Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0006564_Permit Issuance_20160810Water Resources ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY August 10, 2016 Mr. Michael J. Pisarik, Sr. Environmental Engineer Baxter Healthcare Corporation 65 Pitt Station Road Marion, North Carolina 28752 Dear Mr. Pisarik: PAT MCCRORY Governor DONALD R. VAN DER VAART Secretary S. JAY ZIMMERMAN Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance Permit NC0006564 Baxter Healthcare Corporation . McDowell County Facility Class III Director Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for a renewal of the subject permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended). The following changes have been incorporated into this renewal: • The Oil and Grease limits were reduced based on the most recent calculation in accordance with the 40 CFR 463 Subpart A. • Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must submit DMRs electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates that these regulations will be adopted and is beginning implementation. The requirement to begin reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application has been added to the permit. (Please see Special Condition A. (3.)). • The list of wastewater treatment equipment was updated. • The new outfall location was identified on the map. State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources 1617 Mail service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611 919 707 9000 If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this permit shall be final and binding. Please take notice that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division of Water Resources. The Division may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Resources, the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act, or any other federal or local governmental permit. If you have any questions on this permit, please contact Sergei Chernikov at 919-807-6386. Sincerely, S. Jay Zimmerman, P.G. 611 "Director, Division of Water Resources cc: Central Files NPDES Files Asheville Regional Office / Water Quality EPA Region IV (e-copy) WSS/Aquatic Toxicology Unit (e-copy) NC0006564 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina . Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, Baxter Healthcare Corporation is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at Baxter Healthcare Corporation U.S. Highway 221 At North Cove McDowell County to receiving waters designated as North Fork Catawba River in the Catawba River Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other applicable conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof. This peanut shall become effective September 1, 2016. This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on January 31, 2020. Signed this day August 10, 2016. S. Jay Zimmerman P.G., Director Division of Water Resources By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission Page 1 of 6 NC0006564 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises .under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein. Baxter Healthcare Corporation is hereby authorized to: 1. Continue operation of a 1.2 MGD wastewater treatment system, consisting of: • Equalization • Neutralization • Nutrient addition • Membrane tanks • Aeration basin • Aerobic digestion • UV disinfection For a facility located at the Baxter Healthcare Corporation, US Highway 221 at North Cove, McDowell County, 2. Discharge treated wastewater from said treatment works to the North Fork Catawba River, currently classified B-Trout waters in the Catawba River Basin. For a period of one year from the effective date of this permit, the discharge of treated wastewater is authorized from the two locations specified on the attached map, designated as Outfall 001. The sum of the discharges from these locations shall not exceed the total limitations set forth in Part I of this permit. After one year from the effective date of this permit the discharge location designated as Old Outfall (35° 50' 15" N, 82° 00' 00" W) shall be permanently closed. Page 2 of 6 NC0006564 Part I A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [15A NCAC 02B .0400 et seq., 02B .0500 et seq.] During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge treated non -contact cooling water, boiler feed water, process wastewater, and sanitary wastewater from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored7 by the Permittee as specified below: Flow 1.2 MGD easuremen Frequency Continuous Recording Influent or Effluent BOD5, 20°C2 460.9 pounds/day 691.4 pounds/day 3/Week Composite Influent and Effluent CODS 1,292.8 pounds/day 1,939.2 pounds/day 3/Week Composite Influent and Effluent Total Suspended Solids Fecal Coliform Total Residual Chlorine' Temperature, °C 278.0 pounds/day 200/100 mL 417.0 pounds/day 400/100 mL 28 µg/L 3/Week 3/Week 3/Week Composite Grab Grab Effluent Effluent Effluent 3/Week Grab Effluent Conductivity, µS/cm 3/Week Grab Effluent Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L pH 3/Week Grab Effluent > 6.0 and < 9.0 standard units 3/week Grab Effluent Oil & Grease NH3-N, mg/L 47.7 pounds/day 95.4 pounds/day Weekly 2/Month Grab Composite Effluent Effluent Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN), mg/L Total Phosphorus, mg/L Chronic Toxicitys Monthly Composite Effluent Monthly Composite Effluent Quarterly Composite Effluent Fecal Coliform6 , geometric mean 3/Week Grab U, D Temperature6, °C 3/Week Grab U,D Conductivity6, µmho/cm 3/Week Grab U, D Dissolved Oxygen , mg/L 3/Week Grab U, D Footnotes: 1. U: at least 100 feet upstream from the outfall. D: downstream at NCSR 155.2. 2. The monthly•average effluent BOD5 concentration shall not exceed the respective influent value multiplied by 0.3 per 40 CFR 439.12(a). 3. The monthly average effluent COD concentration shall not exceed the respective influent value multiplied by 0.572 per 40 CFR 439.12(d). 4. Chlorine limit &monitoring requirements apply only if chlorine is used. The facility shall report all effluent TRC values reported by a NC certified laboratory including field certified. However, effluent values below 50 µg/L will be treated as zero for compliance purposes. 5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) at 16%: Feb, May, Aug, Nov (see A. (2.)). 6. Sample collected three times per week during June 1 through September 30 and once per week October 1 through May 31. 7. Starting on December 21, 2016, begin submitting Discharge Monitoring Reports electronically using NC DWR's eDMR application system. Please See Special Condition A. (3.). There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. Page 3 of 6 NC0006564 A. (2.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly) [15A NCAC 02B .0200 et seq.] The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 16.0%. The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised December 2010, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised- December 2010) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of February, May, August, and November. These months signify the first month of each three-month toxicity testing quarter assigned to the facility. Effluent sampling for this testing must be obtained during representative effluent discharge and shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -December 2010) or subsequent versions. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWR Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Resources • Water Sciences Section/Aquatic Toxicology Branch 1623 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1623 Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Water Sciences Section no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Water Sciences Section at the address cited above. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NO LE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring. Page 4 of 6 NC0006564 A. (3.) ELECTRONIC REPORTING OF DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS [G.S. 143-215.1(b)] Federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and program reports and specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must submit monitoring data and reports electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The final NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule was adopted and became effective on December 21, 2015. NO 1'F: This special condition supplements or supersedes the following sections within Part II of this permit (Standard Conditions for NPDES Permits): • Section B. (11.) • Section D. (2.) • Section D. (6.). • Section E. (5.) Signatory Requirements Reporting Records Retention Monitoring Reports 1. Reporting Requirements [Supersedes Section D. (2.) and Section E. (5.) (a)] Effective December 21, 2016, the permittee shall report discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application. Monitoring results obtained during the previous month(s) shall be summarized for each month and submitted electronically using eDMR. The eDMR system allows permitted facilities to enter monitoring data and submit DMRs electronically using the internet. Until such time that the state's eDMR application is compliant with EPA's Cross -Media Electronic Reporting Regulation (CROMERR), permittees.will be required to submit all discharge monitoring data to the state electronically using eDMR and will be required to complete the eDMR submission by printing, signing, and submitting one signed original and a copy of the computer printed eDMR to the following address: NC DENR / Division of Water Resources / Water Quality Permitting Section A1"1ENTION: Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 If a permittee is unable to use the eDMR system due to a demonstrated hardship or due to the facility being physically located in an area where less than 10 percent of the households have broadband access, then a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements may be granted and discharge monitoring data may be submitted on paper DMR forms (MR 1, 1.1, 2, 3) or alternative forms approved by the Director. Duplicate signed copies shall be submitted to the mailing address above. See "How to Request a Waiver from Electronic Reporting" section below. Regardless of the submission method, the first DMR is due on the last day of the month following the issuance of the permit or in the case of a new facility, on the last day of the month following the commencement of discharge. Starting on December 21, 2020, the permittee must electronically report the following compliance monitoring data and reports, when applicable: • Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports; • Pretreatment Program Annual Reports; and • Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 316(b) Annual Reports. Page 5 of 6 NC0006564 The permittee may seek an electronic reporting waiver from the Division (see "How to Request a Waiver from Electronic Reporting" section below). 