NC0023299_Permit Issuance_20020326

W A T� Michael F. Easley
Governor
,L �aipn
NCDENR William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
-� North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
'< Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
Ms. Barbara C. Norcom
Oakwood Land Development Corporation
P.O. Box 27081
Greensboro, North Carolina 27425-7081
Dear Ms. Norcom:
March 26, 2002
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0023299
Woodlake Mobile Home Park WWTP
Guilford County
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit. Accordingly, we are
forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
This final permit includes one major change from the revised draft permit sent to you on January 9, 2002. The
Wastewater Management Plan requirement has been amended to eliminate the requirement for an analysis of costs for
connection to the City of Greensboro. That information has been submitted by your Authorized Representative (Richard
Hughes of C J Service). The other portions of the Plan must be submitted by October 28, 2002.
Please note that your facility is discharging high amounts of total residual chlorine (TRC). The average TRC
concentration in the effluent should be below 28 µg/L (0.028 mg/L). Your facility discharged TRC concentrations at several
times this level throughout 2000 and 2001. Unless these concentrations are reduced, the Division may reopen this permit
to include a chlorine limit.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you
have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request
must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the
Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is
made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other
permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, the
Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Charles Weaver at telephone number [phone],
extension 511.
cc: Central Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office/Jenny Rankin
NPDES Unit
Technical Assistance & Certification Unit
N. C. Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
Sincerely,
ORIGINA►1A 1WDE.D BY
SUSAN
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center: 1 800 623-7748
it I

Permit NC0023299
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
The Oakwood Land Development Corporation is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 0.07 MGD wastewater treatment facility with the
following components:
• Influent pump station
• Aeration tanks
• Clarification tanks
• Tertiary filtration
• Aerated sludge holding tank
• Gaseous chlorine disinfection
This facility is located off NCSR 3426 south of Greensboro at the Woodlake Mobile
Home Park WWTP in Guilford County.
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into
an unnamed tributary to Polecat Creek,. classified WS-III waters in the Cape Fear River
Basin.

•
Quad: Pleasant Garden, N.C.
Latitude: 35°58'12"
Longitude: 79°47'43"
Stream Class: WS-III
Subbasin: 30609
Receiving Stream: UT Polecat Creek
NC0O23299
Woodlake Mobile Home Park
Facility
Location
North
SCALE t24OOO

Permit NC0023299
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as
specified below:
EFFLUENT'
CHARACTERISTICS
Flow
Monthly
Average .
0.07 MGD
Daily
Maximum
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Measurement
Frequency
Continuous
Sample Type.
Recording
Sample Locationl
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5-day (20°C)
(April 1— October 31)
BOD, 5-day (20°C)
(November 1 — March 31)
Total Suspended Residue
NH3 as N
(April 1— October 31)
NH3asN
(November 1 — March 31)
Dissolved Oxygen2
5.0 mg/L
10.0 mg/L
30.0 mg/L
2.0 mg/L
4.0 mg/L
7.5 mg/L
15.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Weekly
Weekly
Weekly
C Weekl
L
y
Weekly
-Z vial,
Weekly
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent,
Upstream & Downstream
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
Total Residual. Chlorine
Temperature (2C)
Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3+TKN)
Total Phosphorus
pH3
200 / 100 mI
400/100m1
Weekly
7 i,,2/Week
Weekly
Quarterly
Quarterly
Weekly
Grab
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite.
Grab
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent,
Upstream & Downstream
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. Upstream = at least 100 feet upstream from the outfall. Downstream = at least 300 feet downstream from the
outfall.
2. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/L.
3. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
A. (2.) WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
No later than 180 days after the effective date of this permit, the Permittee shall submit to the Division a
wastewater management plan. The plan shall include, at a minimum, the following elements:
• Facilities assessment. Describe deficiencies and operational difficulties in the existing
collection and treatment systems that hinder performance or permit compliance. Identify
potential improvements to correct those deficiencies. At a minimum, evaluate the
following considerations:
• inflow and infiltration,
• diversion of wasteloads during peak flows,
• equipment repairs and preventative maintenance,
• removal of accumulated solids, wastes, other debris
(continued on next page)

Permit NC0023299
A. (2.) WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (continued).
• Optimization plan. Develop.a plan for optimization, rehabilitation, expansion and/or
replacement of the collection and treatment systems to achieve optimum performance.
Identify specific measures and key tasks, including those in the above facilities assessment,
and provide an estimated schedule for completion of each.
• Biosolids management plan. Develop an operations plan to be used (and describe the
procedures currently used) for managing septage / biomass in the treatment system,
including associated solids wasting and disposal, to promote optimum treatment system
performance. Identify operating parameters to be used and target values or ranges of
values where appropriate.
• Communications plan. Describe a plan for informing utility customers of their potential
impacts on treatment system performance and appropriate practices for minimizing those
impacts, including a schedule for implementation of the plan. At a minimum, include the
following elements:
• oil and grease contributions to the collection and treatment system,.
• introductory material for new tenants, describing acceptable waste disposal practices
• common practices that adversely affect the collection/treatment system
• notification procedures in case of emergencies.
Submit the completed plan to: Jenny Rankin
NC DENR Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107

C 1 Service
P. O. Box 5
Oakboro, NC. 28129
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
March 03, 2002
Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NPDES Unit
N. C. Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Weaver,
MAR - 6 2002
-"f'\?ER OUJ iA I!i
Subject: Engineering Alternatives Analysis
Woodlake MHP
Permit no. NC0023299
Gilford County
Please find enclosed the letter from Gilford County Planning and Development on our request to have sewer
service extended to this facility.
We would like to have the EAA removed from the permit for the following reasons:
The city of Greensboro/ Gilford County has no plans now or in the near future to provide service to this area.
The EAA prepared in November 1992 states the only viable alternative then was city/county hook up.
The cost of any alternatives to discharge listed in the 1992 EAA proved to be to costly then and have only
increased over 10 years.
Please contact me at 704-474-3014 if you need more detail on this or any other permit issues.
Sincerely,
Richard Hughes
ORC- Woodlake MHP WWTP
P.O. Box 5
Oakboro, NC 28129

GUILFORD COUNTY
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
February 22, 2002
Richard J. Hughes
ORC Woodlake MHP-WWTP
PO Box 5
Oakboro, NC 28129
Subject: Water and Sewer Feasibility Study
Oakwood Mobile Home Park
209 Sheraton Park Road
ACL No. 09-0633-0-0621-00-002
Dear Mr. Hughes:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the feasibility study from the City of Greensboro Water Resources
Department. Greensboro Water Resources has declined your proposal to extend water and sewer to the
referenced property. Per Mr. Hill's letter this property is not within the current water and sewer service
boundary nor is it within Greensboro's service area.
Please contact Johnnie Hill, Greensboro Water Resources, [phone] with any questions concerning the
water and sewer issues. Also, enclosed is a copy of the resolution adopted by the City of Greensboro City
Council on December 21, 1999.
If you have any other questions telephone me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Beth Anne Aheron
Community Services
Post Office Box 3427 • Greensboro, North Carolina 27402
Telephone: [phone]

336 412 6305 9.6K
02/21/2002 13:54 CITY OF G'BORO WATER RESOURCES 4 6988 NO.294 P01
ATE R
• sources
City of G
.dministration
s36)373-2055
xx [phone]
ustomer Service
.36) 373-2344
tz [phone]
eater Supply
itched Plant
36) 373-5855
tx [phone]
Iwnsend Plant
36) 375-2230
ot [phone]
'step Recianiation
>rth Buffalo Plant
36) 373-5913
x [phone]
Z. Osborne Plant
36) 375-2240
x [phone]
fnstruCtiOb &
ainIenauCe
rvicc C rater
36) 373-2033
x [phone]
eter Services
16)373-2071
x [phone]
Ater Conservation
16)373-7610
x [phone]
irmwatcr
tnagement
i6) 373-2055
( [phone]
MEMORANDUM
TO: Beth Aheron
Guilford County Community Services
FROM: Johnnie Hill
A06\
City of Greensboro Water Resources
DATE: February 21, 2002
SUBJECT: 209 Sheraton Park Road
ACL No. 09-0633-0-0621-00-002
Oakwood Mobile Home Park
Per your request we have reviewed the above piece of property to determine the
feasibility of providing water and sewer service. The referenced property is not within
the current water and sewer service boundary nor is it within Greensboro's service area.
According to the resolution adopted by the City of Greensboro City Council on
December 21, 1999, the referenced property is not eligible for water and sewer service
because it lays outside of the current boundary. Therefore we must decline your proposal
to extend water and sewer to the reference-4 property at tom. is time.
If we can be of further assistance, please call [phone].
jah
1505
P. O. Box 3136, Greensboro; NC 27402-3136 • www.ci.greensboro.nc.us • TDD [phone]

RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING POLICY FOR EXTENSION OF WATER
AND SEWER LINES AND VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS AND
AMENDING THE WATER AND SEWER RULES
WHEREAS, the City adopted a policy regarding voluntary annexations and
extension of water and sewer lines on April 20, 1999, August 2, 1999, and December 21,
1999;
WHEREAS, the City continues to face several critical issues in providing water
and sewer service and has a limited supply of both at this time;
WHEREAS, the City has adopted a water conservation ordinance and has
implemented restrictions from time to time on the extension of water and sewer;
WHEREAS, Randleman Dam has been permitted, and construction on the dam
has just commenced;
WHEREAS, water quality in the Cape Fear basin is presently being studied and
additional waste load allocation in the Upper Cape Fear is questionable;
WHEREAS, the City has purchased water from High Point and Winston-Salem
and is now purchasing water from the City of Reidsville to provide an additional source
of water until construction of the Randleman Dam Project is completed o
o
WHEREAS, a strategy for water and sewer allocation is essential to both
immediate and long term planning and development and for the protection of public L
health, safety and welfare; o Y
•
c
WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of the citizens of Greensboro to enaci o
a growth policy governing voluntary annexations; oz o z
' c U
0
0
U
c
WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of the City to establish revised
criteria for extension of water and sewer lines which protect our limited resources and
promote orderly growth of our environs;
WHEREAS, as growth and development of the City changes and the water supply
and sewer allocation parameters develop, it is important that this policy be periodically
reviewed;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF GREENSBORO:
1. That the described attached policy and amendment to the water and sewer rules is
hereby adopted.
2. That this policy and amendment to the water and sewer rules shall continue in
effect until further action of this Council.
3. That this policy be reviewed periodically, but no later than December 31, 2003
and at least every two (2) years thereafter.
Approved as to form
i\V).
City Attorney

