20141285 Ver 1_401 Application_20141214

December 2, 2014
NC Division of Water Resources
Attn Jennifer Burdette
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
-",4
2 0 1 4 1 2 8 5 ARM
Geothermal, Environmental,
& Well Drilling
RE Pre - Construction Notice (Information Only) 206 Sunnyvale RD, Wilmington, NC
Ms Burdette
Enclosed are the following documents for your review,
Project Narrative Letter DEC 12 D
2014
USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form (Rapanos Form) DE R
Pre - Construction Notice Form 401. .. TER
Figure 1 206 Sunnyvale RD Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 206 Sunnyvale RD Wetland Boundary/ Site Plan
Figure 3 206 Sunnyvale RD Aerial Image
Figure 4 206 Sunnyvale RD Soils Map
Data Forms- Wetland Determination - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Agent Authorization Form with Deed Copy
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact
our office at (910) 270 -2919 or you can email me at gene_arm @bellsouth net
Sincerely,
Gene You E
Environmental Scientist
Enclosures
Applied Keoource Management, FC
FO Box 882, 257 Transfer Station Road, Hampstead, NC 28443, 910 270 2919, Fax [phone]

December 2, 2014
NC Division of Water Resources
Attn Jennifer Burdette
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
RE Project Narrative
206 Sunnyvale RD, Wilmington, NC
Dear Ms Burdette
Geothermal, Environmental,
& Well Drilling
On behalf of Clayton Homes, Applied Resources Management, P C is providing you with a project
narrative for the above referenced site
The project is located at 206 Sunnyvale Road in New Hanover County The property is
approximately 0 61 acre In order to construct a driveway for the setup of a manufactured home, fill
material will be needed in a very small portion of the noted wetlands, therefore the use of a
Nationwide Permit 18 is being sought
The proposed project consists of construction of a driveway across a small wetland area to access
an area of uplands where a home is to be located The wetland area extends to within fifteen feet of
the property line, however, in order to get the home on the uplands, a driveway area of
approximately twenty -four feet is needed Therefore, an extremely minimal impact is necessary to
access the upland area
The impact is expected to be approximately 0 005 acres This wetland impact has been minimized
by keeping the driveway area next to the property line and using only what is needed for installation
of the home Furthermore, fill is only being proposed for driveway /access purposes only
If you have any questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact me at
(910) 270 -2919
Sincerely,
Gene Young, REHS
Environmental Scientist
Applied Resource Management, FC
F 0 Box 882, 257 Transfer Station Koad, Hampstead, NC 28443, 910 270 2919, Fax [phone]

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FOWNI
US. At nn Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by follov ing the instructions provided in Section IN' of the ID Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION I. B- kCKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD).
B DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER-
C PROJECT LOCXTION AND BACKGROUND INFOR'•IATION
State North Carolina County/parish borough New Hanovei City Wilnnngton -'C
Center coordinates of site (lavlong in degree decimal format) Lat 34 177816`:\, Long -77 932466° «'
Unr� ei sal Transy ei se Mei catoi
Name of realest watei body Bainards Creek
Name of neatest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into iahich the aquatic resource flows Barmaids Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03030006
Check if map /diagram of review area and /or potential Jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request
❑ Check if other sites (e g , offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CIiECK ALL THAT APPLY)
El Office (Desk) Determmiation Date
❑ Field Detertnmation Date(s)
SECTION 11. SUMAIARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There au g no "nm ig-able raters of the US 'within Rivers and Haibois Act (RHA) Jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area [Requited]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or maybe susceptible for use to ttansport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There )re "raters of the US 'within Clean Water Act (CW A) Jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Regrcrr ed]
1. Waters of the U S
a Indicate pi esence of water s of U.S in review ai ea (check all that apply)- i
El TNWs, including temtonal seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
❑ Relatively permanent waters` (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands do ectly abutting RPWs that flow directly of mdiiectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RP',Ttrs that flow dnectly or mdnectly into TN`,tirs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow dnectly of mdnectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional Naateis
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated -wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of «ateis of the U S in the l eNiew area
Non- N�etland waters linear feet Nvidth (ft) and /or acres
Wetlands CWt (to be determined) acres
�J« i
c. Limits (boundaiies) of juiisdiction based on 1987 Deliieation'llanual
Elevation of established OHWM (if l nog; n)
2. Neon- re�utated «atersliF etlands (check if applicable) 3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional water s and /or «etlands \ %ere assessed a rthin the ie\ iet� area and dete.-inmed to be not lui isdicuonal
Explain
Boxes checked belo%; shall be sappo.ted b} completing the appropnate sections in Section III below
' For purposes of this fonn an RPNN is def ned as a tnbutanv that is not a TNW and that npicall% fioNN s } ear -sound of has commuous t1ov at least `seasonall}
(e Q npicaily, 3 months)
Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F

