Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20141293 Ver 1_401 Application_20141214Corps Submittal Cover Sheet Please provide the following info 1 Project Name Courtyards at Huntersville I =--- 2 0 1 4 1 2 93 2 Name of Property Owner /Applicant Epcon Commumtites , POC Mr Rick Heareth 3 Name of Consultant /Agent — Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. Mr Gregg Antemann, PWS *Agent authorization needs to be attached. 4 Related/Previous Action ID number(s) N/A 5. Site Address located south of Highway 73 and west of Oliver Hager Road in Huntersville North Carolina 6 Subdivision Name N/A 7 City Huntersville 8 County Mecklenburg 9 Lat N35 4279830 Long W80 908716° (Decimal Degrees Please) 10. Quadrangle Name- Lake Norman South, NC, dated 1996 11 Waterway- UT to McDowell Creek 12 Watershed Santee (HU# 03050101) 13. Requested Action X Nationwide Permit # 29 D General Permit # Junsdictional Determination Request Pre - Application Request D following information will be completed by Corps office AID Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date Authorization Section 10 Section 404 Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose Site/Waters Name Keywords r�j II cws Carolma Wetland Services December 16, 2014 550 E WESTINGHOUSE BLVD CHARLOTTE, NC 28273 866 - 527.1177 (office) 704 - 527 -1133 (fax) Mr William Elliott U S Army Corps of Engineers „ 151 Patton Avenue Asheville, NC 28801 Ms Karen Higgms NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit 512 N Salisbury Street, 9th Floor Raleigh, NC 27604 Subject: Pre- Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and Water Quality Certification No. 3890 Courtyards at Huntersville Huntersville, North Carolina Carolina Wetland Services Project No. 2013 -3170 Dear Mr Elliott and Ms Higgins The Epcon Huntersville project site is approximately 23 acres in extent The project is located south of Highway 73 and west of Oliver Hager Road in Huntersville, North Carolina (Figure 1 USGS Site Location Map). The purpose of the project is to develop the property Into a retirement community consisting of 51 single family ranch homes •Epcon Communities has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404/401 permitting services for this project Applicant Name: EPCON Communities, POC Mr. Rich Heareth Mailing Address: 8600 Sam Furr Road, Suite 180, Huntersville, North Carolina 28078 Phone Number of Owner /Applicant: 704 - 353 -9959 c/o Wes Smith Street Address of Project: south of Highway 73 and west of Oliver Hager Road in Huntersville, NC Waterway: UTs to McDowell Creek Basin: Santee (HU# 03050101) City: Huntersville County: Mecklenburg Tax Parcel ID numbers: 00938110, 00938111, 00938112, 00938118, 00902201, 00902212, 00902214, 00902205, 00902221, 00902219, 00902211, 00939182, 00902220, and 00939110 Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: N35 427983 °, W80 908716° USGS Quadrangle Name: Lake Norman South, NC quadrangle, dated 1996 Current Land Use The site consists of undeveloped wooded areas, agricultural fields, and maintained right -of -ways with adjacent single family residences Typical on -site vegetation Includes loblolly pine (Pmus taeda), paw paw (Asimina triloba), American beech (Fagus grand folia), southern red oak (Quercus falcata), white oak (Quercus alba), sweetgum (Liquidambar styracflua), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulip fera), red maple (Ater rubrum), rye grass (Lolium perenne), and fescue (Festuca arundinacea) An aenal photograph of the project area is attached (Figure 2) NORTH CAROLINA - SOUTH CAROLINA WWW CWS -INC NET Courtyards at Huntersville December 16, 2014 Nationwide Permit No. 29 Application CWS Proiect No 2013 -3170 According to the Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County' (Figures 3 and 4. NRCS Soil Survey Maps, attached), on -site soils consist of Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded (CeB2), Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes (EnD), Monocan loam, 0 -2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (MO), and Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (PaE) On -Site Cecil, Enon, and Pacolet soils are well drained soils Monocan loam (MO) is somewhat poorly drained and is listed on the North Carolina Hydric Soils List for Mecklenburg County as having hydric inclusionsZ. Monocan loam (MO) is also listed as partially hydric on the National Hydric Soils List3 (hydric criteria 2B3, 4) Jurisdictional Determination On April 9, 2014, CWS scientists Kelly Thames, Wetland Professional in Training (WPIT) and Logan Hardin delineated (flagged in the field) junsdictional waters of the U S , including wetlands, within the project area This investigation was conducted according to the U S Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) Routine On -Site Determination Method This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual4, the 2007 USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook', with further technical guidance from the Eastern Mountains & Piedmont Regional Supplement 6, dated April 2012 The approximate wetland boundaries and data points were recorded using a sub -meter Trimble GeoXT GPS unit Jurisdictional stream channels were classified according to recent USACE and North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) guidance These classifications included sampling with a D- shaped dip net, taking photographs, and defining approximate breakpoints (location at which a channel changes classification) within each on -site stream channel The approximate breakpoints and stream classification points were recorded using a sub -meter Trimble GeoXT GPS unit Results The results of the on -site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there are three jurisdictional stream channels (Streams A to C), two jurisdictional wetland areas (Wetlands AA and BB), and one jurisdictional pond (Pond A) located within the project area (Figures 5 and 6, attached) On -Site junsdictional waters of the U.S include unnamed tributaries to McDowell Creek McDowell Creek is part of the Santee River basin (HU# 03050101)7 and is classified as "Water Supply -IV" by the NCDWR. According to the NCDWR, Water Supply IV (WS -IV) waters are defined as- "Waters used as sources of water supply for drinking, culinary or food processing purposes where a WS -I, WS- Il, or WS -III classification is not feasible These waters are also protected for Class C uses WS -IV waters are generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds " On-Site jurisdictional waters of the U S total approximately 1 291 acres. On-Site jurisdictional waters of the U S are summarized in Table 1 (next page) United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2013 Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina United States Department of Agnculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999 North Carolina Hydric Soils List, USDA -NRCS North Carolina State Office, Raleigh 'United States Department of Agriculture —Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2012 National Hydric Soils List by State Environmental Laboratory 1987 "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual ", Technical Report Y -87 -1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi s USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook 2007 USACE Regulatory National Standard Operating Procedures for conducting an approved Jurisdictional determination (JD) and documenting practices to support an approved JD USACE Headquarters, Washington, DC 'US Army Corps of Engineers, April 2012 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region US Army Engineer Research and Development Centre, Vicksburg, Mississippi "HU #" is the Hydrologic Unit Code U S Geological Survey, 1974 Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina 2 Courtyards at Huntersville December 16, 2014 Nationwide Permit No. 29 Application CWS Project No. 2013 -3170 Table 1. Summary of On -Site Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Jurisdictional Jurisdiction Stream, NCDWR USACEf '�x� k °p roz. PP i APProx:.r Data "Point (DP)� "; r USACE/EPA t� ", Letter Jurisdictional Classification ; Stream Streani_`i`; 'Length . Wetland AA Pfiotdgraph Feature Rapanos Intermittent/'. Point ` Classifications, Assessment _. `� I inear. ,, Acreage,, _ ,- Letters- ; Classification$ Perennial re Score Score -4F et_(It7 (ac')t< ",- Perennial Perennial SCP1 405 44 2,507 023 A, B Stream A RPW Seasonal RPW Intermittent SCP3 27 35 574 0 026 C, D Stream B Seasonal RPW Intermittent SCP3 27 24 84 0 005 E Stream C Seasonal RPW Intermittent SCP4 215 15 69 0 003 F Stream Total: 1 3.234 If 1 0.264 ac. Jurisdictional USACE/EPA =Rapanos r� � x< =� t ` �. , Approz: "Acreage� '-'Photograph" g�. p Feature Classification Data "Point (DP)� "; r ' `' t� ", Letter ac: Wetland AA Directly Abutting RPW DPI and DP2 0 077 G, H Wetland BB Directly Abutting RPW DP3 0 10 I I Wati..d Tntal• I fl 177 — I Jurisdictional USACE/EPA Rapanos s, f "A roz;., photograph Feature Classification Data Point (DP) r e "Acres e =g