WQ0035207_Annual Report_20120319

BP
ao!/
Annual Report Review Class A Distribution 5! E,? l l Z_
1. Class A Annual Distribution and Marketing/Surface Disposal Certification Form
• Was a certification form submitted? Y� - 9 w� � 5 -,,,
• Was distribution conducted during th reported year? Y
• How many dry tons were distributed? 5"7 , 8Z wr 1
• Were the distributions within the permitted amount? �2 f
• Were recipients information listed?
• Did it indicate compliance? \r'C.S'
• Was form complete? � e,'
• Was it signed by the appropriate people?
2. Monitoring
• Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency? .
• Were the metals analyses reported on the Residual. Sampling Summary Form?
• Were the results reported in mg/kg? %�-(O
• Were the metals within ceiling concentration permit limits?
• Were the metals within monthly average concentration permit limits?
• If no, were the lab analyses attached?
• Were all the required parameters tested?- '"" e n s N 3 So 8 !y�], o lC
• Was TCLP analysis conducted? � -&S J
• Were the TCLP contaminants within regulatory limits? ] c 5 T-9
3. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction
• Was a signed copy of the Pathogen an ector Attraction Reduction Form submitted? Y ej'
• Did therm indicate the period of coverage, the residual class, and the pathogen reduction alternative and the
vector action reduction option used?
• Was the appropriate docuxpentation to show palogen and vector attraction reduction included in the report?
• Was pathogen and vect8i attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503 or 2T?
4. General
Was the report in the proper format?��S
Were any parts of the annual report mussing? sa
Was the report submitted on time? Y'a x
_x 5U�mi� DR-5 irk, rio� ka-4
PP�Tc�"
v�
Graf
0,
tv �
�w6r"'4
ulali-?. 4LJ2-
Ude� ro d o aril a �Pl i" Is
d �0 }
�
CL 3 LPa'V-°��„`Ck_ ��� P P 50 AD
Z_7' tic)IT �n�

Class A Pathogen Review
To be Class A, residuals shall meet either fecal coliform density or salmonella density.
Fecal colifoml density
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency? es
• Were multiple samples taken? AD an � a.. se-� bVA �;;5 � S Ql v ►�^ S ��� � �'- � a
• Was each sample less than 1000 MPN/gram of total solids? ej'o
Or
Salmonella density
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
• Were multiple samples taken?
• Was each sample less than 3 MPN/4 grams of total solids?
To be Class A, residuals shall meet one of the following alternatives:
Alternative 1 - Time/Temperature.
® Were the residuals maintained for correct time and temperature?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
Alternative 2 - Alkaline Treatment
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the pH raised to 12 or greater and maintained for 72 hours or longer?
• Was the temperature 52°C (126°F) for 12 hours or longer while the pH was 12 or greater?
• Were logs submitted showing time and pH?
• Was the temperature corrected to 25°C (77°F)?
Alternative 3 -Prior Testing for Enteric Viruses/Viable Helminth Ova
• Were residuals analyzed prior to the pathogen reduction treatment?
• Prior to treatment were, the density of enteric viruses less than one Plaque -forming Unit per four grams of
total solids; or
was the resultant density after pathogen treatment less than one Plaque -forming Unit per four grams of
total solid?
OR
• Prior to treatment were, the density of viable helminth ova less than one per four grams of total solids; or
was the resultant density after pathogen treatment of viable helminth ova less than one per four grams of
total solids?
• Were the operating parameters documented to the satisfaction of the Division?
Alternative 4 -No Prior Testing for Enteric Viruses/Viable Hehninth Ova
• Was the density of enteric viruses less than one Plaque -forming Unit per four grams of total solids at the
time the residuals were prepared for sale or given away?
OR
Was the density of viable helminth ova - less than one per four grams of total solids at the time the
residuals were prepared for sale or given away?

Alternative 5 Process To Further Reduce Path
PFRP Composting
• Were the within -vessel method or static aerated pile methods used?
• Was the residuals temperature maintained at 550C (131°F) or higher for three consecutive days or longer
in the within -vessel method or static aerated pile method?
OR
• Was the windrow composting method used?
Was the residuals temperature maintained at 55°C oof fgher for 15 ve during this timeconsecutive days or longer in the
windrow method, and the windrow turned a minimum
PFRP Heat Drying
• Was the residuals dried by direct or indirect with hot gases and moisture content of residuals reduced to
10% or lower?
• Did.the temperature of the residuals or the of the wet bulb temperature of the gas in contact with the
residuals as they leave the dryer exceed 80 C (176 F).
PFRP Heat Treatment
® Were the residuals liquid during treatment?
Were the residuals heated to a temperature of 180°C (356°F) or higher, for 30 minutes?
PFRP Thermophilic Aerobic Digestion
• Were the residuals liquid during treatment?
• Was it an aerobic process with agitation?
• Was the mean cell residence time 10 consecutive days at 55°C (131°F) to 60°C (1400F)?
PFRP Beta Rav Irradiation
rays at dosages of at least 1.0 megarad at room temperature
Were residuals radiated with beta
[approximately 20°C (68°F)]?
PFRP Gamma Rav Irradiation
• Were residuals radiated with gamma rays from certain isotopes, such as Cobalt 60 and Cesium 137; at
dosages of at least 1.0 megarad at room temperature [approximately 20°C (680F)]?
PFRP Pasteurization
• Was the temperature of the residuals maintained at 70°C (1580F) for 30 minutes or longer.

tV
Vector Attraction Reduction Review 4) I
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
38% Volatile Solids Reduction
• tas
there 38% reduction?
re lab sheets/calculations in re/ort?
• s the reduction on volatile so 'ids (not -total solids)?
• W the samples taken at be ' g of digestion process and before application
(Insp ction)?
® Were lculations correct?
-Du Bench Sdale'fest
• Were resid is from anaer bically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were residua anaerobic lly digested in lab?
• Was the test for 40 ays?
• Was the test don be een 30°C (86°F) and 37°C (99°F)?
• Was the reduction n olatile solids (not total solids)?
• Was the reduction 1 s than 17%?
• Were lab sheets/ca u ations in report?
• Were calculations corr ct?
Dgy Bench Scale T k
• Were residuals from aero\1510M
gested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were residua aerobicallin lab?
• Were residu s 2% or lessids?
® Was the to run for 30 da
• Was the t t done at 20°C
• Was the eduction on volae
(not total solids)?
• Was the eduction less th
• Were 1 sheets/calculatiooWere alculations correct
;cific OxAraen Uptake Rate SOUR `
• W e residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• W re residuals 2% or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted)?
• as the test done between 10T (50°F) and 30°C (86°F)?
• as the temperature corrected to 20°C (68°F)?
• as the SOUR equal to or less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of total residual
solids (dry weight basis)?
• Was the sample holding time under two hours?
• Was the test started within15 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained?

cLlL�-' a
MAR 12 2C i
TOWN OF FRANKLIN, NC
RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
Permit No. WQ0035207
2011 ANNUAL REPORT

