20221672 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20221130

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
6/1/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20221672 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Arvin Subdivision
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Sean Clark
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Zachary Thomas:eads\ztthomas
lb. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
11/30/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Chunky Pipe Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
WS-IV;NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
36.0057
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Durham
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No
Longitude:
-78.8263

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
KL Arvin, LLC & Laverne B. Parrish
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB9529/PG41 & DB9529/PG50
2c. Contact Person:
David Goracke (KL Arvin) & Laverne B. Parrish
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
2d. Address
Street Address
9121 Anson Way, Ste. 220 (KL Arvin) & 3132 Cheek Rd. (Parrish)
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Raleigh & Durham NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27612 & 27704 USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Nicole Thomson
4b. Business Name:
Sage Ecological Services, Inc
4c. Address
Street Address
3707 Swift Drive
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27606
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
C
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Arvin Subdivision
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Durham
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0852-11-13-7426,0852-00-89-0520;0852-10-
51-3314;0852-20-88-7604;0852-12-02-4858
2b. Property size:
189.13
2c. Project Address
Street Address
3132 Cheek Rd
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Durham NC
Postal / Zip Code Country
27704 USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Chunky Pipe Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
WS-IV;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010504
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is undeveloped and wooded. The tree canopy consists of mature pines and hardwood trees. The topography of the Site ranges from a low point of +/- 300 feet above mean sea
level (msl) along the drainages on the property, to a high point of +/- 380 feet msl along the northern property boundary adjacent to Cheek Road. Surrounding areas are a mix of
undisturbed forest and residences.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.84
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
11,278
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential development to help meet the housing need in the area.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
Roads and lots were positioned to reduce impacts to streams and wetlands on the Site. The road crossings were designed to cross perpendicular to the jurisdictional features as much as
possible given connection points and property boundaries. There are 1.84 acres of onsite wetlands of which only 0.34 acres are proposed to be permanently impacted. There are
approximately 11,278 linear feet of stream onsite of which only 187 linear feet are proposed to be permanently impacted of which only 129 linear feet will result in permanent loss.
Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts, while silt fencing will be installed to provide additional protection from
runoff.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2020-00212 & SAW-2019-01026
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Mr. David Gainey & Mr. Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
The Arvin Assemblage is comprised of five (5) adjacent properties and was given the Action ID of SAW-2019-01026 after a site meeting with USACE staff in 2019. The Parrish property to
the north was issued a preliminary determination (SAW-2020-00212) on 6/4/2020 after a site meeting with Mr. Andy Williams of the USACE. The main portion of the Assemblage, referred
to as "Arvin Road Assemblage" was visited by both the USACE and DWR in 2019. The field sketch maps were updated per that site review, and provided to the USACE but no formal
documentation by the USAGE was issued at the time. An updated package has been submitted to the current USAGE agent under separate cover.
The NCDWR provided a stream determination (RRO #19-323) for the Arvin Road Assemblage in 2019. A stream determination was provided for the Parrish Property (NBRRO #22-012) in
early 2022. An additional separate stream call (NBRRO #21-463) was made in 2021 on an offsite drainage that was approximately 50 feet from the property line.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No. The entire proposed residential subdivision is shown on the attached mapping.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
- Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
Impact A
Road Crossing
P
Headwater Forest
WE
Yes
Both
0.260
(acres)
Impact K
Lot fill & Road Crossing
P
Headwater Forest
WD
Yes
Both
0.070
(acres)
Impact L
Road Crossing
P
Headwater Forest
WAE
Yes
Both
0.010
(acres)

2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.340
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.340
2i. Comments:
Of the 1.84 acres of wetland on the Site, only 0.34 acres are proposed to be permanently impacted. As the wetland impacts exceed 0.10 acres,
compensatory mitigation will be provided by Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). Statement of Availability (SOA) is attached.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Impact A - Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
SE
Intermittent
Both
4
Average (feet)
30
(linear feet)
S2
Impact A - Road Crossing
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
SE
Intermittent
Both
4
Average (feet)
28
(linear feet)
S3
Impact A - Road Crossing
Temporary
Dewatering
SE
Intermittent
Both
4
Average (feet)
7
(linear feet)
S4
Impact B - Sewer Crossing
Temporary
Dewatering
SA
Perennial
Both
24
Average (feet)
33
(linear feet)
S5
Impact C - Sewer Crossing
Temporary
Dewatering
SI
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
43
(linear feet)
S6
Impact G - Road Crossing
Permanent
Culvert
SD
Intermittent
Both
8
Average (feet)
99
(linear feet)
S7
Impact G - Road Crossing
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
SD
Intermittent
Both
8
Average (feet)
30
(linear feet)
S8
Impact G - Road Crossing
Temporary
Dewatering
SD
Intermittent
Both
8
Average (feet)
24
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
187
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
294
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
107
3j. Comments:
Of the 11,278 linear feet of stream on the Site, only 187 linear feet of permanent stream impact is proposed through two road crossings. Of those 187
linear feet of stream impact, 129 linear feet are associated with culvert installation (permanent impact, permanent loss) and 58 linear feet are associated
with counter sunk rip rap dissipator pads (permanent impact, no permanent loss).
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
Neuse
Catawba
Goose Creek
Other
Tar -Pamlico
Randleman
Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Impact A - Road Crossing
P
SE
No
4,282
3,482
Impact B - Sewer Crossing
P
SA
No
1,958
716
Impact C - Sewer Crossing
P
SI
No
2,466
1,402
Impact D - Sewer Crossing (aerial)
P
SA
No
1,687
612
Impact E - SCM outfall
P
SI
No
627
390
Impact F - SCM outfall
P
SI
No
630
421
Impact G - Road Crossing
P
SD
No
7,805
4,655
Impact H - SCM outfall
P
SD
No
636
419
Impact I - SCM outfall
P
SI
No
66
457
Impact J - Sewer Crossing (aerial)
P
SA
No
1,020
614

6h. Total buffer impacts:
Total Temporary impacts:
Total Permanent impacts:
Total combined buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Zone 1
0.00
Zone 1
21,177.00
Zone 1
21,177.00
Zone 2
0.00
Zone 2
13,168.00
Zone 2
13,168.00
Per 15A NCAC 02B .0714 Neuse River Buffer Rules, Section (11) Table of Uses, (kk)(iv) - sewer crossings with a "permanent maintenance corridor
greater than 30 feet wide [which are] perpendicular crossings that disturb equal to or less than 40 linear feet, no mitigation is required". Therefore, this
impact is deemed "allowable upon authorization". Per 15A NCAC 02B .0714 Neuse River Buffer Rules, Section (9) Table of Uses, (a)(i), "New drainage
conveyances from a Primary SCM, as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1002, when the Primary SCM is designed to treat the drainage area to the
conveyance and that comply with a stormwater management plan reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or a state -approved local
government stormwater program," are "Deemed Allowable".
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Roads and lots were positioned to reduce impacts to streams and wetlands on the Site. The road crossings were designed to cross perpendicular to the
jurisdictional features. There are 1.84 acre of onsite wetlands of which only 0.34 acre are proposed to be permanently impacted. There are 11,278
linear feet of stream onsite of which only 187 feet are proposed to be permanently impacted.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental, additional impacts. The Project will be phased so as to
prevent large areas of land disturbance that could contribute to sediment runoff into the streams and wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
Yes No
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
(linear feet)
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0.34
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
(acres)
There is no wetland mitigation available at any private mitigation banks within the Neuse 01 basin. Therefore, NC Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS) will be providing the compensatory mitigation required for the unavoidable wetland impacts.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No

What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
3. Stormwater Requirements
3a. Select whether a completed stormwater management plan (SMP) is included for review and approval or if calculations are provided to document the project will not cause degradation of
downstream surface waters.*
Stormwater Management Plan Antidegradation Calculations
Comments:
The proposed project stormwater management plan (SMP) will be reviewed by the locally delegated, state -approved government stormwater program. The applicant requests a
Conditional 401 Authorization until the SMP is approved.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Per the NC DWQ April 2004 Version 2.1 Cumulative Impacts policy, small scale residential development projects have a "low potential for cumulative
impact" since the project already in a developed landscape (i.e. existing residences and development in the vicinity) and the area already contains the
necessary infrastructure (i.e. sewer, water, electricity, etc.). The project drains to Chunky Pipe Creek, which is Water Supply -IV (WS-IV); Nutrient
Sensitive Waters (NSW), (i.e. not HQW or ORW). We anticipate the NCDWR will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative analysis is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Municipal sewer operated by Durham with lines located adjacent to the Project site.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No Unknown

5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
A review of the NC Natural Heritage Program dated October 18, 2022, lists no federally listed T&E species on or within 1.0-mile of the Site. Additionally,
formal concurrence was requested from the USFWS on 11/28/2022 confirming there are no Threatened & Endangered species concerns.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
The proposed project is in Durham County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat which would support EFH (i.e., salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The Site itself is not listed as a historic property. A concurrence letter from NC SHPO dated November 21, 2022, confirms there are no historic resources
which would be affected by the project.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Floodplain Maps Database - FIRM Panel No. 3720085200K, effective on 10/19/2018
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Arvin SD Application Supplemental Information.pdf 36.95MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
PCN Cover Letter
Agent Authorization Forms
Figure 1-USGS Arvin Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 - USGS Parrish Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3 - Soil Survey Arvin Site Vicinity Map
Figure 4 - Soil Survey Parrish Site Vicinity Map
Figure 5 - Arvin Post USACE/DWR Stream & Wetland Sketch maps
Figure 6 - Parrish Post USACE/DWR Stream & Wetland Sketch map
NCNHP Database Report
Copy of NCSHPO Review Letter (ER 22-2563)
USFWS Self Certification Submittal
Impact Maps
USAGE PJD Verification, dated June 4, 2020 (SAW-2020-00212)
DWR Buffer Determinations NBRROs #19-323, #21-463 & # 22-012
NC DMS Acceptance Letter (11/29/2022)
Notice of Intent to File a Permit Application
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");

I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Nicole J Thomson
Signature
Akcale I Ma*So a
Date
11/30/2022

ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
EST., 2016
November 30, 2022
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
Attn: Ms. April Norton
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Arvin Subdivision
Request for NWP 29, GC 4226 and Buffer Authorization
Sage Project #2018.091
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
On behalf of Laverne B. Parrish (owner) & KL Arvin, LLC (applicant & owner), please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) that the activities associated with the proposed development of the Arvin Subdivision (Project) may
proceed under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29, General Certification 4256 (GC 4256) and buffer authorization.
Project Purpose and Location
The overall project purpose is development of a residential subdivision. The +/189.13-acre tract is located south
of Cheek Road and Arvin Road, in Durham County, NC. The coordinates of 36.0057°N, 78.8263°W generally
correspond to the center of the Site.
Project Detail
The proposed Project consists of the construction of a residential subdivision with associated roads and utilities
including a sewer line.
Access to the Site will be provided via Cheek Road and Arvin Road along the northern property line. Heavy
equipment typically used for utility installation projects (e.g. backhoes, bulldozers, etc.) will be utilized.
A review of the NC Natural Heritage Program dated October 18, 2022, lists no federally listed T&E species on or
within 1.0-mile of the Site. Additionally, formal concurrence was requested from the USFWS on 11/28/2022
confirming there are no Threatened & Endangered species concerns.
The Site itself is not listed as a historic property. A concurrence letter from NC SHPO dated November 21, 2022,
confirms there are no historic resources which would be affected by the project.
Project History
The site is undeveloped and wooded. The tree canopy consists of mature pines and hardwood trees. The
topography of the Site ranges from a low point of +/- 300 feet above mean sea level (msl) along the drainages
on the property, to a high point of+/- 380 feet msl along the northern property boundary adjacent to Cheek Road.
Surrounding areas are a mix of undisturbed forest and residences.
The Arvin Assemblage is comprised of five (5) adjacent properties and was given the Action ID of SAW-2019-
01026 after a site meeting with USAGE staff in 2019. The Parrish property to the north was issued a preliminary
determination (SAW-2020-00212) on 6/4/2020 after a site meeting with Mr. Andy Williams of the USAGE. The
main portion of the Assemblage, referred to as "Arvin Road Assemblage" was visited by both the USAGE and
DWR in 2019. The field sketch maps were updated per that site review and provided to the USAGE but no formal
documentation by the USAGE was issued at the time. An updated package has been submitted to the current
USAGE agent under separate cover.
Arvin Subdivision Page 1 of 2

