The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20150017 Ver 1_401 Application_20150115v Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone (919) 846 -5900 • Fax (919) 846 -9467 sandec coin To US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Attn JAMES LASTINGER 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 From Bob Zarzecki Soil & Environmental Consultants, P A Re SHOPPES AT HERITAGE VILLAGE Wake Forest, Wake County, NC January 6, 2015 S &EC Project # 12355 W6 N C Division of Water Resources 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit Attn Karen Higgins Archdale Building — 91h Floor 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604 2 0 1 5 0 0 1 7 On behalf of the applicant, Columbia Heritage, LLC, please find attached a complete application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the N C Division of Water Resources (DWR) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 39 and General Water Quality Certification 3890 Please contact meat (919) 846 -5900 if you have any questions or require additional information PROJECT SUMMARY Project Name SHOPPES AT HERITAGE VILLAGE Project Type Retail Shopping Center / Commercial Owner / App Iicant Franklin Village, LLC / Columbia Heritage, LLC County Wake Nearest Town Wake Forest Waterbody Name Smith Creek Index Number 27-33-(2) Class C, NSW USGS Cataloging Unit NEUSE 03020201 iMPACT SUMMARY Stream Impact (acres) 0 Wetland Impact (acres) 0 35 ac Open Water impact (acres) 0 Total Impact to Waters of the U S (acres) 035 Total Stream Impact (linear feet) 0 Zone 1 Buffer Impact - "Allowable" (sf) — Road Crossing 3,530 sf Zone 2 Buffer Impact — "Allowable" (sf) — Road Crossing 3,460 sf Zone 2 Buffer Impact — "Exempt" (sf) — Fill Slopes / Grading- Revegetation 8,110 sf Attachments Complete PCN Application & Supplemental Information DWR Application Fee $240 00 =UL U\Y/ JAN 0 6 2015 oaoF warF9Qc i 0 > Office Use Only Corps action ID no DWQ project no Form Version 1 4 January 2009 Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009 Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form A Applicant Information 1 Processing 1a Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 39 or General Permit (GP) number 1c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corpse ❑X Yes ❑ No 1 d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply) Q 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification ❑ Yes ❑X No For the record only for Corps Permit ❑ Yes ❑X No 1f Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program ❑X Yes ❑ No 1g Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h below ❑ Yes X❑ No 1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes X❑ No 2 Project Information 2a Name of project SHOPPES at HERITAGE VILLAGE 2b County Wake 2c Nearest municipality / town Wake Forest 2d Subdivision name n/a 2e NCDOT only, T I P or state project no n/a 3 Owner Information 3a Name(s) on Recorded Deed Franklin Village, LLC 3b Deed Book and Page No B8462/P420, B15800/P58, B14960/P1371 3c Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable) Andrew L Ammons 3d Street address 10405 Ligon Mill Road, Suite #G 3e City, state, zip Wake Forest, NC 27587 3f Telephone no 919 - 562 -1322 3g Fax no ' fax agent 3h Email address aammons @ammonsdg com Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009 4 Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a Applicant is ❑ Agent X❑ Other, specify developer /contract purchaser 4b Name Daniel S O'Neill 4c Business name (if applicable) Columbia Heritage, LLC 4d Street address 1355 Terrell Mill Road, Budding 1478, Suite 200 4e City, state, zip Marietta, GA 30067 4f Telephone no 678- 460 -3120 4g Fax no 770 - 953 -4306 4h Email address 404 -408 -6589 5 Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a Name Bob Zarzecki 5b Business name (if applicable) Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S &EC) 5c Street address 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104 5d City, state, zip Raleigh, NC 27615 5e Telephone no 919 - 846 -5900 (office) 919 - 256 -4517 (direct) 5f Fax no 919 - 846 -9467 5g Email address bzarzecki @sandec corn Page 2 of 10 B Project Information and Prior Project History 1 Property Identification 1a Property Identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID) 174959552/1749598301 /1749690660 1 b Site coordinates (In decimal degrees) I Latitude 35 9444 Longitude -78 5078 1 c Property size 1926 acres 2 Surface Waters 2a Name of nearest body of water to proposed project Smith Creek (Stream Index No 27- 33 -(2)) 2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water C, NSW 2c River basin Neuse (03020201) 3 Project Description 3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application The site is currently vacant woodland with a drained pond Forestville Road used to traverse the site but was realigned to the east of the property The pre - existing road bed and some pavement remain on the property Heritage Elementary, Middle & High schools are to the west and south The remaining adjacent properties include residential and commercial /retail The NPDES stormwater pond is not located on the property 3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 0 5 3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 750 3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project The purpose is to construct a retail shopping center consistent with the current zoning and land use assigned to the property 3e Describe the overall project in detail, Including the type of equipment to be used Retail shopping center (grocery store, retail shops, restaurants, bank, etc ), parking and access drives Typical heavy equipment will be used 4 Jurisdictional Determinations 4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Comments 4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? Preliminary ❑ Final 4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known) James Lastinger / Steven Ball & David Gainey Agency /Consultant Company Other USACE / S &EC 4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation DWQ #07 -0208 (2/5/2007), NBRRO#14 -282 (9/2/2014), Existing Transportation Facility on -site determination with Chem Smith (DWR) on 9/26/2014, Field verification site meeting with James Lastinger ( USACE) on 7/23/2014 5 Project History 5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (Including all prior phases) in the past? El Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown 5b If yes, explain In detail according to "help file" Instructions 6 Future Project Plans 6a Is this a phased project? ❑X Yes ❑ No 6b If yes, explain A portion of the property (southwest corner) has been set assigned for a potential future apartment complex No additional impacts to streams, wetlands or buffers are anticipated Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009 C Proposed Impacts Inventory 1 Impacts Summary la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply) ❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams —tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2 Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted 2a Wetland impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 2b Type of impact 2c Type of wetland 2d Forested 2e Type of jurisdiction Corps (404,10) or DWQ (401, other) 2f Area of impact (acres) W1 P Fill Headwater Wetland (drained pond) Yes (partial) Corps 031 W2 P Fill Headwater Wetland Yes Corps 004 W3 Choose one Choose one Yes /No W4 Choose one Choose one Yes /No W5 Choose one Choose one Yes /No W6 Choose one Choose one Yes /No 2g Total Wetland Impacts 035 2h Comments W1 is a drained pond bottom W2 is a relic wetland channel A bypass pipe has been proposed to bypass existing offsite stormwater entering the property from Foundation Drive and maintain hydrology to the retained wetland and stream All newly generated stormwater runoff from the project will be routed to the BMP devices for treatment prior to discharge 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted 3a Stream impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b Type of impact 3c Stream name 3d Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e