NC0046892_Permit Issuance_20060419

OF V1 A T ,,9 Michael F. Easley
Governor
Q(� ' D. E. Benton
r Chief Deputy Secretary
"c North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Ken Watson, Complex Manager
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
6851 Freedom Drive
Charlotte, NC 28214
—Dear-Mr.-Watson:
April 19, 2006
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0046892
Charlotte — South Terminal
Mecklenburg County
The Division of Water Quality (the Division) hereby issues the attached NPDES permit for the
subject facility. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994, or as subsequently amended.
RENEWAL SUMMARY
The Division's renewal evaluation includes a reasonable potential analysis (RPA), in
accordance with permitting guidance provided by the EPA. The Division has made the
following decisions based on current information and data from your discharge Monitoring
Report (DMRs) submitted over the last permit cycle:
• Turbidity — Outfall 001 added limit of 50 NTU; Outfall 002, continue
monitoring, no limit.
• Benzene — Outfall 001: retained permit limit (1.19 µg/L) and monthly
monitoring; Outfall 002: continue monthly monitoring, no limit.
• Toluene — Outfall 001: added permit limit (11 µg/L) and monthly monitoring.
Outfall 002: continue monthly monitoring, no limit.
• Phenol — Outfall 001: revised limit to 91 µg/L. Outfall 002: deleted limit;
continue monitoring (see note).
• MTBE — Outfall 001: retained monthly monitoring. Outfall 002: relax
monitoring to quarterly.
• Naphthalene — Outfalls 001 and 002, added monthly monitoring (see note).
• EPA Method 625 — Outfalls 001 and 002, deleted from permit (see note).
QVA
NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 919-733-5083 Customer Service
1-800-623-7748

Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0046892
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
Charlotte — South Terminal
Page 2of 2
Changes to the Draft Permit - Naphthalene and Laboratory Method EPA 625. Because
monitoring by EPA Method 625 detected no parameters, the Division has removed this
monitoring from the permit, in accordance with SOP 2005. Instead, the Division has added the
single parameter, Naphthalene with monthly monitoring to detect heavier fuels such as diesel.
These changes were inadvertently omitted from the draft permit.
Revised Phenol Limit and Minimum Detection Levels. The Division acknowledges Motiva's
request (17Apr06) to reconsider the phenol contribution of Outfall 002 to be zero, and to
recalculate the permit limit at 001 using the full site allocation. Because data showed no
reasonable potential at Outfall 002, the Division has no objection to this request. Therefore,
using 0.48 lbs./day, the Outfall 001 limit has been revised to 91µg/L. It follows then, that the
previously submitted laboratory minimum -detection level of 50 µg/L is sufficiently sensitive to
accommodate this limit. The Division therefore retracts its request for a more sensitive test
procedure (see draft -permit cover letter).
_If any parts, monitoring frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are --
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing, upon written request, within
thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. You must submit this request in the form of a
written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and file it
with the office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina
27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this permit shall be final and binding.
Please notice that this permit is not transferable except after notifying the Division of Water
Quality. The Division of Water Quality may modify, or revoke and reissue this permit. This
permit does not affect your legal requirements to obtain other permits required by the Division of
Water Quality, the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act, or other
federal or local governments.
If you have questions, or if we can be of further service, please call Joe Corporon at (919) 733-
5083, extension 597 or email [e-mail].
Sincerely,
14/
4„c . Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attached: NPDES Permit, NC0046892
cc: Central Files
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Raleigh Regional Office, Surface Water Protection
NPDES Program ,
Philip Morris, Environmental Engineer, Motiva Enterprises LLC, 2232 Ten Ten Road, Apex, NC 27539

Permit NC0046892
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
(NPDES)
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations
promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, as amended,
Motiva Enterprises LLC
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from outfalls located at the
Charlotte - South Terminal
6851 Freedom Drive, Charlotte
Mecklenburg County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Long Creek in the Catawba River Basin in
accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I,
II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective June 1, 2006.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on June 30, 2010.
Signed this day April 18, 2006.
Alan W. Klimek, P.
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0046892
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective.
Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit
conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions described herein.
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
is hereby authorized:
1._ _to continue to_operatea Water P_ollution-Control-System for-the-treatment-of-storrwaterfrom diked
surface -tank storage areas (Outfall 001), and
2. to continue to operate a Water Pollution Control System for the treatment of groundwater and
stormwater from the truck -loading racks area (Outfall 002), the treatment system consisting of
• Oil/water separator
• Three Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) absorption units
• Air Stripper
• Flocculation tank
• Clarifier
• Holding tank
at the Motiva - Charlotte South Terminal, a facility located at 6851 Freedom Drive, Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, and
3. to discharge from said treatment facility through Outfalls 001 and 002 at specified locations (see
attached map) into an unnamed tributary of Long Creek, a waterbody classified as WS-IV waters
within the Catawba River Basin.

Motiva Enterprises, LLC
Charlotte - South Terminal
State Grid/Ouad: FI5SW / Mt Island Lake, NC Permitted Flow: not limited
Latitude: 35° 16' 42" N Longitude: 80° 56' 27" W
Receiving Stream: UT to Long Creek Sub -Basin: 03-08-34
Drainage Basin: Catawba River Basin Stream Class: WS-IV
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
Approximate Property
Boundary
Facility
Location
not to scale
Adair
North
NPDES Permit No. NC0046892
Mecklenburg County

Permit NC0046892
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge stormwater from diked areas via Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored
by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample Location
Flow1
Episodic
1
Effluent
Turbidity2
50 NTUs
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Oil and Grease3
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
45.0 mg/L
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Phenol
91 µg/L
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Benzene
1.19 µg/L
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Toluene
11 µg/L
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Ethylbenzene
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Xylene
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
MTBE4
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Naphthalene
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Acute Toxicity5
Annually
Grab
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. 1. Flow — During periods of no flow, the Permittee shall submit a monthly Discharge Monitoring
Report (DMR) indicating "No discharge." The Permittee shall monitor each discharge event in
one of four ways:
a) measure flow continuously;
b) calculate flow based on total rainfall per area draining to the outfall; (this method of flow
measurement should not be used for facilities with large runoff -collection ponds);
c) estimate flow at 20-minute intervals during the entire discharge event; or
d) report flow based on discharge pump logs.
2. Turbidity — Effluent shall not cause receiving stream turbidity to exceed 50 NTU. If receiving
stream background turbidity exceeds 50 NTU, effluent shall not cause this background value to
increase.
3. Oil and Grease — Where possible, the grab sample for oil and grease should be skimmed from
the surface of a quiescent (calm water) zone.
4. MTBE — Please see Part A.(4.) for other MTBE requirements.
5. Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow, 24-hour), Annual [see Special Condition A.(3)]. Samples
for Acute Toxicity shall be collected concurrent with BTEX sampling.
> The Permittee shall discharge no floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts.
> The Permittee shall discharge directly no tank solids, no tank bottom water, or tank rag layer.
Following hydrostatic testing, the Permittee shall discharge no tank (or pipe) wastes containing benzene
concentrations exceeding 1.19 µg/L, or toluene concentrations exceeding 11 µg/L.