The NCDWR provided a stream determination (RRO #19-323) for the Arvin Road Assemblage in 2019. A stream
determination was provided for the Parrish Property (NBRRO #22-012) in early 2022. An additional separate
stream call (NBRRO #21-463) was made in 2021 on an offsite drainage that was approximately 50 feet from the
property line.
Avoidance and Minimization
Roads and lots were positioned to reduce impacts to streams and wetlands on the Site. The road crossings were
designed to cross perpendicular to the jurisdictional features as much as possible given connection points and
property boundaries. There are 1.84 acres of onsite wetlands of which only 0.34 acres are proposed to be
permanently impacted. There are approximately 11,278 linear feet of stream onsite of which only 187 linear feet
are proposed to be permanently impacted of which only 129 linear feet will result in permanent loss. Construction
fencing will be used to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts, while silt
fencing will be installed to provide additional protection from runoff.
Project Impacts
The are 0.034 acres of proposed permanent wetland impacts, 187 linear feet of proposed permanent stream
impacts (129 linear feet associated with culvert installation & 58 linear feet associated with countersunk rip rap
pads), 107 linear feet of proposed temporary impact, and 21,177 square feet of permanent proposed Zone 1
buffer impacts and 13,168 square feet of permanent proposed Zone 2 buffer impacts.
Mitigation
Proposed wetland impacts will be mitigated through NC Division of Mitigation Services. Proposed stream impacts
are below mitigation thresholds. Proposed riparian buffer impacts are either "Deemed Allowable" or "Deemed
Allowable with Authorization" so no mitigation is required.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Respectfully submitted:
Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
C124
Attachments:
PCN Cover Letter
Agent Authorization Forms
Figure 1-USGS Arvin Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 - USGS Parrish Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3 - Soil Survey Arvin Site Vicinity Map
Figure 4 - Soil Survey Parrish Site Vicinity Map
Figure 5 - Arvin Post USACE/DWR Stream & Wetland Sketch maps
Figure 6 - Parrish Post USACE/DWR Stream & Wetland Sketch map
NCNHP Database Report
Copy of NCSHPO Review Letter (ER 22-2563)
USFWS Self Certification Submittal
Impact Maps
USACE PJD Verification, dated June 4, 2020 (SAW-2020-00212)
DWR Buffer Determinations NBRROs #19-323, #21-463 & # 22-012
NC DMS Acceptance Letter (11/26/2022)
Notice of Intent to File a Permit Application
Nicole J. Thomson, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Arvin Subdivision Page 2 of 2

Name:
Address:
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
f5Y_ 2016
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner or Legal Representative
/ 4 vERNe 8. PA > th
3/3 2 eNeck R L DizR / i, Ne 2 770 '7'
04/L/47C dpmess : RD_ & x /5088 PU.ONAfrt NC 27704)
Phone: 9/9- 53 0 - O / %.T
Email:
Project Name/Description: Parrish Property
Sage Project # 2018.91
Date: �/7/V. 51� 2 0 2
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, the owner or a duly authorized representative of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the CIean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. I also hereby designate and authorize Sage Ecological Services to act on my behalf as my
agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by Sage staff. Please contact Sage to arrange a meeting
prior to visiting the site.
LL t B. A'cj1f-Lia
Print Name of Landowner or Signature of Landowner or
Legal Representative Legal Representative
BY:
BY:

Name:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
EST. 2016
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner or Le2a1 Representative
\\2..\ 5 "0O.,-,) zr L
%Ro, �; v)� Wit) zj 6 NI-
yNo\- sf-c8— 45.511
Project Name/Description:
Sage Project # 2018.91
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, the owner or a duly authorized representative of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. I also hereby designate and authorize Sage Ecological Services to act on my behalf as my
agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by Sage staff. Please contact Sage to arrange meeting
prior to visiting the site.
BY: a.v:NA F 6"c1rgC.Ac-'t- BY:
Print Name of Landowner or Signa e offLandowner or
Legal Representative Lega Representative

Map Location
CASWELL PERSON
ORANGE
DURHAM
CHATHAM
VAN C E
GRANVILLE
FRANKLIN
WAKE
USGS Map
Parrish Property
Sage Project # 2018.91
NE Durham, NC Quadrangle
USGS Topography, December 2013
0
January 2, 2020
625 1,250
Feet
Figure 1
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
Sage Ecobgical Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

Map Location
USGS Topographic Map
Arvin Road Property
Sage Project # 2018.91
NE Durham, NC Quadrangle
December 2016 USGS Topography
January 2, 2019
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Figure 1
SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

Map Location
CASWELL PERSON
ORANGE
DURHAM
CHATHAM
VANCE
GRANVILLE
FRANKLIN
NRCS Soils Map
Parrish Property
Sage Project # 2018.91
Durham County, NC
Soil Survey 1976 Sheet # 22
0
January 2, 2020
625 1,250
Feet
WsC
WsB
Project Study Area
Figure 2
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

ORANGE
Project Study Area
Map Location
DURHAMI
GRANVILLE
kfise
H
NRCS Soil Survey Map
Arvin Road Project
Sage Project # 2018.91 N
Durham County Soil Survey, 1976
Soil Sheet 22
January 2, 2019
0 330 660
Feet
Figure 2
SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

iS''"1-" ,�jF .,€6 4c�ID: �E6r,'
NOTE: Location, shape and size of
depicted features on the evaluated
site are approximate and should be
surveyed by a licensed NC
surveyor for final site planning.
SGO2 Stop Stre
. A%O ce daaijf j o
Map Location
ORANGE
DURHAM
r
CHATHAM
VANCE
GRANVILLE
-`FRANKLIN
WAKE
Post USACE/ NCDWR Meeting
Wetland Sketch Map
1 of 2
Arvin Road Project
Sage Project # 2018.91
November 8, 2019
0 125 250
Feet
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
Figure 3
Drawn By:
David Gainey
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

Map Location
ORANGE
DURHAM
*110
CHATHAM
VANCE
GRANVILLE
-` FRANKLIN
WAKE
Post USACE/ NCDWR Meeting
Wetland Sketch Map
2 of 2
Arvin Road Project
Sage Project # 2018.91
November 8, 2019
0 125 250
Feet
NOTE: Location, shape and size of
depicted features on the evaluated
site are approximate and should be
surveyed by a licensed NC
surveyor for final site planning.
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
Figure 3
Drawn By:
David Gainey
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

Note: Streams depicted herein
may be subject to the NC State
Riparian Buffer Rules
r
+/- 0.091-ac
WD500
CffQ23(3
4 121D<ACINV
1-
Potential
Potential
(Total Included Above)
=Project Study Area
Potential WOTUS—Wetland
u Potential WOTUS — Intermittent Stream
• Wetland Data Point
• Upland Data Point
WD536A
tt wd500
Potential
'x'�S. fir:
Potential
Potential
•
NOTE: Location, shape, and size of
depicted features on the evaluated
site are approximate and should be
surveyed by a licensed NC surveyor
for final site planning.
SE00 ci 3'
•
01
channel
Map Location
CASWELL PERSON
ORANGE
•
DURHAM
CHATHAM
VANCE
GRANVILLE Y*
FRANKLIN
WAKE
Preliminary Jursdictional Determination
Stream and Wetland Sketch Map
Parrish Property
Sage Project # 2018.91
May 28, 2020
0 75 150
Feet
Map Information:
Date Prepared: May 28, 2020
Preparer: P. Beach
Data Source/Date: Stream and Wetland
Assessment Field Data
December 18, 2019;
USACE site verification meeting
May 26, 2020.
Equipment: Trimble - Handheld GPS
Notes: Post Processing to Submeter
Figure 3
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
EST. $ 2016
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

■u■
•• NC DEPARTMENT OF
■■I ■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• •■■
October 18, 2022
Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606-2543
RE: Arvin Road Property; 2018.91
Dear Sean Clark:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
N CN H D E-19670
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES

7 $ & §
oE2°
�>/%
kE-2
% .E /
3®3>
W § §
$ - / °
— E4
e \\/
� a \ /
4 / / W m
\ @ \ % .o
./ § c m \
a) ƒ \ / [
c g
D /f /
fu5f
%
w \3/D
% § 2 '\
E @ u .-
- @ E ,_ o
3�ƒ/
/ _c .c 2 ±
4 ' 2±—
* ®o 0
2 o o ._ /
\ %///
b > \ o ] e
t E a g c@ 9
��/�/ ///�
E co 7
)0ZjO U(6 Z
<cooz \�k/
f E.k ® 2 u m ®
o j 2/ Z § t 2/
ƒ<a/D«
7 a E E c
o e ±/\2
) E $ / 2 E
4 \ / & e
o \ \ 4 \ \
O '« m y @
g = z E
\ / E § I /
EJ o 0 / 8
3 - ,�/�v
e %
° O Z
) / go/
/ 2 § m @ k
3 c uom
No E
There
§
/
\
2
& w
( /
z f
/ \
\ z
o z
z
\ E)
/ §
In \
\ \
\»�%
¥{0
/70
®oo=
o o Z
\ R a ©
[ La
0cC
%/\\
0c \\
0 >,
\ \ § c
0
El)o.0
\-0
Ji
�2O5
0/a
/\/\C
> C C
m G® .%
40 IF,
E (i = {
/»z>.
/ El) IA ao7/&
/ C o 0 w E
4 n///()
oG)0
a f-w0
/ 0 $ 0 (
\ 4 \ W 0
6 0w§\
ƒ / 0o°(
/ \ > '
2 3 @ ± $ ®
W m « o / 0
E°a 0
E E 0 < (0
E \ —m\0-
j # 0 •-
/ / R / } / /
/ ° ® )
/ / (/ / ) f \
e m 2 4 Gz %[
/ § §) ( \ \ §
/ / / G / / § k
\ f f 2 /,'
2 ro c / / J © \
o ee/oz\Q
Z R,Z C e E
\
»
O\

0
(N
2
)
0
§ \
4 /
E
2 0
E ..
/ \ go
/ m
) Z\
/ \\
° t y y y C 0i
k E2/
§ @ c c c c c } z
O \ > > > > > (�
e R 0 0 0 0 0 0¥
c G G G G@@ G »_
/ \ 0 0 0 0 ƒ \ \ 0 \ \
/ O / / / / a \ ¢ / - /
� §j
\>
D O)N 2 .\
_ @ I a e \ : q
///�a ± >\
E
>-oO W 0
e Z © O @ — — %
20�°3 ' 00>
\.\/ / / 772 �\
\ 2° Z e U U§ c c
/\ate 3 \ T
mm2 \g
4 o \\�
e :\0 > 4 4 2
(0 / / \ \\ E E U e c
3 3 C ° / Z « {
Z 2 y \ o 0 0 U/ G C U / o
£ 9 m £ O O O E»» U E § 7
) [ ® 2§ 2 2 2 c c c 0 c 0\
/ § / m 4: : : § / / U 5 }
§ 9 7 o O O O Q O R R Z O C/
G
0 ( CC (a
\
E = ua
-I-,
-0
E 2 c c §\
± O fc
)co E c
®/\ }}
2 / ± %%® \�
1 / t m EE mo
) / [ \ \ _ _ @ / / / k
o e o ° 0 0 u'0 0 E
0 C ƒ e e a C c o C 0\
/ o / 0.)
in ® ° ° \ E % /
0 / \ E E k / / % \ %
O \ O O G \ \ \ / \ \
} / \ \ \ c § § t §\
3 3 3 CD CD 2 c
o 0 0// G e/ § 2
\ \ O O O E » » / E ` /
\\ 2 2 2 0 0) c / f E
c c > > > c e e { 0
(0 (0 -I-. y y o 2 2 U§ \ Q
Z O O Q O R R Z O o f
No Element
No Natural Areas

NCNHDE-19670: Arvin Road Property
N
0
N
co
Q
°DDD
0
Managed Area (MAREA)
Buffered Project Boundary
Project Boundary

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary D. Reid Wilson Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
November 21, 2022
Philip Beach, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
pbeach(asageecological.com
Re: Construct residential development, Arvin Road, Durham, Durham County, ER 22-2563
Dear Mr. Beach:
Thank you for your letter of October 18, 2022, concerning the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
tatal
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
1) State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

L7.li
FE LI Y W ILD JFE
SLiNV Lct
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 1 1 /28/22
Self -Certification Letter
Project Name Arvin Assemblage
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
"no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov. If you have any
questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact Leigh Mann of
this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Arvin Assemblage
Date: 11/28/22
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
Necturus lewisi/ critical habitat
No Suitable Habitat Presesnt/ no critical habitat present
no effect
see attached project review package
Noturus furiosus/
critical habitat
no suitable habitat presesnt/
no critical habitat present
no effect
see attached project review package
Rhus michauxii
suitable habitat present,
species not present
not likely to adversely affect
see attached project review package
Echinacea laevigata
suitable habitat present,
species not present
not likely to adversely affect
see attached project review package
Danaus plexippus
potential habitat present and
no current survey conducted
not likely to adversely affect
see attached project review package
Haliaeetus
leucocephalus
unlikely to disturb
nesting bald eagles
not likely to adversely affect/ no
Eagle Act permit required
see attached project review package
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Signature /Title
November 28, 2022
Date

