20150047 Ver 1_401 Application_20150115

CLearWater
C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc
January 13, 2014 www.cwenv com
Ms Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N Salisbury Street, 9"' Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Pre - Construction Notification
Gibson Property ( +/- 1.78 AC)
Rutherford County, North Carolina
Dear Ms Higgins,
2 0 9 5 0 0 4 7
The attached Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) is being resubmitted on behalf of Mr Thomas
Paige Gibson The project site is located at 103 Lakeview Drive in Lake Lure, Rutherford
County, North Carolina The applicant is seeking a Nationwide Permit 3 and General Permit 30
for repair of an existing dam, repair and construction of a sea wall, and dredging of accumulated
sediment
Should you have any questions regarding the attached permit application and supplemental
information please do not hesitate to contact me at 828 - 698 -9800 A permit application for this
project was submitted to the US Army Corps of Engineers in October of 2014 A copy of this
package has been sent has also been submitted to Mr Ed Williams of the NC Division of Water
Resources, Asheville Regional Office
Respectfully,
Rebekah L Newton
Project Biologist
-Vnw�- ca_,
'R Clement Riddle, P W S
Principal
Copy Furnished
NC Division of Water Resources, Asheville Regional Office — Ed Williams
224 South Grove Street, Suite F
Hendersonville, NC 28792
828 - 698 -9800 Tel
828 - 698 -9003 Fax

I
i AIL
Corps of Lm awi0 c% Nc t7W . wavica +� kJa m
PO BON 1:990 512 � ortl � i
"'itminstm- NC 2%40,- 1 M R-alf'-to N041b C elm ° rEoru
L erynrl7 i t r r'� �i l t5t i `> nati� rai.ag; r o f pruperty� i -fifer l b , tia°>i h-
IWIhM7 1� '�' � d �' i� ialsasa5�*¢ti�.-t� Consultmtas, P,tw_ 40--'Ca go -tct ce wky f ai my
alm d4teaitg tlk pwooesm nt of yunsdicliomal mi6titinli m rcgxwib mad a 'Ls Ada imgw
Wetburch iii 'iA a;g or uhc us snfbja-ci to rvdemmi ju-irisdiction urn Seciiim t Of th-,
ire Wm y Av wdActr Section 10 or the Rowe and Her; Av of Lm CEC its
llluthori,md io pmvo A suppl a {atnria1 irafnririritin -ri as. wL-&d at the mqucm of ibe USACE,
of
.r1Masowilly, 11 autbmipr rim amata,•ek ,of ft Wilmitwci Diseiel, VS Army, Corps of
sate tmve -Al-esr t iNmiins ,4 dNemmnallam a-6 imed with W' aa&- aM Wam -of
the US sabim io a I jurisdic-ti m of &--r ' ec i4A 404 of the C Wat& Azi andk r
Saft -G. i 10 td i . , ivrv--k and Hrdbari Av Oar 9 S!�,
Nv,qxna, 01% art a rtr i1s,c r -rh ow at 5, &r4 ; 6d vat
10? d..9, b-Pdy ,j
P"xvl� clmvi t of mdf CsLs. L-o Ike Li r� - 16
��yy��,,�� ♦ ..,,.«._..,,......, _f(- -8 ,ter -�w.yr
Nmed Name
r •i ; i t Psjuwr
Dale - -,
ayti gr�s�it Cidonv store �s•^auitf F
rf f' ' SIX-1 'YWi I!J

o�oF w n rF9Q�
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
" � NAII'TIAIG
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN ) Form
A. Applicant Information
1
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 3 or General Permit (GP) number 30
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
❑ Yes
® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Gibson Property
2b
County
Rutherford
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Lake Lure
2d
Subdivision name
n/a
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no
Fn/a
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Thomas Paige Gibson and Susan E Gibson
3b
Deed Book and Page No
1055/368
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
n/a
3d
Street address
Post Office Box 1882
3e
City, state, zip
Marion, North Carolina 28752
: c,, r
3f
Telephone no
828- 442 -8801
3g
Fax no
n/a
3h
Email address
paigeandsusan @icloud com
" � NAII'TIAIG
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify
4b
Name
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
4d
Street address
4e
City, state, zip
4f
Telephone no
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
R Clement Riddle
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc
5c
Street address
224 South Grove Street, Suite F
5d
City, state, zip
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792
5e
Telephone no
828 -698 -9800
5f
Fax no
n/a
5g
Email address
rebekah @cwenv com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

B
Project Information and Prior Project History
1
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
227600
1 b
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 432485 Longitude - 82 211465
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1c
Property size
+/- 1 78 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
proposed project
Lake Lure (Broad River)
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
B,Tr
2c
River basin
Broad River
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

