The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20141290 Ver 1_Application_20141216 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PATRICK L. MCCRORY ANTHONY J. TATA GOVERNOR SECRETARY (252) 237-6164 x 3532 tccoggins@ncdot.gov Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165 December 16, 2014 Mr. Thomas Steffens U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington Regulatory Field Office 2407 W 5th St. Washington, NC 27889 Mr. Robert Ridings DWQ-Transportation Permitting Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27609 SUBJECT: Bridge to Culvert at existing crossing of Unnamed Tributary (UT) to Pig Basket Creek on SR 1435 in Nash County. WBS 17BP.4.R.55 Dear Sirs: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to remove and replace Bridge #132, a one span bridge, over UT to Pig Basket Creek on SR 1435 in Nash County. The existing bridge will be replaced with 2, 8’x8’ reinforced concrete box culvert with headwalls and wings. This activity proposes to permanently impact a total of 78 linear feet of stream channel. Also 69 additional ft of stream and buffer will be permanently impacted due to bank stabilization. NCDOT anticipates that this pipe replacement activity will be authorized under Nationwide Permit 14 and NCDWQ GC # 3886. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Chad Coggins, Division Environmental Officer at (252) 296-3532. Your time and effort are appreciated. Respectfully submitted, Chad Coggins Div. 4 DEO Page 1 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. _____________ DWQ project no. _______________ Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): 401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit 401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: Yes No For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. Yes No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h below. Yes No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Bridge 132 (Bridge to Culvert) 2b. County: Nash 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Nashville 2d. Subdivision name: N/A 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 17BP.4.R.55 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Page 2 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify: NCDOT 4b. Name: Timothy M. Little, P.E. Division Engineer 4c. Business name (if applicable): NCDOT Division 4 4d. Street address: 509 Ward Blvd. 4e. City, state, zip: Wilson NC 27895 4f. Telephone no.: (252)237-6164 4g. Fax no.: (252)234-6174 4h. Email address: tmlittle@ncdot.gov 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Chad Coggins Division Environmental Officer 5b. Business name (if applicable): NCDOT Division 4 5c. Street address: 509 Ward Blvd. 5d. City, state, zip: Wilson NC 27895 5e. Telephone no.: (252)237-6164 5f. Fax no.: (252)234-6174 5g. Email address: tccoggins@ncdot.gov Page 3 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.02440 Longitude: 77.94977 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1c. Property size: N/A acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to proposed project: UT To Pig Basket Creek 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; NSW 2c. River basin: Tar-Pamlico 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Agriculture, forestry, and rural residential. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: Approximately 110 LF 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of this project is to replace a failing bridge with a culverted stream crossing on SR 1435 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The existing single span 26’(L) x 25’(W) bridge is structurally deficient and in need of replacement. NCDOT proposes to remove the existing single span bridge and replace it with 2 8’X8’ RCBC 78’ in length with headwalls and wings. Based on hydraulic calculations and observations made on-site after heavy rain events, NCDOT believes that this site will be adequately served by this configuration. Most of the work will be performed with an excavator. Clean earthen fill will be used to backfill over pipe and behind the headwalls. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: Feature appears on USGS Topographic maps and local soil survey. There are no wetlands within project boundaries. Yes No Unknown 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? Preliminary Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Byron Bateman/Chad Coggins Agency/Consultant Company: Other: NCDOT Division 4 Environmental Staff 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions. Page 4 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 5 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): Wetlands Streams - tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland (if known) 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction (Corps - 404, 10 DWQ – non-404, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 P T Fill Bottomland Hardwood Yes No Corps DWQ .01 W1 P T MC Bottomland Hardwood Yes No Corps DWQ .02 W3 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W4 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W5 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W6 P T Yes No Corps DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts .03 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number - Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction (Corps - 404, 10 DWQ – non-404, other) 3f. Average stream width (feet) 3g. Impact length (linear feet) S1 P T Fill UT To Pig Basket Creek PER INT Corps DWQ 16 78 S2 P T Dewatering/streambank stabilization UT To Pig Basket Creek PER INT Corps DWQ 16 69 S3 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S4 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S5 P T PER INT Corps DWQ S6 P T PER INT Corps DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 147LF 3i. Comments: Page 6 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) O1 P T O2 P T O3 P T O4 P T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: There are no open water impacts associated with this project 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: No ponds or lakes will be created as a result of this project 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? Yes No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: Page 7 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? Neuse Tar-Pamlico Other: Catawba Randleman 6b. Buffer impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet) B1 P T Fill/Access UT To Pig Basket Creek Yes No 4766 1250 B2 P T Yes No B3 P T Yes No 6h. Total buffer impacts 4766 1250 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. This culvert was designed on existing alignment and utilizes headwalls and wings to minimize culvert length/stream impacts. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for sediment and erosion control, the protection of wetlands and surface waters will be enforced. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? Yes No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? Mitigation bank Payment to in-lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity Page 8 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm cool cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? Yes No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Impacts associated with this project remain below the threshold for buffer mitigation. Page 9 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes No 1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: Since we are changing the structure from bridge to culvert stormwater will no longer be concentrated on a bridge deck or through drain holes, therefore reducing the occurrence of concentrated flow associated with this structure. Hereafter stormwater will be allowed to sheetflow and dissipate across vegetated shoulders. See permit drawings. Yes