20141294 Ver 1_Application_20141217

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name Orr Road Extension
2. Name of Property Owner /Applicant: City of Charlotte
3. Name of Consultant /Agent: Mr. Isaac Hinson PWS
*Agent authorization needs to be attached.
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): N A----- -.._.. 2® 1 4 1 2 9 4
5. Site Address: southwest of intersection of Austin Drive and N. Tryon Street in Charlotte, NC
6. Subdivision Name: N/A
7. City: Charlotte
8. County: Mecklenburg
9. Lat: N35.266899° Long: W80.770590 (Decimal Degrees Please)
10. Quadrangle Name: Derita, NC, dated 1996
11. Waterway: UT to Sugar Creek
12. Watershed: Santee (HU# 03050103)
13. Requested Action:
X Nationwide Permit # 14 REDEC F U ! °1 T n
General Permit #
1 7 204
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre - Application Request DENR - WATER RESOURCES
AflA 9 CI I=r=P DFRRAITTINIM
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site /Waters Name:
Keywords:

CWS
CCarolina Wetland Services
December 16, 2014
550 E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28273
866 - 527 -1177 (office)
704 - 527 -1133 (fax)
Ms. Crystal Amschler
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street, 9h Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Pre - Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 14
and Water Quality Certification No. 3886
Orr Road Extension Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
Carolina Wetland Services Project No. 2014 - 3280:2
USACE Action Id. 2014 -00280
Dear Ms. Higgins and Ms. Amschler:
The Orr Road Extension project area is located west of the intersection of Orr Road and North Tryon
Street in Charlotte, North Carolina (Figure 1, attached). The purpose of this project is to alleviate
traffic congestion and to provide a direct connection from the Hidden Valley neighborhood to North
Tryon Street. The City of Charlotte (City) has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to
provide Section 404/401 permitting services for this project.
Applicant Name: City of Charlotte, Isaac J. Hinson, PWS
Mailing Address: 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
Phone Number of Owner /Applicant: 704 - 336 -4495
Street Address of Project: southwest of the intersection of Austin Road and North Tryon Street in
Charlotte, NC
Waterway: UT to Sugar creek
Basin: Santee (HU# 03050103)
City: Charlotte
County: Mecklenburg
Tax Parcel ID numbers: 08921226, 8921219 to 8921225, 8920125, 8920301, 8920302
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: N35.266899 °, W80.77059°
USGS Quadrangle Name: Derita quadrangle, North Carolina, dated 1996
Current Land Use
The site consists of wooded areas and single family residences with maintained areas. Typical on -site
vegetation includes red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciva), southern magnolia
(Magnolia grandiora), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), willow oak (Quercus phellos), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), English ivy (Hedera helix), and
sawtooth blackberry (Rubus argutus).
NORTH CAROLINA . SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS- INC.NET

Orr Road Extension Project December 16, 2014
Nationwide Permit No. 14 and WOC No. 3886 CWS Project No. 2014- 3280:2
According to the Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County' (Figures 2 and 3, NRCS Current and Historic
Soil Survey Maps, attached), on -site soils consist of Cecil- Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes
(CuB), Helena sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes (HeB), and Urban land (Ur). On -Site Cecil -Urban
land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes (CuB) is a well- drained soil and, Helena sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes (HeB) is a moderately well drained soil. On -Site Helena sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
(HeB) is listed as hydric on the North Carolina Hydric Soils List for Mecklenburg County and as
having hydric inclusions on the National Hydric Soils List (hydric criteria, 2B3).3
Jurisdictional Delineation
On January 22, 2014, CWS scientists Thomas Blackwell, Professional Wetland Scientist (PWS) and
Gregg Antemann, PWS delineated (flagged in the field) jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including
wetlands within the project area. An approved Preliminary Jurisdiction Determination was issued on
October 2, 2014 (attached, action I.D.: 2014- 00280).
This delineation was conducted according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) Routine
On -Site Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manua14, the 2007 USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebooks,
with further technical guidance from the Eastern Mountains & Piedmont Regional Supplement6, dated
April 2012.
Jurisdictional stream channels were classified according to recent USACE and North Carolina
Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) guidance. These classifications included sampling with a D-
shaped dip net, taking photographs, and defining approximate breakpoints (location at which a channel
changes classification) within each on -site stream channel
The results of the wetland delineation conducted by CWS indicate that there are two jurisdictional stream
channels (Streams A and B) and one jurisdictional wetland area (Wetland AA) located within the project
area (Figure 4, attached). On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. include unnamed tributaries (UT) to
Sugar Creek. Sugar Creek is a part of the Santee River basin (HU# 03050103)7. Sugar Creek is classified
as "Class C Waters" by the NCDWR. According to the NCDWR, Class C Waters are defined as: "Waters
protected for uses such as secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic life including
propagation, survival and maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture." On -Site jurisdictional
waters of the U.S. total approximately 0.90 acres. On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are summarized
in Table 1, next page.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2013. Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999. North Carolina Hydric Soils List, USDA -NRCS
North Carolina State Office, Raleigh
'United States Department of Agriculture —Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2012. 2012 National Hydric Soils List by State
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual ", Technical Report Y -87 -1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
s USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook. 2007. USACE Regulatory National Standard Operating Procedures for
conducting an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) and documenting practices to support an approved JD. USACE Headquarters,
Washington, DC.
e US Army Corps of Engineers, April 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern
Mountains and Piedmont Region. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
"HU #" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. U.S. Geological Survey, 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina.
2

Orr Road Extension Project December 16, 2014
Nationwide Permit No. 14 and WQC No. 3886 CWS Project No. 2014 - 3280:2
Table 1. Summary of On -Site Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on November 17, 2014 to
determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would
be affected by the project. In a response letter, dated November 25, 2014, SHPO stated that they are
"aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project ". CWS also consulted the
SHPO online GIS service9 and the Charlotte Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission10 database
and found no sites of architectural, historical, or archaeological significance within the project limits.
Protected Species
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program ( NCNHP) on November 17,
2014 to determine the presence of any federally - listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or
critical habitat located within the project area. In a response letter, dated December 2, 2014, NCNHP
stated that "The NCNHP database does not show any records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project area ". CWS
also reviewed the NCNHP elemental occurrence GIS layer. Based on this review, there are no current
elemental occurrences within a mile of the project site.
Purpose and Need for the Project
The project is necessary to provide a direct connection from the Hidden Valley neighborhood to North
Tryon Street (Figure 5). This is a large residential community that is in need of additional signalized
intersections with the surrounding major streets. The project will help alleviate traffic congestion at
s Classifications of streams include Traditionally Navigable Waters (TNWs), Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs), and Non - Relatively
Permanent Waters (Non- RPWs). Subcategories of RPWs include perennial streams that typically have year -round flow, and seasonal streams
that have continuous flow at least seasonally. Two classifications of jurisdictional wetlands are used to describe proximity and connection to
TNWs. These classifications include either adjacent or directly abutting. Adjacent wetlands are defined as wetlands within floodplains or in
close proximity to a TN W but without a direct visible connection. Abutting wetlands have a direct surface water connection traceable to a
TNW.
9 http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb /. Accessed November 17, 2014.
Jurisdiction
Stream
NCDWR
USACE
Approx.
Jurisdictional
Classification
Stream
Stream
Quality
Length
Approx
Acreage
USACE /EPA
Feature
Rapanos
Intermittent/
Point
Classification
Assessment
Linear
(ac.)
Classification$
Perennial
(SCP)
Score
Score
Feet (If)
Perennial
Perennial
SCP 1
33
51
2261f
0.02 ac.
Stream A
RPW
Seasonal RPW
Intermittent
SCP2
23
33
2931f
0.02 ac.
Stream B
Seasonal RPW
Intermittent
SCP3
19.5
26
1381f
0.01 ac.
Stream Total:
6571f
0.05 ac.
Approx
Jurisdictional
USACE/EPA Rapanos
Data Point (DP)
Acreage
Feature
Classification
ac.
Wetland AA
Directly Abutting RPW
DPI
0.89 ac.
Wetland Total:
0.89 ac.
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on November 17, 2014 to
determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would
be affected by the project. In a response letter, dated November 25, 2014, SHPO stated that they are
"aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project ". CWS also consulted the
SHPO online GIS service9 and the Charlotte Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission10 database
and found no sites of architectural, historical, or archaeological significance within the project limits.
Protected Species
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program ( NCNHP) on November 17,
2014 to determine the presence of any federally - listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or
critical habitat located within the project area. In a response letter, dated December 2, 2014, NCNHP
stated that "The NCNHP database does not show any records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project area ". CWS
also reviewed the NCNHP elemental occurrence GIS layer. Based on this review, there are no current
elemental occurrences within a mile of the project site.
Purpose and Need for the Project
The project is necessary to provide a direct connection from the Hidden Valley neighborhood to North
Tryon Street (Figure 5). This is a large residential community that is in need of additional signalized
intersections with the surrounding major streets. The project will help alleviate traffic congestion at
s Classifications of streams include Traditionally Navigable Waters (TNWs), Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs), and Non - Relatively
Permanent Waters (Non- RPWs). Subcategories of RPWs include perennial streams that typically have year -round flow, and seasonal streams
that have continuous flow at least seasonally. Two classifications of jurisdictional wetlands are used to describe proximity and connection to
TNWs. These classifications include either adjacent or directly abutting. Adjacent wetlands are defined as wetlands within floodplains or in
close proximity to a TN W but without a direct visible connection. Abutting wetlands have a direct surface water connection traceable to a
TNW.
9 http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb /. Accessed November 17, 2014.

Orr Road Extension Project December 16, 2014
Nationwide Permit No. 14 and WOC No. 3886 CWS Project No. 2014- 3280:2
Please do not hesitate to contact Isaac Hinson at 704 - 336 -4495 or ihinson @charlottenc.gov should you
have any questions or comments regarding these findings.
Isaac J. Hinson, PWS Gregg Anteman, PWS
Water Quality Program Specialist Professional Wetland Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
Figure 2. Current USDA -NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
Figure 3. Historic USDA -NRCS Mecklenburg County Soil Survey
Figure 4. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map
Figure 5. Proposed Impacts — Plan Overview
Figure 6. Proposed Impacts — Plan View & Profile
Pre - Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 14
Approved Preliminary JD
Agency Correspondence
Photo page (A -D)
NCEEP Approval Letter
Complete Plan Set
cc: File

l 4F
r
r, .r' „..
1 -85
' ... }. 1 }Fr +4 r� }.II li 1 r. i. ii• .. � i
1 'J
• I iii. Ly 7i n H
fcwr
r, iL
ry i
tiyJdon f all +• }` y
” u _ Orr Road ,
Now
N. Tryon Street j +'
uj
I �r� � "' I� ;`!.,.. : �'• s i �'h .rtankrr ��ti�i � "�._� -, � r,b
ANN
h �7 ;4s, r' f , ; ;.., t + Legend l!
,��' `�`d c:s.�' •.• 1 �7: Approximate Project Limits
REFERENCE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SERIES, DERITA, DATED 1996. 2,��0 1,000 0 2,000 Feet i
r.I.
FIGUnNO. USGS Site Location Map �� SCALE: 111 2,000' DATE: 12 -12 -14
1 I %WS CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY
Orr Road Extension I / 2014 -3280 AVH
Charlotte North Carolina Camilna
\ J �. w0b,d5 -1-
APPLICANT NO : CHECKED BY:
CWS Project No. 2014 -3280 WWW.CWS- INC.NET GCA

q(/ST�N Wetland AA
— approx 0.89 acre
Perennial RPW Stream A
- approx. 226 If
Legend
Approximate Project Limits
Streams
—••• —• Intermittent
Perennial
Wetlands
Parcels
Roads
- Buildings
ASCP Stream Classification Point
• DP Data Point
Photo Location and Direction
Intermittent RPW Stream A
approx 293 If
i
i
CtiJ
Intermittent RPW Stream B
approx. 138 If
< l
\ \ C�
NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED AND CLASSIFIED BY CWS, INC. ,�Qy
ON JANUARY 22, 2014. BOUNDARIES WERE SURVEYED BY CITY OF CHARLOTTE.
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE. 100 50 0 100 Feet
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND GIs LAYERS PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIs DEPARTMENT,
DATED 2007. STREAM AND WETLAND LAYERS GENERATED BY CWS, INC., DATED JANUARY 2014.
FIGURE NO. Approximate Jurisdictional I SCALE: 1 n : 100' DATE: 12-12-14
Boundary
Ch Ma i l I CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: AVH
4 Orr Road Extension J CWS 2014-3280
Charlotte, North Carolina Czmuna WdbA Services APPLICANT NO: CHECKED BY:
CWS Project No. 2014 -3280 WWW.CWS- INC.NET GCA

