20051764 Ver 1_Meeting Minutes_20030715

~~a~
~Say~d w. a o.~
J
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
July 14, 2003
MEMORANDUM TO: U-3823 Mer er Team ~~{ ~~,,`~'~~ r~~ J
g
d~~. f ~~ 700
FROM: Doug Jeremiah, P.E.
Project Development Engineer ~~~~`"~~~~ ~ ~.~ ,
~, ~~ ~ , ~~~~ ~~~wf
SUBJECT: Widening of SR 1158 (Airport Blvd.) to amulti-lane
facility, from NC 42 to US 264, Wilson County, Federal
Aid Project STP-1158(2), State Project 8.2341801, T.I.P.
U-3823
A concurrence meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, August 14, between
9:00-10:30am. The meeting will be held in the Board Room in the Transportation
Building, 1 S. Wilmington St., Raleigh. The purpose of this meeting is to complete
approval for Concurrence Point No. 3, LEDPA, which will select the Least
Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative, or the "Preferred Alternative." If
concurrence is reached on Point No. 3, then approval for Concurrence Point No. 4,
Avoidance & Minimization, will be discussed.
The information packet is enclosed. Please review this material prior to the
meeting. If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone] x207 or
[e-mail]. Please RSVP if you will not be attending.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW. DOH. DOT. STATE. NC. US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

CONCURRENCE POINT #3 -
LEDPA/PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
SELECTION
CONCURRENCE POINT #4 -AVOIDANCE &
MINIMIZATION
Proposed Widening of SR 1158 (Airport Blvd.) to a multi-lane facility, from NC 42
to US 264, Wilson County
TIP Project U-3823
State Project 8.2341801
Federal Aid Project STP-1158(2)
August 14, 2003
Purpose of Today's Meeting
The North Carolina Department of Transportation's (NCDOT) approved 2004-
2010Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) includes a project to widen SR 1158
(Airport Blvd.) from NC 42 to US 264 in Wilson County (see Figure 1). Due to the
nature of this project (i.e. widening), it was deemed suitable to address Concurrence Point
3 and 4A issues jointly. The purpose of this meeting is to complete approval for
Concurrence Point No. 3, LEDPA, which will select the Least Environmentally
Damaging Practicable Alternative, or the "Preferred Alternative." If concurrence is
reached on Point No. 3, then approval for Concurrence Point No. 4, Avoidance &
Minimization, will be discussed.
Project Description
TIP Project U-3823 is described in the approved 2004-2010 TIP as widening
SR 1158 (Airport Blvd.) to a multi-lane facility, from NC 42 to US 264, a distance of
approximately 2 miles (see Figures 1 & 2). SR 1158 (Airport Blvd.) is currently atwo-
lane facility that connects US 264 and NC 42. US 264 is a four-lane divided facility that
functions as an east-west radial serving traffic travelling into and through the Wilson
area. NC 42 also serves as an east-west radial. It was recently upgraded to a four-lane
divided/ five-lane facility as part of TIP Project U-3472. Merck Road connects with
Airport Blvd approximately halfway between US 264 and NC 42.

U-3823 Merger Team Meeting
August 14, 2003
Project Schedule/Cost
Right-of way acquisition for the project is scheduled to being in federal fiscal year
2004 and construction is scheduled to begin in federal fiscal year 2005.
The most recent cost estimates for the project are as follows:
TIP Estimate: Current Estimate:
Construction $ 6,300,000 $ 5,700,000 - 8,000,000
Right of Way $ 1,200,000 $ 1,015,000 - 1,035,000
Total: $ 7,500,000 $ 6,715,000 - 9,035,000
Capacity of Existing Roadway (No-build)
Current year (2000) daily traffic volumes along SR 1158 (Airport Blvd.) range
from 4,000-4,500 vehicles per day. By the design year (2025), traffic volumes along
SR 1158 (Airport Blvd.) are expected to range between 21,600-22,000 vehicles per day,
resulting in a LOS F in the design year (2025).
Concurrence Point No. 1 Project Purpose & Need (Approved
December 2001)
The purpose of the project is to improve capacity and safety along this section of
SR 1158 (Airport Boulevard).
Concurrence Point No. 2 Design Options for Detailed Study
(Approved December 2001)
At this meeting, the decision was made to study widening SR 1158 (Airport
Blvd.) to afive-lane facility.
Concurrence Point No. 2A Bridging Decisions and Final
Alternatives to Carry Forward (Approved May 2002)
At this meeting, the merger team agreed to carry forward six design alternatives,
involving curb and gutter, shoulder, culvert extension, and bridge scenarios. These six
alternatives are explained in detail in the next section. The typical section for the
shoulder alternatives is shown in Figure 3, and for curb and gutter alternatives in
Figure 4.

