20221578 Ver 1_401 Application_20221104

Staff Review Form
NORTH CAROLINA
Ertrlmnmertlrtl Quality
Updated September 4, 2020
Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
Yes No
ID# *
20221578
Version* 1
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Reviewer List:*
Select Reviewing Office: *
Submittal Type:*
Yes
No
Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnsonl
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
401 Application
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
Yes
No
How much is owed?* $240.00
$570.00

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: *
For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
New Project
Modification/New Project with Existing ID
More Information Response
Other Agency Comments
Pre -Application Submittal
Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
Stream or Buffer Appeal
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
7/18/2022
Project Contact Information
Name:
Heather LaGamba
Who is submitting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
...................................
Project Name: Faith Charter Academy/Faith Rd
Is this a public transportation project?
Yes
No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No Unknown
County (ies)
Rowan
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
7859.1_Faith Road_PCN_11.3.22.pdf 7.28MB
Only pdf or kmz files are accepted.
Describe the attachments or
comments:
PCN for 401 WQC
Sign and Submit
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I, the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

• I, the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I agree that submission of this online form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
rif 00. �Zaf.
Submittal Date: Is filled in automatically.

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2022-02111 Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Faith Charter Academy/Faith Road
2. Work Type: VPrivate ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Attached
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Attached
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Brad Luckey, Pilot Environmental, Inc
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B lb]:
Faith Road
35.593070/-80.462247
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 56608692110000 and 56609601860000
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Rowan
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Salisbury
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Crane Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Yadkin/03040103
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
❑✓ Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Faith Charter Academy/Faith Road
2b.
County:
Rowan
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Salisbury
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Faith Charter, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
4327/0077
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Steve Hubrich
3d.
Street address:
4321 Medical Park Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Durham, NC 27704
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-697-5571
3g.
Fax no.:
919-741-6140
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Bradley Luckey
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Pilot Environmental, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
PO Box 128
5d.
City, state, zip:
Kernersville, NC 27285
5e.
Telephone no.:
336.708.4997
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
5660869211 and 5660960186
Latitude:35.593070 Longitude: -
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
80.462247
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
26 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Cane Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Yadkin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains undeveloped wooded land. The site previously contained a quarry. The site is located within a rural
and residential area of Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetland=0.62 ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Streams=1,391 LF. Open Water Ponds=0.222 Ac
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to development the site with Faith Charter Academy.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project includes the construction of Faith Charter Academy In order to construct the site and provide access
to the school, it is necessary to replace an existing stream/wetland crossing. To facilitate the development of the site,
clearing and grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used during
grading and construction of the site.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No ❑Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: SAW-2022-02111
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Pilot Enviromental, Inc.
Name (if known): David Brame
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE Delineation Concurence E-Mail Dated 10.13.22
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Impacts to streams/wetlands, outside of those proposed in this application, are not anticipated as a result of the proposed
project.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ® P ❑ T
Road
Crossing/Culvert
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.01
Replacement
Hardwoods
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.01