3.
Project Description
3a
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The project parcel is a residential property with a house, boathouse, decks, and associated infrastructure The property
also includes a small dam and existing seawalls Currently, the base of the existing dam is degraded and the dam no
longer impounds water Existing seawalls behind the dam are also degraded and failing Site photographs are included
in Attachment A
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
0 acres within the project boundary
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
Approximately 254 linear feet of stream channel is upstream of the dam on the project property Approximately 120 linear
feet of this stream channel is impounded when the dam is functioning properly and Lake Lure is at full pool elevation
3d
Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The purpose of the proposed work is to repair and improve the existing dam, replace and extend one existing seawall,
add a new seawall, and dredge accumulated sediment upstream of the existing dam
3e
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The project includes the following
1 Repair of the existing dam Sandbags will be placed in the stream channel upstream of the proposed work area
Flexible, plastic piping will be used to route water around the work area so that the dam can be repaired in the dry
The location of the "route - around" can be seen on Figure 3 and a detail of the sandbag "dam" is included on the
"Overall Plan" in Attachment B Once water has been routed away from the area, degraded dam material and pond
bed material will be excavated to allow for installation of a below -grade extension to the existing dam The project
also includes installation of an 8 -inch drain pipe that will allow the applicant to completely drain the pond in the future
for maintenance The dam extension will be a concrete structure in the shape of a wedge that butts directly against
the existing dam Due to site access, concrete will be pumped using a Concrete Pumper Truck No live concrete will
contact jurisdictional surface waters Upon completion of the repair, pond bed material will be returned to grade and
the dam extension will not be visible on the pond bottom A detail of the dam repair is included on the "All Details"
sheet included in Attachment B
2 Seawall replacement and construction (Figure 3) There is an approximately 33 -foot, existing seawall on the east
side of the existing dam This wall is degraded (see photograph in Attachment A) The existing wall will be replaced
and extended by 46 feet The new wall will be concrete with loose rock at the base of the wall, rock will extend to the
normal pool elevation A new seawall will be constructed 5 -7 feet downslope of the existing western seawall The
space between the existing and new wall will be filled and provide equipment access to the site for dredging behind
the existing dam Currently, there is no equipment access to the work area due to an elevation change of greater
than 12 feet between the work area and the applicant's driveway
3 Dredging Accumulated sediment upstream of the existing dam will be excavated Dredging will be constructed
upstream to downstream and dredged material will be placed behind the newly constructed west seawall Once the
western seawall has fill behind it, small equipment (a mini excavator /small track hoe) will have access to the work
area without access to the pond bottom The contractor may also make use of a by -pass channel in the pond bottom
to drain excess water from the area Any excess dredge material will be placed in a truck and hauled off site to an
upland location
4
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes ®No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the pasty
Comments
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company
Name (if known)
Other
4d
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, explain
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number –
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ – non -404, other)
(acres)
—Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ PMT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h Comments
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
intermittent
(INT)?
DWQ – non -404,
width
(linear
feet)
other)
(feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT 11
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
31 Comments
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form – Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ®P ❑ T
Unnamed
Dam Repair
Open Water
0 (No new impact)
02 ® P ❑ T
Unnamed
Seawall Construction
Open Water
0 007 AC
03 ® P ❑ T
Unnamed
Seawall Construction (Extension)
Open Water
0 002 AC
04 ® P ❑ T
Unnamed
Seawall Construction
(Replacement)
Open Water
0 (No new impact)
05 ® P ❑ T
Unnamed
Fill (between existing and new
Open Water
0 007 AC
west wall)
06 ® P ❑ T
Unnamed
Dredging (above existing dam)
Open Water
0 05 AC
4L Total open water impacts
0 066 AC
4g Comments The above impacts account for approximately 33 linear feet of seawall replacement and 158 linear feet of new
seawall
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other
Project is in which protected basing
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
61 ❑PEI
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The project proposes to repair the dam in place which will require no new impacts at the site Once the west seawall is
constructed and filled, access to the work area will not require equipment to enter jurisdictional areas
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
All construction will occur while Lake Lure is drawn down New seawalls will be faced with loose rock up to the full pool
elevation This will provided a rough surface with cracks and crevices to provide aquatic habitat Due to the narrowness and
steepness of the property, a dry- stack, boulder wall is not practical in this location Currently, there is no equipment access to
the work area due to an elevation change of greater than 12 feet between the work area and the applicant's driveway Each
large boulder would need to the transported to the work area individually resulting in a large number of back - and -forth trips by
equipment in sensitive areas adjacent to streams and open water Use of a Concrete Pumper Truck allows the truck to
remain in the applicant's driveway and pump concrete down to the work area without use of large equipment Additionally, a
boulder wall would need to be terraced Currently, the proposed concrete wall is 10- inches wide, a boulder stack wall could
be as wide as 2 -2 5 feet Using a boulder wall would result in additional impacts to open waters due to the increased width of
the wall Once the west seawall is constructed, dredge material will be placed behind the wall This will create an upland
access area for equipment
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
projects
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
Comments
❑ Yes No
❑
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
<1 % - Top of wall will add
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
approximately 130 square feet
of impervious surface area to
the site
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why Negligible impervious surface area will
the added to the site as a result of the proposed project
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's Jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HOW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5 DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) lands
lb If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter )
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
The proposed project is taking place on a previously developed residential parcel Goods and seances needed by the
property owner can be obtained in the Town of Lake Lure or surrounding areas The proposed project will not result in
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Wastewater will not be generated as a result of this project
Page I 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
El Yes 0 N
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
El ® No
impacts
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
FWS County data and the Natural Heritage Program Element Occurrence data
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitats
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystem IMS Impact will not occur in a marine system
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places records maintained by the NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and available
on SHPO's HPOWEB GIS Service and the National Park Service's Download Center The Pine Gables (Site #RF0217) is
located approximately 1 mile from the project site It is the opinion of CEC, that the proposed activity is not likely to threaten
the integrity of this site
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements The applicant received a No -Rise letter for the proposed project
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplam Mapping Program — FEMA Map Panel
3710064200J, effective July 2, 2008
Retie k6M L OCU)VU-)
`1 �lcca-
-13 "15
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is nrovid ed
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

