The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20141297 Ver 1_Application_20141217� ,�u� _�� ,,,,�. STATE OF NORTH CA20LINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT McCRORY GOVERNOR December 17, 2014 US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Attn: Mr. Dave Bailey 3331 Heritage Trade Dr., Ste. 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 Attention: Mr. Dave Bailey and Mr. Dave Wanucha ANOTHONYJ.TATA SECRETARY NC Division of Water Resources Winston-Salem Regional Office Attn: Mr. Dave Wanucha 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Subject: Notification for the replacement of Bridge #30 over Reddicics Creek on SR 1129 (Groometown Road) in Guilford County. WBS # 17BP.7.R11 Dear Mr. Bailey and Mr. Wanucha, The North Carolina Departrnent of Transportation is scheduled to replace Bridge #30 with a new bridge at the same location. I have included the Attachments G& L with a project description and a set of the project plans. A stormwater management plan is also attached. Please review this project for compliance by your Division. We plan to begin construction as soon as possible. If further information is required, please contact Jerry Parker at (336) 256-2063. Your early review and consideration will be appreciated. Sincerely, t � �� J.M. Mills, P.E. Division Engineer, Division 7 Enclosures ca Tim Powers, NCDOT Barry Harrington, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT Jeremy Warren, NCDOT Bobby Norris, District 2 Engineer, NCDOT File Copy P. 0. Box 14996, Gx�NSSOao, NC 27415-4996 Pr[o�ve (336) 334-3192 Fnx (336) 334-3637 �'��'►'�� NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Wafer Resources Pa( McCrory Tom Reeder John Skvarla, III Governor Director Secretary Attachment L: Low Impact Bridge Replacement Process Low Impact Bridge Project No.: B-N/A County Guilford Bridge No.30 over Reddick's Creek WBS Element Number 17BP.7.R.11 This project is subject to the Low Impact Bridge Process as agreed to on October 6, 2009. This project meets the documentation requirements and approval procedures under NEPA, as defined by FHWA, for Low Impact Bridge Replacements. This project meets the standards of NCDOT's Minimum Criteria Rules. Date: December 17. 2014 Applicant Name: NCDOT Applicant Address: 1584 Yancevville Street Greensboro, NC 27415 Primary Contact for Project: Jerrv A. Parker Phone No.: 336-256-2063 Is this an after-the-fact application: Yes X No River Basin: Cape Fear/Randleman Lake Watershed Stream Classification: 17-8-(0.5): WS-IV:03-06-08 Regulatory Authorization Options for this Activity Federal: USACE Nationwide General Permit 3— Maintenance State: General Water Quality Certification #3687 and/or Buffer Authorization Local: None Project Description — The project consists of replacing Bridge #30 over Reddick's Creek on SR 1129 (Groometown Road) and improving roadway approaches. The existing 34' L X 22' W reinforced concrete deck bridge on I-Beams is structurally deficient and will be replaced with a new 90' L X 33' W, single span box beam bridge at the same location. The existing bridge has a sufficiency rating of 39.8. An off-site detour will