Permit NC0046892
A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge treated groundwater and stormwater from truck -loading racks via Outfall 002. Such
discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Daily Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample Location
Flows
Episodic
1
Effluent
BTEX
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Oil and Grease2
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
30.0 mg/L
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Naphthalene
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Turbidity3
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Phenol
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
MTBE4
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Acute Toxicitys
Annually
Grab
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. Flow — During periods of no flow, the Permittee shall submit a monthly Discharge Monitoring
Report (DMR) indicating "No discharge." The Permittee shall monitor each discharge event in
one of four ways:
a) measure flow continuously;
b) calculate flow based on total rainfall per area draining to the
outfall; (this method of flow measurement should not be used
for facilities with large runoff -collection ponds);
c) estimate flow at 20-minute intervals during the entire discharge
event; or
d) report flow based on discharge pump logs.
2. Oil and Grease — Where possible, the grab sample for oil and grease should be skimmed from the
surface of a quiescent (calm water) zone.
3. Turbidity — Effluent shall not cause receiving stream turbidity to exceed 50 NTU. If receiving
stream background turbidity exceeds 50 NTU, effluent shall not cause this background value to
increase.
4. MTBE — Please see Part A.(4.) for other MTBE requirements.
5. Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow, 24-hour), Annual [see Special Condition A.(3.)]. Samples for
Acute Toxicity shall be collected concurrent with BTEX sampling.
> The Permittee shall discharge no floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts.
> The Permittee shall discharge directly no tank solids, no tank bottom water, or tank rag layer.
> Following hydrostatic testing, the Permittee shall discharge no tank (or pipe) wastes containing benzene
concentrations exceeding 1.19 µg/L, or toluene concentrations exceeding 11 µg/L.

Permit NC0046892
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A. (3.) ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (ANNUAL)
The Permittee shall conduct annual toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in EPA Document
EPA/600/4-90/027 entitled "Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and
Marine Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas)
24-hour static test. Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained below all waste
treatment. The Permittee will conduct one test annually, with the annual period beginning in January of
the calendar year of the effective date of the permit. The annual test requirement must be performed and
reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification will be made to the Division by this
date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the next discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit
condition will be entered on the-Etiluent Discharge Form—(MR-1)-fof the month in whichit was
performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent
to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later
than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine
of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of
the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-
opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the
month of the initial monitoring.

Permit NC0046892
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A. (3.) MTBE MONITORING - SPECIAL CONDITION
For the protection of public health, oil terminal Permittees that discharge to waters classified as
water supply (WS waters) shall monitor MTBE for the duration of this permit. Based on data
submitted by the Permittee, the Division has reduced Monthly monitoring to Quarterly. If MTBE is
detected during this permit cycle, the Permittee shall immediately resume Monthly monitoring for
MTBE.

FILE CONTENTS:
Lef�de:
L9' BIMS Tracking Slip
I - t'b :5.
Right side:
❑ streamline Package Sheet
EP' Draft Permit Cover Letter.
CI Draft Permit
1� acility Map
IW Fact Sheet.
10' ermit Writer's Notes
Staff Report from Region
[IK-2O1d Permit
p/ Permit Application.
Cs7/ Acknowledgement Letter
❑ Permittee Responses
NPDES PERMIT
DRAFT & FINAL
CHECK LIST
Facility Ti U rt�1it( �-s
Permit No. ._%'! 1�i —�''7 2 G&' ,, QL rA 560*
NPDES Permit Writer: /
(to region, only if streaml.
(add new policy text; s
(order: cover, suppl
(E-Map: include
(documents pe
(if not in F. • s Sheet -- chronol.gy, strategy, DMR Review, RPA, etc.)
(as :ppr• .riate — not needed if streamlined)
(Te , ffluent Sheets and Special Conditions)
(New Permit or Renewal; any additional permittee correspondence)
(NPDES Unit written response to Renewal Application)
(to acknowledgement letter, if any)
O Waste Load Allocation (reference date; notes if recalculated for current action)
Note: Italics indicate special conditions not always required or applicable.
d)
rize major hanges to permit)
ent, map, effl nt sheets, special conditions)
cility Outfalls; and D sample locations)
it writer's issue and re -issue logic)
Submitted to TFIZP5 Peer Review: Date
of Peer Review completed by
Updated Public Notice System [date] f% ( M
/
Ie' Submitted for Public Notice on col tiodb o Newspaper Notice Received
IB' Draft Permit Maile / E-Mailed] to (Regional Staff) d/ friA-P--440
®'Regional Office Review /Approval completed by yaG414€ 1�
Date
Admin cutoff date
. Updated BIMS Events: [date] . Actual Notice date(s)r��jj�6^�"P
4
by Date
. Received on [Date]
O Additional Review by [TOX/DEH] initiated by Date
❑ Additional Review/Approval completed by Date
❑ EPA Review Draft sent to initiated by Date
O EPA Review /Approval [mail / E-mail] completed by Date Received
VI/FINAL to Mike / Susan / Tom / it r signature on / '"ALetter Dated 11 I'fi(,�
O Additional Review [other]
tH' Final Files transferred to Server (Permits Folder) BIMS Final Updates: Events 1/ Limits
Version 060ct05

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
Fact Sheet Addendum
Motiva Enterprises, LLC
NPDES No. NC0046892
April10, 2006
Joe Corporon, NPDES East
Phenol Calculation. T e ivision evaluated the need for permit limits for phenol by
dividing the "per dis ar er" allocation (0.48 lbs./per day) equally by Permittee's total
number of outfalls, pe OP 2005. This resulted in no limit/no reasonable potential at
Outfall 002, but r a nable potential / permit limit of 40 µg/L at Outfall 001 (see Fact
Sheet, 17Feb06
Revised At the Permittee's Request. Because data showed no reasonable potential at
Outfall 002, the Permittee requested that the Division consider the contribution of 002 to
be zero, and that the Division recalculate the permit limit for 001 considering the full site
allocation. The Division agrees that this is reasonable.
Therefore, the draft phenol limit at Outfall 001 (40 µg/L) has been recalculated for the
final permit using the "per site" allocation (0.48 lbs./per day):
Outfall 001 Highest flow = 0.630 MGD (May03)
001 Limit
= 0.48 lbs./day x I x 1000 tig/L = 91 µg/L
8.34 0.63 NIGD 1 mg/L
Considering this revised phenol limit of 91 µg/L, the Division will retract the request for
a more sensitive test procedure stated in the draft -permit cover letter. Considering the
revised limit, a lab method detection level of 50 µg/L is sufficient for effluent
monitoring.
Correction Concerning Naphthalene and EPA Method 625. Because monitoring by
EPA Method 625 detected no parameters, the Division has removed this monitoring from
the permit, in accordance with SOP 2005. Instead, the Division has added the single
parameter, Naphthalene with monthly monitoring to detect heavier fuels such as diesel.
These changes were inadvertently omitted from the draft permit.

