20210345 Ver 2_B-4626 Reverification Package November 2022_20221105

Permit
Application

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER J. ERIC BOYETTE
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
Telephone: [phone]

Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
1000 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
RALEIGH NC 27610

March 19, 2021

US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587

ATTN: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
NCDOT Coordinator

Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14, and 401 Water Quality
Certification for the proposed Replacement of the superstructure of Bridge No. 3
and the application of deck preservation treatment to Bridge 8 on NC 8/49 over the
Yadkin River (Tuckertown Reservoir) in Davidson, Rowan and Stanly Counties,
North Carolina, Division 9, TIP No. B-4626, BRNHP-0049(33). Debit $570 from
WBS 38443.1.FS2

Dear Mr. Alsmeyer:

The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the
superstructure on Bridge 3 and apply deck preservation treatment to Bridge 8 on NC 8/49 over the
Yadkin River (Tuckertown Reservoir) in Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties with the same
span arrangement on the existing alignment. This action will result in 18 feet of permanent impacts
to the Yadkin River from bank stabilization and 0.57 ac of temporary impacts from causeways for
bridge construction/rehabilitation. No stream mitigation will be required for this project.

Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (ePCN), Stormwater Management
Plan, and Permit Drawings. A Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist (MCDC) was
completed in April 2018 and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon
request.

A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT Website
at: https://xfer.services.ncdot.gov/pdea/PermApps/. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact Jeff Hemphill at [phone].

Sincerely,

Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M.
Environmental Analysis Unit Head

cc:
NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List

Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E-PCN, all you need to do is right-click on the document and you can print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/0/edoc/624704/PCN%20Help%20File%202018-1-30.pdf
County (or Countie s) where the proje ct is locate d:*
Is this a NCDM S Proje ct *
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Is this a NCDOT Proje ct?*
(NCDOT only) T.I.P. or state proje ct numbe r:
WBS #*
1a. Type (s) of approv al sought from the Corps:*
Has this PCN pre v iously be e n submitte d?*
1b. What type (s) of pe rmit(s) do you wish to se e k authorization?*
This form may be used to initiate the standard/individual permit process with the Corps. Please contact your Corps representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items that
are not provided in the E-PCN can be added to the miscellaneous upload area located at the bottom of this form.
1c. Has the NWP or GP numbe r be e n v e rifie d by the Corps?*
Nationwide Pe rmit (NWP) Numbe r:
NWP Numbe rs (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type (s) of approv al sought from the DWR:*
A. Processing Information
Rowan
Davidson
Stanly
Yes No
Click Yes, only if NCDMS is the applicant or co-applicant.
Yes No
This is any publicly funded by municipal,state or federal funds road, rail, airport transportation project.
Yes No
B-4626
38443.1.FS2
(for NCDOT use only)
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Yes
No
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
Yes No
14 - Linear transportation
List all NW numbers you are applying for not on the drop dow n list.
check all that apply
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit Riparian Buffer Authorization
Individual Permit
Pre-Filing Meeting Information
1e . Is this notification sole ly for the re cord be cause writte n approv al is not re quire d?
*
For the re cord only for DWR 401 Ce rtification:
For the re cord only for Corps Pe rmit:
1f. Is this an afte r-the -fact pe rmit application?*
1g. Is payme nt into a mitigation bank or in-lie u fe e program propose d for mitigation of impacts?
Acce ptance Le tte r Attachme nt
1h. Is the proje ct locate d in any of NC's twe nty coastal countie s?*
1j. Is the proje ct locate d in a de signate d trout wate rshe d?*
Link to trout information: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
1c. Primary Contact Phone :*
1d. Who is applying for the pe rmit?*
1e . Is the re an Age nt/Consultant for this proje ct?*
2. Owner Information
Before submitting this form please ensure you have submitted the Pre-Filing Meeting Request Form as we will not be able to accept your application without this important first step. The Pre-Filing
Meeting Request Form is used in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.4(a) “At least 30 days prior to submitting a certification request, the project proponent shall request a pre-filing meeting with the
certifying agency” and in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.5(b)(7), and (c)(5) all certification requests shall include documentation that a pre-filing meeting request was submitted to the certifying
authority at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request. Click he re to read more information on when this form is needed prior to application submission or he re to view the form.
ID#Ve rsion
Pre -fling M e e ting or Re que st Date *
Attach docume ntation of Pre -Filing M e e ting Re que st he re :*
20210345 1
2/15/2021
DWR Pre-Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf 56.45KB
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program.
Yes No
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
FILE TYPE MUST BE PDF
Yes No
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
Jeff Hemphill
[e-mail]
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
(Check all that apply)
Yes No
2a. Name (s) on re corde d de e d:*
2b. De e d book and page no.:
2c. Re sponsible party:
2d. Addre ss *
N/A
(for Corporations)
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
1a. Name of proje ct:*
1b. Subdivision name :
1c. Ne are st municipality / town:*
2a. Prope rty Identification Numbe r:2b. Prope rty size :
2c. Proje ct Addre ss
2d. Site coordinate s in de cimal de gre e s
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits (unless you are using a survey-grade GPS device) after the decimal place as appropriate, based on how the location was
determined. (For example, most mobile phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal place.)
Latitude :*Longitude :*
2e . Te le phone Numbe r:*
2f. Fax Numbe r:
2g. Email Addre ss:*
City
.
State / Province / Region
.
Postal / Zip Code
.
Country
.
Street Address
N/A
Address Line 2
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[e-mail]
3a. Name :*
3b. Business Name :
3c. Addre ss *
3d. Te le phone Numbe r:*
3e . Fax Numbe r:
3f. Email Addre ss:*
NCDOT
(if applicable)
City
Raleigh
State / Province / Region
NC
Postal / Zip Code
27699-1598
Country
US
Street Address
1598 Mail Service Center
Address Line 2
[phone]
(xxx)xxx-xxxx (xxx)xxx-xxxx
[e-mail]
C. Project I nformation and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
Replace the existing superstructure with a wider superstructure on Bridge 790003 and applying
deck preservation treatment to Bridge 790008 on NC 8/NC 49 over Yadkin River and Winston-
Salem Southbound railroad in Rowan, Davidson, and Stanly Counties.
(if appropriate)
Richfield
2. Project Identification
(tax PIN or parcel ID)(in acres)
City State / Province / Region
Postal / Zip Code Country
Street Address
Address Line 2
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the ne are st body of wate r to propose d proje ct:*
3b. Wate r Re source s Classification of ne are st re ce iv ing wate r:*
Surface Water Lookup
3c. What riv e r basin(s) is your proje ct locate d in?*
3d. Ple ase prov ide the 12-digit HUC in which the proje ct is locate d.*
River Basin Lookup
4. Project Description and History
4a. De scribe the e xisting conditions on the site and the ge ne ral land use in the v icinity of the proje ct at the time of this application:*
4b. Hav e Corps pe rmits or DWR ce rtifications be e n obtained for this project (including all prior phase s) in the past?*
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 e xce rpt from the most re ce nt v e rsion of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the proje ct site . (for DWR)
4e . Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 e xce rpt from the most re ce nt v e rsion of the publishe d County NRCS Soil Surv e y map de picting the proje ct site . (for DWR)
4f. List the total e stimate d acre age of all e xisting we tlands on the prope rty:
4g. List the total e stimate d line ar fe e t of all e xisting stre ams on the prope rty:
4h. Explain the purpose of the propose d proje ct:*
4i. De scribe the ov e rall proje ct in de tail, including indirect impacts and the type of e quipme nt to be use d:*
4j. Ple ase upload proje ct drawings for the propose d proje ct.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Hav e the we tlands or streams be e n de line ate d on the prope rty or propose d impact are as?*
Comme nts:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional de te rmination, what type of de te rmination was made ?*
Corps AID Numbe r:
35.50777
ex: 34.208504
-80.18526
-77.796371
Yadkin River (Tuckertown Reservoir)
WS-IV,B;CA
Yadkin-PeeDee
030401030604
Land use in the project vicinity consists primarily of the Yadkin River/Tuckertown Reservoir surrounded by forestland, including Uwharrie National Forest, with interspersed agricultural
and residential land use.
Yes No Unknown
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
File type must be pdf
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
File type must be pdf
0
(intermittent and perennial)
355'
The need of the proposed project is to improve public safety by replacing the structurally deficient, functionally obsolete, and fracture critical bridge (Rowan County Bridge No. 3) from
the state’s transportation infrastructure and maintaining Bridge 8 through deck preservation treatment. The purpose of the project is to construct a new superstructure that meets
current NCDOT bridge design standards. This new superstructure will also eliminate the fracture-critical nature of the structure. The bridge substructure (piers) are in good condition
and do not need to be replaced.
TIP project B-4626 involves the replacement of the eastbound lane bridge superstructure (Bridge 3) and deck preservation treatment to the westbound lane bridge (bridge 8) over
Yadkin River (Tuckertown Reservoir) and Winston-Salem southbound railroad and includes 1.136 miles of roadway improvement in Stanly, Rowan and Davidson Counties.
The proposed eastbound bridge (bridge 3) will have a superstructure that does not contain deck drains. All stormwater from the bridge and approaches will be collected by a storm
drainage system on the west side of the bridge and discharged into a bio-swale in the median. There is one roadside ditch on this project and is located from Sta. 30+50 to 31+00 RT.
The existing westbound bridge (bridge 8) does not contain deck drains. All stormwater from the existing bridge and approaches will continue to be collected by a storm drainage system
on the west side of the bridge and discharge to the existing Hazardous Spill Basin (HSB). The outfall structure of the HSB will be retrofitted to include a new orifice plat and trash rack to
allow the HSB to provide stormwater detention. Cranes and standard construction equipment will be utilized.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
B-4626 Final Permit Drawings.pdf 11.05MB
B-4626 Permit Application Cover Letter.pdf 184.68KB
File type must be pdf
Yes No Unknown
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Example: SAW-2017-99999
5c. If 5a is ye s, who de line ate d the jurisdictional are as?
Name (if known):
Age ncy/Consultant Company:
Othe r:
5d1. Jurisdictional de te rmination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phase d proje ct?*
Are any othe r NWP(s), re gional ge ne ral pe rmit(s), or indiv idual pe rmits(s) use d, or intende d to be use d, to authorize any part of the propose d project or re lated activ ity? This
include s othe r se parate and distant crossing for line ar proje cts that re quire De partme nt of the Army authorization but don’t re quire pre -construction notification.
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Whe re are the impacts associate d with your proje ct? (che ck all that apply):
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted.
"S." will be used in the table below to represent the word "stream".
3a. Reason for impact *(?)3b.Impact type *3c. Type of impact *3d. S. name *3e . Stre am Type *
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction *
3g. S. width *3h. Impact
le ngth *
S1
S2
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government.
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square fe e t:
3i. Total pe rmane nt stre am impacts:
3i. Total te mporary stre am impacts:
3i. Total stre am and ditch impacts:
3j. Comme nts:
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Spe cifically de scribe me asure s take n to av oid or minimize the propose d impacts in de signing the proje ct:*
1b. Spe cifically de scribe me asure s take n to av oid or minimize the propose d impacts through construction te chnique s:*
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
File type must be PDF
Yes No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
Wetlands Streams-tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
Bank Stabilization Permanent Bank Stabilization Yadkin River Perennial Both 800
Average (feet)
18
(linear feet)
Temporary Construction Temporary Workpad/Causeway Yadkin River Perennial Both 800
Average (feet)
224
(linear feet)
0
18
224
242
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
All stormwater from Eastbound Bridge 3 and approaches will be discharged into a bio-swale in the median. All stormwater from Westbound Bridge 8
and approaches will continue to discharge to the existing Hazardous Spill Basin (HSB). The outfall structure of the HSB will be retrofitted to include a
new orifice plat and trash rack to allow the HSB to provide stormwater detention.
No impacts from an onsite detour bridge will be necessary as each bridge will function as an onsite detour during the rehabilitation or deck
preservation application of the other.
Best Management Practices will be adhered to.
2a. Doe s the proje ct re quire Compe nsatory M itigation for impacts to Wate rs of the U.S. or Wate rs of the State ?
2b. If this proje ct DOES NOT re quire Compe nsatory M itigation, e xplain why:
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington District's RIBITS website.
*** Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section .***
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Doe s the proje ct include or is it adjace nt to prote cte d riparian buffers ide ntifie d within one of the NC Riparian Buffe r Prote ction Rule s?
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
If no, e xplain why:
2. Stormw ater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT proje ct subje ct to compliance with NCDOT’s Indiv idual NPDES pe rmit NCS000250?*
Comme nts:
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Doe s the proje ct inv olv e an e xpe nditure of public (fe de ral/state /local) funds or the use of public (fe de ral/state ) land?*
1b. If you answe re d “ye s” to the abov e , doe s the proje ct re quire pre paration of an e nv ironme ntal docume nt pursuant to the re quireme nts of the National or State (North Carolina)
Env ironme ntal Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
1c. If you answe re d “ye s” to the abov e , has the docume nt re v ie w be e n finalize d by the State Cle aring House ? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approv al le tte r.)*
NEPA or SEPA Final Approv al Le tte r
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in v iolation of DWR Wate r Quality Ce rtification Rule s (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolate d We tland Rule s (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Wate r or We tland Standards or
Riparian Buffe r Rule s (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this proje ct (base d on past and re asonably anticipate d future impacts) re sult in additional de v e lopme nt, which could impact ne arby downstre am wate r quality?*
3b. If you answe re d “no,” prov ide a short narrativ e de scription.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is se wage disposal re quire d by DWR for this proje ct?*
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Yes No
F. Stormwater M anagement and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
Yes No
Yes No
G. Supplementary Information
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
B-4626 Type I Ground Disturbing CE Checklist.pdf 2.02MB
B-4626_Final CIA.pdf 2.43MB
FILE TYPE MUST BE PDF
Yes No
Yes No
No notably adverse community impacts are anticipated with this project and no Environmental Justice populations appear to be affected; thus, impacts
to minority and low income populations do not appear to be disproportionately high and adverse. Benefits and burdens resulting from the project are
anticipated to be equitably distributed throughout the community, and no denial of benefit is expected.
Yes No N/A
5a. Will this proje ct occur in or ne ar an are a with fe de rally prote cte d spe cie s or habitat?*
5b. Hav e you che cke d with the USFWS conce rning Endange re d Spe cie s Act impacts?*
5d. Is anothe r Fe de ral age ncy inv olv e d?*
5e . Is this a DOT proje ct locate d within Div ision's 1-8?*
5f. Will you cut any tre e s in orde r to conduct the work in wate rs of the U.S.?*
5g. Doe s this proje ct inv olv e bridge mainte nance or re mov al?*
5g(1). If ye s, hav e you inspe cte d the bridge for signs of bat use such as staining, guano, bats, e tc.? Re pre se ntativ e photos of signs of bat use can be found in the NLEB SLOPES,
Appe ndix F, page s 3-7.
Link to the NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
If you answe re d "Ye s" to 5g(1), did you discov e r any signs of bat use ?*
*** If ye s, ple ase show the location of the bridge on the pe rmit drawings/proje ct plans.
5h. Doe s this proje ct inv olv e the construction/installation of a wind turbine (s)?**
5i. Doe s this proje ct inv olv e (1) blasting, and/or (2) othe r pe rcussiv e activitie s that will be conducte d by machine s, such as jackhamme rs, me chanize d pile driv e rs, e tc.?*
If ye s, ple ase prov ide de tails to include type of pe rcussiv e activ ity, purpose , duration, and spe cific location of this activ ity on the prope rty.
5j. What data source s did you use to de te rmine whe the r your site would impact Endange re d Spe cie s or De signate d Critical Habitat?*
Consultation Docume ntation Upload
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this proje ct occur in or ne ar an are a de signate d as an Esse ntial Fish Habitat?*
6b. What data source s did you use to de te rmine whe the r your site would impact an Esse ntial Fish Habitat?*
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this proje ct occur in or ne ar an are a that the state , fe de ral or tribal gov e rnme nts hav e de signate d as hav ing historic or cultural pre se rv ation status (e .g., National Historic
Trust de signation or prope rtie s significant in North Carolina history and archae ology)?*
7b. What data source s did you use to de te rmine whe the r your site would impact historic or arche ological re source s?*
7c. Historic or Pre historic Information Upload
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No Unknown
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No Unknown
Yes No
Yes No
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
File must be PDF
FWS Website
Schweinitz's sunflower - No Effect, habitat present, last survey 10/21/19
Eagle survey was conducted August 2017 with no nests or birds observed. Another survey will be conducted prior to construction.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
B-4626_NLEB.pdf 343.78KB
File type must be PDF
Yes No
Review of on-line mapping sources
Yes No
MCDC, Historical Architecture Final MOA and Archaeology Memo.
Historical Architecture: Through consultation with the NCHPO, it was determined that the undertaking will result in an adverse effect to Rowan County
Bridge No. 3 (RW2108) . The undertaking will retain the substructure (piers and bents) of the existing bridge, but replace its superstructure and deck,
thereby removing the welded steel elements that define its NRHP-eligibility.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
B-4626 ArchNoSurveyRevised.pdf 4.2MB
B-4626_Tribal_Coordination_Letter_Catawba_12-06-2019.pdf 1.87MB
B-4626 Tribal Response.pdf 662.83KB
B-4626FinalMOA.pdf 281.7KB
File must be PDF
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEM A Floodplain M aps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this proje ct occur in a FEM A-designate d 100-ye ar floodplain?*
8b. If ye s, e xplain how proje ct me e ts FEM A require me nts:
8c. What source (s) did you use to make the floodplain de te rmination?*
Comme nts
M isce llane ous attachme nts not pre v iously re que ste d.
*
· The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief’; and
· The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
· I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
· I agree that submission of this PCN form is a “transaction” subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the “Uniform Electronic Transactions Act”);
· I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the “Uniform Electronic Transactions Act”);
· I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
· I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name :*
Signature *
Date
Yes No
No FEMA study is needed as the new superstructure on Bridge 003 is being built on top of the existing interior bents.
FEMA Flood Maps
M iscellaneous
A FERC permit will be required for this project.
This bridge replacements may involve some level of percussive activity in the disassembly of the existing superstructure of Bridge 0003.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
B-4626 Permit Application Cover Letter.pdf 252.74KB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
Michael Anthony Turchy
3/19/2021
DWR Pre-Fil ing Meeting Req u est Form
ID#*Ve rsion *
Re gional Office *
Re v ie we r List *
Contact Name *
Contact Email Addre ss *
Proje ct Name *
Proje ct Owne r *
Proje ct County *
Owne r Addre ss:
Is this a transportation proje ct?*
Type (s) of approv al sought from the DWR:
Doe s this proje ct hav e an e xisting proje ct ID#?*
Do you know the name of the staff me mbe r you would like to re que st a me e ting with?
Ple ase giv e a brie f proje ct de scription be low.*
20210345 1
Winston-Salem Regional Office - [phone]
Dave Wanucha
Pre-Filing Me eting Reque st submitte d 2/15/2021
Jeff Hemphill
[e-mail]
B-4626
NCDOT
Rowan
City
Raleigh
State / Province / Region
NC
Postal / Zip Code
27699-1598
Country
US
Street Address
1598 Mail Service Center
Address Line 2
Yes No
401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular
401 Water Quality Certification -
Express
Individual Permit Modification
Shoreline Stabilization
Yes No
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
Ple ase attach the docume ntation you would like to hav e the me e ting about.
Signature
Submittal Date
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes
to replace the superstructure on bridge 0003 and apply deck
preservation treatment to Bridge 0008 on NC 8/NC 49 over the
Yadkin River (Tuckertown Reservoir) in Davidson, Rowan and Stanly
Counties with the same span arrangement on the existing alignment.
This action will result in 18 feet of permanent impacts to the Yadkin
River from bank stabilization and 0.05 ac of temporary impacts from
causeways for bridge construction/rehabilitation. No stream mitigation
will be required for this project.
2/17/2021
2/22/2021
2/24/2021
B-4626 Final Permit Drawings.pdf 11.05MB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:

· This form completes the requirement of the Pre-Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
· I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre-filing
meeting request.
· I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.

Your project’s thirty-day clock started upon receipt of this application.  You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary.  You will receive notification when the thirty-day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
2/15/2021
(Version 2.07; Released October 2016)
38443.1.1 TIP No.:B-4626 County(ies):Stanly, Rowan, and Davidson Page 1 of 3
TIP Number:Date:
Phone:Phone:
Email:Email:
County(ies):
CAMA County?
No
Design/Future:Year:2040 Existing:Year:
Aquatic T&E Species?Comments:
Yes No
No
No
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
ac.
2 - 11' paved lanes with grass shoulders.
8100
[e-mail]
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer?Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?
NRTR Stream ID:
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Existing Site
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
ac.
Surface Water Body (1):
Water Supply IV (WS-IV)NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
N/ABuffer Rules in Effect:
6800
2 - 12' asphalt paved lanes with 8' paved shoulders outside and 6' paved shoulders
inside.
Begin and End Bridge: 2 - 12' asphalt paved lanes with 8' paved shoulders and 12' grass
shoulders outside and 6' paved shoulders inside.
Waterbody Information
2020
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
38443.1.1
Impairments:
Other Stream Classification:
Primary Classification:
Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)
Class B
TIP project B-4626 involves replacement of Bridge 790003 and applying a deck preservation treatment to Bridge 790008 over Yadkin River (Tuckertwon Reservior) and Winston-
Salem southbound railroad and 1.136 miles of roadway improvement in Stanly, Rowan and Davidson Counties. This project consists replacing bridge 790003 superstructure
only. The existing and proposed bridge consists of 4 @ 67'- 6", and 1 @ 67'-3 1/4", and 1 @ 141'-0 3/4", 1 @ 160 '- 0'', 1 @ 141' - 0 3/4'', 1 @ 67' - 3 1/4'', 2 @ 67'-6'', and 1 @
62' -9 1/4'' and 1 @ 57'-6''. Continuous with composite deck on steel beams.
The proposed bridge (EBL) 790003 does not contain deck drains. All storm water from the bridge and approaches will be collected by a storm drainage system on the west side
of the bridge and discharged into a bio-swale in the median. There is one roadside ditch on this project and is located from Sta. 30+50 to 31+00 RT.
The existing bridge (WBL)790008 does not contain deck drains. All storm water from the existing bridge and approaches will continue to be collected by a storm drainage
system on the west side of the bridge and discharge to the existing Hazardous Spill Basin (HSB). The outfall structure of the HSB will be retrofitted to include a new orifice plat
and trash rack to allow the HSB to provide stormwater detention.
343 E. Six Forks Road
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
Project Type:
1000 Birch Ridge Dr.Address:
General Project Information
B-4626
WBS Element:
Bridge ReplacementWBS Element:
HNTB North Carolina, P.C./ Joe Olson, P.E.NCDOT Contact:
919-707-6559
Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contractor / Designer:
919-424-0480
[e-mail]
Address:
Rowan
No
9/25/2019
StanlyRichfield
Jacquelyn Bowles, P.E.
Raleigh , NC 27610
River Basin(s): No
City/Town:
7.1
Typical Cross Section Description:
Davidson
Surrounding Land Use:
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
No
Rural and Agriculture
Yadkin River 12-(124.5)
6.8
1.14
Project Description
Proposed Project
Yadkin-Pee Dee
Supplemental Classification:
Wetlands within Project Limits?
(Version 2.07; Released October 2016)
38443.1.1 TIP No.:B-4626 County(ies):Stanly, Rowan, and Davidson Page 2 of 3
Sheet
No.
Station & Coordinates
(Road and Non Road
Projects)
Surface
Water
Body
Base
Width
(ft)
Front
Slope
(H:1)
Back
Slope
(H:1)
Drainage
Area
(ac)
Recommended
Treatm't Length
(ft)
Actual
Length
(ft)
Longitudinal
Slope
(%)
Q2
(cfs)
V2
(fps)
Q10
(cfs)
V10
(fps)
Rock
Checks
Used
BMP
Associated w/
Buffer Rules?
-EBL- Sta. 30+50 RT
35.504051 / -80.186311
-EBL- Sta. 31+00 RT
35.504115 / -80.186156
WBS Element:
0.2
5 No50
0.30%
0.8 0.70.24.0
84
22
5 0.3 0.40.0 6.0 4.0
0.0 6.0 0.60.30% 0.6
No0.50.1 12
Swales
(1)Yadkin
River
(1)Yadkin
River
No
No
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
Additional Comments
(Version 2.07; Released October 2016)
38443.1.1 TIP No.:B-4626 County(ies):Stanly, Rowan, and Davidson Page 3 of 3
Sheet No.
Surface
Water Body
Drainage Area
(ac)
New Built-Upon
Area
(ac)
Volume Treated
(ac-ft)
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
Other Best Management Practices
Additional Comments
0.439
0.36535.505251,-80.185543
The outfall structure of the existing hazardous spill basin will be retrofitted to include a new orifice plat and trash rack to allow the hazardous spill basin to provide stormwater detention.
NoHazardous Spill Basin 0.051.0
5 1.6 0.3Bioretention Swale 18.48
N/A
WBS Element:
Precipitation Depth
Treated over NBUA
(in)
BMP Associated
w/ Buffer Rules?
No
BMP Type
Station & Coordinates
(Road and Non Road Projects)
-EBL- Sta. 31+00 Median
35.504319 / -80.186325
-WBL Sta. 34+70 LT
(1)Yadkin River
(1)Yadkin River
�
�
�
�
C '-'
:r:
�
V)
f-' :r: V) 0... '
0...
�
'
OUJ NN ouo N'-' '-' '--'m ro aJf-N----:z � �I ,J,. ENDP,-OJECTBEGIN PROJECT VICINITY MAP
BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4626
-EBL-POC STA. 10+31.69
-----r-------
BOAT R;,,;-�::�---,_,-,_,, ,...,_.,.---"!._-�
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA
ADT 2020 = 6,800
ADT 2040 = 8,100
K 9 %
D 55 %
T 7 % *
V 60 MPH
*TTST = 5% DUAL 2%
FUNC CLASS =
RURAL ARTERIAL
STATEWIDE TIER
STATlE OlF NORTH CAROlLINA
DIVISION OJF HIGHWAYS
STANLY, ROWAN, AND. DAVIDSON COUNTIES
STATE PROIECT REFERENCE NO.
N.C.B-4626
38443.1.FS2 BRNHP-0049 33
38443.2.3 BRNHP-0049 33
38443.3.3 BRNHP-0049 33
SHEET TOTAL
NO. SHEETS
1
PE
RW/lJTIL CONST LOCATION: REPLACE BRIDGE 790003.AND APPLY DECK PRESERVATION TREATMENT TO BRIDGE 790008 OVER YADKIN RIVER AND WINSTON-SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILROAD. TYPE OF WORK: GRADING,DRAINAGE,PAVING,AND STRUCTURES PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 9
j
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
SITE 1
BEGIN BRIDGE
-EBL-POT STA. 35 + 12.11
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH OF ROADWAY T.I.P PROJECT B-4626
LENGTH OF STRUCTURE T.I.P PROJECT B-4626
TOTAL LENGTH OF T.I.P. PROJECT B-4626
LENGTH BASED ON -EBL-CE N TERLINE
0.927 MILES
0.209 MILES
1.136 MILES
END TIP PROJECT B-4626 -EBL-POC STA. 70+31.93
7
-EBL-
END CONSTRUCTION
-Y2-POT STA. 12+50.00
PERMIT DRAWINGS ARE BASED ON THE 100% ROADWAY PLAN AND PGD FILE FOR TH E TEMPORARY WORK PAD. PERMIT PLANS MAY NE ED TO BE REVISED IF CHANGES OCCUR TO TH E WORK PAD LOCATION AN D ACCESS ROUTE.
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: MNTB HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P.C. 343 E. Six Forks Road, Suite 200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 NC License No: C-1554
FOR DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 1---------�--------------1 2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
ROY H. TELLIER, PE
RIGHT OF WAY DATE: PROJECT ENGINEER
FEBRUARY 22, 2019
ANDREW HALL, PE
LETTING DATE: PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
JUNE 16, 2020 JACQUELYN BOWLES, PE
NCDOT CONTACT
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
[ m �
Q .., •"rJ I
(J)
D.. i a: o.., D >­I,
U) O'N oui N'< '-'
583 582 581 580 579
BIOSWALE PROFILE -STA. 31 + 00 to STA. 34 + 00 MEDIAN
- - - - -- - - - -z□' - -90' -,- -
- - -,- -"j - - - - - --,- -"j - - -"j - - - - - --,- -
-- - ,- 90' - - - -
' ' FALSE SUMP ITYP) SEE , DETAIL
"j - - - -- - - -"j - - - - - --,- -"j - - - - - --,- -
-- -ff5r
---: itXISTING GRO�ND : :-------:-------:---�-��:�--=----� --------·��-=--=----:-��� ----'_ ----
- - _, _ _,....-..-::--::-:-"_�--_,,,, --
- - -,- -"j - - -
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 9
, EXISTING 3GI ' --' CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
__ _,.. I I 15' RCP RIM 575.31 578 __ IN_V_ OUT _ S70._45 _ 577 ' DI RIM 575.31 - - -10v-our sn3) ---576 ----=--�-----575 57,q 573 572 571 570 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -15'1 RCP
' _ □-_-,:!_
11 11
11 11
11 11
11 11
, II 11
-11 -I-I- -
11 11
II 11
11 11
II 11
,_ IJ -1-11 11
11 11
1 I: {I: I ,-:�: � :� - - -
111 111
111 111
111 111
- -PROPQS-ED:-GRAD-E-
.-_,-: -----------
,.-, ._.,: ,_, _ .. '_' .. :: ":,,::,: -:·,:,:",,: ',, '::, ... ,, INV 572.72 - -TRA�SlTlOWFROM -PERFORATED' TO - - -NQN-PERFORAT�D 6' PIPE '
I I] l[I ,-:�:�:t - - -- -toMPA-cTEo-8A-cKF-1Li - - - - -' :�•1 tc': ' " : : _ 1 __ t ___ , ______ 6_ ,�QN_-�E _R�O_Rfi_:E_D _ PJP _E _ l!)'.P!
' I I ' � ' ' , L __ ! , INV 5 1,2.54 , ,
---�------
0.931/.
EXPANDED
-------�­.,,,,.._----
MEDIA
WASHED STONE 5" PERFORA TEEl PIPE W/ FILTER SOCK ITYP)
2' ITYF\) INV 578.00 CLEAN OUT I' ITYP.I
INV 574.95 ' ' INV ,575.06 TRANSITION - - -NQNrl"E-Rl'O-RA lTD-T-O­PERFORATED 6" PIPE FROM ,
INV' 571.21 ' 'INV 570.46 ' ' ' 569 �-�---�---�----�---�---�---�----�---�---�----�---�---�---�----�---�---�----�---�---�-� 30+50 31+00
DETAIL A