be utilized during construction. There are no wetlands within the project area. There are, however, two features — Reddick's Creek (SA) and a UT to Reddick's Creek (SB) — within the project. There are 91 linear feet of permanent stream impacts proposed to Reddick's Creek that are restricted to the banks under the bridge for stabilization purposes (i.e. rip rap will not be within the thalweg of the channel). The project drainage system also consists of a grated inlet and pipe outfall that drain to an existing roadside ditch from a dissipator pad that outlets at non erosive velocities prior to the riparian buffer. Transporla�on Permilfing Unit 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NoM Carolina 27699-1650 Locatiore 512 N Salis6ury SL, Raleigh, Nodh Carolina Phone:919-707-87B41FAX:919-733-1290 Inlemet: hllp:llportal.ncdenr.orglweb/wq An Equal Oppodunily 1 AffrtnaGVe Acuon Employer NonrthCarolina �aturallr� Proposed Riparian Buffer impacts include 1,976 square feet in Zone 1 and 1,320 square feet in Zone 2 to accommodate the wider span bridge and the necessary fill slopes. It should be noted that there is a buffered, intermittent stream channel that parallels the existing roadway. The project proposes no impacts to this adjacent channel or its associated riparian area. The current design maintains the existing transportation facility (ETF) and does not propose to move the fill slope and/or ditchline further into the riparian area associated with feature SB. A review was conducted for the presence of Bald Eagle and small whorled pogonia, the only federally listed protected species for Guilford County. A review of NCNHP mapping showed no known occurrences of either species. Signature: �/Y�v� �Q!� Print Name: J� � ' ' " � � �''S Title: �l V � �I �� /V��'� LowlMlnlmal Impact Brldge Pro�ect Data Sheet . . �.... TIP NO � WA. � . . ��,. WBS �� 17BP,7.R.71 . . . ` Coun Guillord � �� -� � � Brld�eNumber. s��unureNO.a000ao � �� -�� `� � DBSCHpt1o0 .BndgeM30overRetltllcksCreekon5R '� � 11291Graamalown Rd, Ba9in � - CepeFeer�� . Classlticatlon � ws-N� � � � � � � � SIN. .. . . . . .. ... .. 17-e-(o.$) . _ . .. . .. Stream : TyPe SA-Perenniel SB - Inlermmenl SizO SA' WeMetlWiEfh=70' SB: WettetlWldih=2' � BankfullWltllh=20 BenkfulWldlh=8' TyPB ReinkrcedConcrete0eckonl-Beams� � �� Existing Structure S�� -� 3a' z 2z' ��. SuH. Ratin � � �� as:6 � � Proposed5tructure T �a � BoxBeam �� SIZ6(wiaih-outmouq� 90'x33' � � USACE Impacls (LF) � SA-Ves � � � � � Stream SB - Yes . -�. Non 4041m aGts LF � �� No. � � �. USACEIm � acts AC � No � � Wellands -NOn4041m acts AC �� No � � .. CAMA Im- ects AC .... ... .. No .. . . ..... .. ... .. � NC DWQ Buffers Im acu� SF � No �� Buffer A - Iication Re � ulred � >40:tt . YlN . � � � �� No �� NC�DWQ�StormWaler PermlC . Parmit Re ui�etl YIN ' � � �� Habilat /n �� Small whodad pogonle � Yes � (Y ) BalAEegle-No T&E .g BCIeSPfeSenl Smellwhodetlpogonie-No � P Bela Eegle � No '.9i000pCIUSfOn SmellWhotleEpogonia-UnreaoNed �� MoretO�ium �� T e Na . . ` Dates � ' NativelNatche No Trout Watere Trout S ecles Present-- No � � � � � Trout Contlitlons YM � rvo � WRC Reviewer � � No � � � � � � � � . ._.. .. CAMAAECS ._. Nc ... . . .... . .. _. . Essenllal Flsh Habltal � In No Nav.OPening. . _. . . Yes . .. .. .._... USCG Permlt No HlstorlcPro ertles No � � �� Archaeolo Ical Resources No � � ��Srlbal. Lands No� � � �� .. . . ..4 � Resourcea . .. . . No. _. .. .. . .. ... .. . . 