNONE
+ ' +,—
Woodpecker + + + +++ + ++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird "'+ +„+ "++ ++++ ++++ ++++ 4-4— —+—+ ++++ +++— +
BCC-BCR
Wood Th rush
+++ + �+ 1�11 Jill Jill Jill
+ +++ ++++ ++ ++++ +++— +++— +++—
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
■ Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
■ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/librgg/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratorv-birds
■ Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.

10/17/2022
4
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding_,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator ,RAIL, Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?

10/17/2022
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of

10/17/2022
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

10/17/2022
Wetlands
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
RIVERINE
■ RivPrinP

10/17/2022
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency: WithersRavenel
Name: Patrick Welsh
Address: 115 MacKenan Drive
City:
Cary
State:
NC
Zip:
27511
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9194693340

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
NCSH PO DATABASE SEARCH

�
�
ate S•�
$ =,' 1_�` _
�
m
�
m� Ala B1°q�
d
V
Aj
k
C
ChurnTill Or
�
3 x
u
v
-
� enspaie S!
17 s5uix
'
Lambrid9e 52
C
o
� -
Sh sb,ion 9f
ci
o
x
pauvNs
h,r= Dr a
CY
C 7 J
LJ
�
K
P
eL f.
O
A
Y
44
CI
K
+v a.Kuf'e]IrjM
LL
HL'ISCiIIUI S]ip
♦r
Dpnegal
3
® O
a�
A,tl
d
m
LYnliursi Or
y
w
a
a G
J
N
� T
�J u„
X
P
[V
FR
E_
E r
o
Elnrwb°d 51
to �IGr
%
❑
a
�
-
_
E nape
8
C7
_
� arty h
P
U H
�
6
i
z �
•V &
�
anison Gres^ p` o
r`
°
w Loch Slone 6r`
�
�
o.a
O
o
�
rad
X
U
c
Z
or Wood; Dr
© N
_ u,
y
t
..
r �
III
r
�
g
s
e
u, o rv
2 � n
G
<
S
E
❑ a�
fn
—E'
`' N Q E N O
rx
p ]r♦
0 Ll
0
W
n
❑
`�
ava V
5°
V

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
I M PACT EXHIBITS

s—ons moA • ajd ■
—AaninS I sj--ld I sJaau Pu3 /I Noll V il
jauanedsjagj!m o, ���
I
a
a1
l9
E
lN3W3DVld3N 1N3AInD
3AING >IJI181N
LL
M
o
'o
m
Wes'
0
OM
LL M
Z
o�g,o,,g LL
ti
M
s �z� 4
W
�r
I
I
m
I,
114
IIrr
III 'lll
-2, i
I,
z
o
G
z
�w z
2 o
°
0
1
❑aa❑Ofl
ZZw mo
wazw z�
Z
w� U z r
���w
oww�= '0O w
o
a p U p
Q�aQZo w
mw
w J K z 0 D 7
u3L�a zQ�
Z p p w O H w
ouwJmzpQo¢
=�w3wJQ3
= w m H Ua
oN3?N�w z
w
InLZHdzww
SMD
�aSwOj
aHH�c[pUpm
H
zz V

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
ME Review

-0- WithersRavenel
.. Our People. Your Success.
November 16, 2022
Mr. Gary Saine - Town of Gastonia
PO Box 1748
Gastonia, NC 28053-1748
Re: Niblick Drive Culvert Replacement
Gaston County, NC
Threatened & Endangered Species Assessment
WR Project #06210404.01
Dear Mr. Saine
On October 17, 2022, WithersRavenel (WR) conducted a site visit of the Niblick Drive Culvert
Replacement project area (Review Area) for the purpose of evaluating the presence of federally
listed threatened and endangered species and/or potential habitat within the review area. The
review area is approximately 0.05 acres located southwest of the intersection of Niblick Drive and
Elwood Drive in Gastonia, NC (Lat: 35.237068°N;-81.173810°W).
The project is in the Catawba River basin (HUC: 030501011502) and onsite waters drain to
Catawba Creek. The Water Quality Classification for Catawba Creek is C and the Stream Index
Number is: 11-130.
WR surveyed the review area for the presence of federally listed threatened and endangered
species, or their potential habitat, protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This report
summarizes the findings of the survey.
Proposed Activities
The proposed project consists of the replacement of the existing 6-foot wide, 55' long, Corrugated
Metal Pipe (CMP) arch culvert with a 90' long 12'Wx7'H reinforced concrete box culvert plus 48-
foot riprap plunge pool. The longer replacement culvert will facilitate additional necessary support
for the adjacent golf cart bridge.
Site Conditions
The review area consists of approximately 138 feet of perennial stream and adiacent bank located
within the Catawba Creek Golf Course. The stream has a defined bed and bank as it enters the
existing culvert under Niblick Drive, but becomes somewhat incised as it enters the golf course
Property. Substrate is sandy with some sorting.
Threatened & Endangered Species Review
Methodology
WR has conducted a file review of records maintained by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
and NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP). An official species list was generated using USFWS'