POLICY FOR EXTENSION OF WATER AND SEWER LINES AND VOLUNTA
ANNEXATIONS RY
All properties located within the city limits of the City of Greensboro shall be eligible
for
water and sewer service. For properties not so located, extension of water and/o g
service will be allowed only (1) to those persons, fsewer
lie between the city limits and the green line shown on the rations whose properties
on August 21, 2001, are capable under North Carolina law of futurp e and x City Council
City of Greensboro, and are covered by a voluntaryannexation annexation into the
pursuant to either N.C.G.S. 160A-31 or N.C.G. 60A 58 petition executed
where the green line is along a street or creek [Note: it is intended that
will be eligible for service to the extent that sucho propertyrton the far side of the green line
is
of avity
service to a sewer line in the street or alongside the creek] and (2)capable
the following sewer
A. Guilford County Schools within unincorporated areas which must be a r
by the City of Greensboro and Guilford County. PP owed
B. Areas within the Airport Exemption Area.
C Properties for which there was, as of December 21, 1999, a recorded Utility
Agreement and Annexation Petition or an approved master plan, approved
plan, or approved preliminary subdivision plan calling for City water and/ortte sewer
service.
D. Any single-family residential lot or non-residential principal building existin
of December 21, 1999 , located in an unincorporated area and directlygas
water and/or sewer line may make one connection, not to exceed a pipe s sizeiof a
inches for water and 4 inches for sewer, to the line(s). of 1
''A
E. Areas covered by reciprocal service agreements involving water and/or sewer
with other governmental entities.
F "Doughnut hole" property located in an unincorporated area and within an area
surrounded by properties covered by previously submitted utility agreement and
annexation petitions.
G. Properties within the Limited Availability Area shown on the above -state
d which may connect onto or extend the existing underutilized lines in that area ap�
until an additional 250,000 gallons per day of water consumption has been
achieved.
The City of Greensboro will not approve any petition for voluntary annexation on a
property that needs City water and/or sewer in order to be developed but cannot obtain it
due to this policy. However, this policy shall not prevent annexation of properties
already receiving City water and/or sewer service, regardless of location.
This policy shall continue in effect until further action of this Council.

North Carolina, Guilford County
News & Record
Published by
News & Record, Inc.
Greensboro, North Carolina
Affidavit of Publication
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State, duly commissioned, qualified and authorized by law to administer oaths,
personally appeared Ashley Bowles who being first duly sworn, deposed and says:
1/11/02
1. That she is the Publisher's Representative of the Greensboro News & Record, Inc. a corporation, engaged in the publication of newspapers
known as "News & Record", published, issued and entered as second class mail in the City of Greensboro in said County and State.
2. That she is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement; that the notice or other le:. • ertisement, a copy of which is attached
hereto, was published in the News & Record on the above listed dates.
3. That the said newspaper (or newspapers) in which such notice, paper, documd
each and every such publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements
North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Sectio
Publisher's Representative
Sworn to and subscribed before me, this
ID
Notary Public
My commission expires: August 23, 2005
advertisement w
a I s of Section 1-5
alSta'tteso
2002.
as, at the time of
neral Statutes of
ma.
VALER;E McNElL
NOIA"Y PUBLIC
GUILFORD COUNTY, NC
Commission Expires 8.23-2045.
NCDENR/DWQ/NPDES
Ad
Date Edidao
Class PO Ad Corn
1275 I65 01/12/02 News & Record 400 NC0069256 PUBLIC NOTICE STATE
Ad # 11275165
Date 101/10/2002 Time I11:01 AM
PUBLIC NOTICE
STAIR OF NIIN CAROONA
ENVRONMEN1AL
IMNAGEMENT
COMMOSI@e/M DES INC
c61T MAL SE0NICECEMEN
6010(0l, NC 2T699-161T
500070A9CN BF NIENTIO
ISSUER NPDES WASTEWATER
PENM6
Dn ewba da00 ulbn ol2NC
Ganeral50Lte 1 a3.2 L Pub:
Ec Mw 92-50o an4 ogther ww-
tr eNord`r Creelo hn a e,117 n
mental Managposes 0 0006 a Ne-
prapoaes a
Elpnnlnetnnl 5yste`mal(y0POES/
500 10 25 s) Vries Oelpwn6 pub-
lish days from the
wiren commm�N regertling the
pr oposeap met wiu b. so-
auan ea 1711,l noiim`'API
Poet E001 7 cun9Enrlitiae
anal 4momloaCom re dYg
na peaposed pel0(0 fne Of
Web ,5 ii0" a«nelo
hold a poslk meermg im ue
proposed permit Aoua the
uNslon meek.e a a1gn4lcant
degee
tlegee olpublic Inbred.
Coo ies of rie0109 permnan4
PneIsuppo0d Inlormation
enfan. p1 66 b )rme e7a7i p resen
ooem,li end`P0Yment ol` ali
ments•nu/6, 09uealAlol
0brmatun to ine Ne D14000
of weta,Ow MM .hire ebnne
Mckoen`atr19191M133 5069
1A.TlaQd1umea bDReelmeanmNdeer
tiled onnsmaY
ry •ten0noiwa
y
C
2 reof1666 .m. and me
p.m. to ra it nbi non p.m.
NP M. DES Permit Number
iemnelnefi 010,210 isll
00 300T'es nan strop,21 C for e
i teE In cri,d V:,14rdn
r lore UT'rppltn`e Eeal'foh of
FeelOMW, Blr I,.IC uemnl `p` a-
t Iauspen2, aa,90,.atal
Dhen ol, bennene. Yens era
charge may aft etlutur�eelb-
cations In this portion of the
xmg stream.
N �POES Permit Number
NCo023299.I kwood Land
oenelo vmem ca o non
27000, alt000 B.O. NC
2r425TIiasappled 1arw' NC
per-
m t renewal bra 20,7t 40.
cased in treated
renreat d County rule
un n ate E wastewater
ribute N'lo
Poleeal neekme's=ge real
Mae,0asm. curmtM000 end
IO0 051000fan eiicn.g0
into Pa Mloeorltae�reae Ning
Ad shown is not actual print size

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Subject:
January 9, 2002
Lee Spencer
NC DENR / DEH / Regional Engineer
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NPDES Unit
Review of Draft NPDES Permit NC0023299
Woodlake MHP WWTP
Guilford County
AVA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RECE VED
NC.f).trt F% rHMR
JAN 1 5 2002
Winsto ,-Z: alern
Regional Offica
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the draft permit and return this form by February 11,
2002. If you have any questions on the draft permit, please contact me at the telephone number or e-mail address
listed at the bottom of this page.
4�0.I'-1.,40d41�► ,® 4 * **-+.I'et:]
RESPONSE: (Check one)
Concur with the issuance of this permit provided the facility is operated and maintained properly, the stated effluent limits
are met prior to discharge, and the discharge does not contravene the designated water quality standards.
Concurs with issuance of the above permit, provided the following conditions are met:
TN is Of/—/CL sr/1- /%.r rl CoAtce.e9s
>A► 7'1-/ ,4-r-7-4 c je.e9 9- 5- 97 M ell o e vet
XLct-/ i/u.i6 5 rA1 4'i C°A #V 5L ,/LCeAT Co")s ffTt
el, /G/AA[r` GJe---.-( (J 4-r-f IXUALI r f £7-4 ID.4/L0.1*1 (.�L
T-o T/>£ �E- /SSGC44 CL ©/- 7w/I N11T.
Opposes the issuance of the above permit, based on reaso ( below, or attached:
/¢s OuTl/6J44
f T</E
Aft 44
/n0
L L N o 7 67 13✓E c
Signed
t
C�aaa
Date:
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 913733=5083; ctension 511 (fax) 919 733-0719
VISIT us ON THE INTERNET @ http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES Charles.Weaver@ ncmail.net

September 5, 1997
MEMORANDUM
TO: David Goodrich
NPDES Permits Group Leader
Discharge Permits Unit
Division of Water Quality
From:
Lee G. Spencer
Regional Engineer, Public Water Supply
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Environmental Health
SUBJECT: Draft National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System Permit
Woodlake Mobile Home Park WWTP
Permit No. NC0023299
Guilford County
Reference is made to the above Draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Permit. I received a memorandum and package of information on the above referenced
facility from Ron Linville of your Division. The memo states that Guilford County will not
be running sewer into the area anytime in the near future despite the owner's desire to ceas e
this discharge by sewer connection. Mr. Linville further asks that I supply you with written
documentation of any specific activities which we would like included in the permit.
To once again relate our concerns: the existing discharge is on the headwaters of the
City of Randleman's water supply watershed. These waters are classified WS-III. The Staff
Review and Evaluation form states that noxious conditions have been observed immediately
downstream of this discharge. The water treatment plant for Randleman has a very difficult
time with taste and odor problems due to algae in their reservoir, especially during warmer
months. Though this discharge is not likely to be solely responsible for this condition, is it
no doubt a contributing factor. We would like to see correction of this situation of noxious
conditions in the receiving stream, along with consistent compliance with permit limits and
water quality standards.
- continued -

Memorandum to David Goodrich
Permit No. NC0023299
September 5, 1997
page 2,
If the addition of flow equalization, tertiary filters, and chlorination/dechlorination
will adequately address the above concerns, then by all means make these additions a
condition of permit renewal.
If these additions will not adequately address the above concerns, then we still object
to the reissuance of this permit until adequate treatment or another alternative is provided.
cc: Linda C. Sewall
Ron Linville
Public Water Supply/ Raleigh

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
MEMORANDUM
TO:
From:
September 5, 1997
David Goodrich
NPDES Permits Group Leader
Discharge Permits Unit
Division of Water Quality
Lee G. Spencer
Regional Engineer`, Public Water Supply
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Environmental Health
DIEEE HNTIO 2°21
aS SEP 0 61997
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
SUBJECT: Draft National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System Permit
Woodlake Mobile Home Park WWTP
Permit No. NC0023299
Guilford County
Reference is made to the above Draft National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System Permit. I received a memorandum and
package of information on the above referenced facility from Ron
Linville of your Division. The memo states that Guilford County
will not be running sewer into the area anytime in the near future
despite the owner's desire to cease this discharge by sewer
connection. Mr. Linville further asks that I supply you with
written documentation of any specific activities which we would
like included in the permit.
To once again relate our concerns: the existing discharge is
on the headwaters of the City of Randleman's water supply
watershed. These waters are classified WS-III. The Staff Review
and Evaluation form states that noxious conditions have been
observed immediately downstream of this discharge. The water
treatment plant for Randleman has a very difficult time with taste
and odor problems due to algae in their reservoir, especially
during warmer months. Though this discharge is not likely to be
solely responsible for this condition, is it no doubt a
contributing factor. We would like to see correction of this
situation of noxious conditions in the receiving stream, along with
consistent compliance with permit limits and water quality
standards.
585 Waughtown Street,
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107-2241
Voice 910-771-4600
- continued -
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Memorandum to. David Goodrich
Permit No. NC0023299
September 5, 1997
page 2
If the addition of flow equalization, tertiary filters, and
chlorination/dechlorination will adequately address the above
concerns, then by all means make these additions a condition of
permit renewal.
If these additions will not adequately address the above
concerns, then we still object to the reissuance of this permit
until adequate treatment or another alternative is provided.
cc:
Linda C. Sewall
Ron Linville
Public Water Supply/ Raleigh

