20220112 Ver 2_BPDP_Draft_Phase I_20221024

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20220112
Version* 2
Select Reviewer: *
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 10/31/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/24/2022
............................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site? *
Type of Mitigation Project: *
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Company/Owner: * Eco Terra, LLC
Contact Name: *
Scott Frederick
Project Information
Project Type:
Project Name: Falling Run Phase I
County: Edgecombe
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type: *
Mitigation Plans
File Upload:
Signature
Print Name:*
Signature:*
DMS • Mitigation Bank
Yes No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Falling Run_BPDP_Draft_Phasel.pdf 13.32MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Scott J Frederick
scoll JT F ecejc4r

Draft Bank Parcel Development Package
Falling Run Mitigation Site - Phase
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Tar -Pamlico Basin HUC 03020101
NCDWR No. 20220112 V1
:.g.
-
r-
Prepared By:
Prepared For: NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
`,�
ecoltcrra
Eco Terra, LLC
1328 Dekalb Avenue NE
Atlanta, GA 30307
409.913.0020
October 2022
000
..0Vhb
VHB Engineering NC, P.C.
940 Main Campus Dr. Ste. 500
Raleigh, NC 27606
919.754.5019

Table of Contents
1.0
Introduction.....................................................................................................................................1
2.0
Mitigation Project Summary.........................................................................................................1
2.1
Project Goals...............................................................................................................................1
2.2
Existing Parcel Conditions.........................................................................................................2
2.3
Site Viability.................................................................................................................................3
2.4
Watershed Characterization......................................................................................................4
2.5
Soils..............................................................................................................................................4
2.6
Existing Vegetative Communities.............................................................................................5
2.7
Threatened and Endangered Species......................................................................................5
2.8
Cultural Resources......................................................................................................................6
2.9
Jurisdictional Resources -Clean Water Act Sections 404/401................................................6
2.10
FEMA Floodplain Compliance...................................................................................................7
2.11
Site Access, Utilities, and Site Constraints...............................................................................7
3.0
Site Protection Instrument.............................................................................................................7
4.0
Mitigation Work Plan.....................................................................................................................8
4.1
Parcel Preparation......................................................................................................................8
4.2
Restoration Activities..................................................................................................................8
4.3
NCDWR As -Built Evaluation....................................................................................................10
5.0
Monitoring and Maintenance Plan.............................................................................................10
5.1
Monitoring Protocol.................................................................................................................10
5.2
Adaptive Management Plan....................................................................................................11
6.0
Financial Assurance and Long -Term Management..................................................................11
6.1
Financial Assurances.................................................................................................................11
6.2
Long Term Management Plan................................................................................................11
7.0
Project Credits and Credit Release.............................................................................................12
8.0 References...........................................................................................................................................15

Figures
Figure 1.
Vicinity Map
Figure 2.
Credit Service Area
Figure 3.
Existing Conditions
Figure 4.
USGS Topographic
Figure 5.
Drainage Areas
Figure 6.
NRCS 1979 Soil Survey
Figure 7.
Mitigation Credit
Figure 8.
Riparian Buffer Zones
Figure 9.
Monitoring Plan
Tables
Table 1.
Project Goals and Objectives
Table 2.
Feature Description Phase I
Table 3.
Project Attributes
Table 4.
Project Features
Table 5.
Drainage Area and Associated Land Use
Table 6.
Soil Types and Descriptions
Table 7.
Potential Federally Protected Species at the Site
Table 8.
Site Protection Instrument
Table 9.
Proposed Planting Plan
Table 10.
Project Credit Tables
Table 11.
Credit Release Schedule
Appendices
Appendix A.
Site Photographs- July 7, 2022
Appendix B.
Historical Aerials
Appendix C.
On -Site Determination of Applicability to the Tar -Pam River Basin Buffer
Rules April 7, 2022, and Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient
Offset Letter August 23, 2022
Appendix D.
USFWS Self -Certification Concurrence Email
SHPO Request for Review and Response
EDR Radius Map Report -Executive Summary

1.0 Introduction
Eco Terra, LLC is proposing three phases for the 133-acre Falling Run Mitigation Site in
Edgecombe County, NC, hereinafter referred to as the Project or Site. This Bank Parcel
Development Package (BPDP) is developed for Phase I of the project and covers approximately
49.7 acres of proposed conservation easement under the proposed Eco Terra Tar -Pamlico 01-
Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI). The UMBI is being established between Eco
Terra, LLC (Eco Terra) and the NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). The Falling Run
Mitigation Site is located west of the Falling Run tributary approximately 7miles northeast of
Rocky Mount (Figure 1). This Site will provide riparian buffer credits and nutrient offset credits
for unavoidable impacts due to development in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin, US Geological
Survey (USGS) 8-digit hydrologic unit code (HUC) 03020101 (Tar -Pam 01) (Figure 2). The BPDP
is in accordance with the Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of
Riparian Buffers Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (Consolidated Mitigation Rule) and Nutrient Offset
Credit Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703. The Project is being developed in conjunction with a
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) Site, also referenced as the Bonsai Mitigation Site, which
aims to restore wetlands and streams. Since DMS and the NC Interagency Review Team (IRT)
are responsible for reviewing the wetland and stream portion of the conservation easement, this
BPDP is submitted as a separate document complementary to the DMS project.
To access the Project from Raleigh, take 1-40 East and continue on to 1-87 and US-64 East
towards Rocky Mount. Continue on US-64 East approximately 57 miles to Exit 470 for NC-
97/Atlantic Ave. Turn right onto NC-97/Atlantic Ave and then right onto NC-97 East. Then turn
left onto Cool Springs Road and right onto Battleboro-Leggett Road. Once on Battleboro-
Leggett Road, travel approximately 2.3 miles and the entrance to the Site is along a gravel road
headed south. The Site coordinates are 35.995850,-77.684472. The areas proposed for riparian
buffer and nutrient offset credits are located along two jurisdictional streams and five ditches.
Proposed buffers extend a minimum of 30-feet outward from the top of bank JOB) and do not
extend beyond 200 feet from viable features.
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary
Phase I of the Project will help to reduce future sediment and nutrient loading associated with
two unnamed tributaries (UTs) to Falling Run. It will also improve terrestrial habitats along five
ditches by establishing forested buffers that will help to reduce and filter surface runoff from the
surrounding fields. The Project will restore forested buffers to a maximum of 200 feet from the
TOB.
2.1 Project Goals
The primary goals of the Site are to provide ecological and water quality enhancements to the
Tar -Pamlico River Basin by restoring riparian areas to expand the riparian corridor along two UTs
to Falling Run and the associated ditches. The proposed project supports goals identified in the
Ik'a Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I Draft BPDP
ecol�rrCh Page 1

