20150039 Ver 1_401 Application_20150115

WOTHERS R`aVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
1410 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE, SUITE 1o1
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA, 28403
[phone]
FAX [phone]
TO NC Division of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street, 9`h Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
WE ARE SENDING YOU
❑ Shop Drawings
❑ Copy of Letter
® Attached
❑ Prints
❑ Change order
DATE 119115
JOB NO 02130105 00
ATTENTION
Ms Karen Higgins
PHONE# [phone]
RE Lake Castleberry Subdivision — Apex, Wake Co
401 WQC PCN Submittal
02130105.00
401 WQC PCN
1
119115
02130105.00
❑ Under separate cover via
❑ Plans ❑ Samples
❑ Diskette ❑
the following Items:
❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
1/9115
02130105.00
401 WQC PCN
1
119115
02130105.00
Check for $24o Application Fee
1
1/ /15
02130105.00
CD of PCN
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below•
® For approval ❑ Approved as submitted
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
❑ Resubmit
❑ Submit
❑ Return
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
REMARKS:
COPYTO: File
SIGNED Troy Beasley
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify as at once

WITHERS ERS �� RAVEN EL
January 9, 2015
US Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Mr. James Lastinger
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
NC- Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Ms. Karen Higgins
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Re: Lake Castleberry Subdivision — NWP 29 PCN Submittal
Corps AID #SAW - 2013-01277
W &R Project #0213oo63.00
Dear Mr. Lastinger and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of Standard Pacific of the Carolinas, LLC, we are requesting authorization from the USACE
to use NWP 29 for 0.437 acres of permanent wetland impacts, o.o66 acres of temporary wetland
impacts and 148 if of permanent stream impacts for construction of the proposed Lake Castleberry
residential subdivision. We are also requesting a 401 WQC from NCDWR for the above referenced
impacts.
The project is ±128 acres in size and is located in the southwestern quadrant of the intersection of
Green Level West Road and Wimberly Road in Apex, Wake County (Latitude: 35.764489°N;
Longitude: - 78.932961 1W). The project is located in the Cape Fear River basin and onsite waters
drain to White Oak Creek. The Water Quality Classification for White Oak Creek is WS- V;NSW;CA and
the Stream Index Number is: 16- 41- 6- (3.5). The cataloging unit forthe site is 03030002.
Proposed Project
The proposed project consists of construction of a 155 lot residential subdivision and associated
infrastructure (i.e. roads, utilities, stormwater management, etc) to meet the growing demand for
housing in Apex.
Project History
The Corps issued a formal Jurisdictional Determination (AID SAW -2013- 01277) for the Johnson
Assemblage project in September 2013, which comprises most of the proposed project area. A copy
of the JD has been provided as an Appendix.
The proposed project also incorporated two additional parcels (PIN 0723059640 — 5 acres & PIN
072315414 — 6 acres) that were not included in the original JD. W &R conducted a wetland
delineation for these additional parcels in July 2014. There were no wetlands on the additional
eastern parcel (PIN 072315414)• The wetland delineation for the additional northern parcel (PIN
0723059640) simply extended the limits of the Wetland A and Stream 1, which were approved under
the JD for Johnson Assemblage (SAW -2013- 01277). This parcel also contained a non - jurisdictional,
man -made pond constructed in uplands. There are no jurisdictional wetlands or waters between the
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
www.withersravenet.com I License No. C -0832

Lake Castleberry Subdivision — Apex, Wake County
01/09/15
pond and Stream 1 to the west. The results of the wetland delineation and supporting
documentation have been provided as an Appendix.
The Town of Apex issued a Buffer Determination for the project on August 29, 2013. Impacts to
riparian buffers will be permitting through the Town of Apex as a delegated municipality.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of 0.437 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 0.066 acres of
temporary wetland impacts and 148 if of permanent stream impacts.
Of the proposed 0.437 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 0.209 acres of impact (Impacts 1, 3, 6,
11, 12, 13 & 14) will occur from construction of internal access roads and 0.257 acres of impact
(Impacts 2, 4, 5, 8, 9 & 10) will occur from construction of six residential lots.
The 148 if of permanent stream impacts will occur from construction of a road crossing needed to
access developable uplands on the east side of the stream which bisects the property.
The o.066 acres of temporary wetland impacts will occur from installation of a sewer line. Also,
please note that the entire 20' sewer easement will be maintained /mowed in perpetuity, resulting in
0.066 acres of permanent conversion impacts as a result of conversion from forested wetlands to
herbaceous wetlands.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
Proposed permanent impacts have been minimized to only those impacts necessary to construct
roads to access developable uplands and the construction of 5 lots. Road crossings have been
designed to cross the wetlands at perpendicularly at the most narrow points where possible, and to
cross the stream at a perpendicular angle.
The culverted stream crossing at Impacts 13 & 14 will actually impact 2 separate streams and is
necessary to access developable uplands to the east. Impact 13 will occur to a small, unimportant
intermittent stream that is located entirely within the footprint of the road. Impact 14 will occur to a
perennial stream for installation of the 96" box culvert and dissipater. The alignment of this
crossing was determined based on two primary factors. First, a shift of the alignment to the north to
avoid Impact 13 would result in substantial additional wetland impacts. Also, the alignment could
not be shifted farther south to avoid Impact 13 would have impacted a significant meander in the
stream, resulting in additional stream impacts beyond what is currently proposed. Therefore, the
proposed alignment represents the minimization of stream and wetland impacts for a road crossing
at this location. The box culvert for this crossing will be installed 12" below the stream bed in order
to maintain aquatic life movement during periods of low flow.
Impacts 2, 4, 5, 8, 9 & 10 are necessary for construction of six residential lots (Lots 68, 77, 82, 83, 84
& 88). The proposed subdivision was originally approved at 160 lots. However, in order to minimize
impacts, the site plan was redesigned to 155 lots, resulting in a loss of 5 lots. The proposed 155 lots
represent the minimum number of lots needed to support development costs while maintaining a
WITHERS RAVEhlEL Page 2 of 4
E - I- F i- i RS i 5u R�[1"S

