NC0032867_Wasteload Allocation_19920514

NPDES WAS 1'h LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0032867
PERMI'1"1'hE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Roadside Truck Plaza, Inc.
Roadside Truck Plaza, Inc.
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.0145 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 100 %
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Dixon Branch
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-08-05
Reference USGS Quad: G 13NW
County: Cleveland
Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 8/31/92 Treatment Plant Class: class I
Classification changes within three miles:
No change to the South Carolina line
(please attach)
Requested by: 1 Randy Kepler Date: 3/18/92
Prepared by: :. Date: 5 /3 9L
Reviewed b� (/ / i/yj(i.F1t -fillDate: 5 /
wist.01- ('`)1 L___----/11 9 z_
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
Jrao3
3118k7.
Cozs
Drainage Area (mi2 ) 1. 2 7 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 1.7
7Q10 (cfs)
Winter 7Q10 (cfs) o• 3 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
30
30
NH3-N (mg/1)
7. q (A-r)
22. 9 (41)
D.O. (mg/1)
h✓
4r
TSS (mg/1)
3 o
3 0
F. Col. (/100 ml)
7cjo
Z 00
pH(SU)
G-9
c_9
ge.ai...t. ei4.4-,6,0
i.„4),41/
"1,441, 4--
Nel j. G ,.0)
36
30
.
p
LO
ED
Comments:

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Roadside Truck Plaza, Inc.
NC0032867 - Pipe 001
Domestic - 100%
Existing
Renewal
Dixon Branch
C
030805
Cleveland
Mooresville N\
Kepler
3/18/92
G13NW
Request Alt a Don29P NAT J AL
RESOURCES AND
UJMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
APR 1 1992
DIVISION OF EMVIORtIt 1 M MA/AGE/Ea
VOORESVIIIE RER{CRAI OFFICE
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
0215359120
1986
1.27
0.2
0.3
1.7
10.1
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility requesting renewal of existing permit. Since permit last renewed, truck wash discharge no
longer goes through pipe 001. Technical Support recommends that facility be given NH3 Choice
Option to keep existing toxicity test or ass' n summer/winter NH3 limit.
oriY1e 644 5Y)000 06
Special Schedule Requirements and addi 'onal co ents from Reviewers:
(-e.Ge
NNltk3 1„r.-1-s
Recommended b.
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:
Date: 3/24/92
Date:3 . 5 2-
Date:
Date:
APR 2 6 1992
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
vO
PO
N
co

2
Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Settleable Solids (m1/1):
MBAs(mg/1):
Turbidity (NTU)
Toxicity test (P/F)
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Toxicity test (P/F):
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
0.0145
30
monitor
nr
30
1000
6-9
0.1
1.99
50
Chronic @u 10%
Monthly Average with
Toxicity Test
Summer Winter
0.0145
30
monitor
nr
30
200
6-9
monitor
30
Chronic @ 10%
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow constituency
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
Monthly Average with
Ammonia Limit
Summer Winter
0.0145 0.0145
30
7.9
nr
30
200
6-9
monitor
30
30
22.9
nr
30
200
6-9
monitor
30
Parameter(s) Affected
Tox test, MBAs, Settleable
Solids, Turbidity
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
WQ
X_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

•
3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
Instream monitoring requirement for turbidity should be rescinded.
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility de stated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
c \: 4 Z
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) N_ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

/LG
,Ti•7,✓c4
030f0�
OD z — /VD 2 aJl — /�✓n--1 .„: •
00 2, p 0, 00.)7, 'f
ot.d 5..� 3 a 1..7 %� 6 a

o/ ys ;'r /,
-(101 'Tit- ,17) a
022,5 -
azt,) 1.2
. /(77.n -- /0, / /a
�� C�
�.�. /99� ��
A
00/
?I` DD o2 f x s
o, o o S k(Ca
51
(Jy�J
tc
00
Da /,

roadside truck plaza
AMMONIA ANALYSIS
7Q10: 0.2000 cfs
NH3 Effl. Conc: 14.2000 mg/1
AL (1/1.8 mg/1) : 1000.00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc.: 220.0000 ug/1
Design Flow: 0.0145 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 1632.30 ug/1
1.632295 mg/1
NH3 Limit: 7941.045 ug/1
7.941045 mg/1
AMMONIA ANALYSIS (WINTER)
7Q10: 0.3000 cfs
NH3 Effl. Conc: 14.2000 mg/1
AL (1/1.8 mg/1) : 1800.00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc.: 220.0000 ug/1
Design Flow: 0.0145 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 1194.34 ug/1
1.194340 mg/1
NH3 Limit: 22890.10 ug/1
22.89010 mg/1

roadside truck plaza
CHLORINE ANALYSIS
7Q10:
CL2 Effl. Conc:
AL (17/19 ug/1) :
Upstream CL2 Conc.:
Design Flow:
Predicted CL2 Downstream:
CL2 Limit:
0.2000 cfs
1.1400 mg/1
17.0000 ug/1
0.0000 ug/1
0.0145 MGD
115.17 ug/1
0.115165 mg/1
168.2791 ug/1
0.168279 mg/1