2

U-3823 Merger Team Meeting
August 14, 2003
Project Alternatives
Alternative 1
Alternative 1 proposes a shoulder section. This alternative includes the extension
of the existing five-barrel 12-ft. x 7-ft. reinforced concrete box culvert at Bloomery
Swamp. Approximately three equalizer pipes would be added to expand the reach of
floodwaters throughout the wetland system. Additional information on the equalizer
pipes will be presented at the meeting. This alternative would impact approximately
0.734 acres of wetlands and 123 linear feet of stream. Approximately 122 feet of right-
of-way would be needed for this alternative. The estimated total construction cost is
$5,800,000, of which the culvert extension and equalizer pipes cost $310,000. The area
near Bloomery Swamp in this alternative can be seen in Figure 5.
Alternative 2
Alternative 2 is the same as Alternative 1 except that curb and gutter would be
used. Approximately 110 feet ofright-of--way would be needed for this alternative.
Alternative 2 is estimated to have a construction cost of $5,700,000, of which the culvert
extension and equalizer pipes cost $300,000. The area near Bloomery Swamp in this
alternative can be seen in Figure 5.
Alternative 3
Alternative 3 proposes a shoulder section. This alternative also replaces the
existing box culvert at Bloomery Swamp with a bridge 200 feet in length. The bridge
would enhance the reach of floodwaters throughout the wetland system. This alternative
would impact approximately 0.804 acres of wetlands, but approximately 0.140 acres of
wetlands would be restored from the removal of fill on either side of the existing culvert.
The total net loss of wetlands would be approximately 0.664 acres. There will be
approximately 871inear feet of stream impacts. Approximately 122 feet ofright-of--way
would be needed for this alternative. The estimated total construction cost is $6,800,000,
of which the bridge construction costs $935,000. The area near Bloomery Swamp in this
alternative can be seen in Figure 6.
Alternative 4
Alternative 4 is the same as Alternative 3 except that curb and gutter would be
used. Approximately l 10 feet of right-of--way would be needed for this alternative.
Alternative 4 is estimated to have a construction cost of $6,600,000, of which the bridge.;='
construction costs $935,000. The area near Bloomery Swamp in this alternative can be
seen in Figure 6.
3

U-3823 Merger Team Meeting
August 14, 2003
Alternative 5
~,
->
Alternative 5 proposes a shoulder section. This alternative also replaces the box
culvert at Bloomery Swamp with a bridge 475 feet in length. This "reciprocal" bridging
option would remove existing fill from underneath the roadway and replace this area with
a bridge. The bridge would enhance the reach of floodwaters throughout the wetland
system. This alternative would impact approximately 0.500 acres of wetlands at
Bloomery Swamp and restore approximately 0.500 acres of wetlands from the removal of
fill on either side of the existing culvert. The total net loss of wetlands would be
approximately 0.004 acres. There will be approximately 87 linear feet of stream impacts.
Approximately 122 feet ofright-of--way would be needed for this alternative. The
estimated total construction cost is $8,000,000, of which the bridge construction costs
$2,220,000. The area near Bloomery Swamp in this alternative can be seen in Figure 7.
Alternative 6
Alternative 6 is the same as Alternative 5 except that curb and gutter would be
used. Approximately 110 feet ofright-of--way would be needed for this alternative.
Alternative 6 is estimated to have a construction cost of $7,800,000, of which the bridge
construction costs $2,220,000. The area near Bloomery Swamp in this alternative can be
seen in Figure 7.
Table 1 _ Alternatives Comparison of Impacts