SECTION III CR'A ANALI SIS
A. TNNN's AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNNN s
The agencies sill assert jurisdiction oN er TNWs and � -*etlands adjacent to TNNN s If the aquatic resoui ce is a TNNN', complete
Section III A 1 and Section Ili D I onIA, if the aquatic resoui ce is a i%etland adjacent to a TNNV. complete Sections III A 1 and 2
and Section III D 1 . othen,. ise, see Section III B beloiN
1. TNW
Identify TNW
Summarize ia+tooale supporting determination
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion dhat vietland is `adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNNN) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY).
This section summarizes information ►egarding character istics of the tributary and its adjacent t etlands. if an%, and it helps
determine v hether or not the standards foi jurisdiction established under Rapanos ha-* a been met
The agencies will assei t jun isdiction over non - navigable tributaues of TNNN s inhere the ti ibutai ies ai e " relatively permanent
maters' (RPNN's), i e. tributaries that t%pically floss } ear -i ound o► have continuous flow at least seasonally (e g , t%pically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic iesouice is not a TNW, but has %ear -round
(pei enmal) flow, slip to Section III D 2 If the aquatic i esoui ce is a iN etland directly abutting a ti ibutai y n►tli pei enmal flow,
slip to Section III D 4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW i equn es a significant nexus evaluation Corps districts and
EPA regions skill include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent ti ibutai v that is not perennial (and its adjacent Ni etlands if any) and a t► adit►onal navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the Nvatei body° is not an RPW, or a Ni etland du ectly abutting an RPW, a JD ii ill i equn a additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNNN'. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributai y in combination Ni ith all of its adjacent wetlands This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
anal} tical purposes, the ti ibutai y and all of its adjacent wetlands is used iN hether the review ai ea identified in the JD request is
the ti ibutary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both If the JD covers a tributary pith adjacent N% etlands, complete Section III B 1 for
the tributary, Section Ill B.2 for any onsite NN etlands, and Section III.B 3 for all NN etlands adjacent to that ti ibutai both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section Ill C below.
1. Characteust►cs of non -TNWs that flow directly or unduectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watei shed size acres
Drainage area acres
Av erage annual rainfall inches
Av erage annual snowfall inches
(n) Ph%sical Characteiistics:
(a) Relationship with TNW
Ti ibutary flows duectly into TNW
❑ Tributar} flows through Pick List tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are Piet. List river mules fiom Ti.tW
Protect v�ateis are Pick List river mules from RPW
Project maters are Pict. List aerial (straight) mules fiom TNW
Project wateis are Pick List aerial (straight) miles fiom RP`N"
Project ,caters cross of serve as state boundaries D pram
Idenit, flow route to T'_vRV
Tnbutat v srrearm order, if kitota n
`Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional rnfonnation iegaidirg swales ditches, v ashes aTid eicsional feava,es genelall\ and m the and
'A, e_t
Flog route can be desci, bed b, iden,if} =n e 2 tnbutar, a which flog s tluough the ieN lei; area to fiou � to tnbuiary b atnch then floc s into TNN6

ib) General Tnbutary Characteristics (check all that akph )
Tnbutan is ❑ Natural
❑ Artifcial (roan -made) Explain
❑ ?Manipulated (man- altered) Explain
TributarN properties ;; ith respect to top of bank (estimate)
-%;erage nrdth feet
Ai erage depth feet
Aterage side slopes Pict. List
Primary tributary substi ate composition (check all that apply)
❑ Silts ❑ Sands
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gia-, el
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation Type/ ,o cover
❑ Other Explain
❑ Concrete
❑ Muck
Tributary coi,dition/stabihty [e a , highly eroding_ sloughing banks] Explain slightly sloughing banks
Prese,ice of run/riffle /pool complexes Explain no true riffles Seveial small pools possible
Tributary geometry Pickk List
Tributary gradient (appioximate avei age slope) %
(c) Flow
Tributary provides for Pict. List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area /year Pick List
Describe flow regime
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is Pick. Lisi Characteristics
Subsurface flow Pick List Explaum findings
v
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
Tributary has (check all that apply)
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all ndicatois that apply)
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
❑ shelving
❑
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
❑ sediment deposition
❑
❑ water staining
❑
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous 014WM ' Explain
the pi esence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or pi edicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factor s other than the OHWN4 wer e used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (clieck all that apply)
❑ High Tide Line indicated by ❑ Mean High Rater Maik indicated by
❑ oil or scup line along shot objects ❑ survey to a; arlable datum
❑ tine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical niaik,ngs,
❑ physical trial kings /characteristics ❑ ; egetation lines / changes in vegetation types
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list)
(w) Chemical Chaiacteirsres:
Characterize tributary (e g ;eater color is clear discolored oily film hater gaahty general ; ;ateished chaiacteristics, etc )
Explain could not determine due to lack of t; atei at tame of evaluation
Idert&yspecifepollutants ifkiiotvn
e natural of man -made d.scontmu,t} in the OI1 W 11 does not necessarily sevei jurisdiction (e 2, Leie the sueam temporanly flo;i s Linder giounci of -'i Le, e
the OH \UNI has been i enmov ed b} development of agncuitutal practices) «here them is a bleak m the OH�N 1,1 that is utnelazed lo the «cteibodv s f oiN
iegune (e g , ilo;, o, ei a lock outcrop om through a cuh en) the agencies N ;,til look fol indicators of ilo"; abo\ e and below the bleak
'Ibid