WHOLE EFFLU.,.,'TOXICITY 'IFSTING 0[SELRMONITORING SUMMARY] Thu, Feb 13, 1992
FACILITY REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
REYNOLDS TOBACCO-001 PERMIT CHRONIC LIMIT:99% (GRAB) '88
NPDESN: NC0055093 Begin 1/2/90 Frequency: M,Q P/FA 89
County: FORSYTH Region: WSRO Months: MAR JUN SEP DEC '90 - PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS bt PASS PASS PASS PASS
PF: NA SOC/JOCReg: '91 PASS - - FAIL PASS NR PASS - NR PASS - NR
7Q1 Q 0.0 IWC(%):100.0 '92
RIVER RUN UTILfrIES
NPDESN: NC0060291
County: BRIINSWICK Region: WIRO
PP: 0.025
7Q 1 Q 0.09 1WC(%):30.06
PFRMrf CHRONIC LIMIT:30%(GRAB) '88
Begin: 1211/89 Frequency. Q P/F A '89 -
Months: JAN APR JUL OCT '90 NR NIL NR NR NR FAIL. NR - PASS LATE PASS -
.91 PASSSIG - - L.A'111 bt PAIL FAIL PAIL PASS NR PAIL LATE
'92 PASS
SOC/JOC Rcq:
RJR TOBACCO
NPDESH: NC0004707
County: FORSYTII
PF:
7010:0.0
Region: WSRO
1WC(%):100.00
COMPLETE THE BY 5/89
Begin: 1/1/88 frequency.
Montle:
SOC/JOC Rcq:
'88 - - - - - - - -
'89 - - - - - - - -
'90 - - - - - - - -
'91 - - - - - - - -
'92
ROADSIDE TRUCK PLAZA-001
NI'DIJSN: N00032867
County: CIEVELAND Region: MRO
PI': 0.01
7010:0.20 IWC(%):10.10
PERMIT CI IRONIC LIMIT:10%
Begin: 12/17/87 L4eque ncy. Q WE
Months: OCT JAN APR JUL
SOC/10C Rcq:
Y '88
'89
'90
'91
'97
ROBBINS WWLP
PERMIT CHR/ACU MONIT:18%, MID 24 HR P/F, LIMIT
'88
NPDESII: NC0062855
Begin: 12/1/91 Ficquar-y, Q P/F A
'89
County: MOORE Region: FRO
Months: JAN APR JUL OCT
'90
PF: 1.0
SOC/JOC Req:
'91
7Q10: 15.9 IWC(%):8.9
'97
ROBERSONV I LE W W TP
PERMIT CHRONIC LLMIT:91%
'88
NPDESH: NC0026042
Begin: 1/1/88 Frcqumcy. Q P/F
'89
County: MARTIN Region: WARO
Months: FEB MAY AUG NOV
'90
PF: 1.80
SOC/JOC Rcq:
'91
7010: 0.27 IWC(%): 91.18
'92
ROCKINGHAM COMMUNITY COLLEGE
PERMIT CHRONIC LIMIT:99% (GRAB)
'88
NPDESN: NC0046337
Begin: 12/1/90 1re41urncy- Q P/F A
'89
County: ROCKINGHAM Region: WSRO
Months: JAN APR JUL OCf
'90
PP: 0.03
SOC/JOC Rcq:
'91
7010:0.0 IWC(%):100
'92
ROCKINGHAM WWTP
PERMIT CHRONIC LIMIT:28%
'88
NPDESN: NC0020427
Begin: 9/1/90 Frequency. Q P/P A
'89
County: RICI MIOND Region: FRO
Months: FEB MAY AUG NOV
'90
PP:6.0000
SOC/JOC Rcq:
'91
7Q10: 23.4 IWC(%):28.4
'92
ROCKWELL SOUTH W WLP
PERMIT CHRONIC LIMIT:99%, 70%@>0.2 MGD
Y '88
NPDESN: NC002I768
Begin: 9/1/90 Requrney. Q P/F A
'89
County: ROWAN Region: MRO
Months: MAR JUN SEP DEC
'90
PP: 0.20
SOC/JOC Req:
'91
7010: 0.03 IWq%):100.00
SOC-4/8/91-10/31/93 OR EXPAN-ChV MOUNT Q
'92
ROCKY MOUNT REGIONAL WWI' .
PPRMIT CI IRONIC LIM: 21%
V '88
NPDESN: NC0030317
Begin: 11/1/88 RequascY, Q P/P
'89
County: EDGECOMBE Region: RRO
Months: JAN APR JUL OCT
'90
PP: 14.0
SOC/JOC Rcq:
'91
7010: 83.00 IWC(%):20.73
'92
bt PASS (PASS) PAlq PASS (PASS) - - (PASS) NR
Nit - PASS NR - - NR PASS PASS PASS
PASS - - PASS - - bt - - PASS
NR PASS - IATR - PASS hR NR - PASS
PASS
PA- IL
PASS PASS
PASS -
(NR) - - (-) - - - 46.4• NONE• NR 62S• 33.1•
P15• NONE* NONE* NONE* NONE* NONE* NONE* NONE* 27A• NONE* >90 NONE'
- PASS - - bt - PASS NR bt PASS FAIL FAIL
PASS PASS - - PASS - - PASS - - PAIL PASS
FAIL NR NR FAIL FAIL PAIL PAIL FAIL FAIL NR FAIL FAIL
FAIL
FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS - - PASS
PASS - - PASS - - FAIL PASS - PASS
(FAIL) FAIL FAIL (PAIL) - PAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PAIL PAIL PAIL
FAIL FAIL FAIL bt btpAIL. PAIL FAIL FAIL PAIL F,17ChV FAIL PASS
P,28ChV PAIL bt FAIL FAIL PAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PAIL LATE
PASS PASS PASS - - 83.2 83.2 - >99 - - 83.2
45•at NONE* NR PASS' PASS• PASS• 87PASS NR NR PAIL - NR
PASS - PASS PASS - NR bt - LATE PASS - NR
PASS - - PASS - - FAIL - - NR PASS -
PASS - - PASS - - PASS - - PASS -
PASS
0 2 consecutive failures= significant noncompliance Y Pre1988 data available
LEGEND:
PF=Pcrmittod flow (MGD), 7Q10=Rccciving stream low flow criterion (cfs), IWC%=Instrcun waste concentration. Begin=Fist month required, Frequcncy�Monitoring frequency): (Q-Quarterly; M-Monthly, BM-B monthly, SA -Semiannually, A -Amorally;
OWD-Only when discharging; D-Discontinued monitoring requirement; IS -Conducting independent study), P/F=Pase/Fal1 chronic bioassay, Ac=Acute, Cnr-Chronic, A=quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon single failure,
(Dan Notation): I(=Fathead M'umow, • Coriodaphnia sp., my=Myaid shrimp, ChV=Clwonic value, P=Morulity of stated percentage at highest concentration, at=Porfomtd by DEM Aq Tox Group, bt=Bad wt),
(Repnning Notation): 1.-=Dais not roquired, NR=Not reputed, ( )=Begiming of Quarter). (Facility Activity Status): (1=Inactive, N=Newly Issucd(fo construct), 11=Active but not discharging)
41