azLettern, Pond A Impoundment of RPW N/A 085 J Water Total 1 0.850 ac. A request for verification was submitted to the USACE on April, 18, 2014. Agency Correspondence Cultural Resources A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on July 9, 2014 to determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project In a response letter dated July 29, 2014, SHPO states that they "are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project" A copy of SHPO response letter is attached CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service9 and the Charlotte Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission10 database and found no sites of architectural, historical, or archaeological significance within the project limits Protected Species A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program ( NCNHP) on July 9, 2014 to determine the presence of any federally - listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or critical habitat located within the project area. In a response letter, dated July 24, NCNHP states that "the NCNHP database does not show any records for rare species, important natural communities, or natural areas within the proposed project area or within one mile of the proposed project area" A copy of NCNHP response letter is attached Additionally, CWS consulted Element Occurrence sites provided by NCNHP and found no occurrences of protected species within a one mile radius of the project limits. s Classifications of streams include Traditionally Navigable Waters (TNWs), Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs), and Non - Relatively Permanent Waters (Non -RPWs) Subcategories of RPWs include perennial streams that typically have year -round flow, and seasonal streams that have continuous flow at least seasonally Two classifications ofjurisdictional wetlands are used to describe proximity and connection to TNWs These classifications include either adjacent or directly abutting Adjacent wetlands are defined as wetlands within floodplams or in close proximity to a TNW but without a direct visible connection Abutting wetlands have a direct surface water connection traceable to a TN W e http //gis ncdcr gov/hpoweb/ Accessed July 9, 2014 10 http //www emhpf org/homehistorieproperties htm Accessed July 9, 2014 3 Courtyards at Huntersville December 16, 2014 Nationwide Permit No. 29 Application CWS Proiect No 2013 -3170 Purpose and Need for the Project The purpose of the project is to develop approximately 23 acres of property Into a retirement community consisting of 51 single family ranch homes and to provide sanitary sewer service for the new development (Figure 7, attached) This project will help meet the Increasing demand for retirement communities in the Charlotte region. Impacts to on- sitejunsdictional waters are necessary in order to provide sanitary sewer service to the proposed development Sanitary sewer service will be provided by constructing approximately 2,600 linear feet of sanitary sewer line, ranging in diameter from eight to 12 inches, running south of the project parallel to Stream A and tying into an existing sewer (Figure 7, attached) Avoidance and Minimization Impacts to on -site junsdictional waters of the U.S have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable The Courtyards at Huntersville project has been designed to avoid impacts to j unsdictional waters wherever possible and mimimize the extent of necessary impacts to jurisdictional waters Retaining walls have been used to minimize impacts to Wetland AA and Seasonal RPW Stream A Impacts to Pond A are the result of retrofitting the pond for use as a storm water detention pond. Impacts to Pond A have been minimized to the greatest extent possible and will be partially offset by expanding the surface area of the pond to the south In areas where impacts to junsdictional waters of the U S. are unavoidable, steps have been taken to minimize both the extent and severity of the impacts The temporary construction easement for the sanitary sewer will be limited to 40 feet in width through wetlands The permanent maintained portion of the right -of -way (R/W) corridor will not exceed 15 feet in width through wetlands. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters Anti -seep collars will be installed at the downstream wetland boundary and every 50 feet up the gradient until the sewer line exist the wetland All permanent maintained right -of -way through wetlands will be permanently marked in the field to avoid mowing and maintenance of additional wetland areas Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Construction activities and impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters project will comply with all conditions of NWP 29 All work will be constructed in the dry in accordance with Water Quality Certification No 3890 Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters Unavoidable impacts associated with the construction of the Courtyards at Huntersville project include approximately 121 linear feet of impacts to Intermittent Streams, 0.02 acre of permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands, and 0 32 acre of impacts to jurisdictional open waters (Figure 8) Temporary impacts associated with the sewer line will total 0 06 acre (Figure 9) A plan view and grading plan are attached (Figures 10 and 11). Stream Impacts Proposed impacts to Seasonal RPW Stream A include 121 linear feet of permanent impacts. Proposed impacts to Seasonal RPW Stream A are the result of the installation of a pipe for the outfall of the stormwater pond and are the result of a road crossing (Figure 8, attached) 4 Courtyards at Huntersville December 16, 2014 Nationwide Permit No. 29 Application CWS Proiect No 2013 -3170 The stormwater pond dam outfall will be accomplished using a drop inlet with a 36 foot long 24 -inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) with a 10 linear foot rip rap apron on the downstream end to dissipate flows exiting the pipe (Figure 8, attached) Permanent impacts associated with the dam outfall culvert total 46 linear feet of Seasonal RPW Stream A The proposed road crossing will be accomplished using a 65 linear foot 30 -inch RCP culvert with headwalls on both the upstream and downstream ends and a 10 linear foot rip apron on the downstream end to dissipate flows exiting the culvert (Figure 8, attached). The 30 -inch RCP will be buried a minimum of a foot below the channel bed to accommodate movement of aquatic life A plan view is attached (Figures 10 and 11) Permanent impacts associated with the road crossing total 75 linear feet of Seasonal RPW Stream A Wetland Impacts Proposed impacts to jurisdictional wetlands total 0 08 acre are the result of 0 02 acre of permanent impacts to Wetland AA and 0 06 acre of temporary impacts to Wetland BB. Impacts to Wetland AA are the result of placement of fill in Wetland AA in order to construct the proposed stormwater pond and its associated dam A portion of Wetland AA will be filled (0 02 acre) to rehabilitate the dam associated with the stormwater pond (Figure 8, attached) Construction of a 12 -inch sewer line across Wetland BB in order to tie into an existing sewer system will result in 0 06 acre of temporary impacts to Wetland BB (Figure 9). These impacts are the result of clearing to facilitate the construction of the proposed sewer line. There is an existing maintained easement through Wetland BB in which the proposed sewer line is located All impacts to Wetland BB will be temporary (Figure 9) All impacted areas will be returned to their pre - construction grades A plan overview of the sanitary sewer is attached as Figure 12 Pond Impacts Impacts to Pond A are the result of retrofitting the pond for use as a stormwater detention pond Impacts to Pond A have been minimized to the greatest extent possible and will be partially offset by expanding the surface area of the pond to the south Total permanent impacts associated with Pond A total 0 32 acre (Figure 8, attached) The proposed pond is 0 61 acre in extent, totaling approximately 0 24 acre loss in water area Courtyards at Huntersville December 16, 2014 Nationwide Permit No. 29 Application CWS Proiect No. 2013 -3170 Proposed impacts are summarized in Table 2 Table 2. Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters On behalf of Epcon Communities, CWS is submitting a Pre - Construction Notification Application with attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No. 31 (enclosed), and pursuant to Nationwide Permit No 29 and Water Quality Certification No 3890 Compensatory Mitigation Proposed permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U S. total 121 linear feet of Seasonal RPW, 0 02 acre of wetland, and 0 32 acre of open waters Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters are below the thresholds requiring mitigation, therefore no mitigation is proposed for this project 6'. A Jurisdictional �Impact,Type NWP,. Temporary_ @Impacts _ - Impa -tsJ` Feature No: or, (linear, " ;,`(acre) "' Permanent feet).' : <,� Culvert Permanent 65 0 003 Stream A 29 Pipe Permanent 36 0 002 Rip Rap Apron Permanent 20 0 001 Wetland AA Fill 29 Permanent -- 0 018 Wetland BB Utility Crossing 29 Temporary -- 006 Pond A Fill 29 Permanent -- 0 324 Total Permanent Stream Impacts 121.LF,- , , 0.006'acre ` Total Permanent Wetland Impacts — 0.018'acre,, Total Permanent - Open °Water`Impacts` . A `'- ­­0.324 acre-- On behalf of Epcon Communities, CWS is submitting a Pre - Construction Notification Application with attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No. 31 (enclosed), and pursuant to Nationwide Permit No 29 and Water Quality Certification No 3890 Compensatory Mitigation Proposed permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U S. total 121 linear feet of Seasonal RPW, 0 02 acre of wetland, and 0 32 acre of open waters Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters are below the thresholds requiring mitigation, therefore no mitigation is proposed for this project Courtyards at Huntersville December 16, 2014 Nationwide Permit No. 29 Application CWS Proiect No 2013 -3170 Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704 - 408 -1683, or through email at gregg @cws -inc net should you have any questions or comments regarding this request Sincerely, z7-3- C Gregg Antemann, PWS Professional Wetland Scientist Alnsa Haijumenu Staff Scientist H Attachments Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map Figure 2 Aerial Imagery Map Figure 3 Current USDA -NRCS Union County Soil Survey Figure 4 Historic USDA -NRCS Union County Soil Survey Figure 5 Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map - Overview Figure 6. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map Figure 7 Proposed Impacts - Overview Figures 8 -9. Proposed Impacts Figure 10 Proposed Impacts —Plan View Figure 11 Proposed Impacts — Grading Plan Figure 12 Sanitary sewer overview Agent Authorization Form Pre - Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No 29 Agency Correspondence Representative Photographs cc Mr Rich Heareth, Epcon Marvin, LLC Aumprng 1 Station l \ f. 7_ C.� \ � • f Highway 73 ( ' ' \ ~ , 1 z M, % ; � ' • � -`,,. ',\ -� � �. --,.ter q � Terry Lane Oliver Hager Ro ad [, /.r! Al _. / / �� . � ( �. _ , ' qtr �C •' � : ,lr, =� �� \ \\ `. �\ �� � �: �. •,�,�'� ` ''`tom V, i Ilk f/7 kX �� �` � `-� -''�,! .: ;=•- ;� , -:, �� lit_ ' � � � �; \1 1 � a+ r ••r Y' rJ J / \ cam_ _ / ` l (� \��� 11 • ! 1 \� Legend i t Limits t � j REFERENCE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SERIES, LAKE NORMAN SOUTH, NC, DATED 1996. ¢ 2,000 ,001) 0 2,000 Feet SCALE: 1 n 2,000' 4/10/14 FIGURE NO. USGS Site Location Map CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: 2013 -3170 KMT I J CWS Courtyards at Huntersville PLICANT NO: CHECKED BY: Huntersville, North Carolina 1 GCA WWWCWS- INC.NET CWS Project No. 2013 -3170 �PondA� ~ 0.85 acre I Wetland AA Ile 0.077 acre r�� e ♦ S CP2 Figure 6 i . Seasonal RPW Stream A Pi es ~ 574 LF ' Int/Per __..- _.____— o reakpoint Seasonal RPW Stream B ~ 84 LF on -site Perennial RPW Stream ~ 2,507 LF ip - Legend Project Limits Perennial RPW P' •••– Seasonal RPW Wetlands Seasonal RPW Stream C �¢ �_ Ponds ~ 69 on LF -site _ I Wetland BB Roads 0.1 acre on -site �Q- Buildings Parcels ♦scP Stream Classification Point *DP Data Point DP3 ,N Photo Location-Point REFERENCE: BACKGROUND GIS LAYERS PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2009. NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED AND MAPPED WITH A 400 200 0 400 Feet SUB -METER CAPABLE GEOXT TRIMBLE GPS UNIT AND CLASSIFIED BY CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC. ON APRIL 9.2014. JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE. SCALE: 1" 400' 4/10/14 ' Approximate Jurisdictional FIGURE NO. WS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: ' I Boundary Field Map - Overview KMT 2013 -3170 Courtyards at Huntersville PLICANT N0: CHECKED BY: ce.ore w.u�a Sev� «s 5 GCA Huntersville, North Carolina WWW.CWS- INC.NET CWS Project No. 2013 -3170 5A DP i =on A► s CPL i Legend Project Limits ' Perennial RPW I —•••— Seasonal RPW i Wetlands 1 Ponds Roads Buildings •� Parcels ♦SCP Stream Classification Point i *DP Data Point REFERENCE: BACKGROUND GIs LAYERS PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY Photo Location Point GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2009. NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED AND SUB -METER CAPABLE GEOXT TRIMBLE GPS UNIT AND CLASSIFIED MAPPED WITH A 100 50 0 100 Feet BY CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC. ON APRIL 9.2014. JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE. LE: 1" : 100' 4/10/14 ') Approximate Jurisdictional FIGURE NO. i PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: KMT Boundary Field Map 2013 -3170 Cws " C �B ��� Courtyards at Hth 6 LICANT NO: CHECKED BY: GCA •�. Huntersville, North Carolina Ca oiin WWW.CWS- INC.NET CWS Project No. 2013 -3170 Pond A J0.32 acre permanent impacts (fill) l ,j 0 a `" � ° Wetland AA ■ 0.02 acre permanent impact (fill) ® Atr Seasonal RPW Stream A ®® 36 If permanent impact (pipe) 10 If permanent impact (rip rap apron) Seaonal RPW Stream A 65 If permanent impact (culvert) G ! R ure 8 10 If permanent impact (rip rap apron) 1 1 0 l 9 AW I Wetland BB 0.06 acre termporary impacts (clearing) REFERENCE: BACKGROUND GIS LAYERS PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2009. NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED AND MAPPED WITH A Fi ure SUB -METER CAPABLE GEOXTTRIMBLE GPS UNIT AND CLASSIFIED BY CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC. ON APRIL 9. 2014. JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE. KALE: 1" 400' 12/9/14 -WS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: L 2013 -3170 AVH CWSICANT NO: CHECKED BY: Cam4ne Wetland Sar ke■ Q GCA WWW.CWS- INC.NET Legend Project Limits ----■— Stream Impacts - Pond Impact ® Wetland Impacts Perennial RPW —•••— Seasonal RPW rte/ Wetlands Ponds Roads Buildings Parcels 300 150 0 300 Feet Proposed Impacts - Overview FIGURE NO. Courtyards at Huntersville Huntersville, North Carolina 7 CWS Project No. 2013 -3170 \ITF DATA LEGFND Tax Parcel ID 00938110 00938111 k 00938112 PROPOSFb iplist i /// 0 ' ' � I ✓ l LLLIII So. et A — — — — - PmG^ Y e Il / ✓ i �/ I of Mm 69 . k R/W, Area 2903 AU I — — — — Parcel Lim R.w Am (NC`Hwy 73) 083* Ac = —_ = — = Buildng Setback PID 009JB7009 �, _ \ ' /� u�na� `oP n space i ±Aga Eam ^9^t Fro nc.VP Oabam '/V ToWI,Sde,Area 17232 M Pwartwnt TR i 2' Tro tai C from \ 2oni Nfl -CD Prof Rip Rop � 2 -8- SW ky Cur uder 1 O / � (Neighborhood Resldentlal- COnditionl oamae) W 2 -0Y.Iby Curb t 1 i — — — _ — — — Curb Use Age Reeincted Detached Houving Fence, _ G..Mm,l Prof Sign o X / Y / Thejpropased development will be age raaWcted m ace.Mance - —rw- Slgn O hap Stcne wog Sgt+ / / 10 x70 NCDOT I ''th tha'Fedarol F.ir Housing 'ACta Housing for, Older Persona Act f } Flag Pole (by atMre)i PrWME _ \ht Triangle t L (HOPA) The HOPA regula0one will be,Incarporated Into the,COndominlum Bottoml / propoeed Dwelling. Unita�to aoccualpanry by hit leant of mident age [) /`lYYYIIwO'1'Y"/'/\ WmeII Iim C / ` ( fifty -five (55) or oidernin accordance with the'gubeMea r'ML ��yy PID 00938110 1 PID 00938708 / Total Unit. 51 R.W.mial $ } Tme(a) n, 1?+1' ./ ,F.—f i ` Q• .On Jam. M dt Co., ,S 22tG'WW.`_1 -�j- / ...at 1 R Mark R Le, h,A i pose -gt 1 Clubhouse @ Pmol F v 9 Proposed Bulltlin Setbacks i Hags. Parameter 25 Rear Yard Setback — —C— — Communleatlon,Une gg N 0.J g TR R/W (Internal) 10 <Min Budd To One —per_ _ _fg— — Fber Optic i 35 Max Build To EI Fiber ber Optic ea. k Building Setback 11 Min Budd,ng Separation _E — —E— — Unda19mu ^d Electric Une o _ =DHE— — Overhead Electric Une ' 6 ^� SDE 7 P�J T\ 1 P Inside, 102 oHW— — Overhead 'Utility w1ro / Clubhw`saaroge Telephone Pole Total 211 Spa.. ,� G% Wlre PID Farm3v11LLC p ` EtactAC Tmnsfonmr Tdargla (Tye)- _ _ _ _ _ r0 jp J _ a p R.WI.I.9W.11 - Existing Imp. us A m - \ ,� _ d PDp�J it , 8 feting. 0123 Ac -- — _ {,F Ught Pale Pwement 0.11* Ac Firv'Hydmnt / y� G�' a \ Total, Impemom Area 0232 Ac %A nPl 00938111 ,k S 3 P Proposed Urban Open .J. ee I d[`Dafd 5 poa paro p Q /Prop Retaining 9 0 'IS °0.J � Pro ed Impervbua Mee _ S o J r" "3S `�T'Y 1 ' Wall w/R g N \\ Budding. 3832 Ac Nit 4 00 'OI )� M,,4f3' pg AO Sbewalke 070±AU I �• -Y_�— vi 7 / R£, ` G a °rime a E�'°m _`J Pwement 2 -743 Ad YIE(D SIGN 'STOP SIGN Total Imp.n4a. Mao 7273 Ac (43 ex) AO y RT -2 OC — RI Y G L M ` 35435' Sight - 5. yn ^ 36" x 36" x 36" 30 x 30" g4' Prep ^a Trbngk (TYP) /' _ f0 \ Wabrehed Mountain island Lake Protected 20 MPH SPEED r B(rpa \ Mm (MIL - PA -1) B -�- STREET NAME SIGN z CC B/B Y T n.m (7O MaWiy ovuan 0 O -"- R2.-, SIGN o ;� 34 4 - s '\ `A ox MaK'Im io`. Meth R2 -,1 r rtj � 0� � is'x3s' Sight n, .