VICINITY MAP
W(311 NTS
FILL
EXISTING WALL 68 LF ZZ IMPACT #5
0.007 ACRES
SITE
EXISTING WALL 23 LF
vAA
NEW WALL n
IMPACT #2
IMPACT: 112 LF / \
0.007 ACRES i
EXISTING BRANCH
EXISTING DAM
IMPACT #1— REPAIR
DREDGE AREA ` NO NEW IMPACT
IMPACT #6 NEW WALL
0.05 ACRES IMPACT #3
IMPACT: 46 LF
0.002 ACRES \
kPPRO)aMATE3Y 11-5 IF OF 1 � Q
• X A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION
SINGLE WALL HDPE NTH A NEGATIVE EXISTING WALL 33 LF, FOR DREDGING BELOW THE
SLOPE TO PIPE WATER AROUND IMPACT #4 — REPLACEMENT / EXISTING DAM WILL BE SUBMITTED
CONSTRUCTION AREA NO NEW IMPACT BY THE TOWN OF LAKE LURE
GRAPHIC SCALE NEW IMPACT TOTAL ACREAGE: 0.066 ACRES
0 5 10 20
\
/�6 1 INCH = 10 FEET /
�
DAM REPAIR PLANS FOR SCALE: 1" = 10' DRAWN BY: JTP
Odom THOMAS AND SUSAN GIBBON DATE: 01/06/15 CHECKED BY: BSR
Engineering LAKE LURE RUTHERFORD COUNTY, N.C. PROJECT MGR: DWO
PLLC PROJECT NUMBER SHEET
152 East Main Street, Forest City, N.C. 28043
ph: 828.247.4495 fax: [phone] FIGURE # 3 14057 1

MMr
kfor Rd
Io
Gibson Property ( +/- 1.78 AC)
y�a„ro
ay
r+
s
o�
�Ta r °rapt
�p
Swee "tnt ct Gs�p
r o�
Mtn! o
Ftid ra
� ood CT Ville O�
Soya camp .e n ei L'
!1 Chi gsJ
Lwewooda Manor��
i 0 �c
�'" ), fir
L
sh Pt
pn Rd I 1wa 89rnt Ridge ao
0 anc 7
o� Project Parcel
ttardsRd Igo; Seton Rd
�� Lakn'rNy� Am
r>l5
o
x
v
4'c �e 0.
S
9
6
/t
Is$ d L off 01 J
d�
�esrgern Re y��tr''
1�
Cry
"1911106 ,4,
r
ad
cit
-_ N
Legend Lake
Parcel 0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Drawn by: RLN 01.09.15; CEC ProjectV90
Rutherford County, CLearWater Site Vicinity
North Carolina Figure 1
224 South Grove Street, Suite F
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792

Gibson Property ( +/- 1.78 AC)

^
_
�
^ `
,
..
]�
�
~
�
�
�&
�
Project Parcel
'----'-- _ _- ---~_
-
�
�
'
`
v
/
w-

Attachment A
Site Photographs

Existing east seawall. Wall to be replaced and expended.
Backside of existing dam looking upstream. Dam no longer impounds water.

Looking upstream (north) of dam. Sediment to be removed. New sea walls to be constructed on
the east and west of the impoundment (lake and impoundment current drawn down).

Attachment B
Engineering Plans and Details

r-
LO
jo
Z
O
m
fr_ 4
O
LL
�/o w
VJ
Z
J
I..L
NW Q
1..1..
zD
Q
N
a
0
z
N
W
H
O
Z
J
Q
W
Z
W
/ f
� i r
/
/
a
E
d
a
C
C
d
l7
O
u
a
D
O
r
C
d
d
W
C0
G
Doff aKyKy d3A00
i x I1Nff� OaOJalHl ra 3an33.1
y gz= NOS810 Nvsns GNd SVWOHI �utulopo
aop p
mYS E <A acd SNYId arod3a rvva L O < o ff
ENO
ats
��Y6v 2i,"5r4s
2
z�t.o
F S = g
E
faui
pE6sE 8
J � S
S
l�szC�-
t
z
mwa
AS
(MR30-VN3a3N)Sl W A31MY MM SLN3AYW N3d SNYld 03SN
I
Z
O
m
fr_ 4
O
LL
�/o w
VJ
Z
J
I..L
NW Q
1..1..
zD
Q
N
a
0
z
N
W
H
O
Z
J
Q
W
Z
W
/ f
� i r
/
/
a
E
d
a
C
C
d
l7
O
u
a
D
O
r
C
d
d
W
C0
G
Doff aKyKy d3A00
i x I1Nff� OaOJalHl ra 3an33.1
y gz= NOS810 Nvsns GNd SVWOHI �utulopo
aop p
mYS E <A acd SNYId arod3a rvva L O < o ff
ENO
ats
��Y6v 2i,"5r4s
2
z�t.o
F S = g
E
faui
pE6sE 8
J � S
b
is
_ 46E
- l 4
35
q-� s
'R
C
HI o
W F w
W o Z o
2 o a J
z
i uFi rc �
o x
U w O
l�szC�-
F
a
a
a
`
,F
y
�
/
�55�
s
am
�Eg
i3
2
tt
€ >Ee
S
3
-5
3Eae
8
s �aE
"o
=e
"
b
is
_ 46E
- l 4
35
q-� s
'R
C
HI o
W F w
W o Z o
2 o a J
z
i uFi rc �
o x
U w O
l�szC�-
F
a
a
a
`
,F
y
�
/
�55�
FF
gg 3
am
�Eg
i3
2
a�
b
is
_ 46E
- l 4
35
q-� s
'R
C
HI o
W F w
W o Z o
2 o a J
z
i uFi rc �
o x
U w O
S
y�
C
t
tgb
s
/
`
,F
y
�
/
�55�
FF
gg 3
am
3Eae
8
s �aE
"o
=e
"
S
y�
C
t
tgb
s
/
`
,F
y
�
/
�55�
FF
gg 3
am
:l A
Ml
0
0
U
J
wo-
I /�U
V y /
oa
€a
it
Y _ _�
be X:
o ^gEy'ppEZkgggaA�a:� $� �a
M�3e'"� pp FC
R "� fi a�a�y 8 es
3 i
a = _
$ Q J
Y y W
J �
O
I - SIOZ 6C 'r -P pal -ld —P lA3a-3SYe- 4S091 \LA38\OMO \aNd3a MO NOSSO NY50S ONY StlNOHI - LSO >I \ViOZ \Z aw<u
FT \Tn3'd \JMa \'dIVd3'd NV(l NOME) Nvsns a NV SVNOHl - LSO- VT \VTOZ \ :Z
/
`
i
Y'
y
�
/
am
€a
it
Y _ _�
be X:
o ^gEy'ppEZkgggaA�a:� $� �a
M�3e'"� pp FC
R "� fi a�a�y 8 es
3 i
a = _
$ Q J
Y y W
J �
O
I - SIOZ 6C 'r -P pal -ld —P lA3a-3SYe- 4S091 \LA38\OMO \aNd3a MO NOSSO NY50S ONY StlNOHI - LSO >I \ViOZ \Z aw<u
FT \Tn3'd \JMa \'dIVd3'd NV(l NOME) Nvsns a NV SVNOHl - LSO- VT \VTOZ \ :Z