Town of Franklin, NC
Residuals Land Application Program
2011 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Certification Form, Annual Operations Summary, Facility and Land
Applier Contact Information
2. Annual Residual Sampling Summary Forms, Residuals Analysis, &
SAR Calculation Page
3. Annual Land Application Field Summary Forms
4. TCLP Analysis
5. Pathogen Reduction/Vector Attraction Reduction
'6. Soil pH & Lime Application Records
7. Soil Analyses

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
WQ Permit #: W00035207 County Macon Year 2011
Facility Name (as shown on permit) Town of Franklin WTP NPDES No. PWS 01-57.010
Land Application Operator S nagro Phone# [phone]
Land application of residuals as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year?
X YES NO. If NO, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to Part C. Also, if residuals were generated but not land applied,
please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A — Residuals Application Summary:
Total number of application fields in the permit: N/A
Total number of fields utilized for land application during the year: 4
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites: 57_87
Total number of acres utilized for land{ application during the year: 35.9
Part B — Annual Compliance Statement:
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2011 with all conditions of the land application permit (including but not limited to items
1-13 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality X YES NO.
If no, please provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corrective action taken,
1. Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2. Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and time was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pl-I of at least 6.0 or the
limit specified in the permit.
3. Annual soils analysis was performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies of
laboratory results are attached.
4. Annual TCLP analysis (if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5. All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6. The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .I 105(a) or the Pollutant Loading
Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .I 105(b) (Applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities),
7. All general requirements as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503
regulated Facilities).
8. All monitoring and reporting requirements in ISA NCAC 02T .I I I I were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503
regulated facilities).
9. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality,
10. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
l I. Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receiving residuals, as specified
in the purimit,
12. No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto ndjacent property or neat -by surface waters has occurred.
13. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
Part C — Certification:
"1 certify, under penalty of law,that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for
knowing violations"
ivlarshaiI Purvear,'rechnical Services Director
P titice Name and Title (type or print)
' r
Si atur f Preparer* Date
(if different from Permittee)
0 0 �jZ
g a r of ate
Signature of Land Applier Date
(if different from Permittee and Preparer)
*T3, arcr is defined in 40 CFR Part 503 NO and I SA NCAC 02T .I 102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (12/2006)
op
J��

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
WQ Permit #: W00035207 County Macon Year 2011
Facility Name (as shown on permit) Town of Franklin WTP NPDES No. PWS 01-57-010
Land Application Operator Synagro Phone# [phone]
Land application of residuals as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year?
X YES NO. If NO, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to Part C. Also, if residuals were generated but not land applied,
please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A — Residuals Application Summarv:
Total number of application fields in the permit: N/A
Total number of fields utilized for land application during the year: 4
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites: 57.87
Total number of acres utilized for land application during the year: 35.9
Part B — Annual Compliance Statement:
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2011 with all conditions of the land application permit (including but not limited to items
1-13 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality X YES NO.
If no, please provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corrective action taken.
1. Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2. Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at least 6.0 or the
limit specified in the permit.
3. Annual soils analysis was performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies of
laboratory results are attached.
4. Annual TCLP analysis (if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5. All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6. The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .I 105(a) or the Pollutant Loading
Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(b) (Applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7. All general requirements as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503
regulated facilities).
8. All monitoring and reporting requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1 I I I were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503
regulated facilities).
9. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality.
10. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
11. Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receiving residuals, as specified
in the permit.
12. No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
13. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
Part C — Certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law,that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for
knowing violations."
Marshall Puryear, Technical Services Director
Permittee Name and Title (type or print)
Signature of Preparer* Date
(if different from Permittee)
a of ate
LL . t l 4 "i
5'So m
Signature of Land Applier Date
(if different from Permittee and Preparer)
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 02T .1102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (12/2006)

2011 ANNUAL OPERATIONS SUMMARY - LAND APPLICATION
ORANKLIN, NC
RANKLIN, NC WTP LIQUID
DRY METRIC
MONTHNEAR AMOUNT UNIT DRY TONS UNIT TONS
July 2011 499,200.00 G 57.87 D 52.49
YEARLY TOTAL 499,200.00 G 57.87 D 52.49
1 /31 /2012

2011 ANNUAL REPORT
PROJECT: Town Of Franklin WTP
Franklin NC
FACILITY: Town of Franklin WTP
437 Industrial Park Road
Franklin, NC 28744
(828)-369-8998
WTP NPDES:
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:
FACILITY OPERATOR:
PWS 01-57-010
Marshall Puryear TSD
284 Boger Road
Mocksville, NC 27028
k336
ItS0
Robert Hartzel, WTP Superintendent
Town Of Franklin WTP
437 Industrial Park Road
Franklin, NC 28744
(828)-369-8998
at

ANNUAL RESIDUALS SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Attach this form to the corresponding Annual Report.
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed than those required to be summarized on this form.
Permit Number:
Facility Name: FRANKLIN, NC
NPDES# :
orWQ# (residual only)
WWTP Name: FRANKLIN WTP
Residuals Analysis Data
Product Type WPL
Date Sampled (grab) or 02/23/11
Date Composited
Percent Solids 2.78 ✓
PARAMETERS (mg/kg dry weight)
Arsenic
5-11-1
Cadmium
<1. ✓
Mercury
<0.4. v
Chromium
101.
68 ✓
Copper(
Lead
11
Molybdenum
<5
Nickel
22 ✓
Selenium
<1
✓
Zinc
93
Total Phosphorus
988v"-
8270 ✓
TKN
Ammonia -Nitrogen
719
Nitrate and Nitrite
68.3 r%
Laboratory
A&L EASTERN LABORATORIES, INC.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
X
(S
Date , Q - 3-7 r v7-
DENR FORM RSSF (5/2003) Printed: Friday - February 10 2012 at 08.54:02 for 2254 01

1
ANNUAL RESIDUALS SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Attach this form to the corresponding Annual Report.
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed than those required to be summarized on this form.
Permit Number:
Facility Name: FRANKLIN, NC
NPDES# :
or WQ# (residual only)
WWTP Name: FRANKLIN WTP
Residuals Analysis Data
Product Type WPL
Date Sampled (grab) or 02/23/11
Date Composited
Percent Solids 2.78
PARAMETERS (mg/kg dry weight)
Aluminum
192000 ✓
Calcium
4 030
Magnesium
2370
pH
6.78V
Potassium
12 9 0 ✓
Sodium
358 ✓
Laboratory
A&L EASTERN LABORATORIES, INC.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
X
GNATURE OF IIREP-ARER)
NR - Data Not Reported or Data Not Required
Date a - 2 7 -I z
DENR FORM RSSF-B (7/2002) Printed: Friday - February 10 2012 at 08:54:29 for: 2254 01