Type of jurisdiction 3f Average stream width (feet) 3g Impact length (linear feet) S1 Choose one S2 Choose one S3 Choose one S4 Choose one S5 Choose one S6 Choose one 3h Total stream and tributary impacts 0 31 Comments Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009 4 Open Water Impacts If there are proposed Impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U S then indivii ually list all open water impacts below 4a Open water Impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 4b Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c Type of Impact 4d Waterbody type 4e Area of Impact (acres) 01 Choose one Choose O2 Choose one Choose 03 Choose one Choose 04 Choose one Choose 4f Total open water impacts 0 4g Comments 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below 5a Pond ID number 5b Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d Stream Impacts (feet) 5e Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f Total 5g Comments 5h Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no 51 Expected pond surface area (acres) 5j Size of pond watershed (acres) 5k Method of construction 6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will Impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then Individually list all buffer impacts below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form 6a Project Is In which protected basin? ❑X Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other 6b Buffer Impact number — Permanent (P) or Temporary T 6c Reason for Impact 6d Stream name 6e Buffer mitigation required? 6f Zone 1 Impact (square feet ) 6g Zone 2 Impact (square feet 131 T Grading & Re- vegetation UT to Smith Creek No 0 2,550 B2 T Grading & Re- vegetation UT to Smith Creek No 0 1,200 B3 T Grading & Re- vegetation UT to Smith Creek No 0 4,000 B4 T Grading & Re- vegetation UT to Smith Creek No 0 300 B5 T Grading & Re- vegetation UT to Smith Creek No 0 60 B6 & 137 = P Road Crossing UT to Smith Creek No 3,530 3,460 6h Total Buffer Impacts 3,530 11,570 61 Comments 131, 62, 63, 134 & 135 are all "exempt' uses as grading and vegetation w/n Zone 2 only 136 & 137 are both associated with the access drive which Is centered on an existing entrance drive (old Forestville Road) Page 5 of 10 D Impact Justification and Mitigation 1 Avoidance and Minimization 1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project S &EC was hired by the current owner to delineate all wetlands, streams and buffers and obtain agency verifications The site plan was developed to avoid all stream impacts, and minimize buffer impacts by utilizing an existing entrance drive location Wetland impacts were determined unavoidable to provide the necessary outlot/outparcels for a viable protect The wetland impacts are primarily to those within a drained pond bottom and relic wetland channel, away from streams and buffers lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques The limits of disturbance will be located in the field with temporary tree protection fencing A land disturbance /erosion control plan will be obtain from the Town of Wake Forest, along with a post - construction stormwater management plan to include the Crystal Stream devices 2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State 2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State? ❑X Yes ❑ No 2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply) ❑ DWQ Q Corps 2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? Q Mitigation bank ❑Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a Name of Mitigation Bank Pancho Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank 3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Riparian wetland Type Choose one Type Choose one Quantity 0 7 Quantity Quantity Attached is a Mitigation Credit Reservation Contirmation Letter from Restoration bystems, LLC Payment made pending approva 3c Comments 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached ❑ Yes 4b Stream mitigation requested linear feet 4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature Choose one 4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only) square feet 4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested acres 4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested acres 4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested acres 4h Comments 5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009 6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires El Yes XQ No buffer mitigation'? 6b If yes, then Identify the square feet of Impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the amount of mitigation required 6c 6d 6e Zone Reason for Impact Total Impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1 5 6f Total buffer mitigation required 0 6g If buffer mitigation Is required, discuss what type of mitigation Is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank, permlttee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment Into an approved In -lieu fee fund) All buffer impacts are either "exempt' or "allowable" The buffer impacts around the entrance drive from Rogers Road are less than 6h Comments 150 feet and 1/3 acre associated with the crossing This was accomplished by means of siting the crossing over the existing entrance drive, the pipe does not need to be extended and as such new stream impacts are not required, but buffer impacts will be necessary to obtain the required shoulders Page 7 of 10 E Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1 Diffuse Flow Plan la Does the project Include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers Identified ❑X Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? lb If yes, then Is a diffuse flow plan Included? If no, explain why A diffuse flow plan is not included because the only new stormwater discharge pipe has been designed to Yes No flow to a dissipater located at the edge of the floodplain The non - erosive flow path from this dissipater ❑ Q travels across non - jurisdictional floodplain, then jurisdictional wetlands, prior to entering the buffer and stream 2 Stormwater Management Plan 2a What Is the overall percent Imperviousness of this project? 80 2b Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Z Yes ❑ No 2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why 2d If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan The conceptual stormwater management plan (SMP) proposed for the protect was presented to DWR in a pre - application meeting held on December 8, 2014 The plan includes the use of two Crystal Stream stormwater treatment devices that discharge to the floodplain well beyond any stream buffers The Town of Wake Forest, a DWR Certified Local Goverment, has conceptually approved the SMP and will review and approve the final SMP for the protect A bypass pipe has been proposed to bypass existing offsite stormwater entering the property from Foundation Drive and maintain hydrology to the retained wetland and stream All newly generated stormwater runoff from the project will be routed to the BMP devices for treatment prior to discharge 2e Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plans Town of Wake Forest 3 Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Town of Wake Forest, NC ❑X Phase II ❑x NSW 3b Which of the following locally - Implemented stormwater management programs ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply) ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other 3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑X No attached? 4 DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑Coastal counties ❑HQW 4a Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ORW (check all that apply) ❑Session Law 2006 -246 ❑Other 4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached 5 DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009 F Supplementary Information 1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes ❑X No use of public (federal /state) land? lb If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State El Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)? 