110006_Inspection_20221122

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:110006 ActiveFacility Status:Permit:AWC110006 Denied Access
Inspection Type:Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:Routine BuncombeCounty:Region:Asheville
Date of Visit:11/22/2022 Entry Time:10:00 am Exit Time:11:30 am Incident #:
T&C DairyFarm Name:Owner Email:
Owner:George A Nesbitt Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Status:
Location of Farm:
PO Box 936 Fletcher NC 287320936
440 Lower Brush Creek Rd
Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Latitude:Longitude:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents
436 Lower Brush Creek Rd, Fletcher. 4 miles SW of Fairview, 6 miles east of Fletcher, turn at Oak Baptist Church on to Lower
Brush Creek Rd. Go to dirt Rd 4th drive on left.
Question Areas:
828-628-2852
35° 28' 35''82° 26' 05''
Fletcher NC 28732
George A NesbittCertified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
21355Operator Certification Number:
On-Site Representative(s):Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Tony Nesbitt 828-628-1956
Primary Inspector:Timothy R Fox Phone:[phone]
Inspector Signature:Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Tim Fox with ARO inspected the site.
Tony Nesbit was present during the inspection.
Calibration was done in 2022.
Spot checked field 20 9.2 acres.
soils done in 2021 (due every 3 years)
CE hrs (6 hours needed by 1/1/2025.
Page 1 of 5
Inspection Date:
Owner:Facility Number:
Reason for Visit:Inspection Type:
AWC110006 George A Nesbitt 110006
11/22/22 Compliance Inspection Routine
Permit:
Current promotionsDesign CapacityRegulated Operations
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 300 296
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
300
420,000
Waste Structures
Observed
Freeboard
Designated
Freeboard
Closed
Date
Built
DateIdentifierType
Effective
Date
Waste Pond SLURRY POND 01/01/1989 22.80 01/01/1996
Page 2 of 5
Inspection Date:
Owner:Facility Number:
Reason for Visit:Inspection Type:
AWC110006 George A Nesbitt 110006
11/22/22 Compliance Inspection Routine
Permit:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage)
Page 3 of 5
Inspection Date:
Owner:Facility Number:
Reason for Visit:Inspection Type:
AWC110006 George A Nesbitt 110006
11/22/22 Compliance Inspection Routine
Permit:
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 2 Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
Page 4 of 5
Inspection Date:
Owner:Facility Number:
Reason for Visit:Inspection Type:
AWC110006 George A Nesbitt 110006
11/22/22 Compliance Inspection Routine
Permit:
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Page 5 of 5