Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0001086_Permit Modification_20060810NAY August 10, 2006 Mr. Hal Hegwer, Town Manager Town of Spring Lake P. O. Box 617 Spring Lake, NC 28390-0617 Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality Subject: Permit Modification Application WQ0001086 I . Additional Information Request Land Application of Residual Solids (503) Town of$pring_Lake Dear Mr. Hegwer In the application for modification.of the -subject perinit, received June 14,.2006, the net acres for application on the LASCA form Was 15.84 acres. The vicinity/buffer-map submitted with the application showed the disposal/application area to. be 15.84 acres northeast of the treatment plant. In a site visit to the plant on July 24, 2006r, I met with Mr. Daniel Gerald and observed the application area. Jim Barber of the Division of Water Quality's Fayetteville Regional Qffice did a file ,search and found a map of the Spring Lake. Regional. Wastewater Treatment Plant. This map was dated 1989 and showed the land application area as being the cleared land to the northeast of the plant and inside the fenced area of the wastewater treatment plant. The map indicated, this area to be 15.84 acres. The Land Application Unit does not believe the area inside the facility fence should be part of the application area. • Additional information is required before we may continue our review. Please provide the following information by September 12, 2006 -1. -A-detailed scaled -buffer map showing the application/disposal areas With —the dimensions and acresto be applied on. The map should' include all buffers, monitoring wells and plant location. 2. An updated Land Application Site Certification Attachment. Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and regulations. Any'oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the responsibility of the applicant. In addition, any omissions made in responding to the above items may result in future requests for additional information. Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Internet: www.ncwaterqualitv.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper Noe Carolina aturally Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: (919) 733-3221 Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: (919) 715-0588 Fax 2: (919) 715-6048 Customer Service: (877) 623-6748 Mr. Hal Hegwer August 10, 2006 Page 2 Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. Three copies of all revised and/or additional documentation should be - submitted to my attention at the address above. If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me at (919) 715-6189. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, E. D. Hardee Aquifer Protection Section Land Application Unit cc: Mr. William A Williams, MacConnell & Associates P.C. ayettev ;Ile Rcgi alffice A a uifer_ Protection .Section Central Files AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM Date: July 5, 2006 To: ❑ Landon Davidson, ARO-APS dwat-B arnhardt; �FRO=tPS ❑ 'Andrew Pitner, MRO-APS ❑ Jay Zimmerman, RRO-APS RECEIVED JUL 0 6 2006 DENR - FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE ❑ ,David May, WaRO-APS ® Charlie Stehman, WiRO-APS ❑ Sherri Knight, WSRO-APS From: Ed Hardee , Land'Application Permitting and Compliance Unit Telephone: (919) 715'-6189 Fax: (919) 715-0588 E-Mail: ed.hardee@ncmail.net A. Permit Number: WQ0001086 B. Owner: Town of Spring Lake , C. Facility/Operation: Town'of Spring Lake Residuals Land Application Program ❑ Proposed ® Existing ❑ Facility ❑ Operation D. Application: • 1. Permit Type: ❑ Animal ❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ H-R Infiltration El Recycle ❑ I/E Lagoon ❑ GW Remediation (ND) ❑ UIC - (5QW) closed loop water only geothermal For Residuals: ® Land App. ❑ D&M El Surface Disposal ® 503 ❑ 503 Exempt El Animal 2. Project Type: ❑ New ❑ Major Mod. El Minor Mod. Z Renewal ❑ Renewal w/ Mod. E. Comments/Other Information: ® I would like to accompany you on a site visit Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your review, comment, and/or action. Within 30 calendar days, please take the following actions: ® Return a Completed Form APSSRR. ❑ Attach We11'Construction Data Sheet. ❑ Attach Attachment B for Certification,by the LAPCU. ❑ ,Issue an Attachment B Certification from the RO*. * Remember that Youwillbe responsible for coordinating site visits, reviews, as well as additional. information requests with other RO-APS representatives in order to .prepare a complete Attachment B for certification. Refer to the RPP SOP for additional detail. When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office -Aquifer Protection Section contactperson listed above. RO-APS Reviewer: Date: FORM: APSARR 09/04 Page 1 of 1 P.O. Box 129 Morrisville, NC 27560 919-467-1239 To: Jim Barber Fayetteville Regional Office 225 Green Street, Ste. 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301- 5043 MAcCONNELL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Transmittal Letter From: Date: 909 Aviation Parkway Suite 1400 Morrisville, NC 27560 Fax 919-319-6510 RECEDED JUN f 6 2006 DENR - FAYEirEV1LLE REGIONAL OFFICE William A. Williams, P.E. 06/15/2006 Project No.: Residual Solids Land Application Re: Town of Spring Lake Land Application of Residual Solids Items Enclosed: One copy of the Non -Discharge Permit Minor Modification Application for the above referenced project. NON -DISCHARGE PERMIT MINOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION FOR: LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS Applicant: Town of Spring Lake; North Carolina Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility Permit No.: NC0030970 Residual Solids Land Application Permit No.: WQ0001086 PO Box 617 300 Ruth Street Spring Lake, North Carolina 28390-0617 Application Package Prepared By: MacConnell & Associates, P.C. PO Box 129 909 Aviation Parkway, Suite 1400 Morrisville, NC 27560 Morrisville, NC 27560 Phone: (919) 467-1239 Fax: (919) 319-6510 MacConnell & Associates, P.C. RECEIVED JUL 66 2006 DENR-FAYETTE' LLE REGIONALOFAI AQUIFER PROTECT oN sECTIoN JUN 1 4 2006 MAcCONNELL & AssoccuTes, P.C. Town of Spring Lake, North Carolina ORDER OF CONTENTS • Cover Letter • Non -Dedicated Residuals Land Application Programs Form • Residuals Source Certification Attachment • Land Application Site Certification Attachment RECEIVED / DENR I DWQ AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION JUN 1 4 2006 • Supporting Documentation: 2006 Soil Test Report 2005 Annual Land Application Certification Form 2005 Annual Surface Disposal Summary Form 2005 Annual Land Application Field Summary Form 2005 Annual Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction Form Explanation of Non -Compliance Items Plant Available Nitrogen Calculations MacConnell & Associates, P.C. NON-DICHARGE PERMIT MINOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION FOR: LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS Applicant: Town of Springlake, North Carolina Wastewater Treatment Plant Cover Letter MACCONNELL & ASSOCIATES. P.C. MacConnell & Associates, P.C. P.O. Box 129 ni Morrisville, NC 27560 919-467-1239 MAcCONNELL & ASSOCIATES, P.C. June 13, 2006 Mr. E. D. Hardee NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources Aquifer Protection Section, Division of Water Quality Non -Discharge Permitting Unit 1636 Mail Service Center 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636 Re: Town of Spring Lake Land Application Permit Number: WQ0001086 Dear Mr. Hardee: 909 Aviation Parkway Suite 1400 Morrisville, NC 27560 Fax 919-319-6510 On behalf of the Town of Spring Lake, we are pleased to submit one (1) original and three. (3) copies of. the application for minor permit modification of the Town's existing land application permit. There is no fee for a Minor Permit Modification. We are requesting that the Town be allowed to land apply residual solid from the Wastewater Treatment Plant at an agronomic rate, instead of dry tonnage basis. The previous permit for the facility allowed for 220 pounds per acre per year of PAN for Bermuda Grass, and an additional 50 pounds of PAN per acre per year for overseeding with Rye Grass. Based upon the prior permits, land applying the residuals on Bermuda Grass with Rye Grass overseeding would allow for the agronomic rate of 270. pounds per acre per year .of PAN. Please call us if you have any questions. Your assistance and cooperation are greatly appreciated. Sincerely, William A. Williams, P.E. Project Manager MacConnell & Associates, P.C. cc: Hal Hegwer, Town Manager Daniel Gerald, Water Resources Director Mike Criscoe, WWTP Operator Jim Barber, Fayetteville Regional Office NON-DICHARGE PERMIT MINOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION FOR: LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS Applicant: Town of Spring Lake, North Carolina Wastewater Treatment Plant Non -Dedicated Residuals Land Application Program (NDRLAP) Form MAcCONNELL & AssocLATFs, P.C. MacConnell & Associates, P.C. State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: NDRLAP 02/02 (NON -DEDICATED RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAMS) The Division of Water Quality (Division) will not consider this application form to be complete unless all the instructions are followed. Failure to follow the instructions or to submit all of the required items will lead to additional application processing and. review time. For more information or for an electronic version of this form, visit our web site at: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu/ INSTRUCTIONS TO THE APPLICANT: A. Application Form: ✓ This application form must be submitted for any permitting action involving a non -dedicated residuals land application program. ✓ Non -dedicated residuals land application programs are ones in which all land application sites do not meet the criteria in 15A NCAC 2H .0203 (11)(a) and (b). Specifically, a residuals land application program cannot be designated as non -dedicated if any of the following is applicable: • Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that receives residuals at rates or frequencies greater than agronomically justifiable. • Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that is used primarily for residuals disposal alone (i.e., versus crop production). • Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that is designated as dedicated by the Division's Director. ✓ Any changes to this application form will result in the application package being returned. • All forms and guidance documents referred to in this application form may be downloaded from the web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu/. B. General Information: ✓ The applicant is either the existing Permittee or the entity that is to be responsible for the operation of the residuals land application program and compliance with the resultant permit. If the applicant is a corporation, ensure that that applicant's name as listed in Item I. 1. corresponds with the name under which the corporation is registered with the NC Department of the Secretary of State. ✓ The signing official must meet the criteria stipulated in 15A NCAC 2H .0206 (b). An alternate person may be designated as the signing official, provided that a delegation letter from a person who meets the referenced criteria is submitted. The delegation letter does not have to be resubmitted if the signing official has not changed since the last permitting action associated with this residuals land application prop am. ✓ The submitted fee should be in accordance with the Division's most recently -adopted fee schedule. This fee schedule as well as a detailed explanation of its application may be downloaded from the web site at: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu/. Checks are to be made payable to: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). C. Submission