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Winston—Salem Regional Office
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lee Spencer
THROUGH: Steve Mauney " \
FROM: Ron Linville
SUBJECT: Oakwood Homes — Woodlake MHP
NC0023299
Guilford County
DATE: 970818
rj
Please be advised that a meeting was held on April 22, 1997 in the WSRO DWQ with
representatives of Oakwood to discuss options for this facility. Woodlake was encouraged to
look at additional flow equalization, tertiary filters and disinfection options (chlorination and
dechlorination as opposed to ultraviolet). Guilford County will not be running sewer into the
area anytime in the near future despite Oakwood's desire to cease this discharge by sewer
connection.
The Piver letter indicates a desire to add flow to this facility despite previous problems
with the receiving stream. Barbara Norcom indicated on this date by phone that they are trying
to sell this plant to a utility and they will know by the end of the month if this will occur. At
that time they will advise DWQ in writing. She also indicated that the purchaser would be
required in the contract to provide for WWTP upgrades by a specified date.
DWQ needs to reissue this permit and request concurrence from DWS at this time. If
you have any questions or comments please contact Dave Goodrich at 910/733-5083 x 517.
You may also wish to discuss this with our office. Barbara Norcom with Oakwood may be
reached at 910/664-2400 for additional insights. Should you require specific activities to be
included in the NPDES Permit, please detail them in writing to Dave Goodrich. Thank you for
your time and consideration.
attachments: File memo of April 22, 1997
Piver letter
cc: WSRO
Central Files
Dave Goodrich

OAKWOOD
HOMES
CORPORATION
7800 McCLOUD ROAD (27409-9634) • POST OFFICE BOX 27081 • GREENSBORO, N.C. 27425-7081 • 910-664-2400
May 20, 1997
Mr. Larry D. Coble, Regional Supervisor
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107-2241
vn
RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. Of EHNR
MAY 2 1 1997
W•nSt ofl-SaiBf'
Regiofa1 Office
Re: Woodlake MHP NPDES No. NC0023299
Dear Mr. Coble:
Per our meeting April 22, 1997, Bill Piver has presented his findings of water/sewer
consumption for the above referenced waste treatment plant in the attached letter.
It appears that we do have the capacity for development on the existing permit.
Please review Mr. Piver's findings and let me know how we proceed from here. I look
forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
OAKWOOD LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Barbara C. Norcom
Director of Operations
Attachment

William C. Piver & Associates
eveCopment
.
anagement �' F ngineerin
805 Spring Forest Road, Suite 950 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 • 919/872-0021 • Fax: [phone]
May 12, 1997
Ms. Barbara C. Norcom
Director of Operations
Oakwood Land Development Corporation
P.O. Box 77013
Greensboro, N.C. 27417-7013
Re: Woodlake STP.
Greensboro, N.C.
Dear Ms. Norcom:
At your request we have reviewed the referenced sewage treatment plant's flow records as well as the
water consumption for the 300 lot Woodlake Mobile Home Park, the major contributor to the plant. 115
lots in the Greybridge Subdivisionalso contribute flow to this facility. Our findings are as follows:
1. The plant is presently permitted to.discharge up to 70,000. gallons per day (gpd)
average daily flow (ADF). DEHNR will not permit a flow increase over 70,000 gpd.
2. Over the past 12 months the plant has treated and discharged an ADF of 42,503 gpd.
The highest monthly ADF was in January of this year, 48,511 gpd.
3. Discussions with the State DEHNR indicate that the agency will accept the highest
monthly ADF (48,511 gpd) as the current level of utilization of the plant. Therefore,
the remaining capacity available to Oakwood for development is 21,489 gpd, which
will bring the level of utilization of the plant to 70,000 gpd.
4. When the 12 month ADF (42,503 gpd) is divided by the total number of sites (415)
contributing to the plant, an ADF of 105 gpd/site is derived.
5. Utilizing the contribution/site ratio of 105 gpd/ site would allow Oakwood to
develop an additional 204 sites (21,489 gpd / 105 gpd/ site) that would discharge to
this facility without exceeding its permitted flow limit.
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call us.
Sincerely,
William C.
illiam C. Piver, P.E.
ociates.
Helping Businesses and Individuals Maximize their Property Development Objectives

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
April 22, 1997
MEMORANDUM
TO: File
FROM: Steve Mauney
SUBJECT: Oakwood Homes/Woodlake
Guilford County
On April 22, 1997, Larry Coble and I met with Robert D. Harvey, V.P. Adm.
Oakwood; Barbara C. Norcom, Director of Operations, Oakwood and William C. Piver, PE
to discuss their compliance status.
BACKGROUND
1. Engineering Economic Analysis, November 1992.
2. ATC issued March 15, 1994, for tertiary filters and UV disinfection. (not
constructed)
3. Oakwood sold the Woodlake MHP but still controls Graybridge Subdivision and owns
about 60 acres of vacant land.
4. Draft permit is on hold from comments by Division of Water Supply.
5. Through February 1997, the facility has shown 6 months of total compliance.
MEETING NOTES
1. Ms. Norcom said that it would cost $800,000 to run the sewer up Randleman Road
and to install the Pump Station along with 'an additional requirement from Greensboro to
upgrade the water line to their site from 6" to 12".
2. A second option to tie into sewer at Pleasant Garden is a distance of 1 1/2 miles.
3. Oakwood expressed a strong desire to eliminate the plant, but with the associated
costs, they desire to upgrade their plant until sewer collection is available at a more
reasonable cost.
4. Oakwood was encouraged to look at the addition of flow equalization as well as the
tertiary filters and disinfection. As opposed to the UV disinfection, Mr. Piver said they
would evaluate chlorination and dechlorination.

e
5. Mr. Harvey said that Guilford County doesn't have the area of Woodlake listed on
any future schedule to receive sewer service.
6. Oakwood will evaluate current water use and their potential to use the total 70,000
GPD capacity of permit. (Current flow average of 41,000 GPD).
• 7. Response from Oakwood is due June 2; 1997.
SUMMARY
Some of the mechanical units may need major renovation just to achieve the original
capacity of 70,000 GPD. If Oakwood begins to back pedal on the upgrades listed above in
#4, they should be required to provide a current alternative$analysis which includes a soils
analysis.

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
April 25, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lee Spencer, WSRO
Linda Sewall, DEH
THROUGH: Dave Goodrich
FROM: Jeanette Powell
SUBJECT: Draft NPDES Permit No. NC0023299
Woodlake Mobile Home Park
cc: Ron Linville, WSRO
The following is provided in response to your March 26, 1996 memo providing comments
on the subject draft NPDES permit.
An alternatives analysis was performed in 1993..The facility is in the process of
investigating connection to municipal sewer, which is currently located within 2.25 miles
of the site. There are no current plans for the extension of municipal sewer to the site.
However, the facility is investigating the possibility of installing a sewer line and
recovering the costs through connection fees.
According to the Regional Office, there is no analytical documentation of problem
discharges from this facility. Noxious conditions have been visually observed instream
and the facility has cleaned out the creek on at least one occasion.
A copy of the Regional Office Staff Report is attached for your convenience, as is a copy of
the revised Part III of the permit. The draft permit has been modified to require removal of
the discharge and connection to municipal sewer within 180 days of availability. An
updated alternatives analysis shall also be required within one year of the issuance of this
permit. In addition, Ron Linville has indicated that the removal of the elbow on the
discharge pipe is desirable. This action would allow the Regional Office to visually
observe the discharge and collect samples when suspect conditions exist. Barbara Norcom
of Oakwood Development is pursuing this action directly with Ron Linville.
We hope that this information satisfies any concerns you have regarding the renewal of this
NPDES permit. If you have further comment regarding this discharge, please respond
prior to May 24 so that we may proceed with finalizing this permit.

Part III
Permit No. NC0023299
E. POTW Connection Condition
This facility discharges into a zero flow stream and removal of the discharge is recommended.
Within 180 days of municipal sewer service availability, Oakwood Land Development Corporation
is required to tie on and discontinue all wastewater discharges to waters of the state.
F. Zero Flow Condition
The facility discharges into a stream with 7Q10/30Q2=0 cfs. Removal of discharge is
recommended if a more environmentally sound alternative is available at an economically
reasonable cost. An engineering report evaluating alternatives to discharge is due within one year
of permit issuance. As part of the report, the cost of constructing a treatment plant that will meet a
limit 17 µg/1 chlorine should be included, if there are no feasible alternatives to surface discharge.
Upon review of the engineering report, the Division retains the right to reopen and modify this
NPDES permit to require removal of the discharge or to revise the permit limitations within a
specified time schedule.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Health
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Linda C. Sewall, Director
MEMORANDUM
TO:
e��
�EHNFR
March 26, 1996
Mr. David Goodrich
NPDES Permits Group Leader
Discharge Permits Unit
Division of Environmental Management
FROM: Linda C. Sewalll, Director
Division of Environmental Health
SUBJECT: Draft National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System Permit
Woodlake Mobile Home Park WWTP
Permit No. NC0023299
Guilford County
Reference is made to the above Draft National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System Permit. We have reviewed this draft
permit and offer the following comments.
The existing discharge is on the headwaters of the City of
Randleman's water supply watershed. These waters are classified
WS-III.
The draft permit states that "An engineering report evaluating
alternatives to discharge is due 180 days prior to expiration along
with the renewal application". Yet the Staff Review and Evaluation
form states that this language was previously included in the
3/15/94 Authorization to Construct. It also states that no
alternatives analysis was provided with the permit renewal
application. Is this report not due now?? Could not the current
application be considered incomplete?
The Staff Review and Evaluation form also states that noxious
conditions have been observed immediately downstream of this
discharge. The water treatment plant for Randleman has a very
difficult time with taste and odor problems due to algae in their
reservoir, especially during warmer months. Though this discharge
is not likely to be solely responsible for this condition, is it no
doubt a contributing factor. What has been done to correct this
situation of noxious conditions in the receiving stream?
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Memorandum to David Goodrich
Permit No. NC0023299
March 26, 1996
page 2
There was not a copy of the Regional Office's Staff Report
with this draft permit.
Is publicly owned wastewater collection available in this
area? If not, how soon until it is available?
We look forward to your response to the above questions. If
we can be of further assistance, please contact us.
LS/LGS

Engineering Economic Analysis
NPDES Permit Options
Woodlake Mobile Home Park
Guilford County , NC
Prepared for:
Oakwood Land Development Corporation, Inc.
2225 S. Holden Road
Greensboro , NC 27417
Prepared by:
Research & Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
106 Short Street
Kernersville, North Carolina 27284
919/996-2841
��pOD
CORPORATION DEVELOPMENT
A SUBSIDIARY OF OOOD HOMES CORPORATION
2225 SOUTH POST OFFICE OROAD
BOX013
GREENSBORO, 77 7F C 741
910-855-2526 95
FAX [phone]
BARBARA C. NORCOM
DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS
vember 1992