No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0 % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: This constitutes a linear project with a net decrease in impervious surface 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: N/A 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Certified Local Government DWQ Stormwater Program DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? N/A 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply Watershed Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? Yes No 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): Coastal counties HQW ORW Session Law 2006-246 Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? Yes No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No Page 10 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No 1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Yes No 1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) Comments: Yes No 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? Yes No 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No 2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No 3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. N/A Page 11 of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? Yes No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? Yes No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NCNHP Databases indicated no occurrences of endangered species in the vicinity. Furthermore, existing stream conditions are not compatible with the habitat required for endangered mussels and there is no significant amount of mature pine forest around the bridge to provide habitat for Red Cockaded Woodpeckers. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Yes No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NCNHP layers in ArcGIS 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? Yes No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NCDOT/HEU clearance 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Yes No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NCDOT Hydraulic Unit, NC Floodmaps Chad Coggins Applicant/Agent's Printed Name __________________ Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) 12/16/2014 Date (V e r s i o n 1 . 2 ; R e l e a s e d S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 1 ) 17 B P . 4 . R . 4 1 Co u n t y ( i e s ) : Na s h Page 1of 1 Pr o j e c t T y p e : D a t e : Ph o n e : Ph o n e : Em a i l : Em a i l : Co u n t y ( i e s ) : CA M A C o u n t y ? De s i g n / F u t u r e : Ex i s t i n g : Su p p l e m e n t a l : No n e Nu t r i e n t S e n s i t i v e W a t e r s ( N S W ) Pr i m a r y : Ba s k e t C r e e k T r i b u t a r y Ta r - P a m l i c o jd a v i s @ w e t h e r i l l e n g . c o m 2 P a v e d L a n e s ( 1 0 ' - 0 " w i d t h ) ; s h o u l d e r s v a ri a b l e w i d t h ( 4 ' - 9 ' ) ; 9 ' w i d e s h o u l d e r s th r o u g h o u t g u a r d r a i l l o c a t i o n w i t h 6 ' p a v e d a n d 3 ' g r a s s e d . 2 P a v e d L a n e s ( 1 0 ' - 0 " ) ; v a r i a b l e w i d t h ( 4 ' - 8 ' ) g r a s s e d s h o u l d e r s Ta r - P a m l i c o NC D W Q S t r e a m I n d e x N o . : Pr o j e c t / T I P N o . : NC D O T C o n t a c t : Pr o j e c t N o . : 17 B P . 4 . R . 4 1 Co n t r a c t o r / D e s i g n e r : cc o g g i n s @ n c d o t . g o v PO B o x 3 1 6 5 , W i l s o n , N C 2 7 8 9 5 Ge n e r a l P r o j e c t I n f o r m a t i o n Ad d r e s s : 7/23/2014 55 9 J o n e s F r a n k l i n R d . 