TYPICAL BIOSWALE CROSS-SECTION ( Not to Scale)
LEXISTING GRADE r7 ----------1 ��-+--------
EXPANDED SLATE FILTRATION MEDIA 3:1 SLOPE OR FLATTER
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC WRAP AROUND STONE
NOTES:
12" OF No. 57 WASHED STONE
2' (TYP.)
l .PERFORATED, NON-PERFORATED, AND CLEANOUT PIPE MATE RIAL SHALL MEET THE AASHTO SPECIFICATIONS FO R EITHE R HOPE (SECT. 1032-7 MSHTO M294 FOR TYPE S OR FOR TYPE D - SECT. 1044-7 AASHTO M252) OR PVC (SECT. 1032-8 MSHTO M304, SECT. 1044-6, ASTM D1785). 2.PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN PIPES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 4 ROWS OF PERFORATIONS AT :Ml-IN DIAMETER PLACED 6-INCHES ON CENTER WITHIN EACH ROW. WRAP WITH FILTER SOCK. 3.PROVIDE WATER TIGHT CONNECTIONS USING WATERSTOP OR COMPRESSION GASKET APPROVED BY ENGINEER ON ALL STRUCTURE PENETRATIONS.
32+00 33+00
DETAIL B
FALSE SUMP LONGITUDINAL SECTION (Not to Scale)
�LEVEL
NOTES: 1. TOP ELEVATION OF BERM SHALL EXTEND ACROSS SWAL&1lASIN SECTION UNTIL IT INTERSECTS WITH EXISTING GRADE.
BERMUDA SOD OVER 3-D GEOTEXTILE PERMANENT SOIL REINFORCEMENT MAT
2.BERM SHALL BE COVERED WITH 3-D GEOTEXTILE PERMANENT SOIL
REINFORCEMENT MAT (PSRM) AND BERMUDA SOD. PSRM & BERMUDA SOD SHALL EXTEND 2 FEET BEYOND TOE OF SLOPE. 3.3-D GEOTEXTILE PERMANENT SOIL RE INFORCEMENT MAT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS }�viii�fi.i�AD��1ll�'ffH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, SPECIAL �c�o1f�JEx,.wfH�����T1�mLm��R1-tt�N1�I titl��t6'vED BY NCDOT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION NOTE:
3Ll+OO 3Ll+50
DETAIL C
RECESSED CLEANOUT W/CONCRETE COLLAR (Not to Scale)
NOTES: 1. CLEANOUT CAP SHALL BE RECESSED l" MIN. BE LOW GROUND, REMOVABLE, WATER TIGHT, AND CLOSED UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS. 2. CONCRETE SHALL BE 3,000 PSI. 3. THIS CONCRETE COLLAR DETAIL SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL CLEANOUTS ON PROJECT. 4. USE 45 DEG ELBOWS A T ALL BENDS IN PIPE CLEANOUTS.
DETAIL D
PERFORATED PIPE END CLEANOUT
PROPOSED
LENGTH BASED ON OF UNDERDRAIN.
(Not to Scale)
DIR. .. 1. ONLY UNDERDRAIN PIPE SHOULD BE PERFORATED. 6" PERFORATED PIPE __j W/FILTER SOCK
n=1o----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------�
[ '" "
I (J) D._
a: o._, D >­I, U)
o.,_ N, 'm �---:
DETAIL 01 SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH { Not to Scale)
Cut Slope Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
FROM -EBL-STA. 30+50 TO STA. 31+00 RT.
DETAIL 02 TOE PROTECTION "-"1 (Notto Scola)
o,.P/01Je,..
d-0.33 Ft.
Type of Liner = Class. B Rip-Rap
FROM -EBL-STA. 29+50 TO STA. 30+50 RT .
0
ALCOA POWER GENERATING INC. OB 734 PG 77 OB 876 PG 128
WETLAND & STREAM IMPACTS
/ /
� �--�TING R/1'1 /-�
/ g
-WBt� Sta. 26+80:10
-WBL -PCC Sta. 30+!6J7
--------------0 0
-EB . PCC Sta. 29+56.55 0
0
0
SPEC LAT. 'V' DITCH SEE DETAIL 01
CUBE YADKIN GENERATION LLS OB 1284 PG 34 7
DETAIL D3 SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH (Notto Scale)
�:::,. W Min.D- 1 Ft.
B= -4 Ft.
FROM STA. 31+00 TO STA. 33+50 MEDIAN
DETAIL 04 SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH (Notto $<;<1111)
�:::,. W Min.D= 1 Ft.
B- 2 to -4 Ft.
FROM STA. 33 + 50 TO STA. 3-4 + 00 MEDIAN
DETAIL 05
LAKE BANK STABILIZATION
2,1�D La:;' �ox.�_/�
Type of Liner = COIR FIBER MAT (CFM) D=Varies (To Top of Bank)
FOR -EBL-PROFILE, SEE SHEET 9
FOR -WBL-PROFILE, SEE SHEET 12
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEET S-1 THRU S-
-3
8:1 TAPER �I 30• I
ln�
-£BL -PT Sta. 32+33J4
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. MNTB HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P.C.
�:re�gh7i�o���k �a�gf1naS���6s 2 oo l-____ B---_4_6�2_6'--___ ...._ __ 5'----�
NC Li Ce n Se NO : C - 1 5 5 4 RW SHEET NO.
LEGEND
� DENOTES TEMPORARY � IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
RETAIN OUTLET STRUCTURE. REMOVE EXISTING ORIFICE PLATE AND TRASH RACK. INSTALL 2" ORIFICE PLATE WITH TRASH RACK AT ELEV. 574.0
CD I.LI I "'
I -' CD �
ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 9
SITE 1
�
lvADKJN RJVERI
TEMP. IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
SKETCH OF BRIDGE IN RELATIONSHIP TO PAVEMENT
-£BL-
BEGIN SBG + 69 .65 -EBL-17.67' RT
NOT TO SCALE
BEGIN APPROICH SUB
-£BL -Sta.POT 34+88JI
....
BEGIN BRIDGE
-£BL -Sta.POT 35+12JI
6= 9(10'0'
0
.,_, _____________________________________________________________ .... ________________________________________________________ _,
[ '" "
I (J) (l_
a: (l_' D >­I, U)
o.,_ N, 'm �---:
DETAIL 01
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH { Not to Scale)
Cut Slope
Min. D= 1.0 Ft.
FROM -EBL-STA. 30+50 TO STA. 31+00 RT.
DETAIL 02 TOE PROTECTION "-"1 (Notto Scola)
o,.P/01Je,..
d-0.33 Ft.
Type of Liner = Class. B Rip-Rap
FROM -EBL-STA. 29+50 TO STA. 30+50 RT .
0 CUBE YADKIN GENERATION LLS DB 1284 PC 34 7
DETAIL D3
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH (Notto Scale)
�:::,. W Min.D-1 Ft.
B= -4 Ft.
FROM STA. 31+00 TO STA. 33+50 MEDIAN
DETAIL 04
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH (Notto $<;<1111)
�:::,. W Min.D= 1 Ft. B- 2 to -4 Ft.
FROM STA. 33 + 50 TO STA. 3-4 + 00 MEDIAN
DETAIL 05 (Notto Scul8)
LAKE BANK STABILIZATION
2,1�D La:;' �ox.�_/�
Type of Liner = COIR FIBER MAT (CFM)
D=Varies (To Top of Bank)
FOR -EBL-PROFILE, SEE SHEET 9
FOR -WBL-PROFILE, SEE SHEET 12
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEET S-1 THRU S-
-3
8:1 TAPER �I 30• I
ln�
-£BL -PT Sta. 32+33J4
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 4 OF 9
SITE 1 I YADKIN RIVER I
\_TEMP. IMPACTS INSURFACE WATER
SKETCH OF BRIDGE IN RELATIONSHIP TO PAVEMENT
-£BL-
BEGIN SBG + 69 .65 -EBL-17.67' RT
NOT TO SCALE
BEGIN APPROICH SUB
-£BL -Sta.POT 34+88JI
....
BEGIN BRIDGE
-£BL -Sta.POT 35+12JI
6= 9(10'0'
0
.,_, _____________________________________________________________ .... ________________________________________________________ _,
g:r-----------------------------..,...---------.....,...� .................... ..----;:: MNTB HNTB NORTH CAROLINA, P.C. PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
:::::'. 343 E. Six Forks Road, Suite 200 B--4626 6
aJ WETLAND & STREAM IMPACTS ��l W�ns�o ��� g�����na 27609 1--R-
O
-AD_
W
_A;;;.
Y
_�.;.
E
;;.;Sl""
G
:""H-EET_N_Q ___ L..
HY
_D_RA_U_L::.IC_S __ ..
[ 0,
I
(J)
D._
a:
o._,
D >­I,
U) O'N
ouiN'<,,
CUBE YADKIN GENERATION LLS
g �------- ---------��------------
+ I() w --ol­Z -w ::i •·•w
I <(I u 1-V'> I-V'>w
� ...!i � --i -�---7
__ l
-WBL------:
CONC
NC 49 BRIDGE I N0.3 CONC
-WBL -POT Sta. 45+17.53 =
-Y/-POC 20+21.25
N 49" 55' 46.5" E
c -I SUSPENDED FROM BRIDGE IAT& Tl BANK STABILIZATION
TEMPORARY IMPACTS TO
SURFACE WATER CUBE YADKIN GENERATION LLS
SKETCH OF BRIDGE IN RELATIONSHIP TO PAVEMENT
-£BL -PUT Sta. 45+22.65
-YI- POC 20+94JI 6, = !If 08' 52'
N 4g 54' 2413" E
TYPE B-77
END BRIDGE
Sta. POT 46 +l4JJ4
NOT TO SCALE
-EBL-
-£BL -PC Sta. 46+43.41
END APPROACH SLAB
-EBL -Sta.POT 46+3791
CAT-1
8:1 TAPER
30'
INC.
-£BL -PCC Sta. 49+05.31
/.
ENGINEER ENGINEER
PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 5 OF 9
LEGEND
� DENOTES TEMPORARY � IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER 0
ALCOA POWER GENERA TING INC.
-WBL-PC Sta. 47+32.29
--�□s
'-re_ --� --------__::::.-----· ----� ---�f:XISTfN(;"i;---_ _ _ _ � v H/tv---�
-EBL-PC Sta. 46+43.EI
ALCOA POWER GENERA TING INC.
00 ILi+
Z O 1' :::; I.O ,_ :z:: ILi
��� -<( V) V) �.Ju., CD ILiILi V) I
c-al ,---: �=--"-----------------------......l....--�....l:....L...i.�------------------__J
a-.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------r--------------------------il-i_-_-_-_':::,_.:Co�Jr,EC�T�-•�E;,_,;::.�,_N�
:_
cC:,rEN_oo_·. :::r:::Js_H::'
:_
,;;,J,JNEor.:::1 g: 1///
1
:1/)/1:��XI;/�� If �NTB ���8 E�0 �I� �����I ��ad�-��ite 20 0 B---4626 6 � }//////////////����, ., ��l[i��rJs�o��� g����!na 27609 1---------SH_E_ET
_N_0_.--------"1
aJ •i///,'fj/,'j,\'ii//1�/?WETLAND & STREAM IMPACTS ROADWAY DESIGN : //////f/// /] f/,j// ENGINEER 11/!211 111 1 1 1/llf/
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
[ 0, " ui I (J) o._, :,: a:
o._, D >­I,
U) O'N oui N'<,,
1,€/ 7/!:/ ///,//?j�'
4li l4J1 l111;!�(@ I I 11 It tit J11f'r
:, I
1, ///,�1l;�,, I I I l�l///t�j�?,'
t lf//ltf{I/ I
'!///,'//.'/,�,
/G//,'//
I /12/// J ,?t , ,, 1,�,
�/@I
�(
CUBE YADKIN GENERATION LLS
I
I
� I
I
�
g ------------------------------------------+ I() w '° 1-
------
�Mt:::: ....I I <(I u 1-V'> I-V'>w � ...!i � --i -�---7
0 0 1() w +1-z '°w -Mw ....I I
a:I I .,_ � __ l
-WBL------: I
NC 49 BRIDGE I N0.3 CONC
--------------------·
N 49' 55' 46.5" E
0 ;:S V'>
I-
�
V'>w
c -I SUSPENDED FROM BRIDGE BANK STABILIZATION----,c:: __________ I¼' ,w ....I V'> a:i w I
TEMPORARY IMPACTS TO
SURFACE WATER
-------------------------------:,,,fe,'---
SKETCH
-EBL -PUT Sta. 45+22.65
-YI-POC 20+94JI 6, = !If 08' 52'
N 4g 54' 2413" E
END BRIDGE
Sta. POT 46 +/4JJ4
0 CUBE YADKIN GENERATION LLS
I SITE 1 I
!YADKIN RIVERI
OF BRIDGE IN RELATIONSHIP TO PAVEMENT
NOT TO SCALE
-EBL-
� CAT-1 "
-EBL -PC Sta. 46+43.41
END APPROACH SLAB
-EBL -Sta.POT 46+3791
8:1 TAPER
30'
INC.
-EBL -PCC Sta. 49+05.JI
' ' \
,i ''
� ' I i � ,
' '
PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 6 OF 9
0 0 ILi+ Z O 1'
:::; I.O ,_ :z:: ILi
���
"{ V) V) �.Ju., CD ILi
ILi V) I
r--0)
.... ', ·st ��:i\. _____________________________________________________ .,_ _____ """"a;.;.,:,...,;,,,,;,...,...,jli,,,;;_.,_�,:,,;;;;,.;,;.;...;.. ...... _ ..... ___________________________________________ _