2h. Comments: Wetland impact #1 will permanently impact 0.01 acres (282 SF) of wetlands with road crossing. Temporary
wetland impacts are not proposed. Mitigation is not proposed for unavoidable wetland impacts.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ® P ® T
Road Crossing/
De-wateringl
Unnamed
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
2.45/2.25
20/20
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
20/20
3i. Comments: Stream Impact 1 will permanently impact 20 linear feet (49 SF) of stream with culvert/wall fill associated with
culvert replacement fill and temporarily impact 20 linear feet (45 SF) of stream channel with associated de -watering.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Areas of temporary impact will be restored to similar pre -construction grades, stabilized with natural fiber matting and native
herbaceous seed mix or woody live stakes. Mitigation is not proposed for unavoidable stream impact.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: Open water impacts are not proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: Impacts to waters from pond construction is not proposed.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired?
B1 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts are not proposed.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The applicant has designed the proposed school, parking areas, athletic fields and stormwater ponds to avoid other impact to
streams, wetlands and open water ponds. The applicant has selected the proposed stream crossing in a location of an
existing stream crossing and culvert, thus avoiding additional net loss of stream than a new proposed crossing location. The
applicant is utilizing head/end walls and minimizing road shoulder side slopes to minimize the impact to the stream and
wetlands.
The remaining 0.609 acres of wetlands, 1,346 linear feet of stream channel and 0.22 acres of open water ponds are being
avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The clearing limits will be staked and sediment/erosion control devices will be used. Temporary coffer dams will be installed
upgradient of the proposed culvert replacement. During construction, water will be pumped around the construction footprint.
Appropriate stream bank protection will be provided in the channel during culvert replacement and all excess excavated
material will be immediately removed from the stream bank and wetlands within the road crossing area. Upon completion of
the culvert installation, the temporary sand bag coffer dam will be removed and flow will be diverted through the culvert.
Following culvert installation, disturbed banks will be restored to similar pre -construction grade, matted and seeded/live
staked.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
ElPayment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments: Mitigation is not proposed.
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.621 acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments: see above 3c
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h.
Comments: Mitigation is not proposed.
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
11.5 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
The site has been designed in accordance with State stormwater requirements.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
® DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ® No
letter.)
Comments: A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We are not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed project will connect to existing sanitary sewer lines located on the site. Impacts to streams or wetlands
assoicated with sewer lines are not proposed.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The attached IPac dated 11.2.22 identifies Tri colored bat (Proposed Endangered) and Schweinitz's sunflower
(Endangered) as potentially occurring within the project area. The project area contains an existing road and sanitary
sewer crossings that have become overgrown with dense mid and understory vegetation. Based on our observations, the
project area does not contain suitable habitat for the Tri colored bat or Schweinitz's sunflower. Therefore, we have made
the determination the proposed project would have no effect to federally protected species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
® Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat. Best
management practices and the construction of stormwater ponds will prevent sediment from entering down -gradient
waterbodies which may contain fish.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The attached SHPO Map (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) does not identify cultural resources on or within 1,500 feet the
site. A copy of the map is included as an attachment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: A floodplain development permit will be obtained from FEMA
jurisdiction prior to construction of the crossing or impact to the 100-floodplain
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA NHFL (Drawing 4, attached)
Digitally signed by Bradley Luckey
Bradley
DN: cn=Bradley Luckey, o=Pilot
Enviromental, Inc., ou,
Bradley S. Luckey, PWS
email=[e-mail],
11.3.22
Lucke
c=US
Date: 2022.11.03 20:38:10-04'00'
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
Property Address: I' u r [GL�In 5
to C_ —
Applicant Information:
Name: LL
Address: i 1�1Pxc)� c6k
roc -
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Signature: Date: _ l��

