20121055 Ver 1_Worksheets_20120910

0 LL
62 Lo CO
LL
9 r - Ol
Ln
LO
0 CD
�-�
� o
- ^+ L
� �.J L I•'r � � N (a
fit 3Z
j 3
0
° a� c
CO v
O
i L> `° E
r ' N O
m �o
cc
cc
r O
O d
aci m CL
ey
L !

Z °b rOe r s @ Li m
3 \ w U LO
r-
r
mqT
m U M
� � U
! U - o
w
Lir �
Eo
=co Cl
co
mo
/ N c
O
m
` oU
d
z
T O
U �aG 3z
N c
C O) N 7
(3A J O
U
(U
r > >a o
O i iE N
N
U �
O N
O
JjWfD_ N
m ajr. � N mi9 0
a
r
c J U U O
41fz
z
a
D7 ix O I , L CO
m II . o CL o
f _
^' d
cr

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 9/27/2012
Project/Site: EB -5539
Stream SA
Latitude: 35.617901
Evaluator: J - Hartshorn (KHA)
y Count : Pitt
Longitude: - 77.396797
9
B. Reed (KHA)
0
1
Total Points: 31
Stream Determination
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitte t Perennial
.g. Quad Name: Greenville SW
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
3
1,
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 14
Absent '
Weak _,
-Moderate
Strong
Score_',
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1,
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
-
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
- 'I
5. Active /relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2.. `...�
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1,
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
12 "•,`
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1'
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
0:5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes= 3
_ 0
anwciai uucnes are nue rareu, see uiscussions in ruanuai
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
1 -...
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
.;0..
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
0 -_
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =3
.3
C. Biology Subtotal = 7
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
-., 3'
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3 _
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
- 2
3
.;0..
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0 -_
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
L5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0:5,
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5,.
an
26. Wetland plts in streambed
FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
_ _ „0:' °'.';;
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of
manual.
Notes: Stream SA is a stormwater driven channel with groundwater
interception. SA beains aooroximately 60' northeast of a larae 60" CMP and
the origin of SA. The outlet structure appears to join a 36" RCP heading to a
stormwater basin, with high flow events bypassing the RCP and discharging to
the dissipater pad. The RCP is blocked by debris however, and all flow from the
60" CMP is discharging to SA. Based on debris piles and wrack lines in the
trees, SA reaches very high flood stages on a regular basis.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
- STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET A
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: City of Greenville 2. Evaluator's name: d Hartshorn (KHA), B. Reed (KHA)
3. Date of evaluation: 09/27/2012 4. Time of evaluation: 10:00 am
5. Name of stream: EB -5539 - Stream SA 6. River basin: Tar - Pamlico
7. Approximate drainage area: 30 acres 8. Stream order:. First Order
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 10. County: Pitt
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (ex.34.872312): 35.617901 Longitude (ex.- 77.556511): - 77.396797
I-
Method location determined (circle): i. iiPSOPopo SheetEhrtho (Aerial) Photo /GISQJther GISEJDther
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Stream SA begins northeast of W 3rd Street, approximately 1,000 feet from the main channel of the Tar River.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Stream SA will be spanned by a boardwalk. All construction will be out of the OWHM.
15. Recent weather conditions: Sunny and dry, no recorded rainfall in the last 7 days according to NOAA/NWS
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny and clear, approximately 80 degrees F.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: IISection 10 IITidal Waters IIEssential Fisheries Habitat
,aTrout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters 1:1 Nutrient Sensitive Waters Dwater Supply Watershed, (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: n/a
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 60 %Residential
10 %Forested
22. Bankfull width: 5'-8-
24. Channel slope down center of stream: DFlat (0 to 2 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight 00ccasional bends
_% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
% Cleared /Logged 30 % Other (Construction or Roadway
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): T -5'
Gentle (2 to 4 %) ELModerate (4 to 10 %) ,❑_Steep ( >10 %)
Frequent meander _❑.Very sinuous 013raided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 48
first 100'. As the
sewer crosses tiA as
Evaluator's Signature Date 09/27/2012
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26.

EB -5539 - Stream SA
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* Thee characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0 — 5
0-4
0 — 5
2
no flow or saturation= 0; strop flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
1
(extensive alteration -0; no alteration =max points)
3
Riparian zone
0 -6
0 -4
0 -5
4
no buffer - 0; -contiguous, wide buffer = max points)_
-
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0
0
4
(extensive dischar es = 0' no discharges =max Dints
0 -5
-4
-4
5
Groundwater discharge
0 -3
0 =4
0 -4
3
d
no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands etc. =max Dints
J)
6
Presence of adjacent tloodplain
0 -4
0 -4
o —z
3
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0— 5
0— 4
0— 2
3
p.,
p (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0 -5
0 -4
0 -3
2
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0 -5
0 -4
0 -4
1
extensive deposition— 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
NA`
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0 - 5
1
y
(deeply incised = 0 stable bed & banks = max points)
F"
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
3
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
R7
14
Boot depth and density on banks
0
0
0
2
Q
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
-3
-4
-5
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0
0
0
4
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max Dints
-5
-4
-5
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
2
no riffles/ripples or pools= 0; well- develo ed = max omts
0 -3
_
0 -5
0 -6
F
�.
17
Habitat complexity
0 -6
0 -6
0 -6
3
.Fr
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Canopy coverage over streambed
a
(no shading vegetation etation = 0; continuous cano =max Dints
o —s
o —s
o —s
3
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0 -4
0 -4
NA'
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 5
0-5
0
no evidence = 0; common numerous es = max points)
—
21
Presence of amphibians
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
1
O
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es =max points)
a
O
22
Presence of fish -
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
0
..
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es =max Dints
-
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 — 5
0-5
3
no evidence — 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
too
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
4$
* Thee characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 9/27/2012
Project/Site: EB -5539
Stream SIB
Latitude: 35.617802
Evaluator:
County: Pitt
Longitude: - 77.396599
B . Reed
B Reed (KA) HA)
0
1
Total Points: 22.5
Stream D wiWkQ.4circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephem al Intermltten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Greenville SW
if >_ 19 or perennial ifz 30
3
1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 7
Absent
Weak
Moderate:
Strong;
. Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
1.
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
_ -_ 7 _
5. Activelrelic floodplain
0
1
2
3
11. .
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
-'0... _�..
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
0
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0 t
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
'1 `'
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1 `.,�„
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0 �o a
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 7.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
A-
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
.2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0 -,
16. Or anic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5 "
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
35 '
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2c`!`:.
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
31
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
,,0.
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
.0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
'_.-0.5_..:
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
71.5... :
'perennial steams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of
manual.
Notes: Stream SIB is a low- quality intermittent channel that is primarily fed by
stormwater leaving the adjacent housina develooment. The channel elevation
confluence with SA near wetlands WA and WB. Fish and frogs were observed in

USACE AID# DWQ # Site #_ (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: City of Greenville 2. Evaluator's name: J. Hartshorn (KHA), B. Reed (KHA)
3. Date of evaluation: 09/27/2012 4. Time of evaluation: 11:15 am
5. Name of stream: EB -5539 - Stream SB 6. River basin: Tar - Pamlico
7. Approximate drainage area: 15 acres 8. Stream order:, First Order _
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100, 10. County: Pitt
11. Site coordinates (if known):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
prefer in decimal degrees.
35.617802
12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Longitude (ex. - 77.55662
77.396599
Method location determined (circle): EhPS❑ropo SheeC]Drum (Aerial) Photo /GISather GISather
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Stream SB is located adjacent to a Greenville Utilities Lift Station access road near the intersection of W Conley St and W 3rd St.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Stream SB will be spanned by a boardwalk. All construction will be outside of the OWHM.
15. Recent weather conditions: Sunny and dry, no recorded rainfall in the last 7 days according to NOAA/NWS
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny and clear, approximately 80 degrees F.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
,_Trout Waters 00tustanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed, (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: n/a
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 65 % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
1 % Forested % Cleared/ Logged 34 % Other ( Paved Roadway
22. Bankfull width: 2'_3, 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 12'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: 0 Flat (0 to 2 %) _❑,Gentle (2 to 4 %) 10 Moderate (4 to 10 %) DSteep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight 00ccasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 28 Comments:
Stream SB is a stormwater driven channel that conveys surface runoff from a large residential development to stream SA. A
steep concrete flume discharges surface flow to SB, which has low banks and is narrow. SB is located in a topographic
crenulation that may be a natural feature, or was enhanced during construction of the adjacent lift station. SB intercepts
Evaluator's Signature Date 09/27/2012
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