Page: 1 of 2
Report Number: 11-055-9208
Account Number: 46622
Send To: SYNAGRO CENTRAUTECHNICAL
MARY BREWER
284 BOGER RD
MOCKSVILLE , NC 27028
Lab Number: 80976
Sample Id : FRANKLIN WTP
' A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
i
� 7621 Wtlitepine Road Richmond, Virginia 23237 (sOd) 743.9401 Fax [phone]
m
wwKwleastern,00m
Project: FRANKLIN WTP
NC CERT #257
REPORT OF ANALYSIS Date Sampled: 2/23/2011 00:00:00
Date Received: 02/24/2011 00:00
Date Reported: 06/30/2011
Total Solids `
2.78
27800
100.0
JM
02/24/2011 14:19
SM-254OG
Moisture'
97.22
100.0
JM
02/241201114:19
SM-2540G
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
0.83
8270
10.0
JM
02/25/2011 08:19
SM-4500-NH3C-TKN
Total Phosphorus
0.10
988
100
KM
02/25/2011 12:00
SW 6010C
Total Potassium
0.13
1290
100
KM
02/2512011 12:00
SW 601CC
Total Sulfur
0.36
3580
100
KM
02/25/2011 12:00
SW 601CC
Total Calcium
0.40
4030,
100
KM
02/25/2011 12:00
SW 6010C
Total Magnesium
0.24
2370
100
KM
02/26/2011 12:00
SW 6010C
Total Sodium
0.04
358
100
KM
02/25/2011 12:00
SW 601CC
Total Iron
30600
1
KM
02/25/2011 12:00
SW 6010C
Total Aluminum
192000
10
KM
02/25/2011 12:00
SW 6010C
Total Manganese
486
1
KM
02/25/2011 12:00
SW 601CC
Total Copper
68
1
KM
02/25/2011 12:00
SW 6010C
Total Zinc
93
1
KM
02/25/2011 12,00
SW 6010C
Ammonia Nitrogen
0.07
719
10.0
JM
02/25/2011 08:19
SM-4500-NH3C
Organic N
0.76
7551
10.0
02/25/2011 08:19
CALCULATION
Nitrate+Nitrite-N
68.3
1.00
JM
021281201107:50
SM450ONO3F
Total Cadmium
<1.0
1.0
KM
02/25/2011 12:00
SW 601CC
All values are on a dry weight basis except as noted by asterisk. Detection limit on all N series is on a wet basis.
D::r n pads tv d ;mrtr: r..re for !f S rxoiusr,e and car.'f,cr: of vs of,»s ::fl:,ofa..<nd n:,y rur , ror(,, oco�i :� w1,0 %, Orrar;, nor rn ,yy ary rcferc,;Cm Oc
yr, w; f uC c raenf ar.::^o:rl ar:::r., cur rrior
fU Lh9 .Yarn. i�E �asu1L•:• Or 97r9 CUI•'l,n�rti in c;ciS' AG' ri/Siri}�. !'•'� J1Uui5.:d G7:3rA. vL•:iOf:aL•n r'f ^ nr2 JL}a
Debbie Holt

Page: 2 of 2
Report Number. 11-055-9208
Account Number: 46622
Send To: SYNAGRO CENTRAUTECHNICAL
MARY BREWER
284 BOGER RD
MOCKSVILLE , NC 27028
A &L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
7621 Whitepine Road Richmond, Virginia 23237 [phone] Fu (SK 271.6446
wwwaleastenl.com
Project: FRANKLIN WTP
NC CERT #257
REPORT OF ANALYSIS Date Sampled: 2/23/2011 00:00:00
Lab Number • 80976 Bate Received: 02/24/2011 00:00
samnle Id • FRANKLIN WTP Date Reported: 06/30/2011
Total Chromium lu-i U--
Total Nickel 22 5 KM 02/25/2011 12:00 SW 6010C
Total Lead 11 5 KM 02/25/2011 12:00 SW 6010C
Total Arsenic 5.0 1.0 KM 02125/2011 12:00 SW 6010C
Total Mercury <0.4 0.4 KM 02/25/2011 09:00 SW-74718
Total Selenium <1.0 1.0 KM 02/25/2011 12:00 SW 6010C
pH (Standard Units) * 6.78 JM 02/25/2011 08:19 SW-9045D
Total Molybdenum <5 5 KM 02/26/2011 12:00 SW 6010C
Comments:
QUALIFIER: THE MATRIX SPIKE WAS OUT OF LIMITS FOR "P". ALL OTHER QC DATA IS ACCEPTABLE.
All values are on a dry weight basis except as noted by asterisk. Detection limit on all N series is on a wet basis.
�. , r 1• I .I: c• o'our G:a•Dr,; •^ne-� i,' innor Dv rs:NdGh?,wd in :YF.CJ!, or);urt, ncr,m,..::,n1 rt ffe.'Wrco iso .-no6k:
$^J C•iniblrJr?U.7
u. .•.c• Prpl.'{ i; N) ecSUirS, o!'::7r CO^a711n!; is o y 3CL.nt'skt;7.: eV;' rei@f15fl. 4: Onar oi;J11C ?I;aC•1D0! rr3LL'S lvifrucK nhi: of-rr Cu( f.'.riC; L:fyrr? :]iJ±i1C:;'l.'7tr91:.
Debbie Holt

WOF
OWN
.tAMPLIRG
DATE -nME
IWA
roper l7,iild,,sWrgCit7g.-Pracedures-
f,b5.e COIASC60R. Of t1heSe'SaMPI--S-
PRt9tRVED
J-14
.201IZZ-24
cy -1-sill .12j.
��ro-CentraktLc
T
.&STOMER .,N.A'GR',O.-,.S.P.UTH.E�,A'S,
PAOJE�CTMAM52R� w 7
KER 7
YAVP
A,& L -SAMPL-E:`--
LAS #- Typk..:.t,.
;W'TyV'
SAMPLE.
uCl I'm
cd,
figg
As
SL N.
.. 'l
.. gPIA%P'P
-SLSLR &T90-pldi,suItjrbdi ..... ap
PP,
p
-d
White: hite ANA fz3=Py

SodiumAbsorption. Ratio Calculation (SAR)
Product Code �`., Product Name Sample Date Report Range Ratio
2254-01-WPL-NC FRANKLIN, NC WTP LIQUID 2/23/2011 7/1/2011-713112011 0.1837
Na mg/I = (Na mg/kg x % Solids) + 100 = (358 x 2.7800) + 100 = 9.9524
Ca mg/I = (Ca mg/kg x % Solids) + 100 = (4030 x 2.7800) + 100 = 112.034
Mg mg/I = (mg mg/kg x % Solids) -100 = (2370 x 2.7800) + 100 = 65.886
Na meq = Na mg/l + Molec.Wgt.Na = 9.9524 + 23 = 0.432713
Ca meq = Ca mg/l+ Molec.WgtCa = 112.034 + 20 = 5.6017
Mg meq = Mg mg/1 + Molec.Wgt.Mg = 65.886 + 12 = 5.4905
SAR = Na meq _ SgrRoot[0.5 x (Ca meq + Mg meq)] = 0.432713 + SgrRoot[0.5(5.6017+5.4905)] = 0.183741
Printed: 12/28/2011
Page 1 08:35