1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Yes ❑ No letter) Comments 2 Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ❑X No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)? 2b is this an after - the -fact permit applications El Yes ❑X No 2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s) 3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑Yes Q No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description The protect involves a retail shopping center consistent with adjacent shopping centers and surrounding uses This is essentially an in -fill project in that it's completely surrounded by developed properties As such, it is not anticipated to result in any cumulative impacts 4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility Town, City DENR that The protect will utilize the Town of Wake Forest / City of Raleigh sanitary sewer system The and will ensure adequate capacity exists Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ❑X No habitat? 5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ❑X No impacts? 5c if yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted - 5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NHP database and GIS data 6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a WIII this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes Q No 6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NOAA -EFH Mapper - The protect is located in the piedmont of NC outside of any EFH areas 7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? SHPO -HPO website (attached) 8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a WIII this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑ Yes ❑X No 8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements 8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC FLOOD /FEMA website - The Town of Wake Forest does not allow any development in the floodplain aI Digitally signed by Bob Zarzecki 1 DN cn =Bob Zarzecki, o =S &EC, PA Bob Zarzecki\ou= Wetlands Department Sb Zar ec Bob Zarzecki Date- 201 5 01 061 2 30 2 5 - 05'00' us (� January 6, 2015 Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided Page 10 of 10 14 U) N O c O � o O O NN V V' n N N Lf) T w N ro W 4 V O a r O z � U O m � 0 u U U G] w d U u U U V w O U p O N m O O m N M f/t N 14 N ro a w CD W R 0 a, ro U .-I a 2 a a) tD N U G Z 4 Ln m `a PC N cq r Z M p A .-1 V J a", w a U U z y o C � Zu 041 Ix v /w U O cq Z p O w= M Coll O 9 N Jw m H M > C N NQ L4 F. M E O e , Ea rm a 1 N r1J .-a a ru ru LD a r. rm Ln ru U 1 Ln E%- Ln ni Q v s Environmental Consultants, 8413 I nU. of NCUSL Road, Suue 104, Raleigh, NC 37615 • Phcmr (919) 846 -59(X +and(.c com PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION Project Name/Description Shoppes at Heritage Village S &EC Project #12355 Date- December 2014 The Department of the Army U S Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 Attn James Lastinger Field Office Raleigh Regulatory Field Office I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Sod & Environmental Consultants, PA (S &EC) staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site Investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S &EC (as my agent) to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project NOTICE This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, Is valid only for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S &EC staff You should call S &EC to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site. PARCEL INFORMATION Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN) Site Address- City, County, State 174959552/1749598301 /1749690660 0/916/0 Forestville Road Wake Forest, Wake County NC PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name Franklin Village, LLC (Attn Andrew L Ammons) Address 10405 Ligon Mill Road, Suite #G, Wake Forest, NC 27587 Phone No (919) 562 -1322 Fax No ( ) Mobile No ( ) Email aammonsPammonsdg com Date Owner Signature We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. Environmental Consultants, 8412 Falls of Neusc Road, Sure 104, R:deo, NC 2761 J • Phone (919) 846 -5900 sandec coin APPLICANT CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION Project Name/Description Shoppes at Heritage Village S &EC Project #12355 Date December 2014 The Department of the Army U S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 Attn James Lastinger Field Office Raleigh Regulatory Field Office I, the undersigned, a duly authorized contract purchaser /applicant of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U S Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Sod & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff (as my agent) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S &EC (as my agent) to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S &EC staff. You should call S &EC to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site PARCEL INFORMATION Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN) Site Address City, County, State 174959552/1749598301 /1749690660 0/916/0 Forestville Road Wake Forest, Wake Count 17"-PJIM S o -N c-iL c. 12 - 12 - l q (lease print) Property Owner Signature Date We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. 3u &*-' - Mitigation Credit Reservation Confirmation Letter Statement of Availability Pancho Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank December 23, 2014 U S Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 Re: Reservation of Compensatory Riparian Wetland Mitigation Credits Project: Shoppes at Heritage Village This document confirms that Columbia Heritage, LLC (Applicant) has reserved for purchase 70 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Credits from the Pancho Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank Restoration Systems (RS) attests to the fact that 70 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Credits are currently available for immediate transfer from its Official Bank Credit Ledger to Applicant and that as of this date RS has placed 70 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Credits into "no- sale " - reservation status under the name of the project referenced on this document (Project) This credit will remain in reservation status until payment in full is received from the Applicant, resulting in the issuance of a Transfer of Mitigation Responsibility form by RS acknowledging that the applicant has fully secured credits from the bank and RS has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation obligation requiring the credits If RS does not receive payment in full for the Mitigation Credits within thirty (30) prior to the initiation of Project construction, RS has the right to terminate this Reservation Letter, in which case RS will have no further obligation to provide mitigation credits to the Applicant RS will issue the Transfer Certificate within five (5) days of receipt of the Purchase Price RS shall provide to Applicant the Transfer form debiting credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger showing the permit number and the resource type secured by the applicant, and will send an a copy of the Transfer Certificate with an updated Official Credit Ledger to regulatory agencies showing the proper documentation If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 919 - 334 -9123 Thanks, Tiffam Bylow Project Manager Restoration Systems, LL - �>"' 46Z��7 BADE DR I I M 0 a L ---- I Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 9412 FO6 -f N[ R-A %ude 104. R.kilot NE. 27613 • Mfi (919) 94& "M • F.� 1919) *46 -9467 1: 5P RROW Df aG S� Project No. Figure 1 - 1:24K USGS 12355.W1 opographic Quadrang Project Mgr.: Heritage Tract N SIB Columbia Prop. Wake County, NC Scale: 1" = 1000' Wake Forest Quadrangle 811114 I M 0 a L ---- I Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 9412 FO6 -f N[ R-A %ude 104. R.kilot NE. 27613 • Mfi (919) 94& "M • F.