EB -5539 - Stream SB
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECORE_GION POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Presence oftlow / persistent pools in stream
0
0
1
no flow or saturation — 0; stron flow °.max onts
-5
_Evidence
-4
of past human alteration
0
0 5
EMouti
0
2
extensive alteration =0; no alteration =max omts
-6
_ _
3
Riparian zone --. - -
- - - -
0 -6
_0 -4
2
.-. no buffer 0conti uous widebuffer =max tints-
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges ,
0`— 5
0. 4
0 4 _
3
extensive discharges =.O;, nodischarges = max oints
:a
5,
-- Groundwatefdischarge -- - -
-01-3
- 0 4 -�
0 -4
2
d
(no discharge 0; s rin s seeps, wetlands, etc. = max, points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
1
,:. no flood lam = 0; extensive, flood lain =. max points)
7_
- Entrenchment / floodplain access
0
0_4
0-2
1
p,
.(deeply entrenched = -O,.frequent flooding =max, ants
-5
$
of adjacent wetlands
0— 6
0-4
0— 2
2
no wetlands large adjacent wetlands max
_
_.--..
9
.... -
Channel sinuosity -
-
'0 =5
0 -4
0 -3
0
extenstve,channelization,.,0; namral meander_. max
points)_
-
10
Sedimentinput —
0-5
'0-4
0 4
3
_
extensive deposition—. 0; little or no sediment = max
points)
11
Size &diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
NA*
fine,. homogenous - 0;,lar e, . diverse sizes =max points)..
•.
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 4
.__..
0 5_.
1
.�
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed• & banks =max points)
13
- - Presence of major bank failures --
---
0-5
- -
0 5
0 —5
2
F�
_ severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks - max p
points)
14
Root depthand density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
0
=
_H
no visible roots = 0; dense . roots throughout max
points).....
_. .......
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0
0-4
0-5
4
_(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
—5
Presence of riffle- pooUri � le- ool complexes
PP P
0
-6
16:.'
-3
0 -5
0
0
no fiffles/ripples or pools 0; well-developed max points)-
..
- -
e'
17
- Habitat complexity - - -
- -
-6
--
0 -6
-
0 -6
1
�.
little orno,habitat _o;.fre'uent,. varied habitats = max points)'0
18
- - Canapy coverage over streambed
0 =5
-
0 5
0 5
1
no shading vc ctation 0, continuous canopy points), ots
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0 4
0 -4_._
NA'
(deeply embedded - 0; loose structure - max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0
no evidence 0 common numerous types= max points)
0-5
0 —'S
(j
21
Presence of amphibians
0 -4
0-4
0-4
1
0
no evidence 0; common, numerous es = max points
O
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0-4
0 -4
1
�
(no evidence = .O; common, .numerous es. °..max points),
I _.,_.
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
no evidence -0� abundant evidence = max "
points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
2$
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 9/27/2012
Project/Site: EB -5539
Stream SC
Latitude: 35.617802
Evaluator: Hartshorn (KHA)
County: Pitt
Longitude: - 77.396202
B. Reed (KHA)
0
1
Total Points: 34.5
3._`
-3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
Stream Determination
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitte t Perennial
g. Quad Name. Greenville SW
if a 19 or perennial if a 30
0
1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 15.5
Absent "_ _'
Weak_.
Modera'_te'
Strong
` Score`
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3._`
-3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2 _
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
1 .
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1,.
5. Active /relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
13 a-
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1_
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2_
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria -
0 -
1
2
3
' -- 3..
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1 `
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
_ 0.,..
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1,.
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
1 "
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2-
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
_ 0-
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
_ 0.,..
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
,0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
1 _
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
1;: ,
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
�,. ,05 ,
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'): ",I.,
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of
manual.
Notes: Stream SC is a channel that branches off of stream SA and flows
east through wetland WB. SC dissipates into WB after flowing approximately
200'. The banks and alluvial benches within SC have cravfish burrows. and fish

USACE AID# DWQ # Site #_ (indicate on attached map)
0 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: City of Greenville 2. Evaluator's name: J. Hartshorn (KHA), B. Reed (KHA)
3. Date of evaluation: 09/27/2012 4. Time of evaluation: 10:45 am
5. Name of stream: EB -5539 - Stream SC 6. River basin: Tar - Pamlico
7. Approximate drainage area: 4 acres 8. Stream order:, First Order
9. Length of reach evaluated: 200 10. County: Pitt
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Latitude (cx. 34.872312):
35.617802
Longimde (ex.- 77.55661 p: - 77.396202
Method location determined (circle):I+ UPS❑Popo Shee ✓brtho (Aerial) Photo /GIS [Dther GISL]lther
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Stream SC is located at the foot of a hillslope, behind residential housing along the north side of W Conley Street in a sewer easement.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Stream SC will be spanned by a boardwalk. All construction will be outside of the OWHM.
15. Recent weather conditions: Sunny and dry, no recorded rainfall in the last 7 days according to NOAA/NWS
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny and clear, approximately 80 degrees F.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _aEssential Fisheries Habitat
._Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters 0 Nutrient Sensitive Waters Dwater Supply Watershed, (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: n/a
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 75 % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
25 %Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: 2 -4 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1' -2'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _✓ Flat (0 to 2 %) _Gentle (2 to 4 %) DModerate (4 to 10 %) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ElStraight 00ccasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 40 Comments:
Stream SC is branch channel off of SA that flows through a sewer easement along the foot of a large hillslope. SC dissipates
into wetland WB. SC has crayfish burrows and wetland vegetation in exposed areas of the streambed. SC is also fed by
groundwater seepage from the adjacent hillslope.
Evaluator's Signature Date 09/27/2012
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change- version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26.

EB -5539 - Stream SC
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0
0-4
0 5
1
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
— 5
—
2-
:Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
0
_
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0 — 4
0 —3
2
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 -5
0 -4
0 -4
1
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0 -3
0 -4
- --
0 -4
3
d
(no .discharge n
ischar e = 0; springs, s, sec s, wetlands etc. =max points)
NPresence
6
of adjacent floodplain
0-4
-
0 - 4
0-2
2
cz)
r
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
2
Entrenchment/ floodplain access
0
0
0
3
C
(deeply entrenched =0; frequent floodin =max points)
-5
-4
-2
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0— 6
0-4
0-2
3
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands= max points)
- Channel sinuosity
0 -5
0 -4
0 -3
2
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander= max points)
10
Sedimentinput
0 -5
0 -4
0 -4
4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 -5
NA*
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 4
0-5
3
>r
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)_
13
Presence of major bank failures
0
0
0 -5
3
asevere
erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks = max points)
-5
-5
Q
Root depth and density on banks
0
0
0
14
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout =max points)
-3
-4
-5
Q
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
- -
0 4
0-5
4
_ substantial impact =0' no evidence = max points)
-
16
Presence of riffle- pool/ripple -pool complexes
1
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
0-3
0-5
0-6
d'
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 6
0-6
1
y
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
—
Canopy coverage over streambed
18
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
1
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy points) ots
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0 -4
0 -4
NA`
(dccplv embedded =0 loose structure max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
�
(no evidence =0; common, numerous types =max po mts
0 -4
0 -5-
0 -5
2
21
Presence of amphibians
0 -4
0 4
0 -4
2
no evidence= 0; common numerous t es = max
-..
O
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
0
no evidence= 0' common numerous types= max points)
Evidence of wildlife use
23
0-6
0 — 5
0— 5
2
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
40
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 9/27/2012
Project/Site: EB -5539
Stream SD
Latitude: 35.617599
Evaluator: J. Hartshorn (KHA)
County: Pitt
Longitude: - 77.392403
B. Reed (KHA)
0
1
Total Points: 38
Stream Determination '
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitt t Perennial
e . Quad Name: Greenville SW
if z 19 or perennial if z 30
3
1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 17
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
-- -Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
-
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active /relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
1 2
1 3
1 1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
- 1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3_
C. Biology Subtotal = 10.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3.
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
- 1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
26, Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5, Other = 0
1.5
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p, 35 of
manual.
Notes: Stream SD is a short
crosses
SD in the sewer easement has wide banks armored with rip rap and
smartweed is qrowinq well within the channel bed. Downstream of the
easement, SD has multiple riffles complexes and step pools.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
0 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: City of Greenville 2. Evaluator's name: J. Hartshorn (KHA), B. Reed (KHA)
3. Date of evaluation: 09/27/2012 4. Time of evaluation: 1:45 pm
5. Name of stream: EB -5539 - Stream SD
7. Approximate drainage area: 10 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 8
11. Site coordinates (if known):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
prefer in decimal degrees.
35.617599
6. River basin: Tar - Pamlico
8. Stream order:, First Order
10. County: Pitt
12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Longitude (ex.- 77.55661 p: - 77.392403
Method location determined (circle): t. uPS❑ropo Sheet Who (Aerial) Photo /GIS❑Dther GISather
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams) location):
Stream SD is located east of W Conley Street and north of W 3rd Street in a sewer easement at the outlet of a stormwater basin.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Stream SD will be spanned by a pedestrian bridge. All construction will be outside of the OWHM.
15. Recent weather conditions: Sunny and dry, no recorded rainfall in the last 7 days according to NOAA/NWS
16. Site conditions at time of visit Sunny and clear, approximately 80 degrees F.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: IISection 10 IITidal Waters IIEssential Fisheries Habitat
IITrout Waters 0outstanding Resource Waters II Nutrient Sensitive Waters nWater Supply Watershed. (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES If yes, estimate the water surface area: 1 acre
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad Wrap? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 80 % Residential
10 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 81-101
24. Channel slope down center of stream: QFlat (0 to 2 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight 00ccasional bends
%Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
Cleared / Logged 10 % Other (Stormwater Basin
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 5 -8'
Gentle (2 to 4 %) IIModerate (4 to 10 %) 0steep ( >10 %)
,QFrequent meander OVery sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 62
stormwater basin collecting runoff from area
SD, which ioins SE before flowing into the Tar River.
ou crosses the sewer easement, wnere its DanKS are armored wain no rap and wetlano veaetation is present in the cnannel.
Evaluator's Signature Date 09/27/2012
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26.