2018 Tar -Pamlico River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) by promoting "nutrient and sediment
reduction in agricultural areas by restoring and preserving wetlands, streams, and riparian
buffers." Table 1 lists the specific enhancements to water quality and the ecological process.
Table 1: Project Goals and Objectives
Goal
Objectives
CU-Wide and RBRP
Supported Goals
Nutrient inputs will be significantly decreased
Promote nutrient and
by changing the overall land use from
sediment reduction in
Reduce nutrient
agriculture/pasture to forest. As a result,
agricultural areas by restoring
levels
runoff will be filtered through re-established
and preserving riparian
buffer areas.
buffers.
Promote nutrient and
Decrease sediment
Benefits will be achieved via the reduction of
sediment reduction in
sediments from agricultural areas due to
agricultural areas by restoring
inputs
continuous maintenance and disturbance.
and preserving riparian
buffers.
Benefits will be achieved through the
Promote nutrient and
Preserve/restore
restoration and preservation of buffer areas
sediment reduction in
streams, wetlands,
allowing for increased infiltration and nutrient
agricultural areas by restoring
and riparian buffers
uptake during precipitation events.
and preserving riparian
buffers.
Continue targeted
Protect property in
Record a conservation easement
implementation of projects
perpetuity
under the Buffer programs.
Benefits will be achieved by restoring riparian
buffer habitats to functioning headwater and
D programmatic goal,
Restore terrestrial
bottomland hardwood forest ecosystems.
Nortthh Carolina General Statue
habitats
These restored habitats will connect to
habitats both up and downstream of the
143-214.10
restored/enhanced areas.
2.2 Existing Parcel Conditions
The conservation easement associated with Phase I and the BPDP covers approximately 49.7
acres and consists of agricultural fields, five ditches (identified and labeled as D18, D22, D27,
D29 (Reaches A and B), & D30) , and two UTs to Falling Run (denoted as SF & SG) (Figure 3 &
Appendix Q. The site shows evidence of livestock management and alteration of the hydrologic
regime for agriculture. Currently, the fields are being used for row crop production. Surface and
groundwater quickly move across the Site, draining into ditch and stream channels. This water
continues flowing towards Falling Run, a tributary of Beech Branch and the Tar River (Figure 4).
Phase I exhibits approximately 2,036 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel and 3,723 linear
feet of ditches. Table 2 describes these attributes in detail.
Ik'a Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I Draft BPDP
ecolt�rra. Page 2

Table 2: Feature Description - Phase I
Resource ID
Resource Type
Length
(linear feet)
Jurisdictional
Connection
SF
Stream
1,214
Falling Run
SG
Stream
822
Falling Run
D18
Ditch
419
SG
D22
Ditch
1,180
SG
D27
Ditch
448
SF
D29A
Ditch
560
SF
D29B
Ditch
1,020
SF
D30
Ditch
232
SF
Table 3: Project Attributes
Project Watershed
Summary Information
Project Name
Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I
Geographic Location (Lat, Long)
35.995850,-77.684472
River Basin
Tar -Pamlico
USGS HUC (8-digit, 12-digit)
03020101, 030201010902
Site Protection Instrument
To be recorded
Total Credits
715,939 BMUs, 34,609 Ibs of N, 2,229 Ibs of P
Types of Credits
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset
BPDP Date
September 2022
Initial Planting Date
February 2023
Baseline Report Date
March 2023
MY1 Report Date
December 2023
MY2 Report Date
December 2024
MY 3 Report Date
December 2025
MY4 Report Date
December 2026
MYS Report Date
December 2027
2.3 Site Viability
A representative from the NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) met with Eco Terra
personnel on February 28, 2022, to assess applicable stream origins of Site resources across the
entire Falling Run Mitigation Site. An official Stream Origin Determination Letter was issued to
Eco Terra on April 7, 2022. In addition, NCDWR performed a second site visit on June 8, 2022, to
determine the Site's viability for riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation. A Site Viability
Letter was subsequently issued on August 23, 2022. Both documents covered the entire 133-
acre proposed easement area. According to NCDWR, 17 ditches were deemed suitable for
riparian buffer and/or nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295. There have been
no changes to land use since NCDWR's site visit in June 2022. A copy of both NCDWR letters is
included in Appendix C and those resources applicable to Phase I of the Project are summarized
in Table 4.
Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I Draft BPDP
ecolt�rra Page 3

Table 4: Project Features
Resource ID
Classification
Buffer Credit Viable"
Nutrient Offset Viable'
SF
C; NSW
Yes
Yes
SG
C; NSW
Yes
Yes
D18
N/A
Yes
Yes
D22
N/A
Yes
Yes
D27
N/A
Yes
Yes
D29A & D29B
N/A
No
Yes
D30
N/A
No
Yes
Must follow requirements stated in NCDWR Letter dated 8/23/2022
2.4 Watershed Characterization
The Site is located in the 12-digit HUC 030201010902 and NCDWR Subbasin 03020101. Falling
Run, located downstream and outside of the Site's boundaries, receives all runoff. It is classified
by NCDWR as C; NSW. The watershed is dominated by agricultural land and forested areas
(Figure 3). There is minimal impervious surface. This subbasin is expected to experience
significant population growth due to its proximity to Wake County. Figure 5 depicts topography
at the Site and its surrounding areas. Based on elevations presented on the Hartsease and
Whitakers, NC US Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles, topography is
gently sloping to the southeast. Table 5 summarizes the drainage areas for Streams F and G and
surrounding land use.
Table 5: Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use
Resource
Drainage Area*
Land Use
ID
(acres)
SF
64
Planted row crops (94%), forested (4%), solar panels (2%)
SG
40
Planted row crops (94%), forested (6%)
*Upstream area
2.5 Soils
The Site soils are mapped on the 1979 Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey as
Altavista fine sandy loam, Conetoe loamy sand, Roanoke loam, State loamy sand, and Wickham
sandy loam. Table 6 provides general descriptions of each map unit.
`AO Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I Draft BPDP
ecolt�rrCh Page 4

Table 6: Soil Types and Descriptions
Soil Series Name
Description
Altavista fine sandy loam consists of well drained soils on smooth, flats and
AaA-Altavista fine sandy
low ridges and shallow areas in stream terraces. Permeability is moderate
loam, 0-3% slopes
and surface runoff is moderately high. Seasonal high-water table is at 1.5 to
2.5 feet during late winter and early spring.
Conetoe loamy sand consists of well -drained soil on smooth to slightly
CeB-Conetoe loamy
rounded low ridges on stream terraces. Permeability is moderately rapid
sand, 0-4% slopes
and surface runoff is low. Seasonal high-water table is at a depth of 6 feet
or greater.
Roanoke loam consists of poorly drained soil on broad flats and in slightly
Ro-Roanoke loam
depressional drainageways in stream terraces. Permeability is slow and
surface runoff is moderately high. Seasonal high-water table is at or near
the surface and this soil is frequently flooded for brief periods.
State loamy sand consists of well -drained soil on smooth to slightly
StB-State loamy sand, 0-
rounded, low ridges on stream terraces. Permeability is moderate to
4% slopes
moderately rapid and surface runoff is moderate. Seasonal high-water table
is at a depth of 6 feet or greater.
WkB-Wickham sandy
Wickham sandy loam consists of well drained soils on low ridges on stream
loam, 0-4%slopes
terraces. Permeability is moderate and surface runoff is moderate. Seasonal
high-water table is at a depth of 6 feet or greater.
2.6 Existing Vegetative Communities
Row crop vegetation serves as the dominant vegetative community across the Site. The current
crop is soybeans. Less frequently maintained areas such as field edges and drainages consist
primarily of early successional vegetation. American pokeweed (Phytolacca americana) and
other various weeds are common. In addition, several small areas exhibiting canopy vegetation
also exist along the top of banks of the ditches and tributaries. Trees observed were loblolly pine
(Pinus toeda), willow oak (Quercus phellos), and sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua). The
understory and herbaceous layer of these limited areas consists of smaller sweetgum saplings,
sea myrtle (Baccharis halimifolia), poison -ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), peppervine (Ampelopsis
arborea), blackberry (Rubus pensilvanicus), common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), Virginia
creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense).
Stream channels possess emergent vegetation such as cattails (Typha latifolia), pennywort
(Hydrocotyle vulgaris), parrot's feather (Myriophyllum aquaticum), and soft rush. Ditches in this
area include soft rush (Juncus effusus) and bulbous buttercup (Ranunculus bulbosus).
2.7 Threatened and Endangered Species
The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)
website was checked on July 12, 2022. Five federally protected species were listed as potentially
occurring on the Site. Additionally, a NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) data explorer report
reviewed on July 12, 2022, identified two federally protected species occurring within one mile
of the Site (Table 7). These were the bald eagle and the Neuse River waterdog.
Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I Draft BPDP
eCOlt�rra. Page 5

