20051764 Ver 1_Scoping Comments_20000101

Stag. : north Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
~~r~
NCDENR
March 6, 2000
MEMORANDUM
To: William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager, NCDOT, Project Development & Environmental Analysis
From: John E. Hennessy, NC Division of Water Quality~~~ -
Subject: Scoping comments on proposed widening of SR 1158 (Wilson Christian Road) from NC 42 to US 264,
Wilson County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-1158(2), State Project No. 8.2341801, TIP U-3823.
Reference your correspondence dated February 1, 2000 in which you requested comments for widening project TIP
U-3823. Preliminary analysis of the project reveals the potential for multiple impacts to perennial streams and
jurisdictional wetlands in the project area. Furthermore, the impacts include a crossing of Bloomery Swamp (DWQ
stream index number 27-86-6-(3)) with a classification of WS-lV nutrient sensitive waters. The DOT is respectfully
reminded that they will need to comply with all the Neuse River Rules prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification. Further investigations at a higher resolution should be undertaken to verify the presence of other
streams and/or jurisdictional wetlands in the area. In the event that any jurisdictional areas are identified, the
Division of Water Quality requests that NCDOT consider the following environmental issues for the proposed
project:
A. We would like to see a discussion in the document that presents a clear purpose and need to justify the
project's existence. Based on the information presented in your report, we assume that the Level-of- Service
(LOS) is one of the primary reasons for the project. Therefore, the document should delineate a detailed
discussion on the existing Level-of-Service as well as the proposed future Level-of-Service. The discussion
for the future Level-of-Service should consider the Level-of-Service with and without the project.
B. The document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed impacts to wetlands and
streams with corresponding mapping.
C. There should be a discussion on mitigation plans for unavoidable impacts. If mitigation is required, it is
preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental documentation.
While the NCDWQ realizes that this may not always be practical, it should be noted that for projects
requiring mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification.
D. Review of the project reveals that no Outstanding Resource Waters, Water Supply Water, High Quality
Waters, Body Contact Waters, or Trout Waters will be impacted during the project implementation.
However, should further analysis reveal the presence of any of the aforementioned waters, the DWQ requests
that DOT strictly adhere to North Carolina regulations entitled "Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds"
(15A NCAC 04B .0024) throughout design and construction of the project. This would apply for any area
that drains to streams having WS (Water Supply), ORW (Outstanding Resource Water), HQW (High Quality
Water), B (Bodv Contact), SA (Shellfish Water) or Tr (Trout Water) classifications.
E. When practical, the DWQ requests that bridges be replaced on the existing location with road closure. If a
detour proves necessary, remediation measures in accordance with the NCDWQ requirements for General
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

