2020306 Ver 2_17BP.5.R.79 Reverification file 11012022_20221103

WC
WB
WA WB
WD
WA
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATIONDIVISION OF HIGHWAYSDIVISION 5
Figure4
County: Wake
Division: 5
0 300 600150Feet
³
Legend
Study Area
Wetland
Perennial Stream
Buffalo Creek Mainstem
2013 NC OneMap Aerial Date: August 2017
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURESBRIDGE REPLACEMENTBRIDGE NO. 216 ON SR 2366OVER BUFFALO CREEK WBS: 17BP.5.R.79
Old Tarboro Rd.
Buffalo Creek Braid

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT

Action Id. SAW-2017-00853 County: Wake County U.S.G.S. Quad: Knightdale

NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

Permittee: NCDOT; Division of Highways ATTN: Mr. J. R. Hopkins, P.E., Division Engineer
Address: 2612 North Duke Street Durham, North Carolina 27704
Telephone: [phone] (Chris Murray)

Size (acres) 10 Nearest Town Knightdale
Nearest Waterway Buffalo Creek River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates Latitude: 35.79896; Longitude: -78.40458
Location description: WBS W17BP.5.R.79; Bridge No. 216 over Buffalo Creek, on SR 2366, Old Tarboro Road,
northwest of Wendell, NC

Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination

X There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including
determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other
resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that
would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction.

B. Approved Determination

There are waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

We recommend you have the waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your project area delineated. As the Corps may not
be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation
that can be verified by the Corps.

The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified
by the Corps. If you wish to have the delineation surveyed, the Corps can review and verify the survey upon completion. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA and/or RHA jurisdiction on your property
which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five
years.

The waters of the U.S., including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed
by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on ______________. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

Action Id. SAW-2017-00853

Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Eric Alsmeyer at [phone] X 23 or
[e-mail].

C. Basis For Determination: The project study area contains jurisdictional waters of the US, Buffalo Creek, with ordinary
high water marks, and adjacent wetlands. Buffalo Creek is a tributary of the Little River and the Neuse River. The Neuse River is a
Section 10 Water.

D. Remarks: This JD was confirmed by field inspection on 5/3/2017. The drawings on the attached Figure 4, ”
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES, BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, BRIDGE NO. 216 ON SR 2366, OVER BUFFALO CREEK”, dated
August 2017, generally depict the approximate boundaries and locations of potential jurisdictional waters of the US within the subject
study area.

E. Attention USDA Program Participants

This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps’ Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.

**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**

Corps Regulatory Official: ______________________________________________________________________________

Date: September 27, 2017 Expiration Date: N/A

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0.

Copy Furnished:

Heather Smith
Ecological Engineering, LLP
1151 SE Cary Parkway; Suite 101
Cary, NC, 27518

Page 2 of 2
SAW-2017-00853

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: NCDOT; J. R. Hopkins, P.E. File Number: SAW-2017-00853 Date: September 27, 2017
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above
decision. Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/functions/cw/cecwo/reg or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SAW-2017-00853

SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Attn: Eric Alsmeyer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.

________________________________________
Signature of appellant or agent.
Date: Telephone number:

For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:

District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Eric Alsmeyer, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATI ON
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: September 26, 2017

B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Heather Smith, 1151 SE Cary Parkway, Suite 101, NC,
27518.

C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, NCDOT_17BP.5.R.79_SR 2366_Old Tarboro
Rd_BR216_Div5, SAW-2017-00853

D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: WBS W17BP.5.R.79; Bridge No. 216 over
Buffalo Creek, on SR 2366, Old Tarboro Road, northwest of Wendell, NC
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake County City: Wendell
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.79896 0 Long.: -78.40459 0
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Buffalo Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date: Field Determination. Date(s): 7/11/2017
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.

Site
Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
“may be” subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404)
T1 35.79896 -78.40459 250 FEET Non-wetland Section 404
T2 35.79905 -78.40419 150 FEET Non-wetland Section 404
WA 35.79859 -78.40459 0.15 ACRES Wetland Section 404
WB 35.79905 -78.40419 0.21 ACRES Wetland Section 404
WC 35.79934 -78.40427 0.44 ACRES Wetland Section 404
WD 35.79909 -78.40477 0.16 ACRES Wetland Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.

2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)

Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: Data sheets prepared by the Corps: Corps navigable waters' study: U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: USGS NHD data. USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000; Knightdale Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Wake County Soils National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: GIS _ State/local wetland inventory map(s): _ FEMA/FIRM maps: _
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: A erial (Name & Date):
or Other (Name & Date): Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: Other information (please specify):

IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.

_____________
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable) 1

1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

(Version 2.08; Released April 2018)
17BP.5.R.79 TIP No.:17BP.5.R.79 County(ies):Wake Page 1 of 1
TIP Number:Date:
Phone:Phone:
Email:Email:
County(ies):
CAMA County?
Yes
Design/Future: Year:2025 Existing: Year:
Aquatic T&E Species?No Comments:
Yes No
No
Wetlands within Project Limits?
Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)Supplemental Classification:
Forest, agricultural, and rural residential
Buffalo Creek 27-57-16-(2)
1.1
0.11
Project Description
Proposed Project
NeuseRiver Basin(s):
City/Town:
1.6
Typical Cross Section Description:
Surrounding Land Use:
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
No
[e-mail]
Address:
2/25/2020
WakeWendell
Galen Cail
Raleigh, NC 27610
WBS Element:
Bridge ReplacementWBS Element:
Reid B. Robol - VHBNCDOT Contact:
919-707-6711
Suite 500
Raleigh, NC 27606
Contractor / Designer:
919-754-5005
940 Main Campus Drive
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
Project Type:
1000 Birch Ridge Drive Address:
General Project Information
17BP.5.R.7917BP.5.R.79
Impairments:
Other Stream Classification:
Primary Classification:
Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)
State project 17BP.5.R.79 involves the replacement of the existing NCDOT Bridge #910216 on SR 2366 over Buffalo Creek. Bridge #910216 consists of 2@25.3' timber floor on
salvaged I-beams with timber caps on timber piles and abutments. The proposed bridge consists of 1@50' 1@35' 21" cored slab with 2'-6" caps. The proposed crossing is
located in Zone AE of FIRM Map number 3720177400J and was studied by Detailed methods. A stormwater outfall is proposed inside of buffer zone 2 and a Rip Rap pad will be
utilized to dissipate the energy. The standard V ditches at 11+26 L RT and 12+81 L LT meet non-erosive velocity requirement for 10YR discharge. No deck drains are required
for the proposed bridge.
NeuseBuffer Rules in Effect:
0
Bridge: 1@10', 2@11' lanes with 4'-3'' paved shoulders and 8' sidewalk (proposed multi-
use path). Road (-L-):
1@VAR (10'-0'), 2@11' lanes with 2' paved shoulders (4.25' w/ guardrail/8' sidewalk) and
4' grass shoulders. Road (-Y1-/-Y2-):
2@9.5' lanes with 2' paved shoulders and 4' grass shoulders.
Waterbody Information
2019
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
NRTR Stream ID:
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Existing Site
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
ac.
Surface Water Body (1):
Class BNCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
ac.
2@9.4' lanes with 2.0' shoulders. Dead end road at bridge.
3200
[e-mail]
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?Yes
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
B
UF
F
ALO CR
E
E
K
Creek
B
uffalo
1003
2366
2503
2300
2364
2501
LILES-DEAN
RD.
2365
R
D.
O
L
D
T
A
R
B
O
R
O
RD.
BRIDGE
BATTLE
OLD
PROJECT
BEGIN
END
PROJECT
RD.
TOWN
PULLEY
RD.
ROCK
EAGLE
1003
RD.
ROCK
EAGLE
RD.
ROLESVILLE
R
D
.
P
O
N
D
M
A
R
T
IN
97
264
64
264
BUS
64
BUS
Eagle Rock
High
Wake
East
Wendell

25 50 10050
25 50 10050
5 10 2010

DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
PROJECT LENGTHDESIGN DATA
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
GRAPHIC SCALES

PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:
0
9
/
0
8
/
9
9
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
0
00
9
:
5
4
:
5
9

A
M
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
li
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
IT
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
10
2
16
_
H
Y
D
_
P
R
M
_
W
E
T
_
T
S
H
.
d
g
n
s
c
j
o
n
e
s
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
:
A
R
T
MEN
N
A
S
O
H
D
E
P
T
O
F TRA SPORT
T
IO
N
T
A TEOFN RT
CAR
O
LI
N
A
=
=
CLASS =
V
SUBREGIONAL TIER
LOCAL
RURAL
=40 MPH
LENGTH STRUCTURES STATE PROJECT 17BP.5.R.79
LENGTH ROADWAY STATE PROJECT 17BP.5.R.79
TOTAL LENGTH STATE PROJECT 17BP.5.R.79
Prepared in the Offices of:
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
LETTING DATE:
RIGHT OF WAY
COMPLETE:
OCTOBER 11, 2019
PE
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
N/A
17BP.5.R.79
17BP.5.R.79
VICINITY MAP
See Sheet 1B For Conventional Symbols
See Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets
4
-L- POT STA. 12+34.19
END BRIDGE
-L- POT STA. 16+00.00
END STATE PROJECT 17BP.5.R.79
T
I
P

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
:
17
B
P
.
5
.
R
.
7
9
= 0.017 mi.
= 0.095 mi.
ADT
GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE
WAKE COUNTY
BRIDGE NO. 216 OVER BUFFALO CREEK
ON SR 2366 (OLD BATTLE BRIDGE RD.)