Lake Castleberry Subdivision — Apex, Wake County
01/09/15
feasible project. Please note that beyond the typical site development costs (i.e. land purchase
price, onsite infrastructure costs, grading costs, etc.), the project is also burdened with substantial
offsite improvements as well. Specifically, prior to construction of the proposed subdivision, the
applicant had to rehabilitate the 300 if dam of the ±17 acre Castleberry Lake in order meet current
dam safety measures to avoid a catastrophic failure of the dam. Also, as part of the site plan
approval, the Town of Apex is requiring the applicant to construct the following offsite
improvements:
• a satellite pump station with 9,000 if of 6" forcemain;
• a regional pump station with 3,600 if of 16" forcemain and 1,300 if of 16" gravity sewer
• 2,000 if of 8" waterline &
• 8,000 if of 12" waterline.
These improvements are being required to be constructed by the applicant as a direct cost to the
applicant, creating a financial burden in excess of $4 million on the proposed project that must be
offset by the lot yield of the subdivision. These offsite improvements have driven the per lot
construction cost to a point that the selling price of the lots is on the extreme upper end of what the
real estate market will support. The loss of any additional lots will increase the per lot construction
cost for the remaining lots, pricing the lots above what the real estate market will support and
potentially rendering the project unfeasible. Therefore, the proposed impacts from lot fill have been
minimized to the greatest extent possible while maintaining the minimum number of lots necessary
to sell the lots at a price point that the current real estate market will support.
It should be noted that the applicant has minimized impacts from lot fill where possible, such as the
use of retaining walls to stabilize lot fill on lots 54 & 86 (Sheet B) and the adjacent mail kiosk. The
proposed wetland impacts on lots 83 & 83 (Impact 5) are required both for the construction of the
lots and to elevate the lots above the adjacent bioretention basin (BMP #3) to prevent these lots
from being flooded in the event of BMP #3 overflowing during a storm event.
Furthermore, the proposed wetlands to be impacted for construction of lots 68, 77 & 82 consist of
small linear wetlands in crenulations whose hydrology is provided primarily by runoff from adjacent
uplands, with very little influence from groundwater fluctuations. These wetlands are already being
severed by road crossings, further decreasing the value of these wetland fingers. Additionally, the
Town of Apex's stormwater regulations require that all runoff from impervious areas be captured and
conveyed to BMPs for treatment prior to discharge. If direct impacts to these wetlands would have
been avoided by the site design, they would have been surrounded by lots, resulting in all runoff
being directed away from these wetlands and greatly reducing the drainage area and severing their
natural hydrologic source. As a result of the insufficient drainage area severely altering the
hydrology, the function of these wetlands would be secondarily impacted and eventually dry up and
become uplands. Therefore, the integrity and long term viability of these wetlands could not be
maintained in the post- development condition even if direct impacts would have been avoided. It
was determined that the functional value of these wetlands would be better served through the
provision of mitigation in a larger, significant wetland system within an EEP mitigation project.
It should also be noted that when subdivisions are designed to avoid direct impacts to these type of
wetland fingers, the removal of the surrounding forest and exposure to direct sunlight results in the
wetlands becoming overgrown with early successional invasive vegetation. This creates an
undesirable feature for the adjacent property owners, and often, the adjacent property owners will
eventually clear, fill or disturb these wetlands to eliminate perceived hazards such as snakes, as
well as protect their property values. These actions often result in violations if identified, or worse,
WITHERS RAVEhlEL Page 3 of 4
E - I- F i- i RS i 5u R�l1"S

Lake Castleberry Subdivision — Apex, Wake County
01/09/15
unmitigated loss of wetland function. The applicant is attempting to avoid these unmitigated
secondary impacts by addressing these issues with the permitting of proposed site design and
mitigating the functional loss in a regionally significant wetland system.
Mitigation
Stream Mitigation
Since the proposed permanent stream impacts are less than 150 If, the applicant is not proposing
stream mitigation.
Wetland Mitigation
Based on the avoidance and minimization of impacts to the majority of wetlands on the site, the
applicant proposes to mitigate for the 0.437 acres of permanent wetland impacts through the
purchase of offsite mitigation credits at a 2:1 ratio. Therefore, the applicant proposes to purchase
0.90 acres of riparian wetland mitigation from EEP. A copy of the EEP Letter of Reservation has been
provided as an Appendix. Please note that mitigation banks servicing the project HUC were
contacted and did not have riparian mitigation available.
The applicant does not proposed mitigation for the o.006 acres of permanent conversion impacts
from the sewer crossing (Impact #7) since the permanent conversion impacts are less than o.10
acres.
The current request is for 0.437 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 0.066 acres of temporary
wetland impacts and 148 if of permanent stream impacts (see the attached maps and PCN for
details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Troy Beasley
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• USGS Quad
• Wake County Soil Survey
• Property Owner Info
• Corps JD for Johnson Assemblage
• Preliminary JD Information for Additional 2 Parcels (Corps App Only)
• EEP Letter of Reservation
• Impact Exhibits
WITHERS RAVENEL Page 4 of 4
E - I- F i- i RS i 5u R�[''"F