6 � LWCF Resources � Na � � � � Wlltl antl Scenlc River � � No � � � �- � �� Foreat Service Lands No � NA Area . ... _ .... No . . . .. . . .. .. . . � FEMA Bu oW � No _ . � � � � FEMA FIOOtl SIUtl � � �� Yes � � . . ... _ USTS Hez Mats. . . .. No ... . . . .. . . ... . RBlocetBB9 No �� LOCat1D11 � � �AT � � �� 3595379762 � � � � � � LONG � � -79.88573889 - TwoslreamleatureaweretlellneeledwitMnlhepmjeclslUtlyarea; SlreamSAisiheprimarychennel�undemeatM1" Britlge Nu 30, Streem SB Is an inlermiltenl, secondery channel Ihal wnlluences vnlh SA in the no�lhwesl quedrenl ol the pmJect study area� Habdat ie presant (or lhe amell whoded poBania in the faresled po�tion of Ihe I. proJecl sWtly aree elong Iha waat side ol Groometown ftd. outslde of Ihe NCDOT tlghEOFway. However, lleltlwork PfoJBCt CollllllBnts wae completetl (OB/26/i'IJ oulside ol ihe recommentletl USFWS aurveywindow for Ihls speGea (mid May-eeAy July). No suilahle feetling/weler source is located withln 1:0 mile of Ihe sludy erea InclutllnB 660 fool retlius Irom �� lhe etlge o/ iha eWdy eree to suppotl baltl eagle habltat. Since Ihere wae na foraging habltal wllhln the raview � aree, e survey of lhe proJecf eluGy erea end ihe area wlihln 6601ee1 of Ihe projecl limits was nol conducled. .___—. . _„'- �...� �..�.......u.w�_....._......._, _ �...._. __,.__..__ _J.. .:....._.., . __..__.... _ . :COmpletedby: /w��.. ~ �.-i . . ___ �— Leetl n01n r �'.� � ..._ _ ..._.._... _............_ .,...... : ... .«_. � .................� ...., _ .... � .v.>,_.._ _ ., �. . ..W.... _,,.. ,. . � �� nm Idf r ' 15/012074 >> � N � � � � � N �m d N A U �- Z �o o r rn U O � d C 0 w` r y > N o � y rn d y V U � a o Y m a � d N � .. c o V Z_ . � 2 fq "m L C = N E ., z° � 3 C .? U � A E •c 6 ► C O .q U .y N U `m 3 � � N C O .� �N m U m d H C O a .� N O 0 w N 0 V m > .� z w .o a ." F" � a v � � a v�i m -°�' � o O� O'.—d'^tl ro '� °i � a. C�°�m" � � «° �'a A rn U��.� �}�b'�d apd d a:�'S'a au � t° �p ��'�d �bA.;� ��a � N � b � � w Y � .� m �. �� "P v v °° ."a .� « �a « o.p +�7�j-� w O? ` t> O �v�.�+v.� a� � 'a v p P G .d � 'OH�a^°'> � v .G .�. m �b3y� � v y o �.' �� ° ;; `" m °' .�� a a�.�� °a a� oyd3 eo �'' ° �o '? 9�>�abi� m �yq'd �C � 5A O " v �a w 4 � y, � a�i "' � o ❑ F" m o W �O .? m .n w Q G � ,q y�c°d°:�O w � � d ti .. V � Y�OF ��"ay�� °c � � °' a°JO � U � c�a�GG,��"�cQ w �,y�, ��]1 � 0 A O N � "� ~ '� a Pa'o^ o F v o" v Pa p,'� o Ri pp F,G W G�L.�y F L� a�.r� �� bd °'�� o0 a d F O � � A q � � Ab� °� m cw v 8a,�� o .. d pp A N P� b � 0.b ma.�'a°� 0 � � � � O o a � ,n ym� U CO.� u" O f-i u � a � p C mm��aa .a��Ca �,��"wvC� o�� +� Oa �Np a � ?l �E O N � � o d � 3'�b �� a�apa a � o � Y a ,� " p � o d vg wg�q �c�°nda�� « b q � S o � � H �„�b a� �o � 4 `� � v � N � � N'p W�� ro .�'x a� a3' a-°,;�a 0 � '� y ,��, o .,q°' � y>.l-, C > � o � � � ° � 0 3 °pa � m �„ o y d V� Q O y w 'o^ " n' q _�,'' aaa��oa m m U'o � p 'a C w Uyy m a n mF T.