of Application Packages: ✓ Submit one original and three copies of the entire application package, including the cover letter, the completed and appropriately executed application form, as well as all required attachment forms and supplemental attachments. The instructions (Pages 1 of 5) do not need to be submitted. ✓ To determine which attachment forms and supplemental attachments are required to make a complete application package, read the instructions of each attachment form carefully. Application packages should be organized and bound (i.e., stapled, three-ring binder, etc.) in the following order prior to submission: • Cover letter and application fee. • Attachment Order 1: Non -Dedicated Residuals Land Application Programs (Form NDRLAP). > Attachment Order 1-a: Signing official delegation letter. • Attachment Order 2: Residuals Source Certification Attachment (Form RSCA). • Attachment Order 3: Land Application Site Certification Attachment (Form LASCA). ✓ The application package should be sent to the address at the end of this application form. Do not submit this application package to any Division regional office. FORM: NDRLAP 02/02 Page 1 of 5 Attachment Order 1 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality NON -DEDICATED RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAMS (THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) Application Number: (to be completed by DWQ) I. GENERAL INFORMATION (See Instruction B.): 1. Applicant's name: Town of Spring Lake, North Carolina RECEIVED / DENR j DWQ AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION 2. Signing official's name and title: Mr. Hal Hegwer, Town Manager JUN 1 4 2006 3. Complete mailing address of applicant: PO Box 617 (300 Ruth Street) City: Spring Lake State: North Carolina Zip: 28390-0617 Telephone number: (910 ) 436-0241 Facsimile number: (910) 436-2667 E-mail address: 4. Name and complete mailing address of contact person and/or consulting firm who prepared application: William A. Williams, P.E., MacConnell & Associates, P.C. PO Box 129 (909 Aviation Parkway, Suite 1400) City: Morrisville State: North Carolina Zip: 28560 Telephone number. (919 ) 467-1239 . Facsimile number: (919) 319-6510 E-mail address: wawmacassoc@bellsouth.net 5. County where residuals land application program is headquartered: Cumberland County 6. County(ies) where residuals source -generating facilities are located: Cumberland County 7. County(ies) where land application sites are located: Cumberland County 8. Fee submitted: $ No fee for Permit Renewal / Minor Permit Modification II. PERMIT INFORMATION: 1. Application is for. ❑ new, ® modified, ❑ renewed permit (check all that apply). 2. If this application is being submitted to renew or modify an existing permit, provide the following: the permit number the most recent issuance date W00001086 February 8, 2006 , and the expiration date January 31, 2011 . Date of most -recently certified Attachment A: February 8, 2006 Date of most -recently certified Attachment B: February 8, 2006 FORM: NDRLAP 02/02 Page 2 of 5 Attachment Order 1 3. Check all that apply to the requested permit modification: ® INCREASE ❑ DECREASE the maximum permitted annual dry tonnage for existing residuals source -generating facility(ies) certified for this residuals land application program. ❑ ADD ❑ DELETE residuals source -generating facility(ies) to/from those certified for this residuals land application program. ❑ INCREASE ❑ DECREASE the net acreage associated with land applications site(s) currently certified for this residuals land application program. ❑ ADD ❑ DELETE land application site(s) to/from those certified for this residuals land application program. ❑ OTHER. Explain: III. RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM INFORMATION: 1. Who will be responsible for the day-to-day management of the residuals land application program: Permittee or ❑ residuals management firm. If a residuals management firm, complete the following: Finn contact person and title: Finn name and complete mailing address: City: State: Zip: Telephone number: ( ) Facsimile number: ( ) E-mail address: 2. List the Operator In Responsible Charge (ORC) and all Back -Up ORCs for the residuals land application program, their certification numbers, and their affiliations in the following table: Designation Name Affiliation Certification Number ORC Michael Crisco WWTP Superintendent 15683 Back -Up ORC Daniel Gerald Public Works In Process Additional Back -Up ORCs (if applicable) If an ORC and at least one Back -Up ORC are not currently designated for this residuals land application program, provide the candidates' names, affiliations, and an estimated time schedule for each candidate's completion of the required training school and certification test: Mr. Daniel Gerald, the Public Works Director of the Town of Spring Lake, is actively seeking certifications as Back -Up ORC for the WWTP. Currently, Mr. Michael Crisco is the only ORC authorized to land apply waste at the facility. No waste will be land applied, except by Mr. Crisco, until such time as the Town of Spring Lake can certify a Back -Up ORC. FORM: NDRLAP 02/02 Page 3 of 5 Attachment Order 1 3. Complete the following tables regarding management of the residuals land application program: a. Plant Available Nitrogen Summary: Determine the maximum plant available nitrogen (PAN) generated by all residuals source -generating facilities as currently certified and proposed for certification with this application and list the results in the following table: Maximum amount of residuals to be certified: •287 dry tons per year. PAN Pounds of PAN per Dry Ton (Weighted Average) ' Pounds of PAN per Year . Surface Incorporation or Injection Surface Incorporation or Injection First -Year _ 32.27 • Not Applicable 9,260 Not Applicable Five -Year Maximum Adjusted 29.32 Not Applicable 8,414 ot A Plicable Applicable b. Land Application Site Use Summary: Suinmarize information regarding the land application sites as currently certified and proposed for certification with this application: Category Use Acres Comments Crops Forest or Plantation 0 Row Crops 0 Hay 15.84 Utilizing Site 1 Pasture 0 Total: 15.84 Utilizing Site 1 Methods Surface 15.84 Utilizing Site 1 Incorporation or Injection 0 Total: 15.84 Utilizing Site 1 Restrictions Year -Round 0 Seasonal 0 ' Total: 15.84 Utilizing Site 1 c. Residuals Land Application Summary: Determine the minimum acreage required to land apply the residuals as currently certified and proposed for certification assuming the scenarios listed in the following table: Assumed Application Rate (lbs PAN/ac-yr) Acres Required Using First -Year PAN Concentrations Acres Required Using Five -Year Maximum Adjusted PAN Concentrations Surface Incorporation or Injection Surface Incorporation or Injection 70 132 Not Applicable 120 Not Applicable 150 62 Not Applicable 56 Not Applicable 250 37 Not Applicable 34 Not Applicable FORM: NDRLAP 02/02 Page 4 of 5 Attachment Order 1 4. Identify and provide a plan as well as a schedule to resolve any issues that would prevent all of the residuals currently certified and proposed for certification to be land applied without exceeding agronomic rates or violating any of North Carolina's standard permit conditions governing residuals land application programs (e.g., not enough storage, not enough land, etc.): A new clarifier was installed at the WWTP within the last year. Actual quantities of waste generated at the facility have yet to be determined from historical data. Also, a new ORC for the land application was hired by the Town of Spring Lake. In the interim. McGill Environmental was contracted to remove and dispose of excess residuals at the facility until land application could be resumed. Until actual quantities of waste are determined, McGill Environmental has 'remained contracted to remove excess waste that would exceed agronomic rates or violate any of North Carolina's standard permit conditions governing residuals land application programs. Applicant's Certification: I, Hal Hegwer , attest that this application for Town of Spring Lake, North Carolina has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the Division of Water Quality may not conduct a technical review of this program and approval does not constitute a variance to any rules or statutes unless specifically granted in the permit. Further, any discharge of residuals to surface waters or the land will result in an immediate enforcement action, which may include civil penalties, injunctive relief, and/or criminal prosecution. I will make no claim against the Division of Water Quality should a condition of this permit be violated. I also understand that if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned to me as incomplete. Note: In accordance with North Carolina General Statutes §143-215.6A and §143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor, 1vhich may include a fine not to exceed $10,000 as well as civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. . I Signature: '�' Date: THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT By U.S. Postal Service: By Courier/Special Delivery: 1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER 512 NORTH SALISBURY STREET, SUITE 1219 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617 . RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (919) 733-5083 *** END OF FORM NDRLAP 02/02 *** RECEIVED / DENR f DWQ AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION JUN 1 4 2006 FORM: NDRLAP 02/02 Page 5 of 5 - Attachment Order 1 NON-DICHARGE PERMIT MINOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION FOR: LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS Applicant: Town of Spring Lake, North Carolina Wastewater Treatment Plant Residuals Source Certification Attachment (RSCA) Form MAcCONNELL & Assocurps, P.c. MacConnell & Associates, P.C. State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION ATTACHMENT (THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) The Division of Water Quality (Division) will not consider this attachment form to be complete unless all the instructions are followed. Failure to follow the instructions or to submit all of the required items will lead to additional application processing and review time. For more information or for an electronic version of this form, visit our web site at: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu/ INSTRUCTIONS TO THE APPLICANT: A. Attachment Form: ✓ Do not submit this attachment form for review without a corresponding residuals program application form (Form NDRLAP). ✓ Any changes to this attachment form will result in the application package being returned. 1 For new residuals programs or renewed residuals programs, submit a separate attachment form for each residuals source -generating facility to be certified for this residuals program. 1 For modified residuals programs in which any modification to the certified residuals -source generating facilities is proposed, submit a separate attachment form for only those residuals source -generating facilities that are affected by the proposed modification. 