D�0� WA L$;' G
�n r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
FE Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Lake Castleberry Subdivision
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Apex
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
See enclosed Property Owner Info
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Stan Pac of the Carolinas — Contract Purchaser
4b.
Name:
Gray Methven — Director of Land Development
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Standard Pacific of the Carolinas, LLC
4d. Street address:
1100 Perimeter Park Drive; Suite 112
4e.
City, state, zip:
Morrisville, NC 27560
4f.
Telephone no.:
919 - 465 -5930
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
gmethven @stanpac.com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Troy Beasley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Withers and Ravenel
5c.
Street address:
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
5d.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e. Telephone no.:
910 - 256 -9277
5f.
Fax no.:
910 - 256 -2584
5g.
Email address:
tbeasley @withersravenel.com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
See Parcel Exhibit
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.764489 °N Longitude: - 78.932961'W
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
±128 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
White Oak Creek - Stream Index: 16 -41- 6(3.5)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS- IV;NSW,CA
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear (Jordan lake) — HUC: 03030002
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site primarily consists of undeveloped woodlands and Lake Castleberry, and contains several residential
dwellings. The primary land use in the vicinity of the project consists of residential development.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
±5.29 acres of wetlands; 15.6 acres of jurisdictional surface waters (Lake Castleberry)
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
±2,916 If total (Int — 51 If; Per — 2,865 If)
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision and associated infrastructure (i.e. roads,
utilities, stormwater management) in order to meet the growing demand for residential housing in Apex.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project consists of the construction of a 155 lot single family residential subdivision and associated infrastructure (i.e.
roads, utilities, stormwater management). Typical commercial construction equipment and techniques will be used to
construct the proposed project.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Preliminary Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: Withers & Ravenel
Name (if known): Troy Beasley
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The Corps issued a final JD and signed wetland survey (AID SAW- 2013 - 01277) for the "Johnson Assemblage ", which
comprises the majority of the proposed project area.
The proposed project added two additional parcels that were not covered under the formal JD. W &R conducted a
wetland delineation of the additional 2 parcels not covered under the formal JD. The documentation supporting the
wetland delineation has been provided as an Appendix. Please note that we are requesting a Preliminary JD for these
additional 2 parcels to be issued in conjunction with issuance of the NWP.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project will be constructed in phases. However, all impacts for the entire project have been addressed under this
application.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
Impact 1
Fill for Road
Headwater Forest
® Yes
® Corps
0.028 ac
® P El
Crossing
El No
® DWQ
Impact 2
Fill for Lot
Headwater Forest
® Yes
® Corps
0.121 ac
® P ❑ T
Construction
El No
® DWQ
Impact 3
Fill for Road
Headwater Forest
® Yes
® Corps
0.027 ac
® P El
Crossing
El No
® DWQ
Impact 4
Fill for Lot
Headwater Forest
® Yes
® Corps
0.019 ac
® P El
Construction
❑ No
[A DWQ
Impact 5
Fill for Lot
Headwater Forest
® Yes
® Corps
0.060 ac
® P ❑ T
Construction
❑ No
® DWQ
Impact 6
Fill for Road
Headwater Forest
® Yes
® Corps
0.101 ac
® P El
Crossing
El No
® DWQ
Impact 8
Fill for Lot
Headwater Forest
® Yes
® Corps
0.025 ac
® P El
Construction
El No
® DWQ
Impact 9
Fill for Road
Headwater Forest
® Yes
® Corps
0.028 ac
® P El
Crossing
El No
® DWQ
Impact 10
Fill for Road
Headwater Forest
® Yes
® Corps
0.007 ac
® P El
Crossing
El No
® DWQ
Impact 11
Fill for Road
Headwater Forest
® Yes
® Corps
0.006 ac
® P ❑ T
Crossing
El No
® DWQ
Impact 12
Fill for Road
Headwater Forest
® Yes
® Corps
0.013 ac
El El
Crossing
El No
® DWQ
Total Permanent Wetland Impacts
0.437 ac
Impact 7
Sewer Line
Headwater Forest
® Yes
® Corps
0.066 ac
El ® T
Crossing
El No
® DWQ
Total Temporary Wetland Impacts
0.066 ac
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.503 ac
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Impact 14
Road Crossing
UT to White Oak
® PER
® Corps
4'
98 If
❑ P ❑ T
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
Impact 15
Road Crossing
UT to White Oak
❑ PER
® Corps
1'
50 If
❑ P ❑ T
Creek
® INT
® DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
148 If
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑ PEI T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ® Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired?
131 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ PEI T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts are being permitted by the Town of Apex as a delegated municipality.
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands
and "waters" could be minimized.
Proposed permanent impacts have been minimized to only those impacts necessary to construct roads to access developable
uplands and the construction of 5 lots. Road crossings have been designed to cross the wetlands at perpendicularly at the
most narrow points where possible, and to cross the stream at a perpendicular angle.
The culverted stream crossing at Impacts 13 & 14 will actually impact 2 separate streams and is necessary to access
developable uplands to the east. Impact 13 will occur to a small, unimportant intermittent stream that is located entirely within
the footprint of the road. Impact 14 will occur to a perennial stream for installation of the 96" box culvert and dissipater. The
alignment of this crossing was determined based on two primary factors. First, a shift of the alignment to the north to avoid
Impact 13 would result in substantial additional wetland impacts. Also, the alignment could not be shifted farther south to
avoid Impact 13 would have impacted a significant meander in the stream, resulting in additional stream impacts beyond what
is currently proposed. Therefore, the proposed alignment represents the minimization of stream and wetland impacts for a
road crossing at this location. The box culvert for this crossing will be installed 12" below the stream bed in order to maintain
aquatic life movement during periods of low flow.
Impacts 2, 4, 5, 8, 9 & 10 are necessary for construction of six residential lots (Lots 68, 77, 82, 83, 84 & 88). The proposed
subdivision was originally approved at 160 lots. However, in order to minimize impacts, the site plan was redesigned to 155
lots, resulting in a loss of 5 lots. The proposed 155 lots represent the minimum number of lots needed to support development
costs while maintaining a feasible project. Please note that beyond the typical site development costs (i.e. land purchase
price, onsite infrastructure costs, grading costs, etc.), the project is also burdened with substantial offsite improvements as
well. Specifically, prior to construction of the proposed subdivision, the applicant had to rehabilitate the 300 If dam of the ±17
acre Castleberry Lake in order meet current dam safety measures to avoid a catastrophic failure of the dam. Also, as part of
the site plan approval, the Town of Apex is requiring the applicant to construct the following offsite improvements:
• a satellite pump station with 9,000 If of 6" forcemain;
• a regional pump station with 3,600 If of 16" forcemain and 1,300 If of 16" gravity sewer
• 2,000 If of 8" waterline &
• 8,000 If of 12" waterline.
These improvements are being required to be constructed by the applicant as a direct cost to the applicant, creating a
financial burden in excess of $4 million on the proposed project that must be offset by the lot yield of the subdivision. These
offsite improvements have driven the per lot construction cost to a point that the selling price of the lots is on the extreme
upper end of what the real estate market will support. The loss of any additional lots will increase the per lot construction cost
for the remaining lots, pricing the lots above what the real estate market will support and potentially rendering the project
unfeasible. Therefore, the proposed impacts from lot fill have been minimized to the greatest extent possible while
maintaining the minimum number of lots necessary to sell the lots at a price point that the current real estate market will
support.
It should be noted that the applicant has minimized impacts from lot fill where possible, such as the use of retaining walls to
stabilize lot fill on lots 54 & 86 (Sheet B) and the adjacent mail kiosk. The proposed wetland impacts on lots 83 & 83 (Impact
5) are required both for the construction of the lots and to elevate the lots above the adjacent bioretention basin (BMP #3) to
prevent these lots from being flooded in the event of BMP #3 overflowing during a storm event.
Furthermore, the proposed wetlands to be impacted for construction of lots 68, 77 & 82 consist of small linear wetlands in
crenulations whose hydrology is provided primarily by runoff from adjacent uplands, with very little influence from groundwater
fluctuations. These wetlands are already being severed by road crossings, further decreasing the value of these wetland
fingers. Additionally, the Town of Apex's stormwater regulations require that all runoff from impervious areas be captured and
conveyed to BMPs for treatment prior to discharge. If direct impacts to these wetlands would have been avoided by the site
design, they would have been surrounded by lots, resulting in all runoff being directed away from these wetlands and greatly
reducing the drainage area and severing their natural hydrologic source. As a result of the insufficient drainage area severely
altering the hydrology, the function of these wetlands would be secondarily impacted and eventually dry up and become
uplands. Therefore, the integrity and long term viability of these wetlands could not be maintained in the post - development
condition even if direct impacts would have been avoided. It was determined that the functional value of these wetlands would
be better served through the provision of mitigation in a larger, significant wetland system within an EEP mitigation project.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

It should also be noted that when subdivisions are designed to avoid direct impacts to these type of wetland fingers, the
removal of the surrounding forest and exposure to direct sunlight results in the wetlands becoming overgrown with early
successional invasive vegetation. This creates an undesirable feature for the adjacent property owners, and often, the
adjacent property owners will eventually clear, fill or disturb these wetlands to eliminate perceived hazards such as snakes, as
well as protect their property values. These actions often result in violations if identified, or worse, unmitigated loss of wetland
function. The applicant is attempting to avoid these unmitigated secondary impacts by addressing these issues with the
permitting of proposed site design and mitigating the functional loss in a regionally significant wetland system.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Retaining walls have been used to avoid wetland impacts on the lots 54 & 86, as well as the mail kiosk. Silt fencing will be
installed around all disturbed areas to prevent sedimentation of adjacent wetlands and streams. Equipment will be
stored /staged in uplands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.90 acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 8of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Diffuse flow requirements will be reviewed /approved by the Town of
❑ Yes ® No
Apex, as a delegated municipality, during the stormwater management plan review
and buffer authorization permitting.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
26%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The stormwater management plan consists of a combination of grassed swales, wet ponds, stormwater wetlands and bio-
retention. The stormwater management plan is being reviewed /approved by the Town of Apex.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Apex
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes
® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is located within a rapidly growing area of Apex, and is not anticipated to be a specific catalyst for
future development that could impact nearby downstream water quality.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Western Wake WWTP
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
W &R reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at http: / /www.ncnhp.org /web /nhp /database- search,
as well as NCNHP GIS data to identify if there were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the
proposed project. The review of the NHP data did not identify any recent occurrences of endangered species or critical
habitat on the subject property or within 1.0 miles of the project. Furthermore, site reviews did not identify the presence of
any federally protected species known to occur in Wake County. Therefore, the proposed project will have No Effect on
federally protected species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters in Wake County classified as EFH.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
W &R reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb /, to
determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The
database review did not identify any known resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com
Troy Beasley — W &R
Authorized Agent
01/09/15
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

WITHERS NkRAVENEL
ENGINEERS ( PLANNERS SURVEYORS
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned contract purchaser Standard Pacific of the Carolinas (Client) does hereby
appoint Troy Beasley / Withers & Ravenel. Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of
petitioning the appropriate local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army
Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, etc.) for:
a) review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands,
streams, riparian buffers, etc.) and /or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate environmental
permit applications /requests for the ±110 acre Johnson Assemblage Project.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts on
behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests /applications and the required supplemental
materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client. .
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of environmental
review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or termination by
the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
Troy Beasley /Withers & Ravenel, Inc.
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
Wilmington, NC 28403
Tel. [phone]
Date: JE2 ') 7' 13
Signature of Client:
(Name - Print) (Tit— le
(Si nature)
Mailing Address
City State Zip
Phone:
Email:
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 275111 tel.: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com I License No. C -0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 ( tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
7011 Albert Pick Road I Suite G I Greensboro, NC 27409 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]