SNOURINOO ONUSIX3 N.,a4,,, M" n� r • a
Ln
w Q f �ao�£m ,.N ,.INfC� OifOJtl3Hlfa Sam 3.v� .w.nm����d R ' \ m m
Z g 3Gw NOSGIO Nvsns ONd SVNOHl $"l oi�"� o F
r €� N
31v0 we (a�loo- aN3aaNna3aaoa A31NSV now S1N3nno� aid savor a3s < W 3y <A
31V0 A9 NOILdIUDS30 AM 5; % $ hsa aC3 SNVld WVd3a VIVO p o W
,T \TARJ \E)Ma \'dI`ddRJ INVG NOSH Nvsns aNV SdWOHl - LSOK \- VTOZ \1

(ten
m
J
E
a
/
g5z goy
�6j� W �¢m
; R
NV Id I IVt1d / \V
NfL�OMOJtl3Hlftl 3-3.1
NOSGIO NVSnS ONd SVWOHI
✓fl ld R 1
�u� o`�Uq
p l J
n
m
m
aJ
w
/
QN
W
/
�_
f—
C
31va
Ae
(znr130- aN3aulJseu�OOa A3aati noaf urr3nnoa a3a sxvtd a3s
I
S'+ I 31y0 I AS I NOLLdIaOS30 I I I ��� �i l o l o l 6 1 K 101 0
of
M
L W E
O E co
cn 17 -0
I � �
F
i
�O
W;S
2�a
- e
io
FU O
e� Q
oa
z z F
z� UIQo �_
r �
is
/?o
` \
�a y
og
M- - - - --
\W
D
U / /
i
/
/
I �
�gt
o�
S
T2av
m
0 O-)
V
II
t, t /
61
II DM
z z
0
u� u� 0
In
0 m 00 �
0 \
E)- W O L
< z � m
/n Q m n
75 v /
0
u/
J
E
a
/
xal
W
/
/
QN
W
/
�_
f—
C
, l -
SIOZ 6C
Q
z z
0
u� u� 0
In
0 m 00 �
0 \
E)- W O L
< z � m
/n Q m n
75 v /
0
u/
*-c
J
Q
Zy
/
H
W
/
/
QN
W
/
�_
f—
C
, l -
SIOZ 6C
Q
m
0
Z
$k
*-c
ei
lu
p 12
- - - _ - --
zvo
is
u
i
i
----------- - - - - -- <y
\
\
s;a.
J
Q
Zy
H
W
O
QN
W
�_
f—
C
, l -
SIOZ 6C
Q
m
0
Z
$k
ei
lu
p 12
- - - _ - --
zvo
is
u
i
i
----------- - - - - -- <y
\
\
s;a.
i
,T \TARJ \JMa \'dIVdRJ Wb4 NOSBIJ Nvsns (INV SdWOHl - LSOVT \-VTOZ \:Z
W
f—
C
, l -
SIOZ 6C
i
,T \TARJ \JMa \'dIVdRJ Wb4 NOSBIJ Nvsns (INV SdWOHl - LSOVT \-VTOZ \:Z

\�P�1'uhr�ri
%id `f imp
a � HH
Z
Z � g�g;fifiJJ RR � �ri�
I ICI ICI co icl
I I I II �I x l I I I I I I I I
W
a
Lit
— 1
>.
!M-1, 1-11
I 1 -01, I I I
1 I 1 I I I
I
I! RI 1 1 1 'I 1 'I 1
w
s 115
01><I�� .� asl .asl
I I I Ir;
Z
N Q
I I f I I �I I• al I I I ��
i i I "I ! I I• ! i I ! ai ( !
I '! I ! I� I• i�! -I � I I I I
' ! • I 1 I E � •I 'i •I � I I
I
oa
SBI Ixa i I I 'I I col I I CI
wa
I w I -I TfI__
I I w I I I I - � �,• , I i l
s iTl -i �
_ U
f l I I =1 I i 1 1 —III I I —I _ —I III- I i I U a
- III =III III -1 -1 r I -III =1 1=
IIl-
--
100 I I cI
01I I mI
4 - -
��
'WSJ0--
\
\� o
\\ LL1 I_
06 cr
p co
IDS,
�� 00
° °yyI
v
i 1 ti
o a �
Q
° E E\ - ` `�f R
i
7 \O
rT \Tn3'd \JMa \\dI`dd32J NVG NOSSIJ Nvsns (IN`d SVNOHl - LSOtT \ -VTOZ \:Z

Figure 3 and Attachment B can be downloaded at the following link
https: / /dnve google. com/ folderview? id= OB6ezHfPT6LvWNjRfNU5tMkU1ZUE &usp= shanng