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0032867
PERMT TEE NAME: Roadside Truck Plaza, Inc.
FACILITY NAME: Roadside Truck Plaza, Inc.
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 00k
Design Capacity: 0.005 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 0 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 100 %
Comments:
RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Dixon Branch
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-08-05
Reference USGS Quad: G13NW
County: Cleveland
Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 8/31/92 Treatment Plant Class: class 1
Classification changes within three miles:
No change to the South Carolina line
(please attach)
Requested by: Randy Ke . ler Date: 1/13/92
Prepared by: Date: 57/ 3 i
Reviewed �, �..� °1 Date:
rf., 5 / q z-
/cz Wp
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
Z' M N
o/-// 92.
‘6 g9
Drainage Area (mi2 ) 0, o/
Avg. Streamflow (cfs): o• 7
7Q10 (cfs) o• ' Winter 7Q10 (cfs) c• d 30Q2 (cfs) a- J
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
A. 4u .
n
.Pc,.. A14K
D5 (mg/1)
- �1
--
NH3 ( )
—
D. . (mg/1)
—
TSS (mg/1)
-I-5
. 1. (/10 )
p U)
—
OA GYcA5c (Ay/,e)
30
;, :m ,,,ly )
7:4-a5 (Afro)
.s_o
PLOTED
Comments:

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Roadside Truck Plaza, Inc.
NC0032867 - Pipe 002
Industrial - 100%
Existing
Renewal
UT Kings Creek
C
030805
Cleveland
Mooresvillev4 A
Kepler
3/18/92
G13NE
Request #
11/6689EFT. 01 NATURAL
RESOURCES AND
COMMUNITY [WWI .or%TF.NI
NPR 11992
III1SIOI OF ENMIP,C!IIIEMTAF. • a, .Its;
MOORESVILLE REGWMM OFFICE
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
est. 0.01
0
0
0.1
0
100
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility requesting renewal of existing permit. Outfall was permitted in 1987 after being found bye
ARO.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by,:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor: Z)1�'-
Permits & Engineering:
Date: 3/23/92
Date: c 06° a'
Date: 5
Date:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: APR 2 6 1992
tV
co

2
Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Turbidity (NTU):
Toxicity test (P/F):
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Da. Avg. Da. Max.
NOL
30 60
Monthly Averagc
Da. Avg. Da. Max.
0.005 0.005
30 60 WQ
45
50
NONE
REQUIRED
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
X Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility downstate(' the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes ✓ No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) N_ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.