\ 6es6 '. , � >—� b v°"' ) \ - a_ Impervba. Mmwl«aba rlso .tears feat per amt p L9 a \..seas ' / - cuvrdl� ran POGO r� 1 Tat- Sib isg s1 a ^its - 7&50 m feet of t6% Q y j 0 \ �ryo GENERAI NOTES m E CI C 1 All developm.t and mnatruc0on stall oo pt' with all zoning d public rig be and /or within public ea mente hall, V �t J A. o 3 CI you ) A ! '\ .ubdivbbn at.lw.rde f the Town of HunlanMga Mecklenburg County (� \ \ X 'are,. ('\„ II rg y mai ^tamed bN the pubbc bony with ownership /luried.Don of lbe 0. \ /r� and NCDOT appheabl. _ subject property W o PropSDE I ` ` ` s ` +.v36 2 Thb� �nperly m% be subJaet, W arc/ easements .lid /or right -.} -way 20 Maintenance Cownante. Prior to the Issuance t an Occupanry Permit V '/�) A ReWininq . ' of re rd for any Eullding within as permltbdldwabPment arvea'by a78MP the 'Prop SOE 3 NI appilcable federal stab and local emAroamental pemdb ark applicant or owner of the BMP shall ea 1sh formal Mointenancs II approwta will be obta d by Davdoper Covenant approved by the Mwklanburg County land Use and 'j DMew% 51 4 I / . Joseph R Norkt 7v.- "` 4 All arms d..' 2-d man and /or�urben open, space shall M Erwiron, f,.y5emcn Agenry and recorded In the'OMaead'the owned and .,.Wined byathe homeownen;oaaocletbn and dedicated Regular o /'Oeeda In whah the owner ackowledq. the,duy of,th< ` A�� n j % t * t for perpaWity owner and all a bemuerd o ners of the pmperly b m.I.Wm'the'amp V * aJ\ J jO`yAO� / _r ` d 13 I'I 5 This development b in the NIL -O watershed dkbicl and must meerw in accodanea Ith +the terms o /`the Covenant O - pv )r O 42 _ 150 square feet af'ImPp tea far tuturo homedw'nere use rm 21 Direct .cease from Iota W .1 thoroughf.ro =Ixted l7MP 8 Acmae (In9reee /egreea)�locallon aiM deei9n �ain::U an thief plan a 22 Boullao frolnl A IlneTelmentling th h .11ocationhfrom mhkhytllpe rollel MYL�7520, D ` imbjacl to b Ilndudi ht -of -w on dl Into u' Ia tu� lane pincipk verb_ pla�^e ol'ths front building devatbn arcluaNe of 0 35 v35' SIgM € Drovemen ( fig 9 %) oa r a jacen ppmh. D% widows and similar appurterwncea must, Ea cletl \ \ Triangle (rya) 0 n - ' + I4 arse oppoaln9 aacmv points ModifleaIt," W,plan In rmult Intended b c la an wan bulMin9 facade gne an a offset The e \ rop ReWWn n48- 7 La matudn troea III be larded 40 0 C wRnin'tne ired / w g° g p / ffOqu build -to line kfaatabliahad on therrecoM"Iat final let AHlet, 12 � I+Y D - �-�\ y Wall - 43 /, planUn9 strip along all. etrmts Small maturing trod a to be uved 4 P ( P )'( d 28 'Prop 15' SDE +/^ _ a. 8 Tr where ®h aril baaPmv1 ad per building - I 23 Water mdHSa^kary Sewer snail be Wbbc and designed Par CMUD Oy, of the Moll will be prwldad in lusters s ehownd on, the plane LoceHan ,of etanaarde I / / allboxes'ara subJmt'W apprw.l from USPS 24 Approval of thle.plan la of authonzation to gmde .dJacant 0 CIO 15 /. a. When fie. a. Ml arse' ova mot .sedan dm lesion I / 10 as approved by building ing gee hall be set .,depicted m thb plan and —. w gro 9, Perm '� \ O 28 ) �� / as apPraved by bulldn9 mdb 25 Nl rd bt.I­d from are the W befectetl proPerlY ere S 49 ' ,.�' 44 a I I 17 Ones the ahsets tad _the Town street tree shall be Proposed' W o O (erFr _ P ` I p mainWl^.el't, caM,far, pled docent lo'the tree 28 NI curb atoll be wllgOeeurb B+guHer, unlem olherwlae noted z f't� Prop 15' SDE g j $[{ roP n roe 16' SOE / ar by prop 1—...r o J ;27 All- d,meniona are me ured to the�baok +of curb unless noted ti ^ 9 W fl I / , 1 / oept In subdMsi,ne where the properly r asecolation i. othenua Z W PID 00978113 % l \7 fief �/ responLie for m'nat.ance (ZO Article 73a7u 2B NI radius dimumabne aro measured W the back of eurb>unle. noted Z Q Ft' Carol'Jett h Irvin I I - I - _ a 35.35 SI9M 12 & k kngae shall dhere.W the sprayed btlNkron ekeWn plan > J R ~ v 4'S Triangley(Typ) I -�/ 13 Building ^gandi.e. All detached ,pdneipal etmeWroa .Nan new a ath,miw _ O a A 27 a d I I (: 1 - ' / mm. m Wld,rg .aPambon of 11" 29 NI Sid-talk or. t., be 5 unless *the plea oted', J C o 48 y JO Sight tdangl. shown r the mWmum`aqui ed F _ g 14 ,HVAC Other llblitiee mu.t be located outside an established setback 31 No vehklm a Itted to bs rkad in designated landsca V Z I I I 4.... _ Stormv+aler pond dam,outfall DR / regwraa .IderyaM and not ntnm 5 of p ales or mar toe lens (Mbck o re perm pa a% qn pe y, F fop SDEu .� Q_­ �- I ' I I - 4 882 TOH ZO),HVAC far Lots 16 -20 ewNbs, placed n the side of 32 NI prop.,ndwdastri., need cr.avine shall, meet ADA requirements s _ _ - / cop Barricade the building I 33' Attmncrat stmcbon Joints cantmctar' ah,II m d II the Joint per W IO E..1 C. / ` ��. _ 15 A9 signs will be rmawea h appr�d wcpurateN and .hall meet Article SW'Debn 102.1 {. 10 of the TOH, ZO 34 NI pavement aroas to be fbxble .sphah pawmmL per Std Detail Y �4 y III g 26 4.7 2 / „� J ` _ CJs // 16 ^((77raHi2coarol //ppaayy.. t uarWrga R street ughong,Pkn) -(1) 2003 V a $Standard elreef`m.rkro' must be'matallad'by ths,dmeloparmt one 35 FTro apparolu. r ads hall be, designed and rt_.Int.Iwcl to .�., o. v:i p�ee"I el I' aaxx, 1 / Watl ` o�O comer of allW Cheat In.rmT'. n� in�duuedld ^gam ISUaels r before any Pport the,,mpoaetlanoada oftN PWrotua of BD OOw poulida �. ng. or N b thoee atroetap the tleal m.1owl —Uon lid WgWpn of 38 CooMlnate all curb d street grodm In Interaeatlon _Ia Irmpmtor I• '46 I .. /O / that must be In accordance with etandards,e . ined5Wthe land 37 NI ad Improvamanb al CourtyaMS at Hurderewlla am to MP / Q / Devabgas i S e ^lo d. Mmad ankea' p ^'anerna i cede., la, a d natad,wdn`tna Tow ^,ar Count' LUESAI,Pdoryb a.nawa kn > N II I PraF�lcmoes 1 / / ' o D is r= "(t2 Bardcadee�mual be,Irulolbdzat the .aa ofnM1ll dead -ell 38 In rolgn9 or hit ty brruine' ewaepin9 ar the .tans base ana /ar 30 Peet ♦w g app �) application of a Wok coal may M required war 'Mersmtbns Thees �� 1 IConatructen , I n atroeb ax pt eul -de -sac streets, which have bins Improved with a r quwemenb ^Biu be aaWMlehed by the InapmWr and Eased on field n r8uffer I m paan anent turnaround a equIV by'thb OMlnan.. Design, material oMitlona, y y Proposed road crossln9 $ o / lid Inetau En of the baricadee'muaI be In accordance with the 39 in'arder to . dmina kee mtnlmum,o0o5x toe D W re�propar' ga p a a p o "+ 181' /Prop RatalnlrgWa _ / } PID U097B102 Lend oe IUup fit Standards Manual (3) No department, offl -, agerd, the curb x of g 24 _ �,,W ail'r +u ` I Caakv Firma, LLC or employee of'fhe town 111 accept for malat rwnc, lay out open 40 handrolb % be required by a repreeerdathre of the,COUrdy If O 0 ' TR ImProv's, gmde pave or Igm a e,',etmor .r authorize the Nryfng .f anted by field condltien. E / water lne ee m eleetrleal Iee'ed nalon then facl9Uea or 41 Controctor'.halivenaum1a11 handi.up spaces d walk landing .rem do r atarem�in a %,etreee w,thm the tiwn mesa, man :er'.at'n..;been not araeee'z parse ^t .lope in dl mroatbne (cwbneaee area) (, pro rife' I ccepbd opened r 'h. dherwlae melwd the leg.' afatuv of 42 Separate budding permis am required for retaining walls boardwalk %8 g $I a pubne etreatlpdpr W the effective date of thh tlinence or for brklg. dumpeter aralosuree nument. sign o other acc.mry / Tip bb70' Curb 9 % r a a etrmL each street c.rr.ponde in its Ioca0an and lines with structure: ar element. a'� Q.r a ,feet shown, on a pregminry vubdlvI". plan tentot.1 ly approved 43 Retaining welts' >4ift (Reaiden0al) or 5`tt'(Commercial) m height �' 2 49 2 Vol* Cub '{/ by the'Town Manager or Dealgnated AdminietratM Agent or such requires a permit from the Code Enforcement prior W c mdmcUOn W 2-8' Std I /1 street naetEmn acceptod oa,a pubik street b) wta or a maJoriry 3 / Tronaitlon Cu EkGLtter / 1 all the members "o the Town Board r by Nth SWIe f florin T� ^9 ^..r f romM for the etainin9 wall(.) moat m by that he ly 1 -79t enstroeted W a cifkaton der W ieeuanee al C 0 _ / Caroline or such street he. be cee feria seas boa street b the dl(e) In (are) a pe p Curb \ �( / P Pu y M All'reWlnl wally In S lcl',Ina �lione (>5 tt in het ht shall 2 -8' Std State of North Carolln mh etmat Is n rasa rHate treat ^9 rata fig pee Pea 7 9 ) �Guardmg f the rmulremenb f the NCSBC,Ch.pbr'1 - Speckl Inpmfbn y/ Pro sad Polk CurbQCUttsr prop M Mw ?Q �F / / built i. mon(onnance rith the proNa'an of all ppgmoble ordln.ncee Us`dab9aa per the Mecklenburg Caurdyk Code Enforcement' Spe.laI w 6 Cluster 7 (Smllon 8170 R 8200 TOH ZO) In 7Prece. Additianl b of rotam(e wall boa shag be A w /7 d'>°cy� pectlone N P 9 P pn'� \ / I 'b / / 17 �ueintenane„ Guamntee.+PJI ImpmvemanW� required byeNkeoMirwnce submitted tacfhe 'Hume.01. Engineering Depoftmmt for,'Wee, and ��'V� guaranteed alai _ P y .pp I Town of HunWmWlle hall bs copied II Statement of shall w nteed nal defects In workmormhi nd'nrotsrials b gjJ I \ the fiul� plat far U the dceriate offthe mpiellon f the improveame flirt of S Ial 1 coon °S WI, In Final Re and,Deel Rag of N I \ \ / I / / n or Prindpal ins Reapanib a -Chmge DPIRC) Letteni gn �U I / which — I later The eubdMdar shall file with the Town a >! Curve Table Curve P Length Radius Della C7 74893 350000 0121309 C2 ' 191 282 ISO 000 0730351 C3 121 955 200 000 0345615 C4 145 444 150 000 055 3319 C5 237 707 150 000 0904751 CB 104 959 400 000 0150203 C7 297 001 110 250 1 154 2054 CB 99152 150000 1 0375224 II N P ropoeed maintenance bond wM'adequat..uretie.fin,an amount determmad by 45 Can it.. of talning,endt(s) cannot begln ntil all necessary IL 25'R Y� - -3 , P�J I 5rurBM , // / I the of Huntanrvilk /Mecklenburg Count' to be auffldent to `anuro iN_bulll' drwlnlredand bin of tha'elonn dmba includl 5 I L_ % I maintenance and repair of such imp —nnard for the on -year Bs D 9e system rg K'P', pE' E 20 Lartdpegce �� = y \`p er / ova rdy pedal (Sedan 8400 TOH 20) _ tleaigrwd dlWh., must be submitted Prkr W mlMMalori nnl d ig Water Ouol tv UO Financial Mmnge to aro to be mode+thmugh Inspec0an to the Count' Eng,nes l.9 Department m acce,w^ with _ L / E mmt AMP Mack County guorontenng the Inatallatbn d hwinxnenmo ofl".Iled he Suhdlvkl.ny0rdlnanes —ExTap d ` I -- v( / BMPo lg We Wuonmo of CO. for 'seventy -fhro percent (75x) of all 47 bb to .