-L- P0T STA. 10+00.00
BEGIN STATE PROJECT 17BP.5.R.79
SR 2366 (OLD BATTLE BRIDGE RD.)
-Y1-
SR 2366 (OLD BATTLE BRIDGE RD.)
-L-
BUSINESS 64
TO
EAGLE ROCK RD.
TO
E
A
G
L
E
R
O
C
K
R
D.
T
OS
R
2
3
6
5
(
O
L
D
T
A
R
B
O
R
O
R
D.)
-
Y
2
-
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE TO LIMITS ESTABLISHED USING METHOD III.
OFF-SITE DETOUR
2,000+ VPD
PROJECT #:B16012.00
www.stewartinc.com
Firm License #: C-1051
T 919.380.8750
RALEIGH, NC 27603
223 S. WEST ST, STE 1100
CLOSED TO TRAFFIC.
SR 2366 IS CURRENTLY
NOTE:
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
ROBERT WILLIAMS, PE
ANDY YOUNG, PE
NCDOT CONTACT
LISA GILCHRIST, EI
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
17BP.5.R.79 N/A
17BP.5.R.79 N/A UTILITIES
ROW
-Y2- STA. 10+70.68
END CONSTRUCTION
-Y1- STA. 11+00.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
17BP.5.R.79 N/A CONSTRUCTION
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
-L- POT STA. 11+46.81
BEGIN BRIDGE
= 0.078 mi.
JULY 21, 2020
-L- STA. 20+80.00
END CONSTRUCTION
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
SITE 1
SHEET 1 OF 6
PERMIT DRAWING
NSRS 2011NAD 83/
2
3
4
7
8
9
10
11
12
S
LT
I
N
V
=
2
7
6.
2
2'
I
N
V
=
2
7
5.
0
9'
MTL CANOPY
S
H
E
D
H
T
R
B U F F A LO C R E E K
B
UF
F
ALO CR
E
E
K
18" RCP
18" CMP
15" RCP
15" RCP
C
W
W
T
T
B
O
X
E
L
E
C
T
RI
C
G
TS
8"
24"
8"
24"
8"
2
4"
8"
8
"
24"
8"
24"
24"
INNERDUCT
CATHODIC
CATHODIC
END
A
BA
N
D
ABAND
ABAND
A
BA
N
D
ABAND
8
"
MTL
GR
10
'
BST
20.5'
5
6
18
" P
VC
18
" P
VC
18
" DIP
BS4
=2
7
4.
7
0'
BS1=2
7
4.
7
7'
BS2
=2
7
4.
7
5'
BS3
=2
7
4.
6
9'
EXISTING RW
EXISTING RW
11' S
OIL
SOIL
0.
5
5
MI
L
E
S
T
O
E
A
G
L
E
R
O
C
K
R
D
0.52 MILES TO EAGLE ROCK RD
BRI
DGE
2
16W
O
O
D
M
T
L
EXISTING RW
EXISTING RW
EX
IST
ING
RW
EX
IST
ING
RW
E
XI
S
T
I
N
G
R
WE
XI
S
TI
N
G
R
W
P
B
2
0
0
5

P
G
7
4
2
-
7
4
4
P
ERMANENT

E
AS
EME
NT
P
B 2
0
0
5
P
G 7
4
2
-7
4
4
P
E
RMANENT
EAS
EMENTDB 12725 PG 333
WATER LINE EASEMENT
ECM
ECM
O
L
D
T
A
R
B
O
R
O
1
8'
R
D
S
R
2
3
6
5
ELIZABETH ANDERSON BECKERT
BW & G GROUP, LLC
WILLIAM M WOMBLE, JR
NELSON KEITH AYSCUE
BECKERT
ELIZABETH ANDERSON
BECKERT
ELIZABETH ANDERSON
BOX
ELECTRIC
PB 2015 PG 918
UTILITY EASEMENT
SERVICE COMPANY
10'X30' PUPLIC
EIP
EIP
DB 12725 PG 333
EASEMENT
WATER LINE
SOIL
VALVE
AIR RELEASE
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
RISER
BLOWOFF
EIP
EIP EIP
ABAND
HEPHZIBAH BAPTIST CHURCH
OLD BATTLE BRIDGE RD
(SR 2366) 18.4' BST
OLD BATTLE BRIDGE RD
SR 2366 VAR BST
HISTO
RIC
BO
U
N
D
ARY
HO
O
D - AN
DERSO
N
FARM
H
ISTO
R IC BO
U
N
D
A
RY
H
O
O
D
- A
N
D
ERSO
N
FA
R M
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
C
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
D
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
A
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
A
BEGIN STATE PROJECT
17BP.5.R.79
-L- POT Sta. 10+00.00
17BP.5.R.79
-L- POC Sta. 16+00.00
END STATE PROJECT
-Y1- Sta. 11+00.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y1- POT Sta. 10+00.00
15
2
0
-Y2- PC Sta. 10+03.07
-Y2- POT Sta. 13+03.25
-Y2- PT Sta. 10+60.04
-L- PC Sta. 12+66.13
-L- PT Sta. 16+66.05 -L- PC Sta. 18+01.41
-L- PT Sta. 20+46.94
-Y1- POT Sta. 12+30.48
-Y2- POT Sta. 10+00.00
-L- POT Sta. 20+80.00
END CONSTRUCTION
END CONSTRUCTION
-Y2- Sta. 11+94.00
-Y2- Sta. 10+70.68
END PAVING
1
1
1
2
3
30" RCP-IV
EST 7 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 2 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
REMOVE
+98
END SBG
CLASS II RIP RAP
TB 2GI
TB 2GI
TB 2GI
SEE DETAIL 1
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL 1
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL 2
SLOPE=3.3%
EST DDE=85 CY
DITCH
STANDARD BASE
15
"
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
2:
1 2:1
D
( Not to Scale)
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
DETAIL 3
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
FROM STA. 11+00 TO STA. 11+26 -L- RT
CLASS II RIP RAP
EST 10 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 3 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
B
2:12:
1 D
( Not to Scale)
STANDARD BASE DITCH
AT STA. 12+93 -L- LT
DETAIL 4
B=2.0 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
SEE DETAIL 4
SLOPE=1.5%
EST DDE=30 CY
STANDARD BASE DITCH
( Not to Scale)
BANK STABILIZATION
DETAIL 5
GEOTEXTILE
Type of Liner= CLASS II RIPRAP
3.0'min.
2.0'
NWS
SEE DETAIL 3
SLOPE=0.7%
EST DDE=2 CY
STANDARD V DITCH
flatter2:1 or
FROM STA. 12+02 TO STA. 12+28 -L-
FROM STA. 11+53 TO STA. 11+68 -L-
SEE DETAIL 5
EST 173 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 162 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
BANK STABILIZATION
SEE DETAIL 5
EST 121 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 115 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
BANK STABILIZATION
EST 7 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 2 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
Flatter3:1 or
D
2:
1
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
FROM STA. 10+30.6 TO STA. 11+00 -L- RT
FROM STA. 10+50 TO STA. 12+18.5 -Y1- RT
FROM STA. 10+50 TO STA. 12+18 -Y1- LT
DETAIL 1
Min. D= 1.5 Ft.
Ground
Natural Slope
Ditch
Front
SEE DETAIL 2
SLOPE=2.5%
EST DDE= 150 CY
STANDARD BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL 6
TOE PROTECTION
Fill Slope2:1 or Flatter
b
DETAIL 6
Ground
Natural
( Not to Scale)
TOE PROTECTION
d
Geotextile
Type of Liner= Class B Rip-Rap
b= 2.0 Ft.
d= 1.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 12+43 TO STA. 13+10 -L- RT
EST 14 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 5 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL 2
SLOPE=0.1%
EST DDE=55 CY
DITCH
STANDARD BASE
GEOTEXTILE
EST 22 SY
EST 11 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
B
2:12:
1 D
( Not to Scale)
STANDARD BASE DITCH
FROM STA. 10+15 TO STA. 11+27 -L- LT
FROM STA. 10+00 TO STA. 11+94 -Y2- LT
FROM STA. 12+18 TO STA. 12+30 -Y1- LT
DETAIL 2
B=3.0 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
417BP.5.R.79
NAD 83/ NA 2011

9
:
5
5
:
0
8

A
M
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
1
0
2
1
6
_
H
y
d
_
w
e
t
_
P
S
H
0
4
.
d
g
n
s
c
j
o
n
e
s
RE
VIS
IO
N
S
5
/
1
4
/
9
9 SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
4
FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEET 5
www.stewartinc.com
T 919.380.8750
Raleigh, NC 27603
Suite 1100
223 S. West St,
Firm License No. C-1051
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEETS S-1 THRU S-18
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
SEE DETAIL 7
TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY
DETAIL 7
(NOT TO SCALE)
NG
NG
1.5:11.5 :1
1.0'
CLASS A RIP RAP
CLASS II RIP RAP
TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY
GEOTEXTILE
MIN ELEV=272.1'
SHEET 2 OF 6
PERMIT DRAWING
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'100'50'
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL INFF
CLEARING
DENOTES MECHANIZED*
*
*
*
**
*
**
*
*
SITE 1 TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
WHEN APPLICABLE
APPROVED NCDOT BMP METHODS
BRIDGE COMPONENTS, USING
REMOVE ALL EXISTING AND OLDER
CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLETELY
PER DETAIL 5
CLASS II RIP RAP BANK STABILIZATION
CAUSEWAY, CONTRACTOR WILL RETAIN
UPON REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY
DIRECTED BY ENGINEER
CLEARING ACTIVITY IN HPB AREA AS
CONTRACTOR WILL LIMIT TREE
C
C
C
C
F
C
F
C
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
2
6
5270
2
7
0
2
7
0
270
270
270
2
7
0
2
7
0
2
7
0
2
7
5
2
7
5
275
275
2
75
275
275
27
5
275
275
2
7
5
275
275
2
7
5
2
7
5
2
7
5
2
7
5
2
7
5
2
7
5
275
280
2
8
0
2
8
0
2
8
0
2
8
0
2
8
0
280
280
280
280
280
280
2
80
280
280
2
8
0
2
8
0
280
280
280
2
8
0
280
2
8
5
285
2
8
5
285
285
285
285
290
29
0
290
290
2
9
0
2
9
5
295
295
295
295
300
300
300
300
300
300
3
0
5
2
3
4
7
8
9
10
11
12
S
LT
I
N
V
=
2
7
6.
2
2'
I
N
V
=
2
7
5.
0
9'
MTL CANOPY
S
H
E
D
H
T
R
B U F F A LO C R E E K
B
UF
F
ALO CR
E
E
K
18" RCP
18" CMP
15" RCP
15" RCP
C
W
W
T
T
B
O
X
E
L
E
C
T
RI
C
G
TS
8"
24"
8"
24"
8"
2
4"
8"
8
"
24"
8"
24"
24"
INNERDUCT
CATHODIC
CATHODIC
END
A
BA
N
D
ABAND
ABAND
A
BA
N
D
ABAND
8
"
MTL
GR
10
'
BST
20.5'
5
6
18
" P
VC
18
" P
VC
18
" DIP
BS4
=2
7
4.
7
0'
BS1=2
7
4.
7
7'
BS2
=2
7
4.
7
5'
BS3
=2
7
4.
6
9'
EXISTING RW
EXISTING RW
11' S
OIL
SOIL
0.
5
5
MI
L
E
S
T
O
E
A
G
L
E
R
O
C
K
R
D
0.52 MILES TO EAGLE ROCK RD
BRI
DGE
2
16W
O
O
D
M
T
L
EXISTING RW
EXISTING RW
EX
IST
ING
RW
EX
IST
ING
RW
E
XI
S
T
I
N
G
R
WE
XI
S
TI
N
G
R
W
P
B
2
0
0
5