4CILITY NAME: FRANKLIN, NC
WNER: CHRISTINE SLAGLE
TE #: NC MA OOX01 FIELD# : MA OOXOI 0001
ESIDUAL SOURCE(S):* See list at bottom of report
ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PREDOMINANT SOIL SERIES: TOXAWAY
PERMIT #: W00035207 ANNUAL DRY TONS APPLIED: 5.48
OPERATOR: CHARLES SLAGLE CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY (NON-503):
I`
fa p, fA&,na.— ACRES UTILIZED: 3.00 ACRES PERMITTED: 3.00
Page : I
Lime Applied ***
Date Lbs/Ac
allons (G) or Cubic Yards (CY)
Dry
Site
Inches
Appli-
Vola-
Miner -
or Wet Tons (WT) (specify)
o
Tons
Cond.
Precip.
cation
tili-
ali-
Ammonia
Nitrate
PAN
)ATE or
/�
Per
Residual
Dry, Wet,
Past 24
Method
zation
zation
TKN
Nitrogen
and
(ppm)
Crop
MONTH
Total
Per Acre
Solids
7/12/11
47,300.00 (G)
15766.667
2.78
1.828
FWPL
MOIST
0-<1/2"
SURIN
1.0
0.40
8,270.0 p
719.00 p 1
68.30 p
3808
FESCUE
Jul-11
47,300.00 (G)
15,766.667
Total Gallons/Ac: 15,766.67
As Cd Cr Cu Pb Hg Mo Ni Se Zn P PAN
TOTALS:
LZ
innuallbs/acre 0.018 0.004 0.369 0.249 0.040 0.001 0.018 0.080 0.004 0.340 3.61 14
;umulative lbs/acre 0.018 0.004 0.369 0.249 0.040 0.001 0.018 0.080 0.004 0.340 i
%�
144
,-rmit PAN Limit (lbs/acre) 1st Crop/2nd Crop
N
`
" = F
n ; 2 H `f y
x
fflD
f F
Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate Limit (lbs/acre)
36.6
34.8
,�
1339.0
267.9 15.0 'rc`' { ` 375.0
89.0
2500.0 5
rWPL = FRANKLIN, NC WTP LIQUID
x X/*// � P 2-10,4112
(SIGNATURE OF LAND APPLIER) DATE
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and
evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
N/A = Not Applicable NR = Not Reported or Not Required % = percent p = ppm or mg/kg ** Volatilization Rate: Surface 0.5, Injection/Incorporation 1.0
* Application Method: SUR - Surface, INJ-Injection,SURIN -Incorporation *** See Site pH & Lime Application Records Section of Report for Fields where Lime is to be applied in 2012

ACILITY NAME: FRANKLIN, NC
WNER: CHARLES SLAGLE
TE #: NC MA OOXO1 FIELD# : MA OOXO1 0002
ESIDUAL SOURCE(S):* See list at bottom of report
ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PREDOMINANT SOIL SERIES: DILLSBORO
PERMIT #: W00035207 ANNUAL DRY TONS APPLIED: 16.31
OPERATOR: CHARLES SLAGLE CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY (NON-503):
ACRES UTILIZED: 4.20 ACRES PERMITTED: 4.20
Page : 1
Lime Applied
Date Lbs/Ac
SATE or
allons (G) or Cubic Yards (CY)
or Wet Tons (VM (specify)
%
Dry
Tons
Per
Residual
Site
Cond.
Dry, Wet,
Inches
Precip.
Past 24
Appli-
cation
Method
Vola-
tili-
zation
Miner -
ali-
zation
TKN
Ammonia
Nitrogen
Nitrate
and
PAN
(ppm)
Crop
MONTH
Total
Per Acre
Solids
7/7/11
58,400.00 (G)
13904.762
2.78
1.612
FWPL
MOIST
0-<1/2"
SUR
0.5
0.40
8,270.0 p
719.00 p
68.30 p
3448
I FESCUE
7/11/11
43,800.00 (G)
10428.571
2.78
1.209
FWPL
MOIST
0-<1/2"
SUR
0.5
0.40
8,270.0p
719.00 p
68.30 p
3448
I FESCUE
7/13/11
38,500.00 (G)
9166.667
2.78
1.063
FWPL
DRY
0-<1/2"
SUR
0.5
0.40
8,270.0p
719.00 p
68.30 p
3448
FESCUE
Jul-11
140,700.00 (G)
33,500.000
Total Gallons/Ac: 33,500.00
As
Cd
Cr
Cu
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
PAN
TOTALS:
27
wnual lbs/acre
0.039
0.008
0.784
0.528
0.085
0.003
0.039
0.171
0.008
0.722
7.67
,umulative lbs/acre
0.039
0.008
0.784
0.528
0.085
0.003
0.039
0.171
0.008
0.722
f
AA
200
ermit PAN Limit (lbs/acre) 1st Crop/2nd Crop
t 3
f
s; .�.
36.6
:� .•i� 3..<
34.8
,.,, iy>. /
rs sr j
i• ., ix. I/ ... ...:: ... .. .. c
1339.0 267.9
%3,,�.., .. ,x r a•!
15.0 , 375.0
..f=� �v. ..3; .S n, SLK�D%j
89.0 2500.0 y s
'D Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate Limit (lbs/acre)
sy
WPL = FRANKLIN, NC WTP LIQUID
x 4*x /� - IV 2- / 0 0,��
(SIGNATURE OF LAND APPLIER) DATE
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and
evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
N/A = Not Applicable NR = Not Reported or Not Required % = percent p = ppm or mg/kg * * Volatilization Rate: Surface 0.5, Injection/Incorporation 1.0
* Application Method: SUR - Surface, INJ -Injection, SURIN -Incorporation *** See Site pH & Lime Application Records Section of Report for Fields where Lime is to be applied in 2012

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
I
I
Page: 1
Lime Applied ***
ACILITY NAME: FRANKLIN, NC
PREDOMINANT SOIL SERIES: BRADDOCK
1WNER: CHARLES SLAGLE
PERMIT #: W00035207
ANNUAL DRY TONS APPLIED:
2.64
Date Lbs/Ac
ITE #: NC MA OOXO1 FIELD# : MA OOXO1 0003
OPERATOR: CHARLES SLAGLE
CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY
(NON-503):
ACRES UTILIZED: 3.50
ACRES PERMITTED:
3.50
LESIDUAL SOURCE(S):*• See list at bottom of report
allons (G) or Cubic Yards (CY)
Dry
Site Inches Appli- Vola-
Miner -
or Wet Tons (WT) (specify)
Tons
Cond. Precip. cation tili-
ali-
Ammonia
Nitrate
PAN
% DATE or
Per
Residual Dry, Wet, Past 24 Method zation
zation
TKN Nitrogen
and
(ppm)
Crop
MONTH Total Per Acre Solids
7/13/11 22,800.00 (G) 6514.286 2,7g
0.755
FWPL DRY 0-<1/2" SUR 0.5
0.40
8,270.0 p 719.00 p
68.30 p
3448
FESCUE
Jul-11 1 2,800.00 (G) 6,514.286
Total Gallons/Ac: 6,514.29
As Cd Cr Cu
Pb
Hg Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P PAN
TOTALS:
5
Annuallbs/acre
0.008 0.002 0.153 0.103
0.017
<.001 0.008
0.033
0.002
0.140
1.49
Cumulative lbs/acre
0.008 0.002 0.153 0.103
0.017
<.001 0.008
0.033
0.002
0.140
r „ .,
g,
'ermit PAN Limit (Ibs/acre) 1st Crop/2nd Crop
ar.
/h,i..ri si,a
Ks ,w..' • Ft,jf
z° ,,.i<• Y y.,! •i.?
a
s
2500.0
r
�,
179
Y
;.
FD Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate Limit (lbs/acre)
36.6
34.8
y
r a ;
1339.0
267.9 15.0 375.0
89.0
FWPL = FRANKLIN, NC WTP LIQUID
(SIGNATURE OF LAND APPLIER) DATE
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and
evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
N/A = Not Applicable NR = Not Reported or Not Required % = percent p = ppm or mg/kg ** Volatilization Rate`: Surface 0.5, Injection/Incorporation 1.0
* Application Method: SUR - Surface, INJ - Injection, SURIN - Incorporation *** See Site pH & Lime Application Records Section of Report for Fields where Lime is to be applied in 2012