NATURAL COMMUNITY TYPE AND SPECIES SURVEY REPORT
Arvin Assemblage
Durham, Durham County, North Carolina
November 28, 2022
Sage Project Number 2018.91
Prepared for:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
551 Pylon Dr # F
Raleigh, NC 27606
Submitted by:
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
SITE DESCRIPTION 23
1.1 Site Location 23
1.2 General Site Description 23
NATURAL COMMUNITIES 3$
2.1 Natural Community Identification Methodology 3-9
2.2 Natural Communities On -Site 3.
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES 5-14
3.1 Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Methodology 5-14
3.2 Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Results 6
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1124
REFERENCES 1223
SITE PHOTOS A-1
FIGURES B-1
NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM DATABASE REPORT C-1
USFWS INFORMATION FOR PLANNING & CONSULTATION REPORT D-1
SPECIES CONCLUSION TABLE E-1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Sage Ecological Services, Inc. (Sage) completed a review of the Natural Communities Forest
Typing and Threatened and Endangered (T&E) species habitat and species -specific surveys on
the +/- 190.06-acre Arvin Assemblage (Site) located in the City of Durham, Durham County, NC.
The purpose of this evaluation was to determine if Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered
Species or their habitat will be associated with the future development of this Site. Sage
completed the field evaluation on October 19, 2022. Figure 1 shows the location of the Site on the
NE Durham, NC US Geological Survey (USGS) topographical quadrangle sheet, and Figure 2 shows
the Site's location on the applicable portion of the United States Department of Agriculture's
Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS) Soil Survey for Durham County. The site is
located within the Neuse River Basin.
Two natural communities as well as maintained/disturbed areas are present on the Site. These
include bottomland hardwood forest, mixed mesic oak -hickory forests, successional loblolly pine
stands, maintained lawns, and a powerline. Figure 3 depicts the approximate boundaries of these
natural communities.
Four threatened and endangered (T&E) species, one candidate species, and the bald eagle are
listed as potentially present near the Site by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information
for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) resource list (Appendix D). No T&E species are documented
to occur on or within 1.0 mile of Site per the NC Natural Heritage Program's database search
(Appendix C). A survey for Michaux's Sumac, Smooth Coneflower and the Bald Eagle was
conducted on October 19, 2022. No individuals were observed.
1

SECTION 1
SITE DESCRIPTION
1.1 Site Location
The Site is located +/- 500-feet WSW of the Cheek Road and Benbow Road intersection in SW
Durham County, NC. The coordinates of 36.0100° N, 78.8270° W generally correspond to the center
of the Site.
1.2 General Site Description
The Site is comprised of five adjacent parcels. The Site is mostly wooded except a single power
line easement and a single-family residence in the northern corner of the Site. Mature Mesic-Mixed
Oak -Hickory hardwoods interspersed with Loblolly Pine generally dominate the upland areas of
the Site. Successional Pine stands consisting primarily of Loblolly Pine are found throughout the site.
Mature Bottomland hardwood stands interspersed with Mature Loblolly Pine stands dominate the
drainages and floodplains throughout the Site. The topography of the Site ranges from a low point
of +/- 288 feet above mean sea level (msl) at the southeast property corner where Chunky Pipe
Creek exits the Site, to a high point of +/- 384 feet msl in the northeastern portion of the Site.
According to the US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA
NRCS) Soil Survey for Durham County, NC, the Site contains the Altavista silt loam, Chewacla and
Wehadkee, Creedmoor sandy loam, Iredell loam and White Store sandy loam soil series.
2

SECTION 2
NATURAL COMMUNITIES
2.1 Natural Community Identification Methodology
Prior to arriving on -site, topographical maps, soil survey maps, orthophotographs, and ArcGIS
generated maps of the area were reviewed to preliminarily identify areas (e.g., slope direction,
ground cover, drainages, hydric soils areas, areas showing standing water, etc.) where different
natural communities would likely exist. References materials used include plant keys and botanical
references for natural communities that are common in this area of the state.
The Site was traversed on foot and dominant canopy, midstory, and understory species were
noted. Areas where community composition changed were noted and mapped. Table 4 and
Figure 3 provides additional information for the natural communities on the Site.
2.2 Natural Communities On -Site
Table 1: Natural Communities
Natural Community
Approximate
Coverage
(acres)
Dominant Species
Bottomland Hardwood
Forest
+/- 28
Canopy: Red Maple, American Elm, American
Sycamore, River Birch, Tulip Poplar
Midstory: American Elm, Ironwood, Northern
Spicebush
Understory: Poison Ivy, Greenbrier, Christmas Fern
Successional Loblolly Pine
Forest
+/- 79
Canopy: Loblolly Pine, Red Maple, Sweet Gum
Midstory: Loblolly Pine, Sweet Gum, Red Cedar
Understory: Christmas Fern, Poison Ivy, Japanese
Honeysuckle, Muscadine Grape, Greenbrier
Mixed-Mesic Oak Hickory
Hardwood Forest
+/- 84
Canopy: White Oak, Northern Red Oak, Southern
Red Oak, Shagbark Hickory, Pignut Hickory,
Loblolly Pine, Tulip Poplar, Red Maple, Sweet Gum
Midstory: Loblolly Pine, American Holly, Sweet Gum
Understory: Christmas Fern, Poison Ivy, Japanese
Honeysuckle, Muscadine Grape, Greenbrier
Powerline
+/ 3.75
Canopy: none
Midstory: Sweet Gum, Tulip Poplar
Understory: Poison Ivy, Greenbrier, Sericea
Lespedeza, Mountain Mint, Winged Sumac
3

The bottomland hardwood forest is present within the drainages that run through the Site. These
communities are thin due to the steep slopes of the drainages but become wider as they
approach the pond in the southern portion of the Site. The canopy is dominated by Red Maple
(Acer rubrum), American Elm (Ulmus americana), River Birch (Betula nigra), Tulip Poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera) and American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis). The midstory and
understory are generally open due to the maturity of the canopy with American Elm, Ironwood
(Carpinus caroliniana), Northern Spicebush (Lindera benzoin) Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron
radicans), Greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), Christmas Fern (Polystichum acrostichoides) and
Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) present.
Successional Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda) stands are scattered throughout the Site. These managed
stands of loblolly pine are mostly a monoculture; however, occasional Sweet Gum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana) and Red Maple saplings are present in the
midstory. The understory contains sparse to moderately dense populations of Christmas Fern,
Poison Ivy, Japanese Honeysuckle, Muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia), and Greenbrier.
The mesic mixed hardwood forest covers the majority of the Site. The canopy is dominated by
White Oak (Quercus alba), Northern Red Oak (Quercus rubra), Southern Red Oak (Quercus
falcata), Shagbark Hickory (Carya ovata), Pignut Hickory (Carya glabra) and Loblolly Pine. Other
tree species include Tulip Poplar, Red Maple, and Sweet Gum. The midstory and understory
generally open due to the maturity of the trees with Loblolly Pine, American Holly (Ilex opaca),
Christmas Fern, Poison Ivy, and Muscadine Grape present. Invasive species noted in these
communities include Japanese Honeysuckle. Inclusions of small pockets of additional upland
forests including, but not limited to, dry-mesic and mesic hardwood forests are present within this
community type but are not dominant.
The powerline easement is present in the eastern portion of the Site running north/ south. The
midstory and understory are moderately to very dense due to the overwhelming amount of
Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) and a lack of regular maintenance. The easement is
dominated by Sweet Gum and Tulip Poplar in the midstory and Sericea Lespedeza in the
understory along with species such as Mountain Mint (Pycnanthemum virginianum), Winged
Sumac (Rhus copallinum), Greenbrier and Poison Ivy.
4

SECTION 3
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
3.1 Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Methodology
Prior to completing the field survey, Sage biologists reviewed the USFWS current IPaC list of
Threatened and Endangered species (T&E) (Table 2 and Appendix D). The survey windows for the
target species were referenced to establish the appropriate field survey dates. Sage biologists
reviewed various botanical sources to refresh familiarity of the species and habitat descriptions.
Pictures of the species, botanical descriptions, and keys were reviewed and printed for use in the
field survey.
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program's (NCNHP) GIS database was conducted
concurrently with the initiation of project fieldwork. This database review included a 1.0-mile radius
search of the most recent GIS NCNHP Elemental Occurrence records (Appendix C).
On October 19, 2022, Sage biologists walked transects and conducted a Natural Communities
survey (Figure 3) and a species survey of the evaluation area within the locations most closely
resembling suitable habitat on the Site. Within the species survey area, particular attention was
given to areas that met many elements of the habitat descriptions and/or where known associate
species were observed. Items brought along for use during the field survey included printed
pictures of the species, botanical reference books including keys, camera, tape measure, 10x
hand lens, field notebook, aerial maps, and survey flagging. Sage biologists also visited nearby
known populations of Michaux's sumac on the same day as the Site survey.
Table 2. USFWS Threatened & Endangered Species List per IPaC1
Common Name
Scientific name
Federal Status
Habitat Type
Bald eagle
Haliaeetus Ieucocephalus
BGPA2
Terrestrial
Michaux's sumac
Rhus michauxii
Endangered
Terrestrial
Neuse River waterdog
Necturus lewisi
Threatened
Aquatic
Carolina madtom
Noturus furiosus
Endangered
Aquatic
Monarch butterfly
Danaus plexippus
Candidate
Terrestrial
Smooth Coneflower
Echinacea Iaevigata
Threatened
Terrestrial
1 - IPaC List checked on 10/15/2022
2 - BGPA - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
5

3.2 Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Results
The NCNHP GIS database review indicated no federal T&E species are present on or within 1.0
mile of the Site (Appendix C). Table 3 provides additional information on the T&E species survey
results. Detailed information on each species and the habitat survey is below.
Table 3. T&E Species Survey Results
Common Name
Habitat
Present
Survey Results
Biological
Conclusion
Bald eagle
Yes
No individuals observed
Not Likely to
Adversely Affect
Michaux's sumac
Yes
No individuals observed
Not Likely to
Adversely Affect
Neuse River waterdog
No
No survey performed
No Effect
Carolina madtom
No
No survey performed
No Effect
Monarch Butterfly
No
No survey performed
No Effect
Smooth Coneflower
Yes
No individuals observed
Not Likely to
Adversely Affect
BALD EAGLE
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: Year-round; November - March (optimal for birds and
nests); February - May (optimal for active nesting)
SPECIES AND HABITAT DESCRIPTION
The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act is enforced by the USFWS. Golden eagles do not nest
in North Carolina. Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forests in proximity to large
bodies of open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically
within 1.0 mile of open water.
SURVEY RESULTS
A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area, as well as the area within a 1.0-mile radius of
the project limits, was performed on October 15, 2022, using 2021 color aerials. Multiple farm ponds
are located on and within 1.0 mile of the Site which are large enough to support foraging habitat
for bald eagles. Since there was foraging habitat within the review area, a survey of the project
study area and the area within 660 feet of the project limits was conducted on October 19, 2022.
No individuals or nests were observed. Additionally, a review of the NCNHP database, updated
October 2022, revealed no known occurrences of this species within 1.0 mile of the project study
6

area. Due to the lack of observed individuals, known occurrences, and minimal impact
anticipated for this project, it has been determined that this project will is not likely to adversely
affect this species.
MICHAUX'S SUMAC
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: May - October
SPECIES AND HABITAT DESCRIPTION
Michaux's Sumac is a rhizomatous, densely hairy shrub, with erect stems from 1 - 3 feet (ft) (30.5 -
91 centimeters, cm) in height. The compound leaves contain evenly serrated, oblong to
lanceolate, acuminate leaflets. Most plants are unisexual; however, more recent observations
have revealed plants with both male and female flowers on one plant. The flowers are small, borne
in a terminal, erect, dense cluster, and colored greenish yellow to white. Flowering usually occurs
from June to July; while the fruit, a red drupe, is produced through the months of August to
October.
Michaux's Sumac grows in sandy or rocky open woods in association with basic soils. Apparently,
this plant survives best in areas where some form of disturbance has provided an open area.
Several populations in North Carolina are on highway rights -of way, roadsides, or on the edges of
artificially maintained clearings. Two other populations are in areas with periodic fires, and two
populations exist on sites undergoing natural succession. One population is situated in a natural
opening on the rim of a Carolina Bay.
SURVEY RESULTS
Suitable open habitat for the Michaux's Sumac is present within the powerline easement and
along Avalon Road at the northeastern property line. However, the soils on the Site within areas
that could be considered habitat are not suitable for the species. A survey for Michaux's Sumac
was conducted on October 19, 2022, and no individuals were observed; however, one associative
species: Winged Sumac (Rhus copallina) is present on the Site. A review of NCNHP records,
updated October 2022, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. A
population of Michaux's Sumac was visited prior to the survey on the day of the survey to assess
the current growth conditions. Due to lack of known nearby occurrences and observed
individuals, the development of the Site is not likely to adversely affect this species.
7