USGS QUAD &
WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY

'�
■♦
� . �y
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 1500 3000
1,
®R
.�
I inch 3000
l `
I fir �,'�' �•
FQ
I1 ( �j�
TO
k
IRA
�
....•�R
� \��
Off.
Pollr► y'
. — :
_
� ��
/1. \����
�'�
•
W.
l doh
Ilk, (rte
)
- - - �✓
�.-- ._
1 car
PrA,
....
ISO
1 I
IN
aillt(A
;1►?r7
.�
In
/
�•
_
AV
.,
ME
AN
1
I WN
jC/
LAKE CASTLEBERRY SUBDIVISION
WITHERS RAVENEL
APEX WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

f�ti�
i
a
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 350 700
1 V
1 inch = 700 ft.
I
(r
Q
y�
LAKE CASTLEBERRY SUBDIVISION USGS QUAD - GREEN LEVEL W�THER8 RAVENEL
lNiIN[[RS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
APEX WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

I
GRAPHIC SCALE
` } n Co 0 350 700
�+ r� 1 inch = 700 ft.
C r B
CrB2 CrC1
M la 4'
1 -
E CrB2
MfC ?.
G rC 2
GrB2
• s, o crc2 i
a
LAKE CASTLEBERRY SUBDIVISION WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY - SHEET 64 W�THER8 RAVENEL
lMiIN!!RS 1 PLANNERS I SURVIVORS
APEX WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
II

PARCEL /PROPERTY OWNER INFO

WITHERS �- R.A'VENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
Lake Castleberry Subdivision — Apex, Wake County
Property Owner Information
Parcels 1 & 9
PIN: 0723042529 & 0723034576
Freeman Johnson
4501 Green Level West Road
Apex, NC 27523
Book: 014320; Page: 00360
Parcel 2
PIN: 0723059161
Henry E. Lewey Heirs c/o Diane Lewey Teague
Stephenson Court
Lenoir, NC 28645
Book: 001778; Page: 00 -E-
Parcel 3
PIN: 07230331178
William and Virginia Partlow
8704 Castleberry Road
Apex, NC 27523
Book: 002695; Page: 00912
Parcels 4 & 8
PIN: 0713936063 & 0713935397
Michael Yang
210 Edinburgh Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Book: 002751; Page: 00433
Parcel 5 & 7
PIN: 0713822568 & 0713930311
Standard Pacific of the Carolinas, LLC
6701 Carmel Rd; Suite 425
Charlotte, NC 28226
Book: 015785; Page: 01286
Parcel 6
PIN: 0713827260
Patricia Gamin
8812 Castleberry Road
Apex, NC 27523
Book: 003433; Page: 00640
Parcel 10
PIN:0723059640
Country Living Rentals, LLC
1804 Holt Road
Cary, NC 27519
Book: 011019; Page: 01234
Parcel 11
PIN: 0723154148
Dennis & Maureen Heck
532 Wimberly Road
Apex, NC 27523
Book: 005182; Page: 00558
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
www.withersravenel.com I License No. C -0832

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 300 600
1 inch = 600 ft.
PARCEL 10
PIN: 0723059640
PARCEL 11
RE ID: 0256496
PIN: 072315414
RE ID: 0112805
PARCEL 1
PIN: 0723042533 PARCEL 2
RE ID: 0036133
PIN: 0723059161
PARCEL 8
RE ID: 0092212
PIN: 071935397
RE ID: 0012365
PARCEL 7
PARCEL 9
PIN: 0713930311
PIN: 0723034576
RE ID: 0012362
RE ID: 0417341
PARCEL4
PIN: 0713936063
RE ID: 0012365
PARCEL 5
PIN: 0713823778
PARCEL 3
RE ID: 0012362
PIN: 0723033178
RE ID: 0709500
PARCEL 6
PIN: 0713827260
RE ID: 0091935
NOTES:
1) PARCELS 1 -9 ARE INCLUDED IN THE APPROVED JD
DATED 9/18/13 (SAW- 2013 - 01277)
JOHNSON ASSEMBLAGE
PARCEL EXHIBIT
WITHERS &' I- AVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
APC: WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

CORPS JD FOR
JOHNSON ASSEMBLAGE

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW- 2013 -01277 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -GREEN LEVEL
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Standard Pacific of the Carolinas, LLC
Grey Methven
Address: 1100 Perimeter Park Dr.
Suite 112
Morrisville, NC, 27560
Telephone Number:
Size (acres) 119 Nearest Town Apex
Nearest Waterway Haw River River Basin Haw. North Carolina.
USGS HUC 3030002 Coordinates Latitude: 35.7650381674502
Longitude: - 78.9346790137354
Location description: The project site is located adincent to Green Level West Rd., near the town of Mex, Wake County, North
Carolina. Aquatic features on site drain to White Oak Creek in the Cape Fear River basin.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may request
an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may provide
new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
X The waters of the U.S, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on 9/18/13. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
Page 1 of 2

published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808 -2808 to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact James Lastinger at 919 -554 -4884 x32 or
James .C.Lastinger(ibusace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Streams on site exhibit an established OHWM. Wetland areas on site exhibit
criteria as described in the Corps 1987 wetland delineation manual and appropriate regional supplement.
D. Remarks: Site visit conducted on 6/28/13 to verify extent of jurisdictional features on site.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 11/18/13.
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.** _
Corps Regulatory
Date: September 18 20W Expiration Date: September 18, 2018

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level ofsupport to the public. To help pis ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction, Survey or visit hQ.-A en r2.nwp.usace.grmy.mi11survq.h11 I to
complete the survey online.
Copy furnished;
Withers & Ravenel, Inc.
Attn: Troy Beasley
1110 Commonwealth Drive
suite 101
Wilmington, NC 28403