2. How to Request a Waiver from Electronic Reporting The permittee may seek a temporary electronic reporting waiver from the Division. To obtain an electronic reporting waiver, a permittee must first submit an electronic reporting waiver request to the Division. Requests for temporary electronic reporting waivers must be submitted in writing to the Division for written approval at least sixty (60) days prior to the date the facility would be required under this permit to begin submitting monitoring data and reports. The duration of a temporary waiver shall not exceed 5 years and shall thereupon expire. At such time, monitoring data and reports shall be submitted electronically to the Division unless the permittee re -applies for and is granted a new temporary electronic reporting waiver by the Division. Approved electronic reporting waivers are not transferrable. Only permittees with an approved reporting waiver request may submit monitoring data and reports on paper to the Division for the period that the approved reporting waiver request is effective. Information on eDMR and the application for a temporary electronic reporting waiver are found on the following web page: http: / /portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/admin/bog/ipu/edmr 3. Signatory Requirements [Supplements Section B. (11.) (b) and Supersedes Section B. (11.) (d)] All eDMRs submitted to the permit issuing authority shall be signed by a person described in Part II, Section B. (11.)(a) or by a duly authorized representative of that person as described in Part II, Section B. (11.)(b). A person, and not a position, must be delegated signatory authority for eDMR reporting purposes. For eDMR submissions, the person signing and submitting the DMR must obtain an eDMR user account and login credentials to access the eDMR system. For more information on North Carolina's eDMR system, registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit the following web page: http: / /portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/admin/bog/ipu/edmr Certification. Any person submitting an electronic DMR using the state's eDMR system shall make the following certification [40 CFR 122.22]. NO OTHER STATEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION WILL BE ACCEP "I cert, underpenaly of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properlygather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." 4. Records Retention [Supplements Section D. (6.)] The permittee shall retain records of all Discharge Monitoring Reports, including eDMR submissions. These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the report. This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time [40 CFR 122.41]: Page 6 of 6 Latitude: Longitude: Quad #: Receiving Stream: NC0006564 Baxter Healthcare Corporation 35°50'14" Sub -Basin: 81°59'55" Stream Class: D 10 SE - Little Switzerland North Fork Catawba River 03-08-30 B Trout No &tPi Map not to scale McDowell County Medical Products Mr. Sergei Chernikov NCDENR/DWR/NPDES Complex Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 c Subject: NPDES Permit NC0006 61- Addendum to Application Submitted 10/27/2015 Dear Mr. Chernikov, Baxter RECEIVED/NCDEQ/DWR APR 13 2016 Water Quality Permitting Section Upon reviewing the manufacturing operations at the Baxter facility in Marion, NC, it was determined that the facility generates metals finishing categorical wastewaters as described by 40 CFR 433. The facility performs passivation of specific process equipment on a quarterly to semi-annual basis, which is considered a coating operation under 40 CFR 433. Additionally, Baxter performs welding, machining, and other similar operations in the facility machine shop. The water from the passivation will be captured for off -site disposal. None of the operations in the machine shop have a discharge to drain, rather the waters are recycled or captured for off -site disposal. Therefore, although metals finishing wastewaters are present at the facility, Baxter will not discharge metals finishing wastewater to the sewer or Outfall 001. As the categorical wastewater does not discharge to Outfall 001, Baxter does not anticipate any changes to the effluent limitations and monitoring requirements in Section A.(1.) of the NPDES permit. Please contact Mike Pisarik at (828)756-6017 if you have any questions or need any further information. Sincerel (/ v—� Tony Johnson VP Operations — US and Canada Baxter Healthcare Corporation 61 Pitts Station Road / PO Box 1390 / Marion, North Carolina 28752 T 828.756.4151 Chernikov, Sergei From: Belnick, Tom Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 3:24 PM To: Chernikov, Sergei Subject: Baxter Draft Permit Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Sergei- got a call from Arcadis/Chris Stanfield representing Baxter. He will send in official comments on draft permit, with these concerns: • Cover Letter had requested equipment update to Supplement to Cover page • Cover Letter had requested removal of sand filters, and addition of membrane bioreactor • Requested acknowledgement of outfall relocation- new coordinates provided Baxter will also be sending an Addendum to application- they conduct some metal finishing during shutdown, but this wastestream is collected in sumps and hauled offsite, so would not impact permit. Tom Belnick Supervisor NPDES Complex Permitting Unit, DWR North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 919-807-6390 office tom.belnick@ncdenr.gov 512 North Salisbury Street 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27669 %Nothing Compares— -.. Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 1 ASHEVILLE GIVEN -TIMES VOICE OF THE MOUNTAINS • QTIZEN-TIMES.com Public Notice North Carolina Environmental Management Commission/NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-1617 Notice of Intent to Issue a NPDES Wastewater Permit The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission proposes to issue a NPDES waste- water discharge permit to the person(s) listed below. Written comments regarding the pro- posed permit will be accepted until 30 days aft- er the publish ,date of this notice. The Director of the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) mayhold a public hearing should there be a significant degree of public interest. Please mail comments and/or information requests to DWR at the above address. Interested persons may visit the DWR at 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC to review information on file. Additional Information on NPDES permits and this notice may be found on our website: http://deq.nc.9ov/about/d rv'i s ions/water- resources/water-resou rces-permits/wastew- ater-branch/npdes-wastewater/pub I ic-notice- s,or by calling (919) 807-6304. TRO Consuftants, Inc .requested renewal of permit , NC0075388 for Pleasant Cove Home WWT9gP in Buncombe County; this permitted dis- charge French Broad domestic iver Basiwastewater to Pole Sam's MartInc. requested to renew NPDES per- mit NC0044199 for Sam's Mart #45 WWTP, Hay- wood County, discharging treated wastewater to Pigeon River, French Broad River Basin. The Baxter Healthcare Corporation has applied for renewal of permit NC0006564 for the Baxter Healthcare Plant in McDowell County. This facility discharges treated wastewater to the North Fork Catawba River, Catawba River Basi- n. East YanceyWater & Sewer District requested renewal of permit, NC0087891, forSouth Toe River WWTP in Yancey County; this permitted discharge is treated domestic wastewater to South Toe River, French Broad River Basin. March 23, 2016 (3689) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION BUNCOMBE COUNTY SS. NORTH CAROLINA Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State, duly commissioned, qualified and authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared Kelly Loveland, who, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: that she is the Staff Accountant of The Asheville Citizen -Times, engaged in publication of a newspaper known as The Asheville Citizen -Times, published, issued, and entered as first class mail in the City of Asheville, in said County and State; that she is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement; that the notice or other legal advertisement, a true copy of which is attached hereto, was published in The Asheville Citizen -Times on the following date: March 23rd 2016. And that the said newspaper in which said notice, paper, document or legal advertisement was published was, at the time of each and every publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General Statues of North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina. igna Sworn to an 2016. otary Publi My Com f ission expires the 5th day of October, 2018. Signed this 23rd day of March, 2016 aking affidavit) subscribed before me the 23`d day of March, (828) 232-5830 I (828) 253-5092 FAX 14 O. HENRY AVE. I P.O. BOX 2090 I ASHEVILLE, NC 28802 I (800) 800-4204 ) GAN4ETT ,,,`0,\N JOYFA'• ctv NOTARY Chernikov, Sergei From: Pisarik, Michael J <michael_pisarik@baxter.com> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 2:14 PM To: Chernikov, Sergei Subject: RE: Baxter Draft NPDES Permit Comments Sergei, Thank you for your very quick response. Information