Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20181089 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Summary_20221104Strickland, Bev From: Patrick Smith <psmith@sandec.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 12:14 PM To: samantha.j dailey@usace.army.mil; Goss, Stephanie Cc: Drew Blake; Tkugler5; bdaniel@wmgda.com; Bob Zarzecki Subject: [External] 1708 Lewter Shop Road Restoration - Year 2 Monitoring Summary (SAW-2018-01799 / DWR #18-1089) Attachments: Year 2 Monitoring Report - 1708 Lewtershop Road Restoration Project - 11-01-2022 (RFS).pdf CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Sam and Stephanie, Hope all is well. Attached please find our Year 2 Monitoring Summary for the Lewtershop Road restoration project including a summary from our recent monitoring visit, a site photo points map, year- to-year comparative site photos, and wetland data forms. Sam, I understand that you've taken over this project/project area since James Lastinger moved to the Washington, NC, office. James can likely provide any background information you need if it's not already in your files. Otherwise, don't hesitate to reach out to Bob or me if we can be of assistance or provide background. Please let me know if you have any questions. As always I'm available to get on a call. Best, Patrick PATRICK K. SMITH, PE, LEED®AP President/Principal Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA North Quarter Office Park 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104 Raleigh, NC 27615 Office (919) 846-5900 Direct (919) 256-4541 Mobile (919) 302-5783 psmith@sandec.com Visit us at sandec.com 1 This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This electronic communication may not have passed through our standard review/quality control process. Design data and recommendations included herein are provided as a matter of convenience and should not be used for final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's original signature and seal. If you are not the named addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the original communication from your system. Thank you. Please consider the environment before printing this email. 2 Year 2 Monitoring Summary 1708 Lewtershop Road Stream Restoration Project Chatham County, NC SAW-2018-01799 / DWR #18-1089 S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 _,•`� CAR°A1r� 0-�Q ��.`�'o SEAL 7. a D25525 r' • 4/GiNE•:• Patrick K. Smith, P.E. �i/'4'IK K N���� N.C. License No. 25525 r�� ? l' � Firm License No. C-2141 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 8412 Falls of \ruse Road, Suite 10-1, Raleigh, NC 27613 • Phone: (919) 8-k-3900. 1;. . (019) 840-9467 sunclee.eom Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Year 2 Monitoring Summary 1708 Lewtershop Road Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 The following summary of our Year 2 Monitoring efforts for the 1708 Lewtershop Road Stream and Wetland Restoration Project is provided. Post -restoration Monitoring Requirements As described in the post -construction Engineer's Certification letter, dated November 10, 2020, regulatory agencies require the following monitoring: • NCDEQ-DWR — The restored wetland, stream and adjacent buffer areas be monitored for a period of three (3) years and must include photographs detailing overall site conditions. Monitoring reports are to be submitted annually. • USACE — The restored wetland area be monitored annually for a period of up to five (5) years and include the collection of wetland determination data sheets along with photos of wetland restoration area. Monitoring reports are to be submitted annually. As agreed upon, annual site monitoring is to be qualitative in nature and will include an updated photo at each photo point to allow for year-to-year comparison of the restored wetlands, stream and buffer areas between monitoring years. As described in our certification letter, a total of 16 photo points were installed within the project limits to describe the as -built site conditions including four (4) overall/general site photos, five (5) stream photos, three (3) wetland photo points and four (4) buffer photo points. The location of each photo point is identified in the field with a flagged and numbered wooden construction stake. The approximate location of each of the photo points are shown on the attached Photo Points Map. A wetland data form for each of the restored wetland areas will also be prepared to further document restored wetland conditions each year. Annual site monitoring visits will be performed in the Fall timeframe. Monitoring