+
590
580
570
560
550
540
530
520
510
+
(-)0.7112% 6(+)2.00001/.
PI = 32+10.00EL. = 578.31 vc = 450' GRADE DATA -EBL-
FILL FACE CvEND BENT 1
35+00
ST A. 35+12.11 -EBL -GRADE PT. EL. 584.35
BEGIN FRONT SLOPEST A. 35+01.63 -EBL -GRADE POINT EL. 584.14
PARTIAL REMOVALOF EXISTING STRUCTURE __ _,,.
HP 12x53 STEEL PILES-�
SPAN A
1'-7" BERM NORMAL TO CAP
1'-0" MIN. EARTH BERM NORMAL TO CAP
EXP.
FIX.
36+00
SPAN B
PARTIAL REMOVALOF EXISTING
FIX.
37+00
SPAN C
FIX.
CLASS IIRIPRAP STRUCTURE <TYP.l / r,
B EL. 574.81± 4 EL. 576.14±tj EL. 577 .50 ± .._ --,r EL. 561 ± l !u EXISTING i \"' "' : l COLUMN : : i ... i (TYP .) �:� ••• �i'! ........ :f-�: : •. ;: .......... _ II '■ ,■ ■1 --., I ••Ill I I I I I
......... I I I I I••• I
.......... : ... : I I
NORMAL TO CAP 't-+---. ... : :----: :
I I --r•,
: : --I I
y � 100 YR W.S.EL. 564. 7 ... , 11 I 1 11 I I ·••11111■ II 11 II II ......I I ■ I I I ■ I I••• I : :• •• •: : • •• •• ••
11/2= 1 SLOPE ------------....... l l r EL. 542 ± : i
�--· ■--� ----
,-t �-i ............. --�-,.
y
SPAN D
�APPROXIMATE WATERSURFACE ELEVATIONEL. 559.1 (12/13/93)
38+00
SPAN E
FIX.
tj EL. 578.79±
.... 11 I 1 II I I ■r•"II■ II ■1 II ■1 ....... I I ■ I I I ■ I r·· i . .. .. .. .. .. . • .. ,. . J ••
y � NORMAL W.S.EL. 564.5
F .A. PROJECT NO.: BRN HP-0049(33)
�HYDRULIC DATA OBTAINED FROM ADJACENT BRIDGE(BRIDGE NO. 790008) PLANS DATED MARCH 1996.
<(
I
<(
wz H
_J
� HYDRAULIC DATA
DESIGN DISCHARGE = 129,271 CFS FREQUENCY OF DESIGN DISCHARGE -50 YEAR -DESIGN HIGH WATER ELEVATION -564.7 -DRAINAGE AREA -4,120 SQ. MI. -BASE DISCHARGE (0100) -150,816 CFS -BASE HIGH WATER ELEVATION = 564.7
� OVERTOPPING FLOOD DAT A
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE FREQUENCY OF OVERTOPPING FLOOD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
N/A )500 YR 581.4
END BENT 1 . . . . :r:uI­
<( ::;;;
W.P. 1
RIP RAP CLASS II 2'-0" THICK
FILL FACE Cv END BENT 1 STA. 35+12.11 -EBL-
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB ST A. 34+88.11 -EBL -
TO I-85
BEGIN FRONT SLOPE ST A. 35+01.63 -EBL -
DRAWN BY, ----�T�. H=A�RT=LE=Y ____ DATE:
CHECKED BY : R.FISHER DATE :
DESIGN ENGINEER OF RECORD: DATE :
1'-7" BERM 1 • NORMAL TO CAP
1'-0" MIN. EARTH BERM NORMAL TO CAP EL. 575.59 (LEVEL)
2/19
2/19
W.P. 2 ST A. 35+ 79.61 -EBL -
IIII I
IIIIIIII
67'-6"
BENT 1 : : --, ••• .i i.....-----:. ............. .: ------:--t--------------------=-+--: : : : ----
BENT 2
: : I I --r••••• ••••• , : : ---�-----------------� : :
BENT 3
i----- -----i . . ·-----------------·
BENT 4
SECTION ALONG l -EBL-(SECTIONS AT BENTS AND END BENTS ARE AT RIGHT ANGLES)
W.P. 3 STA. 36+47.11 -EBL-
90 ° -00'-00" (TYP .l
67'-6"
' .... t ....• • : �-: "" i . ----1" ----
W.P. 4 ST A. 37+14.61 -EBL-
r··----I ------.,. .. I I I I I I L I : ... =r- -· /"""""" ... ......EXISTING__/ FOOTING (TYP.)
67'-6"
UNIT 1 = 337'-3 1/4"
TOT AL BRIDGE LENGTH = 1101'-11 1/4" (FILL FACE TO FILL FACE)
PARTIAL PLAN (PILES NOT SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW)
W.P. 5 STA. 37+82.11 -EBL-
Clz H I­
V) �
0 w
V) 0
- Ha_'. --­X >-W 1-
Q_ � 0 .
0::: Q_
Q_ >-
67'-6"
-a0
..... 1 r-------r ------1r-: �-"T -: : N • • + • •-�--:------,�t .• • . . . ' . ·------ --------• I : I • 3'-0"(TYP.l
• 0
I -lD
I")
�!Rl�IL□ �□INI/A\ OOW �IL/A\INI �
1-
@© INl©'lf' IIJI�� IF©!Rl ©©INl�'lFIRlllJl©'lF□©INI
PLANS PREPARED BY, One Glenwood Avenue
i Suite 900 Gannett Flem inn Raleigh. NC 27603
!::I [phone] Excellence Delivered As Promised NC Lie. No. F-0270
PROJECT NO. B-4626
STANLY 2 ROWAN
AND DAVIDSON COUNTIES
STATION: 45+22.65 -EBL -20+94.11 -Yl -REHABILITATION OF BRIDGE #790003 SHEET 1 OF 5 MILEPOST W 44.80
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RALEIGH PRELIMINARY
GENERAL DRAWING FOR BRIDGE OVER YADKIN RIVER AND WINSTON-SALEM SOUTHBOUND RR ON NC 8/49 BETWEEN SR 1578 AND SR 2543
REVISIONS SHEET NO.
�----------Jr;:;;NO;r--;;::-7�;;:-:;;::--r::;;�;::-,----;:::-:;:;:---. S-1 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED --
il
�·t--B_Y,_+--_DA_TE_, ---f�NOc+-_BY_, ---+-□-AT_E_, -----11------1 <'o> TOTAL FINAL UNLESS ALL <9l SHEETS SIGNATURES COMPLETED � � 5
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 7 OF 9
00 'n 0 0 0 a,I'-'00 a +�V) 'l!)N l!) ""(I) 'LO 0 0 ' 0"" / Ql+­(J) © 0 / vlQl.?: .c 0 L <{ / rr, C03 0Cl:'. / z a 0/,-0:, L +­V) / Ql E ci ·o(/)
D / l!) N l!) "" ' (I)
590
560
550
540
530
520
510
(-)0.71121/.�::-:_
PI = 32+10.00 EL. = 578.31 vc = 450'
GRADE DATA -EBL-
FILL FACE (sJ END BENT 1
35➔00
STA. 35+12.11 -EBL -GRADE PT. EL. 584.35
W.P. 1
RIP RAP CLASS II 12'-0" THICK)
SPAN A
l'-7"BERM
l'-0" MIN. EARTH BERM
l'-7" BERM 1 • l'-0" MI�.
36+00
SPAN B
*APPROXIMATE ELEVATION OF EXISTING BENT CAP DEMOLITION
i37+00
SPAN C
FIX FIX
BENT 2
BENT 3
SECTION ALONG -EBL-0 STA. 35+12.ll -EBL-0 EARTH BERM EL. 57 4.45 ILEVEU !SECTIONS AT BENTS AND END BENTS ARE AT RIGHT ANGLES)
.Y. -(1J D0 +-� C a, Ql n o.� C:l!) 0/ 3 (/) 0+-Cl:'.0
<I) 0L ()_ / (/) +-� +­E ci 6 l/) + g �;::: 0 0 4-­, 0, 3 0. L t�
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB STA. 34+88.11 -EBL-
TO I -85
BEGIN FRONT SLOPE ST A. 35+01.32 -EBL -
W.P. 2 W,P. 3 ST A. 35+ 79.61 -EBL -STA. 36+47.11 -EBL-
90 °-00'-00" ITYP.l
67'-5" !SPAN A) 67'-6" (SPAN Bl
W.P. 4 STA. 37+14.61 -EBLr
i
mscrn,Jif J_i FOOTING ITYP.l 67'-6" !SPAN Cl
C 04-- ' �� UNIT 1 = 337'-4" IW.P. 1 TO .W.P. 6, 5-SPAN CONTINUOUS UNIT) E o. 0 0 TOTAL BRIDGE LENGTH = ll01'-ll1/4''1FILL FACE TO FILL FACE) >, ::fE � ()_ +­c""Ql N i�o. n ' NOTES: t GENERAL DRAWING INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM THEc -FIELD AND LOCATION SURVEYS, THE ORIGINAL PLANS
PARTIAL PLAN !PILES NOT SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW)
38+00
SPAN D SPAN E
FIX
BENT 4
fS .:,,. !;
� 25 ;:
W.P. 5 STA. 37+82.ll -EBL-7
57'-6" !SPAN D) 67'-4" !SPAN El
PLANS PREPARED BY: One Glenwood Avenue
<{'<{
ff HYDRULIC DAT A OBTAINED FROM ADJACENT BRIDGE (BRIDGE NO. 790008) PLANS DAT[D MAR('.;H 1996.
� HYDRAULIC DAT A
DESIGN DISCHARGE FREQUENCY OF DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN HIGH WATER ELEVATlON DRAINAGE ARE.A BASE DISCHARGE (0100) BASE HIGH WATER ELEVATION
129,271 CFS 50 YEAR 564.7 4,120 SO. MI. 150,816 CFS 554.7
� OVERTOPPING FLOOD DAT A
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE FREQUENCY OF OVERTOPPING FLOOD OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
SCOPE OF WORf<
N/A )500 YR 581.4
-REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE DECK AND STEEL SUPERSTRUCTURE. -REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE END BENT CAPS AND CUT STEEL PILES ONE FOOT BELOW GROUNDLINE. -REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE BENT CAPS & PORTIONS OF COLUMNS. -CONSTRUCT END BENTS ANC BENT CAPS. -PLACE STEEL BEAM AND PLATE GIRDERS ON ELASTOMERIC BEARINGS. -PLACE CONCRETE DECK AND BARRIER RAILS, AND INSTALL STRIP SEALJOINTS. -PLACE APPROACH SLABS. -PLACE RIP RAP AT END BENTS. -REMOVE UNSOUND CONCRETE AND PROPERLY PREPARE EXISTING BENT COLUMNS FOR SHOTCRETE REPAIRS AND EPOXY RESIN INJECTION.
w I HEREBY CERTIFY THESE PLANSARE THE AS-BUILT PLANS / z H _j I u f-<{ ::fE
PROJECT NO. B-4626
STANLY. ROWAN
AND DAVIDSON COUNTY
STATION: 45+22.65 -EBL-MILE POST�44.80 SHEET 1 OF 8
WIDENING AND REHABILITATIONOF BRIDGE NO. 790003
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RALEIGH
GENERAL DRAWING FOR BRIDGE OVER YADKIN RIVER AND WINSTON-SALEM SOUTHBOUND RR ON NC 8/49 BETWEEN SR 1578 AND SR 2543
REVISIONS SHEET NO . b, 81-----------------------, AND THE ROUTINE INSPECTION REPORT DATED 12/22/2016. su11,900 / N DR AWN BY : ____ T�-�HA=R�T-LE-Y-/J�. �MY-A�--DATE : 06/2020 � 6ann ... tt c, ... m,·nin DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED <: � CHECKED BY : J, YANNACCONE DATE: 05/2021 BRIDGE ORIENTATION CONFORMS TO THE EXISTING PLANS � C' rls=. !:I 7;_';/:;0��6��603 FINAL UNLESS ALL NO.
ii BY: DATE: NO BY: DATE: SH
3l TOTAL SHEETS l��D�E�SI�G�N�E�N�GI�N�EE�R�O�F�R�E�CO�R�D�:=;;;;;:R.�N�E�LS�O�N=�D�A�TE;..;_:�0�5/�2�0�21;;.i.. ___ A_N_D_T _H _E _F_I_E _L _D _A_N_D_L _o_cA_T_I_D_N _S _uR_V_E_Y_S _. __________________________________ &_c_ell _en_c_eo_e_li_�_�_d_A_sP_,_om_u_·e_d_N _c,_;c_N_�_H_,,_•_ ..... ...;.S.IG�N�A.T.U.R.ES�C.O•M•P•L.ET.E�D-11.la:.1....-...J.---...l,;li..,_ __ 1-__ ..11,,_:.;.,;;:___,,1 � � 125
PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 7 OF 9 Revised 11/1/2022
POINT 2
POINT 3 POINT 5
POINT 6
POINT 8
POINT 1 POINT 4
SHEET 3 OF 5
GENERAL DRAWING
BETWEEN SR 1578 AND SR 2543
SOUTHBOUND RR ON NC 8/49
RIVER AND WINSTON-SALEM
FOR BRIDGE OVER YADKIN
T. HARTLEY S-3
BENT 9
BENT 10
BENT 11 BENT 12 END BENT 2
FIX.FIX.FIX.EXP.
(+)3.6446%
W.P. 13
W.P. 11W.P. 10
(+)2.0000%
111°-05'-00"
END APPROACH SLAB
57'-6"
GRADE DATA -EBL-
STA. 43+58.77 -EBL-STA. 44+26.27 -EBL-
STA. 46+37.97 -EBL-
STA. 45+22.65 -EBL- P.O.T. =
STA. 20+94.11 -Y1- P.O.C.
7'-0" MIN. BERM
10'-
0"
M
I
N.
B
E
R
M
ADJACENT BRIDGE
PROTECTION OF
CONNECT TO SLOPE
SPAN MSPAN LSPAN KSPAN JSPAN I
FILL FACE @
GRADE PT. EL. 606.39
STA. 46+14.04 -EBL-
END BENT 2
(
LE
V
EL
)
B
E
R
M
EL.
599 .
44
W.P. 14
STA. 46+14.04 -EBL-
END BENT 2
FILL FACE @
111°-05'-00"
CAP
NORMAL TO
SLOPE 1•:1 (MAX)
EL. 554|
EL. 575|
28'-10•"33'-10ƒ"
SLOPE PROTECTION
EXISTING CONCRETE
23'-8" MIN.
VERT. CL.
44+00 45+00 46+00
EL. 536|
W.P. 12
STA. 44+93.77 -EBL-
4
8
'-
6
"
(TYP.)
COLUMN
EXISTING
FIX.
1
'
-
0
"
62'-9‚"
YA
D
K
I
N
R
I
V
E
R
43+00
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

