20210986 Ver 2_W-5601EY Permit Package Supporting Information - REV 11012022_20221101

REVISED
November 1,
2022
W-5601 EY
Pre -Construction
Notification
Supporting
Information
Table of Content
-Maps and figures: Pages 2-4
-Environmental project commitments for aquatic species: Pages 5-6
-Coordination with USFWS regarding project for aquatic species:
Pages 7-17
-Recent survey results for federally protected species: Pages 8-24
-NCDEQ DWR Determination of applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules
and Mitigation Rules (July 22, 2019) Pages 25-26
-USACE Jurisdictional Determination (February 11, 2021): Pages
26-35
-Historic Architecture and Landscapes No Survey Required Form:
Pages 36-38
-No Archaeological Survey Required Form: Pages 39-40
-Categorical Exclusion: Pages 42-46
Table of Content -New Nov. 1, 2022
-Catawba Indian Nation information: Page 47
-Mitigation information: Pages 48-49
-Permits from agencies: Pages 50-63
-Permit drawings: Pages 64-79
-Previous PCN electronic copy from 7/28/2021: Pages 80-88
-Consultation 08022022: Pages 89-95

$ � �
9 �
% 2 E F Juniper
North am \ , j#n_w,■a
o in
ƒ ■�� §
£
% 2
5
�
�
�
q,
-
��
� »
�
Project Site
#
ƒ �
a y®
. �
MtPleasant 2w
O ±5 / 1mi
� z
0gburn
Crossroads
}
2
t
FNI
eU
��
N C D O T Division 5
Project Delivery Unit
W-58O]EY
NC 42 at SR 2727(Sabs Road)
Wake Count
Vicinity Map Figure 1

qp "ORTry C�O'
� NCDOT Division 5
Project Delivery Unit
� x
q
9 �
OFTPP
W-5601 EY
NC 42 at SR 2727 (Sauls Road)
Wake County
USGS Topo Map Figure 2

FINAL Construct Eastbound Left Turn Lane on NC 42 at the SR 2727 (Sauls Road)
Intersection
Environmental Commitments
The following "Design Standards in .Sensitive Watersheds" [I SA NCAC 04B. 0124 (b) (eJi are
incorporated into NCDOI'proiects that occur within or upstream of water bodies that contain
federally protected aquatic species. Within the Environmentally Sensitive Areas, the following
shall apply:
-The contractor mayperform clearing operations but not grubbing operations until
immediately prior to beginning grading operations.
-Once grading operations begin in the Environmental Sensitive Areas, work shall progress in a
continuous manner until complete.
-Erosion control devices shall be installed immediately following the clearing operation.
-Seeding and mulching shall be performed on the areas disturbed by construction immediately
followingfnal grade establishment.
-Seeding and mulching shall be done in stages on cut and fill slopes that are greater than 20
feet in height measure alongthe he slope or greater than two acres in area, whichever is less.
The following are additional measures intended to further reduce deleterious
construction related effects to the waterway:
Off -site detours will be utilized to the maximum extent possible.
No heavy equipment will be placed in the stream outside of the impervious dikes installed at the
Little Creek and Unnamed Tributary to Little Creek.
The following documents will be used during design and construction: 1) NCDOT Erosion and
Sediment Control Design and Construction Manual; 2) NCDOT Best Management Practices
for Construction and Maintenance Activities and 3) NCDOT Stormwater Best Management
Practices Toolbox.
Culvert construction activities will have containment measures in place to prevent
components of the structure from dropping into the stream outside of the impervious dike.
The method of containment will be proposed by the contractor and approved by the engineer
as necessary.
Special sediment control fence NCDOT Standard No. 1606.01 or a combination of special
sediment control fence and standard silt fence will be installed between the top of the stream
bank and adjacent grading activities. Once the disturbed areas of the project draining to these
areas have been stabilized, the special sediment control fence and/or standard silt fence and
all built up sediment adjacent to these devices will be removed to natural ground and stabilized

with a native grass mix.
All sedimentation and erosion control measures, throughout the project limits, will be
maintained to ensure proper function of the measures following NCDOT protocols.
Embankment construction and grading shall be managed in such a manner as to prevent
surface runoff/drainage from discharging untreated into the riparian buffer. All interim
surfaces will be graded to drain to temporary erosion control devices. Temporary berms,
ditches, etc. will be incorporated, as necessary, to treat temporary runoff before discharging
into the riparian buffer (as specified in the NCDOT BMP Manual).
All sedimentation and erosion control measures will be appropriately maintained following
NCDOT standards to ensure proper function of the measures. This project must adhere to
conditions of General Permit NCGO1000 to Discharge Stormwater under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System for Construction Activities. The project design and
construction activities are required to "select, install, implement and maintain best
management practices (BMPs) and control measures that minimize pollutants in the discharge
to meet the requirements of the permit." Among these conditions, the permit requires: 1) all
erosion and sedimentation control measures must be inspected at least once every seven
calendar days and 2) within 24 hours after any storm event of greater than 1.0 inch of rain per
24 hour period. It is understood that these requirements and implementation of other
appropriate BMPs are monitored through multiple layers of oversight. At a minimum, the
following personnel monitor erosion control measures:
• Contactor project manager
• NCDOT Division Environmental Officer and Environmental Specialists
• NCDOT Roadside Environmental Field Operations Staff
NCDOT will require utility relocations to utilize directional (horizontal) boring under Little
Creek at the culvert crossing. Open cut (trenching) of the Unnamed Tributary to Little Creek
at the existing 48 inch pipe structure has been determined to be allowable based on
coordination with the USFWS dated July 6, 2021.
In the event that visible sediment loss from the project is observed at the bridge site, a review
of turbidity levels will be made upstream and downstream 400 meters (0.25 mile) to determine
if sedimentation effects are occurring beyond the Action Area as defined in the Biological
Opinion. If visual observation of turbidity levels downstream appear to be elevated beyond
upstream observations, the project inspector will contact the Division Environmental Officer.
If determined that project -related sediment is occurring beyond 400 meters, the USFWS must
be contacted immediately to discuss potential remediation.

yam" O�
C
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER J. ERic BOYETTE
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
July 31, 2020
Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
SUBJECT: Section 7 Concurrence Request for construction of an eastbound left turn lane on
NC 42 at the SR 2727 (Sauls Road) intersection in Wake County (TIP Number:
W-5601EY)
REFERENCE: -Protected Species Survey (NCDOT, July 26, 2018)
-Aquatic Species Survey Report for Widening and Culvert Extension on NC 42
over Little Creek (Three Oaks Engineering for NCDOT, March 28, 2018)
-Michaux's Sumac Update (NCDOT, June 3, 2019)
-W-5601EY construction plans with mark-ups
Dear Sir:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct an eastbound
left turn lane on NC 42 at the SR 2727 (Sauls Road) intersection in Wake County (TIP Number:
W-5601EY). As of today, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists the following federally
Endangered, Threatened and Proposed aquatic species for Wake County that are known to occur
within the Swift Creek -Middle Creek subbasin where the project occurs: Dwarf wedgemussel
(Alasmidonta heterodon), Yellow lance (Elliptio lanceolata), Atlantic pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni),
Carolina madtom (Noturus furiosus) and Neuse River waterdog (Necturus lewisi).
Proiect Information for aquatic species:
Little Creek within the survey reach ranged from 15 to 25 feet wide with banks three to six feet
high and water depths up to four feet. Little Creek at the project site (in the Upper Neuse
subbasin) flows approximately 2.4 river miles to its confluence with Middle Creek.
Construction of this project will result in a culvert extension at Little Creek and pipe structure
replacement and extension at UT to Little Creek. Additional activities associated with this work
include installation of dewatering devices to work in the dry and grading of streambank with
installation of Class II rip rap on the banks to provide permanent stabilization. These activities
will result in surface water impacts and will require permits from the USACE and NCDEQ DWR.
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 5 OFFICE
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704
CS 9 17-27-03
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: ncdot.gov
Location:
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704

Aquatic Species Survevs:
Aquatic Species Survey Report for Widening and Culvert Extension on NC 42 over Little
Creek for W-5601EY (Three Oaks Engineering for NCDOT, March 28, 2018)
-This aquatic species report was provided to assess aquatic habitat in/near Little Creek at the
project site. (Note: The UT to Little Creek at the project site is a moderately impacted and
degraded stream channel that does not provide suitable habitat for protected aquatic species and
was not studied as part of this report.)
-Surveys for freshwater mussels and Carolina madtom were conducted on February 16, 2018.
-Surveys for Neuse River waterdog were completed on February 5-9, 2018.
-A total of 3.2 person hours of survey time were spent in the reach on February 16, 2018 in which
only Eastern Elliptio (Elliptio complanata) were observed.
-Suitable habitat for the Carolina madtom was present in the reach; however, the species was not
observed during the study.
-The Neuse River waterdog was not found at the project during the survey efforts.
Proposed Biological Conclusions:
The results indicate that the study area supports a freshwater mussel fauna of Eastern Elliptio; no
other mussel species were found. Neither the Dwarf wedgemussel, Yellow lance or Atlantic
pigtoe were found during the surveys. While other species were not found during these surveys,
appropriate habitat is present; thus, the presence of additional species cannot be altogether ruled
out. Several of the target species rare specie are known from the receiving stream, Middle Creek.
Based on the survey results, impacts are unlikely to occur in the study area. Strict adherence to
erosion control standards should minimize the potential for any adverse impacts to occur. The
following recommended Biological Conclusions are provided below:
Dwarf wedgemussel: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Yellow lance: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Atlantic pigtoe: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Neuse River waterdog: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Carolina madtom: No Effect
Proiect Information for other species:
Habitat at the project study area is described as including maintained/disturbed community and
mixed pine hardwood community. Suitable at the site does exist for other non -aquatic protected
species. These are discussed below:
Michaux's sumac:
Suitable habitat is present in the margins of sandy open woods with some form of disturbance.
The site was surveyed by Jason Dilday and other NCDOT staff on July 26, 2018 and found
appropriate habitat but no occurrences of Michaux's sumac. Heather Montague and Trey
Lineberry conducted an updated survey on May 30, 2019 which resulted in no observation of this
plant species. The recommended Biological Conclusion is May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely
Affect.
Red -cockaded woodpecker:
Habitat for red -cockaded woodpecker does not exist within the study area. Large mature pines
are present in the study area; however, these areas are crowded by hardwood trees and dense
understories that make the area unsuitable for red -cockaded woodpecker foraging habitat. Roost

trees were also not present within the study area. The recommended Biological Conclusion is No
Effect
Bald eagle:
Habitat for the Bald eagle primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to large bodies of open
water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 mile of
open water. Based on an examination of aerial photographs, no water bodies large enough or
sufficiently open to be considered potential feeding sources were identified within 1.0 mile of the
study area. No bald eagles or nest trees were observed during the survey conducted by Jason
Dilday and other NCDOT staff on July 26, 2018. Due to the lack of suitable habitat, no known
occurrences, and minimal impact anticipated for this project, the recommended Biological
Conclusion is No Effect.
Northern long-eared bat:
The USFWS has developed a Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) in conjunction with the
FHWA and USACE for the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) species. The PBO covers the entire
NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including this project. The Biological Conclusion provided
by the PBO is May Affect. Likely to Adversely Affect. The PBO allows for incidental take
coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act.
This level of incidental take is authorized from the effective date to a final listing determination
through December 31, 2020.
NCDOT believes that the requirements of Section 7 (a) (2) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
have been satisfied and hereby request your concurrence. Thank you for your assistance with this
project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (919)
220-4618 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Christopher A. Murray, SPWS
NCDOT Division 5 Project Engineer for Planning and Environmental Studies

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
August 3, 2020
Christopher A. Murray, PWS
North Carolina Department of Transportation
2612 North Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
Dear Mr. Murray:
U.S.
FISH & WILDL7 FE
SERVICE
� o=
This letter is in response to your letter of July 31, 2020 which provided the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) with the biological conclusion of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation that the proposed construction of an eastbound left turn lane on NC 42 at the SR
2727 intersection in Wake County (STIP No. W-5601EY) may affect, but is not likely to
adversely affect the federally endangered Dwarf Wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) and
Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii), the federally threatened Yellow Lance (Elliptio lanceolata),
and the federally proposed threatened Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni) and Neuse River
Waterdog (Necturus lewisi). The following response is provided in accordance with Section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
The action involves a culvert extension on Little Creek and a pipe replacement and extension on
an unnamed tributary to Little Creek. The tributary to Little Creek does not provide suitable
habitat for any of the listed or proposed listed aquatic species. According to the information
provided, a mussel survey was conducted at the project site on February 16, 2018. The survey
extended from 400 meters downstream to 100 meters upstream of the Little Creek crossing. The
only mussel species observed was the common Elliptio complanata. A survey was conducted for
Neuse River Waterdogs February 5-9, 2018. No Neuse River Waterdogs were captured. Also,
plant surveys were conducted within the project area on July 26, 2018 and May 30, 2019. No
Michaux's Sumac were observed.
Based on available information, the Service concurs with your conclusion that the action may
affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the Dwarf Wedgemussel, Yellow Lance, Atlantic
Pigtoe, Neuse River Waterdog, and Michaux's Sumac. Although the Atlantic Pigtoe and Neuse
River Waterdog are currently only proposed listed species, this concurrence will be valid if and
when these species become officially listed. The Northern Long-eared Bat has previously been
addressed through a separate programmatic consultation. We also concur that the action will
have no effect on all other listed species. We believe that the requirements of Section 7(a)(2) of
the ESA have been satisfied. We remind you that obligations under Section 7 consultation must
be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered in this review; (2) this
action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or (3) a new
species is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by this identified action.

The Service appreciates the opportunity to review this project. If you have any questions
regarding our response, please contact Mr. Gary Jordan at [phone] (Ext. 32).
Sincerely,
bORY �� V
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Electronic copy:
Andy Williams, USACE, Wake Forest, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmoor, NC
Heather Montague, NCDOT, Durham, NC

Murray, Christopher A
From: Jordan, Gary <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 3:00 PM
To: Murray, Christopher A
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Construction of an eastbound left turn lane on NC 42 at the SR 2727
(Sauls Road) intersection in Wake County (TIP Number: W-5601 EY)
F
UTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
port Spam.
Chris,
You are correct in your understanding. This is an appropriate use of the PBO/PCO's.
Gary Jordan
Fish and Wildlife Biologist, Liaison to NCDOT
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Email: [e-mail]
From: Murray, Christopher A <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 10:20 AM
To: Jordan, Gary <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Construction of an eastbound left turn lane on NC 42 at the SR 2727 (Sauls Road) intersection in
Wake County (TIP Number: W-5601EY)
Gary,
We finally have some safety projects coming on line and wanted to check with you again with this specific project
particularly to address aquatic species issues. This project now has a let date of March 2022 which would mean that
construction would likely start in late spring or early summer 2022. 1 am only concerned with this in regards to making a
determination if a new surveys need to be done later this summer for mussels/Carolina madtom and early winter for
Neuse River waterdoe.
The following summarizes information for this project:
The Department is proposing construction of an eastbound left turn lane on NC 42 at the SR 2727 (Sauls Road)
intersection in Wake County (TIP Number: W-5601EY). The project crosses two streams, Little Creek and UT to Little
Creek. Construction of this project will result in a culvert extension at Little Creek and pipe structure replacement and
extension at UT to Little Creek. Additional activities associated with this work include installation of dewatering devices
to work in the dry and grading of streambank with installation of Class II rip rap on the banks to provide permanent
stabilization.
Surveys for aquatic species were conducted by the following individuals on the noted dates:

Surveyor
Surrey Type
Dates
Tom Dickinson Permit # 18-ES00343)
Mussel and CMT*
February lb. 2018
Kate Montieth Sevick (Permit # 18->~ S00485)
NRWD**
Februa 5-9.2018
Mary Frazer
NRWD
February 5-9.2018
Evan Morgan
NRWD
February 5-9.2018
Nancy Scott
NRWD
February 5-9.2018
The following is a summary of the findings:
M I155PI5'
A total of 3.2 person hours of survey time was spent in Little Creek. Only Eastern Elliptio, Asian clam and Pointed
Campeloma were observed during the survey.
rolina madtom:
Appropriate habitat is present for the Carolina madtom; however, the species was not observed during the survey.
Neuse River waterdog:,
The Neuse River waterdog was not observed during the survey.
The USFWS had provided a concurrence letter for protected species on August 3, 2020 and concurred with findings of
May Affect, Not Likely to Affect for Neuse River waterdog, Dwarf wedgemussel, Yellow lance and Atlantic pigtoe. This
concurrence at some level was based on a review of the aquatic species surveys listed above.
The Division would plan on using the mussel PBO/PCO and Neuse River waterdog and Carolina madtom PCO to address
aquatic species for the project. This will be the first use of the PBO/PCOs for project that the Division that involve a
culvert extension (conveying Little Creek). The IPaC site indicates Atlantic pigtoe, Dwarf wedgemussel, Yellow lance,
Carolina madtom and Neuse Rive waterdog at the site (with no listing of critical habitat for any of these species). A
review of current NCDOT EAU information regarding ISRs indicates that the project does intersect an ISR or within 0.25
mi of an ISR for any of these species. Additionally, the project is not located in the Critical Habitat for any of the aquatic
species.
Use of the PBO/PCOs for a culvert extension (Appendix 132) indicate a survey for aquatic species is not required to
develop Biological Conclusions. Division 5 proposes to use the PBO/PCOs to provide BCs of May Affect, Not Likely to
Adversely Affect for the noted aquatic species. The project design and construction will adhere to all commitments
addressed in the PBO/PCO.
Please advise if the Division is correct in our understanding of use of the PBO/PCO in regards to a culvert and pipe
extension on this project. A re-scoping of the ISRs will be done later this summer and early winter to determine if there
are any updates to ISRs for aquatic species.
Thanks,
Chris Murray
Christopher A. Murray, SPWS
Project Engineer for Planning and Environmental Studies
Project Delivery Unit
Division 5
[phone] office **NEW PHONE NUMBER**
[e-mail] **NEW EMAIL ADDRESS**
NCDOT-Division 5

2612 N. Duke Street
Courier: 17-27-03
Durham, NC 27704
From: Jordan, Gary <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 7:51 AM
To: Murray, Christopher A <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Construction of an eastbound left turn lane on NC 42 at the SR 2727 (Sauls Road) intersection in
Wake County (TIP Number: W-5601EY)
External email. ❑o not click links or open attachments unless you verify, Sehd all suspicious email as an attachment to
FM.
Chris,
The question of "shelf life" for a concurrence does not have a specific answer and will vary depending on the
situation. Technically, your aquatic surveys were already slightly out of date, but no problem for this particular
project. For this specific project, I would say that if construction has not started within a year, you should
contact me to determine whether the concurrence is still valid or not. In some cases it may be as simple as me
providing an email stating that your concurrence is still valid because conditions have not changed. In other
potential cases, you may need a new aquatic survey. It will depend mostly on where occurrences of
listed/proposed species are in relation to the project site and on quality of habitat.
Gary Jordan
Fish and Wildlife Biologist, Liaison to NCDOT
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone:[phone] x.32
Email: gwy [e-mail]
From: Murray, Christopher A <camurray@ncdot-gov>
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 4:54 PM
To: Jordan, Gary <gary [e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Construction of an eastbound left turn lane on NC 42 at the SR 2727 (Sauls Road) intersection in
Wake County (TIP Number: W-5601EY)
Gary,
Thanks for clarifying information about the BC for plants. One follow up question is to ask what is the "shelf life" of the
informal concurrence? I only ask because the aquatic surveys were completed in 2018 and plant surveys completed in
both 2018 and in 2019. The let date for all of our projects, including this project, at this time is up in the air. This project
could be constructed this winter or possibly next year or beyond.