Brad Luckey
From: Heather LaGamba
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2022 4:45 PM
To: 401 [e-mail]
Subject: Pre -File Notice - Faith Charter K-6 - Faith Rd (7859.1)
We would like to submit a Pre -filing Notice for the following project:
Project Name: Faith Charter K-6 - Faith Rd (7859.1)
Project Owner: Faith Charter, LLC
Project Owner's Address: 4321 Medical Park Drive, Suite 100, Durham, NC 27704
Project County: Rowan
Type of project/Approval Sought: 401 WQC, Pre -Application Request Meeting Declined
Thank you and have a wonderful day!
Sincerely,
Heather LaGamba
336.345.9536 (c)
336.310.4527 (o)
P.O. Box 128
Kernersville, NC 27285
www.lilotenviro.com
[e-mail]

Wd 3OVNIV2i4 M101S
y ' 1608d VNIlO JtlO IS NNA HL6d N
�s l � j o
2i�,L2iF�HJ H,LIF�3
SNVld NOIlDn HISNOJ 3.1 1S a N a o U

NIV�dGOM�
�rooaz ""0' o HiaoN'Hliv� ro
�a Y Nazro
2I3 L2IF�HJ H IF�3 w x
c SNd1d NOIZJC1iIZSNOD 3ZIS N - w
X
8 L£8
O
wuj
8 L£8
H
O
z
O
O
#1
1
X C, o o
L ££8
_ � M
r ~ M
7
>OzOa
\ �o»OJ
V ,r co
\
Q�s
w
p
L 6Z8
z
3 'o
o �.
•• �U
o-
Y
o r
W
0
N
� W o
U �77 ii
O
0
v� v— m- �v �� C,
pp
� �
\ _ /.
IH \
w z w m :Z7
4m- g.
U)
. . .
w U)
w a z
. . . .
9Eg SEB b " / j / ww
pXw
/ w
loll
£8 — CD _ `
F J bpq,
9E8 55�- W � SEB�i / zo
x \ / z g w
< w
m u)
rn�.
w� ¢ c8 �. \\-
w
Q b£8 SEg 9£g Eg
�
m v Q
w
A�\VA
AV A�Vvvvv v� vv ��V�om c)a pI a �p /
a�� 1 05 o�\ a / /—aaa_
1 1 v v ry v�
1 a 1 O p /
11l v v vvvv °� 1�\ p a
v1 w v� m
�11��vv� avvvvv� \ w�
u) / _j 1 \ — J zcq / /
V1 v v v v v v v //I mo v� /
11A vvvv v� v� vvv v / �— / °Qv�---/
11 vv °�a v vvvv v vvvv l 1 L
�Lo�

Scott Edwards
From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 12:33 PM
To: Scott Edwards
Subject: SAW-2022-02111 / Faith Road / Hubrich Contracting / Salisbury / Rowan County, NC -
DELINEATION CONCURRENCE
Attachments: SAW-2022-02111_Delineation Exhibit.pdf
Dear Scott,
Reference is made to ORM ID SAW-2022-02111, please reference this number on any correspondence
regarding this action.
On September 26, 2022, we received information from you requesting the Wilmington District, Regulatory
Division review and concur with the boundaries of an aquatic resource delineation.
We have reviewed the information provided by you concerning the aquatic resources, and by copy of this e-
mail, are confirming that the aquatic resources delineation has been verified by the Corps to be a sufficiently
accurate and reliable representation of the location and extent of aquatic resources within the identified review
area. The location and extent of these aquatic resources are shown on the delineation map, labeled `Drawing 5
Wetland Map Faith Road' and dated October 10, 2022.
Regulatory Guidance Letter (RGL) 16-01
https://usace.contentdm.ocic.or /ug tils/getfile/collection/pl602lco119/id/1256 provides guidance for
Jurisdictional Determinations (JD) and states "The Corps generally does not issue a JD of any type where no JD
has been requested". At this time we are only verifying the delineation. This delineation may be relied upon
for use in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. "This
verification does not address nor include any consideration for geographic jurisdiction on aquatic resources and
shall not be interpreted as such.
This delineation verification is not an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) and is not an appealable
action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (33 CFR Part 331).
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
O: [phone], Ext. 35
M: [phone]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey can
be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser:
https:Hregulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/. Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and
complete the survey.

k
WB 1-3_
(0.009 ac) 1W
WC 1-8 - T
- (0.07 ac)
5
P B
B t,
i (250 LF) :_ (0.07 ac)
r �:::::::.. ir
* f
5A `\ WD 1-4
PA
(1,141 LF) (0.15 ac) (0.01 ac) WF 1-8
F! ) (0.05 ac
4.
WG 1-19
WGA 1-9 ME (0.20 ac)
WA 1-15 I (0.17 ac)
- __(0.09 ac)
WE 1-9
(0.09 ac) DP-1
DP-20 C
-- --
IL
r rIlk
/
LEGEND
#.
Site Boundary
Potential Perennial Stream
• r-
P II S
7
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ otem. a nterrn LLent tream
144
Potential Wetland
r
Pond
■ Culvert
STREAM AND WETLAND DELINEATION CONDUCTED BY PILOT PERSONNEL ON 07.27.22. THE DP-1Data Point
DELINEATION WAS CONFIRMED BY MR. CHRIS HOPPER WITH THE USACE BY EMAIL, DATED 10.11.2022 SA 1-5 Flag Number/Feature ID
(SAW-2022-02111). THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OR DELINEATED FEATURES.
Drawing 5 Wetland Map
2019 Satellite Imagery from ESRI Faith Road
and Pilot GPS Data - - Approximate 26-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 250' p���Q� Salisbury, Rowan County, NC
Date: 10.13.22 P I L O T E N V I R O N M E N T A L I N C
Pilot Project 7859.1

