20051764 Ver 1_Information Letter_20040308

~,qT~ r Michael F. Easley, Governor
`O~0 RQG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Cq ~ Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
j ~ Division of Water Quality
0 .,~ Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
March 8, 2004
MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator
NCDENR Office of Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs
From: Cynthia F. Van Der Wiele, NCDOT Coordinator (' '~~(i(,~
Subject: Finding of No Significant Impact for SR 1158 (Airport Boulevard) from north of NC 42
to US 264, Wilson County, F.A. Project STP-1158(2), State Project No. 8.2341801, TIP
Project U-3823, State Clearinghouse Project 04-0224.
This office has reviewed the referenced document. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is responsible
for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for activities that impact waters of the
state including wetlands.
NCDWQ concurs with the finding of no significant impact.
NCDOT should abide by the project commitments as specified on the "green sheet". The installation of
hazardous spill catch basins shall not involve the filling of wetlands. Additional mitigation will be
required if these impacts are completely unavoidable.
The NCDWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on your project. Should you have any
questions or require any additional information, please contact Mr. John Hennessy at 919.733.5694.
cc: Chris Militscher, USEPA
Gary Jordan, USFWS, Raleigh Field Office
Travis Wilson, NCWRC
File Copy

North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Cert'rfication Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/

SR 1158 (AIRPORT BOULEVARD)
From North of NC 42 to US 264
Wilson County
WBS Element 34981.1.1
Federal Project No. STP-1158(2)
State Project No. 8.2341801
TIP PROJECT U-3823
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Submitted pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)
y~P`~Of NORTH ~OGy'
v z
~ O
~:
'91~F^'T OF TR ANSeO~~P
APPROVED:
/Z 2 L/3
Date ~~~
1 3I o3
ae
regory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
~bf n F.~llivan III, Division Administrator
Federal i~hwav Administration

SR 1158 (AIRPORT BOULEVARD)
From North of NC 42 to US 264
Wilson County
WBS Element 34981.1.1
Federal Project No. STP-1158(2)
State Project No. 8.2341801
TIP PROJECT U-3823
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
December 2003
Documentation Prepared in Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
by:
Eliza eth A. Smyre
Project Development Engineer
~~.••`~H CAROB j'',
. ~ .....».. N
= •~ SE AI ~
3 ;'moo q
Charles R. Cox, P.E. ~; 1g /q s
Project Development nit Head ~'S-•'•~.N I E~:~ G
i~ -9 ••.......
~~/If/11111tf1\\

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. TYPE OF ACTION .........................:........................................................................1
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION .......................................................... 2
III. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ................................................ 3
IV. ACTIONS REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES ............................................... 4
V. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS ................................................................. 5
A. Circulation of Environmental Assessment .............................................................. 5
B. Comments Received on Environmental Assessment .............................................. 5
C. Comments Received During and Following the Public Hearing ............................ 9
VI. REVISIONS TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT .....................................10
A. Recommended Alternative .................................................................................... 10
B. Updated Cost Estimate .......................................................................................... 10
C. Federally=Protected Species Surveys .................................................................... 10
VII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ..........................................................................12
A. August 14, 2003 NEPA/ 404 Merger Team Meeting ........................................... 12
VIII. ONLY PRACTICABLE ALTERNATIVE WETLAND FINDING ..............13
IX. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT .............................14
TABLES
Table 1. Summary of Recommended Alternative ........................................................10
Table 2. Project Cost Estimate ......................................................................................10
FIGURES
1. Project Vicinity Map
2. Recommended Alternative Plan View
3. Recommended Alternative Typical Section
APPENDICES
A. Written Comments on Environmental Assessment
B. December 23, 2003 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Section 7 Response

PROJECT COMMITMENTS
SR 1158 (AIRPORT BOULEVARD)
From North of NC 42 to US 264
Wilson County
WBS Element 34981.1.1
Federal Project No. STP-1158(2)
State Project No. 8.2341801
TIP PROJECT U-3823
Hydraulics Unit/ Division 4 -Construction
The Bloomery Swamp stream crossing on SR 1158 (Airport Boulevazd) is within
1.1 miles of a critical water supply intake azea (classified WS-IV NSW). Therefore,
according to guidelines developed by NCDOT and the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ), hazazdous spill retention basins will be installed at the crossings of Bloomery
Swamp. Stormwater treatment measures will be evaluated. Selection of these measures ,~G
will be finalized further along in the design process. ~ ,,~„~;-,~(,~.-E= ~U ~'~-- ~-
~~~~~~ , vw a~~ C~
Roadside Environmental Unit/ Division 4 -Construction ~
Due to the presence of high quality wetlands at Bloomery Swamp, Design
Standazds in Sensitive Watersheds .024 NCAC Title 15A provisions will be included in
the design. ~,~- ~1,0-~"~,~Y~ J ~.l
Division 4 -Design Unit
A "sealed crossing" will be installed at the railroad crossing neaz Bloomery
Swamp, which includes gates, signal flashers, and a monolithic concrete barrier installed
in the median leading up to the crossing.
Division 4 -Design Unit
The typical section over Bloomery Swamp will be reduced to a four-lane
cross-section in order to minimize wetland impacts.
Project Development & Environmental Analysis
Surveys conducted by NCDOT staff indicate that Bloomery Swamp contains a
viable mussel fauna. An additional mussel survey will be conducted within a yeaz prior to
the project's Let date.
U-3823 Finding of No Significant Impact Page I of I
December, 2003

SR 1158 (AIRPORT BOULEVARD)
From North of NC 42 to~ US 264
Wilson County
WBS Element 34981.1.1
Federal Project No. STP-1158(2)
State Project No. 8.2341801
TIP PROJECT U-3823
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Prepared by the Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
In Consultation with
The Federal Highway Administration
I. TYPE OF ACTION
This is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) administrative action, Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
The FHWA has determined this project will not have any significant impact on
the human and natural environment. This FONSI is based on the Environmental
Assessment (EA), which has been independently evaluated by the FHWA and determined
to adequately and accurately discuss the environmental issues and impacts of the
proposed project. The EA provides sufficient evidence and analysis for determining that
an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. The FHWA takes full responsibility
for the accuracy, scope, and content of the EA.