Mr. William D. Gilmore memo
03/06/00
Page 2
401 Certification 2726/Nationwide Permit No. 33 (Temporary Construction, Access and Dewatering) must be
followed.
F. Review of the project reveals that no High Quality Waters or Water Supply Waters will be impacted by the
project. However, should further analysis reveal the presence of any of the aforementioned water resources,
the DWQ requests that hazardous spill catch basins be installed at any bridge crossing a stream classified as
HQW or WS (Water Supply). The number of catch basins installed should be determined by the design of the
bridge, so that runoff would enter said basin(s) rather than flowing directly into the stream.
G. If applicable, DOT should not install the bridge bents in the creek, to the maximum extent practicable.
H. Wetland and stream impacts should be avoided (including sediment and erosion control structures/measures)
to the maximum extent practical. If this is not possible, alternatives that minimize wetland impacts should be
chosen. Mitigation for unavoidable impacts will be required by DWQ for impacts to wetlands in excess of
one acre and/or to streams in excess of 1501inear feet.
I. Borrow/waste areas should not be located in wetlands. It is likely that compensatory mitigation wilLbe
required if wetlands are impacted by waste or borrow.
G. DWQ prefers replacement of bridges with bridges. However, if the new structure is to be a culvert, it should
be countersunk to allow unimpeded fish and other aquatic organisms passage through the crossing.
H. If foundation test borings are necessary; it should be noted in the document. Geotechnical work is approved
under Genera1401 Certification Number 3027/Nationwide Permit No. 6 for Survey Activities.
I. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules { 15A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(6) }, mitigation will be required for
impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single perennial stream. In the event that mitigation becomes
required, the mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values. In
accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules { 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h)(3) }, the Wetland Restoration
Program may be available for use as stream mitigation.
J. Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands.
K. The 401 Water Quality Certification application will need to specifically address the proposed methods for .
stormwater management. More specifically, stormwater should not be permitted to discharge directly into the
creek. Instead, stormwater should be designed to drain to a properly designed stormwater detention
facility/apparatus.
L. The NCDOT is reminded that they will need to plan, design, and construct their project so that they comply
with all the Neuse River Rules. Issuance of the 401 Water Quality Certification is contingent upon adherence
to the Neuse Rules.
M. While the use of National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps and soil surveys is a useful office tool, their
inherent inaccuracies require that qualified personnel perform onsite wetland delineations prior to permit
approval.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality standards are met and
designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact
John Hennessy at [phone] or [e-mail].
cc: Eric Alsmeyer, Corps of Engineers
Tom McCartney, USFWS
David Cox, NCWRC
Central Files

a,.. SwF o
~~
f.
~~
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAb4ES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 DAVID iv1000Y
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
February 1, 2000
MEMORANDUM TO: File
FROM: Jeff Ingham; P. E.
Project Development Engineer
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheet for the proposed widenins of SR 1158
(Wilson Christian Road) to multi-lanes from NC 42 to US 264,
Wilson County, State Project No. 8.2341801, Federal Aid
Project No. STP-118(2), U-3823
Attached for your review and comments are the scoping sheets for the subject
project (See attached map for project location). The purpose of these sheets and the related
review procedure is to have an early "meeting of the minds" as to the scope of work that
should be performed and thereby enable us to better implement the project. A scoping
meeting for this project is scheduled for February 28, 2000 at 10:00 A. M. in the Project
Development and Environmental Analysis Conference Room (Room 470). You may
provide us with your comments at the meeting or mail them to us prior to that date.
Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process. If there are any
questions about the meeting or the scoping sheets, please call me at 733-7844, ext. 254.
JI
attachments
~ ~~(1

PROJECT SLOPING SHEET
TIP # U-3823
PROJECT # 8.2341801
F. A. PROJECT # STP-1158(2)
DIVISION: 4 COUNTY: Wilson
Date: January 21, 2000
Revision Date:
Project Development Stage
Programming
_x_ Planning
Design
ROUTE: The proposed project involves the widening of SR 1158 (Wilson Christian
Road) to a multi-lane facility from NC 42 to US 264 in Wilson County.
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION: Major Collector
LENGTH: 2 miles (3.2 kilometers)
PURPOSE OF PROJECT: Widening SR 1158 will improve the safety and handling
capacity of the roadway. Widening will also allow the handling of future residential,
industrial, and commercial growth in the area.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND MAJOR ELEMENTS OF WORK: The proposed
project includes the widening of a 2-lane facility to a multi-lane facility. The proposed
project will likely involve the extension of two existing culverts, the addition of curb and
gutter, sidewalks, and railroad crossing arms.
TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT TO BE PREPARED
Environmental Assessment
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY SCHEDULE
EA completion - July O 1
FONSI completion - Apri102
WILL THERE BE SPECIAL FUNDING PARTICIPATION BY MUNICIPALITY,
DEVELOPERS, OR OTHERS? YES NO X