50 9 W a r d B l v d . Su i t e 1 6 4 Ra l e i g h , N C 2 7 6 0 6 No r t h C a r o l i n a D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Hi g h w a y S t o r m w a t e r P r o g r a m S T O R M W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T P L A N FO R L I N E A R R O A D W A Y P R O J E C T S Ch a d C o g g i n s - D i v i s i o n E n v i r o n m e n t a l O f f i c e r Br i d g e R e p l a c e m e n t ac. Ge n e r a l P r o j e c t N a r r a t i v e : Th e p u r p o s e o f t h i s p r o j e c t i s t o r e p l a c e t h e s u b s t a n d a r d b r i dg e # 1 3 2 o n S R 1 4 3 5 ( W o m b l e R o a d ) . T h e r e p l a c e m e n t s t r u c t u r e w i l l be a double barrel 8' x 8' concrete box cu l v e r t . T h e t o t a l o p e n w i d t h o f t h e c u l v e r t ( 1 6 f e e t ) c l o s e l y a p p r o x i m a t e s t h e n o r m a l b a n k f u l l w i d t h o f t h e s t r e a m . T h e c u l v er t i n v e r t w i l l b e b u r i e d a m i n i m u m o f 1 ' - 0 " b e l o w th e n a t u r a l s t r e a m b e d a n d w i l l b e o n a m i l d ( 0 . 3 2 % ) s l o p e . T h e mi l d s l o p e w i l l a l l o w t h e c u l v e r t b o t t o m t o n a t u r a l l y a g r a d e w it h n a t i v e b e d m a t e r i a l . D u e t o t h e m i l d s l o p e , co n c r e t e s i l l s a t t h e c u l v e r t i n l e t a n d o u t l e t w i l l n o t b e n e c e s sa r y . E x i s t i n g d r a i n a g e p a t t e r n s a d j a c e n t t o t h e r o a d w a y w i l l be m a i n t a i n e d . Ty p i c a l C r o s s S e c t i o n D e s c r i p t i o n : Re f e r e n c e s 790 (2013) 0. 2 1 Av e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c ( v e h / h r / d a y ) : ac . Ot h e r S t r e a m C l a s s i f i c a t i o n : W e t h e r i l l E n g i n e e r i n g I n c . / J i m D a v i s , P E Ci t y / T o w n : 91 9 - 8 5 1 - 8 0 7 7 Hi g h w a y D i v i s i o n 4 Ad d r e s s : (2 5 2 ) 2 3 7 - 6 1 6 4 Na s h No No n e NC D W Q S u r f a c e W a t e r C l a s s i f i c a t i o n f o r P r i m a r y R e c e i v i n g W a t e r 30 3 ( d ) I m p a i r m e n t s : Ri v e r B a s i n ( s ) : Pr i m a r y R e c e i v i n g W a t e r : Cl a s s C Bu f f e r R u l e s i n E f f e c t Pr o j e c t D e s c r i p t i o n No n e Su r r o u n d i n g L a n d U s e : Ru r a l 0. 0 6 m i . 0. 1 5 Pr o j e c t B u i l t - U p o n A r e a ( a c . ) Pr o p o s e d P r o j e c t Ex i s t i n g S i t e Pr o j e c t L e n g t h ( l i n . M i l e s o r f e e t ) : WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT SHEET 1 OF 9 PERMIT DRAWING 2014/10/14 T V = = = MPH ADT % * DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS FUNC CLASS = 0 0 0 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) PROJECT LENGTH STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION NO. TOTAL SHEETS N.C. SHEET 1 DESIGN DATA SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE: P.E. P.E. GRAPHIC SCALES PLANS PROFILE (VERTICAL) HYDRAULICS ENGINEER LOCATION: TYPE OF WORK: 0 9 / 0 8 / 9 9 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 0 00 See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets $ $ $ $ $ $ S Y S T IM E $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ C O N T R A C T : C 2 0 3 3 15 A R T MEN N A S O H D E P T O F TRA SPORT T IO N T A TEOFN RT CAR O LI N A 17BP.4.R.55 PE, UTIL., R/W CONST. SUBREGIONAL TIER THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. RIGHT OF WAY DATE: PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS NCDOT CONTACT: DB4A-630132 4 *S.U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering Note: Not to Scale STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS GREG S. PURVIS, PE ENGINEERING ETHERILLW Raleigh, N.C. 27606 Bus: 919 851 8077 Fax: 919 851 8107 CIVIL/SITE DESIGN - GIS/GPS - CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/DESIGN - BRIDGE/STRUCTURE DESIGN 559 Jones Franklin Rd. Suite 164 License No. F-0377 P R O J E C T : 17 B P . 4 . R . 