II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), in conjunction with
FHWA, proposes to widen SR 1158 (Airport Boulevazd) to a multi-lane facility from
north of NC 42 to US 264 in Wilson County (Figure 1). A five-lane facility is proposed
for the project except for the section in the vicinity of Bloomery Swamp, where afour-
lane facility is proposed to minimize impacts to wetlands. The widening will be done
with a combination of symmetric and asymmetric widening, in order to provide a "best-
fit" alignment. The travel lanes on SR 1158 will be 12 feet (3.7 m) wide. The proposed
design will replace the existing box culvert at Bloomery Swamp with a bridge 200 feet
(61 m) in length. A curb and gutter section will be used along the entire length of the
project.
A "sealed crossing" will be installed at the railroad crossing near Bloomery
Swamp including gates, signal flashers, and a monolithic concrete barrier installed in the
median leading up to the crossing. A sealed crossing restricts motorists from crossing the
railroad tracks while the gates aze down.
Several turn lanes aze also proposed as part of the project scope. At the
intersection of SR 1158 (Airport Boulevazd) with US 264, a second left-turn lane and an
exclusive right-turn lane is proposed to be added to southbound SR 1158 (Airport
Boulevazd). Also, a second left-turn lane and an exclusive right-turn lane aze proposed to
be added to eastbound US 264 at this intersection. Dual exclusive right-turn lanes are
proposed to be added to northbound SR 1158 (Airport Boulevard) at the intersection. A
second left-turn lane is proposed to be added to westbound US 264 at the intersection. At
the intersection of SR 1158 (Airport Boulevazd) and SR 1157 (Merck Road), a second
left-turn lane is proposed to be striped on existing pavement on eastbound SR 1157
(Merck Road).
This project is driven by the need to improve traffic flow, level of service (LOS),
and safety on this section of SR 1158. This section of SR 1158 is expected to operate at a
LOS D in the design year 2025 if no improvements aze made but would improve to LOS
C with the additional lanes. Additionally, the intersection of SR 1158 and US 264 is
currently operating at a LOS F and will continue to do so if no improvements aze made.
While the accident rate is currently under the statewide average for similaz roadways, the
increase of traffic into the design yeaz 2025 may increase the facility's accident potential
if no improvements aze made.
The project is included in the approved 2004-2010 Transportation Improvement
Program (T.I.P.). Right-of--way acquisition is scheduled to begin in Federal Fiscal Year
(FFY) 2004 and construction in FFY 2005.
The estimated total cost for the recommended alternative (Alternative 4) is
$7,615,000, with approximately $6,600,000 appropriated for construction and $1,015,000
appropriated for right-of--way costs. The estimated cost for the bridge structure is
$935,000, included in the total construction costs.
2

III. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Wetland impacts cool a avoided, as wetlands aze located on both sides of
the roadway. Approximatel 0.664 cres (0.269 hectare) of wetlands will be impacted;
this total includes the 0.800 acres (0.324 hectare) actually impacted by construction
minus 0.140 acres (0.057 hectare) that will likely be restored through fill removal.
Approximately 871ineaz feet (27 m) of streams will be impacted. It is anticipated that no
federally-protected threatened or endangered species will be impacted.
This project will cause the relocation of one residential house. As was discussed
in the EA, the proposed relocation will be conducted in accordance with the Federal
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970
(Public Law 91-646) and the North Carolina Relocation Assistance Act (GS-133-5
through 133-18). Though some land will be required for right-of--way, this project is not
expected to cause much change in the economic condition of the project study area. The
project is not expected to have significant impact on noise and air quality. There aze no
impacts to historic azchitecture or azcheological resources.
3

IV. ACTIONS REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES
Because impacts to jurisdictional surface waters and wetlands are anticipated, in
accordance with provisions of section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), a
permit will be required from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (IJSACE) for the
discharge of dredged of fill material into "Waters of the United States." Due to the scope
of the proposed project, a Section 404 Individual Permit will be necessary.
A North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Section 401 Water Quality
Certification is required prior to the issuance of the Section 404. Section 401 Certification
allows surface waters to be temporarily impacted for the duration of the construction or
other land manipulations, and ensures that the state's water quality standards will not be
violated.
4

V. COORDINATION AND COMMENTS
A. Circulation of Environmental Assessment
The NCDOT and the FHWA approved the EA in September 2002. The approved
EA was circulated to the following federal, state, and local agencies for review and
comments. An asterisk (*) indicates a written response was received from the agency.
Copies of the correspondence received are included in Appendix A of this document.
Responses to substantial comments are noted in Section B of this document.
United States Army Corps of Engineers- Regulatory Division
*U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
National Marine Fisheries Service
*U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
N.C. Department of Public Instruction- School Planning
N.C. Department of Administration- State Clearinghouse
N.C. Department of Cultural Resources- State Historic Preservation Office
*N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water
Quality
*N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Wildlife Resources
Commission
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Marine
Fisheries
Upper Coastal Plain Council of Governments
Wilson County Commissioners
City of Wilson
B. Comments Received on Environmental Assessment
1. United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Comment: "Though the existing structure at Bloomery Swamp is a box culvert, the
Service is pleased that alternatives are being considered for a bridge to replace
the culvert. A bridge may provide better hydrological connectivity between
the dissected portions of the wetlands along SR 1158 and also provide
increased potential for wildlife movement along the Bloomery Swamp
corridor. The four bridge alternatives also have less impact on wetlands and
streams. For these reasons, the Service prefers the bridge alternatives
(Alternatives 3, 4, 5, and 6) over the culvert extension alternatives
(Alternatives 1 and 2)."
Response: At the August 14, 2003 merger team meeting, Alternative 4 was selected as
the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA). This
alternative replaces the existing culvert with a bridge 200 feet (61 m) in length
over Bloomery Swamp.

Comment: "The Service concurs with the NCDOT's "No Effect" determinations at this
time. However, since Michaux's sumac is a plant species that occurs in
disturbed azeas such as roadsides, additional surveys should be conducted
again within two years of actual project construction."
Response: A new survey for the Michaux's sumac was conducted by NCDOT biologists
on July 1, 2003. After an extensive seazch, the only Rhus species found was
winged sumac (Rhos copallina). There were no specimens of Michaux's
sumac found during the survey. Therefore, a biological conclusion of "May
Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect" should be rendered. In a December
23, 20031etter to NCDOT (Appendix B), the USFWS concurred with this
biological conclusion.
2. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Comment: "Specific compensatory mitigation has not been identified by NCDOT for
this project."
Response: On-site mitigation opportunities exist where the existing culvert and part of
the causeway fill will be removed during bridge construction. Approximately
0.140 acres (0.06 hectazes) of wetland can potentially be restored in this azea.