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Title Page
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 General Information 1
2.1 Existing Discharge Facilities 2
2.2 Compliance History 2
3.0 Evaluation of Alternatives 2
3.1 Connection to Public
Sewer System
3.2 Subsurface Disposal
3.3 Spray Irrigation
3
4
6
3.4 Relocation of Discharge
To Flowing Stream 7
3.5 Continuation of Discharge Under
More Stringent Permit Limits 7
4.0 Cost Analysis 8
4.1 Preliminary Cost Estimate:
Connection To City Sewer
At Pleasant Garden School 8
4.2 Preliminary Cost Estimate:
Connect to City Sewer At
South Elm Eugene Street
9
4.3 Preliminary Cost Estimate:
Upgrade Existing Treatment Plant 9
5.0 Summary 9

a
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
APPENDIX 1
APPENDIX 2
APPENDIX 3
APPENDIX 4
APPENDIX 5
APPENDIX 6
APPENDIX 7
USGS Topo Map
Compliance Evaluation Analysis Report
Previous Investigation of Connection to
City Sewer
Information Relative to South East Sewer
Project
Possible Route for Connection to City
Sewer
Soil & Environmental Consultants Report
Potential Route For Relocation
of Discharge

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This engineering economic analysis of available non -discharge and
discharge alternatives has been prepared for Woodlake :Mobile Home
Park (WLMHP) as required by the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. The purpose of this
report is to identify and evaluate feasible alternatives for the
disposal of wastewater from the mobile home park which now
discharges to a designated zero flow stream.
2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION
Facility Name:
NPDES Permit No:
County:
Facility Address:
Name of Permittee:
Permittee's Mailing
Address:
Permittee's Phone
Number:
Name of Receiving
Stream:
Report Prepared by:
Preparer's NC PE
Certification No.:
Preparer's Address:
Preparer's Phone No.:
Woodlake Mobile Home Park
NC 0023299
Guilford
Sheraton Park Rd.(NCSR 3426), south
of Greensboro, Guilford County, NC
Oakwood Land Development Corporation
2225 S. Holden Road
Greensboro, NC 27417
[phone]
Unnamed tributary to Polecat Creek in
the Cape Fear River Basin
Dennis R. Herzing, P.E.
15609
P 0 Box 473
Kernersville, NC 27284
919-996-2841
Date of Investigation: September 1, 1992 through November
1,1992
Page - 1 •

2.1 EXISTING DISCHARGE FACILITIES
WLMHP's existing wastewater treatment facility consists of an
extended aeration treatment plant. The plant has an influent pump
station, two parallel aeration systems each having 35,000 gallon
capacity & diffused aeration, aerated sludge holding tank, final
clarifiers, chlorination, chlorine contact tank, continuous flow
measurement and recording, and standby power. The plant is
currently permitted for a flow of 70,000 gal./day at a detention
time of 24 hours.
The existing facility provides treatment for the wastewater
discharge from WLMHP which currently has approximately 300 mobile
home lots, and from Greybridge Development which has approximately
118 lots either completed or under development.
For reference purposes, a partial copy of the USGS topo map of the
area is provided in Appendix 1 of this report.
2.2 COMPLIANCE HISTORY
Based on a review of compliance evaluation analysis reports.
covering the period May, 1990 through March, 1992, only one minor
permit violation was identified during the two year period. That
violation, which occurred in July, 1991, consisted of a reported
NH3-N value of 6.53 mg/1 as opposed to a permit limit of 5.00 mg/1.
Copies of the referenced compliance evaluation analysis reports are
provided in Appendix 2 of this report.
3.0 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
The following non -discharge alternatives have been considered in
this study:
1. Connection to municipal sewer system
2.. Subsurface disposal
3. Spray irrigation
In addition to the non -discharge alternatives listed above,
relocation of the discharge to a stream with 7Q10/30Q2 >0 or 7Q10 =
0 and 30Q2 >0 has been considered. Also, upgrade of the existing
facility to continue the discharge in compliance with limits of
BOD = 5/10 mg/1, NH3-N = 1/1.8 mg/1, summer/winter respectively,
as defined in the existing permit, has been considered.
Page - 2

3.1 CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER SYSTEM
Various options for connecting the discharge from WLMHP to the
municipal sewer system have been previously investigated by another
consultant on behalf of Oakwood Land Development,Inc. Based on the
information available to RAL, it appears that both a private system
(serving only property owned by Oakwood) and a public system
(serving the entire drainage basin) were considered. It appears
that the other consultant's investigations concluded that
approximately 19000 feet of sewer lines (one mile of gravity sewer,
the rest force main) would be required for the private system.
Connection to the Municipal system would have been inside the
Greensboro city limits along South Elm Eugene Street, about three
miles north of the existing WLMHP treatment plant location.
Although feasible, connection to the municipal system in this
manner was shown to be very expensive. Preliminary cost estimates
for the private and public systems, as prepared by Hugh Creed
Associates, Inc., are provided in appendix 3 of this report.
In the course of this investigation, it has been learned that
Guilford County and the City of Greensboro are in the process of
extending municipal sewers to areas somewhat nearer WLMHP.
According to Mr. Larry Harville of the Guilford County Planning and
Development Department, the sewer extension project was prompted by
the poor soil conditions and numerous failing subsurface disposal
systems in the area.
The project, known as "The Southeast Sewer Project", consisting of
7 separate phases designated project A through G, has been approved
by the City of Greensboro and the County Board of Commissioners.
Engineering design contracts have been awarded on three of the
projects and the other four are anticipated in the near future. In
addition to these seven sewer extension projects, and more
pertinent to this report, the County Board of Commissioners has
authorized a sewer extension to Pleasant Garden elementary school.
The Pleasant Garden School sewer will extend to within
approximately two miles of WLMHP's property, making connection of
their discharge to the municipal system at that point another
possible alternative. According to Mr. Harville, completion of the
sewer to Pleasant Garden School is anticipated by late 1994 or
early 1995. A map of the proposed sewer extensions, project
schedule, and county newsletter concerning the projects are
provided in Appendix 4 of this report.
It appears that the most feasible route for a force main to
transfer the discharge from WLMHP to the municipal sewer near the
school would be along the right-of-way of Sheraton Park Road as
shown in Appendix 5 of this report. This route would require
approximately 11000 feet of force main and 500 feet of gravity
sewer. The exact distances will depend on the final location of the
municipalsewer when it is constructed and -easement availability.
Page - 3

In another project, unrelated to the subject of this report, RAL
suggested the possibility of connecting an industrial discharge to
the municipal sewer at Pleasant Garden School. At present, the
County sewer project proposes construction of an eight inch gravity
sewer to serve the school. Connection of WLMHP and
pssibly
industrial discharge) to that sewer may necessitate anincrease tin
size of the line or other design changes which would have to be
discussed in detail with the county.
3.2 SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL
At the present time, Oakwood Land Development, Inc. owns a tract of
approximately 50 acres of undeveloped land south of Greybridge and
west of WLMHP. Although potentially available for on -site
wastewater disposal, Oakwood has had plans to develop the 50 acre
tract for some time. The use of the tract for on -site wastewater
disposal would, therefore, have a significant opportunity cost.
In RAL's opinion, regardless of land availability, the chances for
success of a subsurface disposal system large enough to handle the
currently permitted flow of 70,000 gal./day are very remote. Based
on the county's experience with failed subsurface systems in the
area, as related to us by Mr. Harvel, it also seems unlikely that
the county would look favorably on the installation of such a large
system.
In order to more fully evaluate the potential for on -site disposal
at this site, we have reviewed a report by Soil & Environmental
Consultants, Inc. (S&EC) which was recently prepared for us
relative to an engineering economic analysis for another mobile
home park located just south of WLMHP. All of the recommendations
in that report were based on, s&EC's experience with soils in
southern Guilford county near WLMHP. S&EC conducted an office study
to provide approximate land area requirements and loading rates to
be used in considering the potential for an on -site disposal area.
A complete soil study would have to be conducted at a later date,
should a potentially acceptable disposal area be identified. The
office study was conducted by Mr. Kevin C. Martin, CPSS, and his
report and recommendations are provided in Appendix 6 of this
report for reference.
Recommendations given in the S&EC report were based on a design
flow of 27,000 gal./day for the other project. RAL has extrapolated
to estimate the parameters for the 70,000 gal./day design flow at
WLMHP. Based on the report, a conventional nitrification trench
subsurface disposal system, to handle the currently permitted
design flow of 70,000 gal/day, would require approximately between
27 and 55 acres of suitable land, including the 100% repair area
required by state design criteria.

4
S&EC also considered the land requirements for a low pressure pipe
subsurface disposal system. According to their analysis, between 19
and 80 acres of suitable land would be required.
In his report, Mr. Martin indicated that, in his experience, he
believes that it would be extremely unlikely that the low ends of
the ranges of required land area identified above would be
sufficient. Rather, he suggested using values about in the middle
of the ranges given. Also, the values given in the S&EC report were
exclusive of state required buffer areas. Based on all of the
factors involved, the following loading rates and land area
requirements for subsurface disposal systems are estimated.
Loading Rate:
Required Land Area
For 70000 Gal/day :
Conventional
Nitrification
Disposal Trenches
0.2 to 0.4 GPD/SF
Approx. 47 Acres
Low Pressure Pipe
Disposal Trenches
.05 to 0:2 GPD/SF
Approx. 52 Acres
RAL has noted the existence of several small creeks, drainage
swales and dense woods on the 50 acre tract. Also, it would be
necessary to keep any on -site disposal system a safe distance from
the lake which forms the entire east boundary of the parcel.
Therefore, we estimate that no more than 35 to 40 acres of the
tract is realistically available for on -site disposal.
The potential for purchase or long term lease of adjacent property
in order to acquire sufficient land for a subsurface disposal
system has been considered. At the present time, it appears very
unlikely that any adjacent landowners can be• identified who are
willing to consider the sale or lease of such a large parcel for
such an arrangement.
Based on the above information, it appears that a subsurface
disposal system is not a feasible alternative for this project,
either on -site or on adjacent land.
Page - 5

3.3 SPRAY IRRIGATION SYSTEM
The only potential on -site area for spray irrigation is the 50 acre
parcel previously described. Also, according to the S & EC report
(Appendix 6), between 24 and 64 acres would be required for spray
irrigation. Using the same reasoning as described above in section
3.2 of this report, the land area requirement is estimated, for
planning purposes, to be about 50 acres for the disposal area. In
addition to the disposal area, additional land would be required to
construct a holding pond. State design criteria require an absolute
minimum of 30 days storage for spray irrigation systems designed
for more than 1000 gal./day. S&EC indicated in their report that,
based on their experience in the area, a holding time of between 45
and 90 days will be required when a detailed water balance is done.
Based on a storage period of 70 days, at a flow rate of 70000
gal/day, a 4 foot deep pond would have to be about 4 acres in size.
Considering reasonable buffer areas and an access road, the
required space is estimated to be closer to 6 acres. The above
described calculations suggest that the following approximate
design criteria are appropriate for planning purposes.
Preliminary Criteria for Spray Irrigation
Loading Rate: .33 to .75 inches per week (.027 to .067 gpd/sf)
Land required
for disposal: 50 acres
Land required
for holding
pond
Total land
required•
6 acres
56 acres.
The possibility of acquiring adjacent land for spray irrigation
system was considered as described above for subsurface disposal.
To date no available land (either for sale or lease) has been
identified. Therefore, the spray irrigation alternative does not
appear to be feasible for this project.
Page - 6