reports will be submitted to USACE, NCDEQ-DWR, and Chatham County within 30 days of each scheduled monitoring visit, each year starting in 2021. Monitoring reports will describe observations from our site monitoring visit (including supporting Page 1 of 3 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Year 2 Monitoring Summary 1708 Lewtershop Road Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 documentation and representative photos) along with recommendations for addressing any issues within the restored stream, buffer and wetlands identified during our monitoring visit. Our Year 1 (2021) monitoring visit was performed on October 29, 2021. Our Year 1 monitoring summary was submitted on November 8, 2021, to USACE, DWR and Chatham County via Email. Year 2 Monitoring Summary Our Year 2 (2022) monitoring visit was performed on October 4, 2022, at which time we traversed the extent of the restoration site, collected photos at each of the previously established photo points, evaluated general planting survivability, and performed an evaluation of the restored site wetland areas. As shown in the attached comparative Monitoring Photo Set, site vegetation is thriving. The herbaceous vegetation is generally dense and the woody plantings appear healthy and in good condition. A number of the observed planted stems were already 5 to 7 feet, or more, in height. At the time the wetland and buffer photo points were established, three (3) planted stems within the general vicinity of each photo point were identified and pin -flagged for future observation. All but one of these stems were relocated during our site monitoring visit, and the vast majority of those stems observed remained viable. We observed a variety of the planted tree and shrub species during our visit including Bald Cypress (Taxodium distichum), Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii), American Sycamore (Plantanus occidentalis), Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), Witch Hazel (Hamamelis virginiana), Silky Dogwood (Cornus amomum), Red Chokeberry (Aronia arbutifolia) and Sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum). A number of volunteer woody species as well as numerous herbaceous species were observed throughout the wetland and buffer areas. Page 2 of 3 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Year 2 Monitoring Summary 1708 Lewtershop Road Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 The attached wetland data forms, one for each wetland, indicate that the restoration remains successful. And, while wetland hydrology was achieved in both wetland areas, saturation or inundation was not observed at the time of our monitoring visit. As shown on the attached Antecedent Precipitation Data the three months leading up to our visit indicate that the site is considered to be "Normal", however, as you are aware (and as indicated on the graph) conditions might well have been considered "Dryer than Normal" if not for the large rainfall associated with Hurricane Ian which impacted North Carolina just a few days prior to our site visit. The generally "Dry/Normal" conditions indicated, in combination with the generally higher temperatures leading up to our visit, and the fact that the vegetation is just beginning to signs of dormancy, provides further reason for the lack of saturation within the upper 12-inches at the time of our visit. The stream, while densely vegetated over much of the bed, appeared in good condition. We saw no indication of instability in the channel or any of the in - channel structures. Vegetation along the streambanks is dense, and also thriving along the entirety of the restored stream. The ground surface within the wetland and buffer restoration areas, including the adjacent side slopes is generally dense and the soil surface remains stable. We observed a few areas of modest ground cover and relatively minor erosion within the floodplain area. No evidence of significant erosion or sedimentation was observed. Our next monitoring visit is scheduled for October 2023, with a similar monitoring report to follow shortly thereafter. Attachments: 1. Photo Points Map 2. Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set 3. Wetland Data Forms 4. Antecedent Precipitation Data Page 3 of 3 NORTH SCALE I " = 40' 40 20 40 CONTOUR INTERVAL = I' NOTES: GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS PHOTO POINT (TYP.) 0+00 RESTORED STREAM ALIGNMENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY (TYP.) LOCATION OF PHOTO POINTS ARE APPROXIMATE AND INTENDED FOR REPRESENTATION PURPOSES ONLY. FLAGGED AND NUMBERED WOODEN STAKES IN FIELD CORRESPOND TO NUMBERED PHOTO POINTS. ALL LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY. SITE VON ITO�I f\G - PhOTO POINTS MAP © 2020 Sol 4 Environmental Consultants. FA. N.C. FIRM LICENSE NO. C-2141 RESTORED WETLAND BOUNDARY (APPROX.) z 0 0 c.DQ z2 OH z z 0 0o 0 11-1 I—p U3 � W z 0 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 1 — As Built General Site Conditions (Looking Southeast) Photo 1A — Year 1 Monitoring (2021) General Site Conditions (Looking Southeast) Page 1 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 1B — Year 2 Monitoring (2022) General Site Conditions (Looking Southeast) Page 1 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 2 — As Built General Site Conditions (Looking East) Photo 2A — Year 1 Monitoring (2021) General Site Conditions (Looking East) Page 2 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project Nu13526D4 Year JMonitoring Photo Set Photo 2B--Year 2Monitoring (2022 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 3 — As Built General Site Conditions (Looking West) Photo 3A — Year 1 Monitoring (2021) General Site Conditions (Looking West) Page 3 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 3B — Year 2 Monitoring (2022) General Site Conditions (Looking West) Page 3 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 4 — As Built General Site Conditions (Looking Northwest) Photo 4A — Year 1 Monitoring (2021) General Site Conditions (Looking Northwest) Page 4 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 4B — Year 2 Monitoring (2022) General Site Conditions (Looking Northwest) Page 4 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 5 — As Built General Site Conditions (Looking Northwest) Photo 5A — Year 1 Monitoring (2021) General Site Conditions (Looking Northwest) Page 5 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 5B — Year 2 Monitoring (2022) General Site Conditions (Looking Northwest) Page 5 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 6 — As Built Restored Stream & Adjacent Wetlands (Looking Upstream) Photo 6A — Year 1 Monitoring (2021) Restored Stream & Adjacent Wetlands (Looking Upstream) Page 6 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 6 — Year 2 Monitoring (2022) Restored Stream & Adjacent Wetlands (Looking Upstream) Photo 6Age 6Year 1 Monitoring Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 7 — As Built Restored Stream & Adjacent Wetlands (Looking Upstream) Photo 7A— Year 1 Monitoring (2021) Restored Stream & Adjacent Wetlands (Looking Upstream) Page 7 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 7B — Year 2 Monitoring (2022) Restored Stream & Adjacent Wetlands (Looking Upstream) Page 7 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 8 — As Built Restored Stream & Adjacent Wetlands (Looking Upstream) Photo 8A — Year 1 Monitoring (2021) Restored Stream & Adjacent Wetlands (Looking Upstream) Page 8 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 8B — Year 2 Monitoring (2022) Restored Stream & Adjacent Wetlands (Looking Upstream) Page 8 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 9 — As Built Restored Stream & Adjacent Buffer (Looking Upstream) Photo 9A — Year 1 Monitoring (2021) Restored Stream & Adjacent Buffer (Looking Upstream) Page 9 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 9B — Year 2 Monitoring (2022) Restored Stream & Adjacent Buffer (Looking Upstream) Page 9 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 10 — As Built Restored Wetland Vegetation (Swamp Chestnut Oak, Quercus michauxii) Photo 10A — Year 1 Monitoring (2021) Restored Wetland Vegetation (Swamp Chestnut Oak, Quercus michauxii) Page 10 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 10B — Year 2 Monitoring (2022) Restored Wetland Vegetation (Swamp Chestnut Oak, Quercus michauxii) Page 10 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 11 — As Built Restored Wetland Vegetation (Bald Cypress, Taxodium distichum) Photo 11A — Year 1 Monitoring (2021) Restored Wetland Vegetation (Bald Cypress, Taxodium distichum) Page 11 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 11B — Year 2 Monitoring (2022) Restored Wetland Vegetation (Bald Cypress, Taxodium distichum) Page 11 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 12 — As Built Restored Wetland Vegetation (American Sycamore, Platanus occidentalis) Photo 12A — Year 1 Monitoring (2021) Restored Wetland Vegetation (American Sycamore, Platanus occidentalis) Page 12 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 12B — Year 2 Monitoring (2022) Restored Wetland Vegetation (American Sycamore, Platanus