Based upon agreements stipulated in the "Memorandum of Agreement
Among the North Cazolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, the North Cazolina Department of Transportation, and the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District" (MOA), it is understood that
the North Cazolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will assume responsibility for
satisfying the federal Clean Water Act compensatory mitigation requirements
for NCDOT projects that aze listed in Exhibit 1 of the subject MOA during the
EEP transition period which ends on June 30, 2005.
Since U-3823 is listed in Exhibit 1, the necessary compensatory mitigation to
offset unavoidable impacts to waters that aze jurisdictional under the federal
Clean Water Act will be provided by the EEP. The offsetting mitigation will
derive from an inventory of assets already in existence within the same 8-digit
cataloguing unit. The Department has avoided and minimized impacts to
jurisdictional resources to the greatest extent possible. The unavoidable
impacts will be offset by compensatory mitigation provided by the EEP.
Comment: "Bloomery Swamp and the unnamed tributary to the swamp will be
potentially impacted. Alternatives 3, 4, 5, and 6 provide the least amount of
stream impacts (i.e. 87 feet). EPA would prefer one of these alternatives over
Alternatives 1 & 2 concerning these potential stream impacts."
6

Response: At the August 14, 2003 merger team meeting, Alternative 4 was selected as
the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA). This
alternative replaces the existing culvert with a bridge 200 feet (61 m) in length
over Bloomery Swamp.
Comment: "The EA identifies that approximately 14.12 acres of active farmland will be
potentially impacted by the project...EPA recommends that NCDOT contact
NRCS to identify the status of these farmlands within Wilson County and
include this information in the Finding of No Significant Impacts (FONSI)."
Response: The EA indicates that the project area is either within the municipal
boundaries of the City of Wilson or within the city's extra-territorial
jurisdiction (ETA, and thus does not quali for prime or unique farmland
under the NRCS designation system. CAc~- Gi~i ~
/'t~a ,~iv~~ '
3. N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water ~
uali
Comment: "At this time, the DWQ does not support the selection of an alternative that
incorporates curb and gutter as part of the project design. However, the DWQ
will discuss design options with the DOT as part of selecting the preferred
alternative."
Response: NCDWQ's concerns were discussed in the August 14, 2003 merger team
meeting. During the meeting, NCDWQ agreed to the selection of Alternative
4, which includes a curb and gutter section, as the LEDPA for this project.
Comment: Given the close proximity of downstream water supply intakes and the
projected increase in trucks carrying industrial materials along this road, the
DWQ strongly supports (and may likely require) the installation of hazardous
spill catch basins for the project."
Response: Because the Bloomery Swamp stream crossing on SR 1158 (Airport
Boulevard) is within 1.1 miles of a critical water supply intake area (classified
as WS-IV NSW), hazardous spill retention basins will be installed at the
crossing of Bloomery Swamp. Selection of additional stormwater treatment
measures will be fmalized fiu~ther in the design process. These measures are
included in the project commitments.
Comment: "In previous discussions about the project alignment and the use of roadway
shoulders, the DWQ expressed concerns about the proposed relocation of a
local resident to avoid impacting natural resources and/or cemetery...
Dependent on the magnitude of the natural resource impact and the desires of
the potentially relocated resident, the DWQ may support impacting natural
resources to prevent the loss of the residential dwelling."
7

Response: The primary reason for the residential relocation is the avoidance of the
cemetery. The landlord of the house in question was at the design public
hearing. He lives across the road from his rental' property and would lose
additional frontage if the rental~house was avoided. He was satisfied with the
alignment as proposed.
Comment: "Where streams must be crossed, the DWQ prefers bridges be used in lieu of
culverts. However, we realize that economic considerations often require the
use of culverts.... Moreover, in azeas where high quality wetlands or streams
aze impacted, a bridge may prove preferable."
Response: At the August 14, 2003 merger team meeting, Alternative 4 was selected as
the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA). This
alternative replaces the existing culvert with a bridge 200 feet (61 m) in length
over Bloomery Swamp.
Comment: "There should be a discussion on mitigation plans for unavoidable impacts. If
mitigation is required, it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized)
mitigation plan with the environmental documentation."
Response: As previously stated, unavoidable impacts not mitigated for on-site will be
offset by compensatory mitigation provided by the EEP.
4. N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Wildlife Resources
Commission
Comment: "NCWRC supports bridging [Bloomery Swamp]. Bridges provide better
hydraulic connectivity that culverts, reduce in-channel stress that causes
downstream channel instability, and allow for wildlife movements along the
riparian corridor. At this time, alternatives that include bridging the Bloomery
Swamp crossing aze preferred. We strongly suggest that NCDOT study bridge
lengths at this crossing which balance wetland impacts with wetland
restoration gained by the additional bridge length."
Response: At the August 14, 2003 merger team meeting, Alternative 4 was selected as
the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA). This
alternative replaces the existing culvert with a bridge 200 feet (61 m) in length
over Bloomery Swamp.
Comment: "In the Finding of No Significant Impact, NCDOT should commit to using
natural stream channel designs on any stream relocations and to use NCDOT
Best Management Practices."
Response: It is the policy of NCDOT to utilize natural stream channel design wherever
feasible, and such practices will be incorporated into this project. Best
Management Practices aze standazd commitments for all NCDOT projects.
8

C. Comments Received During and Following the Public Hearing
Following the circulation of the EA, NCDOT and USACE held an informal
combined public hearing on May 1, 2003 ~at the James B. Hunt High School in Wilson.
The public was given the opportunity to comment on the project in an informal, one-on-
one setting. The majority of attendees were property owners who live along SR l 158
(Airport Boulevard).
Three property owners provided comments on the proposed alignment. Two of
the three objected to the proposed alignment due to impacts to their respective properties.
A third resident stated a preference for the curb-and-gutter section, noting that it would
be safer for school traffic. In response to property owners' concerns, NCDOT shifted the
alignment to reduce impacts to the affected properties. The alignment was adjusted
variable distances, with a maximum shift of 24 feet (7.3 m).
Written comments were later submitted by the City of Wilson; the City
questioned the length of the medians proposed at the intersection of US 264 and SR 1158
(Airport Boulevard). NCDOT has consulted with all concerned developers regarding the
medians at this intersection and will present the results of these discussions to City of
Wilson officials.
9

VI. REVISIONS TO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
A. Recommended Alternative
NCDOT has selected Alternative 4 as its recommended alternative. Alternative 4
replaces the existing box culvert at Bloomery Swamp with a bridge 200 feet (61 m) in
length (Figure 2). Acurb-and-gutter section (Figure 3) will be used along the entire
project. Table 1 is a summary of all pertinent data relating to this alternative. At the
merger team meeting on August 14, 2003, the agencies concurred that Alternative 4 is the
Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA).