B
-
B SECTION ALONG { -EBL-
(SECTIONS AT BENTS AND END BENTS ARE AT RIGHT ANGLES)
(PILES NOT SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW)(PILES NOT SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW)(PILES NOT SHOWN IN PLAN VIEW)
PARTIAL PLAN
TO I-74
GENERAL DRAWING
BETWEEN SR 1578 AND SR 2543
SOUTHBOUND RR ON NC 8/49
RIVER AND WINSTON-SALEM
FOR BRIDGE OVER YADKIN
580
590
600
610
620
570
560
550
540
530
520
510
630
640
TOTAL BRIDGE LENGTH = 1101'-11‚" (FILL FACE TO FILL FACE)
EL. 590.40|
STRUCTURE (TYP.)
OF EXISTING
PARTIAL REMOVAL
EL. 591.74|EL. 593.11|
EL. 564.5
** NORMAL W.S.
EL. 594.24|
67'-3‚"
BENT CAP
PROPOSED
HOR. CL. TO
29'-11"|
47+00
90°-00'-00" (TYP.)
PROPOSED BENT CAP
18'-5" | HOR. CL. TO
3
8
'-
4
"
2
9
'-
0
"
3
6
'
-
0
"
2
7
'
-
0
"
(
T
Y
P
.
)
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
(
T
Y
P
.
)
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
E
X
I
S
T
I
NG
T
O
MI
L
E
P
O
S
T
4
4
A
P
P
R
OX
I
MA
T
E
L
Y
4
2
2
4
F
T
.
3'-0"
(TYP.)
VC = 300'
EL. = 610.41
PI = 48+15.00
UNIT 2 = 442'-1•"UNIT 3 = 322'-6•"
-EBL-
STA. 45+56.54
24
"
RC
P
RAILROAD)
SALEM SB
{ -Y1- (WINSTON
ACCESS
TEMPORARY CONST.
PROTECTION
CONCRETE SLOPE
PAY ITEM)
RAP (ROADWAY
& CLASS I RIP
RCP EXTENTION
EL. 575|
| 6'-0"
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RAILROAD
67'-6"67'-6"
RIGHT-OF-WAY
RAILROAD
CURVE)
(TANGENT TO
111°-08'-52"
75'-
0
"
(SEE DETAILS)
CONST. ACCESS
TEMPORARY ACCESS (SEE DETAILS)
TEMPORARY CONST.
EL. 570|
75'-
0
"
DRAWN BY :
CHECKED BY :
DATE :
DATE :
DATE :DESIGN ENGINEER OF RECORD:
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED
FINAL UNLESS ALL
SIGNATURES COMPLETED
NO.NO.BY:BY:DATE:DATE:
REVISIONS SHEET NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS1
2
3
4
PROJECT NO.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RALEIGH
B-4626
STANLY, ROWAN
AND DAVIDSON
45+22.65 -EBL-STATION:
COUNTIES
R. FISHER
2/19
2/19
--
POINT 7
POINT 10
FOR CSX
EASEMENT
CONSTRUCTION
POINT 9
STATION OFFSETPOINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0.000'
0.000'
36.000'
36.000'
48.788'
48.788'
34.598'
34.598'
70.293'
70.293'
44+56.17
44+42.38
44+17.00
45+20.69
44+80.07
45+58.24
45+25.55
46+23.22
46+03.26
45+89.70
EASEMENT
CSX CONST.
ACCESS
TEMPORARY CONST.
EL. 566.5 |
TOP OF PAD
ROCK CAUSEWAY
TEMPORARY
EXCAVATION
AREA OF IMPACT 0.14 AC.
9.3 C.Y.
STONE QUANTITY 159 TONS
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 8 OF 9
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No.(From/To)Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 EBL Sta. 33+18 to Sta. 36+00 RT Temp. loading pad 0.54 189
1 EBL Sta. 43+95 to Sta. 44+35 RT Temp. loading pad / Class'I' Rip-Rap 0.02 35
1 EBL Sta. 44+37 to Sta. 44+51 Med Bank Stabilization <0.01
TOTALS*:0.57 224
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Revised 2016 09 09 SHEET 9 OF 9
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Stanly, Rowan, and Davidson Counties Bridge
B-4626
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1/29/2020
18
18