� 1919) *46 -9467 f � • j,- 305A •�: ,, r ' n. • w_ ;j tr•d prrqsct Ham HarRagaTract H 3° Ca[um a U12 Fab d?km R" Sake 1 W &Wgk W MIS ^ rune: (919) U&3M- Fa: (919) 2*-M7 Wake County, MC - Mmkq COUMY SON amgwav �0�1994 Ohe@t 195 Shoppes at Heritage Village (WakeGIS) N A J 125 250 500 Feet 1 inch = 250 feet Disclaimer Maps makes every effort to produce and publish the most current and accurate information possible. However, the maps are produced for informa hon purposes, and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied ,are provided for the data therein, its use, or its interpretation. _ _ a a /`2 i ` A� r ,k Existing Stream & Buffer Crossing / Old Forestville Rd. r x Heritage Middle & Sho es - Elementary Schools pp at X Heritage Village Existing NPDES .., Stormwater s Pond Off -site Smith * USGS Pond Creek Not Present I i � ` rte; r•a ' USGS Pond / Now Drained �■, Foundation Drive & Wetlands -- Qj I �Or�stville Road Af :7 k Heritage High School k r Excerpt from 2013 Wake Forest, r NC USGS Topographic Quad Map • w/ Aerial Image j 4 I uw �•- lt,>u.x Shoppes at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service \�M e. Heritage Village National Wetlands Inventory Dec 29, 2014 !f-3 Wetlands CE Freshwater Emergent - Freshwater ForestedlShrub _ Estuarine and Marine Deepwater - Esluanne and Marine _ Freshwater Pond - Lake - Rivenne - Other esn Site -1 ic. r 300 This rnap is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is nol ras ponsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map, All wetlands related daft should be used in accordance with the layer metadaL found on the VVetiands Mapper web site. User Remarks: S &EC Shappse M Hat gs Vfflnsgs M7 Aw tl 4f' r �• _ . -.. _ Site r 'S •A�rv" 1 ,` ,, I ''.�, Zu 5.. t -, -o , •�A.. :�' �, - �_ ,,� ��i, � ilia e• �.- + � -�'°�� _ �. Shoppes at Heritage Village 12/29/2014 Legend Q Panas Flood Hazard Areas O POiti -I A—s AE St r tram Cantari- Floodway (AE) Cross Sections 0.2 %Chang An— IFbod Hazed r L.— Future Conditbro 1 %Annual Chance Flood Hazard North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Affi IVA NCDEW North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory John E Skvarla, III Governor Secretary September 2, 2014 S &EC Stephen Ball 8412 Falls of the Neuse Suite 104 Raleigh, NC 27615 Subject: Surface Water Determination NBRRO# 14 -282 Wake County Determination Type Buffer Call Isolated or EIP Call ® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B 0233) Start@ ❑ Tar - Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B 0259) ❑ Ephemeral /Intermittent/Perennial Determination ❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B 0267) ❑ Isolated Wetland Determination Project Name Heritage Tract N Location/Directions Property is located at the SE corner of Davis and Forestville Rd in Wake Forest, NC Subject Stream UT to Sanford Creek Determination Date: August 8, 2014 Staff. James Graham Feature/Flag Not Subject E /11P* Start@ Stop@ Sod USGS Subject To Survey Topo To Buffers Buffers A X P Below the offsite X X SW pond B X P X C X P At the breach in the X X and dam D (Pond) X Not present X X *E /I /P - Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perenmal Explanation The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1 24,000 scale Each feature that ► checked N rdiCarolma s., / /.. o Y"pKIK «y North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1628 Mad Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 Phone (919) 791 -4200 Internet www ncwaterauality ora Location 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax (919) 788 -7159 An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Acton Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper Hentage Tract N Wake County, September 2, 2014 Page,2 of 2 othdr streams located on your property that do not show up onathe maps referenced abovesbut, still may be considered jurisdictional according to the US' Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the.Division, of Water Resources (DWR) This on -site determination.shall expire five (5) years from, the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties -that dispute a determination made,by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the Director. An appeal request must be made, within sixty (60) days�of date of this letter,or from the date the affected party,(including downstream =arid /or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination bythe Director shall be referred to the Director,m writing c/o Karen Higgms,,DWR`WeBSCaPe Unit; 1650 Maff Service Center „ Raleigh, NC 27699. 'This determination'is final,and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask fora hearing or appeal within sixty (60) days. The °owner /future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any other Local, State, and Federal Agencies).of this decision concerning any future correspondences - regarding the subject,property (stated' above). This project may require a Section, 404 /401,,Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be directed to the Division of Water Resources4Central Office) at (919)- 807 -6300, and the US Army Corp,of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at,(919) -554 -4884. If-you have•questions,regardmgthis determination, please feel free to contact.James,Graham at (919),791 -4256 Re ect ly, ' 12 / x Danny Sm Raleigh Regional Office cc RRO /SWP File Copy NCDWR JRG 08082014 Feature B Perennial Subject to Buffers Feature C Perennial Subject to Buffers Feature A Perennial Subject to Buffers Pc nd Not Present Nat Subject to Buffers ti O�O� W AT F � r A Mr Steven Ball S &EC, P A 11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, NC 27614 Michael F Easley, Governor William G Ross Jr , Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources February 5, 2007 Subject Property. Heritage High School Wake Forest, Wake County, NC On -Site Neuse River Basin Buffer Determination Dear Mr. Ball- Alan W Klimek, P E Direltor Division of Water Quality DWQ Project # 07 -0208 Wake County Page 1 of 2 Y L_. On February 2, 2007, at your request, Ian McMillan of the DWQ conducted an on -site determination to review a stream feature located on the subject property for applicability to the Neuse River basin buffer rules The stream feature is labeled as "247' on the attached map initialed by Ian McMillan on February 2, 2007 The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the stream feature labeled as 11247" on the attached map is subject to the4sleuse River basin buffer rules. The owner (or future owners) should notify the DWQ (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any future correspondences concerning this property. This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Cyndi Karoly, DWQ, 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, ,2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604 -2260 Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter Applicants are hereby notified that the 60 -day statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision DWQ recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made in a timely manner To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of rn`hCarolina �Naturally 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit 1650 Mad Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone (919) 733 -1786 / Fax (919) 733 -6893 Internet http //h2o enr state nc us /ncwetlands An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled /10% Post Consumer Paper S &EC, P A Page 2 of 2 February 5, 2007 Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.0 27699 -6714 This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days Phis letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the buffers Nor does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State if you have any additional questions or require add tonal information please call Amy Chapman at (919) 715 -6823 Sincerely, 1 L (� ',)Cyndi Karoly, 401 Oversight /Express Review Permitting Unit CBK/i�m Enclosures Wake County Soil Survey Map Wake forest USGS Quadrangle, Wake County, NC cc. Mike Horan, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office File Copy Central Files Filename 070208HeritageHighSchool (Nake)DET \ f �� _ � L"�''� �� - rS• -��1� � of k E_ ti: •y �• 1 \.:'�' �/r t !� `/0 ;' `~-'�' ••rl s[. r` , `,iy '� - ��`:"`�ll�5��► , ?:\l !�. Y� • 'L f4 ,�fr{ , ' rr1fJ` y �,I '(rrr /� , a+'S ,.l•, •l�,�S) /~- ..,�.'� `�. ;• SI ro11_7 `ti4 '� I' J'�. -'1 �! 