LastlV, thank you for your assistance on these proiects sent to you over the last two weeks. 1 hope that my requests
have not placed undue burden on your calendar or work schedule.
Thanks,
Chris
Christopher A. Murray, SPWS
Project Engineer for Planning and Environmental Studies
Project Delivery Unit
Division 5
[phone] office **NEW PHONE NUMBER**
camurray0ncdot.gov **NEW EMAIL ADDRESS**
NCDOT-Division 5
2612 N. Duke Street
Courier: 17-27-03
Durham, NC 27704
r ff A;
�r
From: Jordan, Gary <gary [e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 4:21 PM
To: Murray, Christopher A <[e-mail]>
Cc: Wilson, Travis W. <[e-mail]>; Montague, Heather W <[e-mail]>; Andy Williams
<andrew.e.williams2 usace.arm .mil>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Construction of an eastbound left turn lane on NC 42 at the SR 2727 (Sauls Road) intersection in
Wake County (TIP Number: W-5601EY)
+ t�iail. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious ernail as an attachment to
Chris,
Attached is a concurrence letter. Please note that although I did concur with the MA-NLAA conclusion for
Michaux's sumac as per your letter request, you could have gotten by with a No Effect conclusion. In most
cases with plants, if a survey does not reveal any specimens of the listed plant species, then a No Effect is
appropriate (the only exception is when you have a listed plant with an occurrence nearby). We treat plants and
animals somewhat differently in this regard.
Gary Jordan
Fish and Wildlife Biologist, Liaison to NCDOT
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone:[phone] x.32

Email: gary iordan�fws�ov
From: Murray, Christopher A <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 3:03 PM
To: Jordan, Gary <gary [e-mail]>
Cc: Wilson, Travis W. <travis.wilsan@ncw_ ildlife.org>; Montague, Heather W <[e-mail]>; Davidson,
Stephen R <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Construction of an eastbound left turn lane on NC 42 at the SR 2727 (Sauls Road) intersection in
Wake County (TIP Number: W-5601EY)
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening attachments, or
responding.
Gary,
The Department is proposing construction of an eastbound left turn lane on NC 42 at the SR 2727 (Sauls Road)
intersection in Wake County (TIP Number: W-5601EY). The project crosses two streams, Little Creek and UT to Little
Creek. Construction of this project will result in a culvert extension at Little Creek and pipe structure replacement and
extension at UT to Little Creek. Additional activities associated with this work include installation of dewatering devices
to work in the dry and grading of streambank with installation of Class II rip rap on the banks to provide permanent
stabilization.
Recommended Biological Conclusions are proposed for the following species: Atlantic pigtoe, Yellow lance, Dwarf
wedgemussel, Neuse River waterdog, Carolina madtom, Michaux's sumac, Red -cockaded woodpecker, and Northern
long-eared bat. I am attaching the following for your review:
-Concurrence request
-Protected Species Survey (NCDOT, July 26, 2018)
-Aquatic Species Survey Report for Widening and Culvert Extension on NC 42 over Little Creek (Three Oaks Engineering
for NCDOT, March 28, 2018)
-Michaux's Sumac Update (NCDOT, June 3, 2019)
-W-5601EY construction plans with mark-ups
-W-5601EY vicinity map
The Department requests that you review this information and provide concurrence with our findings.
Thanks,
Chris
Christopher A. Murray, SPWS
Project Engineer for Planning and Environmental Studies
Project Delivery Unit
Division 5
[phone] office *"NEW PHONE NUMBER"*
camurray mcdot.gov **NEW EMAIL ADDRESS**
NCDOT-Division 5
2612 N. Duke Street
Courier: 17-27-03

Durham, NC 27704
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.0 Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties

Roy COOPER
GOVERNOR
Attention
STATt.,
q y
a
r
erse�„aw
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
J. ERIC BOYETTE
SECRETARY
March 10, 2021
Chris Murray, SPWS
Division 5 Project Engineer for Planning and Environmental Studies
0,#,, '�v �' ,
From: Heather W. Montague
Division 5 Environmental Officer
Subject: Updated Bald Eagle Survey for W-5601EX and W-5601EY: widen NC 42 for
center turn lane from Field Hill Drive (SR 5330) to Winterton Drive (SR
5637) and construct an eastbound left turn lane on NC 42 at the Sauls Road
(SR 2727) intersection in Wake County.
Mr. Murray,
Please accept this memo regarding the updated survey for bald eagle for the above referenced
combined project locations.
Bald eagle: IPaC does NOT identify potential for this species at the project study areas.
Habitat for bald eagle primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to large bodies of
open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically
within 1.0 mile of open water. Based on an examination of aerial photography, there are a
few ponds at least 2 acres in size or greater identified within 1.0 mile of the study areas.
Although these ponds provide some open water, due to location and proximity from large
water bodies around which eagles typically nest, these ponds would not be considered
optimal feeding sources. Additionally, a review of NCNHP records, March 2021,
revealed no known occurrences of this species within 1.0 mile of the study areas. No bald
eagles or nest trees were observed in the study areas or within 660 feet of the study areas
during a visual survey conducted on March 09, 2021. Due to the lack of suitable habitat
and no known occurrences, a biological opinion of No Effect is rendered for this species.
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 5 OFFICE
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704
CS# 17-27-03
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968
Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704

9
r�
L
Q
0')
IL
w
w
0
c�
Rd
Sao,-
rs
Y �
fie... •-�Y '-�
�
� ��
4-1
���,. -'�x - -
. --
_ _ - _ -__ :��-�.
• f.
_
_
Lid
..
WLo
AM—
}+
.
�� ...
W
�
it • _
■
�
4:,
o �.

(nLL-
:
Lu 0
CD
o
En
Lij
jig,
LO 4..
J U su a ,.
Af
4w
a
�• i
W r.'
*-- -
a F F`
ALL
G 4-r
co
� L
w
pa,
w a N
o

g
l
W
LO
%i
� U
qj
W
_N
-g-u�-uvsuuar; 0
s

.T
.� ?�.�..*Olt.

Roy COOPER
GOVERNOR
STATt.,
q y
a
r
erse�„aw
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
June 4, 2021
Attention: Chris Murray, SWPS
Project Engineer for Planning and Environmental Studies
0,#,, �, ,
From: Heather W. Montague
Division 5 Environmental Officer
JAMES H. TRomom III
SECRETARY
Subject: Michaux's sumac and Red cockaded woodpecker update for W-5601EX and
W-5601EY in Wake County: widen NC 42 for center turn lane from Field
Hill Drive (SR 5330) to Winterton Drive (SR 5637) and construct an
eastbound left turn lane on NC 42 at the SR 2727 (Sauls Road) intersection.
Mr. Murray,
Please accept this letter as a summary of the efforts made and resulting findings on the part of
NCDOT Division 5 to update the status of Michaux's sumac and red cockaded woodpecker
for the above combined referenced projects.
Michaux's sumac: Limited habitat for Michaux's sumac is located within the project limits
within the portion of the study area particularly along the woods edge and powerline
easements. Prior to conducting a survey, a known population on Barwell Road in Raleigh
was visited to review the plant's local appearance, habitat, and flowering status. A 2.0 person
hour plant by plant survey of the project study area was conducted on June 1, 2021. No
specimens were found during the survey, therefore, a biological conclusion of No Effect is
rendered for this species.
Red -cockaded woodpecker: Habitat for the red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW) does not
exist within the study area. Large mature pines are present in the study area, however
these areas are crowded by hardwood trees and dense understories that make the area
unsuitable for RCW foraging habitat. Roost trees were also not present within the study
area. A review of the NCNHP database indicates no known occurrence of the species
within one mile of the study area. The biological conclusion for RCW is No Effect.
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fax: [phone] NORTH DUKE STREET
DIVISION 5 OFFICE Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 DURHAM, NC 27704
2612 NORTH DUKE STREET
DURHAM, NC 27704 Website: www.ncdot.gov
CS# 17-27-03

Investigators:
Heather Montague
Environmental Officer
NCDOT Division 5
Brenna Copeland
Summer Engineering Assistant
NCDOT Division 5
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at
hwmontaguegncdot.gov or at [phone].
cc: W-5601EX and W-5601EY project files

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
July 22, 2019
To: Mitchell Wimberley, Environmental Scientist, Kleinfelder
From: Rob Ridings, NC Division of Water Resources, Transportation Permitting Branch
Subject: NCDOT Project: W-5601EY, NC 42 at SR 2727, Wake County.
Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) and Mitigation Rules (15A NCAC
2H.0506[h]).
Dear Mr. Wimberley;
On July 17, 2019, NC Division of Water Resource received your request to confirm your on -site determination of
drainage features at the above -referenced project for applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules and Stream Mitigation
Rules. The drainage features are approximated on referenced package received by DWR.
NCDWR has confirmed that the drainage features labeled below are as follows:
Little Creek: Perennial. Subject to Buffer Rules. Subject to Mitigation Rules.
UT Little Creek: Perennial. Subject to Buffer Rules. Subject to Mitigation Rules.
No other stream or buffer sites were identified in this request. Also, this letter only addresses applicability to the
Neuse Buffer Rules and Mitigation Rules at the sites specifically marked on the referenced maps and does not apply
to reaches of the channels further downstream from the NCDOT project area, or to any other drainage features in the
vicinity.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the mitigation rules and the buffer rules and does not approve any
activity within the buffer, Waters of the United States, or Waters of the State. Any impacts to wetlands, streams and
buffers must comply with the Neuse Buffer Rules, 404/401 regulations, water supply regulations (15A NCAC 2B
.0216), and any other required federal, state and local regulations. Please be aware that even if no direct impacts are
proposed to the protected buffers, sheet flow of all new stormwater runoff as per 15A NCAC 213.0233 is required.
The owner (or future owners) or permittee should notify NCDWR (and other relevant agencies) of this
determination in any future correspondences concerning this property and/or project. This on -site determination
shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by NCDWR or Delegated Local Authority that a
surface water exists and that it is subject to the mitigation rules may request a determination by the Director. A
request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Amy Chapman, NCDWR
Transportation Permitting Branch, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
Individuals that dispute a determination by NCDWR or Delegated Local Authority that "exempts" a surface water
from the mitigation rules may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the office of
Administrative hearings. You must file the petition with the office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60)
days of receipt of this notice and the date the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is
notified of this decision. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the office of Administrative Hearings
during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between
DE Q�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTM C-OLINA
o.�memmE.A­WQ�.ifly /"� 919.707.9000

the hours of 8:OOam and 5:OOpm, except for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the petition
must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings.
The petition may be faxed -provided the original and one copy of the document is received by the Office of
Administrative Hearings within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission.
The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. Sam M. Hayes, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
If you have any additional questions or require additional information please call Rob Ridings at 919-707-3873.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-00295 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Angier
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: NCDOT
Nicole Thomson
Address: 2612 North Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
Telephone Number: 919-754-7806
E-mail: nithomson2Oncdot.gov
Size (acres) 5.45 Nearest Town Raleigh
Nearest Waterway Middle Creek River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates Latitude: 35.5901
Longitude:-78.6338
Location description: The project site along existing NC Hwv 42, at its crossing of Little Creek, near the town of Raleigh, Wake
County, North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 2/11/2021. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once

SAW-2021-00295
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact James Lastinger at 919-554-4884 ext 32 or
James.C.Lastint!er(&usace.armv.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 02/11/2021.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: 4:11' .✓
Date of JD: 02/11/2021 "Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable

SAW-2021-00295
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
A licant: NCDOT, Nicole Thomson File Number: SAW-2021-00295 Date: 02/ll/2021
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
❑X
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mit/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.asi)
or the Corps regulations at.33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
Nor -
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: James Lastinger
CESAD-PDO
Raleigh Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunit to participate in all site my-csti ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: James Lastinger, , 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 02/11/2021
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: NCDOT, Nicole Thomson, 2612 North Duke
Street, Durham, NC 27704
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, W-5601 EY, SAW-2021-
00295
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project site along existing NC
Hwy 42, at its crossing of Little Creek, near the town of Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Wake City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.5901 Longitude:-78.6338
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Middle Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECKALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: February 11, 2021
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAYBE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
(decimal
(decimal
amount of
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic
degrees)
degrees)
aquatic
wetland vs.
resource "may be"
resources in
non -wetland
subject (i.e., Section 404
review area
waters)
or Section 10/404)
(acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
S1
35.5899
-78.6348
300 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
S2
35.5904
-78.6334
400 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
WA
35.5899
-78.6348
0.45 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WB
35.5900
-78.6354
0.25 acre
Wetland
Section 404
WC
35.5898
-78.6351
0.45 acre
Wetland
Section 404

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AID for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or
a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: attached dated February 11, 2021
®Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets:
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑Corps navigable waters' study:
®U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
®USGS NHD data:
❑USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Angier Quad
®Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake County, 1970, sheet 100
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: NC FIRM
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): undated
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
El Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later Jurisdictional determinations.
1,r-� C;0;�40,�
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
02/11/2021
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established
time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

r

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use
17-02-0013
----� r----- UPDATE
t HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
LZ NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
' This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
W-5601EY
County:
Wake
WBSNo.:
50138.1.156
Document
Type:
PCE
Fed. Aid No:
HSIP-0042(067)
Funding:
❑ State ® Federal
Federal
Permits :
® Yes ❑ No
Permit
T e s :
ProiectDescription: Widen for Left Turn Lane on NC 42 at SR 2727 (Sauls Road).
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS information, historic designations roster, and indexes was
undertaken on April 26, 2021 for the 2021 updated study area. Based on this review of the
updated study area, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of
Potential Effects, which is defined on the following map. There are no properties over fifty years
of age within the APE; a modern subdivision is located along Pinnacle Ridge Road. There are no
National Register listed or eligible properties and no survey is required. If design plans change,
additional review will be required. UPDATED REVIEW APRIL 2021
Why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predictinz that there
are no unidentified significant historic architectural or landscape resources in the proiect
area:
HPO quad maps and GIS information recording NR, SL, LD, DE, and SS properties for the
Wake County survey, Wake County GIS/Tax information, and Google Maps are considered
valid for the purposes of determining the likelihood of historic resources being present. There
are no National Register listed or eligible properties within the APE and no survey is required.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
❑Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
NCDOT Architectural Historian
Date
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEYREQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 1 of 3

MAL WEATHERS
ROAD
S,Iver Farm RC
uz
LASSITER FARMS
m
JORDAN
WINDY HILLS
A
SAULS
T,�s10',
JORDAN RIDGE
� HAQLEY
' MEADOWS SOUTHERN MEADOWS
LAUREL GROVE
9
g��
J3�9
d
Pr�
nP
�
4
yE
�a1 Weat
&apl
GU(fy
3� BRITTANY HILLS
�UrsrCn NATHANS _
LANDING C FIELD RI
KSTONE 'c Jordan Rd
V m C
a �
rY yo66 �
KENWOOD
Middle Creek Church MEADOWS ax a
a
o
az QINNACLE RIDGE t
as)oi S� �"acr� 17a6e
`N SUN RIDGE
tiro FARM
a
VALLEY RIDGE a
Trendy Trunk
c
QL
y
Altice ❑r
x
110L)Dr ROCKHURST
QEnvi
Project Location.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 2 of 3

HPO GIS.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEYREQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 3 of 3

