20001195 Ver 15_Public Notice_20141125

I I
I���I
PUBLIC NOTICE
US Army Corps
Of Engineers
Wilmington District
Issue Date: November 25, 2014
Comment Deadline: December 26, 2014
Corps Action ID Number: SAW- 2014 -00838
The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) received an application from the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) seeking Department of the Army authorization for the
construction of a new Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) and associated structures and
parking for the Charlotte Douglas International Airport (CLT) in Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina.
Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached plans.
This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site
at http: / /www.saw.usace.army.mil /Missions /Re ulatoUPermitPro r�px
Applicant: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Courtney Nolan, AJW -2E 11D
Terminal Engineering Center
1701 Columbia Avenue
College Park, Georgia 30337
AGENT: URS Corporation
Mr. Chris Petterson
6000 Fairview Road, Suite 200
Charlotte, North Carolina 28210
Authority
The Corps evaluates this application and decides whether to issue, conditionally issue, or deny
the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of the following Statutory Authorities:
® Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344)
❑ Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403)
❑ Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33
U.S.C. 1413)
Location
The project is located on the southern portion of the CLT site, located northwest of the
intersection of West Boulevard with Billy Graham Parkway, in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina (N 35.204046, W - 80.946237). The project area is adjacent to unnamed
tributaries of Coffey Creek.

Project Area (acres): 10.5 Nearest Town: Charlotte
Nearest Waterway: Coffey Creek River Basin: 03050103
Latitude and Longitude: 35.203758 N, - 80.944415 W
Existing Site Conditions
The topography of the ATCT project study area is characterized as gently sloping with steeper
areas occurring along drainage ways. Elevations range from a high of 700 feet to a low of 650
feet along tributaries. Land use in the study area is characterized by commercial landscapes,
particularly the Charlotte Airport facility. Outside of the airport property, the land is mostly
vacant wooded land or commercial. The project study alternatives are located within the
Catawba (Hydrologic Unit 03050103) River Basin. Streams in the project area are tributaries to
Coffey Creek. Other streams within the airport property drain into Toggart Creek and Tier Creek
(the land on the northwester portion of the airport property including tributaries to Tier Creek,
occur in the Catawba River Basin with Hydrologic Unit 03050101). Aquatic communities in the
study area include both intermittent and perennial piedmont streams. One jurisdictional wetland
adjacent to tributaries of Coffey Creek occurs within the study area.
Applicant's Stated Purpose
The purpose of this project is to replace the existing ATCT facility that no longer provides
adequate coverage of airfield traffic control needs. The existing ATCT structure has been in
service for over 30 years and does not have sufficient height or ground position to provide
required lines of sight across the airfield, particularly with the recent addition of the third parallel
runway at CLT in 2010. Although a newly -sited ATCT would likely support a conceptual forth
10,000 ft parallel runway included in the current airport master plan, the current need for the
proposed ATCT is independent of any future runway expansion.
Proper positioning of the ATCT to provide adequate depth perception, lines of sight, and
visibility of all areas on the airfield is vital for airport traffic control personnel to safely and
efficiently manage aircraft movements. In addition to addressing these emerging visual flight
safety needs, the new ATCT would include provisions for updated digital flight control
components including the TRACON facility. The proposed ATCT would also improve operation
conditions within the control cab including enhanced equipment layout, operating space and
controller station visibility and ergonomics.
Project Description
The proposed project involves the construction of a 370 foot high ATCT, a Terminal Radar
Approach Control (TRACON) building, a 239 space parking lot and access driveway, two
stormwater BMP detention ponds and sewer lines to service facility. The proposed project would
result in impact to 709 linear foot of intermittent stream channel and 0.007 acres of wetlands due
to grading to facilitate the buildings and parking areas.
-2-