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0011808
Project Name: Faith Charter K-6
November 02, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The enclosed species list
fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Please note that new species information can change your official species list. Under 50 CFR
402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list
should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends you visit the ECOS-IPaC website at
regular intervals during project planning and implementation to ensure your species list is
accurate or obtain an updated species list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A biological assessment (BA) or biological evaluation (BE) should be completed for your
project. A BA is required for major construction activities (or other undertakings having similar
physical impacts) considered to be Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c))
(NEPA). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a BE be
prepared to determine effects of the action and whether those effects may affect listed species
and/or designated critical habitat. E?ects of the action are all consequences to listed species or
critical habitat that are caused by the proposed action, including the consequences of other

11/02/2022
activities that are caused by the proposed action. A consequence is caused by the proposed action
if it is reasonably certain to occur and would not occur "but for" the proposed action..
Recommended contents of a BA/BE are described at 50 CFR 402.12. More information and
resources about project review and preparing a BA/BE can be found at the following web link:
https://www.fws. gov/office/asheville-ecological-services/asheville-field-office-online-review-
process-overview.
If a Federal agency determines listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected
by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR
402. The Service is not required to concur with "no effect" determinations from Federal action
agencies. If consultation is required, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed
species, proposed critical habitat, and at -risk species be addressed within the consultation. More
information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of
permit or licensed applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook"
at the following web link: https://www.fws.gov/media/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Act, there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project -
related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds,
including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12
and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). More information about MBTA and BGEPA can be found at the
following web link: https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds.
We appreciate your consideration of Federally listed species. The Service encourages Federal
agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species in their project planning
to further the purposes of the Act. Please contact our staff at 828-258-3939, if you have any
questions. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference the
Consultation Code which can be found in the header of this letter.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
• Migratory Birds
• Wetlands

11/02/2022
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

11/02/2022
Project Summary
Project Code: 2023-0011808
Project Name: Faith Charter K-6
Project Type: Culvert Repair/Replacement/Maintenance
Project Description: Faith Charter School, 26-ac, culvert replacement
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.p-oop-le.com/maDs/035.59311625.-80.46185224389095.14z
%r WAY
.I rk r
�CllurGn SC
Counties: Rowan County, North Carolina

11/02/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 3 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
Insects
NAME
STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
STATUS
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

11/02/2022
USFWS National Wildlife Refuge Lands And Fish
Hatcheries
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.

11/02/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the
continental USA and Alaska.
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)

11/02/2022
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

11/02/2022
Wood Thrush '
BCC Rangewide ---- —+-- ---- ---+ -- —
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding_,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?

11/02/2022 4
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

11/02/2022 5
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

11/02/2022
Wetlands
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
RIVERINE
• Riverine

11/02/2022
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency: Pilot Environmental, Inc
Name: Scott Edwards
Address: 428 Park Lawn Court
City:
Kernersville
State:
NC
Zip:
27285
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
3362794683

. {K ram.
Ir
' # " x
NV �
+*'', .. •+. +' G ■ #, �- r ' -# M. - _+
- ., ,'xm At
•
� . ' 'ate - ! �r � i�
{ •:. _ - 'tip r - .,
oogr
;± # O ■ ■ mop
�Am.%�}..
_ t - P
k. pop
IL
WAVA
iw' + ! +' r ANI CIF . # • #•` •
r SIP Molt. * Ip do
* ,.f
# tiAP
i t
dlkr
Rw,.r .•
J � 2 r w) _ t
JL
4 \ _ a
R t' y
3
4 ! a �
46
CL
4 fi+
AM IP
~ ' - • � r � `fir ` � � *
•� �- ''�
ff
4.
if Opt per
�� •y�`/ IL
JkL 4k
A jai
7 /y
■ _ w
AS '` y
pod$he