Project Tracking No.
E17-02-0013
resubmit
N O ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY RE\QUIRED FORMTO
1181
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for thisproject. It is not valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must r`
consult separately with the Historic Architecture and Landscapes Team.q CSy'
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No.
WBS No
W-5601EY
50138.1.155
County:
Document:
Federal Aid No: HSIP- Funding:
0042(067)
Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No
Wake
Federal CE
❑ State ® Federal
Permit Type:
Project Description: Construct an eastbound turn lane on NC 42 at SR 2727 (Sauls Road) in
Wake County, North Carolina. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) corresponds
with the overall project study area as depicted on the attached ARC-GIS shape file maps. It
measures .20 mile in length and 100 feet to 250 feet in width. Additionally, there are small
construction and wetland easement areas associated with the project.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Permitting and funding information was reviewed for determining the level of archaeological input
required by state and federal laws. Based on the submitted "request for cultural resources review"
form, the project is federally funded with United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) federal
permit interaction. As such, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act will apply and the
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA) will serve as the lead federal agency. Next, construction
design and other data was examined (when applicable) to define the character and extent of potential
impacts to the ground surfaces embracing the project locale. The archaeological APE encompasses
all areas of potential ground disturbing activity.
Once an APE was outlined, a map review and site file search was conducted utilizing on-line
resources provided to the NCDOT by the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Monday, June 28,
2021. No NRHP eligible archaeological sites nor any other archaeological resources are located
within the APE or directly adjacent.
Examination of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), State Study Listed (SL), Locally
Designated (LD), Determined Eligible (DE), and Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing resources
available on the NCSHPO website is important in establishing the location of noteworthy historic
occupations related to a perspective construction impact area. A cross-check of these mapped
resources concluded that none of the above properties with potential contributing archaeological
components are situated within the APE. In addition, historic maps of Wake County were appraised
to identify former structure locations, land use patterns, cemeteries, or other confirmation of historic
occupation in the project vicinity. Archaeological/historical reference materials were inspected as
well. In general, the cultural background review established that no previously recorded
archaeological sites, cemeteries, or NRHP properties with potential archaeological components are
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY TEAM "NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED" FORM
1 of2

Project Tracking No.
17-02-0013
located within the APE. Based on cultural -historical factors, the APE is conside resubmit
potential for the documentation of archaeological resources.
Further, topographic, geologic, flood boundary, and NRCS soil survey maps were referenced to
evaluate pedeological, geomorphological, hydrological, and other environmental determinants that
may have resulted in past occupation at this location. Aerial and on -ground photographs (NCDOT
Spatial Data Viewer) and the Google Street View map application (when amenable) were also
examined/utilized for additional assessment of disturbances, both natural and human induced, which
compromise the integrity of archaeological sites. Environmental/impact factors do not suggest a
heightened potential for archaeological resource recovery.
(This project falls within a North Carolina County in which the following federally recognized
tribes have. expressed an interest: Catawba We recommend that you ensure that this
documentation is forwarded to these tribes using the process described in the current NCDOT
Tribal Protocol and PA Procedures Manual.)
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably
predicting that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE.
The entire APE is characterized as disturbed and impacted from the two roads right-of-way or in
wetland areas with flooded soils which would have deterred human settlement. There are no
existing NRHP eligible archaeological sites within the projects APE, and it is unlikely to contain
significant, intact, and preserved archaeological deposits. As currently proposed as a federally
funded project, no further consultation is advocated. A finding of "no archaeological survey
required" is considered appropriate.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST: NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED
Scott Halvorsen-6 4-it , 6/28/2021
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST II Date
2020 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY'TIiAM "NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED" FORM
2of2

ARC-GIS aerial shape file map relating the boundaries and location of the
Area of Potential Effects (APE) in Wake County, North Carolina.

Type I and II Ground Disturbing Categorical Exclusion Action
Classification Form
STIP Project No.
WBS Element
Federal Project No.
A. Project Description:
W-5601 EY
50138.1.156
HSIP-0042(067)
Wake County — Construct an Eastbound left turn lane on NC-42 at SR-2727 (Sauls Rd).
See attached files for titlesheet, plansheet and biological report.
B. Description of Need and Purpose -
The purpose of this project is to improve safety and traffic operations at the intersection.
C. Categorical_ Exclusion Action Classification: (Check one)
®
TYPE IA
❑
TYPE I B
❑
TYPE II A
❑
TYPE II B
D. Proposed Improvements
(26) Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, reconstruction,
adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (including parking, weaving, turning, and
climbing lanes), if the action meets the constraints listed in 23 CFR 771.117(e)(1-6).
E. 5 ebal Project Information:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service has developed a programmatic biological opinion (PBO)
in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration, the US Army Corps of Engineers
and NCDOT for the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in eastern
North Carolina. The PBO covers the entire NCDOT-pro-gram in Divisions 1-8
including all NCDOT projects and activities. The programmatic determination for NLEB
for the NCDOT program is "May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect". The PBO provides
incidental take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act for five years for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus in
Divisions 1-8.
Updated 4/25/17

F. Protect Impact Criteria Checklists:
Type I & II - Ground Disturbing Actions
FHWA APPROVAL ACTIVITIES THRESHOLD CRITERIA
If any of questions 1-7 are marked "yes" then the CE will require FHWA approval.
Yes No
Does the project require formal consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife
❑
I
Service (USFWS) or National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)?
Does the project result in impacts subject to the conditions of the Bald and
❑
2
Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA)?
Does the project generate substantial controversy or public opposition, for any
❑
3
reason, following appropriate public involvement?
Does the project cause disproportionately high and adverse impacts relative to
❑
4
low-income and/or minority populations?
Does the project involve a residential or commercial displacement, or a
❑ 0
5
substantial amount of right of way acquisition?
6 Does the project require an Individual Section 4(f) approval?
El Z
Does the project include adverse effects that cannot be resolved with a
7 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) under Section 106 of the National Historic ❑ 0
Preservation Act (NHPA) or have an adverse effect on a National Historic
Landmark (NHL)?
If any of questions 8 through 31 are marked "yes" then additional information will be required for those
questions in Section G.
Other Considerations Yes No
Does the project result in a finding of "may affect not likely to adversely affect"
8 for listed species, or designated critical habitat under Section 7 of the ❑
Endangered Species Act (ESA)?
9 Is the project located in anadromous fish spawning waters?
❑
Does the project impact waters classified as Outstanding Resource Water
10 (ORW), High Quality Water (HQW), Water Supply Watershed Critical Areas,
303(d) listed impaired water bodies, buffer rules, or Submerged Aquatic
❑
Vegetation (SAV)?
❑
11 Does the project impact waters of the United States in any of the designated
mountain trout streams?
❑
12 Does the project require a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Individual
Section 404 Permit?
❑
z
13 Will the project require an easement from a Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) licensed facility?
❑
14 Does the project include a Section 106 of the NHPA effects determination
other than a no effect, including archaeological remains?
2 Updated 4/25/17

Other Considerations (continued)
Yes
No
15 Does the project involve hazardous materials and/or landfills?
❑
Does the project require work encroaching and adversely affecting a
16 regulatory floodway or work affecting the base floodplain (100-year flood)
❑
elevations of a water course or lake, pursuant to Executive Order 11988 and
23 CFR 650 subpart A?
Is the project in a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) county and
❑
0
17
substantially affects the coastal zone and/or any Area of Environmental
Concern (AEC)?
Does the project require a U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) permit?
18
❑
19
Does the project involve construction activities in, across, or adjacent to a
❑
designated Wild and Scenic River present within the project area?
20
Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) resources?
❑
21
Does the project impact federal lands (e.g. U.S. Forest Service (USFS),
❑
USFWS, etc.) or Tribal Lands?
22
Does the project involve any changes in access control?
❑
23
Does the project have a permanent adverse effect on local traffic patterns or
❑
community cohesiveness?
Will maintenance of traffic cause substantial disruption?
24
❑
Is the project inconsistent with the STIP or the Metropolitan Planning
25 Organization's (MPO's) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) (where
❑
0
applicable)? _
Does the project require the acquisition of lands under the protection of
Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act, the Federal Aid in Fish
26 Restoration Act, the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, Tennessee Valley
❑
0
Authority (TVA), or other unique areas or special lands that were acquired in
fee or easement with public -use money and have deed restrictions or
covenants on the property?
27
Does the project involve Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
❑
buyout properties under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)?
28
Does the project include a de minimis or programmatic Section 4(f)?
[]
29 Is the project considered a Type I under the NCDOT's Noise Policy?
❑
30
Is there prime or important farmland soil impacted by this project as defined by ❑
the Farmland Protection Policy Act FPPA)? _
Are there other issues that arose during the project development process that ❑
31
affected the project decision?
G. Additional Documentation as Required from Section F
Updated 4/25/17

Proiect Commitments
No Special Project Commitments.

Categorical Exclusion Approval
STIP Project No.
WBS Element
Federal Project No.
Prepared By:
W-5601 EY
50138.1.156
HSIP-0042(067)
nncu5;gne4 by:
5/29/2018 �Le,,aa Meeolo�+a
Date Meadows. Assistant Division Design Engineer
NCDOT
Prepared For:
Reviewed By:
DocuSigned by:
F
5/29/2018 �lS d�U�t,W'
Date figoMa-rrfy, Division Environmental Officer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
If all of the threshold questions (1 through 7) of
7 Approved Section F are answered "no," NCDOT approves this
Categorical Exclusion.
If any of the threshold questions (1 through 7) of
❑ Certified Section F are answered "yes," NCDOT certifies this
Categorical Exclusion.
DocuSIgned by:
5/29/2018 m e� �'Pe
Date �wchaahrdl-,=Kneis, PE Divi
sion ision 5 Project Delivery Engineer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
FHWA Approved: For Projects Certified by NCDOT (above), FHWA signature
required.
Date John F. Sullivan, 111, PE, Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
5 Updated 4/25/17

Ca(a Am Irw INn Ndnon
TII4a1 Hicb'k P—h- omw
IBM TOnl Slrrcn Ronrl
flock Hill, Sown Cardin, 2"M
on — 400-128 2r27
Fax 8a3.a74-67"
Septsmber d, 2019
Attention: Chris Murray
NCDCT Division 5
2612 North Duke street
Durham, NO 27704
Re. TFrPOY TIP p Pr*d lmuripwn
SaTalymiPrw__ m NG 'am ER 53301� 5R 5�67 Wd et M'n Ji_n±FR 2?"
201P�183-26 W-5601ER in Wakr GwMy-WBS Nurnher: SOl g.7.175
Dear Mr. Murray,
The Cstamba have no immediate concerns with regard to Iraditional Cultural proparties.
sacred sites or Native American archaeologpcsl sites within the boundaries of the
proposed protect areas. However, the Catawba are to he notltied if Native American
artifacts and i or human remains are located during the ground disturbance phase
of this project.
If you have questrons please wntact Caitlin Rogers at 863-32&-24,27 ext- 226. or e-mail
caitlr nh @wpperaRs.com.
Sincerely,
� rs jfi i.• ��: rrjr,�• � y
Wanonah G. Haire
TriGal Historic Preservation 4ffloer

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
July 23, 2021
Mr. Chris Murray, SPWS
Division 5 Project Engineer - Planning & Environmental
North Carolina Department of Transportation
2612 North Duke Street
Durham, North Carolina 27704
Dear Mr. Murray:
Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
W-5601EY, Construct Eastbound Left Turn Lane on NC 42 at SR 2727 (Sauls Road), Wake
County, WBS Number 50138.1.156
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) will provide the
compensatory stream and wetland mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on
July 23,2021, the impacts are located in CU 03020201 of the Neuse River basin in the Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-
Region, and are as follows:
Stream &
Wetlands
River
Basin
Cu
Location
Eco
Region
Stream
Wetlands
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non-
Coastal
Riparian
Marsh
Impacts
Neuse
03020201
CP
0
0
97.000
0.190
0
0
*Some of the stream and/or wetland impacts may be proposed to be mitigated at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. See permit application
for details.
DMS commits to implementing sufficient compensatory stream, wetland, and buffer mitigation credits to
offset the impacts associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies in accordance with the In -
Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation
acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from DMS.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420.
Sincerely,
James B. Stanfill
DMS Asset Management Supervisor
Cc: Mr. Andy Williams, USACE - Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Ms. Amy Chapman, NC Division of Water Resources
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT - EAU
File: W-5601EY - Division 5
NORTH Cfis10LIN D E�
o.P.ro�em m e.w-wi 9.aiK
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West ]ones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center � Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form
Permittee: NCDOT, Chris Murray Action ID: SAW-2021-00295
Project Name: NCDOT/W-5601EY/NC 42/Division 5/Wake County County: Wake
Instructions to Permittee: The Permittee must provide a copy of this form to the Mitigation Sponsor, either an approved
Mitigation Bank or the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS), who will then sign the form to verify the
transfer of the mitigation responsibility. Once the Sponsor has signed this form, it is the Permittee's responsibility to ensure
that Wilmington District Project Manager identified on page two is in receipt of a signed copy of this form before conducting
authorized impacts, unless otherwise specified below. If more than one Mitigation Sponsor will be used to provide the
mitigation associated with the permit, or if the impacts and/or the mitigation will occur in more than one 8-digit Hydrologic
Unit Code (HUC), multiple forms will be attached to the permit, and the separate forms for each Sponsor and/or HUC must
be provided to the appropriate Mitigation Sponsors.
Instructions to Sponsor: The Sponsor verifies that the mitigation requirements (credits) shown below have been released
and are available at the identified site. By signing below, the Sponsor is accepting full responsibility for the identified
mitigation, regardless of whether they have received payment from the Permittee. Once the form is signed, the Sponsor
must update the bank ledger and provide a copy of the signed form and the updated ledger to the Permittee, the Project
Manager who issued the permit, the Bank Project Manager, and the District Mitigation Office (see contact information on
page 2). The Sponsor must also comply with all reporting requirements established in their authorizing instrument.
Permitted Impacts and Compensatory Mitigation Requirements:
Permitted Impacts Requiring Mitigation* 8-digit HUC and Basin: 03020201, Neuse River Basin
Stream Impacts (linear feet)
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riparian Riverine
FRiparian Non-Riverine
Non -Riparian
Coastal
97
1 0.19
*If more than one mitigation sponsor will be used for the permit, only include impacts to be mitigated by this sponsor.
Compensatory Mitigation Requirements: 8-digit HUC and Basin: 03020201, Neuse River Basin
Stream Mitigation (credits)
Wetland Mitigation (credits)
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riparian Riverine
Riparian Non-Riverine
Non -Riparian
Coastal
164
0.38
Mitigation Site Debited: North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
(List the name of the bank to be debited. For umbrella banks, also list the specific site. For NCDMS, list NCDMS. If the NCDMS
acceptance letter identifies a specific site, also list the specific site to be debited).
Section to be completed by the Mitigation Sponsor
Statement of Mitigation Liability Acceptance: I, the undersigned, verify that I am authorized to approve mitigation
transactions for the Mitigation Sponsor shown below, and I certify that the Sponsor agrees to accept full responsibility for
providing the mitigation identified in this document (see the table above), associated with the USACE Permittee and Action
ID number shown. I also verify that released credits (and/or advance credits for NCDMS), as approved by the Wilmington
District, are currently available at the mitigation site identified above. Further, I understand that if the Sponsor fails to provide
the required compensatory mitigation, the USACE Wilmington District Engineer may pursue measures against the Sponsor to
ensure compliance associated with the mitigation requirements.
Mitigation Sponsor Name: NCDEQ - DMS
Name of Sponsor's Authorized Representative: Beth Harmon