1 The attachment should be organized prior to submission in the following order (i.e., by facility): • Attachment Order 2: Residuals Source Certification Attachment (Form RSCA). > Attachment Order 2-a: Vicinity map. > Attachment Order 2-b: Process flow diagram and/or narrative. > Attachment Order 2-c: Quantitative justification for residuals production rate. > Attachment Order 2-d: Sampling plan. • > Attachment Order 2-e:. Laboratory analytical reports and operational data. 1 All forms and guidance documents referred to in this attachment form may be downloaded from the web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu/. B. Residuals Source -Generating Facility Information: ✓ Attach a vicinity map that shows the location of the facility and meets all of the criteria in the latest version of the document entitled "Guidance for the Preparation of Vicinity/Buffer Maps for North Carolina Residuals Permitting Programs." ✓ Attach a detailed narrative and/or process flow diagram that describes how the residuals are to be generated, treated, processed, and stored at the facility. ✓ Attach a quantitative justification for the value provided in Item I. 8. Ensure that the amount of residuals listed is the maximum amount expected to be generated by the facility for the life of the permit. hi addition, ensure that this amount is equivalent to that which is actually to be land applied, distributed, and/or disposed, including any chemicals, amendments, or other additives that are added to the residuals during processing. C. Residuals Quality Information: ✓ Attach a detailed sampling plan for the residuals source -generating facility. Ensure that the plan identifies sampling points, sampling frequency, sample type, as well as the Division -certified laboratory to be used. In addition, ensure that the plan details how the facility and/or the residuals are monitored for any applicable pathogen reduction and vector attraction reduction requirements. Note that all sampling and monitoring must be completed on the residuals as they are to be land applied, distributed, and/or disposed. ✓ Attach reports for all laboratory analyses used to complete this attachment form. Attach documentation that the facility complies and/or the residuals comply with any applicable pathogen reduction and vector attraction reduction requirements. Renewed residuals programs and modified residuals programs are exempt from this requirement as long as the facility is (i) currently certified for this residuals program; (ii) no changes in the generation, treatment, processing, and/or storage are proposed; and (iii) a land application/distribution/disposal event has taken place in the last three years. This exemption will not be allowed unless all three of these criteria are met. ✓ Item II. 3. does not have to be completed for facilities that are less than 0.5 MGD in design flow that treat 100% non -municipal, domestic wastewater only. FORM: RSCA 02/02 Page 1 of 8 Attachment Order 2 -1- Applicant's name: Town of Spring Lake, North Carolina Check all that apply: ❑ NEW RESIDUALS PROGRAM ® RENEWED RESIDUALS PROGRAM ® INCREASE ❑ DECREASE the maximum permitted annual dry tonnage for this residuals source - generating facility certified for this residuals program. Current: 30 dry tons and proposed: Agronomic Rate_ per year. ❑ ADD ❑ DELETE this residuals source -generating facility to/from those certified for this residuals program. ❑ OTHER Explain: I. RESIDUALS SOURCE -GENERATING FACILITY INFORMATION (See Instruction B.): 1. Name of facility: . Town of Spring Lake WWTP, North Carolina 2. Facility permit holder. Town of Spring Lake WWTP, North Carolina Facility permit holder is (check one): ❑ federal, ❑ state, ® local government, or ❑ private. Facility permit number. NPDES Permit No. NC0030970 • Facility permit issued by (check one): _ ® Div. of Water Quality, ❑ Div. of Environmental Health, or ❑ other (explain: ). 3. If the facility permit is not issued by the Div. of Water Quality, complete the following: a. Facility contact person and title: Facility complete mailing address: City: State: Zip: Telephone number. ( ) Facsimile number: ( ) E-mail address: b. Facility complete location address: City: State: Zip: County: Latitude: and longitude: 4. Purpose of the facility (check one): ® treatment of municipal wastewater, ❑ treatment of 100% domestic wastewater, ❑ treatment of potable water, ❑ treatment of 100% industrial wastewater, ❑ treatment of industrial wastewater mixed with domestic wastewater, or (approximate percentages: % industrial and % domestic) ❑ other (explain: ). 5. Is the facility required to have an approved pretreatment program: ❑ yes ® no. If yes, please specify whether or not such a pretreatment has been approved: ❑ yes ❑ no. 6. Facility pennitted/design flow: 1.50 MGD and facility average daily flow: 0.80 MGD. 7. Maximum amount of residuals to be certified for this facility: 287 dry tons per year. FORM: RSCA 02/02 Page 2 of 8 Attachment Order 2 8. Specify the following regarding treatment and storage volumes available at the facility. Type and volume of residuals treatment: The residual solids from the WWTP are treated by Alkaline (Lime) Stabilization prior to disposal. The actual volume of residuals from the WWTP to be disposed of through land application has not been determined due to the recent addition of a new, more efficient clarifier. Estimates of the volume of residuals are approximately 160 dry metric tons per year. Type and volume of residuals storage (i.e., outside of residuals treatment units): The Sludge Holding Tank has a capacity of 350,000 gallons. The existing anaerobic digester (volume = 125,000 gallons) can be used for additional storage, if required. II. RESIDUALS QUALITY INFORMATION (See Instruction C.): • 1. Specify if residuals are regulated under (check one): ® 40 CFR Part 503 or ❑ 40 CFR Part 257. 2. Specify if residuals are intended for (check one): ❑ Land Application/Distribution (Class A or Equivalent). Complete all items EXCEPT Items II. 4b., 4c., 7b., and 7c. ® Land Application (Class B or Equivalent). Complete all items EXCEPT Items II. 4a., 4c., 7a., and 7c. ❑ Surface Disposal. Complete all items EXCEPT Items II. 4a., 4b., 5., 7a., 7b., and 8. 3. Hazardous Waste Determination: Complete the following to demonstrate that the residuals are non- hazardous under RCRA: a. Are the residuals are listed in 40 CFR §261.31-§261.33: ❑ yes ® no. If yes, list the number(s): b. Specify whether or not the residuals exhibit any of the characteristics defined by 40 CFR §261.21- §261.24: ❑ yes ® no. Fill in the following tables with the results of the latest toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) analysis as well as those for corrosivity, ignitability, and reactivity: laboratory: Meritech, Inc. and date of analysis: 05-25-05 Passed corrosivity test: ® yes ❑ no. pH: 6.60 s.u. (2 < pH < 12.5). Passed ignitability test: ® yes ❑ no. Flashpoint: <200 °F (> 140° ). Passed reactivity test: ® yes ❑ no. HCN: <50 mg/kg (<250) & H2S: <100 mg/kg (<500). TCLP Parameter Limit (mg/L) Result (mg/L) TCLP Parameter Limit (mg/L) Result (mg/L) Arsenic 5.0 <0.100 Hexachlorobenzene 0.13 <0.010 Barium 100.0 1.32 Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene 0.5 <0.010 Benzene 0.5 <0.0100 Hexachloroethane 3.0 <0.010 Cadmium 1.0 <0.020 Lead 5.0 <0.100 Carbon Tetrachloride 0.5 <0.0100 Lindane 0.4 <0.0005 Chlordane 0.03 <0.0005 Mercury 0.2 <0.0200 *** TABLE CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE *** FORM: RSCA 02/02 Page 3 of 8 Attachment Order 2 *** TABLE CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE *** TCLP Parameter Limit (mg/L) Result (mg/L) TCLP Parameter Limit (mg/L) Result (mg/L) Chlorobenzene 100.0 <0.0100 Methoxychlor 10.0 <0.0005 Chloroform 6.0 <0.0100 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 200.0 <0.100 Chromium 5.0 • <0.050 Nitrobenzene 2.0 <0.010 m-Cresol 200.0 <0.020 Pentachlorophenol 100.0 <0.050 o-Cresol 200.0 <0.010 Pyridine 5.0 <0.010 p-Cresol 200.0 . <0.020 Selenium 1.0 <0.100 Cresol 200.0 <0.020 Silver 5.0 <0.050 2,4-D 10.0 <0.100 Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 <0.0100 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 7.5 <0.010 Toxaphene 0.5 <0.0100 1,2-Dichloroethane 0:5 <0.0100 Trichloroethylene 0.5 <0.0100 1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.7 <0.0100 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 400.0 <0.010 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.13 <0.010 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2.0 <0.010 Endrin 0.02 <0.0005 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 1.0 . <0.0100 Heptachlor and its Hydroxide 0.008 <0.0005 Vinyl Chloride 0.2 <0.020 4. Metals Determination: Complete one of the following tables (i.e., as applicable) to demonstrate that the residuals do not violate the ceiling concentrations for metals regulated under 40 CFR Part 503 or 40 CFR Part 257: a. For Class A or Equivalent: Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight basis) for the following metal parameters: laboratory and date of analysis: Parameter Analysis Required for Permitting by NC if Residuals are Regulated Under... Parameter „ Ceiling Concentration (mg/kg) Monthly Average Concentration (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg) 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Arsenic 75 41 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Cadmium 85 39 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Copper 4,300 1,500 . 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Lead 840 300 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Mercury 57 17 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Molybdenum 75 n/a 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 . Nickel 420 420 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Selenium 100 100 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Zinc 7,500 2,800 FORM: RSCA 02/02 Page 4 of 8 Attachment Order 2 b. For Class B or Equivalent: Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight basis) for the following metal parameters: laboratory: Meritech, Inc. and date of analysis: 03/21/2006 Parameter Analysis Required for Permitting by NC if Residuals are Regulated Under Parameter Ceiling Concentration (mg/kg) Result (mg/kg) 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Arsenic 75 <3.56 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Cadmium 85 2.28 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Copper 4,300 270 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Lead 840 14.9 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Mercury 57 No Analysis 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Molybdenum 75 5.55 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Nickel 420 9.32 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 . Selenium 100 4.88 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 Zinc 7,500 743 c. For Surface Disposal: Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight basis) for the following metal parameters: laboratory: and date of analysis: Parameter Analysis Required for Permitting by NC if Residuals are Regulated Under... Closest Distance to Property Lines (meters) Arsenic (mg/kg) Chromium (mg/kg) Nickel (mg/kg) 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 > 0 but < 25 30 200 210 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 > 25 but < 50 34 220 240 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 > 50 but < 75 39 260 270 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 >_ 75 but < 100 46 300 320 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 > 100 but < 125 53 360 390 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 > 125 but < 150 62 450 420 40 CFR Parts 257 and 503 >_ 150 73 600 420 FORM: RSCA 02/02 Page 5 of 8 Attachment Order 2 5. Nutrient/Micronutrient.Determination: Complete the following: a. Total solids: 2.16 %. b. Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight basis) for the following nutrient and micronutrient parameters: laboratory: Meritech, Inc. and date of analysis: 03/21/2006 Parameter Result (mg/kg) Aluminum 8,860 Ammonia -Nitrogen 13,400 • Calcium 71,500 Magnesium 3,850 Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen <463 pH 8.8 Phosphorus 16,300 ' Potassium 4,440 Sodium 26,000 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 43,300 c. Using the results listed in Item II. 5b. above, calculate the sodium adsorption ratio (SAR): 3.76 . d. Specify the mineralization rate to be used in calculating the plant available nitrogen (PAN) of the residuals: 30 %. This rate is a ►1 default value or ❑ actually established. If the residuals are not generated from the treatment of municipal or domestic wastewater, explain or provide technical justification as to why the selected default value is appropriate to be applied to these residuals: II-J I L Calculate the PAN for the residuals (i.e., on a dry weight basis) and list the results in the following table: Application Method First Year PAN (mg/kg) Five -Year Maximum Adjusted PAN (mg/kg) Surface 16,133 8,414 Injection/Incorporation Not Applicable Not Applicable e. Are the residuals are a registered fertilizer with the NC Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services: ❑ yes ® no. If yes, provide date of registration approval: the current registration number: and the fertilizer equivalent: %, %, and %. FORM: RSCA 02/02 Page 6 of 8 Attachment Order 2 Ll r- Other Pollutants Determination: Specify whether or not there are any. other pollutants of concern in the residuals and list the results of the latest analyses: None 7. Pathogen Reduction Determination: Specify which alternative(s) will be used to meet the pathogen reduction requirements: a. For Class A or Equivalent: ❑ A fecal coliform density that is demonstrated to be less than 1,000 MPN per gram of total dry solids. OR ❑ A salmonella sp. density that is demonstration to be less than 3 MPN per 4 grams of total dry solids. AND one of the following (except for residuals regulated under 40 CFR Part 257 that are to be distributed): ❑ Alternative 1 [40 CFR §503.32 (a)(3)] - Time/Temperature Compliance. ❑ Alternative 2 [40 CFR §503.32 (a)(4)] - Alkaline Treatment. ❑ Alternative 3 [40 CFR §503.32 (a)(5)] - Prior Testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova. ❑ Alternative 4 [40 CFR §503.32 (a)(6)] - No Prior Testing for Enteric VirusNiable Helminth Ova. ❑ Alternative 5 [40 CFR §503.32 (a)(7)] - Process to Further Reduce Pathogens (PFRP). Specify one: ❑ composting, ❑ heat drying, ❑ heat treatment, ❑ pasteurization, ❑ thermophilic aerobic digestion, ❑ beta ray irradiation, or ❑ gamma ray eradiation. ❑ Alternative 6 [40 CFR §503.32 (a)(8)] - PFRP-Equivalent Process. Explain: b. For Class B or Equivalent: ❑ Alternative 1 [40 CFR §503.32 (b)(2)] - Fecal Coliform Density Demonstration. ❑ Alternative 2 [40 CFR §503.32 (b)(3)] - Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (PFRP). Specify one: ❑ aerobic digestion, ❑, air drying, ❑ anaerobic digestion, ❑ composting, or ® lime stabilization. ❑ Alternative 3 [40 CFR §503.32 (b)(4)] - PSRP-Equivalent Process. Explain: ❑ Not Applicable - Regulated under 40 CFR Part 257 with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution. c. For Surface Disposal: ❑ Alternative for Surface Disposal Units Only [40 CFR §503.33 (b)(11)] - Soil/Other Material Cover. ❑ Select One of the Class A or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item II. 7a. above. ❑ Select One of the Class B or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item H. 7b. above. ❑ Not Applicable - Regulated under 40 CFR Part 257 with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution. FORM: RSCA 02/02 Page 7 of 8 Attachment Order 2 ILi L_ r 8. Vector Attraction Reduction Determination: Specify which altemative(s) will be used to meet the vector attraction reduction requirements: ❑ Alternative 1 [40 CFR §503.33 (b)(1)] - 38% Volatile Solids Reduction (Aerobic/Anaerobic Digestion). ❑ Alternative 2 [40 CFR §503.33 (b)(2)] - 40-Day Bench Scale Test (Anaerobic Digestion). ❑ Alternative 3 [40 CFR §503.33 (b)(3)] - 30-Day Bench Scale Test (Aerobic Digestion). ❑ Alternative 4 [40 CFR §503.33 (b)(4)] - Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate Test (Aerobic Digestion). ❑ Alternative 5 [40 CFR §503.33 (b)(5)] - 14-Day Aerobic Processes. ❑ Alternative 6 [40 CFR §503.33 (b)(6)] - Alkaline Stabilization. ❑ Altemative 7 [40 CFR §503.33 (b)(7)] - Drying of Stabilized Residuals. ❑ Alternative 8 [40 CFR §503.33 (b)(8)] - Drying of Unstabilized'Residuals. ❑ Alternative 9 [40 CFR §503.33 (b)(9)] - Injection. ❑ Alternative 10 [40 CFR §503.33 (b)(10)] - Incorporation. ❑ Alternative for Surface Disposal Units Only [40 CFR §503.33 (b)(1 1)] - Soil/Other Material Cover. ❑ Alternatives for Animal Processing Residuals Only: Specify one: ❑ injection, ❑ incorporation, or ❑ lime addition to raise pH to 10. ❑ Not Applicable - Non -Animal Processing Residuals Regulated under 40 CFR Part 257 with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution. *** END OF FORM RSCA 02/02 *** FORM: RSCA 02/02 Page 8 of 8 Attachment Order 2 J Attachment 2a - Attach a vicinity map that shows the location of the facility and meets all of the criteria in the latest version of the document entitled "Guidance for the Preparation of Vicinity/Buffer Maps for North Carolina Residuals Permitting Programs." Site Vicinity Map Attached Attachment 2b - Attach a detailed narrative and/or process flow diagram that describes how the residuals are to be generated, treated, processed, and stored at the facility. The residuals are generated from the WWTP. Treatment of the residuals consist of aerobic digestion in the WWTP process. Once generated, the residuals are amended by lime addition (alkaline stabilization). Following stabilization, the residuals are transported to the application site via leak -proof tank trailer. The liquid sludge is applied by discharge -controlled outlet pipes on the tank trailer. The ORC for the facility, currently Mr. Michael Criscoe is the only personnel authorized to land -apply the residuals. Mr. Daniel Gerald, the Water Resources Director for the Town of Spring Lake is currently seeking certification to serve as a back-up ORC. Attachment 2c - Attach a quantitative justification for the value provided in Item I. 8. Ensure that the amount of residuals listed is 'the maximum amount expected to be generated by the facility for the life of the permit. In addition, ensure that this amount is equivalent to that which is actually to be land applied, distributed, and/or disposed, including any chemicals, amendments, or other additives that are added to the residuals during processing. Historical data would indicate that the quantity of residuals disposed of is approximately 700,000 gallons. However, a new clarifier has been constructed and has become operational within the last year. The quantity of residuals generated by the WWTP in 2005 was approximately 101 dry tons. Of this quantity, approximately 66 dry tons were land applied, and 35 dry tons were removed and disposed of by McGill Environmental. Attachment 2d — Sampling plan. Continuous measurements are recorded on the influent flow into the WWTP. Daily composite monitoring samples are collected on the influent and effluent for analysis of BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue. The effluent from the WWTP is sampled daily for analysis of NH3 as N, Dissolved Oxygen, Fecal Coliform, and pH. Fecal Coliform are also sampled daily upstream and downstream of the WWTP. Representative samples of the residual sludge are sampled at least once per year, prior to disposal by land application or off -site disposal. • The residual sludge analysis includes TCLP for Pesticides, Herbicides, Reactivity, Metals, and Organics, as well as for nutrient and micronutrient parameters. Attachment 2e - Laboratory analytical reports and operational data. Attached. HARNETT COUNTY cs TO uuwcra -I PROJECT LOCATION TOWN of SPRING LAKE CUMBERLANO COUNTY • FAYETTEVILLE LOCATION MAP 0 7 4 8 Process Flow Diagram P1 Mechanical Screen (Hurry 107% Rove) Influent Screw Pumps (2) Grit Chamber Influent Metering Box Static Screen Overflow Aeration Basins (2) ' (926,800 gallons each) Return Activated Sludoe Sludge Decanting Tank i (142.100 gallons) Lime Silo (3,000 of) Sludge Stabilization Tanks (2) (10,000 gallons each) Anaerobic Digestor (125.000 gallons) (For Temporary Storage of Sludge) 50% Flow 1 Waste Sludge Sludge Pump Lime Stabilization 50% Flow 50%Flow 1 Clarifiera(3) Effluent Water LT. Sludge Holding Tank (350,000 gallons) Land App ication of Sludge or Other Removal Methods Post Aeration Basins (2) (29,920 gallons each) Chlorine Contact Basins (2) (24,000 gallons each) Effluent Metering Box • Outfall #001 Process Flow Description Two parallel screw pumps lift the raw sewage to the influent channel that feeds the "Pista Grit" vortex grit removal system. The flow then passes through a mechanical bar screen and a fixed bar screen. Flow is measured by a Parshal flume before it enters the activated sludge process trains which operate in parallel. The effluent from the activated sludge process enters on of three final clarifiers, with 50% of the flow passing through the clarifier constructed in 2004, and 25% of the flow passing through each of the two older, smaller clarifiers. The overflow or effluent flows by gravity to two post aeration basins and then to two chlorine contactchambers, where chlorine is introduced to the effluent to disinfect it. The effluent then gravity flows through an effluent metering box and then to the outfall at Lower Little River. The underflow from the clarifiers or sludge is either reintroduced to the activated sludge process as return activated sludge or fed to the sludge -decanting tank (the old aerobic digester) as waste activated sludge. The sludge holding reduces some of the volatile solids by aeration (oxidation) and prevents the sludge from going septic or anaerobic. The sludge holding does not meet pathogen reduction requirements for aerobic digestion. Sludge is lime stabilized to Class B standards and held in a Biosolids storage tank prior to disposal by land application or other removal method. Biosolids are presently land applied to 15.84 acres of permitted land on the WWTP site. Coastal Bermuda and Winter Rye Grasses are grown on these properties. bb/.bti/1E7bb 14: by ;i;ib3421b11 Nitt<1 I tl l'1 rt-nar. UGI coo L Contact: Client Meritech, Inc, Environmental Laboratory Laboratory Certification No.165 Mike Ctdxoe Town of Spring Lake PO Box 617 Spring Lake, NC 28390-0617 Mezitech Work Order # Pas mom % Solids Volatile Solids Ammonia, Nitrogen TICN Nitrate/Nitrite, Nitrogen Nitrogen, total PAN .Murninwm, total Arsenic, total Cadmium, total Calcium, total Copper, total Lead, total Magnesium, total. Molybdenum, total Nickel, total Phosphorous, total Potassium, total Selenium, total Silver, total Sodium, total - ZinS total PH Paint Fite: 03210693 Result Report Date_ Date Sample Revd: Sample: Sludge Digcotor Big Slue Grab 2.16 % 1.26% ' 13,400 mg/kg 43,300 mg/kg < 463 mg/kg 43,300 mg/kg 22,900 mg/kg 8,860 ntg/kg 3.56 mg/kg 2.28 mg/kg 71,500 rug/kg 270 mg/kg 14.9 mg/kg 3,850 mg/kg 5.55 mg/kg 9.32 nag/kg 16,300 mg/kg 4,440 mg/kg 4.88 mg/kg 534 rng/1 26,000 mg/kg 743 mg/kg 5.8 S.U. Ftce Liquid Prtaent I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data. d isAarg 3/23/06 3/22/06 3/22/06 3/29/06 3/22/06 3/30/06 4/10/06 3/24/06 3/24/06 3/24/06 3/23/06 3/24/06 3/24/06 3/23/06 3/24/06 3/24/06 3/24/06 3/23/06 3/24/06 3/24/06 3/23/06 3/24/06 3/23/06 3/23/06 Air olp�1, 0 -100 °A° 0-100% 10 tag/kg 50 mg/kg 10 nag/kg 50 mg/kg 5.00 nag/kg 1.00 mg/kg 0.200 mg/kg 10.0 mg/kg 0.200 mg/kg 1.00 mg/kg 10.00 mg/kg 0.500 mg/kg 1.00 mg/kg 2.00 mg/kg 20.0 mg/kg 1.00 tag/kg 0.005 mg/l 20.0 mg/kg 1.00 rug/kg 1.0-14.0SM. 4/11/06 3/21/06 3/20/06 EPA 160.3 EPA 160.4 E1311 350.1 EPA 351.1 EPA 353.2 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 1501 _ d.✓ c J - �I. �E,,, La ratory Representative. 642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320 teL (336)342. 4748 fax. (336) 342-1522 DO/OOLOOO ID;3O L■700JYcaucc rcr�a■c.w■ ■...