WTCIN17Y MP NO SAME
f" -RICHr Or WAY
(g)- CENTERLINE
(NF)--NML FOUND
MCW PAPE FOUND
(B'S) -IRGN PIPE SET
THIS CERTMES THAT THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE
BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTTON OF SECTION 404 OF THE
CLEAN WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON
THIS DATE UNLESS THERE 15 A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR
OUR PUBLISHED REGULA77ON5, THIS DETERMINA77ON MAY BE
RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS FROM THIS
DATE THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE U77UZING THE
APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE 1987 CORPS
0'F £ NE£RS WMANDS �W N CA 770(3 MANUAL
I.GIGa. *WT iW
SCR. I MS
(60' now "
/ FREE340f PAY JOHNSA'1
_
UN04 JOHNSON HALF -41 O.B. 14320, PC, J60
PIN NO. 0723,OJ -04 -2533
DATE OF R. JONNSOR I
1 B.N. 1961, PG. 746
PIN 0713.02 -9s -8455.
EXP1RAIlON DATE OF DELI NO
NEAfiON'
USA CE AC770M ID. l `Q•fil 7 - d i� 79
UCM) � LINE NE MARKER
SEP 0 6 2013
(UGOL)- UNIOERGROUND CAS LINE
D.& 9284, PG, 971
BANK
D.B. 29JO, PG. 6J5
POYA) -SEAPOW
e
PIN NO. 0723.0f-05-9640
PIN NO. 30.004 2667
ga'z- LAN£AR VERAHD
f(PU)- PRazpRTY LINE
_ PIN NO. 0723.01 -15 -4148 \
TO
265.90'
i S 89.47.27' £ 53x.92'
✓IW
CM 4058. PG. 167
MAP BY WILLA M 0. YATES
178.75'
LINO Nor SUR4'EY, p-
-
BOUNDARY LINE
LIND14 JOHNSON HALE
EASE aw- ---- •-•
-.
TOW OF APEX EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION LINE
COUNTY LwE* -
MME-AD POWER LINE-
UNDERGROUND CAS LINE- o >a:
o- WETLAND AREA
m sv V13t IMPOUNDMENT
O -SHEET NUMBER
NORTH CAROLINA
WAKE COUNTY
I WOMB a CO 2MM CERTIFY TWT rEMS PUT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY
SUPSM50DN FROM AN ACTlA4L SURVEY A41DE UNOSR MY SUPERWSI'ON
DEED OESCRfPRON RRE'CCORGED IN BOOK PACE rN�T
RIE ETOUaLAARlES NDF SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDA^JITED AS DRAWN FROM
MWOR4456N FOUND NW BOOK PAGE THAr THE RAW
OF PRECISOV AS CALCULATED IS 1, ,?24,640 4; TAT THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH C.S. 47 -30 AS AMENDED. WITNESS MY oRfG9NAL.. SlCNA.TURE,
REGI 7M47TON NUMBER AND SEAL THIS _22nd AW of AUGUST AD.,
R£CISTTLNNo. •-3Z' 8`D SURVEYOR
° N CAR
0 � �z
SEAL s
L -327 L°
8 u
D.
AIT
FREEMW RAY JOHNSON
LJNad .K+wsom HALE
AS. 14320, PG. J60
N M7. O"J.OJ -04-259
6FF #.- S .
TRACT 1 "
Jay ACRES
COUNTY LMNG REK" LLC
CHARLES W. CHOWVINIG
D.B. 110 PG. I2J4
D.& 9284, PG, 971
LOT I
0
D.B. 29JO, PG. 6J5
B.M. 2004, PQ 1693
PIN NO. 072301 -25 -1792
\
PIN NO. 0723.0f-05-9640
PIN NO. 30.004 2667
PIN NO. 0725.01-03-9161
_ PIN NO. 0723.01 -15 -4148 \
D.B. 854 Pc. 716
265.90'
i S 89.47.27' £ 53x.92'
IPF
IYF
CM 4058. PG. 167
MAP BY WILLA M 0. YATES
178.75'
30' ACCESS FASEMEHT
EM ]LEO 'PROPERTY OF JETER
B.M. 2009. PG. 169J
LIND14 JOHNSON HALE
vEt7) IPF 3
/ �oygh 5
o
', H
O PF
J. AACON NILWMS
DISTANCE
7.250 ACNIES
ELZA C. WFU -14W
149.16'
3 WUUREEN A HECK
D.B. 6866, PC. 682
D.B. 5182, PG. 558
D.B. 7107, PG. 528
PIN NO. 30.004 2667
PIN NO. 0725.01-03-9161
_ PIN NO. 0723.01 -15 -4148 \
D.B. 854 Pc. 716
265.90'
�T /�iT�/1�p�S
41.JW ACRE
FN N0. 071 J-BS -4330
(CHATHAM COUNTY)
261.32'
(EXCLUSIVE OF AREA IN RI-W)
MAP BY WILLA M 0. YATES
178.75'
FREE WKN RAY JOHNSON
EM ]LEO 'PROPERTY OF JETER
202.81'
LIND14 JOHNSON HALE
J. WWWS', a4TEO A14RCH 13, 1976
J40.17'
G. 560
N 751421' E
175.73'
PEN NO. 075.
3
N 2 -r?XO7' W
250.01'
L I I
SOT 1 146' E
187.52'
L12
S 1]09'15 W
21&90'
03
S 36'OB'J7 W
197.96'
04
S 40-35'41' W
f 69.60'
LIS
S 00'!7'37 E
,59.36'
L16
S 46'17'!] E
161.14'
L17
311
C
O
z
n
a
0
0
w
TaICT 2
DISTANCE
7.250 ACNIES
N 01'122.1• W
149.16'
3 WUUREEN A HECK
HENRY £ LEWEY
D.B. 5182, PG. 558
D.B. 7107, PG. 528
B.M. f979 PC. 618 m
PIN NO. 0725.01-03-9161
_ PIN NO. 0723.01 -15 -4148 \
j NANCY W. BRIT
l D.B. 7503, PC. 88
Lor 1
y B.M. 2007, PC. 746
p PIN NO. 072303 - 14605
p
mW&LLLC
D.B. 12481, PG. J65
LOT 2
B.M. 2007, PG. 746
PIN NO. 07230) -f4 -4206
IPF
377:49' N 89'2920' E Jfl -J'J' M
Inr 198,22'
NOTES
THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED IN THE 100 YEAR ROOD
PLAIN AS SHOWN ON THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
AGETICY ROOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO 3720071300K AND
3720072 -T= NO 0713 AND 0723 EFFECTIVE DATE
FEBRUARY Z 2007 AND MAY Z 2006. THE PROPERTY IS
LOCATED WrTHIN ROOD ZONE X.
MLSCLOSURE WAS DISTRIBUTED BY THE COMPASS METHOD.
THE DISTANCES ON THE AMP ARE AORISTED HORIZONTAL
GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS N07M OTHERWISE ALL AREA
CALCULATED BY COORDINATE COMPUFAnON.
300' 150' 0'
SCALE IN FEET
775,16'
WETLANDS DELINEATED BY WITHERS & RAVENEL
DATE: 5 -13 -13
SCALE: 1" =300'
SURVEYED BY: BC
DRAWN BY: MJB
CHECK & CLOSURE BY: MG
CAD FILE: STAAWETLANDS
PROJECT NO:
THOWS GERALD CLOER, JR.
PAMELA A CLOER
D.B. 90JJ PG. 2495
D.B. 5726, PG. 245
LOr A
B.M. 2001, PG. 1379
PIN NO. 0723.03 -15 -0849
POND
(NOT SUBJECT)
PERENNM STREAMS -2,905 L.F.
INTERMITTENT STREAMS-100 LF.
TOTAL STREAMS 3,W5 L.F.
TOTAL WETLAND AREA -4.856 ACRE'S
LAKE AREA - 15.600 ACRES
TOTAL AREA 20.456 ACRES
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP FOR
STANDARD PACIFIC OF THE CAROLINAS, LLC
SHEET 1 OF 25
TOWNSHIP: NEW HOPE & COUNTY: CHATHAM &
WHITE OAK WAKE
ZONING: I P.I.N. SEE ABOVE
LN E TABLE
LINE BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
N 01'122.1• W
149.16'
L2
N 01'122J' W
30.25'
LJ
N 81262 ' E
174.92'
L4
N 81'3436" E
265.90'
L5
S 81'34'58' W
261.32'
L6
S 8,'2623' W
178.75'
L7
N 2801'4.' W
202.81'
L8
N 79'11'55' W
J40.17'
L9
N 751421' E
175.73'
LIO
N 2 -r?XO7' W
250.01'
L I I
SOT 1 146' E
187.52'
L12
S 1]09'15 W
21&90'
03
S 36'OB'J7 W
197.96'
04
S 40-35'41' W
f 69.60'
LIS
S 00'!7'37 E
,59.36'
L16
S 46'17'!] E
161.14'
L17
N 01'51.09' E
218.39'
L 18
N 742127' E
191.92'
L I9
S 00015'05 £
30.69'
L20
S 15'1421' W
121.31'
L21
S 8827' f 4' E
28.44'
L22
S 2058'35 W
6.14'
L25
S 17'1 f'57" E
1.27'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE DELTA AMC . RADIUS ARC LEN. CHORD LEN. rANGENr CHORD MO
CI 1716'14' 1526.14' 326.84' 326.22' 164.05' S 5716'45' W
WITHERS & RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
STATE: NORTH CAROLINA 115 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 www.withersravenel com License No C -0832
I tel: [phone] fax:[phone]