� �.� q N N �� a� W =''Ui°.��.�° o q a � � F �i � 3� � v�2 "„p ° 'd d °' � � �� vp'� � � �'�.SA �� t� � .9 d��M�'�� O o.0 3 �a�w a�'i m ��+`� v wF � `2 � F� 'S v 'a �.�,��s�� w.,°y •� � �S y' �2 a'q �i � L1� z c� wQ z� a� �� LLJ �z �� w ~ U W O Q z � w�a � �� N � � � r m H z U w a � � � �Q � N � a ° w w o a a � a w � � zr N wc� za Qa s� s W3 dN �ti 1� O ry0 � 2y �� , J O � r G` `�� GJ � J R��O\ ` / W Q �_ 3� W m W Q �"" Z � N g � Y a N Z � d Z j g1- W � d I , W 0 , �I �� i� I I i il i II I II I II I _�I JLL � @ rl � � � � � � H °� o W � �„ a o ��ao�Na �x°�e�a�z � °acFiW ��F � � zwy� �o� cc � � a�+ oa � o H �7 P'. P� � 9 � �ry G' W � 'o A � W � � ,- � e - � � �� ,�� W � � �� LJ W � 0 a o \ N � 1 � W m Q � U � � U � I� a � o c� N � E m � �� zm� OI N N C C U �- F N N O. � � Q��j EI- a � o� d y a�i � C C U C � W Ul N O. E�v O� W ��X t E � W U a W U Q O_ U V u E 3 m � K� Fm E,.. Q � � c !/� � C U N N F E� E� o 0 U � - Q a � � N c ° F- � m c � m � U � v � W a ° �m _ `m-- Q c a�i � m J U — � v W U � V c � a o 9 � �^ m o � � c � Z 3 v a W H W N � 9 a � c � E—'� � F LL j v > C y C V C _ C 10 _ N � E LL 3 .... d a m r-, rn a � T � m �� ~ lh E � M m � N X m (� o x m m M � 0 0 o � 10 Ot «4 'n '� o °m � � v � y � � J R1 N J «� O F (/J Z Q H , , - ., ' . - , . - � I'Il� � II I'1' 'I'I III "I . �11'll"1 '111� �11111111111''1'11"1� : ��1�1111'1111'1111111� � ' ��1�1'''11"'111''1''� ��'�"'1'1'1'1'1111'1� . �1'1'I'lll"'1'lll"" , �1'�"111"'111'11'11 .. ' ' �I'1'1'lllllllll"11 . . -. : : . - NO SURVEY REQUIR�D FORM PROJECT INrORMATION P�roject No. WBS No: F.A. No: STR. #400030 42608.1.ST7 n/a Federal (USACE) Pernzit Required? Projec! T'rncking No. (Lrlerno( UseJ 10-03-0007 I �--- -------� County.• Guilford Document. Minimum Criteria Sheet Funding: ❑ State � Federal ❑ Yes ❑ No Permit Type: Project Description:Replacement of Bridge No. 30 on SRI129 in Gz�idford County, North Carolina. The NCDOT proposes to replace the siructurally deficient structure along with some minor ditch-line impacts within a 400ft. (+ the bridge length) long and 80ft. wide archaeological APE area centered upon Bridge No. 30 and [he SR1129 cenler-line. On-srte detoairs will NOT be utilized for the project. 5UMMARY OF CULTIIRAL RESOURC�S I2�VIEW Brief description of review nctivities, results of revrew, and concdusians: A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Tuesday, April 30, 2010. This work disclosed the location of NO previously recorded archaeological sites situated within the project's APE or adjacent to the APE, but did illustrate a number of recorded archaeological sites that had been recorded within the general vicinity of the project study area. A review of Guilford County National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed archaeological properties illustrated that no sucli resources were situated within or proximal to the APE. Furthermore, topographic maps, historic maps (NC maps website), USDA soit survey maps, aerial photographs, and the Google street view map application were utilized/inspected to gauge environmental factors that may haue contributed to historic or prehistoric sertlement within