occidentalis) Page 12 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 13 — As Built Restored Buffer Vegetation (Green Ash, Fraxinus pennslyvanica) Photo 13A — Year 1 Monitoring (2021) Restored Buffer Vegetation (Green Ash, Fraxinus pennslyvanica) Page 13 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 13B — Year 2 Monitoring (2022) Restored Buffer Vegetation (Green Ash, Fraxinus pennslyvanica) Page 13 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 14 — As Built Restored Buffer Vegetation (Spice Bush, Lindero benzoin) Photo 14A — Year 1 Monitoring (2021) Restored Buffer Vegetation (Spice Bush, Lindero benzoin) Page 14 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 14B — Year 2 Monitoring (2022) Restored Buffer Vegetation (Spice Bush, Lindero benzoin) Page 14 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 15 — As Built Restored Buffer Vegetation (Witch Hazel, Hamamelis virginiana) Photo 15A — Year 1 Monitoring (2021) Restored Buffer Vegetation (Witch Hazel, Hamamelis virginiana) Page 15 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 15B — Year 2 Monitoring (2022) Restored Buffer Vegetation (Witch Hazel, Hamamelis virginiana) Page 15 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 16 — As Built Restored Buffer Vegetation (Tulip Poplar, Lirodendron tulipifera) Photo 16A — Year 1 Monitoring (2021) Restored Buffer Vegetation (Tulip Poplar, Lirodendron tulipifera) Page 16 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewter Shop Road —Stream Restoration Project S&EC Project No. 13526.D4 Year 2 Monitoring Photo Set Photo 16B — Year 2 Monitoring (2022) Restored Buffer Vegetation (Tulip Poplar, Lirodendron tulipifera) Page 16 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: 1708 Lewter Shop Road Applicant/Owner: N/A City/County: Cary/Chatham Sampling Date: 10/04/2022 Investigator(s): S&EC- Josh Harvey Section, Township, Range: N/A Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.792546 Soil Map Unit Name: N/A State: NC Sampling Point: DP1 Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0 Long: -78.936670 Datum: NAD 83 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? NWI classification: N/A Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated Concave _Surface _True _Sparsely High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) _ _ _ (A3) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16) _Saturation _Moss Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _ _ _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _Drift _Thin _Saturation Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants _ _ _ Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 30 Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP1 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'r ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 50% of total cover: =Total Cover 20% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'r ) 1. Taxodium distichum 10 Yes OBL 2. Platanus occidentalis 5 No FACW 3. Pinus taeda 10 Yes FAC 4. Platanus occidentalis 5 No FACW 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 30 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'r ) 1. Juncus effusus 20 Yes FACW 2. Carex grayi 10 Yes FACW 3. Scirpus cyperinus 5 No FACW 4. Bidens trichosperma 5 No OBL 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 40 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'r ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel 0-6 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 6-12 10YR 4/1 85 10YR 4/6 Loc2 5 C PL 15 C PL Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Texture Remarks Sandy Sandy 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) X Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils, Version 8.0, 2016. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: 1708 Lewter Shop Road Applicant/Owner: N/A City/County: Cary/Chatham Sampling Date: 10/04/2022 Investigator(s): S&EC- Josh Harvey Section, Township, Range: N/A Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.792209 Soil Map Unit Name: N/A State: NC Sampling Point: DP2 Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0 Long: -78.936359 Datum: NAD 83 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? NWI classification: N/A Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Soil Cracks (B6) Surface (B8) (C2) Imagery (C9) (D1) (D4) _Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Plants (B14) Vegetated Concave _Surface _True _Sparsely High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) _ _ _ (A3) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Trim