It should be noted that the ATCT project is considered to be a single and complete project with
activities that have occurred on the greater Charlotte Airport property. The Corps has issued CLT
two Nationwide Permits #39 (Action IDs 2000 -31354 and 2003 - 30940) and three IPs (Action
IDs 2006 - 32521, 2008 -03090 and 2010- 00837) for activities on the Charlotte Airport Property.
There have also been a total of three permit modifications issued to CLT, two for the permit
issued under Action ID 2006 -32521 and one for the permit issued under Action ID 2008 - 03090.
The total impact authorized under all of these permits is 25,444 linear feet of stream, 4.183 acres
of wetlands, and 7.55 acres of open water. The table below details the permits issued for the
Charlotte Airport Property.
Summary of past Charlotte Airport permitted actions
AID
Type of
Issue
Additional
Total Impacts
Description of
Permit
Date
Impacts
Authorized
Work
Authorized
To Date:
NWP 39
2961f stream
2961f stream
Runway 23 Safety
2003 -1354
Area
2003 -30940
NWP 39
2691f stream
565 if stream
National Guard
Armory
2005-31167
Replaced with
AID below
IP
3/20/
16,312 if streams
16,877 if streams
New parallel
2007
0.432 ac wetlands
0.432 ac wetlands
runway, runway
4.631 ac open waters
4.631 ac open waters
extension, road
relocations
7/15/
5,2471f stream
22,1241f stream
Additional impacts
2009
0.716 ac wetland
1.148 ac wetlands
associated with the
2.89 ac open water
7.552 ac open water
new parallel
2006 -32521
runway, runway
extension, road
relocations
4/26/
*110 If of stream
22,1241f stream
construct part of
2010
1.148 ac wetlands
the West
Total authorized
7.552 ac open water
Boulevard re-
after modification
alignment
* *21,559 If stream
1.148 ac wetlands
7.552 ac open water
IP
7/17/
2,395 if stream
24,519 of stream
Roadway
2009
3.035 ac wetlands
4.4183 ac wetlands
improvements for
7.552 ac open water
the Little Rock
Road entrance and
6/11/
7761f
25,2951f
modification to
2008 -03090
2012
4.4183 ac wetlands
proposed parking
Total authorized
7.552 ac open water
areas. (Parking
after modification
Deck)
3,171 if stream
3.035 ac wetland
-3-

2010 -00837
IP
10/16
/2012
1491f stream
25,4441f stream
4.4183 ac wetlands
7.552 ac open water
Construction of
Taxiway D
Total Impacts
25,4441f stream
for all
4.183 ac wetlands
cumulative
7.552 ac open waters
activities on
Charlotte
Airport
Property
* Total impacts did not change with the final modification due to the fact that CDIA agreed to
apply these new impacts toward the 21,5591f total since they were unsure if all the proposed
impacts would be completed in the near future.
* *The actual 4 /26/2010 permit authorized 22,5591f of stream channel. This is a typo and the
actual impacts should have been 21,5591f.
Avoidance and Minimization
The applicant provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or minimize
impacts to the aquatic environment:
The project footprint has been limited to the greatest extent practicable. Stormwater detention
ponds were designed to avoid stream impacts.
Compensatory Mitigation
The applicant offered the following compensatory mitigation plan to offset unavoidable
functional loss to the aquatic environment:
At this time the applicant has proposed no compensatory mitigation be performed to off -set
impacts to intermittent streams. The applicant has requested that compensatory mitigation be
waived for the project on the basis that the intermittent streams proposed for impact originate
from stormwater runoff, drain a small watershed area (approximately 14 acres) and the streams
have low habitat. The applicant further cites as justification to waive mitigation their conclusion
that the groundwater connection to the streambed is primarily a result of bank erosion and
channel incision and that the stream substrate contains mostly an aggregation of silt and sand.
Essential Fish Habitat
Pursuant to the Magnuson- Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, this Public
Notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements. The Corps' initial
determination is that the proposed project would not effect EFH or associated fisheries managed
by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine
Fisheries Service.

Cultural Resources
Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Appendix C of 33
CFR Part 325, and the 2005 Revised Interim Guidance for Implementing Appendix C, the
District Engineer consulted district files and records and the latest published version of the
National Register of Historic Places and initially determines that:
❑ Should historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, be
present within the Corps' permit area; the proposed activity requiring the DA permit (the
undertaking) is a type of activity that will have no potential to cause an effect to an
historic properties.
® No historic properties, nor properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are
present within the Corps' permit area; therefore, there will be no historic properties
affected. The Corps subsequently requests concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).
❑ Properties ineligible for inclusion in the National Register are present within the Corps'
permit area; there will be no historic properties affected by the proposed work. The Corps
subsequently requests concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).
❑ Historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are
present within the Corps' permit area; however, the undertaking will have no adverse
effect on these historic properties. The Corps subsequently requests concurrence from the
SHPO (or THPO).
❑ Historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are
present within the Corps' permit area; moreover, the undertaking may have an adverse
effect on these historic properties. The Corps subsequently initiates consultation with the
SHPO (or THPO).
❑ The proposed work takes place in an area known to have the potential for the presence of
prehistoric and historic cultural resources; however, the area has not been formally
surveyed for the presence of cultural resources. No sites eligible for inclusion in the
National Register of Historic Places are known to be present in the vicinity of the
proposed work. Additional work may be necessary to identify and assess any historic or
prehistoric resources that may be present.
The District Engineer's final eligibility and effect determination will be based upon coordination
with the SHPO and/or THPO, as appropriate and required, and with full consideration given to
the proposed undertaking's potential direct and indirect effects on historic properties within the
Corps- indentified permit area.
-5-