4WE BILLY L SEARS
JULA N. D.B. 826. P� 22
Cfkr9VCa. LOT 2
ohnc ARID P.S. 2006 -5
PIN NO. 0713 -73-9730
(CM47MW OOU"
MINTY AW NO SCALE
HEATH P. CUMMWGS
MARGARET E. CUMNNS
OA 841. PG. 588
tor 3
P.9- 2001, PC, 33.
P.S 2006 -6
PW NO. 07IJ -7J -9107
(C€HrH.w COUNTY)
f
,ANTES T. JOHNSON
CARLY C. JONNSON
D.B. 1607, PG. ,9J
TRACT 2
P.S. 2011, PG. 220
PIN NO. 0713 -62 -5934
(OWATFAM COUNTY)
40
IPF
NORTH CAROLINA
WAKE COUNTY
HEATH P. CUMMWGS
MARGARET E CUMMNS
D.B. 841, PG. 588
LOT JA
P.S. 2001, PG. M
PIN NO. 0713 -72 -4805
(-IN- COUNTY)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
D.B. 374 PG. 270
PIN NO. 9795 -18 -6724
M4P BY THE ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS ENTREO
'PROJECT MAP SEGMENT 9
REV. ESTATE B. EVERETT
JORDAN DAM & TAKE'.
DATED JULY J1, 1968
I MCFAEL D. COODFRED CERTIFY TEAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY
SIJFVM.FION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNLW? MY SUPVMSh7N
DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN 804K PACE Q
ME WUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY W" I'M AS VMWN FROM �
INFORMATION FOUND IN DDOK ACE TFAr THE RATIO
OF PRECISION AS CALCrwtATm rs 1 +; THAT THIS PLAY WAS PREPARED
W ACCORDANCE W TH U.S. 47-30 AS AWf;.DW, W MESS MY OiS'XIML SIGNATURE:
RECCW170M NUMBER AND�!SF�ILL THIS ,Z% DAY OF AUGUSr AD,
-_„2ZL �F G ' d�12�LENO SURVEYOR
No. L -3278 r
6 CAR( /0%,
f! / '111
a SEAL r
L -3278 , L°
D G9
HEATH A CUMMW=
A 4ROARET E C UMMWS
1F.a 841. PG: 988
LOT 3
P.9 2001, PC. m
A& 2"006 -6
M NO. 071J-T3 -9107
(CFAFHW COUNTY,
J, MACOY WRLAMS
RIZA L. waiws
DAL 8866 PG. B42
PIN NO. 071704 - 94]-2601
R) L? 858 P`l6
PIN NO 0713-85-4130
(CFAITAM CouNFY)
MAP BY WTLLAM O. YATES
ENTITLED 'PROPERTY OF JEW?
J. WILLp (V. DATED MARCH 1J, 1976
�s� H 88"11'01' E J
A5, IPFSA�r 1N.J2• JPF 21.,
Oil
mr 1.0 1.
7WICT3
JO.60 ACRES
A4"ZL SZE KONG YANG C457LEVOW
A MMY SZE YUNG YANG LAKE
DUCT 2 IPF
DA 2751, PG.. 433
PIN NO. 0713.04 -Li2 -3778 ®Q k
LAP BY W7LLNM O. YATES
ENITrtm 'PROPERTY OF
MILDRED 0. CtSTLEBERRY, \, IPF
DATED JUNE 11, 197Y
I&V AGRE.S" V
PATRVC14 M GREW v
D.B. 5434 PG 640
ilr j
PIN NO. 0713.04 -82 -7260 !aF
r, -4
IPF
LETHA J. SHULL
D.B. 3764, PG. 458
D.B. 2876, PG. 218
PIN NO. 071J.04- 92 -2J86
PONO
' SL 9JEC1)
N°F Arr � 7s�,s4' = r
9d
@ S 7 s� °O
554'58°
r � Rip
JOHN W. POWEEL
MF
7RACEY A POWEiI.
D.B. 727, PG. 682 / rn
PIN NO. 0713-7f-1 6707 L�8 r,166, 7 . =f i1
(G OT 7A B) I u, 1971..
B.A0. 1999, PG. 698 NOTES
MAKE COUNTY) TINS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED IN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD WETLANDS DELINEATED BY WITHERS & RAVENEL
PLAIN AS SHOWN ON THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 572007IJOOK AND
5720072300J NO 0713 AND 072J UFEC77W DATE DATE: 5 -13 -13
FEBRUARY 2, 2007 AND MAY $ 2006. THE PROPERTY IS -
LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD ZONE X. SCALE: 1' =300'
68
IPF
PAMELA Y. CLOFR
r D.S. 907[7 PC. 2495
DA 5726. PM 245
e„ : -� LiLF, zDarrr 1779
'��.,,,,lr -e, PIN NR 072104-13. -0949
41.X0 ACRES
t
(EXCLUSIVE OF AREA IN R/W)
FREE14AN RAY JOHNSON
LINDA 455. JOHh6ON F360 POND
DA 14720, PC 360
PIN NO. 072J.OJ -04 -2553 n
u
IPF N 86'18 53' E 973.36'
E 347.27' 775„ 16'
19.22' THOMAS WIDER S
4 DALISA 71.E �71
7WZT 6 R PIN NO. 072,10-05-8239
AM
ES MAP BY SUITH d; SMITH SURVEYORS
7.JW AE a ` ENII/LED 'PROPEMY OF
(EXCLUSIVE OF AREA IN R/W) y JAMES J. PA#AVK AND WIFE
WKLNM A PARROW JOANNE F. PANZIA^,
�T .S Z '� DATED JULY 17, 1977
VIRGINIA A PARILOW ev {V
i'"..A D.B. 2695, PG. 912 tiF
166737 B.M. 1979 PG. 687
(E)(CLUSIVE OF AREA IN RIOW) N t PIN Na 0723.03-0-J178 ❑ 'Pro
M/CHAEZ SZE KONG YANG p „g• cq w1
KIMMY SZE YUNG YANG
TRACT 1 a 3a.DB' NF.
D.& 2751, PG. 4JJ
PIN NO. 0713.04 -9J -6063
AIAP BY WILLAU 0. YATES
ENTITLED 'PROPERTY OF �g9
MLDRED a CtSTLEUDW, 2747' 531
DATED OCTOBER 31, 1977 A
I f/.M ACRES
2.61
IPs
15.9• YARD
E7VCRgAcwvw
J3A.91' t l 1ya
`75,04 W ` J1,6J'y
� e.6
LW
am# AGRES LW T
�+ LINE BEARING DISTANCE
�
' L I N 01'12'2J* W 149.16'
L2 N 01'12'23' W 50.25'
NF LJ N 8126'23' E 174.92'
HOWARD F TWIGGS L4 N 81'3438' E 26x90'
BETTY M TW1GB5' L5 S 81'5438' W 261.32'
D.B. 5436, PG. 676 L6 S 8126'23' W 178.75'
PIN NO. 071.x04 -92 -6479 L7 N 26'01'43' W 20281'
LB N 79'11'55' W •40.17'
NC.G.S. A EARL SMITFr L9 N 1514'21' E 17x73'
MO eJ (2011) -N4W ae L10 N 271,'07' W 250.01'
N. GR10 COORDS. L 11 S OZ I'46' E 187.52'
N- 727,659.J 10 L12 S 12'09'15' W 216.90'
E =2.044744.6TO LIJ S J6108152' W 197.96'
rr9,or.17 '6pp, t 014 S 40'3541" W 169.60'
015 S 00'17JY E 159.J6'
016 S 4617'17' E 161.24'
N.GG.S. 'DOWNS' L 1 7 11 oYJlVr E 216.J9'
L 18 N 7421 23' E 191.92'
L 19 S 00105'08' E 30.69'
L20 S 15'1421' W 121.31'
L21 S 8627'14' E 28.44'
L22 S 20'58'73' W 6.14'
L23 S 11111157' E 1.27'
LNW TALE
CURVE DELFA ANG. RADIUS ARC LEN. CHORD LEN. TANGENT CHORD BRC.
CI 1Z16'14' 1526.14' 326.84' 326.22' 164.05' S 5718'45 W
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP FOR
MISCLOSURE WAS DISTRIBUTED BY THE COMPASS METHOD. SURVEYED BY: BC STANDARD PACIFIC OF THE CAROLINAS, LLC
THE DISTANCES ON THE MAP ARE ADJUSTED HORIZONTAL
GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE: ALL AREA DRAWN BY: MJB
CALCULATED BY CGORDWATE COMPUTATION. SHEET 2 OF 25
3t7�' 150, 0' CHECK & CLOSURE BY: MG NEW HOPE & CHATHAM &
CAD FILE: STAAWETLANDS TOWNSHIP: WHITE OAK COUNTY: WAKE STATE: NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE IN FEET PROJECT NO: ZONING: P.I.N. SEE ABOVE
WITHERS & RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
115 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 www withersravenel.com License No. C -0832
1el:919 -469 -3340 fax:[phone]