Lines (B16) _Saturation _Moss Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table _ _ _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ _ _ Deposits (B3) Muck Surface (C7) Visible on Aerial _Drift _Thin _Saturation Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants _ _ _ Iron Deposits (B5) X Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief _ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP2 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'r ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 50% of total cover: Absolute % Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'r ) 1. Taxodium distichum 2. Platanus occidentalis 3. Liquidambar styraciflua 4. Quercus michauxii 5. Pinus taeda 6. 7. 8. 9. Dominant Indicator Species? Status =Total Cover 20% of total cover: 5 No OBL 5 No FACW 15 Yes FAC 5 No FACW 15 Yes FAC 45 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 23 20% of total cover: 9 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'r ) 1. Juncus effusus 2. Carex grayi 3. Lespedeza angustifolia 4. Lycopus americanus 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 15 Yes FACW 10 Yes FACW 5 No FAC 5 No OBL 35 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 18 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'r 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 7 =Total Cover 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species Column Totals: Prevalence Index x 1 = x2= x3= x4= x5= (A) = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DP2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Typel Loc2 0-12 10YR 6/1 80 10YR 4/6 20 C PL Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey compacted clay 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (outside MLRA 127, 147, 148) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: This data sheet is revised from Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils, Version 8.0, 2016. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewtershop Road — Site Monitoring (Year 2) S&EC Project No. 13526 Wetland Data Form Photographs Photo 1— Data Point 1 (North of stream) Photo 2 — Data Point 1 (North of stream) Page 1 of 4 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewtershop Road — Site Monitoring (Year 2) S&EC Project No. 13526 Wetland Data Form Photographs Photo 3 — Data Point 1 Soil (Depth: 0-4") Photo 4 — Data Point 1 Soil (Depth: 12") Page 2 of 4 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewtershop Road — Site Monitoring (Year 2) S&EC Project No. 13526 Wetland Data Form Photographs Photo 5 — Data Point 2 (South of stream) Photo 6 — Data Point 2 (South of stream) Page 3 of 4 Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 1708 Lewtershop Road — Site Monitoring (Year 2) S&EC Project No. 13526 Wetland Data Form Photographs Photo 7 — Data Point 2 Soil (Depth: 0-12") (with oxidized rhizosphere shown) Photo 8 — Oxidized Rhizosphere Page 4 of 4 Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA' Daily Global Historical Climatology Network Mar 2022 Apr 2022 May 2022 Jun 2022 Coordinates 35.792546, -78.936670 Observation Date 2022-10-04 Elevation (ft) 323.35 Drought Index (PDSI) Not available (2022-09) WebWIMP H2O Balance Wet Season Figure and tables made by the Antecedent Precipitation Tool Version 1,0 Written by Jason Deters U.S. Army Corps of Engineer~ n Jul 2022 Aug 2022 n Sep 2022 _ Oct 2022 Nov 2022 Dec 2022 - Daily Total - 30-Day Rolling Total 30-Year Normal Range Jan 2023 Feb 2023 30 Days Ending 30th %ile (in) 70th %ile (in) Observed (in) Wetness Condition Condition Value Month Weight Product 2022-10-04 2.364567 5.31811 4.68504 Normal 2 3 6 2022-09-04 3.204331 5.835433 2.259843 Dry 1 2 2 2022-08-05 3.080315 6.61378 5.307087 Normal 2 1 2 Result Normal Conditions - 10 Weather Station Name Coordinates Elevation (ft) Distance (mi) Elevation A Weighted A Days Normal Days Antecedent APEX 35.7425, -78.8369 450.131 6.576 126.781 3.793 10348 90 APEX 2.2 N 35.7572, -78.8378 458.005 1.017 7.874 0.466 72 0 APEX 1.5 E 35.7269, -78.8188 453.084 1.481 2.953 0.671 23 0 APEX 1.8 E 35.7295, -78.8138 439.961 1.576 10.17 0.725 17 0 APEX 0.6 S 35.7174, -78.8459 459.974 1.806 9.843 0.83 3 0 CARY 2.7 S 35.7442, -78.8061 412.074 1.731 38.057 0.845 9 0 APEX 3.0 NNW 35.7669, -78.8607 416.011 2.15 34.12 1.041 2 0 CARY 1.4 S 35.7632, -78.7998 419.948 2.525 30.183 1.212 3 0 CARY 35.72, -78.7878 390.092 3.162 60.039 1.613 50 0 NEW HILL 35.6811, -78.9156 319.882 6.123 130.249 3.553 4 0 RALEIGH 4 SW 35.7294, -78.6839 419.948 8.629 30.183 4.143 821 0 RALEIGH STATE UNIV 35.7908, -78.6989 399.934 8.426 50.197 4.215 1 0