Endangered Species
Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Corps reviewed the project area, examined
all information provided by the applicant and consulted the latest North Carolina Natural
Heritage Database. Based on available information:
® The Corps determines that the proposed project would not affect federally listed
endangered or threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat.
❑ The Corps determines that the proposed project may affect federally listed endangered or
threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat. The Corps initiates
consultation under Section 7 of the ESA and will not make a permit decision until the
consultation process is complete.
❑ The Corps is not aware of the presence of species listed as threatened or endangered or
their critical habitat formally designated pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(ESA) within the project area. The Corps will make a final determination on the effects of
the proposed project upon additional review of the project and completion of any
necessary biological assessment and /or consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service and/or National Marine Fisheries Service.
Other Required Authorizations
The Corps forwards this notice and all applicable application materials to the appropriate State
agencies for review.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources ( NCDWR): The Corps will generally not make
a final permit decision until the NCDWR issues, denies, or waives the state Certification as
required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92 -500). The receipt of the application and
this public notice, combined with the appropriate application fee, at the NCDWR Central Office
in Raleigh constitutes initial receipt of an application for a 401 Certification. A waiver will be
deemed to occur if the NCDWR fails to act on this request for certification within sixty days of
receipt of a complete application. Additional information regarding the 401 Certification may be
reviewed at the NCDWR Central Office, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit, 512 North Salisbury
Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 -2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding
the application for a 401 Certification should do so, in writing, by December 26, 2014 to:
NCDWR Central Office
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
(LISPS mailing address): 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617
Or
(Physical address): 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM):
❑ The application did not include a certification that the proposed work complies with and
would be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved North Carolina
Coastal Zone Management Program. Pursuant to 33 CFR 325.2(b)(2) the Corps cannot
issue a Department of Army (DA) permit for the proposed work until the applicant
submits such a certification to the Corps and the NCDCM, and the NCDCM notifies the
Corps that it concurs with the applicant's consistency certification. As the application
did not include the consistency certification, the Corps will request, upon receipt,
concurrence or objection from the NCDCM.
Based upon all available information, the Corps determines that this application for a
Department of Army (DA) permit does not involve an activity which would affect the
coastal zone, which is defined by the Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Act (16 U.S.C. §
1453).
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts
including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will
reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit
which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its
reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be
considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics,
aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife
values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use,
navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water
quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of
property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving
the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the
impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental
Protection Agency's 404(b)(1) guidelines.
Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies
and officials, including any consolidated State Viewpoint or written position of the Governor;
Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this
proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to
determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this
decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water
quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above.
Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and /or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the
overall public interest of the proposed activity.
-7-

Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a
public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing shall be
granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is
otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.
The Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District will receive written comments pertinent to the
proposed work, as outlined above, until 5pm, December 26, 2014. Comments should be
submitted to Crystal Amschler, Asheville Regulatory Field Office, 151 Patton Avenue, Room
208, Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006, at (828) 271 -7980 ext 231.
WE