A
i .
II101'"N I I III I't l PCP� I�)
06)N \ I l
iir3tic�
RANDALL STEVEN STEWART
DB 460/317
PB 2/1
- 1
1
i
1
THOMAS P. GIBSON
1 and
SUSAN E. GIBSON ++
\ DB 1061/685
PB 5/109
11
storm `r
, drain
t
R. STEVEN STEWART i '-' '•t
` DB 730/477 , grovel
PB 5/109
� , t
I
tj
t
,
',
rock
PROJECT DESCRIPTION`°`°" Arolck
u ;{%
ti wm ; t\ column i k _
bweatihthed r heasah&ezvmrj,zn4b2sim0ythe re -42 sa-0r'smt�r,�rr. ar�et,*e a+ro t=
G pwr a =Tee _Zf `te�,s FJi tfte *2 27s d este-e the vrZt-.#1-e X-3 e.nto:.
0rce fii3€e �fF:ra��app � to el- s cn �re-e"bY
the Tavrn f Linke Lam: a=nstr a -ta 1rLft1 _=CMte W IS �aE . 7 3 e =ntractss vg . 'lc
d7st aiI; trt Bt-ffe- arca"cme a e of the rr<rair&a=ibr<- t arp lx
a-eP'�tegten�grr�, t1=�^ erF�aag a�%c�r��s. d the .st:�s3c sf ilei urEn,�rre� trai.�t>ta-t.
eat: t'a p eva fs t� a =Ce= t titre =iii 1r: r t3 aft St e of t e
I d t•tutary, we vr`:9 bee g tlta ek tt v-wu -ote r, tta �t to a -t rte; 3_rgtF
of aPP:r.m mate, 7f ff zln its _urm-lt 331f tolhelp vrththe e ; emn of tim. bink _n this 2; a .
3stce tlt_ Waigsas� c +�strt�-t�, itte a*W the 1 tfmm tie urnmar:•_
tna;. Aaq ate i be �d a� f°'s hal tlac'=�'Mrm ate s e ez=t-=-tom Wal cfii tu-b
,p a -rate p i:31fOfthe cote 79itij of ft ImTr..me d tr;b=mr,yto L;ke Lu 7e b -. em % rg the
aH't
i thea =rd b% -da WN=be 1x0me4.affdtf,--uknr;medvitau1-YVe he
:�Fez3 tlrt Tr L r lite rreea ec m ssb1;U, ettae�ro �=*rp: the
puirp a r d bzg ftrr yr � be e nlqoecf -
€'�ra�r rafltaa^-.t*citun�p3M r .p�w�Pr oft :=L=zt
tlhe.; has n4 trr vn ire'b€vas. z# L��e L;
n= a,o_r
%� L- gravel dr ive _ ii_
--------- _ir«----== -.-_-_
-------------
wm
,
i
t
CYNTHIA ANN KUNATH
DB 1049/459; DB 1015/15
Reference to map of survey by
Nathan Odom, PLS of Professional
,
Surveying Services, dated January 23,
2001, mop# 20118 L.
Waters of
LAKE LURE
R03ERT KIRK NEUMANN
and wife
VICKI S. NEUMANN
DB 581/23
Reference to map of survey by
Nathan Odom, PLS of Professional
Surveying Services, dated 8/6/91,
/ map# 1 C12972S.
RAYMOND L. JONES
DB 681/x86
Reference to mop of survey by
Nathan Odom, PLS of Professional
Surveying Services, dated March 17,
1995, map# 16111 S.
THOMAS P. GIBSON ` \
and v
SLSAN E. GIBSON
DB 1061/685 \
PB 5/109
TO —L-AKI E URE
/ `` 6 °sPhol_ _ t
-V T
\� 0
�R�Nc
III(!\l\�
Major dements of DWQ Construction General Permit
This document contains the major elements
General Permit (NCGOl) with emphasis pia
2011). Since the summary list below canno
implementation_ See: http://portal.ncdeni
Site Area
Stabilization
Stabilization Time
Description
Time Frame
Frame Exceptions
• Perimeter dikes,
swales. ditches
7 days
None
and slopes
• High Quality
Nater (HQW)
7 days
None
Zones
If slopes are IW or
• Slopes steeper
7 days
less in length and are .
than 3; t
not steeper than 2:1,
14 da s are allowed.
7 -days for slopes
• Slopes 3: i or
14 days
greater than 50 feet
flatter
in length
• All other areas
None _
(except for
with slopes flatter
14 days
perimeters and
than 4:1
H W Zones
"Extensions of time may be approved by the permitting authority
based on weather or other site-specific conditions` that make compliance
impracticable." (Section 1LB0_)(h))
August 4, 2011
Construction
Irequirements for ground cover within 14, and in sonic places, 7 days.
• No paint or liquid wastes in stream or storm drains
• Dedicated areas for demolition, construction and other
wastes must be located 50' from storm drains and streams
unless no reasonable alternatives available.
• Earthen -material stockpiles must be located 50' from storm.
drains and streams unless no reasonable alternatives
available.
• Concrete materials must be controlled to avoid contact with
surface waters, wetlands, or buffers.
• Requirements are the same as in previous permit.
• The permit allows reduction from the 20 acre minimum if
the Director of DWQ determines that other BMPs provide
cauivalentDrotection.
Major Elements of DWQ Construction General Permit- Continued
• Same weekly inspection requirements
• Same rain gauge & inspections after 0.5" rain event
• Inspections are only required during "normal business
hours"
• Inspection reports must be available on-site during
business hours unless a site-specific exemption is
a gKoved.
• Records must be kept for 3 years and available upon
request.
• Electronically -available records may be substituted
under certain conditions.
• Projects permitted under the previous permit can
continue to follow the previously -permitted conditions.
• Complete applications received prior to August 3, 2011
can follow conditions of approved rove a lication-
pp
• Applications received after August: 2, 2011 must comply
with new permit conditions,
August 4, 2-03
Designation on the plans where the 7 and 14 -day ground {
stabilization requirements of the NPDES permit apply
Designation on the plans where basins that comply with the
surface -withdrawal requirements of the NPDES permit are
located.
• No paint or liquid wastes in stream or storm drains j
• Dedicated areas for demolition, construction and other
wastes located 50' from storm drains and streams unless
no reasonable alternatives are available.
• Earthen -material stockpiles located 50' from storm
drains unless no reasonable alternatives available.
e Concrete materials must be controlled to avoid contact
with surface waters, wetlands, or buffers.
• Outlet structures must withdraw from basin surface
unless drainage area is less than I acre.
• Use only DWQ-approved floceulants.--
!n order for the FX SC Plan to satisfy the conditions of the Construction General permit, -it must identify areas where the;ground stabilization requirements apply and the
location of the basins where the surface-withdraivalrequiremenrs apply,
Document prepared by the Division of Water Quality
GENERAL NOTES:
SHEET INDEX
TI TLE
COVER
EXISTING CONDITIONS
OVERALL PLAN
STRUCTURAL DETAILS
JOB NUMBER:
14057
00
M
I'1;
Iz
W
1�
W
d
IUJII�INIMI�I�I�°
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS
PLAN AND SPECIFICATION
WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM
A DULY REGISTERED
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
AS SIGNIFIED BY MY HAND
Z
0
® (;
}
Z
0
i -
V) o
zUJ W
Q
� j
CL 0 /y
Q
a_
W
CK
Z
Q
0
W
W
Vo
J
UJ
_<
M J
U ;r
it
�-r w
SCALE: N.T.S.
DATE: 10/27/14
DRAWN BY: JTP
CHECKED BY DWO
PROJECT MGR: DWO
COVER 1Q