the project limits, and to assess the level of modem, slope, agricultural, hydrological, and other erosive-type disturbances witUin and surrounding the archaeological APE. BriefF,xplanation ofwhy the available informatian provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there nre na t�nidentified historic properties in tl�e APE: Archaeological site potential within the proposed APE impact area is relatively non-existent. Due to the diminutive nature of this bridge replacement, the sloping and disturbed ground surfaces contained witliin and adjacent to the existing r-o-w, and relatively minute construction footprint using no on-site construction detours, tlie project, as proposed, is unlikely to affect any significairt NRIIP eligible cultural resources. No further archaeological wark is recommended. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: � Map(s) � Previous Survey Info � Photos ❑ Photocopy of County Swvey Notes FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAI. RESOURC�S PROF�SSIONAL NO SURVEY REOUIRED ❑Con�espondence ••Nn SnrreV Reguirrod"/nrro fru' Minor7innspnrioHon Prn(ecu a.r Onolified In !he Jpp7Yrngrarmm�lrc Agr'eenrenl. NCD07'.4rchnenlnyy �F Hisror'ic Archilecnire Grm�ps "No 9�rveY Reqinred"jarm forMinor TnnrsP�rlalion !'rnjecls a�' Qunl fed in �he 2007 P�rogrmm�inlic AgremnenL NCD07'ArxLnenln��Ye Hi.rinrie Arcltlmcnire Grmrrys �/• 1 " � `\ • a Ja - � \ \- � � e � ► � r �y��,' i �� y ` � �� ` e� ► '-r r� �— � � �.i � ` ; �� .. .. h � � ♦�1 �� _ _� � - _ t �� i t � . � � _ r 1 � ti ;� �� 9� � I 85 � , � ��._ � �` � � ♦ ' � 1 � ` �i � B � � Z _ �=. 8 7 m I� � � -, - � 1 � � 70 , 1 1 � / ` � _ � I 1 � ✓ � � ` _ 1" � _ � ` 7 � � �j' p '�� 1 � � � .. _ h '�� 1 � .. �� + �' �, � �. ` ti I Y� �� 7 I i � �� r � � � � �� , ' ' � � 1 J � � � � � \ / — I � f.♦ f ` ' \ / ` � \ � 1 � ' ` I1, , 1 � .. _ I 6 � _ q ` _ —'' � � .,�— i � i A � \^� �.�_, ;_ . �, ) _ 85 � _ — — — U H �a �, � I �I � �1 '' . �_�_, � �� 4s �r � � � �� I ; . `� GUILFORD 30 1^ , �•- ,r' r i' � :r �f � a " < �;.�'. � Groomal�wn Rd - _ r� � ;t .� _�� ' 7r � Gr,00m�EO Rtl? - � i� � � ,.., „ , , •• ,_ e. _ . _ . _ _ __ _ . _ � � ;.' . � ' . . �� ,. �__ 1 , h . . � rinomefown Rd i� � �w k7� ��1. � � �roome�o;twn Rel - , .� _ NO SURVEY REQUIRED F'ORM PROJECT INTORMaTION Prqject No: Str. # 400030 WBS No: 42608.1. ST7 F.A. No: Federal (USACE) Permit Reyuired? Counry.• Document: Projecf 7rucking No. (lnlernnlU.se) � I � ]0-03-0007 L..-- __------_ Guilford PCE Fundiiig: ❑ 5tate ❑ Yes ❑ No Pernlit Tj�pe: � Federal Prnject Description: Replace Bridge No. 400030 on SR 1129 in kind with off-site detours. There will be minor ditch-line impacts. Area of potential effects (AP�) is 40' either way from the centerliue of the Uridge and 200' from eitUer end of the bridge. SUMMARY OF CULTURAL R�SOURCES REVIEW /3rief'description of review activi.!ies, resulls of review, nnd conclussons: Review of HPO quad maps, historiaaesignations roster, avd indexes was undertaken on 7 April 2010. Based on this review, there are no existiug NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of Potential EfFects. The CRS also reviewed Google Maps Streetview and aerial photographs and there are no properties over fifty years of age locnted witl�in the specified 400-foot APE. Bridge No. 400030 is a 1952 steel stringer b:idge that is not eligible for National Register listing according to the NCDOT Historic Bridge suivey. BrieJ'Explanalion ofwhy the m�nilafile infnrmation provide,s a relinhle basis,far reasonably predicting lhni Ghere cn-e »o unrdentifed historic properties in theAPE.