G
FEW
•� FLOJDWAY
COFFEY CREEK CENTERLINE
•r
°s
e
s
EXISTING COFFEY CREEK
SANITARY SEVER WIN
• AN EASEMENT
POSED DETENT
UNITS OF CONSTRUCT
PROPOSED WALKING TRAIL
SB Y1 SB -20 'S8 -ig -t8
FLOODPLA I N
e (MECKLENBURG COUNTY)
• FEW
FLOODPLAIN
4
— 1
PROPOSED DETENTION POND 13JTFALL —
P '
B 1 PROPOSED DETENTION POND
E j
,i
s
s
s ,
$I o
i•
s• f
P
LEASE BOUNDARY
SO-15.
WETLAND
Z 3
SIB-13 §B-12 SO-11A 118-5 SB -T/SA
SB -16
5
PROPOSED CATCH
STORM DRAII
4
4
i
STREAM IMPACTS
on
La,
STREAM
DESIGNATION
IMPACT (LF) CLASSIFICATION
TOTAL IMPACT
FEET
EPHEMERAL
INTERMITTENT
A
188
149
337
B
170
560
730
C
TOTAL
225
583
0
709
225
1292
WETLAND IMPACTS
WETLAND
NAME
MPACT AREA
s
0.0017 ACRE
TOTAL 0.007 ACRE
` CENTER OF AIRPORT
f TRAFFIC CONTROL TONER
LIMITS OF BASE BUILDING
AND LINK TO TONER
EXISTING OVERHEAD POKER LINES
AND EASEMENT
SCALES Sw01NN FOR 22- X 34" SWEET. AO,MST SCALES FOR OTHER SaIES. I PAGE 2 OF 2
400 NerinpvkTOwn COMer,tOW Mematny ROW, NE.
a. .n.m.. o..ral. aoaae
T.I. N° ro+erooe -eeoo ... mvauaa -xao
ON1CrM�La Ck
Wm : Cm" IL 11111E>TNDOW PC
Nn NMrMDMMI► am 1. lams
Wwr�nrMCn
am
Copyright 0 2013 URS Corporation, Al l Rights Reserved
3
m
IEV I TDATE DESCRIPTION I JCR I -DATE- JAPVC
DEPARTMENT OF TRANBPORTATION B
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
TONS
CIVIL —
STREAM AND VETLAID
IMPACT EXHIBIT
CHARLOTTE CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (CLT) NC
1.soco w A
— J HO / J
Mo
2
1

Project Description
Proposed Charlotte - Douglas International Airport
Airport Traffic Control Tower /Terminal Radar Approach Control Facility
Charlotte, Mecklenberg County, North Carolina
October 10, 2014
INTRODUCTION
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes to construct a new Airport Traffic
Control Tower (ATCT) and Terminal Radar Approach Control ( TRACON) base building at
the Charlotte - Douglas International Airport (CLT) located in Charlotte, Mecklenberg
County, North Carolina. The new FAA owned and operated facility will replace the existing
ATCT and TRACON which were commissioned in 1977 and 1979 respectively by the FAA.
The proposed ATCT / TRACON site is located on the south side of Hangar Road, west of
Yorkmont Road. The FAA ATCT / TRACON project is independent of other projects at the
CLT Airport.
The existing tower cab is approximately 575 square feet (sf) with a floor height of 150 feet
(ft) above ground level (AGL). The existing TRACON/base building is approximately
21,000 sf. Additional air traffic controller positions were added in 2010 which included one
to the ATCT and three to the Terminal Radar Approach Control ( TRACON). In addition to
supporting CLT, the TRACON also provides service to Concord Regional Airport (JQF) and
Hickory Regional Airport (HKY) ATCTs. JQF is the 5th busiest airport in North Carolina,
which services a large number of NASCAR teams.
In Fiscal Year 2011 the Secretary of Department of Transportation (DOT) made a
commitment to the airport sponsor that the FAA will support the replacement of the existing
facility.
PROJECT NEED
The existing ATCT cab is inadequate for current operations and necessary equipment
upgrades. The new ATCT will be designed as an Major Activity Level ATCT to enhance
safety and efficiency by providing adequate depth perception, line of sight, and visibility of
all movement and non - movement areas at the airport. The new ATCT cab will be
approximately 850 sf in size with a floor height of 335 ft AGL and provide the following
essential improvements:
• improve visibility of airport surface;
• eliminate tower cab overcrowding of current operational equipment and positions;
• increase base building size for operational and administrative requirements; and
• provide adequate parking for all stationed staff and to accommodate shift changes,
and visitor parking.
The existing TRACON /base building is overcrowded for the existing staff. The
overcrowding extends to the available parking and during training days there are
Proposed CLT ATCT / TRACON Facility

