NC0032891_Wasteload Allocation_19920520

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0032891
PERMITTEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
Phillips Pipe Line Company
Charlotte Terminal
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001&002
Design Capacity:
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow): 100 %
Comments:
Stormwater from diked containment areas (no oil/water separators)
STREAM INDEX: 11-120-5
RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Gum Branch
Class: C
Sub -Basin:
03-08-34
Reference USGS Quad: F15SW,Mtn.Isle.Lake
County: Mecklenburg
Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 4/30/92 Treatment Plant Class: 0
Classification changes within three miles:
Ca. 7 mi. to Lake Wylie (WS-III).
(please attach)
Requested by: Jule Shanklin `/.IV Date: 11/19/91
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
tt\ \ 9.l
(ot, I0
SA 0 2
Drainage Area (mi )
7Q10 (cfs) 0
Avg. Streamflow (cfs): I
Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 0
Toxicity Limits: IWC
Instream Monitoring:
Recommended Limits Monthly Average
For Both Outfall 001 & 002 (if needed):
Flow (MGD):
pH (SU):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
Turbidity (NTU):
TSS (mg/1):
Benzene (j.tg/1):
Toluene (j.tg/1):
Ethylbenzene (µg/1):
Xylene (µg/1):
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
cF:c',\
*
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
(MTBE) (µg/1): monitor
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR CONDITIONS
30Q2 (cfs)
Chronic
FPt5oVtC-
Daily Max Mon. Freq. W CR..1.
++ instantaneous
6-9 2/mon
45 2/mon
2/mon
45 2/mon
**
**
**
**
**
PLOTTED
++ Permit must contain flow monitoring requirement such that all volumes of wastewater leaving
the facility are monitored. If continuous monitoring is not feasible, then discharger shall record the
approximate times that discharge began and ended, along with instantaneous flow at the time of
effluent samping. Monitoring for all toxicants should be performed during the first five discrete
discharge events (annually thereafter) after the effective date of the NPDES permit. Monitoring
should occur at the same time that the whole -effluent toxicitiy sample is collected during the
discharge event (samples should be collected within 24 hours of the beginning of the event).
�h,reeOw.
*The turbidity in the receiving stream will not exceed 50 NTU. (111t 7Q10 = 0, 50 NTU applies as
an effluent limit.)
** BTEX parameters should be monitored using an EPA approved method to a detection level of
at least 1 ppb. Organic parameters IMMO should be monitored during the first five events and
annually thereafter in correspondence with toxicity testing. Clause should be placed in the permit
to allow for additional limits on these or other toxicants should the whole effluent toxicity test
indicate toxic effects.

ROAD CLASSIFICATION
PRIMARY HIGHWAY
HARD SURFACE
SECONDARY HIGHWAY
HARD SURFACE OMNIJ
PROVED S�AoE�D -
UNIMPROVED ROAD
Latitude
Map # F15SW
Longitude
Sub -basin 03-08-34
Stream Class WS-IV
Discharge Class Industrial - Petroleum
Receiving Stream UT to Gum Branch
Design Q episodic Permit expires 8/31/01
SCALE 1:24 000
0
0.kV JJOA1dA\�\V h1\�:
0
• oix000nvx��e.�s'-'
1 MILE-
vo �000eooeo-„wi:�:
7000 FEET
1
0
1 KILOMETER
T
CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
Phillips Pipe Line
NC0032891
Mecklenburg County
Tank Farm

c<.t�criTlsa�rti
Schematic Water Flow
Philips Pipe Line Company
Charlotte Terminal
Paw Creek, North Carolina
Mecklenberg County
NPDES # NC0032891
Tank Dike 1
Contains only stormwaier
discharges, no tank bottom
or *Water separator water
Tank Dike 3
-
001
Unnamed tributary to
Gum Branch Creek
4
r- 002

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Phillips Pipeline Co.
NC0032891 - 001, 002
Industrial - 100%
Existing
Renewal
UT Gum Branch
C
030834
Mecklenburg
MRO.
J. Shanidin
11/19/91
F15SW
Request # 6610
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
est.
<1.0
0.0
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Large bulk storage facility. Recommend new stormwater discharge SOP from petroleum storage
facilities [ref. 3/15/92 memo to Regional WQ Supervisors].
Outfall 001 consists of stormwater from fuel loading area and storage tank dike area. Treatment is
an oil/water separator. Outfall 002 consists of stormwater from a second storage tank dike area (no
oil/water separator). Per staff report, the facility is currently pumping and hauling ti ecwflifr8 ATUztat
outfall 002. MRO should comment on the necessity of a permitted outfall for 002. RESOURCE AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPhZ.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: APR 1 4 1992
-1 Z-A (: A 1*. ou - WO -VC -
Recommended by:
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor: ")�C
OIVJSI BF ErV'I ONMENTAL MANABEMEAJ
4iaORESVIilE RECIDNAL OFFICE
D
Date: gl3h a-
-- ----- - Date: Sl 1 /61�-
Permits & Engineering: /� ' Date: 17'
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: MAY 0 8 1992