Table 1. Summary of Recommended Alternative
:Typical Section _ r.~s~`.~.~ ;,;:~ . t~.~;Cu~rb:and_Gfutter.~:.a. ~.'
Right-of--way 110 feet (34 m)
TotahWetland:Impacts~~r .~~ ,0.664°acres*~(0:27,hectare)::
Stream Impacts 87 feet (26.5 m)
:'Relocations ~ . ,t:,,.~.- s~;r~ ~: :~~~,~~~.~ ,~ ~~.~- .,~
~1~
-~ ~ ~ .,
Note: u.t-c~+ acres includes 0.800 acres of wetlands minus
0.140 acres of possible restored wetlands from fill removal.
B. Updated Cost Estimate
The most recent cost estimate for the project with the final recommended
Alternative 4 is provided in Table 2.
Table 2. Project Cost Estimate
xigtitor way ~ _ . SlZpO,AO0, _ ~. $1;015,000*;
Total $7,500,000 $7,615,000
*Note: The Right of Way total reflects the 110 feet of right of way required
by Alternative 4. The estimate listed in the EA incorporated 100 feet of right
of way.
The total cost for the structure (included in the construction cost) is $935,000.
C. Federally-Protected Species Surveys
Based on the request from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, an additional
survey for the Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii~ was conducted on July 1, 2003. After
an extensive seazch, the only Rhus species found was the winged sumac (Rhus
copallina). There were no specimens of Michaux's sumac found during the survey.
Therefore, a biological conclusion of "May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect"
10

should be rendered for the project. In a December 23, 20031etter to NCDOT (provided in
Appendix B), the USFWS concurred with this biological conclusion.
Previous surveys indicated that Bloomery Swamp contains a viable mussel fauna.
Therefore, an additional mussel survey will be conducted within a year prior to the
project's Let date. In addition, Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface
Waters will be strictly adhered to ensure the protection of the mussel fauna in the creek.
11

VII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A. August 14, 2003 NEPA/ 404 Mer~:er Team Meetin
Concurrence Point 1, Purpose and Need, and Concurrence Point 2, Design
Alternatives, were reached on December 12, 2001, and May 15, 2002, respectively,
during NEPA/ 404 Merger Team Meetings. These meetings aze discussed in the EA.
A NEPA/ 404 Merger Team Meeting to discuss Concurrence Point 3, the Least
Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA), was held on August 14,
2003. The following agency representatives were in attendance: U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, N.C. Division of Water Quality, N.C. Wildlife
Resources Commission, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, N.C. Department of
Transportation, and the Federal Highway Administration.
During this meeting, Concurrence Point 3 was reached. Alternative 4 was
selected as the LEDPA.
12

VIII. ONLY PRACTICABLE ALTERNATIVE WETLAND FINDING
Executive Order 11990, "Protection of Wetlands," established as a national policy
to avoid, to the extent possible, adverse impacts on wetlands and to avoid direct or
indirect support of new construction wherever there is a practicable alternative.
NCDOT was unable to totally avoid wetlands because the project involves
widening an existing roadway; wetlands are located on both sides of the current
alignment. However, strategic placement of right-of--way limits and the use of a "best-fit"
alignment have allowed estimated impacts to wetlands to be reduced to 0.664 acres
(0.27 hectare). This is greatly reduced from the 3.65 acres (1.5 hectare) estimated for a
symmetric widening option and 2.98 acres (1.2 hectare) for an asymmetric widening
option. The majority of the impact reduction occurred in the Bloomery Swamp area,
where construction of the bridge would allow for 0.140 acres (0.06 hectare) of wetlands
to be restored from the removal of fill material associated with the existing culvert.
It was determined there is no practicable alternative to the proposed construction
in wetlands and that the proposed action includes all practicable measures to minimize
harm to wetlands which may result from such use.
13

IX. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Based upon a study of the impacts, of the proposed project, as documented in the
EA, and upon comments received from federal, state, local agencies, and the general
public, it is the finding of the FHWA and the NCDOT that this project will not have a
significant adverse impact upon the human or natural environment. The project is not
controversial from an environmental standpoint. No significant impacts to natural, social,
ecological, cultural, or scenic resources are expected. The proposed project is consistent
with local plans and will not disrupt any communities. The project has been extensively
coordinated with federal, state, and local agencies. In view of the above evaluation, it has
been determined that a FONSI is applicable for this project. Therefore, neither an
Environmental Impact Statement nor further environmental analysis is required.
The following persons may be contacted for additional information regarding this
proposal:
Mr. John F. Sullivan, III
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
310 New Bern Avenue
Suite 410
Raleigh, NC 27601-1418
[phone]
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
[phone]
EAS/eas
14

~~ I
' ~` i
~ ~ `~
_• ~ ~ ' .
+. ~ '~~ ~
~: , \ END PROJECT / I '~
,m ~ ~~
O _ t ,~ ~ , 4.. ~ / .
/ • ~ \-
~ ` 1 1~ - \~
0
~~
~I ~ .I- ~ i
.~~~
r
I ..
~ i ~" J \\\~~ BEGIN PROJECT ~„ i--~
~i: ~ ~
~ -~:m ~ .. ~ I I
~1 ~ ~ A o ~ ~ ,I ~ ~
~ ~ ~ I
` ~1 ~ , M l RC ~• O /
' ~ ~' ~ l
t-----I v w- ~; r
~ I-
.~ ~ ~
~ \ ~ A i
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
;j, OF TRANSPORTATION
i DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
VICINITY MAP
SR 1158 (AIRPORT BLVD.)
FROM NORTH OF NC 42 TO US 264
WILSON COUNTY
TIP PROJECT U~823
NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 1

8'-0"
~.,,
NAiURAI GROVND
-_III-I I -III-III _
11=111=11=111c ~___
NOTE: Widening dimensions from. centerline
may vary depending on symmetrical or
asymmetrical widening in various areas.
-----g- -.~ ._ -r'
EXISTING PAVEMENT
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
100' RIGHT OF WAY
' 26~-0.~ ~ 26'-0" -
VAR 22' TO 32'
~~ - ~---+1---~
EXISTING PAVEMENT
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2
(To Be Used In Bloomery Creek Wetlands Area)
TYPICAL SECTIONS
FOR ALTERNATIVE 4 (RECOMMENDED)
110' RIGHT OF WAY
E 32'-0"
VAR 22' TO 32'
8,-0„
NAiURAI GROUND
-111111=1 i -111= 11I I I= 11
II =111-11=111=
8'
LL GROUND
11 =111 ~-11
II-111=
,; "~ ~` ~ NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAY
r+ „`. DIVISION FOUR DOC
SR 1158 (AIRPORT BLVD.)