significantly more vehicles than parking spaces available. The new TRACON base building
will house the TRACON, maintenance and facility equipment, and the Air Traffic
Management District Office. Additionally, the base building will house three System
Support Centers (SSC), and their respective personnel; these functions need to be co- located
for logistics purposes, including operations and training. The new TRACON base building
will be approximately 42,000 gross sf.
PROJECT LOCATION
The proposed ATCT and TRACON/base building site is located approximately 1,000 ft west
of Yorkmont Road on the south side of Hangar Road. The project site encompasses
approximately 10 acres, and is located in Charlotte, Mecklenberg County, North Carolina.
The proposed new ATCT site coordinates are:
• Latitude 35'12'14.28"N
• Longitude: 80° 56' 35.76 "W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The CLT ATCT / TRACON replacement project includes Next Generation (NextGen)
technology that enables safe and efficient airport operations. The proposed FAA owned and
operated facility will include a lease area of approximately 10 acres. The primary features of
the new ATCT will include:
• the new ATCT
• a new TRACON base building
• 239 parking spaces (7 handicap spaces) and 6 motorcycle
• perimeter security fence
• security guard booth
• access roads to accommodate tractor trailers and emergency vehicles (e.g., fire
trucks) access to all sides of the building
• dual emergency generators and uninterruptible power supply system
• exterior fuel tank
Additional description of the proposed ATCT / TRACON and associated features are provided
in the following paragraphs:
• Proposed site work includes fill placement and construction of a new one -story
TRACON/base building and ATCT.
• The ATCT will be situated adjacent to the base building and connected via an
enclosed building link. The tower shaft will be constructed of pre -cast concrete
panels forming non - functional shaft supporting a 16 -sided steel cab approximately
850 sf in size.
• A total of 239 parking spaces are proposed, along with associated driveways, which
are located the minimum distance from the buildings to meet FAA security
requirements.
Proposed CLT ATCT / TRACON Facility 2

• Concrete walkways will be provided for access to parking areas. A paved walking
trail for use by the occupants and for security inspections to the fenceline will be
installed around the perimeter of the property, inside the fence.
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS OVERVIEW
Alternative locations for the new ATCT and alternative designs were considered. To address
procedural requirements, the no -build or no action alternative was also considered. The
following sections describe these two types of alternatives and provide justification for the
selected alternative.
LOCATION ALTERNATIVES
Six sites were evaluated covering each quadrant of the airport and three preferred sites were
selected for the Comparative Safety Analysis, which took place during the ATCT siting
process at the FAA's Airport Facilities Terminal Integration Laboratory ( AFTIL). The siting
review evaluated a number of factors, including visibility performance requirements, Federal
laws, regulations, orders and standards that pertain to the siting of an ATCT, and operational
requirements. All six sites were initially discussed and evaluated at the AFTIL I site visit,
July 19, 2011. During the AFTIL I site evaluation, Sites 3, 4, and 6 were eliminated, and
Sites 1, 2, and 2A were determined suitable for a more detailed evaluation. Site 3 did not
provide a satisfactory view of thresholds 18R and 18L traffic issues. Site 4 required an AGL
eye level of 500 ft and was rejected due to excessive height. Site 6 had several issues
including unsatisfactory view of thresholds 18R and 18L problem areas, the view of Taxiway
S was blocked by the fire station, and the height would need to be increased substantially to
view operations on Taxiway C. In addition to these pre - identified sites, other sites were also
evaluated during the AFTIL 1.
Sites 1, 2, and 2A were further evaluated during the AFTIL II study, which occurred January
23 through January 27, 2012. Upon further evaluation, potential wetlands were identified on
Site 1. No initial environmental issues were identified on Site 2 and 2A, resulting in Site 2A
becoming the prefered site. Conceptual plans were drawn for the three selected sites and
further analyzed before selecting the preferred site, Site 2A. Site 2 as well as Site 2A are
located adjacent to a high - voltage powerline, requiring that the high - voltage powerline be
relocated underground. It was determined that moving Site 2A an additional 50 feet to the
west would eliminate the necessity for relocating the power line. The new position was
designated Site 2B.
The AFTIL II evaluation included determining requisite eye level elevations in order to meet
the visual requirements of FAA Order 6480.4A, as well as determining potential obstructions
as defined in Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77. The analysis for each site initially
examined the "eye level elevation" required for each location based on the runway visibility
without regard to obstructions. Each site was then analyzed for height requirements based on
existing obstructions between the proposed ATCT site and movement areas. Ground
elevations and building heights were ascertained from the 3D Airport Layout Plan (ALP)
provided by AFTIL.
Proposed CLT ATCT /TRACON Facility 3

Copies of the approved Siting Report, Environmental Due Diligence Audit and
Environmental Assessment for the project are are provided in the appendix. Please refer to
these document(s) for a thorough assessment of the location alternatives and justification for
the selected alternative.
Proposed CLT ATCT /TRACON Facility 4

Figure 1 -1 Alternative ATCT Site Locations, CLT, Charlotte, NC
Source: 2011 USDA NRCS Image; North Carolina, Inset location map, MapTech, Inc.