2
Existing Limits
pH (SU):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
Phenols
Mon. Avg. Daily Max,
6-9
30 60
monitor
Recommended Limits Monthly Average
For Both Outfall 001 & 002 (if needed):
Flow (MGD):
pH (SU):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
Turbidity (NTU):
TSS (mg/1):
Benzene (14/1):
Toluene (41):
Ethylbenzene (µg/1):
Xylene
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
*
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
(MTBE) (41): monitor
SPECIAL INSTRUCI1ONS OR CONDITIONS
Daily Max. Mon. Freq. WOJEL
++ instantaneous
6-9 2/mon
45 2/mon
2/mon
45 2/mon
**
**
**
**
**
++ Permit must contain flow monitoring requirement such that all volumes of wastewater leaving
the facility are monitored. If continuous monitoring is not feasible, then discharger shall record the
approximate times that discharge began and ended, along with instantaneous flow at the time of
effluent samping. Monitoring for all toxicants should be performed during the first five discrete
discharge events (annually thereafter) after the effective date of the NPDES permit. Monitoring
should occur at the same time that the whole -effluent toxicitiy sample is collected during the
discharge event (samples should be collected within 24 hours of the beginning of the event).
*The turbidity in the receiving stream will not exceed 50 NTU. () 7Q10 = 0,1,50 NTU applies as
an effluent limit.)
** BTEX parameters should be monitored using an EPA approved method to a detection level of
at least 1 ppb. Organic ID should be monitored during the first five events and
annually thereafter in correspondence with toxicity testing. Clause should be placed in the permit
to allow for additional limits on these or other toxicants should the whole effluent toxicity test
indicate toxic effects.

3
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
New regulations/standards/procedures TSS, O&G,pH,flow
New facility information BTEX
The following parameter(s) are water quality limited:
For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be
consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
X No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Miscellaneous information pertinent to the renewal or new permit for this discharge. Include
relationship to the Basinwide Management Plan.
WASTELOAD SENT TO EPA? (Major) N (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how wasteload fits into basinwide plan.)
Additional Information attached? _N (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name 'D I L- t F 9 Co . Permit # t c too 3 28 91 Pipe # Doi t o oZ.
ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (EPISODIC)
The permittee shall conduct FIVE acute toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in
E.P.A. Document 600/4-85/013 entitled "The Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and
Marine Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales
promelas) 24 hour static test, using effluent collected as a single grab sample. Effluent samples
for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained below all waste treatment. Sampling and
subsequent testing will occur during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date
of this permit. After monitoring of the first five toxicity tests, the permittee will conduct one test
annually, with the annual period beginning in January of the next calendar year. The annual test
requirement must be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30,
notification will be made to the Division by this date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the
next discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this
permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it
was performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is
to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream,
this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test.
Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 O. D cfs
Permitted Flow Y4 MGD Recommended by:
IWC
Basin & Sub -basin 0 3 o S }- LA..,
Receiving Stream ur cur" IE32.
County ARur24 Date 4 f Z11 Z
EAM Fathead 24 Version 10191

iV CCb 3 Z8,1
...'f?1 4--1. p 5 P r Nc
O7 �uM Q C
Cum
V'1
Nit -Lies RcLINe Co,
Qc-fF = Vwr
7co; 0
Ct4/2/),.11) f , / TS ww fl-oN'To2
k * MAA.) 67?- ea. 1- SCp(R/24C:7S.
IN TTIIS /R.&fr
0 fr Cf 30 4 2// o/J
fl E/cLy
-Two arr Ott • CO / ` 5r-04.ti AT f2 _ Toni r'u£L LotiD/N9._-- .t7_ 5706.446_
mAix Z>rfc6 fIR-6fF , (. o/ -4/ .o Sd�,AL' To/L� _.
C0 Z - $i i u 1,0,7 s€Cptv)_ 5;DR 4e. %vJk Zf
No_ 72'�b7i)ledr.
SzND
002 - rAJG / - D oOf.S(7t
_ itoM2a nJJ146 fir'' f-tp,1?i t Jf5 FoK 60771
1-1Wt 9rag4GC T 1 eft , No tad + is s %ioaE%>

