Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20191604 Ver 2_USACE Correspondence_20221114Strickland, Bev From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 7:45 PM To: Gerald Pottern; Homewood, Sue Cc: Aaron Collins; Jonathan Pittman Subject: RE: [External] RE: High Point Upper Piedmont Lake, SAW-2019-02250 Attachments: HighPoint Sed Disposal Sites Ltr+Maps.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Hi Gerald, and thanks for your email with updated information on the additional sediment disposal areas (included in the attachment) for the above referenced project. The Corps hereby associates the additional upland sediment disposal areas with the NWP 39 verification dated 6/30/2022, specifically pertaining to Special Condition 1. Further, since no return water from the upland contained disposal areas is anticipated in reach waters of the US, no NWP 16 authorization is required for this project. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Dave Bailey David E. Bailey, PWS Regulatory Project Manager US Army Corps of Engineers CE-SAW-RG-R 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Mobile: (919) 817-2436 Email: David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is located at: https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/ Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey. From: Gerald Pottern <gpottern@rjgacarolina.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 5:17 PM To: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov>; Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Davi d. E. Ba i ley2 @ usace. a rmy. m i l> Cc: Aaron Collins <acollins@schnabel-eng.com>; Jonathan Pittman <jpittman@schnabel-eng.com> Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: [External] RE: High Point Upper Piedmont Lake, SAW-2019-02250 Also, regarding Dave's comment about return water from the upland contained disposal area -- nearly all the water runs back into the permitted area of the pond where it was taken from. The mostly -drained sediment is mixed with an absorbent polymer and loaded into trucks, at which point it is squishy and too wet for landfill capping material, but it is not dripping wet. 1 Gerald From: Gerald Pottern <gpottern@rjgacarolina.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 4:35 PM To: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov>; David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil <david.e.bailey2@usace.army.mil> Cc: Aaron Collins <acollins@schnabel-eng.com>; Jonathan Pittman <jpittman@schnabel-eng.com> Subject: Re: [External] RE: High Point Upper Piedmont Lake, SAW-2019-02250 Hi Dave and Sue -- Attached is our letter and mapping to request that two additional sediment disposal site alternatives should be added to the 404 and 401 verification letters for the referenced project. Please email or call me if you need any further information to approve this request. Thanks! Gerald Pottern Mogensen Mitigation Inc. - Raleigh MMI Environmental Consultants 104 East Chestnut Avenue Wake Forest, NC 27587 Office / Home: 919-556-8845 Mobile / Text: 919-649-6506 Gerald©MogMit.com Gpottern©RJGAcarolina.com <°/, }}}}}}}_<{ <°/, }}}}}}}_<{ <°/, }}}}}}}_<{ 2 From: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2022 8:03 PM To: David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil <david.e.bailey2@usace.army.mil>; Gerald Pottern <gpottern@rjgacarolina.com> Cc: Scarlett Kitts <skitts@schnabel-eng.com>; Aaron Collins <acollins@schnabel-eng.com>; Jonathan Pittman <jpittman@schnabel-eng.com> Subject: RE: [External] RE: High Point Upper Piedmont Lake, SAW-2019-02250 Hello Gerald, Assuming there are no additional stream, wetland, or buffer impacts at the new disposal location, then sending a letter with the information as stated below will suffice for DWR. If there are new impacts those would require a 401/buffer modification. Sue Homewood (she/her/hers) Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office Department of Environmental Quality 336 776 9693 office 336 813 1863 mobile Sue.Homewood@ncdenr.gov 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 Winston Salem NC 27105 From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2022 1:37 PM To: Gerald Pottern <gpottern@rjgacarolina.com>; Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Scarlett Kitts <skitts@schnabel-eng.com>; Aaron Collins <acollins@schnabel-eng.com>; Jonathan Pittman <jpittman@schnabel-eng.com> Subject: [External] RE: High Point Upper Piedmont Lake, SAW-2019-02250 CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Hi Gerald, and thanks for the email. Sending a letter with mapping of the new site and asking for concurrence from the Corps will suffice for this detail change. In addition to the sediment disposal material, note also that the return water from the upland contained disposal area is not allowed to impact any additional waters without authorization (reference NWP 16). Please let me know if you have any questions. -Dave Bailey David E. Bailey, PWS Regulatory Project Manager US Army Corps of Engineers CE-SAW-RG-R 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Mobile: (919) 817-2436 3 Email: David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is located at: https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/ Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey. From: Gerald Pottern <gpottern@rjgacarolina.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2022 1:10 PM To: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil>; Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Scarlett Kitts <skitts@schnabel-eng.com>; Aaron Collins <acollins@schnabel-eng.com>; Jonathan Pittman <jpittman@schnabel-eng.com> Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] High Point Upper Piedmont Lake, SAW-2019-02250 Hi Dave and Sue, We have a problem with the Upper Piedmont Parkway lake Dredging project (SAW-2019-02250 and DWR # 2019-1604 v.2). Our permit application identified the sediment disposal site as Kersey Valley Landfill, but the landfill manager just informed Schnabel that they won't accept the sediment unless it is filter -pressed to dry it out, as they need it for capping material. The cost to do that would overwhelm the project cost. The City of High Point's public services engineer is now seeking alternative disposal sites. One possible site is a former water treatment plant basin on Washington Street, and the other is a landfill in Thomasville. Once the City has found an acceptable site, can we just send a letter to ACE and DWR with mapping of the new site, or will we need to revise and resubmit the permit application ? We understand of course that the sediment disposal may not impact any additional waters. Gerald Pottern Mogensen Mitigation Inc. - Raleigh MMI Environmental Consultants 104 East Chestnut Avenue Wake Forest, NC 27587 Office / Home: 919-556-8845 Mobile / Text: 919-649-6506 Gerald©MogMit.com Gpottern©RJGAcarolina.com <c/, }}}}}»=<{ <°/, }}}}}»=<{ <°/, }}}}}»=<{ 4 From: Scarlett Kitts <skitts@schnabel-eng.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 4:57 PM To: Aaron Collins <acollins@schnabel-eng.com>; Carter Parsons <cparsons@schnabel-eng.com>; Gerald Pottern <gpottern@rjgacarolina.com>; Rich Mogensen <rich@mogensenmitigation.com> Cc: Jonathan Pittman <jpittman@schnabel-eng.com> Subject: dredge Ok Folks, We have an interesting situation. The dredged material was rejected from the Kersey Valley landfill. The landfill indicated they wanted the material filter -pressed before they would accept it. This was not expected and the additional cost to perform this handling process would overwhelm the cost of the project. I called Allan (City) to see what options we have. He sent me an email regarding two other places we might be able to used to get rid of the material. (see attached) If we agree that either (or both) of these places is acceptable for us to deposit the material — we then need to see if we can change the permit. The permit specifically states that we will deposit the material at the Kersey Valley landfill. I don't think the Army Corps will care where the material is deposited — as long as it's a regulated disposal site. Attached is an email that talks about alternative disposal sites. Gerald, if we find out that the sites the City listed in the email (attached) are worthy to take our sediment, how difficult (time -wise) would be to change the permit? Or do you think the Army Corps will care that the disposal site has changed? Thank you! -Scarlett 3carlett Kitts, PE Senior Engineer / Schnabel Engineering South, P.C. Schnabel Engineering T 336.274.9456 / C 336.854.9211 11 A Oak Branch Drive Greensboro, NC 27407 schnabel-eng.com El El El El Build Better. Together. 5