• Aerial photographs and background research indicated that there are no properties over fifly years of age in the specified 400' APE corridor. FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL R�SOURCES PROF�SSIONAL NO SURVEY REOUIRED — Histaric Architecture Cultural 8!�°a-1 G 7a � a ••No Surrev Rer/uireA'.Inrn� ('or Minm''I'r'mis�mrmtlm� R'rJectr n.c QunlilirAin ILe 1407 R'ngrnnrumlic Agreemenl. NCDOT Arc4nenlu� R 1lisloric ArcLirecOn'e Grm�ps llate g�� U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service � � . � Trust Resources List � Endangered Species Act Species List (USFWS Endangered Species Program). There are a total of t threatened or endangered species on your species ]ist. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fishes may appear on the species list because a project could cause downstream effects on the species. Critical habitats listed under the Has Critical Habitat column may or may not lie within your project area. See the CriNcal habimts within your project area section below for critical habitat that lies within your project area. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. Species that should be considered in an effects analysis for your project: Flowering Plants Status Has Critical Habitat Contact Small Whorled pogonia Threatened snecies Raleigh Ecological (Isotria medeoloides) info Services Field Office Critical habitats within your project area: There are no critical habitats within your project area. FWS National �ldlife Refuges (USFWS National �ldlife Refuges Program). There are no refuges found within the vicinity of your project. FWS Migratory Birds (USFWS Migratory Bird Programl. The protection of birds is regulated by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA). Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally killed ar injured by otherwise lawful activities. For more information regarding these Acts see: h�m •//www fw�ov/migratorvbirds/RegulationsandPolicies html. All project proponents are responsible for complying with the appropriate regulations protecting birds when planning and developing a project. To meet these conservarion obligations, proponents should identify potential or existing project-related impacts to migratory birds and their habitat and develop and implement conservation measures that avoid, minimize, or compensate for these impacts. The Service's Birds of Conservation Concern 09/30/2014 Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPAC) Page 7 of 6 Version 1.4 San S ouci Ferry Ramp35.91 321°-76.8 177 51° 0 1 20.5 Miles ³ Shoreline Stabilization on SR 1500San Souci RoadBertie County Quad Name W oodard xx ARTMEN N A S O H DEP T O F T R A S P OR T T IO N T ATE O F N R T C AROLINA