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-00295 County: Wake County U.S.G.S. Quad: Angier
GENERAL PERNHT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee: Chris Murray
NC Department of Transportation, Division 5
Address: 2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, North Carolina 27704
Telephone Number: [phone]
Size (acres) 3_2 Nearest Town Fuguay-Varina
Nearest Waterway Little Creek River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC 03020201 Coordinates Latitude: 35.590080
Longitude:-78.634082
Location description: The site is located along NC 42 over Little Creek at the NC 42, Sauls Road intersection, in Wake County,
North Carolina. NCDOT has identified the proiect as XW-5601EY.
Description of projects area and activity: This authorization is for temporary and permanent impacts to tributary streams and
wetlands associated with the construction of an eastbound turn lane at an existing NCDOT roadwav intersection. NC 42 at SR
2727 (Sauls Road) as follows: Site 1 (Stationll+79 to 13+65-L-LT) Wetland B 0.02 acre of wetland fill for roadway
development and 0.06 acre of mechanized land clearing. Site 2 (11+88 to 13+66-L-RT) Wetland C 0.03 acre of wetland fill for
roadway development and 0.03 acre of mechanized land clearing. Site 3 (13+87 to 14+38-L-LT) Little Creek (Stream 1)
Culvert extension (inlet) 16 linear feet, bank stabilization (inlet) 42 linear feet and temporary dewatering (inlet) 13 linear feet.
Culvert extension (outlet) 14 linear feet, bank stabilization (outlet) 18 linear feet and temporary dewatering (outlet) 10 linear
feet. Site 4 (14+43 to 15+86-L-LT) Wetland A 0.03 acre of wetland fill for roadway development and 0.04 acre of mechanized
land clearing. Site 5 Unnamed tributary to Little Creek (Stream 2) (Station 17+75 to 19+36-L) Culvert extension (inlet) 20
linear feet, (Station 19+05 to 19+26-L-LT ) bank stabilization (inlet) 35 linear feet and temporary dewatering (inlet) 12 linear
feet. (Station 18+04 to 18+38-L-RT) Culvert extension (outlet) 47 linear feet, (Stationl7+87 to 18+04-L-RT) bank stabilization
and at grade rin ran dissination nad (outlet) 20 linear feet and temnorary dewatering (outlet) 15 linear feet (see attached
plans).
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number and/or Nationwide Permit Number: NWP 14 Linear Transportation Projects
SEE ATTACHED RGP or NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted application and attached information dated June 4, 2021 and received on August 2, 2021. Any
violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a
restoration order, a Class I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
Special Conditions:
In order to compensate for impacts associated with this permit, mitigation shall be provided in
accordance with the provisions outlined on the most recent version of the attached Compensatory
Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form. The requirements of this form, including any special
conditions listed on this form, are hereby incorporated as special conditions of this permit authorization.
2. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS's) Programmatic Biological/Conference Opinion
(PBO/PCO) titled "Bridge and Culvert Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North Carolina,
NCDOT Divisions 1-8)," dated September 11, 2019, including the June 1, 2021 Addendum for Yellow
Lance (Elliptio lanceolata) contains mandatory terms and conditions to implement the reasonable and
prudent measures that are associated with "incidental take" that are specified in the PBO/PCO. Your

authorization under this Corps permit is conditional upon your compliance with all the mandatory terms
and conditions associated with incidental take of the PBO/PCO, which terms and conditions are
incorporated by reference in this permit. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions associated with
incidental take of the PBO/PCO, where a take of the listed species occurs, would constitute an
unauthorized take, and it would also constitute non-compliance with your Corps permit. The USFWS is
the appropriate authority to determine compliance with the terms and conditions of its PBO/PCO, and
with the ESA.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS's) Programmatic Conference Opinion (PCO) titled
"Bridge and Culvert Replacements/Repair/Rehabilitation Effects on Carolina Madtom and Neuse River
Waterdog in NCDOT Divisions 2, 4, 5, and 7" dated May 6, 2020, contains mandatory terms and
conditions to implement the reasonable and prudent measures that are associated with "incidental take"
that are specified in the PCO. Your authorization under this Corps permit is conditional upon your
compliance with all the mandatory terms and conditions associated with incidental take of the PCO,
which terms and conditions are incorporated by reference in this permit. Failure to comply with the
terms and conditions associated with incidental take of the PCO, where a take of the listed species
occurs, would constitute an unauthorized take, and it would also constitute non-compliance with your
Corps permit. The USFWS is the appropriate authority to determine compliance with the terms and
conditions of its PCO, and with the ESA.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide and/or regional general permit
authorization is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide and/or regional
general permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below,
provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide and/or regional general permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and
conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under contract to
commence in reliance upon the nationwide and/or regional general permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide and/or regional general permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone].
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Andrew Williams at [phone] or Andrew.E.Williams2Ousace.armv.mil.
Corps Regulatory Official:
Expiration Date of Verification: March 18, 2022
A. Determination of Jurisdiction:
Date: August 27, 2021
1. ❑ There are waters, including wetlands, on the above described project area that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction. Please note, if work is authorized by either a general or nationwide permit, and you wish to request an appeal of an

approved JD, the appeal must be received by the Corps and the appeal process concluded prior to the commencement of any
work in waters of the United States and prior to any work that could alter the hydrology of waters of the United States.
2. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC §
1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.
3. ❑ There are waters, including wetlands, within the above described project area that are subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
4. ❑ A jurisdiction determination was not completed with this request. Therefore, this is not an appealable action. However, you
may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps for further instruction.
5. ® The aquatic resources within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
the preliminary jurisdictional determination issued 2/11/2021. Action ID: SAW--2021-00295.
B. Basis For Jurisdictional Determination: N/A. An Approved JD has not been completed.
C. Remarks: None
D. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
E. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in A2 and A3 above).
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Philip Shannin, Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, FLOOR M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
Phone: [phone]
EMAIL: PHILIP.A.SHANNIN(aUSACE.ARMY.MIL
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by: Not Applicable.
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official:
Ronnie Smith
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
http:Hcop2smEu.usace.army.mil/cm_Uex/Pp=136 * 0.

Copy Furnished:
Todd Tugwell
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 106
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Todd. [e-mail]
Kim Browning
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 106
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Kimberly.D.Browninggusace.army.mil
Beth Harmon
DOT Coordinator
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
b eth.harmon(oncdenr. gov

Action ID Number: SAW-2021-00295 County: Wake County
Permittee: Chris Murray
NC Department of Transportation, Division 5
Project Name: NCDOT/W-5601EY/NC 42/Division 5/Wake County
Date Verification Issued: August 27, 2021
Project Manager: Andrew Williams
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: Andrew Williams
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

DocuSign Envelope ID:7791441C-CADD-4CC7-A44F-007189F7F257
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Mr. Brandon H. Jones, PE, Division Engineer
NCDOT Division 5
2612 North Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 3, 2021
DWR # 20210986
Wake County
Subject: APPROVAL OF 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION WITH ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
NCDOT TIP #W-5601EY: NC Hwy 42 at SR 2727, Wake County.
Dear Mr. Jones:
You have our approval for the impacts listed below for the purpose described in your application received by the Division of Water
Resources (Division) July 28, 2021. These impacts are covered by the attached Water Quality General Certification
Number 4135 and the conditions listed below. This certification is associated with the use of Nationwide Permit Number 14 once it is
issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before
proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge, and
Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The Division has determined that the proposed project will comply with water quality requirements provided that you adhere to the
conditions listed in the general certification and to the additional conditions itemized below.
The following proposed impacts are hereby approved. No other impacts are approved, including incidental impacts. [15A NCAC
02H .0506(b)]
Stream Impacts in the Neuse River Basin
Site
Permanent Fill in Perennial
Stream Oinear ft
Riprap Stabilization in
Perennial Stream linear ft
Temporary Dewatering to
Perennial Stream linear ft
Total Stream
Impact linear ft
3
30
60
23
113
5
67
55
27
149
Total
97
115
50
262
Total Stream Impact for Project: 262 linear feet.
Wetland Impacts in the Neuse River Basin
Site
Permanent Fill (ac)
Mechanized Clearing (ac)
Total Wetland Impact (ac)
Total
0.07
0.12
0.19
Total Wetland Impact for Project: 0.19 acres.
This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application. The plans and specifications for this project are incorporated
by reference as part of this Certification. If you change your project, you must notify the Division and you may be required to submit
a new application package with the appropriate fee. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this
Certification and is responsible for complying with all conditions. [15A NCAC 02H .0507(d)(2)].
D E Q�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality j Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH CAROLINA
aewun oeim�m.ma owi� /ZO 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID:7791441C-CADD-4CC7-A44F-007189F7F257
If you are unable to comply with any of the conditions of the attached Water Quality General Certification or with the additional
conditions itemized below, you must notify the DWR Transportation Permitting Branch within 24 hours (or the next business day if a
weekend or holiday) from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances.
The permittee shall report to DWR any noncompliance with, and/or any violation of, stream or wetland standards [ 15A NCAC
02B .0200] including but not limited to sediment impacts to streams or wetlands. Information shall be provided orally within 24 hours
(or the next business day if a weekend or holiday) from the time the permittee became aware of the non-compliance circumstances.
Additional Conditions:
1. Compensatory mitigation for impacts to 0.19 acres of wetlands is required. We understand that you have chosen to perform
compensatory mitigation for impacts to wetlands through the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) (formerly
NCEEP), and that the DMS has agreed to implement the mitigation for the project. DMS has indicated in a letter dated July 23, 2021
that they will assume responsibility for satisfying the federal Clean Water Act compensatory mitigation requirements for the above -
referenced project, in accordance with DMS's Mitigation Banking Instrument signed July 28, 2010.
2. If multiple pipes or barrels are required, they shall be designed to mimic natural stream cross section as closely as possible
including pipes or barrels at flood plain elevation and/or sills where appropriate. Widening the stream channel should be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases water velocity causing sediment deposition that
requires increased maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage. [I5ANCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
3. Riprap shall not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner that precludes aquatic life passage.
Bioengineering boulders or structures should be properly designed, sized and installed. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
4. For all streams being impacted due to site dewatering activities, the site shall be graded to its preconstruction contours and
revegetated with appropriate native species. [ 15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
5. If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area shall be maintained to prevent direct contact between curing concrete and
stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete shall not be discharged to surface waters due to the potential for
elevated pH and possible aquatic life and fish kills. [15A NCAC 0213.0200]
6. During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of the U.S., or protected riparian
buffers. [I 5A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
7. The dimension, pattern and profile of the stream above and below the crossing shall not be modified. Disturbed floodplains and
streams shall be restored to natural geomorphic conditions. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
8. The use of rip -rap above the Normal High Water Mark shall be minimized. Any rip -rap placed for stream stabilization shall be
placed in stream channels in such a manner that it does not impede aquatic life passage. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
9. The Permittee shall ensure that the final design drawings adhere to the permit and to the permit drawings submitted for approval.
[15A NCAC 02H .0507 (c) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2)]
10. All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved BMP measures from the most current
version of NCDOT Construction and Maintenance Activities manual such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and other diversion
structures shall be used to prevent excavation in flowing water. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3) and (c)(3)]
11. Heavy equipment shall be operated from the banks rather than in the stream channel in order to minimize sedimentation and
reduce the introduction of other pollutants into the stream. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)]
12. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent contamination of
stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials. [I 5A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)]
13. No rock, sand or other materials shall be dredged from the stream channel except where authorized by this certification. [15A NCAC
02H.0506(b)(3)]
14. Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface waters is prohibited.
[I 5A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)]
D ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH CAROLINA 919.707.9000
pepa,hny,�p! EmlmnmmMl puallry

DocuSign Envelope ID:7791441C-CADD-4CC7-A44F-007189F7F257
15. The permittee and its authorized agents shall conduct its activities in a manner consistent with State water quality standards (including
any requirements resulting from compliance with §303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of State and
Federal law. If the NCDWR determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or
achieved use) or that State or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, the NCDWR
may reevaluate and modify this certification. [15A NCAC 02B.0200]
16. All fill slopes located in jurisdictional wetlands shall be placed at slopes no flatter than 3:1, unless otherwise authorized by this
certification. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
17. A copy of this Water Quality Certification shall be maintained on the construction site at all times. In addition, the Water Quality
Certification and all subsequent modifications, if any, shall be maintained with the Division Engineer and the on -site project manager.
[15A NCAC 02H .0507(c) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2)]
18. The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary located within the construction corridor approved by this authorization, including all
non-commercial borrow and waste sites associated with the project, shall be clearly marked by highly visible fencing prior to any land
disturbing activities. Impacts to areas within the fencing are prohibited unless otherwise authorized by this certification. [15A NCAC
02H.0501 and .0502]
19. The issuance of this certification does not exempt the Permittee from complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or
ordinances that may be imposed by other government agencies (i.e. local, state, and federal) having jurisdiction, including but not limited
to applicable buffer rules, stormwater management rules, soil erosion and sedimentation control requirements, etc.
20. The Permittee shall report any violations of this certification to the Division of Water Resources within 24 hours of discovery. [15A
NCAC 02B.0506(b)(2)]
21. Upon completion of the project (including any impacts at associated borrow or waste sites), the NCDOT Division Engineer shall
complete and return the enclosed "Certification of Completion Form" to notify the NCDWR when all work included in the 401 Certification
has been completed. [I 5A NCAC 02H.0502(f)]
22. Native riparian vegetation must be reestablished in the riparian areas within the construction limits of the project by the end of the
growing season following completion of construction. [15A NCAC 02B.0506(b)(2)]
23. There shall be no excavation from, or waste disposal into, jurisdictional wetlands or waters associated with this permit without
appropriate modification. Should waste or borrow sites, or access roads to waste or borrow sites, be located in wetlands or streams,
compensatory mitigation will be required since that is a direct impact from road construction activities. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3) and
(c)(3)]
24. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper design, installation and
operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface waters standards [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)
and (c)(3)]:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and maintained in
accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design
Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must be such that they
equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including
contractor -owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed, operated, and maintained in
accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in accordance with the requirements of
the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
25. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or surface waters, or within 5 feet of the top of bank, without
prior approval from DWR. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3) and (c)(3)]
26. When applicable, all construction activities shall be performed and maintained in full compliance with G.S. Chapter 113A Article 4
(Sediment and Pollution Control Act of 1973). Regardless of applicability of the Sediment and Pollution Control Act, all projects shall
incorporate appropriate Best Management Practices for the control of sediment and erosion so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur. [15A NCAC 02H .0506{b)(3) and (c)(3) and 15A NCAC 02B .0200]
Q
� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
E512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH RouNa Q.
919.707.9000
oawrhaant or [ iAamm,di Oua�

DocuSign Envelope ID:7791441C-CADD-4CC7-A44F-007189F7F257
27. Design, installation, operation, and maintenance of all sediment and erosion control measures shall be equal to or exceed the
requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual, or for linear
transportation projects, the NCDOT Sediment and Erosion Control Manual.
All devices shallbe maintained onall construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) sites, including contractor -owned or leased
borrow pits associated with the project. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosioncontrol measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at alltimes.
For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures shall be designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance
with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual. Reclamation measures and implementation shall comply
with the reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act and the Mining Act of 1971.
If the project occurs in waters or watersheds that contain federally -protected aquatic species, the sedimentation and erosion control
designs shall comply with the requirements set forth in 15A NCAC 04B .0124 (b-e), Design Standards in Sensitive Watershed.
[15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3) and (c)(3); GC 4135]
28. The stream channel shall be excavated no deeper than the natural bed material of the stream, to the maximum extent
practicable. Efforts must be made to minimize impacts to the stream banks, as well as to vegetation responsible for maintaining the
stream bank stability. Any applicable riparian buffer impact for access to stream channel shall be temporary and be revegetated with
native riparian species. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless contested. [G.S. 143-215.5] Please be aware that by having
impacted waters without first applying for and securing the issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification, you have violated Title 15A
of the North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 2H .0500. Title 15A NCAC 2H .0500 requires certifications pursuant to Section
401 of the Clean Water Act whenever construction or operation of facilities will result in a discharge into navigable waters, including
wetlands, as described in 33 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 323. It also states any person desiring issuance of the State
certification or coverage under a general certification required by Section 401 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act shall file
with the Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality. Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, these violations and any future
violations are subject to a civil penalty assessment of up to a maximum of $25,000.00 per day for each violation.
This Certification can be contested as provided in Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes by filing a Petition for a
Contested Case Hearing (Petition) with the North Carolina Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) within sixty (60) calendar days.
Requirements for filing a Petition are set forth in Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and Title 26 of the North
Carolina Administrative Code. Additional information regarding requirements for filing a Petition and Petition forms may be accessed
at http://www.ncoah.com/ or by calling the OAH Clerk's Office at [phone].
One (1) copy of the Petition must also be served to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality:
William F. Lane, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review of the Division under section 401 of the Clean Water Act and 15A NCAC 02H .0500. Please
contact Rob Ridings at rob.ridings(a»ncdenr.gov if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
0DocuSigned by:
.11ti 4&p
9C9886312DCD474...
S. Daniel Smith, Director
Division of Water Resources
cc:
Andy Williams, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Chris Murray, Project Engineer, Division 5 Planning & Environmental
Heather Montague, Division 5 Environmental Officer
Beth Harmon, Division of Mitigation Services
File Copy
D ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH CAROLINA 919.707.9000
pepa,hny,�p! EmlmnmmMl puallry

DocuSign Envelope ID:7791441C-CADD-4CC7-A44F-007189F7F257
NCDWR Project No.:
Applicant:
Project Name:
County:
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification:
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent
modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401 Transportation Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of
Water Resources, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1617. This form may be returned to NCDWR by the applicant, the
applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the
observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401
Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Agent's Certification
Date:
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the
observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401
Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Engineer's Certification
Partial Final
Date:
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North Carolina, having
been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project for the Permittee hereby state that, to the
best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to
be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature
Date
Registration No.
D ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH OAROLINA 919.707.9000
pepa,hny,�p! EmlmnmmMl puallry