JOB NUMBER:
14057
�Q
00
�m
W
U
Z
U)
lW.7
O
0
>-
0_
LAI
� Vel
� 4
D O
W
m
W
d
U)
Z
J
CL
C
S
W
LN M 1t toc0
W
Q'
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS
PLAN AND SPECIFICATION
WAS PREPARED BY ME OR
UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT i AM
A DULY REGISTERED
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
AS SIGNIFIED BY MY HAND
AND SEAL.
now
Z
/O
V ! V)
�y� U
■ Z
r
z
Z0
O Q '2
ul ' 0
^
z V O w
a
J
Q
Ld
W �®
Q W
(M '/®®,
V
0
r.
N Q
U�
-62
zA
a
0
rt u
..0 R
bo
F mvU
a
SCALE: 1" = 20'
DATE: 10/27/14
DRAWN BY: JTP
CHECKED BY: DWO
PROJECT MGR: DWO
SHEET:
EXISTING Q
E

PERMANENT SEEDING
GRASS -LINED CHANNELS
Kentucky bluegrass 20 Ib/ac
Rye (grain) 40 Ib/ac
Lime 4000 Ib/ac
10-10-10 fertilizer 1200 Ib/ac
straw 4000 Ib/ac
ALL OTHER SURFACES
Tall fescue 100 Ib/ac
Serico lespedeza (Scarified) 30 Ib/ac
Kobe lespedeza 10 Ib/ac
10-10-10 fertilizer 1000 ib/ac
straw 4000 Ib/ac
TEMPORARY SEEDING
SUMMER (May 15 - Aug 15)
German millet 40 Ib/ac
FALL (Aug 15 - Dec 15)
Rye (grain) 120 Ib/ac
WINTER/EARLY SPRING (Feb 1 - May 15)
Rye (grain) 120 Ib/ac
Korean lespedeza 50 Ib/ac
Lime 2000 Ib/ac
10-10-10 750 Ib/aC
straw 4000 Ib/ac
SEEDING PROCEDURES:
1- Apply seed, at the rates above, in two intersecting
directions. Rake in lightly.
2. Do not seed areas in excess of that which can be
mulched an some day.
3. Do not sow immediately following rain, when ground is too
dry, or during windy periods.
4. Roll seeded area with roller not exceeding 112 lbs.
5. Immediately following seeding and compacting, apply mulch
to a thickness of 1/6 inches. Maintain clear of shrubs
and trees.
6. Apply water with a fine spray immediately after each area
has been mulched. Saturate to 4 inches of soil_
SEED PROTECTION:
I- Identify seeded areas with stakes and string around area
periphery. Set string height to 6 inches.
2. Cover seeded slopes where grade is 4 inches per foot or
greater with erosion fabric. Roll fabric onto slopes without
stretohitq or pulling.
3. Lay fabric smoothly an surface, bury top end of each
section in 6 inch deep excavated topsal trench. Provide 12
inch overlap of adjacent rolls. Backfill trench and rake
smooth, level with adjacent sol.
4. Secure outside edges and overlaps at 36 inch intervals
with stakes
5. Lightly dress slopes with topsoil to ensure dose contact
between fabric and soil.
6. At sides of ditches, lay fabric laps in direction of water
bow. Lop ends and edges minimum 6 inches-
lE'vVAKT
4%i
.0
.1109
TROUT BUFFER SEEDING
Z
SUMMER 'May 15 - Aug 15)
INDIANU-ASS (Sorgastrum nutans)
15 Ib/oc
LITTLE ELUESTEM (Schizachyrium scoporium)
15 ib/oc
FALL (A 15 - Dec 15)
VIRGINIA 'hgLDRYE (Elymus virginicus)
15 Ib/ac
WINTER/EARLY SPRING (Feb 1 - May 15)