WX fa
Wale-
Av
Ci
Ir
ri
IA
LEGEND
Site Boundary
Al 77
ICA
USGS Topographic Map
Drawing I `
' Faith Road
U3G3Topographic Map
Approximate 36'AcreTract
Ak
Salisbury, NCQuadrangle '
Salisbury, Rowan County, NC
Scale: 1"=3OOO' fILT
' ��� Pilot Project 7859.1

is
AJP
Ar,
e
t
� w
w•i � } � �n'• � � �t i it
sk
•
IF N
4
�•� LEGEND
_ Site Boundary
Drawing 2.
USDA Web Soil Survey tPILOT
of Rowan County, NCScale: 1" = 300' �'� '"` Lh 4 RONMFNTF.L. INC
Web Soil Map
Faith Road
Approximate 26-Acre Tract
Salisbury, Rowan County, NC
Pilot Project 7859.1

i�
e
64;0
r" VOL, j&2'
Drawing 2A
USDA Soil Survey
' -
Of Rowan County, NC �',��dal.;=�..
Published 2004 Sheet 12
F31�Jb
PILOT Eh V RO NM EFJT kL. INC
Not To Scale
Published Soil Map
Faith Road
Approximate 26-Acre Tract
Salisbury, Rowan County, NC
Pilot Project 7859.1
1
4 �

J
do - #:--M.
fi
LEGEND
LRite Boundary
reshwater Emergent
reshwater Forested/Shrub
stuarine and Marine Deepwater
stuarine and Marine
reshwater Pond
ake
iverine
ther
Drawing 3
USFWS NWI
Wetlands Mapper
Scale: 1" = 400'
-ter —. . m- '=� -.'Ar.— :�4_ f 1.
t
OL
Tt AL .. .
•�� �f 3 as , � �}++-. a
`4 P4-�
lift A
PIL�
�
PILOT Eh V RONMEHTF.L. INC
NWI Map
Faith Road
Approximate 26-Acre Tract
Salisbury, Rowan County, NC
Pilot Project 7859.1

...
IN
IL
7,0` i #
AINIL7.i Y t JAK
� ^A
LEGEND
Site Boundary
1 °ffAnnual Chance Flood Hazard
ERegulatory Floodw2y
e Special FloodNay
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
PF,,AreawithReduced Risk Due to Levee
Drawing 4 FEMA FIRM
}. Faith Road
National Flood Hazard Layer "Y' k:. -
' Approximate 26-Acre Tract
From FEMA Web Map Service 3. -
Scale: 1" - 400' Salisbury, Rowan County, NC
PILM Pilot Project 7859.1
PILOT Eh V ROAM EFJTF.L. iNC

= - •-' - -
}
-,, • At
lk
�-# -
WB 1-3 vw� AM
(0.009 ac) • ;-
WC 1-8 '., ..
- (0.07 ac)
SB PB y
(250 LF) \ (0.07 ac) *+
W D 1-4
SA
PA (0.01 ac)
(1,141 LF) (0.15 ac) WF 1-8
i I (0.05 ac)to
y
WG 1-19
WGA 1-9
us. (0.20 ac)
_
WA 1-15 (0.17 ac)
(0.09 ac)
WE 1-9
(0.09 ac) DP-1
w' DP-20 0•-
IN.#P -J*'�'
• #�� ~4V
Ir
46
LEGEND
Site Boundary
ANk R' Potential Perennial Stream
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Potential Intermittent Stream
s a► Potential Wetland
Pond
����- ' � � ■ Culvert
STREAM AND WETLAND DELINEATION CONDUCTED BY PILOT PERSONNEL ON 07.27.22. THE DP-10 Data Point
DELINEATION WAS CONFIRMED BY MR. CHRIS HOPPER WITH THE USACE BY EMAIL, DATED 10.11.2022 it
�
(SAW-2022-02111). THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OR DELINEATED FEATURES. SA 1-5 Flag Number/Feature ID
Drawing 5 Wetland Map
2019 Satellite Imagery from ESRIf , . ; Faith Road
and Pilot GPS Data Approximate 26-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 250' PLOT Salisbury, Rowan County, NC
Date:10.13.22 PILOT ENVIR0NMENTAL,INC Pilot Project7859.1