DocuSign Envelope ID: 3DA8CB66-1 AEA-466F-AB88-E4B3F543131 E
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Mr. Brandon H. Jones, PE, Division Engineer
NCDOT Division 5
2612 North Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 3, 2021
DWR # 20210986
Wake County
Subject: APPROVAL OF NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER AUTHORIZATION WITH ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
NCDOT TIP #W-5601EY: NC Hwy 42 at SR 2727, Wake County.
Dear Mr. Jones:
You have our approval for the impacts listed below for the purpose described in your application received by the Division of Water
Resources (Division) July 28, 2021. These impacts are covered by the Neuse Buffer Rules and the conditions listed below. Please
note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including those required by (but
not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The following impacts are hereby approved, provided that all of the Conditions listed below and all of the conditions of the Neuse
Buffer Rules are met. No other impacts are approved, including incidental impacts. [15A NCAC 0213.0611(b)(2)]
Neuse Riparian Buffer Impacts
Site
Zone 1 Impact
(sq ft
Zone 1 Buffer Mitigation
Required(using 3:1 ratio)
Zone 2 Impact
(sq ft
Zone 2 Buffer Mitigation
Required(using 1.5:1 ratio
3
6489
N/A
3685
N/A
5
8818
N/A
4830
N/A
Totals
15307
0
8515
0
* n/a = Total for Site is less than 1/3 acre and 150 linear feet of impact, no mitigation required
Total Buffer Impact for Project: 23822 square feet.
This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application. The plans and specifications for this project are incorporated
by reference as part of this Authorization Certificate. If you change your project, you must notify the Division and you may be
required to submit a new application package. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Authorization
Certificate and is responsible for complying with all conditions. [15A NCAC 0213.061 l(b)(2)]
If you are unable to comply with any of the conditions below, you must notify the DWR Transportation Permitting Branch within 24
hours (or the next business day if a weekend or holiday) from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances.
The permittee shall report to DWR any noncompliance with the conditions of this Authorization Certificate and/or any violation of
state regulated riparian buffer rules [15A NCAC 02B.0714]. Information shall be provided orally within 24 hours (or the next business
day if a weekend or holiday) from the time the applicant became aware of the circumstances.
D E Q�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality j Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH CAROLINA
aewun oeim�m.ma owi� /ZO 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: 3DA8CB66-1 AEA-466F-AB88-E4B3F543131 E
Additional Conditions:
1. All stormwater runoff shall be directed as sheetflow through stream buffers at non -erosive velocities, unless otherwise approved by
this certification. [15A NCAC 02B.0714].
2. All riparian buffers impacted by the placement of temporary fill or clearing activities shall be restored to the preconstruction
contours and revegetated. Maintained buffers shall be permanently revegetated with non -woody species by the end of the growing
season following completion of construction. For the purpose of this condition, maintained buffer areas are defined as areas within the
transportation corridor that will be subject to regular NCDOT maintenance activities including mowing. The area with non -maintained
buffers shall be permanently revegetated with native woody species before the next growing season following completion of
construction. [15ANCACO2B.0714].
3. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B.0714, sediment and erosion control devices shall not be placed in Zone 1 of any Neuse Buffer without
prior approval by the NCDWR. At this time, the NCDWR has approved no sediment and erosion control devices in Zone 1, outside of
the approved project impacts, anywhere on this project. Moreover, sediment and erosion control devices shall be allowed in Zone 2 of
the buffers provided that Zone 1 is not compromised and that discharge is released as diffuse flow.
This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless contested. [G.S. 143-215.5]
This Authorization Certificate can be contested as provided in Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes by filing a
Petition for a Contested Case Hearing (Petition) with the North Carolina Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) within sixty (60)
calendar days. Requirements for filing a Petition are set forth in Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and Title 26 of
the North Carolina Administrative Code. Additional information regarding requirements for filing a Petition and Petition forms may
be accessed at http://www.ncoah.com/ or by calling the OAH Clerk's Office at [phone].
One (1) copy of the Petition must also be served to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality:
William F. Lane, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This Authorization shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
This letter completes the review of the Division under the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules as described in 15A NCAC 02B.0714. Please
contact Rob Ridings at rob.ridings&cdenr.gov if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
9C9886312DCD474...
S. Daniel Smith, Director
Division of Water Resources
cc:
Chris Murray, Project Engineer, Division 5 Planning & Environmental
Heather Montague, Division 5 Environmental Officer
File Copy
D ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH CAROLINA 919.707.9000
pepa,hny,�p! EmlmnmmMl puallry

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
WATER QUALITY GENERAL CERTIFICATION NO.4135
GENERAL CERTIFICATION FOR PROJECTS ELIGIBLE FOR US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
• NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBER 14 (LINEAR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS), AND
• REGIONAL GENERAL PERMIT 198200031 (NCDOT BRIDGES, WIDENING PROJECTS,
INTERCHANGE (IMPROVEMENTS)
Water Quality Certification Number 4135 is issued in conformity with the requirements of
Section 401, Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North
Carolina Regulations in 15A NCAC 02H .0500 and 15A NCAC 02B .0200 for the discharge of fill
material to surface waters and wetland areas as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (14) of
the US Army Corps of Engineers regulations and Regional General Permit 198200031.
The State of North Carolina certifies that the specified category of activity will not violate
applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-
217 if conducted in accordance with the conditions hereinafter set forth.
Effective date: December 1, 2017
Signed this day: December 1, 2017
By
for Linda Culpepper
Interim Director

CESAW-RG (File Number, SAW-2021-00295)
a44-"H,
09/24/2021
Signature of-S'ponsor's Authorized Representative Date of Signature
Conditions for Transfer of Compensatory Mitigation Credit:
• Once this document has been signed by the Mitigation Sponsor and the District is in receipt of the signed form, the
Permittee is no longer responsible for providing the mitigation identified in this form, though the Permittee remains
responsible for any other mitigation requirements stated in the permit conditions.
• Construction within jurisdictional areas authorized by the permit identified on page one of this form can begin only after
the District is in receipt of a copy of this document signed by the Sponsor, confirming that the Sponsor has accepted
responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein. When NCDMS provides mitigation for authorized
impacts conducted by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), construction within jurisdictional areas
may proceed upon permit issuance; however, a copy of this form signed by NCDMS must be provided to the District
within 30 days of permit issuance. NCDOT remains fully responsible for the mitigation until the District has received this
form, confirming that the Sponsor has accepted responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein.
• Signed copies of this document must be retained by the Permittee, Mitigation Sponsor, and in the USACE administrative
records for both the permit and the Bank/ILF Instrument. It is the Permittee's responsibility to ensure that the District
Project Manager (address below) is provided with a signed copy of this form.
• If changes are proposed to the type, amount, or location of mitigation after this form has been signed and returned to
the District, the Sponsor must obtain case -by -case approval from the District Project Manager and/or North Carolina
Interagency Review Team (NCIRT). If approved, higher mitigation ratios maybe applied, as per current District guidance
and a new version of this form must be completed and included in the District administrative records for both the permit
and the Bank/ILF Instrument.
Comments/Additional Conditions: A letter from NCDMS, confirming they are willing and able to accept the applicant's
compensatory mitigation responsibility, dated 7/23/2021 was included with the preconstruction notification. (67 linear
feet of stream impact at 2:1 ratio and 30 linear feet of stream impact at 1:1 ratio. 0.19 acre (rounded) at 2:1 ratio.)
This form is not valid unless signed below by the District Project Manager and by the Mitigation Sponsor on Page 1. Once
signed, the Sponsor should provide copies of this form along with an updated bank ledger to: 1) the Permittee, 2) the
District Project Manager at the address below, 3) the Bank Manager listed in RIBITS, and 4) the Wilmington District
Mitigation Office, 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105, Wake Forest, NC27587 (or by email to [e-mail]. mil).
Questions regarding this form or any of the permit conditions may be directed to the District Mitigation Office.
USACE Project Manager: Andrew Williams
USACE Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Email: [e-mail]
Date: 2021.08.27
11:44:06-04'00'
USACE Project Manager Signature
08/27/2021
Date of Signature
Current Wilmington District mitigation guidance, including information on mitigation ratios, functional assessments, and
mitigation bank location and availability, and credit classifications (including stream temperature and wetland groupings) is
available at http://ribits.usace.army.mil.

Hiq ha North Carolina Department of Transportation°
StOYIwX Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.07; Released October 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
°k
WBS Element: 50138.1.156 TIP No.: W-5601EY County(ies): Wake Page t of 2
General Project Information
WBS Element:
50138.1.156 ITIP Number: W-5601EY Project Type: Roadway Widening Date: 10/22/2017
NCDOT Contact:
Galen Cat, PE
Contractor / Desi ner:
Joshua G. Dalton, PE
Address:
NCDOT Hydraulics Unit
1590 Mail Service
Raleigh, NC 27699-1590
Address:
Sungate Design Group, P.A.
905 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone:
919-707-6727
Phone:
919-859-2243 ext. 201
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
[e-mail]
City/Town:
Raleigh
Coun ies :
Wake
River Basins :
Neuse
ICAMA County?
No
Wetlands within Project Limits?
Yes
Project Descri bon
Project Length lin. miles or feet):
0.20 surroundingLand Use: Low & Medium Residential
Pro osed Project
Existing Site
Project Built -Upon Area ac.
1.1 ac.
0.7 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description:
NC 42: 3 paved lanes (total 36' wide), 4' paved shoulder on each side, 2' grass shoulder
on each side (5' with guardrail)
NC 42: open shoulder section, 2 paved lanes (total 24' wide)
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Design/Future: 12000 Year:
Existing: 9,200 Year:
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has proposed to widen NC 42 in Wake County. This involves the extension of culvert #910975 along Little Creek.
The existing culvert is a 3@10'x9' Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (RCBC) with flared wingwalls and a square edge headwall. The existing culvert is not buried. The proposed
extension is approximately 16' upstream and 14' downstream. This structure has been designed to have as little environmental and surface water impacts as possible. Channel
improvements were made from the proposed RCBC design. Excavation was kept to a minimum to produce as little impact as possible. Where excavation is necessary,
geotextile and rip rap were utilized for bank stabilization in an attemp to reduce stream bank erosion. The proposed extension will not be buried. There is an existing 48" RCP
along a jurisdictional stream that will be replaced with a 72" RCP -III. On the NW quadrant of the pipe, there is an existing roadside ditch that outlets into the jurisdictional stream
which has been shifted to accomodate the fill slope. The proposed roadside ditch will be lined with Class B rip rap. The proposed ditch outlets into the stream with a non -erosive
velocity. On the SE quadrant of the pipe, there is an existing roadside ditch that outlets into the jurisdictional feature. This ditch has been shifted and lined with Class I rip rap.
The proposed ditch outlets into the stream with a non -erosive velocity.
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1): Little Creek
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
27-43-15-10
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Primary Classification:
Class C
Supplemental Classification:
Nutrient Sensitive Waters NSW
Other Stream Classification:
None
Impairments:
None
Aquatic T&E Species?
No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
Buffer Rules in Effect: Neuse
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
INo
I Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? INo
Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? INo
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
I N/A
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) I

Highway North Carolina Department of Transportation
Stormwater =�
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.07; Released October 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 50138.1.156 TIP No.: W-5601 EY County(ies): Wake Page 2 of 2
Additional Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (2): UT to Little Creek
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
27-43-15-10
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Primary Classification:
Class C
Supplemental Classification:
Nutrient Sensitive Waters NSW
Other Stream Classification:
None
Impairments:
None
Aquatic T&E Species?
No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
Buffer Rules in Effect: Neuse
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
INo
I Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? INo
Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? INo
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
I N/A
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
Surface Water Body 3 :
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Prima Classification:
Supplemental Classification:
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments:
Aquatic T&E Species?
Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
Buffer Rules in Effect:
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer?
Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
Surface Water Body 4 :
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Prima Classification:
Supplemental Classification:
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments:
Aquatic T&E Species?
Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
Buffer Rules in Effect:
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer?
Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
Surface Water Body 5 :
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Prima Classification:
Su lemental Classification:
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments:
Aquatic T&E Species?
Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
Buffer Rules in Effect:
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer?
Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)

W
O
I
See Sheet IA For Index of Sheets
See Sheet 1B For Conventionot Symbols
2727
4847
5503
if
2736 �� Gtlf PROJECT
SITE
2731
3889 err
3890
5330 5367 4840
2727
388
388
357
2734
42
42
4838
4358
�
435
4360
i/
2736 4837
735
43
4356 /,
361
/
I
G��O�
O.
�P
VICINH YMAP
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
LOCATION: CONSTRUCT AN EASTBOUND LEFT TURN
LANE ON NC 42 AT THE SR 2727 (SAULS RD.)
INTERSECTION.
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE AND CULVERT
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
BEGIN STATE TIP PROJECT
-L- POT STA. 11 + 00.00
SITE 1
TO HWY-401,---- - --
Q (FUQUAYIVARfNA)'
SITE 2
01EY
SITE 4
1 �N
r
1 jN
N.C.
W-5601 EY
I
50138.1.156
HSIP-0042(067)
PE
50138.2.156
HSIP-0042 067
R/W & UTIL.
50138.3.156
HSIP-0042(067)
CONST.
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 10
END STATE TIP PROJECT W-5601EY
-L- POT STA. 22 + 00.00 /
END PAVING
-L- STA. 21 + 60.00
TO I-40
er Qw N
Z }
SITE 3 SITE 5
1. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
2. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2015 = 12,000
V = 60 MPH
FUNC CLASS =
MINOR ARTERIAL
REGIONAL TIER
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT W-5601EY =.208 MILES
K5 5F,111,fNcrN.c., d
4505Falls ,141 Faxd
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
S"',4aa
Raleigh, NC 27609
1000 Birch Ridg a Dr.
l rh—,019)783-9114
KC7
Raleigh NC, 27610
— r 7,-266
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
DEWAYNE L. SYKES, P.E.
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
PROJECT ENGINEER
AUGUST 19, 2019
BRYAN E. HOUGH, P.E.
LETTING DATE:
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
APRIL 8, 2020
NCDOT CONTACT.- STEPHEN R. DAVIDSON, PE
DIVISION DESIGN ENGINEER — DIVISION 5
hcov
0
N
z
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.E.
SIGNATURE.
75% PLANS
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

50' 25' 0 50' 100, PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
W-5601EY 4
F+M
PW SHEET NO.
SCALE: 1"=100'
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
F F DENOTES FILL IN
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
WETLAND
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES MECHANIZED
DENOTES TEMPORARY
CLEARING
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
M�
�o
� N
o
zz
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
35 LF OF
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
SITE 3
BANK STABILIZATION
INLET F.
BENJAMIN FHARMON
PERMIT D RAW I N G
30 LF OF INLET
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS
& 42 LF INLET CHANNEL
Ln
BENJAMIN F. HARMON
SEE DETAIL 4
SEEP
N
/
SHEET 3 O F 10
BANK STABILIZATION \
` `
-�
/
SITE 4
ENLAR
EMENT VIEW
DAVID PORTER
PHYLLIS PORTER
EST.32 TONS CL II RIP RAP \ I \
EST. 57 SY GEOTE)MUE
SEE DETAIL 5
�m
\
\
ILI
\ y-
-L- +96.71 S
60A0'LT �O
TOE PROTECTION q-I
SPEC. LATERAL 'V' DITCH
�ccLs-ewP"_SEE
EST. 50 TON CL B RIPRAP
ET 5 OF 10
/
\ SITE 1 ,,,� -+
_ TOE PRO ECTION�
- + -'C
50A0' LT STA EST' S7 TONS ICL�� RIB RAP � m
60.00' LT
EST. 256 SY GQOTEXX�j��LE'L
y STA. 14+ 9 TO 16+86 -L- LT N
\ -'C ROnST
\ E53`. 69 TONS CL B RIP RAP
EST. 311,SY GEOTEXTILE I N�
SEE DETAIL I
d \
EST. 193 SY GEOTEXTILE
. 17+67 TO 19-14 -L- LT
SEE DETAIL 2
T
TDE 'V C
_ SITE 5
PDE I -L- 478,688
RY 50. ' LT
I VER 1'
TOE PROTECTION
STA. 20+50 TO 21+60 -L- LT
EST. 44 TONS CL B RIP RAP
EST. 195 SY GEOTEXTILE
SEE DETAIL 1
SEE ETAYL
E
E s
C G
a F -��
Ex s. Nc ww
�
�� 4 F
F
�-.i'
F
_
F
Exs,Na ww
F
F.O., Centu yLinkF�F
wrwr4,r�.�.rwrwr
-
-
F.O. Centur Llnk
n,lY y w
COLLAR
.0., Ce to yLink
/ 60" J
F C=CON p H
-
°
.8" E
-
—
2" RCP
_ _[7H�
f oJ�n is�o0n CW�
—��H
OVOE„or4pL�r�i=
HDPE, Johnsto��C—ountrr
L
Exislwc ww
*
—r
RY IN,NC
S e�eF m F� �— —_ F Q x13E'(BASIN TOPTWPFTHJ GTI
y-
w v e me6E—
<Y'
PDE
HOPE, Jonst on
o
C E m,+ —_ IF
�EC� F
P-I C 1 REMOVE 60 LF
C}+�?S Dine g Pr gO eS DITCH
a Exi rwc iw
S
SITE 2 \
TOE PROTECTION 18 LF OUTLET CHANNEL
+I p
(BASIN DEPTH) 1.5: SIDE SLO ggqFFE
CAP 1T1':188 CY
TDE /
C
DE
C
f
I 9 I
C,OC
mom\ �/Cl_ L LATERAL 2 BASE DITCH
q EST. I RIP RAP
EST. 81 TONS CL I RIP RAP
STA. 11 120 TO 14 116 -L- RT BANK STABILIZATION
EST. 83 TONS CL B RIP RAP EST. 95 TONS CL II RIP RAP
EST. 373 SY GEOTEXTILE GEOTEXTILE ON BANKS ONLY
� \
Z9
20 LF F
SPECIAL LATERAL IL BASE DITCH w/CL I RIP RAP
EST. 295 TONS I RIP RAP
EST. 149 SY GEOTEXTILE
FROM STA. 21+29 -L- RT
TO STA. 22+00 -L- RT
SEE DETAIL 1 EST. 45 SY GEOTEXTILE
BERRY EUGENE GUY SEE DETAIL 6
_ \'
s 1
\e\ \\
CHAN L &
\ BANK STABI ATION
AT PJ
- +
'L
GEOTE
EST. 681 SY 18 -L- -L- f7q,�7
FROM STA. 18-03 -L- RT 58.00'RT
62 -L- RT
SEE DETAIL 3
SICHEL T. SPEIGHTS
DOUTL /BZ
SEE
2
SEOE DETAIL
RACHEL E. TONST ALI
#
-
ELL W B
NCH
TIE
IN
6"
AK
TREE
TLM - ETA.
14+13.7
, 8
.06
LT
LEF
D17
CH
B
#2
- YELLON
BENCH
TIE
IN 10"
AK TREE
L =
231.12'
_ STA.
2+9
.86
28
03'
LT
EL
=
69.08
RIG
T DITCH
- -
- -
-
CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA
3Ca10'x9' RCBC Sta. 14+28
DESIGN DISCHARGE = 1,300
CFS
PIPE HYDRAULIC DATA
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 50
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 229.1
BASE DISCHARGE = 1,711
BASE FREQUENCY = l00
YRS
FT
CFS
YRS
72"WSP & RCP-1V Sla. /8+90
DRAINAGE AREA = 106 AC
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 50 YRS
DESIGN DISCHARGE = 1/0 CFS
END
PRO
ILE
-
ELEV.
257.
8'
270
BASE HW ELEVATION = 229.9
FT
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 235.5 FT
2 70
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 3,400
CFS
100 YEAR DISCHARGE = l30 CFS
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 500+
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 234.9
YRS
FT
100 YEAR HW ELEVATION = 235.9 FT
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 500+ YRS
BEGIN
PR
FIL
i
2
2
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 223 CFS
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 238.0 FT
ELEV.
2
1.1
'
2
Pl
CULVE
ZT -L-
TA. 14 4
28
1n
1n
250
= 12+75.
-
EL =
234.90
11
=
50'
70'SK
w
EL
= 2
_
3.60
I�
Ln
W
J EdVu
= 5
M
EXT
ND EX
STING
ROPo
D
K
97
U
V
I N
J II
Q m
o
+
24
cp1D'x9
RCBC
OADW
Y
V
50
MP
J
z
N
24
W I
v)
m
II
2'RCP
IV
N
CD
+
4.
2
T��
I+
7
230
I
I II
1=17+
7-
L
Z
e d
I I
EL
235.
_ I­_o
�JJ
OJW
1=18
00
L-
T
22
NORMLWS
22
DATE 1
-3-17
G
EC.
AT.
m
P1=1
+03
-L-
HT
it
910
L=2
9,8
10 11
12 13 14
15
16 17 18 19
20 21
22