EB -5539 - Stream SD
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS '--
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 't
4
3
_ no flow or saturation.= 0;. strong flow.: max points)
0-5
0
0 5
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0 5
0
2
extensive alteration =_0; no alteration =.max points)
_ _
_ -
3
- Riparian zone -
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
no buffer O contiguous, wide buffer= max points)
Evidence of nutrientoi chemical discharges'-
4-
0 -5
-0 -.4
0 -4
4
.. -(extensive discharges = O;..nd discharges =:max. omts
:. .
_
.
.a
5
Groundwater discharge
�0 -4
0 -4
3
Uno
discharge 0;springs, seeps, wetlands,,etc. max points)
6
- Presence of adjacent floodplain
0
0- 4
0-4
0-2
2
no flood lain =0; extensive flood lain = max points)
..
_
._
access
0-5
0-4
0-2
2
P.
(deeply .entrenchedh 0; frequent lood
- floodin =max points)
_
8_
-.. Presence of adjacent wetlands
0- 6
0 4
0 2
3
no wetlands 0; large adjacent wetlands = max --oints `
_ . _..'
9
_ - Channel sinuosity
0-5
,
0-4
0-3
3
extensive channelization 0; natural meander, max points).
10
Sediment input
0 -5
0-4
0 -4
3
- _
extensive deposition- 0; little or-no sediment =max points)
Il
- 'Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA *
-
0 -4
0 -5
NA *
fine, homogenous =. 0; large,, diverse sizes = max points)..
_. __
.......
Evidence of channel incision or widening
..�
12
0-5
0-4
0-5
4
(deeply incised 0; stable bed & banks max points)'
H
13
Presence of major bank failures -
--
0-5
-
0-5
- --
0-5
4
--
severe. erosion = 0;. no erosion, . stable banks = max points)
_
14
Root depth and density on banks - -
- _
0-3
--
0 4
0-5
3
no visible roots= 0; dense roots .throughout = max points)
c
13
Impact by agriculture,, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 4
0-5
4
._.,.........,..
substantial impact =0; no evidence =max: omts
_
-
16
Presence of riffle- pool/ripple -pool complexes
0-3
3
no riffles/ripples or, pools - 0; well develo ed' max points)_
0-5
0-6
-
H
H
17
-
Habitat complexity
0 -6
0-6
0-6
5
little or no habitat 0;. frequent,-varied habitats = max points)
-. Canopy coverage over streambed
p-
1.8
no shading vegetation 0; continuous canopy max points)
5
0 5
0-5
3
19
Substrate embeddedness --
-NA*
0 -4
0 -4
NA*
(deeply .embedded= 0; loose structure,- = max
20
Presence of stream in_ vertebrates {see page 4)
- '
0
no evidence =0' common numerous _ es = max points)
0-4
0 3
-_- -
0-5
Pre senceofamphibians -
21
_
0 -4
0-4
0-4
2
O
no evidence - 0; common, numerous types = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0- 4
0-4,
0-4
3
m
no evidence 0; common numerous es °max omts
--
23
-- Evidence ofwild6fetise- -
"-
0 = 6
0-5
- -- - --
0-5
¢
no evidence - O abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first,page) .
62
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 9/27/2012
Project/Site: EB -5539
Stream SE
Latitude: 35.617199
Evaluator: J Hartshorn (KHA)
County: Pitt
Longitude: - 77.392097
B. Reed (KHA)
0
1
Total Points: 36.5
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
Stream Determination
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermift t Perennial
e . Quad Name: Greenville SW
if z 19 or perennial If z 30
0
1
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 18
Absent
weak
Moderate
Strong _
Score
1'. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
-
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active /relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1 1
2
1 3
- 1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
2
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
1:5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
aRrtlGal oRCnes are not rated; see discussions In manual
B. Hydroloqy Subtotal = 10.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria -
0
1
2
3
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 8
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75, OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep, 35 of
manual_
Notes: Stream SE is a large perennial channel that is deeply encised. The
channel crosses the sewer easement, and within the easement the banks are
approximately 8 -10' higher than the water surface. After the easement, SE
drops approximately 10' through a series of step pools to meet the Tar River
elevation. Stream SD joins SE north of the easement before SE traverses more
step pools and ultimately flows into the Tar River. Upstream of the easement
bank depths are 15 -20' deep and 30' wide.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site #_ (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: City of Greenville 2. Evaluator's name: d Hartshorn (KHA), B. Reed (KHA)
3. Date of evaluation: 09/27/2012
5. Name of stream: EB -5539 - Stream SE
7. Approximate drainage area: 20 acres
9. Length of reach evaluated: 500'
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
35.617199
4. Time of evaluation: 2:50 pm
6. River basin: Tar - Pamlico
S. Stream order:. FirSt Order
10. County: Pitt
12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Longitude (ex. —77,556611): - 77.392097
Method location determined (circle): U, PS ❑fopo SheetEbrtho (Aerial) Photo /GIS[3)ther GISather
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Stream SE is located north of W Conley Street and approximately 500' west of the US -13 /Memorial Drive Bridge
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Stream SE will be spanned by a pedestrian bridge. All construction will be outside of the OWHM.
15. Recent weather conditions: Sunny and dry, no recorded rainfall in the last 7 days according to NOAA/NWS
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Sunny and clear, approximately 80 degrees F.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: F Section 10 IITidal Waters IIEssential Fisheries Habitat
_QTrout Waters 00unstanding Resource Waters F Nutrient Sensitive Waters Dwater Supply Watershed. (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES If yes, estimate the water surface area: 1 acre
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: 70 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial % Agricultural
15 % Forested 10 % Cleared / Logged 5 % Other (Stormwater Basin
22. Bankfull width: 10' -30' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 6' -15'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: DFlat (0 to 2 %) QGentle (2 to 4 %) _QModerate (4 to 10 %) nSteep (> 10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight 00ccasional bends W✓ Frequent meander -EI. Very sinuous IIBraided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 50
Evaluator's Signature Date 09/27/2012
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26.

