20061503 Ver 1_More Info Received_20061001

Subject: [Fwd: Bayberry Farms at the Preserve - 401 Certification]
From: Joanne Steenhuis <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, O1 Oct 2007 11:29:54 -0400
To: Bev Strickland <[e-mail]>
Project #2006 1503 ver2 addition info
Subject: Bayberry Farms at the Preserve - 401 Certification
From: "Jeff Coward" <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:25:52 -0400
To: "Joanne Steenhuis" <[e-mail]>
Joanne, as was suspected, the impact calculations for U3 and U4 were reversed. I am attaching a copy of the revised
impact table provided to me by the design engineers. Per your request, I am also attaching pages eight and nine of the
PCN form. The pages have been changed to reflect the impacts listed on the table. Thanks for all your help. Give me a
call if you have any questions.
Jeff
Jeffrey 2: Coward
Natural Resource Specialist
Dial Cordy & Associates
201 North Front Street -Suite 601
Wilmington, NC 28401
Ph [phone]
Fax [phone]
Content-Type: message/rfc822
!Bayberry Farms at the Preserve - 401 Certification'.
Content-Encoding: 7bit
_ _
20070928rvsdImpacts.pdf Content-Type: application/pdf
Content-Encoding: base64
__
BayberryPCNrvsdPgs8and9.doc Content-Type: application/msword
Content-Encoding: base64
__ __ _ __

ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC.
zuzv7v.trigorrcag. corm
--_
700 E31ue Ridge Road, Suite 101 • Raleigh, NC 27606 • p 919.755.5011 • f919.755.1414
July 23, 2007
Revised: September 28, 2007
SUB.IEC'[': \>/ctland Impacts
PROJECT: 1:3atyherry I'annsi~t'1'he Preservr
COMPUTED BY: .lohn F. Oglesby
CIIECKED 13Y: P.R4.G
BAYBERRY FARMS AT THE PRESERVE
WETLAND IMPACTS
"Rl" Road A 866 sf Bridge (2 Span)
~~R2" Road E 0 sf Bridge (1 Span)
"R3" Road G 3,432 sf Fill
"R4" Road H Road will not cross / No impacts
"Rg" Road F 5,415 sf Bridge (1 Span)
"R6" Road A 370 sf Bridge
"R7" Road K 922 sf Bridge
"UI" Road A 4,346 sf
~'U2" Road A 1,285 sf
"U3" Road A 3,597 sf
"U4" Road K 271 sf
TOTAL 20,504 square feet = .0471 Ac

1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: To utilize upland areas
on the site. roads are proposed to impact wetlands in nine places. Total
wetland impacts equa10.471 acres.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not
limited to mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding,
ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure
and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
R-1 Road crossing Pocosin/pine flatwoods No Appr. 1 mile 0.020
R-3 Road crossing Pocosin/pine flatwoods No Appr. 1 mile 0.079
R-5 Road crossing Pocosin/pine flatwoods No Appr. 1 mile 0.125
R-6 Road crossing Pocosin/pine flatwoods No Appr. 1 mile 0.008
R-7 Road crossing Pocosin/pine flatwoods No Appr. 1 mile 0.021
U-1 Road crossing Pocosin/pine flatwoods No Appr. 1 mile 0.100
U-2 Road crossing Pocosin/pine flatwoods No Appr. 1 mile 0.029
U-3 Road crossing Pocosin/pine flatwoods No Appr. 1 mile 0.083
U-4 Road crossing Pocosin/pine flatwoods No Appr. 1 mile 0.006
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.471
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property;
218.59 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to
identify temporary impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to
placement of fill or culverts, dam construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization
activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib walls, gabions, etc.), excavation,
ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles
showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be
included. To calculate acreage. multiply length X wirlth_ then rlivirle by 4~ Shy
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage)

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries,
sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts
include, but are not limited to fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage,
bulkheads. etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
4. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the nroiect:
Stream Im act (acres): N/A
Wetland Im act (acres): 0.471
O en Water Im act (acres): N/A
Total Im act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.471
Total Stream Im act (linear feet): N/A
5. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland
or stream) and the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please
note that this section only applies to waters that have specifically been
determined to be isolated by the USACE.
6. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts
should be included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also,
the proposed pond should be described here and illustrated on any maps
included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ®uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation,
installation of draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic,
trout pond, local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: woodland
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface
area: N/A
I. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)

Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be
useful to provide information related to site constraints such as topography,
building ordinances, accessibility, and financial viability of the project. The
applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact site layouts, and
explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss
construction techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The applicant and design professionals have worked hard to limit wetland impacts
and still achieve the purpose of the project. The current design has excluded
portions of upland from proposed development, thereby substantially reducing_the
footprint of wetland impacts associated with roadway crossings. Additionally
bridges will be used at proposed roadway crossings to minimize the construction
footprint. Drawings of the bridges are included with this application illustrate the
construction design.