U
rte`^/ z
VIRGINIA 4ILDRYE (Elymus virginicus)
15 Ib/ac
WETLAND
SHALLOVI SEDGE (Corex lurido)
10 ib/ac
Lime 2000 Ib/ac
10-10-1Z 750 Ib/ac
CLL�
straw 4000 Ib/ac
W
MJ
V)
kOh'F
7HOMAS P. GIBSON
and
SUSAN E. GIBSON
DB 1061 /685
PB 5/109
1—Story
Frame
W/ Dsmt.
1 � 1
r )
-bl dg.-"
N - ---
Z
1
TRASH GUARD
STING /Wmi
cam
APPROXIMATELY 77 LF
\koyF l iIN . 50 l \ t t // / " / / / EXISTING ROCK WALL _
� i r
TROUT BLtfFER
i \ \ j ( { { ( 2s' FROM 990 CONTOUR
DENUDED LUTS
\\\\\\�` \\ \ !1
\\ \\\ 1� 1 1 t it I1 Rix .
t
CREEK
147 LF OF TROUT I I I j I�i/I' ! I 111'Itl ! ! AROUNDCON PIPING M P C
BUFFER AN 1 ` 1 f } ii i ltill AREA TOLAKt
III I l i 1 it'll lilllt
ty IIII 41(� 1` 1 1 It � � !illi `fill
til 111 Jill
111 I m
1
1 113 LF OF TROUT
U AN
I 1jI } li \ c' / I 14 �{11 i
bld
ik 11 L 1 iI11l� !
off)
\T�11 1(i( I ii(( fl!Il
\ � 1 i
IiII�iIIIIiIIII III -ray
til l i \ 1, ( III IIII IIIIIlyl1 F
if I IIII�I1111iIIIl IIIf
1,.' i I II I IIII iIIIIiIh ko
( �It11\Iltli \\\ 1 \ \� I/1,1�11!llIlIlJ11ip � yF
Il(lJl1l///'//11/j/l(.Si
*01ye
/` SIN HOPE VAIH A
I 1, / SLOPE TO PIPE WATER AROUNDAi11fE Q
\ CONSTRUCTION AREA
/
l/ /f t if I ( SANDBAG DAM
t-\ \ \
3' T(
TOF
li
A
TB
11
\\I\\
rO C�1
f'�
Pat I O , ,� I !/��/ 60\ `',
SLOPE
SIZE & LAYOUT
(TINDALL K04848 OR EQUIVALENT)
4000 PSI CONCRETE
H-20 LOADING
Surve
DITCH INLET ADAPTOR JOB NUMBER:
(TINDALL MDT 1365# OR EQUIVALE9T)
RIM ELEVATION 11 14057
SLOPE
a 6 (I I) C1 93
—III VARIES
_ mm
a I—IIII
2'-0" SQ. MIN. OR III —I
LARGEST PIPE t8"Ir
_ INVERT ELEVAT1a4
to d III—II
UNDISTURBED EARTH OF
ALL COMPACTED TO 95%
STD PROCTOR
INSTALL & MAINTAIN INLET PROTECTION AROUND
ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS DURING CONSTRUCTION.
DITCH INLET ADAPTOR
N.T.S.
COMPACT IN 6' TO 8' LIFTS TO
IS ROCK INCREASE BEDDING TO 6'
WASHED STONE
PIPE BEDDING DETAIL
RCP & HDPE
ALL STAGING AND STOCKPILE AREAS SHOULD Q
BE DONE OUTSIDE THE TROUT BUFFER WHEN
PRACTICABLE I Il
ANY TEMPORARY SPOIL PILES SHALL BE
PROVIDED VATH PROTECTION - TEMPORARY
% COVER (TARP) OR SURROUND WITH SILT
/ FENCE
0
Ab
AV
of /
1 }
gra e1
z
A
INV: 1' ABOVE STREAM FLOW
SANDBAG DAM DETAIL
N.T.S. -lo
IN
Referen
Nathan O
Aoor, Survevina
{ A\ t
HEREBY
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS
'LAN AND SPECIFICATION
NAS PREPARED BY ME OR
JNDER MY DIRECT
3UPERVISION AND THAT I AM
4 DULY REGISTERED
4RCHITECT OR ENGINEER
JNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
4S SIGNIFIED BY MY HAND
SCALE: 1" = 10'
DATE: 10/27/14
DRAWN BY: JTP
CHECKED BY: DWO
PROJECT MGR: DWO
OVERALL a
Z
0
In
U
rte`^/ z
Z
z
o
Z �
CLL�
Z
a
d
W
MJ
V)
a
w
z
o
'Q
LLJ
of
Y
Q W
0
SCALE: 1" = 10'
DATE: 10/27/14
DRAWN BY: JTP
CHECKED BY: DWO
PROJECT MGR: DWO
OVERALL a