EB -5539 - Stream SE
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0 -
0 - 4
$
no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow =:max oints
-
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0- 6
0- 5
[M7ountain
2
extensive alteration =0; no alteration =max oints
3
Riparian zone
0- 6
0 4
4
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0
0-4
4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges =maX points)_
—4
_5
Groundwater
0 -3
0 -4
0 -4
3
U
no discharge = O;s rings, see s,. wetlands etc. max oints
rr
6
- — -- -_
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 — 4
0-4
0 — 2
1
no floodplain = 0; extensive flood p lain = max points)
2
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0 4
0-2
0
a
(deeply f entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
—
8-
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
1
no wetlands — 0; large adjacent wetlands =max omts
9
Channel sinuosity
0 -5
0 -4
0 -3
4
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max ousts
10
Sediment input
0 -5
0 =4
0 -4
3
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment =max points)
11 -
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 -4
0 -5
NA*
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes =max oints
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0
0
0
0
>0
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks — max oints
-5
-4
-5
"i
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
0
severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks = max points)
P?
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
-
0 4
0-5
1
Q
F
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
-
I S
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 4
0-5
¢
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
—
16
Presence of riffle -pool ripple- poolcomplexes
0
0
0
3
no riffles/ripples les or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
-3
-5
-6
1
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
5
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
4
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0 -4
0 -4
NA*
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0
0-5
0
no evidence — 0; common numerous types = max oints
- 5
21
Presence of amphibians
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
2
O
no evidence= 0; common numerous types= max points)
O
22
Presence offish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
2
m
-
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
¢
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
50
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: EB -5539 - South Tar River Greenway City /County: Greenville, Pitt County Sampling Date: 9/27/2012
Applicant/Owner: City of Greenville state: NC Sampling Point: WA/WB -UP
Investigator(s): B. Reed (KHA), 1. Hartshorn (KHA) Section, Township, Range: Greenville
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hlllslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope ( %): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Let: 35.618000 N Long: 77.397102W Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Bb - Bibb complex I NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No= (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation lll—Ill Soil ll��l� or Hydrology significantly significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes � No =,
Are Vegetation IJ Soil 1J or HydrologYR naturally problematic? (If needed. explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes JZL No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No
Hydrology Indicators:
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
g
Indicators (minimum of two required)
WA -UP is approximately 10' northwest of wetland flag WA8, and 2' higher in elevation than WA8. This
area is adjacent to a maintained berm that creates a large stormwater basin. Conditions have been
sunny and dry, with no rain recorded in the last 96 hours. This form is also representative of WB -UP.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Primary
Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check
all that apply)
Surface Water (All
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2)
Mad Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (62)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
-
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aeral Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
eInundation
Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Water - Stained Leaves (89)
Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No - ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No ✓ Depth (inches): > 24"
H
Saturation Present? Yes
No ✓ Depth (inches): > 24"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E(, No 1Z
includes czipillary hinge
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available:
Remarks:
There were no indicators of wetland hydrology observed at the data point location. The water
table was not observed within the upper 24 ", and the soil was not saturated within the upper 24 ".
The majority of the uplands surrounding wetlands WA and WB are comprised of
maintained /disturbed areas, residential developments, and roadway corridors. Due to the
similarity of conditions, as well as the close proximity of the wetlands to one another, this data
point was collected as representative of both WA -UP and WB -UP.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA/WB -UP
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
4
1. none
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
6
2.
3,
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
8
OBL species x 1 =
0% = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
0% 20% of total cover: 0%
FACW species x2=
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size. 30'
)
FAC species x3=
1. Liquidambar styracinua
5% Y FAC
FACU species x4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2, Robinia pseudoacacia 5% Y NI
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
?.
Y 2 -Dominance Testis >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
10% = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
5% 20% of total cover. 2%
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must
1, Eupatorium capillifolium
40% Y FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Festuca sp.
40% Y FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
3. Arundinariagigantea 5% N FACW
Rubus 2% N
4 argtrtus
FAC
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft It m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
5
6.
7.
8.
0.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
10.
11.
height.
12.
87% = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
43.5% 20% of total cover: 17.4%
Woody Vine Stratum (plot size: 30'
)
1 Vilis rolundifolia
5% Y FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation -/
2, Smilax rotundifolia 5% Y FAC
3,
4,
5,
10% = TotalCover
50% of total cover:
5% 20% of total cover: 2%
Present? Yes ♦ No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
The upland area at WA -UP appears to be infrequently mowed, but has not been
mowed /maintained recently. There are no canopy species present in the upland area at WA -UP,
and sapling and shrub species are
sparse. The upland area is dominated by herbaceous
vegetation. The uplands adjacent
to WB are maintained /disturbed residential yards.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W WB -UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Cola (mast) A
Coicr (mast) A Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0 -4" 10YR 4/3 100
Fine sandy loam
4 -24" 10YR 5/3 100
Sandy loam
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histcsd (Al)
Polyvalue Belau Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Fpipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Mad (1`10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Praine Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbdc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR O, S)
Della Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Cloyed Metnx (S4)
Reduced Vertic (1`18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Sol] Present? Yes—a No-✓
Remarks:
The soils at WA -UP may have been historically disturbed, and is located near the transition from
buried sewer line to aerial sewer line to cross SA and WA. The disturbance within the soil profile
appears to increases with depth. No saturation was found in the upper 24 ", and the water table
was also not observed within the upper 24 ".
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProiectlSite: EB -5539 - South Tar River Greenway city/county: Greenville, Pitt County Sampling Date: 9/27/2012
Applicant/Owner: City of Greenville state: NC Sampling Point: WA /WB -WET
Investigator(s): B. Reed (KHA), J. Hartshorn (KHA) Section, Township. Range: Greenville
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplaln Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope ( %): <1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 35.617901 N Long: 77.397102 W Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Bb - Bibb Complex NWI classification:
Are climatic! Ndrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 571 No= (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil lI��—i� or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes M No =,
Are Vegetation Soil 1J or HydrologYR naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc-
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ _ No Is the Sampled Area II��/ I
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ _ No within a Wetland? Yesa NoE]
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ _ No
Remarks:
WA -WET is approximately 15' southeast of wetland flag WA8, and 2' lower in elevation than
wetland flag WAS. This area is adjacent to an above ground sewer crossing of stream SA.
Recent conditions have been sunny and dry, with no rain recorded in the last 96 hours.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B6)
Primary
Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check
all that apply)
✓
Surface Water (At)
Aquatic Fauna (B73)
✓
High Water Table (A2)
Mad Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
✓
Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B7)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
✓
Crayfish Burrows (CB)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
✓
Geomorphic Position (132)
Deposits (65)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
,Iron
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss (D6) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
✓
NOTI Depth (inches): 0 -12"
Water Table Present? Yes
No_ Depth (inches): 2°
H,///
Saturation Present? Yes
No _ Depth (inches): 0"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes I y I No o
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos. previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetlands WA and WB are low -lying floodplain wetlands associated with streams SA, SB, SC, and the
Tar River. Surface water was observed throughout the interior reaches of the wetland, reaching
depths of 12 ". Soils in WA and WB show signs of alluvial deposition as distances to the stream
channels decrease. The water table was observed initially at 10 ", but while completing the
observation point documentation, the water table recharged to a depth of 2" below the surface.
Soils were saturated to the surface throughout wetlands WA and WB. Wetland WB is bounded on
the southern side by a steep topographic break.
The similarity of conditions found in wetlands WA and WB, as well as the close proximity of the
wetlands to one another, make this data point reflective of both wetlands.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA /WB -WET
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Salix niera
Absolute Dominant Indicator
%Cover Species? Status
25% Y OR
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across At Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1000/0 (A/B)
2. Taxodium distichum 20% Y OBL
3. Betula nigra 10% N FACW
4. Acer rubrum 10% N FAC
5. Liqutdanlbor styrociflua 5% N FAC
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total %Cover of. Multiply by
8
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BtA =
70% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35% 20% of total cover: 14%
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Salix nigra 20% Y OBL
2. Acer rubrum 15% Y FAC
3. Liquidambar styraciflua 10% Y FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophyto Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Y 2- Dominance Testis >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrol ogy must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
7
8.
45% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 22.5 0/o 20 %of total cover: c) 0/o
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1, Persicaria amphibia 40% Y OBL
2. Saururus cernuus
20% Y OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb-All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -AII woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
3, Juncus efusus 5% N OBL
4. Scirpus cyperinus 5% N OBL
5. Rubus argutus 5% N FAC
6. Typha latifolia 2% N OBL
7 -
8.
g.
10.
11.
12.
500% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1. none
77% =Total Cover
38.5% 20% of total cover. 15.4%
)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation -/
Present? Yes ♦ No
2.
3.
4,
5_
0% =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0% 20% of total cover: 0%
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Smartweed and lizards tail are dominant throughout the floodplain, and the low -lying areas with
surface water are dominated by cattail and lizards tail. The canopy species are along the fringes
of the wetland, and black willow is found throughout WA. The canopy in wetland WB is
dominated by cypress and black gum.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA/WB-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Cola (moist) % Color (moist) °A Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0 -6" 10YR 4/1 100 Loamy sand
6 -18" 10YR 3/1 100 Loam
'Type: C- Concentration, D- Depletion, RNA—Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric SOIIS':
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) B 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vedic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ® Piedmont Floodplain Scils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 15311)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