ACILITY NAME: FRANKLIN, NC
WNER: CHRISTINE SLAGLE
TE #: NC MA OOXOI FIELD# : MA OOXO1 0004
ESIDUAL SOURCE(S):* See list at bottom of report
ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PREDOMINANT SOIL SERIES: BRADDOCK
PERMIT #: W00035207 ANNUAL DRY TONS APPLIED: 33.43
OPERATOR: CHARLES SLAGLE CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY (NON-503):
ACRES UTILIZED: 25.20 ACRES PERMITTED: 25.20
Page: 1
Lime Applied ***
Date Lbs/Ac
)ATE or
allons (G) or Cubic Yards (CY)
or Wet Tons (WT) (specify)
%
Dry
Tons
Per
Residual
Site
Cond.
Dry, Wet,
Inches
Precip.
Past 24
Appli-
cation
Method
Vola-
tili-
zation
Miner -
ali-
zation
TKN
Ammonia
Nitrogen
Nitrate
and
PAN
Win)
Crop
MONTH
Total
Per Acre
Solids
7/13/11
11,400.00 (G)
452.381
2.78
0.052
FWPL
DRY
0-<1/2"
SUR
0.5
0.40
8,270.0 p
719.00 p
68.30 p
3448
I FESCUE
7/14/11
87,600.00 (G)
3476.190
2.78
0.403
FWPL
DRY
0-<1/2"
SUR
0.5
0.40
8,270.0 p
719.00 p
68.30 p
3448
I FESCUE
7/15/11
29,200.00 (G)
1158.730
2.78
0.134
FWPL
MOIST
0-<1/2"
SUR
0.5
0.40
8,270.0 p
719.00 p
68.30 p
3448
FESCUE
7/19/11
55,200.00 (G)
2190.476
2.78
0.254
FWPL
DRY
0-<1/2"
SUR
0.5
0.40
8,270.0 p
719.00 p
68.30 p
3448
FESCUE
7/20/11
70,750.00 (G)
2807.540
2.78
0.325
FWPL
DRY
0-<I/2"
SUR
0.5
0.40
8,270.0p
719.00 p
68.30 p
3448
FESCUE
7/21/11
34,250.00 (G)
1359.127
2.78
0.158
FWPL
DRY
0-<I/2"
SUR
0.5
0.40
8,270.0 p
719.00 p
68.30 p
3448
FESCUE
Jul -if
288,400.00 (G)
11,444.444
Total Gallons/Ac: 11,444.44
As
Cd
Cr
Cu
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
PAN
TOTALS:
9
annual lbs/acre
0.013
0.003
0.268
0.180
0.029
0.001
0.013
0.058
0.003
0.247
2.62
l/
;umulative lbs/acre
0.013
0.003
0.268
0.180
0.029
0.001
0.013
0.058
0.003
0.247
f k..
�a { r a'/
s k s
✓ ' : / /✓1 �i, . ram'' �, �y ?� k ar/�,/ `'/ '�
/ � r� // /"� '
'` r r
` � � � 179
,rmit PAN Limit (lbs/acre) 1st Crop/2nd Crop
t`�/.Fv`. v',i
'�i"
a hi9 i3�,.i /,/.% Y
k r.✓
f ,:BE
a an �i3,v,., ./.S�:j 3.. ,.a vF�./,'wi .f rre .3 '�/
a�i.! „%,. ..Y
/ ,.:.�c a,h
.T�v' Y
'D Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate Limit (lbs/acre)
36.6 34.8
v /
1339.0
267.9 15.0 iE/ o `�x f 375.0
89.0
2500.0
'WPL = FRANKLIN, NC WTP LIQUID
(SIGNATURE OF LAND APPLIER) DATE
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and
evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
N/A = Not Applicable NR = Not Reported or Not Required %= percent p = ppm or mg/kg ** Volatilization Rate: Surface 0.5, Injection/Incorporation 1.0
* Application Method: SUR - Surface, INJ -Injection, SURIN -Incorporation *** See Site pH & Lime Application Records Section of Report for Fields where Lime is to be applied in 2012

WoUMMIT
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Analytical Laboratories
LABORATORY REPORT
Client
Synagro Southeast
284 Boger Rd.
Mocksville, NC 27028
Order Number
1103359
Project Number
Franklin WTP
Issued
Thursday, March 03, 2011
Total Number of Pages
5 (excluding C.O.C. and cooler receipt form)
Approved By: zit/'
QA Manager
1��l�II�I�I�II��IE��191
NELAC Accreditation #E87688
"Analytical Integrity" - EPA Certified • NELAP Certified
3310 Win Street - CUyE'11100a Fain, Ohio 44223 o Phone: [phone],11 - Pax: 330-253-4489
Web Site; www.settek,com

ddw
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Analytic,al 1.7bomtorles
Sample Summary
Client: Synagro Southeast
Order Number: 1103359
Laboratory ID Client ID Matrix Sampling Date
1103359-01 Franklin WTP Sludge 2/22/2011
"Analytical Integrity" - EPA -Certified • NELAP Certified
3310 Win Street Cuyahoga Falb, Ohlo 44223 o Rhone: 330-253-02-11 - Fax: [phone]
Web 001te: www.settek.com

NUMMIT
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
kn�lyrica/ Laboratories
Report Narrative
Client: Synagro Southeast
Order Number: 1103359
3
No problems were encountered during analysis of this order number, except as noted.
Data Qualifiers:
B = Analyte found in the method blank
J = Estimated concentration of analyte between MDL (LOD) and Reporting Limit (LOQ)
C = Analyte has been confirmed by another instrument or method
E = Analyte exceeds the upper limit of the calibration curve.
D = Sample or extract was analyzed at a higher dilution
X = User defined data qualifier. .
S = Surrogate out of control limits
U = Undetected
a = Not Accredited by NELAC
ND = Non Detected at LOQ
DF = Dilution Factor
Limit Of Quantitation (LOQ) = Laboratory Reporting Limit (not adjusted for dilution factor)
Limit Of Detection (LOD) = Laboratory Detection Limit
Estimated uncertainty values are available upon request.
Matrices:
A=Air
C = Cream
DW = Drinking Water
L = Liquid
0 = Oil
SL = Sludge
SO = Soil
S = Solid
T = Tablet
TC = TCLP Extract
WW = Waste Water
W = Wipe
The test results meet the requirements of the NELAC standard, except where noted.- The information contained in .
this analytical report is the sole property of Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. and that of the client. It cannot
be reproduced in any form without the consent of Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. or the client for which this
report was issued. The results contained in this report are only representative of the samples received. Conditions
can vary at different times and at different sampling conditions. Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. is not
responsible for use or interpretation of the data included herein.
"Analyfleal Integrity" - EPA Certified - NELAP Certified
3310 Win Streit • Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 o Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Wets Site: www. settelccom