5 5 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 Prepared for: BRIDGE #630132 ENGINEER ROADWAY DESIGN SUBMITTAL DATE: SUBMITTAL #: BRIDGE #: EXPRESS DESIGN BUILD: DIVISION 4A - YEAR 2 LETTING DATE: 790 6 * TTST =3%DUAL =3% NASH COUNTY APRIL 16, 2013 APRIL 16, 2013 30 15 30 60 30 15 30 60 6 3 6 12 RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING & STRUCTURE EDWARD G. WETHERILL, PE ADT FY =N/A N/A=DHV D =N/A NSRS 2007 NAD 83/ CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. K. ZAK HAMIDI, PE DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT ENGINEER 55 ON SR 1435 (WOMBLE RD.) -L- POT STA. 11+77.00 -L- POT STA. 14+92.00 (BEULAH RD.) TO SR 1432 (WOMBLE ROAD) SR 1435 -L- EXDB4A-630132 PROJECT BEGIN NCDOT PROJECT DB4A-630132 END NCDOT (CASTALIA ROAD) TO SR 1425 B A S K E T C R E E K T R I B U T A R Y O F BRIDGE NO. 132 OVER TRIBUTARY BASKET CREEK TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT DB4A-630132 = LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT DB4A-630132 = 0.060 MILES 0.060 MILES 10 / 13 / 14 S-104 630132 2013 PROJECT SITE 1004 1417 1432 1438 1432 1437 1435 1417 1425 1435 1452 Store Suttons 1453 1454 R e d R d . R d . W o m b le 1425 1003 1003 Red Oak 43 R e d O a k R d . Rose B l v d. Beulah Rd. T a yl o r St or e R d. Castalia Rd. 43 VICINITY MAP OFF-SITE DETOUR RIGHT OF WAY PLANS 5 / 1 4 / 9 9 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ DB4A-630132 BRIDGE 630132 PROJECT REFERENCE NO.SHEET NO. SHEET 5 OF 9 PERMIT DRAWING 2 0 14 / 10 / 14 130 CL STA. 13+34.00 -L- CL GRADE EL.=149.51 SKEW=80 SLOPE=0.32% CL INV. EL.=135.68’ 2:1 SLOPE (NORMAL TO CL) TYPICAL STREAM BED WSEL=140.4’ (6-23-14) 100 YR. WSEL=143.04’TOP OF BANK LT. TOP OF BANK RT. 30" CAAP INV. 140.0’ 2 @ 8’ X 8’ RCBC (INVERTS BURIED 1’ MIN.) 10050050100 150 25 YR. WSEL=142.0’ 140 RIGHT OF WAY PLANS don’t use any pen table when plotting 00 00 55 55 1010 1010 1515 1515 2020 2020 2525 2525 3030 3030 3535 3535 4040 4040 4545 4545 5050 5050 5555 5555 6060 6060 6565 6565 7070 7070 7575 7575 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ 8 / 2 3 / 9 9 PROJ. REFERENCE NO.SHEET NO.0 135 135 140 140 145 145 150 150 155 155 130 130 13+50.00 135 135 140 140 145 145 150 150 155 155 130 130 13+75.00 140 140 145 145 150 150 155 155 135 135 14+00.00 135 135 140 140 145 145 150 150 155 155 130 130 14+40.00 X-4DB4A-630132 -L- 2.5 5 WLB WLBWLBWLBWLBWLB WETLAND WLB WLBWLBWLBWLB WETLAND WLB WLBWLB WETLAND WLB WLB WLB WLBWETLAND SHEET 6 OF 9 PERMIT DRAWING 2 0 14 / 10 / 14 148.70 EX. ROWEX. ROWPROP. ROW PROP. ROW 0.020 0.020 3:1 S.S. 141.54 S.S. 137.42 2: 1 PROP. PDE 148.86 EX. ROWEX. ROWPROP. ROW PROP. ROW 0.020 0.0203:1 S.S. 141.84 3: 1 S.S. 146.80 PROP. PDE PROP. PDE 148.99 EX. ROWEX. ROWPROP. ROW PROP. ROW0.020 0.020 3:1 S.S. 142.41 S.S. 146.96 3: 1 149.06 EX. ROW EX. ROWPROP. ROW PROP. ROW 0.020 0.0203:1 S.S. 142.75 2 :1 S.S. 147.56 00 00 55 55 1010 1010 1515 1515 2020 2020 2525 2525 3030 3030 3535 3535 4040 4040 4545 4545 5050 5050 5555 5555 6060 6060 6565 6565 7070 7070 7575 7575 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ 8 / 2 3 / 9 9 PROJ. REFERENCE NO.SHEET NO.0 140 140 145 145 150 150 155 155 135 135 14+50.00 140 140 145 145 150 150 155 155 135 135 14+70.00 140 140 145 145 150 150 155 155 135 135 14+92.00 X-5DB4A-630132 -L- 2.5 5 WLB WLBWETLAND SHEET 7 OF 9 PERMIT DRAWING 2 0 14 / 10 / 14 149.05 EX. ROW EX. ROWPROP. ROW PROP. ROW 0.020 0.021 3:1 S.S. 142.80 3 :1 S.S. 148.75 149.04 0.020 0.030 S.S. 143.06 4 :1 S.S. 147.67 2.5:1 EX. ROWEX. ROW 149.09 0.020 0.040 EX. ROWEX. ROW RE VIS IO N S HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER R/W SHEET NO. SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ 8 / 1 7 / 9 9 DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION DB4A 630132 SHEET 8 OF 9 PERMIT DRAWING DETAILS 2 0 14 / 10 / 14 ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION 2: 1 V A R. WINGWALL END VAR. (TYPICAL) 2:1 CULVERT INVERT (BURIED 1’+/-) PROPOSED 2 @ 8’ X 8’ RCBC CLASS I RIP RAP 130 0 140 CHANNEL SECTION @ CULVERT OUTLET FLOW 10 20 30 40 50 THICKNESS=18" MIN. (TYPICAL) 2:1 VAR. 2: 1 WINGWALL END (TYPICAL) V A R. 150 130 0 140 10 20 30 40 50 60 CHANNEL SECTION @ CULVERT INLET FLOW CULVERT INVERT (BURIED 1’+/-) PROPOSED 2 @ 8’ X 8’ RCBC Ha n d Existing Existing Pe r m a n e n t T e m p . E x c a v a t i o n M e c h a n i z e d