The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act is enforced by the USWFS. Habitat for the bald eagle
primarily consists of mature forests that are in proximity to large bodies of water for forage.
Nesting sites are typically found in large dominant trees within 1.0 mile of a large body of water.
A desktop-GIS assessment of the conservation easement area, as well as the area within a 1.0-
mile radius of the Project limits was performed using 2021 color aerials. There are no water
bodies large enough to be considered potential feeding sources within the easement area or
within 1.0-mile of the Project limits. Due to the lack of habitat and minimal impact anticipated
with this mitigation site, it has been determined that this project will have no effect on this
species.
Habitat for the Neuse River waterdog includes rivers and larger streams exhibiting large leaf
piles for habitat. The UTs at the Site have water quality that is negatively impacted by nutrient
and sediment inputs from the surrounding farm fields. The proposed buffer mitigation plan will
not include any work within the existing stream channels. Due to the lack of viable habitat and
minimal impact anticipated within this mitigation site, it has been determined that this project
may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect this species.
In an e-mail response dated August 2, 2022 (Appendix D), the USFWS concurred with the
proposed biological conclusions submitted in a self -certification request for this project.
Table 7: Potential Federally Protected Species at the Site*
Scientific Name
Common Name
Habitat Present
Biological Conclusion
Ha(iaeetus
Bald eagle
No
No Eagle Act Permit
feucocephafus
Required
Necturus (ewisi
Neuse River waterdog
No
May affect, not likely to
adversely affect
Noturus furiosus
Carolina madtom
No
No Effect
Fusconaia masoni
Atlantic pigtoe
No
No Effect
E((iptio
Tar River spinymussel
No
No Effect
steinstansana
*Checked study area in USFWS IPaC on 7/12/2022
2.8 Cultural Resources
A review of the NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) database (accessed July 19, 2022)
was conducted for compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The
database did not reveal any occurrences located within one mile of the Site on the National
Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or that are eligible. Additionally, a scoping letter response
from SHPO dated September 14, 2022, indicated no historic properties would be affected
(Appendix D).
2.9 Jurisdictional Resources -Clean Water Act Sections 404/401
A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) site visit has not been conducted by the US
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). NCDWR staff has been on -site to verify which features are
subject to the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rules and which can provide riparian buffer and
nutrient offset mitigation credits (Appendix Q. Implementation of this project will not fill or
`AO Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I Draft BPDP
ecolt�rrCl. Page 6

impact any Waters of the United States; therefore, no Section 404 or 401 permits will be
required.
2.10 FEMA Floodplain Compliance
The Site is located in the 100 Year Floodplain of Swift Creek. A floodplain development permit
will be submitted to the Edgecombe County Floodplain Manager once the conservation
easement is recorded. Proposed implementation of work will not commence until all required
permits have been received.
2.11 Site Access, Utilities, and Site Constraints
An EDR Radius Map Report with GeoCheck was requested for the entire parcel through
Environmental Data Resources, Inc on May 5, 2022. The Federal, State, and Tribal environmental
databases list three records that occur within 0.25 miles of the Site, including one leaking
underground storage tank 0.185 miles from the Site, one underground storage tank located
0.217 miles from the Site, and one US mine located 0.003 miles from the Site. The executive
summary of the EDR report is included in Appendix D.
There are no known utility easements that will interfere with the implementation of the riparian
buffer restoration. There are no proposed crossings within the easement.
The Site is within two FEMA regulated areas as shown on DFIRMS 3720389200K, 3720389100K,
3720388200K, and 3720388100J. The site occurs in Zone AE as well as the 0.2% Annual Chance
Flood Hazard Zone.
3.0 Site Protection Instrument
The land required for planting, management, and stewardship of the Site includes portions of
the parcels listed in Table 8. The parcels will remain in private ownership with a portion
protected by a conservation easement. The stewardship of the conservation easement will
transfer to a NCDWR approved long-term stewardship group and will be managed under the
terms detailed in the approved NCDWR conservation easement.
`AO Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I Draft BPDP
ecOlt�rra. Page 7

Table 8: Site Protection Instrument
Landowner
PIN
County
Site Protection
Instrument
Deed Book
and Page
Number*
Protected
Acreage
3881-79-
7044
Edgecombe
Conservation
Easement
1622/0231
2.00
3881-89-
3058
Edgecombe
Conservation
Easement
1622/0228
12.57
0327 3882-90-
Edgecombe
Easement Conservation
1622/0239
4.93
Billy Dean Bulluck Jr.
Trustee et al
3881-98-
0837
Edgecombe
Conservation
Easement
1622/0241
5.84
3892-02-
6539
Edgecombe
Conservation
Easement
0846/0445
17.13
3891-18-
0572
Edgecombe
Conservation
Easement
1622/0224
7.23
*The Conservation Easement Deed Book and Page Number will be determined at the time of recording
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan
The Project will restore a network of corridors on land that has been impacted by agriculture.
The restored riparian buffers and nutrient offset planting will improve the water quality of
downstream receiving waters. Implementation activities conducted to generate Riparian Buffer
and Nutrient Offset Credits within the riparian buffers and adjacent riparian areas will occur in
close proximity to a proposed Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) site, Bonsai Mitigation Site.
The riparian buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas are shown on Figures 7 and 8.
4.1 Parcel Preparation
Site preparation will include soil sampling to determine if soil amendments are needed for
successful establishment of a forested riparian buffer. Soil amendments will be applied, and
invasive species will be treated as needed across the Site. The only ditch what will require
maintenance is D29A. The upper portion of this feature is not viable for riparian buffer or
nutrient offset mitigation credit. It will be filled and graded to allow for diffuse flow towards the
remaining portions of D29A and D29B.
4.2 Restoration Activities
The Site will be planted with appropriate native hardwood trees species. Vegetation
management and herbicide applications may be needed in the first three years to prevent
invasive species and promote the establishment of planted hardwood trees. The target
community type is Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp (Schafale, 2012). Tree species and
permanent seed mix planted across the Site will potentially include the species listed below in
Table 9.
% Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I Draft BPDP
ecol�rrCh Page 8