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER JAMES H. TROGDON, III
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

WEBSITE:NCDOT.GOV
Location:
CENTURY CENTER, BUILDING B
1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE
RALEIGH NC 27610

April 11, 2017

TO: Jason Dilday, Environmental Senior Specialist
Environmental Coordination & Permitting Group – Eastern Region, NES -
PDEA

CC: John Williams, Project Engineer
Project Development Group - Western Region, PDEA

FROM: Chris Manley, Environmental Program Consultant
Biological Surveys Group, NES - PDEA

SUBJECT: Streamline Section 7 Consultation for the Northern Long-Eared Bat associated
with the replacement of Bridge No. 3 over the Yadkin River and the Winston
Salem SB Railroad on NC 49 in Rowan County, TIP No. B-4626.

The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT, Division 9) proposes to replace
Bridge No. 3 over the Yadkin River and the Winston Salem SB Railroad NC 49 in Rowan
County, TIP No. B-4626. The existing bridge is a 13 span, reinforced concrete deck
superstructure with I-beams, steel girders, reinforced concrete caps, piles, abutments, and
concrete guardrails. The overall length of the structure is 1094 feet. Construction plans for
the new structure have not been finalized as of this writing.

The project to replace Bridge No. 3 has been reviewed for effects on the northern long-
eared bat (NLEB). As of May 4, 2015, NLEB is listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) as “Threatened” under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. As of April 11, 2017,
NLEB is listed by USFWS (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/nc_counties.html)
as “Probable/Potential” in Rowan County. USFWS also established a final rule under the
authority of section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act that provides measures for the
conservation of NLEB. The USFWS has tailored the final 4(d) rule to prohibit the take of
NLEB from certain activities within areas where they are in decline. This incidental take
protection applies only to known NLEB occupied maternity roost trees and known NLEB
hibernacula. Effective February 16, 2016, incidental take resulting from tree removal is
prohibited if it 1) occurs within a ¼ mile radius of known NLEB hibernacula; or 2) cuts or
destroys known occupied maternity roost trees, or any other trees within a 150 -foot radius
from the known maternity tree during the pup season (June 1-July 31).

According to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) Biotics Database, most
recently updated January 2017, the nearest NLEB hibernacula record is 99 miles
northwest of the project (EO ID 32171) and no known NLEB roost trees occur within
150 feet of the project area. EO 32171 represents Black Rock Cliffs cave site with
multiple observations from 1986 to 2011.

NCDOT has also reviewed the USFWS Asheville Field office website
(http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html) for consistency
with NHP records. This project is located entirely outside of the red highlighted areas (12-
digit HUC) that the USFWS Asheville Field Office has determined to be representative of an
area that may require consultation.

For the proposed action, NCDOT has committed to the conservation measures listed below:

1) No alterations of a known hibernacula entrance or interior environment if it impairs
an essential behavioral pattern, including sheltering northern long-eared bats
(January 1 through December 31);
2) No tree removal within a 0.25 mile radius of a known hibernacula (January 1
through December 31); and
3) No cutting or destroying a known, occupied maternity roost tree, or any other trees
within a 150-foot radius from the known, occupied maternity tree during the period
from June 1 through and including July 31.

NCDOT has determined that the proposed action does not require separate
consultation on the grounds that the proposed action is consistent with the final
Section 4(d) rule, codified at 50 C.F.R. § 17.40(o) and effective February 16, 2016. NCDOT
may presume its determination is informed by best available information and consider
Section 7 responsibilities fulfilled for NLEB.

If you need any additional information, please contact Chris Manley at 919-707-6135.

NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not valid
for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the Historic
Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: B-4626 County: Davidson, Rowan, Stanly
WBS No: 38443.1.FS2 Document: PCE or CE
F.A. No: BRNHP-0049(33) Funding: State Federal
Federal Permit Required? Yes No Permit Type: ?
Project Description: NCDOT intends to replace Bridge No. 3 on NC 49/NC 8 over the Yadkin River near
the intersection of the Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly County lines. The original request for cultural resources
review did not include preliminary design, but proposed a study area 1100 feet long and 300 feet wide. Based
on updated mapping, a revised corridor roughly 6000 feet (1828.8 meters) long was subsequently established
along with preliminary designs that reduce the project footprint to existing right-of-way (ROW) with the
exception of two areas along the south side of the project, close to the bridge footings where additional ROW
is anticipated. Additionally, a 25-foot easement for construction and utilities was added to that revised area of
potential effects (APE). Based on further planning, an additional area along the south side of NC 49 in Stanly
County (west of the Yadkin River) was added to the proposed APE to accommodate a proposed haul road
for launching a work barge. and for construction equipment to reach the water's edge during the bridge
replacement and construction along the bridge approaches. This revised APE is now estimated to encompass
27.5 acres (nearly 11.13 hectares).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
The initial review of the site maps and files archived at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology was
conducted on March 5, 2015. While no previously identified archaeological sites are recorded within the
proposed APE, some landforms within the project APE appear to retain potential for archaeological
resources. Additionally, several known sites are documented in similar settings, outside the current APE, but
in the general vicinity (i.e. 31Dv500, 31Dv501, 31Dv269, 31Dv490, 31Dv491, 31St97, 31St98). Soils
documented in the area are consistent with expectations for steeply sloped, well-drained, areas in the
Uwharries region. Some of these soils are not to dissimilar to those encountered in areas surrounding more
significant archaeological sites identified to the south (i.e. Doerschuk). It was noted that portions of the
proposed APE have clearly been modified by the construction of highway and bridge facilities, as well as
nearby parking areas.
An examination of the data presented on the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB
GIS Service (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) reveals that historic property locations within .5-mile of the
proposed project are the former location of the Stokes Ferry Bridge (RW0653) and the current Bridge No. 3
over the Yadkin River (RW2108). No previously documented cemeteries are located within the same .5-mile
radius.
An examination of soils in Davidson County presented on the National Resources Conservation Service Web
Soil Survey (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx) indicates the following soil types
are mapped within the proposed APE: Georgeville silt loam, 4 to 15 percent slopes, extremely boulder
(GmD); and Georgeville silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes, extremely boulder (GmF). For the portion of the
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of 7
Project Tracking No.:
15-02-0049
Project Tracking No.:
APE within Rowan County, the following soils are mapped: Badin channery silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes
(BaD); and Uwharrie loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes, very stony (UhE). For the portion of the proposed APE
that falls within Stanly County, the following soil types are mapped: Badin channery silt loam, 8 to 15 percent
slopes (BaD); Goldston very channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes (GoF). The most recent additions to
the proposed APE all fall within areas mapped as possessing GoF soils.
The first (preliminary) APE for the project included a 300-foot wide corridor and, as a result, an
archaeological reconnaissance to determine the scope for any further investigations seemed prudent.
Archaeological Survey Required form was submitted on March 27, 2015. In 2017, the APE was revised
(along with preliminary design) to reflect a much narrower project footprint that would largely remain within
existing ROW. It was determined, at that time, to conduct the archaeological reconnaissance on the portions
of the proposed project footprint that would extend outside the severely disturbed ROW.
An archaeological reconnaissance, consisting largely of windshield survey with visual inspection in the areas
added to accommodate a 25-foot easement for construction and utilities was conducted on March 10, 2017
by NCDOT archaeologists, Shane Petersen and Brian Overton. As expected, existing ROW areas are
dominated by steep slopes, cut banks, and terracing. Exposed soils appear to suggest moderate to severe
erosion in some areas. In other areas outside existing ROW, exposed and exfoliating bedrock is visible in
areas that are not severely sloped. None of the APE investigated in 2017 was considered to have a
reasonable potential for intact significant archaeological resources. On March 14, 2017, a No Archaeological
Survey Required form was produced based on these results.
On January 31, 2018, revised mapping was received based on information used to support NCDOT’s permit
applications (United States Army Corps of Engineers and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission permits)
for the project. This mapping was used to revise the APE to its current dimensions and was used to guide
further archaeological reconnaissance investigations along the south side of NC 40 in Stanly County. These
reconnaissance investigations were conducted by NCDOT archaeologists, Shane Petersen and Brian Overton
on April, 12, 2018. The archaeological reconnaissance was accomplished through the visual inspection
(including walkover examination) of the entire portion of APE added in the January 2017 mapping.
No further archaeological investigations are required for the project within the area established as the current
APE. Should the project expand outside the archaeological APE, as defined herein, further consultation will
be necessary.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
As noted on the soil mapping for Stanly County, the portion of expanded APE still falls within the area
mapped as Goldston very channery silt loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes. Nevertheless, topographic mapping of
the area suggested that portions of this additional APE might exhibit far less slope than suggested by the soil
mapping. While portions of the additional APE do exhibit little slope, the vast majority of the additional
APE is steeply sloped from the existing highway facility shoulders. Aerial photographs taken in 1026, in
advance of the creation of the Tuckertown Reservoir reveal that much of this area was cleared at one time
and may have been used for agricultural purposes. Nevertheless, the portion of APE that stretches between
the easement for NC 49 in Stanly County and the edge of Tuckertown Reservoir/Yadkin River, is very
narrow (no more than 24 meters at its widest point; generally far more narrow). This area is still considered
to be very unlikely to possess intact archaeological deposits that would be considered eligible for the National
Register of Historic Places.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Map(s) Previous Survey Info Photos Correspondence
Other: soil map
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 7
15-02-0049
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED
July 10, 2018
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST Date
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of 7
Project Tracking No.:
15-02-0049
Aerial photograph illustrating the updated APE (orange lines) for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 3
over the Yadkin River on NC 49.
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
4 of 7
Project Tracking No.:
15-02-0049
Aerial photograph with 2-foot contours illustrating the western end of the proposed project, the original
APE (yellow) and the updated APE (orange) accommodating temporary water access.
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
5 of 7
Project Tracking No.:
15-02-0049
Detail of the 1926 aerial photograph of the Tuckertown Reservoir vicinity along the Yadkin River at the
Stokes Ferry location
(https://library.digitalnc.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/ncimages/id/11874/rec/6).
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
6 of 7
Project Tracking No.:
15-02-0049
Photograph illustrating the location of additional ROW south of NC 49, facing east.
Photograph of the base of the sloped easement east of the Yadkin River boat access, facing east.
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
7 of 7
Project Tracking No.:
15-02-0049
Soil Map—Davidson County, North Carolina, Rowan County, North Carolina, and Stanly County, North Carolina
(Replacement of Bridge No. 3 over the Yadkin River)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
7/10/2018
Page 1 of 4
39
2
8
9
0
0
39
2
9
1
0
0
39
2
9
3
0
0
39
2
9
5
0
0
39
2
9
7
0
0
39
2
9
9
0
0
39
2
8
9
0
0
39
2
9
1
0
0
39
2
9
3
0
0
39
2
9
5
0
0
39
2
9
7
0
0
39
2
9
9
0
0
39
3
0
1
0
0
573100 573300 573500 573700 573900 574100 574300 574500 574700 574900
573100 573300 573500 573700 573900 574100 574300 574500 574700 574900
35° 30' 41'' N
80
°

1
1
'

4
0
'
'

W
35° 30' 41'' N
80
°

1
0
'

2
2
'
'

W
35° 30' 0'' N
80
°

1
1
'

4
0
'
'

W
35° 30' 0'' N
80
°

1
0
'

2
2
'
'

W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
0 400 800 1600 2400
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Meters
Map Scale: 1:9,030 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Davidson County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 18, Sep 26, 2017
Soil Survey Area: Rowan County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 14, Oct 3, 2017
Soil Survey Area: Stanly County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 19, Oct 3, 2017
Your area of interest (AOI) includes more than one soil survey
area. These survey areas may have been mapped at different
scales, with a different land use in mind, at different times, or at
different levels of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil
properties, and interpretations that do not completely agree
across soil survey area boundaries.
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Soil Map—Davidson County, North Carolina, Rowan County, North Carolina, and Stanly County, North Carolina
(Replacement of Bridge No. 3 over the Yadkin River)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
7/10/2018
Page 2 of 4
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 18, 2011—Oct 25,
2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Davidson County, North Carolina, Rowan County, North Carolina, and Stanly County, North Carolina
(Replacement of Bridge No. 3 over the Yadkin River)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
7/10/2018
Page 3 of 4
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
GmD Georgeville silt loam, 4 to 15
percent slopes, extremely
bouldery
6.4 23.2%
GmF Georgeville silt loam, 15 to 45
percent slopes, extremely
bouldery
5.9 21.5%
W Water 1.6 5.9%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 14.0 50.7%
Totals for Area of Interest 27.5 100.0%
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
BaD Badin channery silt loam, 15 to
30 percent slopes
1.5 5.5%
UhE Uwharrie loam, 15 to 45
percent slopes, very stony
0.9 3.3%
W Water 2.0 7.4%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 4.4 16.2%
Totals for Area of Interest 27.5 100.0%
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
BaD Badin channery silt loam, 8 to
15 percent slopes
1.2 4.2%
GoF Goldston very channery silt
loam, 15 to 45 percent
slopes
7.1 25.9%
W Water 0.8 3.0%
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 9.1 33.1%
Totals for Area of Interest 27.5 100.0%
Soil Map—Davidson County, North Carolina, Rowan County, North Carolina, and Stanly
County, North Carolina
Replacement of Bridge No. 3 over
the Yadkin River
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
7/10/2018
Page 4 of 4
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER ,
AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING
TIP NO. B-4626
REPLACEMENT OF ROWAN COUNTY BRIDGE NO. 3
ON NC 49/NC 8 OVER THE TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR/YADKIN RIVER
AND THE WINSTON SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILWAY
DAVIDSON, ROWAN, AND STANLY COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA

WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) proposes to fund the
replacement of Rowan County Bridge No. 3 over the Tuckertown
Reservoir/Yadkin River and Winston Salem Southbound Railway in North
Carolina (hereafter, the Undertaking) through the Federal Highway Bridge
Replacement and Rehabilitation Program; and

WHEREAS, the FHWA has consulted with the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO) pursuant to 36 CFR Part 800, regulations
implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C.
300101 et seq.); and

WHEREAS, the FHWA has determined that the Undertaking will have an
adverse effect upon Rowan County Bridge No. 3, a property determined eligible
for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP); and

WHEREAS, the FHWA has notified the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation (ACHP) of the adverse effect and the ACHP has chosen not to
participate in the consultation; and

WHEREAS, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has
participated in the consultation and has been invited by the FHWA and SHPO to
be a signatory to this Memorandum of Agreement (MOA); and

WHEREAS, the FHWA has consulted with Cube Hydro Carolinas, the Catawba
Indian Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, the Trading Ford Historic
District Preservation Association, the Badin Museum, and the United States
Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
2
Forest Service regarding the effects of the Undertaking on Rowan County Bridge
No. 3 and has invited them to be concurring parties to this MOA;

NOW, THEREFORE, the FHWA, SHPO, and NCDOT agree that the
Undertaking will be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations
to take into account the effects of the Undertaking on Rowan County Bridge No.
3.

STIPULATIONS
The FHWA will ensure that the following measures are made part of any
approval or funding issued to the NCDOT for the Undertaking to fulfill the
FHWA’s responsibilities under 36 CRF Part 800, regulations implementing
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. 300101 et seq.).

I. Rowan County Bridge No. 3.
A. Photodocumentation. Prior to the initiation of construction, the
NCDOT will record the existing condition of Rowan County Bridge
No. 3 in accordance with the attached Historic Structures and
Landscape Recordation Plan (Appendix A).

The results of the photographic recordation will be submitted to the
SHPO in advance of any work taking place. The SHPO will have
fifteen (15) days from receipt of the materials to review and comment.
If no comments are received by the NCDOT after the fifteen (15) days,
work may commence.

Additional photography may be undertaken during demolition if
feasible. Dismantling of the superstructure may allow enhanced views
of those structural elements for which the bridge is considered
significant.

B. Historical Record. Rowan County Bridge No. 3 is represented in the
North Carolina Historic Bridge Inventory and the state architectural
survey. Documentation and findings established for the B-4626 project
will be added to both records. As Rowan County Bridge No. 3 derives
its significance from its engineering, it will appear on NCDOT’s
“Historic Bridges of North Carolina” website as the first
featured example in a new section devoted to technological
innovation. By highlighting specific bridges, the educational utility of
the website should achieve increased focus and effectiveness in
Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
3
alerting the public to historic bridges, as well as NCDOT’s efforts to
preserve and record them.

SHPO and the concurring parties will be afforded opportunity to
review and comment on the Rowan County Bridge No. 3 website
feature. If no comments are received from the SHPO or concurring
parties within thirty (30) days of confirmed receipt, the NCDOT can
assume that the SHPO and concurring parties do not object to the
feature.

Should any of the parties notified have questions, comments or desire
a meeting to discuss the feature, the FHWA and NCDOT will arrange
a joint consultation to address such questions and comments. If the
questions and/or comments cannot be resolved, the parties will use
Stipulation III below to resolve any disputes.

II. Unanticipated Discovery.
In accordance with 36 CFR 800.11(a) if the NCDOT identifies additional
cultural resources during construction and determines them to be eligible
for the NRHP, all work will be halted within the limits of the NRHP -
eligible resource(s) and the FHWA and SHPO contacted within forty-eight
(48) hours. If after consultation with the Signatory Parties additional
mitigation is determined necessary, the NCDOT, in consultation with the
other Signatory Parties, will develop and implement appropriate
protection/mitigation measures for the resource(s). The NCDOT will
notify the SHPO and FHWA of any additional cultural resources that are
determined to be not eligible for NRHP listing. Inadvertent or accidental
discovery of human remains will be handled in accordance with North
Carolina General Statutes 65 and 70.

III. Dispute Resolution.
Should any of the Signatory or Concurring Parties object within thirty (30)
days to any plans or documentation provided for review pursuant to this
MOA, the FHWA will consult with the objecting party(ies) to resolve the
objection. If the FHWA or the objecting party(ies) determines that the
objection cannot be resolved, the FHWA will forward all documentation
relevant to the dispute to the ACHP. Within thirty (30) days after receipt
of all pertinent documentation, the ACHP will either:

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
4
Provide the FHWA with recommendations, which the FHWA will take
into account in reaching a final decision regarding the dispute, or

Notify the FHWA that it will comment pursuant to 36 CFR 800.7(c) and
proceed to comment. The FHWA will take into account any ACHP
comment provided in response to such a request in accordance with 36
CFR 800.7(c)(4) with reference to the subject of the dispute. Any
recommendation or comment provided by the ACHP will be understood
to pertain only to the subject of the dispute; the FHWA’s and NCDOT’s
responsibility to carry out all of the actions under this agreement that are
not the subject of the dispute will remain unchanged.

IV. Amendments.
Should any of the Signatory or Concurring Parties to this MOA believe
that its terms cannot be carried out or that an amendment to the terms
must be made, that (those) party(ies) will immediately consult with the
other party(ies) to develop amendments in accordance with 36 CFR
800.6(c)(7). If an amendment cannot be agreed upon, the dispute
resolution process set forth in Stipulation III will be followed.

V. Termination.
Any of the Signatory Parties may terminate the MOA by providing thirty
(30) days written notice to the other parties, provided that the signatories
will consult during the period prior to termination to seek agreement on
amendments or other actions that would avoid termination. Termination
of this MOA will require compliance with 36 CFR 800. This MOA may be
terminated by the execution of a subsequent MOA that explicitly
terminates or supersedes its terms.

VI. Duration.
Unless terminated pursuant to Stipulation V, this MOA will be in effect
until December 31, 2027.

Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by the FHWA, SHPO, and
NCDOT, its subsequent filing with the ACHP, and implementation of its terms
evidence that the FHWA has afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment on
the Undertaking and that the FHWA has taken into account the effects of the
Undertaking on Rowan County Bridge No. 3.

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
5

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
6
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,
AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING
TIP NO. B-4626
REPLACEMENT OF ROWAN COUNTY BRIDGE NO. 3
ON NC 49/NC 8 OVER THE TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR/YADKIN RIVER
AND THE WINSTON SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILWAY
DAVIDSON, ROWAN, AND STANLY COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA

Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by the FHWA, SHPO, and
NCDOT, its subsequent filing with the ACHP, and implementation of its terms
evidence that the FHWA has afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment on
the Undertaking, defined above, and that the FHWA has taken into account the
effects of the Undertaking on the historic property.

CONCUR:

Cube Hydro Carolinas Date

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
7
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,
AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING
TIP NO. B-4626
REPLACEMENT OF ROWAN COUNTY BRIDGE NO. 3
ON NC 49/NC 8 OVER THE TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR/YADKIN RIVER
AND THE WINSTON SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILWAY
DAVIDSON, ROWAN, AND STANLY COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA

Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by the FHWA, SHPO, and
NCDOT, its subsequent filing with the ACHP, and imple mentation of its terms
evidence that the FHWA has afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment on
the Undertaking, defined above, and that the FHWA has taken into account the
effects of the Undertaking on the historic property.

CONCUR:

The Catawba Indian Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office Date

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
8
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,
AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING
TIP NO. B-4626
REPLACEMENT OF ROWAN COUNTY BRIDGE NO. 3
ON NC 49/NC 8 OVER THE TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR/YADKIN RIVER
AND THE WINSTON SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILWAY
DAVIDSON, ROWAN, AND STANLY COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA

Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by the FHWA, SHPO, and
NCDOT, its subsequent filing with the ACHP, and implementation of its terms
evidence that the FHWA has afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment on
the Undertaking, defined above, and that the FHWA has taken into account the
effects of the Undertaking on the historic property.

CONCUR:

Trading Ford Historic District Preservation Association Date

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
9
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRES ERVATION OFFICER,
AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING
TIP NO. B-4626
REPLACEMENT OF ROWAN COUNTY BRIDGE NO. 3
ON NC 49/NC 8 OVER THE TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR/YADKIN RIVER
AND THE WINSTON SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILWAY
DAVIDSON, ROWAN, AND STANLY COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA

Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by the FHWA, SHPO, and
NCDOT, its subsequent filing with the ACHP, and implementation of its terms
evidence that the FHWA has afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment on
the Undertaking, defined above, and that the FHWA has taken into account the
effects of the Undertaking on the historic property.

CONCUR:

Badin Museum Date

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
10
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,
AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING
TIP NO. B-4626
REPLACEMENT OF ROWAN COUNTY BRIDGE NO. 3
ON NC 49/NC 8 OVER THE TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR/YADKIN RIVER
AND THE WINSTON SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILWAY
DAVIDSON, ROWAN, AND STANLY COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA

Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by the FHWA, SHPO, and
NCDOT, its subsequent filing with the ACHP, and implementation of its terms
evidence that the FHWA has afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment on
the Undertaking, defined above, and that the FHWA has taken into account the
effects of the Undertaking on the historic property.

CONCUR:

United States Forest Service Date

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
11
APPENDIX A

Historic Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan
Replacement of Rowan County Bridge No. 3
on NC 49/NC8 over the Tuckertown Reservoir/Yadkin River
and the Winston Salem Southbound Railway
Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties, North Carolina
TIP Project B-4626

PHOTOGRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS

❑ Overall views of Rowan County Bridge Number 3 and its surroundings.

❑ Images showing the details of the superstructure and substructure of
Rowan County Bridge Number 3.

PHOTOGRAPHIC FORMAT

❑ All images will be captured, labeled, and stored according to the North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Office’s, “Policy and Guidelines for
Digital Photography for Historic Property Surveys, National Register
Nominations and NRAC PowerPoint Presentations, Revised November 2008.”

COPIES AND CURATION

❑ One (1) set each of all photographic documentation will be deposited with
the North Carolina Division of Archives and History/State Historic
Preservation, and the Historic Architecture Group of NCDOT.

❑ Any existing mechanical or engineering drawings of or related to Rowan
County Bridge Number 3 will be gathered, stored, and curated by HPO.

Permit
Package
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-00611 County: Davidson County U.S.G.S. Quad: High Rock
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee: Jeff Hemphill
NCDOT
Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Telephone Number: [phone]
Size (acres) 7.1 (approximate) Nearest Town New London
Nearest Waterway Yadkin River River Basin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040103 Coordinates Latitude: 35.505836
Longitude: -80.183851
Location description: The site is located along NC 8/49 over the Yadkin River at NCDOT Bridge #3 in Rowan and Stanly
Counties, North Carolina. The site is approximately 1600 feet southwest of NC 8/49, Tuckertown Road intersection. NCDOT
has identified the project as B-4626.
Description of projects area and activity: This authorization is for the permanent and temporary discharge of clean fill material
associated with an existing bridge replacement project. Permanent impacts include the placement of rip rap within 18 linear
feet of stream channel for bank stabilization. Temporary impacts are within 0.57 acre of jurisdictional tributary/stream and is
associated with the installation of a temporary causeway for construction (see attached plans).
Applicable Law: Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number and/or Nationwide Permit Number: NWP 14 Linear Transportation Projects
SEE ATTACHED RGP or NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted application and attached information dated March 19, 2021. Any violation of the attached
conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, a Class
I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
Special Conditions:
1.The Permittee shall fully implement the Memorandum of Agreement between the Permittee, the North Carolina State
Historic Preservation Officer and the Federal Highway Administration, dated, April 12, 2018, including Appendix A,
which is incorporated herein by reference.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide and/or regional general permit
authorization is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide and/or regional
general permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below,
provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide and/or regional general permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and
conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under contract to
commence in reliance upon the nationwide and/or regional general permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide and/or regional general permit’s expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone].