Altern-
atives Typical
Section Right-
of-Way Wetland
Impacts Stream
Impacts Relo-
cations Structure
Cost Estimate Construction
Cost Estimate
1 Shoulder 122 ft. 0.734 ac. 123 ft. 1 ~ $310,000 $5,700,000 -~~
2 C & G 110 ft. 0.734 ac. 123 ft. 1 $300,000 $5,800,000 - :
3 Shoulder 122 ft. 0.664* ac. 87 ft. 1 ~r $935,000 $6,800,000..
4 C & G 110 ft. 0.664* ac. 87 ft. 1 $935,000 $6,600,000
5 Shoulder 122 ft. 0.004** ac. 87 ft. 1 $2,220,000 $8,000,000 .
6 C & G 110 ft. 0.004** ac. 87 ft. 1 $2,220,000 $7,800,000
*Note- 0.664 acres includes U.tSUU acres of wetlands impacted minus u.14v acres or
possible restored wetlands from fill removal
**Note- 0.004 acres includes 0.500 acres of wetlands impacted minus 0.500 acres of
possible restored wetlands from fill removal
~q ,~ _
:~
',
4

U-3823 Merger Team Meeting
August 14, 2003
Project Issues
Bridge vs. Culvert
Since the wetland system in Bloomery Swamp is determined to be of high-
quality, NCDOT is committed to looking at the reasonableness and feasibility of bridging
in this area. It should be noted that subsequent references to "wetlands restored" are
referring to areas underneath the proposed bridges that are now filled, but have the
potential to be converted back to the wetlands.
Issue 1: Hydrologic Flow
Bridge:
• Would allow for hydrologic flow with larger opening.
Culvert:
• Existing crossing is five barrel 12x7 ft culvert. It serves as a 60-foot bridge.
• Existing culvert is only 12 years old. The culvert replaced a longer bridge. = ''
• Existing culvert has proven to be hydraulically sufficient. It has created only 0.7 feet
of backwater upstream during the 100-yr. flood event. It is recommended by the
Hydraulics Unit.
• Equalizer pipes will be added under the roadway along the swamp to improve
hydrologic flow.
Issue 2: Wildlife Crossing
Bridge:
• Larger opening will allow for some wildlife crossing opportunities. However, the
vertical clearance under bridges (as currently proposed) would be only 3-4 feet.
• The roadway could be raised, at a cost of approximately $200,000/ft. The roadway
would need to be raised approx. 3-4 feet in order to be attractive to large mammals.
• A permit would be required for a modification to the floodway, requiring FEMA and
local government involvement.
Culvert.•
• Existing culvert has live flow, so it is unlikely that small mammals are using it.
• Larger arch culverts could be installed to facilitate wildlife crossings, such as a 12-ft x
7-ft arch culvert (large and small mammals) at the east end, and a 53" x41" arch
culvert (small mammals) at the west end. A third arch culvert could be installed, and
the cost for all three would likely fall under $150,000.
• The large arch culvert would probably be more attractive for large mammals than a
3-4-ft bridge vertical clearance.