1't�Y J y' r;,'ti•�: ?.• a �,�,t' ve j J , ,, �`'�'� �' �• : \`,. J �• `� ?� ` JIJ; ` r C i ' , ,- �`tyj �f (�Sl l��3* ;_� 1 \Lw 1( j t►l i.' N t \ -1 Sfair y't 7777), -]' 1` t ~l' ! y �ia•.a� �•. 40 1 �I � � �• `G�r � `4 0� � J /rr j`�\ � � _ �, 1` ��} % t ice', ' r -' ^C't J!• �'l'1 � '� _`'� ��5, � /'�"i ~�y >�ny}. ••�y4i�' `1 +`' 1��\ ' (Ir1! 'i'' �JI� rk `"-; r` -i'�• Jj ^�' 1 -.�i /1''� \tri J JI 6 i %9ya t ".+�",i:. 1 L f�; ,J I� `��j,�♦ � %,• }J�, } ll��' `I '� r4 4:\ � . J• ' • J -; I (�:a `sue' � � ` = I t'� }?..,��`~,J� r"•i �1',Y L_ Z ,lti,y1` ".ti ;}r'! 1 � y i '� ��., )jj u l r ' l., \1 �. �`:�,� I � � ` r , rte,..- 11 IIJ� � ✓� ! _ l��!` (.,�'� i a Ir J!` 1 s. ,.... �r• `-- ,l :ti t , i . }+ 1 its ri 3� •, 15' , Uf 1 1 j. ►r y-. �/' ?� l l J �`' /' { � - � `�;�,�}. �s:✓ �S^'i ``' nfi>fj ,, � 'r,. -, % -�i •�' `S'•'F- '^'wy�,��•—h, - � .� ��y V' -^ �1 •:1 -! -Y 'N y ti _ lrf.j ,' �•. `a�l•l �v� t e+i ��.r� /�� ,( ��, , ^f�.r_ ii 1 �\,..,,• l ,i_�� \y°S�w r'•., r ''1 fr -.� J,•J,', , - ��°.�, :� •t iVr'..� � ;•{• 1 ! �• `� \,, ��'. - �- ^+ r�i`,�- '.•fig � �•f'1 A� � r/ ♦ 9' ✓y r �c ((fi�t /• i i . ., �l l�}�ry1 tl_`' y- ( �Jy l h,�' rya,` l '.,# •j J? 1 't;- •' , I t ` 1l.' � � r _�'`'� �1 ` /'`' }��Z.1 '' � �a� �` jt i• \ �) t� +ryl ,,-.� � � ��t•-:'1 I,V . i r.,. Y! - ��\ `� • �.�..ti ��; � � e • � 1•i ", ^�.- .1,,1►,1`1''1 ' 1-�'��1 �� ti � it� . �j /�� y ., 15y �`.jL`_� -►ate' ,.- • �... I I 1 J S � „ {� r - 1 � . - � . -' -•e. ,\ � • "'t,; -` �- '°�;•' �,'ri' -4�� ' cub ,�., 1' �}',j r1;� �,, � J,�rr�r�•,_ r }ti ;1 tai 1 f� -�yC.�Y� �uf.Sl ••� Uz � l f1 i' /%r \ ' (��'�\ I �� 5, +r 'rl "t ��!�'' r� � '� `f`Y >_ ��_t � �� rr•1 li1f,�,i 1'� IAf' /�� /� •I �� tiJ r \� `F'fJ i��! f�.� !(v r• rn'��,`� -'i' ` �'1i • � -� I1 r'I - ; \ �_1 S � r� . r ; •�'�.i.? `! f . 1', r Jl ,,� ��. �' 'T- r�� ,� 1_: _,+- +- �s _ � .� �• !/� �.• ,/, '.� � . -` --4 � , r3 �. /; v �1, .Jim..•► .' , Project No. Figure 1 - 1:24K USGS 4716MI 'opographic Quadrangle Project Mgr.: Heritage High School Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA JP LS3P Associates Ltd 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC27614 (919) 846 -5900 - (919) 846-9467 Scale: Wake County, NC Web Page: wNw•.SandEC.com 1" = 2,000' 11108106 Wake Forest (quadrangle � rr,• . � �—° �' �''„ � J: * � ', ::.rr, '" s y:. art y� �r3• " =e , , d407 Ex w r • d � p X wl Art' wmC1 tit I < ' 1, (1 +• `Agq r / It 3.,•r /; f tit'n . Wr./. wmU2# , ,i,R�/ 1 4 4� M + I r Mt.. tai! t rmp6` iL _ s,: � -r' 4Vi�C t rl wr; 4•t r ,` � t i y T .- � �h.� j �IKy� t � ,� f �,,.G _�.� s �, } ?. -a�� Y �,� �'� � i � � �r% �. ' t FC r" j.l,� ,f',� I,,t '�+ I,N[ _r i►lryi� ` FIIOH� �' %� §� Wnr[= f. w,rr wwF j ` i HeH II i r' i v - 1. r{ �+>r ✓��F+ro r �``�.' }% _ � ��'S��/ _.. / � �`�� .- wo s c? - y 81 i1C�1 inB cr t Project No. Figure 2 -NRCS Soil 4716.W1 Survey Project Mgr.: Heritage High School Soil & Environmental C0115"ltants, PA JP LS3P Associates Ltd 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.- R� +eigh, PAC 27614 (919) 846 -5900 - (919) 846.9457 Scale: Wake County, NC Web Page: r•.'w*% ;.SandEG.00m 1" = 1,320' 11108/06 Wake County Soil Survey Possible Upland Break in Channel Starts Neuse River Buffer\ \1\ \ \ n -Per Meeting with NCDWQ on Feb 2, 2007 237 24 9 � a�n i,: 2; \�\Ur \�� I. I Prglectfsite 5 Applicant/Owner Investigator(s) _ vii--opc WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region City /County r a K Sampling Date (e A'/ "j State Sampling Point Z Of &� Section, Township, Range Landform (hdlstope, terrace, etc) Local relief (concave, convex, none) Slope (%) Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat 7 . Sa 9y"7� Long K. 9 g 32 -A Datum NAB A, _ Soil Map Unit Name -C Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) NWI classification _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks ) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316) Are Vegetation . Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation . Soil . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes )� No Is the Sampled Area Hydnc Sod Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes —.2L No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks HYDROLOGY Welland Hydrology Indicators- Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired) Primary Indicators (minimum of one Is required check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (814) -C Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Drainage Patterns (810) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ,4 Crayfish Burrows (CB) _ Drift Deposits (133) _ Thin Muck Surface (0) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Geomorphic Positron (132) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Shallow Aquitard (133) Water - Stained Leaves (139) _ Microtopographic Relief (134) _ Aquatic Fauna (613) _ FAC Neutral Test (135) Field observations Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches) Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches) Saturation Present? Yes N' No Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well aerial photos, previous inspections) If available Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 WL OPl Sampling Point. 5 e % Cover Species? - Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A) = Total Cover 50% of total cover 20% of total cover Sapling Stratum (Plot size 1 1 Art; ruhnw� 2 3 4 5 6 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 20% of total cover Shr%�b Stratum (Plot size t 1 KK fUi ow, 2 56.e gip 3 4 5 6. = Total Cover ITotal Number of Dominant �" Species Across All Strata J (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC d_� (A/B) Total % Cover of. Multiply by OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A - 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytrc Vegetation _ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% _ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0' _ 4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 10 11 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 20% of total cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size ) 1 i0 _ rAC 2 3 4 5 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 20% of total cover rs here or on a separate sheet.) Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height Hydrophytrc Vegetation Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0 50% of total cover 20% of total cover Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, Herb Stratum (Plot size ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in 1 i 11116 M an It (7 6 cm) or larger to diameter at breast height (DBH) 2 [nsio J�wlknkiif . To y y"" — Sapling - Woody plants excluding woody vines, 3 ..1Wi;� A&Qg; r _ KALAd approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less 4 than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH 5 Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 6 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height 7 Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including B herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 9 It (1 m) to height 10 11 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 20% of total cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size ) 1 i0 _ rAC 2 3 4 5 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 20% of total cover rs here or on a separate sheet.) Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height Hydrophytrc Vegetation Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0 SOIL Wt- DPI Samphnq Point S 0roa Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features finches) Color (moist) Color (moist) % - rmLLR7 Texture Remarks 'Type C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix MS= Masked Sand Grains `Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrix Hydric Sod Indicators Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils _ Histosol (A1) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _ Black Htsttc (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19) _ Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (173) (MLRA 136, 147) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (177) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR N, _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (F73) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophybc vegetation and i Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, — Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic Type Depth (inches) Hydric Sod Present? Yes )� No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0 Up- oPa WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site shoppe., al� City /County li)ahe i0 „ri jLjakt Sampling Date /7 r Applicant/Owner COW 1 ,e �U _ 1 C_ State A) t' . Sampling Point Al fff bQ Investigator(s) zio Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillsloW terrace, etc) Local relief (concave, convex none), Slope ( %) Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat �, 5075 D l Long 32 1143902 Datum AlAQ E5 _ Soil Map Unit Name NWI classification Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 5<' No (If no, explain in Remarks ) Are Vegetation . Soil . or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances” present? Yes X", No Are Vegetation Soil . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks,) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No _ HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) _ Surface Water (All) _ True Aquatic Plants (814) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (810) _ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (CB) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Iron Deposits (65) _ Geomorphic Position (132) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC•Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations / Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes No Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (Inches) Z No, Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present'> Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks i I US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size ) - 1 r (af Ua 2 Q11 itu6 Ai4ra �t� AC 3 4 5 6 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 20% of total cover Sapling Stratum (Plot size 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 20% of total cover Shrub Stratum (Plot size 1 z L_a VAhAf -�„ ;Flt)a 3. 4 5 6 = Total Cover up OPI Sampling Point, F Dominance Test worksheet Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC Id1) (A/B) Total % Cover of Multiply by OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation _ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% _ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0' _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must be present unless disturbed or problematic Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata. size Herb Stratum Plot 50% of total cover 20% of total cover Tree -Woody plants excluding woody vines, ( ) �Q� approximately 20 ft (5 m) or more In height and 3 in 2 M;rg.vt viem �,viruwi rn _ (7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH) 3 4 5 6 7. 6 9 10 11 50% of total cover = Total Cover 20% of total cover Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including herbaceous vines regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size ) 1 Lan;rofa z —j — 3 4 5 Hydrophytic = Total Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover 20% of total cover Present? Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Yes I No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0 SOIL up opa Sampling Point Idiv Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist)_% L Color (moist) _- 6% TygLoci Texture _ Remarks Q_Q C S6 Ll- 'Type C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS-Masked Sand Grams kocation PL-Pore Lining, M = Matrix Hydnc Sod Indicators, Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods _ Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplam Soils (1`19) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (178) — Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _- Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed). Type Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0 APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U S Army Corps of Engineers This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook SECTION I• BACKGROUND INFORMATION A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) B DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER C PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION Shoppes at Heritage Village State North Carolina County/parish/borough Wake City Wake Forest Center coordinates of site (lat /long in degree decimal format) Lat 35 94440 E, Long -078 50780 Ki Universal Transverse Mercator Name of nearest waterbody Smith Creek (DWR Stream Index No 27- 33 -(2)) Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows Neuse River Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020201 ® Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential Jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request ® Check if other sites (e g , offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a different JD form D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) Office (Desk) Determination Date Field Determination Date(s) July 23, 2014 (James Lastmger, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) SECTION II SUMMARY OF FINDINGS A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION There re no "navigable waters of the US' within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) Jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the review area [Required] Q Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide EJ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce Explain B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION There P� "waters of the US " within Clean Water Act (CWA) Jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required] 1 Waters of the U S a Indicate presence of waters of U S in review area (check all that apply) ' ❑ TNWs, including territorial seas ❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs ❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs Q Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs Q Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs ❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters [] Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands b Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U S in the review area Non - wetland waters 7501inear feet 3width (ft) and/or 0 05 acres Wetlands 0 5 acres c Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on 987 DehneatioA an Elevation of established OHWM (if known) 2 Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable) 3 Q Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional Explain i Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below 2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally" (e g , typically 3 months) ' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F SECTION III CWA ANALYSIS A TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete Section III A 1 and Section III D 1 only, if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III A 1 and 2 and Section III D 1 , otherwise, see Section III B below 1 TNW Identify TNW Summarize rationale supporting determination 2 Wetland adjacent to TNW Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent" B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY) This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent waters" (RPWs), i e tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e g, typically 3 months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round (perennial) flow, slap to Section III D 2 if the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow, slap to Section III D 4 A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law. If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III B I for the tributary, Section III B 2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III B 3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III C below 1 Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW (j) General Area Conditions Watershed size 50 acres Drainage area 50 acres Average annual rainfall 45 inches Average