Figure 3 -2 Aerial Perspective, Alternative ATCT Sites 1 and 2A, CLT
Source: 2011 USDA Aerial Imagery

Site Location Number
Latitude
Longitude
Site 1
35 12 14.2227N
80 56 39.9042W
Site 1A
35 12 14 -426ON
84 56 40.281oW
Site 2
35 12 12.9787N
86 56 35.0986W
Site 2A
35 12 14.1350N
80 56 35.184OW
(Inset Area)
t '
�.N:Hangar
. d
Oil
�_r 'Site 'FA
Site 1 , , r ' it I
y� •°�_ °r' I�
Site 2
Hangar Ny
� • � , � �� _ � Road
s �F
Figure 3 -1 Proposed ATCT Alternative Sites, CLT, Charlotte, NC
Source: USGS Topographic Mapping; 7.5 minute Charlotte West Quadrangle
5
SI
t .e
f �
t '
�.N:Hangar
. d
Oil
�_r 'Site 'FA
Site 1 , , r ' it I
y� •°�_ °r' I�
Site 2
Hangar Ny
� • � , � �� _ � Road
s �F
Figure 3 -1 Proposed ATCT Alternative Sites, CLT, Charlotte, NC
Source: USGS Topographic Mapping; 7.5 minute Charlotte West Quadrangle