Table 9: Proposed Planting Plan
Scientific Name
Common Name
Density
Spacing
Strata
Betufa nigra
River birch
5%
8 X 8
Canopy
Carpinus carofiniana
Ironwood
5%
8 X 8
Understory
Ceftis faevigata
Sugarberry
2%
8 X 8
Canopy
Cephafanthus occidentafis
Common buttonbush
5%
8 X 8
Understory
Corpus amomum
Silky dogwood
5%
8 X 8
Understory
Cyriffa racemiffora
Titi
5%
8 X 8
Understory
Diospyros virginiana
Common persimmon
5%
8 X 8
Understory
Fraxinus pennsy(vanica
Green ash
2%
8 X 8
Canopy
Ilex opaca
American holly
5%
8 X 8
Understory
Liriodendron tu(ipifera
Yellow poplar
5%
8 X 8
Canopy
Magnolia virginiana
Sweetbay
5%
8 X 8
Understory
Nyssa biffora
Swamp tupelo
5%
8 X 8
Canopy
Persea pafustris
Red bay
5%
8 X 8
Understory
Pfatanus occidentafis
Sycamore
2%
8 X 8
Canopy
Quercus bicolor
Swamp white oak
2%
8 X 8
Canopy
Quercus faurifofia
Swamp laurel oak
5%
8 X 8
Canopy
Quercus fyrata
Overcup oak
5%
8 X 8
Canopy
Quercus michauxii
Swamp chestnut oak
5%
8 X 8
Canopy
Quercus nigra
Water oak
3%
8 X 8
Canopy
Quercus pagoda
Cherrybark oak
2%
8 X 8
Canopy
Quercus pheffos
Willow oak
5%
8 X 8
Canopy
Quercus shumardii
Shumard oak
5%
8 X 8
Canopy
Taxodium distichum
Bald cypress
5%
8 X 8
Canopy
Ufmus americana
American elm
2%
8 X 8
Canopy
Andropogon gerardii
Big bluestem
N/A
N/A
Herbaceous/
Permanent seed mix
Argostis a(ba
Redtop
N/A
N/A
Herbaceous/Permanent
seed mix
Carex vu(pinoidea
Fox sedge
N/A
N/A
Herbaceous/
Permanent seed mix
Juncus effusus
Soft rush
N/A
N/A
Herbaceous/
Permanent seed mix
Juncus coriaceus
Leathery rush
N/A
N/A
Herbaceous/
Permanent seed mix
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
N/A
N/A
Herbaceous/
Permanent seed mix
Pennisetum g(aucum
Pearl top millet
N/A
N/A
Herbaceous/
Permanent seed mix
Setaria itafica
Foxtail millet
N/A
N/A
Herbaceous/
Permanent seed mix
Sorghastrum nutans
Indian grass
N/A
N/A
Herbaceous/
Permanent seed mix
Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I Draft BPDP
CCco terra. Page 9

A density of approximately 600 to 800 trees per acre is proposed for the initial planting, and is
expected to be sufficient to meet the performance standards of 260 stems per acre after five
years outlined in Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295. A minimum of eight species will be planted, and
species will be mixed to provide diversity of hardwood trees across the Site. No one tree species
will be greater than 50% of planted stems. Planted tree species may differ from species listed in
Table 9 due to availability of trees at the time of planting. A seed mix will be applied in areas
where bare soil or limited herbaceous vegetation is present. The seed mix will include native
grasses and will provided temporary and permanent ground cover for stabilization. The
proposed planting area is depicted on Figure 7. Planting is scheduled for installation in February
2023.
4.3 NCDWR As -Built Evaluation
Eco Terra will submit a written notification to NCDWR within 30-days of project planting that all
buffer and nutrient offset mitigation activities have been completed and the conservation
easement has been marked. The credit release schedule may be modified or delayed if written
notice is not submitted within 30 days.
5.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
5.1 Monitoring Protocol
Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be installed within the 45 acres of planted riparian
buffer and nutrient offset areas to monitor survival of planted trees. In order to adequately
monitor the vegetation, the planted area will be monitored in 100-m2 plots. A total of 20 fixed
100-m2 plots will be established and located in the riparian buffer and nutrient offset credit
areas (Figure 9). An additional seven random 100-m2 random plots will be surveyed each year
for a total of 27 vegetation plots.
Vegetation assessment will follow the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 2 Protocol for
Recording Vegetation (2008). A reference photo will be taken from the origin of each plot. All
planted stems will be flagged and recorded.
The measures of vegetative success for the Site will be survival of at least four native hardwood
tree species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent of stems, at a stem density of at
least 260 stems per acre after five years. Native volunteer species may be included to meet the
performance standards upon written approval by NCDWR. Invasive species will be monitored
and treated.
A visual assessment of the conservation easement will be performed each year. This inspection
will evaluate:
• Any potential encroachment;
• Effectiveness of invasive species managment;
• Any potential beaver activity;
Ik'a Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I Draft BPDP
ecOlt�rra. Page 10

• Diffuse flow within restored buffer areas;
• Condition of easement markers; and
• Any land disturbance that may impact the restored buffer areas.
Annual mowing between planted tree rows will occur for at least the first two growing seasons
to establish row integrity for site monitoring and subsequent supplemental planting and
herbaceous competition control.
5.2 Adaptive Management Plan
Remedial actions will be implemented to address components of the Site that are failing to meet
success criteria, as part of an adaptive management plan. The source of failure and methods
needed to rectify the failure will be identified as part of the remedial actions.
6.0 Financial Assurance and Long -Term Management
6.1 Financial Assurances
Following approval of the Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I BPDP, Eco Terra will provide a
Performance Bond from a surety that is rated no less than an "A-" as rated by A.M. Best. The
Performance Bond amount will be 100% of the estimated cost for implementation of the Project
as described in the BPDP, but not less than $150,000. In lieu of posting the performance bond,
Eco Terra may elect to construct the project prior to the first credit release. In that case, no
performance bond will be necessary.
After completion of the restoration/construction, a separate Performance/Maintenance Bond
will be secured for 100% of the estimated cost to implement the maintenance and monitoring
plan for a term of one year and be extended annually for a minimum of five years. Upon
NCDWR approval, this may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to complete the
monitoring. Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually to cover the
next years, monitoring period, with confirmation of renewal provided to NCDWR with each
annual monitoring report, when applicable. NCDWR reserves the right to alter the credit release
schedule if monitoring reports are submitted without proof of bond renewals, when applicable.
6.2 Long Term Management Plan
Upon closeout of the project as approved by NCDWR, the Site conservation easement will be
transferred to an approved NCDWR long-term stewardship group. The larger parcel will remain
in private ownership. The long-term manager will be chosen prior to the submittal of the
Monitoring Year 4 (MY4) Report and will be responsible for periodic inspection of the Site to
ensure that the restrictions documented in the recorded easement are upheld in perpetuity. No
remaining credits will be released for MY4 until the conversation easement has been assigned to
an approved stewardship group.
% Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I Draft BPDP
ecOlt�rra. Page 11