W-SUMMIT
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. A4arch 03, 2011
Analytical Laboratories Client: Synagro Southeast
Address: 284 Boger Rd.
Mocksville, NC 27028
Received: 2/24/2011
Project #: Franklin WTP
TCLP
Metals
Clicnt 1D#
Ub 1D#
Collected Ana`131e
Rep Lmt
l3M9
lnit
Matrix Method
DP
ReaLyi
inn Analyst
Franklin WTP
1103359.-01
22-Feb-11 Cadmium
0.1
<0.1"
mg/I
SL
1311
1
1
28-Feb-11 VVK
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-il Chromium
0.2
<0.2
mg/l
SL
1311
1
5
28-Feb-11 VVK
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Selenium
0.5
<0.5
mg/1
SL
1311
1
1
28-Feb-11 VVK
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Arsenic
0.5
<0.5
mg/I
SL
1311
1
5
28-Feb-11 WK
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Lead
0.5
<0.5
mg/I
SL
1311
1
5
28-Feb-11 VVK
Franklin WfP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Silver
0.5
<0.5
mg/I
SL
1311
1
5
28-Feb-11 VVK
Franklin WfP .
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Barium
5
<5.0
mg/1
SL
1311
1
- 100
28-Feb-11 VVK
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Mercury
0.002
<0.002
mg/I
SL
1311
1
0.2
28-Feb-11 VVK
TCLP Volatiles
Client 1139
Lab ID#
Collected Annl�l-
Rep Lm
Result
Units
Matrix. Method
DF
RegLyl
Run Ant{\rsl
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Benzene
0.1
<0.1
mg/L
SL
1311
1
0.5
28-Feb-11 MS
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-112-Butanone (MEK)
2
<2.0
mg/L
SL
1311
1
200
28-Feb-11 MS
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Vinyl Chloride
0.2
<0.2 _
mg/L
SL
1311
1
0.2
28-Feb-11 MS
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Chloroform
0.1
<0.1
mg/L
SL
1311
1
6
28-170411 MS
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Chlorobenzene
0.1
<0.1
mg/L
SL
1311
1
100
28-Feb-11 MS
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Tetrachloroethene
0.1
<0.1
mg/L
SL
1311
1
0.7
28-Feb-11 MS
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 i,1-Dichloroethene
0,1
<0.1
mg/L
SL
1311
1
0.7
28-Feb-11 MS
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Carbon tetrachloride
0.1
<0.1
mg/L
SL
1311
1
.0.5
28-Feb-11 MS
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
' 22-Feb-11 1,2-Dichloroethane
0.1
<0.1
mg/L
SL
1311
1
0.5
28-Feb-11 MS
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Trichloroethene
0.1
<0.1
mg/L
SL
1311
1
0.5
28-Feb-11 MS
TCLP BNA
Client ID#
Ub ]D#
Collected AnalAnalZ
Reo Lmt
Result
Units
M1 dX Meth
DF
RegLvl
Run Analyst
Franklin WTP
1103359.01
22-Feb-11 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.1
<0.1
mg/I
SL
1311
1
0.5
01-Mar-11 AKE
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Nitrobenzene
0.1
<0.1
mg/I
SL
1311
1
2
01-Mar-11 AKE
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-112,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.1
<0.1
mg/I
SL
1311
1
0.13
01-Mar-11 AKE
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Hexachloroethane
0.1
<0.1
mg/I
SL
1311
1
3
01-Mar-11 AKE
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11.1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.1
<0.1
mg/I
SL
1311
1
7.5
01-Mar-11 AKE
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Pentachlorophenol
0.25
<0.25
mg/I
SL
1311
1
100
01-Mar-11 AKE
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-112,4,6--Trichlorophenol
0.25
<0.25
mg/I
SL
1311
1
2
01-Mar-11. AKE
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-112,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.25
<0.25
mg/I
SL
1311
1
400
01-Mar-11 AKE
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Pyridine
0.25
<0.25
mg/1
SL
1311
1
5
01-Mar-11 AKE
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Cresols
5
<5.0
mg/I
SL
1311
1
200
01-Mar-11 AKE
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Hexachlorobenzene
0.1
<0.1
mg/I
SL
1311
1
0.13
01-Mar.-li AKE
Page 4
"Analytical Integrity" - EPA Certified - NELAP Certified
3310 Win Street - Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 4422.3 e Phone: [phone]•11 - Fax: [phone]
Wob Site: www. elte k.com

SUMMIT
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Analytical Laboratories
TCLP Pesticides
Client 1D#
Lab ID#
Collected Annlyte
Rep Lunt
Result
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Heptachlor Epoxide 0.002
<0.002
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Toxaphene
0.1
<0.1
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-I1 Chlordane
0.01
<0.01
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Methoxychlor
0.002
<0.002
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Endrin
0.002
<0.002
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Heptachlor
0.002
<0.002
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-11 Gamma-BHC
0.002
<0.002
TCLP Herbicides
Client 11.)#
Lab IN
Collect cd Amahl
Rep Lmt,
Result
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-112,4,5-TP(Silvex)
0.5
<0.5
Franklin WTP
1103359-01
22-Feb-112,4,D
5
<5.0
Client ]DO Lab ID# Collected AnniLle
Franklin WTP 1103359-01 22-Feb-11 Flash Point
Client ID# Lib ill# Collected Annit4e
Franklin WTP 1103359-01 22-Feb-11 pH
Client 11)# Lab ID# Collected Aimlyte
Franklin WTP 1103359-01 22-Feb-11 Reactive Cyanide
Client JIM lab ]D# Collected Aualyte
Franklin WTP 1103359-01 22-Feb-11 Reactive Sulfide
March 03, 2011
Client: Synagro Southeast
Address: 284 Boger Rd.
Mocksville, NC 27028
Received: 2/24/2011
Project #:Franklin WTP
Units Matrix Method DF RegLvi )Wi Analyst
mg/I
SL
1311
1
0.008
01-Mar-11 KMG
mg/I
SL
1311
1
0.5
01-Mar-11 KMG
mg/1
SL
1311
1
0.03
01-Mar-11 KMG
mg/I
SL
1311
1
10
01-Mar-11 KMG
mg/1
SL
1311
1
0.02
01-Mar-11 KMG
mg/I
SL
1311
1
0.008
01-Mar-11 KMG
mg/I
SL
1311
1
0.4
01-Mar-11 KMG
Units
M m
Method
DF
Real-vi
Run Analyst
mg/I
SL
1311
1
1
28-Feb-11 KMG
ma/1
SL
131l
1
10
28-Feb-11 KMG
Result
Units
Matrix Method
DF
LONG
Itun Apalyg
>140F
SL 1010
1
25-Feb-11 DVW
Res d
Units
Matrix meth
DF
LQQ
Run Analyst
5.91 su@19.2C
SL 9040
1
0.01
02-Mar-11 DHC
Result
Units
matrix Meth
D
LQQ
Run Analyst
<0.5
mg/kg
SL 7.3.3.2
1
0.5
25-Feb-11 TIR
Result
jh s
Mai& Niclhod
DF
LQQ
Run Analyst
<25.0
mg/kg
SL 7.3.4.2
1
25
25-Feb-11 TIR
Page 5
"Analytical Integrity" • EPA Certified - NELAP Certified
3310 Win Street • Cuyahoga N9119, ©laid 44223 o Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
Web Site: wwwsetfekxom