for outfall 2 on our application should read: Outfall Deg Min Sec Deg Min Sec 2 35 50 14 81 59 55 North Fork Catawba Please let me know if you need more. Thank you, Mike From: Chernikov, Sergei [mailto:sergei.chernikov@ncdenr.gov] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 10:37 AM To: Pisarik, Michael J Subject: RE: Baxter Draft NPDES Permit Comments Mike, Thank you for comments! Please e-mail me the lat. and long. For the new outfall location. Attached is the NPDES boilerplate language. Thank you! Sergei Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D. Environmental Engineer II Complex NPDES Permitting Unit Tel. 919-807-6386 Fax: 919-807-6489 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Express Mail: 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, NC 27604 From: Pisarik, Michael J [mailto:michael pisarik@baxter.com] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 10:25 AM To: Chernikov, Sergei <sergei.chernikov@ncdenr.gov> Subject: Baxter Draft NPDES Permit Comments Dear Mr. Chernikov: Baxter has reviewed draft NPDES permit (NC0006564) that was for our review on March 8, 2016. Based on our review we have the following comments: 1) Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet, Item 1: Baxter is in the process of upgrading the wastewater treatment system (WWTS) from a conventional activated sludge system with a clarifier and sand filtration to a membrane bioreactor (MBR) system. The membrane tanks replace both the clarifier and sand filters in a single unit. Additionally, in the new system equalization and neutralization are two separate process units. The 1 changes to the process are noted on Form 2C listed for Outfall 002. We ask that the supplement to the permit cover sheet be updated to reflect the required wastewater process equipment required for Outfall 002. Additionally, as noted in our cover letter to the NPDES Application, dated October 26, 2015 (attached), Baxter has requested removal of the Upflow Sand Filtration system as an interim change in the permit required treatment system equipment. The existing sand filters are structurally degraded and Baxter can meet the permit limits without them in operation. After removal, Baxter plans on reusing the existing sand filter structure as part of the new expansion; it will become the new centrifuge building. The change in equipment was noted on Form 2C listed for Outfall 001. We ask that the supplement to the permit cover sheet be updated to reflect the change in the required wastewater process equipment required for Outfall 001. 2) Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet, Item 2: As part of the WWTS upgrade Baxter is proposing to move the outfall approximately 550 feet upstream from the current location. This new location will be more convenient for the discharge of wastewater from the new UV Disinfection skid. Additionally, the new discharge line will be larger to accommodate future growth at the facility and to improve the discharge hydraulics. We ask that the supplement to the permit cover sheet be updated to note the location of Outfall 002. 3) The draft permit did not include Parts II, III, or IV. Can you confirm that the permit would be issued with the version on the NCDENR website labeled as version 11/09/2011.1? Or is there a newer version that would be used? If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me. Regards, Mike Pisarik Sr. Environmental Engineer Baxter Healthcare Corporation 65 Pitts Station Road Marion,NC 28752 (828)756-6017 Work (828)808-4386 CeII michael pisarik@baxter.com 2 Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources Fact Sheet for NPDES Permit NC0006564 Facility Information Applicant/Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare Corporation Applicant Address: 65 Pitt Station Rd, Marion, NC 28752 Facility Address: Hwy 221 at North Cove, Marion, NC 28752 Permitted Flow: 1.2 MGD Type of Waste: Non -contact Cooling Water, Boiler Feed Water, Process Water, and Sanitary Wastewater Facility/Permit Status: Renewal County: McDowell County Miscellaneous Receiving Stream: North Fork Catawba River Stream Classification: B Trout 303(d) Listed?: No Subbasin: 03-08-30 Drainage Area (mi2): calculated 31.5 mi2 Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 10.2 cfs Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 15.2 cfs Average Flow (cfs): 63 cfs IWC (%): 16 % Primary SIC Code: 2834 Regional Office: Asheville USGS Topo Quad: D 10 SE Permit Writer: Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D. Date: February 1, 2016 SUMMARY The Baxter Corporation requires a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge permit to dispose of treated non -contact cooling water, boiler feed water, process wastewater, and sanitary wastewater through surface water discharge. The facility manufactures sterile liquid solutions in flexible bags for medical procedures. Baxter Corporation's NPDES permit has expired and they have requested renewal of their permit. The source of the wastewater is non -contact cooling water, boiler feed water, process water, and sanitary wastewater. The facility is currently upgrading its wastewater treatment system and relocating the outfall 550 ft. upstream of the current location to accommodate the upgrade. The upgrade will be completed within 1 year of the permit effective date. After treatment, wastewater is discharged through outfall 001 into the North Fork Catawba River, which is classified B-Trout Waters,1' in the Catawba River Basin. Fact Sheet NPDES Renewal (NC0006554) Page 1 In 1995, the Division of Water Resources issued an Authorization to Construct that permitted the construction of a new outfall into the North Fork Catawba River 3.2 miles upstream of the confluence with Armstrong Creek. Prior to 1996, Baxter Healthcare and American Threads discharged through outfalls constructed at the same location in the North Fork Catawba River (0.2 miles downstream of the confluence with Armstrong Creek). CURRENT STREAM CONDITIONS Baxter Healthcare discharges into the North Fork Catawba River, 3.2 miles upstream of the confluence with Armstrong Creek. In 1994, DWR modeled the North Fork Catawba River from Baxter Corporation's outfall to Lake James. The model included the interactions of Baxter's discharge with American Threads (no longer exists). The North Fork Catawba River changes classification t the confluence of Armstrong Creek and North Fork Catawba River. The upstream classification is B —Tr and the downstream classification is C. The model was based on the BOD load of 1321 (daily max) and 880 (monthly average). The current load is substantially lower. The model indicated that dissolved oxygen concentrations from the outfall to the confluence with Armstrong Creek did not fall below the state standard of 6.0 mg/L for trout waters. The lowest predicted value in this reach did not fall below 7.0 mg/L. TECHNOLOGY BASED EFFLUENT LIMITS DEVELOPMENT BOD5, COD, and TSS are based on effluent guidelines (40 CFR 439 Subpart D) and have been recalculated to reflect the most current data available (See attached calculations). The results of these calculations are less stringent than the limits in the current permit (with an exception of Oil and Grease). Since the facility has no plans to expand production in the foreseeable future (per the facility), it is recommended that the old limits for most parameters are maintained. The limits for Oil and Grease will be reduced. According to the new calculation, the oil & grease (O&G) limit is lower than in the previous permit. The oil and grease limit consists of two components. First component is cooling water from the extruders, and is limited per 40 CFR 463 Subpart A — Plastic Molding and Forming Point Source Category. The other component is sanitary wastewater, which is limited based on BPJ of 30 mg/L monthly average and 60 mg/L daily maximum. The process wastewater coveted under 40 CFR 439 does not provide an allocation. INSTREAM MONITORING The facility is required to conduct self -monitoring of the North Fork Catawba River at one location upstream of the discharge and one location downstream of the discharge. The instream self -monitoring includes: fecal coliform, temperature, conductivity, and dissolved oxygen. REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS (RPA) The Division conducted EPA -recommended analyses to determine the reasonable potential for toxicants to be discharged at levels exceeding water quality standards/EPA criteria by this facility from Outfall 001. For the purposes of the RPA, the background concentrations for all parameters were assumed to be below detections level. The RPA uses 95% probability level and 95% confidence basis in accordance with the EPA Guidance entitled "Technical Support Document for Water Quality - based Toxics Control." The application data was used in the analysis. For Outfall 001 calculations included: Zn, Ba, and Fe (please see attached). Based on the RPA, no water quality based limits are necessary. TBEL limits will be maintained for Outfall 001. Fact Sheet NPDES Renewal (NC0006554) Page 2 TOXICITY TESTING _Current Requirement: Outfall 001 — Chronic P/F @ 16% using Ceriodaphnia dubia Recommended Requirement: Outfall 001 — Chronic P/F @ 16% using Ceriodaphnia dubia This facility has passed 18 of 19 quarters (1 failure), please see attached. COMPLIANCE SUMMARY During the last 5 years, the facility had 4 limits violations (3 for Fecal Coliform and 1 for TSS), please see attached. All violations occurred within a few days of each other and it appears to be a treatment upset. PERMIT LIMITS DEVELOPMENT • The pH limits in the permit are based on the requirements of the 15A NCAC 2B .0200. • The following limits in the permit are based on the requirements of 40 CFR 439 Subpart D: BOD, COD, and TSS. • The following limits in the permit are based on the requirements of 40 CFR 463 Subpart A: Oil and Grease. • The TRC limit in the permit is based on the requirements of the 15A NCAC 2B .0211. • The Whole Effluent Toxicity limit in the permit is based on the requirements of the 15A NCAC 2B .0500. • The Fecal Coliforms limits