(is) Biological Characteristics Channel supports (check all that appli):
❑ Riparian comdor Chat actenstics (r\ pe aNeraze �� idth)
❑ «'eland fimge Chaiactensuc;
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explam findings
❑ Fishlspav n areas Explam findings
❑ Otlier em ironineiitall}- sensitive species E \plain finduigs
❑ Aquatic/Naildlife diieisity Explam findings
2 Characteristics of is etlands adjacent to non -TNNN' that floss do ectl� or indirectl} into TtiNV
(i) Physical Characteiistics,
(a) General Wetiand Charactenstics
Properties
'Wetland size 00acres
Wetland type Explain
Wetland quality Explam low quality
Project — etlands cross or ser e as state boundai ies Explain
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW
Flow is Pic> Ust Explain
Surface flow is Pick_ Li'si
Chai acteristics
Subsuiface flow Pfe List Explain findings
❑ Dye (oi othei) test performed
(c) \Wetland Adiacencv Deteninnation sloth Non -TNW
❑ Duectly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explain
❑ Ecological connection Explam
❑ Separated by benn /bamer Explain
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Piolect wetlands are Pick List river miles fiorn TNW
Project waters aie _Pict: List aenal (stiaight) miles fiom TNW
Flow is fiom Pick List
Estimate appioxnnate location of wetland as within the Pict. List floodplam
(n) Chemical Charactei ►sties
Characterize ,vetland system (e g , water color is cleat, biotan, oil film on surface, water quality, general watershed
cliatactensties, etc) Explam unkno-,tn due to no water m system at time of evaluation
Identify specific pollutants, if Irnown
(m) Biological Charactei istics Wetland supports (check all that apply)*
❑ Ripailan buffer Chaiactenstics (type, aveiage widtli)
❑ N egetation type /perce t co,, er Explain hydi ophytic, \ egetation/ appiox 90° o cover
❑ Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish /spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally- sensitit e species Explain findings
❑ Aquatic /wddhfe dneisity E-�.plain findings
3 Cltai actei istics of all «etlands adjacent to the ti ihutaiy (if arts)
All N� etland(s) being considei ed in the cantalatiy e anal} sis Pleb List
,kppros nnateh ( )acs es in total are bein g considered in the cumulau� e anal', sis

For each �3 etiand specify the folio« mg
Directly abuts9 (Y, "N) Size (m aces) Directiv abuts? (Y /N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being peifonned
C SIGNIFICANT NEXLS DETERIIIINATION
A significant nexus analysis «ill assess the flow characteiistics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any �i etlands adjacent to the tributary to deter mine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the follwi trig situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination mirth all of its adjacent
ni etlands. has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect oil the chemical, physical and/or biological integi ity of a TNW
Considei ations v hen evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the r ohrme, duration, and frequency of the flonti
of Hater in the ti ibutary and its proximity to a TNN11, and the functions perfoi need by the tiibutary and all its adjacent
ii etlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e g betni eel] a
tributary= and its adjacent Ni etiand or bet«een a tributaiy and the TNR). Similai ly, the fact an adjacent «etiand lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus
Draw connections betneen the featuies documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Insti uctional Guidebook Factors to consider include, for example
• Does the t ibutary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood watei s to
TNWs, or to i educe the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW'?
• Does the ti ibutary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle suppoi t functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, of rearing young for species that aie present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutlients and oiganu, carbon that
support downsti earn foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and floe {s duectly or mdnectly into TNNA's Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section Ill D
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent Ni etlands, NN het a the non -RPW floiti s du ectly or indirectly into
TNR's Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent "etlands, then go to Section III D
3 Significant nexus findings for NN etlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence of absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination tt nth all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section Ill D
D DETER1l2INATIONS OF JURISDICTION -kL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS /N'1 ETLA.NDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)•
1 T \R's and Adjacent Wetlands Cl.eck all that apply and provide size estimates in ic\iett area
❑ TNWs hnear feet tardth (ft), Or, acres
❑ Ni'etiands adjacent to TNWs acres
RPN1,s that flw« duectly or mdit ectly into TNNN's
Q Tribatanes of T'`'%N's ,here tributaries typically flow year -round ate junsaictiona' Pro,,ide data and i2nonale nmdicatrng tnet
tubLtary is perennial stream had dater flowing at time of inspect-on stater dept,i is app�oxnnatel) I feet Appears inat
tnbatary !,as been chaninelized into a ditch
❑ Tnbutanes of T'_x'W Etheie tnbutanes ha -,e continuous flo v seasonally (e 6 typically three months each )eat) aie
jurisdictional Data supponmg this conclusion is pio \ided at Section III B Pio�ide rationale indicating that t-ibutzr, tlo`as
seasonalh