NEUSE RIVER WATERDOG
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: November 15 - March 15
SPECIES AND HABITAT DESCRIPTION
The Neuse River waterdog is a permanently aquatic salamander. It can grow up to 11 inches long.
It has a reddish -brown body with an irregular pattern of large blue or black spots. The waterdog
has a laterally compressed tail the same coloration as the body; however, the belly is typically a
dull brown or gray color with spots similar to those seen elsewhere on the body. Adult Neuse River
Waterdogs have elongated heads with squared -off noses, cylindrical trunks, and tails that are
laterally compressed and ridged. Three dark -red, bushy gills project from either side of the head
and a dark line runs through the eye. The skin is smooth, slimy and a light rusty brown color, with
the belly being a paler brown or grayish. There are dark brown or blackish spots throughout the
surface that are smaller on the underside. The limbs are rather small, and the front and hind feet
have four toes each (unlike most salamanders, which have five toes on each back foot). Its
appearance is significantly different in earlier life stages, as hatchlings and larvae. Hatchlings are
light brown in color with dark lines from each nostril through the eye to the gills, with a white patch
behind the eye and above the line. Their heads are round when compared to the square,
elongated heads of the adults. Hatchlings have spots with concentrations highest on the tail,
making the tail darker than the head and trunk. Their forelimbs have three complete toes, and a
bud that will later develop into the inner fourth toe. The hindlimbs are not yet developed.
The Neuse River waterdog specific habitat characteristics include low to moderate gradient
streams and low current velocity. It is a fully aquatic salamander, never leaving the water. It lacks
lungs, getting oxygen from the water via external gills and needs clean, flowing water with high
dissolved oxygen concentrations. The species dwells in streams wider than 15 meters but has been
found in smaller creeks.
SURVEY RESULTS
Suitable habitat for the Neuse River waterdog is not present on the Site. Tributaries do not have
appropriate substrate, stability, and presence of enriched oxygenated waters to provide suitable
habitat. A review of NCNHP records, updated October 2022, indicates no known occurrences
within 1.0 mile of the study area. The proposed site development should have No Effect on this
species.
8

CAROLINA MADTOM
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: Year-round; April - October (optimal)
SPECIES AND HABITAT DESCRIPTION
The Carolina madtom is a small catfish, reaching a maximum length of nearly five inches. When
compared to other madtoms, the Carolina madtom has a short, chunky body and a distinct color
pattern. Three dark saddles along its back connect a wide, black stripe along its side extending
from its snout to the base of its tail. The adipose fin has a dark blotch that does not quite reach
the fin's edge, giving the impression of a fourth saddle. Yellowish to tan blotches space the
saddles, while the rest of the fish is tan. The belly is un-speckled, and the tail has crescent -shaped
brown bands near its edge and center. Its pectoral spines have well-defined serrated (saw -like)
projections along both margins. Stinging spines in its pectoral fins, earn this fish the "furiosus" title
that is part of its scientific name.
The species occurs in riffles, runs, and pools in medium to large streams and rivers. Ideally, it inhabits
fresh waters with continuous, year-round flow and moderate gradient in both the Piedmont and
Coastal Plain physiographic regions. Optimal substrate for the Carolina madtom is predominantly
silt -free, stable, gravel and cobble bottom habitat, and it must have cover for nest sites, including
under rocks, bark, relic mussel shells, and even cans and bottles.
SURVEY RESULTS
Suitable habitat for Carolina madtom is not present on the Site. Tributaries do not have
appropriate substrate, stability, and presence of enriched oxygenated waters to provide suitable
habitat. A review of NCNHP records, updated October 2022, indicates no known occurrences
within 1.0 mile of the study area. The proposed site development should have No Effect on this
species.
MONARCH BUTTERFLY
SPECIES AND HABITAT DESCRIPTION
The monarch butterfly is a large butterfly species with two sets of wings and wingspan of three to
four inches. Their wings are a deep orange with black borders and veins, and white spots along
the edges. The underside of the wings is pale orange. The body is black with white markings.
9

Adult Monarch butterflies feed on a variety of flowers in fields, roadside areas, open areas, and
gardens, but can only breed where milkweeds are found. The Monarch butterfly migration route
crosses North Carolina in the spring as the species makes its way north during annual migration.
SURVEY RESULTS
The monarch butterfly is listed as a Candidate species and is not currently afforded protection
under Section 7 of the ESA. Feeding habitat for monarch butterfly is present in the study area along
the powerline. A review of NCNHP records, updated October 2022, indicates no known
occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. Due to lack of known nearby occurrences and
observed individuals, the development of the Site is not likely to adversely affect this species.
SMOOTH CONEFLOWER
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: May - October
SPECIES AND HABITAT DESCRIPTION
The US Fish & Wildlife Service's (USFWS) optimal survey window is from late May through October.
The smooth coneflower is typically found in open woods, glades, cedar barrens, roadsides,
clearcuts, dry limestone bluffs, and power line rights -of -way, usually on magnesium and calcium
rich soils associated with amphibolite, dolomite or limestone (in Virginia), gabbro (in North Carolina
and Virginia), diabase (in North Carolina and South Carolina), and marble (in South Carolina and
Georgia) with higher pH (basic). Smooth coneflower occurs in plant communities that have been
described as xeric hardpan forests, diabase glades or dolomite woodlands. Optimal sites are
characterized by abundant sunlight and little competition in the herbaceous layer. Natural fires,
as well as large herbivores, historically influenced the vegetation in this species' range. Many of
the herbs associated with smooth coneflower are also sun -loving species that depend on periodic
disturbances to reduce the shade and competition of woody plants.
SURVEY RESULTS
Suitable open habitat for the Smooth Coneflower is present within the powerline. However, the
soils on the Site range from slightly acidic to strongly acidic. A survey for Smooth Coneflower was
conducted on October 19, 2022, and no individuals were observed. No associative species were
present on the Site. A review of NCNHP records, updated October 2022, indicates no known
occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. Due to lack of known nearby occurrences and
observed individuals, the development of the Site is not likely to adversely affect this species
10

SECTION 4
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc. (Sage) completed a review of the Natural Communities Forest
Typing and Threatened and Endangered (T&E) species habitat and species -specific surveys on
the +/- 190.06-acre Arvin Assemblage (Site) located in the City of Durham, Durham County, NC.
Two natural communities as well as maintained/disturbed areas are present on the Site. Figure 3
depicts the approximate boundaries of these natural communities.
No T&E species are documented to occur on or within 1.0 mile of Site. A survey for Michaux's
Sumac, Smooth Coneflower and the Bald Eagle was conducted on October 19, 2022. No
individuals were observed. Development of the Site is not likely to adversely affect Michaux's
Sumac, Smooth Coneflower and the Bald Eagle. Habitat for T&E aquatic species is not present on
the Site.
11

SECTION 5
REFERENCES
Munsell Color. 2000. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Gretagmacbeth, New Windsor, NY.
N.C. Division of Water Quality. 2010. Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
Streams and Their Origins, Version 4.11. North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. Raleigh, NC.
Radford, Albert E., Ahles, Harry E., and C. Ritchie Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the
Carolinas. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Laboratory (USCOE). 1987. Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual. Wetlands Research Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army
Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Guidance (Version 2.0),
ed. J.S. Wakeley, R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble, ERDC/EL TR-10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army
Engineer Research and Development Center.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2020. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.5. http://wetland-
plants.usace.army.mil/
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1976. Soil Survey of Durham County, North Carolina. Natural
Resources Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
USFWS. 2020. Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) Fact Sheet. Updated November 10, 2020.
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_michauxs_sumac.html
USFWS. 2020. Optimal Survey Windows and Number of Years a Survey is Valid for North Carolina's
Federally Threatened, Endangered, and At -Risk Plant Species. US Fish and Wildlife Service,
Raleigh, NC. http://www.fws.gov/nces/es/plant_survey.html. Updated March 10, 2020.
USFWS. 2021. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Ieucocephalus) Fact Sheet. February 2021.
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/bald-eagle-fact-sheet.pdf
USFWS. 2021. Recovery Outline for Carolina Madtom (Noturus furiosus). November 2021.
https://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plan/Carolina%o20Madtom%o20Recovery%o200utline.
pdf
U.S. Geological Survey. 2022. NE Durham, NC Quadrangle, North Carolina [map]. 1:24,000. 7.5
12

Photo 1: North end of the Powerline looking south.
Photo 2: Southern end of the Powerline looking North.
APPENDIX A
SITE PHOTOS
A-1

Photo 3: Typical Successional Forest.
Photo 4: Typical Bottomland Forest.
A-2

Photo 5: Chunky Pipe Creek.
Photo 6: Typical Mixed-Mesic Oak Hickory Forest.
A-3

APPENDIX B
FIGURES
B-1

APPENDIX C
NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM DATABASE REPORT
C-1

Map Location
ORANGE
DURHAM`
VANCE
GRANVILLE
FRANKLIN
USGS Topographic Map
Arvin Road Property
Sage Project # 2018.91
NE Durham, NC Quadrangle
December 2016 USGS Topography
January 2, 2019
Figure 1
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
ESr. Md.
CHATHAM
WAKE
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
CeII: 919-559-1537

Map Location
ORANGE
DU R HIN211
GRANVILLE
WAKE
NRCS Soil Survey Map
Arvin Road Project
Sage Project # 2018.91
Durham County Soil Survey, 1976
Soil Sheet 22
January 2, 2019
0 500 1,000
Feet
Figure 2
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
ES,* Md.
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

Stand 3 - Mixed-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest
Stand 2 - Successional Loblolly Pine Forest
Note: The Mesic-Mixed Forest Community (Stand 3) also contains
isolated stands of additional hardwood forest community types (i,e, Dry Mesic, Mesic)
Map Location
CASWELL PERSON
ORANGE
DURHAM
GRANVILLE
WAKE
Natural Community Type
Sketch Map
Arvin Road Project
Sage Project # 2018.91
November 28, 2022
SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES.
EST.* 2016
Figure 3
Drawn By:
David Gainey
1" = 400' Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
0 200 400 Cell: 919-559-1537
Feet

APPENDIX D
USFWS INFORMATION FOR PLANNING & CONSULTATION REPORT
D-1

■an
an NC DEPARTMENT OF
o n ■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• ■r N
October 18, 2022
Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606-2543
RE: Arvin Road Property; 2018.91
Dear Sean Clark:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
N CN H D E-19670
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL. AND CULTURAL RESOURCES

No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
$ & §
oE2°
kE--o
% E 9-
•(7) 3 >
/ � § E
> / / °
•3 E 4
/toy
e9/
/ c C
@\&o
§c
/ \ / [
0
§/u).c
%®\f
(0
\£/D
.o c o .R
E $ % .y
@ E o
3�ƒ/
c •: 2
�)\U
@ @ % E
® E £ E
% \ ] (0
/ E @ 13
-
/m£0
D tic
E
DI
\ w / 0
e ® z
co _C•
D273-0
3 E E \
± @ 2 0
>a) o
/L(0
\\/
g § 6 /
@.5 @ m
E @ I /
oTo ro
/ 2
§ )
o Z
c y '0
0 / \ /
/ 7 _c\
c +
Eo -
/
$ - \
0
\ \]/
a)@ E _@
E/$«
o £ 2
D o co
o e m E
a) -o2 /
} ƒ §o
/(0
U ° §
R Z 6 e
§
0
\
2
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
a)
.0
0
2
\
»
0a
& \
D \
Z >)
o
0
0 \
/ ,13 §
\ E)
\ 0
0
\ \
m - a;7»\Q
w
®.0=
\�0Z
\ R a ©
E\0/
\\\\
»�
0 D O
\\ \\
\0%2
0 \ j
\{ 2§
{ a )
//
@e
0w
0-/fi7b
o /&
/\2
\. c
co
> C tc C
3: 0
i (i _c\
/ /»0
U[\J\
o. 0&
\0\E o�a2
2� a;® (O 0
fk\/
\/0)
(\\\
S 0 IL c
@//\/
> I•2c
%/\\o
a <O �
a�
c c • \ 0 \
ECll 0•-: =
E 0 7 ƒ / E
o@U Ea IF,
/ (/ / ) ƒ \
mZ40 %[
§ (0 C 0 � (o c
f �% _.
/ / / / § k
@ @ » 6 ƒ % \
/ / § J © \
e e/ 0 Z\ Q
R,z C e E

No Element Occurrences are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
2
/
—_0
$
0 0 c
§ 0 0 no
< >>c
c c c }} Z D
§ § § / / w y 0 om \
ƒ O O O E»» U E § 7
4—% 0 0 0 e e e Z e 2 O
0 > > > 3 c § £ m m
m a t t e 7•2.2 U§ -}
0 0 0 0 U O R R Z 0 §Z
•
•
/ §$
0\
\
co
c .co\
0 (
e)c
E $ $ 0,2
§
0
e e -I-, -I-, -I-,o 2 U o CD0
U U U O R R Z O o f

NCNHDE 19670: Arvin Road Property
Managed Area (MAREA)
Buffered Project Boundary
xg
-g
<E o
2110
NTZ
Project Boundary
4-
0
0)
a

APPENDIX E
SPECIES CONCLUSION TABLE
E- 1

11/20/22, 4:21 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced
below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but
that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust
resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species
surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to
each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that
section.
Location
\....„„\...)
0
Durham County, North Carolina0
I
Local office
i
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
I [phone]
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/IocationNP5IYHTPN5EU3H7ESZJEJV63VY/resources 1/13