PARTIAL PLAT
SCALE -1" = 2C
995 _
ALL REBAR IS TO BE LOCATED MViRTUALLYTHE
PLANE APPROXMIATELY 3 INCHES FROM SOIL FACE
EEHI]
70' THICK 3MO CONCRETE -NOMINAL HEIGHT -B-0'.
6MX. HEIGHT W-WAPPLY STANDARD FOUNDATION ...._
WATERPROOFING TO THIS SIDE OF WALL
VERTICAL REINFORCEtAE'NT€5REPAR13'DC. _
LOCATED 3' FROM BACKFILLED FACE GFIVALL
_. _ ._.-..-._..... HORIZONTAL REINFORC'c3,1FNTfa RESARB'
OC. TIED TOVERTICALRECIFORCEIt.ENT
F I_I F F
PROVIDE OF 720E SA1(OR RIP RAP, NOT �{
990 SHOVYNj COVER OVER FOOT1t.-3 .(. ---
-
t5REBAR DOhU—1 33X5 SPACED TC-, AS SWAN —�
4- CCWrMLJ'JS PE:x' RiTEO PFE P9ZD T..4ZU4
FCO TUNA CK ON EAST 00
;tJ BAR531'r +Ok ,78`O C. —•`\
;3 S &4,RS C�4Ti+,B.�A A2€1 cpm t.Slx�;kcs —�
317x19' 35TILB CONCRETE SOI. KEY --`
95 BARS 36' LONG SPACED i6' OC
985 _ (2) ES BARS CONM''UOUS
DESIGN INFORMATION
THE DESIGNS PRESENTED ON THESE DRAWINGS INCORPORATE THE FOLLOtAfGVG MINIMUM VALUES.
VERIFICATION THAT THESE VALUES ARE MET OR EXCEEDED IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN FJCT NEER.
CONCRETE
IMPORTANCEFACTORS
MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
WIND
1.0
FTG. & WALLS I SLAB 350013500 PSF
SNOW
1.0
DENSITY 150 PCF
SEISMIC
1.0
PERFORMING SLUMP 4 INCHES
DESIGN LOADS vmEREAPPLmw-E
SOIL
ROOF DL I SNOW
15M6 PSF
DESIGN SOIL BEARING PRESSURE (MIN) 2000 PSF
FLOOR DL ILL
151100 PSF
SOIL INTERNAL FRICTION ANGLE (MIN) 30 DEG
WIND
90 MPH
COMPACTED SOIL - TO 95% PROCTOR IN 8- INCREMENTS
EXPOSURE CATEGORY
C
SLIDING COEFFICIENT (GONG TO RES. SOIL) .38u
SEISMIC DESIGN
REINFORCING
SEISMIC USE GROUP
1
ALL REINFORCING STEEL IS TO BE ASTM A616 GRADE 60,
SITE CLASSIFICATION
D
FABRICATED AND PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 378.
SPECTRAL RESPONSE
ALL LAPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 36 BAR DIAMETERS.
ACCELERATION SDS 392A % S0121%9
DESIGN NOTE
STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
MOMENT,;TME
ROOF TRUSSES DESIGNED BY OTHERS
SEISMIC BASE SHEAR
Vx--1.1k Vy-',.Ik
itt REBAR DOWELS 337(" SPACEaSRX;A5 5PL'u?iN
ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
EQVLNT LTRf. FRCS
HANDWHEEL 10°
TANTE 995
995 995' -0" - EL- TOP OFWALL (CONSTANTI
3"
ALL REBAR IS 10 BE LOCATED INVIRTUALOCTiE SAME
PLANE APPROXIMATELY 3INCHES FROM SOL ��ACE
995
3EC0.BCAPRRETE NSTANDARD
MAX HEIGHT FOIACWTON
WATERPROOFING TO THIS $DE OF WALL
V.RTiCALREtNFORC£MENT03RMARl6'O:. —
v
LOCATE03'FROLIBACKFfU.EAFACEOFWAiI-
993.0 WATER ELEV._. WATER ELEV.
�_� HORIZONTAL REINFORCELOa.*5REBAR 9'_.._
_- _.._. _..__ _93.0
�
"
f =_ ac: ter) rtiv€nrleaLRbriFGRc�r.�ENrR0V0EAMlMMM
EXiVINGCONCRETEOAM
OF RF T
A. „uaF ND
z s
.`.-..._
a
i — SHOAN) COVER OVER FOOTNGS0
itt REBAR DOWELS 337(" SPACEaSRX;A5 5PL'u?iN
a T s i —I v -II YLOCIJS pERFORATEDP PIPEDTC
DAYLIGHT .
99099a5 BARsz-6LONG,1s- G.C.
0NEWCONCRETEDAM DITION SHOULD EXTEND UPAT 990
LEAST 24AOVETME 30TTOM OF THE EXISTING DAM.
J 1
I, DEPTH OF DAM ADDITI N MAY VARY FROM DIMENSIONS !
SHOWN BASED ON TH CONDITION OF THE SOIL I=I I E I —11 IS i— 15) ts � cmamous ANDspacEo to WaRT
- ' 4 HOOK AT END MAY OCCUR C
ATANYCORqR
t"'Lorr:4R£sARs?A�Ttea:
EPDX;ED6' GI:XISTING
CONCRE
18, MIN. TEDAM WDTi nn TTBPArD 3
HIT-HY20B MAX,EPDXYOREaJAL.. oa El
3 _
a' 4 NEWCONCRETEDAM
\K,35BMlft9X
ZIA
L, R€BAR'STIRRUPS'
! - PACED NdhSOFTETHAN iYAPART'
` .
I ,°' "5 REBAR, CONTIRLh1USA.YDS?Aim
985 -.�° - NO PARTNERTHAN I4'APART 985
A
. - STIRRUPS SI4OLLO BE SI SO
- THAT THIS SPACE IS B£TVffRi 3
PROPOSED 8 DRAIN PIPE a .6. ° , . ; AND41NCHESONALLSIDES
_. WITH VALVE _� _ _ __. - h. e _ N. ,�-. -
980 980
TYPICAL SECTION (WEST WALL)
SCALE -112" = IV
TYPICAL SECTION (NORTH WALL)
SCALE -1/2"= T-0"
980
a _
- .. y �, I 27'Xifi'356GiB CO>'CRETE SOy KEY
I i�f 9SSARS26'LONGSPACED7B'OC
(2) 85 SARs CONTINUOUS
_j jalj ; 1 1{I�I
985
TYPICAL SECTION (EAST WALL)
SCALE -1/2"= l' -O*
980
,SAN A 4