PROJECT SLOPING SHEET
TYPE OF ACCESS CONTROL: Partial? None?
NUMBER OF: Interchanges 0 Grade Separations 0 Stream Crossings 2
TYPICAL SECTION OF ROADWAY:
Proposed: 5-lane facility (consideration could also be given to a median divided facility)
TRAFFIC (ADT):
Current (2000): 4000-4500 vpd
Design Year (2025): 12,300-12,700 vpd
DESIGN STANDARDS APPLICABLE: AASHTO x 3R
CURRENT COST ESTIMATE:
Construction Cost (including engineering
and contingencies) $ 6,300,000
Right of Way Cost (including relocation, utilities and
acquisition) (TIP Right of Way Estimate) $ 1,200,000
Force Account Items $
Preliminary Engineering $
Total Cost $ 7,500,000
TIP COST ESTIMATE:
Construction $ 4,700,000
Right of Way $ 1,200,000
TOTAL TIP COST ESTIMATE $ 5,900,000

PROJECT SLOPING SHEET
LIST ANY SPECIAL FEATURES, SUCH AS RAILROAD INVOLVEMENT, WHICH
COULD AFFECT COST OR SCHEDULE OF PROJECT:
ITEMS REQUIRED (X) COMMENTS COST
Estimated Cost of Improvements:
x Pavement: $
x Surface $ 1,355,700
Base $
Milling and Recycling $
Turnouts $
Shoulders
Paved $
Earthen $
x Earthwork $ 754,050
Subsurface Items $
x Subgrade and Stabilization $ 244,575
x Drainage (List any special items) $ 420,000
Sub-Drainage $
Structures Width x Length
Bridge Replacement $
New Bridge $
Widen Bridge $
Remove Bridge $
New Culvert $
Culvert Extension 1@10x8 $ 52 800
Retaining Walls
Noise Walls,
Concrete Curb and Gutter
Concrete Sidewalk
Wetland Mitigation
Fencing: WW and or CL
x Erosion Control
Landscaping
Lighting
x Traffic Control
Signing:
New
Upgraded
x Traffic Signals
5@12x7 $ 120,360
$ 244,200
$ 321,100
$ 209,000
$ 65,000
$ 105,000
$ 45,000

PROJECT SLOPING SHEET
ITEMS REOUIRED(X) COMMENTS COST
x RR Signal with gates: $ 110,000
If 3R
Drainage Safety Enhancement $
Roadside Safety Enhancement $
Realignment for Safety Upgrade $
Utility Construction
Water $
Sewer $
x Pavement Markings
Paint $
x Thermo. & Markers $ 52,500
Delineators $
x Other Clearing, grubbing, mobilization, misc. $ 1,430,715
Contract Cost Subtotal $ 5,530,000
Engineering and Contingencies $ 770,000
Preliminary Engineering Costs $
Force Account $
CONSTRUCTION Subtotal: $ 6,300,000
Right of Way:
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH:
Right of Way Subtotal (TIP) $ 1,200,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 7,500,000
Prepared by: Jeff Ingham Date 1/14/00

PROJECT SLOPING SHEET
THE ABOVE SLOPING INFORMATION HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED
BY".
INIT. DATE NIT. DATE
Highway Design Board of Tran. Member
Roadway- Board of Tran. Member
Structure Dir. Plan. & Prog.
Design Sen-ices Dep. Admin.-Preconst.
Geotechnical Chief Engineer-Oper.
Hydraulics Secondary Roads Off.
Loc. & Sun-e~-s Construction Branch
Photogrammetr<- Roadside Environmental
Prel. Est. ~Engr. Maintenance Branch
Planning & Envir. Bridge Maintenance
Right of Wav Statewide Planning
R/W Utilities Division Engineer
Traffic Engineering Bicycle Coordinator
Project Management Program Development _
County Manager FHWA
City/Municipality- Dept. of Cult. Res.
Others Dept. of EH & NR
Others Others
IF YOU ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH PROPOSED PROJECT OR SLOPING.
NOTE YOUR PROPOSED REVISIONS BELOW AND INITIAL AND DATE AFTER
COMMENTS.

-•.,~. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~.f` PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
VICINITY MAP
SR 1158(WILSON CHRISTIAN ROAD) FROM NC
42 WEST TO US 264
WILSON COUNTY
TIP PROJECT U-3823