3.4 RELOCATION OF DISCHARGE TO FLOWING STREAM
The relocation of the discharge from WLMHP to Polecat Creek has
been investigated. It appears that a route does exist which would
involve installing approximately 6500 feet of gravity sewer. The
main obstacles to this alternative are the crossing of Sheraton
Park Road and the need to obtain easements from landowners along
the route. A possible route for the discharge is identified on the
USGS topo map of the area and has been included in Appendix 7 of
this report.
Typically, relocation of a discharge from a zero flow stream to a
more significant stream (7Q10/30Q2 > 0) would be expected to result
in somewhat less stringent discharge limits (ie: BOD = 30 mg/1, SS
= 30 mg/1). In the area near WLMHP, however, Polecat Creek is
believed to have a 7Q10=0, a winter 7Q10=0.75, and a 30Q2=0.15. It
is also important to note that Polecat Creek is the water supply
for the Town of Randleman. Also, during the course of this study,
it has been learned there are plans already underway to construct a
dam on the Deep River at Randleman in order to create a large
drinking water impoundment. Based on the above information, WLMHP
would probably have to contend with very stringent discharge limits
within a short time after relocating their discharge, if such
limits are not imposed immediately. Thus, the relocation of the
discharge to Polecat Creek would probably involve a considerable
expense and little, if any, benefit.
3.5 CONTINUATION OF DISCHARGE UNDER MORE STRINGENT PERMIT LIMITS
According to the existing NPDES permit for this facility, if the
discharge continues after May 1, 1994, the more stringent limits of
BOD5 = 5/10 mg/1 and NH3-N = 1/1.8 mg/1, summer/winter
respectively, will apply.
Based on a review of the self -monitoring data from the facility for
the two year period from May 1990 through March 1992, the proposed
stringent concentration limits for BOD5 were exceeded only six
times and the stringent ammonia limits were exceeded only five
times. This data suggests that the existing treatment facility can
probably be modified in order to comply with the new discharge
limits. It is important to note, however, that the flow through the
plant ranged from 39,500 gal/day to 47,600 gal/day during the data
collection period. It is assumed that the existing plant's ability
to meet the stringent limits would be more questionable as the
permitted flow of 70,000 gal/day is approached.
Improvements that may be required, if the present facility is to
continue discharging, include effluent sand filters and, possibly,
breakpoint chlorination for ammonia nitrogen removal followed by
dechlorination to reduce chlorine residuals.
Page - 7

4.0 COST ANALYSIS
Based on the results of this investigation, it appears that
connection of the WLMHP to the municipal sewer system is the only
non -discharge option evaluated which may be technically possible.
The main constraints appear to be the considerable distance which
the discharge would have to be pumped and the possible need to make
design changes to the proposed new municipal sewer in order to
accommodate the added flow. The other possible alternative for this
facility is to upgrade the existing treatment facility in order to
meet the more stringent limits which will be imposed in 1994. A
preliminary capital cost estimate for each of these alternatives
has been prepared in order to compare them. These estimates are
necessarily very preliminary .at this time. Prior to actual
implementation of either alternative, more accurate design criteria
should be established and the cost estimates revised to reflect
same.
4.1 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMA 1 E: CONNECT DISCHARGE TO MUNICIPAL SEWER
AT PLEASANT GARDEN SCHOOL
Easement Acquisition- (not land purchases)= $ 10,000
Pump Station - (Duplex W/ Standby Power) _ $ 50,000
6 Inch PVC Force Main -11000 LF @ $12.50 = $137,500
Bore & Jack @ HWY. - (6" pvc in 12" stl.
casing) 150 LF @ $150/LF = $ 22,500
Air Release Manholes - 4ea. @ $2000 = $ 8,000
8 Inch PVC Gravity Sewer - 500 LF @
$30.00 LF. _ $ 15,000
Manholes - 5 ea. @ $1200 $ 6,000
Erosion/Sedimentation Control - Lump Sum = $ 15,500
Final Grading & Seeding of Alignment = $ 15,000
Damage Repair - (pavement repair, culvert
replacement, etc.) _ $ 5,000
Professional Fees = $ 25,000
Misc. Incidental Costs & contingencies = $ 10,000
Approximate Total Cost Estimate = $319,500
Page - 8

4.2 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMA L h: CONNECT DISCHARGE TO MUNICIPAL SYS1 hM
AT SOUTH ELM EUGENE STREET
Cost of "private system" as estimated by
Hugh Creed Associates
= $425,100
4.3 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMA 1 E: UPGRADE OF EXISTING TREATMENT PLANT
Effluent Sand Filters - Lump Sum, Inst. _ $ 45,000
Dechlorination (If Required) - Lump Sum = $ 10,000
Breakpoint Chlorination (If Required) _ $ 15,000
Professional Fees = $ 8,500
Misc. Incidental Costs & Contingencies = $ 10,000
Approximate Total Cost Estimate = $ 88,500
5.0 SUMMARY
Based on the approximate cost estimates identified above, it is
immediately apparent that the least costly alternative, in terms of
capital costs, is to upgrade the existing treatment plant and
continue to discharge at the present location. Operating costs for
the various alternatives can not be determined at this time due to
the very preliminary nature of the design criteria. A general
comment on operating costs, however, is as follows:
1. Operation of the upgraded treatment plant would entail
chemical costs not now incurred, but additional power costs
for pumping for the other alternatives would probably
balance the increased chemical costs.
As a result of this study, it appears that the only reasonably cost
effective alternative is to upgrade and continue to operate the
existing plant. There appears to be a general movement toward
extending municipal sewers toward the area around WLMHP, however,
and further discussions with city and county authorities concerning
possiblecost sharing arrangements are recommended. Such
arrangements may benefit Oakwood Land Development and other
residents in the area.
Page - 9

APPENDIX 1
USGS TOPO MAP

r‘V -

APPENDIX 2
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION ANALYSIS REPORT

00'S . 08'S.
oo-g
22'0. • 08.79
• 10.00-44-.71/.54 • -1/0- -1 ,-„Ja
- -002 , • , Nk4H1,3..3.3.71 NHiSs31N'F-a31 02 fr0 wrIKNni
oos NvFliss•37-1, 2s EL ' 6 2w1Vxl
T.(701. - 6 k"S.. :62V0 -JOVS341/'
tr - V 917.07
• . . • •
00 1, • ',Of,' 9 -. - • . .
NVI-1.1.SE 371 9V-7a
00 • 2-s. bo L oos NVH.LS31"
.
oo s
00 0 1.00 N NVF)
VI-11
•
00 08 ' a aos - NVHISS31: NVHIS-E31 . a7-1- 68 '2 • ' -1-ZVO . .:
10N - 00' 9 4. .10N.- : .,, - p ':.po0 L J',..po.'".o.4: ..-...,:1, .:ip:'...
_ - . -
)..00 ' 8 !:. J pci.4.9T, .4... 41Ai:IL
.,..._ :. ..,.. .,.-., .....:•• . _., . .: :,•:..,: ..,
00-9 f QW ?...- 1.' 00t7.--?"'--: -.- NVHISST1 NYHISS.31':-NY1714S.'.S371:'.9 ;- 'S.-. .. --c:IZVO7
- - - - - - ,
00 ' 0 .. 02.. "9 00 -'' -:'.. W.1-1.1.771 80V S.-:7S'' -(7L.' V 9ZVO'
-.: 60/
00 ' 0 : OS ' 9 00S7: NVHIS.331 NSS3 VEU1 Z6 S
. :
• - -
•
00 ' OZ 00S ' NVH1SS31d2W-9 - S 2L ' 6 V2V07
00 "
00 ' 8
00'L 00S7 NVH/SS1 NVH4.SS31. NVHISED.-1 02'2 90/6:
• ••
-Q8'9 00S' UVH/SS31 NW-LISS:31 S" Srfr 9LV0'
•
1
08v9 oos' NVHISSD1 NVHigE31 S'9 ' VS-r2 :SLVO'
10N 009 J 10N ' 0'0001- J 00'S .J 002 J 00'fil- J OOLO' J IIWII
&Gil oa 3NI>J01H3 1103 371J N-2HN SSI/E38 GOE axpw/o HINOW 1
01000 00200 0900S 991-2 01-900 02c00 01.00
ado.diinD fro. -AIN003/NOITIN WJOEENK-R0--NOI_MITT
OOLO --M01J ND ISDG MO8SNIMO-dH14 DAviaoom AII1I3VJ
301 2.0Z6-t-0 GOD:Eld .1)1J0,-fld 00 DdId 66 .i.;c2nO3N--11.Wnd
SISA1VNV NOTIVA1VAD .13NVIT.:11/403
, •!...1--.!,•;0E1s/

1
:...:MPLIANCE EVALUATION ANALS.:I,'.... REPORT E
PERMIT - -NC0023299 PIPE-001
FACILITY—WOODLAKE MHP-REENEBORO
1 LOCATION- -GREENSDORO
MONTH
LIMIT
90/05
50050 003.10 00530
Q/MGD / t
pc.)D
•
• 17: A 0700 r
4E1: (AO!
.0446 14.60
• •
5'0 / 0.6
04-41
-• i •
1.% t.".1 • f7) •
9e/p
•
90/09 0'395 LrESTHiiN
L I MIT ,107
90 /1 '7'
• • ;
91
- • '
•
.91 4.
• .. ••
A:..
REPORT PERIOD: 9005 r)10-4 LOC E -
DEEIGN .0700 (1! -- 2
REGION/CO11TY--04 GUILFORD
00610 31616 5.0060
NI.134-NH4 - FEC COLT CHLO-FUNE
F.' . 00 F • N L
LE'ESTHAN
5.00
00300 f.) 0010
DO TEMP
. .
6 00
6. 40
_..1:•;
• N OL
. 00-
13 . 00 •
6 5r LFEETHAN LEE ,S.' TH -500 6 '50 • 13.00
. • ... z . • • . '
• • • , • , .
, .34 LES f T1--1 AN • 500- • 6 20 . 00
1\5'
oor 1.!:PG'0
mi-ig-'01.J.",.-LET.t:t I EtAN
- -
• .) ,?) • • .`2;:.17.H A E TIIIII • "- -
• .
• NOL:
4 00
•
• 6:;:.:914r,r 00
• _
- • - ,•
. •, . • , , • • .:. .. .,.
L _I M I , e-,.
v ,., 30'; 0'..-. . ' 5--. 00 F." 1000 , O.
1
9 1 / 04. ::'• ,... : -f:0475 .3-.:5:4:::.. .- • 4. ..-.5....*:L E - ::',`.T.H7N .LE' STH N
, . .
•
. 4,..:•,,,-i-. --•....-- . : • ..::... "
•
AV E..34T: ..'
.1-,`:"; - _ ---.....-•
.. .• . . ,
M 'A X-..i'..1ti0. ' • '7'7 '''. .-':•-:... ' • • •,•••;. 0.'..f.. :: • i ..4.;:,.5'..:. ,---..-..: .- j ....."34 .LE,S: E. Tj.- IA i'.! :..::....-
-MINt..60*.:... s64.L -E17 ss.471.1v00-*7.-171i)..w,tt.„77H(..w.LE1.1-.IN.
uNaf; .-,...-..,:.::.,.... , .,,.....mt.,......-,.....:—':,..mt:AL.,..z ' ':::...*/.7.:t.1 (IL(lo,`*/10 0 1'1 L s..-::1....
00
6 •(..5NCL
. •
500 42.* 13 00.
500 70
LIL MG, L DEG C
:". • ,
•