FROM NORTH OF NC 42 TO US 264
WILSON COUNTY
TIP PROJECT U-3823
FIGURE 3

APPENDIX A
Written Comments on
Environmental Assessment
A

United States Department of the In
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Feld Oflice
post Ot'fce Boz 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636.3726
October 22, 2002
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
~~C E 1 ~Fp
OCt 2-* ~~~n?
-~
,•..
'Tr ` ANA!~5
This letter is in response to your September 25, 2002, letter, requesting comments from the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the widening of
SR 1158 (Airport Boulevard) from NC 42 to US 264, Wilson County, North Carolina (TIP No.
U-3823). These comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
Acco~iin~to the EA, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
widerl~~a 2.O mile portion of SR 1158 to a multi-lane facility. A five-lane facility is proposed for
the project except for a section in the vicinity of Bloomery Swamp, where afour-lane facility is
proposed to minimize wetland impacts. There are six construction alternatives being considered.
There are three proposals for extending/replacing the existing structure over Bloomery Swamp:
(1) extend the existing culvert; (2) a 200 feet long bridge; and, (3) a 475 feet long bridge. Each
of these proposals has both a curb and gutter option and a shoulder option along SR 1158, for a
total of six construction alternatives.
y~iiiie most of the drea eo be impacted is either agricuiturai land or maintainedidisturbed land, the
EA states that some coastal plain bottomland hardwood forest and a small amount of young pine
plantation would be disturbed. Both of these community types provide habitat for a variety of
forest wildlife species. Table 9 of the EA states that net wetland impacts would range from
0.004 acres to 0.734 acres. Alternatives 5 and 6, with the 475 feet long bridge, have the least
wetland impacts, and Alternatives 1 and 2, with the extension of the existing culvert, have the
greatest wetland impacts.
Though the existing structure at Bloomery Swamp is a box culvert, the Service is pleased that
alternatives are being considered for a bridge to replace the culvert. Abridge may provide better
hydrological connectivity between the dissected portions of the wetlands along SR 1158 and also
provide increased potential for wildlife movement along the Bloomery Swamp corridor. The
four bridge alternatives also have less impact on wetlands and streams. For these reasons, the
A-1

Service prefers the bridge alternatives (Alternatives 3,4,5, and 6) over the culvert extension
alternatives (Alternatives 1 and 2).
There are three federally-protected species listed for Wilson County - dwarf wedgemussel
(Alasmidonta heterodon), red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) and Michaux's sumac
(Rhos michauxii). The NCDOT has determined that the proposed project will have "No
Effect" on these three species: The Service concurs with the NCDOT's "No Effect"
determinations at this time. However, since Michaux's sumac is a plant species that occurs in
disturbed areas such as roadsides, additional surveys should be conducted again within two
years of actual project construction. The results of these surveys should be submitted to our
office for review. We believe that the requirements of section 7 (a)(2) of the ESA have been
satisfied for now. We remind you that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered in this review; (2) this
action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a
new species is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
The Service believes that this EA adequately addresses the existing fish and wildlife resources,
the waters and wetlands of the United States, and the potential impacts of this proposed project
on these resources. The Service appreciates the opportunity to review this project. If you have
any questions regarding our response, please contact Mr. Gary Jordan at [phone]
(Ext. 32).
Sincerely,
l~ ~..
Garland B. Pardue, Ph.D.
Ecological Services Supervisor
cc: ;Chris Militscher, USEPA, Raleigh, NC
David Cox, NCWRC, Creedmore, NC
John Hennessy, NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC
Mike Bell, USACOE, Washington, NC
A-2

,~a~tEU sr~r~s
A UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENC
i REGION a
r ~~ ~ A.TLA.NTA FEDERAL CENTEF ,,~...~•~
i c t FORSYT~ STREET ~~~-G ~ ~ ~~.`~
F,y~,,< oq0~{,~~` ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30303-8960 ,!"
i
DFC ~ ~ ,'!1
r,1 w)
. ~
December 2 2002 ~ ~ ` ' ~~
L r_
Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Manager Director, Project Development and Environmental
Analysis Branch
N.C. Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
SUBJECT: EPA Review of the Federal Environmental Assessment for the Widening of
SR 1158 (Airport Boulevard) from NC 42 to US 264, Wilson County; Federal
Aid Project STP-118(2), State Project No. 8.23418011501, TIP Project U-
3823
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Pursuant to Section 309 of the Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has reviewed the referenced North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Widening of SR 1.158 (Airport Boulevard) from NC 42
to US 264, Wilson County. The EA addresses eight (8) alternatives, including the "No-build"
alternative, a mass transportation alternative, and six (6) highway construction alternatives.
Alternatives 1-6 are widening options with variations of shoulder sections or curb and gutter
sections and utilizing ~ box culvert versus two different bridge lengths over Bloomery Swamp.
The NCDOT has proposed a 5-lane facility for an approximate distance of 2 miles to connect NC
4~ and US 264. EPA offers the following comments on the EA.
.,
- PURPOSE AND NEED
* Protect ~~'eed -The EA identifies that the intersection of Airport Boulevard and US 264 is
currently operating at Level of Service (LOS) F and future traffic conditions will worsen if no
improvements are made. Traffic volumes along this 2-lane section of roadway are expected to
increase to 21,600 - 22,000 vehicles per day in the year 2025. The current accident is rate is
currently under the state-wide average. However, based upon future traffic projections, accident
rates are expected to increase if no improvements to this connector are made. EPA concurs with
the traffic forecasts and the project's documented need.
* Protect Purpose -The EA states that improved capacity and safety are the main purposes for
the project. EPA concurs with the overall purpose for the project.
intemat.lddr? •"•,i.~ • h;tp:.•wx~~f.a~a.go•.
RecycleJ/Recvclablr .Phntatl wdh veyetable A-3 ~'~ InKS on AeryUatl Farar ~dd:r•rnwn i~!°~ ~~~=r.:~:osurnr:•:

- ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Alternatives to various aspects of the proposed project were considered in the EA. EPA's
comments are as follows:
* No-Build Alternative - As outlined in the EA, the no-build alternative would not satisfy the need
or purpose for the proposed action. EPA concurs with this determination.
* Mass Transportation Alternative -Amass transportation alternative was very generally
addressed in the EA, including the expansion of bus service or the introduction of rail service.