[I— II la mip�[e 19mdi 9 the /or �ro onjf�* Nacarc to red Pmp ReWkdng Wet ton \ - L_ 1 eonstruc0on whch Ighl ro bN lea antklpatetl b lea built wdhin directed So the back of proposed lob All fforb will be made to =C _ / the'areaywhleh)droln Into the;BM "lowing WAUA redlt for Improvementa d R N&42847 ��'r� -_ protect azI,ting Cross whleh m %. affected Developer ogre. to 14' 72822 _ insisted prior W the bmbalon of, the final snit The aPDrowl of e I x hove a ceNnediarb.rbt h/r uch, slWa0ons _ 1 1 `� W/F pW� / / as ptl�lanw dSecb nP 10ntPe�it��il�bbe ottbJ� bur 48, Ple.e em Shasta C90 -C9 it for Sae Detalb m uA l6 .(/ 1\ cam w 49 UnR ink . shown k aubjecttW change lessee demand Develomr / Couny.Zoning,OMlnarae the provlaione of which Including .ubaequeM the right to moQy the bwlGng /unR fgurvtion In all endmanb, dare ineorporobd herein ro cc buildings as �m rketing and unit lee g/ Actual lbor plena and July 25, 2014 19 tai °its U0 MaInM_n.no .� MPo� rd a nTtrucled,on rDrMal °IY footprinte'wgl be .tennlnedrat the`Ome of building plan oubmltlnI awned land and that am t thin loWn t shall be SC.ALt FIL 1 / l maintained Ey °o ProP's,t awnen A.aoructed or tla owner of the euEJecl property BMWe,fhal .re'eontroofed oni pubge,land within \ID 009 18 I /// // �/ NOTE I " -60' 'Cork Farms LLCI 1 TR / The Town of requires thin all etroe. propoeed W be taken _ iFEMA NOTF own by the Town for maintenance W owed, state eo and mad by 'Iimoneed p ordered In the state North Caroline 1 The Proposed Sit' i1 bcatetl outside of the 100 year floodplaln' - cam, cilongln"ew b for adequate cc od1thr n Review f street,tinatruetbn by the mortifying grocer b requifea,throughout the construction process Refer W the I, \ \`t1f AR "'I'i 2 AeeoMing to the Federal +Emerge.% Management Agenrys Flood Wur.nce Map dated Mauch 02, 2009 the aublect troll a_hown herein Ilee within Town of Hun lie ErgI --- Standards and Procedures Manual'for additianl Information moludirg the required aedificatbn form ZNr - `+ -, I 0,{ FIG 1,0 Zone V (ore. tlatermineel W be outside 02) annual chance fioodplaln) Community Panel No 3710463100 J GRAPHIC SCALE - k _ > - �p 'q if .. o Ja TL WG TON ' No F- 1018,,1pp�` 1 mch -60 feet ml�,� �� �� � � .:111 � � - . ' :. . ; '� ;�.:, - s,. 'm � �;,� - �il�il��.�® I • ® .. " • � NI I I �il � • 1 �� � - /� it � - �'(I ��► — t► ���� - �0 %fiff� �� ': /� {f��.����' /Ass` �_ �I /� BMPs S.PIe 1^ -10 Note No Swlmming /Flehl Ing elgm shall be added per irupectore dincUon Amen, Easement olgl Structure so. detail 50- YR'ELLV -75585 this ahest �. 585 Penn - - 10 -YR ELEV -75480 - Prop Retaining Woll 12 -YRl ELEV =75790 - Wt Pond: 752 85 } - Nb a"-75298 753.0 10'1 Normal Pool- 752.15 _ _ No me! Pool -752 15 75265 N 51165 Inflow Foreboy Prop HW_ Inv Out-743 82 45 0 7450 Prop Inv =744 23 STORMWATER BASIN SECTION A -A Prop 36 "Stm Swle Nom 32 rop Grote F Rim -755 Concrete Slab To (3) 36'x8' Windo Dew753 75 -- 4, OrRtce 4' Diameter Pipe Inv 75315 Normal Pool EIM- 752.15 752.1.5 4' Orifice Inv = 752.15 FlOW"' 9' MIN 55 Structure to be Filled with Flowable Flowable Controlled Density FlII After Installation of 24' Diameter RCP Storm Sewer Pipe PERMANENT OUTLET, STRUCTURE iLqqjAEo ieo112fa pN Rawr - - - Wm Or iv401 CF 1 /525 CM RYP 24IW PEAT CONiAOL 510RM FVFN T 3JJ99 CF PRE DEVEIOPMEN! RIRIOrr POeT I aF/fF[WMFM NNOFE -� )S114 POSTAtOUfINO� fIEVAPON NiNCN 21. 21lip 145 21A1 210 ]SJ VO 10YR 6HP _ -'s RSe JB 71a 80 $OYR eYR -438 - ee ei ee Be 75101 Tov or D.M 7 15 7se so 7,15 - Flow Dlverter Present YIN Shallow..land Nelumbo lutea _ N Re dated By 60 Deep pool LID Huntersvl0e Treatment Effectiveness 65 60 Standard NC Slate Plane X eash Arrow arum 80 1431439 845 NC State Plane Y (nothing) Pontedeno cordate _ 616657 9254 90 Shallow pool Sagittana Arrowhead 165 60 Shallow pool z,folia Saglttano lancifolio Bulttongue 65 60 Shallow pool Schoenoplectus tatiemtonta_ni Soft stem bulrush 50 45 Shallow pool Sporganlum amencanum American burreed 65 60 SFiallow pool / . V •� Imo► ,o X11111 ���,; -, ®�; �.o•:� !►,0 ......,......;... :, : , : ���� � ► �1�' :. .,,: - X11111 �,i I "Mm, _ ml�,� �� �� � � .:111 � � - . ' :. . ; '� ;�.:, - s,. 'm � �;,� - �il�il��.�® I • ® .. " • � NI I I �il � • 1 �� � - /� it � - �'(I ��► — t► ���� - �0 %fiff� �� ': /� {f��.����' /Ass` �_ �I /� BMPs S.PIe 1^ -10 Note No Swlmming /Flehl Ing elgm shall be added per irupectore dincUon Amen, Easement olgl Structure so. detail 50- YR'ELLV -75585 this ahest �. 585 Penn - - 10 -YR ELEV -75480 - Prop Retaining Woll 12 -YRl ELEV =75790 - Wt Pond: 752 85 } - Nb a"-75298 753.0 10'1 Normal Pool- 752.15 _ _ No me! Pool -752 15 75265 N 51165 Inflow Foreboy Prop HW_ Inv Out-743 82 45 0 7450 Prop Inv =744 23 STORMWATER BASIN SECTION A -A Prop 36 "Stm Swle Nom 32 rop Grote F Rim -755 Concrete Slab To (3) 36'x8' Windo Dew753 75 -- 4, OrRtce 4' Diameter Pipe Inv 75315 Normal Pool EIM- 752.15 752.1.5 4' Orifice Inv = 752.15 FlOW"' 9' MIN 55 Structure to be Filled with Flowable Flowable Controlled Density FlII After Installation of 24' Diameter RCP Storm Sewer Pipe PERMANENT OUTLET, STRUCTURE m a O Z U s F �- 10' Littoral Shelf Sclentl8c Name iLqqjAEo ieo112fa pN Rawr - - - Wm Or iv401 CF 1 /525 CM RYP 24IW PEAT CONiAOL 510RM FVFN T 3JJ99 CF PRE DEVEIOPMEN! RIRIOrr POeT I aF/fF[WMFM NNOFE -� )S114 POSTAtOUfINO� fIEVAPON NiNCN 21. 21lip 145 21A1 210 ]SJ VO 10YR 6HP _ So 06 RSe JB 71a 80 $OYR eYR -438 - ee ei ee Be 75101 Tov or D.M 7 15 7se so m a O Z U s F �- 10' Littoral Shelf Sclentl8c Name BMP Inset Table Wet Pond STORM _ .< W R Project Name _ Courtyards at Huntersvdle Sequence ID - - 1 Surface Area s- ft _ 130 in - __ Draineiie Area acres Quill sedge 145 2443 Land UsefDevelopment T - >2 acres - Residential )pen S ace Percent Bull-Upon A ea - She land -438 - Permanent Pool De th it 1 80 75 7 15 Forebay Permanent Pool Depth it Great blue Lobeha _ 7,15 - Flow Dlverter Present YIN Shallow..land Nelumbo lutea _ N Re dated By 60 Deep pool LID Huntersvl0e Treatment Effectiveness 65 60 Standard NC Slate Plane X eash Arrow arum 80 1431439 845 NC State Plane Y (nothing) Pontedeno cordate _ 616657 9254 m a O Z U s F �- 10' Littoral Shelf Sclentl8c Name Common Name Quantity North Quantity South Zone - x � 80 75 o �z Swamp milkweed 130 in n Care. tenera� Quill sedge 145 130 1Shnllow land Eupatonadelphus fstulosus Joe Pye Weed 80 75 She land psi ��z Scarlet rose mallow 80 75 Shallow land Lobelia slphlL6ca_ _ _ Great blue Lobeha _ 100 - -- 90 _ Shallow..land Nelumbo lutea ,F 65 60 Deep pool z z N, 65 m a O Z U s F �- 10' Littoral Shelf Sclentl8c Name Common Name Quantity North Quantity South Zone - Allsma subcordatum Water plantain 80 75 Shallow pool Ascleplas incarnate Swamp milkweed 130 115 Shallow land Care. tenera� Quill sedge 145 130 1Shnllow land Eupatonadelphus fstulosus Joe Pye Weed 80 75 She land Hlblscus coccineus Scarlet rose mallow 80 75 Shallow land Lobelia slphlL6ca_ _ _ Great blue Lobeha _ 100 - -- 90 _ Shallow..land Nelumbo lutea American lotus 65 60 Deep pool Nuphor lutea advena Yellow pond Illy 65 60 Deep pool PeBandra wrgmica Arrow arum 80 75 Shallow pool Pontedeno cordate Plckerelweed 100 90 Shallow pool Sagittana Arrowhead 165 60 Shallow pool z,folia Saglttano lancifolio Bulttongue 65 60 Shallow pool Schoenoplectus tatiemtonta_ni Soft stem bulrush 50 45 Shallow pool Sporganlum amencanum American burreed 65 60 SFiallow pool aA lL Jul) 25, 2014 .I SN f�RO�� �� {CAt7U7! �,�St �� -v r;? SCALt 1 -zo ton no 2014 0210 GRAPHiCISCXLE ,' Lws Fcs�Ig4 I to 20 Ao =' tWl&.ErON a �5- o sA�,s n1q..3t1�iv� ' FIG 11 I inch _2U hcl ,'' °.n,'4ni'r.- N "��` / "; {hp 111 if l`f %l; r INDEX OF SHEETS SHEET NO 1 COVER SHEET SHEET NO 2 PERMIT SHEET SHEET NO 3 TRUNK EXTENSION -STA 0±00 00 TO STA 10400 00 SHEET NO 4 TRUNK EXTENSION -STA 16+0000 TO STA 20 +00 00 SHEET NO 5 TRUNK EXTENSION -STA 20+000U TO STA 26 +0000 SHEET I NO 6 TRUNK EXTENSION - EROSION CONTROLy DETAILS SHEET NO 7 TRUNK EXTENSION -CMU6 DETAILS se N LOCATION MAP BENCH MARKS (NAD 89[21111, NAVD SRI BA7 /1 Capped /5 Reber (labeled EMH &T TRW) Northlrlg - 613866.4150 Easbng - 143191 Elev - 705V Bil Capped /5 Reber (Labeled EMH &T TRAM Northing - 815318 4440, Eaating - 1431375 5410 Ebv - 721M C I-1LARLO TTE - ME C ISLE NB BUR G UTILITIES' CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA ElNTGINE�_1T`ING DIVISION SANITARY SEWER & WATER - MAIN SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE COURTYARDS AT I- UNTERSVILLE St Capped #5 Rebar (Labeled E14f &T TRW) Northing - 8180804080 Eaetingr- 14314056200 Elov - 73449 e e DESIGN COMPANY EMH &T INC CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLANS PREPARED BY Wesley Smith, PE ADDRESS 301 McCullough Dr Suite 109 BRIDGE CHARLOTTE, NC 28262 PHONE (704548 -0333 Fax (704) - 548 -0334 DATE DESIGN I COMPLETED FEBRUARY 26, 2014 SURVEY COMPANY, EMH &T, INC CONS ULTINGENGINEERS SURVEYED BW ADDRESS 301 McCullough Or Suite 109 EXISTING GAS MAIN - CHARLOTTE, NC 28262 PHONE (704) -548 -0333' Fax (704) -548 -0334 DATE SURVEY COMPLETED JANUARY 16, 2014 DEVELOPER EPCON COMMUNITIES ADDRESS 8600 Sam Furr Rd Suite 180 EXISTING WATER OR SANITARY'SEWER.R/W HUNTERSVILLE„ NC' 28078 CONTACT Rich Heareth -- PHONE (855)- 762 =1010 CONTRACTOR INSPECTOR INSIDE CHARLOTIE ( ) YES (X) Ntr Mecklenburg Co TOPO NO- 1460 / pore role!