APPENDIX 3
PREVIOUS INVESTIGATION OF
CONNECTION TO CITY SEWER

1
November 2, 1990
HUGH CREED ASSOCIATES, INC., P.A.
Consulting Engineers do Land Surveyors
1306 W. WENOOVER AVENUE. P.O. Box 9623
GREE_NSBORO. N.C. 27408 TEL. [phone] OR
275-9826
Harold Mc Bane
Oakwood Land Development
Post Office Box 77013
Greensboro, NC 27407
Re: Proposed Lift Station at Woodlake
Guilford County, NC
Dear Harold:
Attached is a map showing the proposed location of the Force Main and Gravity
Sewer System to tie the Woodlake Treatment Plant into the City of Greensboro
Sewer System, Also attached are copies of a preliminary cost estimate for
a Public Station which would serve the entire Drainage Basin and the cost
estimate for a Private Lift Station which would only serve the Woodlake,
Greybridge, and undeveloped properties owned by Oakwood. Please review
these maps and figures, call so I can set up another meeting with the
City and County concerning funding for the project.
If you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
Norris Z. Clayton, P.E., R.L.S.

HUGH CREED. ASSOCIATES, INC., P.A.
Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors
1306 W. WENDOVER AVENUE. P.O. BOX.9623
GRE.ENSBORO. N.C. 27408 TEL. [phone] OR
275-9826
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR
PROPOSED PRIVATE WOODLAKE LIFT STATION
EAST SHERATON PARK ROAD, GUILFORD CO., N.C.
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL COST
1. Complete wet well 1 Each
Mounted Lift Station
2. 6" Force Main 12,700 L.F.
3. 8" Gravity Main 5,250 L.F.
$50,000.00 $50,000.00
$13.00
$40.00
TOTAL
$165,100.00
$210,000.00
$425,100.00

m
i
s
i
i
HUGH CREED ASSOCIATES, INC., P.A.
Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors
1306 W. WENDOVER AVENUE. P.O. Box 9623
GREENSBORO. N.C. 27408 TEL. [phone] OR
275-9826
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR
PROPOSED PUFBLIC WOODLAKE LIFT STATION
EAST SHERATON PARK ROAD, GUILFORD CO., N.C.
IITEM QUANTITY
UNIT COST TOTAL COST
I1. Complete wet well/ 1 Ea. Dry well Lift:Station $100,000.00 $ 100,000.00
I 2. 8" D.I. Force Main 12,700 L.F.
$15.00 $ 190,500.00
3. 12" Gravity Main 3,800 L.F.
$46.00 $ 174,800.00
I4. 15" Gravity Main 550 L.F.
$54.00 $29,700.00
5. 18" Gravity Main 900 L.F. $62.00
$55,800.00
TOTAL $ 550,800.00

NEWSLETTER
Southeast Guilford County
No. 3 Sept., 1991
PUBLTC SEWER STATUS
In the December issue of the Southeast Newsletter, we reported that the State
required us to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) for sewer lines to this
area. The State requirement was based upon the length and magnitude. of the project
(30.5 miles of lines and 5 pump stations).
The Environmental. Assessment addressed three (3) alternatives. They were 1)
construction of a sewer line to alleviate failing septic systems, 2) private
construction of eight (8) small package wastewater treatment facilities; and 3) the
no build alternative. Package treatment systems are less expensive than extension
of public lines from Greensboro existing sewer system. However, package plants have
a higher likelihood of failure than a municipal system, and are not favored by the
State when sewer service is an available option and also when within a major
watershed (Burlington).
Our consultant, Piedmont -Olsen Engineers, Inc., completed an EA for the project. On
July 24th the State advised us of a "Finding of No Significant Lnpact" (FONSI). The
FONSI concludes the environment review An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
will not be prepared for this project. We may now proceed with the Design Phase.
DESIGN STATUS
The Southeast Sewer Project as approved by the County Board of Couuuissioners and
City of Greensboro has seven (7) project phases. Most phases depend on the
adjoining downstream phase for design location and elevations.
Greensboro's section has now been designed to the point where staff could recommend
design work to begin on Projects A, D, and F as shown on the map. Projects B,'C, E,
and G, will follow at a later time as locations and elevations are established.
In addition to the Southeast sewers, the Board of County Commissioners has
authorized the extension of sewer lines to Alamance and. Pleasant Garden Elementary
schools. The schools sandfilter sewer systems are in dire need of replacement.
On September 9th, the Board of County Commissioners authorized engineering contracts
to the following firms:.
Project A Hunter's Ridge Area
Jamestown Engineering Group, Inc.
Project D Big Alamance Pump Station and Outfall
Piedmont -Olsen Engineers, Inc.
Project F Hickory Meadows, Coopers Farm, Forest Oaks Section 17
R S & H Engineers, .Inc.
Should you live in one of the project areas, one of these design firms may be
requesting permission to survey on your property.
Design work for Willow Bend Subdivision Sections 1, 2, and 3 was contracted to
Jamestown Engineering Group, Inc., by the County in 1988. The design is nearly
complete except for the connection point at the proposed Big Alamance Outfall.
Construction of the Willow Bend lines will be included with construction of Phase D.
NOTE: Any suggestions/comments on future Southeast Newsletters would be greatly
appreciated. Please. direct to Guilford County Environmental Services
[phone].
Specific questions and concerns about septic systems and the repair policy
may hP ada rRsed by contaetinrt Frei rnnmanf a1 wc,a1 i-11 at (Q1Q 1 "]71-7a1 "2

}48
ST ' LORI
ROTHERVOOD
CANNELS
1 y
T
ELUX
.(� COCOA Z.
SHERATON
FOREST EDGE
IBERTY VALL
e LEV S
}NNTERS ' I�'I
SECTS. 1,7 W
O
NESBIT ; RD
4I6
LALAIS DR
BASVELL
R ➢GE
FR. JECT
4 6
\ 16° F.M.
N> SON
CT
HURCH R
LAND
Jul
ITTLE
ALAMANC
PUMP
STATION
BEAVER CREE
PUMP STATION
It gf r�.�iii:�.i► o GAxs
I 0 ` SEC". 17 ..
zV ELL`
FAR11 • o �QegL�
njrz1LA r qs /
VALHALA DH Q'. • /' /
DZZY H
000' 2000' 0 4000'
8000'
SCALE I • = 4000'
n
LITTL
KNOX RD 2Y42
XNOX RD 31
J l
FROJECT D
CLDE FUI , 16r / 3389
SECT. 1 2. 1
3368
3370
FIGURE No. 10
ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR INTERIM
SERVICE TO TARGET SUBDIVISIONS
LEGEND
PROPOSED CITY OF GREENSBORO
..� r FACILITIES (UPSIZED)
PROPOSED CITY OF GREENSBORO
FACILITIES (UNAFFECTED)
ALTERNATIVE FACILITIES
RECOMMENDED TO SERVICE
TARGET SUBDIVISIONS
SUBDIVISION
6V 87p0
Ill lTrn I\in 1111(`'1-411/Trt] 4^YIII'1VI
I I JOB TNUIOER
I�� OA0
69034
1A383 T01R! SNGQ4SLRLNG GROUP. LAC.
on

APPENDIX 5
POSSIBLE ROUTE FOR CONNECTION TO CITY SEWER

APPENDIX 6
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. REPORT

Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
3818 Bland Road ■ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 ■ [phone] r Fax [phone]
July 7, 1992
R&A Laboratories
Attn: Mr. Dennis Herzing
Preliminary* Recommendations - Hidden Forest Trailer Park
East of Highway 220, Randolph County, N.C.
An office review of the above named project was performed by
Kevin C. Martin, Certified Professional Soil Scientist, to
determine its potential for.an on -site wastewater treatment
system. The evaluation was made by an office review ofsoil
types mapped by SCS across the county line in Guilford County
and based on our experience. The purpose of the review is
only to provide the design engineer with guidance on
potential site selection that would warrant an on -site
evaluation.
According to the Guilford County Soil Survey the following
soils are found in the vicinity of the park: Appling, Cecil,
Chewacla, Enon, Mecklenburg, Vance and Wilkes.
If these soils actually exist in the area, most can be
utilized for subsurface and/or spray irrigation waste
treatment systems if the required buffers from property
lines, wells, streams, ponds, places of public assembly,
residences, etc. are met.
In general all soil types described above except the
floodplain soil (Chewacla) can be utilized for spray
irrigation as long as slopes do. not exceed 15% and topography
is not complex.
only the Cecil and Appling soil types are usually suitable
for subsurface systems. Due to the presence of mixed
mineralogy clays and or shallow depths to rock Enon,
Mecklenburg, Vance and Wilkes soils are not useable for
subsurface systems unless 24". or more of loamy or non -mixed
clays overly the mixed clay subsoil. This 24" must also be
free of any evidence of a soil wetness condition.
Soil/Site Evaluation 1 Mapping and Physical Analysis ® Wetlands Mapping and Mitigation ilk Environmental Audits
(fin -Site Waste Trpahnprtt Systems: F,vahtat-nn and Desien