EEP LETTER OF RESERVATION

IMPACT EXHIBITS

WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT SUMMARY
IMPACT
MAP
IMPACT #
WETLANDS
STREAMS
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
PERMANENT
TEMPORARY
SQ. FT.
AC
SQ. FT.
AC
LF
LF
A
1 1
1,217
0.028
-
-
-
A
2
5,265
0.121
-
-
-
A
3
1,171
0.027
-
-
B
4
824
0.019
-
-
-
B
5
2,623
0.060
-
-
-
B
6
4,418
0.101
-
-
-
-
B
7
-
-
2,861
0.066
-
-
C
8
1,108
0.025
-
-
-
-
C
9
1,236
0.028
-
-
D
10
320
0.007
-
-
-
D
11
260
0.006
-
-
-
D
12
580
0.013
-
-
-
-
D
13
-
-
-
-
98
0
❑
14
-
-
I -
50
0
TOTALS
19,022
0.437
1 2,861
1 0.066
148
0
I!
I
I
� I
I Y.
vr� �
VICINITY MAP
—.. L.. —.. I SITE
Est Ro
VEL WEST goA ' - o GR��N�E�E�
BECKWITH
BMP #4
(WET POND _ m WHITE OAK
CREEK
A �I� I I I RURAL
1 RESIDENTIAL P ES VE
• •` I P T HITE
• I •••� — / — _ I I N.T.S. AKCWREEK
%/ '
_ BMP #6
/ BMP #5 (GRASSED
(STORMWATER I SWALE)
WETLAND) _
MAP C
1
BMP #3
(BIORETENTION)
AMENITY \-
\
1 BMP #2
(WET POND)
.. . ... ...... P
LAKE CASTLEBERRY •^� ' '�, (Q \ `
O
COLONIAL AND CARDINAL
/;�•.� , - PIPELINE EASMENT
, - .r /
_ L . GRAPHIC SCALE
500 0 250 500 1000
I� E•"
BMP #1 \ O
(WET POND). z 1 inch = 500 ft.
III
Revision Date B
LD • W I T H E R8 &- RAV E N E L I j
1,v CASTLEBERRY OVERALL WETLAND & STREAM IMPACT MAP E��, „EE.: , PLANNERS , SURVEYORS
Town of Apex Wake County North Carolina I a�Ke�a�� o���e c�ry,NO, r��z�s�� re1111-6-340 b--NO C -N

n' /'
y v
CID
TOWN OF\ A X
/ / / //' / /,' / — — / / \ 11 I \ \\ \\ �• \\ I 1 I I it \ /' /l / \ i ' �/ /\ \ \I , I O I /
/x+305
PENMAN N WE L ND _ I \ 1 1Fj\ \ ¢
IMPACT # 1 \�\
0.0.28 AC (1,217 SF) �` �� /, " I \I\ 1 \ I / \c �� / 4 •
290 — — — — — — — — / / / //� • / , ,
77
_,— %`1111,' /�/ / i ,/ 4��• — l - - - -/� _` �—\— —'- -__ — \� � \ \\\ ` \. \\ 1\ \\ .1✓/ 11 11 /i'\ I� M\ 11 / 10 }'' /J .�' /4,/ • / ��
AC (�,26� SF )I\ \ II II I I / // I/ ,'/ _ --•/ \/ —'/ /'/ 61
-------- - S68
6@2
PERMANENT WE LAND
---- - - - - -- —_\ `\ \� \ / IMPACT #3
�_ 'f • / /,' %, �� /7 k\' \ \` \ '� / - -- • iM \ �� 0.0.27 AC 1,172 SF)
-305 1, It '19
,' ,' /� '// / ' /// ,\\ \ \� - --� \ \�\ � \"y''' // / * • ,' J f \ \ 11 ��\ I� I � � / / / '' \ Iv '/ �\
v:
GRAPHIC SCALE
Q0
I I I \ \ \ / / / / \ i .. '. / \ i //
/ / — \ \ , Z 1 inch = 50 ft.
No.
Date
B
D�i�
Dawn By
S�
Dme' ''°'
1 5 I,
LAKE CASTLEBERRY
Town of Apex Wake County North Carolina
WETLAND IMPACTS #1 #2 AND #3
/ /
WITHERS I&- RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYOR f
nsm.....Ddve C.,,N.nnc...n.a73„ t.n91saes3340 .Me,.,nd.­. llces N.. C -0B33
A
cne�x�aBY
ewo
_
J.bNu.
02130105.00

TOWN II: \ I \ I /' I I I\ / •` : // �, \ `sr ` `K ^
i' OF
B O50R q ' I / l I AP EX RIPq RIgN J0 RDA N L 5BUFFER RI
FFEIg ORDAN 0 L • \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 / l \/ \ i I / ; I ; I �i C \ � �j -^ � \ / / / may`.` l 'o ? o
\�`•' \ ' '`'` � `-
• —
R/P LqKE`'; 50'
-
,'/ BUFFER \TOWN OF AP I. ��B M � 3 // ' /`• \
!/ l R s+ R�PARi Ek l
BUFFER (gIb�\ET�NTON
EXISTING \ `\ \ // \ �♦ r, \ \;
WETLANDS__ / `\ • � �♦ `fly, \ :�•
TO REMAIN / a �� �� v �.. ♦♦ A vv v I
v W,
V
i
w w r" / w /�' , -'\l, / i i �o \ - ♦ ` ♦ �' M A Y WETLAND
r' / /,� / / — — / // % / /- - - -- -- - -�, i ✓. F • IMPACT #7
�!! \\ w r , - , - / MANN W LA - _ - ` `. \ •/ f• •.066 AC (2,861 SF
IMPACT #S
'4> , , . .60 A, , - - - �/
-
290 a\ ¢ \ \ � \
�� ' t
- - w 86),
{
�x
YC
0,0/Y9 Ad 8/14 SF --
RETAINING
\ _ 290 w w LL'.(TYP)
i
TAINING
' ! ' / r,' / r �0 / - �\ 9�� --] +• //3 / \ \� x - - - - - - -- \ '� R ALL (TYP
j �i / \ �, r / r , , , �\ � \ r' `% � � •1 � / /i MAIL KIOSK \ _ - -\ --
' / \
lol
r
w
v' MANN W LAN t \
•
\ ' IMPACT #6 �- t GRAPHIC SCALE
101 AC (4,418 SF }♦
0.101
so o zs so too
/ i \ \ / / //• , o/ / \ I \ \ / / / • O
/ \ / /� 1 inch = 50 ft.
No.
Revision Date B
C10 1 9U' N,-
- �v °� LAKE CASTLEBERRY WETLAND IMPACTS #4 TO #7 wiTHERS �►vENE sn�P,
� B
cnPkea e, wn No- ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
Town of Apex Wake County North Carolina D,me C111,NO,,h -.1 275ji r,11- -- 1340 L—,—N,, C -N32

