470003_Routine Inspection_20221024

�-5 i6114/1-
ivision of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 40 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: .0Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I/O 2-yArrival Time:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
AV-td,eeez E 7 f//l
y .r L,J.ri'&
Departure Time:
/ '✓!'3 • .• • '
e,7 Owner Email:
Phone:
County: �-]�),r,e_, Region: c--/&)
641
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
t?
Title:
Phone:
1/
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Design
Capacity Pop.
35372
,2 2cv
Layer
Non -Layer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Ca.aci Po
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1 Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c.
d.
❑ Yes J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Er No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Yes jaallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
n Yes a -No ❑ NA 0 NE
n Yes -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes -Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes .sallo ❑ NA n NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application'? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes-I'<10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding n Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 7 - r( ;6442_,-)
,
/'
13. Soil Type(s): t1,.
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes...-❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes„-0 No ❑ NA 0 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes F1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes __No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 0 Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? n Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE �
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check n Yes .Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP n Checklists n Design ❑ Maps n Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. n Yes , . No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application n Weekly Freeboard n Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
n Rainfall ❑ Stocking n Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes -ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/201 5 Continued

Facility Number: 4/-7 -
03
Date of Inspection: /0/ t1/t .
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑Yes -Zs.10 ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes 2'-10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes hTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes -E1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes -"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes,,121gO ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 0 YesVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Jo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
ief,rie%
Gam
Q'ie, / .vim d ti necele, C • �r��( f/
.(91 S '7S(
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
c21/2 /////e// S&f / 3
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: 164/Z <)
5/12/2020

e-/-t-ezte.e b), /(c
J33s,
l/e hai'I »
igi'Vce/i_ 10/(70,
FACILITY#: V7-0
FARM NAME:
(7)201
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS A►
EXPERIATION DATE
- CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
PERMIT (#19)
LAGOON LEVEL
NUMBER OF ANIMALS
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST SR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (#21)
- GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE 9b- /?-
i - NITROGEN LEVEL v2 'g
DATE V&NITROGEN LEVEL 3< v�
DATE 2/ / o 77-) NITROGEN LEVEL 3," •
3, S'
,14//?-/
SOIL REPORT (#21)
EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE q/0251 4?-6)
P-I (NO MORE THEN 400)
PH (Note if 4 or less)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
Not over PAN
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
IRR2 (#21)
CROP TYPES
Not over PAN
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
CROP TYPES
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION (#24)
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBFATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
%' DATE OF CALIBRATION /(, /2
FLOW RATES
; RAIN FALL xi) -INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT f
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
I 9/2-SLUDGE (#21 &2s)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE `�
0: 3. U P: 5 l % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM 2( CROP YEILDS ORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be n crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st - Ends September 30th
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1st- Ends March 31 st
Corn: Opens February 15th - Ends June 30th
Cotton: Opens March 15th - Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September 1st- Ends March 31 st
Oats: Opens September 1st- Ends April 15th
Wheat: Opens September 1st - Ends April 30th
Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15th
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31 st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15th - Ends August 31 st