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters to the review area (check all that apply)
❑ Tnbutary vi aters 203 linear feet 2 w idth (ft)
❑ Other non -w etland 1v aters acres
Identify t }pe(s) of caters
3. Non -RPWss that flomi directlN or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RP�V but tlovvs duectly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a stgnifica,mt nexus vt nh a
TIv'W is jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional .vateis vi ithin the review area (check all that apply)
El Tributary vv aters linear teet w idth (it)
Other non - wetland vv atei s aci es
Identify t;pe(s) of waters
-I Wetlands do ectly abutting an RPW that flow du ectly or nxhi ectly into TN Ws.
❑ `,Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jutrsdnetional as adjacent w etlands
® Wetlands duectly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year -round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial to Section III D 2, above Provide rationale indicattn- that wetland is
do ectly abutting an RPW vt etland flogs into folk blanch vN Itch flomti s to Bar nan ds Creek
❑ Wetlands duectly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow `seasonally ' Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III B and rationale in Section III D 2, above Piov rde rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review aica 61 acres
5 Wetlands adjacent to but not do ectly abutting an RPW that flow du ectly or indn ectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nevus with a TNW are juusidictional Data support tin a this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estmlates for jurisdictional wetlands to the review at ea acres
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow du ectly or indn ectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similaily situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional Data supporting tills
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for junsdictional wetlands in the review area acres
7 Impoundments of jut isdictional vi atei s.
As a geneial rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary iematns jurisdictional
Demonstrate that impoundment was created fiom `waters of the U S , ' or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the cinelia for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nevus to commerce (see E below)
E ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] `:WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF t1VTIICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMIMERCE, INCLUDING AN1
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)-"
❑ which ate or could be used by mteistate of foie�gn travelers for iecteatnonal or other purposes
❑ fiom which fish or shellfish ate of could be taLen and sold in interstate of foreign commerce
❑ which ate of could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
❑ Interstate isolated wares E)_plann
❑ Other fac,ors Elplaim
See Footnote = 3
' To complete ine anal\ sis ,efei to the he} in Section III D 6 oftne Instructional Guide000l
10 Prior to asset ring or declining Chi A jut isdictton based soleh on this cate60i v Cot ps Dtsti icts -,N ill elev ate the action to Coi ps and EPA HQ for
revue« consistent tN]iln the process described in the Cot ps,EPA ileinotandurn Regaining Chi 4 4etJuiiMicrion Folloning Rapanos

IdentiA K ater bod-, and summarize rationale supporting determination*
Prryide estivates for jurisdictional eaters in the re -, ietix area (cheer, all that apply)
❑ Tnbutary water linear feet vodth (ft)
❑ Other non- \% etland eaters acres
Identify t� pe(s) of «aters
❑ Weiland- acres
NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLL DING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL TH 4T APPLI)
❑ If potential �Netlands mere assessed within ,be ieN iew area, these areas did not meet the ciitena in the 1957 Corps of Engmeeis
Wetland Delineation Manual and'or appropriate Regional Supplements
❑ Re,, iew area included isolateo wateis with no submatial nevus to interstate (or foreign) coavneice
❑ Prior to the Ian 2001 Supi erne Court decision in SiV4A'CC the ieview area v ould ha\ e been regulated based solely on the
Migratory Bud Rule' (..MBR)
❑ Waters do not meet the Sianificant Nexus' standard, , here such a fiiidnig is requned for jurisdtetioa Evplam
Other (evplam, if not coveied abo-, e)
Provide acieage estimates for non - jurisdictional waters in the review area, tiflbere the sole potential basis of junsdiction is the 1,IBR
factors (i e, presence of migratory birds, piesence of endangered species, use of «ater for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgement (check all that apply)
Q 'von- ,A,etland watei s (i e rivers, sti earns) linear feet width (ft)
Lakes /ponds acres
Other non - wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
0 Wetlands act es
Provide acreage estimates for non- lunsdictional wateis in the ieview area that do not meet the' Significant Nexus standard, u hei e such
a finding is required for luusdiction (check all that apply)
❑ Non - wetland waters (i e , rivet s, streams) linear feet, width (ft)
❑ Lakes /ponds acres
❑ Other non- Aetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
El Wetlands acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA. Data revieNN ed for JD (check all that appl) - checked items shall be included in case file and, Nkheie checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below)
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑ Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
❑ Office concurs \Aith data sheets /delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report
❑ Data sheets piepaied by the Corps
Corps na\ igable waters study
❑ U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS b and 12 digit HUC maps
❑ U S Geological Surveti map(s) Cite scale & quad name \N il,nnigton, NC
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Surxey Citation
❑ National wetlands inventory n1ap(s) Cite name
❑ State /Local wetland im entory map(s)
❑ FEMA'FIRM maps
100 -yeah Floodplam EleNdtron is (National Geodectrc Vertical Datum of 191-9)
® Photogiaphs ® Aerial (Name & Date) Carteret County GIS
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)
❑ Pie -, sous deter_rmation(s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Applicable, supporting case lay,
❑ zpptrcable,si.pportmg scientific Iiteratu e
❑ Other ifor-nation (plea e specrfi i
B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