+�• MERITECH, INC. Emlronmental Laboratories A DMaton of Water Teennobgy and ConErcb, Inc. Client: 'Iowa of Spring Lake project TCLP Cliept Sample ID: Di=eetor Sample Collation` OS/18/05 Mcriteeh Sample ID: 05190547 .1311: - TCLP 4r4anics • VilatIh t tIW.t/L aU Analyeit 06,01r05 Mn lyic CAB Earamft Runt >bdlt Waite Sermons <0.0100 mg/L 0.0100 0.50 Carbon Itateldctida <0.0100 mot 0.0100 0.60 . Chbrobeaexne 4 0.0100 mg/L 0.0100 100 Cblorokma <0.0100 nip% 0.0100 6.0 1,-0khloroedate a 00100 me. 0.0100 0.50 1,1-Dialdatotthenc <0.0400 0.0100 ' 0.20 Methyl 8601Xetone <M100 tna/L 0.100 200 Tearchlort cdiyleco < 0.0100 awl. 0.0100 0.i0 Tlicblorodbms <0.0100 txg1L 0.0100 0.50 Vial Chloe& < 0.020 tn$. 0020 0.20 $6tnl.Vokths SW-041$270 8straetk.K 05/31105 Analyds: 06/02/05 Aoa yst_ CAB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 buss& MO INN HOLD t Ribligshillta 1,A-Dklilorobcnz ne < 0.010 mg& 0.010 73 1 Hdtaenloeobearae < 0.010 ale. 0.010 0.13 1 Wara ddoto-1,3-hasdiam <0.010 me. 0.010 0.3 1 Aczarldoroedese - < 0.0)0 me. 0.010 3.00 1 2-14gthylphazi <0.010 rlL 0.010 200 1 3M-Medlthelol < 0.020 . mg 1. ' 0020 400 1 IBtrobao;ac <0.010 mg1.. 0.010 2.00 1 Pantochkettigtool <0AS0 roslL .0.050 100 1 Priam < 0.010 mg 1. 0-010 30 1 2.44S-TrioblocopbcnoI <0A10 nia 0010 400 1 2,4,6•Tdddaropbcnol < 0.010 rng/L 0.010 2.00 _ 1 2.4-Dbitradoa s <0.010 rnp1L 0.010 0.13 I -I hatrsby corgi) ►hair 1 baw tsviswsd and approve these dato. Laiernetary ]Es 042 Tam= Road' Roldsv llo, NC 27320 (338) 342.4748 Ph 1 (330) 342-1522 Fax 06/82/2885 16: 36 16db-swore MERITECH, INC. Environmental Laboratories A Dhielon et Water Technology end Controls, inc. Client Town afSpaag Lake Project TCLP Client Sample ID: Digester Semple Collection: 05J18/05 Merited* 8ampls ID: 05190547 1311. TCLP Metals btehlt-LPA affil Ezbactfa c OSf26/0 Wok 0610IJ05 Leatoskr Bu1B Wu b4,L.11 lh aLirllt Mitkothlin Amnia rc 0.100 meal 0.100 SA 1 Balm 131 iseL 0.050 100.0 1 catml mi <0. 20 m 0A20 1.0 1 <QOM elsIL 0.050 5.0 1 Leal <0.100 3i 11. 0.103 S.0 1 Sere loom• a0.100 moon- 0.10D 1.0 1 Sllva <0.050 m011. 0.050 S.0 1 Wilt -EPA2454 13 cgarc 05/261DS - An** fir • AIWtgds: 05/31105 riZIESZ ___ l i. May <0.0100 m, lL 0.0100 ' 01 1 • Aral 05h3N5 &MAE .1N lid Die A • Stalin pp 6.60 in - _ 2.0.125 3 Italian Mnlyar 0S/264S her Beak WI 1he1 Um* Mika inglialnit Colvlly IJao•Ccr:v:ln I hmby web that I haw rrrieiei a ul approve drse data 642 Tamco Road Reidsville, NC 27320 (336) 3424748 Pb' (338) 342.1522 fax 86/02/2005 16:36 13363421522 MU%L EVrt rrv+�n MERITECH, INC. Envirorirtl.ntat Laboratories A DWbton of water Ter3Vdiopy and Coat*, Inc. C1T k Town of SprintLake PoiTCPP Client Sample ID: Digester Sample Collection: 05/18/05 Merited Sarmpie ID: 03190547 1311- TCLP Pesticides, Herbiddg3. RteslctIvity ma ac Ic : 05R3105 - Analyst: TA Analysis 05 2!t05 hamlet Basil Ihdtt ' illidldt Diklielickg Liadane 40.000S rept OA005 0400. t Chlordane <0.0005 les4. 0.0005 0A30 1 end* 40.0005 U*IL. 0.0005 0.020 I Heptachlor <0.0005 me. 0.0005 0.0000 1 Itivibmobier <0.0005 ntg4. 0.0005. 10.00 1 Tombola <0.0100 we- 0.0100 0.50 1 Ke,lieler- tea►-$44 wu E b atax 0373103 Analysts: 05t75J05 Ambit - TA y� D <0.100 all. 0.100 10.0 -- 1 • 2.4.5.TT(Si1reac)-<0.0100 ens& 0.0100 1.00 1 Item:dyke. $W-144 Cb 7. Sulfide 91134 < 100 vn$sk0 100. Cyanide 934 <SOD raect 50.0 1to$tbt'tiq ,I1IO >200 7 I hereby eve that 1 have reviewed and arprare doss data. 642 Tamco Road • Reidsville, NC 27320 (338) 342.4748 Ph • (336) 3424522 Fax -L: 20 20 NON-DICHARGE PERMIT MINOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION FOR: LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS Applicant: Town of Spring Lake, North Carolina Wastewater Treatment Plant Land Application Site Certification Attachment (LASCA) Form MAcCONNELL & ASSOCIATES, PC. MacConnell & Associates, P.C. State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION ATTACHMENT (THIS FORMMAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USEASAN ORIGINAL) The Division of Water Quality (Division) will not consider this attachment form to be complete unless all the instructions are followed. Failure to follow the instructions or to submit all of the required items will lead to additional application processing and review time. For more information or for an electronic version of this form, visit our web site at: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu/ INSTRUCTIONS TO THE APPLICANT: A. Attachment Form: • ✓ Do not submit this attachment form for review without a corresponding residuals program application form (Form NDRLAP). ✓ Any changes to this attachment form will result in the application package being returned. 1 For new residuals land application programs or renewed residuals land application programs, submit the requested information for all land application sites to be certified for this residuals land application program. ✓ For modified residuals land application programs in which any new/transferred land application sites or modification to the certified land application sites 'are proposed, submit the requested information for only those land application sites that are new/transferred or affected by the proposed modification. 1 All forms and guidance documents referred to in this attachment form may be downloaded from the web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu/. B. Land Application Site Information: 1 Additional copies of Page 2 of 2 of this attachment form may be used if necessary. ✓ The status of the land application site with respect to this residuals land application program must be provided in the table in Item I. 1. The status categories and their corresponding codes are as follows: • New (N) ♦ Renewed (R) • Modified (M) • Transferred (T) ✓ If this is the first time that an application package is being submitted using Form NDRLAP, then a Watershed Classification Attachment for Residuals Programs (Form RWSCA) must be completed for all existing land application sites. ✓ For each land application site with a status code of N, attach the following in the order specified: • Attachment Order 3: Land Application Site Certification Attachment (Form LASCA). ➢ Attachment Order 3-a: Watershed Classification Attachment for Residuals Programs (Fomi.RWSCA). ➢ Attachment Order 3-b: County Manager Notification Attachment (Form CMNA). > By Land Application Site: • Attachment Order 3-c: Landowner Agreement Attachment (Form LOAA). • Attachment Order 3-d: Buffer Waiver Agreement Attachment (Form BWAA). • Attachment Order 3-e: An updated vicinity/buffer map that meets all of the criteria in the latest version of the document entitled "Guidance for the Preparation of Vicinity/Buffer Maps for North Carolina Residuals • - Permitting Programs." • Attachment Order 3-f: A soils and agronomic evaluation that meets all of the criteria in the latest version of the document entitled "Guidance for the Preparation of Soils and Agronomic Evaluations for North Carolina Residuals Permitting Programs." ✓ For each land application site with a status code of R attach the following in the order specified: • Attachment Order 3: Land Application Site Certification Attachment (Form LASCA). > By Land Application Site: • Attachment Order 3-c: Landowner Agreement Attachment (Form LOAA). • Attachment Order 3-d: Buffer Waiver Agreement Attachment (Form BWAA). • Attachment Order 3-e: An updated vicinity/buffer map (i.e., see above for criteria guidance). • Attachment Order 3-g: An updated accounting of the land application site's cumulative pollutant loading rates (CPLRs) that are required by the permit of the residuals land application program from which the site is being transferred. 1 For each land application site with a status code of M contact the appropriate Division's regional office to determine attachment requirements. ✓ For each land application site with a status code of T attach the following in the order specified: • Attachment Order 3 through 3-f: Everything required for land application sites with a status code ofN. > Attachment Order 3-g: An updated accounting, of the CPLRs (i.e., see above for criteria guidance). FORM: LASCA 02/02 Page 1 of 2 Attachment Order 3 L1 1 J I Applicant's name: Town of Spring Lake, North Carolina Check all that apply: ❑ NEW RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM ❑ RENEWED RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM ❑ ADD ❑ DELETE this/these land application site(s) to/from those certified for this residuals land application program. ❑ INCREASE ❑ DECREASE the net acreage associated with this/these land application site(s) currently certified for this residuals land application program. OTHER Explain: Increase allowable disposal quantities to agronomic rates Land application sites currently certified: 15.84 net acres and proposed for certification: 15.84 net acres. Total to be certified: 15.84 net acres. Approximate percentages: % forested, 100 % agricultural, and % reclamation sites. I. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION (See Instruction B.): 1. Complete the following table with the requested information: Status Code Site/Field ID Landowner(s) Lessee(s) or Operator(s) County Net Acres Predominant Soil Series Soil CEC M-modify 1 Town of Spring Lake Town of Spring Lake Cumberland 15.84 Wickham Loam FORM: LASCA 02/02 *** END OF FORM LASCA 02/02 *** Page 2 of 2 Attachment Order 3 FORM: RWSCA 02/02 ShZO-d V00/E00'd 059-1 •1 : MacConnell 8 Associates, P.C. PFiCtE NO. : 919 319 E61E1 Dec. 12 212105 12:22P14 P2 State of North Carolina Department oiEr n o£'Wa x Quality 1 Resonrces Divls WATERSHED CLASSIFICATION ATTACHMENT A HMENT FORPROGRAMSRESIDUALS _ (THIS FORMMATBENIOTOCOPIEDFOR USEASANORIt911VAD !vision) wilt not consider this s form to be complete TheDivision of ri cd Quality (� tastrnctions or to submit all of the are foil -creed. Failure to fellow it mks; an the t red processing and review required theme win lead*, atddaltmai application . or r me Electronoc version ofthisPr" visit our web site at httptl/i2o.ettr ssater-� •-fmtpsr/ • 1;: Pos'nsorsis¢osneastm+ for . i • T 10INSTIWCrIONS T .TCANT 16 A. Atbehnsen:Form I I Do not sate dietsattachment sp+A r attachment form for review without a correa applioatiost ! 1 tbsys (BortarmRLAP), ` ✓ My chattece to this auachmeat fortn will result in the opplicedion is where iesiddttlif D. Prepare t!m inhumation with the requested mation for each bast • ion program activities are Owned to occur within a pear regionsd office eomdy coverage. . ✓ AItional copies of Page 2 of 2 of Piste attachment form, ;nay be o� IJSOS Topog ✓ Use a pordoa of an 8.5-inch by 11•taoh copy of the t ut occur as opo at rerate Map to tho location acdvit are planned Fl identify dm claim doo Pe seines waters as clearly as possible.program Map paiaof mast be labeled with die asap tome and --- aumbet, !its identified location. and be of clear and reproducible quality. Latitudes and longitudes must repotted as being based on either the NAA 27 or the AD 83 data sys t 1 ,le methods of deteasuinitig location latitudes sold longitudes and _ their corresponding codes are as Mows:. • Digistal orRaa►Photo Fxtsactivtt (EXT) • Address ls+iatclting ( Control ) • Geodetic Quality CPS Sunv�cy{GEO) • Cadenza' Surviy ( i . ;" • LO -C Navigation Device,(IAR) ♦ • Cadenza' Saivay O i = rGPS (OPS) ♦ Coavaaoa from Coordinate Pierre (t3f) • Navigation• 6aatao8 (RS) • Conversion from Township -Section -Range i ) ♦ R �� Caste (ZIP) • Coar►usian from Universal Trans Mao (T) I ♦ Map I b7 Digit* or Manual Esmacdoo (MAP) ti 1 Location a cY � be provided to its nearest unit (e.g., eaten ssr. � of a second, etc.)!, Itt to the appropriate regions] aides for t*view and . F l:: C. Mail or lent the attachment form and the map portion 7. ,.: is obtatn t+aaerbed7 aid clasaisieation iafortatathus. co their contact of may 1 le A list of the Division's iag%aai offices. their county v togs. _ _ downloaded from the web silo at: httpaJh2o.enr at mone/ndpul. . I The Divisions will not consider this to be complete until it is complied by the 1pphoptime regional office. ' To Regional Oflom _ Fle Rsstiosml ortk. .. . Address of Rogiensl Office: d fir: Fevettraie Ste= _North Cool28301 5094 o, n L AMA2 l Telephone ninnber. (9101486.1541 '_ Faositioa7s ssmmbcr.. � • � �_�_.