aa! \j♦ , ' // ! I I I I I I II I \ \ ` \ `\ \\ , I. I ' I l � I I , / i I l
� , I I � I I ' �� � 1 1 I I � 1 I� � • I I I I I I V 1 A � \
—L-4J
'oWk OF '�:� / // / ,'' // i / /ice i —_ - -- — _ —.� / I I I\ _� � �\\ 1\\ 1 —I� r I �• I I I I I I I \ \ \ \
illy I v v
JORDAN LA� � 50 , BUPFEk,
50' BUFFER
90
/
- --
\ —II
T — T 11 I �• KTARSLEY
IREET
TO REMAIN —'�
AN ENT WETLAND --- ----
- -- \ —
/ / ' — IMPACT #g -----
\ 028 AC (1,236 SF
30
•• \ .
'#8- \ __ ��\ �� � ,�' ;r...�•.. \ �\�`�
��'� \�h ��� 9Fbp •�T� \ +� 025 AC 1,108 SF �` \ - - - -- '••; �O.
S�
\ \
N \p' gppT `��•� ➢(_l` /ON /q� •``�•� \ \ \ \ / — -- - - - -\ - - - - -_ — / y \ \\ \,\1
I /—_ -- —' /// "•/•
O �q ��.1 �� ��. — _ ♦ ,� I I ,� / /...— _ -----------------------
Mo\YI�R�� Tom, �•l ` ------- - - - - --
h `��`` ,/ / �N eAS�I'A� 11 ���,`/ �`e `r���l\ • —\ / //� \1 / \ // �.. / "�•• - -' -- - - - - - -- /
'' ------ - - - - --
EXI51IING POI [D
l l //� 1 I ! l °� / \,/ — , ♦_ ` —�' \tl -- /' , / i' �''' ---- ------- - --\\\
�� \ \\ s \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ yl Q� \ \ `•'`�rY ��'��`%l, \ GRAPHIC SCALE
\ \ \ \ � \ \ \ I � � J, ! '_�— �'�� j ``r�� ��•� // \ \ , �
50 0 2- 50 100
_31 0 ,� �✓ \ \ tx
♦\ \ -' 1 \ \ ` / \ . . �` ,\ I / �.�\ / , �� �• , °.` / . / z 1 inch = 50 ft.
�\ _ II \ \ �\ J`. / \ _ � _, \� / �/ _ I\ rte_ ° »' ��•-
it
Date
B
De i,
Dawn By
s_
Dme11-50'
11 5 1.
LAKE CASTLEBERRY
Town of Apex Wake County North Carolina
WETLAND IMPACTS #8 AND #9
WITHERS &— RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYOR[
115 M­... Cary, N.nn Carolina 27511 1e1: 91 -3340 .Me ,.end.m. License N..0 33
C
cne�x�aBY
CUD
—
1onNn.
02170109.00

SIR
FAA
dr
. 0
I
a
as
a
PERMANENT STREA +
/ IMPACT #13 �� � • �� ` °' l
50 LF (100 SF)
MAN STRE
S�PE _ I �
,,'�•yl i / 98 k (392 /SF/
STABILIIZA N // r
/WIJ,r' PSRM
,� /,/ ,/ ,/ ii�� �•. Ili I I / / OLA�S �' R44AP
��
1
%I C9UR /HQ E (/4',X 4/' /
/. 771'.
/Z
/ �� — I I / ,
/ �j \ -- —� J4SRDA LA TOWN, OF APEX/
`fib' BUFF 50' IRU14FE0 i >E
x GRAPHIC SCALE
F, 50 0 25 50 100
O
Z 1 inch = 50 ft.
PERMANENT SOIL REINFORCEMENT
PIPE OUTLET MATTING (PSRM)
A
SQUARE PREFORMED PLAN VIEW
SCOUR HOLE (PSH)
(RIP RAP IN BASIN NOT
SHOWN FOR CLARITY)
0918
INSTALL LEVEL
AND FLUSH WITH
NATURAL GROUND
A
CLASS 'B'
PIPE OUTLET RIPRAP APRON
RIP RAP
SECTION A —A
SCOUR HOLE DETAIL
NTS
305 30511
HW (IN). HW # (OUT)
Re " " °° Date By
-� WETLAND IMPACTS #10 #11 AND #12
o.a,�� e� �a�. r r W I T H E R8 RAV E N E L
11/5/2014 LAKE CASTLEBERRY D
',,6N° STREAM IMPACTS #13 AND #14 E " " " " " :' "` " "xexs l s "` " "' °`S
�� 02130105M Town of Apex Wake Count North Carolina 1111-6-340 C -N32
x
J
EXt�` Tl��1G
.y
- - --- % -'- e
�L / \
�IVETLANDDS
\ TO NEMAll'
MAN NIELA
/
IM VA #10
.y
41 41, \1/ \1/
41 Ii
\
/
0.007 (32 SF
/
I
W
W
W
L...
IMPACT
`1' 0.013 AC
2
80 SF)
SIR
FAA
dr
. 0
I
a
as
a
PERMANENT STREA +
/ IMPACT #13 �� � • �� ` °' l
50 LF (100 SF)
MAN STRE
S�PE _ I �
,,'�•yl i / 98 k (392 /SF/
STABILIIZA N // r
/WIJ,r' PSRM
,� /,/ ,/ ,/ ii�� �•. Ili I I / / OLA�S �' R44AP
��
1
%I C9UR /HQ E (/4',X 4/' /
/. 771'.
/Z
/ �� — I I / ,
/ �j \ -- —� J4SRDA LA TOWN, OF APEX/
`fib' BUFF 50' IRU14FE0 i >E
x GRAPHIC SCALE
F, 50 0 25 50 100
O
Z 1 inch = 50 ft.
PERMANENT SOIL REINFORCEMENT
PIPE OUTLET MATTING (PSRM)
A
SQUARE PREFORMED PLAN VIEW
SCOUR HOLE (PSH)
(RIP RAP IN BASIN NOT
SHOWN FOR CLARITY)
0918
INSTALL LEVEL
AND FLUSH WITH
NATURAL GROUND
A
CLASS 'B'
PIPE OUTLET RIPRAP APRON
RIP RAP
SECTION A —A
SCOUR HOLE DETAIL
NTS
305 30511
HW (IN). HW # (OUT)
Re " " °° Date By
-� WETLAND IMPACTS #10 #11 AND #12
o.a,�� e� �a�. r r W I T H E R8 RAV E N E L
11/5/2014 LAKE CASTLEBERRY D
',,6N° STREAM IMPACTS #13 AND #14 E " " " " " :' "` " "xexs l s "` " "' °`S
�� 02130105M Town of Apex Wake Count North Carolina 1111-6-340 C -N32