11/20/22, 4:21 PM
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
o9b
IPaC: Explore Location resources
&
\,-q°
cioi&
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/IocationNP5IYHTPN5EU3H7ESZJEJV63VY/resources 2/13

11/20/22, 4:21 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis
of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in
that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at
the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this
list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often
required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from
either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field
office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species1 and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for
more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/IocationNP5IYHTPN5EU3H7ESZJEJV63VY/resources 3/13

11/20/22, 4:21 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Amphibians
NAME
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes j
NAME STATUS '
STATUS
Threatened
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecplspecies/528
Insects
NAME
Boa
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
bttps://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
Endangered
STATUS
Candidate
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/IocationNP5IYHTPN5EU3H7ESZJEJV63VY/resources 4/13

11/20/22, 4:21 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
Critical habitats
Threatened
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Actl.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/col lections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see
exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around
your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/IocationNP5IYHTPN5EU3H7ESZJEJV63VY/resources 5/13

11/20/22, 4:21 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional
maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your
list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other
important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
NAME
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
BREEDING SEASON
\let\Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
4 \°
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its+
range in the continental USA and Alaska. mi
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Aiaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
Probability of Presence Summary
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/IocationNP5IYHTPN5EU3H7ESZJEJV63VY/resources 6/13

11/20/22, 4:21 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and
understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before
using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
a
‘tA
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The caicuiation is done in three stepsi*
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2 To property present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence
at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of
presence on week 12 is 0.2510.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0,0510.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fail between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar,
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/IocationNP5IYHTPN5EU3H7ESZJEJV63VY/resources 7/13

11/20/22, 4:21 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird
BCC - BCR
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
1+++ +++ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l-k 11 I I
++++ +}i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I.1 I I l I I+++++ f+
I I f+ +}++ ++++ +III I I I I I I I I I I I I++++ +++ +�' +++
+++ I I I I I I I I I I I l 1 I I I I I I I I I I I II I; I I I I I I I I I I+++ ++++
\...)18*°-
I:Ip TEf tT!11O6
�1
+--1 1-1-7)--17++ -4+-1 1111 1111 1111 1111 1 Hii++++++++++++
Tell me more about conservation measures i can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds
are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of
Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity
you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified
location?
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/IocationNP5IYHTPN5EU3H7ESZJEJV63VY/resources 8/13

11/20/22, 4:21 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey banding and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and
citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuousty being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the 'Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do i know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps
provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird
on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with It, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likety does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in
the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/IocationNP5IYHTPN5EU3H7ESZJEJV63VY/resources 9/13

11/20/22, 4:21 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data
Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to
you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
< \00
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what
other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory
birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability
of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project not your exact project
footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black
vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is
the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as
more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a
lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look
for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to
avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn
more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement
to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources
page.
Coastal Barrier Resources System
Projects within the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) may be subject
to the restrictions on Federal expenditures and financial assistance and the consultation
requirements of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) (16 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). For more
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/IocationNP5IYHTPN5EU3H7ESZJEJV63VY/resources 10/13

11/20/22, 4:21 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
information, please contact the local Ecological Services Field Office or visit the CBRA
Consultations website. The CBRA website provides tools such as a flow chart to help
determine whether consultation is required and a template to facilitate the consultation
process.
There are no known coastal barriers at this location.
Data limitations
The CBRS boundaries used in IPaC are representations of the controlling boundaries, which are depicted
on the official CBRS maps. The boundaries depicted in this layer are not to be considered authoritative for
in/out determinations dose to a CBRS boundary (i.e., within the "CBRS Buffer Zone" that appears as a
hatched area on either side of the boundary). For projects that are very close to a CBRS boundary but do
not clearly intersect a unit, you may contact the Service for an official determination by following the
instructions here: https://www.fws.gov/servicelcoastal-barrier-resour{es-system-property-documentation
Data exclusions
CBRS units extend seaward out to either the 20- or 30-foot bathymetric contour (depending on the location
of the unit). The true seaward extent of the units is not shown in the CBRS data, therefore projects in the
offshore areas of units (e.g., dredging, breakwaters, offshore wind energy or oil and gas projects) may be
subject to CBRA even if they do not intersect the CBRS data, For additional information, please contact
10\it
[e-mail].
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/IocationNP5IYHTPN5EU3H7ESZJEJV63VY/resources 11/13

11/20/22, 4:21 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these restAts with a site visit to
determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands;
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
Palustrine
RIVERINE
Riverine
0?°'
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory
website
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether
wetlands occur. Additional information on the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular
site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted
on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/IocationNP5IYHTPN5EU3H7ESZJEJV63VY/resources 12/13

11/20/22, 4:21 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or
products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should
seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory
programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
‘)
\s
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/IocationNP5IYHTPN5EU3H7ESZJEJV63VY/resources 13/13

SURVEY PROVIDED BY BASS, NIXON AND KENNEDY, INC.
DELINEATION PROVIDED BY SAGE ECOLOGICAL SERVICES, INC.
STORMWATER REVIEW BY CITY OF DURHAM
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS PROPOSED = 574
IMPERVIOUS:
PRE —DEVELOPED = 0.65 AC.
POST -DEVELOPED = 53.93 AC.
PROPOSED BUILT UPON AREA (BUA) = 53.93 AC.
TOTAL LENGTH OF STREAMS: 11,278 LF +/-
TOTAL AREA OF WETLANDS: 80,279 SF +/-
11/28/20229:03:40 AM PLOT BY:jeremy
R:*2018*18249 - Arvin Road Assemblage*CIVIL*04 Construction*Impact Maps*Overall Impact Map.dgn
I,n� ii-i, 'ii 'ii ii ili i
LILUUsILV

IMPACT A
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
4.282 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
3.842 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
28 LF / 133 SF
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERTI
30 LF / 118 SF
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
58 LF / 251 SF
TEMP. STREAM I1'ACT
7 LF / 50 SF
WETLAND ImPACT
11.453 SF / 0.26 AC
IMPACT E
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
627 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
390 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WETLAND IMPACT
N/A
I1PACT I
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
66 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
457 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAPT
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WETLAND IMPACT
N/A
IMPACT 8
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
1.958 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
716 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM ImPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
33 LF / 779 SF
WETLAND IMPACT
N/A
I1I'ACT F
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
630 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
421 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP-RAP1
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WE TL ANO I1PACT
N/A
IMPACT d
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
1.020 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
614 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WETLAND IMPACT
N/A
I1PACT C
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
2.466 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
1.402 SF
STREAM II ACT (RIP -RAP)
N/A
STREAM I1PACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
43 LF / 147 SF
WETLAND IMPACT
N/A
IMPACT G
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
7.805 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
4.655 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
30 LF / 210 SF
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
99 LF / 797 SF
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
129 LF / 1.007 SF
TEmP. STREAM ImPACT
24 LF / 192 SF
WETLAND I1PACT
N/A
IMPACT K
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
N/A
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAPT
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WETLAND IMPACT
3.246 SF / 0.07 AC
IMPACT 0
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
1.687 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
612 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WETLAND I1PACT
N/A
IMPACT H
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
636 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
419 SF
STREAM I1PACT (RIP -RAP)
N/A
STREAM I1PACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WETLAND IMPACT
N/A
IMPACT F
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
N/A
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
N/A
STREAM I1PACT (RIP-RAPI
N/A
STREAM I1PACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM I1.'ACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WETLAND IMPACT
318 SF / 0.01
AC
TOTAL IMPACTS
TOTAL SF
TOTAL AC
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
21.177 SF
0.49 AC
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
13.528 SF
0.31 AC
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
58 LF / 343 SF
0.01 AC
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
129 LF / 915 SF
0.02 AC
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
187 LF / 1.258 SF
0.03 AC
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
107 / 1.168 SF
0.03 AC
WETLAND IMPACT
15.017 SF
0.34 AC
N
W_
H
H
Z
0
U
a
2
J
J
cc
W
0
N
co
6
z
0
DATE 10-180-22
DRAWN BY J.JONES
APPROVED BY OLD
Z
co
11/14/20226:57:21 AM PLOT BY:jeremy
R:*2018*18249 - Arvin Road Assemblage*CIVIL*04 Construction*Impact Maps*Overall Impact Ouantities.dgn

M
A
O
M
I
/
/ I \ /— — --d` / 7
I / '.> ?O.. ./7
I / /7-11` /
1 ,' 2 '�O
/
,
\/• ♦��/ //�
'
'
50' NEUSE RIVER
—RIPAREAN BUFFER
(MEASURED FROM /
TOP OF BANK) / -
-TOP OF,-- -
STREAM -
BANK — -
-- -
0
i J
'28'L x 12'W x 22" DEEP
/CLASS 1 RIP —RAPS
/
1
/
•
/
/
/
z r •
/
/
/
/
i
I
I I
I I I
I
I I
I
'
I ,
/ /
/
/
IMPACT A
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
4.282 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
3.842 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAPT
28 LF / 133 SF
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERTI
30 LF / 118 SF
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
58 LF / 251 SF
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
7 LF / 50 SF
WETLAND IMPACT
11.453 SF / 0.26 AC
/
/
/ /
/
/ /
/
LEGEND
1U
WE
2.�.'.►Atk4
/z,
PROP.
42" RCP
PROP. RETAINING WALL
/
//// PROP. 12" DIP
// /� WATERLINE
STREAM
IMPACT
30' ZONE 1
IMPACT
20' ZONE 2
IMPACT
TEMP.
STREAM
IMPACT
RIP —RAP
WETLAND
IMPACT
WETLAND /
30' ZONE 1
IMPACT
WETLAND /
20' ZONE 2
IMPACT
SCALE IN FEET
350
345
PROP
GRADE
340
—EX.
GRADE
335
„139.00
C- @ 4F/0%
330
325
320
315
133 N
V U
= 334.30
1+50 2+00
20 40
80 120 160
SCALE:
H - 1" = 20
V - 1" = 5'
2+50
co
0
z
0
DATE 10-180-22
DRAWN BY J.JONES
APPROVED BY OLD
Z
co
CO
11/11/20222:23:45 PM PLOT BY: eremy
R:*2018*18249 - Arvin Road Assemblage*CIVIL*04 Construction*Impact Maps*Impact A Stream.dgn

30' CITY OF /�
.4 '/ 30 , ,.DURHAM SANITARY \ %
/ „Al(- SEWER EASEMENT �Jl
\ r ' / 1/VA—A j '
�l ,�' / i
, ,,,,,
`\I,-
,-
/ �.
1
FLOODWAY ' ` / / ,
1 - ' / WETLANDS,' ./,
i
•
sue, ii��y�0 `\ �///hg,'/ TOP OFi�/,'
Fes% / / /� STREAM]
// / \ i // .'BANK
// '
f f / �.� j
��l_ \. ,�� /.
50' NEUSE RIVER
RIPAREAN BUFFER
(MEASURED FROM
TOP OF BANK)
/
�-
1Q.
'e2
. ��• ,yam
-S-S
I ..
SS'
- - PROP. DOGHOUSE /
SS'
/
IMPACT 8
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
1.958 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
716 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
33 LF / 779 SF
WETLAND IMPACT
N/A
LEGEND
0S D SEWEEX. ROEASEMENTRY
100 YEAR FL00DPLAIN
STREAM
IMPACT
30' ZONE 1
IMPACT
20' ZONE 2
IMPACT
WETLANDS
TEMP.
STREAM
IMPACT
SCALE IN FEET
0
0
0
0
305
300
295
290
285
280
275
270
w
0
x
z
w
tn
W100 W
L EL.—=
295_6-
Ex. G
RAD
E
f
\
E)S. 12" SEWER
I V. = 284.4
2'
CQV
MIN.
ER
207.6
2 LF -
8" DIP
0.
51%
vv
COo
SCALE :
H - 1"
V - 1"
=20'
= 5'
+00 1+50 2+00
0 20 40
80 120 160
CO
O
z
O
DATE 10-180-22
DRAWN BY J.JONES
APPROVED BY OLD
Z
co
11/11/20222:23:27 PM PLOT BY:jeremy
R:*2018*18249 - Arvin Road Assemblage*CIVIL*04 Construction*Impact Maps*Impact B - Stream.dgn