U-3823 Merger Team Meeting
August 14, 2003
Issue 3: Wetlands
Bridge:
• Only the 475-foot bridge will "zero" out the impacts of the widening project on
wetlands. This "zero" effect will be accomplished by creating wetlands under the
bridge where the causeway is removed.
• 200-ft bridge will impact 0.664 acres of wetlands.
Culvert:
• Will impact 0.743 acres of wetlands.
There is a sewer line parallel to the roadway on the downstream side which has
fill placed over it, thus limiting potential benefits from expanding the stream channel for
the wetland system in this immediate area.
Curb c4r Gutter vs. Shoulder Section
NCDOT maintains that a curb & gutter section is the best choice for this project.
Substantial development is expected to occur along Airport Blvd. With such
development come new driveways. The City of Wilson has been requiring developers to
install curb & gutter as a condition of their development even on roadways with a
shoulder.
In areas where runoff from the roadway is draining to Bloomery Swamp or the
other stream, grass swales and curb & gutter can be constructed to provide treatment
before eventual discharge. Other treatment techniques such as pre-formed scour holes,
level spreaders, dry detention basins, diffusing flow, etc. can be incorporated as well. In
areas where offsite drainage would reach the roadway, separate grass swales can be
constructed to keep it from commingling with the road runoff. Similar measures were
taken on the NC 42 widening, currently in construction, and in the vicinity of this project.
The specifics of such treatment measures are typically discussed during Concurrence
Points 4B and 4C. These techniques can be used to meet the requirements of the Neuse
Buffer Rules. The Hydraulics Branch has prepared some preliminary design measures
that should satisfy the previous stated concerns of NCDWQ. These measures will be
presented at the meeting on the preliminary design plans.
Also, of significant importance is that a shoulder section would cause three
additional residential relocations, along with one cemetery relocation. The curb and
gutter alternatives will minimize impacts to several residential properties.
6

U-3823 Merger Team Meeting
August 14, 2003
Combined Design Public Hearing
NCDOT and the USACE held a combined public hearing on May 1, 2003 in
Wilson. Attendees were generally property owners who live along SR 1158 (Airport
Blvd.). No one commented on the bridge/culvert issue, and only one person provided a
comment on the proposed typical section. He preferred acurb-and-gutter option. The
post-hearing meeting minutes are included in Attachment 1.
Comments on the Environmental Assessment
USFWS Comment- "Though the existing structure at Bloomery Swamp is a box culvert,
the Service is pleased that alternatives are being considered for a bridge to replace the
culvert. Abridge may provide better hydrological connectivity between the dissected
portions of the wetlands along SR 1158 and also provide increased potential for wildlife
movement along the Bloomery Swamp corridor. The four bridge alternatives also have
less impact on wetlands and streams. For these reasons, the Service prefers the bridge
alternatives (Alternatives 3, 4, 5, and 6) over the culvert extension alternatives
(Alternatives 1 and 2)."
NCDOT Response - To be discussed at today's meeting.
EPA Comment - "Alternatives 3, 4, 5, & 6 provide the least amount of stream impacts.
EPA would prefer one of these alternatives over Alternatives 1 & 2 concerning these
potential stream impacts."
NCDOT Response - To be discussed at today's meeting.
EPA Comment - "The EA identifies that approximately 14.12 acres of active farmland
will be potentially impacted by the project...EPA recommends that NCDOT contact
NRCS to identify the status of these farmlands within Wilson County and include this
information..."
NCDOT Response -The EA indicates that the project area is either within the municipal
boundaries of the City of Wilson or within it's extra-territorial jurisdiction (ETJ), and
thus does not qualify for prime or unique farmland under the NRCS designation system.
NCDWQ Comment - "At this time, the DWQ does not support the selection of an
alternative that incorporates curb and gutter as part of the project design. However, the
DWQ will discuss design options with the DOT as part of selecting the preferred
alternative."
NCDOT Response - To be discussed at today's meeting.
7

