NC0029602_Wasteload Allocation_19820125

J
Facility Name:
Existing
Proposed
0
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION Co r r
Y0.,t (zinraw.. Date: I 0/P/CS1
Permit No.: IN)(- u G ').91 Ca 0 0-- Pipe No.: h U 1 County: Yr4-cUGt
Design Capacity (MGD): ODC- Industrial (% of Flow): Domestic (% of Flow):
Receiving Stream: ki nn 11 G.r . Class: C Sub -Basin: (>1O`4- n.a_
Reference USGS Quad• C, (Please attach) Requestor: K k+L\ R A / Reg erral Office £- K,(S,
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
Design Temp.: _5- 0 Drainage Area: 0,1 m Avg. Streamflow• —
7Q10:, 0,0 C-FS Winter 7Q10: 30Q2•
a) .R f4k41
4.0 Location of D.O.minimum (miles below outfall):' 3 ilit-`- ' rSlope. •�
cu
Velocity (fps) : C) i 45 K1 (base e, per day, 20°C) : l . DI K2 (base e, per day, 20°C) • CrS. C)
0
c�
N
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
15b p-
g O r
f L-r
30 ii---isf-Q---
b.0 r
{�L
FP cad Co I �
�---
(6�5
" n'll-'
Original Allocation
Revised Allocation
repared By:0
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
Date(s) of Revision(s)
(Please attach previous allocation)
rLAA.f _Qti0" Reviewed By:
elAJ
Date:

-00zikAA-- gb_tt,tA Ff2e,y,J ccs2,_ — -1/AAJ,c, 1,1,0„y
4, _44,3 C.,
4a
rj = 0a0
o. 5
--uff-; 0,5 Y306Lat-
0,0
0,0012
IUDS = (9• o
:
STy: /fo, o
Qo of o
5' 0

Form #0C
`,?c)4P. 2AiG• J-21 g?�
WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM
2 i 6N. C. DEPT. OF NATURAL
& ECONOMIC RESOURCF.S
Facility Name: Yadkin Board of Ed -Forbush Elem School
County: Yadkin Sub -basin: 03-07-02
Regional Office: Winston Salem Requestor: Kitty Kamer
Type of Wastewater: Industrial
Domestic 100
If industrial, specify type(s) of industry:
Receiving stream:
UT Mill Branch
Other stream(s) affected:
Class: C
Class:
7Q10 flow at point of discharge: 0.0 cfs
30Q2 flow at point of discharge:
Natural stream drainage area at discharge point: 0.1 m2
Recommended Effluent Limitations
Monthly Avg.
BOD5 = 30 mg/1
TSS = 30 mg/1
DO = 6.0 mg/1
Fecal Coliform = 1000#/100 ml
pH = 6-8.5 (SO)
Qw = 0.006 MGD
This allocation is: / / for a proposed facility
/ / for a new (existing) facility
/ / a revision of existing limitations
a confirmation of existing limitations
Recommended and reviewed by: .
//01W1,14//
Head, Techncial Services Branch
Reviewed by:
Regional Supervisor
Permits Manager
Approved by:
Division Director
Date:
Date: r .2.
Date:
Date: f/ZrLl—
Date: 1