INDEX OF SHEETS
Cover Sheet .......................................................... ............................... 1
General Notes and Details .................................. ...........................2 -2B
Storm Drainage Summary & De tails ............ ............................... 3 -3A
Plan& Profile ................................................... ............................... 4 -5
Traffic Control Plans ................................... ............................... TCPI
Pavement Marking & Signing Plan ............. ............................... PMl
Erosion Control ............................................ ........................ECI -EC2
UtilityRelocation .............................................. ...........................UBOI
CrossSections .................................................. .........................XI -XII
TOTAL SHEETS 24
cCTA
(ALM"TIM
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
Proposed Impacts - Plan Overview
PE SEAL
PRELIMINARY
Do Not Use For Construction
Record Drawings
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 88
ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL
.DISTANCES. DATE RANGE OF SURVEY:00 100 /0000 TO 00 /00 /0000.
PLANS PREPARED BY:
155:5� 600 East Fourth Street
BU4 "NG Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Phone: [phone]
FOR CHARLOTTE Fax: [phone]
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
PLANNING & DESIGN GROUP
PROJECT LENGTH = 0.17 MILES
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
GRAPHIC SCALES
20 40 60
Plan View .................
20 40 60
Hors. Profile ............
4 >� 12
Vert. Profile .............
s5 10 15
Cross Section ...........
Construction Administration
Landscape Management
Engineering Services
Utility Coordinator
CDOT - Design
CDOT - Implementation
CMU
Planning
Storm Water Services
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
ProposedProperty Line .... ..............................— — — —
— — —
Existing Property Line .... ...............................
Maintained as R/W Line . ...............................
-
Existing Structures .......... ............................... .-°----------------------
Railroad Tracks ............... ...............................
Proposed Edge of Pavement ..........................
Fe nce ................................. ............................... ,
SlopeStake Line .............. ............................... c
Temporary Construction Easement ............. e
e
Sidewalk /Utility Easement ............................
StormDrainage Easement ............................ ME
Soe
Existing Gas Line ............ ............................... G
G
Existing Water Line ........ ............................... w
w
Existing Sanitary Sewer . ............................... SS
Ss
Existing Underground Telecommunications
Existing Underground Electric .....................
Existing Storm Drainage ............................... ----- --
-_ --
Proposed Storm Drainage .............................
Existing Tree ............................................................ ...............................
Existing Water Meter .............................................. ...............................
wu
❑
ExistingWater Valve .............................................. ...............................
w
Pa
ExistingGas Valve .................................................. ...............................
GV
oa
Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole ........................... ..............................�
Proposed Sanitary Sewer Manhole ......................... ..............................�
Existing Storm Drain Manhole ................................ ..............................�
Proposed Storm Drain Manhole ............................ ...............................
0
Existing Telephone Manhole .................................. ...............................
ProposedTelephone Manhole .................................. .............................OT
Existing Electric Manhole ...................................... ............................... O
Proposed Electric Manhole .................................... ...............................
(D
Existing Catch Basin ............................................... ...............................
8
ProposedCatch Basin ............................................. ...............................
Existing Light Pole .................................................. ...............................
ProposedLight Pole ................................................. ...............................
Existing Utility Pole ................................................. ...............................
)a
Guy Wire ............................................................. ...............................
—<
Proposed Utility Pole ............................................... ...............................
Y,
IronPin ..................................................................... ...............................
ExistingFire Hydrant ............................................. ...............................
.
ProposedFire Hydrant ........................................... ...............................
ExistingDrop Inlet ................................................... ...............................
0
Proposed Drop Inlet ................................................. ...............................
Accessible Ramp ..................................................... ..............................®
TreeProtection .............................................. ...............................
Proposed Guardrail .................................... ...............................
. .
SiltFence ...................................................... ...............................
�-
Proposed Curb & Gutter, Cone. Drive, Sidewalk ...................
ProposedAsphalt Pavement ......................... ...............................
Proposed Rip Rap Ditch ............................... ...............................
ProposedGravel ............................................ ...............................
Proposed Pavement Removal ....................... ...............................
Proposed Sidewalk Bridging Tree Roots ... ...............................
Designated Wetland Area ............................ ...............................
...... .
FIGURE 5
Friday, September 26, 201412:30:23 PM
is
t�
a
O
O
L`
rl
O
1
rl
1
N
In
it
z
V
.O
QI
L�
O
W
C�
F�1
0
.O
it
a

78
77
77
76
76
76
75
75
75
PRONLE -L-
-,PROPOSED ElEVA ON -L-
Z' 772
N Z + Z '=N 4 UNK ZZ (INK
768
\\ �/ 764
760
NOTE.,
SEE SHEET 3 AN 3A FOR PIPE
CROSSING AND EAM PROFILES
756
1211E OF B' % V PDBG O 214%
BLF OF 15° tCP O 1.00E
752
750
F �F
IQ ie Ile �°
R
z g $ w
v
cgs
Pam. .°_. IlAs
0
0+50 1 +00 1 +50 2 +00 2 +50 3+00 3+50 4 +00 + +50 5+00 6+80
• \\ F ` \\ /ir Jv // 1 \ \ \ snec STREAM
, - - PROPOSED STREAM IMPACT: �� .df'
- 0 \ nE TO EXISTNG Sni . MATCN EXISTNG BANK -1
Q / //O >> ��J.�\\ - 661E (CHANNEL GRADING y SLOPES AND lMDTHS T nE IN POINT O ROPOSED fi' SIDEWALK
Tp SITION FROM Z -6° CURB AND WT1ER TO -0' CURB AND CU AND SOFT STABILIZATION) S ,rte ROPOSED V PLANTING STRIP
\ '� / 08921222
�� \G)� / / / W WT EKISnNC DRIN:WAY AND REMOVE AT E%'S NG TOOLED JOINT - PERMANENT ROPOSEO BonaM (ST'EAM KATHERINE M. Zw.j e
\ J / �\ AWAL M. HOPKINS SEE STREAM PROFILE Y- ON SHEET 3A WSOR a iY y
ROPOSED ACCESSIBLE RAMP (TYP.) - CMlDS 10.31A / 3.00'
\ / D 86 PG 68 w DB 17986/PG 71 F —
\
'r SIDEWALK \\ // 22 RIVE y ROPOSEO NANRALFl MATTING 228 DAWN CIRClEi2 �� D Z
ROPOSED 183 LF OF SAFETY S50. ROPOSED GRADING UMI FOR
\
DIVE EXISTING OF 16'
G WELL HOUSE \ v / RCP O 1.00% STREAM IMPROVEMENTS ( OF OITClIi - •" (�
/
eTUn VV / / VE E)GFM FENCE TO HERE EMOVE D05TING FENCE TO ERE
STAY INSIDE EASEM(N PROPOSED BOTTOM OF B g A
(STAY NSIDE EASEMENY) ( 7) w
m PROPOSED TOP OF
+. I R/ OPO6E0 =BAK
p0 E0 WAi NE / 21 r m eW
AGE TO DRAIN 0e, �
08921221 L
PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT: p' e �j E KATHERINE acs °I'tA ORR ROAD L- (n
0.36 AC. (FILL) w °� y` -'
PERMANENT y 17986/PG 71 �, yY D
• �. PROPOSED STREAM IMPACT: T
/ // r �e�+D, 1• '00e �` y 300 DAWN CIRCLE
o e�{ - 126 LF (PIPING)
' - PERMANENT +
IS
H rc
O�
\ /i ✓ + OgR e
-2 b iz
� REMOVE EXISTING FEN b
CE +� N q
iz
T�T� r / REMOVE E%ISRNG OUT BURDIN
ANSITII FROM 2' -8° CURB AND W 6+' \.J b T BUILDIN
// TO 2'-0 CURB AND WTIER - CLDS 10.19 SED 8 SIDEW
PRCPOSED a TING STRI I -
// PROPOSED 2' -8° CURB AND GUTFER (TYP. ° + , PROPOSED STREAM IMPACT: '
, - 10 LF (RIP RAP APRON)
PERMANENT .o ° • , • ?�L.VJ'1 4 y
o O3
PROPOSED 7 SIDf:WP
: 08921220
KATHERINE M.
Wisoll
6 N 9$F' OP 36' SOP d 1.898 ' / (STA VE SIDE FEN E TO HERE' r ��_ „ OB 19910/PG 351
,ry 316 DAWN CIRCLE
,pv
� , °• EW,2 A. 1211E 4'•P G 14x cri
PROPOSED 300 LF OF SAFELY RAIL - CLDS 50.04 . _F2 ,BE N TO BOX WLN7tT, j4gE %ENING'IN
f • K CULVERT TO CAST OR PROPERLY CORED
CL tH
GRADE 7185 AREA N DRAIN INTO S o lF W iB' RCP O.1 %, 0
OP OSED ENDW -SEE SP
PROPOSED STREAM IMPACT;
-80 LF (CHANNEL GRADING AND �, ,N� , ROPOSED RI RAP `APRON; SEE DETM60N SHEET 3' / ® a
EXISTING WETLAN05 TO BE PROTECTED. NO DISTURBANCE SHALL b
TAKE PLACE OUTSIDE THE PROPOSED WORK 0MI75 SOFT STABILIZATION) y�K OPpSED 9 IMPROVEMENTS - SEX SHEET 3A FOR SJRENA OFNE AND M1W T /
- PERMANENT O+ • • y ' / PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT: W O
' PROPOSED GRADING 0M1T5 F0x E ' 0.04 AC. (CONSTRUCTION ACCESS)
5 IMPROVEMENTS (TOP OF DITCH) /`�° O, Y y / - TEMPORARY
TIE TO OOSTING S{REAM.•MATCH EXISTING BANK---
SLOPE$' AND WIDTHS kT TIE IN POINT • Y •
PROPOSED BO , ' r •' •. ' \ \
( / \\ TTOM OF STREAM
FIG. 6
32250' V
VC
78C
HLAI i�tl K
K ° 3C 0
00 _
_ _
_-
Mlo S
S -1 FES-2 E
EW -2 C
CB -1 C
CB -2 E
EW -1
!i tin
776
^app5
onn °n N
ND _L_-
R
z g $ w
v
cgs
Pam. .°_. IlAs
0
0+50 1 +00 1 +50 2 +00 2 +50 3+00 3+50 4 +00 + +50 5+00 6+80
• \\ F ` \\ /ir Jv // 1 \ \ \ snec STREAM
, - - PROPOSED STREAM IMPACT: �� .df'
- 0 \ nE TO EXISTNG Sni . MATCN EXISTNG BANK -1
Q / //O >> ��J.�\\ - 661E (CHANNEL GRADING y SLOPES AND lMDTHS T nE IN POINT O ROPOSED fi' SIDEWALK
Tp SITION FROM Z -6° CURB AND WT1ER TO -0' CURB AND CU AND SOFT STABILIZATION) S ,rte ROPOSED V PLANTING STRIP
\ '� / 08921222
�� \G)� / / / W WT EKISnNC DRIN:WAY AND REMOVE AT E%'S NG TOOLED JOINT - PERMANENT ROPOSEO BonaM (ST'EAM KATHERINE M. Zw.j e
\ J / �\ AWAL M. HOPKINS SEE STREAM PROFILE Y- ON SHEET 3A WSOR a iY y
ROPOSED ACCESSIBLE RAMP (TYP.) - CMlDS 10.31A / 3.00'
\ / D 86 PG 68 w DB 17986/PG 71 F —
\
'r SIDEWALK \\ // 22 RIVE y ROPOSEO NANRALFl MATTING 228 DAWN CIRClEi2 �� D Z
ROPOSED 183 LF OF SAFETY S50. ROPOSED GRADING UMI FOR
\
DIVE EXISTING OF 16'
G WELL HOUSE \ v / RCP O 1.00% STREAM IMPROVEMENTS ( OF OITClIi - •" (�
/
eTUn VV / / VE E)GFM FENCE TO HERE EMOVE D05TING FENCE TO ERE
STAY INSIDE EASEM(N PROPOSED BOTTOM OF B g A
(STAY NSIDE EASEMENY) ( 7) w
m PROPOSED TOP OF
+. I R/ OPO6E0 =BAK
p0 E0 WAi NE / 21 r m eW
AGE TO DRAIN 0e, �
08921221 L
PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT: p' e �j E KATHERINE acs °I'tA ORR ROAD L- (n
0.36 AC. (FILL) w °� y` -'
PERMANENT y 17986/PG 71 �, yY D
• �. PROPOSED STREAM IMPACT: T
/ // r �e�+D, 1• '00e �` y 300 DAWN CIRCLE
o e�{ - 126 LF (PIPING)
' - PERMANENT +
IS
H rc
O�
\ /i ✓ + OgR e
-2 b iz
� REMOVE EXISTING FEN b
CE +� N q
iz
T�T� r / REMOVE E%ISRNG OUT BURDIN
ANSITII FROM 2' -8° CURB AND W 6+' \.J b T BUILDIN
// TO 2'-0 CURB AND WTIER - CLDS 10.19 SED 8 SIDEW
PRCPOSED a TING STRI I -
// PROPOSED 2' -8° CURB AND GUTFER (TYP. ° + , PROPOSED STREAM IMPACT: '
, - 10 LF (RIP RAP APRON)
PERMANENT .o ° • , • ?�L.VJ'1 4 y
o O3
PROPOSED 7 SIDf:WP
: 08921220
KATHERINE M.
Wisoll
6 N 9$F' OP 36' SOP d 1.898 ' / (STA VE SIDE FEN E TO HERE' r ��_ „ OB 19910/PG 351
,ry 316 DAWN CIRCLE
,pv
� , °• EW,2 A. 1211E 4'•P G 14x cri
PROPOSED 300 LF OF SAFELY RAIL - CLDS 50.04 . _F2 ,BE N TO BOX WLN7tT, j4gE %ENING'IN
f • K CULVERT TO CAST OR PROPERLY CORED
CL tH
GRADE 7185 AREA N DRAIN INTO S o lF W iB' RCP O.1 %, 0
OP OSED ENDW -SEE SP
PROPOSED STREAM IMPACT;
-80 LF (CHANNEL GRADING AND �, ,N� , ROPOSED RI RAP `APRON; SEE DETM60N SHEET 3' / ® a
EXISTING WETLAN05 TO BE PROTECTED. NO DISTURBANCE SHALL b
TAKE PLACE OUTSIDE THE PROPOSED WORK 0MI75 SOFT STABILIZATION) y�K OPpSED 9 IMPROVEMENTS - SEX SHEET 3A FOR SJRENA OFNE AND M1W T /
- PERMANENT O+ • • y ' / PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT: W O
' PROPOSED GRADING 0M1T5 F0x E ' 0.04 AC. (CONSTRUCTION ACCESS)
5 IMPROVEMENTS (TOP OF DITCH) /`�° O, Y y / - TEMPORARY
TIE TO OOSTING S{REAM.•MATCH EXISTING BANK---
SLOPE$' AND WIDTHS kT TIE IN POINT • Y •
PROPOSED BO , ' r •' •. ' \ \
( / \\ TTOM OF STREAM
FIG. 6