7.0 Project Credits and Credit Release
This Site has the potential to generate up to 715,939 ftz of riparian buffer mitigation credits or
663,251 ftz (34,609 lb of N and 2,229 Ibs of P) of nutrient offset credits within a 49.7-acre
conservation easement (Figure 7). The credits will be derived from riparian buffer restoration,
enhancement, and preservation and will service the Tar -Pam 01 watershed. Also, some of the
proposed riparian buffer mitigation credits, where allowed, can be converted to nutrient offset
credit in accordance with the Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule, 15A NCAC 02B .0703. In
accordance with the UMBI, any credit conversions must be calculated using the guidance
provided in the Clarified Procedures for Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits and Nutrient Offset
Credits letter issued in November 2019 by NCDWR. Upon receiving written approval from
NCDWR, riparian buffer restoration credits, within the 0 tol00-foot zone along SF, SG, D18, D22,
and D27 can be converted to nutrient offset credit, generating up to 30,446 Ibs on N and 1,961
Ibs of P. The total potential riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits that the Falling
Run Mitigation Site Phase I will generate were calculated using the NCDWR "Project Credit Table
Template (Updated February 2022)" and are presented in Table 10. Figure 8 depicts riparian
zones of 50, 100, and 200 feet from the top of bank to demonstrate width requirements for
crediting. There will be three credit ledgers: Riparian Buffer, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus.
Ik'a Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I Draft BPDP
ecOlerrCh Page 12

`o
O
a
a
a 0
o I.
u �
z
v
o
p.
'z
o
o
a
o m
0
u
o 0
z z
0 0
z z
0 0
z z
x
u` o
u �
'v
o\°
U X
— O
c z
V ro o
o
m
vl
a0
v
N
V
��
N Q
c z
o Q
Q
o
a
o
v
a
w
a
c
N N N
Z
m w
LL LL
E E
LL LL
E E
m m
E E
m m
o 0
ri ri
0 0
^^^^
0 0
0 0
m m
0 0
o o
0 o
O 'ro
H m 0
m c
O N
u
H
g v
_ =
z
C O
m
O
O
H
N
X Lo
O p
v
c �
v y
>
C
Q
O
o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
,, o
m
y v y
a
--
——
——
o 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
`o
DL
Y
w
}
o o
z z
o o
z z
o 0
z z
0 0
z z
0 0
z z
0 0
z z
m
m
o
z v v
a
N
o
oi
E
F
o
o
o
«
'v
o o
O O
z z
o o
O O
z z
o o
O O
z z
F
E —
z LL m m
E E E E
m
O
m
F
ry
a
acna
v
V
v
^ Z
O
Q
m l7
ry
m
v
V v
Z
O
y
y
o
�
�
usi
in
W
usi
m
LL
O
F
.. ..
c �
v
G
'° Z L
F«
v
v
a00
Z" v
m w
O
~
._
W a
O
o
c
v
Z

Table 11: Credit Release Schedule
Task
Project Milestone
% Credit Available
for Sale
Instrument and BPDP approved by NCDWR, conservation
1
easement recorded, and financial assurance posted.
15
Mitigation site earthwork, planting, and installation of
2
monitoring devices completed.
20
Monitoring financial assurance posted and approval of as-
3
built report.
10
Monitoring report #1: Approved by NCDWR and financial
4
assurance renewed.
10
Monitoring report #2: Approved by NCDWR and financial
5
assurance renewed.
10
Monitoring report #3: Approved by NCDWR and financial
6
assurance renewed.
10
Item B(1) of Section X in the Eco Terra Tar -Pamlico 01
UMBI has been completed and approved by NCDWR.
10
No remaining credits released until the conservation easement has been assigned to an
approved long-term steward.
Monitoring report #4: Approved by NCDWR and financial
8
assurance renewed.
5
Monitoring report #5: Approved by NCDWR and financial
9
assurance renewed.
10
Total:
100
Ik'a Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I Draft BPDP
ecOlerrCh Page 14

8.0 References
Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA). 2007. DFIRM 3720251500J.
Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA). 2007. DFIRM 3720252500K.
Lee, Michael, R. Peet, S. Roberts, and T. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2022. Web Soil Survey.
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.goy/app/HomePage.htm
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2018 Tar -Pamlico River Basin
Restoration Priorities.
North Carolina Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295
Mitigation Program Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian
Buffers.
North Carolina Environmental Management Commission. 2020. Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703
Mitigation Program Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian
Buffers.
North Carolina Environmental Management Commission. 2020. Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0734 Tar -
Pamlico River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy: Protection and
Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2010. Methodology for Identification of
Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins. Version 4.11. Raleigh.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2011. Surface Water Classifications.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2022. Data Explorer. Department of Natural and
Cultural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Fourth Approximation.
Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, N.C. Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, NC. 208 pp.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. 1979. Soil Survey Edgecombe County,
North Carolina.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2022. Information and Planning Consultation (IPaC).
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/
Ik'a Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I Draft BPDP
ecOl�rrCh Page 15

Figure is Vicinity Map
Falling Run Site Phase I I Battleboro, NC
r Whitakers
1
y
aoi I
1
I•
I
I
1
1
n 1
NYC Battlebbro Cherry
I Crossroads
Drake
Belmont Lake '
Golf Club 1
I
I Phillips
To 1 Crossroads
N
ay A Betts?wfur
�I
wl
2 ,
a�� 1 s7
y�ey
qke
South Rocky
4s'��
acOKOrra 'I'Vhb.
Gethsemane
❑raughn
Red Hill
Ik Le
Kingsboro
Wrendale
Mount Brake µ
Co
leY Ra State of North Carolina D0,141sri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGrapi {
GeoTechnclogies, Inc, M7ASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, USDA
y -
( mmm��
00 1 2 Miles
Source ESRI Streets Sosemap
Q Phase I Conservation Easement

0
-4
I !

Figure 3: Existing Conditions
Falling Run Site Phase I I Battleboro, NC
w'I�
eco�terra
--- ilib.
Q= Phase I Conservation Easement
0 375 750 Feet Ditch
- Stream
Source NC' Oneinap 2021 Aerial, Sub -meter Tap of Bank

Figure 4: USG5 Topographic Map
Falling Run Site Phase 116attleboro, NC
�.Ixf
ecofterra `Nib
IpA
• a'a or
r �4
Iz
4 J\wo
+ Ab.
r 01 ,
•
— 0
_ q.
i er
N
0 1,000 2,000 Feet
Source USA Topomaps
L1
�3 National Geographic I
ociety, i-cvbel
Phase I Conservation Easement

Figure 5: Drainage Area
Falling Run Site Phase I I Battleboro, NC
eco, erra
`4OVhb.
(00
Stream F Drainage Area (54 ac)
500 1,000 Feet — Stream G Drainage Area (40 ac)
Ditch
Stream
Phase I Conservation Easement
5ourre NC Onemap ,?Q21 Aerial, 5ub,meter Top of Bank, Stream 5tats Drainage Areas

Figure 6. NRCS 1979 Soil Survey Map
Falling Run Site Phase 116attieboro, NC
r..
LCDkLr-rc �VhU
StB we W
Ca
CeB We
StB Ca
StB
A aA
Ro
WkB ,
s � •
f
A
CeB
WkB
R❑ "
A aA
'i
D gA
t- StB
(00 37S 7SO Feet
Source 1979 NRCS Soil Survey, Mop Sheets 6 & 9,
Phase I Conservation Easement