Plans for previously authorized permits associated with
the Charlotte Airport

Master plan showing approximate locations of projects
for each Action ID

Il�'rt1 `i f�V c:
�51k3'*�' -sG4�
(""'r.f., `� �, 7 Vy ��� � � '-w^,� 7 � t r yr � - �� '�"3 .;� ✓ � . s¢ � €� t 1 a � 1 � °j - �, a, � -. �aj" � r .. `iS Y 1 +�
C'gfr� � � + -' C"�-g}�'� ca(If`..J -f r •°",�`� f+ �� „� _��,a- �y•+s'��, p„L'�77 �`V�,� � '� i�� Y� V ro '' Fi i _.^` s
i �a�# 7 L Y1 � i 1 O %/ ` r� r I( �' � i 6 � • y w A � ��
� � F -- 1 I/r - 1, -. �. °✓,'d j _ i � '[` t 5 v
1faj� rtl 2 a L L4 JIr^ fa.r� rl;..w��k rlt "It k4 { §e� rr
r .,� •" s�.f 41`.!rJrr�"" -al$� .'
water,
.r'� Iti � "d. ?r J. i s is,� � -; •-� r i �. v I �f � � `' `� �(I � � �-
��diC � �•� rf '� ,a/ �- trr�'�i�l.�. f. �,�!w . �. n�,�g., ,`,''T��k E[ �,� `� Y ° �s-�ti � -r e' ' F�J�� s � #: i 7r✓ 6L rt r f � \\ -� -'e-r �[� r,.s�.'r -� 7 'ya' ) 1 � ,.' V 4�.4 ,.�� f �!
r .rya - s.w. -, - ✓ - -
F`t lrtrfl? ns 1//
���Parking Deck! Road Re A1lgilment,
03090,-'
208 ,
° <jfl't4 \1t , �'i, \� sue' S1'` ! "` -�---✓ °ti q 1� �� a.4{ j -' r� r,.. rc 'S` '.(�i r f }aa ° fli S 1 r�+�. ?
�'l.F`+':1 ; ,ar' r•c, A .° �_' z` '"'�\ : t� :t�rr '`?_ - .� r prli'f� $L, alr �ki�! j .s tf -, 1.
5k L f _ `i'S` ! ✓'
���dn x rf r^•�„�� `> �� r Y� 1 r f n f � r • � �f' 'tom � , ' „LL �` � -
9�+l4�+:< n I i , rL � '� ;� � , � ��� ` � �x,� ?; � .J 1� ` E r � �i+ r '�� si ��y� "`" � �"� I �E +•- . :
' -�,�: \�. E'� l• 4' r ��� � � '� � i:r....�� -I P I r� �F-, t '' g`. • � _ r-, � -. ti
('U``s � t
�w l -. � .k \sy f ,r� t r .��,;.,.`�[ � f ' s it' i i'� �x�., -• C? - ..""�° t.1 ,�� .�+ s$�;+
akiway. . P, �ij 4��/ct(S it (j
2010 `0.00837 f5 r y
I Y 111., ✓�\. �y`p°`"v°` flf - f S'sl r�4`r�f ,,fit E�'3 It" r �k��'y ? I�. rl? �ri r `�r .� -d�r
u'44
l z � ' ✓l ",'F,. -�� 1�.,. -\ � i it �r L r-...- a R _ E I � 3��'1 � - pl rf �s. ;,4�d �3�� : � � eD#j
;i rr�,�Ui�I `rl��.d r`,��J_.•rr R✓ ,.,
S�r �li -tµ .��� � k! 1,. \ ! � Y' � '�, � -£_✓ �- s,� �'',L �V �S �+.
p n -. tf It r f � r.k` c ' �.. j r r 1 I '' '�.r -,' "�I, r- ?� v-� it :•�s 'z aa^- �,,..�r�"' -.1?
1s�Ilel RtJ�3►d�` `'� , e ��1 }�'
� 1� ` S , r�_£"" ��.� t• F E .:y - 'sasr��n '' . � F��:. � s� t' � I- , ��� s\ 4t�� ft �.
4 ��'` Z L,y ! :I s U } r1 y � 7 �� "'vw✓r I � r�A1 f S ;'��i K 1ff, W �S \t,� ��r'�
es s �r1 �r��. .>�� -.'.y ��� ,.. d �,'T r 2 r,. .' �., ,-f� V r .. � .�� T fi r ,it^�.- ✓f>�� - #(�r� ��r:•r�� a
71� i 'fl 4 Yt,I���Sk i #'; ( ��` +� � a',. s I�rl,\\ q�'P�l�r ��"• i 'V�Iwssl (� i s s �� - i .
♦ f4 �1� a\ -, A •� � � . •�' � r� r. li .. .`' �^ m i f - "$L`r - y�. j c' `YV '{ y s
!f (J ` � ��,?1 � i 1�,�1.���`�� -, '� I r 'S - -`" r l' •'� `:��snr��i y 11) I #�;r i �1 \- F r
w
rJrTb/''J ��I 0 4� i � ..'wM- .'��^'r'..� �- r� � `f�.r ✓r �,:-�^, 1-3a r � car'
f3 -,•-, " $'k'I. �e. ,. y,, '.r , %)�k ,� w,, `r r ,�t 1 j V.'y' /i. -,` -- ,-+�na f
sl "Z kn� `•r p3q`: �y j I 'iG:�� ;• �r it j'(
rA?: �, �,.spq�g- �,� , �y � L�! � r•-1 _�' s
4F �"` ft. '. !t \m.��, r f } �. ti /��.n� ]`1 ,fig , Iw.,y -�, L�Jy _;[ l�. ti r�?.,• --'"l.
� r f !
➢
f y 1 r.', t I •, _" \ �yI( '.-
�`.�ki

Action ID 2006 -32521 Plan showing activities authorized
by the 4/26/2010 permit modification