C l e a r i n g P e r m a n e n t T e m p . C h a n n e l C h a n n e l N a t u r a l Si t e S t a t i o n S t r u c t u r e F i l l I n F i l l I n i n C l e a r i n g i n S W S W I m p a c t s I m p a c t s S t r e a m No . ( F r o m / T o ) S i z e / T y p e W e t l a n d s W e t l a n d s W e t l a n d s i n W e t l a n d s W e t l a n d s i m p a c t s i m p a c t s P e r m a n e n t T e m p . D e s i g n ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( f t ) ( f t ) ( f t ) 1 1 3 + 1 1 5 t o 1 3 + 8 5 2 a t 8 ' x 8 ' R C B C < 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 3 7 8 B a n k S t a b i l i z a t i o n 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 2 6 9 2 5 TO T A L S * : < 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 5 0 . 0 2 1 4 7 2 5 0 *R o u n d e d t o t a l s a r e s u m o f a c t u a l i m p a c t s NO T E S : Re v i s e d 2 0 1 3 1 0 2 4 SHEET 9OF 9 W E T L A N D P E R M I T I M P A C T S U M M A R Y WE T L A N D I M P A C T S SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Nash County DB4A-630132 17BP.4.R.55NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 11/10/2014 BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT SHEET 1 OF 5 BUFFER DRAWING 2014/10/14 T V = = = MPH ADT % * DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS FUNC CLASS = 0 0 0 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) PROJECT LENGTH STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION NO. TOTAL SHEETS N.C. SHEET 1 DESIGN DATA SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE: P.E. P.E. GRAPHIC SCALES PLANS PROFILE (VERTICAL) HYDRAULICS ENGINEER LOCATION: TYPE OF WORK: 0 9 / 0 8 / 9 9 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 0 00 See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets $ $ $ $ $ $ S Y S T IM E $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ C O N T R A C T : C 2 0 3 3 15 A R T MEN N A S O H D E P T O F TRA SPORT T IO N T A TEOFN RT CAR O LI N A 17BP.4.R.55 PE, UTIL., R/W CONST. SUBREGIONAL TIER THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. RIGHT OF WAY DATE: PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS NCDOT CONTACT: DB4A-630132 4 *S.U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering Note: Not to Scale STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS GREG S. PURVIS, PE ENGINEERING ETHERILLW Raleigh, N.C. 27606 Bus: 919 851 8077 Fax: 919 851 8107 CIVIL/SITE DESIGN - GIS/GPS - CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/DESIGN - BRIDGE/STRUCTURE DESIGN 559 Jones Franklin Rd. Suite 164 License No. F-0377 P R O J E C T : 17 B P . 4 . R . 5 5 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 Prepared for: BRIDGE #630132 ENGINEER ROADWAY DESIGN SUBMITTAL DATE: SUBMITTAL #: BRIDGE #: EXPRESS DESIGN BUILD: DIVISION 4A - YEAR 2 LETTING DATE: 790 6 * TTST =3%DUAL =3% NASH COUNTY APRIL 16, 2013 APRIL 16, 2013 30 15 30 60 30 15 30 60 6 3 6 12 RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING & STRUCTURE EDWARD G. WETHERILL, PE ADT FY =N/A N/A=DHV D =N/A NSRS 2007 NAD 83/ CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. K. ZAK HAMIDI, PE DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT ENGINEER 55 ON SR 1435 (WOMBLE RD.) -L- POT STA. 11+77.00 -L- POT STA. 14+92.00 (BEULAH RD.) TO SR 1432 (WOMBLE ROAD) SR 1435 -L- EXDB4A-630132 PROJECT BEGIN NCDOT PROJECT DB4A-630132 END NCDOT (CASTALIA ROAD) TO SR 1425 B A S K E T C R E E K T R I B U T A R Y O F BRIDGE NO. 132 OVER TRIBUTARY BASKET CREEK TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT DB4A-630132 = LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT DB4A-630132 = 0.060 MILES 0.060 MILES 10 / 13 / 14 S-104 630132 2013 PROJECT SITE 1004 1417 1432 1438 1432 1437 1435 1417 1425 1435 1452 Store Suttons 1453 1454 R e d R d . R d . W o m b le 1425 1003 1003 Red Oak 43 R e d O a k R d . Rose B l v d. Beulah Rd. T a yl o r St or e R d. Castalia Rd. 43 VICINITY MAP