U-3823 Merger Team Meeting
August 14, 2003
1VCDWQ Comment - "In previous discussions about the project alignment and the use
of roadway shoulders, the DWQ expressed concerns about the proposed relocation of a
local resident to avoid impacting natural resources and/or cemetery... Dependent on the
magnitude of the natural resource impact and the desires of the potentially relocated
resident, the DWQ may support impacting natural resources to prevent the loss of the
residential dwelling."
NCDOT Response- The primary reason for the relocation is the avoidance. of the
cemetery. The landlord of the house in question was at the design public hearing. He
lives across the road from his rental property and would lose additional frontage if the
rental house was avoided. He was satisfied with the alignment as proposed.
NCDWQ Comment - "Where streams must be crossed, the DWQ prefers bridges be
used in lieu of culverts. However, we realize that economic considerations often require
the use of culverts... Moreover, in areas where high quality wetlands or streams are
impacted, a bridge may prove preferable."
NCDOT Response - To be discussed at today's meeting.
NCWRC - "NCWRC supports bridging [Bloomery Swamp]. Bridges provide better
hydraulic connectivity than culverts, reduce in-channel stress that causes downstream
channel instability, and allow for wildlife movements along the riparian corridor. At this
time, alternatives that include bridging the Bloomery Swamp crossing are preferred. We
strongly suggest that NCDOT study bridge lengths at this crossing which balance wetland
impacts with wetland restoration gained by the additional bridge length."
NCDOT Response - To be discussed at today's meeting.
Avoidance/Minimization
By the very nature of this project (widening), the ability to avoid and minimize
impacts is limited. However, avoidance and minimization have been incorporated into
the preliminary design through strategic placement of the right-of--way limits. The
decision was made early on to pursue a `best-fit" alignment. This has allowed the
estimated impacts to wetlands be reduced to a maximum of 0.73 acres (depending on the
LEDPA selected) from 3.65 acres for a symmetric widening option, and 2.98 acres for an
asymmetric widening option. Estimated impacts for surface waters, wetlands, and buffer
zones, are included below in tables 2, 3, and 4. The majority of this impact reduction
occurred in the Bloomery Swamp area, the remainder in the unnamed tributary to
Bloomery Swamp. The roadway alignment has also been positioned to avoid impacts to
a cemetery. The alignment has also been designed to limit relocations to one, whereas
many as 3-4 properties were in danger of being relocated. However, the shoulder section
alternatives would cause 4 relocations, along with the cemetery relocation.
8

U-3823 Merger Team Meeting
August 14, 2003
The widening will occur on the south side of the existing roadway in the area of
Bloomery Swamp, because the wetlands on the northern side were determined to be of
higher quality. The roadway will be widening to four-lanes in the vicinity of Bloomery
Swamp (instead offive-lanes) in order to minimize impacts. Hazardous spill control
basins will also be installed near Bloomery Swamp, and this should minimize effects of
any illicit discharges from the roadway. Also, installation of equalizer pipes may
enhance wildlife movement across the road barrier.
Table 2. Estimated Impacts to Surface Waters
Surface Water Alternatives 1&2 Alternatives 3&4 Alternatives 5&6
Bloomery Swamp 36 feet 0 feet 0 feet
Unnamed Tributary 87 feet 87 feet 87 feet
Total 123 feet 87 feet 8? feet
Table 3. Estimated Impacts to Wetlands
Wetland Alternatives 1&2 Alternatives 3&4 Alternatives 5&6
Bloomery Swamp 0.730 acres 0.660* acres 0.000** acres
Wetland along UT 0.004 acres 0.004 acres 0.004 acres
Total 0.734 acres 0.664 acres 0.004 acres
*Note- 0.660 acres includes 0.800 acres of wetlands impacted minus 0.140 acres of possible restored
wetlands from fill removal
**Note- 0.000 acres includes 0.500 acres of wetlands impacted minus 0.500 acres of possible restored
wetlands from fill removal
Table 4. Estimated Impacts to Riparian Buffers
Water Biotic Alternatives 1&2 Alternatives 3&4 Alternatives 5&6
Resource Community
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 1 Zone 2
Bloomery Bottomland
Swamp hardwood 924 ft.z 533 ft.Z 1105 ft.2 730 ft.Z 1105 ft.z 730 ft.2
Unnamed Bottomland
Tributary hardwood, 779 ft.z 104 ft.`' 779 ft.~ 104 ft.z 779 ft.z 104 ft.2
agricultural
Total 1703 ft.Z 637 f~t.Z 1884 ft.2 834 ft.Z 1884 ft.2 834 ft.Z
(~~~~
9