50' 25' 0 50'
100, PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
W-5601EY 4
F+M
SCALE: 1"=100'
PW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
F F DENOTES FILL IN
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
WETLAND
SURFACE WATER
DENOTES MECHANIZED
DENOTES TEMPORARY
CLEARING
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
M�
�o
p N
o
zz
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
35 LF OF
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
SITE 3
BANK STABILIZATION
PIPE INLET
BENJAMIN F. HARMON
PERMIT D RAW I N G
30 OF INLET
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS �� 1
8 42 LF INLET CHANNEL � /��w� �
BANK STABILIZATION 1N \
L(T BENJAMIN F. HARMON
/
SEEP DETAIL 4
S
N
SHEET 4 O F 10
OAV10 PORTER
PHYLLIS PORTER
)
EST. ES TONS CLIIRIP RAP ,\I 111 �\
EST. 57 SY GEOTEXTILE \, I
-k SITE 4 -L- +9&7 3 S
SPEC.LATERAL'V'DITCH SEEENLETENT 5 OFEW
10
SEE DETAIL 5
SITE 1
_ z 9
ILI 60.00'LT (
I
\ y- TOE PROTECTION �I1
--LCL.6.wRAP
EST. 50 TON CL B RIPRAP
EST. 193 SY GEOTEXTILE
_ - +
50.00' LT
60.00' LT
\\
TOE PROECTION� `L
-'� K'
STA 11 S7 TONS 13L 8 RIB RAP �
y STA. 14+ 9 TO 16+86 -L- LT N
\ -� t NiY
\ EST. 69 TONS CL 8 RIP RAP I
EST. 311,SY GEOTEXTILE ly
I
. 17+67 TO 19-14 -L- LT
SEE DETAIL 2
— T PDE I
& RY
SITE 5
-L- +78.68
'
TOE PROTECTION
STA. 20+50 TO 21+60 -L- LT
EST. 44 TONS CL B RIP RAP
EST. GEOTEXTILE
EST. 256 SY G TEXj�.LE� �
QO AjL
SEE ET 1 -J;
SEE DETAIL 1 I'\ CO \`1
d � � I
g,
TDE ti 50. LT
C I VER 1'
DE IL
SEE DETAIL 1
xx sr
E
c'C
a a F
+
_
�r -
N
'Sf R
x
8" E
P o
�- 23L 3m
- �_ _
—25— =F F ��IN
c
ry ��� J ASfo
OV C pp�//
O,• p EM VE
IF O NDDTC/
�r5 \ \ Exi 1NG w
�� y
/ r'
\
4 � 4 \ N
w A
p SIZE 60 (BASIN TOP ENGTH
x 31 (BASIN TOP W TH) x I
(BASIN DEPTH) 1.5: SIDE SLO
-
w
PD`E E C
C E
. 5 � t" IiNc
E
SF� /h
T
C
/ Ex iw
_
/ Duke Energy Pro r
9y g ess
/
�''
�PECIAL
SITE 2
TOE PROTECTION 18 LF OUTLET CHANNEL
Il CAP 1�: 188 CY
I TIDE /
@\
()E
C I
f — — —
c'�+ / I'
n
LATERAL 2' BASE DITCH
r1 es`� w/CL I RIP RAP
/9/ EST. 81 TONS CL I RIP RAP
STA. 11 120 TO 14 116 -L- RT BANK STABILIZATION
EST. 83 TONS CL B RIP RAP EST. 95 TONS CL II RIP RAP
EST. 373 SY GEOTE)MUE
SEE DETAIL 1 GEOTEXTILE ON BANKS ONLY
79
\ 20 LF F
\I CHAN L 8
e\e\
SPECIAL LATERAL IL BASE DITCH
EST. 295 TONS CL I RIP RAP
- + EST. 681 SY GEOTEXTILE
w/CL I RIP RAP /
-L- +7q,�7 —26�
EST. 149 SY GEOTEXTILE
/, FROM STA. 21+29 -L- RT
TO STA. 22+00 -L- RT
EST. 45 SY GEDETAILLE
1
BANK STABI ATION
'L FROM STA. 16-03 -L- RT
58.00'RT
SEE DETAIL 3
BARRY EUGENE GUY SEE DETAIL 6
AT PJ DOUTL /BZ
\ \ PEE
2 SEOE DETAIL 62 -L- RT
SICHEL T. SPEIGHTS
RACHEL E. TUNST ALI
#
-
ELL W BENCH
TIE
IN
6"
AK
TREE
TLM - ETA.
14+13.7
, 8
.O6
LT
[LEFT
Dl
CH
BIl
#2
- YELLON
BENCH
TIE
IN 10"
AK TREE
L =
231.12'
- STA.
2+9
.86
28
03'
LT
EL
=
69.08
RlG
T DI
CH
- -
- -
-
CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA
3CaIQ'X9' RCBC Sta. 14+28
DESIGN DISCHARGE = 1,300
CFS
PIPE HYDRAULIC DATA
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 50
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 229.1
BASE06—
DISCHARGE = 1,711
BASE FREQUENCY = l00
YRS
FT
CFS
YRS
72"WSP & RCP-1V Sla. /8+90
DRAINAGE AREA = 106 AC
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 50 YRS
DESIGN DISCHARGE = 1/0 CFS
END
PROFILE
ELEV.
2
7.
8'
270
BASE HW ELEVATION = 229.9
FT
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 235.5 FT
2 70
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 3,400
CFS
100 YEAR DISCHARGE = l30 CFS
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 500+
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 234.9
YRS
FT
100 YEAR HW ELEVATION = 235.9 FT
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 500+ YRS
BE
IN
PROFILI
i
260
2
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 223 CFS
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 238.0 FT
ELE
. 2
1.1
'
2
Pl
CULVE
ZT -L-
TA. 14 4
28
A
1n
250
= 12�;F75.6
V
-
=
50'
EL =
7D°sK
234.90
w
EL
= 2
3.60
I;
Ln
J
_
W
W
= 5
M
EXT
ND EX
STING
ROPo
D
K
97
U
I N
Q m
o
+
24
cp1D'x9
RCBC
OADW
Y
V
50
MP
91
Q I
W
I J
z
N
1
24
W I
Lo
m
II
21RCP
IV
N
CD
+
1%
(-J0524I.
(+)4.-/667_
�N Lu
561
2
T��
T+
7
230
I
I II
1=17+
7-
L
Z
d
I I
EL =
235.
is
o
�J
OJLu
1=18
00
L-
T
22
NOW
I WS
J
22
DATE 11
-17
G
EC.
AT.=Z
m
P1=1
+03
-L-
RT
it
L=2
9.8
10 11
12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20
21
22

TDE
IMPACTSAN
SURFACI WATER
W
TEMP IMPACTS
IN SURFACE WATER
xv
J
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER BAN �ATTABILIZATION
DENOTES TEMPORARY PIPE INLET
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER SEE DETAIL 4
IMPACTS I
URFACE WATER
42,1
20' 10' 0 20' 40'
J tFtM
SCALE:I"=20'
m
of Dt r
SPEC. LATERAL
'V' DITCH _
SEE DETAIL 2
a
ro ro 0 o O o0 0� Oro
N/2 1 C
Zs /COO)
i
T F0 ._
�i
L
Kle
XTA
�4
LIN
MPIMPACTS
SURFACE WATER
Lu
° o
oO
0
ti0\
SITE S
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
W-5601EY
P,W SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
ENGINEER
E PLANS
M
QO NOT llSE FOR
/ W ACQUISITION
z
- ov oc
�o 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Oo0�Oo 0 o v� _ vp i
oo� 0c:)
CD 0 o O o0
1 o g 000 0�0 0 SPECIAL LATERAL 2' BASE DITCH w/CL LRIP--RAP-
EST. 295 TONS CL I RIP_RAP- —
\ ,P D E — — T-6&1-XTI SY-GIEOTELE
FROM STA. 18 + 03 -LT
�� -RCP-IV �O STA. 20+62 -L- R
BANK STABILIZ ION \
- AT PIPE OUT T
SEE DETAIL
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 5 OF 10

0�
LJT�
JT_
5 10
PROJ. REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
I W-5601 EY
X-1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
:5
0
20
1
1
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
ITE
1
3
0.02
02
SI
E
PERMIT
DRAWING
M
CH
NI
ED
CLEARING
?�
EC
ANIZED
C
EAR
NG
H
E
F
10
q
in
JI
w
in
FILL
I
ET
N
0.02
Log=
FILL
I
ETL
N
E
HA
IZ
D
CLEARING
2�
EC
ANIZED
C
EAR
NG
Z
w
ILL
N
ET
AN
o.02
02
FILLI
WETLAND
_
in
MECHANIZED
LE
RING
EC
ANIZED
C
EAR
NG
0
0
SIT
1
3
3
SIT
2
FILL
IN
WE
LA
D
0.02
0.02
ME
HA
IZ
D
CLEARING
EC
ANIZED
C
EAR
NG
12
+
0.
0
P-
inL,
0 01
0.01
6:7
10
+
0.
00
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
110
1
10
0
0
0
0
5
0
20
1
1
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0

0
LJJJTJJ_�I
5 10
PROJ. REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
W-5601 EY
X-2
1
0
1
0
1,30
120
1
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
AO
30
20
1
1
20
30
AO
0
60
0
80
0
100
1
0
1,10
130
1
0
150
PERMIT
DRAWIN
H
E
F
10
O.
2
O.0
0. 22
0.02
0.0
0.02
z
16+
0.
0
--
ITE
4
3
0.(12
.02
ME
HA
IZ
D
LE
RING
2`
Z
ME
HA
IZ
D
FILL
CLEARING
Vs—WETIJ
'ND
15
+
0.
0
ITE
4
ST
EA
LITTLE
CREEK
ME
HA
IZ
D
LE
RING
tit
S
RF
CE
WA
ER
ITE
3
—
—
TMPIMACSI
S
RF
CE
WA
ER
14+
-
SI
E
S
REAM
ITT
E qREEK
IM
CTS
IN
P
1
1 0.02
.02
—
?.
A
ER
N.
0.
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
100
0
80
10
10
50
4p
10
1 20
11
1
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0

PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
W—5601EY
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
dNC®N�PLE
rE PLANS
DO NOV USE P+OE
VW ACQUIRT]ON
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
C
STA,
1
+28
-
-
3@
0'x
' R
BC
C1.
EL
V
34.9'
SITE
J
2.12:1
SKEWED
(
YP.
:1
NO
M
L
(Ty .)
EXISTING
RIGHT
EXIS
. TOP
SLAO
EXIST
NG
RIGHT
TO
O
B
NK
ELE
.=
22.7
V
T
DP
DF
ANK
E
EV.
2
4.3
/
DATE:
8-3-17
LEV
= 2
2.
OUTLET
PR
TEC
IO
BA KFI
MA
L
5:1
N
RM
L
XIS
. INVERT
O
ELE
. =
18.
'
LA
S I
RIP
RA
LO
E=0.0
•
3 FT.FT
EXIST.
IN
ER
EO
EXT
LE
TYP)
ELEV.
= 2
2.7
OL)TLEr
POT
CTI
N
CL
SS
THWIC
II R
P RAP
2�
GOT
XTI
E (
P.)
EX
AV
TI
N
EXCAVATION2
Y
III,
left
j,EO
LA
S II
RIP
RAP
EX
ILE
(TYP.)
S
LE
5'

PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
W—5601EY
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
INC®NPLE
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
rE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR
VW ACQUIRT]ON
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
SHEET
9
OF
10
C
STA 1
72" W
+ 87 —
P/RCP
—
SITE 5
I
I
OP=24
—22
.9
.6
EX
TOP
F BAN
EX
OP OF
BANK
EX
8" RCP
— —
INV=230.4
72'
S=1.01%
WSP
20 LF
CL I RI
PROPOE
RAP
ED CO
NTERS
NK
2" RCP
S =1.0
IV
°/D
72
' RCP —IN'
=1.010
IN
=228.

WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
11+79 to 13+65-L-LT
ROADWAY FILL
0.02
0.06
100007
2
11+88 to 13+66-L-RT
ROADWAY FILL
0.03
0.03
00007
3
13+87 to 14+38-L-LT
CULVERT EXTENSION INLET
Individually rounded
numbers
< 0.01
16
INLET CHANNEL
< 0.01
13
INLET BANK STABILIZATION
42
CULVERT EXTENSION OUTLET
< 0.01
14
OUTLET CHANNEL
0.01
10
OUTLET BANK STABILIZATION
18
4
14+43 to 15+86-L-LT
ROADWAY FILL
0.03
0.04
5
17+75 to 19+36-L-
72" PIPE at INLET
< 0.01
20
18+94 to 19+36-L-LT
INLET CHANNEL
< 0.01
12
19+05 to 19+26-L-LT
INLET BANK STABILIZATION
The hydraulics unit
calculates the
complete/final
amount and then
rounds the final
quantity.
35
18+04 to 18+38-L-RT
72" PIPE at OUTLET
47
17+75 to 17+87-L-RT
OUTLET CHANNEL
< 0.01
< 0.01
15
17+87 to 18+04-L-RT
OUTLET CHANNEL COUNTERSUNK
RIP RAP AND BANK STABILIZATION
< 0.01
20
TOTALS*:
0.07
1
RIM 0.12
0.02
0.02
212
50
0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
2018 Feb

I
See Sheet IA For Index of Sheets
See Sheet 1B For Conventionot Symbols
2727
4847
5503
if
2736 �� Guf PROJECT
SITE
2731
3889 err
3890
5330 5367 4840
2727
388
388
357
2734
42
42
4838
4358
�
435
4360
i/
2736 4837
735
43
4356 /,
361
/
I
G��O�
O.
�P
VICINN YMAP
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE CO UNTY
LOCATION: CONSTRUCT AN EASTBOUND LEFT TURN
LANE ON NC 42 AT THE SR 2727 (SAULS RD.)
INTERSECTION.
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE AND CULVERT
BEGIN STATE TIP PROJECT W-5601EY
-L- POT STA. 11 + 00.00
TO HWY-401---- - --
Q (FUQUAY IVAP"A)
BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT
RAC _41-
�,� SITE 3
N.C.
W-5601 EY
I
50138.1.156
HSIP-0042(067)
PE
50138.2.156
HSIP-0042 067
P/W & UTIL.
50138.3.156
HSIP-0042(067)
CONST.
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 4
END STATE TIP PROJECT W-5601EY
N -L- POT STA. 22 + 00.00
1 aN END PAVING
-L- STA. 21 + 60.00
TO I-40
er Qw N
Z I}
SITE 5
1. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
2. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA
50 25 0 50 100 ADT 2015 = 12,000
PLANS V = 60 MPH
50 25 0 50 100 FUNC CLASS =
MINOR ARTERIAL
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20 REGIONAL TIER
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT W-5601EY =.208 MILES
or:
K5 5F,111scf<<erN.c., d
4505Falls -41 Faxd
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
S"',4aa
Raleigh, NC 27609
1000 Birch Ridg a Dr.
l rh—,019)783-9114
KC7
Raleigh NC, 27610
— Faa (Y I `J7 7,-266
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
DEWAYNE L. SYKES, P.E.
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
PROJECT ENGINEER
AUGUST 19, 2019
BRYAN E. HOUGH, P.E.
LETTING DATE:
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
APRIL 8, 2020
NCDOT CONTACT.- STEPHEN R. DAVIDSON, PE
DIVISION DESIGN ENGINEER — DIVISION 5
hcov
0
N
z
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
75% PLANS
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