Figure 7: Mitigation Credit LC7CrrQ JV�7�
Falling Run Site Phase I I BattleborO, NC
Ditch
no Stream
0 Phase I Conservation Easement
No Credit
(00 300 600 Feet
0 Buffer Restoration 0-100' (Riparian Buffer of Nutrent Offset Credit)
Buffer Restoration 101-200' (Riparian Buffer or Nutrient Offset Credit)
Stream Buffer Enhancement 0-100' {Riparian Buffer Credit)
0 Stream Buffer Enhancement 101-200' (Riparian Buffer Credit)
F—� Stream Buffer Preservation 0-100' (Riparian Buffer Credit)
Stream Buffer Preservation 101-200' (Riparian Buffer Credit)
Buffer Restoration 0-100' {Nutrient Offset Credit)
0 Buffer Restoration ID1-200' (Nutrient Offset Credit)
Svjree NC Onerrop.?027 Awful, 5tlb•mvtef Tev oiblonk

Figure 8: Riparian Buffer Zones !'IM � 1:'
Falling Run Site Phase I j Battleboro, NC GCaaVerra. =j►hb.
Q
0 300 600 Feet
Source: NC Clnemap 202.1 Aenct, Sub -meter rop of Bank.
Ditch
Stream
Q Phase I Conservation Easement
(� 0-30'
Q 31-50'
0 51-100'
0 100-zoo'

Figure 9: Monitoring Plan
Falling Run Site Phase I I Battieboro, NC eCoVerra. *ihb.
Q Monitoring Plats
0 Phase I Conservation Easement
No Credit
Ditch
0o Stream
Q
D 300 600 Feet
F--] Buffer Restoration 0-100' (Riparian Buffer at Nutrient Offset Credit)
Buffer Restoration 101-200' (Riparian Buffer or Nutrient Offset Credit)
Stream Buffer Enhancement 0-100' (Riparian Buffer Credit)
(♦ Stream Buffer Enhancement 101-200' (Riparian Buffer Credit)
C= Stream Buffer Preservation 0-100' (Riparian Buffer Credit)
Stream Buffer Preservation 101-200' (Riparian Buffer Cttdit)
Buffer Restoration 0-100' (Nutrient Offset Credit)
0 Buffer Restoration 101-200' (Nutrient Offset Credit)
�urvre: ESRI 5asemap, Sub -meter Top oT Gunk

Appendix A

Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I
Edgecombe County, NC
Site Photographs — Taken July 7, 2022
Ditch 18 (D18)
Ditch 27 (D27)
Ditch 29B (D29B)
Falling Run Mitigation Site Phase I
Site Photographs
Ditch 22 (D22)
.�Hi�asL-
Ditch 29A (D29A)
Ditch 3 & Stream E Confluence
VHB Project No. 39077.36
Page 1 of 1

Stream F
Stream G
Bonsai Mitigation Site VHB Project No. 39077.36
Site Photographs Page 2 of 2

Appendix B

1951 Historical Aerial
eco terra * hb
Falling Run Site Phase I I Battleboro, NC
QN
0 300 600 Feet
Source: USGS Data Explorer Single Frame Aerial
r� Phase I Conservation Easement
O
O
m
r
0
rn
m
t
v

1974 Historical Aerial;'s
eco�erra vhb.
Falling Run Site Phase I Battleboro, NC
F_ ...
' r
QN
0 300 600 Feet
Source: USGS Data Explorer Single Frame Aerial
Esri .Community Maps Contributors, State of North Carolina
OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph,
GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NIPS, US Census
Bureau, USDA
r Phase I Conservation Easement

Appendix C

DocuSign Envelope ID: D1 EOAKC-130413-41315-BED8-C921370A73625
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
Scott Frederick
Eco Terra LLC
[e-mail]
NORTH CAROLINA
Emdranmen[al Quality
April 7, 2022
Project 20220112 V1
Edgecombe County
Subject: Applicability to the Tar -Pam River Basin Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0734
Project: Falling Run Buffer Site
Address: Near 3817 Battleboro-Leggett Rd., Battleboro, NC 27809, Edgecombe County, NC
Location: Lat., Long: 35.995822,-77.678946
Dear Mr. Frederick:
On February 28, 2022, Shelton Sullivan of the Division of Water Resources (DWR) conducted
an on -site review of features located on the Falling Run Buffer Site in Edgecombe County to
determine the applicability of features on the site to the Tar -Pamlico River Basin Riparian
Area Protection Rules, Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0734.
The enclosed map(s) depictthe feature(s) evaluated and this information is also summarized
in the table below. Streams were evaluated for being ephemeral, at least intermittent, and
for subjectivity to the Tar -Pam River Basin Riparian Area Protection Rules. Streams that are
considered "Subject" have been located on the most recently published NRCS Soil Survey of
Person County and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic (at 1:24,000 scale)
map(s), have been located on the ground at the site, and possess characteristics that qualify
them to be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered "Not Subject" have
been determined to not be at least intermittent, not present on the property, or not depicted
on the required maps.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules within the
proposed easement and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters
of the state. There may be other streams, wetlands, ponds, or other features located
on the property that appear or do not appear on the maps referenced above. Any of
the features on the site may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army
Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean Water Act.
The following table addresses the features observed and rated during the DWR site visit. See
attached map and key provided by Scott Frederick with Eco Terra Partners LLC
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NCRTH CAROB_ NA
uepanmem 0 Dvirm eorai a.x 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: D1 EOAKC-130413-41315-BED8-C921370A73625
Page 2 of 3
Falling Run Buffer Site
Project 20220112 V.1
Feature Type:
stream
(ephemeral,
Subject to
Depicted
Depicted
Feature ID
intermittent,
Buffer
Start @
Stop @
on
on
perennial), ditch,
Rules
Soil Survey
USGS Topo
swale, wetland,
other
Start Point
indicated on map,
Stream A
Stream- at least
Yes
Green/Blue,
Stream E
Yes
Yes
intermittent
Ditch/Stream
transition
Start Point
Stream- at least
indicated on map,
Confluence
Stream B
intermittent
yes
Green/Blue,
with Stream E
yes
Yes
Ditch/Stream
transition
Start Point
Stream- at least
indicated on map,
Confluence
Stream C
intermittent
No
Green/Blue,
with Stream E
yes
Yes
Ditch/Stream
transition
Start Point
Stream- at least
indicated on map,
Confluence
Stream D
intermittent
yes
Green/Blue,
with Stream E
yes
Yes
Ditch/Stream
transition
Continues
beyond the
Present at western
Stream- at least
property
eastern
Stream E
intermittent
Yes
boundary; blue line
property
Yes
Yes
boundary at
on map
Goose Hollow
Ln.
Continues
Start Point
beyond the
Stream- at least
indicated on map,
eastern
Stream F
Yes
Green/Blue,
property
Yes
Yes
intermittent
Ditch/Stream
boundary at
transition
Goose Hollow
Ln.
Partial,
Continues
Upper leg
Starts beyond
beyond the
Partial,
Stream G
Stream- at least
only, see
western project
western
Upper leg
No
intermittent
yellow on
boundary
property
only, see
boundary,
map
map
flows north
Green
Ditches, ponds,
See the map
Labeled
or drainage
No
provided by Eco
See map
Partial
Partial
Features
features
Terra LLC
on Map
* E: Ephemeral, I: Intermittent, P: Perennial
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute this determination made by the DWR may
request an appeal determination by the Director of Water Resources. An appeal request