%. • �- ewlm / , F-r r r Know what's below Call before you,dlg Al.d C.adL On'e Call Center Inc Call' 1- 800 - 632 -4949 before you dig. It's the law! 'By law everyone MUST contact the North Carolina One -Call Center 1- 900-6324949 at least 48 hours but no more than 10 working days (excluding weekends and legal hollEays) before beginning ANY digging purled GENERAL NOTES 1 Construction and matwl,le shall, " Ina ... rdw,, with Charlotte- Mecidenburg Utility Department Standards and,Specl6catlont per ewe rmutAlNee. cam 2 All Contracture working on CMUD,)obe we required to imrLa copy of the Design Manual and !hall keep a copy w the Job site at dI times, 3 The Contractor Is fully,,reep -Mble for contacting dlyappmfrlate parties and ring thel3utAltles ararloc V prior to,the commencement yof construction 4Call NC One Call at 1- 800 -832 -4949 or 8I1 for utility locating .!Mass ' hours prior to e enl of coy work. Contractor shun verify location cod depth of all exiting i ut111tl onprlw to construction 4 If the proposed water cod /w sanilwy sewer-moln Is Installed withir,02' N any ,_directlon,(vertiwlly or horlzontully),from.g —moms the Contractor .hall c ]Il Pledmonti Natural Gat Company et (704) 525 -5585 and inform them 5 Sanitary eeww lotwole are to be Installed at'. depth no greater than five (5) feet where practical e at the property fine unless Indicated an the plans to be Installed4,t ;- nWxn. � 6.nraiAmaae. � wxw.rieWev: ' / n 1111 -- � \ w,aa yoWa.ur Si,iik, 300' 0 300 us 6 Wnimum'crowr of,36' for water mains 7 Ductile 4on pipe (red brose for 2' eater mains) required for-both water mains and ea w Imes If the following clearances went met - Water+ line, croesing under sewer Iine(for'mry clearance) 18' vertical for vats, One N.talled obese .veer line, - 10 hwltwlal separation fer water line parallel tolseew line (or 18'vwlkal ,watlw In espdr4t.`dIt0.e) - For eater One. 12• dearonca with .term drain• gas Mens, talsphone duds, and underground,aables S. Sarltwy s rew latwal locations are appmArnate and are ab*t to'relocatlon due to field can dtions 9 Recorded `Plate we required for actiwtlw of watw mains. Easements we not acceptable. a C CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH, CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG UTILITY DEPARTMENT ,STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS LEGEND, SUMMARY OF SEWER MAINS & MANHOLES BRIDGE BUILDING LENGTH CHECK DAM STD 6 83 _ �►--�► DITCH, CREEK OR BRANCH III LP EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 575 LF EXISTING GAS MAIN - a EXISTING IRON PIN o EXISTING IL SANITARY SEWER — EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 0 EXISTING 1 WATER MAIN W EXISTING WATER OR SANITARY'SEWER.R/W — — — — EXISTING WATER VALVE so FENCE (LIBEL TYPE) — —• —• GAS VALVE v GROUND (PROFILE) — -------- GUARD 'RAIL - - MARSH At Al OVERHEAD ELECTRIC - E PIERS POWER POLE W /GUY WIRE e-- PROPERTY LINE e PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED � SANITARY SEWER —i- PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER'MANHOLE 0 PROPOSED TL WATER MAIN (MARKED EVERY 100') — PROPOSED WATER OR SANITARY SEWER R/W PROPOSED WATER VALVE H RAILROAD — T- RIP - RAP c$a� ROAD /STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY R/W SEDIMENT FENCE (SILT FENCE) STD 662 •- •- • -• -• -• STORM DRAIN WITH CATCH BASIN OR DROP INLET- - - - - - -» STREET`SIGN a TEMPORARY DIVERSION STD 6 20 TD —TD —TD TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP STD 6 60 TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING STD 1 TOWER LINE — TREE- - 0 UNDERGROUND CABLE uC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC uE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE uT WATER METER .W ,�0I ARO�i''', !VANS mmil 1Rf HAMBLErON d z5_ Na F -1016 OF Ile APPROVALS (SEALS) SUMMARY OF SEWER MAINS & MANHOLES l SIZE LENGTH SIZE LENGTH �" III LP Id' 575 LF 8" 895 tF SUMMARY OF WATER MAINS & FIRE HYDRANTS SIZE LENGTH SIZE LENGTH North CgFdfro RLS I North Cowollna�PE - PLk,IS,PREPARED By ffizm° e,alnean hva,, H blal —a tiMhc Aal mcC,4wan W. SH I W Clnb,le rC te)et clans )pr.SO.A,1l too tree Beg rldJ.H hcopm FIGURE 12 AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION I, Rich Heareth, representing Epcon Communities, hereby certify that I have authorized Gregg Antemann of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this request for wetlands determination / permitting and any and all standard and special conditions attached. We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. Z-Ltl Applicant's signature Date` �ZT-2r C- 74 -- & - �- Agent's signature 12/12/14 Date Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence. o�oF w a rF9p� Office Use Only Corps action ID no DWQ project no Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008 Page 1 of 15 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version Pre - Construction Notification (PCN ) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps ®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit 1b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 29 or General Permit (GP) number 1c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ® No 1 d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply) ® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification ❑ Yes ❑ No For the record only for Corps Permit ❑ Yes ® No 1f Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program El Yes No 1g Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h below ❑ Yes ® No 1h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ®No 2. Project Information 2a Name of project Cortyards at Huntersville 2b County Mecklenburg 2c Nearest municipality / town Huntersville 2d Subdivision name N/A 2e NCDOT only, T I P or state project no N/A 3. Owner Information 3a Name(s) on Recorded Deed n 3b Deed Book and Page No 3c Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable) N/A p A__1L 3d Street address 3e City, state, zip DENR - W ER RESOURCE 3f Telephone no rc LNG 3g Fax no 3h Email address Page 1 of 15 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a Applicant is ❑ Agent ® Other, specify EPCON Communities 4b Name Mr Rich Heareth 4c Business name (if applicable) EPCON Communities 4d Street address 8600 Sam Furr Road, Suite 180 4e City, state, zip Huntersvdle, North Carolina 28078 4f Telephone no 704 - 353 -9959 c/o Wes Smith 4g Fax no 4h Email address 5. Agent /Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a Name Gregg Antemann 5b Business name (if applicable) Carolina Wetland Services, Inc 5c Street address 550 E Westinghouse Blvd 5d City, state, zip Charlotte, NC 28273 5e Telephone no 704 -408 -1683 5f Fax no 704- 527 -1133 5g Email address gregg @cws -inc net Page 2 of 15 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID) multiple 1 b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees) Latitude 35 427983 Longitude - 80 908716 (DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD) 1c Property size 23 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to proposed project UT's to McDowell Creek 2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water Class C 2c River basin Santee (HU# 03050101) Page 3 of 15 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 3. Project Description 3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application The site consists of undeveloped wooded areas, agricultural fields, and maintained right -of -ways with adjacent single family residences Typical on -site vegetation includes loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), paw paw (Asimina tnloba), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), southern red oak (Quercus falcata), white oak (Quercus alba), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), tulip poplar (Linodendron tulipifera), red maple (Acer rubrum), rye grass (Lolium perenne), and fescue (Festuca arundinacea) An aerial photograph of the project area is attached (Figure 2) 3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 0 177 ac 3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 700 linear feet of intermittent stream, 2,507 linear feet of perennial stream 3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project The purpose of the project is to develop approximately 