in the permit are based on the requirements of the 15A NCAC 2B .0211. PROPOSED CHANGES • The Oil and Grease limits were reduced based on the most recent calculation in accordance with the 40 CFR 463 Subpart A. • Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must submit DMRs electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates that these regulations will be adopted and is beginning implementation. The requirement to begin reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application has been added to the permit. (Please see Special Condition A. (3.)). Proposed Schedule for Permit Issuance Draft Permit to Public Notice: Permit Scheduled to Issue: February 23, 2016 April 18, 2016 NPDES Contact If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit; please contact Sergei Chernikov at (919) 807-6386. Fact Sheet NPDES Renewal (NC0006554) Page 3 CHANGES IN THE FINAL PERMIT • The list of wastewater treatment equipment was updated. • The new outfall location was identified on the map. Fact Sheet NPDES Renewal (NC0006554) Page 4 No'e +0 j'(M i't(ii 1L)( P,itolilkk_ Belnick, Tom From: Belnick, Tom Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 5:58 PM To: 'Pisarik, Michael J' Subject: FW: NC0006564 Acknowledgement of Permit Mod Application Attachments: 201511201739.pdf Mike- I've attached a pdf of the Division's acknowledgement of receipt on 8/1/2014 of your original NPDES permit renewal application. By this email, I am also acknowledging receipt on 11/2/2015 of an NPDES Permit Modification application for increase in permitted flow to 1.4 MGD. Per our discussion today, you are withdrawing the modification request and will proceed forward with plant upgrade. We are currently behind in permit renewals, and will get back to your renewal in 2016. You will keep operating under the terms of your current permit until a new permit is issued. You indicated that the Permit Modification Application contains some updated material that might be useful for the renewal, so I will alert the permit writer to review both applications before proceeding with a draft permit. Feel free to contact me with any further questions. Tom Beinick Supervisor NPDES Complex Permitting Unit, DWR North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 919-807-6390 office tom.belnick@ncdenr.gov 512 North Salisbury Street 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27669 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Original Message From: Tom Beinick [mailto:tom.belnick@ncdenr.gov] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 5:40 PM To: Beinick, Tom <tom.beinick@ncdenr.gov> Subject: Message from "RNP0026733F34F1" This E-mail was sent from "RNP0026733F34F1" (Aficio MP C4502). Scan Date: 11.20.2015 17:39:51 (-0500) Queries to: rcollins@systeloa.com Belnick, Tom From: Belnick, Tom Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 3:38 PM To: Davidson, Landon; Heim, Tim; Wiggs, Linda - Subject: FW: NPDES Application Cover Letter Attachments: Baxter NPDES Permit App Cover Letter.pdf Fyi... I think Wren has already sent you's their permit mod request, but the attached letter might help. Quick note.... Current permit (NC0006564) expired 1/31/2015. Facility submitted renewal app in 2014, and just submitted a permit mod request to increase flow from 1.2 MGD to 1.4 MGD. NPDES cannot mod an expired permit, so we'll address both at the same time, likely next year. They plan to replace old WWTP with new. As an industrial facility, they do not require ATC to build new WWTP (but must still comply with Minimum Design Criteria). I'm discussing with them whether they really want the expanded flow in permit, since that might require additional documentation and additional EPA review, and could take 6+ months. If they just want the new plant/additional size to handle peak flow, they could start a lot sooner. Let me know if any questions. Tom Belnick Supervisor NPDES Complex Permitting Unit, DWR North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 919-807-6390 office tom.belnick@ncdenr.gov 512 North Salisbury Street 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27669 ±;s}cthing Compares--, Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Pisarik, Michael J [mailto:michael_pisarik@baxter.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 2:41 PM To: Belnick, Tom <tom.belnick@ncdenr.gov> Subject: RE: NPDES Application Cover Letter My apologies. I must have gotten into a hurry. Here is the full letter. From: Belnick, Tom [mailto:tom.belnick@ncdenr.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 1:19 PM To: Pisarik, Michael J Subject: RE: NPDES Application Cover Letter Mike- is there a Page 2 to the letter? Thanks. You'll need to let us know if you still want DWR to consider an expanded flow with your permit renewal. Also, DWR will need to evaluate how to permit 2 potential outfalls following completion of the new WWTP. Tom Belnick Supervisor NPDES Complex Permitting Unit, DWR North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 919-807-6390 office tom.belnick a(�ncdenr.gov 512 North Salisbury Street 1617 Mail Service Center.. Raleigh, NC 27669 Nothing Co Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Pisarik, Michael J [mailto:michael pisarik@baxter.comj Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 1:12 PM To: Belnick, Tom <tom.belnick@ncdenr.gov> Subject: NPDES Application Cover Letter Tom, Thank you for the call today. I've attached the cover letter that should have been in front of our permit application. If you have any other questions, please let me know. Mike Pisarik Sr. Environmental Engineer Baxter Healthcare Corporation 65 Pitts Station Road Marion,NC 28752 (828)756-6017 Work (828)808-4386 Cell michael pisarik@baxter.com North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Pat McCrory Governor November 13, 2015 Mr. Mike Howell, Plant Manager Baxter Healthcare Corporation PO Box 1390 Marion, North Carolina 28752 l�f ✓ M I'+ 2 q IRA V3V7.06. Peemr+ review/Jews ceivoli /Ai 7/4 WZ or .1.14F144 x E n 4 6.5 Dear Permiee: Donald R. van der Vaart Secretary betiia frei P-ecirt i ►%ia Subject: Acknowledgement o Application No. NCO 10656 Baxter Healthcare Corporation WWTP McDowell County The Water Quality Permitting Section has received your permit renewal application on November 02, 2015. A member of the NPDES Unit will review your application. They will contact you if additional information is required to complete your permit renewal. Per G.S. 150B-3 your current permit does not expire until permit decision on the application is made. Continuation of the current permit is contingent on timely and sufficient application for renewal of the current permit. Please respond in a timely manner to requests for additional information necessary to complete the permit application. If you have any additional questions concerning renewal of the subject permit, please contact Wren Thedford at 919-807-6304 or wren.thedford@ncdenr.gov. O.Rs mvD Sincerely, ‘Ate et Ft 14 (4444640) o..cl5 M60 E),./1„ MAK°A1 L/ fLoP 1. YA16 t' f1Qa/4uce(at? 3 r = 0-6r16-vi e/r WreAA, TIAzobford.,►J Wren Thedford Wastewater Branch cc: Central Files Asheville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section NPDES Unit /YU lAvvi Arc d4�.3 seeK►) exkolnk 4fol l. Z49t0 )YfM69 Ea,iIS -/4Ie revrelic_ EPA— joiovt) �� 1,�(rWG1I rej.) 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone: 919-807-63001 Fax: 919-807-6492/Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Internet:: www,ncwater.orq An Equal Opportunity\Affirmative Action Employer Penvii 1( Ncam 6sw Ieifr1i?'i14( v3 vios- Baxter October 26, 2015 Baxter Healthcare Corporation P.O. Box 1390 Marion, North Carolina 28752 828-75 51 See 4H4014paieS HaV1 tr/ -e te e NCDENR/DWR/NPDES Complex Permitting Unit / efoi '7IS77 See 1617 Mail Service Center e 44 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 ;yam Jobi i- 2 -4 t.se /ow_ /11C00 0 6517Y — No f sv Subject: NPDES Permit NCD0591:176114 Modification To Whom It May Concern, Please find attached the NPDES permit modification application for Baxter Healthcare, LLC (Baxter), Permit No. NC0059140764. Baxter is replacing the existing wastewater treatment plant with a more modern facility designed to both meet the current load and to accommodate future growth. The attached application describes both the existing and new wastewater treatment plant, as they will be operated concurrently during the startup period of the new facility. 04,1r 61,41 Atiho 4pplivihoi - Apo t 44%ot (otili6 A7sis-) Ihrei6A-r4dinkia F As part of the facility changes, Baxter is proposing to move the permitted outfall approximately 550 feet upstream from the current location. The new outfall will be designed with better hydraulic characteristics to handle the design peak flows and will be closer to the wastewater treatment plant. Both outfalls will be used during startup, as the influent flow will be split between the new and old treatment systems until the biology is sufficiently advanced in the new treatment system to accept the entire flow. As the two outfalls will be discharging the same wastewater they are substantially identical, therefore we only included one set of data for the effluent characterization. After startup is complete the existing treatment plant, including the existing outfall, will be taken out of service. For the existing outfall this means that it will be abandoned in place, but permanently capped or plugged so that it can no longer be used. Note that the permit application includes a list of equipment in use for each of the outfalls. One change that Baxter is proposing for the existing system is the removal of the existing sand filters from the process. The sand filter efficiency has greatly decreased due to maintenance issues and significant expense would be required to improve their condition. However, Baxter can meet the current permit limits straight out of the clarifiers, so there should be no impact on permit compliance. The change is necessary so that Baxter can reuse the existing sand filter structure as part of the new expansion; the new centrifuge will be constructed in the sand filter current location. Although a permit to construct is not required, Baxter is including with this application copies of the Basis of Design Report. This report is included to provide details on the new wastewater treatment system and wastewater characterization that are not possible with the standard application forms. Please note that we discussed the permit application requirements with Mr. Ron Berry in the NCDENR Raleigh offices. He indicated that the permit renewal application submitted by Baxter on July 28, 2014 had not yet been assigned a permit writer and indicated that both permit applications would be reviewed concurrently; therefore. Baxter would not be required to submit a second I/20/Wir - 19)1wif di:'n W/C04344 (CA I ,clyietfe LiAlC410, 1-6 770,315y_67/0) 04-4 cot eff-, (mixt PoarrKi 53-7C 6- 6q17). 