This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.

If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Andrew Williams at [phone] or [e-mail].

Corps Regulatory Official: ___________________________ Date: May 4, 2021
Expiration Date of Verification: March 18, 2022

A. Determination of Jurisdiction:

1. There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction. Please note, if work is authorized by either a general or nationwide permit, and you wish to request an appeal of an
approved JD, the appeal must be received by the Corps and the appeal process concluded prior to the commencement of any
work in waters of the United States and prior to any work that could alter the hydrology of waters of the United States.

2. There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC §
1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.

3. There are waters, including wetlands, within the above described project area that are subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

4. A jurisdiction determination was not completed with this request. Therefore, this is not an appealable action. However, you
may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps for further instruction.

5. The aquatic resources within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
the approved jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID: SAW- .

B. Basis For Jurisdictional Determination: N/A. An Approved JD has not been completed.

C. Remarks: USACE has verified the delineation associated with this project, based on a desktop review of
information submitted with the application and contained in the administrative record for this project.

D. Attention USDA Program Participants

This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps’ Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.

E. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in A2 and A3 above).

If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:

US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Philip Shannin, Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, FLOOR M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
Date: 2021.05.04
13:37:41 -04'00'

Phone: [phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail]

In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by: Not Applicable.
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.

Corps Regulatory Official: ______________________________________________________

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0.

Copy furnished (via email):

Amy Euliss
NCDOT Division 9
[e-mail]

Date: 2021.05.04
13:38:28 -04'00'
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,
AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING
TIP NO. B-4626
REPLACEMENT OF ROWAN COUNTY BRIDGE NO. 3
ON NC 49/NC 8 OVER THE TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR/YADKIN RIVER
AND THE WINSTON SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILWAY
DAVIDSON, ROWAN, AND STANLY COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA

WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) proposes to fund the
replacement of Rowan County Bridge No. 3 over the Tuckertown
Reservoir/Yadkin River and Winston Salem Southbound Railway in North
Carolina (hereafter, the Undertaking) through the Federal Highway Bridge
Replacement and Rehabilitation Program; and

WHEREAS, the FHWA has consulted with the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO) pursuant to 36 CFR Part 800, regulations
implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C.
300101 et seq.); and

WHEREAS, the FHWA has determined that the Undertaking will have an
adverse effect upon Rowan County Bridge No. 3, a property determined eligible
for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP); and

WHEREAS, the FHWA has notified the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation (ACHP) of the adverse effect and the ACHP has chosen not to
participate in the consultation; and

WHEREAS, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has
participated in the consultation and has been invited by the FHWA and SHPO to
be a signatory to this Memorandum of Agreement (MOA); and

WHEREAS, the FHWA has consulted with Cube Hydro Carolinas, the Catawba
Indian Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, the Trading Ford Historic
District Preservation Association, the Badin Museum, and the United States
Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
2
Forest Service regarding the effects of the Undertaking on Rowan County Bridge
No. 3 and has invited them to be concurring parties to this MOA;

NOW, THEREFORE, the FHWA, SHPO, and NCDOT agree that the
Undertaking will be implemented in accordance with the following stipulations
to take into account the effects of the Undertaking on Rowan County Bridge No.
3.

STIPULATIONS
The FHWA will ensure that the following measures are made part of any
approval or funding issued to the NCDOT for the Undertaking to fulfill the
FHWA’s responsibilities under 36 CRF Part 800, regulations implementing
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. 300101 et seq.).

I. Rowan County Bridge No. 3.
A. Photodocumentation. Prior to the initiation of construction, the
NCDOT will record the existing condition of Rowan County Bridge
No. 3 in accordance with the attached Historic Structures and
Landscape Recordation Plan (Appendix A).

The results of the photographic recordation will be submitted to the
SHPO in advance of any work taking place. The SHPO will have
fifteen (15) days from receipt of the materials to review and comment.
If no comments are received by the NCDOT after the fifteen (15) days,
work may commence.

Additional photography may be undertaken during demolition if
feasible. Dismantling of the superstructure may allow enhanced views
of those structural elements for which the bridge is considered
significant.

B. Historical Record. Rowan County Bridge No. 3 is represented in the
North Carolina Historic Bridge Inventory and the state architectural
survey. Documentation and findings established for the B-4626 project
will be added to both records. As Rowan County Bridge No. 3 derives
its significance from its engineering, it will appear on NCDOT’s
“Historic Bridges of North Carolina” website as the first
featured example in a new section devoted to technological
innovation. By highlighting specific bridges, the educational utility of
the website should achieve increased focus and effectiveness in
Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
3
alerting the public to historic bridges, as well as NCDOT’s efforts to
preserve and record them.

SHPO and the concurring parties will be afforded opportunity to
review and comment on the Rowan County Bridge No. 3 website
feature. If no comments are received from the SHPO or concurring
parties within thirty (30) days of confirmed receipt, the NCDOT can
assume that the SHPO and concurring parties do not object to the
feature.

Should any of the parties notified have questions, comments or desire
a meeting to discuss the feature, the FHWA and NCDOT will arrange
a joint consultation to address such questions and comments. If the
questions and/or comments cannot be resolved, the parties will use
Stipulation III below to resolve any disputes.

II. Unanticipated Discovery.
In accordance with 36 CFR 800.11(a) if the NCDOT identifies additional
cultural resources during construction and determines them to be eligible
for the NRHP, all work will be halted within the limits of the NRHP-
eligible resource(s) and the FHWA and SHPO contacted within forty-eight
(48) hours. If after consultation with the Signatory Parties additional
mitigation is determined necessary, the NCDOT, in consultation with the
other Signatory Parties, will develop and implement appropriate
protection/mitigation measures for the resource(s). The NCDOT will
notify the SHPO and FHWA of any additional cultural resources that are
determined to be not eligible for NRHP listing. Inadvertent or accidental
discovery of human remains will be handled in accordance with North
Carolina General Statutes 65 and 70.

III. Dispute Resolution.
Should any of the Signatory or Concurring Parties object within thirty (30)
days to any plans or documentation provided for review pursuant to this
MOA, the FHWA will consult with the objecting party(ies) to resolve the
objection. If the FHWA or the objecting party(ies) determines that the
objection cannot be resolved, the FHWA will forward all documentation
relevant to the dispute to the ACHP. Within thirty (30) days after receipt
of all pertinent documentation, the ACHP will either:

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
4
Provide the FHWA with recommendations, which the FHWA will take
into account in reaching a final decision regarding the dispute, or

Notify the FHWA that it will comment pursuant to 36 CFR 800.7(c) and
proceed to comment. The FHWA will take into account any ACHP
comment provided in response to such a request in accordance with 36
CFR 800.7(c)(4) with reference to the subject of the dispute. Any
recommendation or comment provided by the ACHP will be understood
to pertain only to the subject of the dispute; the FHWA’s and NCDOT’s
responsibility to carry out all of the actions under this agreement that are
not the subject of the dispute will remain unchanged.

IV. Amendments.
Should any of the Signatory or Concurring Parties to this MOA believe
that its terms cannot be carried out or that an amendment to the terms
must be made, that (those) party(ies) will immediately consult with the
other party(ies) to develop amendments in accordance with 36 CFR
800.6(c)(7). If an amendment cannot be agreed upon, the dispute
resolution process set forth in Stipulation III will be followed.

V. Termination.
Any of the Signatory Parties may terminate the MOA by providing thirty
(30) days written notice to the other parties, provided that the signatories
will consult during the period prior to termination to seek agreement on
amendments or other actions that would avoid termination. Termination
of this MOA will require compliance with 36 CFR 800. This MOA may be
terminated by the execution of a subsequent MOA that explicitly
terminates or supersedes its terms.

VI. Duration.
Unless terminated pursuant to Stipulation V, this MOA will be in effect
until December 31, 2027.

Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by the FHWA, SHPO, and
NCDOT, its subsequent filing with the ACHP, and implementation of its terms
evidence that the FHWA has afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment on
the Undertaking and that the FHWA has taken into account the effects of the
Undertaking on Rowan County Bridge No. 3.

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
5

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
6
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,
AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING
TIP NO. B-4626
REPLACEMENT OF ROWAN COUNTY BRIDGE NO. 3
ON NC 49/NC 8 OVER THE TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR/YADKIN RIVER
AND THE WINSTON SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILWAY
DAVIDSON, ROWAN, AND STANLY COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA

Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by the FHWA, SHPO, and
NCDOT, its subsequent filing with the ACHP, and implementation of its terms
evidence that the FHWA has afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment on
the Undertaking, defined above, and that the FHWA has taken into account the
effects of the Undertaking on the historic property.

CONCUR:

Cube Hydro Carolinas Date

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
7
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,
AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING
TIP NO. B-4626
REPLACEMENT OF ROWAN COUNTY BRIDGE NO. 3
ON NC 49/NC 8 OVER THE TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR/YADKIN RIVER
AND THE WINSTON SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILWAY
DAVIDSON, ROWAN, AND STANLY COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA

Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by the FHWA, SHPO, and
NCDOT, its subsequent filing with the ACHP, and implementation of its terms
evidence that the FHWA has afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment on
the Undertaking, defined above, and that the FHWA has taken into account the
effects of the Undertaking on the historic property.

CONCUR:

The Catawba Indian Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office Date

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
8
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,
AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING
TIP NO. B-4626
REPLACEMENT OF ROWAN COUNTY BRIDGE NO. 3
ON NC 49/NC 8 OVER THE TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR/YADKIN RIVER
AND THE WINSTON SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILWAY
DAVIDSON, ROWAN, AND STANLY COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA

Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by the FHWA, SHPO, and
NCDOT, its subsequent filing with the ACHP, and implementation of its terms
evidence that the FHWA has afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment on
the Undertaking, defined above, and that the FHWA has taken into account the
effects of the Undertaking on the historic property.

CONCUR:

Trading Ford Historic District Preservation Association Date

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
9
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,
AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING
TIP NO. B-4626
REPLACEMENT OF ROWAN COUNTY BRIDGE NO. 3
ON NC 49/NC 8 OVER THE TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR/YADKIN RIVER
AND THE WINSTON SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILWAY
DAVIDSON, ROWAN, AND STANLY COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA

Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by the FHWA, SHPO, and
NCDOT, its subsequent filing with the ACHP, and implementation of its terms
evidence that the FHWA has afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment on
the Undertaking, defined above, and that the FHWA has taken into account the
effects of the Undertaking on the historic property.

CONCUR:

Badin Museum Date

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
10
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
AMONG
THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION,
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER,
AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
REGARDING
TIP NO. B-4626
REPLACEMENT OF ROWAN COUNTY BRIDGE NO. 3
ON NC 49/NC 8 OVER THE TUCKERTOWN RESERVOIR/YADKIN RIVER
AND THE WINSTON SALEM SOUTHBOUND RAILWAY
DAVIDSON, ROWAN, AND STANLY COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA

Execution of this Memorandum of Agreement by the FHWA, SHPO, and
NCDOT, its subsequent filing with the ACHP, and implementation of its terms
evidence that the FHWA has afforded the ACHP an opportunity to comment on
the Undertaking, defined above, and that the FHWA has taken into account the
effects of the Undertaking on the historic property.

CONCUR:

United States Forest Service Date

Memorandum of Agreement
B-4626 Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties
11
APPENDIX A

Historic Structures and Landscape Recordation Plan
Replacement of Rowan County Bridge No. 3
on NC 49/NC8 over the Tuckertown Reservoir/Yadkin River
and the Winston Salem Southbound Railway
Davidson, Rowan, and Stanly Counties, North Carolina
TIP Project B-4626

PHOTOGRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS

‰ Overall views of Rowan County Bridge Number 3 and its surroundings.

‰ Images showing the details of the superstructure and substructure of
Rowan County Bridge Number 3.

PHOTOGRAPHIC FORMAT

‰ All images will be captured, labeled, and stored according to the North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Office’s, “Policy and Guidelines for
Digital Photography for Historic Property Surveys, National Register
Nominations and NRAC PowerPoint Presentations, Revised November 2008.”

COPIES AND CURATION

‰ One (1) set each of all photographic documentation will be deposited with
the North Carolina Division of Archives and History/State Historic
Preservation, and the Historic Architecture Group of NCDOT.

‰ Any existing mechanical or engineering drawings of or related to Rowan
County Bridge Number 3 will be gathered, stored, and curated by HPO.