23 acres of property into a retirement community consisting of 51 single family ranch homes and to provide sanitary sewer service for the new development (Figure 7, attached) This project will help meet the increasing demand for retirement communities in the Charlotte region Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters are necessary in order to provide sanitary sewer service to the proposed development Page 4 of 15 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used Unavoidable impacts associated with the construction of the Courtyards at Huntersville project include approximately 121 linear feet of impacts to Intermittent Streams, 0 02 acre of permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands, and 0 32 acre of impacts to jurisdictional open waters (Figure 8) Temporary impacts associated with the sewer line will total 0 06 acre (Figure 9) A plan view and grading plan are attached (Figures 10 and 11) Stream Impacts Proposed impacts to Seasonal RPW Stream A include 121 linear feet of permanent impacts Proposed impacts to Seasonal RPW Stream A are the result of the installation of a pipe for the outfall of the stormwater pond and are the result of a road crossing (Figure 8, attached) The stormwater pond dam outfall will be accomplished using a drop inlet with a 36 foot long 24 -inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) with a 10 linear foot rip rap apron on the downstream end to dissipate flows exiting the pipe (Figure 8, attached) Permanent impacts associated with the dam outfall culvert total 46 linear feet of Seasonal RPW Stream A The proposed road crossing will be accomplished using a 65 linear foot 30 -inch RCP culvert with headwalls on both the upstream and downstream ends and a 10 linear foot rip apron on the downstream end to dissipate flows exiting the culvert (Figure 8, attached) The 30 -inch RCP will be buried a minimum of a foot below the channel bed to accommodate movement of aquatic life A plan view is attached (Figures 10 and 11) Permanent impacts associated with the road crossing total 75 linear feet of Seasonal RPW Stream A Wetland Impacts Proposed impacts to jurisdictional wetlands total 0 08 acre are the result of 0 02 acre of permanent impacts to Wetland AA and 0 06 acre of temporary impacts to Wetland BB Impacts to Wetland AA are the result of placement of fill in Wetland AA in order to construct the proposed stormwater pond and its associated dam A portion of Wetland AA will be filled (0 02 acre) to rehabilitate the dam associated with the stormwater pond (Figure 8, attached) Construction of a 12 -inch sewer line across Wetland BB in order to tie into an existing sewer system will result in 0 06 acre of temporary impacts to Wetland BB (Figure 9) These impacts are the result of clearing to facilitate the construction of the proposed sewer line There is an existing maintained easement through Wetland BB in which the proposed sewer line is located All impacts to Wetland BB will be temporary (Figure 9) All impacted areas will be returned to their pre - construction grades A plan overview of the sanitary sewer is attached as Figure 12 Pond Impacts Impacts to Pond A are the result of retrofitting the pond for use as a stormwater detention pond Impacts to Pond A have been minimized to the greatest extent possible and will be partially offset by expanding the surface area of the pond to the south Total permanent impacts associated with Pond A total 0 32 acre (Figure 8, attached) The proposed pond is 0 61 acre in extent, totaling approximately 0 24 acre loss in water area 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments 4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type Preliminary inal E] ry of determination was made? 4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company CWS Name (if known) Other 4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation A request for verification was submitted to the USACE on April, 18, 2014 Page 5 of 15 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Project History 5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 0 Yes ® No ❑ Unknown 5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions 6 Future Project Plans 6a Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No 6b If yes, explain Page 6 of 15 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version C Proposed Impacts Inventory 1 Impacts Summary la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply) ® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2 Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non404, other) (acres) Temporary T W1 ®P ❑ T Fill ® Yes ❑ No ® Corps I ❑ DWQ 002 W2 ❑ P ® T Utility crossing ❑ Yes ® Corps 006 (clearing) ® No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 008 2h Comments Permanent impacts to wetlands total 0 02 acre 3 Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non -404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ®P ❑ T Culvert Stream A ® PER ❑ INT ® Corps ❑ DWQ 4 65 S2 ®P ❑ T Pipe Stream A ® PER ❑ INT ® Corps ❑ DWQ 4 36 S3 ® P ❑ T Rip rap apron Stream A ® PER ❑ INT ® Corps ❑ DWQ 4 20 S4 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S5 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S6 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h Total stream and tributary impacts 121 31 Comments Permanent Impacts to Jurisdictional Streams total 121 If (0 006 acre) of stream channel Page 7 of 15 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U S then individually list all open water impacts below 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e Open water Name of waterbody impact number— (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Temporary T 01 ®P ❑ T Pond A Fill Pond 0 324 02 ❑P ❑T 03 ❑P ❑T 04 ❑P ❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 0 324 1 4g Comments Total pond impacts are 0 324 acre 5. Pond or Lake Construction i If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g Comments 5h Is a dam high hazard permit required ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no 51 Expected pond surface area (acres) 5j Size of pond watershed (acres) 5k Method of construction 6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b 6c 6d 6e 6f 6g Buffer impact number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Temporary T impact required? B1 ❑P ❑T F1 Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P ❑T El Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P ❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h Total buffer impacts 61 Comments Page 8of15 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version D Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U S have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable The Courtyards at Huntersville project has been designed to avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters wherever possible and minimize the extent of necessary impacts to jurisdictional waters Retaining walls have been used to minimize impacts to Wetland AA and Seasonal RPW Stream A Impacts to Pond A are the result of retrofitting the pond for use as a storm water detention pond Impacts to Pond A have been minimized to the greatest extent possible and will be partially offset by expanding the surface area of the pond to the south In areas where impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U S are unavoidable, steps have been taken to minimize both the extent and severity of the impacts The temporary construction easement for the sanitary sewer will be limited to 40 feet in width through wetlands The permanent maintained portion of the right -of -way (R /W) corridor will not exceed 15 feet in width through wetlands Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters Anti -seep collars will be installed at the downstream wetland boundary and every 50 feet up the gradient until the sewer line exist the wetland All permanent maintained right -of -way through wetlands will be permanently marked in the field to avoid mowing and maintenance of additional wetland areas Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters Construction activities and impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters project will comply with all conditions of NWP 29 All work will be constructed in the dry in accordance with Water Quality Certification No 3890 1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U S have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable The Courtyards at Huntersvdle project has been designed to avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters wherever possible and minimize the extent of necessary impacts to jurisdictional waters Retaining walls have been used to minimize impacts to Wetland AA and Seasonal RPW Stream A Impacts to Pond A are the result of retrofitting the pond for use as a storm water detention pond Impacts to Pond A have been minimized to the greatest extent possible and will be partially offset by expanding the surface area of the pond to the south In areas where impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U S are