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0046892
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
NC0022187 — Motiva Enterprises, LLC, Charlotte South Terminal
Applicant Address:
Mr. Ken Watson, Complex Manager
Facility Address:
6851 Freedom Drive, Charlotte, NC 28214
Permitted Flow
Not limited
Type of Waste:
Stormwater, truck -loading rack wastewater, groundwater remediation
effluent
Facility/Permit Status:
Active / Renewal
County:
Mecklenburg
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
303(d) Listed?
Subbasin:
Drainage Area (mi2):
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs)
Average Flow (cfs):
IWC (%):
BACKGROUND
UT to Long Creek Regional Office:
WS-IV
[11-120-(2.5)]
No Permit Writer:
03-08-34 Date:
0.01
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100%
State Grid / USGS Quad:
Mooresville
F 15 SW/Mountain
Island Lake
Joe Corporon
17Feb06
a a I I I IP
Lat. 35° 16' 42" N Long. 80° 56'27" W
Waste Load Allocation (WLA) and Bulk -Storage SOP. A Waste Load Allocation was last conducted in
April 1993, when the receiving stream, Long Creek [11-210-(2.5)], was classified WS-IV waters. {BIMS:
This discharge location is mis-located as receiving -stream segment [11-210-(0.5)] and should be
corrected.} The WLA recommended monitoring for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, lead, 1,2,
Dichloroethane, and MTBE including permit limits. The Division established new effluent limits and
monitoring requirements for the previous permit following Requirements for Discharges from Oil and
Petroleum Storage Facilities (SOP 2001, version 30Ju101).
PERMITTING STRATEGY
New SOP for Oil Terminals. The Division established renewal criteria for this permit according to the
NPDES Permitting Requirements for Petroleum Bulk -Storage 2005 Permitting Strategy, version September 9,
2005 (2005 SOP). This document recommends 12 criteria for renewal including reasonable potential analyses
(see Renewal Summary). Database for this RPA is attached to this document.
Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA): The Division conducted a reasonable potential analysis according to
EPA guidelines in order to establish potential for a given parameter to exceed its water quality stream
standard. The Division established a list of parameters of concern (POCs) based on the previous permit. These
parameters include benzene, toluene, turbidity, and MTBE. In addition, the Division calculated phenol limits
appropriate for a discharge to water supply (WS-IV) waters considering a total of eight discharges to this
water shed (see 2005 SOP, item 11).
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0046892
Renewal
Page 1

Concerning Benzene and Toluene. The Division considered the standards for benzene (1.19 µg/L) and
toluene (11 µg/L) in its evaluation of reasonable potential (RP). The Permittee reported benzene at Outfall
001 in excess of the standard twice during the permit cycle (1.8 µg/L in Dec02, and 3.4 µg/L in Aug04),
clearly indicating RP. Therefore a permit limit for benzene (1.19 µg/L) will be added to Outfall 001. Similarly,
toluene was detected in Dec02 (99 AWL) and again in Aug04 (3.4 µg/L) at Outfall 001 and will therefore
require a permit limit. Neither benzene nor toluene was detected at Outfall 002.
Phenol Calculation. The phenol limits calculation considers the phenol allowable mass loading (0.48
lbs/day) for all terminals discharging to WS waters in the Paw Creek area. This allowable wasteload is further
divided herein by 2 (the number of outfalls, per SOP 2005). For this permit, therefore:
Outfall 001 Highest flow = 0.630 MGD (May03)
Outfall 002 Highest flow = 0.312 MGD (Sep03)
001 = 0.24 lbs./day x 1
8.34 0.63 MGD
002 = 0.24 lbs./day x 1
8.34 0.31 MGD
0.04 mg/L = 40 µg/L
0.09 mg/L = 90 µg/L
The Division used the above loadings (in AWL) to evaluate reasonable potential at Outfalls 001 (40 µg/L) an
002 (90 µg/L). However, since the Permittee reported phenol at a level of 72 µg/L (Nov04) at Outfall 001,
reasonable potential is clearly present. Because phenol was not detected during the entire permit cycle at
Outfall 002, there is no reasonable potential at this outfall (method detection level 50 AWL). Therefore, the
Division will retain a limit at Outfall 001 (40 µg/L), but continue with monitoring only at Outfall 002 (no
permit limit).
Concerning MTBE. The Permittee detected MTBE at a level of 74 µg/L (Dec02) at Outfall 001, but not at
Outfall 002. Therefore, monthly monitoring will continue at 001 but will be relaxed at 002 to Quarterly, in
accordance with SOP 2005.
Concerning Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing. This facility has "passed" annual toxicity testing for
the last five years (LC-50 >100). No changes to the permit recommended.
RENEWAL SUMMARY
• Turbidity (Outfall 001: RP = Yes; max predicted 231.50 NTU; n = 19); add permit limit of
50 NTU. Outfall 002: RP = No; continue monitoring, no limit.
• Benzene — (Outfall 001: RP = yes) retain permit limit (1.19 µg/L) and monthly monitoring.
Outfall 002: RP = no; continue monthly monitoring, no limit.
• Toluene - (Outfall 001: RP = yes) add permit limit (11 µg/L), monthly monitoring. Outfall
002: RP = no; continue monthly monitoring, no limit.
• Phenol — Outfall 001: revise limit to 40 µg/L. Outfall 002: delete limit (RP = no); continue
monitoring.
• MTBE — Outfall 001: retain monthly monitoring. Outfall 002: relax monitoring to quarterly.
• Naphthalene — add monthly monitoring to address diesel, per 2005 SOP.
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0046892
Renewal
Page 2

PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public Notice: March 1, 2006
Permit Scheduled to Issue: April 24, 2006
NPDES DIVISION CONTACT
If you have quest
Corporon, NP
NAME:
REGI
AL OFFIC
y of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Joe
at [phone] ext. 597.
,cfc of��2 �D Co NiYr�'
DATE: a*/-1/4•RI/c:'
NAME: S ,4,v 1 u - /P L2 A L DATE:
SUPERVISOR: / -� �-2
v'
NPDES SUPERVISOR:
/14,,
DATE: J/ 2 77;
DATE: -1% -O
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0046S92
Renewal
Page 3

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Turbidity
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
57
58
59
60
199
200
Date
Data
: i
t
is
I
E' "l
I,.
r
t,,,
5"'
$,
t.•�
;:�
%'
!.
t
!, 1
r';
s <3
: .1
; :
4, •'•;j
"q
is
i.
l .1
;.
•.;
i ,1
1,,,
L,k
k
i, 1
'. `
i '4
r; .1
3
BDL=112DL
8.8 8.8
2.4 2.4
6.3 6.3
10.0 10.0
1.9 1.9
4.9 4.9
7.7 7.7
4.7 4.7
11.0 11.0
4.5 4.5
6.4 6.4
50.0 50.0
10.0 10.0
2.8 2.8
21.0 21.0
4.7 4.7
2.9 2.9
f
Results
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V.
n
Mult Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
11.4224
9.4118
1.2136
17
4.6300
50.0 ug/L
231.5 ug/L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26':.
27
28
29..
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
199
200
Date
Data
'?;£
=T
-.
!y .
';=
BDL=112DL
Results
Std Dev.
Mean
C.V. •
n
Mult Factor =
Max. Value
Max. Pred Cw
NO DATA
NO DATA
NO DATA
0
N/A
0.0 ug/L
N/A ug/L
-1-
46892 MOtiva RPA-001, data
2/21/2006

Table 1. Project Information
Facility Name
WWTP Grade
NPDES Permit
Outfall
Flow, Ow (MGD)
Receiving Stream
Stream Class
7010s (cfs)
7Q10w (cfs)
30Q2 (cfs)
QA (cfs)
Time Period
Data Source(s)
Motiva Enterprizes. -. Charlotte South Terminal
. NC0046892
001
0.063
UT of Gum Branch
WS-IV
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Jan02 - Dec05
DMRs
Table 2. Parameters of Concern
Par01
Par02
Par03
Par04
Par05
ParO6
Par07
Par08
Par09
Par10
Par11
Par12
Par13
Par14
Par15
Name
Type Chronic Modifier Acute PQL Units
Turbidity
NC
50
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
10
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ng/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
46892 MOtiva RPA-001, input
2/21 /2006

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Motiva Enterprizes - Charlotte South Terminal
NC0046892
Time Period Jan02 - Dec05
Ow (MGD) 0.063
7010S (ds) 0
7010W (ds) 0
3002 (ds) 0
Avg. Stream Flow, OA (ds) 0
Reeving Stream UT of Gum Branch
WWTP Class
IWC (%) O 7010S 100
0 7010W 100
0 3002 100
0 QA 100
Stream Class WS-IV
Outfall 001
w = 0.063 MGD
PARAMETER
TYPE
STANDARDS &
CRITERIA (2)
PQL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
(1)
NCwos/ 6FAY /
Chtrneb Au*
n IDd Max Prod ov Atlornr6lrcw
Turbidity
NC
50
uglL
17 17
231.5
Acute: WA
•——_—•—•—•
— �_——:—•—_—•
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Acute: N/A
-------------•—•--
Chronic: Error O Type
---------•---
ug/L
0 0
WA
Acute: WA
-Chronic: Error O Type
------• ------•-------•---•-----
uglL
0 0
N/A
Acute: N/A
-Chronic: Error 0 Type
-------------•—•-------------•—•
uglL
0 0
WA
Acute: WA
_ _ _ _orO _
Chronic: ErrType
--- ---- —---------•
- — — — - -
10
uglL
0 0
N/A
Acute: WA
_ _
-Chronic: Error O Type
---------- ---•
-- ---- — — — —
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Acute: WA
_ _ _ _
—_ —• •---•
ug/L
0 0
WA
Acute: WA
-Chronic: Error 0 Type
- — — — — ---- — — —•—•----
— — —
not
0
WA
Acute: N/A
_ _
- Chronic: Error 0 Type
__ —_-- _—•---•—.-----_—_—.—.
— — -
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Acute: N/A
Chronic: Error 0 Type
r
------•-- --------•------ •—•---•
uglL
0 0
WA
Acute: N/A
Chronic: Error 0 Type
---- ----•-- •—•---•---•—•---•
uglL
0 0
WA
Acute: WA
Chronic: Error 0 Type
------- _—_ — - —•-------•—•-----•
- —
ug/L
0 0
WA
Acute: N/A
Chronic Error O Type
----•— — - --•--
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Acute: WA
Chronic Error O Type
------------ ----- ---•-----
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Acute: WA
Chronic: Error 0 Type
- -----—•---•---------•---•
I
•Legend:
C a Carcinogenic
NC = Non•carclnogenic
A = Aesthetic
•• Freshwater Discharge
46892 MOtiva RPA-001, rpa
2/21/2006

Motiva Comments on Draft Charlotte Terminal NPDES Permits
Subject: Motiva Comments on Draft Charlotte Terminal NPDES Permits
From: "Morris, Philip C MOTIVA-DVM/4221" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 09:20:04 -0500
To: "Joe Corporon" <[e-mail]>
CC: "Watson, Kenneth W MOTIVA-DVM/4238" <[e-mail]>, "Baker, Sam W
MOTIVA" <[e-mail]>
Joe,
appreciate the opportunity to review the Fact Sheets and to comment on the draft NPDES permits for
Motiva's Charlotte North Terminal (NC0022187) and Charlotte South Terminal (NC0046892): The
comments below regard the Charlotte South permit. I have no comments for Charlotte North.
1. On the Facility Location Map, Outfall 002 should be spotted at the Northwest corner of the facility,
adjacent to Outfall 001.
2. Motiva respectfully requests the DWQ to reconsider the basis of the proposed phenol limit for Outfall
001, which represents a 55% reduction from the current limit. The Fact Sheet indicates that the proposed
limit is based on the allowable (phenol) wasteload divided by the number of outfalls. The Fact Sheet goes
on to state that phenol was not detected during the entire permit cycle at Outfall 002, therefore there is no
reasonable potential (of phenol) at this outfall.
Since there is no reasonable potential of Outfall 002 exhibiting phenol, Motiva requests that its contribution
to the facility phenol wasteload be considered as zero. Motiva believes that such an approach is also
consistent with guidance previously provided by DWQ regarding the completion of DMRs. Such guidance
has instructed operators to consider analytical results that are less than the detectable limit to be
considered zero for calculation purposes.
Should the DWQ accept Motiva's proposed methodology, the phenol limit would remain unchanged at 90
ug/I.
Again, I appreciate the opportunity to offer comments on the draft permits. Please feel free to contact me
at one of the numbers below should you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Philip Morris
Environmental Engineer
Motiva Enterprises LLC
2232 Ten Ten Road
Apex, NC 27539
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Internet: http://www.shell.com
Original Message
1 of 2
4/10/2006 7:32 AM