w
w
z
0
�Fne
'AF»e
H�y}e
w�u
r v+<
50' 25' 0 50' 100, PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
W-5601EY 4
F+M
PW SHEET NO.
SCALE: 1"=100'
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS
ZONE 1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS
ZONE 2
o
zz
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
35 LF
OF
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
SITE 3
BANK STABILIZATION
PIPE INLET F.
BENJAMIN FHARMON
BUFFER D RAW I N G
SEE DETAIL 4
S
30 LF OF INLET \
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS 1
ID
BENJAMIN F. HARMON
/
8 42 LF INLET CHANNEL l
N
BANK STABILIZATION \
/
DAVID PORTER
PHYLLIS PORTER
EST. 32 TONS CL II RIP RAP
EST. 57 SY GEOTE)MUE \
\
-L- +96.71 S
SPEC. LATERAL 'V' DITCH
SEE DETAIL 5
I`
'LT
%/CL B RIPRAP
_ +
\ \ ,,
TOE PR `
O�CTION � m
TOE PROTECTION
NI
\ 'L _*STA. 14+�39 TO 16+86 -L- LT I
ST
ESQ: 69 TONS CL B RIP RAPSTA.
EST . 50 TON CL B RIPRAP
EST. 193 SY GEOTEXTILE
. 17+67 TO 19-14 -L- LT
SITE 5
TOE PROTECTION
20 50 TLT
OCL
STA. 11 84 TO 13 i' 8 -L- T
50A0' LT EST. 57 TONS CL RIB RAP Dmm
60.00' LT EST. 256 SY GQOTEXX��LE'L
NF�ROMI
\ I s
EST. 311,SY GEOTEXTILE
l d -7 I SEE DETAIL I ' ap CO \
SEE DETAIL 2
T
TDE —
-
\ I
EST. 444 TONS B RIP RAP
EST. 195 SY GEOTEXTILE
SEE DETAIL 1
E
SEE
ESE
w E
�er
exSTNeww
�
\ 4F 4
0
I
c
C 4
EXISTING ww
Nov' �
' wrwr4�Wrwr�vr \
EeT- -
o
F.O. Centur Llnk
gl
u_CONC. DITCH
F.O., Centu yLink �F
-- -
--
-
.0., CenturyLL!nk
--'
F J
-
_
N.C. HWY 42 R� 81 @ B \
%
78
N ' 0/' 44.8' E '
L Z8
° - -
--,� --�
C. HWY 42 -
_
24.5' BST
- _ -
i[7�� oJ�in S�o�n CW Uri— - Tv
OVO„
_ o'c4Nr��iCi� o
HDPE, Jornsto
5
HOPE, JConst on - C
NounLt r
Ce- -
REMOVE 60 LF
mDu�e�
Ex6TWG wW
\�
Y-
y.�
A y-
F SIZE' BASIN IN TOP F ENGTH
( )x
(BASIN DEPTH) 1.5: SIDE SLOPE,
\ . e
•
F m
6E— C _E �L p F
R ov
C E FT
I
CPT QQ ING TW
Pr CONC.2DITCH
} z s
�/Cl_
`
/�: 188 CY
TDE
�� \�
Sc T m •
L LATERAL 2' BASE DITCH
es`T w/CL I RIP RAP
TOE PROTECTION 18 LF OUTLET CHANNEL
STA. 11 120 TO 14 116 -L- RT BANK STABILIZATION
EST. 83 TONS CL B RIP RAP EST. 95 TONS CL II RIP RAP
EST. 373 SY GEOTE)MUE GEOTEXTILE ON BANKS ONLY
� \
s
s \I � o.
Ze
2 F
L & L
- +
p 4
V+NJ
SPECIAL LATERAL 2' BASE DITCH w/CL I RIP RAP
o
EST. 681 TONS CL I RIP RAP I`
EST. 681 SY GEOTEXTILE -L- f7q,�7
EST. 81 TONS CL I RIP RAP
EST. 149 SY GEOTEXTILE
FROM STA. 21+29 -L- RT
TO STA. 22+D0 -L- RT
SEE DETAIL 1 EST. 45 SY GEOTEXTILE
BARRY EUGENE GUY SEE DETAIL 6
1 o
\\. Z9
BANK �. ATI
--_BANK,
�\� O
'L
BZ 2
FROM STA. 18-03 -L- RT 58.00'RT
TO STA. 20+62 -L- RT
SEE DETAIL 3
SICHEL T. SPEIGHTS
1\
�'/�..,/$fE D� �
SEE DETAIL 3
RACHEL E. TUNST ALI
M #
-
ELL W BENCH
TIE
IN
6"
OAK
TREE
- ETA.
TL-L
14+13.7
, 8
.O6
LT
LEF
D17
CH
Bll
#2
- YELLON
BENCH
TIE
IN 10"
AK TREE
=
231.12'
- STA.
2+9
.86
28
03'
LT
EL
=
69.08
RIG
T DI
CH
- -
- -
-
CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA
3CaIQ'X9' RCBC Sta. 14+28
DESIGN DISCHARGE = 1,300
CFS
PIPE HYDRAULIC DATA
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 50
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 229.1
BASE DISCHARGE = 1,711
BASE FREQUENCY = l00
YRS
FT
CFS
YRS
72"WSP & RCP-/V Sla. /8+90
DRAINAGE AREA = 106 AC
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 50 YRS
DESIGN DISCHARGE = 1/0 CFS
END
PRO
ILE
—
ELE
. 2
7.
8'
270
BASE HW ELEVATION = 229.9
FT
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 235.5 FT
2 70
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 3,400
CFS
100 YEAR DISCHARGE = l30 CFS
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 500+
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 234.9
YRS
FT
100 YEAR HW ELEVATION = 235.9 FT
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 500+ YRS
BEGIN
PROFILE
i
2
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 223 CFS
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 238.0 FT
260
ELEV.
2
1.1
'
::t
kQ
Lo
`2
P
CULVERT
-L-
TA. 14
28
J I�
cr In
250
l = 125.
+7
-
EL =
234.90
V
=
50'
7D°sK
w
EL
= 2
3.60
I;
J
_
W
W
= 5
M
EXT
ND EX
STING
ROPo
D
K
97
U
V
I N
J II
Q m
o
+
24
�10'x9
RCBC
OADW
Y
V
50
MP
a/
Q I
W
I J
z
N
24
W I
vT
m
II
eRCP
IV
N
CD
+
2
Til
I+
230
I
I II
l=17+
57-
L
Z
d
I I
EL
235.
O
1
1=18
00
L-
T
22
NORM
L WS
J J
W
22
DATE
-3-17
B7G
SPEC.LAT.
m
Pl=l
+03
-L-
RT
it
L=2
98210
10 11
12 13 14
15
16 17 18 19 20 21
22

RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACTS
BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT
Site Station Structure ROAD PARALLEL
No. (From/To) Size / Type CROSSING IMPACT BRIDGE ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2
(ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2)
3
13+18 to 15+39-L-
CULVERT EXTENSION
X
6489
3685
10174
5
17+48 to 19+77-L-
ROADWAY FILL
X
8818
4830
13648
TOTALS*:
15307
1 8515
1 23822
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
0
NOTES:
2018 Feb

WETLANDS IN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLANDS IN
BUFFERS
ZONE1 ZONE2
SITE NO. STATION (FROM/TO) (ft) (ft)
3 1 13,18 to 15+39-L- 278 917
(TOTAL: 1 278 1 917 1
2018 Feb
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
7-21-2021
WAKE COUNTY
W-5601EY
50138.3.156
SHEET 4 OF 4
Rev. Jan 2009

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
June 1, 2021 Ver 4.1
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E-PCN, all you need to do is right -click on the document and you can print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https://edoes. deq. n e.gov/WaterResou rces/0/ed oc/624704/PCN % 20 Help / 20F i le / 202018-1-30. pdf
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:*
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project*
r Yes C No
Click Yes, only if NCDlvS is the applicant a co -applicant.
Is this project a public transportation project?
O Yes f No
This is arry publicly funded by rrunicipal,state a federal funds road, rail, airport transpafatm project.
Is this a NCDOT Project?*
C Yes C No
(NCDOT only) T.I.P. or state project number:
W-5601EY
WBS#*
50138.1.156 (Note: charge any administrative fees to 50138.155)
(fa N=use aiy)
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:*
IJ Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
G Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
r Yes
R No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
IJ Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified bythe Corps?*
6 Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 14 - Linear transportation
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
List all NJVnurbers ycu are applying fa not m the drop dawn list.
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:*
check all that apply
PP 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit rJ Riparian Buffer Authorization
r Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
Before submitting this form please ensure you have submitted the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form as we will not be able to accept your application without this important first step. The Pre -Filing
Meeting Request Form is used in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.4(a) "At least 30 days prior to submitting a certification request, the project proponent shall request a pre -filing meeting with the
certifying agency" and in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.5(b)(7), and (c)(5) all certification requests shall include documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was submitted to the certifying

authority at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request. Click hereto read more information on when this form is needed prior to application submission or hereto view the form.
Is this a courtesy copy notification?*
r Yes (-- No
ID# Version
20210986 1
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date
6/30/2021
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
Oickthe upload button a drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
W-5601 EY Pre -filing meeting review information 20120986 ver 1.pdf 1.11 MB
File type crust be FCF
1e. Is this notification so lelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
.............................................. .......................................................................................................................................
*
For the record onlyfor DWR401 Certification: f Yes F No
For the record onlyfor Corps Permit: f Yes F No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
C Yes F No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
If so, attach the acceptance letter from ratigaton bank a in -lieu fee program
F Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Oickthe upload button a drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Accept-W-5601 EY-Div 5.pdf 394.3KB
FiLEiYFE MJST BE FDF
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?*
r Yes F No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?*
c Yes c No
Link to trout information: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
B. Applicant Information V
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Chris Murray, SPWS
1b. Pri mary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner
(Check all that apply)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
C Yes (-- No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:*
North Carolina Department of Transportation
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
(fa Corpvations)
2d. Address*
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
❑ Applicant (other than owner)

Street Address
2612 North Duke Street
Address Line 2
atY
Durham
Postal / Zp Code
27704
2e. Telephone Number:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Aovince / Regim
NC
Country
USA
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information lJ
1a. Name of project:*
Construct eastbound left turn lane on NC 42 at SR 2727 (Sauls Rd) intersection in Wake County
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
*
Raleigh
2. Project Identification lJ
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
(tax RN a parcel ID)
(in acres)
Various
3.2
2c. Project Address
Street Address
near 4366 NC Highway 42
Address Line 2
aty
State / Aovince / Regim
Raleigh
NC
Postal / Zp Code
Country
27603
USA
2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits (unless you are using a survey -grade GPS device) after the decimal place as appropriate, based on howthe location was
determined. (For example, most mobile phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal place.)
Latitude:* Longitude:*
35.59004-78.63480
ex: 34.208504-77.796371
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Lick Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
27-43-15-10; Class C; NSW
Surface Water Lookup
.............................................................................................................. .......................
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.*
030202010902
River Basin Lookup
4. Project Description and History

4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Existing conditions at the site includes wooded, undeveloped land. Scattered residential housing is located along NC 42 just outside of the project limits.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes F No r Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.19
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
(intermittent and paenrial)
262
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Purpose of the project is to improve safety of the intersection by reducing the number of rear end collisions. This is accomplished by installing a left turn lane on NC 42 to give left
turning vehicles storage separate from the through lane.
The project is not being constructed as part of another project (i.e. new subdivision or business). It is a single and complete project which has independent utility. In other words, this is
a stand alone project that meets the purpose and need statement. This project is not related to any other project that has stream and/or wetland impacts.
—Important: This W-5601 EY project will be let with W-5601 EX. W-5601 EX is a separate intersection improvement project in the nearby vicinity (but is NOT directly adjacent to the limits
of W-5601 EY). Both projects have separate independent utility and exist as separate projects. The W-5601 EY project as a TIP number will likely be dropped and both the W-5601 EX
and W-5601 EY project combined inletting to assist in reducing project costs and administrative issues.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:
1. Widen fill slopes (reduced to 2:1 in wetlands and streams) throughout the project to provide for the typical section.
2. Extend emsting 3 @ 10'x9' Reinforced Box Culvert (Structure 910975) at Lick Creek.
3. Emsting 48 inch RCP pipe will be replaced with a larger 72 inch RCP pipe. This pipe will partially be installed via trenchless installation.
4. Emsting cross section: 2 paved lanes (24 ft total width). Proposed cross section: 3 paved lanes (36 ft total width).
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
c Yes
r No
Comments:
Delineated by Nikki Thompson (Kleinfelder).
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
O Preliminary O Approved f Not Verified r Unknown f N/A
Corps AID Number:
Exarrple: SAW-2017-99999
SAW-2021-00295
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Nikki Thompson
Agency/Consultant Company: Kleinfelder
Other:
O Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made bythe Corps or DWR.
February 11, 2021
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This
includes other separate and distant crossing for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification.
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands F0 Streams -tributaries W Buffers
F- Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
"W." will be used in the table below to represent the word "wetland".

2al Reason*(?)
2b. Impact type*(?)
2c. Type of W.
2d. W. name*
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of J12g.
Jurisdicition*(')
Impact
area*
Site 1
Roadway Fill
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland B
Yes
Both
0.020
(acres)
Site 1
Mechanized Clearing
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland B
Yes
Both
0.060
(acres)
Site 2
Roadway Fill
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.030
(acres)
Site 2
Mechanized Clearing
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.030
(acres)
Site 4
Roadway Fill
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland A
Yes
Both
0.030
(acres)
Site 4
Mechanized Clearing
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland A
Yes
Both
0.040
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.210
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.210
2i. Comments:
Rounding issues with this PCN spreadsheet. NCDOT summary sheet indicates 0.07 ac total permanent fill in wetlands and 0.12 ac total mechanized
clearing in wetlands. NCDOT will provide for 0.19 ac of wetland mitigation for the project.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted.
"S." will be used in the table below to represent the word "stream".
3a. Reason for impact*(')
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
3f. Type of
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
M
Jurisdiction*
length*
S1
Culvert extension inlet
Permanent
Culvert
Lick Creek
Perennial
Both
23
16
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S2
Culvert inlet channel
Tem orar
P Y
Dewaterin 9
Lick Creek
Perennial
Both
23
13
dewatering
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S3
Culvert inlet bank
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Lick Creek
Perennial
Both
23
42
stabilization
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S4
Culvert extension outlet
Permanent
Culvert
Lick Creek
Perennial
Both
24
14
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S5
Culvert outlet channel
Tem orar
P Y
Dewaterin 9
Lick Creek
Perennial
Both
24
10
dewatering
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S6
Culvert outlet bank
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Lick Creek
Perennial
Both
24
18
stabilization
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S7
72 inch e at inlet
pipe
Permanent
Culvert
UT to Lick Creek
Perennial
Both
8
20
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
gg
72 inch pipe inlet channel
Temporary
Dewatering
UT to Lick Creek
Perennial
Both
8
12
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S9
72 inch e inlet bank
pipe
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
UT to Lick Creek
Perennial
Both
8
35
stabilization
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S10
72 inch pipe at outlet
Permanent
Culvert
UT to Lick Creek
Perennial
Both
8
47
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S11
72 inch pipe outlet channel
Temporary
Dewatering
UT to Lick Creek
Perennial
Both
8
15
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S12
72 inch pipe outlet
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
UT to Lick Creek
Perennial
Both
8
20
countersunk rip rap pad and
Average(feet)
(linear feet)
bank stabilization
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government.
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
212

3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
50
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
262
3j. Comments:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts below.
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)? *
Check all that apply.
rJ Neuse r Tar -Pamlico
r Catawba r Randleman
r Goose Creek r Jordan Lake
r Other
6b. Impact Type*(?)
Culvert Extension/Roadway Fill
6c. Per or Temp* (?) 6d. Stream name* 6e. Buffer mitigation required? * 6f. Zone 1 impact* 6g. Zone 2 impact*
P Lick Creek No 6,489 3,685
-]
(square feet) (square feet)
Pipe Extension/ Roadway Fill
P
UT to Lick Creek
t
8,818
(square fee[)
4,830
(square feet)
6h. Total buffer impacts:
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 15,307.00
8,515.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 15,307.00
8,515.00
6i. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:*
1. Both structures have been designed to have as little wetland, stream and buffer impact as possible.
2. Bank excavation was kept to minimumto produce as little impact as possible.
3. Stilling Basin #1 relocated outside of riparian buffer area.
4. Where excavation is necessary, geotextile and Class II rip rap will be used to provide long term stabilization and reduce stream bank scour.
5. A 72 inch water line located to the south of NC 42 will be relocated at project. This will be installed at the culvert site by bore/jack with receiving/exit
pits outside of the riparian buffer zones (i.e no stream impacts from this specific utility at the culvert crossing).
6. Project will utilize 2:1 slopes throughout limits ofjurisdictional resources to minimize impacts to streams, wetlands and riparian buffers. The Division
Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer has indicated that further steepening of the fill slope (i.e. to a 1.5:1) will result in reduced
establishment of permanent vegetation and result in loss of sediment from the fill slope.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:*
1. Significant effort will be made during construction to minimize impacts to streams, wetlands and riparian buffers. This will be accomplished through
monthly environmental permit reviews. Additional on site meetings will be held with NCDOT inspectors and contractor to evaluate further efforts to
minimize impacts during construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
F Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
r DWR I7 Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?

❑ Mitigation bank © Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
G Yes G No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
30 linear feet at 1 : 1 ratio and 67 linear feet at
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
a 2:1 ratio. This is per Andy Williams (USACE)
warm
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation
Concepts tab on the Wilmington District's RIBITS website.
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
0.19 acre at a 2:1 ratio per Andy Williams
(square feet)
(USACE)
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) Ca
*** Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section .***
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
F Yes r No
1 b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of stormwater treatment. If the project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection
program, include a plan that fully documents how diffuse flowwill be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM)s must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design Manual. Associated supplement forms and other documentation shall be
provided.
What type of SCM are you providing?
r" Level Spreader
r" Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
❑ Other SCM that removes minimum30% nitrogen
[jl Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flowthrough the buffer
(check all that apply)
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r• Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
F Yes r No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
F Yes
r No
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized bythe State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copyof the NEPAor SEPAfinal approval letter.)*
Yes
6 No
Comments:*
Document does not need to be finalized by the State Clearing House.