P
G
7
4
2
-
7
4
4
P
ERMANENT

E
AS
EME
NT
P
B 2
0
0
5
P
G 7
4
2
-7
4
4
P
E
RMANENT
EAS
EMENTDB 12725 PG 333
WATER LINE EASEMENT
ECM
ECM
O
L
D
T
A
R
B
O
R
O
1
8'
R
D
S
R
2
3
6
5
ELIZABETH ANDERSON BECKERT
BW & G GROUP, LLC
WILLIAM M WOMBLE, JR
NELSON KEITH AYSCUE
BECKERT
ELIZABETH ANDERSON
BECKERT
ELIZABETH ANDERSON
BOX
ELECTRIC
PB 2015 PG 918
UTILITY EASEMENT
SERVICE COMPANY
10'X30' PUPLIC
EIP
EIP
DB 12725 PG 333
EASEMENT
WATER LINE
SOIL
VALVE
AIR RELEASE
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
RISER
BLOWOFF
EIP
EIP EIP
ABAND
HEPHZIBAH BAPTIST CHURCH
OLD BATTLE BRIDGE RD
(SR 2366) 18.4' BST
OLD BATTLE BRIDGE RD
SR 2366 VAR BST
HISTO
RIC
BO
U
N
D
ARY
HO
O
D - AN
DERSO
N
FARM
H
ISTO
R IC BO
U
N
D
A
RY
H
O
O
D
- A
N
D
ERSO
N
FA
R M
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
C
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
D
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
A
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
A
BEGIN STATE PROJECT
17BP.5.R.79
-L- POT Sta. 10+00.00
17BP.5.R.79
-L- POC Sta. 16+00.00
END STATE PROJECT
-Y1- Sta. 11+00.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y1- POT Sta. 10+00.00
15
2
0
-Y2- PC Sta. 10+03.07
-Y2- POT Sta. 13+03.25
-Y2- PT Sta. 10+60.04
-L- PC Sta. 12+66.13
-L- PT Sta. 16+66.05 -L- PC Sta. 18+01.41
-L- PT Sta. 20+46.94
-Y1- POT Sta. 12+30.48
-Y2- POT Sta. 10+00.00
-L- POT Sta. 20+80.00
END CONSTRUCTION
END CONSTRUCTION
-Y2- Sta. 11+94.00
-Y2- Sta. 10+70.68
END PAVING
1
1
1
2
3
30" RCP-IV
EST 7 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 2 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
REMOVE
+98
END SBG
CLASS II RIP RAP
TB 2GI
TB 2GI
TB 2GI
SEE DETAIL 1
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL 1
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL 2
SLOPE=3.3%
EST DDE=85 CY
DITCH
STANDARD BASE
15
"
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
2:
1 2:1
D
( Not to Scale)
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
DETAIL 3
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
FROM STA. 11+00 TO STA. 11+26 -L- RT
CLASS II RIP RAP
EST 10 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 3 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
B
2:12:
1 D
( Not to Scale)
STANDARD BASE DITCH
AT STA. 12+93 -L- LT
DETAIL 4
B=2.0 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
SEE DETAIL 4
SLOPE=1.5%
EST DDE=30 CY
STANDARD BASE DITCH
( Not to Scale)
BANK STABILIZATION
DETAIL 5
GEOTEXTILE
Type of Liner= CLASS II RIPRAP
3.0'min.
2.0'
NWS
SEE DETAIL 3
SLOPE=0.7%
EST DDE=2 CY
STANDARD V DITCH
flatter2:1 or
FROM STA. 12+02 TO STA. 12+28 -L-
FROM STA. 11+53 TO STA. 11+68 -L-
SEE DETAIL 5
EST 173 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 162 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
BANK STABILIZATION
SEE DETAIL 5
EST 121 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 115 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
BANK STABILIZATION
EST 7 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 2 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
Flatter3:1 or
D
2:
1
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
FROM STA. 10+30.6 TO STA. 11+00 -L- RT
FROM STA. 10+50 TO STA. 12+18.5 -Y1- RT
FROM STA. 10+50 TO STA. 12+18 -Y1- LT
DETAIL 1
Min. D= 1.5 Ft.
Ground
Natural Slope
Ditch
Front
SEE DETAIL 2
SLOPE=2.5%
EST DDE= 150 CY
STANDARD BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL 6
TOE PROTECTION
Fill Slope2:1 or Flatter
b
DETAIL 6
Ground
Natural
( Not to Scale)
TOE PROTECTION
d
Geotextile
Type of Liner= Class B Rip-Rap
b= 2.0 Ft.
d= 1.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 12+43 TO STA. 13+10 -L- RT
EST 14 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 5 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL 2
SLOPE=0.1%
EST DDE=55 CY
DITCH
STANDARD BASE
GEOTEXTILE
EST 22 SY
EST 11 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
B
2:12:
1 D
( Not to Scale)
STANDARD BASE DITCH
FROM STA. 10+15 TO STA. 11+27 -L- LT
FROM STA. 10+00 TO STA. 11+94 -Y2- LT
FROM STA. 12+18 TO STA. 12+30 -Y1- LT
DETAIL 2
B=3.0 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
417BP.5.R.79
NAD 83/ NA 2011

9
:
5
5
:
14

A
M
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
1
0
2
1
6
_
H
y
d
_
w
e
t
_
P
S
H
0
4
_
c
o
n
.
d
g
n
s
c
j
o
n
e
s
RE
VIS
IO
N
S
5
/
1
4
/
9
9 SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
4
FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEET 5
www.stewartinc.com
T 919.380.8750
Raleigh, NC 27603
Suite 1100
223 S. West St,
Firm License No. C-1051
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEETS S-1 THRU S-18
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
SEE DETAIL 7
TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY
DETAIL 7
(NOT TO SCALE)
NG
NG
1.5:11.5 :1
1.0'
CLASS A RIP RAP
CLASS II RIP RAP
TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY
GEOTEXTILE
MIN ELEV=272.1'
SHEET 3 OF 6
PERMIT DRAWING
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'100'50'
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL INFF
CLEARING
DENOTES MECHANIZED*
*
*
*
**
*
**
*
*
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
WHEN APPLICABLE
APPROVED NCDOT BMP METHODS
BRIDGE COMPONENTS, USING
REMOVE ALL EXISTING AND OLDER
CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLETELY
PER DETAIL 5
CLASS II RIP RAP BANK STABILIZATION
CAUSEWAY, CONTRACTOR WILL RETAIN
UPON REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY
DIRECTED BY ENGINEER
CLEARING ACTIVITY IN HPB AREA AS
CONTRACTOR WILL LIMIT TREE
SITE 1
C
C
C
C
F
C
F
C
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
2
6
5270
2
7
0
270
2
7
0
270
2
7
0
2
7
5
2
7
5
275
275
2
7
5
275
2
7
5
2
7
5
4
B U F F A L O C R E E K
B
U
F
F
AL
O C
R
E
E
K
W
G
T
S
2
4
"
8
"
2
4
"
8"
A
B
A
N
D
A
B
A
N
D
5
6
18
" D
IP
BS
4
=2
7
4.
7
0'
B
S
1=2
7
4.
7
7'
BS
2
=2
7
4.
7
5'
BS
3
=2
7
4.
6
9'
BRI
D
G
E
2
16W
O
O
D
M
T
L
P
B
2
0
0
5
P
G
7
4
2
-7
4
4
P
E
R
MA
N
E
N
T
E
A
S
E
ME
N
T
DB 12725 PG 333
EASEMENT
WATER LINE
VALVE
AIR RELEASE
CONC
CONC
CONC
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
C
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
D
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
A
O
417BP.5.R.79

9
:
5
5
:
2
0

A
M
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
1
0
2
1
6
_
H
y
d
_
w
e
t
_
P
S
H
0
4
_
B
l
o
w
u
p
.
d
g
n
s
c
j
o
n
e
s
RE
VIS
IO
N
S
5
/
1
4
/
9
9 SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
4
FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEET 5
www.stewartinc.com
T 919.380.8750
Raleigh, NC 27603
Suite 1100
223 S. West St,
Firm License No. C-1051
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEETS S-1 THRU S-18
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
SEE DETAIL 7
TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY
SHEET 4 OF 6
PERMIT DRAWING
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL INFF
CLEARING
DENOTES MECHANIZED*
*
*
*
**
*
**
*
*
SITE 1
MECHANIZED CLEARING
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'25'12.5'
MECHANIZED CLEARING
FILL IN WETLAND
TEMP SW IMPACT
SW IMPACT
SW IMPACT
FILL IN WETLAND
NAD 83/ NA 2011
TEMP SW IMPACT
C
F
F
F
F
F
C
00
00
1010
1010
2020
2020
3030
3030
4040
4040
5050
5050
6060
6060
7070
7070
8080
8080
9090
9090
100100
100100
110110
110110
120120
120120
130130
130130
140140
140140
150150
150150
0
9
:
5
5
:
2
6