Motiva Comments on Draft Charlotte Terminal NPDES Permits
From: Joe Corporon[mailto:joe.corporon(a�ncmail.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:58 AM
To: Morris, Philip C MOTIVA-DVM/4221
Subject: [Fwd: Motiva - NC0046892]
« Message: Motiva - NC0046892 »
2 of 2 4/10/2006 7:32 AM

North Carolina } ss
Mecklenburg County}
The Knight Publishing Co., Inc.
Charlotte, NC
Affidavit of Publication
THE CHARLOTTE OBSERVER
NCDENR/DWQ/NPDES
CAROLYN BRYANT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CTR
RALEIGH NC .27699-1617
REFERENCE: 30045571
5656793 Citgo Petroleum
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said
County and State, duly authorized to administer
oaths affirmations, etc., personally appeared,
being duly sworn or affirmed according to law,
doth depose and say that he/she is a
representative of the Knight Publishing Company a
corporation organized and doing business under the
laws of the State of Delaware, and publishing a
newspaper known as The Charlotte Observer in the
city of Charlotte, County of Mecklenburg and State
of North Carolina and that as such he/she is
familiar with the books, records, files and
business of said Corporation and by reference to
the files of said publication
the attached advertisement was inserted. The
following is correctly copied from the books and
files of the aforesaid Corporation and
Publication.
PUBLISHED ON: 03/04 2'bb
AD SPAC :
FILED 0
NAME:
104 LINE
03/10/06
TITLE:
DATE:
In Testimony Wheeof I have hereunto set my hand and
day and year aforesaid.
Nota _ w ei<<My Commission Expires:
i,,te�aa n:. PUBLIC NOTICE.
• STATE OF.. NORTH CAROLINA .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION/NPOES UNIT
1617 MAIL' SERVICECENTER
RALEIGH, NC'27699-1617
' 'NOTIFICATION.OF.INNT7AEENTTOISSUEANPIES:,�'
lu.. i.a:'�:WASJEWE11PERMIT,
On- the''. basis' of•thorough:sfaff. revia and application of NC General
Statute 143.21, Public law 92.50Q and other Iawful standards and reg
blatrorte"the Noah CarolmaEnw;rek ernal Management Commission,
p to issue a•National Pdluteht Drscfiaige Etmination System
(N ES)twdtewatefd tbtiepeisan(s)�listedbelow
affeca4P'4��` d y fror�i't)t� of this notice? 6ty.ar. tr.
14it([e 4��t a..,:, a
mays alsr. the emg th r Irmo v ill be eetes
antra() after. the pub e of this notice All comments
yre0ryad daft,Qrerermderr m',the. final determinations
tagardirigs fi 'p ed ptmrnL'tisI DtrectootThrrhe NGDvrPo rl
Wel$i•O may>:15r'ade:lnjtQfd;apublk nreetirg for the proposed
permit the Division racei a e slg t degree of pubfig inter•
Of tl1iEdretl permit su i on.fiR
mt used}odeterrtaconatrons -t tt .-areevaliable
li en ro4Uest and payment c .�WmdutUnn ,M Cotnt.
)mefrterandiorh3q(testshlr irdo riabon.to� NC Division Water
703 = y�of the al> 050ress meal the Point Source Branch at (919)
.�9exte{t q()a64,'PIEateindritf�C3herNPAESpenhil.
numper (attached) any rcahon. Interested persons may
aal1ssgqiiait•ttiQ Devia'q�bp{ 1Nat rdy et 512 N. Saksbuty Street;
pafelgfr NC 2'760at i46 befwrean ie hours' of 6 00 a m. and 5:00,
-711tv.,... ,,, t.
Citgo Petroleum . Paw Creek fial NCOO2,1 has applied tc
renqeewW Itsipegntt dis a,vrggin to �!? bib' of Gum; Drench
In Ma Catawba Rrirep t iri turb ity benzaria'ere
ay affect future wasteloadallo•
Y•rrw iss'tEYti'ntrsaaynetvt:
fMotiva j eterp.' ' . LW (t(CAO 1, 87) has applied for renewal d its
NPDES permit dtscharggi gg fo ar[urfnanted tributary of Gum Brandt in
(the,Catawba River BastrfnBeraerle. manganese, and turbity are water-,
. gUality limited. This dischargq may gitect fuhue wasteload allocations
to this receivingstreani tu`s ;O..'t:iac+r-,.. UuG:ei,.m•pe,,
Motive Enterniss, LLC (Nryoacaro)'. � {qf (erjewal qq([jts per:
, mlt discharging tq the Catawba Barr T trpar metersCcr¢eitd,
'toluend`and phenorare walerrq Irrj Thls,dischagHe.Inay
:affect LjWrewasteloadallocatiops tece �stJeern}.i?:tit.ri
4ssb7e3. :.. t ..
(}.rp;;tft reyleyf Worn ion on fir
waterqualr� 6rnit ATMs d,;
tc'svareltoUii'id r e• art�rste
affixed my seal, the
+!(y CornrntS` ;-
, 2006

-le
t-Sa OVA
krti
TA- 4-S .(3. ,OG
(d\Ofr
on c
4Z
4C5?�23-6
Wan- ` 77
1
2. C
C,3/0/fc)
- Cf
' ( 7
t rak Fc— b .6 30 ti 6-(�
asp� k_6 c_1
(A b "\ s
09,(5Y—f• Dc 5 G(-w S)
tvtorrefs
00 Ca -1 3 1 8 f.vr k�
No c-s c-c-it„ca_of>
Z 14f-c ?bfS
. o5q rZ64) .� —

110
4.4 Cr
/46'pcs e P
25
Fe-P (e,
.7 FCC 5-0
A �-t� �z REQ 40
Pt /-{ 2- ii>
(AWL
oQ D Odz.
Ca 2—