0�10�WA TEp,,
O lqiiii� -c
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A
Applicant Information
1
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 18 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification
❑X Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ❑ No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑X Yes ❑ No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
206 Sunnyvale RD
2b
County
New Hanover l_-� y tr
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Wilmington 1
2d
Subdivision name
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state project no
3
1 BUFFER PERMIT - I NG
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
_LM N
3b
Deed Book and Page No
t�- 7S'
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
at 0'i /t 6U�C? .
3d
Street address
-t cco 0eL &,r, 1-:3 rl 41tvjl lI'z Tn/ 5 C Ix r &rs
3e
City, state, zip
- 5202 I /VC- v3 /c /
3f
Telephone no
v
3g
Fax no
3h
Email address
dlz nd, In0Cre-0 L/A /Av , /tcf
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
Agent ❑ Other specify
4b
Namen1E
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
/
/PGA vr1CC ant
4d
Street address
4e
City, state, zip
ct S oe -- /JC ;ZaY 3
4f
Telephone no
7 _ l c.%
4g
Fax no
�j�p �? _
4h
Email address
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
�lti/Y� C1i1 C'J1%
5c
Street address
5d
City, state, zip
5e
Telephone no
5f
Fax no
5g
Email address
Page 2 of 10

B
Project Information and Prior Project History
1
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
--Oa7- 0/o2 -00 !
1b
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude / 7 8/5 ° Longitude -7'7, V 3;;2 w�, °
1c
Property size
s 4i ( acres fl.
2
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water to proposed protect,
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
2c
River basin
3
Project Description
3a
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the protect at the time of this
c
application L �rrerl�� P� o�ae� v ",t/ {c ve / ro/?as
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 0, arm r/_ I��e
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property l®3
3d
Explain the purpose of the proposed protect - ASS S,,zki/ /r;+�ct is 7o ZT ,Aw �4_ -
v� ci^ d c6c 55 � �� WC r,[,4 y �rl Mil r 7U /✓ AI( C� ✓{'1GCnkl-i e fie,d
3e Describe the overall protect in detail, including the type of equipment to be used % )ls,4. //%-/7&,
0 �ia c% e, �ve
c I I u4z d �ck-ho,; MP des iz la "I Ir "a � � -!n rsLuu 1M a, � t� cc
4
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
es ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known) ( ,,,� ��ti �'E�iS
Agency /Consultant Company ��/
Other A lreo� �es07 ✓rlct�'i -er?V,4
4d
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
5
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this protect (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes o ❑ Unknown
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes 2rNo
6b
If yes, explain
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1 4 January 2009

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which se0ons were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
Wetlands ❑ Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b
Type of impact
2c
Type of wetland
2d
Forested
2e
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one ►��
Choose one
Y /N
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g Total Wetland Impacts
pO5
2h Comments
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b
Type of impact
3c
Stream name
3d
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e
Type of
jurisdiction
3f
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
31 Comments
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then indivi ually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5I Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes /No
B2
Yes /No
B3 _
Yes /No
B4
Yes /No
B5 -
Yes /No
B6
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts
61 Comments
Page 5 of 10

D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
la Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing (project
VtivtiMl2ed Q✓nov/F� Cd 1 �cl �GC�L% 4, �f2�tPC Ct/> C Ion -6 4t- -p Y rt fr� �Cr� 1A
Veto nt) ace(a U U
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques /
Is 40 Gyl � l Gtc Cep /-1 AP "Z,--ett 1710 r �i /v
area S, �� (en(�nss slnct /� �/iS�icl�P� rt)-- 1.�'7tuteti �il/ Cc/ /'QrrlcLr/�r�5 (ti2°/ /Gl/l�% /
J
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes 21
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
4 ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
protect?
/+ ❑ Mitigation bank
/ ❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity
Quantity
Quantity
3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
Choose one
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes No El
buffer mitigation
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c
6d
6e
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a
Does the protect include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes No
within one of the NC Riparian Suffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What 3s the overall percent imperviousness of this protect?
%— ID
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ONO
2c
If this protect DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
4e'e /'1etr✓I c7cS
J
2d
If this protect DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply)
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

F
Supplementary Information
1
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑Yes No
use of public (federal /state) land
1 b
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter )
Comments
2
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes o
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)
2b
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes U40
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes 0410
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
4
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility — P ,; 1 f C '� MVA< < �
J t
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