A
M
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
2
0
2
1
6
_
H
y
d
_
L
_
X
P
L
.
d
g
n
s
c
j
o
n
e
s
8
/
2
3
/
9
9
PROJ. REFERENCE NO.SHEET NO.
270 270
280 280
260 260
270 270
280 280
260 26012+00.00
270 270
280 280
260 260
270 270
280 280
260 260
12+50.00
X-217BP.5.R.79
-L-
10 20
(BEGIN BRIDGE)
11+52+/-
(END BRIDGE)
12+37+/-
WETLAND
CLEARING
MECHANIZED
WETLAND WETLANDJS
EXTENDS PAST XSC BOUNDARY
ROWROW
CLEARING
MECHANIZED
WETLANDS
FILL IN
SHEET 5 OF 6
PERMIT DRAWING
276.17
2:1 0.020 0.020
2:
1
1%
268.28
0.0200.020
276.34
2:1 0.020 0.020
2:
1
1%
276.44
2:1 0.020 1%0.020
2:
1
1%
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 11+53 to 13+18 -L- 1@50' 1@35' 21' CS W/ 2'-6'' CAPS 0.02 0.04 < 0.01 0.04 93 104

TOTALS*: 0.02 0.04 < 0.01 0.04 93 104 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES: Existing Channel Impacts Permanent and Existing Channel Impacts Temp. are coincident
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 6 OF 6

WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
WAKE
17BP.5.R.79

NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
02/25/2020
(Version 2.08; Released April 2018)
17BP.5.R.79 TIP No.:17BP.5.R.79 County(ies):Wake Page 1 of 1
TIP Number:Date:
Phone:Phone:
Email:Email:
County(ies):
CAMA County?
Yes
Design/Future: Year:2025 Existing: Year:
Aquatic T&E Species?No Comments:
Yes No
No
Wetlands within Project Limits?
Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)Supplemental Classification:
Forest, agricultural, and rural residential
Buffalo Creek 27-57-16-(2)
1.1
0.11
Project Description
Proposed Project
NeuseRiver Basin(s):
City/Town:
1.6
Typical Cross Section Description:
Surrounding Land Use:
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
No
[e-mail]
Address:
2/25/2020
WakeWendell
Galen Cail
Raleigh, NC 27610
WBS Element:
Bridge ReplacementWBS Element:
Reid B. Robol - VHBNCDOT Contact:
919-707-6711
Suite 500
Raleigh, NC 27606
Contractor / Designer:
919-754-5005
940 Main Campus Drive
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
Project Type:
1000 Birch Ridge Drive Address:
General Project Information
17BP.5.R.7917BP.5.R.79
Impairments:
Other Stream Classification:
Primary Classification:
Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)
State project 17BP.5.R.79 involves the replacement of the existing NCDOT Bridge #910216 on SR 2366 over Buffalo Creek. Bridge #910216 consists of 2@25.3' timber floor on
salvaged I-beams with timber caps on timber piles and abutments. The proposed bridge consists of 1@50' 1@35' 21" cored slab with 2'-6" caps. The proposed crossing is
located in Zone AE of FIRM Map number 3720177400J and was studied by Detailed methods. A stormwater outfall is proposed inside of buffer zone 2 and a Rip Rap pad will be
utilized to dissipate the energy. The standard V ditches at 11+26 L RT and 12+81 L LT meet non-erosive velocity requirement for 10YR discharge. No deck drains are required
for the proposed bridge.
NeuseBuffer Rules in Effect:
0
Bridge: 1@10', 2@11' lanes with 4'-3'' paved shoulders and 8' sidewalk (proposed multi-
use path). Road (-L-):
1@VAR (10'-0'), 2@11' lanes with 2' paved shoulders (4.25' w/ guardrail/8' sidewalk) and
4' grass shoulders. Road (-Y1-/-Y2-):
2@9.5' lanes with 2' paved shoulders and 4' grass shoulders.
Waterbody Information
2019
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
NRTR Stream ID:
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Existing Site
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
ac.
Surface Water Body (1):
Class BNCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
ac.
2@9.4' lanes with 2.0' shoulders. Dead end road at bridge.
3200
[e-mail]
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?Yes
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
B
UF
F
ALO CR
E
E
K
Creek
B
uffalo
1003
2366
2503
2300
2364
2501
LILES-DEAN
RD.
2365
R
D.
O
L
D
T
A
R
B
O
R
O
RD.
BRIDGE
BATTLE
OLD
PROJECT
BEGIN
END
PROJECT
RD.
TOWN
PULLEY
RD.
ROCK
EAGLE
1003
RD.
ROCK
EAGLE
RD.
ROLESVILLE
R
D
.
P
O
N
D
M
A
R
T
IN
97
264
64
264
BUS
64
BUS
Eagle Rock
High
Wake
East
Wendell

25 50 10050
25 50 10050
5 10 2010

DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
PROJECT LENGTHDESIGN DATA
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
GRAPHIC SCALES

PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:
0
9
/
0
8
/
9
9
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
0
00
10
:
0
1:
3
8

A
M
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
li
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
IT
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
10
2
16
_
H
Y
D
_
P
R
M
_
B
U
F
_
T
S
H
.
d
g
n
s
c
j
o
n
e
s
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
:
A
R
T
MEN
N
A
S
O
H
D
E
P
T
O
F TRA SPORT
T
IO
N
T
A TEOFN RT
CAR
O
LI
N
A
=
=
CLASS =
V
SUBREGIONAL TIER
LOCAL
RURAL
=40 MPH
LENGTH STRUCTURES STATE PROJECT 17BP.5.R.79
LENGTH ROADWAY STATE PROJECT 17BP.5.R.79
TOTAL LENGTH STATE PROJECT 17BP.5.R.79
Prepared in the Offices of:
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
LETTING DATE:
RIGHT OF WAY
COMPLETE:
OCTOBER 11, 2019
PE
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
N/A
17BP.5.R.79
17BP.5.R.79
VICINITY MAP
See Sheet 1B For Conventional Symbols
See Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets
4
-L- POT STA. 12+34.19
END BRIDGE
-L- POT STA. 16+00.00
END STATE PROJECT 17BP.5.R.79
T
I
P

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
:
17
B
P
.
5
.
R
.
7
9
= 0.017 mi.
= 0.095 mi.
ADT
GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE
WAKE COUNTY
BRIDGE NO. 216 OVER BUFFALO CREEK
ON SR 2366 (OLD BATTLE BRIDGE RD.)

-L- P0T STA. 10+00.00
BEGIN STATE PROJECT 17BP.5.R.79
SR 2366 (OLD BATTLE BRIDGE RD.)
-Y1-
SR 2366 (OLD BATTLE BRIDGE RD.)
-L-
BUSINESS 64
TO
EAGLE ROCK RD.
TO
E
A
G
L
E
R
O
C
K
R
D.
T
OS
R
2
3
6
5
(
O
L
D
T
A
R
B
O
R
O
R
D.)
-
Y
2
-
THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE TO LIMITS ESTABLISHED USING METHOD III.
OFF-SITE DETOUR
2,000+ VPD
PROJECT #:B16012.00
www.stewartinc.com
Firm License #: C-1051
T 919.380.8750
RALEIGH, NC 27603
223 S. WEST ST, STE 1100
CLOSED TO TRAFFIC.
SR 2366 IS CURRENTLY
NOTE:
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
ROBERT WILLIAMS, PE
ANDY YOUNG, PE
NCDOT CONTACT
LISA GILCHRIST, EI
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
17BP.5.R.79 N/A
17BP.5.R.79 N/A UTILITIES
ROW
-Y2- STA. 10+70.68
END CONSTRUCTION
-Y1- STA. 11+00.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
17BP.5.R.79 N/A CONSTRUCTION
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
-L- POT STA. 11+46.81
BEGIN BRIDGE
= 0.078 mi.
JULY 21, 2020
-L- STA. 20+80.00
END CONSTRUCTION
BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT
SITE 2
SITE 1
SHEET 1 OF 3
BUFFER DRAWING
NSRS 2011NAD 83/
2
3
4
7
8
9
10
11
12
S
LT
I
N
V
=
2
7
6.
2
2'
I
N
V
=
2
7
5.
0
9'
MTL CANOPY
S
H
E
D
H
T
R
B U F F A LO C R E E K
B
UF
F
ALO CR
E
E
K
18" RCP
18" CMP
15" RCP
15" RCP
C
W
W
T
T
B
O
X
E
L
E
C
T
RI
C
G
TS
8"
24"
8"
24"
8"
2
4"
8"
8
"
24"
8"
24"
24"
INNERDUCT
CATHODIC
CATHODIC
END
A
BA
N
D
ABAND
ABAND
A
BA
N
D
ABAND
8
"
MTL
GR
10
'
BST
20.5'
5
6
18
" P
VC
18
" P
VC
18
" DIP
BS4
=2
7
4.
7
0'
BS1=2
7
4.
7
7'
BS2
=2
7
4.
7
5'
BS3
=2
7
4.
6
9'
EXISTING RW
EXISTING RW
11' S
OIL
SOIL
0.
5
5
MI
L
E
S
T
O
E
A
G
L
E
R
O
C
K
R
D
0.52 MILES TO EAGLE ROCK RD
BRI
DGE
2
16W
O
O
D
M
T
L
EXISTING RW
EXISTING RW
EX
IST
ING
RW
EX
IST
ING
RW
E
XI
S
T
I
N
G
R
WE
XI
S
TI
N
G
R
W
P
B
2
0
0
5