1,11
3.5 ac D
Lake -HJJ
It
hu
tI
fl
n le
Ir
:—T IM
I � o=
µ �� �J w o -
La
W&IA
SAtF
STREAM FEATURES
TOTALS 4WI 22634 1550 2258 5164
r
j.� WETLAND FEATURES
ly A.
4 5,T IV al a.
omi
1. .5 a— a
T 10 G o.m —o '5,��Atr� "Al
Ii w A.
7r a. maW o
z z
0AN —I
-a
Z I
T,, �w . o. a ::J
r
/� TOTALS 4.In ato4 13" o2zT a.aoo 6221
Li
POND FEATURES
'n
PAGE T_ALP0"D—AIaI2A
INX
IT 384 n 1381
2 6 38 Iml
IN clas
5 e T
a
7
oll TOTALS kw3 Imi T-In
''
U.-
PAGE
a, 0 INDEX
6
U
PROPOSED PROJECT
0 NEW IMPACTS
NEW RUNWAY and TAXIWAY PROJECT
a REVISED RUNWAY CONSTRUCTION LIMITS
- =7 Z > N. RUNWAY 160-36C E)Cr.. AND ANriLARy TANS
ANCILLARY TAXIWAY EXTENSION
WETLAND FEATURES I - - -1 OLD DOWD ROAD REALIGNMENT
By PROJECT MENT
PROJECT �IMPA 0 EC (ACRES) Z" op—, ..' I
ES) WALLACE NEEL ROAD REAUGNMENT
WEST BLVD. REALIGNMENT
IMPORTANT INTERMITTENT
--------- STREAM CHANNEL (HS)
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
PERENNIAL STREAM CHANNEL (PS)
UNIMPORTANT INTERMITTENT
STREAM CHANNEL (UQ
TYPICAL FEATURE CALLOUT
JURISDICNON FEATURE TYPE
T
AREA ID OR CATEGORY
BB LF LENGTH, OR ARFA—­L M� TABLE ITEM 9
629
Charlotte•Douglas
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
TOTALS a1a — I.— A — rl-
a—
POND FEATURES
IMPACTED BY PROJECT (ACRES)
i 1 g It
TION
2009 AIRPORT MODIFICATION
DESIGNEDEIY:
REVYWONVESCRIP TION
DATE
PROJECT ENG.:
-
I JANUARY 17, 2WT ARMY CORPS LETTER EXHIBIT
1/I72007
4041401 PERMIT APPLICATION
I
PROJECT NO.:
2 JANUARY 17,2W7 -CORRECTIONS
V26122H_
DRAWN BY: NFA
3 lANUARY31,ZW7M(MTNGREvISK)NS
113112007
S
1' =800' -I.:
A779770 CDIAAddtbnalSerAmeTasMmap-O�Xmxd\RevL,�4_p4O82DO9
CHECKED BY:
4 APRILS, 2009 PERMIT MODIFICATIONS
4 /0 812 0 09
DATE ISSUED: MAY 2006
5

Action ID 2006 -32521 Plan showing activities authorized
with the 3/20/2007 permit and the 7/15/2009 permit
modification

Action ID 2008 -03090 Plan showing activities authorized
by the 7/17/2009 permit and the 6/11/2012 permit
modification

Action ID 2010 -00837 Plan showing activities authorized
by the 10/16/2012 permit

Figure 2
ONE COMPANY Many Solutions -
Charlotte - Douglas IntemationaE Airport 1 Taxiway D 1 fJSACE Individual Perrnit Application

2
iu
7w
PROPOSED
60' RCP
STREAM A
De-TAIL (SEASONAL RPW)
"T
AREA STREAM A IMPACT
(TOTAL IMPACT 148.5 If,
GRADING IMPACT 126.5 It,
ROPOSED", RIP RAP IMPACT 22 If)
TAXI W� Y 0
.00A'nCN
.—WETLAND BB
(OPEN WATER)
STREAN A IMPACT AREA Q5L
SCALE V Za"
TALBERT&IJIBRIGHT CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
04611"41mN.940M.'a 2MIMITM32, TAXIWAY D STREAM IMPACT PLAN
CA LKVar . OMM. FGW�
D
a I
IN
SYMOM LEGfND
4L
OMMM LAW
" bomm
Dwm.fflw sm
mf� mm Mw Lm
Uffr aF DWUlktM
DLNW PQ 90
nwromm Nppm" #a
Kxr
STREAN A IMPACT AREA Q5L
SCALE V Za"
TALBERT&IJIBRIGHT CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
04611"41mN.940M.'a 2MIMITM32, TAXIWAY D STREAM IMPACT PLAN
CA LKVar . OMM. FGW�
D
a I

r
r
740
730
720
C
C
i`
0 +00 1 +00 2 +00 3 +00 4 +00 5 +00 6 +00
CDIA TAXIWAY
CULVERT CROSS-SECTION
HDR Engineering, Inc.
of the Carolinas CDIA
aw s cu.�,sme.s�. �000 � wnee.. xc xexm
DATE
3/11/10
FIGURE
FIG. 5
1
PRCPOSEE
(n
)
GRAD
EXISTING
(TYP.
GF
ADE
PROPOSED
CULVERT
1
j
O
O
�t
h
d)
1`7
tr3
(3)
CSJ
OD
O
OD
h
CO
O
tl�
N
�
ts)
r
C6
h
m
pr)
O
0 +00 1 +00 2 +00 3 +00 4 +00 5 +00 6 +00
CDIA TAXIWAY
CULVERT CROSS-SECTION
HDR Engineering, Inc.
of the Carolinas CDIA
aw s cu.�,sme.s�. �000 � wnee.. xc xexm
DATE
3/11/10
FIGURE
FIG. 5