1). ( lyre wiSofrovrin reptinl eKpoitet(mPow' 00 1.` I 00 p e reold, kit weVit/Xly w ski o 'nte( 6,(142id nevu 'demist' 70 a",f, . . t It 24)11. application fee with this permit modification application. If this is in error, please let us know so that a check can be issued for the application fee. In order to help you expedite your review, Baxter and our consultant would like to meet with NCDENR to discuss the application and to answer questions you may have about the project. Please let us know when you are available to meet. You can contact me directly at (828) 756-6753 or brian d smith@baxter.com. Brian D S Director of Environmental Health & Safety Attachments: Permit Application Binder (3 copies) Each binder contains EPA Form 1 EPA Form 2C Engineering Alternatives Analysis Local Government Review Form Basis of Design Report /1/ o �� 6 y 1)) tri.vc,ug f - 0.11/.9 /11d Oc,4/-4 g) ,wti- e� % - d. r3 /16Y6 / - 13J n C) � a' 7-SS /- _ ¢ed ,A- t-1 - S tie'/ cam.f un . S 4,1,eel 1 k J fA-t i-t � ,� �,� ti . } 1'c-4/ f rULl it - ['Lc.Qc4 " y-ik_AA/Lt E,X i1Z- & Cal - 1-4. t - C, At v, V wS CZ �J 1, c,_ 1, \_%2 J�vn.. if-e iv,/ I) geoo roz41— 4 3t/i.Q - 8 157,o // - /S03 a / . /9 ii 6___Le___ oc) F'/'2- Id 3 ccgia_tti A_ p/4471/c Add: To4-4-1-iry eo,d-o-d- e,,,kt, e ptiAm_ docaliAl. 6, fey (e..;i_eci. _ -) i-gsu g,,k, /<:‘, - s-o . 0 /e/ 404141 3 /t ,2 /oh /z - 1'L). /et x 0, -#49 /'1G ,b x 3, 3 t 313 /?/d it4-0, ?-b -r 6 /111DA/.4 ; . = 313 tio, 7 // a`- l 61)0 4„,/ pt.u-/4-71A9,L- 1300.- 1 ` V A-A-3 Am, - rs.,1-Q4n- f NU,� -c o cii P is co.) k 4) 401414_ -= d i /10 up_ 3 &A-311--t-ittv- 0.1) ttc,r) x 0 r x 8.3‘i 8,4', I I )7 cl 0 ce,, its s /it-e.t/ s 014A. x < /8. 3 ci bt:,_ (d r1 y '"Ax) O, 4et 432,y2 43°% J i\ti Q �v CF/2 /-/ 4 2 p rob rkwr,uy1— 94S.o vit ,A,Aced P)-9 o, iti6P o 3,3't xt2,/ x6O2.0 /e9 1-4:44) 1()A4:21 = /t3.‘ /6t4.7,y Ati), = /I; 4/ -H7 7 i-e/ J�PJ /V D W Ilja co J l l �i/� 1 s o ,,`e-n, V v � �/ e l �; p cry, r1 cvti �h S tt,p 1, r� a/ � l �°q' 8010U� IA co.) % we,- 71„Cecil filolS7, r"-P ,s �. / vLic cz is �a vim. /-ei �, .� rD,-)h a. /! tioi .)-1\ pn riA'4-tM . {k-Gyt, . ,1--er Cu 0 ex f w -� df-e- ✓�- = 1 S 1 %'� / l J^-t a x A7 Va,A-i �;% t� 0n. rut_ yo CFI, .e-/3 9, yZ Pr-oc-ciA - a fi`42644)( CA)O h.,, 8o, 2( 2. i'% /JA 410 Win- Cv /4 rt„),,,,, 7,/t) /1-1-(Ac . 1t 33 5 S �� y — /-/'/. /e",7 A 3 r= S ��a s 1-0) : S 52- ',...z--/c)7„, 7 le/ rs� ,,ve 0t20 CSC y &k.dtt4A- — 3, 3 y — „tg 0 /, (AA.;1 a-)( .) 40 13 sa ?,��- r,-a� o. o $ � /t G a x 41 D '7 /6 )(8, 3 y / / l Tss S, �� x S S s ate, ��wi ' rg . 3 a, n Y , 0 8. 3y /ti)t7 f -1�i /1 1 /aL 2 123, y l /t (hi?) / ,7 18o4e 7gC ,!- 8.3 y 1vv, te,s, r = D, 2?4 /4 c 2 ? /G x 8.3y = IWL y (61A-11) '"`A`% P<,.,..t /`t-x - /3,11 Ss, 3 2 1�3, y t i(g,1 =2V/2, 8/a/ LJ Taps /1,35 S, 2- li: July 28, 2014 Division of Water Resources NCDENR 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Attention: Wastewater Branch Reference: Renewal Application for NPDES Permit NC0006564 To Whom It May Concern: Baxter RECEIVED/DENR/DWR AUG - 12014 Water Quality Permitting Secflon Baxter Healthcare Corporation requests the renewal of Permit NC0006564 which expires 31 January 2015. Enclosed is the permit renewal application packet (original and 2 copies) which includes EPA Form 1-1, EPA Form 3510-2C, Priority Pollutant Analysis analytical results, and associated documentation. No significant manufacturing changes have occurred since the last renewal application. Please note that oil and grease is not expected in our effluent. As per previous discussions with NCDENR, we would like you to consider removing this monitoring requirement from the new permit. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 828-756-6017. Sincerely, Michael J. Pisarik Sr. Environmental Engineer Enclosures (Original + 2 copies): EPA Form 1-1 EPA Form 3510-2C Baxter Map Process Flow Diagram Sludge Management Narrative Pace Analytical Reports Baxter Healthcare Corporation PO Box 1390, Marion, NC 28752 T 828.756.4151 Please print or type in the unshaded areas only. EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item 1 of Form I) NC0006564 Form Approved. OMB No. 2040-0086. Approval expires 3-31-98. FORM fAPFLICATIO �RM `�+ NPDES I. OUTFALL LOCATION lwIEPA list the U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER EXISTING IVIANUFACTURING,JCOMMERCIAL, MINING AND SILVICULTURE OPERATIONS Consolidated Permits Program latitude and longitride of its.location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receiving water. For each outfall, A. OUTFALL NUMBER (fist) B. LATITUDE C. LONGITUDE • D. RECEIVING WATER (name) 1. DEG. 2. MIN. 3. SEC. 1. DEG. 2. MIN. 3. SEC. 1 35 50 10 82 00 01 North Fork Catawba II. FLOWS, SOURCES OF POLLUTION, AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES the facility. in Item be determined Indicate B. Construct (e.g., sources of intake a water balance for certain water; operations on the mining activities), contributing wastewater to the effluent, and treatment units line drawing by showing average flows between intakes, operations, provide a pictorial description of the nature and amount of any A. Attach a line drawing showing the water flow through labeled to correspond to the more detailed descriptions treatment units, and outfalls. If a water balance cannot sources of water and any collection or treatment measures. B. For each outfall, provide a description of: (1) All operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including process wastewater, sanitary wastewater, cooling water, and storm water runoff; (2) The average flow contributed by each operation; and (3) The treatment received by the wastewater. Continue on additional sheets if necessary. 1. OUT- FALL NO. (list) 2. OPERATION(S) CONTRIBUTING FLOW 3. TREATMENT a. OPERATION (list) b. AVERAGE FLOW (include units) a. DESCRIPTION b. LIST CODES FROM TABLE 2C-1 1 v Ground Water 1.328 MGD Neutralized 2-K Cooling Ponds 0.130 MGD Pre -Screening 1-T Boiler Feed Water 0.221 MGD Equalization 1-0 Sanitary Water 0.149 MGD Nutrient Addition XX V S • Process Water 0.700 MGD Activated Sludge 3-A l Flocculation 1-G 1—C I ' o S� /i / i) 7 1-1 O Clarification 1-R Jl ' Sand Filtration 1-R I .11 1 �i,.. o.^ t4 /' V , ��� I- i (� Disinfection 2 -R 61L(l O `o9G (Sludge) Aerobic Digestor 5-A Filter Press 5-R Land Application 5-P OFFICIAL USE ONLY (effluent guidelines sub -categories) EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE 1 of 4 CONTINUE ON REVERSE LINE DRAWING Blue River I90,000 GPD 45,000 GPD', Raw Materials 10,000 GPD Solid Waste 4,000 GPD Fiber Preparation 15,000 GPD 40,000 GPD Grit Separator Stormwater 36,000 GPD 45,p00 GPD Dyeing Municipal Water Supply 30,000 GPD 20 000 GPD 40,000 GPD Neutralization Tank Loss Washing 10,000 Blue River 10,000 GPD Cooling Water 6,000 GPD 34,000 GPD Max: 20,000 GPD Waste Treatment Plant #1 Outfall 001 GPD Drying 40,000 10,000 GPD GPD Waste Treatment Plant #2 70,000 GPD + Stormwafer Outfall 002 50,000 GPD 5,000 GPD ' To Atmosphere To Product 5,000 GPD Schematic of Water Flow Brown Mills, Inc. City, County, State Figure 2C-1 CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT C. Except for storm runoff, leaks, or spills, are any of the discharges described ❑ YES.(complete the following table) , in Items II -A or B intermittent or seasonal? III) , • !® NO (go to Section :_ ,., ,_, } . ';3. FREQUENCY ' .' '::. • 4. FLOW , - a. DAYS PER B. TOTAL VOLUME ' 2. OPERATION(s) WEEK, . b. MONTHS a. FLOW RATE (in mgd) , (specifywith units) . 1. OUTFALL CONTRIBUTING FLOW (specif ' PER YEAR 1. LONG TERM 2. MAXIMUM 1. LONG TERM 2. MAXIMUM C. DURATION NUMBER (list) . (lis() ` average) (specify average). ' AVERAGE - .DAILY AVERAGE DAILY .-. (indays) N/A • III. PRODUCTION A. Does an effluent guideline limitation promulgated by EPA under Section 304 of the Clean Water Act apply to your facility? rr, YES (complete Item II1 B) • ❑ NO (go to Section IV) B. Are the limitations in the,applicable effluent guideline expressed in terms of production (or other measure of operation)? ❑ YES (complete Item III-C) !4 NO (go to Section IV) C. If you answered "yes" to Item III-B, Mist the quantity which represents an actual measurement of your level of production, expressed in the terms and units used in the applicable effluent guideline, and indicate the affected outfalls.. 1. AVERAGE DAILY PRODUCTION 2. AFFECTED OUTFALLS a. QUANTITY PER DAY b. UNITS OF MEASURE c. OPERATION, PRODUCT, MATERIAL, ETC. - . (specify) (list ouffall numbers) . ,.. ' ... .. .. ,. ', ..• ._ 001. IV. IMPROVEMENTS A. Are you now required by any Federal, State or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading or operations of wastewater treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the discharges described in this appfcation? This includes, but is not limited to, permit conditions, administrative or enforcement orders, enforcement compliance schedule letters, stipulations, court orders, and grant or loan conditions. ❑ YES (complete the following table) n NO (go to Item IV-B) 1. IDENTIFICATION OF CONDITION, 2. AFFECTED OUTFALLS 4. FINAL COMPLIANCE DATE AGREEMENT, ETC. 3. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT a. NO. b. SOURCE OF DISCHARGE a. REQUIRED b. PROJECTED B. OPTIONAL: You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs (or other environmental projects which may affect your discharges) you now have underway or which you,plan. Indicate whether each program is now underway or planned, and indicate your actual or planned schedules for construction. ❑ MARK "X" IF DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL PROGRAMS IS ATTACHED EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE 2 of 4 CONTINUE ON PAGE 3 CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS A, B, & C: See instructions before proceeding — Complete one set oftables for each outfall —Annotate the outfall number in the space provided. NOTE: Tables V-A, V-B, and V-C are included on separate sheets numbered'V-1 through V-9. .EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item I of Form 1) . NC0006564 D. Use the space below to list any of the pollutants listed in Table 2c-3 of the instructions, which you know or have reasonto believe is discharged or may be discharged from any outfall. For every pollutant you list, briefly describe the reasons you believe it to be present and report any analytical data in your possession. 1. POLLUTANT 2. SOURCE 1. POLLUTANT 2. SOURCE N/A VI. POTENTIAL DISCHARGES NOT COVERED BY ANALYSIS Is any pollutant listed in Item V-C a substance or a component of a substance which you currently use or manufacture as an interm ❑ YES (list all such pollutants below) II NO (go to Item VI-B) ediate or final product or byproduct? EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE 3 of 4 CONTINUE ON REVERSE CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT VII:.BIOLOGICAL TOXICITY TESTING DATA has been made on any of your discharges or on a receiving water in ❑ NO (go to Section WI) Do yOu. have any knowledge or 'reason to believe that any biological test•for acute br chronic toxicity relation to your discharge within the last 3 years? • • n YES (identify the tests) and describe their purposes below) , ' ,r ; Quarterly toxicity testing is VIII. CONTRACT ANALYSIS INFORMATION Were any of the analyses reported in Item V carried out as'required by the current permit. • • performed' by a contract laboratory or consulting firm? , telephone number of, andpollutants analyzed by, ❑ NO (go to Section LY) below) ' , , q YES (list the name, address, and . each such laboratory orfirm A NAME , B: ADDRESS C. TELEPHONE (area code & no.) D.POLLUTANTS.ANALYZED 4 (bsf) Pace Analytical Services IX. CERTIFICATION 9800 Kincey Ave Suite 100, Huntersville, NC 28078 and all attachments were prepared under my direction the information submitted. Based on my inquiry the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge including the possibility of fine and imprisonment (704) 875-9092 or supervision in accordance,with of the person or persons who and belief, true, accurate, for knowing violations. O&G, Amonia, Tota1F,N, Total P,.Priority, Politants a system designed to assuie that manage the system or those persons and complete- 1 am aware that there l certify under penalty of law that this document qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate directly responsible for gathering the' information, are significant penalties for submitting. false information, A. NAME & OFFICIAL TITLE (type or print) , ' Terry Foxx, Interim Plant Manager B. PHONE NO. (area code & no.) (828) 756-6588 C. SIGNATURE1 �} / / ! 4 L4 . O D. DATE SIGNED 7/ 3/ / / EPA Form 351 b-2C (8-90) ` ) PAGE 4of4 PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE IN THE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY. You may report some or all of this information EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item 1 of Form 1) on separate sheets (use the same format) instead of completing these pages. NCO 006564 SEE INSTRUCTIONS. V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS (continued from page 3 of Form 2-C) 'OUTFALL NO. PART A —You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table -for each outfall. See instructions for additional details. 1. POLLUTANT 2. EFFLUENT 3. UNITS (spec* if blank) 4. INTAKE (optional) a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE (if available) c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE . (if available a. CONCEN- TRATION b. MASS a. LONG TERM AVERAGE VALUE (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS b. NO. OF ANALYSES (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS d. NO. OF ANALYSES a. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) 17.. 8 114 8 . 7 60.4 12 mg/L lbs b. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 88 528 30 170 21 mg/L lbs c. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) NA 0 d. Total Suspended Solids(TSS) 36.5 219 13.8 86 21 mg/L lbs _.. e. Ammonia (as IV) <0 . 1 <0 . 1 3 mg/1 f. Flow VALUE 0,. 8 0 VALUE 0. 74 VALUE 3 0 MGD VALUE g. Temperature (winter) VALUE 16. 1 VALUE 13 VALUE 22 °C VALUE h. Temperature (summer) VALUE 2 8. 1 VALUE 2 6. 2 VALUE 21 °C VALUE i. pH MINIMUM - MAXIMUM MINIMUM 7 MAXIMUM 7 .5 21 STANDARD UNITS 1 PART B — Mark "X" in column 2-a for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark "X" in column 2-b for each;pollu ant you believe to be absent. If you mark co umn 2a for any pollutant which is limitedeither directly, or indirectly but expressly, in an effluent limitations guideline, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. For other pollutants for which you mark column 2a, you must provide quantitative data or an explanation of their presence in your discharge. Complete one table for each outfall. See the instructions for additional details and requirements. 1. POLLUTANT AND CAS NO. Of available) 2. MARK "X" 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional) a BELIEVED PRESENT b. BELIEVED ABSENT a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE (if available) c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE (if available), . a. CONCEN- TRATION b. MASS a. LONG TERM AVERAGE VALUE (1) CONCENTRATION (2)_MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS d. NO. OF ANALYSES (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS b. NO. OF ANALYSES a. Bromide (24959-67-9) . v b. Chlorine, Total Residual �/ /� c. Color X d. Fecal Coliform X / ` 36 8.0 13 #/100m1 e. Fluoride (16984-48-8) f. Nitrate -Nitrite Al) X(as EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE V-1 CONTINUE ON REVERSE ITEM V-B CONTINUED FROM FRONT • 1. POLLUTANT AND . CAS NO. - (ifavailalile) - g. Nitrogen, Total •Organic (as JV) 2. MARK "X" 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional) a. BELIEVED PRESENT X b. BELIEVED ABSENT a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE ,b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE (if available) c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE (ifavailable) . (1)- CONCENTRATION (2) MASS' (1) CONCENTRATION - (2) MASS (1)` - CONCENTRATION (2) MASS d:NO. OF_ ANALYSES a. CONCEN- TRATION b: MASS a. LONG TERM AVERAGEVALUE` (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS - b. NO. OF ANALYSES h. Oil and Grease X ND, mg/L i. Phosphorus (as P), Total (7723-14-0) X j. Radioactivity (1) Alpha, Total. X (2) Beta, Total X (3) Radium, Total X (4) Radium 226, Total X k..Sulfate (as SO,) (14808-79-8) X I. Suede (as 5) X m. Sulfite (as S03) (14265-45-3) X n. Surfactants X o. Aluminum, Total (7429-90-5).- X p. Barium, Total. (7440-39.3), , X 22.7 NA NA NA NA NA 1 ug/L NA 4. Boron, Total (7440-42-8) X r. Cobalt,Total, (7440-48-4)- - X s. Iron, Total (7439-89-6) X 76.3; 'ug/ L t. Magnesium, Total (7439-95-4) - X 11700 - NA NA NA_ NA NA 1 ug/L. '.?NA u. Molybdenum, Total (7439-98-7) X v. Manganese, Total (7439-96-5) ' X. w. Tin, Total (7440-3175)-- X x. Titanium, Total (7440-32-6) X EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE V-2 CONTINUE, ON PAGE V-3' - • EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item I of Form I) NCO 00.6564_ _ _ OUTFALL NUMBER 1 - PART_C - If you are a primary' industry and this outfall contains process•wastewater, refer to Table 2c-2 in the instructions to determine which of the GC/MS fractions you must test for. Mark "X" in column 2-a for all such GC/MS fractions that applyto your industry and'for ALL -toxic metals, cyanides; and -total phenols: -If you are not required to -mark .column 2-a (secondary industries; nonprocess-wastewater ouffalls,'and nonrequired. GC/MS fractions), mark "X" in.column 2-b for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present Mark "X" in column 2-c for each pollutant you believe is absent. If you mark column 2a for any pollutant, you must ...provide the results of at'least one analysis for that pollutant. If you mark -column 2b for any pollutant, you must provide the results:of at least one analysis for that, pollutant if you know or have reason to believe it will be discharged in concentrations of 10 ppb or greater. -If you mark column•2b for acrolein, acrylonitrile,-2,4 dinitrophenol; or 2-methyl-4, 6 dinitrophenol, you must provide the -results of -at least•one-analysis for each•of-these pollutants which you know or have reason to believe that you discharge in concentrations of 100 ppb or greater. Otherwise, for pollutants for which you mark column 2b, you must either submit at least one analysis or . briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is expected to be discharged. Note that there are 7 pages to this part;' please review each carefully. Complete one table (all 7 pages) for each outfall. See instructions for --7 additional details and requirements.- . - _ . . 1. POLLUTANT AND' - CAS NUMBER - (ifavaifable) - , 2. MARK"X" 3i EFFLUENT - 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional) ' a: _TESTING REQUIRED b. BELIEVED _PRESENT c. BELIEVED ABSENT a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE (ifavailable) c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE Of available) d. NO. OF ANALYSES -a:CONCEN- . TRATION .b. MASS • a. LONG TERM AVERAGE VALUE b. NO. OF ANALYSES (1) CONCENTRATION . (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION' " (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) •CONCENTRATION' '(2)MASS ' METALS, CYANIDE, AND TOTALPHENOLS 1 M. Antimony, Total (7440-36-0) 2M. Arsenic, Total (7440-38-2) 3M.'Beryllium, Total (7440-41-7) , 4M. Cadmium, Total (7440-43-9). _ . 