Nit-tiP P P-c-t ( .
G
c„ rT Cu�,n,
Gil L(. 12ec MGAID ,68G!i/4 /V I3 - / ✓& eo7F`. • (: 47NOu9/
jLl<l Y Nor NCE1) j7 _ef /T Fo 2 i TF/ - /< . C, (" Ro) wi 62.
EVA uIAT . Wv-IcN W 1-4 (S %ZCE1 V6-1) .•

e
Aicoo
Ce Z
SW.
70,0 0,0 c74-
a TPID 6t."..ac2
/
C4,5J : tV5 V; 8- / 0-
___154J/4
2 fr_erri re(0,..-,--*,aaCS_Zei. z •
724-c-- 11_/,`/767 of 0
• 1, )1.-7 0 rld
5, /e /7e 4, • 4/e. '74
C -4 /17 / A244 , 4
, 4c,
Is 6. 7 4-7,1/62.
a 5-
- •c
4,/ 7X, ,/ 4 Seya-A.
v;
s 740,-e/ /ei
,
t‘e /ek
/
7 4 .1 4_7_12
It° CE:tair, 4./ (L/a-4/
2tp fe,e;erro

A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Permit. No. NC0032891
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge
stormwater from outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics Discharge Limitations Monitoring Requirements
Measurement Sample Sample
Monthly Avg. Weekly Avg. Daily Max. Frequency Type Location
Flows Monthly 1 Effluent
Total Suspended Solids 45.0 mg/1 Monthly Grab Effluent.
Oil and Grease2 Monthly Grab Effluent
EPA Methods 624/625 Semi-annually Grab Effluent
Xylene Semi-annually Grab Effluent
Acute Toxicity- Annually Grab Effluent
Footnotes:
I Where no measurable discharge occurs, "no discharge" should be clearly noted on the submitted monthly discharge monitoring report.
Flow may be monitored in one of four ways: a) Measure flow continuously, b) Calculate flow based on the area draining to the outfall, the built upon
area, and the total rainfall (this method of flow measurement should not be used at facilities that have large ponds to collect
surface water runoff), c) Estimate by flow measurement at 20 minute intervals during the entire discharge event, or d) Base flow on pump logs.
2 Where possible, the grab sample for oil and grease should be skimmed from the surface of a quiescent (calm water) zone.
3 Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow, 24-hour) Monitoring, Annual, See Part III, Condition E.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
There shall be no direct discharge of tank solids, tank bottom water, or the rag layer.
There shall be no direct discharge of tank contents following hydrostatic testing unless benzene concentration is less than 71.4 ug/I and toluene
concentration is less than I I ug/l.

A. ( ). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Permit No. NC0032891
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge
stormwater from outfall(s) serial number 002. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics Discharge Limitations Monitoring Requirements
Measurement Sample Sample
Monthly Avg. Weekly Avg. Daily Max. Frequency Type Location
Flow 1 Monthly 1 Effluent
Total Suspended Solids 45.0 mg/1 Monthly Grab Effluent
Oil and Grease2 Monthly Grab Effluent
EPA Methods 624/625 Semi-annually Grab Effluent
Xylene Semi-annually Grab Effluent
Acute Toxicity- Annually Grab Effluent
Footnotes:
t Where no measurable discharge occurs, "no discharge" should be clearly noted on the submitted monthly discharge monitoring report.
Flow may be monitored in one of four ways: a) Measure flow continuously, b) Calculate flow based on the area draining to the outfall, the built upon
area, and the total rainfall (this method of flow measurement should not be used at facilities that have large ponds to collect
surface water runoff), c) Estimate by flow measurement at 20 minute intervals during the entire discharge event, or d) Base flow on pump logs.
2 Where possible, the grab sample for oil and grease should be skimmed from the surface of a quiescent (calm water) zone.
3 Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow, 24-hour) Monitoring, Annual, See Part III, Condition E.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
There shall be no direct discharge of tank solids, tank bottom water, or the rag layer.
There shall be no direct discharge of tank contents following hydrostatic testing unless benzene concentration is less than 71.4 ug/1 and toluene
concentration is less than 11 ug/1.