OFF-SITE DETOUR RIGHT OF WAY PLANS RE VIS IO N S HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER R/W SHEET NO. SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D G N $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ U S E R N A M E $ $ $ $ 8 / 1 7 / 9 9 DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION DB4A 630132 DETAILS 2 0 14 / 10 / 14 SHEET 3 OF 5 BUFFER DRAWING ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTION 2: 1 V A R. WINGWALL END VAR. (TYPICAL) 2:1 CULVERT INVERT (BURIED 1’+/-) PROPOSED 2 @ 8’ X 8’ RCBC CLASS I RIP RAP 130 0 140 CHANNEL SECTION @ CULVERT OUTLET FLOW 10 20 30 40 50 THICKNESS=18" MIN. (TYPICAL) 2:1 VAR. 2: 1 WINGWALL END (TYPICAL) V A R. 150 130 0 140 10 20 30 40 50 60 CHANNEL SECTION @ CULVERT INLET FLOW CULVERT INVERT (BURIED 1’+/-) PROPOSED 2 @ 8’ X 8’ RCBC RO A D CR O S S I N G BR I D G E PA R A L L E L IM P A C T ZO N E 1 (f t 2) ZO N E 2 (f t 2) TO T A L (f t 2) ZO N E 1 (f t 2)ZONE 2 (ft2)TOTAL (ft2)ZONE 1 (ft2)ZONE 2 (ft2) 1 2 a t 8 ' x 8 ' R C B C 1 2 + 6 0 t o 1 4 + 0 0 X 4 7 6 6 1 2 5 0 6 0 1 6 TO T A L : 47 6 6 1 2 5 0 6 0 1 6 0 0 0 IM P A C T BU F F E R I M P A C T S S U M M A R Y TY P E SI T E N O . ST R U C T U R E S I Z E / TY P E ST A T I O N (F R O M / T O ) AL L O W A B L E M I T I G A B L E BUFFER REPLACEMENT SHEET 4 OF 5PROJECT: 17BP.4.R.55 (DB4A 630132) 10/14/2014N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS NASH COUNTY Rev. May 2006 ZO N E 1 (f t 2) ZO N E 2 (f t 2) 1 1 3 + 4 0 t o 1 4 + 0 0 l t 1 0 7 6 9 9 TO T A L : 10 7 6 9 9 WE T L A N D S I N B U F F E R I M P A C T S S U M M A R Y SHEET 5 OF 5PROJECT: 17BP.4.R.55 (DB4A 630132) 10/14/2014N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS NASH COUNTY WE T L A N D S I N BU F F E R S SI T E N O . ST A T I O N (F R O M / T O ) Rev. Jan 2009 ADDITIONAL INF�RMATION AND COMP'UTATIONS HYDROLOGY: DA=2.9 SQ. MI. USGS. RURAL. REGRESSION..,EQUATIONS:..SIR 2009-5158_..,_.. 100%.,HYDROLOGIC..REGION..4,. Q2-60,3JDA)0_649 =60 3�2:q) 649120. CFS.......120. GFS.. - ...... ......... .............. Q70 174(DA)0 617 174�2 9! 67 335 CFS 340 CFS ... ......... ... ....................................... ......... Q25=245(DA)0.606_245�2 9�0.606 467 CFS 470 CFS . .. .................... .. ....................... Q50=309(DA) '600_309(2.9) '600 585 CFS 600 CFS - .....................................�. ............. ........ - - . - -........ Q100=380(DA� �594 380(2.9)0.594 �15 CFS 700 CFS ......p ......................... ... .................................................................... Q500=550(DA)'S83 550(2.9) �553 1023 CFS 1000 CFS . _ ..................................................................................................................... EXISTING BRIDGE OPENING....TOTAL=186 SQ. FT. BELOW DESIGN WSEL-87 SQ. FT. c�......................... .................. .. . .............. ....................... ............ IYO os6 ��, CULVERT OPENING_,.,TOTAL.=772 _ SQ.. FT..... .. ..... BELOW ..DESIGN.. WSEL.=.88 :6. SQ.. Fl:.. (AT ,INLET), ... ....................................... BELOW DESIGN WSEL=89.6 SQ. Fl:. (AT OUTLETI. ............................... SITE DATA Drainage Area „2:9 SQ:MI :....................... Source .............USGS. QUAD.................................... RiverBasin ......TAR PAMLICO ......... .. ... Character ..-.--.-_--RURAL Stream Classification (Such as Trout, High Quality Water, etc.) .......C; NSW Data on Existing Structure ]��.?9'-9".SPAN; EBTS: RC CAPS ON TIMBER PILES; RC FLOOR ON I-BEAMS Debris Potential: Low......Moderate...X....High........ Data on Structures Up and Down Stream ,. UPSTREAM: BRIDGE #155 1@18'-3" SPAN DOWNSTREAM: BRIDGE #204 2@28'-6" SPANS Gage Station No.... wA.... .. .. .. .. Period of Records WA y ...... ............................................ rs. Max. Discharge......