AL)
MEMORANDUM U J
DATE: • September 08, 2005 4,0)
/14Y
TO: NPDES Program Cc(11
FROM: Joe R. Corporon, L.G.
Permit Writer
SUBJECT: Revised Guidance to Permit Writers — Allowable Phenol Loads for Bulk
Oil Terminals in the Paw Creek Area, Catawba River Basin.
As part of the newly revised Standard Operating Procedures — Permit Requirements for
Discharges from Oil and Petroleum Storage Facilities (SOP-2001), the Division has
recalculated the allowable load for phenol. New numbers are appropriate for bulk oil
distribution terminals discharging to an unnamed tributary of Gum Branch (WS-IV) and an
unnamed tributary of Long Creek (WS-IV CA), both within subbasin 030834. This document
affects eight (8) permitted facilities discharging to WS waters (see Table 1).
I have made these calculations considering the following background and assumptions:
1. The water quality stream standard comes from the EPA Document Ambient Water
Quality Criteria for Chlorinated Phenols. This standard has been included in the North
Carolina 2B .0200 Rules and has been applied to Water Supply (WS) waters since 1990.
2. The standard for chlorinated phenolic compounds is 1.0 µg/L. Although it is unlikely
that petroleum bulk storage facilities would discharge chlorinated phenolic compounds,
they may discharge phenol. Therefore, the Division is concerned that phenol (at levels of
1 µg/L or greater) has potential to create "daughter compounds" at downstream water
intakes where water is drawn from the river and chlorinated. It is therefore appropriate to
calculate allowable phenol load near the closest water intake downstream of these bulk
storage facilities.
3. I have applied the 30Q2 flow because the standard is based on potential aesthetic
concerns (taste and odor associated with chlorinated phenols in fish and drinking water).
I have applied the standard (1.0 µg/L) near the confluence of Long Creek and the
Catawba River (approximately 1,000 feet upstream) where the Division calculated 30Q2
flow at 716 cfs (based on Clariant Corporation's 1996 WLA, NC0004375). Therefore,
the allowable wasteload for each of nine (9) dischargers is calculated:
716 cfs x 0.001 mg/L x 8.34 = 3.851bs./day total phenol
1.55
3.85 lbs./day of phenol = 0.48 lbs./day per discharger
8 dischargers
Paw Creek
Phenol Calculations Memorandum -- July 27, 2005
Page 1

To evaluate reasonable potential for phenol:
1) Use the facility's average wasteload/stormwater flow (highest monthly average flow
during the last permit cycle) to convert the calculated individual wasteload allocation
(per facility) of 0.48 lbs./day to a concentration in mg/L.
Single-Outfall Example: Highest flow for Outfall 001 = 0.55 MGD
001 =
0.48 lbs./day x 1 = 0.10 mg/L
8.34 0.55 MGD
6.63
Two-Outfall Example: Highest flow for Outfall 001 9h5'MGD
Highest flow for Outfall 002 = MGD D -3 (t..
[Divide allowable wasteload by the number of outfalls (0.48 lbs/day divided by 2)]
6-Cr
001 = 0.24 lbs./day x 1 = (y93 mg/L
8.34 0y55 MGD
.63
002 = 0.24 lbs./day x 1 = ›,435.-mg/L
8.34 0MGD 0. p 7 3
Proceed with reasonable potential analysis (RPA) using resultant (in mg/L) as limit.
Table 1 -- This guidance applies to the following NPDES facilities:
PERMIT
NUMBER
DISCHARGER
RECEIVING
STREAM
NC0021962
CITGO Petroleum — Paw Creek
Gum Branch
NC0022187
Motiva Enterprises LLC — Paw Creek
Gum Branch
NC0031038
Colonial Pipeline — Charlotte DF
Gum Branch
NC0032891
Kinder Morgan Southeast Term., LLC
Gum Branch
NC0046213
Marathon Ashland Petroleum LCC
Long Creek
NC0004839
Kinder Morgan Southeast Term., Char.
Long Creek
NC0005185
Megellan Terminals Holdings, LP
Long Creek
-. NC0046892
Motivia Enterprises LLC, Charlotte South
Long Creek
Paw Creek
Phenol Calculations Memorandum -- September 08, 2005
Page

NC DENR - DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
.0308 CATAWBA RIVER BASIN
c_ k----c6c \It t\c- 5W-F.-A-a/(
/mac (�G
2B .0300
Name of Stream Description
Classification
Class Date Index No.
Killian Creek From source to a point 1.2 C 03/01/62 11-119-2-(0.5)
miles upstream of mouth
Snyder Creek From source to Killian Creek C 03/01/62 11-119-2-1
Anderson Creek From source to Killian Creek C 03/01/62 11-119-2-2
Wingate Creek From source to Anderson C 03/01/62 11-119-2-2-1
Creek
Wilkinson Creek From source to Wingate Creek C 03/01/62 11-119-2-2-1-1
Ballard Creek From source to Wingate Creek C 03/01/62 11-119-2-2-1-2
Hooper Branch From source to Anderson C 03/01/62 11-119-2-2-2
Creek
Forney Creek From source to Killian Creek C 03/01/62 11-119-2-3
Killian Creek From a point 1.2 miles WS-IV 08/03/92 11-119-2-(4)
upstream of mouth to
Dutchmans Creek
Stanley Creek
Stanley Creek
South Stanley Creek
Taylors Creek
Dutchmans Creek
N,".
Long / eek
Dixon Branch
Vances Twin Lakes
Swaringer Lake
Long Creek
From source to a point 1.0 C 03/01/62 11-119-3-(1)
mile upstream of Gaston
County SR 1918
From a point 1.0 mile WS-IV 08/03/92 11-119-3-(2)
upstream of Gaston County SR
1918 to Dutchmans Creek
From source to Dutchmans WS-IV 08/03/92 11-119-4
Creek
From source to Dutchmans WS-IV 08/03/92 11-119-5
Creek
From a point 0.8 mile WS-IV;CA 08/03/92 11-119-(6)
downstream of Taylors
Creek to Lake Wylie, Catawba
River
From source to a point 0.6 C 09/01/74
mile downstream of
Mecklenburg County SR 2074
From source to Long Creek C 09/01/74 11-120-1
Entire lakes and C 09/01/74 11-120-1-1
connecting stream to Dixon
Branch
Entire lake and connecting C 09/01/74 11-120-2
stream to Long Creek
From a point 0.6 mile
downstream of Mecklenburg
County SR 2074 to a point
0.4 mile upstream of
Mecklenburg County SR 1606
WS-IV 08/03/92
McIntyre Creek
McIntyre Creek
From source to a point 0.3 C
mile upstream of Mecklenburg
County SR 2025
11-120-(0.5)
09/01/74 11-120-3-(1)
From a point 0.3 mile WS-IV 08/03/92 11-120-3-(2)
upstream of Mecklenburg
County SR 2035 to Long Cr.
27
4-