)LRUE Environnimental 1.echnologies, Inc.
JJ aV Win Street
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
alysis Request/ 11111!llllll�illl�INll 11111111f11111�1111�11{11I11
For Summit Environmental 1�1111111I�U�
I Illfllllllff 1111111111) Iirr ni W,uuflrr ffl. ��,.�.,,..,......_- _..._-
Page
1NUIIINIIIUIIIIIIUIIlll�lllUIIIIINII�IIIIIIIIItllill�I�l��Nlll�f ��
:^.. Order lD: 1103359
co
Company Name (Please Print)
$ ,�� /� o
Project Name
r �lr.�-
t i V bU 7—/'
:..:..
o
d':
U,
-
-VA
:Collected
Com an Address
P YProject
rh oc t4� v, rr-e s- C__ 2 7 0 26
Address
:,;
11
;�q �a :
:•
-
;:;.: Ey .. :'.
lie�tPhone7No. _ g Z
O
Report to
Client Fax No. Please Fax Results ✓ �
Pp#
Client Email Please Email Results
f'h &AeA2
Auote No.
Contact P rson
Sampled by
Check if Ohio DA,P samples ✓
#
Identilication.o
:,Date
meSample :. '.
..Collected'
Plc&A Check
AnalvtiuI
Box
�-
P �JkL"xi •W i %'
2 2 i
16 ! 3 v
L�-c
I
id
FL.1
Relinquish by: Date I Time. ., Received.b : :.. °Rate '_,' Time :.: NotestComments-
.
r 17: sv
Received in lab by: Date Tune. Must be approved
Rush Requested 13y:
Z -1 of Date by lab manager
White and yellow pages should accompany samples to the laboratory. The client retains the pink page. 38760

ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM (02T Rules)
Facility Name: Town of Franklin WTP WQ Permit Number: WQ0035207
WWTP Name: Town of Franklin WTP NPDES Number: PWS 01-57-010
Monitoring Period: From 01/01/11 To 12/31/11
Pathogen Reduction (40 CFR 503.32/15A NCAC 02T.1106) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed:
Class A:
Alt. 1/A (time/temp) Alt. 2/B (Alk Treatment) Alt. 3/C (Prior Testing)
Alt. 4/13 (No Prior Test) Alt. 5/Process to Further Reduce Pathogens Alt. 6 (Equivalent to PFRP)
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Compost Heat Drying Heat Treatment Thermophilic
Beta Ray Gamma Ray Pasteurization
Class B:
Alt. (1) Fecal Density Alt. (2) Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens
If applicable to alternative performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization Air Drying Composting Aerobic Digestion
Anaerobic Digestion
Tf nnnlirahla +n oltarna+lira narfnrma`I [!'lace A nr Place R1 rmmnla+a tha fnllnwina mnnitnrina data -
Parameter
Allowable Level in Sludge
Pathogen Density
No. of
Frequency
Sample
Analytical
Excee-
of
Type
Technique
Minimum Geo. Mean Maximum Units
dences
Analysis
Fecal
2x10 to the 6`
MPN
MPN/g
Coliform
power per gram
of total solids
CFU/g
CFU
1000 MPN per gram of
<7
NA
<7
MPN/g
0
Annual
Grab
SM2540G
total solids (dry weight)
Salmonella
3 MPN per 4 grams total
bacteria (in
solids (dry weight)
lieu of fecal
coliform)
Vector Attraction Reduction (40 CFR 503.33/15A NCAC 02T.1107) - Please indicate option/alternative performed:
Option/Alt. 1
Option/Alt. 2
Option/Alt. 3 Option/Alt. 4
(VS reduction)
(40-day bench)
(30-day bench) (Spec. 02 uptake)
Option/Alt.5
Option/Alt.6
9ption/Alt.7 `. Option/Alt.8
(14-Day Aerobic)
(Alk Stabilization)
(Drying — Stable) (Drying — Unstable)
Option/Alt. 9
Option/Alt. 10
(Injection)
(Incorporation)
No vector attraction reduction alternatives were performed
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32/15A NCAC 02T.1106 and the vector attraction
X reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33/15A NCAC 02T.1107 have been met."'
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32/15A NCAC 02T.1106 and the vector attraction
reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33/15A NCAC 02T.1107 have not been met." (Please note if you check this statement attach an '
_ explanation why you have not met one or both of the requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that.qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have
been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
Jay Gibson Utilities Director
Pre er Name and Title (type or print)
Signat re a Preparer* Date
Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable) (type or print)
Signature of Land Applier (if applicable)
Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T.1102 (26)

Synagro-Mocksville
Marshall Puryear
284 Boger Road
Mocksville, NC 27028
NC Certification No. 402
i£ SC Certification No. 99012
Full Service Analytical
NC Drinking Water Cert No. 37735
Environmental Solutions
Project: Franklin WTP
Lab Submittal Date: 02/23/2011
Prism Work Order:1020616
Case Narrative
03101 /2011
This data package contains the analytical results for the project identified above and includes a Case Narrative, Sample
Results and Chain of Custody. Unless otherwise noted, all samples were received in acceptable condition and processed
according to the referenced methods.
Data qualifiers are flagged individually on each sample. A key reference for the data qualifiers appears at the end of this case
narrative.
Narrative Notes:
Laboratory report attached with a total page count of 5 pages.
Please call if you have any questions relating to this analytical report.
Respectfully,
PRISM LABORATORIES, INC.
Project Manager
Data Qualifiers Key Reference:
1-ge Wr (?L 16--v d&_Jz�
Reviewed By
BRL Below Reporting Limit
MDL Method Detection Limit
RPD Relative Percent Difference
* Results reported to the reporting limit. All other results are reported to the MDL with values between MDL and
reaortina limit indicated with a J.
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Prism Laboratories, Inc.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-8001629-6364 - Fax: [phone]

Full -Service Analytical &ISM l Environmental Solutions
AJWRAICRIM WGM
Sample Receipt Summary
03/01/2011
Prism Work Order: 1020616
ZIlent Sample ID Lab Sample ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Received
Franklin WTP 1020616-01 Solid 02/22/11 02/23/11
Samples received in good condition at 1.9 degrees C unless otherwise noted.
This report should not be reproduced, except In its entirety, without the written consent of Prism Laboratories, Inc.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240643 - Charlotte, NC 28224.0643
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-8001629-6364 - Fax: [phone]

g,j
. . . . . . . . . . . . - — ---- M
9 LA60RATORIE$ INC.
NC Certification No. 402
SC Certification No. 99012
NC Drinking Water Cert. No. 37735
Full -Service Analytical &
Environmental Solutions
449 Springbrook Rd.
P.O. Sox 240543
Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Client Name: Synagro-Mocksville Project Name: Franklin WTP
Sample Date/Time Collected: 02/22/11 16:30 Project ID: Franklin WTP
Sample Date/Time Submitted: 02/23/11 10:55 COC Group: 1020616
rlsm
Fecal Coliform in
Sample
Client
Solids(MPN/g)
Reporting
ID
Sample ID
SM9221 E
Limit
% Solids SM2540 G
Analysis Date/Time
1020616-01
1 Franklin WTP
<7
7
2.90
2123/11 12:36
Note: Al results are reported on a dry -weight basis
Data Reviewed By: pt? "dr.V Project Manager: Q ec�i
Review Data: 3 ! 1( Approval Date: 3 t
This report should not be reproduced, except In Its entirety, without the written consent of Prism Laboratories, Inc.