P R O J E C T L E N G T H L E T T I N G D A T E : S T A T E S T A T E P R O J E C T R E F E R E N C E N O . S T A T E P R O J . N O . F. A . P R O J . N O . D E S C R I P T I O N N O . T O T A L S H E E T S N . C . SH E E T 1 P r e p a r e d i n t h e O f f i c e o f : D I V I S I O N O F H I G H W A Y S 2 0 1 2 S T A N D A R D S P E C I F I C A T I O N S P R O J E C T E N G I N E E R P R O J E C T D E S I G N E N G I N E E R L O C A T I O N : T Y P E O F W O R K : DI V I SI ON OF H I GH WA Y S ST A T E OF N OR T H C A R OL I N A 1 1 3 A i r p o r t D r . , E d e n t o n , N C 2 7 9 3 2 D I V I S I O N O N E D D C U N I T D R A W N B Y : D . H . S T A L L I N G S B E R T I E C O U N T Y S H O R E L I N E S T A B I L I Z A T I O N 1 . 2 0 0 8 1 1 2 1.2008112WBS ELEM ENT:LENGT H O F P R O J E C T = 0 . 2 M I LE S 5 F E R R Y R A M P T O 0 . 2 M I L E S N O R T H S R 15 0 0 S A N S O U C I R D F R O M PROJECTVICINITY MAP R a n d o l p h B R u s s e l l 1 1 1 P o n d R d W i n d s o r N C 2 7 9 8 3 7 5 0 / 4 0 30 L.F.100 L.F. 5 5 L . F . 3 0 L . F . 2 5 L . F . W i n d s o r N C 2 7 9 8 3 A M L P r o p e r t y M a n a g e m e n t 4 2 1 W h i t e O a k R d 2 2 W E T L A N D I M P A C T : 4 3 0 F T P R O J E C T T O T A L S O P E N W A T E R I M P A C T : 7 3 2 F T S H O R E L I N E S T A B I L I Z A T I O N : 2 4 0 L . F . 8 9 9 / 5 6 1 C a s h i e R i v e r SCALE 1"=50’ LEGENDEXISTINGPROPOSED STATE O F N O RTH CAROLINA DEPARTMEN T O F T R A N SPOR T A T ION D R A W N B Y : D A T E : C O U N T Y : S C A L E : Q U A D : B A S I N : W B S # : S H E E T # : D . H . S T A L L I N G S E D E N T O N , N C 2 7 9 3 2 ( 2 5 2 ) 4 8 2 - 1 8 5 0 1 1 3 A I R P O R T D R . D I V I S I O N 1 NO R T H C A R O L I N A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N V I E W D E T A I L E D D R A W I N G L A T . = 3 5 . 9 1 3 2 1 0 N L O N G . = 7 6 . 8 1 7 7 5 1 W B E R T I E W O O D A R D R O A N O K E SH O R E L I N E S T A B I L I Z A T I O N O N S R 1 5 0 0 S A N S O U C I R D xx 1 . 2 0 0 8 1 1 2 Cashie River S R 1 5 0 0 W L B W L B 1 " = 1 0 ’ T U R N A R O U N D STABILIZATION PROPOSED SHORELINE 2 O P E N W A T E R I M P A C T : 19 8 F T 2 GATERAMP FERRYNWL G R A V E L EXISTING RIP RAP 8 ’ 1 0 ’ 1 6’ G R A V E L R D S A N S O U C I R D 12’ R a n d o l p h B R u s s e l l 111 P o n d R d W i n d s o r N C 2 7 9 8 3 7 5 0 / 4 0 100’ +- 30’ +- W E T L A N D I M P A C T : 4 3 0 F T E D G E O F G R A V E L (CLASS B RIP RAP) 2 O F 5 J U L Y 2 5 , 2 0 1 4 M A P 1 T O T A L S P L A N V I E W D E T A I L E D D R A W I N G STATE O F N O RTH CAROLINA DEPARTMEN T O F T R A N SPOR T A T ION D R A W N B Y : D A T E : C O U N T Y : S C A L E : Q U A D : B A S I N : W B S # : S H E E T # : D . H . S T A L L I N G S E D E N T O N , N C 2 7 9 3 2 ( 2 5 2 ) 4 8 2 - 1 8 5 0 1 1 3 A I R P O R T D R . D I V I S I O N 1 NO R T H C A R O L I N A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N L A T . = 3 5 . 9 1 3 2 1 0 N L O N G . = 7 6 . 8 1 7 7 5 1 W B E R T I E W O O D A R D R O A N O K E SH O R E L I N E S T A B I L I Z A T I O N O N S R 1 5 0 0 S A N S O U C I R D 1 . 