a
3
O
~c
N
N
r
I I
I i
i
i
~~
i

~~
I
o -II
~ It-
o =iii
~ li-
ii
~ Bii=
Z -Ili
~~~~_
~'
l
0
__
~~

r- _
_ _q
O
Z ~ N
3 ~_
O

,~
~" H
V
W
N ~
p
E-
~

d
J
V ~
oC
,
V
Z
~

N
X
W Q
I
~
N
~ ~y
m
c
Z ~ N
.~ O ~
m .V ~
V ~ ~
~ N
E E c
~~
° E o
.~ ,
N N
C ~C
0
~N
m ~ •~
E -o m
~ ~_
~ a 3
~ m c
.C 'p V
~ ~ ~
- ' ~ p d
3 > E
r E
;' w a ~
i'' p E o
Z
~'
=ui
iii=
r =iii
~I1~-
~i-Ili
q%i -
Z~-III
Z i,l_
N
M
O
N
N
~c
o ~==ill
= 11-
~ -iii
3 iiu!
2 iii -
=111
~ i,=
a
a~
L
N
C
d
N ~
O~
Z~
a~
~ Z ~
O v
_j_ ~- W ~
i Z N
~ ~ ~ O
a Q ~
~. V m
Z
N r ~O
W H
m
0
v

o =iii
;liii=
o =!n
ulll-
_III
~~II~-
z=lil
~Vil-
Z '~'
O ~O
a cV
O 0 ~
J O
~
m
~
O
°~°~~~
M
~=~Ov~ON
"~'V
Foo~
ao
3
,~ Z
M
~ a N
~
w
p
p
°~5
Z ~ O ~ J
J ~z3
o

N
~ O
Z ~- M
W
GC
~. ~
_
IL
_ M
Z~
O ,;;
F-- >
W Q
~~
W
a °c
/V_
~```ji Q
^
0
W

'I
q

Q>
> N
~' M
~! ~~ ~ o
_; ~ N
'J ! N
oc i ~ Q
~ >
O
__ _ .. __
N
I M
i
0
~' i =iit
o iii=
~, -. n
~ ni,ii
~ ii =
=ii~,
i ~ n!=
O I-~ ~ ~
Z ,-; -
~ I ~'
$ ,III
~ Ili-
~ ii,i-'
~ =,i~
~ -i _
~-~~
~~~I-
~~_III
~~Ii-
~~i
~ iii=
iii
~,~i-
i
i
0
r
O
z
~ z a
~ O ~
~ o
Z W =
W N ~
i ~ V ~
~ z ~
N
X
W
.~ c o
.~ o
o ~ '~
~, o
N N
C ~ C
00
.y
m ~ •~
m
'D = ~
~ a 3
c ~
.~ -0 0
~ ~
3 > E
~ ~
p ~ o
Z
1
__ _ --
~O
N
~~
N
M
0
---~
N
N
oc
O
~O
N

O
00
i ~=ul
~n=
& =iii
~ iiiin
~ in=
~ =iii
~ ~~i=
a
Q
N
t
~3
0
z~
Z~
O V
Z
~ V ~
W
~ t/1 O
J _
z V m
N ~
x }.
W F- ~
N
m
Z
o •o
N
'~ N
d ~ ~
J O
~a~m Z
o=o~~~
~ O O ~ W ~ ~
3
Z z~
oV
u°i p N ~
~N"> ~O
Z p ~ ~ J
~z3
V ~
'~ NO
o cc
Z LL.
~i'
W
~Q
t/7 N
Z ~
O ,,,,,
V ~
W Q
J z
Q W
/V J
ii Q
O
LL