o�oF wA7Eq
o � e
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ®No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes ❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ®No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Orr Road Extension Project
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
"" " ° -I
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
VEC 1 7 Z014
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A DENR - WA i'
3d.
Street address:
DUFFER p yNt1771N�,
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: City of Charlotte
4b. Name:
Mr. Isaac Hinson, PWS
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
City of Charlotte
4d. Street address:
600 E. Fourth Street
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
4f. Telephone no.:
(704) 336 -4495
4g. Fax no.:
(704) 353 -0473
4h. Email address:
ihinson @charlottenc.gov
5. Agent /Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Gregg Antemann
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5c. Street address:
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
5e. Telephone no.:
704 - 408 -1683
5f. Fax no.:
704 - 527 -1133
5g. Email address:
gregg @cws- inc.net
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
08921226, 8921219 to 8921225, 8920125, 8920301,
8920302
Latitude: N35.266899° Longitude: -
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
W80.770590
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
2.05 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
UT to Sugar Creek
proposed project:
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c.
River basin:
Santee (HU# 03050103)
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of a wooded areas and single family residences with maintained areas. Typical on -site vegetation
includes red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora), loblolly
pine (Pinus taeda), willow oak (Quercus phellos), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera
japonica), English ivy (Hedera helix), and sawtooth blackberry (Rubus argutus).
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.89
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
226 linear feet (If) of perennial stream, 431 If of seasonal stream
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project is necessary to provide a direct connection from the Hidden Valley neighborhood to North Tryon Street (Figure 5).
This is a large residential community that is in need of additional signalized intersections with the surrounding major
streets. The project will help alleviate trafic congestion at Arrowhead Drive and will also provide left turn access from the
neighborhood to North Tryon Street. These needs were determined by studying current traffic patterns and the local road
network usage.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project proposes to install a 6' by 4' box culvert that will be buried 1 foot. In accordance with City storm water design
standards, this culvert has been designed to convey the 25 -year storm event. The proposed impacts to Waters of the
U.S. total 0.417 acres, including 282 linear feet (If) of stream channel.
The proposed permanent impacts to wetlands are 0.36 acre. The plan proposes to fill a portion of Wetland AA, resulting
0.36 acre permanent impact (Figure 6).
The City also proposes temporary wetland impact on the area of wetlands from the edge of the fill slope to the easement
line (0.04 acre). This area will be restored to pre- construction contours and planted with native wetland vegetation
(Figure 6).
Proposed permanent impacts to the stream channel (Stream A) total 282 linear feet (If). The impacts consist of channel
grading from the culvert inlet to the upstream limit of disturbance (66 If), piping the existing channel from the culvert inlet
to the culvert outlet (126 If), and installing rip rap apron on the culvert outlet (10 If), and channel grading from the end of
the rip rap apron to the downstream "Tie to Existing Stream" point (80 If) (Figure 6). All areas proposed for channel
grading are intended to improve conveyance through the project area. The banks will be stabilized with temporary
erosion control matting and native vegetation.
According USACE, grading from the culvert inlet to the upstream limit of disturbance (66 If) and proposed stream
improvements (80 If) do not result in loss of stream channel and therefore would not require mitigation.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes ❑ No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: CWS
Name (if known): Gregg Antemann
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination issued 2/10/2014 (attached).
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 5of13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
® Yes
® Corps
0.36
❑ No
® DWQ
W2 ❑ P ®T
Construction
® Yes
® Corps
0.04
access
❑ No
® DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: Impacts to Jurisdictional Wetlands total 0.40 acre.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Channel grading
and soft
Seasonal RPW
❑ PER
® Corps
3'
66
stabilization
Stream A
®INT
®DWQ
S2 ®P ❑ T
Culvert
Seasonal RPW
❑ PER
® Corps
3'
61
Stream A
® INT
® DWQ
S3 ®P ❑ T
Culvert
Perennial RPW
® PER
® Corps
3'
65
Stream A
❑ INT
® DWQ
S4 ®P ❑ T
Rip Rap apron
Perennial RPW
® PER
® Corps
3'
10
Stream A
❑ INT
® DWQ
S5 ®P ❑ T
Channel grading
and soft
Perennial RPW
® PER
® Corps
3'
80
stabilization
Stream A
E:1 INT
®DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
282
3i. Comments: Permanent Impacts to Jurisdictional Streams total 282 If (0.02 acre) of stream channel.
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number-
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number-
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P [-IT
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3' ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
IThe proposed alignment is the only practicable alternative because the City currently has existing right -of -way from North
Tryon Street to Dawn Circle. Beyond Dawn Circle, the road is aligned directly with Elgywood Lane, which provides the most
direct and efficient access to the Hidden Valley Neighborhood. The road bed must pass through the existing wetlands to align
with Elgywood Lane and to avoid the home at 229 Austin Drive. To minimize impacts, the road fill slope has been increased
to the maximum allowable slope to minimize the footprint of impacts to on -site streams and wetlands. Impacts have been
further reduced by removing the standard planting strip from between the sidewalks and edge of road along the section of
road that passes through the wetlands. Finally, the proposed road just west of Dawn Circle has been aligned to avoid impacts
to a portion of the wetland that projects up a small valley towards Dawn Circle.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. Proper sediment
and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
®Payment to in lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Uzi 1-2
Q i y
3c. Comments: DEC 1 A 2814
f
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program DEN __;AT:�`
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ® Yes ERIV1�rT�NU
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.75 acres
4f. Non- riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: No significant change in impervious area.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ®No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will not result in additional future development.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on November 17, 2014 to determine the
presence of any federally - listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or critical habitat located within the project
area. As of the date of submittal no response has been received from the NCNHP. CWS also reviewed the NCNHP
elemental occurrence GIS layer. There are no current elemental occurrences within a mile of the project site.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ®No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries: http: / /sharpfin. nmfs. noaa. gov /website /EFH_Mapper /map.aspx
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on November 17, 2014 to determine the
presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. As of
the date of submittal no response has been received from the SHPO. CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service
and the Charlotte Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission database and found no sites of architectural, historical,
or archaeological significance within the project limits.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM No. 3710457500K
Mr. Isaac Hinson, PWS
__A —J
12 -16 -2014
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

U.S. ARMY CODS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action I.D.: 2014 -00280 County: Mecklenburg . U.S.G.S. Quad: Derita
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner /Agent: Charlotte - Mecklenburg Storm Water Services / Attn: Isaac Hinson
Address: 600 East Fourth Street Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone No.: 704- 336 -4495
Property description:
Size (acres): 7.17
Nearest Waterway: Sugar Creek
Coordinates: 35.266899 / - 80.77059
Nearest Town: Charlotte
River Basin: Catawba
Hydrologic Unit Code: 03050103
Location Description: The site is located southwest of the intersection of Austin Road and North
Tryon Street, in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X Based on preliminary information, there may be waters and wetlands on the above described property. We strongly
suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be
considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). ). If you
wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction,
Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are waters and wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the on your property delineated. Due to the'size of your property and/or our present
workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
The waters and wetlands on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps.
We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by
the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your
property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years.
_ The waters and wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.

Action ld.: 2014 -00280
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and /or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and /or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Amanda Fuemmeler at 828- 271 -7980.
C. Basis For Determination
The site contains wetlands as determined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the Interim
Regional Supplement to the Corps ofEngineers Wetlands Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountain andPiedmont Region. These
wetlands are adjacent to stream channels located on the property that exhibit indicators of ordinary high water marks. The
stream channels on the property are unnamed tributaries to Sugar Creek which ultimately flows into the Catawba River. The
Catawba River is a Section 10 water starting downstream at the Mountain Island Lake Dam on the Mecklenburg /Gaston
County line.
D. Remarks:
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation /determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation /determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. if you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
FUEMMELER.AMA NEMMELERAdWANDAJONES.1242835M
DN —US o-US.GOVetNnem,.-DOD.
NDA.JONES.12428 owPkl, —USA,
_FUBWELEP.aMANDK"ES.1242833W
Corps Regulatory Official: Amanda Fuemmeler 35090 Uaw MI 4.02.1017,26A? -D p
Issue Date: February 10, 2014 Expiration Date: Not Applicable (due to Preliminary JD)
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at irtt :1:'pert.nw .Usacc.arniv..mi list rvev.htali
to complete the survey online.
CF: Carolina Wetland Services, Attn: Thomas Blackwell, 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28273

§00 M�
NOTIFIC'A "TiO1i OF ' DIMINISTRATi\ I NPPf L. UPI10Nv ; AND PRO( T S� A�3E3
RIat C!LST FOR APPS .kL
Applicant: Charlotte- Mecklenburg Storn Water
File Number: 2014 -00280
Date: February 10,
Services / Attn: Isaac Hinson
2014
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
X PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above
decision. Additional information may be found at
http://www.usace.array.mil/CECW/Pages/reg_.iiatetials.aspx or Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
•. ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights
to appeal the permit, including its terns and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that
the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer.
Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right
to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a)
modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify
the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the
district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
© ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Pen-nit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights
to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
® APPEAL: ` If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this
form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the
date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process
by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
® ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received
by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an
approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may
provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN;INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an
initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons
or objections are addressed in the administrative record
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However,
you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and /or the appeal
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
process you may contact:
also contact:
Amanda Fuemmeler, Project Manager
Mr, Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
USACE, Asheville Regulatory Field Office
CESAD -PDO
151 Patton Ave
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
RM 208
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Asheville, NC 28806
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
828- 271 -7980
Phone: (404 ) 562 -5137
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Amanda Fuemmeler, 69 Darlington Avenue,
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, boom 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
Phone: [phone]
4

i
Carolina Wetland Services
November 17, 2014
550 E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28273
704 -527 -1177 (v)
704 -527 -1133 (fax)
Ramona Bartos
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -4617
Subject: Request for Records Search
Orr Road Extension Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2014- 3280:2
Dear Ms. Bartos:
On behalf of our client, Charlotte Storm Water Services, we are hereby contacting the North Carolina
State Historic Preservation Office regarding the presence of any historic properties or cultural resources
within the referenced project area. The project area is approximately 7.17 acres in extent and is
located west of the intersection of Orr Road and North Tryon Street in Charlotte, North Carolina
(Figure 1, attached). The attached USGS Site Location Map (Figure 1) was prepared from the Derita,
NC Quadrangle, dated 1996.
The site consists of wooded areas and single family residences. The purpose of this project is to
provide a direct connection from the Hidden Valley neighborhood to North Tryon Street.
Construction of this project will cause unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. and
require Section 404/401 pennitting.
Based on a review of SHPO's online GIS Mapping Application', there are no historic properties listed
within the project limits. Photographs A -D (Figure 2, attached) are representative of the site.
Please provide a written response concerning your determination regarding the presence of any historic
properties or cultural resources within the project area. Feel free to contact me with any questions at 704-
626 -9850 or at aliisa @cws- inc.net. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Aliisa Harjuniemi Gregg Antemann, PWS
Staff Scientist II Principal Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
Figure 2. Topographic Location Map
Photopage
http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb /. Accessed November 17, 2014.
NORTH CAROLINA . SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS- INC.NET

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCron'
Secretary Susan Kluttz
November 25, 2014
Aliisa Harjuniemi
Carolina Wetland Services
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Orr Road Extension Project, Charlotte, CWS 2014 - 3280:2, Mecklenburg County, ER 14 -2575
Dear Ms. Harjuniemi:
Thank you for your letter of November 17, 2014, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579 or
environmental. reviewLuncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
6fy"Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 Fast Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 MaWng Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

L ctws
Carolina Welland Services
November 17, 2014
550 E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28273
704 - 527.1177 (v)
704 - 527 -1133 (fax)
Ms. Allison Weakley
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
North Carolina Department of the Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601
Subject: Request for Records Search
Orr Road Extension Project
Charlotte, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2014- 3280:2
Dear Ms. Weakley:
On behalf of our client, Charlotte Storm Water Services, we are hereby contacting the North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program regarding the presence of any federally - listed, candidate endangered or
threatened species, or Critical Habitat within the referenced project area. The project is located west of
the intersection of Orr Road and North Tryon Street in Charlotte, North Carolina (Figure 1, attached).
The attached USGS Site Location Map (Figure 1) was prepared from the Derita, NC Quadrangle,
dated 1996.
The project area is approximately 7.17 acres in extent and consists of wooded areas and single family
residences. The purpose of this project is to provide a direct connection from the Hidden Valley
neighborhood to North Tryon Street. Construction of this project will cause unavoidable impacts to
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. and require Section 404/401 permitting.
Please provide a written response via email to aliisa @cws- inc.net concerning the presence of
federally - listed, or candidate endangered or threatened species or Critical Habitat within or near the
project area. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Aliisa Harjumemi,
Staff Scientist I1
Attachment:
Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
Figure 2. Aerial Map
C.
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Principal Scientist
NORTH CAROLINA ' SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS- INC.NET

ALE V.AA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Land and Water Stewardship
Pat McCrory
Governor
Ms. Aliisa Harjuniemi
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
Aliisa(@cws- inc.net
RE: Orr Road Extension Project
Bryan Gossage
Director
December 2, 2014
Orr Road and North Tryon Street, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2014 - 3280:2
Dear Ms. Harjuniemi:
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
Thank you for the opportunity to provide information from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
( NCNHP) database for the proposed project referenced above. The NCNHP database does not show any
records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation /managed areas
within the proposed project area based on the maps and Geographic Information System (GIS) data
submitted with your request for information.
Within one mile of the proposed project area, the NCNHP database shows element occurrence records
for the following rare species:
* For status definitions, please see the Definitions document at http: / /www.ncnhp.org /web /nhp /database- search.
The occurrence record for Tall Larkspur has low accuracy due to the lack of site - specific locational
information associated with this record, but this species has been documented from the Charlotte area.
In addition, the NCNHP database shows several properties considered to be Mecklenburg County open
space within one mile of the project area, the closest of which are Hidden Valley Neighborhood Park (ca.
0.3 miles west of the project), and the Eastway and Briarwood Community Parks ca. 0.4 miles and 0.5
miles south of the project area, respectively.
Please note that although the NCNHP database may not show records for rare species within the
proposed project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. Occurrences of rare species documented within one mile of the
proposed project area increase the likelihood that these species may be present within the project area
if suitable habitat exists. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual
field surveys if needed, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species.
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1601
Phone: 919 - 707 -86001 Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper
ELEMENT
OCCURRENCE
STATE
FEDERAL
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME
STATUS*
ACCURACY
STATUS*
STATUS*
Delphinium exaltatum
Tall Larkspur
Historical
Very Low
E
FSC
* For status definitions, please see the Definitions document at http: / /www.ncnhp.org /web /nhp /database- search.
The occurrence record for Tall Larkspur has low accuracy due to the lack of site - specific locational
information associated with this record, but this species has been documented from the Charlotte area.
In addition, the NCNHP database shows several properties considered to be Mecklenburg County open
space within one mile of the project area, the closest of which are Hidden Valley Neighborhood Park (ca.
0.3 miles west of the project), and the Eastway and Briarwood Community Parks ca. 0.4 miles and 0.5
miles south of the project area, respectively.
Please note that although the NCNHP database may not show records for rare species within the
proposed project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. Occurrences of rare species documented within one mile of the
proposed project area increase the likelihood that these species may be present within the project area
if suitable habitat exists. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual
field surveys if needed, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species.
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1601
Phone: 919 - 707 -86001 Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

Orr Road Extension Project
Orr Road and North Tryon Street, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2014 - 3280:2
December 2, 2014
Page 2
Feel free to contact me at 919 - 707 -8629 or Allison.Weakley @ncdenr.gov if you have questions or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
u4&Amwea, Ae '
Allison Schwarz Weakley, Conservation Planner
NC Natural Heritage Program

Orr Road Extension December 16, 2014
Nationwide Permit No. 14 Proiect No. 2014 - 3280:2
Photograph A. View of Perennial RPW Stream A, facing downstream.
Photograph B. View of Intermittent RPW Stream A, facing upstream.