n 1 I i 1 I 1 \ \ /1 /1
I 1 I 1 111 \
1 I 1 \ I 11 1 1 I I / -/ \/ `
1 I 1 10 1 I 1 1 // \ ` 1
I I / / \
I 1 l I I
1 �I 1 I\ 1 \\\\ 1
5 I1 II 1 \I 11 I11 I 1 \ \ \1 \%
II I 101 EX. 50' GAS 1i
I I 1 I I \ 1 IL INE EASEMENT •�•�'•••
I/ (� I 1 I I .ice %J_
I \ 1 1 1 1 I ,\
I 1 1 1 I 1 \ -••�.•
/ 1 1 1 \ *1 1 1\ ;/
/ \ \'1 1 �
DI 1 1 \ 1 Y/'
1
\ \ \
\ \
\\ \ \ --
\ \ \ \ \ ` _ _
\ \ \ \ \
\ WETLANDS \\ \\
\
`,'�\., V V I-2 \ \\
\ ♦ `� \
\
�•� - �, �\
L ♦ `\ \\ ,\
I %� \ \ \ 1 \
�: \ �• ,\ \ \ \ 1
X i.. \ : \ \ \ I I
_d \ \ \ \ \ \
4111 '/ \ TOP OF \\ \ \ \\ \ X
PROP. \ STREAM 1 \ \\ \\ \ \I \
' \\ \�► , \BAN, \ ♦.' \\ \\ \\ ,1 \\ I 1\ \
I f'4 . * ` \ \ \ 1 q \
30'ICITY OF 1 r \ \ \ 1
DURHAM SANITARY 4�� / C> I \ \ \ \
SEWER EASEMENT 1 I�� �► \\ \ \ \
�'I / / I I l / l ,, � l� �A A\ "� \ \ \\
I l / S° ` � \\
11 l.X / / fl �• �� �i PROP. j \ \\
�/ // 50' NEUS/ / E RIVER, �0�hQ // \\ jx� \ \ I j I I
/ RIPAREAN BUFFER /‘/ \// \%ems\ 1
I / ( MEASURED FROM / /\ - •. ,.� • \
L TOP OF BANKI I \ / \ \ 11 j I
- -'/ / // / I / • /i ..� r �• 1 11 O II 1
/ / / 1 1 / / / / \ / "t I \
▪ ' 7/ / / 1• I / / / ' I 1 1I \
/1 / / /' �•\• / 1 I ` III I 1 \
Cj // i j I/ 1 l I/ I • / i `� j i I
_I / / /;� / / 1
�/ I i 1 I I
/ - /
/ , ' ▪ ,/ : P \ / 1 �• T4 1 I
/
/
/
/
1
/ / / / / j i \ 4\ \\ \ 1 1 III/ I
\ 1 I / i // �!/\t \ 1\ `\ % \ >41
\ V \ \ / / / / 11
\ \ .�/ / / / o %� 7 \1 \\ 11 \\ I Iu 1 \ \ , ,/ / '1 r 4� 1� ; ,• \ \ �1 \
1 1 \ \ \ l L' / / ., I \ i \ \ ' 1\ `-J JI1
\ \ 1 // n_ ir �1 1 \. 1 II\ I I�—
CO
IMPACT C
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
2.466 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
1.402 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
43 LF / 147 SF
WETLAND IMPACT
N/A
LEGEND
STREAM
IMPACT
30' ZONE 1
IMPACT
20' ZONE 2
IMPACT
WETLANDS
TEMP.
STREAM
IMPACT
I1
SCALE IN FEET
320
315
310
305
300
295
290
285
L
•
X. GRAD
E1
•
146.13
LF
- 8
" Pv
c@
0.6
8%
/
/,
/
O
a
1-
N
w
�0
. II
Ma
a
1
1
N N
II II
~z
o-
zz
pV 45 64551.
9"
SCALE:
H - 1"
V - 1"
/
=20'
= 5'
6+00
0
20 40
80 120 160
7+00
8+00
z
0
co
0
z
a0
O
DATE 10-180-22
DRAWN BY J.JONES
APPROVED BY OLD
Z
co
1/11/20222:23:10 PM PLOT BY:jeremy
R:*2018*18249 - Arvin Road Assemblage*CIVIL*04 Construction*Impact Maps*Impact C - Stream.dgn

•. -",
/ r•
•
-
•
FLOODWAY
•
•
•
30' CITY OF /
URHAM SANITARY
WER EASEMENT
S� ~' ; -
\ .....
'S
PROP. DOGHOUSE
MANHOLE
IMPACT D
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
1.687 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
612 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAPT
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WETLAND IMPACT
N/A
•
\ ,\ \ `100 YEAR -YEAR -I �-
• ��� - --�
\
N 0 /
♦ N /
m 0
♦♦� / ,-•
N
TOP OF
STREAM \r^
BANK
w
0
EX. 25' SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
--Ss
LEGEND
30' ZONE 1
IMPACT
20' ZONE 2
IMPACT
WETLANDS
50' NEUSE RIVER
RIPAREAN BUFFER
(MEASURED FROM
TOP OF BANK)
SCALE IN FEET
325
320
315
310
0
0
0
0
J
0
x
z
w o
N -
3J-
o U
CDZ
oz
O0
cr U
_wow
AIM •
(A0N
ao II
-o
16
AT
fP
" STEEL,
IERE SP
CAS
CRO
ACED
305
INC,
SSI
e 4
0
(2,
1.11
00
x
M M
PIPE
G
0' 0.C. MAX.)
0100 WL EL.__ 30949 +/
1
50.0
LF - •" OIF
0.53 i
300
295
i
/
/
LF
Q‘ic
/
/
/
/
051'
00
ao 0
wI,-
00
II II
1-
0-
zc
J
\ /
CONC. PIERS FOR SUPPORTI
AEiIAL STREAM CROSSING
(PIERS SPACED a 20' 0.C.
NG
MA
EX. INV = 297.97
PROIS INV IN = 30E.00
290
SCALE:
H - 1"
V - 1"
=20'
= 5'
1 +00
0 20 40
80 120 160
1+50
2+00
z
0
co
0
z
O
DATE 10-180-22
DRAWN BY J.JONES
APPROVED BY OLD
Z
co
11/11/20222:22:52 PM PLOT BY:jeremy
R:*2018*18249 - Arvin Road Assemblage*CIVIL*04 Construction*Impact Maps*Impact D - Stream.dgn

-- III I
CI Imo/ , 1 1 J \ 1 \1 1 \ II \ \ 1
%Q / 1 I I I 1 / I 1• I SO'4 1 \ 1 I 1 \ 1 \ \ 1
- -- tl II l I I 1 1 11 50' NEUSE RIVER / I ` \ 1 \i4 '
/ lI / 1 1 I I RIPAREAN BUFFER / \ \ \ \ I I \ ,I
SCM #4 // C7 11 / / 1i \ \ \
1 1 / 1 1 l 1 / ( MEASURED F ROM \ �� \ \ \ I 1
II / / / I l l •I TOP OF BANK l + \ \ \ \\ 1 \\ �V ,�\ l�
�, / / l / 1 %l I ,, I �a \ 1 \ \ \ \ 1
/ / /1 / , /•
/ , /i �'I j \. \\ \ \ \ \ \ I \ 11�
1 l / /� l 0'1 / 11 f , / 1 \ \I \\ \\
/
•/ / / / i 1z . \ \ \ I 1
1 / 1 / / / 1 7!I'4:
1i '� 'i �V/l �'� I � � � ,,
I 1 � t>, .�� �'1 '1`, •oo��^\, '1 v I/
/I114T::]:Nv• 1/,/;,,/// •I/ / I ////3Q 1 Jam,\\ \IItl1V1\F--_�I
���1 �' ,' ,' 1, ZO 1°4 ' 1 \, , \ `\ \ �I� 3Q' ' PROP. 30' CITY OF
^\ '7 `` J' /� �� l�(� Z�'� i i- l `� \\ . 1 DURHAM SANITARY
II _?y(�/ /� '4O //y , l N\ ` II ,'�I SEWER EASEMENT
7' I _ •� / \ /' /:• / 1/ ,A� , \\ i i•\ \
�, h . ' ' Gi I 7'�(� 1 k 1 //1t1 `1 \ I \
J r' i' '� .O 1. ZONE I \?Q%��\ •� " /-�
ii
• 2 71,
I.
CD �' /' k ��°•�'�� I ‘ \\ i ONE 2 l .' 1
— — —I ` � �
-
' • �
� IMPAOO E \I�' '��i'ti� /
_--> II 1 / 100 YEAR FL00DPLAIN \ \\_--- '\
/'- i_
I/ r __��-----►----'/ / ice, \ I
ar
1-------- �� ( �//' i- a1 i
a
IMPACT E
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
627 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
390 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WETLAND IMPACT
N/A
LEGEND
STREAM
IMPACT
30' ZONE 1
IMPACT
20' ZONE 2
IMPACT
WETLANDS
PROP. 50'
OREENWAY
EASEMENT
SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40
80 120 160
IMPACT F
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
630 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
421 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WETLAND IMPACT
N/A
co
0
z
0
DATE 10-180-22
DRAWN BY J.JONES
APPROVED BY OLD
z
C.
c ruju
o LJJ N o 0iNa
z :14°
W tCW• EIGT
z J°J_O x
X HJx—
zJa°z2
� z
N W T.
J J
OO ▪ U oa[
Z
co
11/11/20222:22:29 PM PLOT BY:jeremy
R:*2018*18249 - Arvin Road Assemblage*CIVIL*04 Construction*Impact Maps*Impact E and F - Buffer.dgn

/` I I 1 '.� 1 / / I 1 I '
11II �\ \ '�N 1 / 1♦.1 / / / 1 ���1
1 1\ \\ `, \ \\\\\ii't`\1� \ill ) / �;E,ZO t •--I
is/I■ I.
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ \ \ \ ✓ �j0 \ \•1',, • \ / I/ X
\ \\ \ \ \ \\ 1\ \ \ \\ `\ o • \ \ 1 N`� 1 �\ \\ \ \\ \ �k �)C�
\ \ \\ \\ \ \ •\,\\ \\\\ ��?�C'� \TOP OF` �\ \ 11 I \I
\\ \ \ \ \ \\ \�' \ \ A,\ ti\ STREAM / d \\ \ 1 ,\ 0�.:\ \ \\: \ `
\\ \\ \ \\ 1 I /�♦; i,LO `L�\�,\\BANK ;`T, \ \ \\\\ \\
\ `\ I / 1 / r�I .A i' 50' NEUSE R I VER II / 1, \
) 1 / / / RIPAREAN BUFFER II
/ / / / / 1 \�I ( MEASURED FROM, I
/ /1 / / / / 1 ' 1 ;TOP OF hBANK 1
l /1/ // / 1/ /1 A I i IA5u \
/
/ / / 1 ( k, �r `
/ / / 1 A` \•
\\cam c\ ( PROP. RETAINING WALL ,
\ ,..� �`
. , -2- ''' 0--• ---r: -,... , ,.
`.
`,PROP • 8" DIP `\
WATERLINE \
N. . \ \
\-CONC.\\ \\
`SIDEWALK
`\ \
+\ \
i
1 III n \\ \A
\L1
�� , ' I�
``.,.` �I` ' PROP. RETAINING WALL\ 1
\ \(,-
\ v\ V \ \
\ \ \ \ `
1 30'L x 8'W x 22" DEEP
�� CLASS 1 RIP -RAP \ \\ \\\
1/li , \\
1 , / ' ` �\ \,♦, \\ \\ \\ \\ `.\-
1 1 \ `� \ ♦• \ \ \ \\ \\\
PROP. 1 TWIN \ \\\ \\ `\ ''♦, \\ \\ ��\
48 RCP's
7 \ \ \`�\\\`\ \N \\ �. \\� \ \ \ \\
I 1 \ �\ \\ \\ �\ \ c \\ \ \ \• \ \ \
X1�1 \ �\ \ �\ \�� I �, ♦ \ \ \ \ \
\ ♦\ PROP. 8" PVC \ \ \f \'. \ \ \
.; \,$AN. SEWER \ \ ▪ \ ♦cr\ ♦ \ \
IMPACT G
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
7.805 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
4.655 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
30 LF / 210 SF
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
99 LF / 797 SF
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
129 LF / 1.007 SF
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
24 LF / 192 SF
WETLAND I IPAC T
N/A
SCALE IN FEET
LEGEND
STREAM
IMPACT
30' ZONE 1
IMPACT
20' ZONE 2
IMPACT
TEMP.
STREAM
IMPACT
1 RIP -RAP
WETLANDS
0
20
40
80
120
160
350
345
340
335
330
325
320
NV
315
ETAIN
WALL
IN
= 32
ING
0.10
PROP. GRADE
J
00 LF
CP @ 1.
X. GRADE
RETAININ
WALL
00%
'MEP MI
In
V OUT = 319.20
1+00 1+50
NOTE:
CULVERT INVERTS SHALL BE INSTALLED
20% OF PIPE DIAMETER BELOW EXISTING
STREAM INVERT.
2+00
SCALE:
H - 1" = 20'
V - 1" = 5'
co
0
Z
O
DATE 10-180-22
DRAWN BY J.JONES
APPROVED BY OLD
Z
co
11/11/20222:22:09 PM PLOT BY:jeremy R:*2018*18249 - Arvin Road Assemblage*CIVIL*04 Construction*Impact Maps*Impact G - Stream.dgn