�-,_ • Please provide ens with the vtaterbody naiac(s), . stream index sump (s). an cshd tcua(s)a � a 8d stassitication(s) of the steam wetgrs that are closest to and. downslopt: le proposed residuals program settvirl • ' planned occur, as identified on the attached map segmgsat. �,�' ' / t — Signature of regional office sluff: _ 4 Dam: Armament Order 3-a .:: • -01i NrV90:11 900Z-91-030 Page 1 oT2 f•. 3 NMI ••• inilimmiligliMumgesim Milrelirri'M 11111111.0.01 mis �-ate== im... Paso 2of2 FORM: RWSCA 02/02 Attactsivsk Order 3-a • A a Lil ; 1 r _ 0 Attachment Order 3-e, Vicinity/Buffer Map Scale (feet) 500 1000 feet NON-DICHARGE PERMIT MINOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION FOR: LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS Applicant: Town of Spring Lake, North Carolina Wastewater Treatment Plant Supporting Documentation MAcCONNELL & Assoc7ATEs, P.c. MacConnell & Associates, P.C. L i_ _ L 0: CP 4. 1- ID ID CP CS O. DP 5 ID CP ?=:,) Mat'S *ellen* Divitihml :1949):704WK-Arxtlitvi-vo!***4004wnontFtc;:lz nfl:T:',%;r4z4i.i.1#-44.ga4-:.;;:, 4-.'.!:' Grower: Town of Spring Lake Copies 7b: sty blicbtrel Crlscoe 'PO Box 617 Spring Lake, NC 211390 oil Test Report Farmi:' 1123/2006 ' SERVING N.C. MIMI'S FOR OVER 60 YFARS Cumberland County ggronosilst Comments -.. 04 hiliiinatiOn • • ' .• *lied Lille. .*ein*Ettlitto*...it.-.5„41.,-i,;•;:;:. ....,•:::-.%: .-":':'. l'si.,• :s- „:,i; i;.,1;,'.*:. •• '......::::.*:"*"'.'lltt.,: - ::t..;,5.";:r:41....-,1*.,;,i i; ... : ' .: , •:-... -; ..., ...:. ..... :•..111'..'7:.'":“."-; mpie No. last Crop IELD1 Mo Yr rm Crop or Your Lim. a N P205 1(20 151 Crop: Berm HayfflosiE 0 60-80 0 30-50 2rel Crop: Berm Bayifits,/il 0 180-210 0 100-I 20 I fg S Cu Zn B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mn pHS pH$ See Note 12 12 !at Remits 11 Grass AM WIV OTC BS% ite pH Itl K-I Ca% 11416 Abed ifs-Al(1)Ifu-A1(2) Zu4 mu r riE 1.22 Ii_O et6.0 0.7 6.8 726 i 49 87.0 8.0 67 45 45 1 im Zu-Al Csa S-1 t at 574 49 SJ-I NO3-N liffh-N Na 0.1 ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM Permit#: WQ0001086 County: Cumberland Year: 2005 I Facility Name (as shown on permit): Land Application Operator: Spring Lake WWTP Mike Criscoe Phone: 0910/436-0241 Land application of residual solids as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year? ig Yes 0 No If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to the certification. Also, if residuals were generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled. Part A: I Total number of application fields in permit:1 1 ITotal number of fields land application occurred during the year:1 1 ITotal amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites: I 66.14 . I ITotal number of acres land application occurred during the year:( . 15.84 I Part B: JFacility was compliant during calendar year. 2005 with all conditions of the land application permit (including but not limited to items 1-12 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality. 0 Yes i[ No If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain _j corrective action taken. 1. Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites. 2. Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at least 6.0 or the limit specified in the permit. 3. Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies of laboratory results are attached.. 4. Annual TCLP analysis was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached. 5. All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached. 6. The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in Table 1 of 40 CFR Part 503.13 or the Pollutant Loading Rates in Table 2 of 40 CFR part 503.13 (applicable to 40 CFR Part.503 regulated facilities). 7. All general requirements in 40 CFR Part 503.12 and management practices in 40 CFR Part 503.14 were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities). 8. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality. 9. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are attached to include appropriate actions and remediations. 10. Vegetative cover as specified in the permit was maintained on this site and the crops .grown were removed in accordance with the crop management plan. 11. No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred. 12. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application'of residuals. "1 certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." Ethel T. Clark, Mayor Permittee Name and Title (type or print) • ilIJ.CG✓c Signature of Permittee OZ-Z6-?.004 Date Signature of Prepafer* Date Signature of Land Applier Date (if different from Permittee) (ifditferent from Permittee and Preparer) ' Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) DENR FORM ACF (5/2003) ANNUAL L STKTBUTI�VA—ANL^, ihARK�;TING7 a'CiRFAL'r;4 DIsFusAL�CERT'I"FI"CATION�AN:D SUMMARY FORM PERMIT #: WQ0001086 FACILITY NAME: •Spring Lake WWTP PHONE: 910/436-0241 COUNTY: Cumberland . OPERATOR: Mike Criscoe FACILITY TYPE (please check one): Surface Disposal (complete Part A (Source(s) and "Residual In" Volume only) and Part C) 0 Distribution and Marketing (complete Parts A, B, and C) Was the facility in operation during the past calendar year? jg Yes 0 No No If No skip parts A, B, C and certify form below Part A*: Part B*: Month Sources(s) (include NPDES :# if applicable) •January Volume (dry tons) Recipient Information Amendment/ Bulking Agent Residual In Product Out • Name(s) Volume (day tons) . Intended use(s) SLWWTP 0.453 February SLWWTP 2.175• March SLWWTP 2.311• April SLWWTP • 4.521 . May SLWWTP 8.338• .June SLWWTP 7.577 .July SLWWTP 14.134 August SLWWTP 10.147 - September SLWWTP• 11.286 . .• October SLWWTP . 0 November SLWWTP • 0 December SLWWTP • • 5.205 Totals: Annual (dry tons):_ 0 66,147 0 0 Amendment(s) used: I • Bulking Agent(s) used: 1• 1 r more space than given is required, please attach additional information sheet(s). 0 Check box if additional sheet(s) are attached Part C; Facility was compliant during calendar year 2005 with all conditions of the permit (including but not limited to items 1-3 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality. ❑ Yes xi No If No, please provide a written description why the facility was not compliant. I . Ail monitoring was done in accordance with the permit and reported for the year as required and three(3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached. 2. All operation and maintenance requirements were compiled with or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality. 3. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well. "i certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there arc si nificant penalties for submitting false information, ' ` g t; e po 'ty of fin- and imprisonment for knowinge�wviolations." .ee/�'T—' ��A/��► V*.Zi�O` Il .4,4/v - 0Z�fi��(I�14 Signature of Permittee Date • Signature of Preparer Date (if different from Permittee) **Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) DENR FORM DMSDF (11/2005) i I I I 1 i' t ' ;_ . I�' 1 J.. L_� 1__1 1 L .L-__,J i ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD. PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE. Facility Name: Owner: Site #: Spring Lake WWTP Spring Lake Field #: Operator: 1 Permit #: WQ0001086 Annual Dry Tons Applied: 66.14497785 Mike Criscoe Acres Utilized: 15.84 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): Acres Permitted: 15.84 Date or Month Speeiry Totals Per Acre o /o Solid s Dry Tons Per Acre -• •Hrs. Residual Sources (Summarize) site Cond. Dry, Wet, Moist Inches Precip, Past 24 Appli- 'cation Meth- . od* Vola- tili- zation Rate** Miner- ali- . zation . Rate TKN Ammo- nia- Ni- trogen Ni- trate and Nitrite PAN 1 PAN 2 Must Select Crop1 or Crop 2 * i�,,I, c'��.v�l. - - Report Total. in C;o1, Crop 1 Crop 2 * I-2005 I0.250 647.1 1,06 0.028602936 SLWWTP S 0.5 0.3 36,200. .943 1,980. 0.74531 ####### Bermuda 1 2-2005 49.200 3106.1 1.06 0.137294091 SLWWTP S 0,5 0.3 ' 36,200 943 1,980 3.5775 ####### Bermuda 2 3-2005 52.275 3300.2 1.06 0.145874972 SLWWTP S 0.5 ' 0.3 • 36;200 943 1,980 3.80109 ####### Bermuda 3 -1-2005 102.275 6456.8 1.06 0.285401487 SLWWTP S 0.5 0.3 36,200 943 1,980 .7.43676 ####### Bermuda 4 5-2005 188.625 11908. 1.06 0,526363778 SLWWTP S 0.5 0.3. 36,200 •943 1,980 13.7156 ####### Bermuda 5 6-2006 171,425 10822 1,06 0.478366657 . SLWWTP S 0.5 0.3 36,200 943 1,980 12.4649 ####### Bermuda 6 7-2005 3 19.750 20186 1.06 ' 0.892272064 SLWWTP S 0.5 0.3 36,200 943 1,980 23.2501 ####### Bermuda 7 8-2005 229.550 14492 1.06 0.640566231 SLWWTP S 0.5 0.3 36,200 943 1,980 16.6914 ####### Bermuda 8 9-2005 255.325 16119 1.06 0.71249215 SLWWTP ,S 0.5 0.3. 36,200 943 1,980 18.5656 ####### Bermuda 9 10-2005 0 0 1.06 0 SLWWTP S 0.5 0.3 ' 36,200 943 • 1,980 0 ####### Bermuda 10 11-2005 () 0 1.06 0 SLWWTP S - 0.5 0;3 36,200 943 1,980 0 ####### Bermuda 11 12-2005 117.750 7433.7 1.06 0.328584943. SLWWTP S 0.5 0.3 36,200 943 1,980 8.562 ####### Bermuda 12 TOTALS: 94471 As Cd Cr Cu Pb Hg . Mo Ni Se Zn P PAN 1 PAN 2 Lime Applied . Annual lbs/acre 0.519471922 0:02447 0.1'1859 2.16307 0.07867 0.01495 0.03942 0.99384 0.07876 7.6501 182.901 108.81 0 Date lbs/ac Current Cumulative lbs/ac 4309471922 1.27647 2.90259 44.4511 9.58467 0.53195 3.22742 8.09984 2.78076 109.921 • 1 1 Biosolic 3,780 Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac 3.79 1,252 2.784 42.288 9.506 0.517 3.188 . 7,106. 2.702 .102.271 Permitted C. P. L. R.*** 36 34 2,677 , 1,338 267 ' 15 16 374 89 2,498 Permit PAN Limit 1st/2nd Crop .. 220 1 50 "I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are signif cantcnalt'es or submit ' g false information, ipcluding the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." ibr(attire of Land Applier OZ-L8-7roo6 *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC -Incorporation Date **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Infection/Incorporation -1.0 ***C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate The RSSf Data and the Dry Tons Per Acre are to be entered on the MFLSF Form. The FSF and MFLSF are mathematically linked so this information needs to be entered into the same numbered column on the MFLSF as is entered on the identically numbered FSF row to properly complete the metals equations. ie. FSF row # 1 to MFLSF column # 1. DENR FORM FSF (5/2003) ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM Facility Name: WWTP Name: Spring Lake WWTP Spring Lake WWTP Monitoring Period: From January 1, 2005 Permit Number: NPDES Number: To December 31, 2005 WQ0001086 NC0030970 Pathogen Reduction (40 CFR 503.32) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative perfor Class A: Alternative 1 ■ Alternative Alternative 2 ■ 3 ■ Alternative 4■ I Alternative 5■ I Alternative 6■ IIf applicable to alternative performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens": Compost ■ Heat Drying • I Heat Treatment Thermophilic I • • [Beta Ray ■ I Gamma Ray • I Pasteurization ■ Class B: .1 Alternative I Alternative 2 . Jg[ I Alternative I. 1 ■ 3 ■ If applicable to alternative performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens": Lime Stabilization tif I Air Drying • 1 Composting 'Aerobic Digestion • ■ !Anaerobic Digestion❑ I lIf applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring data: 1 Parameter t Allowable Level in Sludge. • Pathogen Density Number of Excee- dences . Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Analytical Tech-nique Minimum Geo..MeanMaximum Units 1• II Fecal Coliform 2x 10tothe6th power MPN per gram of total solids or 2 x 10 to• the 6th power CFU per gram of • 1000 mpn per gram of total solid - 'Salmonella bacteria (in .lieu of fecal 1 coliform) 3 MPN per4 grams total solid (dry weight) • Vector Attraction Reduction (40.CFR 503.33) - Please indicate option performed: --I;Dption 1 ❑ 'Option 2 0 "Option 6 M'Option 7 ❑'Option 8 0 No vector attraction reduction options were performed ❑ I _._;CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement) Option 3 0 'Option 4 ❑ 'Option 5 ❑ Option 9 . ❑ 'Option 10 ❑ ❑ "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have been met." "1- certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 50332 and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have not been met." (Please note if you check this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the requirements.). "This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the I►ystem designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information —]tsed to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment." J Michael Criscoe -Signature of Pfeparer of-2 6.2ot Date Land A Michael Criscoe am and Title (if a licable)(type or print) OL'20•56 Signature of Land/Applier (if applicable) Date • DENR FORM RE (5/2003) The only known area of non-compliance with the permit (##WQ0001086) is in the batching of the biosolids for lime stabilization. On several dates, the pH was elevated to between 11.0 and 12.0 (corrected pH results), with the resulting 2-hour and 24-hour times remaining between 11.0 and 12.0 (corrected pH results). The probe records indicated that the pH exceeded 12.0 on those occasions, and that the temperature corrected results are where the pH was low. The dates in which this occurred are as follows: 1-10-2005 . 2-28-2005 . 3-23-2005 3-25-2005 . 4-3-2005 4-22-2005 4-26-2005 4-28-2005 4-29-2005 4-30-2005 5-6-2005 5-10-2005 5-30-2005 .6-2-2005 6-3-2005 10-24-2005 New policies and procedures are being implemented at the Spring Lake WWTP to prevent such occurrences in the future. On June 2, 2005, the batching pH was extremely low, and the material was rebatched. Plant Available Nitrogen calculations Constituents mg/kg - Dry Weight TKN 43,300 Ammonia-N 13,400 NO3-NOZ-N 463 Mineralization Rate Dry Tons Date of Analysis: 3/21/2006 30 % 287 Design value, including adding lime PAN = 16,133 ppm Dry Weight 32.27 pounds/dry ton/year = 9,260 pounds/year Constituent - ' mg/kg Sodium 26,000 Calcium 71,500 Magnesium 3,850 Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR 14659 29.32 8,414 % Solids =. 2.16 Concentration Equivalent Weight MillEquivalents Na 561.60 23 24.417 Ca 1544.40 20 77.220 Mg 83.16 12 6.930 SAR = 3.76 Organic Nitrogen = 29,900 mg/kg dry weight To Be Land Applied = 17,163 pounds/year The 5-year maximum adjusted PAN are calculated below. The mineralization rates utilized for these calculations are from anaerobically digested residuals, which more closely resembles the WWTP processes that occur during the generation, processing, and lime stabilizing of the residuals. Nmin for Yeara1= 5,149 pounds 12,014 Ibs remaining N, for Year12= 1,802 pounds 10,212 Ibs remaining Nmin for Year23= 817 pounds 9,395 Ibs remaining Ninin for Year3.4 = 376 pounds 9,019 Ibs remaining Nmb, for Years = 271 pounds Maximum Adjusted Pan = 8,414 pounds/year (for design sludge production value) :F3TB13.4ki.Q01 FAX TRANSMISSION DENR FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH:CAROLINA 28301-5043 VOICE: 910-486-1541 Fax: 910-486-0707 To: E ?AJ/C- L GcRac a Date: .s // /o. Co Fax #: 9/ o - 413 Co — Co Co? From: ci AR3cl2 Subject: Spk/ , tAk=E (.v cv1P COMMENTS: Pages (including cover): (,• c,� 5E4._. —riv..4I w/A 7-T.4 c (1LE-73 P.m) T o 's .air' 2 u.ucc4, W(L&. BE le, .A fiT6 . F/2orl . /o —• P-o. Boz 129 I ; Morrisville, NC 275d0 919-167-1239' March 6, 2006 Mr AlailiVuri. Klimek'P.E, NC D ent ofEadira3 T and Application Perrin 1viacConnell 'and 'Associate Division o/Water.Qua Aquifer . rotection. Sect•bn 1636 Mail Service Center 512 Nortli Salisbury' Street, S� Raleigh lallorth Carolina 276 wn of Spring mberland COO Town of Spni1g L'� 191 s_'iduala Land Application 'Pro.' 4umber • '0001086 .I P.C. Project No.: A10143 0d WQ o� 909 Aviation Parkway Suite 1400' Morrisville, NC 27560 Fax 919-319-6510 i i �� 7 � Ill. �II � I• iL,, �! I, V; Il d'I i On behalf of the Town of S ring Lake, 'we' will , request an m nxstrative hearing per Chapter �,�,. request Ixa l�I� 150E of the North CarolinaGeneral Statutes, We request that your review the above referenced I, n r i II I ��� f permit a soon as possible. Wei:beIieve that the modifications `itO,.the permit are unfair, without merit, ar itrary, and- extremel costly; to the ,Town of Spring_Lake W e ask'that you correct the permit to;allow' foragronomi, lir its.:Please,seeour responses below. ( I' 1j,,q i - . i i '' r Ii i1�5,, III i •`' 1 _ Eli y. • In your:1� er dated .February 8, s2006, you noted.. that "the ae submitted to a p l for I I, I I , -, , r \ , P , I PP Y o this permit r- ewal and minor;modzfication,was submitted significantly after the expiration date of Its, kermit'", '�I ;.the previ»us issuance of this .,, .You should note that the ,initial application for renewal of the pe i. t was submitted ,to,"NC DENR for 'approval in Sep ember' 2003, well before -the e iratio of the revious ' ` tt..i The Town.of Spring Lake contacted NC DENR in '�P .... � P ..., P I, , „ .A;pri12004; . aud'•disc eyed that no record of the submittal was shown from NC:DENR records. The Town of Spring L a e then faxed the renenv'a1 forms on April 14, 2004. 1Vo' tees onse or` acknowledgement was received by the Town oil pnng'Lake from the fax of'the p t forms either. The Town of : ' ' I .• I. c�, N , I ill 1. : , ;, Sprung i,- ., a has shown di igence in, attempting to, renew their p ,I, l it for: land application; of the residual , Taste. The . final s ction :of the permit renewal , applhcation :included a copy of the certified ` receipt for thelSt 'ember 2003 submittal arid tJ p fax receipt for the April'2004 submittal' C�> ,p P �i: j�`II C :��� , `';1d�� �31tih1l�IN�3Q�N II .kf.aht,:` .. k 88d90-9 tL-6 t,6 89 :PT "_900Z/80/90 Also inyour letter; ixou• lave„indicated that the permit has bee ijriiodi£ed• .ROM 287 dry, tons per year to 0•dry tons per year; biasedlupoza a reductton from f4 1141ares, to 15 84 acres. This Would consti a approxunately 00 o reduction of capacity for the .faaal tyy.t Under Condition �1T.,13. you I 11gL a i I, ill, „ 7. wrote { 'Tills condttion re s that - onomie rates .not be' exceeded !,!when land • a 1 'n ISite.,,, ; �,� , �� � w! � , � �! , : [� r WIl � -, 14 , ,PP Y� g : residua • to a Whle�,i j pll lernut establishes ,a max u application rate, based° on the � I'�' I1 �9 'need ,I11 'I� II� �'.�4 � • nutrien loadin rate:of a :articular, cover cro d I g p ,, I , p,.aa;,tual rated m�1 , eedC,t'o Ibeiiad-uste bas411 on_th9e- I 14i ,the residuals such ,as, liming.'' !I II I1 j � � ; r1.1 , i prograRap 1 d the potential fo ui I. fr1 '1ul ( I 1 13 1 and potassium to the 'site' soils Based upon the So"' ; est Report, over,. tiliz ti f Site 1 is. not ark is e. y 1= wing addresses the needs o the crop based ony�soii{ tests or other nutrients pies. 1; ; � h ,I�6flI f� I ; The D• ision has significantl{co cems. about the ',Capacity of over -application of residuals 7,41n response; 1. `4 Plant' Available' '1Nitrogen- (P. i The Bali Cone 'Phis uit' mineralizatiozil. rate of 30% and- with the anal !cal ` results of 36,200 <943 �9 ka,, a d 1,980 Ei NON ' `TKN,' ' g/l, g Ammonia-N an g/kg. 3 Oz N would indicated the.PAN to be':13,0291ppm,,dry eight, which would equate to'2606 poundsldry tonryear. W. an apple Ication� ra e of 22'0 pounds per acre per, year'' of P T fo r' Bermuda Grass (laths listed m the permit) 'i this would; allow for maximum quantity for land .application to ! , ' A al 'dry i 0,..tileier be approxrmatelZ;133 7, rdrytononthe 15.84 acre Byoverseedingthesite(e.g.,Bemiudagrastheyserandryegrassin'theihBOTHcropstbreceive� ji4 Ii�'I ;.'a residuals), a net increase of 50 pounds of PAN' per acre per year would be allowed. .. t 9 �,1 i il. ,9; . This would allow for the 'application. rate' of 270 Quads per acre per year'ofPAN „ i9�j91I r'9i 7 whichwould incease the maximum quantity for tan application from 133.7 dry toms Ill i I. '9L1,9 per yeah' to 16 dry' tons per year Prior �teords have ; .shown - disposal of approximately i00 t0125 dry tons per year. for;the ` cthty. li The December. 114'2'ii.)1041'11' Soil Test Report that x�cras ,conducted by the NCDAS&CS:. i Agronomic Divi�ion;'(attached) .forte land appliaation site i�nFdicated that:"soil 'pH hl 'Ir a bj - I, r �Os►D�e 7t �.Qito � aaowu. wr��-rl.�.� w�. C A :with the __ - �.r � _..z � I I add • • �• I nitrogen; I I{ a ono r I• 1 see,.,. attached), based. ,;upon • a pecificl items reflected from your comments for the permit renewal. t. ition.1. 6. I ` I{' ' i condition`• refers to 'e; jiollutant ceiling concentrations for land application. As outlined response to this ' ` 'lib Nis. Thornburg in the resubnarttal of December 19, 2005 ' this is .. r the only instan4e ofreco d'that showed'elevated arsenic concentratiions. Typical.'. results have . shown arsenic levels' as don -detectable. ' The Town of Spring Lake is investigating the issue, but the result appear , t'oi:b}e an isolated incident. However, it should be noted that .even' thousgh an elevated ..level;., of 'arsenic concentration was detected : (62.2 mg/kg); this ` concentration was ;below�the maximum, ceiling: concentratibnl 75 m I I � , } �I � g, , ( fig); and the. Cumulative Poll tang L'oadhlig1 Rate li(0,tiS) through .2005 :(4 31, po kd per acre)! are` well below the +I -. '91 ,i9 1!o -I , ,, I maximum. allowed-under,ithe. permit (36 pounds per acre) �I' s such, this comment is not' appl cable to the permit. C I ',,however; a compound of con �ei 'should show concentrations as exc ding the maximum ceiling concentration; the sludge wit ,i be retested to confirm the test; resu or determine if I • :result is an isolated anomaly.1 I 1 1, , :qi • •I 1 111 n 31t+f e1N 3QDN I .i if li' - Yl� ;4° I; I�'(� I - 88I90-9IL-616 85:17T 900Z/80/90 G ,J C,pndition u. This. condition require T'e Town of -Spring • di back-up. ORC ,is-a C edition 1I. 13 • S4.note above.. ' rthat a back-up, operator r'esp?ns ble. charge,:(ORC) .is. desighated.: atk ?s! currently seeking a back-uQRC ; or the WWTP As: Soon as ufrped, `he Division Wi11 be notifid ' ` •I, Fo 1note a: of Attac;me' A. er details sarnp; Pleasecall us ;if, apprec ated. Sincerely, • an is attached for your review; questions. Your assistance and cooperation are greatly_ ' cc; Hai He er ii �' , Tor+►u Manage triscoe, WWT? Op_ Da el Gerald, Wc P Willi . , ! A. LVillianiis, .� Project . anager 90 3Jdd Toss of Spring T ake or,;;Town of Spring Lake . . o , Town of Spring Lake 1• • 41 j 3 iVfli 1831bM/eINW3aDN 18890-9ZL616 89: T 900Z/80/90 1 ::8• PO. Box 129 Morrisville, NC 2756J 919-467.1239 7 May2, 2006 lfl Mr. Ed. J4ardee ,. NCDENR — DWQ : 1, Aquifer tection Section 2728 Capital Boulevard,' I`ch; Raleig r C 27604 i RE Permit No: WQ00010 4b - .Town of Spring Lake Reside Land Application of Residual Solids • { Connell ,& ociaates P.C. Project No.: A10143.00. i Dear Mr Hardee, The purpose of this,, letter is to; {provide you ' with an update j fiord the Town of Spring Lake's Residuals.Land Application rogram.' The permit renewal issued; on February 8, 2006, calls for decrease: in the amount of residualsthat May; be land applied ! Previously, there were'287 dry tons per. ear permitted and onlyi3O dry tons per year are permitted per this renewal. This will `. result in a decrease of almo 40$ of the. amount previouslyu" `ermined.' ',The reason for thus. l' ` nwdi£ication is `thlat 48.03, 'acres of';previously permitted ]andj was not included in the permit renewal. i Total acreage of land `available for residuals disposal is: aow.15.84 acres, • " We believe that the above entioned modifications are not justifiied and that they. will have a severely' egative-fin, ai, ' act on the Town. Based on ourr ussion a .few weeks ago, it is q �. ,i II it :� I;• ° 'ltl i,'1 I ,, , our midi'tanding that the 'A' Fier. Protection Section would 1 Bing to discuss changes; in the permitewal conditions is lsued:on ebruary 8 2006. You m € ned tlbat`S1�.dryt ns per! yearwouldacceptable' if ' '• ti dnitoi g' wells are installed. an ! io" l 16'4, dry .tons per year if monito`ri. . wells are'insta]led.l�r;Per�,oar discussion, the AquiferJj ProtectiontSection would also � i ill lA �il�n: N ; - consider'�permitting 270 po of PLAN (Plant. Available, NitrogIeI n) per acre.per year. 909 Aviation Parkway Suite 1400 Morrisville, NC 27560 Fax'919-319-6510 Land Application Program . yr ; , 1 1 i , :11 4 111 Gary SiMacConnell,; P.E. I-7- ; r!' II Presideni r , 1 , . Cc: -.a.1 Hegwer, Town:ofS,&g,Lake el Gerald, Town afillpring Lake , , • .14 1 • • 1 2,2)--06 ' • . ; 11'3 ' tr 4 • 1 • t 11 ' 11 1' • • 1. 