Orr Road Extension December 16, 2014
Nationwide Permit No. 14 Protect No. 2014 - 3280:2
Photograph C. View of Intermittent RPW Stream B, facing downstream.
Photograph D. View of Wetland AA, facing southeast.

wrrw�1 A�a
�®
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Michael Ellison, Director John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Ecosystem Enhancement Program Secretary
November 24, 2014
Isaac Hinson
Charlotte- Mecklenburg Stormwater Services
600 Fast Fourth St.
Charlotte, NC 28202 Expiration of Acceptance: May 23, 2015
Project: Orr Road Extension County: Mecklenburg
This is a conditional acceptance letter. The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project
as indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will be approved by the
permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine
if payment to the NCEEP will be approved. You must also comply with all other state federal or local government permits
regulations or authorizations associated with the proposed activity including SL 2009-337: An Act to Promote the Use of
Compensatory Mitigation Banks as amended by S.L. 2011 -343.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of Elie
issued 404 Permit /401 Certification /CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In-
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation
are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to NCEEP for this impact is determined by
permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below.
a- w�nnvq vv a Xi3iii ru ­1 vivo Arva lvdi be utinzed ror this impact.
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at
(919) 707 -8915.
Sincerely,
7fill James. B a vU
cc: Karen Higgins, NCDWR Wetlands /401 Unit Asset Management Supervisor
Crystal Amschler, USACE - Asheville
Alan Johnson, NCDWR - Mooresville
Aliisa Haijuniemi, agent
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652
Phone: 919 - 707 -89761 Internet: www,ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper
River
;Basin
CU
Location
Stream (feet) T____WetIands
(acres)
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non -Ri arian Coastal Marsh
I!no
atawba
03050103*
0
0
0
0.75
0 0
a- w�nnvq vv a Xi3iii ru ­1 vivo Arva lvdi be utinzed ror this impact.
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at
(919) 707 -8915.
Sincerely,
7fill James. B a vU
cc: Karen Higgins, NCDWR Wetlands /401 Unit Asset Management Supervisor
Crystal Amschler, USACE - Asheville
Alan Johnson, NCDWR - Mooresville
Aliisa Haijuniemi, agent
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652
Phone: 919 - 707 -89761 Internet: www,ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

INDEX OF SHEETS
Cover Sheet .......................................................... ............................... I
General Notes and Details .................................. ...........................2 -2B
Storm Drainage Summary & Details ............ ............................... 3-3A
Plan& Profile ................................................... ............................... 4-5
Traffic Control Plans ................................... ............................... TCPI
Pavement Marking & Signing Plan ............. ............................... PM1
Erosion Control ............................................ ........................EC1 -EC2
UtilityRelocation .............................................. ...........................UB01
CrossSections .............................................. .............................X1 -X11
TOTAL SHEETS 24
KYh
CHARLOTTE
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
Construction Plans of Proposed
Orr Road Extension Proiect
PE SEAL
PRELIMINARY
Do Not Use For Construction
Record Drawings
VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 88
ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL
DISTANCES. DATE RANGE OF SURVEY:00 /00 /0000 TO 00 /00 /0000,
PLANS PREPARED BY:
/■%� 600 East Fourth Street
B� `NG Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
MW U/ Phone: [phone]
FOR CHARLOTTE Fax: (704) 336$586
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
PLANNING & DESIGN GROUP
PROJECT LENGTH = 0.17 MILES
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
GRAPHIC SCALES
20 40 60
PlanView .................
20 40 60
Holz. Profile ............
�$ 12
Vert. Profile .............
10 15
Cross Section ...........
I Construction Administration 1
Landscape Management
Engineering Services
Utility Coordinator
CDOT - Design
I CDOT - Implementation I —
I CMU
Planning
Storm Water Services
CONVENTIONAL SIGNS
ProposedProperty Line .... ..............................— — — —
— — —
Existing Property Line .... ............................... —
Maintained as R/W Line . ...............................
-
Existing Structures .......... ............................... .-------------------------
Railroad Tracks ............... ...............................
Proposed Edge of Pav ement ..........................
Fe nce ................................. ...............................
SlopeStake Line .............. ............................... c -
Temporary Construction Easement ............. e
e —
Sidewalk /Utility Ease ment ............................ —.c--
StormDrainage Easement ............................ SDE
SDE-
Existing Gas Line ............ ............................... c
c
Existing Water Line ........ ............................... w
w
Existing Sanitary Sewer . ............................... Ss
Ss
Existing Underground Telecommunications
Existing Underground Electric .....................
ExistingStorm Drainage ............................... ----- - - -
- --
Proposed Storm Drainage .............................
Existing Tree ................................................................ ...........................l;,i
Existing Water Meter .............................................. ...............................
w
❑
Existing Water Valve .............................................. ...............................
vN
�a
Existing Gas Valve .................................................. ...............................
cV
Pa
Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole ........................... ..............................0
Proposed Sanitary Sewer Manhole ......................... ..............................(D
(D
Existing Storm Drain Manhole ................................ ..............................
Proposed Storm Drain Manhole ............................ ...............................
Existing Telephone Manhole .................................. ...............................
Proposed Telephone Manhole ................................ ...............................
(D
Existing Electric Manhole ...................................... ...............................
Proposed Electric Manhole .................................... ...............................
Q
Existing Catch Basin ............................................... ...............................
8
Proposed Catch Basin ............................................. ...............................
Existing Light Pole .................................................. ...............................
#
Proposed Light Pole ................................................. ...............................
.'
Existing Utility Pole ................................................. ...............................
)a
GuyWire ............................................................. ............................... —<
ProposedUtility Pole ............................................... ...............................
•,
Iron Pin ..................................................................... ...............................
0
Existing Fire Hydrant ............................................. ............................... .
Proposed Fire Hydrant ........................................... ...............................
ExistingDrop Inlet .................................................... ..............................0
ProposedDrop Inlet ................................................. ...............................
Accessible Ramp ..................................................... ..............................®
TreeProtection .............................................. ...............................
ProposedGuardrail .................................... ...............................
.
SiltFence ...................................................... ...............................
0
Proposed Curb & Gutter, Conc. Drive, Sidewalk ...................
Proposed Asphalt Pavement ......................... ...............................
ProposedRip Rap Ditch ............................... ...............................
ProposedGravel ............................................ ...............................
Proposed Pavement Removal ....................... ...............................
Proposed Sidewalk Bridging Tree Roots ... ...............................
Designated Wetland Area ........... ............................... .......
................. ........
0
C `+ �ARLO i m
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
Bid Set No.
APPROVED
CITY ENGINEER DATE
Friday, September 26, 2014 12:30:23 PM
G�
a
O
rl
0
1
rl
1
N
rl
�.t
z
�i..1
V
0
i�
Pi
O
v5
X1..1
W
W
0
CIS
z
V
�O
a