1 /' .1/ / / / / / / I
/ / / / / / / / / / > %' I T\ / 7
/
f ( ( / , I / /•
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f//
/ / / / / / / \ i / i
I I I I I� I G, / • i
' I I I 1 1 I1 1 1 1 1 %% not' i/ I
,� / / / ••
J 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I,% 2 i i
1 1 I 1 1�11 1 11 1 I I I / /• / .• ' /
'�'Y / \ • / / ! / !
I % ! ! \ 1 I I I
1 I I I I I 1
I I I I I I1 WETLANDS / / 1 I I I
I 11 1 1\ ' • 1
1 I II 1
/ 1 1 / 1\ \ 1 1 / / TIOP 0�1I 1 i
\
III I •\ \ - / \ STREAM\: I 1
/ / / I* 1 18 NK
' \!MPACT!H • ' \- i
/
\ \ : ( /
/ \ \\ \ '�/ /
J 's? ,)
\\ \ \ % 1 � �� 1' 1 1 '♦
\ \ _1 .•1
\ \ \ L 1 I♦ 1 I ♦♦ .
' i ,/�' \ �'11* `\ \\ \\ `�, \
PROP. 50'
GREENWAY
EASEMENT
`L•♦ / i \ \ \
l \ '' L
• i/ / •• 50' NEUSE RIVER " •
I RIPAREAN BUFFER \
�100 YEAR FL00DPL'AIN (MEASURED FROM
♦ TOP OF♦•BANK )
PROP. 30' CITY OF '•♦ •
DURHAM SANITARY ''• • .
SEWER EASEMENT ♦
IMPACT H
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
636 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
419 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WETLAND IMPACT
N/A
LEGEND
STREAM
IMPACT
30' ZONE 1
IMPACT
20' ZONE 2
IMPACT
WETLANDS
SCALE IN FEET
WD-4
,x, ,\\ \.
` \\ \ \ 50' NEUSE RIVER\ +
\ - ` ` •RIPAREAN BUFFER \ \ \\
,, \ \\ \`N\ \(MEASURED FROM ` \
TOP OF BANK) \ ,`\
\ �\
\ `J \ \` ' \
\•'
'.\ \
\ o
\ '\ \/+ \
I I / / \`N `\
\•\
� \
A \
\ + i1 / / ��.`. tip...
\
� �C\4a \
•
`, Na„ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ ' -
\ \\\•\ \ \
♦\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ 1'
\\ \\ \ \I _/
1 11 II i
\ \ 11 1 I 1I\I \ \ \
\1 I I ` 1 1 1 \ +, \ \ \
I I 1 I Il I\\1\\ )'I \I / 1
1 1 / / / / / I
\\ \\•\\ \\\\\\\\
\\`\\\\\'�\\\ \
\\\\\\\``\\ \` �x
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\. \ \\ \\\\�\\\\\\\\ \
\\\\\\\\\ .\\\\ , \\\\\ \
0 20 40
80 120 160
\
•
\ -r „ /
\_- \
IMPACT I
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
66 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
457 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WETLAND IMPACT
N/A
4
O J
O
CC
_ Z
Z � z
D3.
Q fA
CO Ucncc
2O
cc
LL
> U
ZCC
co
0
z
0
DATE 10-180-22
DRAWN BY J.JONES
APPROVED BY OLD
Z
co
11/11/20222:21:49 PM PLOT BY:jeremy
R:*2018*18249 - Arvin Road Assemblage*CIVIL*04 Construction*Impact Maps*Impact H and I - Buffer.dgn

--.-- 1
I I
/ I
/' I /
/ /
/ / Qs
/
/ Ii---/
I I ---
/ / - --
/ �T
{/ /
/// //
50' NEUSE RIVER *�., //
RIPAREAN BUFFER •G
(MEASURED FROM / �•
TOP OF BANK)... /
ill Lu
I /
\\ -- •.
N ,
EX. 25' SANITARY-
\--�
\ EX. MANHOLE �, ��`-� SSA \ -
SS 100 YEAR FL00DPLAIN
.✓ //\ /- •
//•` -
/ '•\ /,...i 1
♦
30' CITY OF /
DURHAM SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT\
x_.--- .—•TOP OF � •�� I��,
,' STREAM •,•L, , , \
/ BANK •�.
\\ / /
0 \40♦•
,RFgM
SSA \ ,��``\\\ �\\` F=w �\
--
SEWER EASEMENT
30'
/
IMPACT J
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
1.020 SF
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
614 SF
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WETLAND IMPACT
N/A
LEGEND
•
STREAM
IMPACT
2
30' ZONE 1
IMPACT
20' ZONE 2
IMPACT
WETLANDS
SCALE IN FEET
325
320
315
310
305
0
a
-'6" STEEL CASING PIPE
AT STREAM CROSSING,.
(PIERS SPACED @ 40 0.C. MAX.)
Q100 WL EL
311.2 +7
Jdr
240.00 LF - 8"
e 0-50%—
DIP
II ♦
NIM
■
H
1
300
295
/
/
/
I/
II
EXIS-ING
(RADE
CONC. PIERS FOR SUPPORTING
AERIAL STREAM CROSSING
(PIERS SPACED a 20' 0.C. MAX.)
CX. INV IN = 301.15
EX. INV OUT = 301.02
PROF. INV N = 310
.00 (OUTSIDE DROP)
290
SCALE:
H - 1 " = 20'
V - 1" = 5'
1 +00
0
20 40
80 120 160
1+50
2+00
co
6
z
0
DATE 10-180-22
DRAWN BY J.JONES
APPROVED BY OLD
Z
co
11/11/20222:21:31 PM PLOT BY:jeremy
R:*2018*18249 - Arvin Road Assemblage*CIVIL*04 Construction*Impact Maps*Impact J - Stream.dgn

--:, 355
/
/1`
/ \
/ / .
/ \\ .
Y / \\\; / /
/ / / / �,, \\
/ ,i
/ / / / / , / /
1 / // / / !/, / / / / I
/ 1 / / // / /1 // , // / 1 /
/1 / / / / / // /
//r /// / // / 1 '/ //// // I // /
/
,3 , / ,, / / / / I
J /I/ / 1, /, /, //
/ / / / / 1
/ // , // ,I / / , /I
/ ' / / / /
IF_ E-4111111111111111111411116
—
/
I
/ 1/ J / / y/ .1 /
/ I ' p/ / / _ /
/ /
/ / / /
�/ / / / // / /
/ • j,/ / / J
/ / /
/ / /
//
' / / / / I/ / /
/ /;
f //
/ //
// I / /
-///'--/ --Y Y
/ , / b l l l / /
/ / / / / / / /
/ / 1� / / i / / / // I
/ / / 4 l i I I I 1 1
/ /' // / I / // / / 1 1 1 1 1
►J / / ; / /'/ '' '' /' / 1 1 / ;'
/ / / / / / // I / // / / / / 1 / / 1 I 1
/ / / / ! / / / / 1 1 1
/ // / / I / I / 1 / /
/ / /j—/ / ,4
/ / / / /
/
// //�///j '/j/// /
/ /
/ ////r///
/ / / / / / / /�6cY // / / /1, / / / / I/
/,// / /// / / /r�_
,-/-71_ _/-7-7-7r/ ///
/
/
/ A•
/ / / / / / / / /
'` il7E ` // /' /) // / // / / / /
�� / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / / /
7 �10 VE / / / / / / /
// / / // / / 1 / / — — �— —
/ / // // /-1-
/ / / I/ // / / / / /
\ -r / / / / 1 / l / / / / /
/ //
/1 / /
/ /
/ . /
/ /
/ / 1
11/11/20222:21:12 PM PLOT BY:jeremy R:*2018*18249 - Arvin Road Assemblage*CIV L*04 Construction*Impact Maps*Impact K - Wetland.dgn
IMPACT K
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
N/A
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (RIP -RAP)
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT)
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WETLAND IMPACT
3.246 SF / 0.07 AC
LEGEND
STREAM
IMPACT
30' ZONE 1
IMPACT
20' ZONE 2
IMPACT
WETLAND
IMPACT
SCALE IN FEET
80 120 160

/
/ /
/ / / / /
/ /
/ // / / / '
..../ / / / / / /
/ / /
/ / / / /
/
/
/
\
\
'tll ;
00,
\
/"
/
\/ /� 1
1 /
I //
. \ \ : \ :.•r. ______ ___, // ,
/ iI' ,/ // // // ,/ / ///////// /'/ \• \\ \
1, I \ /��i� '�ia�
IMPACT F
TOTAL
ZONE 1 NEUSE BUFFER
N/A
ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (RIP-RAP1
N/A
STREAM IMPACT (CULVERT]
N/A
TOTAL STREAM IMPACT
N/A
TEMP. STREAM IMPACT
N/A
WETLAND IMPACT
318 SF / 0.01
AC
LEGEND
STREAM
IMPACT
30' ZONE 1
IMPACT
20' ZONE 2
IMPACT
WETLAND
IMPACT
SCALE IN FEET
v
co
0
Z
CO
O
DATE 10-180-22
DRAWN BY J.JONES
APPROVED BY OLD
Z
co
0 20 40
80 120 160
11/11/20222:20:56 PM PLOT BY:jeremy
R:*2018*18249 - Arvin Road Assemblage*CIVIL*04 Construction*Impact Maps*Impact L - Wetland.dgn

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2020-00212 County: Durham County U.S.G.S. Quad: Northeast Durham
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Applicant:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Size (acres)
Nearest Waterway
USGS HUC
Sa2e Ecological Services, Inc
Sean Clark
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
[phone]
22.3 (approximate)
Chunky Pipe Creek
03020201
Nearest Town Durham
River Basin Neuse
Coordinates Latitude: 36.009265
Longitude: -78.82740
Location description: The property is located approximately 500 feet West -Southwest of the Cheek Road, Benbow
Drive intersection in Durham, Durham County, North Carolina (see attached map).
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process,
including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation
requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all
waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an
appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the
waters, including wetlands, have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands, at the project area, which is
not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the
waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC
§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
Page 1 of 2

SAW-2020-00212
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Andrew Williams at
[phone] or Andrew.E.Williams2(ausace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: N/A. An Approved JD has not been completed.
D. Remarks: Site visit conducted by USACE on May 26, 2020
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in Section B. above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request
to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Philip Shannin, Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801

SAW-2020-00212
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by: Not Applicable.
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence. Date: 2020.06.04
��`�`' ��7� 13:48:41-04'00'
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date: June 4.2020
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/f?p=136:4:0.

Note: Streams depicted herein
may be subject to the NC State
Riparian Buffer Rules
trffiTfinigle
btoTTROMfiibilblag9
M230C2tit31.921
(7O,MniVii2DIDD
R,TIT:OTZLISEA
Crt23DCAMO
0520.k.Off....ngs
CEJ2±1104P
G2:22ffinaMMITIMCI
(?},-4rid'EnQ21
024:•43M4
NOTE: Location, shape, and size of
depicted features on the evaluated
site are approximate and should be
surveyed by a licensed NC surveyor
for final site planning.
OSSCLgo.JO'rrn
Map Location
CASWELL PERSON
ORANGE
CHATHAM
•
DURHAM
VANCE
GRANVILLE
—FRANKLIN
Preliminary Jursdictional Determination
Stream and Wetland Sketch Map
Parrish Property
Sage Project # 2018.91
May 28, 2020
Map Information:
Date Prepared: May 28, 2020
Preparer: P. Beach
Data Source/Date: Stream and Wetland
Assessment Field Data
December 18, 2019;
USACE site verification meeting
May 26, 2020.
Equipment: Trimble - Handheld GPS
Notes: Post Processing to Submeter
Figure 3
SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
WAKE
0 75 150
Feet
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

SAW-2020-00212
PROCESS AND
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Sean Clark Sage Ecological Services, Inc
File Number: SAW-2020-00212
Date: June 4, 2020
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
7
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION
Additional
Corps
I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative
information may be found at http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
appeal of the above decision.
or
regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A:
•
•
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP),
or object to the permit.
the permit document and return
you may accept the LOP and your
you accept the permit in its entirety,
determinations associated
it to the district engineer for final
work is authorized. Your signature
and waive all rights to appeal the
with the permit.
therein, you may request that the
to the district engineer. Your
or you will forfeit your right to appeal
and may: (a) modify the
or (c) not modify the permit
objections, the district engineer
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP)
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section
objections must be received by the district engineer within
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration,
because of certain terms and conditions
II of this form and return the form
60 days of the date of this notice,
engineer will evaluate your objections
to address some of your objections,
written. After evaluating your
as indicated in Section B below.
B:
•
•
PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP),
the permit
the permit document and return
you may accept the LOP and your
you accept the permit in its entirety,
determinations associated
it to the district engineer for final
work is authorized. Your signature
and waive all rights to appeal the
with the permit.
terms and conditions therein, you
by completing Section II of this form
within 60 days of the date of
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional
APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers
(Standard or LOP) because of certain
Administrative Appeal Process
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
approved JD or
60 days of the date of
JD.
Engineers Administrative
form must be received by