--_-
w I~
~ y 'Y ~ I I I
{ w W
w II I
w
ww
w w
~~` f~
O "
_... ~ ..~ _~ -w w w~ 1 I I I
w w
w w I ~ I
w w ~I i
w w w y
II I
w w I I
w w w
w 'Y I I
w I I I
'~ 'Y l ~
w :~ ~.~-- 'f ~
w<= ~ , .. I
w ~ w ~
w ~ w =I
w -~~~ ~ ~
~~ I ~;
.~' I
,~..~~ t ;('i ~
. ~.J~
,..~..~~ ~ i I ~
I I
~ I li~
~// II
w ( I I I
w fem.. ~~~. I
~ f.. w ~ ~
w
w~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~~ W
~~ w w w
f~~ w ~ w I i I
_.. f... w w w ~
w
~` I I
w ~
'~ w I I I
~~I~ I
,~
w w w I I I
w,~ ~ I I
~ I$'
W w ~: II'I'
w w ~~ I~ I
w ~ w
w w W~ I I II
ww I I ~
~.. z..l,:. ~,, i I I.
U~ ~~ ^~
»~ -~
~ - _~
w .~ 1 ~ ~ I l~
~ ~ ~~
w ~~
w
l ww
ww~~~ I
w w I
w~
~ w I
w ~
w w w~ ~ I,
w r
w I
Y
w
w
w w
w
w
`\~.,., t w ~~ w~ w I
~,~ ,~ , ~
~~_r v "-
,.,1 ~,-,~ ;.~
w ~ I '~
w
w w ~ T '
?f'
w w ~y
1 i
w + I
I
" w ~
w
,~} ~ I
w * ' ~
I
S~
;Q ,.
~~,
w
N w ;,
~
~' 'w ~ ~ ~
w
w
~ ~ ~'
w
V ~ . '~~ I ~
~ \
'~ r,

,
Zw Y
w s w i I
,.
,,
4~
~

w
,I
~ w , i.I
,;
~ ~, I ''i
i
r
+ ' i~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
~~
4
S ~
~
__ ~' I ~,
i
w
" w
__`
w ~. ,~ ,1 ~ ~r ...~~,~~ti,-~t, v, t~ , ~-.
w w
w
w t
"~ w w w
r
w w ,.~ ~~~
w w w ~
w y
w w .~
w '~ ~~
w w ,
~ ,_
w w ~.~'w
' w w „~ ~ w
w ^'
~ w _.~~~ ' ~~r
w ~,'~
~ w }~,S
~' w
~ w
w w ~•_
w w ~~~
w }
w ~ f..
w ~ ~.~ l
~'
l ~ f"? w w w
~~r'w
'~ f"! w w w w w w w ti
.-'!~~ , w
~~°
~.. y w w w
.~~. w w w w .
w w w
w w + ww ,
w w w w '
~ w w %~
w w w
w w w ,,~
'~ w w
w
w
/ w w
~w ~
~ w ,
i w '~ "
'~ w w ~
/ W
~ w ~ W
w w ,~ '~
* w '~ w
w +
l,~ C,~ (~ w w w w
S;5 1
r~
~~ {{
~~ w w w w w:
w
SS w w w w
4~ 7 w w ~ w w
w w
(~ w w w
{~~ w w w w ~
w w
w
„1 ~:y.~ w w
w
~ w
~ w
4~ w w
,~~
w
w
w
w i w
w w
w y
w w ~ w
w .
' .a
.,'~ '
. .
,~
w
~r
~ ~ , ,,,r~,r~,,~~.~
4 '_ Jr.. ,
~~,~~
w ~
Z
O ~'
~O ~y
a N
O
N ~ N ~
O ~ M~
~N J ~~N
mQ
W
~Q~
O Z~„~
uZi ~
= OWOI"-Q
V
o
~0~ ~
~3 ~~
~Zo QNZ'~H
~-
0
oo~
v> > ~p
~
~ Q
Q > ~
J o ~ N
J ~
~ V try
~z3~