GENERAL NOTES I GENERAL NOTES
PROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONS: I EROSION CONTROL:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SET AND ADJUST PROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONS AS NECESSARY TO THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
ENSURE PROPER LONGITUDINAL GRADE FOR DRAINAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN APPROPRIATE CITY AND STATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ORDINANCES. THE
EXISTING PAVEMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT STANDING WATER DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED AREAS
SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL FOLLOW THE EROSION CONTROL OL MEASURE H
DRIVEWAYS ANDS S SHOWN ON SHEETS EC1 AND EC2.
SIDEWALKS:
I
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DIMENSIONS ARE FROM EXPANSION JOINT TO EXPANSION
JOINT. MATCH REPLACEMENT MATERIALS TO THE EXISTING SURFACE ACCORDINGLY:
o CONCRETE - SIX INCH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (3600 PSI).
• ASPHALT - (COMMERCIAL) TWO INCH SF9.5B COURSE AND FOUR INCH 119.08
INTERMEDIATE COURSE.
(RESIDEN TAL) TWO INCH SF9.5B COURSE AND FOUR INCH AGGREGATE
BASE (ABC) COURSE.
• GRAVEL - SIX INCH INCIDENTAL STONE
SIDEWALK SHALL BE FOUR INCHES THICK, AND SIX INCHES THICK AT DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS,
PER CITY STD. N0. 10.22.
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES:
GRADES, ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER, THEY MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS. STATIONS,
OFFSETS AND ELEVATIONS REFER TO THE CENTER OF DROP INLETS, MANHOLES AND JUNCTION
BOXES, AND THE MIDPOINT OF THE LIP FOR CATCH BASINS. ALL PIPES SHALL BE RCP CLASS
III, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
WEEPHOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, A MINIMUM OF 1
WEEPHOLE PER STRUCTURE. WEEPHOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE BOTTOM 1/3 OF
STRUCTURE AND COVERED ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE BY A BAG MADE OF FILTER
FABRIC AND FILLED W/#78 STONE. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE PAYMENT FOR THIS WORK.
UTILITIES:
UTILITIES ARE ILLUSTRATED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. THE CITY WILL NOT BE HELD
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OF UTILITY LO ATIONS SIZES DEPTHS OR FOR
COMPLETENESS OF UTILITY INFORMATION
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND MEET WITH ALL UTILITY
OWNERS, THE CITY UTILITY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTOR WHOSE FACILITIES WILL BE
AFFECTED TO DETERMINE UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL UTILITIES
FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY HIS OPERATIONS OR THOSE OF HIS AGENTS. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL HOLD THE CITY HARMLESS FOR ANY THIRD -PARTY INCONVENIENCE CREATED BY WORK
OF HIS OWN FORCES OR THAT OF HIS AGENTS. ANY DAMAGES INCURRED SHALL BE THE
CONTRACTORS FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY.
AS NEEDED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST /RELOCATE THE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER
LINES ONLY. ALL OTHER ADJUSTMENTS /RELOCATIONS WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE VARIOUS
UTILITY OWNERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WORK WITH UTILITY OWNERS SO AS
NOT TO ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PROJECT SCHEDULE. THE CITY WILL NOT BE HELD
RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DELAYS OR DISRUPTIONS TO THE WORK SCHEDULE OF OTHER UTILITY
OWNERS.
• FOR UTILITY LOCATES CALL NORTH CAROLINA ONE -CALL ® 1- 800 - 632 -4949.
• FOR LOCATES OF UTILITIES NOT MEMBERS OF NORTH CAROLINA ONE -CALL CONTACT
PROJECT MANAGER & UTILITY COORDINATOR.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL WATER VALVES, WATER METER BOXES AND WATER
VAULTS TO FINISHED GRADE. WATER METERS LOCATED IN SIDEWALKS OR CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS
SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN CONCRETE BOXES.
GAS LINES WILL BE ADJUSTED /RELOCATED AS NEEDED BY PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PI M N
ED O T NATURAL GAS AT LEAST TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LINE:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE CARE WHEN WORKING AROUND SANITARY SEWERS AND WATER
LINES. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR DAMAGE EXISTING SEWER OR WATER LINES, HE SHALL
IMMEDIATELY REPLACE THE LINE AT HIS EXPENSE WITH DUCTILE IRON PIPE. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL REPLACE SANITARY SEWER AND /OR WATER LINE, WITH A MINIMUM TEN FOOT SECTION
OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE WHEN DRAINAGE PIPE COMES WITHIN TWO FEET OF SAID LINES,
VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY.
SUBSURFACE PLANS:
NO SUBSURFACE PLANS ARE AVAILABLE ON THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR MAY MAKE
HIS OWN INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS.
MAIL BOXES:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ALL MAIL BOXES AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 107 -12 OF THE
NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES. COORDINATE THIS WORK WITH
THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE.
FENCES:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND RESET FENCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND /OR AS
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
TREES, SHRUBS, AND HEDGES:
THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE TREES, SHRUBS, AND HEDGES WITHIN THE
EASEMENT LINES UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO BE PROTECTED. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL ALSO PROTECT TREES AND SHRUBS OUTSIDE OF CUT /FILL LINES, IN ADDITION TO
THOSE THAT RECEIVE TREES /SHRUB PROTECTION BARRIERS. WHEN ROOT PRUNING IS
NECESSARY, CUT ROOTS CLEANLY USING A DISC TRENCHER IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
01000 OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. PRUNING SHALL
BE PER THE LATEST STANDARD OF THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL
(TYP.) USE PLYWOOD FORMS WHEN TREE ROOTS ARE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CURB &
GUTTER OR SIDEWALK. USE CLD STD. 40.11 FOR BRIDGING TREE ROOTS. TREES SPECIFIED BY
THE PLANS TO HAVE ASPHALT CURBING MUST USE CLD STD. 40.13. TREE PROTECTION SHALL
BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CLD STD. 40.02. WHEN THE TREE IS CLOSE TO THE WORK AREA
TREE PROTECTION CLD STD. 40.12 SHALL 8E USED.
SIDE SLOPES:
LIMITS OF PROPOSED SLOPES ARE INDICATED IN THE PLANS, DETAILS AND STANDARD
DRAWINGS. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED A 3:1 (HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL)
UNLESS DESIGNATED BY THE ENGINEER. A CUT SLOPE OF 2:1 MAXIMUM WILL BE USED ONLY
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AND DEPRESSED CURB:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT 6 -INCH THICK CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AT
INTERSECTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS FOR ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAILS,
CONSTRUCTION PLANS & NCDOT STANDARD DRAWINGS.
SAWCUTS:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT EXISTING ASPHALT AND /OR CONCRETE SURFACES PRIOR
TO REMOVAL UNLESS OTH
ERVASE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SAW T
CU WIDTH SHALL BE
1 FOOT MINIMUM FROM THE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT. SAW CUT PAVEMENT SHALL BE
REPLACED AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT REQUIRED TO TIE -IN TO FACE OF
PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER.
PAVEMENT DEGRADATION FEE:
CDOT HAS DETERMINED THAT NO PAVEMENT DEGRADATION FEE IS TO BE ASSESSED
TRAFFIC CONTROL:
TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THE "WORK
AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK" (WATCH) AND THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS ON SHEETS
TCP1.
STANDARDS
THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS AND THE LATEST REVISION THERETO ARE APPLICABLE
TO THIS PROJECT AND BY REFERENCE ARE CONSIDERED A PART OF THESE PLANS.
NCDOT STANDARDS SHALL BE USED. CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MAY BE USED IF THERE IS NOT AN APPLICABLE NCDOT STANDARD.
NCDOT:
STD. NO:
TITLE:
200. 02 .............................. ...............................
.......................CLEARING AND GRUBBING
300. 01 .......................... ...............................
...........................PIPE INSTALLATION
838. 21 ................................ ...............................
.....................REINFORCED CONCRETE ENDWALL
840. 01 ........................... ...............................
..........................BRICK CATCH BASIN
840. 03 ............................. ...............................
........................FRAMES, GRATES. AND HOODS
846. 01 ........... ........................................ .......
.. ........................ 2' -6' STANDARD CURB AND GUTTER
848.01-- ........................ ...............................
.......................CONCRETE SIDEWALK
1205. 08 .... ................... ................... ..................................
......PAVEMENT MARKINGS
1250. 01 .......................... ...............................
.........................RAISED PAVEMENT MARKINGS
CHARLOTTE:
CLEARANCE
STD. NO.:
TITLE:
1E9............................. ...............................
...........................CURB TRANSITION
125E ........................................ .................
...........................TYPE II MODIFIED DRIVEWAY
10. 31A ................................ ...............................
.....................ACCESSIBLE RAMP
10. 35B ............................... ...............................
......................TRUNCATED DOMES
10. 36A ............................. ...............................
........................CULVERT CROSSING
10. 368 ............................. ...............................
........................CULVERT CROSSING
20. 22 .............................. ...............................
.........................FLARED END SECTION
20. 23 ......................................... .............................................
RIPRAP APRON AT OUTFALLS
30. 06A .......................... ...............................
...........................SILT FENCE
30. 06B .......................... ...............................
30. 10 ................................. ...............................
...........................HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE
......................TEMPORARY ROCK CHECK
30. 11A .................................. ...............................
...................CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
30. 13 ............................... ...............................
30. 15 ............................. ...............................
........................EROSION CONTROL DEWATERING
..........................INLET PROTECTION
30. 17 ................................. ...............................
......................TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE
30. 18 .................................... ...............................
...................CONSTRUCTION WITHIN CREEK BANK
30. 20 ............................... ...............................
........................MATTING DETAIL
40. 02 ........................... ...............................
...........................TREE PROTECTION
40. 11 ................................. ...............................
.......................BRIDGING TREE ROOTS
40. 12 ............................ ...............................
...........................TREE PROTECTION
40. 14 ............................ ...............................
...........................ROCK CHIMNEY
50. 04A ........................... ...............................
.........................SAFETY RAIL
50. 14 .................................. ...............................
.....................PIANO -STYLE CROSSWALK
ABBREVIATIONS
AB AN D ............................
ABANDONED
A.D ........... ......................ALGEBRAIC
DIFFERENCE
ASPH ..............................
ASPHALT
APPROX ..........................
APPROXIMATELY
B /C ...... ...........................BACK
OF CURB
BI T .............. .....................BITUMINOUS
PERMANENT
BM ......... ..........................BENCH
MARK
BRG ... ..............................8
FARING
CB ......... ..........................CATCH
BASIN
C &G ..... ...........................CURB
AND GUTTER
CL .... ...............................
CLEARANCE
CA FENCE .....................CHAIN
LINK FENCE
CMP ........... .....................CORRUGATED
MTL PIPE
CONIC .. ............................CONCRETE
-POINT OF VERT INT
CON ST.............................
CONSTRUCTION
DB ........ ...........................DEED
BOOK
DCB ....... .........................DOUBLE
CB
DI ......... ...........................DROP
INLET
D I A ... ...............................
DIAMETER
DW ......... ..........................DRIVE
WAY
DIM ............ ......................DIMENSION
SOUTH
E ....... ...............................
EAST /EASTI N G
EA .... ...............................
EACH
ELE V .......... ......................ELEVATION
SPLIT RAIL FENCE
EDP ...... ...........................EDGE
OF PAVEMENT
ESMT .. .............................
EASEMENT
EXIST ........ .......................EXISTING
STANDARD
F /C ...... ...........................FACE
OF CURB
F'S ......... .........................FLARED
END SECTION
FH ........ ...........................FIRE
HYDRANT
FOC ....... ..........................FIBER
OPTIC CABLE
GV....................... ............
GAS VALVE
HORI Z ..............................
HORI ZON TAL
INT- .. ..............................I
N TER SECTI ON
INV ......... .........................INVERT
GROUND
IP ......... ...........................IRON
PIN SET
L ....... ...............................
LENGTH
LF ........... .........................LINEAR
FOOTAGE
LT..... ...............................
LEFT
It, ..... ...............................
POUND
LP ......... ..........................LIGHT
POLE
MAX
MAXIMUM
MIN ..............................
MINIMUM
. .... .
MONO _.. .. ............
......... MONOLI THIC
mph ...... ..........................MILES
PER HOUR
MTL ....... ..........................METAL
N .................... .................NORTH
/NORTHING
N T& .........................
NOT TO SCALE
O/ H ..........................OVER
HEAD
OC ............................ON
CENTER
PAVT . .......................PAVEMENT
ROCK
PC .. ..........................POINT
OF CURVATURE
PERM ........................
PERMANENT
PG ............................
PAGE
PI ... ..........................POINT
OF INT
PK ............................PK
NAIL SET
PP .. ..........................POWER
POLE
PROP ........................
PROPOSED
PSE ..........................PERM
SW ESMT
PT .. ..........................POINT
OF TANGENCY
PIA . ........................
-POINT OF VERT INT
PILE ..........................PERM
UTILITY ESMT
r ...... .........................RADIUS
R T ..............................
RI G H T
RCP_ .......................
REINFORCED CONC PIPE
RELOC ......................
RELOCATE
R/W .. ........................
RIGHT OF WAY
S_ ........................
SOUTH
SO .. ..........................STORM
DRAIN
SF. .............
SQUARE FOOT
S/R FENCE ..............
SPLIT RAIL FENCE
SS..
SEWER
STA ..........................
STATION
STD ..........................
STANDARD
SW ............................
SIDEWALK
TAN ..........................
TANGENT
TCE ...........................TEMP
CONST ESMT
TEMP ........................
TEMPORARY
TP ..... .......................TRAVERSE
POINT
T /W ..........................
TEST WIRE
TYP .. ........................
TYPICAL
U/G ..........................UNDER
GROUND
VC.. ... .......................VERTICAL
CURVE
VERT .........................
VERTICAL
W..............................
WEST
W / ............................
WITH
WM . ..........................WATER
METER
W VAULT ..................
WATER VAULT
WV . ..........................WATER
VALVE
60p ..........................SIXTY
PENNY NAIL SET
................................
FOOT
..... ...........................INCH
D R r
0' -2.9' 10' 4'
3' -7.9' 25' 19'
8'+ 50' 44'
R
Not to scale
r o
[V
CURB AND GUTTER
SIDEWALK TRANSITION DETAIL AT BACK OF CURB
uecnox ions nu sai ueu
�. slave - 1s. wAVa°. uruwu
su olW�wo�r mux
(IZ1 wc6 jµsu�6 ra
us mw rrx Ism r�'ar. uau�wum
��
L1ND DU=P W sTAANNU.mw
nl
ROCK
CHIMNEY ao.1a
PII Yl<5�LY L
lQb HAND
CITY OF � DDY®Oe smmAeael TEMPORARY TREE PROTECTION DETAIL
Igo
lm) uxD OMIDPONT BrMDWIS
TREE PROTECTION DETAIL
Law°rIfi pympg apglg R+ 40.02
8
3 8 S �
�a
b Ego
7
'a -
Eoii
E7
m
Q
Z�
LL
Wa
7
/�/� O
YL O
O
P 4
z M
a
a �
q
N
o- a
rc �
� o �
["I
U
W
Oa �O
W O
oW Az
W
F
N
o In
Friday, September 26, 2014 12:28:11 PM

q
D E
ORR ROAD
-L-
1 T
4' PLANTING STRIP 7' SIDEWALK 2.5' 5' BIKE LANE 11' LANE 11' LANE 5' BIKE LANE 2.5 7' SIDEWALK 1'
CURB � CURB
27 1 27 O V' 0
TYPICAL SECTION T
s C1 STATIONS 1 +15 TO 4 +25 s
R1 D1 (DESIGNATED WETLAND AREA) E1 R1
6' SIDEWALK
1'
2%
s
8' PLANTING STRIP
2%.
ORR ROAD EXTENSION
1 -L- 1
2.5' 5' BIKE LANE 11' LANE 11' LANE 5' BIKE LANE 2'S' 8' PLANTING STRIP
CURB V` CURB
V'O
1 2%
6' SIDEWALK 8' PLANTING STRIP 2.5'
1'
CURB
s
2%
TYPICAL SECTION
STATIONS 4 +25 TO 6 +67
6' SIDEWALK
1'
2%
s
q
ORR ROAD EXTENSION
1 -L- 1
5' BIKE LANE 11' LANE 11' LANE 5' BIKE LANE RIGHT TURN LANE 2.5'
WIDTH VARIES 0 -12' CURB (* V'O
TYPICAL SECTION
STATIONS 6 +67 TO 9 +29.84
MATERIAL SCHEDULE
Cl
PROP. 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S 9.5 B,
AT AN AVG. RATE OF 112 LBS PER SQ YD -INCH TO BE INSTALLED
IN TWO LIFTS
D1
PROP. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, TYPE 1 19.0 B
AT AN AVG. RATE OF 114 LBS PER SQ YD -INCH
E1
PROP. 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B 25.0 B
AT AN AVG. RATE OF 114 LBS PER SQ YD -INCH
R1
PROPOSED 2' -6" CONC. CURB AND GUTTER
S
4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK
T
COMPACTED EARTH MATERIAL
(98% COMPACTION WITH A PASSING PROOF ROLL)
t
27
6' SIDEWALK 1,
2%
S
,sell
�cg
a z�
a ate$
m
0
2
N rE a
J n
W�
� z
d. o
a
J � N
O
S
F
6
y �
b
s
N
N
U
z
�a w
O �
GW U
I�N °kn
PM

