20141126 Ver 1_Email_20141215

Wanucha, Dave
From:
Euliss, Amy
Sent:
Monday, December 15, 2014 3:11 PM
To:
Wanucha, Dave; John T Thomas JR SAW
Cc:
Blanton, William A; Harmon, Beth
Subject:
RE: W -5209F - Structure Question
Attachments:
404 and 401 permits for W5209F Forsyth.pdf, 20141215_W5209F_Permit Package.pdf
Dave,
Please keep the revised drawings for your file. I don't think we need to revise the 401, since permanent impact totals
haven't changed. Let me know if you have any questions.
From: Euliss, Amy
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 6:28 PM
To: Wanucha, Dave; John T Thomas JR SAW
Subject: Fwd: W -5209F - Structure Question
Make that 9 additional feet not four. I send along a revised plan when I receive it.
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Cail, William G" <gcail @ncdot.gov>
Date: December 10, 2014 at 4:01:13 PM EST
To: "Euliss, Amy" <aeuliss @ncdot.gov >, "Blanton, William A" <wablanton @ncdot.gov>
Subject: RE: W -5209F - Structure Question
Disregard prior email and "rev" permit. Evidently I was not using Structures correct extension
numbers. It will be about 9' additional ...... another permit is on the way.
From: Euliss, Amy
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 8:00 AM
To: Cail, William G; Blanton, William A
Subject: RE: W -5209F - Structure Question

Okay. I'll also need a statement as to why Structures needs the additional 10' of culvert that I can
include inmy modification request. I'll have to submit a modification request which can take upto6O
days.
-Amy
From: Cai[ William G
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 7:46 AV
To: Blanton, William A; Eu|iss Amy
Subject: FVV: VV-52O9F- Structure Question
Guessthismeanstheyvehfied --'soundsUkevveUneedtomodifypermit Will be about 1Yadditional
of box.
From: Davenport, Donald
Sent: Monday December 08, 20147:30 AM
To: [ai|, William G
Subject: RE: W-5209F - Structure Question
Galen,
That's what it looks like tous.
Andre
From: Cai[ William G
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 7:18 AM
To: Davenport, Donald
Subject:FW: W-52O9F- Structure Question
Wanted to check on Structures determined length of culvert extension. Structures determined length is
about 1O'longer. I am fine if we need to lengthen, we'll just likely have to update permit impacts. Can
you verify?
From: Blanton William
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 2:00 PM
To: [ai|, William G
Subject: VV-52O9F- Structure Question
Galen,
Hope you had a good Thanksgiving. VVe finally received the structure plans for this one and noticed a
slight variance between Hydn/srendition. There is always some difference, but in this case the length
of culvert is approximately 10' longer in the structure plans (which affects 10' more of stream). | know

the permit and everything associated with itis based on the original layout. What doyou
recommend? | haven't spoken with Amy yet; | wanted to check with you first. Please refer tothe
attachment: red lines are original and purple lines are new (minus wing vxa||s).
Thanks,
Al
smallomrr*qwna*ncwm and nnmmImeona*,immuNwommww o puumpZcon:JmI mw and may u*aimmmwammIrdpmmwm