annual snowfall 4 inches (n) Physical Characteristics (a) Relationship with TNW ❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW ® Tributary flows through � tributaries before entering TNW Project waters are -5 aver miles from TNW Project waters are �,(b less river miles from RPW Project waters are 2-$. aerial (straight) miles from TNW Project waters are L(br less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain Identify flow route to TNW5 Onsrte RPW to offsjte UT to Smith Creek to Neuse River Tributary stream order, if known first (b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply) Tributary is ® Natural ❑ Artificial (man -made) Explain ❑ Manipulated (man - altered) Explain Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and West s Flow route can be described by identifying, e g, tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate) Average width 3 feet Average depth 0 5 feet Average side slopes ertical Q,.7 -or less) Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply) ® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete ❑ Cobbles ® Gravel ❑ Muck ❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type /% cover ❑ Other Explain Tributary condition /stability [e g, highly eroding, sloughing banks] Explain realtrvely stable w/ some eroding banks Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes Explain present but not strong Tributary geometry helatrvely straight Tributary gradient (approximate average slope) 2 -3 % (c) Flow Tributary provides for $easo fl Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year 0 or rater Describe flow regime receives groundwater flow & flow from stormwater ponds Other information on duration and volume maintains weak baseflow year round and high flashy storm flows Surface flow is )Discrete and confined Characteristics Subsurface flow nknown Explain findings ❑ Dye (or other) test performed Tributary has (check all that apply) ® Bed and banks ® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply) ® clear, natural line impressed on the bank ® changes in the character of soil ® shelving ® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ® leaf litter disturbed or washed away ® sediment deposition ® water staining ❑ other (list) ❑ Discontinuous OHWM 7 Explain If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ ❑ High Tide Line indicated by ❑ ❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings /characteristics ❑ tidal gauges ❑ other (list) the presence of litter and debris destruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of wrack line sediment sorting scour multiple observed or predicted flow events abrupt change to plant community me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply) Mean High Water Mark indicated by ❑ survey to available datum, ❑ physical markings, ❑ vegetation lines /changes to vegetation types (m) Chemical Characteristics. Characterize tributary (e g , water color is clear, discolored, oily film, water quality, general watershed characteristics, etc ) Explain generally clear Identify specific pollutants, if known none known 'A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e g, where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow regime (e g , flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break 'Ibid (iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports (check all that apply) ® Riparian corridor Characteristics (type, average width) >50' ® Wetland fringe Characteristics wetlands at head of stream ® Habitat for ❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings ❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings ❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species Explain findings ® Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings macrobenthos (e g amphipods, etc ) 2 Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW (i) Physical Characteristics (a) General Wetland Characteristics Properties Wetland size 15 acres Wetland type Explain headwater forest per NCWAM (successional drained pond) Wetland quality Explain MEDIUM quality Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain no (b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW Flow is ntermitt Explain Surface flow is Discret Characteristics Subsurface flow nknown Explain findings ❑ Dye (or other) test performed (c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW ® Directly abutting ❑ Not directly abutting ❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain ❑ Ecological connection Explain ❑ Separated by berm/barrier Explain (d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW Project wetlands arei river miles from TNW Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from TNW Flow is from Wetland to, navigable to ew rs Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the gqi year or greater, floodplam (n) Chemical Characteristics Characterize wetland system (e g , water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface, water quality, general watershed characteristics, etc ) Explain clear Identify specific pollutants, if known none known (iii) Biological Characteristics Wetland supports (check all that apply) ® Riparian buffer Characteristics (type, average width) > 50' ® Vegetation type /percent cover Explain thick successional mostly/] 00% ® Habitat for ❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings ❑ Fish /spawn areas Explain findings ❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species Explain findings ® Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings 3 Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any) All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis 2 Approximately ( 0 5 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis For each wetland, specify the following Directly abuts9 (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts9 (YIN) Size (in acres) Yes 045 Yes 005 Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed wtldlfie habitat, pollutant removal, limited storage C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of a TNW For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of a TNW Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent wetlands It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e g between a tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland Iles within or outside of a floodplam is not solely determinative of significant nexus Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example • Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW9 • Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW9 • Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that support downstream foodwebs? • Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or biological integrity of the TNW9 Note the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented below 1 Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III D 2 Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III D 3 Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III D D DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) 1 TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area ❑ TNWs linear feet width (ft), Or, acres ❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs Q Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that tributary is perennial ® Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e g , typically three months each year) are jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows seasonally multiple oberservations Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply) JD Tributary waters 750 linear feet3width (ft) ❑ Other non - wetland waters acres Identify type(s) of waters Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs ❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a TNW is ,jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply) El Tributary waters linear feet width (ft) [] Other non - wetland waters acres Identify type(s) of waters Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs ® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands Q Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year -round Provide data and rationale indicating that tributary