0 +5244
CL OF ROAD - L-
I E1.EM 773.355
CL OFI ROAD - L-
I 531.61 773.483
I I
I II
CL OF ROAD - L-
/ 17.94' LT.
ELEV: 7272
I 11 z Q0F ROAD -L-
/ /
16.W ". 71.939
Q
�y� I
ELGYWOOD LANE
I
me
9 +24.60
\ \\ I
CL OF ROAD
- L-
49.98' LT.
TG+81.15
6
8 +09.80
- L-
r CL OF ROAD - L-
7
I I I I
0+58.83
III I I
CL CF ROAD - L-
I
25.95' LT.
I III I I
E". 73.563
I III I I
0+53.73
III I
CL OF ROAD - L-
I
34.40' LT.
III I I
ELEY. 7.1919
I III I
0+51.21
g
CL OF ROAD - L-
'^ I I I I I
I III I I I
E".. 74.023
+10.28
9 +24.60
CL OF ROAD
CL OF ROAD - L-
49.98' LT.
65.54' LT.
8 +09.80
EIEV: 791.163
r CL OF ROAD - L-
9 +25.27
CL OF ROAD - L-
6+05. 0
5802' LT.
+32.28
CL OF ROAD - -
29.52' LT.
1
1 1 1 I I
790.810
ELEN 78.796
_ _ 1 U I
F1EV: 79.712
9+2
9+24.51
I
1 1\ I I z I I
2.
g
CL OF ROAD - L-
ROAD - L-
E".78.578
1
\\ Q I
48.05' LT.
5+90.13
CL OF ROAD - L-
\
6 +46.7
ELEY. 790.404
CL OF ROAD - L-
19.68 LT.
9 +21.27
E".. 780.513
5+80'3
1
CL OF ROAD - L-
CL OF ROAD - L-
I I I
CL OF ROAD - L-
3833' LT.
I I I
18.00 LT.
F1EV: 77.681
ELEO. 790.010
ELEN 780.978
I II II
I III II
I II II
I II
8 +15.80
CL OF ROAD - L-
a+oo
I
I II II
6+001 II II
I
I
30.03' LT.
7 +0o I
ElEV: 789.898
D
I II II
9+08.31
/ -- - -- I II II
i -y I, II
CL OF ROAD - L-
23.36' LT.
ELEN 789.445
I,
~
CL OF ROAD - L-
116TWA
CL OF ROAD - L-
in
16.00' LT.
ELEV: 77.293
18.48' LT.
C". 789.280
z
18.00 LT.
5+87.28
ELEN 781.148
6 +47.68
+00 9+00
9+ .19
Q
EIEN.
8+89.91
or_,
/ / / / / /
/ /
EMV. 780.481
CL OF ROAD - L-
/ / /
6 +38.38
ElEV: 78.843
16.2Y LT.
CL OF ROAD - L-
MAY LT.
8 +0205
/ / o/ /
/
ELE .. 789.173
z
5 +95.05
a
OL OF ROAD - L-
/
CL OF ROAD - L-
29.45' LT.
8+04.34
CL OF ROAD - L-
26.03' LT.
ELEM. 79.717
44.09' LT.
ELEV. 789.031
ELEV. 78.504
6 +27.50
9 +04.
9 OF R
CL OF ROAD - L-
CL OF ROAD - L-
39.75' LT.
CL OF ROAD - L-
54.02' u.
CL OF ROAD - L-
L
46.12' LT.
0".. 78.263
29.22' LT.
E".. 789.613
CL OF ROAD - 2-
LlEV: 789.185
49.41' L'
9 +14.06
9 +3299
CL OF ROAD - L-
CL OF ROAD - L-
55.38' LT.
CL OF ROAD - L-
3281'
EUEW. 789.784
59.10 LT.
ELEV. 789.3(108 6
.. 78.816
9+2215
9+35.05
1.
CL OF ROAD - L-
CL OF ROAD - 2-
38.57 LT.
67.63' LT.
E".. 789.456
ELEY. 790.000
0
+10.28
CL OF ROAD
49.98' LT.
E". 78.759
8 +09.80
1 1 111 111
r CL OF ROAD - L-
6+05. 0
I I
+32.28
CL OF ROAD - -
29.52' LT.
1
1 1 1 I I
1 CL OF ROAD - L-
L 37.80' LT.
ELEN 78.796
_ _ 1 U I
F1EV: 79.712
-LO
I
1 1\ I I z I I
2.
CL OF ROAD
22.28'
\\ II 11
ROAD - L-
E".78.578
1
\\ Q I
2ELEY 780.135
5+90.13
CL OF ROAD - L-
\
6 +46.7
17.84' LT.
ELLV. 78.200
CL OF ROAD - L-
19.68 LT.
I
E".. 780.513
5+80'3
1
6 +61.13
CL OF ROAD - L-
I I I
CL OF ROAD - L-
15.90 LT.
I I I
18.00 LT.
F1EV: 77.681
I I I I
ELEN 780.978
I II II
I III II
I II II
I II
I
a+oo
I
I II II
6+001 II II
I
I
7 +0o I
I II II
I II II
,I
/ -- - -- I II II
i -y I, II
I,
CL OF ROAD - L-
16.00' LT.
ELEV: 77.293
6 +65.10
CL OF ROAD - 2-
18.00 LT.
5+87.28
ELEN 781.148
6 +47.68
18.91' LL
/
CL OF ROAD - L-
EIEN.
18.84' LT.
5 +98.7
CL OF ROAD L-
/ / / / / /
/ /
EMV. 780.481
-
26.02' LT.
/ / /
6 +38.38
ElEV: 78.843
/ / / /
CL OF ROAD - L-
MAY LT.
8 +0205
/ / o/ /
/
ELEN. 780'091
34.38' LT.
EIEU 78.883 63
/
CL OF ROAD - L-
29.45' LT.
8+04.34
CL OF ROAD - L-
ELEM. 79.717
44.09' LT.
ELEV. 78.504
6 +27.50
8 +03.13
CL OF ROAD - L-
39.75' LT.
CL OF ROAD - L-
54.02' u.
M. 79.318
0".. 78.263
8 +25.04
CL OF ROAD - 2-
49.41' L'
EIEV: 77&988
6 +2255
CL OF ROAD - L-
59.10 LT.
.. 78.816
,sell
r:
LL 8 8 w
a 8�
Ak �tuz
m
} O
� 2
Z
W=
-3
LL
p
Yi =
QO
N
a
D
a
b
4
U
N � 6
F
U COO
0
f-L
� °a F
a w
ap aw
GW F
� va
W �
N o �
PM

77:
76(
76,
76(
75(
75i
STREAM AND 6' x4' PCBC PROFILE -Y-
0+50 1+00 1 +50 2 +00 2 +50
STREAM AND 6' x4' PCBC ALIGNMENT -Y-
low,
..�. -
,
�<
3+00 3+50
—nE TO EXISTING STREAM
WEAN a(oss secnorls \
05 \
\ 3
F �05 � it B O
e 9g� q09 S
:f \ e �9
12-H.xow000
/ � e
RR TzseT.
\ \ e
772
768
764
760
756
753
mi-;.
III
e
c c
W Z
m
0
� 2
Z�
—3
�LL
�Wy
Y. z
�o
4411
b
° °z ccdll °,
dU
O Y � L °
N
N
F
U
W
a �d
OW A
� O
zM oN
Friday, December 05, 2014 9:12:49 AM
EW -2
Y
aamp
N
N
n
wad
PROPOSED 27
X tY WOOD SEAL
��-
—
—
—
7REAM
BOTYOM ELEVATION
121LF OF 7
' PC9C O 214X
PROPOSED Y
X 1Y WOOD SEAL
—PROPOSED RIP
APRON
EIO770M
AnON
N
5
1 n
0+50 1+00 1 +50 2 +00 2 +50
STREAM AND 6' x4' PCBC ALIGNMENT -Y-
low,
..�. -
,
�<
3+00 3+50
—nE TO EXISTING STREAM
WEAN a(oss secnorls \
05 \
\ 3
F �05 � it B O
e 9g� q09 S
:f \ e �9
12-H.xow000
/ � e
RR TzseT.
\ \ e
772
768
764
760
756
753
mi-;.
III
e
c c
W Z
m
0
� 2
Z�
—3
�LL
�Wy
Y. z
�o
4411
b
° °z ccdll °,
dU
O Y � L °
N
N
F
U
W
a �d
OW A
� O
zM oN
Friday, December 05, 2014 9:12:49 AM

PROFILE -L-
780
32250'
PVI STA. -
P,4 ELEV. °
VC
+2215
76264
fM11pY0 01At
DAV ° nAT
K 3c
00
776
-1 FES -2
EW -2
CB -1
CB -2
EW -1
8
I
4.25%
- --
y�
772
..
.-
n
SING GROI
NO -L-
+ y+
N Z 2N
I
a
-
��
m +1 >i
UNG: ZZ
N
mmI +F
UNK
ZM
<3
-
O. VI
��
OPOSED ELEVA
ION -L-
768
rh
764
\
760
756
NOTE-.
SEE SHEET 3 AN
CROSSING AND SIREAM
3A FOR PIPE
PROFILES
12111 OF 6' X
' PCEIC O 214%
'52
6LF OF 16'
CPO 1.00%
50
n9
2v
P
.6�
R p?m
760 I •
776
772
g
gg C
788
e 3w-
64 °0 mz
a
m
'60
'56 0
0
'52
50,.
0450 1 +00 1 +50 2 +00 2 +50 3+00 3450 4+00 4150 5+00 5+50 1,
�STNC STREAMp
TIE TO EXISTING MATCH EXISTING BANK S° -1
d` \ \\ '� SLOPES AND W1D7HS T TIE IN POINT O •" OPOSED 6' SIDEWALK r- Syi
7V ,rte OPOSED B' PLANTING STRIP I e O
9DON FROM 7 -6' CURB AND GU TO .� -0'
CURB AND GUTTER - OLDS 10.19 © / S 08921222 l _ t e �p�_ O
W CUT EASING DRIVEWAY AND REMOVE AT E70�lINC TOOLED JOINT // 08921226 SEE STREAMS PROFILE (YS)EOH SHEET 3A KATHERINE M. a
\ �E.o` / NAWAL M. HOPKINS W1SOR e p
DPOSED ACCESSIBLE RAMP (TIP.) - CMlDS 10.31A / J, _ c
\ \\ \ \\ `9 �, P __� - \\ / DB 77986 /PG IV y OG OP NANRAI. FIB MATTING 228 DAM CIRCLI
ROPOSED 7 SIDEWALK \ / 229 AUSTIN DRIVE F� D Z C
\ \ / ROPOSED 183 LF GF SAFETY RAIL - TERES 60. ROPOSED GRADING UMI FOR / g i OVE EXSTING WELL HOUSE 34LF OF 18' RCP O 1.00% STREAM IMPROVEMEN xOF DITCHe — VE DOSING FENCE lO HERE OVE DOSI FENCE TO = O
/ f\ STAY INSIDE EASEMEN PROPOSED BOTTOM OF BAN LL
� (STAY INSIDE EASEMENT) ( » W / E
/ PROPOSED TOP aF BANK C q
ROPOSED EN�WAIi -SEE m W
ao B AGE To DRAIN +°� 08921221
e ' /mss, E KATHERINE oRh Ogg ROAD -L- (/) YIF o
4 a0�p 17986/PG 71 ° -
/ // , �• �1 1• \ 'ao �,-,f F 300 DAWN CIRCLE
U1
Ew-I O If + a
/s �/i e o• x I �' F' kk s, I as -I- S a
A'"a �.F' as° , / 5.59'A'` cli
� r
o StO� rn
REMOVE E%ISDNG FEN S ° = b
y 141 �a \ e
0 a . Y { 3 p r r , �'A , a r '� 4 F e. REMOVE E7(ISDNC IXIT BUILgN m m z mm
+� SIT FROM 7-6' TER- AND CU $ \.J a REM EKI�SjINB QOg'T BURDIN
/ TO 7- CURB AND CUTTER - CLDS 10.19 + ,6 +0p �' ,F" }+' OPOSED SIDEW ' /,R —I ` o
e PROPOSED V TING STRI _ H Y
PROPOSED 2' -6' CURB AND GUTTER (TYP. ° , ar r • , .
PROPOSED 7 SIDEW r� r 08921220
KATHERINE M. U
,ate A O — r F'. ; ­REMOVE DOSIING CE TO HERE' �_ _ _ WISOR r.l
93LF OF 38' RCP d1.89% ' , FEN ' /
(STAY AN EA {NT) DB 19910 PG 351 +
O F E e 316 DAWN CIRCLE
°1P EW-2 i - ° E + 121V X 4. 214%
m2 E a,�OP PT09E TO BOX CULV T PIPE OPENING IN j ' O
PROPOSED 300 lF OF SAFELY RAIL - OLDS 50.04 r F -THb VTR Y a%
, I 7 TO CAST .OR PROPERL CORED
I
GRADE' THIS AREA TO DRAIN INTO S °` OF 16' RCP 0,11
O
„ OPOSED ENDW -SEE SP • / tea/ O
• • ' r r . a
OPOSED Po�RAP APRON -SEE DETAIL, ON SHEET W *4 `° O
EASING WETLANDS TO BE PROTECTED. NO DISTURBANCE SHALL ' a PROPOSED BOTTOM OF BANK S1REA /M -_ F^+/1 O
TAKE PLACE OUTSIDE THE PROPOSED WORK LIMITS O PROPO�D TOP o BANK 1 OPOSED r IMPROVEMENTS - SEE SHEET 3A FOR OFIIE AND ALIGNDAENT O
,e
'
O
PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS F ,� , • ' r r , ' Y I W
Ei•°I iS1 C/2
S IMPROVEMENTS (TOP OF DI7CH) 5° o
TIE TO DOSING S •MATCH DOSI7NG , Y W
SLOP BANK AND XIDTIS �.T DE M POINT r- oy/ / y OPOSED BOTTOM' w STREAM F
/ \ _ 14 En
FNday, December 05, 2014 9:15:23 AM