CATAWBA RIVER BASIN
Name of Stream
Subbasin Stream Index Number Map Number Class
Little Wilson Creek (Burnt Timber Branch)
Locust Creek
Locust Spring Branch
Long Branch
Long Branch
Long Branch
Long Branch
Long Branch
Long Branch
Long Branch
Long Branch
Long Branch
Long Cove
Long Creek
Long Creek
Long Creek
Long Creek
Long Creek
Long Creek
Long Creek
Long Shoal Creek
Longview Creek
Lonon Branch
Loom Creek
Lost Cove Creek
Lost Cove Creek
Loving Branch
Lower
Lower
Lower
Lower
Lower
Lower
Creek
Creek
Creek
Little
Little
Little
River
River
River
0 6( r
Lucky Creek
Lyle Creek
Lyle Creek
Lyle Creek
Lytle Branch
Mace Branch
Machine Branch
Mackey Creek
Mackey Creek
Mackey Creek
Magazine Branch
Mahaffie Branch
Maiden Creek
Maiden Creek
Maiden Creek, including Maiden reservoir
below elevation 842
Major Branch
Maple Tree Branch
Marks Mountain Branch
Martin Branch
Marvin Branch
Mauney Creek
Maynard Lake
McAlpine Creek (Waverly Lake)
CTB31
CTB30
CTB30
CTB30
CTB30
CTB30
CTB30
CT830
CTB30
CTB31
CTB35
CTB35
CTB34
CTB32
„_J CTB34
_---ACTB34
,___40/ CTB34
CTB36
CTB36
CTB36
CTB32
CTB35
CTB30
CTB30
CTB30
CTB31
CTB31
CTB31
CTB31
CTB31
CTB32
CTB32
CTB32
CTB32
CTB32
CTB32
CTB32
CTB30
CTB30
CTB38
CTB30
CTB30
CTB30
CTB30
CTB32
CTB35
CTB35
CTB35
CT831
CTB31
CT831
CTB30
CTB38
CTB35
CTB34
CTB34
11-38-34-3
11-19-6
11-24-2
11-7-7
11-10-7
11-19-7
11-19-11-4
11-24-14-9
11-32-2-10
11-38-5-1-1
11-129-1-8
11-129-5-7-1
11-132
11-76-5-1
11-120-(0.5)
11-120-(2.5)
11-120-(7)
11-129-16-(1)
11-129-16-(2.3)
11-129-16-(4)
11-64
11-129-1-17
11-24-10-1
11-12-8-1
11-7-10-2
11-38-34-11
11-38-32-17-2
11-39-(0.5)
11-39-(6.5)
11-39-(9)
11-69-(0.5)
11-69-(5.5)
11-69-(7.5)
11-110
11-76-(0.5)
11-76-(3.5)
11-76-(4.5)
11-12-4
11-24-14-12-1-1
11-138-2-5
11-15-(1)
11-15-(2)
11-15-(3.5)
11-32-2-9-2
11-76-2
11-129-5-7-2-(1)
11-129-5-7-2-(3)
11-129-5-7-2-(2.5)
11-38-34-11-3-2
11-38-34-11-4-2
11-38-34-11-3-5
11-24-11
11-138-3-4
11-129-15-5
11-137-4-3
11-137-9
C11SE2
ElONW3
D11NW8
E09NE9
ElONW5
ElONE1
D1OSE7
D10SE4
E11NW9
C12SW2
E12NW6
E14SW2
G14SE3
E14NW5
F15SE1
F15SW3
F15SW7
F13SE4
F13SE4
F13SE5
D13SE9
E13NW3
D10SE3
E10SW3
E10NW7
C11SE7
D12NE1
D13NW4
D12SE1
D12SW6
C14SW7
D14NW8
D14SW3
F15NW1
E13NE3
E14NW2
E14NE1
ElOSWS
D10SE2
H16NW4
ElONW6
ElONW6
ElONW6
E11SE1
E14NW2
E14SW3
E14SW2
E14SW2
C11SE5
C11SE6
C11SE8
D10SE6
H15NE2
F14NE7
G15NW5
G16NW5
C;Tr,ORW
WS-II,B;HQW
C;Tr
C;Tr,HQW
C;Tr
WS-II,B;Tr,HQW
WS-II,B;Tr,HQW
C;HQW
C
C
C;ORW
C
C
WS-IV
C
WS-IV
WS-IV;CA
WS-II;HQW
WS-II;HQW,CA
C
WS-V,B
C
C;Tr
C
C;HQW
C;Tr,ORW
C
C
WS-IV
WS-IV;CA
C
WS-IV
WS-IV;CA
WS-IV,B;CA
C
WS-IV
WS-IV;CA
C
C;HQW
C
WS-I;Tr,HQW
C;HQW
C
C
C
WS-II;HQW
C
WS-II;HQW,CA
C;Tr,ORW
C;Tr,ORW
C;Tr,ORW
C;Tr
C
WS-IV
C
C
Page 11 of 18

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes_ No X
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Carolyn Bryant
Date: March 15, 2005
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County: Mecklenburg
MRO No.: 05-08
Permit No. NC0046892
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and address: Motiva Enterprises
6851 Freedom Drive LLC-Charlotte South Terminal
Charlotte, North Carolina 28214
2. Date of investigation: 02-28-05
3. Report prepared by: Samar Bou-Ghazale, Env. Engineer I
4. Persons contacted and telephone number: Mr. L.W. Caudle, Terminal Operator; (704) 394-
2314
5. Directions to site: From the junction of I-85 and Highway 27 in Charlotte, travel west on
Highway 27 (Freedom Drive) approximately three (3) miles to Old Mt. Holly Road.
Motiva Enterprises is located on the left at the intersection of Old Mt. Holly Road and
Freedom Drive.
6. Discharge point(s). List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35° 16' 42" Longitude: 80° 56' 27"
Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge point on
map.
USGS Quad No.: F 15 SW USGS Quad Name: Mountain Island
7. Site size and expansion are consistent with application?
Yes X No_ If No, explain:

8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Flat to gently sloping. The site is not
located in a flood plain.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: None within 500 feet of the discharge point.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Unnamed tributary to Long Creek.
a. Classification: WS IV
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Catawba River Basin; 030834
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The receiving
stream is a dry ditch. Typical Class C uses downstream.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted:
Stormwater discharge from the tank farm area is intermittent depending on rainfall.
The permitted discharge from the Groundwater remediation system and the truck
loading rack stormwater is 0.058 MGD.
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the wastewater treatment facility? 0.058
MGD
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity)? 0.058
MGD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to
Construct issued in the previous two years: N/A
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater
treatment facilities: The existing groundwater treatment facilities consist of an
oil/water separator, an air stripper, two flocculation tanks, a clarifying basin,
carbon filtration and a holding tank. The wastewater treatment at the
loading/unloading area consists of an oil/water separator and a holding tank.
Wastewater from the holding tank is routed through the groundwater remediation
system. There are two outfalls from the facility. Outfall 001 consists of
stormwater discharges from the tank farm area and outfall 002 consists of treated
groundwater and stormwater discharges from the loading rack area. Outfall 001
and 002 are situated within a couple of feet of each other.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: N/A
g•
Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Acute toxicity is being monitored.