�`r!? ................... c.f.s Date........... w?............... Frequency ........wj°�.......... Historical Flood Information: BURT BORIS Period of Date, 9./1999., E1eV149.0+/.p.Est. Freq. >SOO..yr. Source BRIDGE MAINTENANCE.SUPERVISORKnowledge,.15...yrs. Period of Date............ Elev...........ft. Est. Freq. ........yr. Source ......... ......... ......... ......... Knowled9e........yrs. EXISTING 100-YR WSEL Allowable HW Elev.�Q...RS 4000 743,58' .,.....{}, Normal Water SurFace Elev. , 140.4 {}, Manning's n: Left O.B. �05 -:08 Channel „-035., . Right O.B. �08..... Obtained From ,FIELD. SURVEY.,. Flood Study/Status NOT IN FEMA REGULATED FLOOD HAZARD ZONE _ Floodway Established?.....WA,,... With Without Flood Study 700 yr. Discharge __ WA.... c.f.s.; WS Elev.: Floodway .... �`�!? ... ft. Floodway ....Pl!?......ft. @River Station ? DESIGN DATA Hydrological Method........USGS.RURAL.REGRESSION,.EQUATIONS.(SIR.2009 515�) .... . . ....... Hydraulic Design Method HEC RAS VERSION ,4.1,0 .................... . _ Design Tailwater � Q ft.; (] ..........ft.; Q N.;Q ........... fl.; Q ft. ta � �'2s ' so�� ioo soo Inlef Conirol OutleT ConTrol Size & Type (c.f�-.s.) Ke HWiD Hh ' dc d� 2 � ho ry LSo Hft �• Remarks SEE HEC RAS FOR ANALYSIS Is a Floodway Revision Requiredz......NO________ ___ ____________ Outlet Velocity (V�o) .......... 4:4 f.p.s. Natural Channel Velocity (V�o) ........ 4.3__ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ f.p.s. Re uired Outle Protectio� � ` CL45S ,I, RIP„RAP_ _... z 2 f. s. q i ... . - - - ...... � ) .......... :� ............. P• WS EL. Tak Design: Discharge ... 47R....... c.f.s. Base Flood: Discharge ....700....... c.f.s. Overtopping: Discharge >1000..._,_. c.f.s. @ River Station 4000 Frequency ........... 25........yr. Elev. ..........142.0........... fF. Frequency ......... �.��........yr. Elev. ..........143,04......... ft. Frequency........>SOO........yr. Elev. .........".749:06..........ft. * OT OCCURS @ STA. 14+72 -L- NO fLOOD STUDY TAR PAMLICO BASIN CULVERT SCJRVEY & HYDRAULIC DESIGN REPORT N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION �JF HIGHWAYS HYDRAULICS UNIT RALEIGH, N. C. --� / �� r r I.D. No.. SF-630132...... Project No. ..17BP_4,R.41 ................... proj. Station .....13_�34:00„-L-......,.,,,. County ,,,,,, NASH ............... Stream......TRIBUTARY. TO..BASKET CREEK.....,......_...., Stru. No...0132.,,. ROSE BLVD CASTALIA RD. On Highway.SR.1435..(WOMBLE.RD,).. Between .SR 1437...,. ,.,,... and ..... SR 1425 Recommended Structure .2.@.,,8' X_ 8' RCBC.. jBURIED..I ). ............................ - ........................ �, . ...................................... ................................. .................. N; �: Recommended Width of Roadway. 34' (SHLD. PT. TO SHLD: PT:) Skew ... gpo o: �: Recommended Location is (Up At, Down) Stream from Existing Crossing. ............... ... � LL Statewide Tier ❑ Regional Tier ❑ Sub-Regional Tier � � Bench Mark is TBM-1 -L- STA. 14+16.01 47J8' LT. . . . ............. ................................. ... '- Elev. .. 144.44 {{ Datum: ,,.. NAVD 88 v: ....................................................................... �: `+� Temporary Crossing ... NOT.REQUIRED ......................... . . - ..... ............... . .. ..... - a: m� �: . 0 z v .o a i N: OT o: r�� ii: r ="�1.� �. {n. �.�a -��p� z I�� I 0 N: '"' s M. � r � r ' O: � O �" �++h +* �� Z �f�w,�* a:'g�,z: � :� �'u�.r�� !�.+. v 1 Gf n%. ' .. �, � �{ x� ,� ° �av-C�� , w� `iw� � � � � � � �� tl ,.�ty�x u �t � � t ° j�' �:� r' 'r R�, I � a� �J� ,e a �r, , * �r ., ',1 M �y ' ,„�.7 '... ::$Y ��x 1 � � � � J 4 'll y I � � -.__ . �� m� ° e - ; ! �: �e ENGINEERING H: U; Designed by: . JIM.. DAVIS, PE_ ........................ � �2 � / � � �� DaTe � - - - -......�...... Y: Assisted by: . HARMINDER, SINGH, EI ....................... N � m Project Engineer : .. D. V . .PE . . ..... .. ... .. .. �� .. _ �... i ' � Reviewed by: . _"�-�.. ......... '....--....�L-B-/� C N �i��,','� �.. C A: T � ,jr�ri ' �.� (�ES '�� o: � � '�� 2:' : S E A L , 18A62�� t