1'1 w
\y l J
L
c' 111
� I 1111 1
D 111111 � 11
-i v w rl .0 11 I
n 111
_ 14,
r d e 1 ' GL
EFI — 1
I
I
p+j
Cn
M
fTl
_ /dl
M �I
(T7 e
i ,
41
T'
80i
79
79:
781
78'
781
771
77:
77(
PROFILE -L-
300
796
792
788
'84
'60
'76
'72
'70
6 +00 6 +50 7 +00 7 +50 8 +00 8+50 9 +00
WORK BEYOND ORR ROAD EXTENSION PROJECT OMITS
TO BE BUILT BY BLUE ONE EXTENSION PROJECT
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ON ORR ROAD EXTENSION.
LL \
TIE TO EXISTING\ mxwe>E P. 1
V.
ANSITION FROM -6- CURB AND CUTTER TO X -0- CURB 406 GUTTER -ODs 10.19
O LL \
Z
I
_ \7
OPOSSDIIAOCESSIBU RAMP (TYPj - CLDS 10.31A
ROC( CHIMNEY - CLDS 40.1
08920301
OAK TREE IS TO BE PRUNED BY A LICEN
ARBORIST To PROVIDE CLEARANCE TO
JAYANTILAL PATEL
�,a D8 26374/PG 115
\
I
I
THE ROADWAY AND PROPER SIGHT DISTANCE
er` 5905 NORTH TRYON
8 SAW CUT AND REMOVE
u
PAD AS SHOWN
TO THE STOP UCy4T- ANQ_INTERSECTION
—I
STREET
100.
PN STA.
VC
- 7 +50
REMOVE DUSTING 15- R
III
W17H SUITABLE BACKRLL MATERIAL
BLUE ONE EXTEN
TIE IN POINT
EIEV. _ 790.83
;TAN 8 +30.51
I
j
\ nOVE EXISTING 15- e
_L e
I
O e _
O e
REMOVE FENCE INSIDE EASEMENT
F
rz TIRO
F F F F F
_ a
�- FD F �— F
"'u�
o
A.D. -
K
-1. COX
M. 56
.�
x�v. ]fl1� _ J �
0 x�__��x
NOW
�1 I
_
\ N
G
x x X x\
fin"
HIGH POINT
A - 8 +00
�
�o _
li °>'
a
II x owr_
S4{F QF 18- RCP O 247%
I w
I 7 ,1
I
I � x 341E OF 18- RCP O 1.00X
—_ I O ,R- Q
I
CB
-3
CB
-4
1)<IiCE ENERG ua.�a
8
g
G
—Ryw --I-- —
o
4aoo
/
----
I
---- - - - --/ I $
0 1
o
F
28.00
I
/ °
T
_
c I
8�
We
E'
F ruvR'n
—
T - -_ LL
o
C
e
e L
�I
S+
n
/
a e e
W
OPOSED 7 -8- CURB AND GUTTER (TIP.)
4 I
O
. —.- -�-
e TIE PROPOSED 18- RCP INTO EXISTING JUNCTION BOX
9-
OPOSED e' SIDEWALK (TIP.)
HARVEY GOUCH AND
--
--
LOUISE G. GOUCH
DB 5434 /PG 429 7RYPE II MODIFIED DRIVEWAY - ODS 10.25E
o z
w
Z
STING GROUND
-L-
LL
I I I n
OPOSED ELEVATION
-L-
I
I
I
8' RCP O 2.47%
— 1021E
24- RCP O 0.7
.i
P
S nF
6m9
m0
madam
m�
mm
g
0 m0
300
796
792
788
'84
'60
'76
'72
'70
6 +00 6 +50 7 +00 7 +50 8 +00 8+50 9 +00
WORK BEYOND ORR ROAD EXTENSION PROJECT OMITS
TO BE BUILT BY BLUE ONE EXTENSION PROJECT
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ON ORR ROAD EXTENSION.
4
a
a b y
W
E
i
0
Z�
91
aq
/W
YX QO
a
1
j m Y
J � N
O O
b
o i
N
U W H
H
O� aF
W �
F
_ O
Friday, September 26, 2014 12:18:01 PM
LL \
TIE TO EXISTING\ mxwe>E P. 1
V.
ANSITION FROM -6- CURB AND CUTTER TO X -0- CURB 406 GUTTER -ODs 10.19
O LL \
Z
I
_ \7
OPOSSDIIAOCESSIBU RAMP (TYPj - CLDS 10.31A
ROC( CHIMNEY - CLDS 40.1
08920301
OAK TREE IS TO BE PRUNED BY A LICEN
ARBORIST To PROVIDE CLEARANCE TO
JAYANTILAL PATEL
�,a D8 26374/PG 115
\
I
I
THE ROADWAY AND PROPER SIGHT DISTANCE
er` 5905 NORTH TRYON
8 SAW CUT AND REMOVE
u
PAD AS SHOWN
TO THE STOP UCy4T- ANQ_INTERSECTION
—I
STREET
CONCRETE
b DO DITCH TO BE Fllil
REMOVE DUSTING 15- R
III
W17H SUITABLE BACKRLL MATERIAL
a �_ a
REMOVE OUSTING 1Y 11
I
j
\ nOVE EXISTING 15- e
_L e
I
O e _
O e
REMOVE FENCE INSIDE EASEMENT
F
rz TIRO
F F F F F
_ a
�- FD F �— F
"'u�
o
F
°E JUST MANHOL—_ —_ —_
E -15• RM
I -- I
—
.�
x�v. ]fl1� _ J �
0 x�__��x
NOW
�1 I
_
\ N
G
x x X x\
fin"
I POLE TO BE REMOVED BY OTHERS (TYP.) - SEE UBO
�
�o _
li °>'
a
II x owr_
S4{F QF 18- RCP O 247%
I w
I 7 ,1
I
I � x 341E OF 18- RCP O 1.00X
—_ I O ,R- Q
I
$I
1)<IiCE ENERG ua.�a
ow G G G ♦
G
G
—Ryw --I-- —
o
4aoo
/
----
I
---- - - - --/ I $
0 1
$
F
28.00
I
/ °
T
Rlmnw
c I
I-TI
I
E'
F ruvR'n
—
T - -_ LL
o
C
e
e L
Amx�r R y ro
n
/
a e e
W
OPOSED 7 -8- CURB AND GUTTER (TIP.)
4 I
O
OPOSED g PLANTING STRIP) a
e TIE PROPOSED 18- RCP INTO EXISTING JUNCTION BOX
9-
OPOSED e' SIDEWALK (TIP.)
HARVEY GOUCH AND
NOTE-
OUSTING BUILDING, FUEL TANKS AND
LOUISE G. GOUCH
DB 5434 /PG 429 7RYPE II MODIFIED DRIVEWAY - ODS 10.25E
o z
w
Z
CONSTRUCTION. TI BE REMOVED PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
5601 NORTH TRYON STREET
LL
I I I n
4
a
a b y
W
E
i
0
Z�
91
aq
/W
YX QO
a
1
j m Y
J � N
O O
b
o i
N
U W H
H
O� aF
W �
F
_ O
Friday, September 26, 2014 12:18:01 PM

GENERAL NOTES
A) ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MOST CURRENT EDITIONS
OF THE CHARLOTTE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION(CDOT) WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDSOOK(W.A.T.C.H.),
THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES(M.U.T.C.D.), THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION(NCDOT) SUPPLEMENT TO THE M.U.T.C.D., THE NCDOT ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS AND
THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES.
B) THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY CDOT IN WRITING 10 WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF ANY ROAD CLOSURE
OR 5 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CLOSING ONE OR MORE TRAVEL LANES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SECTION
'APPROVAL AND NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY OF THE W.A.T.C.H.
HANDBOOK.
C) ALL SIGNAL REVISIONS OR SHIFTS OF SIGNAL HEADS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CDOT; PRIOR TO
REVISING TRAFFIC LANES WHICH REQUIRE SIGNAL REVISIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CDOT
IMPLEMENTATION SECTION MANAGER (GUS JORDI / 336 -7056) A MINIMUM OF 30 CALENDAR DAYS IN
ADVANCE. TRAFFIC LANES SHALL NOT BE SHIFTED UNTIL THE REQUIRED SIGNAL REVISION / SHIFT IS
COMPLETE AND READY FOR ACTIVATION. FOR NOTICES RELATED TO SIGNAL WORK REQUIRING NEW UTILITIES,
REFER TO PROJECT NOTES.
D) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH, INSTALL, RELOCATE, AND MAINTAIN ALL TRAFFIC
CONTROL DEVICES, SIGNS, BARRICADES, WARNING AND /OR CHANNEUZING DEVICES FOR WORK SITES AND
DETOUR ROUTES AS SHOWN IN TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER.
E) CONSTRUCTION PHASING MAY DICTATE THAT TWO OR MORE TYPICAL W.A.T.C.H. DIAGRAMS OR STANDARDS
BE USED IN ONE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION. CHANNELIZING DEVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THESE TYPICALS SHALL
BE MOVED, SUPPLEMENTED, CHANGED, OR REMOVED AS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION
PHASING OF THE PLANS. THE LOCATION AND POSITIONING OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE
ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE MOTORIST DOES NOT RECEIVE FALSE INFORMATION WHEN TWO OR MORE
TYPICALS AND /OR ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS OVERLAP.
F) CONTRACTOR SHOULD BE AWARE THAT WHEN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA IS IN OR NEAR
A VERTICAL CREST OR HORIZONTAL CURVE, THE WORK AREA SHALL BE EXTENDED SO THAT LANE CLOSURE
BEGINS IN ADVANCE OF THE CURVE AND MINIMUM STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE IS MET.
G) OFF -DUTY POLICE OFFICERS MAY BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER TO BE PRESENT FOR
CONTROLLING TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION HOURS.
H) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK ALL HAZARDS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROJECT WITH WELL- MAINTAINED
SIGNS, BARRICADES, WARNING AND /OR CHANNEUZING DEVICES. ON CONNECTING ROADS, ALL BARRICADES,
SIGNS, WARNING, AND /OR CHANNEUZING DEVICES SHALL BE MOVED, SUPPLEMENTED, CHANGED, OR REMOVED
AS REQUIRED DURING THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
I) WORK ON THE PROJECT OR ANY SEPARATE ACTIVITY THEREIN SHALL NOT START UNTIL ALL OF THE
REQUIRED SIGNS, BARRICADES, WARNING, AND /OR CHANNELIZENG DEVICES ARE INSTALLED AND APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER.
J) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GUS JORDI, IMPLEMENTATION SECTION MANAGER (704 - 336 -7086) WITH
THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CDOT) TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY
WORK THAT WILL REQUIRE THE RELOCATION OR PLACEMENT OF SIGNS OR OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
BY THE CITY.
K. THE CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN DURING ALL PERIODS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THE ABILITY TO FLAG
TRAFFIC USING QUAUFIED FLAGGERS WHEN NECESSARY OR REQUIRED
L THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND ADDRESS CONFLICTING PAVEMENT
MARKINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SECTION 'TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE DEVICES' OF THE
W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING
PAVEMENT MARKINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
M) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TWO WAY TRAFFIC ON ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT UNLESS
OTHERWSE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS PROJECT NOTES. OR BY THE ENGINEER,
N) CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PROPERTY OWNERS AND TENANTS ACCESS TO THEIR
PROPERTY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT LIMITS, INCLUDING REASONABLE INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR
BUSINESSES. SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID TO FIRE HYDRANTS
O) THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY (BY MAIL) ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS WHO HAVE DIRECT
ACCESS TO THE ROADWAY WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS A MINIMUM OF 5 AND A MAXIMUM OF 10 WORKING
DAYS PRIOR TO INSTAW14G TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IN FRONT OF THOSE PROPERTIES. NOTIFICATIONS
SHOULD INCLUDE CONTACT PERSONS NAME, TELEPHONE NUMBER, EMAIL ADDRESS, AND MAIUNG ADDRESS.
P) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PATROL THE WORK SITE AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF EACH WORK DAY (AT A
MINIMUM) TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ARE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY.
CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ARE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING AT ALL
TIMES DURING PERIODS OF CONSTRUCTION INACTIVITY.
0) DURING PERIODS OF INACTIVITY OR AT NIGHT, EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE PARKED IN SUCH A MANNER AS
TO BLOCK SIDEWALKS, TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, OR THE MOTORISTS' VIEW OF TRAFFIC. EQUIPMENT SHALL
BE AT LEAST 10 FEET AWAY FROM THE TRAVEL LANE.
R) WHENEVER TRAFFIC MUST BE ROUTED ACROSS THE CENTERLINE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE TWO
OPPOSING DIRECTIONS MUST BE PHYSICALLY SEPARATED. TRAFFIC CONES CAN BE USED FOR THIS PURPOSE
DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS; REFLECTORIZED CONES OR DRUMS MUST BE USED AT NIGHT. TRAFFIC SHALL NOT
BE ROUTED ACROSS THE CENTERLINE DURING CONSTRUCTION INACTIVITY UNLESS PAVEMENT MARKING
CONFLICTS ARE APPROPRIATELY ADDRESSED AND AGREEMENT ON REMOVAL OR NOT IS WORKED OUT WITH
THE ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SECTION 'DURATION OF WORK' OF THE W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK. IF
THE ENGINEER APPROVES TRAFFIC TO CROSS THE CENTER LINE DURING CONSTRUCTION INACTIVITY, ONLY
REFLECTORIZED DRUMS MUST BE USED.
S) THE CITY ENGINEER OR DIRECTOR OF THE CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OR THEIR
APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVES ARE AUTHORIZED TO STOP ANY WORK WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY THAT
DOES NOT FOLLOW THIS TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN OR REQUIREMENTS OF THE W.A.T.C.H. AND THE M.U.T.C.D.
UNTIL SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.
PROJECT NOTES
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL FINAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND RAISED PAVEMENT
MARKERS. CDOT SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL FINAL SIGNAGE.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL ONLY WORK ON ONE CORNER OF AN INTERSECTION AT A TIME
3. DURING THE HOURS OF 7:00 AM -9:00 AM AND 4:30 PM -6:30 PM MONDAY THRU FRIDAY CONSTRUCTION
OR MAINTENANCE WORK WHICH INVOLVES CLOSURE OF A TRAVEL LANE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED ON
THOROUGHFARE STREETS EXCEPT FOR EMERGENCY SITUATIONS OR WITH APPROVAL FROM CDOT.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UMI.j,CONSTRUCTION TO ONE STREET AT A TIME, UNLESS OTHERWISE
INSTRUCTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT CONSTRUCTION TO ONE BLOCK EACH DAY IN
ORDER TO DECREASE THE AMOUNT OF BACKFILL
TRAVELWAY WINK ZONE
�i INCH
. .OR E
........
DETAIL A
N.T.S.
CONSTRUCTION PHASING
T ADJACENT LANES TO CONSTRUCTION ZONES MAY REMAIN OPEN IF LATERAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN EDGE OF
TRAVEL LANE AND EQUIPMENT IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 2 FEET (INCLUDING WIDTH OF DRUM). IF A
PHASE I: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL CONSTRUCTION WARNING SIGNS ONE WEEK PRIOR
DROPOFF EXISTS WITHIN THE WORK ZONE, CONTRACTOR SHOULD FOLLOW THE SECTION MISCELLANEOUS
TO THE BEGINNING OF WORK. THE APPROACH WARNING SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ON AUSTIN
CONSIDERATIONS OF THE W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK PERTAINING TO ADJACENT LANE CLOSURES DUE TO DROPOFFS.
DR., DAWN CIRCLE, AND ELGYWOOD LANE AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL CONSTRUCTION
U) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE PHASING AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
IS COMPLETED.
COMPLETE THE REQUIREMENTS OF EACH CONSTRUCTION PHASE IN SEQUENCE. WHEN A CONSTRUCTION PHASE
IS DIVIDED INTO STEPS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE REQUIREMENTS OF EACH STEP IN SEQUENCE.
T
PHASE II: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT PAVEMENT, CURB &GUTTER, DRAINAGE,
(EXAMPLE: THE REQUIREMENTS OF PHASE I SHALL BE COMPLETED BEFORE PROCEEDING TO PHASE 11; THE
SIDEWALK, ETC. FROM NORTH TRYON TO AUSTIN DR. USING DIAGRAMS AND 9 OF THE
#
REQUIREMENTS OF STEP 1 OF PHASE I SHALL BE COMPLETED BEFORE PROCEEDING TO STEP 2 OF PHASE 1).
WATCH HANDBOOK. THE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED ROAD SHALL REMAIN CLOSED AND BARRICADED
ALL WORK DESCRIBED IN THE PROJECT PHASING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR, EXCEPT WHERE
UNTIL ALL PHASES ARE COMPLETE.
IT IS SPECIFIED FOR CERTAIN WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS.
PHASE III: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT PAVEMENT, CURB & GUTTER, DRAINAGE,
V) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO STOP TRAFFIC FOR MORE THAN 5 MINUTES AT A TIME IN
SIDEWALK, ETC. FROM DAWN CIRCLE TO AUSTIN DR. USING DIAGRAMS #4 AND #9 OF THE
ANY ONE DIRECTION.
WATCH HANDBOOK. THE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED ROAD SHALL REMAIN CLOSED AND BARRICADED
UNTIL ALL PHASES ARE COMPLETE.
W) CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO WORK ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD SIMULTANEOUSLY WITHIN
THE SAME AREA EXCEPT WHERE THE ROADWAY IS DIVIDED BY A RAISED MEDIAN. IT WILL BE ACCEPTABLE TO
PHASE IV: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MILL AS NEEDED ON DAWN CIRCLE AND AUSTIN DR.,
CONSTRUCT BORE PITS ON EACH SIDE OF A ROADWAY FOR BORING UTILITIES UNDER THE ROADWAY UNLESS
INSTALL ASPHALT WEDGING AS NEEED ON DAWN CIRCLE, PAVE ENTIRE JOB, AND PRE STRIPE
TRAVEL LANES. EDED BY ENGINEER TO COMPLY WITH PEDESTRIAN REQUIREMENTS OR LATERAL CLEARANCE FROM
TRAVEL
ALL PERMANENT MARKING. ONCE PRE STRIPING HAS BEEN APROVED BY CDOT, FINAL PAVEMENT
MARKING AND RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE INSTALLED. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE
X) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE SECTION 'PEDESTRIAN CONSIDERATIONS' OF THE
USING DIAGRAMS #4 AND #9.
W.A.T.C.H.
e• ID iii
a
ir to 3 y 4"
'4"+t
� �1r
i• a' kilr�)MI�r,I ii �
TYPF, Tai eA.RWAGE
*' MAIL SI HIPES MAY UE 4 INCHES NAPE VVMEHE
RAIL LFINIG I AIDE LEGS TITAN 3 FEET.
THE SIDES OF BARRICADES iFACIN3 TF FIC
."All HASrF RFTF60RF.FIFC7TIVF RAIL FAKI"
DIAGRAM 4
WORK AREA ON SHOULDER
(MINOR ENCROACHMENT ON PAVEMENT)
EZZI
I
,• LEGEND
1$4 . ., � ccxesmxu.s
",wc,o,�r,, •' cu. R'rewuse ce �rauc -. u,wwr?� � M90W �Fl
DIAGRAM 9
2 WAY, ONE LANE TRAFFIC
(FLAGGER CONTROL)
x
n�
d
LSkCzEND
• conezDCxuxs
., .. Ga wow �m
.die.
a
m
z �
b
,I z
� O
n
} O
a�
Z=
� V
O
� LL
RD
LU
o
it O
O
a
J � N
rc
o �
� o°a
�0�/
F•4
pa ow
U H
azp u
z
Cz
� F
W
Friday, September 26,2014 11.45;15 AM