h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A.
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Tank bottom water is pumped to a
holding tank and is treated through the ground remediation system. Tank solids are
pumped and hauled for off -site disposal by US Filter of Concord, Tel# [phone].
3. Treatment plant classification: Class I.
4. SIC Code(s): 5171
Primary: 53
Main Treatment Unit Code: 53000
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies
involved (municipals only)? N/A.
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: Acute toxicity monitoring is
already included in the permit.
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (please indicate) N/A.
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the non -discharge
options available. Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray irrigation: N/A
Connection to regional Sewer System: N/A
5. Air Quality and/or Groundwater concerns or hazardous material utilized at this facility that
may impact water quality, air quality or groundwater? Contaminated groundwater already
exists at the site. Hazardous material stored at the site may be a constant threat to the
groundwater. Air Quality Permits are issued by Mecklenburg County.
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Permittee, Motiva Enterprises, is requesting NPDES Permit renewal for the discharge

of treated groundwater and stormwater. A review of the past hear's self -monitoring data, from
02/04 through 01/2005, revealed no violations.
It is recommended that the NPDES permit for this facility be renewed pending review by the
Groundwater section.
Signature of Report P 'parer
f/3.• 7?•f. -",..W...0.4,0‘
Water Qualify Regional Supervisor
7AAS-
Date

CERTIFIED MAIL #7004 1160 0000 8009 5067
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
December 21, 2004
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NC DENR/Water Quality/NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Permit Renewal Application
NPDES Permit: NC0046892
Motiva Enterprises LLC — Charlotte South Terminal
Dear Mr. Weaver:
MDTIVA
ENTERPRISES LLC
Motiva Enterprises LLC — Charlotte South Terminal is hereby requesting renewal of NPDES Permit
NC0046892. The subject permit expires on June 30, 2005. Some enhancements have been made to
the groundwater recovery system since the last permit that have increased water flow to Outfall 002;
however, no physical changes were made to the wastewater treatment components at the facility.
The Charlotte -South Terminal does not generate sludge as part of wastewater discharge; therefore no
sludge management plan is necessary for this facility.
As requested please find enclosed the following items:
• Cover letter requesting renewal of permit and documenting any changes at the facility since
issuance of the last permit including a narrative description of the sludge management plan if
applicable. (One signed original and two copies);
• Completed NPDES Permit Application — Short Form C, included as Attachment A (One signed
original and two copies);
• Delegation of Authority documentation included as Attachment B;
If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
Motiva Enterprises LLC
wit4t-ii0(042
Nicola E. Cloutier
Environmental Engineer
Attachments
cc: Charlotte -South Terminal Files
N. E. Cloutier
DEC 3 0 2004
P.O. Box 2476 Alexandria, Virginia 22301
Phone: (703) B38-9611 Fax: [phone]

M:1Grar phIcsl2200-Ralelo!•'1:4I1\0000 Terminals1058503 Charlotte South1058503 charlotte south SM.dwg, 07/03/2003 01:54:36 PM, WWeslerlund, GES
MW-49
SMW-48
MW-52
PLANTATION
PIPELINE PROPERTY
MW-17
1
MW-36
MW-1
NRW-2A
OuXc4LLcd Imo•
o IxfFA - '4Za
MOTIVA
PROPERTY
PZ-1
EXXON s TW-1
PROPERTY I
MW-12 t V
sMW-37 \ sITW-2
MW-50D L RW-3
s PZ-2 5[
s ZI
1 LTW-3
0
tr'TW-4
C sMW-18
MW-43
MW-42
PZ-5
sMW-38
N. PZ-4
MW-34D
MW-35
MW-13
MW-14
sPZ-3
CATCHMENT
BASIN
toRW-2 s MW-29 s MW-10
DIKE POND
S MW-26
®RW-1�
MW-23
RW-1A s
MW-33D
RW-6
MW-15A
MW-41D4
r
sPPL81
s MW-55
MW-28 MW-54
MW-56 AS-1
MW-57
sMW-6 sMW-47
CUT ooi - STO,?-,w4rE72. T.4‘.41c_ r 4 '4
tai-a-P-,4+-t- - 7-12t4TE SITC42_v„ 4-7-JG-Zo-w403' F/2. -v roaAvc e
PLANTATION
PPL31 MANIFOLD
AREA
sPPL41
MW-5
MW-20
MW-2
MW-19D s
s MW-8D
0
PPL51
s
MW-31
LOADING
sMW-7
SMW-46
sMW-4
Lti7 s MW-16D
MW-32
WAREHOUSE
LEGEND
DRAFTED BY:
W.A.W.
(N.J.)
CHECKED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
MONITORING WELL
TEMPORARY . WELL
E RECOVERY WELL
m AIR SPARGE
SITE MAP
SHELL OIL PRODUCTS US
MOTIVA FACILITY #058503
6851 FREEDOM DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
vati
NORTH
Groundwater & Environmental Services, Inc.
ONE NORTH COMMERCE CENTER, 5293 CAPITAL BLVD., RALEIGH, NC 27616
SCALE IN FEEL DATE E FIGURE
-
0 2O 73-03

F
Motiva Enterprises LLC - Charlotte South Terminal
NPDES Permit # NC0046892
Effluent Flow
Month
Year
Outfall 001
Outfall 002
MGD
MGD
January
2003
0
0
Feburary
2003
0.1775
0
March
2003
0.2367
0.1818
April
2003
0.3508
0
May
2003
0.387
0.191
June
2003
0.1978
0
July
2003
0.202
0
August
2003
0.2818
0
September
2003
0.3034
0.2747
October
2003
0.1653
0
November
2003
0.647
0
December
2003
0.1128
0.1846
January
2004
0
0
Feburary
2004
0.1208
0
March
2004
0.777
0.2519
April
2004
0.4
0
May
2004
0.094
0.294
June
2004
0.3487
0
July
2004
0
0
August
2004
0.2612
0
September
2004
0.1807
0.1619
October
2004
0.1716
0
November
2004
0.1266
0
Average (MGD)
0.2410
0.0670
*Average (Gal/Month)
481,974
133,904
*Note - Assumes 2 discharges per month.