Lando Area Requirements (Exclusive of DEM Required Buffers
with no consideration of mounding
beneath system)*
Assumptions: Permitted Flow - 27,000 gpd
* Prior to a detailed system design or land acquisition a
detailed on -site soils evaluation of any potential sites
would be needed. Once you have located potential areas for
us to examine please call. In the meantime this should
serve as guidance in selecting potential sites.
Acceptable Conventional Ground Absorption Loading Rate
Appling and/or Cecil Soils: .2 to .4 gpd/sq.ft.
Acceptable Low Pressure Pipe Ground Absorption Loading Rate:
Appling and/or Cecil Soils .05 gpd/sq.ft. to .2 gP / g
.ft.
Acceptable Spray Irrigation Surface Application Loading Rate:
(Appling, Cecil, Enon, Mecklenburg, Vance and Wilkes)
.25"/wk. to .75"/wk.
Conventional System Requirements:
The linear feet of conventional trench needed for the
permitted flow is 22,500' to 45,000. This would translate
into a minimum system area of 4.6 to 9.3 acres for the system
alone. An equal amount of repair area will be needed also.
We havenoticed that an addal tolaccountforarea
topographic
normally needed on large systems
irregularities (e.g. gullies, swales, diverging contour
lines, etc.). Therefore, as much as 10.6 acres to 21.4 acres
may be needed for system and repair areas to handle the
permitted flow exclusive of buffers.
Low Pressure Pipe (LPP) System Requirements:
The linear feet of low pressure pipe laterals needed for the
permitted flow is 27,000 to 108,000 feet. This translates
into 3.0 to 12.4 acres for the system alone. An equal amount
of repair area will be required also. We have observed that
large LPP systems often require 25% more area than originally
expected when installed in wooded sites. This is mainly due
to topographic irregularities and "dodging" large trees which
causes some laterals to be installed on spacings of greater
than the 5' on center -design and thus translates into
utilization of additional area so that the minimum linear

feet of laterals can be installed. Because of this, as much
as 7.5 to 31 acres may be required for system and repair
areas to handle the permitted flow.
Conventional and LPP systems must be located at least 50'
from property lines.
Spray Irrigation System Requirements:
The area required for a spray irrigation system exclusive of
buffers with a flow of 27,000 gpd on these type soils will be
9.25 to 24.8 acres. spray systems do not require an
equivalent repair area. These systems also do not normally
need the additional area required in large conventional and
LPP systems discussed previously sincethe laterals feeding
the sprinklers can be located in any pattern as long as the
sprinklers themselves are properly located.
However, spray systems must be located a minimum of 150' from
property lines and 400' from any residence or place of public
assembly off the property. Spray systems over 1,000 gpd also
require a minimum 30 day holding lagoon. On these type soils
the lagoon, based on a water balance, will likely be 45 to 90
days. The average loading rate will be 1/3" to 3/4" per
week. (.027 to .067 gpd/ft2).
I believe that the information in this report should be
sufficient for a preliminary search for potential sites that
pay be suitable for on -site waste water treatment
alternatives for this project. I apologize for the broad,
range in acreage requirements but, based on available
information it is the closest we can come for now. however,
based on my experience it is very unlikely that the low end
of the range will be adequate. Somewhere in the middle of
the range is more likely. If you have questions or would
like for us to assist you pursuing one or more of these
alternatives, please call.
Sincerely,
c
Kevin C. Martin
President, CPSS

APPENDIX 7
POTENTIAL ROUTE FOR RELOCATION OF DISCHARGE

• ; • 80
-- 57' 30"
•

• NPDES FACILITY AND PERMIT DATA 02/19/96 15:18:26
UPDATE OPTION — TRXID 5NU KEY NC0023299
PERSONAL DATA FACILITY APPLYING FOR PERMIT REGION
FACILITY NAME> UOODLAKE MHP--GREENSBORO COUNTY> GUILFORD 04
ADDRESS: MAILING (REQUIRED) LOCATION (REQUIRED)
STREET: P 0BOX - r 701 3 STREET: SHERATON PARK ROAD
CITY: GREENSBORO ST NC ZIP 27417 CITY: GREENSBORO ST NC ZIP 27417
TELEPHONE [phone] DATE FEE PAID: 08/29/95 AMOUNT: 200.00
STATE CONTACT> PG;JEtt -+"` PERSON IN CHARGE BARBARA C , NORCOM
1=PROPOSED,2=EXIST,3=CLOSED 2 1=MAJOR,2=MINOR 2 1=MUN,2=NON-MUN 2
LAT: 3558090 LONG: 07947440 N=NEW,M=MODIFICATION,R=REISSUE> R
DATE APP RCVD 08/29/95 LJASTELOAD REQS 01/01/96
DATE STAFF REP REQS 09/08/95 UASTELOAD RCVD 01/04/96
DATE STAFF REP RCVD 01 /16 /96 SCH TO ISSUE 01/1:/96
DATE TO P NOTICE 02/28/96 DATE,DRAFT PREPARED 01/04/96
DATE OT AG COM REQS / / DATE DENIED / /
DATE OT AG COM RCVD / DATE RETURNED / /
DATE TO EPA / / DATE ISSUED / / ASSIGN/CHANGE PERMIT
DATE FROM EPA / / EXPIRATION DATE 04/30/96
FEE CODE ( 4 ) 1=(>10MGD),2=(>1MGD),3=(>0.1MGD),4=(<0.1MGD),5=SF,6=(GP25,64,79),
7=CGP49,73)8=CGP76)9=(GP13,34,30,52)0=(NOFEE) DIS/C 08 CONBILL ( )
COMMENTS: CK TOTAL AMT $700> > $200= 1PDE S AND $500 RE:=D 950914 BY F . °1CPHERSO'i>
MESSAGE: *** DATA MODIFIED SUCCESSFULLY ***
2
7 01,
re c_
0$5 . -e /r,-{ ek-UtA_ --n `l-��n r 4'1 e Ole o' r Up �r
C 2 iC r.Q- .ei� 1� G f vvrizrN- a r` `r
4 dam. S4r
-('- ( t� /ram �
1-1z NcA—t 6'ti`
u1.71 (f/6 Cuir.
2l/4 ,u... ,1„.7 / tb
_ o.� 612,0 r" `�a'c'°w> ��v-� �-e�� 4'L1-1-"/3- --eot ./"e .

•
NPDES FACILITY AND PERMIT DATA
UPDATE OPTION TRXID 5NU KEY NCOO23299
09/06/95 12:43:55
PERSONAL DATA FACILITY APPLYING FOR PERMIT REGION
FACILITY NAME> WOODLAKE MHP-GREENSBORO COUNTY> GUILFORD 04
ADDRESS: MAILING (REQUIRED) LOCATION (REQUIRED)
STREET: P 0 BOX 77013. STREET: SHERATON PARK ROAD
CITY: GREENSBORO ST NC ZIP 27417 CITY: GREENSBORO ST NC ZIP 27417
TELEPHONE [phone] DATE FEE PAID: 08/29/95 AMOUNT: 700.00
STATE CONTACT> POWELL PERSON IN CHARGE BARBARA C. NORCOM
1=PROPOSED,2=EXIST,3=CLOSED 2 1=MAJOR,2=MINOR 2 1=MUN,2=NON-NUN 2
LAT: 3558090 LONG: 07947440 N=NEW,M=MODIFICATION,R=REISSUE> R
DATE APP RCVD 08/29/95 WASTELOAD REQS 01/041/1Sa
DATE STAFF REP REQS 09 /0S /l5*WASTELOAD RCVD 0 l/bk/Ll(0
DATE STAFF REP RCVD 0(4 (o/9 (( SCH TO ISSUE / /
DATE TO P NOTICE / / DATE DRAFT PREPARED 0t /o4/q(F
DATE OT AG COM REQS / / DATE DENIED / /
BATE OT AG COM RCVD / / DATE RETURNED / /
DATE TO EPA / / DATE ISSUED / / ASSIGN/CHANGE PERMIT
DATE FROM EPA / / EXPIRATION DATE 04/30/96
FEE CODE ( 4 ) 1=01OMGD),2=01MGD),3=00.1MGD),4=(<0.1MGD),5=SF,6=(GP25,64,79),
7=(GP49,73)8=(GP76)9=(GP13,34,30,52)O=(NOFEE) DIS/C 08 CONBILL ( )
COMMENTS:
MESSAGE: ## DATA MODIFIED SUCCESSFULLY ##N
01t64- LAY\ O r`ec Sd2-
cc.l' r S i n p r

CC:
Permits and Engineering
Technical Support Branch
County Health Dept.
Central Files
WSRO
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No X
If Yes, SOC No.
To: Permits and Enine__ erinc�Unit
Water ity Section
Attentio Jeannette well (Review Engineer)
Date: 960110
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County Guilford
Permit No. NC0023299
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address:
Ms. Barbara Norcom, Director of
Operations
Oakwood Land Dev. Corp.
7025 Albert Pick Rd. Suite 301
Greensboro, NC 27409
2. Date of Investigation: 960110
3. Report Prepared by: Ron Linville
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number:
Richard Jenkins 910/656-7100
Barbara Norcom 910/855-2526
5. Directions to Site: From Greensboro I-85/40 take Randleman
Rd south then left on Sheraton Park Rd. WWTP will be on
left approx. 3/4 mile just before large lake.
6. Discharge Points(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35058'12" Longitude: 79047'43"
U.S.G.S. Quad No. D19NE U.S.G.S. Quad Name Pleasant Gdn.
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application ?
X Yes No If No, explain:
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included):
Not in floodplain but adjacent to discharge from lake.
9. Location of nearest dwelling:
None known within 1000'.
era
oti
:4

10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
UT Polecat Creek
a. Classification: WS-III
b. River Basin and Subbasin No: CPF 030608
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: Stream has very little flow during
dry weather and has a history of appearing black and
having eutrophic conditions probably from solids
escaping the WWTP. Mats of material and bubbles are
often observed arising from the bottom of the stream
near the WWTP. Noxious conditions have been alleviated
by stream pumping by the ORC at the direction of the
Permittee.
Part II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: 0.070 MGD
(Ultimate Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Waste
Water Treatment facility? Same.
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility
(current design capacity)? 0.070 MGD with sandfilters
activated.
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two
years. A2C issued in March, 1994 for construction of
dual tertiary sand filters and a UV disinfection unit.
The Region understands that the above construction has
been postponed until a determination has been made as
to a possible connection to a POTW in Greensboro.
e. Please provide a description of existing or
substantially constructed wastewater treatment
facilities: Extended aeration treatment plant with
influent pump station and two parallel aeration systems
with diffused aeration, aerated sludge holding tank,
continuous flow recorder measuring device and standby
power and gas chlorinator. System may not always be
operated as a parallel system and old sandfilters are
not utilized.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities. See A2C above.
g Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: BOD concerns
and public water supply concerns.
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 2

h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
in development approved
should be required not needed
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
Permit No. NA .
Residuals Contractor: Richard Jenkins
Telephone No. Same as above.
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP PFRP
Other
c. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify):
and hauled to POTW in Greensboro as needed.
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed
sheet) . II
4. SIC Code(s) : 6515
Primary 08 Secondary
Main Treatment Unit Code: 060 8
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
Pumped
rating
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds or are any public monies involved. (municipals only)?
2. Special monitoring
requests: None.
or limitations (including toxicity)
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please
indicate)
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated
all of the non -discharge options available. Please provide
regional perspective for each option evaluated.
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 3