unavoidable, steps have been taken to minimize both the extent and severity of the impacts The temporary construction easement for the sanitary sewer will be limited to 40 feet in width through wetlands The permanent maintained portion of the right -of -way (R /W) corridor will not exceed 15 feet in width through wetlands Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters Anti -seep collars will be installed at the downstream wetland boundary and every 50 feet up the gradient until the sewer line exist the wetland All permanent maintained right -of -way through wetlands will be permanently marked in the field to avoid mowing and maintenance of additional wetland areas Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters Construction activities and impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters project will comply with all conditions of NWP 29 All work will be constructed in the dry in accordance with Water Quality Certification No 3890 Page 9 of 15 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State? ❑ Yes ® No 2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply) ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps 2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project ❑ Mitigation bank ❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a Name of Mitigation Bank 3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c Comments 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached ❑ Yes 4b Stream mitigation requested linear feet 4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only) square feet 4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested acres 4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested acres 4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested acres 4h Comments 5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ i 6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ❑ No 6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the amount of mitigation required Zone 6c Reason for impact 6d Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1 5 6f Total buffer mitigation required: 6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund) Page 10 of 15 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version 6h Comments Page 11 of 15 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified [I Yes ®No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules lb If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why ❑ Yes No ❑ Comments 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? >24 % 2b Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ❑ No 2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why 2d If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan BMP sand filter and wet pond have been designed for stormwater managment purposes (Figures 10 and 11) ® Certified Local Government 2e Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Huntersvdle ® Phase II 3b Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply) ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other 3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW ❑ ORW (check all that apply) ❑ Session Law 2006 -246 ❑ Other 4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 12 of 15 PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes ® No use of public (federal /state) land? 1b If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ® No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)? 2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No 2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s) 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in Yes No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality 3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description The project will not result in additional future development 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility N/A Page 13 of 15 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No habitat? 5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted ❑ Asheville 5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on July 9, 2014 to determine the presence of any federally - listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or critical habitat located within the project area In a response letter, dated July 24, NCNHP states that "the NCNHP database does not show any records for rare species, important natural communities, or natural areas within the proposed project area or within one mile of the proposed project area" A copy of NCNHP response letter is attached Additionally, CWS consulted Element Occurrence sites provided by NCNHP and found no occurrences of protected species within a one mile radius of the project limits 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ® No 6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NOAA Fisheries http / /sharpfin nmfs noaa gov /website /EFH_Mapper /map aspx 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on July 9, 2014 to determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project In a response letter dated July 29, 2014, SHPO states that they "are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project" A copy of SHPO response letter is attached CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service and the Charlotte Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission database and found no sites of architectural, historical, or archaeological significance within the project limits 8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑ Yes ® No 8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements 8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM No 3710463100J Mr. Gregg Antemann, PWS Z"J,4_1 L' 74',_ C .,,'- — 12 -16 -2014 Date Applicant/Agent's Signature Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Page 14 of 15 PCN Form – Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version wa+ AQ �.. �. NCIDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Office of Land and Water Stewardship Pat McCrory Bryan Gossage Governor Director July 24, 2014 Ms. Kelly Thames Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. 550 East Westinghouse Boulevard Charlotte, North Carolina 28273 Kelly @cws -Inc net RE Courtyards at Huntersville, Huntersvllle, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina CWS Project No 2013 -3170 Dear Ms. Thames John E Skvarla, III Secretary Thank you for the opportunity to provide Information from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database for the proposed project referenced above. The NCNHP database does not show any records for rare species, Important natural communities, or natural areas within the proposed project area or within one mile of the proposed project area. The NCNHP database does show that the Pennington Community Park, considered to be Mecklenburg County open space, is located ca 0.3 miles east of the proposed project area. Please note that although the NCNHP database does not show records of rare species or important natural communities within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present, it may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species Feel free to contact me at 919 - 707 -8629 or Allison Weakley @ncdenr gov if you have questions or need additional information Sincerely, Allison Schwarz Weakley, Conservation Planner NC Natural Heritage Program 1601 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1601 Phone 919 - 707 -86001 Internet www ncdenr gov An Equal Opportunely 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 1 10% Post Consumer Paper Hs STAip a North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office Ramona M Bartos, Administrator Governor Pat McCron Secretan Susan Klutt7 July 29, 2014 Kelly Thames Carolina Wetland Services 550 East Westinghouse Boulevard Charlotte, NC 28273 Office of Archives and History Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry Re- Develop Courtyards at Huntersville Retirement Community, Highway 73, Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, ER 14 -1580 Dear Ms. Thames- Thank you for your letter for July 9, 2014, concerning the above project We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800 Thank you for your cooperation and consideration If you have questions concerning the above comment, contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919 - 807 -6579 or renee �4ledhdl- eat lev(('L)ncdcr , ov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number Sincerely, 6f"Ramona M. Bartos Location 109 Fast Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address 4617 Mad Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599 i� r.� ��.� �� 7th � �' "� {i �T �• A� �t , �- r �: . �- � �� ; w.- �:' �,.: �4 . _'� _ � v � h ` 7 r � w .- � ��( rte► ��t�I. < q, tit x= i[.- �. •>�-k.•w P UN ;2.l- w4.: a H 'ttY b q iv, I/ Vf op 3 +i�, — x,47.' —'Rq ev •'. �. •t..... a �'���Q '' -'`P v � h ` 7 r � w ki �' `. yr, • � .q 44 +►�}✓, �r�r y� .� i.�. s s �' `. yr, • � .q 44 +►�}✓, �r�r y� .� i.�. Jo _ t¢ -114 1 Niy •, .. .� err � �rL' � f c• ���,' 1 �) � '! i i � ' a' nt7 fit k •yjN, ,. .�jpa yk g yy