Sample Extraction Data
0 PREP
.ab Number Batch Initial Final Date
1020616-01 P1B0568 30 g . 30 mL 02/23/11
NO PREP
Lab Number Batch Initial Final Date
1020616.01 P1130590 10.0009 g 100 mL 02/23/11
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Prism Laboratories, Inc.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-8001529.6364 - Fax: [phone]

SM I Environmental Solutions
LN90nATONES iNG
449 Springbrook Road • P;Q. Box 240543 • Charlotte, NO 28224-0543
Phorm 704/529-6364 • Fax: [phone]
Client Company Name: P %Lv
Report To/Contact Name: A&< h &,if v
Reporting Address:.? y ou P 69
CHAIN OF CUS'
PAGE _ OF � QUOTE #TO ENSURE
Project Name: +2 " I-, I (—
Short Hold Analysis: , (Yes) o)
`Please ATTACH any project specifi
provisions and/or QC Requirements
Invoice To: Z O
Address: 7 1Rqn
Phone: 3 es} (No): '
Email (Yes) (No) Email Address
Purchase Order NodBilling Reference _
Requested Due Date ❑ i Day �2 Days CI 3 Days ❑ 4 Days Q 5 Days
TO BE FILLED IN BY CLIENT/SAMPLING PERSONNEL
Certification: NELAC USACE FL NC
EDD Type: PDF Excel _.Other
Site Location Name:
•
Site Location Physical Address:
'Working Days" o 6.9 Days a Standard 10 days ❑ R �� Must Be ed
Samples received after iS.bO will be processed next business day.
Turna round time is based on business days, excluding weekends and holidays.
(SEEREGARDING
EGAR �SMVI�
EREDRWM SY ORISM�tABO CONDITIONS
_ O ER N/A
Water Chlorinated: YES_ NO �"
Sample Iced Upon Collection: YES X NO _
CLIENT
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
DATE
COLLECTED
TIME
COLLECTED
MILITARY
HOURS
MATRIX
(SOIL.
WATER OR
SLUDGE)
SAMPLE CONTAINER
PRESERVA-
jMULYSES REQUESTED
REMARKS
PRISM
LAB
ID NO.
TYPE
SEE BELOW
NO.
SIZE
F-4-
Lr
4-
o
oL
L
5 G�U�Tj
a
cQ_
Sampler's'Signature
.. .-
Sampled By (Print Name) R, A Q �U, Affiliation S d
Upon relmgtrishing, this Chai of Custody is your authorization for Prism to proceed with the analyses as requested above. Any changes must be
submitted in writing to the Prism Project Manager. There will be charges for any changes after analyses have been initialized. Rel, Raw d 8 . ( turej ents:Dam Mu r1Hon Additional Comm
a I By: (Slgnffiura) Recowd By: (Signature) Date eS Re`'Depai# lie Tine ;? .. ;; y h
rcuuro) :cii•.e1d;Tecii?Fee: ='�s `,'<i?:"�:
Ro nQu od BY: ( AAO ::••:,;.::.:`!.` : - < ',` ',., `::�
RocoM> or9dem Laboratories
MedlodotS pmonC NOTE ALL AMPLEC L SHOULD BE AP UTWITH CUS A OR A71 N LABORATORY. oup O. .•=da:.v;,.;. _:<;:,':•r:2:, ':
SAMPLES ARE NOT ACCEPTED AND VERIFIED AGAINST 000UNTIL RECEIVEDATTHE LABORATORY, (�y� %j �� L
CI Fed Sc C UPS n"otVared (3Prlsm Fletd Sorvico O OMar 1Uzo 1—fo
NPDES: UST: GROUNDWATER. DRINKING WATER: SOLID WASTE: I RCP A-CERCLA I LANDFILL OTHER: * -INS'v
-1
O NC ❑ SCI (3NC ❑ SC O NO D SC 3 NC p SC O NC ❑ SC ❑ NC a SCI C) NC ❑ SC (3 NC (35C I p NC p SC
I
❑ ❑ __ -__ ❑ ❑
l 1
❑— (III ❑ I ❑ 1111 ❑ L] nnv±rwrwr
'CONTAINER TYP9 CODES: A = Amber C = Clear G = Glass P = Plastic; TL = Teflon -Lined Can VOA = Volatile Organics Analysis (4erO tteaC Space)

Agricultural Lime Application Log
Year: 2011
Project: Franklin WTP
Field
(state -county -site -field)
oil
FpH
Lime Requirement
TonslAcre
Applied
Date Applied
NC MA X1-1
5.6
0.4 T/Ac
1.0
08/03/11
NC MA X1-2
5.4
0.8 T/Ac
1.0
08/03/11
NC MA X1-3
5.4
0.9 T/Ac
1.0
08/03/11
NC MA X1-4
5.6
0.4 T/Ac
1.0
08/03/11

Page 1 of 1
:..:
Report Number: 11-188-0575
2
Account Number: 46622
,
sin�twaaskerocom
Send To:. SYNAGRO CENTRAL/TECHNICAL
MARY BREWER
284 ROGER RD
MOCKSVILLE NC 27028
Date Received: 07/0712011 Date Of Analysis: 07/08/2011
�r�L �a��ern Laboratori�s�, lnc.
7.621.whitepme,Road Rtchmond;:Virgihia23237 (W4):7439401 Fax(Q(9)271.6446
G rower:
AL SLAGLE
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
Date Of Report: 07/11/2011
Submitted By: MARSHALL PURYEAR
Farm ID:
Analytical Method(s):
Mehlich 3
Values on this report represent the plant available nutrients in the Explanation of symbols: % (percent), ppm (parts per million), Ibs/A This report applies to sample(s) tested. Samples are retained a
soil. Rating after each value: VL (Very Low), L (Low), M (Medium), (pounds per acre), ms/cm (milli -mhos per centimeter), meq/100g maximum of thirty days after testing. by.
H (High), VH (Very High). ENR - Estimated Nitrogen Release. (milli -equivalent per 100 grams). Conversions: ppm x 2 = Ibs/A, Analysis prepared by: AR Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
C.E.C. - Cation Exchange Capacity. Soluble Salts ms/cm x 640 = ppm.
Pauric McGroary