V W/

o
Z

Q

i-
Z ~

W ~

H ~ ~

1- V
O
~ =
~ > a
~ ~ _ ~ ~
p p V cn
0 cn
~ cn
0
W W
° O Z g ~ ~
~
O ~
O
~
„
,~

~
G..
W ~
~0~~0
0
O
N
U ~
0
~ O

Z
g
3
W
O
m
Q
~_
V

C
' ~ I
4 I
~`
~~ I
N ~
,~
I
~ ~ .~ ~ i
i
~~ ~ ~~
l
i~ ~
O ~,~
II I
I I
~ ~~ ~
W ;
W ~ 1
I
~~ I
s
W W
(~J1
W y i 't I I
,~ ~ ., ~,
.~
../ ~`,
,~ ~
~z I
» "
W ~
w ~ ~~~
~`~~ -~~
.~~ I ~ ~~~~~-
,.. ~i ~~
..~
.,~ I j
,~
.~_.} ~ I I;i~
..~ -=
~ ~~",~~ ~ ~ I ~
~ r"~ ~ ~ '
~~ I
{ ~ " ~ ~ L
f,. ,~ ~
f~ 4 y. 'Y 'Y ~ I i I
~~, ~ ~ I
f~ ~ I
f f ~ y
~.. ~
f~~ w y j I }
~ ~ I I
~~ ~W ~ I- I
~ ~ I I
'~ ~ I I
i ±Y ~ ~ I
~ , I
z ,.r, . ,, .,r
_ '...-~
~'
--_
-- 1
4
3 ~~ ~ _~1 -
w ~} _
~~
-~(~' _.
,~
-~, _~, I
W ~` w I L
'' {
~ ~
..-- 4 W ..
_ ~
'Y +r 7
~ '~ W 1
~ ~ w ~ ti ~ ~,
w
\\ w
~~.. i 'Y
~ '~ ~
4,,..<<. ~, -~ W ~ w ~
~ ~ ,
r
-~ _- ~,. .rte X ~
~ ~
,~~. ,~ _
_
~
~ ,~'
,~

'V y
...
V
..~•.r
W
.
~ ~
W.,
,.
__
,.

~~ w
s .k
s
~~

~{
~ ,
.~~.
~
fir, ~ ~,_
s~
n
r"~
r.,`
:"

`
~
~ i
{~w
~,.
~

,.~ ~~ ~ ~
w ,~ ~ ~ w
f.. ~
,,.~

.~
.%
W
W
,,
w ~~ ~ /
W ,-
~^ ~
'Y 'Y
W
I ~ ,~ W
,~ ~ ~
~ w ~ ~
/ ~ W
~ ~ r
v i
~~ * ~ +
4 '~
t'S r~~ /
~3 ~
r W v w w
(;J w
W M y ,~
~S ~ ~ ~
,.
~:, ~ ~
w
'Y % W '1
..1 `~ ~
~~ ~ ~
L~
w w
.~
~ ti~;
4 '~
~. ~~.,,
.~,
~~ W
't'~ ~
~ ~ 4.
i -_. ~
v , - -.
~ ,.~~ ~
w 1..n'i.~ni.,,
~ _y ~
r
~~,__.
.,~ ~ s
,~ y
~_ i
..~ -.~t -V- ,~
r~ + v
i I r ~ r
Y
w w 1, I w +
W ~ ~ W
~ a ~ I "
'~ I
w ~
~ ~) ~ 4
N `
W I
~ ~ w ~ '`
.~
.~ , ;
V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
~_
~ ~ ti
Z" 4 I ~~
~;~ - ~~~
,~
,~
,~
.~ ; , ~ti ~ ~ ~ - _ _r
r ~~
I
~'_' ` '
S ~, , ,,,,~.- ,,,,_
,.,, w .,
t ,.,.~
~ r,„
~,,,.,
• '~ v . l ~ r^~~
w ..~' ,.
~~ i~ w l I ~ J Its II `
2Q
0
Q N
.-.
~
O
z N
~ = M
N ch

H
m 0 00 N
LLJ
~3o F,F-Z~'j
= ~
Z=~ o~~ a
~ ~ ° ~ W V U
3 ~
aZO QNZ~ J
~~> OO~O~ Q
Z ' ~

~ Y ~ ~ ii
V
`o
.~ r ~
~z3

~ ~
N W
~
~
Z / ^
Z ~ ~
Z
W
W
Q
ii ~
0
=
~

W
~
v
~
~
O
W

N
o 0
N
o ~
~
m N
~
~ t~
~
g N
0
~
d. d.
N
~~~~
U

r
Z
g
~~
V I
O
O
CO
Q
,W^
V
m
O
N