P
G
7
4
2
-
7
4
4
P
ERMANENT

E
AS
EME
NT
P
B 2
0
0
5
P
G 7
4
2
-7
4
4
P
E
RMANENT
EAS
EMENTDB 12725 PG 333
WATER LINE EASEMENT
ECM
ECM
O
L
D
T
A
R
B
O
R
O
1
8'
R
D
S
R
2
3
6
5
ELIZABETH ANDERSON BECKERT
BW & G GROUP, LLC
WILLIAM M WOMBLE, JR
NELSON KEITH AYSCUE
BECKERT
ELIZABETH ANDERSON
BECKERT
ELIZABETH ANDERSON
BOX
ELECTRIC
PB 2015 PG 918
UTILITY EASEMENT
SERVICE COMPANY
10'X30' PUPLIC
EIP
EIP
DB 12725 PG 333
EASEMENT
WATER LINE
SOIL
VALVE
AIR RELEASE
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
RISER
BLOWOFF
EIP
EIP EIP
ABAND
HEPHZIBAH BAPTIST CHURCH
OLD BATTLE BRIDGE RD
(SR 2366) 18.4' BST
OLD BATTLE BRIDGE RD
SR 2366 VAR BST
HISTO
RIC
BO
U
N
D
ARY
HO
O
D - AN
DERSO
N
FARM
H
ISTO
R IC BO
U
N
D
A
RY
H
O
O
D
- A
N
D
ERSO
N
FA
R M
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
C
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
D
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
A
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
A
BEGIN STATE PROJECT
17BP.5.R.79
-L- POT Sta. 10+00.00
17BP.5.R.79
-L- POC Sta. 16+00.00
END STATE PROJECT
-Y1- Sta. 11+00.00
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-Y1- POT Sta. 10+00.00
15
2
0
-Y2- PC Sta. 10+03.07
-Y2- POT Sta. 13+03.25
-Y2- PT Sta. 10+60.04
-L- PC Sta. 12+66.13
-L- PT Sta. 16+66.05 -L- PC Sta. 18+01.41
-L- PT Sta. 20+46.94
-Y1- POT Sta. 12+30.48
-Y2- POT Sta. 10+00.00
-L- POT Sta. 20+80.00
END CONSTRUCTION
END CONSTRUCTION
-Y2- Sta. 11+94.00
-Y2- Sta. 10+70.68
END PAVING
1
1
1
2
3
30" RCP-IV
EST 7 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 2 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
REMOVE
+98
END SBG
CLASS II RIP RAP
TB 2GI
TB 2GI
TB 2GI
SEE DETAIL 1
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL 1
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
SEE DETAIL 2
SLOPE=3.3%
EST DDE=85 CY
DITCH
STANDARD BASE
15
"
15" RCP-IV
15" RCP-IV
2:
1 2:1
D
( Not to Scale)
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
DETAIL 3
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
FROM STA. 11+00 TO STA. 11+26 -L- RT
CLASS II RIP RAP
EST 10 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 3 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
B
2:12:
1 D
( Not to Scale)
STANDARD BASE DITCH
AT STA. 12+93 -L- LT
DETAIL 4
B=2.0 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
SEE DETAIL 4
SLOPE=1.5%
EST DDE=30 CY
STANDARD BASE DITCH
( Not to Scale)
BANK STABILIZATION
DETAIL 5
GEOTEXTILE
Type of Liner= CLASS II RIPRAP
3.0'min.
2.0'
NWS
SEE DETAIL 3
SLOPE=0.7%
EST DDE=2 CY
STANDARD V DITCH
flatter2:1 or
FROM STA. 12+02 TO STA. 12+28 -L-
FROM STA. 11+53 TO STA. 11+68 -L-
SEE DETAIL 5
EST 173 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 162 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
BANK STABILIZATION
SEE DETAIL 5
EST 121 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 115 TONS
CLASS II RIP RAP
BANK STABILIZATION
EST 7 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 2 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
Flatter3:1 or
D
2:
1
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
FROM STA. 10+30.6 TO STA. 11+00 -L- RT
FROM STA. 10+50 TO STA. 12+18.5 -Y1- RT
FROM STA. 10+50 TO STA. 12+18 -Y1- LT
DETAIL 1
Min. D= 1.5 Ft.
Ground
Natural Slope
Ditch
Front
SEE DETAIL 2
SLOPE=2.5%
EST DDE= 150 CY
STANDARD BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL 6
TOE PROTECTION
Fill Slope2:1 or Flatter
b
DETAIL 6
Ground
Natural
( Not to Scale)
TOE PROTECTION
d
Geotextile
Type of Liner= Class B Rip-Rap
b= 2.0 Ft.
d= 1.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 12+43 TO STA. 13+10 -L- RT
EST 14 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST 5 TONS
CLASS B RIP RAP
SEE DETAIL 2
SLOPE=0.1%
EST DDE=55 CY
DITCH
STANDARD BASE
GEOTEXTILE
EST 22 SY
EST 11 TONS
CLASS I RIP RAP
B
2:12:
1 D
( Not to Scale)
STANDARD BASE DITCH
FROM STA. 10+15 TO STA. 11+27 -L- LT
FROM STA. 10+00 TO STA. 11+94 -Y2- LT
FROM STA. 12+18 TO STA. 12+30 -Y1- LT
DETAIL 2
B=3.0 Ft.
Min. D=1.5 Ft.
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
SEE DETAIL 7
TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY
DETAIL 7
(NOT TO SCALE)
NG
NG
1.5:11.5 :1
1.0'
CLASS A RIP RAP
CLASS II RIP RAP
TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY
GEOTEXTILE
MIN ELEV=272.1'
417BP.5.R.79
NAD 83/ NA 2011

10
:
0
1:
4
6

A
M
R
:
\
H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
s
\
P
E
R
M
I
T
S
_
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
\
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
9
1
0
2
1
6
_
H
y
d
_
b
u
f
_
P
S
H
0
4
.
d
g
n
s
c
j
o
n
e
s
RE
VIS
IO
N
S
5
/
1
4
/
9
9 SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
4
FOR -L- PROFILE, SEE SHEET 5
www.stewartinc.com
T 919.380.8750
Raleigh, NC 27603
Suite 1100
223 S. West St,
Firm License No. C-1051
FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEETS S-1 THRU S-18
Raleigh, NC 27606
VHB Engineering NC, P.C. (C-3705)
940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500
SHEET 2 OF 3
BUFFER DRAWING
GRAPHIC SCALE
0'100'50'
SITE 1
SITE 2
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
WHEN APPLICABLE
APPROVED NCDOT BMP METHODS
BRIDGE COMPONENTS, USING
REMOVE ALL EXISTING AND OLDER
CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLETELY
PER DETAIL 5
CLASS II RIP RAP BANK STABILIZATION
CAUSEWAY, CONTRACTOR WILL RETAIN
UPON REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY
DIRECTED BY ENGINEER
CLEARING ACTIVITY IN HPB AREA AS
CONTRACTOR WILL LIMIT TREE
C
C
C
C
F
C
F
C
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
Site Station Structure
No. (From/To) Size / Type
1 11+26/12+79 -L- LT 1@50' 1@35' 21' CS W/ 2'-6'' CAPS X 2011 478 2489
1 11+26/12+79 -L- LT 1@50' 1@35' 21' CS W/ 2'-6'' CAPS X 746 1330 2076
2 11+18/13+09 -L- RT 1@50' 1@35' 21' CS W/ 2'-6'' CAPS X 1647 1647
2 11+18/13+09 -L- RT 1@50' 1@35' 21' CS W/ 2'-6'' CAPS X 1206 1733 2939
5610 3541 9151 00000
NOTES:
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 3 OF 3
ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE
2/25/2020
ZONE 2
(ft2)
ZONE 1
(ft2)
TOTAL
(ft2)
ZONE 2
(ft2)
ZONE 1
(ft2)
TOTAL
(ft2)
WAKE COUNTY
17BP.5.R.79
BUFFER
REPLACEMENT
IMPACTS
RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
TOTALS*:
ROAD
CROSSING BRIDGE PARALLEL
IMPACT ZONE 1
(ft2)
ZONE 2
(ft2)
TYPE

Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E-PCN, all you need to do is right-click on the document and you can print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/0/edoc/624704/PCN%20Help%20File%202018-1-30.pdf
County (or Countie s) where the proje ct is locate d:*
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Is this a NCDOT Proje ct?*
(NCDOT only) T.I.P. or state proje ct numbe r:
WBS #*
1a. Type (s) of approv al sought from the Corps:*
1b. What type (s) of pe rmit(s) do you wish to se e k authorization?*
This form may be used to initiate the standard/individual permit process with the Corps. Please contact your Corps representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items that
are not provided in the E-PCN can be added to the miscellaneous upload area located at the bottom of this form.
1c. Has the NWP or GP numbe r be e n v e rifie d by the Corps?*
Nationwide Pe rmit (NWP) Numbe r:
NWP Numbe rs (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type (s) of approv al sought from the DWR:*
1e . Is this notification sole ly for the re cord be cause writte n approv al is not re quire d?
*
For the re cord only for DWR 401 Ce rtification:
For the re cord only for Corps Pe rmit:
1f. Is this an afte r-the -fact pe rmit application?*
A. Processing Information
Wake
Yes No
This is any publicly funded by municipal,state or federal funds road, rail, airport transportation project.
Yes No
17BP.5.R.79
(for NCDOT use only)
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
Yes No
03 - Maintenance
List all NW numbers you are applying for not on the drop dow n list.
check all that apply
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit Riparian Buffer Authorization
Individual Permit
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
1g. Is payme nt into a mitigation bank or in-lie u fe e program propose d for mitigation of impacts?
Acce ptance Le tte r Attachme nt
1h. Is the proje ct locate d in any of NC's twe nty coastal countie s?*
1j. Is the proje ct locate d in a de signate d trout wate rshe d?*
Link to trout information: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
1c. Primary Contact Phone :*
1d. Who is applying for the pe rmit?*
1e . Is the re an Age nt/Consultant for this proje ct?*
2. Owner Information
1a. Name of proje ct:*
1b. Subdivision name :
1c. Ne are st municipality / town:*
If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program.
Yes No
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
FILE TYPE MUST BE PDF
Yes No
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
Christopher Murray
[e-mail]
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
(Check all that apply)
Yes No
2a. Name (s) on re corde d de e d:*
2b. De e d book and page no.:
2c. Re sponsible party:
2d. Addre ss *
2e . Te le phone Numbe r:*
2f. Fax Numbe r:
2g. Email Addre ss:*
Elizabeth Anderson Beckert, BW & G Group, LLC, William M. Womble, Jr.
(for Corporations)
North Carolina Department of Transportation
City
Durham
State / Province / Region
NC
Postal / Zip Code
27704
Country
USA
Street Address
2612 N. Duke Street
Address Line 2
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[e-mail]
C. Project I nformation and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
Replacement of Bridge 216 over Buffalo Creek on SR 2366 (Old Battle Bridge Road)
(if appropriate)
Wendell
2. Project Identification
2a. Prope rty Identification Numbe r:2b. Prope rty size :
2c. Proje ct Addre ss
2d. Site coordinate s in de cimal de gre e s
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits (unless you are using a survey-grade GPS device) after the decimal place as appropriate, based on how the location was
determined. (For example, most mobile phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal place.)
Latitude :*Longitude :*
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the ne are st body of wate r to propose d proje ct:*
3b. Wate r Re source s Classification of ne are st re ce iv ing wate r:*
Surface Water Lookup
3c. What riv e r basin(s) is your proje ct locate d in?*
3d. Ple ase prov ide the 12-digit HUC in which the proje ct is locate d.*
River Basin Lookup
4. Project Description and History
4a. De scribe the e xisting conditions on the site and the ge ne ral land use in the v icinity of the proje ct at the time of this application:*
4b. Hav e Corps pe rmits or DWR ce rtifications be e n obtained for this project (including all prior phase s) in the past?*
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 e xce rpt from the most re ce nt v e rsion of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the proje ct site . (for DWR)
4e . Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 e xce rpt from the most re ce nt v e rsion of the publishe d County NRCS Soil Surv e y map de picting the proje ct site . (for DWR)
4f. List the total e stimate d acre age of all e xisting we tlands on the prope rty:
4g. List the total e stimate d line ar fe e t of all e xisting stre ams on the prope rty:
4h. Explain the purpose of the propose d proje ct:*
4i. De scribe the ov e rall proje ct in de tail, including indirect impacts and the type of e quipme nt to be use d:*
4j. Ple ase upload proje ct drawings for the propose d proje ct.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
(tax PIN or parcel ID)
1774653625; 1774761247 and 1774665953
(in acres)
3.54
City
Wendell
State / Province / Region
North Carolina
Postal / Zip Code
27591
Country
USA
Street Address
622 Old Battle Bridge Road
Address Line 2
35.79896
ex: 34.208504
-78.40464
-77.796371
Buffalo Creek
B; NSW 27-57-16-(2)
Neuse
030202011502
Existing land use is all wooded land in the nearby vicinity of the bridge. The existing bridge and adjacent roadway have been closed since 2011.
Yes No Unknown
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
17BP.5.R.79 USGS topo map.pdf 1.25MB
File type must be pdf
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
17BP.5.R.79 Wake County Soil Survey map.pdf 1.39MB
File type must be pdf
0.06
(intermittent and perennial)
275 feet
Replacement of structurally deficient bridge currently closed to traffic.
Project will involve removal and demolition of existing bridge with timber vertical abutments. The existing bridge is a 2 @ 25.3 foot timber floor on salvaged I-beams with timber caps on
timber piles and abutments. The proposed structure is a 1 @ 50 foot and 1 @ 35 foot 21-inch cored slab with 2.5 foot caps. Interior structural component comprised of drilled shaft
bents. Equipment will include grader, bull dozer, excavator, mini excavator, crane, etc.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
File type must be pdf
5a. Hav e the we tlands or streams be e n de line ate d on the prope rty or propose d impact are as?*
Comme nts:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional de te rmination, what type of de te rmination was made ?*
Corps AID Numbe r:
5c. If 5a is ye s, who de line ate d the jurisdictional are as?
Name (if known):
Age ncy/Consultant Company:
Othe r:
5d. List the date s of the Corp jurisdiction de te rmination or State de te rmination if a de te rmination was made by the Corps or DWR.
5d1. Jurisdictional de te rmination upload
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phase d proje ct?*
Are any othe r NWP(s), re gional ge ne ral pe rmit(s), or indiv idual pe rmits(s) use d, or intende d to be use d, to authorize any part of the propose d project or re lated activ ity? This
include s othe r se parate and distant crossing for line ar proje cts that re quire De partme nt of the Army authorization but don’t re quire pre -construction notification.
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Whe re are the impacts associate d with your proje ct? (che ck all that apply):
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
"W." will be use d in the table be low to re pre se nt the word "wetland".
2a. Site #*(?)2a1 Reason *(?)2b. Impact type *(?)2c. Type of W.*2d. W. name *2e . Fore ste d *2f. Type of
Jurisdicition *(?)
2g. Impact
are a *
2g. Total Te mporary We tland Impact
2g. Total Pe rmane nt We tland Impact
2g. Total We tland Impact
2h. Comme nts:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted.
Yes No Unknown
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Example: SAW-2017-99999
SAW-2017-00853
Heather Smith and David Cooper
Ecological Engineering (now part of VHB)
September 27, 2017
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
17BP.5.R.79 Wake PJD.pdf 128.36KB
17BP.5.R.79 Wake PJD form.pdf 129.93KB
17BP.5.R.79 approved Jurisdictional Features Wake216.pdf 3.14MB
File type must be PDF
Yes No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
Wetlands Streams-tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
1 Roadway fill P Riverine Swamp Forest Perm Fill Yes Both 0.020
(acres)
1 Mechanized clearing P Riverine Swamp Forest Mech Fill Yes Both 0.040
(acres)
0.000
0.060
0.060
Project results in 0.02 ac permanent fill in wetland and 0.04 ac mechanized clearing in wetland.
"S." will be used in the table below to represent the word "stream".
3a. Reason for impact *(?)3b.Impact type *3c. Type of impact *3d. S. name *3e . Stre am Type *
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction *
3g. S. width *3h. Impact
le ngth *
S1
S2
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government.
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square fe e t:
3i. Total pe rmane nt stre am impacts:
3i. Total te mporary stre am impacts:
3i. Total stre am and ditch impacts:
3j. Comme nts:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts below.
6a. Proje ct is in which prote ct basin(s)?*
6b. Impact Type *(?)6c. Pe r or Te mp *(?)6d. Stre am name *6e . Buffer mitigation re quire d?*6f. Zone 1 impact *6g. Zone 2 impact *
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Te mporary impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Pe rmane nt impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combine d buffe r impacts:
6i. Comme nts:
Supporting Docume ntation - i.e . Impact M aps, Plan She e t, e tc.
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Spe cifically de scribe me asure s take n to av oid or minimize the propose d impacts in de signing the proje ct:*
Bank Stabilization Permanent Bank Stabilization Buffalo Creek Perennial Both 30
Average (feet)
93
(linear feet)
Temporary Dewatering Temporary Dewatering Buffalo Creek Perennial Both 30
Average (feet)
104
(linear feet)
0
93
104
197
Note that existing channel impacts permanent and existing channel impacts temporary are coincident.
Check all that apply.
Neuse Tar-Pamlico
Catawba Randleman
Goose Creek Jordan Lake
Other
Allowable P Buffalo Creek No 5,610
(square feet)
3,541
(square feet)
0.00 0.00
5,610.00 3,541.00
5,610.00 3,541.00
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
910216_Permit Drawings_20200225.pdf 2.13MB
910216_Permit Drawings_BUFFER_20200225.pdf 924.14KB
File must be PDF
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
Fill slopes have been steepened to 2:1 in wetlands to minimize impacts. Only the smallest amount of wetland and stream impact has been permitted to
construct a stable roadway and bridge. The temporary causeway was sized to provide minimal access to install the interior drilled shafts.
1b. Spe cifically de scribe me asure s take n to av oid or minimize the propose d impacts through construction te chnique s:*
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Doe s the proje ct re quire Compe nsatory M itigation for impacts to Wate rs of the U.S. or Wate rs of the State ?
2b. If this proje ct DOES NOT re quire Compe nsatory M itigation, e xplain why:
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington District's RIBITS website.
*** Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section .***
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Doe s the proje ct include or is it adjace nt to prote cte d riparian buffers ide ntifie d within one of the NC Riparian Buffe r Prote ction Rule s?
1b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts re quire diffuse flow or othe r form of stormwate r treatme nt. If the proje ct is subje ct to a state imple me nte d riparian buffe r prote ction
program, include a plan that fully docume nts how diffuse flow will be maintaine d.
All Stormwate r Control M e asure s (SCM )s must be de signe d in accordance with the NC Stormwate r De sign M anual. Associate d supple me nt forms and othe r docume ntation shall be
prov ide d.
What type of SCM are you prov iding?
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
Diffuse Flow Docume ntation
2. Stormw ater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT proje ct subje ct to compliance with NCDOT’s Indiv idual NPDES pe rmit NCS000250?*
Comme nts:
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Doe s the proje ct inv olv e an e xpe nditure of public (fe de ral/state /local) funds or the use of public (fe de ral/state ) land?*
1b. If you answe re d “ye s” to the abov e , doe s the proje ct re quire pre paration of an e nv ironme ntal docume nt pursuant to the re quireme nts of the National or State (North Carolina)
Env ironme ntal Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
1c. If you answe re d “ye s” to the abov e , has the docume nt re v ie w be e n finalize d by the State Cle aring House ? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approv al le tte r.)*
Comme nts:*
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in v iolation of DWR Wate r Quality Ce rtification Rule s (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolate d We tland Rule s (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Wate r or We tland Standards or
Riparian Buffe r Rule s (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Measures to minimize construction of impervious dikes and temporary causeways will be determined in the field based on existing field conditions. Only
the smallest amount of fill necessary to construct a stable roadway and bridge will be allowed during construction of this project.
Yes No
Stream, wetland and riparian buffer impacts to not reach thresholds to require mitigation for this bridge replacement project.
F. Stormwater M anagement and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
Yes No
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
(check all that apply)
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
910216 Stormwater Management Plan.pdf 104.52KB
File type must be PDF
Yes No
Yes
G. Supplementary Information
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist does not get sent to the State Clearing House.
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this proje ct (base d on past and re asonably anticipate d future impacts) re sult in additional de v e lopme nt, which could impact ne arby downstre am wate r quality?*
3b. If you answe re d “no,” prov ide a short narrativ e de scription.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is se wage disposal re quire d by DWR for this proje ct?*
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this proje ct occur in or ne ar an are a with fe de rally prote cte d spe cie s or habitat?*
5b. Hav e you che cke d with the USFWS conce rning Endange re d Spe cie s Act impacts?*
5c. If ye s, indicate the USFWS Fie ld Office you hav e contacte d.
5d. Is anothe r Fe de ral age ncy inv olv e d?*
5e . Is this a DOT proje ct locate d within Div ision's 1-8?*
5j. What data source s did you use to de te rmine whe the r your site would impact Endange re d Spe cie s or De signate d Critical Habitat?*
Consultation Docume ntation Upload
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this proje ct occur in or ne ar an are a de signate d as an Esse ntial Fish Habitat?*
6b. What data source s did you use to de te rmine whe the r your site would impact an Esse ntial Fish Habitat?*
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this proje ct occur in or ne ar an are a that the state , fe de ral or tribal gov e rnme nts hav e de signate d as hav ing historic or cultural pre se rv ation status (e .g., National Historic
Trust de signation or prope rtie s significant in North Carolina history and archae ology)?*
7b. What data source s did you use to de te rmine whe the r your site would impact historic or arche ological re source s?*
7c. Historic or Pre historic Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEM A Floodplain M aps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this proje ct occur in a FEM A-designate d 100-ye ar floodplain?*
Yes No
The purpose of this project is to replace a structurally deficient bridge. The roadway and bridge have been designed to allow for two way traffic with a
left turning lane on the bridge deck at the intersection. The Department has recently been advised of a large proposed development (multiple homes)
on the Elizabeth Anderson Beckert property. This development has not had a significant impact on the project design.
Yes No N/A
Yes No
Yes No
Raleigh
Yes No Unknown
Yes No
Use of the Revised Programmatic Biological/Conference Opinion for Bridge and Culvert Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North
Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8 (September 11, 2019), on-site surveys for Michaux's sumac, aquatic mussels, Neuse River waterdog, Carolina
madtom, RCW and Bald eagle.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
File type must be PDF
Yes No
Available mapping.
Yes No
Consultation with Renee-Gledhill Early (State Historic Preservation Office representative), Shelby Reap (NCDOT) and Shane Petersen (NCDOT). The
project as designed will result in No Adverse Effect to the Hood-Anderson Farm (WA2021). Also, coordination with the Catawba Indian Nation.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
16-09-0011_UpdatedEffectsSigned.pdf 6.39MB
AR16-09-0011NoSitesPresentRevisit2.pdf 25.86MB
Catawba Indian Nation letter.pdf 248.7KB
File must be PDF
Yes No
8b. If ye s, e xplain how proje ct me e ts FEM A require me nts:
8c. What source (s) did you use to make the floodplain de te rmination?*
Comme nts
M isce llane ous attachme nts not pre v iously re que ste d.
*
I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a “transaction” subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the “Uniform Electronic Transactions Act”);
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the “Uniform Electronic Transactions Act”);
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name :*
Signature
Date
Project has been designed using Detailed methods.
NCDOT Stormwater Management Plan
M iscellaneous
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Environmental summary for USACE.pdf 131.66KB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
Christopher A. Murray
2/25/2020