Spray Irrigation: Not enough land without utilizing
developable property.
Connection to Regional Sewer System: Connection is being
pursued by Oakwood and may be possible within three years.
Subsurface: Not enough land without using developable
property.
Other disposal options:
5. Other Special Items: Associated creek conditions are not
good and complaints have been investigated by the WSRO due
to the water supply concerns. Recommend that the Water
Supply Section also be allowed to comment on this discharge
as well as the City of Randleman. An alternativ€analysis
was submitted to the Division on October 12, 1993. This
alternatives study should be reevaluated prior to Dec. 31,' �
1996 due to the enhanced potential for public sewer in the
Pleasant Garden community and reported recent discussions
between the City of Greensboro and Oakwood Land Development
Corp (owners of the Woodlake MHP WWTP). Conditions in the
creek may be somewhat due to low flows during summer months
and backed up waters; however, the Region still believes
that solids are likely to be escaping into the stream from
time to time.
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The WSRO recommends that the permit be reissued with a
stipulation that the sandfilters and ultraviolet
disinfection be installed within two years of permit
issuance or connect to the public sewer. The facility
should also be required to connect to the POTW within 180
days of economically feasible availability regardless of any
upgrades. This recommendation is based on Part II Section
B.2. and Section B;13. of the existing NPDES Permit.
Sgnature of report preparer
Qualit,Regional Supervisor
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 4

•
•
Staff Review and Evaluation
NPDES Wastewater Permit
FACILITY INFORMATION
Facility Woodlake MHP
NPDES No. NC0023299
Design Flow (MGD) 0.07
Facility Class II
STREAM CHARACTERISTICS
Stream Name UT Polecat Creek
Stream Class WS-III
Sub -basin 03-06-09
Drainage Area (mil) 1.1
S7Q10 (cfs) 0
W7Q10 (cfs) 0
30Q2 (cfs) 0
IWC (%) 100
Proposed Changes
Parameters Affected
Basis for change(s)
Monitoring Frequencies
BOD5, TSS, NH3, Fecal, TRC
2B .0500 Regulations
Ammonia
NH3
2 &4 achievable
Compliance Schedule: n/a
Special Condition(s): Zero Flow Policy, POTW Connection
Permits Sr Engineering Comments:
Chlorine and fecal effluent data are suspect. Per Ron Linville, noxious conditions have been
observed immediately downstream of this discharge. Sand filters are currently off-line. The
draft permit updates monitoring frequencies to Class II requirements, changes NH3 as N from
1.0/1.8 to 2.0/4.0, which has been determined to be technologically achievable, and requires an
alternatives analysis upon renewal. The alternative analysis language was previously
included in the 03/15/94 Authorization to Construct. No alternatives analysis was provided
with the permit renewal application. All other permit requirements are renewed in accordance
with current Division policy.
n
Prepared by: �t'�6
Regional Office Evaluation and Recommendations: 6)

PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA
27626-0535
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO
ISSUE A STATE NPDES PERMIT
0n the basis of thorough staff
review and application of Arti-
i cle 21 of Chapter 143 General
Statutes of North Carolina,
Public Law 92-500 and other
lawful standards and regula-
tions. the North Carolina Envi-
ronmental Management Com-
mission proposes to issue a
permit to discharge to the
persons listed below effective
4/12/96 and subject to special
conditions.
Persons wishing to comment
upon or object to the proposed
determinations are invited to
submit same in writing to the
above address no later than
4/12/96. All comments re-
ceived prior to that date will be
considered in the formulation
of final determinations regard-
ing the proposed permit. A
public meeting may be held
where the Director of the Divi-
sion of Environmental Manage-
ment finds a significant degree
of public interest in a proposed
permit.
A copy of the draft permit is
available by writing or calling
the Division of Environmental
Management, P. 0. Box 29535,
Raleigh, North Carolina
27626-0535, [phone].
The application and other infor-
mation may be inspected at
these locations during normal
office hours. Copies of the
information on file are avail-
able upon request and pay-
ment of the costs of reproduc-
tion. All such comments or
requests regarding a proposed
permit should make reference
to the NPDES permit number
listed below:
Date: 2/21/96
David A. Goodrich for: A. Pres-
ton Howard Jr.. P.E., Director
Division of Environmental
Management
Public notice of intent to issue a
State NPDES permit to the
following:
1. NPDES No. NC0023299. Oak-
wood Land Development Cor-
poration, PO Box 77013,
Greensboro, NC 27417-7013
has applied for a permit re-
newal for a facility located at
Woodlake Mobile Home Park,
Sheraton Park Road (NCSR
3426) south of Greensboro,
Guilford County. The farility
discharges 0.070 MGD of
treated domestic wastewater
from one outfall into an un-
named tributary to Polecat
Creek, a Class WS-III stream
in the Cape Fear River Basin
which has a 7010 floor of 0
cfs and a 3002 flow of 0 cfs.
2. NPDES NO. NC0055913.
Thomas L. Monroe, 5111
Mockingbird Lane, Greensboro,
NC 27406 has applied for a
lermit renewal for a facility
ocated at Monroe's Mobile
Home Park, 955 Halsbrook
Road; south of Greensboro,
Guilford County. The facility
discharges 0.030 MGD of
treated domestic wastewater
from one outfall into Polecat
Creek. a Class WS-III stream
in the River Basin. Dissolved
oxygen, ammonia, and B0D5
are water quality limited. For
some parameters, the avail-
able load capacity of the im-
mediate receiving water will be
consumed. This may affect fu-
ture water quality based efflu-
ent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion,
of the watershed.
NEWS & RECORD
Published by
News & Record, Inc.
Greensboro, North Carolina
North Carolina, Guilford County
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said
County and State, duly commissioned, qualified and
authorized by law to administer oaths, personally
appeared Betty Pitchford who being first duly
sworn, deposes and says:
1. That she is Inside Sales Manager of the Greens-
boro News Company, a corporation, engaged in
the publication of newspapers known as "News
and Record", published, issued and entered as
second class mail in the City of Greensboro in
said County and State;
2. That she is authorized to make this affidavit
and sworn statement; that the notice or other
legal advertisement, a true copy of which is
attached hereto, was published in the
GREENSBORO NEWS & RECORD
on the following dates:
February 25, 1996
for PUBLIC NOTICE and
placed through DIV OF ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT BUDGET
OFC
3. That the said newspaper (or newspapers) in
which such notice, paper, document, or legal
advertisement was published was, at the time
of each and every such publication, a newspa-
per meeting all of the requirements and quali-
fications of Section 1-597 of the General
Statutes of North Carolina and was a qualified
newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597
of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
This 26th day of February, 1996
fied Advertising Manager
Sworn to and su ibed before me, this 26 day of
ebruary 996
Notary WET-1
My commision expires: April 6, 1996

•
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
4497
Ms. Linda C. Sewall, Director
Division of Environmental Health
Post Office Box 29536
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0536
Dear Ms. Sewall:
kVA
�EHNR
I?f- µ 12c5rm,2e
February 23, 1996
Please find attached a copy of the draft NPDES permits listed below which are proposed
for issuance. The receiving waters for these discharges are classified as water supplies. We
cannot issue the permits without your concurrence.
Please advise us of your comments within 30 days, if possible.
Sincerely yours,
David A. Goodrich, Supervisor
NPDES Permits Group
FACILITY NAME
Randolph County - Grays Chapel Elementary
om
Woodlake Mobile Home Park
o - easant Garden Plant
PERMIT NUMBER
NC0040941
NC0055913
NC
vlAo off(-"(C'
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
okw-tcck
\ 9�^
totAks-6-9-

•
• NEWS & RECORD
.31
PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
'COMMISSION
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
27626-0535
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO
ISSUE A STATE NPDES PERMIT
On the basis of thorough staff
review and application of Arti-
cle 21 of Chapter 143 General
Statutes of North Carolina,
Public Law 92-500 and other
lawful standards and regula-
tions, the North Carolina Envi-
ronmental Management Com-
mission proposes to issue a
permit to discharge to the
persons listed ctive
4/12/96 and subject to special
conditions.
Persons wishing to comment
upon or object to the proposed
determinations are invited to
submit same in writing to the
above address no later than
4/12/96. All comments re-
ceived prior to that date will be
considered in the formulation
of final determinations regard-
ing the proposed permit. A
public meeting may be held
where the Director of the Divi-
sion of Environmental Manage-
ment finds a significant degree
of public interest in a proposed
permit.
A copy of the draft permit is
available by writing or calling
the Division of Environmental
Management, P. 0. Box 29535.
Raleigh, North Carolina
27626-0535, [phone].
The application and other infor-
mation may be inspected at
these locations during normal
office hours. Copies of the
information on file are avail-
able upon request and pay-
ment of the costs of reproduc-
tion. All such comments or
requests regarding a proposed
permit should make reference
to the NPDES permit number
listed below.
Date: 2/21/96
David A. Goodrich for: A. Pres-
ton Howard Jr.. P.E.. Director
Division of Environmental
Management
Public notice of intent to issue a
State NPDES permit to the
following:
1.`NPDES No. NC0023299.oak-
wood Land Development Cor-
poration. PO Box 77013,
Greensboro, NC 27417-7013
has ap lied for a permit re-
newal for a facility located at
Woodlake Mobile Home Park,
Sheraton Park Road (NCSR
3426) south of Greensboro,
Guilford County. The facility
discharges 0.070 MGD of
treated domestic wastewater
from one outfall into an un-
named tributary to Polecat
Creek, a Class WS-III stream
in the Cape Fear River Basin
which has a 7Q10 floor of 0
cfs and a 3002 flow of 0 cfs.
2. NPDES NO. NC0055913.
Thomas L. Monroe, 5111
Mockingbird Lane, Greensboro,
NC 27406 has applied for a
lermit renewal for a facility
ocated at Monroe's Mobile
Home Park, 955 Halsbrook
Road, south of Greensboro,
Guilford County. The facility
discharges 0.030 MGD of
treated domestic wastewater
from one outfall into Polecat
Creek, a Class WS-III stream
in the River Basin. Dissolved
oxygen, ammonia, and BOD5
are water quality limited. For
some parameters, the avail-
able load capacity of the im-
mediate receiving water will be
consumed. This may affect fu-
ture water quality based efflu-
ent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion
of the watershed.
Published by
News & Record, Inc.
Greensboro, North Carolina
North Carolina, Guilford County
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said
County and State, duly commissioned, qualified and
authorized by law to administer oaths, personally
appeared Betty Pitchford who being first duly
sworn, deposes and says:
1. That she is Inside Sales Manager of the Greens-
boro News Company, a corporation, engaged in
the publication of newspapers known as "News
and Record", published, issued and entered as
second class mail in the City of Greensboro in
said County and State;
2. That she is authorized to make this affidavit
and sworn statement; that the notice or other
legal advertisement, a true copy of which is
attached hereto, was published in the
GREENSBORO
NEWS & RECORD VED
on the following
R����
February 25, 1996 !` ts
aft
p f.,& BUS'El
OFFtCE
for PUBLIC NOTICE and
placed through DIV OF ENVIRONMENTAL 'MGMT-BUDGET
OFC
3. That the said newspaper (or newspapers) in
which such notice, paper, document, or legal
advertisement was published was, at the time
of each and every such publication, a newspa-
per meeting all of the requirements and quali-
fications of Section 1-597 of the General
Statutes of North Carolina and was a qualified
newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597
of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
This 26th day of February, 1996
Sworn to and
ver i 'ng anager
cribed before me, this 26 day of
February 1996
My commision expires: April 6, 1996
otary Public