is perennial in Section IIi D 2, above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW ® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally " Provide data indicating that tributary is seasonal in Section III B and rationale in Section 111 D 2, above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area 0 5acres Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs [] Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsidictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs p Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IIi C Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9 As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U S ," or Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below) ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA - STATES WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE, DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY).10 Q which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes Q from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce ❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce ❑ Interstate isolated waters Explain ❑ Other factors Explain Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply) Tributary waters linear feet width (fl) Q_ _ Other non - wetland waters acres Identify type(s) of waters �] Wetlands acres "See Footnote # 3 e To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook 10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for review consistent with the process described in the Corps /EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rnpanos NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) �] If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements ❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce ❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the "Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR) Q Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for Jurisdiction Explain ❑ Other (explain, if not covered above) Provide acreage estimates for non - jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential bans of Jurisdiction is the MBR factors (i e , presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional Judgment (check all that apply) ❑ Non - wetland waters (i e , rivers, streams) linear feet width (ft) ❑ Lakes/ponds acres ❑ Other non - wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource [] Wetlands acres Provide acreage estimates for non - jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for Jurisdiction (check all that apply) 0 Non - wetland waters (i e , rivers, streams) linear feet, width (ft) E] Lakes/ponds acres Other non - wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource Wetlands acres SECTION IV. DATA SOURCES A SUPPORTING DATA Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below) Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant ® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant ® Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report �] Data sheets prepared by the Corps Corps navigable waters' study E] U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas ❑ USGS NHD data ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps ® U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name Wake Forest 1 24000 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation Wake County ® National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s) FEMA/FIRM maps 100 -year Floodplam Elevation is 224(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) Photographs ❑ Aerial (Name & Date) or ❑ Other (Name & Date) [] Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter Applicable /supporting case law ❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature ❑ Other information (please specify) B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD 1 1 I I 14201E 2 r }—KmNE, EKS TJRBANCE- 330 SF L -K20w 2 EAmvR w E I 71•SF / 1ElR SAM 201E 2 /126M[ OW. I 01 OIAOFD MO RE- 1EffP1N1E 1 Y,RlO Sf. _ — — -, 30 " •u2[R 201E ,. -- 50 ..oE U915211ED AIEA / OF SvXrA1[/L 1 _ ` 1 �a --------- - - - - -- - 441,WNE2 fig_— -- — '�� r �._ --------- - - - - -- , - - -- Ac \p 1 1 I I 14201E 2 r }—KmNE, EKS TJRBANCE- 330 SF L -K20w 2 EAmvR w E I 71•SF 2JWST l 1 � W I PERMANENT IMPACT WERAMS REMOVED. 031 ACRES 117370 SFI , k . OG�O,f ��Oti 1 J seoPs f!. ISO.fit Y,RlO Sf. ff. 218.EE F.f 2MA6 �a �+i.°� 1%��,-�-� - �- ---�� "" 1l111111li'1�i 1111�11111i1 ! ' - • ,l' 1711 v No 1\ d� I & f 2JWST l 1 � W I PERMANENT IMPACT WERAMS REMOVED. 031 ACRES 117370 SFI , k . OG�O,f ��Oti 1 J `pim-or #3 i115 ACES n , r /r j co A IMPACT EXHIBIT v 0 30 60 120 240 SCALE: , - 60 I u1 z'I" Q W e Nit F C PR J T: SHOPPES AT HERITAGE VILLAGE N/W CORNER OF FORESMLLE ROAD AND ROGERS ROAD TOWN OF WAKE FOREST WAKE COUNTY, NC 27587 FOR: CRC COLUMBIA PROPERTIES 1355 TERRELL MILL ROAD BLDG. 1478, SUITE 200 MARIETTA, GA 30067 PH. (770) 953 -4306 REVISIONS 2014181buffer.dwg 01.05.15 IMPACT EXHIBIT SHEET EX -1 seoPs f!. ISO.fit Y,RlO Sf. ff. 218.EE F.f 2MA6 `pim-or #3 i115 ACES n , r /r j co A IMPACT EXHIBIT v 0 30 60 120 240 SCALE: , - 60 I u1 z'I" Q W e Nit F C PR J T: SHOPPES AT HERITAGE VILLAGE N/W CORNER OF FORESMLLE ROAD AND ROGERS ROAD TOWN OF WAKE FOREST WAKE COUNTY, NC 27587 FOR: CRC COLUMBIA PROPERTIES 1355 TERRELL MILL ROAD BLDG. 1478, SUITE 200 MARIETTA, GA 30067 PH. (770) 953 -4306 REVISIONS 2014181buffer.dwg 01.05.15 IMPACT EXHIBIT SHEET EX -1 HW 1 �` � � 1 i i j li I i I ! � it 1 tr j ?� •,,yJ", _.. -` - `', ENER' ° JB YI.' = 1 DISSIP T,OR 270 JB • �� ` %, I � I '� 1 I +IjiIfYlll I! 1 1 it { I ! �� - �� /i /// g { III , l I �i � i I I I /� _ _ _ - / __ - . i► W1 -PERI MENT MPA O AN 1N�T[D� - ' 01.3j M*E� (11 *5�O/�F) - � Jill -. , ; /Gyp 27 jr \ 1 III { j I � , �, , � � /•.', . //i % , // � rwoo.�*m / I \ -- �• �,_: 1 � III �� / lltll / � -� l , 40i, - 60, JB OC 009 olio 400 z� F�1 Wa z~ z W� L.. 3 0 � a w V E2 z Unw Q a a Ujw V g v N F �Ia DIf 1 r I Ln I I r rI N S � \ i 1 ; 1 r if 1 � \ `\ � 1 ! ► i l � I �rr1111 1.= ` � 1 B- 1 -ZQNO 2 DI$TUR R�.p�C�: I 1 ' 2 I 1, III I�III I rt ,550\SP Ill < I I,; I I I I+ !� II � I i �� l iltlII11I I�I I i +l l llll� � !r I ! IIIII'! /�Irrr'rr�rr;il E' PY —t- I OATi R2 1 i CN l l {lil 1 c JB 0 SCALE: 1' =40' zQ� C Wa W z z w� C. w �5 Q E2 z Loi LLJ a O � � a 0.V m 230 n 2'5 " V Br.WON�E 2 DISTU"M., 11 j i �' 1; j i w' 4,OW-SF i (� i I II �/ �i IN, 10 R7 )N B �\ 30 rT-.'.WtDE-- M% Ll� UQ (DTA& K A It st: 4EU- I BUR v IDE IP ;A\ 20 FT. W - 1\ , MAY BA. g '\ \ \ \ l, 1A ANO RE-Y� to 16 — , � � ��6O � 1 I 1 111 \ \ 1 � 1• '� \ 1 `. ', h, ' '!, �� \ `' 1 1 / /,' // j/ 1 J J/V\ \ if/if 255-- \ � 141 !\ 1}11 ' 11,1 ;,! 1 i 111 � I 1 ; � \I ��l /j�� l Jl�� l I / ,� . 4f 1 it, V CRYSTAL STREAM ENERGY- DI-SSIRA"Tr6ORR wo oop JB � i� CB C4 X CB 01 loll 750 760 SCALE. 1 • --40' m C ism 6 P-0 z 1-0 0 z z E2 00 x �9■ I � I� NEUSE BUFFER ZONE 1: 30 FT. WIDE UNDISTURBED AREA OF VEGETATION. I — NEUSE BUFFER ZONE 2: 20 FT. WIDE, MAY BE GRADED AND RE— VEGETATION. I I-- W2- PERMANENT IMPACT WETLANDS REMOVED: 0.04 ACRES (1,800 SF) in Q O N W U C.7 J � w � O O o rn cC", c m I m 0"oll P SWE: zL W-4 W., Z 0 W� C w a z Q O a oa. V m CL 3 g g� �N w a z Q O a oa. V m CL B-4 -ZONE 2 D Tl*BANCE:/ I I B -5 -ZONE 2 300 SF r 1 DISTURBANCE: 60 SF _ ` l B- 6-ZONE 1 DISTURBANCE: ` - 14l ,'�' I 330 SF B -&ZONE 2 DISTURBANCE: t 710 SF 61RYS�AL STREAM CB i JB CB f / /J B / o - N CB B -7 -ZONE 1 DISTURBANCE: j�� /� ` + �—► ��f� f L 240 // I i - 3,200 SF i I� �. // < AI - / cam/ f; B -7 -ZONE 2 DISTURBANCE: /�i�q- I l ! I 2,750 SF 240 ' NEUSE BUFFER ZONE 1: 30 FT. WIDE UNDISTURBED AREA OF VEGETATION. ��. ` �! l ;'; ; >•�, — - / �` \ ,' i / (11 .i, /�� N � i, NEUSE BUFFER ZONE 2: 20 FT. WIDE, MAY BE GRADED _ AND RE— VEGETATION. sCuE z oc w w— z c� w3 V (ar V Z Q � � a a V 5 m m m m 9 y� 7 u � g � a V (ar V Z Q � � a a V 5 PROJECT: y d 45 0 b o� w wo 8.0 i ® 00 ®� a GO U 0 q u W v a b ori SHOPPES A HERITAGE VILIAGE N/W CORNER OF FORESTVILLE ROAD AND ROGERS ROAD TOWN OF WAKE FOREST WAKE COUNTY, NC 27587 FOR: jLpp INC COLUMBIA PROPERTIES 1355 TERRELL MILL ROAD BLDG. 1478, SUITE 200 MARIETTA, GA 30067 PH. (770) 953-4306 2014181 buffer.dwg 01.05.15 IMPACT EXHIBIT SHEET EX'