However, these options would not reduce current or future traffic volumes for this rural
connector facility as predicted by the NCDOT. Thus, a mass transportation alternative was
eliminated from further study by NCDOT as not being able to meet the project's purpose and
need.
* Construction Alternatives (Widening Airport Boulevard) -The EA addresses six (6) highway
construction alternatives, including three different structures over Bloomery Swamp combined
with either using shoulder or curb and gutter sections with each structure. The NCDOT has not
identified a preferred alternative in the EA The typical section for all of the construction
alternatives include a 5-lane facility with a reduction to a 4-lane facility over Bloomery Swamp.
The structural alternatives include the following: extension of the five-barrel 12 ft. x 7 ft. concrete
culvert box with five (5) equalizer pipes, a 200-foot bridge and a 475-foot bridge.
* Evc~uat~dn ojAlternatives -The EA includes a comparison of the construction alternatives on
page 9 of file EA. The table provides a summary of wetland, stream and relocation impacts for
the six'(6) alternatives under consideration with the structure and total project cost estimates.
Alternatives 1 & 2 include 0.734 acres of wetland impacts and 123 feet of stream impacts.
Alternatives 3 & 4 include 0.664 acres of wetland impacts and 87 feet of stream impacts.
Alternatives 5 & 6 include 0.004 acres of wetland impacts and 87 feet of stream impacts. While
NCDOT does not iden!ify a recommended alternative at this time, EPA would prefer either
Alternatives 5 or 6 based upon those alternatives minimization of impacts to Bloomery Swamp.
- AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
* Wetlands -The wetlands associated with Bloomery Swamp are classified as WS-IV nutrient
sensitive waters. Because this wetland system has been determined to a high quality resource
within the watershed, EPA recommends that all practicable measures be made by NCDOT to
minimize and avoid impacts to this system. In addition, hazardous material spill catch basins
should also be installed along the recommended bridge as requested by the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ). NCDOT has proposed the installation of these catch basins and has included this
provision in one of the project commitments.
Specific compensatory mitigation has not been identified by NCDOT for this project (Page
38 of the EA). Any potential compensatory mitigation of impacted wetlands should be formally
A-4

coordinated through Ms. Kathy Matthews of EPA's Section 404 Wetlands Program.
* Rit~arian Buffers -This project is located within the Neuse River Basin and is subject to the
riparian buffer rules for nutrient sensitive waters. This area of the watershed provides drinking
water for the City of Wilson and should be protected. The potential impacts to riparian buffers as
described in Table 10, page 37 of the EA appear to be statistically very close (Zone 1: 1,703 sq.
ft. vs. 1,884 sq. ft. vs. 1,884 sq. ft. and Zone 2: 637 sq. ft. vs. 834 sq. ft. vs. 834 sq. ft.). EPA
does not have a preference of alternatives regarding riparian buffer impacts.
* Streams - Bloomery Swamp and the unnamed tributary to the swamp will be potentially
impacted. Alternatives 3, 4, 5, & 6 provide the least amount of stream impacts (i.e. 87 feet).
EPA would prefer one of these altematives over Alternatives 1 & 2 concerning these potential
stream impacts.
* Terrestrial Communities -The EA identifies that approximately 3.96 acres of Coastal Plain
Bottomland Hardwoods would be impacted from the proposed project. There are no substantial
differences between the alternatives for these impacted terrestrial resources.
* Prime or Unique Farmland -The EA identifies that approximately 14.12 acres of active
farmland will be potentially impacted by the project. The EA does not specifically address whether
these farmlands are classified as being prime or unique farmland under the Natural Resource
Conservation Service (MRCS) designation system. EPA recommends that NCDOT contact
NRC to identify the status of these farmlands within Wilson County and include this information
in th ~ in3mg of No Significant Impacts (FNSI).
~~
* Noisy Receptors -The EA identifies that 6 residences aze predicted to be impacted from
highway traffic noise in the project area. The predicted noise level increases for the proposed
project range from +6 to +9 dBA. Under the "no build" alternative, traffic noise along Airport
Boulevard would increase approximately +4 to +5 dBA for these same residences. Under current
FHWA criteria for noise mitigation, NCDOT does not propose noise barriers or other mitigation
measures (e.g. Acquisition of property, vegetative barriers, etc.).
*~ Other Impacts -EPA concurs with NCDOT's assessment and findings regarding minimal
potential impacts to the following: air quality, historic properties and cultural resources,
threatened and endangered species, hazardous material sites, environmental justice communities,
relocations to residents (1) and. businesses and indirect and cumulative impacts. Because of
potential temporary impacts during construction, best management practices (BMPs) should be
strictly employed for all direct impacts during construction as highlighted in the EA.
A-5

- SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES
EPA recognizes that there is a viable purpose and need for the NCDOT proposed project.
EPA also recognizes that NCDOT has proposed alternatives which would substantially minimize
impacts to the Bloomery Swamp (i.e. Alternatives 5 & 6) utilizing a longer, more costly bridge
structure. EPA strongly supports NCDOT's efforts to protect high quality resources wherever
feasible. EPA will continue to coordinate with the NCDOT and the Merger Team as this project
proceeds and requests that the issues identified in this letter be addressed in the EA/FNSI.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this EA. Should you have any questions
regarding these comments, please contact Christopher Militscher of my staff at 919-856-4206.
Sincerely,
/ ,.
~~, is ~~. C~~
Heinz J. Mueller, Chief
Office of Environmental Assessment
Environmental Accountability Division

A-6

V .ATF.
\~~p~,....~~0
G
~/
! it
> -t
o ~
MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee
•,r!
From: John Hennessy ~.,. 'f ~`Y
January 13, 2003
L ~
A _
i-_
f" `' ~ °.
s -
'~N a,,
- - . '~~3
-...;
;~ ~•~.
•,_~n

~`~
Subject: Comments on the EA for proposed improvements to SR 1158 (Airport Boulevard) from NC 42
west to US 264 in Wilson County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-1158(2), State Project No.
8.2341801, TIP Project No. U-3823, DENR Project Number 03E-0106.
This office has reviewed the referenced document. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is responsible for the
issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for activities that impact Waters of the U.S., including
wetlands. It is our understanding that the preferred alternative, as presented in the EA, will result in impacts to
jurisdictional wetlands and streams. The DWQ offers the following comments based on review of the
aforementioned document:
A) The DWQ will work with the DOT in the selection of the project's preferred alternative.