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT

Action Id. SAW-2017-00853 County: Wake County U.S.G.S. Quad: Knightdale

GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION

Permittee: Chris Murray
NC Department of Transportation
Address: 2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, North Carolina 27704
Telephone Number: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Size (acres) 3.54 (approximately) Nearest Town Knightdale
Nearest Waterway Buffalo Creek River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates Latitude: 35.798964
Longitude: -78.404587

Location description: The site is located along SR 2366 (Old Battle Bridge Road) over Buffalo Creek at NCDOT Bridge #216 in
Wake County, North Carolina. The site is approximately 200 feet northeast of the Old Tarboro Road, Old Battlebridge Road
intersection.

Description of projects area and activity: This authorization is for the permanent and temporary discharge of clean fill material
associated with an existing bridge replacement project. Permanent impacts include the placement of rip rap within 93 linear
feet of stream channel for bank stabilization, the placement of fill within 0.02 acre wetland for roadway fill and 0.04 acre of
wetland for mechanized land clearing. Temporary impacts are within 104 linear feet of stream channel and are associated
with dewatering activities and the construction of a temporary causeway (see attached plans).

Applicable Law: Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)

Authorization: Regional General Permit Number and/or Nationwide Permit Number: 3: Maintenance

SEE ATTACHED RGP or NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS

Special Conditions:
1. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS’s) Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) titled, “NCDOT Program
Effects on the Northern Long-eared Bat in Divisions 1-8”, dated November 6, 2020, contains agreed upon
conservation measures for the NLEB. As noted in the PBO, applicability of these conservation measures varies
depending on the location of the project. Your authorization under this Department of the Army permit is conditional
upon your compliance with all applicable conservation measures in the PBO, which are incorporated by reference in
this permit. Failure to comply with the applicable conservation measures would constitute non-compliance with your
Department of the Army permit. The USFWS is the appropriate authority to determine compliance with the terms
and conditions of its PBO, and with the ESA.

2. Historic Properties: The Permittee shall fully implement the List of Environmental Commitments between the
Permittee and the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer recorded on Page 1 of the Historic Architecture
and Landscapes Assessment of Effects Form dated March 12, 2019. The Specific Environmental Commitments are:

2-bar metal rail
Limit Tree Clearing
Place crane outside historic boundary.

Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted application and attached information dated February 25, 2020 and including additional
information provided on April 4, 2020 and December 14, 2021. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your
submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, a Class I administrative penalty, and/or
appropriate legal action.

This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide and/or regional general permit
authorization is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide and/or regional
general permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below,
provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide and/or regional general permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and
conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under contract to
commence in reliance upon the nationwide and/or regional general permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide and/or regional general permit’s expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.

Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.

For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone].

This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.

If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Andrew Williams at [phone] or [e-mail].

Corps Regulatory Official: ___________________________ Date: January 13, 2022
Expiration Date of Verification: March 18, 2022

A. Determination of Jurisdiction:

1. There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction. Please note, if work is authorized by either a general or nationwide permit, and you wish to request an appeal of an
approved JD, the appeal must be received by the Corps and the appeal process concluded prior to the commencement of any
work in waters of the United States and prior to any work that could alter the hydrology of waters of the United States.

2. There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC §
1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.

3. There are waters, including wetlands, within the above described project area that are subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

4. A jurisdiction determination was not completed with this request. Therefore, this is not an appealable action. However, you
may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps for further instruction.

5. The aquatic resources within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
the preliminary jurisdictional determination issued September 27, 2017. Action ID: SAW-2017-00853.

B. Basis For Jurisdictional Determination: N/A. An Approved JD has not been completed.

C. Remarks: none

D. Attention USDA Program Participants

Date: 2022.01.13
12:41:12 -05'00'

This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps’ Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.

E. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in A2 and A3 above).

If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:

US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Philip Shannin, Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not Applicable.

It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.

Corps Regulatory Official: ______________________________________________________
Andrew Williams

Date of JD: September 27, 2017

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0.

Date: 2022.01.13 12:41:59
-05'00'

+DQG ([LVWLQJ ([LVWLQJ
3HUPDQHQW 7HPS ([FDYDWLRQ 0HFKDQL]HG &OHDULQJ 3HUPDQHQW 7HPS&KDQQHO &KDQQHO 1DWXUDO
6LWH 6WDWLRQ 6WUXFWXUH )LOO,Q )LOO,Q LQ &OHDULQJ LQ 6: 6: ,PSDFWV ,PSDFWV 6WUHDP
1R )URP7R 6L]H7\SH :HWODQGV :HWODQGV :HWODQGV LQ:HWODQGV :HWODQGV LPSDFWV LPSDFWV 3HUPDQHQW 7HPS 'HVLJQ
   DF DF DF DF DF DF DF IW IW IW
 WR/ #
#

&6:


&$36         
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
727$/6
          

5RXQGHGWRWDOVDUHVXPRIDFWXDOLPSDFWV
127(6 ([LVWLQJ&KDQQHO,PSDFWV3HUPDQHQWDQG([LVWLQJ&KDQQHO,PSDFWV7HPSDUHFRLQFLGHQW
5HYLVHG)HESHEET OF 6






:(7/$1'$1'685$&(:$7(5,03$&766800$5<
:(7/$1',03$&76 685)$&(:$7(5,03$&76
WAKE
17BP.5.R.79

NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
02/25/2020

Action ID Number: SAW-2017-00853 County: Wake County

Permittee: Chris Murray
NC Department of Transportation

Project Name: NCDOT/SR 2366/Old Tarboro Rd/BR216/Division5

Date Verification Issued: January 13, 2022

Project Manager: Andrew Williams

Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: Andrew Williams
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587

Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.

I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.

_______________________________________ ______________________
Signature of Permittee Date

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Chris Murray NC Department of
Transportation

File Number: SAW-2017-00853 Date: January 13, 2022
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
x ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
x OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
x ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
x APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
x ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
x APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division,
Attn: Andrew Williams
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, FLOOR M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
Phone: [phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail]

RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.

________________________________________
Signature of appellant or agent.
Date: Telephone number:

For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:

Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, FLOOR M9, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
Phone: [phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail]

1 Updated 1/20/22

North Carolina Department of Transportation
NEPA/SEPA Consultation Form

STIP Project No. N/A
WBS Element 17BP.5.PE.79
Federal Aid Project No. N/A

A. Project Description, Location, and Purpose:

Project Location: Bridge No. 216 on SR 2366 (Old Battle Bridge Road) over Buffalo Creek in
Wake County.

Project Description: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes
bridge replacement of Bridge No. 216 on SR 2366 (Old Battle Bridge Road) over Buffalo Creek
in Wake County. The purpose of the proposed project is to replace a structurally deficient
bridge.

Bridge No. 216 was constructed in 1957. The two-span bridge is 51 feet long with a deck width
of 25 feet. The structure type is timber floor on salvaged I-Beams. NCDOT Bridge
Management Unit records indicate Bridge No. 216 has a sufficiency rating of 26.64 as of
February 22, 2021.

Bridge No. 216 will be replaced in-place. The bridge is currently closed (closed in 2010); local
traffic is diverted to an off-site detour. The proposed structure would be an 87.38-foot long two-
span cored slab bridge. The bridge typical section is two 11-foot lanes with a 10-foot center
turn lane, approximately four-foot bridge offset, and an eight-foot wide accommodation for
future multi-use path on the south side of the bridge. The proposed design speed is 40 mph.
The project length is approximately 600 feet.

Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements: US Army Corps of Engineer (USACE)
Nationwide Permit No. 3, NC Department of Water Resources (NCDWR) Section 401 Water
Quality Certification 4132, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Permit

B. Consultation Phase: (Check one)

☐ Right-of-Way
☒ Construction
☐ Other: Identify the trigger – (e.g., design change, change in impacts)

C. NEPA/SEPA Class of Action Initially Approved as: (Check one)

☒ SEPA MCDC October 21, 2019

2 Updated 1/20/22

D. Changes in Proposed Action & Environmental Consequences:
Minor design changes have occurred since the Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist
(MCDC) on May 22, 2018. The project length has decreased from 800 feet to 600 feet, and
bridge offsets have been added instead of shoulders. Utility impacts have been reviewed
with the utility owners and environmental agencies. It was determined that the recent
revisions to the utility plans do not result in any changes to previously permitted wetland,
stream, or riparian buffer impacts.

The list of protected species has changed since the previous Categorical Exclusion was
completed. Information regarding Environmental Permits and Protected Species are listed
below.

Environmental Permits
The NC DEQ DWR provided a 401 Water Quality Certification and Neuse Buffer
Authorization, with additional conditions on March 2, 2020 (DWQ Project Number
20200306). The USACE issued Nationwide Permit Number 3 on May 13, 2020 with an
expiration date of verification on January 13, 2022 (USACE Action ID Number SAW -2017-
00853). Work in waters of the United States is authorized under this permit until March 18,
2023. The Division 5 Environmental Officer will be required to monitor construction and
request a permit reverification if necessary from the USACE.

Protected Species
The list of protected species has changed since the previous MCDC was completed. Below
is a table of protected species for Wake County and their current status:

Name Habitat
Present
Status Final Biological
Conclusion
Info Source or
Note
Bald eagle No Bald and Golden Eagle
Prot. Act
No Effect 1
Northern long-eared bat No Threatened MA-LAA 1,4
Carolina madtom* Yes Endangered No Effect 3,7,8
Carolina madtom Critical
Habitat
No Endangered Not Applicable
Neuse River waterdog* Yes Threatened No Effect 3,7,8
Neuse River waterdog
Critical Habitat
No Threatened Not Applicable
Atlantic pigtoe* No Threatened No Effect 2,3,7,8
Atlantic pigtoe Critical
Habitat
No Threatened Not Applicable
Dwarf wedgemussel* Yes Endangered No Effect 1,2,3,7,8
Tar River spinymussel* No Endangered No Effect 3,7,8
Yellow lance* Yes Threatened No Effect 1,2,3,7,8
Yellow lance Critical
Habitat
No Threatened Not Applicable
Cape Fear shiner No Endangered No Effect 3
Red-cockaded
woodpecker*
Yes Endangered No Effect 1,5
Michaux’s sumac No Endangered No Effect 1,6

Information Source or Note:

3 Updated 1/20/22

1. Natural Resources Technical Report (NCDOT, August 2017)
2. Freshwater Mussel Survey Report (NCDOT, November 29, 2017)
3. Aquatic Species Survey Report (NCDOT, October 31, 2019)
4. Programmatic Biological Opinion-NCDOT Program Effects on the Northern Long-eared
Bat in Divisions 1-8 (USFWS, November 6, 2020)
5. Red-cockaded woodpecker Update Memo (NCDOT, March 26, 2021)
6. Michaux’s sumac update (NCDOT, June 18, 2021)
7. NCDOT email request to USFWS for aquatic species concurrence (December 9, 2021)
8. USFWS response to request for aquatic species concurrence (December 14, 2021)
9. IPaC species potentially affected by activities at the project are indicated by an asterisk.

Northern long-eared bat
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has revised the previous
programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and NCDOT fo r the
northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern North Carolina. The
PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT projects and
activities. Although this programmatic covers Divisions 1-8, NLEBs are currently only
known to occur in 30 counties within Divisions 1-8. NCDOT, FHWA, and USACE have
agreed to two conservation measures which will avoid/minimize mortality of NLEBs. These
conservation measures only apply to the 30 current known/potential counties sh own on
Figure 2 of the PBO at this time. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the
NCDOT program is May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect. The PBO provides incidental
take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act for ten years for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in Divisions 1-8,
which includes Wake County, where 17BP.5.R.79 is located. Currently the 30 counties
where NLEBs are known to occur does not include Wake County; accordingly,
environmental commitments (i.e. Measures to Avoid/Minimize Mortality) for this species
are not required for this project. This level of incidental take is authorized from the effective
date of a final listing determination through December 31, 2030.

Cultural Resources: The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) provided an updated
Assessment of Effects form dated March 12, 2019 (attached) verifying that the National
Register listed Hood-Anderson Farm property is still the only property in the project area
eligible for the National Register listing. The following project commitments are still
required: 2-bar rail, limited tree clearing, replacement of crane outside of historic
boundary.

Catawba Indian Nation: NCDOT submitted a letter on September 19, 2019 to the Catawba
Nation (CIN) informing them of the project and results of the archaeological study report.
The CIN responded on October 22, 2019 and indicated no immediate concerns with
regard to traditional cultural properties, sacred sites, or Native American archaeological
sites within the boundaries of the proposed project area ; CIN is to be notified if “Native
American artifacts and/or human remains are located during the ground disturbance phase
of this project.”

Complete Streets: NCDOT’s Division 5 submitted a Phase 3 Complete Streets review
request to the Integrated Mobility Division (IMD) on November 4, 2021. The IMD group
concluded their review on December 20, 2021 and provided a complete streets project
scoping recommendation letter and the signed complete streets project sheet. IMD
concurs that an 8-foot sidewalk should be built in conjunction with this project along with 4 -
foot paved shoulders on both sides of the roadway. The accommodations will complement

4 Updated 1/20/22

the planning efforts and local plans that call for greenways and multimodal connections,
while also balancing environmental and design constraints. Proper transitions and signage
announcing to users that the path narrows on the bridge were recommended by IMD.

E. Conclusion:
The above NEPA/SEPA documentation has been reevaluated (as required by either 23
CFR 771 or by NC General Statute Chapter 113A Article 1). It has been determined that
the current proposed action is essentially the same as the original proposed action.
Proposed changes, if any, are noted in Section D. It has been determined that anticipated
social, economic, and environmental impacts were accurately described in the abo ve
referenced document(s) unless noted otherwise herein. Therefore, the original
Administration Action remains valid.

F. Coordination
NCDOT personnel have discussed the current project parameters with qualified NCDOT
representatives and FHWA (where applicable). The NCDOT Project Manager, Lisa Bullard-
Gilchrist, EI, hereby verifies the involvement of the following staff and the incorporation of
their technical input:

Design Engineer: Andrew Young, PE (Stewart) 12/06/2021
Environmental Specialist: Chris Murray, SPWS (NCDOT) 1/13/2022
Hydraulics Engineer: Reid Robol, PE (VHB) 12/06/2021
Other:

G. Consultation Approval for NCDOT Project 17BP.5.PE.79

Prepared By:

Date Harrison Wenchell, Transportation Planning Team Lead
Stewart

Prepared For: Lisa Bullard Gilchrist, EI
NCDOT, Bridge Program Manager

Reviewed By:

Date Chris Murray, SPWS
Project Engineer for Planning and Environmental Services
NCDOT, Division 5
☒ Approved In adherence with 23 CFR 771 (NEPA) or NC General Statute
Chapter 113A Article 1 (SEPA), NCDOT approves this Consultation.
or
1/20/2022
1/20/2022

5 Updated 1/20/22

☐ Certified NCDOT staff certifies if FHWA signature was previously required or
where changes have resulted in FHWA signature being required.

Date Tracy Parrot, P.E.
NCDOT Division 5, Deputy Division Engineer

FHWA Approved: FHWA signature required for Type I(B) CE, Type II(B) CE, Type III
CE, FONSI or ROD.

N/A
Date John F. Sullivan, III, PE, Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
1/21/2022

6 Updated 1/20/22

H. Project Commitments (as of January 2022)

Wake County
Bridge No. 216 on SR 2366 (Old Battle Bridge Road) over Buffalo Creek
WBS No. 17BP.5.PE.79

All commitments developed during the project development and design phase for the project
are listed below.

NCDOT Hydraulics Unit:

FEMA
The project may encroach but will not adversely affect the FEMA -regulated stream. The
Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with FEMA to determine if a Conditional Letter of Map
Revision (CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) are required
for the project.

The project has received a MOA designation from the Hydraulics Unit and FMP. The MOA has
been approved.

NCDOT Division 5:

Historic Architecture
NCDOT will avoid and minimize potential adverse effects by including in final design plans
project commitments as part of the finding of “No Adverse Effect” for the project and National
Register listed Hood-Anderson Farm property:
• 2-bar metal railing
• Limited tree clearing
• Placement of crane outside of historic boundary

NCDOT Division 5 Construction:

FEMA
If a CLOMR and subsequent final LOMR are required for the project, NCDOT will submit
sealed as-built construction plans to the Hydraulics Unit upon project completion certifying that
the project was built as shown on construction plans.

This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to the FEMA -regulated stream.
Therefore, the Division shall submit sealed As-built construction plans to the Hydraulics Unit
upon completion of the project, certifying that the stream crossi ng structure and roadway
embankment that are located within the 100-year floodplain were built as shown in the
construction plans, both horizontally and vertically.

The project has received a MOA designation from the Hydraulics Unit and FMP. The MOA has
been approved.

7 Updated 1/20/22

Historic Architecture
NCDOT will provide construction contractors the following project commitments as part of the
“No Adverse Effect” finding for the project and National Register listed Hood-Anderson Farm
property:
• 2-bar metal railing
• Limited tree clearing
• Placement of crane outside of historic boundary

Environmental
The USACE issued Nationwide Permit Number 3 on January 13, 2022 with an expiration date
of verification on March 18, 2022 (USACE Action ID Number SAW-2017-00853). Work in
waters of the United States is authorized under this permit until March 18, 2023. The Division 5
Environmental Officer will be required to monitor construction and request a permit
reverification if necessary from the USACE.

8 Updated 1/20/22

9 Updated 1/20/22