SAW-2020-00212
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
■ 1
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Attn: Andrew Williams
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
If you only have questions regarding
also contact:
Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
the appeal process you may
Appeal Review Officer
South Atlantic Division
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Andrew Williams, 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: June 4, 2020
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Attn: Sean Clark
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington; Parrish Property/3132 Cheek
Road; SAW-2020-00212
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: App. 500-feet WSW of
the intersection of Cheek Road and Benbow Drive, in Durham, Durham County, North Carolina.
E. (USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Durham County City: Durham
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 36.010096°N, 78.827061°W
Universal Transverse Mercator: Zone 17S 695831 3987252
Name of nearest waterbody: Chunky Pipe Creek
F. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date: June 4, 2020
M Field Determination. Date(s): May 26, 2020

TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEWAREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude (decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to which
the aquatic resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section 404 or
Section 10/404)
Wetland WAE
36.007877° N
78.826892° W
0.015 acre
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland WD
36.009433° N
78.828232° W
0.091 acre
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland WE
36.007928° N
78.826174° W
0.235 acre
Wetland
Section 404
Tributary D
36.008415° N
78.828844° W
87 LF
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Tributary E
36.007907° N
78.826099° W
172 LF
Non -Wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD fmds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Wetland Stream Sketch Map, prepared by Sage, dated January 22, 2020 (Updated
May 28, 2020) ; 28 January 2020 Wetland delineation report
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
[ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U. S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name- 1-24,000 NE Durham, NC Quadrangle
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Durham County Soil Survey (Sheet #22)
▪ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name
▪ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): NC OneMap 2015
or ®Other (Name & Date): Site photos dated December 18, 2019
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter.
M Other information (please specify): 26 May 2020 USACE site
visit
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Date:
,444 G(241 L 2020.06.04
13:38:57-04'00'
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
May 28, 2020
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
Durham Arvin Associates
4810 Bluestone Drive
Durham, NC 27612
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
November 5, 2019
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
RRO #19-323
Determination date: 09/25/2019
Staff: Brion Byers
Durham County
Determination Type:
Buffer
Intermittent/Perennial
Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
EJ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267)
(governmental and/or interjurisdictional
projects)
® Intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local buffer
ordinances apply)
Project Name:
Address/Location:
Stream(s):
Arvin Road Assemblage
801 Arvin Road, Durham NC
Chunky Pipe Creek
Feature
E/I,PO)
Not
Subject(2)
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
Topo
Feature A
P
X
Throughout
X
X
Feature B
E
X
Off Property
Feature A
X
Feature C
E
X
Off Property
Feature A
X
Feature D
I
X
Off Property
Flag WD431
(N36.00645°,
W78.828350°)
X
X
I
X
Dam
(N36.00602°,
W78.827698)
Flag SD10
(N36.00419°,
W78.82802°)
X
X
P
X
Flag SD 10
(N36.00419°,
W78.82802°)
Feature A
X
X
Feature E
I
X
Off Property
Flag WD416
(N36.006676°,
W78.827622°)
X
X
NORTH CAROLINA
D
Department of Environmental Quality
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
919.791.4200

Buffer Determination Letter
RRO #19-323
Arvin Road Assemblage
November 5, 2019
Page 2 of 3
Feature
E/UP(1)
Not
Subject(2)
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
Topo
Feature F
I
X
Flag SF01
(N36.004543°,
W78.825060°)
Flag SF02
(N36.004223°,
W78.824830°)
X
Flag SF03
(N36.003928°,
W78.824584°)
Feature G
Feature G
I
X
Flag SG01
(N36.005896°,
W78.823359°)
Flag SGO2
(N36.005516°,
W78.823447°)
SGO4
(N36.004940°,
W78.823962°)
Flag SGO6
(N36.003352°,
W78.824435°)
Feature A
X
Flag SGO3
(N36.005216°,
W78.823715°)
Flag SGA01
(N36.004525°,
W78.824115°)
Flag SGO7
(N36.002620°,
W78.824568°)
Feature H
E
X
Throu
hout
Feature I
I
X
(N36.002909°,
W78.820515°)
Feature A
X
Feature J
N/A
Off Property Not Assessed
X
Feature K
N/A
Not Present
X
Feature L
P
X
Off Property
Feature A
X
Feature M
I
X
Off Property
Flag SM01
(N36.002667°,
W78.826699°
X
SMO2
(N36.002881°,
W78.826662°)
Feature A
Feature N
N/A
Off Property Not Assessed
X
Feature 0
N/A
Off Property Not Assessed
X
Feature P
P
X
Off Property
Feature A
(Not Shown on NRCS Soils Map or
USGS Topographic Map)
Pond 1
N/A
Not Present
X
(1) E=Ephemeral, I=Intermittent, P=Perennial, NP=Not Present, NA=Not applicable
(2) Refers to riparian buffer rules only. Stream, wetland, or pond impacts may still be subject to applicable water quality standards and
permitting requirements.
Explanation: The features(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey of
Durham County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale.
Each feature that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined to not be at least intermittent or is not present.
Streams that are checked "Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be
at least an intermittent stream. There may be other features located on the property that do not show up on the
maps referenced above but may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An
NOHTH CaROUNAD_E
Departinent of EnrironnwolN Quality
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
919.791.4200

Buffer Determination Letter
RRO #19-323
Arvin Road Assemblage
November5, 2019
Page 3 of 3
appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service: c/o Karen Higgins;
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 1617 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via
delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.): Karen Higgins; DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 512 N. Salisbury
Street; Raleigh, NC 27604.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, an appeal is requested within sixty (60)
days.
This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Brion Byers at [phone], or by
email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
S. Jay(Zim erman, P.G., Chief
Water Qua ity Regional Operations
Division of Water Resources
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Sean Clark, Sage Ecological Services, Inc., sent via email ([e-mail])
NOHD_E
Department of NMronmmtsl Mallly
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
919.791.4200

Arvin Road Assemblage
Durham County, NC-DWR Project # 19-323
USGS Topographical Map
Northeast Quadrangle
Legend:
-Approx. Project boundary
INN
:: Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer-
ence only ::
t

DocuSign Envelope ID: 56AB1696-E4D9-448F-8A50-1 B474406564C
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretory
S. DANIEL SMITH
NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
February 22nd, 2022
Sean Clark, Sage Ecological Services
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
NBRRO #21-463
Durham County
Determination Type:
Buffer
Intermittent/Perennial
r Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0714)
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0734)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267) (govemmental
and/or interjurisdictional projects)
►� Intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local
buffer ordinances apply)
Project Name:
Address/Location:
Stream(s):
Off Site Arvin Site Feature J
708 Avalon Rd., Durham NC
Chunky Pipe Creek
Determination Date: 2/21/2022
Staff: Josh Bri¢ham
Stream
Feature
EXPO)
Not
Subject Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
Topo
J
I
X
Flag SJO1 at
approximately
36.004318,
-78.819223
w/in 50' of
project boundary
X
(1) E = Ephemeral, I = Intermittent, P = Perennial, NP = Not Present, NE = Not Evaluated
(2) Refers to State riparian buffer rules only. Stream, wetland, or pond impacts are still subject to applicable water quality standards and permitting requirements.
Explanation: The stream(s)/pond(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey
of Durham County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1: 24,000 scale.
Each feature that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined to not be an intermittent stream, perennial stream, a
pond connected to a stream feature, or the feature is determined not to be present. Stream features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be subject to the buffer
rules. There may be other streams located on the property that do not show up on the maps referenced above and are
therefore not subject to the buffer rules. However, if the stream features are present on the tract they are subject to
all other applicable North Carolina stream standards and permitting requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B and
may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality ( Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: 56AB1696-E4D9-448F-8A50-1B474406564C
Off Site Arvin Site Feature J
Durham County
2/22/2022
Page 2 of 2
appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service: c/o Paul Wojoski; DWR
— 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 1617 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via delivery
service (UPS, FedEx, etc.): Paul Wojoski; DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 512 N. Salisbury Street;
Raleigh, NC 27604.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, an appeal is requested within sixty (60)
days.
This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Josh Brigham at [phone].
Sincerely,
cDocuslgned by:
g
BCDA9D625D4A460...
Scott Vinson, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office, Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Laserfiche
Consultant via email, Sean Clark, Sage Ecological Services, sclarkna sageecological.com
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources 1 Raleigh Regional office
3800 Barrett Drive 11628 Mail Service Center 1 Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: 56AB1696-E4D9-448F-8A50-1 B474406564C
Off Site Arvin Site Feature J
Durham County, NC-DWR Project # 21-463
NRCS Soil Survey Sheet 22
Durham Co., NC 1976
Legend:
-project boundary
Base map provided by Sage
Ecological
:: Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer-
ence only ::
r

DocuSign Envelope ID: 56AB1696-E4D9-448F-8A50-16474406564C
Off Site Arvin Site Feature J
Durham County, NC-DWR Project # 21-463
USGS Topographical Map
NE Durham Quadrangle 2019
Legend:
-Project boundary
Base map provided by Sage
Ecological
:: Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer-
ence only ::

DocuSign Envelope ID: E62FEC9F-B89F-458A-8F38-E47D0496E009
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Laverne B. Parrish
3132 Cheek Road
P.O. Box 15088
Durham, NC 27704
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
February 22nd, 2022
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
NBRRO #22-012
Durham County
Determination Type:
Buffer
Intermittent/Perennial
Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0714)
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0734)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267) (governmental
and/or interjurisdictional projects)
® Intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local
buffer ordinances apply)
Project Name:
Address/Location:
Stream(s):
Arvin Road Assemblage
3132 Cheek Road, Durham, NC
Chunky Pipe Creek
Determination Date: 2/21/2022
Staff: Josh Bri
Stream
Feature
E//P(t)
Not
Subject(2)
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
Topo
D
I
X
Flag SDO1 at
approximately
36.008321,
-78.828964
Off project
boundary
X
E
I
X
Flag SE01 at
approximately
36.007660,
-78.826455
Off project
boundary
X
X
F
I
X
Subject w/in 50' of project boundary
X
(1) E = Ephemeral, I = Intermittent, P = Perennial, NP = Not Present, NE = Not Evaluated
(2) Refers to State riparian buffer rules only. Stream, wetland, or pond impacts are still subject to applicable water quality standards and permitting requirements.
Explanation: The stream(s)/pond(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey
of Durham County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1: 24,000 scale.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh. North Carolina 27609
919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: E62FEC9F-B89F-458A-8F38-E47D0496E009
Arvin Road Assemblage
Durham County
2/22/2022
Page 2 of 2
Each feature that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined to not be an intermittent stream, perennial stream, a
pond connected to a stream feature, or the feature is determined not to be present. Stream features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be subject to the buffer
rules. There may be other streams located on the property that do not show up on the maps referenced above and are
therefore not subject to the buffer rules. However, if the stream features are present on the tract they are subject to
all other applicable North Carolina stream standards and permitting requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 02B and
may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An
appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service: c/o Paul Wojoski; DWR
— 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 1617 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via delivery
service (UPS, FedEx, etc.): Paul Wojoski; DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 512 N. Salisbury Street;
Raleigh, NC 27604.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, an appeal is requested within sixty (60)
days.
This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Josh Brigham at [phone].
Sincerely,
CSWeakened by:
e stt 444a,
BCDA9D825D4A48D...
Scott Vinson, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office, Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Laserfiche
Consultant via email, Sean Clark, Sage Ecological Services, sclarkasageecolouical.com
Q
4owmldFnmvowtY Omury�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources I Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive 11628 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: E62FEC9F-B89F-458A-8F38-E47D0496E009
Arvin Road Assemblage
Durham County, NC-DWR Project # 22-012
NRCS Soil Survey Sheet 22
Durham Co., NC 1976
Legend:
-project boundary
Base map provided by Sage
Ecological
:: Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer-
ence only ::
r

DocuSign Envelope ID: E62FEC9F-B89F-458A-8F38-E47D0496E009
Arvin Road Assemblage
Durham County, NC-DWR Project # 22-012
USGS Topographical Map
NE Durham Quadrangle 2019
Legend:
-Project boundary
Base map provided by Sage
Ecological
:: Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer-
ence only ::

Arvin Road Assemblage
Durham County, NC-DWR Project # 19-323
NRCS Soil Survey
Durham Co., NC Sheet 22, 1976
Legend:
-Approx. project boundary
:: Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer-
ence only ::
a

ROY COOPER.
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretory
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
David Goracke
KL Arvin LLC
9121 Anson Way, Ste. 200
Raleigh, NC 27612
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
November 29, 2022
Expiration of Acceptance: 5/29/2023
Project: Arvin Subdivision County: Durham
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
(8-digit HUC)
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Neuse
03020201
Riparian Wetland
0.34
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
cc: Nicole Thomson, agent
DeJa't. Ie:l: n1 (11,-101,11..131 QUA iv
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Deputy Director
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

From: Nikki Thomson
To: 401 PreFi le
Cc: Sean Clark
Subject: Notice of Intent to File a permit application, Arvin Road Assemblage, Durham County, Sage Project No. 2018.91)
Date: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 11:03:00 PM
To whom it may concern:
This email serves to notify DWR of the intent of Sage Ecological to file a Permit Application for the
Arvin Road Assemblage project in Durham County.
Thank you,
Nikki
Nicole Thomson, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
[e-mail]
[phone]