Depleted Ochric 11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (At 2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
✓
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Cloyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vedic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redcx (S5)
Piedmont Flcodplain Sals (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _a No
Remarks:
The soils in WA are sandier closer to SA in the alluvial zone, but at the data point location
(approximately 50' from SA) soils are loamy and the area is a low -lying floodplain. The soil profile
in at WA -WET is reflective of soils throughout wetland WB. There is no evidence of oxidation in
the soil profile, but soils are dark throughout. Soils are saturated at the surface, and the water
table was observed at 2 ".
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: EB -5539 - South Tar River Greenway City /County: Greenville, Pitt County Sampling Date: 9/27/2012
Applicant/Owner: City of Greenville State: NC Sampling Point: WC /WD -UP
Investigator(s): B. Reed (KHA), 1. Hartshorn (KHA) Section, Township, Range: Greenville
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hill Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope ( %); 3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Let: 35.617599 N Long: 77.392502 W Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Bb - Bibb complex NWI classification:
Are climatic! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No= (If no. explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation l!I,III Soil .Il��i� or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes m No =,
Are Vegetation IJ Soil .LJ or HydrologYR naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No Is the Sampled Area rII��I �
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No KI within a Wetland? Yesa No1_1 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
WC-UP is located approximately 10' upslope of wetland WC, and is above the groundwater
seepage zone that maintains the wetland. Recent conditions have been sunny and dry, with no
rain recorded in the last 96 hours.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Primary
Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check
all that apply)
Surface Water (At)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
Mad Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (B76)
Water Marks (B7)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (CO
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
HSediment
Drift Deposits (&3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
AJgal Mat or Crust (84)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (132)
❑Iron
Deposits (B5)
I
lOther (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss IDS) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No _ ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No ✓ Depth (inches): > 18"
o
Saturation Present? Yes
No ✓ Depth (inches): > 18"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No z
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge. monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). if available:
Remarks:
No hydric indicators were observed within WC -UP. Due to the steep elevations adjacent to
wetlands WC and WD, this area is at a significantly higher elevation than the adjacent wetland.
This data point is representative of both WC -UP and WD -UP due to the wetland's similar
conditions and close proximity.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WC WD -UF
US Amy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
%Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
10% Y FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, a FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Daninant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 10% Y FAC
3. Acer rubmm 10% Y FAC
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AtB)
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total %Cover of Multiply by:
8
30% = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
15% 20 %of total cover: 6%
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FAC species x3=
1. Liquidambar stivraci$ta
5% Y FAC
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
2
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2- Dominance Testis >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5% = Total Cover
50 %oftdalcover.
2.5% 20 %oftotalcovec to /n
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must
1, none
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
3.
4,
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/ Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -AII herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
5
6.
7,
8.
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -AII woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
10.
11.
height.
12.
0% =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
0% 20% of total cover: 0%
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Campsis radicans
10% Y FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
�
2, Vitis rotundifolia 10% Y FAC
3, Smilax rolundifolia 10% Y FAC
4.
5.
300 /b = TdalCover
50% of total cover:
15% 20 %of total cover : 60 /a
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations
below).
The steep side slope uplands adjacent to WC and WD have an
established canopy and a thick
vine layer. Most of the slopes south of the wetlands are covered in debris and discarded
household trash that has apparently
been dumped from the housing developments at the top of
the hillslope.
US Amy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WC /WD -UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0 -6" 10YR 4/3 100
Fine sandy loam
6 -18" 10YR 5/3 100
Sandy loam
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Polyoalue Below Surface (58) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ® 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
(F1)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ® Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (1`8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Mad (1`10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (At 2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
i--�
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vedic (1`18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No -✓
Remarks:
No hydric soil indicators were observed within 18" and data point WC -UP. The soil profile
documented here is also representative of the soils found at WD -UP. This data form represents
both WC -UP and WD -UP due to the wetland's close proximity and similarity of conditions.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: EB -5539 - South Tar River Greenway City(County: Greenville, Pitt County
ApplicantlOwner: City Of Greenville State: NC
Investigator(s): B. Reed (KHA), J. Hartshorn (KHA) Section. Township. Range: Greenville
Sampling Date: 9/27/2012
Sampling Point: WC -WET
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Loral relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope ( %g <1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Let* 35.617599 N Long: 77.392502 W Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Bb - Bibb Complex NWI classification:
Are climatic / hyIdrrool�itlllc mnllllditio�ns�Ilo. on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No= (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation I� Soil J—J or Hydrology significantly significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes =✓ No =.
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ _ No Is the Sampled Area Imo. /�I III
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ _ No within a WetlandT Yesl ♦ 1 NO F
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ _ No
Remarks:
WC -WET is located at the foot of a large hillslope, and groundwater seepage is the primary
hydrologic influence. WC also receives floodwaters from stream SD. Conditions have been
sunny and dry, with no rain recorded in the last 96 hours.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Sewndary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Primary
Indicators Imimmum of one is required:
check
all that apply)
Surface Water (Ai)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓
High Water Table (A2)
Mad Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (61)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
✓
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (CB)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
✓
Geomorphic Position (132)
Shallow Aquitard (133)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Wafer- Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes.-
No
- ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
✓
No _ Depth (inches): 8"
✓
Saturation Present? Yes
No
_ Depth (inches): 6"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes. ♦ I No D,
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Soils were saturated at depths of 6 ", and the water table was observed at 8 ". Groundwater
seepage from the hillslopes south of the easement maintain wetland hydrology but over bank
flood flows from the Tar River
and stream SD also inundate this area.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W&WET
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet,
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
%Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Acer rubrum
50/0 Y FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
7
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 2% Y FAC
Ulmus 2% Y
3. rubra
FAC
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1000 /0 (A/B)
6.
?
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total %Cover of Multiply bw
8
OBL species x 1 =
90/0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
4.5% 20% of total cover: 1.8%
FACW species x2=
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FAC species x3=
1. none
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
?
Y 2- Dominance Testis >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
00/0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover.
0% 20% of total cover: n
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
1, Saururus cernuus
30% Y OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Impatiens capenvis
20% Y FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
3. Peltandra virginica 10% N OBL
4,
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplingtShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -AII herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
5
6_
7.
8.
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -AII woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
10.
11.
height.
12.
60% = Total Cover
50% of total cover.
30% 20% of total cover: 12%
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1, Campsis radicans
5% Y FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
2. Vile; rotundifolia 5% Y FAC
3.
4,
8.
10% =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
5% 20% of total cover: 2%
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations
below).
Wetland WC is sparsely vegetated,
but the dominant vegetation
is herbaceous. WC is inundated
when SD floods and when the Tar River floods, so it remains
saturated throughout the year. WC
is also located in a sewer easement.
Canopy species are present along the wetland fringe, but no
sapling or shrub species are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WC -WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) OA Type' Lcc Texture Remarks
0 -4" 10YR 3/1 100
Fine sandy loam
4 -10" 10YR 4/1 100
Fine sand
10 -18" 10YR 5/1 100
Fine sand
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosd (Al)
Pdyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ® 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Mad (1`10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A71)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iran- Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
✓
Umbric Surface (1`13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (1`17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (1`18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Sail Present? Yes —a No —a
Remarks:
The soils at WC -WET are saturated at 6 ". The water table was observed at 8 ". WD -WET is
located within a sewer easement, but frequent inundation and groundwater seepage from the
adjacent hillslope maintain wetland
hydrology throughout the year. The sand content in the
profile increases with depth.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Proiecl/Site: EB -5539 - South Tar River Greenway City /County: Greenville, Pitt County Sampling Date: 9/27/2012
Applicanvowner. City of Greenville state: NC Sampling Point: WD -WET
Investigator(s): B. Reed (KHA), J. Hartshorn (KHA) Section, Township, Range: Greenville
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope ( %): <1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Let: 35.618000 N Long; 77.397102 W Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Bb - Bibb complex NWI classification:
Are climatic! Ndrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 171 NoF_7 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes M No =-
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrolo9YE naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ _ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ _ No -/
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
✓ _ No within a Wetland? Yes Y No
Remarks:
WD -WET is located at the foot of a large hillslope, and groundwater seepage is the primary
hydrologic influence. WD is located in a maintained sewer easement. Conditions have been
sunny and dry, with no rain recorded in the last 96 hours.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Primary
Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
Surface Water (All
Aquatic Fauna (613)
✓
High Water Table (A2)
Mad Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (810)
✓
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
Moss Trim Lines (131 6)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
✓
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aeral Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
✓
Geomorphic Posfton (D2)
❑Iron
Deposits (85)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
EInundation
Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Wafer- Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes_ ✓ No I
Depth (inches): < 1
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No _
Depth (inches): 8"
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 6"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes IV] I No J�l
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Soils were saturated at depths of 6 ", and the water table was observed at 8 ". Low -lying areas
within WD had surface water pooled to depths less than 1 ". Groundwater seepage from the
hillslopes south of the easement maintain wetland hydrology (surface water observed during a
month of low rainfall), but over bank flood flows from the Tar River also inundate this area
seasonally.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WD-WET
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
4
1. none
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
4
2.
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
1000/0
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total %Cover of: Multioly by
8
OBL species x 1 =
0% = Total Cover
50% oftotal cover: 0% 20% of total cover: 00 /0
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
FAC species X3=
FACU species x 4 =
1. none
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophy is Vegetation
7
Y 2- Dominance Testis >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 553.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
0% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0% 20% of total cover: L%
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
1. Saururus cernuus 40% Y OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Persicaria aniphibia 20% Y OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
3. Peltandra virginica 20% Y OBL
Impatiens 10% N
q capensis FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. D B H and greater than 3.28 ft If m) tall.
Herb -AM herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
5. Caret sp. 5% N FAC
6.
7
8.
B.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody ulna -All woody vines greater than 3.28 fl in
10.
11.
height.
12.
95% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 47.5% 20% of total cover: 19%
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1, Canipsis radicans 20% Y FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
L
2.
3.
4.
5.
20% =Total Cover
50 %oftotalcmer: 10% 20 %oftoolcover: 4%
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Wetland WD is dominated by herbaceous vegetation. It is located at the foot of a significant
topographic slope rising to the south. WD is also located in a sewer easement. Significant
inundation from flooding of the Tar River prevents any canopy, sapling, or shrub species from
establishing in the wetland, and during dry months, groundwater seepage from the adjacent
hillslope maintains hydrology in the wetland.
US Amy Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Pant: WD -WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (mast) % Cola (mast) % Twe Loc` Texture Remarks
0 -4" 10YR 3/1 100 Fine sandy loam
4 -10" 10YR 4/1 100 Fine sand
10 -18" 10YR 5/1 100 Fine sand
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL-Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (At)
Payvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) e 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Mad (1`10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A71)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Praine Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
✓
Umbric Surface (1`13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrx (54)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer ([f observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Sol[ Present? Yes ILL No=
Remarks:
The soils at WD -WET are hydric, and the soils are saturated at 6 ". The water table was observed
at 8 ", and low -lying pockets within the wetland have surface water less than 1" deep. WD -WET
is located within a sewer easement, but frequent inundation and groundwater seepage from the
adjacent hillslope have left the soil profile clearly indicative of hydric soils. The sand content in
the profile increases with depth.
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: EB -5539 - South Tar River Greenway CityfCounty: Greenville, Pitt County Sampling Date: 10/08/2012
ApplicantlOwnec City Of Greenville State: NC Sampling Point: WE -UP
Investigator(s): B. Reed (KHA), 1. Hartshorn (KHA) Section, Township, Range: Greenville
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Let: 35.617199 N Long: 77390404 W Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Bb - Bibb Complex NWI classification:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions �lon the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No= (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil 1 t or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes M No=.
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ _ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No
Hydrology Indicators:
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yesa N071
✓
✓
The uplands associated with wetland WE are mostly developed or maintained /disturbed areas.
WE is bounded to the west and to the south by a steep hillslope and roadway corridor. No
recent rainfall has been recorded, but rain was beginning to fall at the time of observation.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Primary
Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check
all that apply)
Surface Water (At)
Aquatic Fauna (Bl3)
High Water Table (A2)
Mad Deposits (1375) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (810)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor CI)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B7)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (132)
❑
Iron Deposits (85)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(B7)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No ✓ Depth (inches): >24"
Saturation Present? Yes
No ✓ I Depth (inches): >24"
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes E] No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,
monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No indicators of wetland hydrology were observed at the data point
location or within 24" of the
surface. The area is a steep
side slope adjacent to developed roadway
corridors.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WE -UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Frarinus pennsvlvanica
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
20% Y FACW
Dominance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1000 (A/B)
2. Liguidambar.ctyraci / lua 15% Y FAC
3-
4.
5.
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total %Cover of: Multiply by
8
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species X2=
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x4=
UPL species X5=
Column Totals: (A) _ (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
35% = Total Cover
50% oftotal cover: 17.5% 20 -A of total cover: 7%
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Acer rubntm 5% Y FAC
2. Quercus phellos 5% Y FACW
3. Lioustrum sinense 5% Y FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 -Dominance Testis >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
7.
8.
15% = Total Cover
50 %oftotalcover. 7.5% 20 %oftotalcover. 3° /"
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. note
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -AM herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
Woody vine -Al woody vines greater than 3.28 it in
height.
3.
4,
5
6.
7.
B.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 Vitis rotundifolia
0% = Total Cover
0% 20% of total cover: 0%
5% Y FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes A No
2, Lonicergjaponica 5% Y FAC
3. Smilax rotundifolia 5% Y FAC
4.
5.
15% =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5% 20 %oftotalcover: 3%
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Canopy and vine cover are dense in the uplands adjacent to WE. This area is upslope of wetland
WE, approximately 34 higher in elevation than wetland WE.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WE -UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) 0/0 Type, Lee'
Texture Remarks
0 -3" 10YR 4/3 1000/0
Sandy loam
3 -16" 10YR 5/3 100%
Sandy loam
16 -24" 10YR 4/1 100%
Sandy loam
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Hlstosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Cloyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Mad (1`10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A71)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochre (1`17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (1`18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (SS)
Piedmont Floodplain Solis (1`19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes a No I v I
Remarks:
No indicators of hydric soil were observed within 24" of the soil
surface.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site : EB -5539 - South Tar River Greenway city1county: Greenville, Pitt County Sampling Date: 10/08/2012
ApplicantlOwner City of Greenville State: NC Sampling Point: WE -WET
Investigator(:): B. Reed (KHA), 1. Hartshorn (KHA) Section, Township, Range: Greenville
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex. none): Slope ( %):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Let: 35.617199 N Long: 77.390404 W Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Bb - Bibb complex NWI classification:
Are climatic I Vrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes = No= (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil Jll J or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are -Normal Circumstances' present? Yes = No =,
Are Vegetation Soil 1J or Hydrolo9YR naturally problematic? (If needed. explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area Imo. /�I
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ _ No within a Wetland? Yesl ♦ I No E]
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
WE -WET is located approximately 5' north of wetland flag WE12 and approximately 2' lower in
elevation than WE12. Rain was falling at the time of observation.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Primary
Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check
all that apply)
Surface Water (All
Aquatic Fauna (Bl3)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Mad Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1110)
Moss Trim Lines (816)
✓
Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
✓
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Deposits (112)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
✓
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
NAlgaSediment
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
l Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
✓
Geomorphic Position (02)
❑
Iron Deposits (85)
LJ
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
HInundation
Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
✓
No- Depth (inches): 14"
✓
Saturation Present? Yes _
No _ Depth (inches): 10"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes I I No o
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos. previous inspections). if available:
Remarks:
Saturation was present at 10" and the water table was observed at 14 ". Wetland WE is a
low -lying floodplain adjacent to the Tar River. There is a berm separating WE from the Tar River
within the project corridor, but west of the corridor, a large break in the berm allows flood flow to
enter WE. The concave depressional nature of the wetland prevents the flood flow from escaping
the wetland and WE remains inundated. Cypress knees throughout the wetland are 3 -4' tall.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WE -WET
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Nvssa sylvatica
Absolute
% Cover
30%
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Y FAC
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, a FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: $ (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 87.5%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
2. Taxodium distichum 25% Y OBL
1 rayinuS enns Iyanica 10 % N FACW
3. 0 Y
4. Liquidambarstyraci / lua 5% N FAC
5. Acer rubmin 5% N FAC
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total %Cover of Multiply by:
8
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
75 % = Total Cover
50 %oftotal cover: 37.5% 20 %oftotal cover: 15 %p
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Fracinus pennsylvanica 10% Y FACW
2. Liriodendron tulipifera 10% Y FACU
3, Acer rubrum 5% N FAC
4. Quercus phellos 5% N FAC
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
)( 2- Dominance Testis >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicatas of hydric soil and wetland hydrol ogy must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
7.
8.
30% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15% 20 %oftotalcover. 6%
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3D' )
1. Carex sp. 30% Y FAC
2.
Saurums cernuus
30%
Y
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -AII herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -AII woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
3. Boehmeria cWindrica 5% N OBL
4 Peltandra virginica 2% N I
5. Woodwardia areolata 2% N OBL
6.
7
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50 %oftotal cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 Vitis rotundifolia
69 % = Total Cover
34.5% 20° %of total cover: 13.8%
5% Y
FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes 2 No
2. Lonicerq/aponica 2% Y FAC
3.
4,
5,
7% =Total Cover
50° %oftotalcover. 3.5% 20 %oftotalcover: 1.4%
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Wetland WE has an established canopy dominated by black gum and cypress trees. The
herbaceous layer is diverse, and indicates that WE is inundated on a regular basis.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WE-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc
Texture Remarks
0 -4" 10YR 3/1 100%
Loam
4 -10" 10YR 4/1 100%
Clay loam
10 -16 +" 10YR 5/1 60% 10 YR 5/6 40% C M
Clay loam
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS-Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL-Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosd (A1)
Pdyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Eplpedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vedic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (Ti
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Mad (1`10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (1`13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (1`17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vedic (1`18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Sols (F19) (MLRA 149A)
ll�
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑-Ilj
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth
�
Hydric Sall Present? Yes No
(inches):
-ILL
Remarks:
Saturation is present at 10" and the water table was observed
at 16 ". The soils below 16" are too
saturated for analysis and removal.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region WF,WG,WH,W1,W3,wK -UP
Project/Site : EB -5539 - South Tar River Greenway City /County: Greenville, Pitt County Sampling Date: 10/08/2012
AppllcantlOwner: City of Greenville State: NC Sampling Point: WF-UP
Investigator(s): B. Reed (KHA), 1. Hartshorn (KHA) Section, Township, Range: Greenville
Landform (hillslope. terrace, etc.): Hlllslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope ( %): 3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Let: 35.617900 N Long: 77.386500 W Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: WaC - Wagram loamy sand NWI classification:
Are climatic I h drat is conllditio��ns Ilon the site typical for this time of year? Yes= No= (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil l� or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes M No =.
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ _ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ _ No _/
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
✓ _ No within a Wetland? Yes ♦ No
Remarks:
Wetlands WF through WK are low -lying wetlands located within the floodplain of the Tar River.
The wetlands are bounded on the southern side by a steep topographic break. The data point
was taken approximately 10' north of flag WF -6, and it was raining at the time of observation.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
✓
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (98)
P_ rimary
Indicators (minimum of one is required
check
all that apply)
✓
Surface Water (A1)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
✓
High Water Table (A2)
Mad Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
✓
Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
✓
Moss Trim Lines (B76)
Water Marks (B7)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
✓
Crayfish Burrows (CB)
✓
Drift Deposits (63)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
✓
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
eInundation
Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
✓
Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _
✓
No _ Depth (inches): 2"
Water Table Present? Yes
✓
No Depth (inches): 2-10"
✓
Saturation Present? Yes
N.IH Depth (inches): 0 -10"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes F.—/] /1 No
includes capillary hinge)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos. previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetlands WF through WK are located within the floodplain of the Tar River. Saturation and
surface water were found throughout the interior reaches of the wetlands. Due to these
wetlands' close proximity to the Tar River, and all of the wetlands being primarily influenced by
groundwater and flooding from the Tar River, one representative data form was completed for
the wetlands. While accounted for individually, the conditions, vegetative communities,
hydrology indicators, and soil profiles were mostly identical throughout the wetlands.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WF -UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Liquidambar styraeiflua
Absolute Dominant Indicator
%Cover Species? Status
15% Y FACU
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88'9% (A(B)
2. Taxodium distichum 15% Y OBL
3 Nyssa sylvatica 15% Y FAC
4. Acer rubrum 5% N FAC
5.
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by
8
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x4=
UPL species X5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
50% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25% 20 %oftotal cover: 10%
Saolinp /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Liquidambar styracif to 10% Y FALW
2. Acer rubrvm 10% Y FAC
3. Nvssa sylvatica 5% N FAC
4. Taxodimn distichum 5% N OBL
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2- Dominance Testis >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrol ogy must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
?.
30% = Total Cover
50% of total cover 1$% 20% of total cover: 60/n
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Impatiens capensis 15% Y FAC
2. Sonrurus cermms
15% Y OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody platys, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -AII herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
3. Boehmeria cvlindrica 5% N OBL
4. Peltandra virginica 5% N OBL
5
6.
7.
6.
9,
10.
11.
12.
50 %oftotalcover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1 Vitis ronindifolia
40% =Total Coder
20% 20 %oflotalcover. 8%
)
5% Y FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes L No
2. Lonicerajaponica 2% Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
7% =Total Cover
50 %oftotalcover: 3.5% 20 %oftotalcover: 1.4%
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Wetlands WF through WK are low -lying cypress -gum swamp vegetative communities. The higher
elevation wetlands have more herbaceous vegetation (wetlands WF and WH) and are primarily
dominated by jewelweed and lizards tail. Canopy coverage remains unchanged at these higher
elevations, sweet gum, cypress, and black gum dominate the canopy.
US Amy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: wF -UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type, Loc Texture Remarks
0 -4" 10YR 3/1 100% loam
4 -10" 10YR 4/1 100% clay loam
10 -16"+ 10YR 5/1 60% 10 YR 5/6 40% C M clay loam
'Type: C- Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all Li
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosd (Al)
Polydalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 151
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrx (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
✓
Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1518)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Mad (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
Depleted Ochhc (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 151
✓
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrx (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Sols (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
(inches):
_a
Remarks:
Saturation occurs in all of the wetlands within 10" of the surface. Through much of the wetland
area, saturation is present at the surface. The water table was observed between 2" and 10"
below the surface. The soils below 16" are too saturated for analysis and removal. The wetlands
receive hydrologic input throughout the year from groundwater, as well as from flooding from the
Tar River.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region WF WG,WH,WI,W3,WK -WET
ProjectiSite: EB -5539 - South Tar River Greenway City /County: Greenville, Pitt County Sampling Date: 10/08/2012
Applicant/Owner: City of Greenville State: NC Sampling Point: WF-WET-
Investigators): B. Reed (KHA), J. Hartshorn (KHA) Section, Township, Range: Greenville
Landform (hiilslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplaln Local relief (concave, convex, none): COncaVe Slope ( %J. < to /p
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Let: 35.617900 N Long: 77.386500 W Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: WaC - Wagram loamy sand NWI classification:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No= (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation " Soil 1� or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are °Normal Circumstances° present? Yes = No =.
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 4.11 _ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No _/
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
_ No withina Wetland? Yes ♦ No
Remarks:
Wetlands WF through WK are low -lying wetlands located within the floodplain of the Tar River.
The wetlands are bounded on the southern side by a steep topographic break. The data point
was taken approximately 10' north of flag WF -6, and it was raining at the time of observation.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two required)
✓
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Primary
Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
✓
Surface Water (At)
Aquatic Fauna (B 13)
"I
High Water Table (A2)
Mad Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
✓
Drainage Patterns (810)
✓
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
✓
Moss Trim Lines (Bl6)
Water Marks (81)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (83)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
✓
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
NAlgal
Mat or Crust (64)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
✓
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (85)
LJ
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
eInundation
Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
FAC- Neutral Test (05)
✓
Wafer- Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ILL No
Depth (inches): 2"
Water Table Present? Yes _✓ No_
Depth(inches): 2-10"
II
Saturation Present? Yes _ ✓ No _
Depth (inches): 0 -10"
I
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes t ♦ I No J]
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). if available:
Remarks:
Wetlands WF through WK are located within the floodplain of the Tar River. Saturation and
surface water were found throughout the interior reaches of the wetlands. Due to these
wetlands all being located in close proximity to the Tar River, and all of the wetlands being
primarily influenced by groundwater and flooding from the Tar River, one representative data
form was completed for the wetlands. While accounted for individually, the vegetative
communities, hydrology indicators, and soil profiles were mostly identical throughout the
wetlands.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WF-WEr
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
8
1. Liquidambar stvraciilua
15% Y FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
2. Taxodium distichum 15% Y OBL
3, Nyssa SyIvatiea 15% Y FAC
4, Acer rubrum 5% N FAC
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8890/0 (A/B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of Multiply by
8
OBL species x 1 =
50% = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
25% 20% of total cover: 10%
FACW species x2=
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: X
)
FAC species X3=
1. Liquidambar styracinua
10% Y FACW
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2. Acer rubtmm 10% Y FAC
3. Nyssa sylvatiea 5% N FAC
4. Taxodium distichum 5% N OBL
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
?
X 2 -Dominance Testis >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
30% = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
15% 20% of total cover: 60/
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. Impatiens capensis
15% Y FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Saururus cernuus
15% Y OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
3, Boehmeria cylindrica 5% N OBL
Peltandra 5% N
4. virginica
OBL
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplingtShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -AII herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
5
6.
7.
8.
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -AII woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
10.
11.
height.
12.
40% =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% 20% of total cover: 8%
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 Vilis rotundijolia
5% Y FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ./
2. Lonicerajaponica 2% Y FAC
3.
4.
5.
7% =Total Cover
50 %oftotalcover:
3.50/0 20% of total cover: 1.4%
Present? Yes • No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations
below).
Wetlands WF through WK are low -lying
cypress -gum swamp
vegetative communities. The higher
elevation wetlands have more herbaceous vegetation (wetlands WF and WH) and are primarily
dominated by jewelweed and lizards tail. Canopy coverage remains unchanged at these higher
elevations, sweet gum, cypress, and black gum dominate the
canopy.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: wF-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Cola (moist) -A Typal Loc Texture Remarks
0 -4" 10YR 3/1 100% loam
4 -10" 10YR 4/1 100% clay loam
10 -16 "+ 10YR 5/1 60% 10 YR 5/6 40% C M clay loam
'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosd (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Fyipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F7) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
✓
Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (AB) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 15]11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Mad (1`10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
Depleted Ochnc (Fl 1) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (A72)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
✓
Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
---III
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
III
�I
Sandy Gleyed Matrx (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redcx (S5)
Piedmont Floodplein Sals (F19) (MLRA 149A)
III
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑I{�
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _✓ No=
Remarks:
Saturation occurs in all of the wetlands within 10" of the surface. Through much of the wetland
area, saturation is present at the surface. The water table was observed between 2" and 10"
below the surface. The soils below 16" are too saturated for analysis and removal. The wetlands
receive hydrologic input throughout the year from groundwater, as well as from flooding from the
Tar River.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