214 We hazel informed the Townr;OSping Lake of these developments and, the, Townis currently assessing their options. e 11 get in touch with you with their. decision as SooriaS possible., u for your assistance.liql •-rt!, 1 • ' t' ! '36t?el ; I 1'4 )• nyn 6 ii'ii.1:17101`1±) elN?311DN 1 • i • 89 il7T 9130Z/80?96 05/0912E10,E 11: . 41-7111 4cP4.'-4‘11.4 • "ki v pt NA lkik rfi. 4;.1e1 AfaiAw • air man 9. I...., ' ia a IMICEICielper• Lei C4,60/ 9gol 040 VIII er4 V;1 lot 4 ?i4111. Veitzidc r.10fi.O.L NUDE&NHMAItH UUAL . Ul tgo.r.9b) T7 V t 311/191A •-• i•-t4 ti et' -4"4?"4"4-"'-`1-s. 11:2 f9.ra 4"t ci • t-fni r VOJ V ‘401p22! rroi 1(' i e,. , / fr41,1 w yt-t Li.rbi.d fr tV I1 11 1V\ 40VOS 0 t. ! -1 if jd 5 -D cpky : MacConnell & Associates, P.C. PHONE NO. : 919 31'9 b510 mar. 'lam .16FOb t7.3: Dbrm re ® • 0 TRe P00,011.7 Lie& 50-Net :CO ?nil" S+ / • •{ fife • - \ IA( r r 1 / FJ"G itE 2 0 Zoe feet f> cz •(./( SCALE -foeT A rerox:rr� LocisAisft of Com,lience i • 4 ti • i T OwN dF '� PrII NU 'i_ A ke 5PrniNt, i.AnE -WASTE...matt TREATMENT PLANT W C 0oa io8d / 6W 93 187 Review t7v:�- tt�Y G. alit! Arpli :i,f,u' Aweu i10 ? tag wel.0 Fax from : 919 319 6510 03/15/06 15:39 Pg: 2 Contact Client: Meritech, Inc. Environmental Laboratory Laboratory Certification No. 165 Mike Criscoe Town of Spring Lake PO Box 617 Spring Lake, NC 28390-0617 Report Date: 4/11/06 Date Sample Revd: 3/21/06 Meritech Work Order # 03210693 Parameters % Solids % Volatile Solids Ammonia, Nitrogen THIN Nitrate/Nitrite, Nitrogen Nitrogen, total PAN Aluminum, total Arsenic, total Cadmium, total Calcium, total Copper, total Lead, total Magnesium, total Molybdenum, total Nickel, total Phosphorous, total Potassium, total Selenium, total Silver, total Sodium, total Zinc, total pH Paint Filter Result 2.16 % 1.26 % 13,400 mg/kg 43,300 mg/kg < 463. mg/kg 43,300 mg/kg 22,900 mg/kg 8,860 mg/kg < 3.56 mg/kg 2.28 mg/kg 71,500 mg/kg 270 mg/kg 14.9 mg/kg 3,850 mg/kg 5.55 mg/kg 9.32 mg/kg 16,300 mg/kg 4,440 mg/kg 4.88 mg/kg 5.34 mg/1 26,000 mg/kg 743 mg/kg 8.8 S.U. Free Liquid Present Sample: Sludge Digestor Big Blue Grab 3/20/06 Analysis Date Reporting Limit Method 3/23/06 3/22/06 3/22/06 3/29/06 3/22/06 3/30/06 4/10/06 3/24/06 3/24/06 3/24/06 3/23/06 3/24/06 3/24/06 3/23/06 3/24/06 3/24/06 3/24/06 3/23/06 3/24/06 3/24/06 3/23/06 3/24/06 3/23/06 3/23/06 0-100c/o 0-100% 10 mg/kg 50 mg/kg 10 mg/kg 50 mg/kg 5.00 mg/kg 1.00 mg/kg 0.200 mg/kg 10.0 mg/kg 0.200 mg/kg 1.00 mg/kg 10.00 mg/kg 0.500 mg/kg 1.00 mg/kg 2.00 mg/kg 20.0 mg/kg 1.00 mg/kg 0.005 mg/1 20.0 mg/kg 1.00 mg/kg 1.0-14.0 S.U. EPA 160.3 EPA 160.4 EPA 350.1 EPA 351.1 EPA 353.2 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 150.1 I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data. Laboratory Representative 642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320 tel.(336)3424748 fax.(336)342-1522 Contact: Client Meritech, Inc. Environmental Laboratory Laboratory Certification No. 165 Mike Criscoe Town of Spring Lake PO Box 617 Spring Lake, NC 28390-0617 Report Date: Date Sample Rcvd: 4/11/06 3/21/06 Meritech Work Order # 03210693 Parameters % Solids cYo Volatile Solids Ammonia, Nitrogen TKN Nitrate/Nitrite, Nitrogen Nitrogen, total PAN Aluminum, total Arsenic, total Cadmium, total Calcium, total Copper, total Lead, total Magnesium, total Molybdenum, total Nickel, total Phosphorous, total Potassium, total Selenium, total Silver, total Sodium, total Zinc, total pH Paint Filter Sample: Sludge Digestor Big Blue Grab esult 2.16 1.26 13,400 mg/kg 43,300 mg/kg < 463 mg/kg 43,300 mg/kg 22,900 mg/kg 8,860 mg/kg < 3.56 mg/kg 2.28 mg/kg 71,500 mg/kg 270 mg/kg 14.9 ing/kg 3,850 mg/kg 5.55 mg/kg 9.32 mg/kg 163300 mg/kg 4,440 mg/kg 4.88 mg/kg 5.34 mg/1 26,000 mg/kg 743 mg/kg 8.8 S.U. Free Liquid Present 3/20/06 Analysis Date Reporting Limit Method 3/23/06 0 -100 % EPA 160.3 3/22/06 0 -100 % EPA 160.4 3/22/06 10 mg/kg EPA 350.1 3/29/06 50 mg/kg EPA 351.1 3/22/06 10 mg/kg EPA 353.2 3/30/06 50 mg/kg - 4/10/06 3/24/06 5.00 mg/kg EPA 200.7 3/24/06 1.00 mg/kg EPA 200.7 3/24/06 0.200 mg/kg EPA 200.7 3/23/06 10.0 mg/kg EPA 200.7 3/24/06 0.200 mg/kg EPA 200.7 3/24/06 .1.00 mg/kg EPA 200.7 3/23/06 10.00 mg/kg EPA 200.7 3/24/06 0.500 mg/kg EPA 200.7 3/24/06 1.00 mg/kg EPA 200.7 3/24/06 2.00 mg/kg EPA 200.7 3/23/06 20.0 mg/kg EPA 200.7 3/24/06 1.00 mg/kg EPA 200.7 3/24/06 0.005 mg/1 EPA 200.7 3/23/06 20.0 mg/kg EPA 200.7 3/24/06 1.00 mg/kg EPA 200.7 3/23/06 1.0 -14.0 S.U. EPA 150.1 3/23/06 - I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data. Laboratory Representative 642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320 tel.(336)342-4748 fax.(336)3421522 `%-50005 / o Cp°4 C z ov ) . 2./Ca VD Ca ?cc -,_->.M21RG 2 4') TrA.p -, -- c ra A G , (7-c (P i=on. P%c 66 t-L cvr-c.`5 0 ("co-carc.tS (�) , 67 For 7%l DD wL fir. (3) r:w Rio cec- S rAck ce.3 , czar l c.. f w Tout,a F 5P/2ivfr f-lE JA)/ r / o i2 P2,CepFa 7)961JDF.,�. N r' (A) stnA.) ° e i SE 11.vi c r a rro - F. p °h DLO r au r P. wati CA -c.rl3 rr:� 7� Ph / 0 �/OZ nor-rjo�— '�—a2�1/ Arc it= c Gr/?/-c' . PoLic l.tJOrL/.�5 c 910- 237-/N(0 tt-• we: A/ .721 5c'v06-a .5c6ee Zotc. AP21 (. al CQ) /:�ICI4 Pam.. -nit" el2 fin) �'o G�co. �! 7 2-46 42911 3 0 it State of Nbrth Caro ma Departme t of Environmen and Natur6I Resources Division of *Mar Quality Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. moss Jr., Secretary, Alan VV. Klir ek P.E. Director • I )ivision of Water Quality; ,Aquifer Protection Section' `'lLocation:2728 Capital Blvd Raleigh', Ng, 27604 jE1' MailingiAddress: 1636 Mail Service Center 11'FAX: (919) 715-0588. (9,19) -715-6048 -<Date:.May 8, 2006 - �ri FAX TO: Jim Barber O. OF PACES INCLUDING THIS SHEET: -6 Spring Lake letters.; • If you receive this fax by mistake call: Aquifer Protection Section @ 919-733.3221 FAX NUMBER: (910) 486-0707 �df1t 13itTIAINSaIDN . r,'`'S ,II aa: • s1 8,,59-SIL-5t6; 85:bZ , 999Zf89156 l Performance Annual Report Page 1 of 2 Performance Annual Report L . General Information Facility/System Name: Town of Spring Lake Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Responsible Entity: Town of Spring Lake- Person in Daniel B. Gerald (910) 497-5748 Applicable Permits: Wastewater Discharge. Permit Number NC0030970 expires September 1, 2006 Land Application of Bio-Solids Permit Number WQ0001086 expires January 31, 2011 Description of Treatment Process: The Town of Spring Lake Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant°is a Dual Train, Extended Aeration . Plant with Secondary Clarification forthe separation of hquids and solids, Post Aeration, Chlorination and De -Chlorination. Aerobic Digestion has been supplemented with Lime Stabilization to ensure that the treated Bio-solids produced after plant processing, meet' EPA and NCDWQ regulations prior to disposal by land application. A monthly report of plant performance as determined by Laboratory 'analysis is submitted to the NCDWQ and an annual Bio-solids application report and Laboratory analysis is submitted to the EPA and NCDWQ Non -Discharge Branch. The plant is also responsible for the two lift stationsinstalled in 'the town's collection system. No reportable discharges or downtime was experienced:by these lift stations., II. Performance Text Summary of System Performance for Calendar Year 2005 The Town of Spring Lake Wastewater Treatment processed for discharge into the Lower Little River 295,407,000 gallons of wastewater during the ,calendar year 2005. While producing the treated effluent' for. disposal the plant produced for Land Application 66.14 dry tons of Bio-solids. The plant flowranged froma'low flow, on September 25th of 549,000 gallons per day to a high flow on August 25th of 1,478,000 gallons per day: A .by month accounting of the system for CY 2005; follows: January- 26,052,000 gallons of treated effluent discharged, no permit violations.noted._ February - 21,945,000 gallons of treated effluent discharged, no permit violations noted. March - 27,142,000 gallons of treated effluent discharged, See attachment April - 24,501,000 gallons of treated effluent discharged, --See attachment May 21757,000 gallons of treated effluent discharged, no permit violations- noted June - 21,292,000, gallons of treated effluent discharged, See attachment July - 22,475,000 gallons of treated effluent discharged, no permit violations noted: August - 23,543,000 gallons of treated effluent discharged, See attachment September - 19,040,000 gallons of treated effluent discharged, no permit violations noted. October - 20,643,000 gallons of treated effluent discharged, no permit violations noted. November - 19,043,000 gallons of treated effluent discharged, no permit violations noted. December. '26,080,000 gallons of treated effluent discharged, See attachments During CY 2005, the plant processed 273,513,00.0 gallons of wastewater and returned, it to the surface ,waters of the state of North Carolina via its permitted discharge point into the Lower little 'River. The Collection system had a total of (4) four • ,http://www.spring=lake.org/general/WWTP%20Annual%20Performance%2OReport htm 5/12/20.06. Performance Annual Report Page 2 of 2 reportable (SSO) Sanitary Sewer Overflows, which occurred during the CY 2005The dates of the SSO are as follows: 03/25/05 850 gallons 03/13/05 700 gallons 05/03/05 300 gallons ' 10/31/05 350 gallons The Town's Wastewater Treatment facility entered into a Special, Order of Consent during the month of October 2004. The Special Order of Consent (SOC) caused the Town to evaluate its Collection system and its treatment plant. The Treatment plant has a newly constructed clarifier that went online in July of 2005. The Collection system is currently in the process of being upgraded to _eliminate (UI) Inflow/Infiltration problems, which have plagued the Town.. III. Notification A copy of this correspondence was placed on the Town of Spring Lakes web site. IV. Certification I certify under penalty of law that this report is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I further certify that this report has been made available to the users or customers of the named system and that those users have been notified of its availability. Violation Date — Attachment March 1.4th thru March 18th Total Suspended Solids (weekly violation) March 21st thru March 24th Total Suspended Solids .(weekly violation) March 28th thru March 31st Total Suspended Solids (weekly. violation) March 1st thru March 31 st Total Suspended Solids (monthly violation) • Violation Date — April 4th thru April 8th Total Suspended Solids (weekly violation) April 1st thru April 30th Total Suspended Solids (monthly violation) Violation Date — June 9th pH (Daily ;Violation) Violation Date — August end Dissolved Oxygen (Daily Violation) Violation Date— December 13th pH (Daily Violation) http://www.spring-lake.org/general/WWTP%20Annual%20Performance%20Report.htm 5/12/2006 Prowf7 Line w6U- 74v /NcrcArG.S /JH1s cuEc,i AS /6 w-1 l'4w3 c „/"Y\ 1• LA/4 ior. e / Cornpf;diACt, `I3 .'3^APPRoX• .r mew wl�r �ocnTwu •••ati;� 1 101' S/--_ J 0 - iab etc* SCALE FICURE .2.. • j OihiN dF' SPr:) N&, •s..A prr •fi 6 LA r 1,1Ay l= %J,47E Ei7P9EN7 pL1L T Wry oao1086./Gki;31f37 1Y\LJ 14f11n \1111..VJ. J \ILI1n ,nf111 l `'`�".• rRevi:ew B ::n:"Rit t1X LIt L-A a Al'N f�+�.l.�rl Ji. y:'1r6! CI 14 ^ . . i , �S irR tat . }JE. ! .r .