DocuSign Envelope ID: D1 EOAKC-130413-41315-BED8-C92B7OA73625
Page 3of3
Falling Run Buffer Site
Project 20220112 V.1
must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this letter to the Director in
writing.
If sending via U.S. Postal Service:
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above unless an appeal is requested within
sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this letter.
If you have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact Shelton
Sullivan at shelton.sullivanPncdenr.gov or 919-707-3636. This determination is subject to
review as provided in G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
DocuSAigned by:
E
R�Gt�G W, * 4"
949D91BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Attachments: Site Map with labels, USGS Topographical Map, NRCS Soil Survey
cc: 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch Laserfiche File
Jordan Burbage, jordanPecoterra.com
Billy Dean Bulluck, Jr., 3806 Battleboro-Leggett Rd., Battleboro, NC 27809
Filename: 20220112V.1_StreamCALLs_FallingRunBufferSite_EdgecombeCo

DocuSion Envelope ID: D1 EOA9EC-BO4B-4B15-BED8-C92B7OA73625

DocuSign Envelope ID: D1 EOA9EC-BO4B-4B15-BED8-C92B7OA73625
USGS Map
Refer to labeled aerial map
Shelton Sullivan, DWR, 2/28/22

DocuSign Envelope ID: D1 HAKC-130413-41315-BED8-C92B70A73625
DgA
�Ivm
5tB
StB
HC We
IgA
._
+ We
Ro
Ca
';,CB
Ca
r StB
4 ~, A a A
Legend,
kB
Proposed Conservation Easement
J7 We
DgA
I We DgA
We
Ro aA
AaA
n
R©
DgA
TaB
WkR Aa
NC GIA, Maxar
Ro
Figure 3: Soil Survey
Falling Run Buffer Site N
PIN: 3891193663 w�E
Tar -Pamlico 03020101 s
/�
35°59'46.86"N 77040'37.65"W
eco terra. Edgecombe County, NC 0 375 750 1,500
1979 Soil Survey of Edgecombe County, NC Feet
Map Sheets #6, #9

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 23, 2022
(replaces letter dated August 1, 2022 and corrects mitigation determination for Ditch #22 &
Ditch 29b only)
Scott Frederick
EcoTerra Partners, LLC
(via electronic mail: scott(aDecoterra.com )
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — Falling Run Site
Near 35.992195,-77.674569 off 3806 Battleboro Legget Rd, Battleboro, NC
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 03020101
Edgecombe County
Dear Mr. Frederick,
On April 18, 2022, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a request
from you on behalf of Eco Terra, LLC (EcoTerra) for a site visit near the above -referenced site in the
Tar -Pamlico River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020101. The site visit was to
determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a proposed Easement
Boundary, which is more accurately shown in the attached map labeled "Figure 1: Site Map" (Figure
1) prepared by EcoTerra. On June 8, 2022, Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject
site. Staff with Eco Terra were also present.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank JOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Feature
Classification
onsite
tSubiect
Riparian Land uses
adiacent to Feature
Buffer
Credit
'Nutrient
Offset
','Mitigation Type Determination w/in
to
riparian areas
Buffer
0( 200')
Viable
Viable
Rule
SA,SB,SD,
Streams
Yes
non -forested agricultural
Yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
SE,
fields.
forested
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
fields only)
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
D E Q North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-161 1
r'c"TMCAROL1NA — 919.707.9000
a unYonwanw Or�ry\

Falling Run Site
EcoTcrra
August 23, 2022
Feature
Classification
'Subiect Riparian Land uses
Buffer 'Nutrient
'-Mitigation Type Determination w/in
onsite
riparian areas
to adjacent to Feature
Credit Offset
Buffer 0( 200,)
Viable Viable
Rule
SC
Stream
Yes Left bank forested; right
'Yes Yes (non-
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
bank non -forested
forested
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
agricultural fields
fields only)
Forested Areas — Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
SF
Stream
Yes Combination of forested
'Yes Yes (non-
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
pasture and non -forested
forested ag
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
agricultural fields
fields only)
Forested Pasture — Enhancement Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)
SG
Stream
No Non -forested agricultural
'--Yes Yes (non-
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
fields within the proposed
forested
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
CE but includes forested
fields only)
areas beyond the CE
Forested Areas — Preservation Site per
boundary
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
27,22,18,16,
Ditches <3'
No Non -forested agricultural
*See Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
15,14,13,121
fields
note
.0295 (o)(8)
1 1,10,7,5,4,2
(see ditch
*Buffer Mitigation Note — Assessment
origins on
concludes the ditch meets 15A NCAC
attached
02B .0295 (o)(8) (A, B, C, D & E). More
map)
information is required to be provided
in a mitigation plan for complete
assessment. See rule.
3,29b
Ditch
No Non -forested agricultural
No Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
>3' depth
fields
.0295 (n)
29a
Ditch
No Historically forested areas
No Yes (left
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
(starts @
>3' depth
with established berm right
bank ag
.0295 (n)
35.994831,
bank; Left bank is non-
fields only)
-77.683947)
forested agricultural fields
30
Ditch
No Non -forested agricultural
No Yes (right
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
>3' depth
fields right bank only
bank ag
.0295 (n)
fields only)
Page 2 of 4

Falling Run Site
EcoTerra
August 23, 2022
Feature
Classification
'Subiect
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
Credit
3Nutrient
Offset
4,5Mitigation Type Determination wlin
onsite
to
adjacent to Feature
riparian areas
Buffer
0f 200,1
Viable
Viable
Rule
1,1 A,2A,6,8,
Ditches
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
No
Either not present or not directly
8A,9,17,19,
fields,
hydrologically connected to a stream
20,21,22A,
23,23A,24,
25,26,27A,
28,31,32
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated April 7, 2022 using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle
topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
° Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
s All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area.
"The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas in Figure 1. A map representing the proposal for the site is attached to this
letter and is initialed by Ms. Merritt on August 1, 2022. Substantial changes to the proposed
easement boundary could affect the Site's potential to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
This viability assessment will expire on August 23, 2024 or upon approval of a mitigation plan
by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, streams or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Page 3 of 4

Fading Run Site
EcoTerra
August 23, 2022
Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
PW/kym
Attachments: "Site Map" (Figure 1)"
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Sincerely,
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
Page 4 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID: F44C11 C2-77C4-4595-A771-0A90A11567A0
writ
Ditch Origins
2: 35.996256, -77.677206 8/1/2022
11: 36.000231, -77.681375 KYM
14: 36.000064, -77.682397
16: 35.995914, -77.681822
18: 35,996483. -77.685397
22: 35.993561,-77.685981
27: 35.991228, -77.682078
29: 35.995750, -77.684322
Left & Right banks in the table are based
an ditch drainage towards the stream.
= BERM and NO CREDITS
4.0111' '-
Stream G ` 1
` I
Proposed Conservation
Easement
Cji Area of Interest
--- Ditch Ditch
---No Connection
Stream . Flow
Direction
NCDOT 2' Contours
Alipp
ecolerra
Property Line
Figure 1: Site Map
Falling Run Buffer Site
PIN: 3891/93663
Tar -Pamlico 03020101
35°59`46.86"N 77°40'37.65'W
Edgecombe County, NC
NC Onemap 2021 Aeria!
8/202
rn
roo�
0 I
Facet