B) '"jAt this time, the DWQ does not support the selection of an alternative that incorporates curb and gutter as
dart of the project design. However, the DWQ will discuss design options with the DOT as part of
selecting the preferred alternative.
C) Given the close proximity of downstream water supply intakes and the projected increase in trucks carrying
industrial materials along this road, the DWQ strongly supports (and may likely require) the installation of
hazardous spill catch basins for the project.
D) In previous discussions about the project alignment and the use of roadway shoulders, the DWQ expressed
'' concerns about the proposed relocation of a local resident to avoid impacting natural resources and/or
cemetery. The document indicates that the project wiil result in the relocation of a local resident.
However, no explanation about the issues associated with the proposed relocation is presented. If the
relocation is a result of avoidance and minimization practices for impacts to jurisdictional waters or riparian
buffers, please provide detailed information that describes the design parameters that are resulting in the
residential relocation. Dependent on the magnitude of the natural resource impact and the desires of the
potentially relocated resident, the DWQ may support impacting natural resources to prevent the loss of the
residential dwelling .
E) After the selection of the preferred alternative and prior to an issuance of the 40l Water Quality
Certitication, the NCDOT is respectfully reminded that they will need to demonstrate the avoidance and
minimization of impacts to wetlands (and streams) to the maximum extent practical. Based on the impacts
described in the document, wetland mitigation may be required for this project. Should the impacts to
jurisdictional wetlands exceed 1.0 acres, mitigation may be reyuired in accordance with NCDWQ Wetland
Rules { 1~A NCAC 2H.0506 (h)(2j}.
s~'M
N. C. Division ci 1`l;,tar Quality 1650 Mail 5erv~~~ 1~-7 r Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 [phone]
Cus'.omar Serric=: '. -dC0-623-7748
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality

~\
`off` ~^ ' cq~G
~~ ~
o i ==y <
~~r -
F) In accordance +vith the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules { ISA NC':1C 3H.0506(b)(6)},mitigation ++~ill be required
for impacts of greater than L50 linear feet to any single perennial stream. In the event that mitigation is
required, the miti~atirin plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values. In
accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules { 15A NCAC 2H.050G (h)(3) },the Wetland Restoration
Program may be available for use as stream mitigation.
G) Where streams must /be crossed, the DWQ prefers bridges be used in lieu of culverts. However, we realize
that economic considerations often require the use of culverts. Please be advised that culverts should be
countersunk to allow unimpeded passage by fish and other aquatic organisms. Moreover, in areas where
high quality wetlands or streams are impacted, a bridge may prove preferable. When applicable, DOT
should not install the bridge bents in the creek, to the maximum extent practicable.
H) Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands.
I) Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practicable. Impacts to wetlands in
borrow/waste areas could precipitate compensatory mitigation.
J) The 401 Water Quality Certification application will need to specifically address the proposed methods for
stormwater management. More specifically, stormwater should not be permitted to discharge directly into
the creek. Instead, stormwater should be designed to drain as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through
the protected riparian buffers.
K) There should be a discussion on mitigation plans for unavoidable impacts. If mitigation is required, it is
preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental documentation.
While the NCDWQ realizes that this may not always be practical, it should be noted that for projects
~ requiring mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required in conjunction with the issuance of a 401
~, Water Quality Certification.
L)' Future documentation should continue to include an itemized listing of the proposed wetland. stream, and
buffer impacts with corresponding mapping.
M) Based on the information presented in the document, the magnitude of impacts to wetlands and streams will
likely require an Individual Permit application to the Corps of Engineers and corresponding 401 Water
Quality Cerrfication. Please be advised that a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfactory
protection of water quality to ensure that water quality standards are met and no wetland or stream uses are
~; lost. In addition, the project will require a Neuse River Buffer Certification prior to incurring in impacts in
' ~' protected riparian buffers. Final permit authorization will require the submittal of a formal application by
r the NCDOT and written concurrence from the NCDWQ. Please be aware that any approval will be
contingent on appropriate avoidance and minimization of +vetland and stream impacts to the maximum
extent practical, the development of an acceptable storm~:tter management plan, and the inclusion of
appropriate mitisation plans where appropriate.
"fhe NCDWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments un) our project. Should you h«+e any yueaions or
require any additional information, plaase contact John Hennessy at (919) 733-~G9-1.
ce: John Thomas, Corps of Engineers
Gary Jordan, USFWS
Travis Wilson, NCWRC
John Hennessy, NCDWQ
File Copy
c:\ncdot\TlP l~- X33 ~komments\l.-3h. ± commcnts.doc
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek. P.E. Director
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Se A'g :enter Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 [phone]
Customer Service: 1-800-623-7748

® North Caro~iu~ia W~dla~e. ~esources Commission
Charles R Fi~llwood, )`,xceuti~e A+recco*
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba IvicGce
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, pENR
!"ROiVl: Datizd Cox, Tech.-:ical Guidance isor
Habitat Conservation Progra '
DATE: November 6, 2002
SUBJE,~T ~ North Carolina Department of Transportation (T~CDOT) Environmental
Assessment (EA) for SR 1158 (Airport Boulevard) widening, from NC 42 to US
264, Wilson County. North Carolina. TIP No. U-3823, SCH Project No.
03-E-0106.
Staff bin?ogists with the N. C. Wildlife Rcsvurces Commission have reviewed the subject
EA and are familiar v~1th habitat values in the project area. Tl~e purpose of this review Lvas to
assess project impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Our co~7ments are provided in accordance
w;~cc7tain provisions of the :national Environmental policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the
Fish an~Wildli**"c Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 ••6b7d).
NCDOI' proposes to widen existing SR ] I~8 to a multilane facility from NC 42 to US 264.
The project will be afive-lane facility except in the vicinity of Bloomery Swamp, where afour-
lane section is proposed. The project length is approxi,rately 2.0 miles. Impacts ro jurisdictional
wetlands and jurisdictional streams varyby alternative and range from 0.004 to 0.734 acres of
wetlands and 87 to 123 linear feet of streams.
V4 c have reviewed the data contained in the EA. The document does an adequate job of
assessing impacts to fish and wildlife and their habitats. Vb'c support NCDOT in the decision to
improve existin; facilities rather than to construct new highways. Improving existing facilities
minimizes environmental impacts while discouraging secondary development, which cluitkly
reduces the utility of the acw roadway, V4 a remain concerned over the potential impacts to the
high quality wetlands adjacent to Bloomery Swamp. NCDOT studied alternatives that include
both a culvert and bridge crossing of these wetlands. InC`tiRC supports bridging this wetlaad
MailingAddress: Division oflniandrishc A-9 7211tiiail5c-~~:eCcncer•Ralei~,h,~IC27G99.1721
Telephone: (9i9j T33.36?} ext. 231 • FaY: (919) 71 ~-76s:3

SR 1158 Widening EA 2 November 6, 2003
system. Bridges provide better hydraulic connectivity than culverts, reduce in-channel stress that
causes downstream channel instability, and alio~v for wildlife movements along the riparian
corridor.