NCDWR BUFFER
DETERMINATION
1I1-I IM_ of od

KM��
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory
Governor
Kimley -Horn & Associates, Inc.
Ms. Beth Reed, PWS
Post Office Box 33068
Raleigh, NC 27636
Charles Wakild, P.E.
Director
January 29, 2013
Natural Resources
Subject Property: South Tar River Greenway Project
Tar - Pamlico River Basin, Tar River [TAR 05, 28 -(94); C, NSW]
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
DWQ # 12 -1055
Pitt County
On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Tar - Pamlico River Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A
NCAC 2B.0259)
Dear Ms. Reed:
On January 28, 2013 at your request, Roberto Scheller of this Office conducted an on -site determination to
review a drainage feature located on the subject property for applicability to the Tar - Pamlico Buffer Rules (15A
NCAC 2B .0259). The features reviewed are labeled as "SA, SB, SC, SD, and SE" on the attached maps and
initialed by me on January 28, 2013.
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the features labeled as "SA, SB, SC, SD" on
the attached maps, and highlighted in red are not subject to the Tar Pamlico Buffer Rules. It has been
determined that the stream features, are not represented on the NRCS Pitt County Soils map or the USGS
Topographic map and therefore riparian buffers are not applicable to these features.
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the feature labeled as "SE" on the attached
maps, and highlighted in blue is subject to the Tar Pamlico Buffer Rules. It has been determined that the
upstream features of this drainage have been piped underground. The riparian buffers begin at the pipe outlet,
located in a wooded area north of West P Street (N 35° 37' 02.61" W 77° 23' 29.39 "), and continues down
gradient into the Tar River as shown on the attached maps.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the
buffers, Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. If you have any additional questions or require
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Phone: 252 - 94684811 FAX: [phone]
Internet v.ncvvaletquality.orq
An Equal Opportunity 1 Atfrrni Action Employer
North Carolina
Naturally

\ \-
.
. . .C}
\2 R -M
k
d`\
Niv,
15/
\
% : \--�'
»
K
§I
,a1
\ice
a [�
�
�;
2• �.
,?
�
o
y\
}
\
% : \--�'
»
K
§I
,a1
\ice
a [�
�

� Y
s
\ ? �_ -.r- �- — — Ewa err. _ •.. �--•�
,
SB
SA fi SD
SE �--
'�_ N 35 3T 02.61. _ II '�I�' I 11
-- 1 _.L_
13 �.- wn23•ss.3s^ W t
w •. �TN � .:
chapel fr y -
vt it i8 9 71 �
. .. /'� , � ✓t it _ � •x'-:._... � �I
FLEMING �l ��•
- i Phil[ p CFi- \ti
`f i! FARMV;LL_ j` '�`LV f
` I1 �' j` i \\ 13-%8 '
`•. ' "do - / __.yi 1 t0 1,.,,. \ N35 W. 15.52'
_��. _,L. 77 2T 21.5T 4
L _Ban Stiffer
_.1.
Location: 0350 3T 04.45" N 077° 23' 41.84" W
3 Caption: South Tar River Greenway, Greenville, Pitt Co.
113
it Y
M•
-
�. r. .� ...-
.p. 1. a7��
rr \
-46-sue/
Alit-
� Y
s
\ ? �_ -.r- �- — — Ewa err. _ •.. �--•�
,
SB
SA fi SD
SE �--
'�_ N 35 3T 02.61. _ II '�I�' I 11
-- 1 _.L_
13 �.- wn23•ss.3s^ W t
w •. �TN � .:
chapel fr y -
vt it i8 9 71 �
. .. /'� , � ✓t it _ � •x'-:._... � �I
FLEMING �l ��•
- i Phil[ p CFi- \ti
`f i! FARMV;LL_ j` '�`LV f
` I1 �' j` i \\ 13-%8 '
`•. ' "do - / __.yi 1 t0 1,.,,. \ N35 W. 15.52'
_��. _,L. 77 2T 21.5T 4
L _Ban Stiffer
_.1.
Location: 0350 3T 04.45" N 077° 23' 41.84" W
3 Caption: South Tar River Greenway, Greenville, Pitt Co.
113
it Y

USACE PRELIMINARY
JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW 2013 -00063 County: Pitt U.S.G.S. Quad: Greenville SW
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Citv of Greenville
attn: Mr. Lynn Raynor
Address: 1500 Beatty Street
Greenville, North Carolina 27834
252- 329 -4620
��p
Agent: Kimlev -Horn and Associates. Inc.
aftn: Ms. Beth Reed
Address: Post Office Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3068
919- 677 -2000
Property description: The proposed nroiect area is adiacent to or within an existing sewer line easement.
Size (acres) approx. 27 acres Nearest Town Greenville
Nearest Waterway Tar River River Basin Tar
USGS HUC 03020103 Coordinates 35.617920 N - 77.395209 W
Location description: The project is identified as EB -5539 (South Tar River Greenwav, Phase 3) and is a 10 -foot
wide, 1.4 mile long multi -use greenwav /bike path from the western terminus of the existing South Tar River Greenwav
at Pitt Street (SR 1611) to Move Boulevard near West 5a' Street.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X Based on preliminary information, there may be waters of the U.S. including wetlandson the above described project area.
We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA)
jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33
CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district
for further instruction. Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the
JD.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on _. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
Page 1 of 2

published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808 -2808 to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact William Wescott at910- 251 4629.
C. Basis For Determination Wetland areas exhibit the three parameters specified in the Regional Supplement of
the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation Manual.
D. Remarks
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you oryour tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room IOM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Divi ton Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence. ** 1 %l _
Corps Regulatory Official: �) sly,
��
Date: 1/10/2013 Expiration Date: 1/10/2018
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit httD: / /Uer2.nwt3.usace.aimy.mil /survey.html to
complete the survey online.
Copy furnished

I"'s,
NOTIFICATION OFe1IJMINISTRAPIVE APPEAL OPTIO
I
OCR 'P'�,#t =u
A licant: Citv of Greenville, attu: Lynn Raynor File Number: SAW 2013 -00063
Date: 1/10/2013
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
I
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I The'followtngadentifies yo q rights and'optmnns regard ngg an— ,admwstrahve`appeal of the above decision' '
Additional mformahon ma -b: found at htto:7 /www usace army mil /uietlfunchons/ w c cwo /re¢ or
1.
Corp s re latior Brat 33 CFR'Part -331 1 x ;� t' .
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable.
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
4TION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
If you wish, you may request an approved JD (wl
Also you may provide new information for furthe
egarding the
ch may be appealed),
consideration by the
^,wX A
f ?�v r.r l.r.. _.
SECTION41'!RE UESTW,FOR'APP,EAL dr;OBJECTIONSyTO`AN�INITIAL PROFFERED.PERMIT: _'a. 5
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: "Ifhe appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum Yor the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Attn: William Wescott
2407 West 5`s Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
910- 2514629
ION: : _.:� :4�;'. �' ,_. -:.,. •;_ _ V-
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD -PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room I OM IS
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
or
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: _, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD -PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone].

PROGRAMMATIC
CATEGORICAL
EXCLUSION APPROVAL

CF.
NCDO'1' PROORAMhdA':'IC CATGOORI(: 4I_ LXChll IIOs(PCF.j
A )N C[•ASS IFICAIS)N PUR,)vI
PCh. Aviwoyal
TIP Project No Lii -5539
W33S) ?lement .15529
Fcdctal -Aid Project No. i_Y -'.SP- 0220(64 - ._.._.__.
)..__--
PCpject�)esm ipgr,n:
The South Tar Rivet (;recnway (Phase 3) proiect proposes to ennstnict a multi -use bicycle
and litth -mi an grecnwey for appiaximately 15 miles to commit vstiag grecnways and
sidewalk fncilitir:,. This phase of the South far River Oremway, is planned to be a I O -fu.tt
Paved patltaadlw hoatdwalk path frorn Moye Aoulmid to Put Sheet All phase, of the
South Tar River (h cebw'ay are (or will be once constructed) o%ned end ❑,,untamed by (tic
City of Clreocvillc. The proposed corridor is shown in Figures 1, 2, and J PSotus along
the existing run irlor are shown in Figure 4
CategonC.al Exclusion Action C'lassidi=(jn
_
PYPE l(A) NO DOXFS Chccked
X i'YPIi 1(13) ANY BOX is Checked
Prepared !! ,
10.Ib.13 JeftiaW,Moore, P.C., Vice Piesideut
Date Knnley -Horn amt AssoclatC.s, —Inc —
(919) 6'7-21 /5, License Nu. 24436
Prepared For; / J!,/_�y
Ct of(irea villc, N�tf�atohna — —
Reviewed: //
D e Project llevelopment 8c P:n l roentatAnalysts Unit
North Carolina Department of "I'ransportatlon
Approved By;
IJ to asston Adwmishator � - -- ---
Federal Highway Adinmistratioh