Appendix D

From:
Matthews, Kathryn H
To:
Heather Smith
Cc:
Casey Bardier
Subject:
Re: Fw: [EXTERNAL] Bonsai Mitigation Site
Date:
Tuesday, August 2, 2022 3:41:25 PM
Attachments:
imaae001.ona
imaae002.ona
imaae003.ona
imaae004.ona
imaae005.ono
Hi Heather,
Thank you for submitting the Bonsai site through the self -certification process. The Service
concurs with your species determinations. Please provide this email to others as needed to
other agencies for their knowledge. Thanks,
Please note that 1 am teleworking Wednesday through Friday, every week. Emoil is the best
way to reach me. Thanks,
Kathy Matthews
NC Renewable Energy Coordinator &
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
551-F Pylon Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
919-856-4520, x. 27
From: Heather Smith <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 2:47 PM
To: Raleigh, FW4 <[e-mail]>
Cc: Casey Bardier <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Bonsai Mitigation Site
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on
links, opening attachments, or responding.
Please find the attached self -certification for a mitigation site in Edgecombe County.
Thanks,
Heather Smith, LSS

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
September 14, 2022
Scott Frederick
Eco Terra
117 Centrewest Court
Cary, NC 27513
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
scotte,ecoterra.com
Re: Falling Run/Bonsai mitigation site, 35.998851,-77.677884, Battleboro, Edgecombe County,
ER 22-1462
Dear Mr. Frederick:
Thank you for your email of August 24, 2022, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
(1� ult
V Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

Falling Run Mitigation Site
Not Reported
Battleboro, NC 27809
Inquiry Number: 6969216.2s
May 06, 2022
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
(rEDW Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBE-BCS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary-------------------------------------------------------
ES1
Overview Map
2
Detail Map
3
Map Findings Summary----------------------------------------------------
4
Map Findings
8
Orphan Summary---------------------------------------------------------
12
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking
GRA
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum------------------------------------------
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary-------------------------------------------.
A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map-------------------------------------------
A-5
Physical Setting Source Map
A-13
Physical Setting Source Map Findings----------------------------------------
A-15
Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------.
PSGRA
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6969216.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E1527-21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
NOT REPORTED
BATTLEBORO, NC 27809
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
35.9962450 - 35- 59' 46.48"
77.6812290 - 77- 40' 52.42"
Zone 18
258302.5
3986656.8
68 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 13720764 HARTSEASE, NC
Version Date: 2019
North Map: 13837663 WHITAKERS, NC
Version Date: 2019
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140521
Source: USDA
TC6969216.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

F- MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
NOT REPORTED
BATTLEBORO, NC 27809
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION
1 COOL SPRING SAND & G US MINES Lower 16, 0.003, SE
A2 PHILLIPS MIDDLE SCHO 4371 BATTLEBORO-LEGG LUST Higher 976, 0.185, NNW
A3 PHILLIPS MIDDLE SCHO ROUTE 2 BOX 1 UST Higher 1148, 0.217, NNW
6969216.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL___________________________ National Priority List
Proposed NPL________________ Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS -------------------- Federal Superfund Liens
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL__________________ National Priority List Deletions
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY__________ Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS_________________________ Superfund Enterprise Management System
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE-------------- Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF------------------ RCRA- Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG------------------- RCRA- Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG------------------- RCRA- Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG----------------- RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS_________________________ Land Use Control Information System
TC6969216.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS_________ Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS --------- Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS_________________________ Emergency Response Notification System
Lists of state- and tribal (Supen°und) equivalent sites
NC HSDS_____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS------------------------- Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF_______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS_______________________ Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI____________________________ Old Landfill Inventory
LCID__________________________ Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LAST__________________________ Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
INDIAN LUST_________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST_________________ State Trust Fund Database
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST____________________ Underground Storage Tank Listing
AST___________________________ AST Database
INDIAN UST__________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL______________ No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP___________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP__________________ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS______________ Brownfields Projects Inventory
F-11QQk1[9PFIVE :IkqWI Z•1,IMtl:Ikq III CITE 7X8i01 7IR
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS----------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY_______________________ Recycling Center Listing
TC6969216.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
HIST LF_______________________ Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI___________________ Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9___________ Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI___________________________ Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS___________ Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL_________________ Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL_______________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register
PFAS-------------------------- PFAS Contamination Site Listing
Local Land Records
LIENS 2_______________________ CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS________________________
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS________________________
Spills Incident Listing
IMD___________________________
Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90____________________
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80____________________
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS_________________________
Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD__________________________
Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS_______
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR_______________
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST____________
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_________________________
Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS__________________________
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS--------------------------
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD__________________________
Records Of Decision
RMP__________________________
Risk Management Plans
RAATS________________________
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP___________________________
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS_________________________
PCB Activity Database System
ICIS___________________________
Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS__________________________
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS_________________________
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE______________
Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA______________
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER _ _ _ _
_ _ _ PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO ---------------------
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS____________________
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS_____________________
Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT____________________
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV_____________
Indian Reservations
FUSRAP______________________
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA_______________________
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
TC6969216.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LEAD SMELTERS____________
Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS______________________
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
ABANDONED MINES ---------
Abandoned Mines
FINDS -------------------------
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
DOCKET HWC----------------
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
ECHO -------------------------
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
UXO ---------------------------
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
FUELS PROGRAM___________
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS__________________________
Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS___________________
ASBESTOS
COAL ASH____________________
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS______________
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance -----------
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES------------------------
NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC----------------------------
Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP---------------------------
Animal Operation Permits Listing
SEPT HAULERS______________
Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
CCB___________________________
Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
PCSRP------------------------
Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
MINES MRDS-----------------
Mineral Resources Data System
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP_____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto ----------------- EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner_____________ EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
[:I Q 7 7X0191T/4 :11XCT91T/:I NZ Mtl:1,III /_1YN:Ih/*1
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS____________________ Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF_______________________ Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST____________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC6969216.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incidents Management Database contains an inventory
of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Department of Environment, &
Natural Resources' Incidents by Address.
A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/28/2022 has revealed that there is 1 LUST
site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation
PHILLIPS MIDDLE SCHO
Incident Phase: CO
Product Type: PETROLEUM
Incident Number: 39357
Current Status: File Located in House
Address
4371 BATTLEBORO-LEGG
Direction / Distance Map ID Page
NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.185 mi.) A2 8
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under
Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the Department of
Environment & Natural Resources' Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database.
A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/08/2022 has revealed that there is 1 UST
site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation
Address
PHILLIPS MIDDLE SCHO ROUTE 2 BOX 1
Facility Id: 00-0-0000016263
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Direction / Distance Map ID Page
NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.217 mi.) A3 10
Other Ascertainable Records
US MINES: Mines Master Index File. The source of this database is the Dept. of Labor, Mine Safety
and Health Administration.
A review of the US MINES list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 US MINES site within
approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation
Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
COOL SPRING SAND & G SE 0 - 1/8 (0.003 mi.) 1 8
Database: US MINES, Date of Government Version: 11/02/2021
Mine ID:: 3102203
TC6969216.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC6969216.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8