5
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes
ErNo
habitat?
5b
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes
El No
impacts?
5c
if yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
- („rC h5 �e LPA""
5d
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species
or Designated Critical
Habitat? vC Ve-i rr- llkr -r J re",
6
Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes
O'fTo
6b
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7
Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a
Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes'
""
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
I' C- ���,� k - WPa woa
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
71:1 Yes
c to
8b
If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Neww� Li �S r✓l�
plicant/A nt's ignature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
(Agent's s nature is )ali if an authorization
letter applicant is provided
Page 10 of 10

RAL06
Project Area I
J\sll RD
RD
.0
Map adopted from USGS Topo Mop Wilmington Quadrangle
TITLE: 206 Sunnyvale RD FIGURE:
A,V121led ReSOUrce Site Vicinity
P C JOB: SCALE: DATE: DRAW4 BY:
1YC2644.3 14162 1 "= 1000' 11/12/14 GY

fG Llfvr-. lw1LLJ fPU \if• OL
)UPUTED FROM RECORDED
DEEDS AND MAPS. i
J
25.93' (TIE)
N 6359'49 "W
—3 p
Q
r
N 2'31 '05 "E
F7 "E -2�_ 0
32.45'
N
w o
� v N
O Q
House
aq Envelope
30'x 75'
INE A-5
616 �+
68��r O 0
�D
3F
o��0
A-5 �0n
_ f
59'53'23"W
37.50' (TIE) �� S 43 03'
S 16'07'36 "E
i
_ N 3707'04"E !
60.37' (T1E LINE)�\Q S 36'53 55
N 31 '40'36'
42.93'
W
01
BO
Cross Section
Note: Proposed impact is required for
access to bring in mobile home
for setup.
248' Sq. Ft.
(0.005 acre)
Impact
(approximate)
_L
S
N
3
Note: Map adopted previous survey by Robert Goslee and Associates dated October 24, 2014
TITLE: 206 Sunnyvale RD FIGURE:
Applied ge5ource Wetland Boundary /Site Plan
Management,
PC JOE: SCALE: DATE: DRAWN 6Y; 2
141 b2 1 " =40' 11 /b /14 GY

Map adapted from New Hanover County GIS Tax Map
TITLE: 206 Sunnyvale RD FIGURE:
Applied kegourc- Aerial Image
C JOB: SCALE: DATE: DRAWN BY: 3
am -''C
NC223�0 14162 1 "= 100' 11/12/14 GY

Le: Leon sand
Ly: Lynn Haven fine sand
Mu: Murvilie fine sand
�ipplied ReSOUrce '
Management, t' C,
TITLE: 206 Sunnyvale RD
- -- - -- Soil Survey --
JOB: SCALE: DATE:
Map adapted from FJRCS WebSoilSurvey
FIGURE:
14162 1 "= 100' 11/12/14
DRAWN BY: -- --
GY

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site 206 Sunnyvale RD City /County New Hanover Sampl,ng Date November 12 2014
Applicant/Owner Carolyn Roberts State NC Sampling Point Upland
Investigator(s) Gene Young, RS -A R M Section, Township, Range W €iminoton NC
Landform (hdislope terrace, etc) Ridge Top Local relief (concave, convex, none) Linear Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR T Lat 34 177815 Long -77 932466 W Datum
Sod Map Unit Name Leon sand NCWAM classification Bottomland Hardwood
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site Npicai for this time of year? Yesx No (if no explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Zemarks This does not appear to be a wetland
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No X
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two
required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface
(68)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Mari Deposits (1315)(LRR U)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
(C3)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
F(B7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Observations
Water Present? Yes _ No X Depth (inches)
Table Present? Yes _ No X Depth (inches) <24"
tion Present? Yes _ No X Depth (inches) <24" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
es capillary fringe)
ibe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available

Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
? Sweet um uidambar s racdiva
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
SSpec4es?
Indicator
Status
FAG
Dominance Test worksheet
Humber of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 3 (A)
Total Humber of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 75 (AB)
10
Y
Y
2 Pnvette (Lrgustrum sinense)
5
FAC
3
4
5
6
Cover
7
15
Sapling Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1
= Total
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of Multiply by
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x3=
FACU species x4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals (A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2
3
4
5
6
7
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1
= Total
Cover
2
3
Hydrophytrc Vegetation indicators
Dominance Test is >50%
Prevalence Index is <_3 0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'
(Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology
must
4
5
6
7
Cover
FACU
FAC
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Grape (Vitas)
10
= Total
Y
Definitions of Vegetation Strata-
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3
in (7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height
(DBH)
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb — All herbaceous (non - woody) plants,
including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size Includes
woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of
height
2 Wax Myrtle (Mynca cenfera)
10
Y
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
i
20
= Total
Cover
2
3
4
5
= Total
Cover
Hydrophytrc
Vegetation
Presents Yes Y No
Remarks (if observed list morphological adaptations below) vegetation strata are very limited due to movang