- 411 WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC), located at https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/ , on
10/17/2022. This species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species,
as well as proposed and designated critical habitat, which may occur within the boundary of the
project and may be affected by the project. The IPaC specified that there are four federally -listed
species that may occur within the project boundary and may be affected by the proposed project.
These species include Tricolored Bat (PE), Bog Turtle (T/SA), Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf (T), and
Schweinitz's Sunflower (E). The IPaC list did not identify any critical habitat within the project area.
WR also submitted a project review request to the NCNHP through their Data Explorer webpage,
located at: https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/, to identify known occurrences of federally listed
threatened or endangered species within 1.0 mile of the review area. The NCNHP project review
did not identify any known occurrences of federally listed species within the review area or within
1.0 mile, as documented in the attached letter from NCNHP dated 10/17/2022.
Species Synopsis and Pedestrian Survey Results
Plants and animals classified as Proposed (P) are currently proposed for official designation of a
protected species under the ESA. Plants and animals classified as Endangered (E) or Threatened
(T) by the USFWS are protected under the provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the ESA of
1973, as amended. The following table presents federally listed species from the IPaC official
species list dated 10/17/2022. While the bald eagle is not currently listed on the ESA, it is
protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA) and was included in the
assessment.
Federal
Habitat
Common Name
Scientific Name
Biological Determination
Status
Present
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus leucocepholus
BGPA*
No
No Effect
Tricolored Bat
Perimyotis subflavus
PE
No
No Effect
Bog Turtle
Glyptemys muhlenbergii
T/SA**
No
No Effect
Dwarf -flowered
Hexastylis naniflora
T
No
No Effect
Heartleaf
Schweinitz's
Helianthus schweinitzii
E
No
No Effect
Sunflower
BGPA* - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
T/SA** - Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance
PE*** - Proposed Endangered
The findings of the survey for each species are addressed below.
Bald Eagle (BGPA)
Based on the review of the NCNHP GIS data, there are no known occurrences of bald eagle nests
within 1.0 miles of the project area. No bald eagle nests were observed within the project area.
Additionally, no bald eagles were observed in flight. Robinwood Lake exists just under a mile east-
southeast of the project area. There are no suitable foraging areas within 660' of the project area
since all of this area is contained within the Catawba Creek Golf Course and therefore outside of
the USFWS National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. Since the proposed project is not

40 WithersRavenel
NOOur People. Your Success.
located within 660' of a bald eagle nest, WR concludes that the proposed project will have No
Effect on bald eagle.
Biological Determination - No Effect
Tricolored Bat (PE)
The review of the NCNHP GIS data did not identify any known occurrences of Tricolored Bat
within 1.0 miles of the review area. Preferred habitat of partly open country with large trees and
woodland edges, typically foraging at treetop level and often over water was not observed within
the project area. Therefore, due to the lack habitat, WR concludes that the proposed project will
have No Effect on the Tricolored Bat.
Biological Determination - No Effect
Bog Turtle (T/SA)
The review of the NCNHP GIS data did not identify any known occurrences of Bog Turtles within
1.0 miles of the review area. Preferred habitat of calcareous (containing calcium carbonate,
calcium, or lime) wetlands, such as open sphagnum bogs, wet meadows and wet pastures was not
observed within the project area. Therefore, due to the lack habitat, WR concludes that the
proposed project will have No Effect on the Bog Turtle.
Biological Determination - No Effect
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf (T)
The review of the NCNHP GIS data did not identify any known occurrences of Dwarf -flowered
Heartleaf within the project area. Preferred habit of acidic soils along bluffs and adjacent slopes,
in boggy areas next to streams and creek heads, and along the slopes of nearby hillsides and
ravines, was not observed within the project area. Additionally, the golf course is heavily managed
which further impacts any potential habitat. Therefore, based on a lack of suitable habitat and lack
of nearby records, WR concludes that the proposed project will have No Effect on Dwarf -flowered
Heartleaf.
Biological Determination - No Effect
Schweinitz's Sunflower (E)
Preferred habitat of shallow, poor, clayey, or rocky soils, preferably near power line right-of-ways
or roadsides was not observed within the project area. Based on the review of the NCNHP GIS
data, there are no known occurrences of Schweinitz's Sunflower within one -mile of the project
area. Therefore, based on lack of nearby records, lack of onsite habitat and the mowed/maintained
golf course environment, WR concludes that the proposed project will have No Effect on
Schweinitz's Sunflower.
Biological Determination - No Effect

40 WithersRavenel
NOOur People. Your Success.
Summary
The review area does not contain occurrences of, or potential habitat for (Bald Eagle, Tricolored
Bat, Bog Turtle, Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf, and the Schweinitz's Sunflower) and will have no effect
on these species. Therefore, it is the opinion of WR that federally protected species are not likely
to be present within the project area, and development of the proposed project is not likely to
adversely affect federally listed species or their designated critical habitat.
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information to complete your
review.
Sincerely,
WithersRavenel
yo"_v
Ian McMillan
Senior Technical Consultant