2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
f Yes (-- No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?.*
r Yes r- No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This safety project has independent utility and is not tied to any other project. Construction of this project does not result in additional development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a.Issewage disposal required byDWRforthis project?*
r Yes C No O N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
6 Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
F Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes O No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?*
O Yes O No
O Unknown
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?*
Completion of a Natural Resource Technical Update, various updated site visits to conduct protected species surveys/assessments and various
coordination with Gary Jordan (USFWS) to specifically reviewthis project and the various aquatic species surveys most recently on February 11,
2021.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?
C Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Available mapping.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data: http://gis.neder.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic
Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina historyand archaeology)?*
r Yes F No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
Direct coordination with NCDOT Cultural Resources including Archaeology and Historic Architecture reviews and assessments.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMAFIoodplain Maps: https://rrse.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
F Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The effective FEMA panel is 1606. This project has been approved through the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program and coordination with
NCDOT. The project will be completed as a MOA Type 2b, which are projects that result in measurable impacts with a decrease of greater or less than
0.5 ft.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*

The effective HEC-RAS model and effective panel that was obtained from FEMA and NCFRIS were utilized to determine the effects of the revised
structure on the floodplain.
Miscellaneous U
Comments
The project is not being constructed as part of another project (i.e. new subdivision or business). It is a single and complete project which has independent utility. In other words, this is
a stand alone project that meets the purpose and need statement. This project is not related to any other project that has stream and/or wetland impacts.
—Important: This W-5601 EY project will be let with W-5601 EX. W-5601 EX is a separate intersection improvement project in the nearby vicinity (but is NOT directly adjacent to the limits
of W-5601 EY). The W-5601 EY project as a TIP number will likely be dropped and both the W-5601 EX and W-5601 EY project combined in letting to W-5601 EX assist in reducing project
costs and administrative issues.
Current let date is June 8, 2022 but will likely be accelerated to December 8, 2022. Anticipate construction to start in March 2022.
Minimum Criteria Determination Checklist signed on May 29, 2018 for W-5601 EY.
72 inch water line will be relocated at project. This will be installed at the culvert site by bore/jack with receiving/exit pits outside of the riparian buffer zones (i.e no stream impacts from
this specific utility). This will be installed at the pipe extension site by open cut within the footprint of the future project fill footprint (note: this has been discussed with the USFWS).
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one
file when possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button a drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
W5601 EY_Permit Drawings Wetland_20210721.pdf 2.01 MB
W5601 EY_Permit Drawings Buffer_20210721.pdf 769.58KB
W-5601 EY Permit Package Supporting Information.pdf 13.39MB
File mst be FLF a IQvI7
Signature V
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:*
Christopher A. Murray
Signature *
cl#14 is ,4: 4191-�4y
Date
7/28/2021

North Carolina Department of Transportation
NEPA/SEPA Consultation Form
STIP Project No. W-5601 EX and W-5601 EY
WBS Element 50138.1.155 and 50138.156
Federal Aid Project No. HSIP-0042(066) and HSIP-0042(067)
A. Project Description, Location, and Purpose:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing to widen NC 42
for a center turn lane from west of Mary Hobby Road (SR 2734) to east of Winterton Drive
(SR 5367) in Wake County (W-5601 EX). The NCDOT is also proposing to widen NC 42 for
an eastbound left turn lane at Sauls Road (SR 2727) in Wake County (W-5601 EY). The
purpose of each project is to improve the safety and traffic operations at the intersections.
B. Consultation Phase: (Check one)
❑ Right -of -Way
❑ Construction
Other: Previous document will be greater than one year old when the Division
requests construction authorization.
C. NEPA/SEPA Class of Action Initially Approved as:
❑X FHWA Class II (CE) May 29, 2018 (both projects)
Additional Notes: A Categorical Exclusion (CE) was completed for the widening of NC 42
for an eastbound left turn lane at Sauls Road when it was known as W-5601 EY and was
signed on May 29, 2018. The original CE was completed for the widening of NC 42 for a
center turn lane from Field Hill Road (SR 5330) to Winterton Drive (SR 5367) (always
known as W-5601 EX) on May 29, 2018. The W-5601 EY project was subsequently
combined to W-5601 EX. A Right of Way (ROW) Consultation was completed for the
combined projects on June 18, 2019. A Construction Consultation was completed for the
combined projects on September 28, 2021.
D. Changes in Proposed Action & Environmental Consequences:
Design: There have been no substantial changes to the design since the Construction
Consultation was completed for both projects. Minor changes have been made in regard to
the following: 1) Limits of Construction Easement at Parcel 2A on W-5601 EX and 2) Limits
of Construction Easement and new ROW acquisition on Parcel 2 on W-5601 EY.
Federally Protected Species: The list of federally protected species for Wake County has
not changed since the Construction Consultation was completed. See the following
information:
Updated 3/17/20

Table 1 for both W-5601 EX and W-5601 EY.
- -
r
KIM.
. -
Bald eagle
No
Bald and Golden Eagle
Prot. Act
No Effect
2,5,6,12
Northern long-eared bat
No
Threatened
MA-LAA
5,9
Carolina madtom*
Yes
Endangered
MA-NLAA
1,5,6,8,10,11
Carolina madtom Critical
Habitat
No
Endangered
Not Applicable
Neuse River waterdo *
Yes
Threatened
MA-NLAA
1,5,6,8,10,11
Neuse River waterdog
Critical Habitat
No
Threatened
Not Applicable
Atlantic i toe*
No
Proposed Threatened
MA-NLAA
1,516,7,10,11
Atlantic pigtoe Critical
Habitat
No
Proposed Threatened
Not Applicable
Dwarf wed emussel*
Yes
Endangered
MA-NLAA
1,5,6,7,10,11
Tar Rivers in mussel
No
Endangered
No Effect
1,7
Yellow lance*
Yes
Threatened
MA-NLAA
1,5,6,7,10,11
Yellow lance Critical
Habitat
No
Threatened
Not Applicable
Cape Fear shiner
No
Endangered
No Effect
1
Red -cockaded
woodpecker*
Yes
Endangered
No Effect
2,5,6,13
Michaux's sumac
No
Endangered
MA-NLAA
2,3,4,5,6,13
Information Source or Note:
1. Aquatic Species Survey Report for W-5601 EY (March 28, 2018)
2. Surveys for Michaux's sumac, Red -cockaded woodpecker and Bald eagle for W-
5601 EY project (July 26, 2018).
3. Michaux's sumac survey for W-5601 EX (June 3, 2019)
4. Michaux's sumac survey for W-5601 EY (June 3, 2019)
5. Section 7 Concurrence Request for W-5601 EY (July 31, 2020)
6. USFWS Concurrence for W-5601 EY (August 3, 2020)
7. Revised Programmatic Biological/Conference Opinion -Bridge and Culvert
Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North Carolina, NCDOT Divisions 1-8
(USFWS, September 11, 2019)
8. Programmatic Conference Opinion -Bridge and Culvert Replacement/Repair/
Rehabilitation Effects on Carolina madtom and Neuse River Waterdog in NCDOT
Divisions 2,4,5 and 7 (USFWS, May 7, 2020)
9. Programmatic Biological Opinion-NCDOT Program Effects on the Northern Long-eared
Bat in Divisions 1-8 (USFWS, November 6, 2020)
10. NCDOT email request to USFWS for updated aquatic species concurrence for W-
5601 EY (February 11, 2021)
11. USFWS response to request for aquatic species concurrence for W-5601 EY (February
11, 2021)
12. Updated Bald Eagle survey for combined W-5601 EX and W-5601 EY (March 10, 2021)
13. Michaux's sumac and Red -cockaded woodpecker Update for W-5601 EX and W-
5601 EY (June 4, 2021)
14. IPaC species potentially affected by activities at the project are indicated by an asterisk.
2 Updated 3/17/20

The USFWS has revised the previous programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction
with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE), and NCDOT for the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) in
eastern North Carolina. The PBO covers the entire NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8,
including all NCDOT projects and activities. Although this programmatic covers Divisions 1-
8, NLEBs are currently only known to occur in 30 counties within Divisions 1-8. NCDOT,
FHWA, and USACE have agreed to two conservation measures which will avoid/minimize
mortality of NLEBs. These conservation measures only apply to the 30 current
known/potential counties shown on Figure 2 of the PBO at this time. The programmatic
determination for NLEB for the NCDOT program is May Affect, Likely to Adversely
Affect. The PBO provides incidental take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance
with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for ten years for all NCDOT projects with a
federal nexus in Divisions 1-8, which includes Wake County, where W-5601 EX and W-
5601 EY are located. Currently the 30 counties where NLEBs are known to occur does not
include Wake County. This level of incidental take is authorized from the effective date of a
final listing determination through December 31, 2030. There are no environmental
commitments for the NLEB for projects located in Division 5.
Use of the Programmatic Biological Opinion/Programmatic Conference Opinion for aquatic
species (including mussels, Carolina madtom and Neuse River waterdog) require specific
Conservation Measures for W-5601 EY. These are provided below in gray:
The following "Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds" [15A NCAC 04B.0124 (b) — (e)]
are incorporated into NCDOT projects that occur within or upstream of water bodies that
contain federally protected aquatic species. Within the Environmentally Sensitive Areas, the
following shall apply:
• The contractor may perform clearing operations but not grubbing operations until
immediately prior to beginning grading operations.
• Once grading operations begin in the Environmental Sensitive Areas, work shall
progress in a continuous manner until complete.
• Erosion control devices shall be installed immediately following the clearing
operation.
• Seeding and mulching shall be performed on the areas disturbed by construction
immediatelv followina final arade establishment.
• Seeding and mulching shall be done in stages on cut and fill slopes that are greater
than 20 feet in heiaht measure alona the sloae or areater than two acres in area.
whichever is less.
The following are additional measures intended to further reduce deleterious construction
related effects to the waterway:
No heavy equipment will be placed in the stream outside of the impervious dikes installed
at the Little Creek and Unnamed Tributary to Little Creek.
3 Updated 3/17/20

The following documents will be used during design and construction: 1) NCDOT Erosion
and Sediment Control Design and Construction Manual; 2) NCDOT Best Management
Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities and 3) NCDOT Stormwater Best
Management Practices Toolbox.
Culvert construction activities will have containment measures in place to prevent
components of the structure from dropping into the stream outside of the impervious dike.
The method of containment will be proposed by the contractor and approved by the
engineer as necessary.
Special sediment control fence NCDOT Standard No. 1606.01 or a combination of special
sediment control fence and standard silt fence will be installed between the top of the
stream bank and adjacent grading activities. Once the disturbed areas of the project
draining to these areas have been stabilized, the special sediment control fence and/or
standard silt fence and all built up sediment adjacent to these devices will be removed to
natural ground and stabilized with a native grass mix.
All sedimentation and erosion control measures, throughout the project limits, will be
maintained to ensure proper function of the measures following NCDOT protocols.
Embankment construction and grading shall be managed in such a manner as to prevent
surface runoff/drainage from discharging untreated into the riparian buffer. All interim
surfaces will be graded to drain to temporary erosion control devices. Temporary berms,
ditches, etc. will be incorporated, as necessary, to treat temporary runoff before discharging
into the riparian buffer (as specified in the NCDOT BMP Manual).
All sedimentation and erosion control measures will be appropriately maintained following
NCDOT standards to ensure proper function of the measures. This project must adhere to
conditions of General Permit NCG01000 to Discharge Stormwater under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System for Construction Activities. The project design and
construction activities are required to "select, install, implement and maintain best
management practices (BMPs) and control measures that minimize pollutants in the
discharge to meet the requirements of the permit." Among these conditions, the permit
requires: 1) all erosion and sedimentation control measures must be inspected at least
once every seven calendar days and 2) within 24 hours after any storm event of greater
than 1.0 inch of rain per 24 hour period. It is understood that these requirements and
implementation of other appropriate BMPs are monitored through multiple layers of
oversight. At a minimum, the following personnel monitor erosion control measures:
• Contactor project manager
• NCDOT Division Environmental Officer and Environmental Specialists
• NCDOT Roadside Environmental Field Operations Staff
NCDOT will require utility relocations to utilize directional (horizontal) boring under Little
Creek at the culvert crossing. Open cut (trenching) of the Unnamed Tributary to Little
Creek at the existing 48 inch pipe structure has been determined to be allowable based on
coordination with the USFWS dated July 6, 2021.
In the event that visible sediment loss from the project is observed at the bridge site, a
review of turbidity levels will be made upstream and downstream 400 meters (0.25 mile) to
4 Updated 3/17/20

determine if sedimentation effects are occurring beyond the Action Area as defined in the
Biological Opinion. If visual observation of turbidity levels downstream appears to be
elevated beyond upstream observations, the project inspector will contact the Division
Environmental Officer. If determined that project -related sediment is occurring beyond 400
meters, the USFWS must be contacted immediately to discuss potential remediation.
Natural Environment: A Preliminary Jurisdictional Request for wetlands and streams for
the W-5601 EY project was submitted to the USACE on July 17, 2019. A Stream
Origin/Buffer Applicability Request for the W-5601 EY project was submitted to the NCDEQ
DWR on July 17, 2019. The NCDEQ DWR provided a Riparian Buffer Determination for
the two stream channels on the W-5601 EY project on July 22, 2019. The USACE provided
a Notification of Jurisdictional Determination for the W-5601 EY project on February 11,
2021 (SAW-2021-00295). The NCDEQ DWR issued Approval of Neuse Riparian Buffer
Authorization with Additional Conditions on August 3, 2021. The USACE issued a
Nationwide Permit No. 14 for the project on August 27, 2021 (expiration date of March 18,
2022). There are no jurisdictional features (streams, wetlands or regulated riparian buffers)
on the W-5601 EX project.
Cultural Resources: The Catawba Indian Nation provided scoping comments on
September 4, 2019 indicating that the Catawba have no immediate concerns with regard to
traditional cultural properties, sacred sites or Native American archaeological sites within
the boundaries of the project study areas.
An updated Historic Architecture and Landscapes No Survey Required Form was
completed on April 13, 2021 and an updated No Archaeological Survey Required Form was
completed on April 20, 2021 for the W-5601 EX project.
An updated Historic Architecture and Landscapes No Survey Required Form was
completed on April 26, 2021 and an updated No Archaeological Survey Required Form was
completed on June 28, 2021 for the W-5601 EY project.
E. Conclusion:
The above NEPA/SEPA documentation has been reevaluated (as required by either 23
CFR 771 or by NC General Statute Chapter 113A Article 1). It has been determined that
the current proposed action is essentially the same as the original proposed action.
Proposed changes, if any, are noted in Section D. It has been determined that anticipated
social, economic, and environmental impacts were accurately described in the above
referenced document(s) unless noted otherwise herein. Therefore, the original
Administration Action remains valid.
5 Updated 3/17/20

F. Coordination
NCDOT personnel have discussed the current project parameters with qualified NCDOT
representatives and FHWA (where applicable). The NCDOT Project Manager, Stephen R.
Davidson, hereby verifies the involvement of the following staff and the incorporation of
their technical input:
Design Engineer: Thomas Meadows 07/06/2022
Environmental Specialist: Heather Montague 07/06/2022
FHWA (if applicable):
Other:
G. Consultation Aaaroval for NCDOT Proiect: W-5601 EX and W-5601 EY
Prepared By:
08/02/2022
UdIC
Prepared For:
Reviewed By:
08/03/2022
—DocuSigned by:
ut,V'is ftU.l rah
Chris Murray, SPWS-Project Engineer for Planning and Environmental
Studies
NCDOT Division 5
— DocuSigned by:
�_o2FnQ='Penrae.v
Stephen R. Davidson, P.E.-Division Design Engineer
NCDOT Division 5
—DocuSigned by:
w
LLaWd
Date Thomas Meadows -Assistant Design Engineer
NCDOT Division 5
❑X Approved
or
Certified
08/04/2022
Date
In adherence with 23 CFR 771 (NEPA) or NC General Statute
Chapter 113A Article 1 (SEPA), NCDOT approves this Consultation.
NCDOT staff certifies if FHWA signature was previously required or
where changes have resulted in FHWA signature being required.
(—�DocuSig^ned by:
l�U. V75InaW
Ben Upshaw, P.E.-Division Project Development Engineer for Brandon
Jones, P.E.-Division Engineer
NCDOT Division 5
FHWA Approved: FHWA signature required for Type I(B) CE, Type II(B) CE, Type III
CE, FONSI or ROD.
Date John F. Sullivan, III, PE, Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
6
Updated 3/17/20

H. Project Commitments (as of August 2, 2022)
Wake County
Widen NC 42 for center turn lane from Field Hill Road (SR 5330) to Winterton Drive (SR 5367)
WBS No. 50138.1.155
TIP No. W-5601 EX
Wake County
Widen NC 42 for an eastbound left turn lane at Sauls Road (SR 2727)
WBS No. 50138.1.156
II1001MO NJA67.1i711WA
Design and Division 5 Construction
Conservation measures outlined the Revised Programmatic Biological/Conference Opinion -
Bridge and Culvert Replacements/Repairs/Rehabilitations in Eastern North Carolina, NCDOT
Divisions 1-8 (USFWS, September 11, 2019) and Programmatic Conference Opinion -Bridge
and Culvert Replacement/Repair/Rehabilitation Effects on Carolina Madtom and Neuse River
Waterdog in NCDOT Divisions 2,4,5, and 7 (USFWS, May 7, 2020) must be adhered to during
the design and construction of the project of W-5601 EY. These measures are indicated on
Pages 4 and 5 of the Consultation.
Division 5 Environmental
The USACE Nationwide Permit No. 14 issued for W-5601 EY has an expiration date of March
18, 2022. Construction at the site for W-5601 EY is authorized under this permit to extend until
March 18, 2023.