5M. Chromium, Total (7440-47-3) 6M. Copper, Total• (7440-50-8) - 7M. Lead, Total (7439-92-1) 8M: Mercury, Total (7439-97-6) - .. X _ .-. . - - 9M. Nickel, Total (7440 )2-0) - 10M. Selenium, Total (7782-49-2) X _ ... . -. _ . ; _....- . -- - - _ 11M. Silver, Total• (7440-22-4). . _ .- 12M. Thallium, Total (7440-28-0) • 13M. Zinc, Total (7440-66-6) - -. X 1.0.1 - _ - _ . ug/L _ 14M: Cyanide, Total (57-12-5).. X -. ._ .- . — -- 15M. Phenols, .Total - - v ^ _ ___ _ . . _ _ - , ... - __ . ,- _.. .._ DIOXIN .: 2,3,7,8-Tetra- _ chlorodDioxin (1764-01-6) Dioxin(1764-01- _ .DESCRIBE RESULTS _ - See attached Priority Pollutant Annalysis _ - . EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE V-3 CONTINUE ON REVERSE CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT 1. POLLUTANT AND CAS NUMBER (ifavai/able) 2. MARK "X" 3. EFFLUENT _ 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional) a. TESTING REQUIRED b. BELIEVED PRESENT . c. a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE (if available) c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE (if available) d. NO. OF ANALYSES a. CONCEN- TRATION - ..b.-MASS a. LONG TERM AVERAGE VALUE b: NO. OF ANALYSES BELIEVED ABSENT (1) CONCENTRATION `-(2)•MASS - (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) 'CONCENTRATION, (2) MASS . - CONCENTRATION. (2) MASS - GC/MS FRACTION —VOLATILE COMPOUNDS- . 1V. Accrolein (107-02-8) . v 2V. Acrylonitrile - (107-13-1) �/ 3V. Benzene (71-43-2) n - - 4V. Bis (Chloro- methyl Ether ' (542:88-1) . 5V. Bromoform (75-25-2) - - - - - - - - - - . _ 6V. Carbon Tetrachloride (56-23-5) - ` , X- , ` - 7V. Chlorobenzene (108-90-7) � . ^ _ 8V. Chlorodi- bromomethane (124-48-1) \ / X / \ _9 _ (7 00-Chl3roethane X 10V, 2-Chloro- ethylvinyl Ether (110-75-8) 11 V: Chloroform (67-66-3) - 12V. Dichloro- bromomethane (75-27-4) - - 13V. Dichloro- difluoromethane (75-71-8) - 14V. 1,1-Dichloro ethane (75-34-3) v 15V. 1,2-Dichloro- ethane (107-06-2) 16V. 1;1-Dichloro- ethylene (75-35-4) %<, - - 17V. 1,2-Dichloro- ' propane.(78-67-5) v 18V. 1,3-Dichloro- propylene (542-75-6) - ` , X - 19V. Ethylbenzene (100-41-4) 20VBro Methyl Bromide (7483.9)' - - v ^ - 21V.-Methyl Chloride (74-87-3) EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE V-4 CONTINUE ON PAGE'V-5 1. POLLUTANT AND ' CAS NUMBER - - (if available) ' 2. MARK"X" 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE,(optiona!), _ a. TESTING REQUIRED b. BELIEVED PRESENT c. BELIEVED ABSENT • a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM-30 DAY VALUE (if available) • c. LONGTERM AVRG.•• VALUE (if available) - d. NO. OF ANALYSES - a. CONCEN- TRATION b. MASS - a:- LONG TERM AVERAGE VALUE • b. NO. OF ANALYSES (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS GC/MS ,FRACTION — VOLATILE COMPOUNDS (continued) - - 22V. Methylene Chloride (75-09-2) , _. _ -- . - - - 23V. 1,1,2,2- Tetractiloroethane (79-34-5) X 24V. Tetrachloro- ethylene (127-18-4) 25V. Toluene (108-88-3) - Trans- 26V.Moro thylen Dichloroethylene (156-60-5) - ` ' X - 27V. 1,1,1-Trichloro- ethane (71-55-6) X 28V. 1,1,2-Trichloro- etttane.(79-00-5) 29V Trichloro- ethylene (79,01-6) - 30V. Trichloro- fluoromethane (75-69-4) ` /X\ 31V. Vinyl Chloride" (75-01-4) - GC/MS 'FRACTION —ACID COMPOUNDS _ _ 1A. 2-Chlorophenol (95-5778) . - u / \•_ _ . .. - 2A. 2,4-Dichloro- phenol (120-83-2) 3A. 2,4-Dimethyi- phenol (105-67-9) 4A. 4,6•Dinitro-O- - Cresol (534-52-1) • 5A.-2,4-Dinitro- phenol (51-28-5) 6A. 2-Nitrophenol (88-7525) _ . 7A. 4-Nitrophenol (1oao2=7) 8A. P-Chloro-M- Cresol.(59-50-7) _ 9A. Pentachloro- phenol'(87-86-5) 10A.-Phenol (108-95-2)' 11 A.,2,4,6-Trichloro phenol (88-05-2) �/ ^ - - EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE V-5 _CONTINUE ON REVERSE CONTINUED FROM. THE FRONT 1. POLLUTANT AND_ CAS NUMBER Of available) 2. MARK °X 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional) a. TESTING REQUIRED b. BELIEVED . PRESENT c. -- a: MAXIMUM_DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE _ • (if available) , c. LONG TERM AVRG. - VALUE (if available) d, NO. OF ANALYSES - a. CONCEN- TRATION b. MASS a. LONG TERM- AVERAGE VALUE - b. NO. OF ANALYSES BELIEVED ABSENT (1) CONCENTRATION _- (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS CONCENTRATION - (2) MASS GC/MS'FRACTION — BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS - — _ 1 B. Acenaphthene (83-32-9) - �/ X 2B. Acenaphtylene (208-98-8)"' X 3B. Anthracene - (120-12-7) - %< - 4B. Benzidine (92-87-5) X 5B. Benzo (a) Anthracene : (56553). �/ X 6B. Benzo (a) Pyrene (50-32-8) _ �/ /� 7B.3,4-Benzo- fluoranthene (205-99-2) . . - X - 8B. Benzo (ghi) - Perylene (191-24-2) X . 9B. Benzo (k) Fluoranthene (207-08-9) 1OB..Bis (2-Chloro- ethoxy) Methane (111-91-1)-. - - - . - X - - 11B. Bis (2-Chloro- ethyl) Ether (111=444) �/ /� . . 12B.'Bis (2- Chloroisopropyn Ether (102-80-1) " X - - 13B. Bis (2-Ethyl- hexyl) Phthalate (117-81-7) ,- 14B. 4-Bromophenyl Phenyl, Ether :- X - 15B. Butyl Benzyl' Phthalate (85--68-7) �/ /� 16B. 2-Chloro- naphthalene (91-58-7) - �. X - 17B.4-Chloro- phenyl•Phenyl Ether (7005-72-3)• � - /� - . (18-01) . X 19B. Dibenzo (a,h) Anthracene (53-70-3) _ __, . 20B. 1,2-Dichloro- benzene (95-50-1) X 21B. 1,3-Di-chloro- benzene (541-73-1) X EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) - PAGE V-6 CONTINUE 'ON'PAGE V-7 1: POLLUTANT AND CAS NUMBER (if available) 2. MARK "X° 3. EFFLUENT 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE •(optional) a. -TESTING REQUIRED b. BELIEVED PRESENT c. BELIEVED ABSENT a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE (ifavailable) c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE (if available) d. NO. OF ANALYSES a. CONCEN- TRATION - b.MASS a. LONG TERM AVERAGE VALUE b.-NO. OF ANALYSES (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS -(1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS GC/MS FRACTION — BASE/NEUTRAL COMP.OUNDS (continued 2213:1,4-Dichloro- benzene (106-46-7) X - — 23B. 3,3-Dichloro- benzidine (91-94-1) 24B. Diethyl Phthalate (84-66-2) - Phth lDate ethyl Phthalat (131 -11-3) • 26B. Di-N-Butyl Phthalate (84-74-2) 27B. 2,4-Dinitro- toluene (121-14-2) 28B. 2,6-Dinitro toluene.(606-20-2) 29B. Di-N:Octyl Phthalate (117-84-0) X - - 30B. 1,2-Diphenyl- hydrazine (as Azo- benzene) (122-66-7) -. 31B. Fluoranthene (206-44-0) X 32B. Fluorene (86-73-7) \/ X 33B. Hexachloro- benzene (118-74-1) v 34B. Hexachloro- butadiene (87-68-3) X • 358i Hexachloro- cyclopentadiene (77-7-4) 36B Hexachloro=- ' ethane (67-72-1) X 37B.Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene (193-39-5) . X 36B. Isophorone (78-59-1) X 39B. Naphthalene (91-20-3) �/ X _ 40B:Nitrobenzene (98-95-.3)' X 4 soli Ne N la sodimethylamine (62-75-9). X _ 42B. N-Nitrosodi- N-Propylamine (621-64-7) . - X _ . EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE V-7 CONTINUE ON REVERSE . CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT 1.,POLLUTANT AND CAS NUMBER Of available) 2. MARK "X" 3. EFFLUENT - 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional) a. TESTING REQUIRED b. BELIEVED PRESENT c. a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE (if available) c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE (if available) d. NO. OF ,ANALYSES a. CONCEN- TRATION b. MASS a. LONG TERM AVERAGE VALUE b. NO. OF ANALYSES BELIEVED ABSENT (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION - (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS GC/MS FRACTION — BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued) _ 43B. N-Nitro- sodiphenylamine (86-30-6) , - 448. Phenanthrene (85-01-8) - 45B. Pyrene (129-00-0) ' 46B. 1,2,4-Tri- chlorobenzene (120-82-1) - GC/MS FRACTION — PESTICIDES - 1 P. Aldrin (309-00-2) _ 2P. a-BHC (319-84-6) v 3P. p-BHC (319-85-7) - 4P. y-BHC (58-89-9) v 5P. 8-BHC (319-86-8). X . 6P. Chlordane-. (57-7449) /� 7P. 4,4'-DDT (50-29-3) - - /� 8P. 4,4'-DDE (72-55-9) u / \ - - 9P.4,4'-DDD (72-54-8) - - v 10P. Dieldrin (60-57-1) - - ' . 11 P. a-Enosulfan (115.29.7) �/ /� - - 12P. p-Endosulfan (115-29-7) - - `/ n - . 13P. Endosulfan Sulfate - (1031-07-8) �/ /� - 14P. 0 (72-20-6) 8) - - v 15P...,Endrin Aldehyde (7421-93-4) - 16P44-8) hlor(76- - .:\/ EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE V-8 - CONTINUE ON PAGE V-9 - EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item 1 of Form 1) I OUTFALL NUMBER NC0006564 1 1. POLLUTANT AND CAS NUMBER (ifavailable) 2. MARK "X" 3. EFFLUENT _ 4. UNITS 5. INTAKE (optional) a. TESTING REQUIRED b. BELIEVED PRESENT c. BELIEVED ABSENT a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE, b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE (ifavailable) c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE (if available) d. Na OF ANALYSES a. CONCEN- TRATION b. MASS a. LONG TERM AVERAGE VALUE b. NO. OF ANALYSES (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS (1) CONCENTRATION (2) MASS GC/MS FRACTION — PESTICIDES (continued) - E o.Heptachlor Epoxide (1024-57-3) ` X 18P. PCB-1242 (53469-21-9) �/ �\ 19P. PCB-1254 (11097-69-1) �/ /� - 20P. PCB-1221 (11104-28-2) \/ �\ - 21 P. PCB-1232 (11141-16-5) -- \/ �\ - ` 22P. PCB-1248 (12672-29-6) �/ �\ - 23P. PCB-1260 (11096-82-5) - - - ' 24P. PCB-1016 (12674-11-2) v 25P. Toxaphene (8001-35-2) �/ ^ ' EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE V-9 0,11- - re, %,,;•\•• • t " 7-- 221 , 8 sottRIteri.,•';- • J - t „.. •, heaert_ •-` • V / Attap.dsta 62114Golvis &lit in Boogie Map Maker Report a problem R • Baxter Healthcare �rGOO n , j m U� r/1 �r. L7/76' •-� 2' Traffic Edt In,6o*Oa !Iv Repdt a'pioblem,'•; RI Baxter Healthcare Marion, NC Water Balance Process Diagram Raw Water From Wells 1.33 MGD Deionizers/Distilled .835 MGD Flushes, Blow -down .248 MGD Production Distilled .587 MGD Flushes Rinses .150 MGD AProduct .437 MGD Sanitary Domestic .170 MGD Potable to Boilers Wood or Combine .221 MGD 1 > Sterilizers SCWS .140 MGD Condensate Return .130 MGD dSterilizer Steam .77 MGD Extruders .086 MGD Cooling Towers .120 MGD SWRS .100 MGD > EWRS .079 MGD > Wastewater Treatment Plant