D
n
_r
Z
m
rn
D
cti
CTI
V)
m
m
SYMBOL
DESCRIPTION
STRIPING ITEM
TI
4' DOUBLE YELLOW LINE
4' DOUBLE YELLOW LINE (THERMOPLASTIC - 120 MILS)
O6'
SOLID WHITE BIKE LANE LINE
6' SOLID WHITE BIKE LANE FINE (THERMOPLASTIC - 120 MILS)
7p
8' MITE TRANSVERSE LINE
8' WHITE/YELLOW TRANSVERSE LINE (THERMOPLASTIC - 90 MILS)
M
6' WHITE MINI SKIP LINE
6' MITE MINI SKIP LINE (THERMOPLASTIC - 120 MILS)
TG
4' YELLOW MINI SKIP LINE
C YELLOW MINI SKIP LINE (THERMOPLASTIC - 120 MILS)
N
8' CROSSWALK LINES
B' CROSSWALK LINES (THERMOPLASTIC -120 MILS)
PI
RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS
RAISED REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS 80 O.C.
T2
24' STOP BAR
24" STOP BAR (THERMOPLASTIC -120 MILS)
DB
RIGHT TURN ARROW
RIGHT TURN ARROW (THERMOPLASTIC -120 MILS)
DD
STRAIGHT & LEFT TURN ARROW
STRAIGHT AND LEFT MRN ARROW COMBINATION (THERMOPLASTIC -120 MILS)
,sell
!xg_ w
W �o
a_o
o==
m
9H
z�
LL
W"
w: Z
Yal O
0
O
N
� m
� v
a
J �
L�
U
a4O za
oz
w a
Na °a
Friday, September 26,2014 11:62:41 AM

To
rtrto Pawn To
SECTION INSTALLATION
IompmTDAns CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION
w=
LL
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
30.11A
FOR LATE WINTER AND
EARLY SPRING:
FOR SUMMER:
FOR FALL:
M OF MRWM
DINIRDI'llilyr srexDARDS
TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE
J0.17 9
SAND BAGS
IMPERVIOUS MATERIAL
1.5' MIN. V WATER LEVEL
ADJUST AS NEEDED
EMBED 6"
III 11-11-1 1 1 11 1 1,F7_RIHI T_=1 11
- - - - - - - - - -
1' MIN.
IT�111
14
III= IIHII- II�II�III- IIHII�II�IH1= 11HIH11 III -III
EROSION CONTROL COFFER DAM
0 fflu
PIT,
�Al cm a, I. HIGH HAZARD
.
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE (T. w Hl
iro /arsax. A'
To
To
,II /wARrB "artB�
F=
NOT TO SCALE
111rVIROPOW STANDARDS EMBANKMENT MATTING DETAIL
30.20 1
FF "-I-. I
UMP HOSE
EROSION CONTROL DEWATERING BAG
3AG
JNG BAG
57 STONE
2
a—
A — B ARE AT EOUAL U—ols
lml J.MOF� I TEMPORARY ROCK CHECK DAM
EIlUBDIIE ===r, ffnff�
zllvi
C ff y OF' I HIGH HAZARD &M— Drawpum SIMRDs TE MP ORARY SILT F
ENCE . ITT t3w 0 0
6B � 4
11E =1
z. OW 4Ea0Cav sED ==7 M To Ca`-
TOE—E—AT —E —E
MAXIMUM SPACING B
A — A ARE AT EOUAL ELEVATIONS
alml CM OF MRWM D uPUar nsrAxDARDSI
TEMPORARY ROCK CHECK DAM
6
E
N
3
1p
60
Z=
LL
LLI
IL z
0
9
W M
con
0
ao z�
OW cn cn
O
Wz
U oV
Tuesday, September 23, 201412:53:12 PM

�]
col
08921226 KATHERINE M. • I
NAWAL M. HOPKINS WISOR
PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION - CMLDS 30.1 `� // DO 17986/PG AUSTIN D IV 6 / 2 1 AVI CIRCLE
L 'F .0
229 AUSTIN DRIVE 228 DAWN CIRCLE
PRaPOSm INLET PROTECTION - cMlDS soa /
\ � / / •/ � �Rw o,PF Pouxo F
\ \o /r PUMP INTAKE H F
DE F / O
/ 08927221
KATHERINE
PUM' / 6a 17986/PG 71 fn
300 DAWN CIRCLEa
G _
/. O W yy oo
O ate c ° } � / ul A. V UU
//
///
fr1
a
(A o
rn
/ OPOSED INLET PROTECTION - CIALDS 30.16 EFT
6
08921220 �
,8 - -- --' _
KATHERINE M.
F
79910 /PG `M 357
• � � yp _ \ _ . �.k�' � DO � _ 376 DAWN CIRCLE
o
.ftOC1C CHECK DAM - CMLDS 30.1 , • ' Z
DEWATERING BA , , LL
SE HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE IN ALL NERAND AREAS I
D COFFER DAM
P RAP APRON - SEE SHEET 3 I O
o 9 l
CHECK DAM - CMLDS 30.10
1 08920301
_ _ , 11111 C� 111 II JAYANTILAL PATEL 1. I LL L O
11 1 1\ L
DO 26374/PG 115 I =
1 ue
ow .L�1j 111 e4 5905 NORTH TRYON I O G
11 F - - - - -- STREET I
1111 111 e l I
111 Z ' 1 I J I
� �1 illl Q 111 e e e e e � e --� — e e �
PAL - �x�TP-, °-I
x+
0
1 1 F�,( F F F F I F �� }' NFwoxuco F F ILL
loo fZ
—�`p
s I �I II e B3OUTFALL I ya - - - - - --
za 1j 1 I I I w-n RoPOSEO I — — Rc P I I F-
a
D
CID I V I I I I I r I n U7 wLer PROTECTION - Lns 3o.1s + V R ORR ROAD —L— � I9+ 19 RR ROAD
01 X d T S I �I I °
m
x
N
PtAl6
OW 111 f� I
IJ `�, I _ — 1y� bL71(E ENERG G
A � l
I I V/ MAFAIMC -- 3n - - -- - -- j
rri
m / I a 1 11 PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS 2" SiL T 1 1.4
_ ����
�' / F F I — — — ° I IF Q7
m L---- - - - - -- O 0
e F F P-1- -- T— ____ —_ —_I LL U
e
e F2
e F F —cwc ox I F Awx Fr F F / ° ■ FFiFL�yl O O:1
e e - -i a - - - -' e P exc� e
v F ('� %
OPOSED INLET PROTECTION - CMLDS 30.15 ¢ W O
lot O PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION - CMLDS e K O X
/� Irl
/� 5s OCK CHECK DAM - CMLDS 30.10 08920125 I ° ti j-.
HARVEY W. GOOCH AND a
LOUSE G. GOUCH
��a• ° DB 5434/PG 429 S r o r
5801 NORTH TRYON STREET
Friday, September 26, 2014 11:48:69 AM

l ualty �x D _
'` °aA::`"'m' =e. oa'�"nar"e"'_ft O 'a r��o4e1 e
AH206PKINS D. Dr® 08921222 a 08 Aa RINE M. NAWAL uwT VaE Aw ouixcso ucs WISOR
DB 17986/PG 68 DB 17986/PG 71 e F
11. P — / 229 AUSTIN DRIVE 228 DAWN CIRCLE
/ \ f rI
a�°�p —/e 1 / e 08921221
�� // / // \p •ag 2 1 e KATHERIN
F Sf 5
a /�a° 'e' 17986/PG 77 D
0 4 avx° -,ate F 300 DAWN CIRCLE in
e t
i� j/ a x �•' e Y I I —
/JO /� /' fi' N d0 I
I La'`
.,rd'.- a F / �f• Fla'` I I
rri
fTl
a F /
Fri
. n� i e' rri
d/ / 7 +00 d ' " `. a+� , ' eta` e
o
o D
. ,� • D as / x+' : V 08921220
KATHERINE M.
e .ate `a " f, •a ' ' \�• - -- WISOR
DB PG 351
`e a \�� , • v'c ___ _ _ 316 19910/ DAWN CRCLE
08920301 1. 1
JAYANTILAL PATEL ■+
DB 111 1 U 1 1\ I` — um p[vmc .rr.nsn rr x.i�T — ft gApa 6374/P 115
ft Omr 5905
I cox 111 11 Dra°r_a I
STREET I I
111111 Z 111'" e P°— "'w,w, a.n
T e \ JI I
D r .1111 Q 111 ` u e ft T e �— e -� e e e
m "11J e e e
ia¢ h ra ..n -1—s T °TI c2
111 1 l
F T F F _ F F i oxao° F F � I
f= ---ig e i of ' of- '>� —��
Z w�_, _' — e h
rn __ t.l- OE � I -neu - - `fix SUE_
1 1 I x x x
-77 *�oa a off'
B3OUTFALL
Its
` I \ I —
II II �rouT =,�e2 lo N I I
0) I IIII
V I d Z
<n I I I y x x -- I a a 1
+ x�� I 9 +00 to 9+ .19 0
' DDKE ENERG
x
by I I / ,ch°e PIEDMO
m / a // I + 7 TURAL GAS 2" STL
41 I / .
— - - -- -r -
F
- - - - -- LL
/.411 / e� e F F —zme oEi F .mo FT F F
0
e e_ =1 e - - - -' a exor e
TA ft x,y,e — o mum r.�c u.,.n x.a�t —ft umro a.s.rn.T .rancr "' _rt Ei
oa 4r� m� e u x` :an�oA�T —TT � —ft DOIM1r — NtlphY pAeTkT _RYOIM1rWnr_ftft O �au,,, eorn xrnx x.gnT e
1 fl. 7Z — WOT _rtD01M1r _ft TkT::Y— IftI.1m WVnr_R I u, O•
Or0«rt— DrT_rt� 08920125 "- T�rno•Orp —ft DO°uixr _rt F �� Q
—e-a HARVEY W. GOUCH AND �-4 Q
a� $ 3 re• a,,,,,�„mem rm ; LOUISE G. COUCH
5434/PG 429
5801 NORTH TRYON STREET a I I I o
{
,sell
3
cg
c
m
a "o.
0
Q
CZ
C
W �
w 7
Y� QO
b o�
a m
x
N
.n
U O
c
a
oz
Wa
OM o MO
Tuesday, September 23, 20114+11:22:10 PM

PM

Tuesday, September 23, 2014 3:45:59 PM

Tuesday, September 23, 2014 3:08:43 PM

Tuesday, September 23, 2014 3:18:00 PM