2 0 0 8 1 1 2 LEGENDEXISTINGPROPOSED Cashie R i v e r S T A B I L I Z A T I O N P R O P O S E D S H O R E L I N E SR 1500SAN SOUCI RD N O T E : P R O P O S E D S H O R E L I N E S T A B I L I Z A T I O N T O M A P S 2 - 4 1 " = 5 ’ WLB NWL 12 ’ - 14 ’ G r a v e l R d 6 ’ 2 5 ’ - 5 5 ’ +- Rand o lp h B R u s s e ll 111 P o n d R d Wind s o r N C 2 7 9 8 3 7 5 0 / 4 0 2 O P E N W A T E R I M P A C T : 5 3 4 F T ( 3 L O C A T IO N S ) B E P L A C E D O N T O P O F E X I S T I N G R I P R A P EDGE OF GRAVEL ( C L A S S B R I P R A P ) J U L Y 2 5 , 2 0 1 4 3 O F 5 M A P S 2 - 4 T O T A L S L E G E N D E X I S T I N G P R O P O S E D STATE O F N O RTH CAROLINA DEPARTMEN T O F T R A N SPOR T A T ION D R A W N B Y : D A T E : C O U N T Y : S C A L E : Q U A D : B A S I N : W B S # : S H E E T # : D . H . S T A L L I N G S E D E N T O N , N C 2 7 9 3 2 ( 2 5 2 ) 4 8 2 - 1 8 5 0 1 1 3 A I R P O R T D R . D I V I S I O N 1 NO R T H C A R O L I N A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N J U L Y 2 5 , 2 0 1 4 L A T . = 3 5 . 9 1 3 2 1 0 N L O N G . = 7 6 . 8 1 7 7 5 1 W B E R T I E W O O D A R D R O A N O K E SH O R E L I N E S T A B I L I Z A T I O N O N S R 1 5 0 0 S A N S O U C I R D 1 . 2 0 0 8 1 1 2 1 " = 5 ’ - C R O S S S E C T I O N DETAIL SECTION N W L CL S T A B I L I Z A T I O N P R O P O S E D S H O R E L I N E ( C L A S S B R I P R A P ) F I L T E R F A B R I C -8’+2’+-GRAVEL EDGE OF M U D L I N E NOTE: O F P A V E M E N T E X I S T I N G 1 0 . 0 0 ’ LC DETA I L S E C T I O N - E N D V I E W 2 PROPOSED CLASS B A N D C L A S S I I R I P R A P T O B E P L A C E D O N T O P O F E X I S T I N G R I P R A P WATER LEVEL: 9.75’11.00’PROPOSED RIP RAP TOP OF C a s h i e R i v e r C a s h i e R i v e r - MAP 1 3 0 ’ - 10 0 ’ + ( V A R I A B L E ) -5’+30’+--100’+ 4 O F 5 M A P 1 ( 2 L O C A T IO N S ) 2 O P E N W A T E R I M P A C T : 19 8 F T W E T L A N D I M P A C T : 4 3 0 F T M A P 1 T O T A L S MAPS 2 - 4 L E G E N D E X I S T I N G P R O P O S E D STATE O F N O RTH CAROLINA DEPARTMEN T O F T R A N SPOR T A T ION D R A W N B Y : D A T E : C O U N T Y : S C A L E : Q U A D : B A S I N : W B S # : S H E E T # : D . H . S T A L L I N G S E D E N T O N , N C 2 7 9 3 2 ( 2 5 2 ) 4 8 2 - 1 8 5 0 1 1 3 A I R P O R T D R . D I V I S I O N 1 NO R T H C A R O L I N A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N J U L Y 2 5 , 2 0 1 4 L A T . = 3 5 . 9 1 3 2 1 0 N L O N G . = 7 6 . 8 1 7 7 5 1 W B E R T I E W O O D A R D R O A N O K E S H O R E L I N E S T A B I L I Z A T I O N O N S R 1 5 0 0 S A N S O U C I R D 1 . 2 0 0 8 1 1 2 1 " = 5 ’ - C R O S S S E C T I O N DETAIL SECTION N W L CL S T A B I L I Z A T I O N P R O P O S E D S H O R E L I N E ( C L A S S B R I P R A P ) EXISTING RIP RAP F I L T E R F A B R I C -6’+3’+-GRAVEL EDGE OF M U D L I N E NOTE: O F P A V E M E N T E X I S T I N G 1 0 . 0 0 ’ LC DETA I L S E C T I O N - E N D V I E W 2 O P E N W A T E R I M P A C T : 5 3 4 F T PROPOSED CLASS B A N D C L A S S I I R I P R A P T O B E P L A C E D O N T O P O F E X I S T I N G R I P R A P WATER LEVEL: 9.75’11.00’PROPOSED RIP RAP TOP OF C a s h i e R i v e r C a s h i e R i v e r 2 5 ’ - 5 5 ’ +- ( 3 L O C A T IO N S ) 5 O F 5 M A P S 2 - 4 M A P S 2 - 4 T O T A L