301L zaampitng mini tlp,aria
Profile Descap€tar (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indreators j
Dew Matix Redox Features
(Inches) Color (mast) °t° Color (moist) `I° Tie Loc Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 2f1 Loamy sand <70% uncoated sand
10-18 i 0YR 711 Loamy sand
18-24 10YR 411 Loamy sand
Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains Location PL= Pore Lining, M= Matrix
_ Hrstosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(LRR S,
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
— Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Surface (171) (LRR O)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Organic Bodies (A6)(LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7)(LRR P, T,
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Muck Presence (A8)(LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ 1 cm Mucky Mineral (A7)(LRR P, T,
_ Mari (F10) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochnc (1711) (MRLA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR
_ Coast Praine Redox (A16)(MLRA
_ Unbrrc Surface (F13( (LRR P, T, U)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR O,S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MRLA 151)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduce Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 1506)
_ Sandy Redox (S6)
— Stripped Matrix (S6)
strrctme Layer (,P observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
do not appear to be hydric
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18)(outside MLRA 150A, B)
Piedmont Floodplarn Soils (F19)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20)
(MRLA 1536)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation
and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
_ Piedmont Floodplarn Soils (MRLA 149A)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720) (MRLA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydnc Sods Present? Yes _ No X

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site 206 Sunnyvale RD City /County New Hanover Sampling Date November 12, 2014
Appircant(Owner, Carolyn Roberts State NC Sampling Point Wetland
Investigator(s) Gene Young RS -A R M Section, Township, Range Wilmington NC
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc) Toe slope Local rel.ef (concave, convex, none) Linear Slope ( %) >1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR T Lat 34 177815 Long -77 932466 W Datum
Soil Map Unit Name Leon sand NCWAM classification Bottomland Hardwood
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (if no,explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Sod Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Zemarks This appears to be a wetland
HYDROLOGY
Weiland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two
required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
Surface Water (A1)
X Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface
(B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Marl Deposits (B15)(LRR U)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
(C3)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery tC9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
Other (Explain in Remarks)
x FAC- Neutral Test (135)
_
(137)
_
Field Observations
rface Water Present? Yes _ No X Depth (inches)
iter Table Present? Yes x No Depth (inches) 10"
tion Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 6" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
es capliidry fiuncge)
ibe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available

Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Sweetaum (Lipuidambar styracifiva)
Absolute
% Cover
20
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
FAC
Dominance Test worksheet,
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100 (A/B)
Y
Y
2 Red Maple (Acer rubrum)
10
FAC
3 Laural Oak (Quercus launfolia)
10
Y
FACW
4
5
6
7
40
Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1
= Total
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of Multiply by
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x2=
FAC species X3=
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals (A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2
3
4
5
6
7
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1
= Total
Cover
2
3
Hydrophybc Vegetation Indicators
Dominance Test is >50%
Prevalence Index is s3 0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'
(Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology
must
4
5
6
7
Cover
OBL
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Netted chainfern (Woodwardia areolata)
15
= Total
Y
Definitions of Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3
in (7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height
(DBH)
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants,
including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size Includes
woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of
height
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1
15
= Total
Cover
2
3
4
5
= Total
Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes Y No
Remarks (if obseraea, list morphological adaptations below) vegetation strata are very limited due to moving

SOIL Sampling roint
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matix Redox Features
flndm) Color (moist) Color (moist) % T�pe Loc Tex +ure Remarks
0 -18 IOYR 211 Sandy loam
Type C= Concentration, D= Depietion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains Location PL= Pore Lining, M= Matrix
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Hrstic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Organic Bodies (A6)(LRR P, T, U)
_ 5 em Mucky Mineral (A7)(LRR P, T,
_ Muck Presence (A8)(LRR P, T)
_ 1 cm Mucky Mineral (A7)(LRR P, T,
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
X Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)(MLRA
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR O,S)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S6)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7 )(L
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks:
soils appear to be hydrrc
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(LRR S
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Surface (171) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (177)
Redox Depressions (178)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochnc (1711) (MRLA 151)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR
Unbnc Surface (F13( (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MRLA 151)
Reduce Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 150B)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20)
(MRLA 1536)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation
and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (MRLA 149A)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MRLA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydnc Soils Present? Yes X Wo _

Date-
To Whom It May Concern.
RE: Agent and Access Authorization Letter
I authorize Gene Young or any employee of Applied Resource Management, PC to act
as an agent on my behalf in all matters dealing with wetland Jurisdictional
Determinations or permitting
I furthermore authorize the US Army Corps of Engineers representative to access my
property as part of this process.
Sincerely,
Printed fume:
Property Address:

5FOR REGISTRATFOt4 REGISTER OF DEED
NEfJ tigt OJNTYY,,, NC
2614 OCT 14 02 25 34 PAS
BK 5845 PG 578 -581 FEE $26 00
NC REV Si $36 00
MW
This Instrument was prepared by Daniel D. Mahn, Attorney at Law,
Without title certification
Parcel Number: R06500- 007 -012 -041
Excise Tax: $ 34 4Q @)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER
Brief Description for the Index: Metes & Bounds Sunnyvale Drive
THIS DEED, made and entered into this 23rd day of
September, 2014, by and between CAROLYN F. ROBERTS (widowed),
6003 Caddy Circle, Wilmington, NC 28405, hereinafter referred to
as the "Grantor "); and CMH HOMES, INC., a
corporation (hereinafter referred to as the
"Grantee ") having a mailing address of
5000 Clautm Fc�oidt . Mar v �rdtp- TN SM H
WITNESSETH
THAT Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the
Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, have and
by these presents do grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the
Grantee in fee simple all of that certain lot or parcel of land
situated in New Hanover County, North Carolina, and more
particularly described as fellows:
BEING ALL OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A
ATTACHED HERETO AND INC€iRPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE.
The property herein described was acquired by Grantor by
instrument recorded in Back 2964, at Page 961, New Hanover
County Registry.

A map showing the above described property is recoraed in biap Book
Page , New Hanover County Regis-ry.
All or a portion of the property- nere_n conveyeaa includes
does not .include the primary residence of tt-.e Grantor.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and
all privileges and appartenances thereto belonging to the Grantee
and nis nears, successors and assigns in free simple forever.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee that Grantor is
seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the
same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of
all encumbrances, and the Grantor will warrant and defend -he
title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever other
tnan the following exceptions: Restrictions, zoning and land use
ordinances, easements and rights of way of record.
IN WITNESs WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the
foregoing instrument as of the aay and year first above written.
1
J,441, 1
1 121'dtt 1 (SE-AL)
Caro yn F. Roberts
STATE OF GZ�
COUNTY OF
t��,o WCr, a Notary Public of the County and State
aforesaid, certify that Carolyn F. Roberts personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the
foregoing instrument for the purposes therein expressed. Witness
iid_ny hand and official stamp or seal, -his day of September,
2014.
My Commission Expo res:
- 2to 1

Exhibit A
BEGINNING at an old iron pipe in the western right of way lire of
Sunnyvale Drive (S.R. #1115)(30.0 feet from the centerline
thereof), said point being North 63 degrees 02 minutes West 30.17
feet from a point in the centerline of said Sunnyvale Drive which
is South 36 degrees 58 minutes West 202.1 feet from a concrete
monument buried under the existing pavement of said Sunnyvale
Drive, said monument being about 17,100 feet westwardly from the
intersection of said Sunnyvale Drive and Carolina Beach Road (U.S.
Highway 421); running thence from said beginning point, North 63
degrees 02 minutes West 261.4 feet to a point in the run of Fork
Branch, running thence up and with the run of said Fork Branch to
a point, the southwestern corner of a tract of land conveyed from
James G. Daughtry and wife to Bill Roberts and wife oy deed
recorded 28 September, 1973 in Book 984, at Page 641 of the New
Hanover- County, N.C. Registry, said point being the following
courses and distances from the preceding point, North 31 degrees
32 minutes East 58.6 feet and North 0 degrees 35 minutes West
45.25 feet to said point, running thence, along said Daughtry`s
southern line, South 63 degrees 02 minutes East 295.0 feet to an
old gun barrel in the western right of ,ray line of aforementioned
Sunnyvale Drive (30.0 feet from the centerline tnereof), said
point being the southeastern corner of said Daughtry lot; running
thence, along the western right of way line of said Sunnyvale
Drive, South 36 degrees 58 minutes nest 100.0 feet to the point of
rsegrnning, containing 0.6 acre of land, more or less, the same
being a portion of that tract of land conveyed to E. N. Oxendi.ne
by glary W. Harts ny deed recorded 16 April, 1965

'<�`p114111Oy
TAMMY THEUSCH BEASLEY
REGISTER OF DEEDS, NEW HANOVER
216 NORTH SECOND STREET
WILMINGTON, NC 28401
Filed For Registration: 1011412414 02.25.34 PM
Book: RE 5845 Page- 578 -581
Document No 2414027482
4 PGS $26 00
NC REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX $3600
Recorder: .iQl- NSON, CAROLYN
State of North Carolina, County of New Hanover
PLEASE RETAIN YELLOW TRAILER PAGE WITH QR.[GINAL DOCUMENT.
Onl A O7/1 a':�
t
i }
VA
jfj 1
'<�`p114111Oy
TAMMY THEUSCH BEASLEY
REGISTER OF DEEDS, NEW HANOVER
216 NORTH SECOND STREET
WILMINGTON, NC 28401
Filed For Registration: 1011412414 02.25.34 PM
Book: RE 5845 Page- 578 -581
Document No 2414027482
4 PGS $26 00
NC REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX $3600
Recorder: .iQl- NSON, CAROLYN
State of North Carolina, County of New Hanover
PLEASE RETAIN YELLOW TRAILER PAGE WITH QR.[GINAL DOCUMENT.
Onl A O7/1 a':