Part III
E. ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (ANNUAL)
Permit No. NC0032891
The permittee shall conduct annual toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in E.P.A.
Document EPA/600/4-90/027 entitled "Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to
Freshwater and Marine Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow
(Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static test. Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be
obtained below all waste treatment. The permittee will conduct one test annually, with the annual
period beginning in January of the calendar year of the effective date of the permit. The annual test
requirement must be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30,
notification will be made to the Division by this date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the next
discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit
condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was
performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be
sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit
may be re -opened and modified to include altemate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test.
Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.

Utuua Pcatiittc_
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No X
If Yes, SOC No.
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Jeanette Powell
Date: March 4, 1996
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County: Mecklenburg
Permit No. NC 0032891
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: Phillips Pipe Line Company
P.O. Box 66
Paw Creek, NC 28130
2. Date of Investigation: March 4, 1996
3. Report Prepared By: Todd St. John
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: E.P. Floyd, Supervisor [phone]
5. Directions to Site: From the intersection of Rozzells Ferry Road and Tom Sadler Road travel
north on Tam Sadler Road approximately 0.4 miles. Phillips Pipe Line Company is located
on the right.
6. Discharge Point(s). List for all discharge points:
Outfall 001:
Latitude: 35° 17' 07" Longitude: 80° 56' 23"
Out Fall 002:
Latitude: 35° 17' 08" Longitude: 80° 56' 18"
Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge point on
map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No.: F15SW U.S.G.S. Name: Mountain Island Lake, NC
7. Site size and expansion are consistent with application? N/A

8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Flat slopes; none of the facilities appear
to be in a flood plain.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: None within 500 feet.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: U.T. to Gum Branch
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 030834
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: General Class C
uses.
PART H - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted: (See Recommendations)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the wastewater treatment facility? (See
Recommendations)
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity)? (See
Recommendations)
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to Construct
issued in the previous two years: N/A
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater
treatment facilities: The facilities consist of a mud trap, an oil/water separator,
pumps and a storage tank. (See Recommendations)
Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: N/A
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Gasoline constituents are toxic.
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: (See Recommendations)
Page 2

3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): Class I (rating has not
changed)
4. SIC Code(s): 5171
Wastewater Code(s) of actual wastewater, not particular facilities, i.e., non -contact cooling
water discharge from a metal plating company would be 14, not 56.
Primary: 73 (See Recommendations) Secondary:
Main Treatment Unit Code: 53000 (See Recommendations)
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies
involved (municipals only)? N/A
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: N/A
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: N/A (please indicate)
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the non -discharge options
available. Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated.
(See Recommendations)
5. Other Special Items: (See Recommendations)
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Phillips Pipe Line Company has requested renewal of its NPDES permit. In his Staff report
dated December 2, 1991, Mr. Kim Colson, formerly of this Office, noted that Phillips Pipe Line
Company was no longer discharging the wastewater generated by the oil/water separator or any of
the other WWT equipment associated with the loading area. The Company had instead elected to
haul the wastewater to Industrial Waste Services, Jacksonville, Florida. Mr. Colson recommended
that if the wastewater was not going to be discharged, then the NPDES Permit should not be renewed.
The writer questioned Mr. E.P. Floyd, Supervisor, if the Company was still using the WWT
facilities to discharge or if they were hauling the waste water to Industrial Waste Services. Mr. Floyd
indicated that they intended to continue to haul the wastewater and to only discharge storm water
from the secondary containment areas via outfalls 001 and 002. He indicated that the Company no
longer desired to use the WWT facilities to discharge wastewater.
Page 3

The WWT facilities consist of an oil/water separator and sump with pumps to send the
wastewater to a storage tank within the secondary containment area. This wastewater is.then hauled
from the storage tank to Industrial Waste Services. There are no longer any discharges from the
subject WWT facilities.
However, both of the outfalls do discharge storm water from each of the two secondary
containment basins. Therefore, this Office recommends that the current NPDES Permit not be
renewed, but a General Storm Water Permit be issued instead.
Signature of Report Preparer
. D. • P--tt
Water Qualityegional Supervisor
Date
Page 4

Ci.N.0 .
ENEPA`•(
OLwa
Tlci
^S
- {9,Fc14
E
1CoPraNYxx
�"a
mammas) XI\\xz
xo
PE O. W� tx7y n X
X POI
PPU pUwiJ \ On
hELL OIL- EXKOl.S
31.n11.ENlt PRASE/
PAW ex,
X
X CCTC1O
X Ch&V2o., Il,1L
s i
PEreotiFUM CWty
AMER-AVA HEST coePoepi
— 4 ---Pt aco E,11ee40 , iqc,
C.ott.cne rnon)
^AUq
Lool OetyFb3
"'LIP -AY Cots).