Evaporation .065 MGD > Spray Ponds .130 MGD Evaporation .028 MGD r_dEffluent .600 MGD BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION MARION,. NC 28752 NC0006564 SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PLAN Waste activated sludge is pumped to one of two aerobic digesters. The sludge is digested and thickened by repeatedly allowing the solids to settle out and draining off the excess treatable water. The digested sludge is then dewatered through a filter press to.a 14%-20% cake. Drainage from the sludge and wash down water from the filter press is pumped back to the aeration basins for recirculation through the activated sludge process. The cake is conveyed to a dump trailer positioned under a roof. Once this trailer is filled, it is picked up by Southern Soil Builders, Inc. and transported to the Catawba County where it is land applied to fur field sites totaling 80.8 net acres. Our sludge land application permit number is WQ0031725. Michael Pisarik, Sr. Environmental Engineer Baxter Healthcare Corporation PO Box 1390, Marion, NC 28752 T 828.756.4151 fif neareua Zniy/rss y��3 Belnick, Tom From: Belnick, Tom Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 5:44 PM To: 'amanda_richcreek@baxter.com' Subject: NPDES NC0006564 Baxter Healthcare -e✓ulNak ens i' V41iovo u» Amanda- your email to Bob Sledge mentioned the passivation process to remove impurities from the surface of the metal. Please include this process description in your next permit renewal along with EPA Form 2C analytical data, and NPDES will then evaluate whether any additional limits might apply. Your facility has demonstrated an excellent compliance record with the chronic toxicity test, indicating no likely impact to aquatic life based on current discharges. Your current permit expires 1/31/2015, and your renewal application will be due at least 180 days prior to expiration. Tom Belnick Supervisor, NPDES Complex Permitting Unit NCDENR/Division of Water Quality 919-807-6390 E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties 1 Chernikov, Sergei From: Chernikov, Sergei Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 2:20 PM To: Belnick, Tom Cc: Sledge, Bob Subject: RE: Baxter Healthcare NPDES Permit Number NC0006564 Tom, I think that during the next renewal they should include the description of this step in the application and should also conduct an analysis for all the metals on the Form 2C. They are consistently passing the WET test and I don't think that there is a need to re -open the permit. Thank you! Sergei Sergei Chernikov,Ph.D. Environmental Engineer II Complex Permitting Unit Phone: 919-807-6393, fax 919-807-6495 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Express mail: 512 North Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27606 E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Belnick, Tom Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 2:10 PM To: Chernikov, Sergei Subject: FW: Baxter Healthcare NPDES Permit Number NC0006564 fyi Tom Belnick Supervisor, NPDES Complex Permitting Unit NCDENR/Division of Water Quality 919-807-6390 E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties From: Sledge, Bob Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 1:38 PM To: Belnick, Tom Subject: FW: Baxter Healthcare NPDES Permit Number NC0006564 Tom, 1 This question is beyond my ability to answer. Can you or a member of your staff advise Ms. Richcreek regarding her situation? Looking at BIMS, it seems that Sergei worked on the last renewal of the permit. Bob From: Richcreek, Amanda K [mailto:amanda richcreek@baxter.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 1:29 PM To: Sledge, Bob Cc: Thomas, Ricky W; Darsey, Andrea Williamson; Taylor, Stephen D; Rogers, Charles G; Finnamore, Michael Allen Subject: Baxter Healthcare NPDES Permit Number NC0006564 Hello Bob, A recent records review of the North Cove waste water discharge program revealed we have not called out specifically the passivation process in the NPDES application. The passivation process involves dipping stainless steel machined parts into a series of vats of sodium hydroxide, citric acid and nitric acid, to remove impurities from the surface of the metal and coat the metal to prevent rust, prior to placing the parts in a clean room environment. The residual from the vats is periodically sent through a neutralization system where caustic or sulfuric is added until the solution reaches a neutral pH, and then is released to be treated as waste water through the waste water treatment system. This process has always been considered a cleaning process and not a passivation as seen at a metal finishing facility. Records of waste water sampling have never indicated any metals in our waste water effluent or sludge. The question was posed to the team as to whether this process should be called out specifically in the waste water permit application. Question 1: Should this process have been included in the permit application submission? Question 2: If so, what steps should we now take to include this process in our permit requirements? Thank you, Amanda Richcreek Environmental Engineer Baxter Healthcare Corporation 65 Pitts Station Rd. Marion, NC 28752 T: 828-756-6809 amanda richcreek(abaxter.com www. baxter.com The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive privilege or confidentiality. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. For Translation: http://www.baxter.com/email disclaimer 2 Baxter Healthcare 2015 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence Outfall 001 Qw = 1.2 MGD Fluoride NC 1800 FW(7Q10s) u,/I 0 U Nil Acute: NO WQS _ _ _ — _ _ _ Chronic: 11,671.0 _— — — —_ _ — —_-- Lead NC-5 FW(7Q10s) 33.8 ug-L 0 U N/A Acute: 187.5 ___ _—__ 162.1 _ _____________-____________ Chronic: Mercury NC 12 FW(7Q10s) 0.5 ng/L 0 o N :\ Acute: NO WQS _ Chronic: 77.8 Molybdenum NC 2000 HI-1(7Q10s) a 1. 0 U N/A Acute: NO WQS _ _ — Chronic: 12,967.7 Nickel NC 88 FW(7Q10s) 261 u1. () u N/A Acute: 1,448.1 _ _ — _ _ Chronic: 570.E Selenium NC 5 FW(7Q10s) 56 Lin.,I. 0 ( N/A Acute: 310.7 Chronic: 32.4 Silver (AL) NC 0.06 FW(7Q10s) 1 23 u_ 1. U u N/A Acute: 6.825 _ _ ron — _ _ Chic: 0.389 Zinc(AL) NC 50 FW(7Q10s) (7 uoI. 1 1 Note: n < 9 Limited data set 10.0 Default C.V. Acute: 371.7 Chronic: 324.2 No value > Allowable Cw 0 limit Barium NC 200 HH(7Q10s) m_I. 1 1 Note: n <_ 9 Limited data set 0.02300 Default C.V. Acute: NO WQS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Chronic: 1296.77419 No value > Allowable Cw _ no limit _ Iron NC 1 FW(7Q10s) mg/L I 1 '.,te: n < 9 cited data set 0.07600 Default C.V. Acute: NO WQS Chronic: 6.48387 No value > Allowable Cw no limit 0 0 N/A Acute: ————————— Chronic: ————-— - — -----— 0 o N/A Acute: Chronic: — — — — — — — — — — — — Page 2 of 2 6564-RPA-2016, rpa 1/29/2016 Baxter Healthcare NC0006564 2015 Freshwater RPA - 95% Probability/95% Confidence MAXIMUM DATA POINTS = 58 Qw (MGD) = 1.20 1Q10S(cfs)= 8.46 7Q10S (cfs) = 10.20 7Q10W (cfs)= 15.20 30Q2 (cfs) = NO 30Q2 DATA Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = 63.00 Receiving Stream: North Fork Catawba River WWTP/WTP Class: III IWC% @IQIOS = 18.02325581 IWC% @ 7Q1OS = 15.4228856 IWC% @ 7Q10W = 10.9026964 IWC% @ 30Q2 = N/A IWC% @ QA = 2.86771508 Stream Class: B Tr Outfall 001 Qw = 1.2 MGD PARAMETER TYPE to STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2) PQL UNITS REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION NC WQS / Chronic Applied Standard %i FAV / Acute n // Det. Max Pred Cw Allowable Cw Arsenic Arsenic C C 50 10 FW(7Q10s) HH/WS(Qavg) µg/L uc'1. 0 n N/AChronic Acute: NO WQS _ Ch _ _ (FW)--- 324.2 -- Chronic(HH):---348.7---------------------_-- - - - - - - - - —. — — Beryllium NC 6.5 FW(7Q10s) a :I'I. 0 N/A Acute: NO WQS Chronic:-----42.1------------------------------ Cadmium NC _ FW(7Q10s) 15 ug 1, !) U VA Acute: 83.2 --Chronic:_ _ -----13.0_ _-- — -------------------------- Chlorides (AL) NC 230 FW(7Q10s) m `I- !i a VA Acute: NO WQS _ --Chronic7---1,491 - — — — — — — — ---- Chlorinated Phenolic Compounds NC I A(30Q2) uO 0 o N/A Acute: NO WQS _ _ _ ---- --Chronic: -—--IWCf- -----—---- Total Phenolic Compounds NC 300 A(30Q2) ug/L 0 U N/A Acute: NO WQS Chronic: --- IWCP ------ ----------- --� Chromium NC 50 FW(7Q10s) 1022 a/I. 0 o N A Acute: 5,670.5 _ _ _ _ Chronic: ----324-_ ---- - -------- - - --- - Copper (AL) NC 7 FW(7Q10s) 7.3 ug/L 0 0 N/A Acute: 40.5 _ _ _ Chronic: -----45A_ -- - - - - - ----- - - - ----- Cyanide NC 5 FW(7Q10s) 22 10 ug L 0 0 N/A Acute: 122.1 --Chronic:_ _ _ -----_ _-- — — — — —— — -- — --- — Page 1 of 2 6564-RPA-2016,rpa 1/29/2016 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS 19 Use "PASTE SPECIAL Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data N/A 1 10.0000 2 0.0000 3 1 4 5 1.00 6 10.0 ug/L 7 10.0 ug/L 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Date Data 0 023 Barium Use"PASTE SPECIAL Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 BDL=1/2DL Results 0.023 Std Dev. N/A Mean 0.0230 C.V. 0.0000 n 1 20 Iron Mult Factor = 1.00 Max. Value 0.023000 mg/L Max. Pred Cw 0.023000 mg/L 4 5 Date Data BDL=1/2DL 0.076 0.076 6564-RPA-2016, data - 10 - 1/29/2016 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Use"PASTE SPE Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 17 Silver (AL) NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA 0 N/A N/A ug/L N/A ug/L Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 Std Dev. 2 Mean 3 C.V. 4 n 5 6 Mult Factor = 7 Max. Value 8 Max. Pred Cw 9 10 11 12 13 14, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 18 "PASTE SPECIAL Values" then "COPY" . Maximum data points = 58 Zinc (AL) NO DATA NO DATA NO DATA 0 N/A N/A ug/L N/A ug/L Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 10 10 Std Dev. Mean C.V. n 6 Mult Factor = 7 Max. Value 8 Max. Pred Cw 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 6564-RPA-2016, data - 9 - 1/29/2016 ARCADJS Infrastructure • Water • Environment • Buildings xter NPDES Perini Modification Application Marion Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade October 2015 iv C,0-6p 6 S 6 y Imagine the result 141 101A f).g(1`t" tr e 73