At this time, alternatives that include bridging the Bloomery Swamp crossing arc preferred.
We strongly suggest that NCDQT study bridge lengths at this crossing which balance wetland
impacts with wetland restoration gained by tltc additional budge le~igth. This arrangement would
be more likely to receive a mort favorable review from our agency.
We concur with the EA for this project. zn the Finding of No significant Impact, NCDO'I'
should commit to using natural stream channel designs on any stream relocations and to use
NCDOT Scst Management practices.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this EA. jf we can be of any further
assistance please call me at (919) SZ8-988b.
cc: Eric ALsme}-ef, USACE, Raleigh
Gary Jordaz!. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Se:~:cc, P.aleigh
John Hennessy, DWQ. Raleigh
v

A-10

APPENDIX B
December 23, 2003 U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service Section 7 Response
B

United States Department of the Interior
FISH A~iD tiVILDLIFE SERVICE
~Irigh Fidd O(fitt
Post Ottict Box X5776
Rilcigh, Nnrth Carolina 276.~o.t726
Decembc-r 23, 2{)03
Lind~cy RidQiclc
Nairth Carolina Departmctt: of '!'rans-portatian
!'reject Development and P•nvironmcntal Analti~is
154E Mail Service Cenlcr
R:,lei~h, North Carolina 27699-1548
Uear y1r. Riddick~
'T'his letter is in responae to ;tour letter of No~~ember 25, ?003 tuhich prn~~idc[~ the U.S. Fish and
~'~'ildlifc $en~ice (Ser~~ice) Frith the biological conclusion nt'the North C'amlina nepartment of
Tran.Sportstion (NCUC)T) that the proposed widening of SR i 1 ~S I;Airport Blvd} from ~1C: 42
~~~~yt to US 2G4 in ~4ilson Counh~ t'TIT' \o. U-:i;i~) will have no effect on thered-cockaded
tivnc~cipeckur (Picuielc:~ barealu~ and may affect, but is not likcl~~ to adversely al-feet the federally
rndattbered Mi.chaux's sumac (Rhos rnir}~araii}. These comments arc provided in accordance
u~ith sertinn 7 afthe Endangered Species Act (SSA} of 1973, as atncntic:tl (1G U.S.C. 1~31-
l 543 ).
1~9 r. {;ary Torcian. Sen~icc biologist, field inspected the project site on July 31, '<'f){~3 and Teri fled
:hat no httbitt~t exists .for the red-cockaded woodrecker. Tlzereforc, the ScnTice concurs v[~•iih your
conclusion that the project will ha~'e n[~ effect an the red-cockaded ~~ondpeeker.
l3asc;ci ou tlic uili~rtitation }~ou submitted, a survey tiva.s conducted in the project €trea for
Iti•Iichaua's sumac em Jule 1, 2003. No specin»ns of MicLaux's sumac were observod; thc7etUre,
t1 iC :i~tv it•G cor~ctus ~viui yew corclusw~r~~ that tl'~c p~ ice' 1L'3}~ ~ff~c!. h:.! :s r.U! l:l:~..•ly to 2.dver=zl~
J
act:ctthis species.
It is understood that a ner~~ sun~ey will be pcrf"orrt~cd t'or the dvc~arf«•edgc~mussel (:1la..rrr~irlnrita
heterodnn) and ihat additional consultation for that species will occur at a later elate. The Service
appreciates tho opportunity ,o review this project. ICyou have any questions re~ardilig out
response, l~leasc contact 1,'!r. Crar.~ Jordan at (~)1 ~l) g5ti-452 (Ext. 321.
Sincerely,
,~
C,arland F3. Pardue, Ph.L1_
Ecological Services Supen~isor
B-1

cc: 'VTike Rel l; T_TS.ACF, Z'Va~hingtnn, NC
lla~~id l+ranklin, ~J~A~'E., ~~~ilminp on, V(:
Torn Hennessy, ~TCDV4 Q, R~ileigl~. NC
Tra~~is ~'vilsan, TtCV4~tC, Greatlrnoor; NC
CluiS Iviilitscscr, LSL•PA, Ralcieh, NC
B-2

TO NC 42
~~
~~
~~~ ~~~~
~~
~~ ~ ~~
~~
~;
~ ~ ~~~ ~ .~
~~
.~
,~ ~ ~ J~
'< Spx9
_` _ _
~~
f .~: ~ ,~ 2
~ ~ ~
F
~ f

......
`.. ~ - ~ ..
. ~~.\
~~: ` ~
:~ ~~
~~
'I ~~
;~~ ~ ~ ~~
-~ :~ ~` TO U S 2 64
~~
~ ~~
`~
~ ~ r ~ r ~ ~ .* ~~
~ \~ .,~ •
~ ~ ~`
~ .. .. ..
-____ . ~ \
~~. _ . ~ -x_ Ayr' -____~-,~_~__~_ YiLx_ r r~ ___~ __.,_ -__ ~_~r.
-~ __
~ ~~~~
.aa a
~~ ~ ~ -__
~_-~
y
~ ~ ~ ! ~
8 ~ Y ~ ~
1 ~ ~ ~ \\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~j ~
i 1' .~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
.~ '~ i t ~ i ~ '~ ~~i
~ x ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ \\ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
a ~ ~ ~` \\
~ ~
~ ~ ~ \
~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~
r
.............~...._t... ~ a... •.
~ x+
r~ ~
GRAPHIC SCALES PROPOSED PAVEMENT
ioo 50 0 loo 200 ~,_ PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY
PLANS ^ 200' BRIDGE
® WETLANDS IMPACTED
® WETLANDS RESTORED
."rrr, WETLANDS
ALTERNATIVE 4 ~RECOMMENDED~: 200' BRIDGE AT BLOOMERY SWAMP
:rd~M~ NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION
~~ DMSION OF HIGHWAYS
.,~4~ DIVISION FOUR DDC
SR 1158 (AIRPORT BLVD.)
FROM NORTH OF NC 42 TO US 264
WILSON COUNTY
TIP PROJECT U-3823
FIGURE 2